XML 16 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Fair value measurements

6 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2025

2. Fair value measurements:

The fair value of financial instruments

A significant amount of Nomura’s financial instruments is carried at fair value. Financial assets carried at fair value on a recurring basis are reported in the consolidated balance sheets within

Trading assets and private equity and debt investments, Loans and receivables, Collateralized agreements

and

Other assets

. Financial liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis are reported within

Trading liabilities, Short-term borrowings, Payables and deposits, Collateralized financing, Long-term borrowings

and

Other liabilities.

Other financial assets and financial liabilities are carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, where the primary measurement basis is not fair value but where fair value is used in specific circumstances after initial recognition, such as to measure impairment.

In all cases, fair value is determined in accordance with ASC 820 “

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

” (“ASC 820”) which defines fair value as the amount that would be exchanged to sell a financial asset or transfer a financial liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It assumes that the transaction occurs in the principal market for the relevant financial assets or financial liabilities, or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market.

Fair value is usually determined on an individual financial instrument basis consistent with the unit of account of the financial instrument. However, certain financial instruments managed on a portfolio basis are valued as a portfolio, namely based on the price that would be received to sell a net long position (i.e., a net financial asset) or transfer a net short position (i.e., a net financial liability) consistent with how market participants would price the net risk exposure at the measurement date.

Financial assets carried at fair value also include investments in certain funds where, as a practical expedient, fair value is determined on the basis of net asset value per share (“NAV per share”) if the NAV per share is calculated in accordance with certain industry standard principles.

Increases and decreases in the fair value of assets and liabilities may significantly impact Nomura’s position, performance, liquidity and capital resources. As explained below, valuation techniques applied contain inherent uncertainties and Nomura is unable to predict the accurate impact of future developments in the market. The valuation of financial instruments is more difficult during periods of market stress as a result of greater volatility and reduced price transparency and may therefore require the greater use of judgement in the determination of fair value. Where appropriate, Nomura uses economic hedging strategies to mitigate risk, although these hedges are also subject to unpredictable movements in the market.

Valuation methodology for financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis

The fair value of financial instruments is based on quoted market prices including market indices, broker or dealer quotations or an estimation by management of the expected exit price under current market conditions. Various financial instruments, including cash instruments and

over-the-counter

(“OTC”) contracts, have bid and offer prices that are observable in the market. These are measured at the point within the

bid-offer

range which best represents Nomura’s estimate of fair value. Where quoted market prices or broker or dealer quotations are not available, prices for similar instruments or valuation pricing models are considered in the determination of fair value.

Where quoted prices are available in active markets, no valuation adjustments are taken to modify the fair value of assets or liabilities marked using such prices. Other instruments may be measured using valuation techniques, such as valuation pricing models incorporating observable valuation inputs, unobservable parameters or a combination of both. Valuation pricing models use valuation inputs which would be considered by market participants in valuing similar financial instruments.

Valuation pricing models and their underlying assumptions impact the amount and timing of unrealized and realized gains and losses recognized, and the use of different valuation pricing models or underlying assumptions could produce different financial results. Valuation uncertainty results from a variety of factors, including the valuation technique or model selected, the quantitative assumptions used within the valuation model, the inputs into the model, as well as other factors. Valuation adjustments are used to reflect the assessment of this uncertainty. Common valuation adjustments include model reserves, credit adjustments,

close-out

adjustments, and other appropriate instrument-specific adjustments, such as those to reflect transfer or sale restrictions. Changes in these valuation adjustments may have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The level of adjustments is largely judgmental and is based on an assessment of the factors that Nomura believes other market participants would use in determining the fair value of similar financial instruments. The type of adjustments taken, the methodology for the calculation of these adjustments, and the valuation inputs for these calculations are reassessed periodically to reflect current market practice and the availability of new information.

For example, the fair value of certain financial instruments includes adjustments for credit risk, both with regards to counterparty credit risk on positions held and Nomura’s own creditworthiness on positions issued. Credit risk on financial assets is significantly mitigated by credit enhancements such as collateral and netting arrangements. Any net credit exposure is measured using available and applicable valuation inputs for the relevant counterparty. The same approach is used to measure the credit exposure on Nomura’s financial liabilities as is used to measure counterparty credit risk on Nomura’s financial assets.

Such valuation pricing models are calibrated to the market on a regular basis and inputs used are adjusted for current market conditions and risks. The Valuation Model Validation Group within Nomura’s Risk Management Department reviews pricing models and assesses model appropriateness and consistency independently of the front office. The model reviews consider a number of factors about a model’s suitability for valuation and sensitivity of a particular product. Valuation models are calibrated to the market on a periodic basis by comparison to observable market pricing, comparison with alternative models and analysis of risk profiles.

As explained above, any changes in fixed income, equity, foreign exchange and commodity markets can impact Nomura’s estimates of fair value in the future, potentially affecting trading gains and losses. Where financial contracts have longer maturity dates, Nomura’s estimates of fair value may involve greater subjectivity due to the lack of transparent market data.

Fair value hierarchy

Certain financial instruments carried at fair value, including those carried at fair value using the fair value option, have been categorized into a three-level hierarchy (“fair value hierarchy”) based on the transparency of valuation inputs used by Nomura to estimate fair value. A financial instrument is classified in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the financial instrument. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows, with Level 1 representing the most transparent inputs and Level 3 representing the least transparent inputs:

Level 1:

Observable valuation inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical financial instruments traded in active markets at the measurement date.

Level 2:

Valuation inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable for the financial instrument.

Level 3:

Unobservable valuation inputs which reflect Nomura assumptions and specific data.

The availability of valuation inputs observable in the market varies by type of financial instrument and can be affected by a variety of factors. Significant factors include, but are not restricted to the prevalence of similar financial instruments in the market, especially for those which are customized, how established the financial instrument is in the market, for example, whether it is a new financial instrument or is relatively mature, and the reliability of information provided in the market which would depend, for example, on the frequency and volume of current market data. A period of significant change in the market may reduce the availability of observable data. Under such circumstances, financial instruments may be reclassified into a lower level in the fair value hierarchy.

Significant judgments used in determining the classification of financial instruments include the nature of the market in which the financial instrument would be traded, the underlying risks, the type and liquidity of market data inputs and the nature of observed transactions for similar financial instruments.

Where valuation models include the use of valuation inputs which are less observable or unobservable in the market, significant management judgment is used in determining fair value. The valuations for Level 3 financial instruments, therefore, involve a greater degree of judgment than those valuations for Level 1 or Level 2 financial instruments.

Certain criteria used to determine whether a market is active or inactive include the number of transactions, the frequency that pricing is updated by other market participants, the variability of price quotes among market participants, and the amount of publicly available information.

The following tables present the amounts of Nomura’s financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025 within the fair value hierarchy.


	Billions of yen
	March 31, 2025
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Counterparty and Cash Collateral Netting (1)			Balance as of March 31, 2025
Assets:
Trading assets and private equity and debt investments (2)
Equities (3)	¥	2,807	¥	1,661	¥	21	¥	—		¥	4,489
Private equity and debt investments (5)		0		2		103		—			105
Japanese government securities		2,674		—		—		—			2,674
Japanese agency and municipal securities		—		222		0		—			222
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities		4,402		2,346		6		—			6,754
Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes		—		1,762		181		—			1,943
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)		—		2		10		—			12
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)		—		3,335		48		—			3,383
Issued/Guaranteed by government sponsored entity		—		3,204		—		—			3,204
Other		—		131		48		—			179
Real estate-backed securities		—		137		207		—			344
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other (6)		—		35		42		—			77
Investment trust funds and other		470		7		3		—			480

Total trading assets and private equity and debt investments		10,353		9,509		621		—			20,483

Derivative assets (7)
Equity contracts		14		2,541		17		—			2,572
Interest rate contracts		22		12,306		100		—			12,428
Credit contracts		1		240		63		—			304
Foreign exchange contracts		0		4,330		33		—			4,363
Other contracts		3		5		3		—			11
Netting		—		—		—		(17,711	)		(17,711	)

Total derivative assets		40		19,422		216		(17,711	)		1,967

Subtotal	¥	10,393	¥	28,931	¥	837	¥	(17,711	)	¥	22,450

Loans and receivables (8)		—		1,795		448		—			2,243
Collateralized agreements (9)		—		344		15		—			359
Other assets (2)
Non-trading debt securities (10)		116		352		17		—			485
Other (3)(4)(11)		211		259		275		—			745

Total	¥	10,720	¥	31,681	¥	1,592	¥	(17,711	)	¥	26,282

Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities	¥	2,757	¥	18	¥	1	¥	—		¥	2,776
Japanese government securities		2,569		—		—		—			2,569
Japanese agency and municipal securities		—		2		—		—			2
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities		2,828		754		—		—			3,582
Bank and corporate debt securities		—		217		0		—			217
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)		—		0		—		—			0
Investment trust funds and other		249		2		0		—			251

Total trading liabilities		8,403		993		1		—			9,397

Derivative liabilities (7)
Equity contracts		5		3,048		16		—			3,069
Interest rate contracts		31		11,523		94		—			11,648
Credit contracts		1		282		99		—			382
Foreign exchange contracts		—		4,148		46		—			4,194
Other contracts		1		42		7		—			50
Netting		—		—		—		(17,361	)		(17,361	)

Total derivative liabilities		38		19,043		262		(17,361	)		1,982

Subtotal	¥	8,441	¥	20,036	¥	263	¥	(17,361	)	¥	11,379

Short-term borrowings (12)	¥	—	¥	595	¥	36	¥	—		¥	631
Payables and deposits (13)(14)		—		311		14		—			325
Collateralized financing (9)		—		704		—		—			704
Long-term borrowings (12)(15)(16)		10		6,428		477		—			6,915
Other liabilities (17)		132		265		65		—			462

Total	¥	8,583	¥	28,339	¥	855	¥	(17,361	)	¥	20,416


	Billions of yen
	September 30, 2025
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Counterparty and Cash Collateral Netting (1)			Balance as of September 30, 2025
Assets:
Trading assets and private equity and debt investments (2)
Equities (3)	¥	3,686	¥	1,661	¥	26	¥	—		¥	5,373
Private equity and debt investments (5)		4		1		122		—			127
Japanese government securities		3,284		—		—		—			3,284
Japanese agency and municipal securities		—		106		2		—			108
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities		5,062		2,635		5		—			7,702
Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes		—		1,820		169		—			1,989
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)		—		0		0		—			0
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)		—		3,038		17		—			3,055
Issued/Guaranteed by government sponsored entity		—		2,889		—		—			2,889
Other		—		149		17		—			166
Real estate-backed securities		—		201		202		—			403
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other (6)		—		35		34		—			69
Investment trust funds and other		412		24		9		—			445

Total trading assets and private equity and debt investments		12,448		9,521		586		—			22,555

Derivative assets (7)
Equity contracts		0		2,908		13		—			2,921
Interest rate contracts		15		13,142		95		—			13,252
Credit contracts		1		286		65		—			352
Foreign exchange contracts		1		4,021		33		—			4,055
Other contracts		2		3		10		—			15
Netting		—		—		—		(18,359	)		(18,359	)

Total derivative assets		19		20,360		216		(18,359	)		2,236

Subtotal	¥	12,467	¥	29,881	¥	802	¥	(18,359	)	¥	24,791

Loans and receivables (8)		12		2,092		494		—			2,598
Collateralized agreements (9)		—		289		15		—			304
Other assets (2)
Non-trading debt securities (10)		184		385		24		—			593
Other (3)(4)(11)		281		144		392		—			817

Total	¥	12,944	¥	32,791	¥	1,727	¥	(18,359	)	¥	29,103


Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities	¥	2,883	¥	39	¥	0	¥	—		¥	2,922
Japanese government securities		2,432		—		—		—			2,432
Japanese agency and municipal securities		—		0		—		—			0
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities		3,875		1,390		—		—			5,265
Bank and corporate debt securities		—		206		0		—			206
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)		—		0		—		—			0
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other (6)		—		0		0		—			0
Investment trust funds and other		182		0		—		—			182

Total trading liabilities		9,372		1,635		0		—			11,007

Derivative liabilities (7)
Equity contracts		0		4,181		31		—			4,212
Interest rate contracts		21		12,152		117		—			12,290
Credit contracts		2		334		111		—			447
Foreign exchange contracts		—		3,579		46		—			3,625
Other contracts		3		30		13		—			46
Netting		—		—		—		(18,203	)		(18,203	)

Total derivative liabilities		26		20,276		318		(18,203	)		2,417

Subtotal	¥	9,398	¥	21,911	¥	318	¥	(18,203	)	¥	13,424

Short-term borrowings (12)		—		661		50		—			711
Payables and deposits (13)(14)		—		306		13		—			319
Collateralized financing (9)		—		662		—		—			662
Long-term borrowings (12)(15)(16)		10		7,022		469		—			7,501
Other liabilities (17)		172		159		130		—			461

Total	¥	9,580	¥	30,721	¥	980	¥	(18,203	)	¥	23,078

———————

(1)	Represents the amount offset under counterparty netting of derivative assets and liabilities as well as cash collateral netting against net derivatives assets or liabilities.

(2)

Investments that are carried at fair value using NAV per share as a practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. As of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025, the fair values of these investments which are included in

Trading assets and private equity and debt investments

were ¥73 billion and ¥85 billion, respectively. As of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025, the fair values of these investments which are included in

Other assets

were ¥3 billion and ¥5 billion, respectively.

(3)	Includes equity investments that would have been accounted for under the equity method had Nomura not chosen to elect the fair value option.

(4)	Includes equity investments which comprise listed and unlisted equity securities held for operating purposes in the amounts of ¥72,184 million and ¥26,217 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2025 and ¥79,893 million and ¥26,129 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2025.

(5)

Private equity and debt investments

include minority private equity and venture capital equity investments and other junior debt investments such as mezzanine debt held for

non-trading

purposes, and

post-IPO

investments. These investments also include equity investments that would have been accounted for under the equity method had Nomura not chosen to elect the fair value option.

(6)	Includes collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and asset-backed securities (“ABS”) such as those secured on credit card loans, auto loans and student loans.

(7)	Derivatives which contain multiple types of risk are classified based on the primary risk type of the instrument.

(8)	Includes loans and receivables for which the fair value option has been elected.

(9)	Includes collateralized agreements or collateralized financing for which the fair value option has been elected.

(10)	Includes non-trading debt securities for which the fair value option has been elected.

(11)	Includes non-financial assets carried at fair value on a recurring basis using similar valuation methodologies to those used for financial instruments.

(12)	Includes structured notes for which the fair value option has been elected.

(13)	Includes deposits received at banks for which the fair value option has been elected

(14)	Includes embedded derivatives bifurcated from deposits received at banks. Deposits are adjusted for fair value changes in corresponding embedded derivatives for presentation in the consolidated balance sheets.

(15)	Includes embedded derivatives bifurcated from issued structured notes. Structured notes are adjusted for fair value changes in corresponding embedded derivatives for presentation in the consolidated balance sheets.

(16)	Includes liabilities recognized from secured financing transactions that are accounted for as financings rather than sales. Nomura elected the fair value option for these liabilities.

(17)	Includes loan commitments for which the fair value option has been elected.

Valuation techniques by major class of financial instrument

The valuation techniques used by Nomura to estimate fair value for major classes of financial instruments, together with the significant inputs which determine classification in the fair value hierarchy, are as follows.

Equities

and equity securities reported within

Other assets

—Equities and equity securities reported within

Other assets

include direct holdings of both listed and unlisted equity securities, and fund investments. The fair value of listed equity securities is determined using quoted prices for identical securities from active markets where available. These valuations should be in line with market practice and therefore can be based on bid prices or

mid-market

prices. Nomura determines whether the market is active depending on the sufficiency and frequency of trading activity. Where these securities are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, no valuation adjustments are made to fair value. Listed equity securities traded in inactive markets are also generally valued using the exchange price and are classified in Level 2. While rare in practice, Nomura may apply a discount or liquidity adjustment to the exchange price of a listed equity security traded in an inactive market if the exchange price is not considered to be an appropriate representation of fair value. These adjustments are determined by individual security and are not determined or influenced by the size of holding. The amount of such adjustments made to listed equity securities traded in inactive markets was ¥nil as of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025, respectively. The fair value of unlisted equity securities is determined using the same valuation technique as private equity and debt investments described below and are usually classified in Level 3 because significant valuation inputs such as liquidity discounts and credit spreads are unobservable.

Private equity and debt investments

—The determination of fair value of unlisted equity and debt investments requires significant management judgment because the investments, by their nature, have little or no price transparency. Private equity and debt investments are initially carried at cost as an approximation of fair value. Adjustments to carrying value are made if there is third party evidence of a change in value. Adjustments are also made, in the absence of third party transactions, if it is determined that the expected exit price of the investment is different from carrying value. In reaching that determination, Nomura primarily uses either a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) or market multiple valuation technique. A DCF valuation technique incorporates estimated future cash flows to be generated from the investee, as adjusted for an appropriate growth rate discounted at a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”). Market multiple valuation techniques include comparables such as Enterprise Value/Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EV/EBITDA”) ratios, Price/Earnings (“PE”) ratios, Price/Book ratios, Price/Embedded Value ratios and other multiples based on relationships between numbers reported in the financial statements of the investee and the price of comparable companies. A liquidity discount may also be applied to either a DCF or market multiple valuation to reflect the specific characteristics of the investee. The liquidity discount includes considerations for various uncertainties in the model and inputs to valuation. Where possible these valuations are compared with the operating cash flows and financial performance of the investee or properties relative to budgets or projections, PE data for similar quoted companies, trends within sectors and/or regions and any specific rights or terms associated with the investment, such as conversion features and liquidation preferences. Private equity and debt investments are generally classified in Level 3 since the valuation inputs such as those mentioned above are usually unobservable.

Government, agency and municipal securities

—The fair value of Japanese and other G7 government securities is primarily determined using quoted market prices, executable broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources. These securities are traded in active markets and therefore are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

Non-G7

government securities, agency securities and municipal securities are valued using similar pricing sources but are generally classified in Level 2 as they are traded in inactive markets. Certain

non-G7

securities may be classified in Level 1 because they are traded in active markets. Certain securities may be classified in Level 3 because they are traded infrequently and there is not sufficient information from comparable securities to classify them in Level 2. These are valued using DCF valuation techniques which include significant unobservable valuation inputs such as credit spreads of the issuer.

Bank and corporate debt securities

—The fair value of bank and corporate debt securities is primarily determined using broker or dealer quotations and recent market transactions of identical or similar debt securities if available, but also using DCF valuation techniques. Consideration is given to the nature of the broker and dealer quotations, namely whether these are indicative or executable, the number of available quotations and how these quotations compare to any available recent market activity or alternative pricing sources. The significant valuation inputs used for DCF valuations are yield curves, asset swap spreads, recovery rates and credit spreads of the issuer. Bank and corporate debt securities are generally classified in Level 2 because these valuation inputs are usually observable or market-corroborated. Certain bank and corporate debt securities will be classified in Level 3 because they are traded infrequently and there is insufficient information from comparable securities to classify them in Level 2, or credit spreads or recovery rates of the issuer used in DCF valuations are unobservable.

Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)

and

Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)

—The fair value of CMBS and RMBS are primarily determined using DCF valuation techniques but also using broker or dealer quotations and recent market transactions of identical or similar securities, if available. Consideration is given to the nature of the broker and dealer quotations, namely whether these are indicative or executable, the number of available quotations and how these quotations compare to any available recent market activity or alternative pricing sources. The significant valuation inputs include yields, prepayment rates, default probabilities and loss severities. CMBS and RMBS securities are generally classified in Level 2 because these valuation inputs are observable or market-corroborated. Certain CMBS and RMBS positions will be classified in Level 3 because they are traded infrequently and there is insufficient information from comparable securities to classify them in Level 2, or one or more of the significant valuation inputs used in DCF valuations are unobservable.

Real estate-backed securities

—The fair value of real estate-backed securities is determined using broker or dealer quotations, recent market transactions or by reference to a comparable market index. Consideration is given to the nature of the broker and dealer quotations, namely whether these are indicative or executable, the number of available quotations and how these quotations compare to any available recent market activity or alternative pricing sources. Where all significant inputs are observable, the securities will be classified in Level 2. For certain securities, no direct pricing sources or comparable securities or indices may be available. These securities are valued using DCF or valuation techniques and are classified in Level 3 as the valuation includes significant unobservable valuation inputs such as yields or loss severities.

Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other

—The fair value of CDOs is primarily determined using DCF valuation techniques but also using broker or dealer quotations and recent market transactions of identical or similar securities, if available. Consideration is given to the nature of the broker and dealer quotations, namely whether these are indicative or executable, the number of available quotations and how these quotations compare to any available recent market activity or alternative pricing sources. The significant valuation inputs used include market spread data for each credit rating, yields, prepayment rates, default probabilities and loss severities. CDOs are generally classified in Level 2 because these valuation inputs are observable or market-corroborated. CDOs will be classified in Level 3 where one or more of the significant valuation inputs used in the DCF valuations are unobservable.

Investment trust funds and other

—Publicly traded funds which are valued based on quoted prices in active markets are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Investments in funds that are not publicly traded but Nomura has the ability to redeem its investment at NAV per share on the balance sheet date are valued at NAV and classified in Level 2. Investments in funds which are valued using significant unobservable valuation inputs such as credit spreads of issuer and correlation are classified in Level 3. Investment in funds that are carried at fair value using NAV per share as a practical expedient are not classified in the fair value hierarchy.

Derivatives

—

Equity contracts

—Nomura enters into both exchange-traded and OTC equity derivative transactions such as index and equity options, equity basket options and index and equity swaps. Where these derivatives are traded in active markets and the exchange price is representative of fair value, the fair value of exchange-traded equity derivatives is determined using an unadjusted exchange price and classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of exchange-traded equity derivatives which are traded in inactive markets or where the exchange price is not representative of fair value is determined using a model price and are classified in Level 2. The fair value of OTC equity derivatives is determined through option models such as Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. The significant valuation inputs used include equity prices, dividend yields, volatilities and correlations. Valuation adjustments are also made to model valuations in order to reflect counterparty credit risk on derivative assets and Nomura’s own creditworthiness on derivative liabilities. OTC equity derivatives are generally classified in Level 2 because all significant valuation inputs and adjustments are observable or market-corroborated. Certain less liquid vanilla or more complex equity derivatives are classified in Level 3 where dividend yield, volatility or correlation valuation inputs are significant and unobservable.

Derivatives

—

Interest rate contracts

—Nomura enters into both exchange-traded and OTC interest rate derivative transactions such as interest rate swaps, currency swaps, interest rate options, forward rate agreements, swaptions, caps and floors. Where these derivatives are traded in active markets and the exchange price is representative of fair value, the fair value of exchange-traded interest rate derivatives is determined using an unadjusted exchange price and classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of exchange-traded interest rate derivatives which are traded in inactive markets or where the exchange price is not representative of fair value is determined using a model price and are classified in Level 2. The fair value of OTC interest rate derivatives is determined through DCF valuation techniques as well as option models such as Black-Scholes or Monte Carlo simulation. The significant valuation inputs used include interest rates, forward foreign exchange (“FX”) rates, volatilities and correlations. Valuation adjustments are also made to model valuations in order to reflect counterparty credit risk on derivative assets and Nomura’s own creditworthiness on derivative liabilities. OTC interest rate derivatives are generally classified in Level 2 because all significant valuation inputs and adjustments are observable or market-corroborated. Certain less liquid vanilla or more complex OTC interest rate derivatives are classified in Level 3 where interest rate, volatility or correlation valuation inputs are significant and unobservable.

Derivatives

—

Credit contracts

—Nomura enters into OTC credit derivative transactions such as credit default swaps and credit options on single names, indices or baskets of assets. The fair value of OTC credit derivatives is determined through DCF valuation techniques as well as option models such as Black-Scholes or Monte Carlo simulation. The significant valuation inputs used include interest rates, credit spreads, recovery rates, default probabilities, volatilities and correlations. Valuation adjustments are also made to model valuations in order to reflect counterparty credit risk on derivative assets and Nomura’s own creditworthiness on derivative liabilities. OTC credit derivatives are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because all significant valuation inputs and adjustments are observable or market-corroborated. Certain less liquid vanilla or more complex OTC credit derivatives are classified in Level 3 where credit spread, recovery rate, volatility or correlation valuation inputs are significant and unobservable.

Derivatives

—

Foreign exchange contracts

—Nomura enters into both exchange-traded and OTC foreign exchange derivative transactions such as foreign exchange forwards and currency options. The fair value of exchange-traded foreign exchange derivatives which are traded in inactive markets or where the exchange price is not representative of fair value is determined using a model price and are classified in Level 2. The fair value of OTC foreign exchange derivatives is determined through DCF valuation techniques as well as option models such as Black-Scholes or Monte Carlo simulation. The significant valuation inputs used include interest rates, forward FX rates, spot FX rates and volatilities. Valuation adjustments are also made to model valuations in order to reflect counterparty credit risk on derivative assets and Nomura’s own creditworthiness on derivative liabilities. OTC foreign exchange derivatives are generally classified in Level 2 because all significant valuation inputs and adjustments are observable or market-corroborated. Certain foreign exchange derivatives are classified in Level 3 where interest rates, volatility or correlation valuation inputs are significant and unobservable.

Nomura includes valuation adjustments in its estimation of fair value of certain OTC derivatives relating to funding costs associated with these transactions to be consistent with how market participants in the principal market for these derivatives would determine fair value.

Loans and receivables

—The fair value of loans and receivables carried at fair value either as trading assets or through election of the fair value option is primarily determined using DCF valuation techniques as quoted prices are typically not available. The significant valuation inputs used are similar to those used in the valuation of corporate debt securities described above. Loans and receivables are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because all significant valuation inputs are observable. Certain loans and receivables, however, are classified in Level 3 because they are traded infrequently and there is not sufficient information from comparable securities to classify them in Level 2 or credit spreads of the issuer or recovery rates used in DCF valuations are significant and unobservable.

Collateralized agreements

and

Collateralized financing

—The primary types of collateralized agreement and financing transactions carried at fair value are reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements elected for the fair value option. The fair value of these financial instruments is primarily determined using DCF valuation techniques. The significant valuation inputs used include interest rates and collateral funding spreads such as general collateral or special rates. Reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because these valuation inputs are usually observable.

Non-trading

debt securities

—These are debt securities held by certain

non-trading

subsidiaries in the group and are valued and classified in the fair value hierarchy using the same valuation techniques used for other debt securities classified as

Government, agency and municipal securities

and

Bank and corporate debt securities

described above.

Short-term

and

long-term borrowings (“Structured notes”)

—Structured notes are debt securities issued by Nomura or by consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) which contain embedded features that alter the return to the investor from simply receiving a fixed or floating rate of interest to a return that depends upon some other variables, such as an equity or equity index, commodity price, foreign exchange rate, credit rating of a third party or a more complex interest rate (i.e., an embedded derivative).

The fair value of structured notes is determined using quoted prices in active markets for the identical instrument if available, and where not available, using a mixture of valuation techniques that use the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities, similar liabilities when traded as assets, or an internal model which combines DCF valuation techniques and option pricing models, depending on the nature of the embedded features within the structured note. Where an internal model is used, Nomura estimates the fair value of both the underlying debt instrument and the embedded derivative components. The significant valuation inputs used to estimate the fair value of the debt instrument component include yield curves, prepayment rates, default probabilities and loss severities. The significant valuation inputs used to estimate the fair value of the embedded derivative component are the same as those used for the relevant type of freestanding OTC derivative discussed above. A valuation adjustment is also made to the entire structured note in order to reflect Nomura’s own creditworthiness. This adjustment is determined based on recent observable secondary market transactions and executable broker quotes involving Nomura debt instruments and is therefore typically treated as a Level 2 valuation input. Structured notes are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as all significant valuation inputs and adjustments are observable. Where any unobservable valuation inputs are significant, such as yields, prepayment rates, default probabilities, loss severities, volatilities and correlations used to estimate the fair value of the embedded derivative component, structured notes are classified in Level 3.

Long-term borrowings (“Secured financing transactions”)

—Secured financing transactions are liabilities recognized when a transfer of a financial asset does not meet the criteria for sales accounting under ASC 860 “

Transfer and Servicing

” (“ASC 860”) and therefore the transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing. These liabilities are valued using the same valuation techniques that are applied to the transferred financial assets which remain on the consolidated balance sheets and are therefore classified in the same level in the fair value hierarchy as the transferred financial assets. These liabilities do not provide general recourse to Nomura and therefore, no adjustment is made to reflect Nomura’s own creditworthiness.

Level 3 financial instruments

The valuation of Level 3 financial instruments is dependent on certain significant valuation inputs which are unobservable. Common characteristics of an inactive market include a low number of transactions of the financial instrument, stale or

non-current

price quotes, price quotes that vary substantially either over time or among market makers,

non-executable

broker quotes or little publicly released information.

If corroborative evidence is not available to value Level 3 financial instruments, fair value may be measured using other equivalent products in the market. The level of correlation between the specific Level 3 financial instrument and the available benchmark instrument is considered as an unobservable valuation input. Other techniques for determining an appropriate value for unobservable valuation input may consider information such as consensus pricing data among certain market participants, historical trends, extrapolation from observable market data and other information Nomura would expect market participants to use in valuing similar instruments.

Use of reasonably possible alternative valuation input assumptions to value Level 3 financial instruments will significantly influence fair value determination. Ultimately, the uncertainties described above about input assumptions imply that the fair value of Level 3 financial instruments is a judgmental estimate. The specific valuation for each instrument is based on management’s judgment of prevailing market conditions, in accordance with Nomura’s established valuation policies and procedures.

Quantitative and qualitative information regarding significant unobservable valuation inputs

The following tables present quantitative and qualitative information about the significant unobservable valuation inputs used by Nomura to measure the fair value of financial instruments classified in Level 3 as of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025. These financial instruments will als

typically include observable valuation inputs (i.e., Level 1 or Level 2 valuation inputs) which are not included in the table and are also often hedged using financial instruments which are classified in Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Changes in each of these significant unobservable valuation inputs used by Nomura will impact upon the fair value measurement of the financial instrument. The following tables also illustrate qualitatively how an increase in those significant unobservable valuation inputs might result in a higher or lower fair value measurement at the reporting date and the interrelationship between significant unobservable valuation inputs where more than one is used to determine fair value measurement of the financial instruments.

March 31, 2025

Financial Instrument

Fair
value in
billions
of yen

Valuation

technique

Significant

unobservable
valuation input

Range of

valuation inputs

(1)

Weighted

Average

(2)(3)

Impact of
increases in
significant
unobservable
valuation

inputs

(4)(5)

Interrelationships

between valuation

inputs

(6)

Assets:

Trading assets and private equity and debt investments

Equities

DCF/Option models

Credit spreads

2.5

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Private equity and debt investments

103

DCF

WACC

Growth rates

Credit spreads

Liquidity discounts

5.8

17.3

0.0

2.0

7.9

11.0

5.0

30.0

11.6

1.2

9.4

16.0

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

Lower fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Market multiples

EV/EBITDA ratios

PE Ratios

Liquidity discounts

7.8

16.2

10.6

28.4

5.0

20.0

10.0

15.2

9.6

Higher fair value

Lower fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Foreign government, agency and municipal securities

DCF

Credit spreads

Recovery rates

0.0

2.4

3.4

18.0

1.1

14.4

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes

181

DCF

Credit spreads

Recovery rates

0.0

227.0

0.0

100.0

14.3

79.8

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)

DCF

Yields

Loss severities

21.1

65.0

21.1

65.0

Lower fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)

DCF

Yields

Prepayment rates

Loss severities

21.5

62.2

15.0

0.0

100.0

41.6

13.5

50.4

Lower fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Real estate-backed securities

207

DCF

Loss severities

0.0

16.9

2.3

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other

DCF

Yields

Prepayment rates

Default probabilities

Loss severities

Credit spreads

4.0

50.0

20.0

2.0

62.9

100.0

0.1

16.9

13.6

20.0

2.0

87.7

4.7

Lower fair value

Change in default

probabilities typically

accompanied by

directionally similar change

in loss severities and

opposite change in

prepayment rates

Investment trust funds and other

DCF

Liquidity discounts

1.5

2.9

2.1

Lower fair value

Not applicable

March 31, 2025

Financial Instrument

Fair
value in
billions
of yen

Valuation

technique

Significant

unobservable
valuation input

Range of

valuation inputs

(1)

Weighted

Average

(2)(3)

Impact of

increases in
significant
unobservable
valuation

inputs

(4)(5)

Interrelationships

between valuation

inputs

(6)

Derivatives, net:

Equity contracts

Option

models

Dividend yield

Volatilities

Correlations

0.0

16.6

3.5

99.4

(0.85

) -

0.99

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Interest rate contracts

DCF/

Option

models

Interest rates

Volatilities

Correlations

0.9

4.5

9.8

13.3

41.0

261.7

(1.00)

0.99

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Credit contracts

(36

)

DCF/

Option

models

Credit spreads Recovery rates Volatilities

Correlations

0.0

132.2

1.0

90.0

45.9

51.9

0.00

0.85

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Foreign

exchange contracts

(13

)

Option

models

Volatilities

Correlations

1.6

- 18.8

0.29 - 0.70

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Loans and receivables

448

DCF

Credit spreads Recovery rates

0.0

193.2

66.7

100.0

9.9

95.1

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Collateralized agreements

DCF

Repo rate

6.4

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Other assets

Non-trading

debt securities

DCF

Credit spreads

5.2

14.4

7.3

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Other

(7)(8)

275

DCF

WACC

Growth rates

10.6

3.0

10.6

3.0

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Market multiples

Liquidity discounts

25.0

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Liabilities:

Short-term borrowings

DCF/

option models

Volatilities

Correlations

5.0

51.5

(0.72

) -

0.96

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Payable and deposits

DCF/

option models

Volatilities

Correlations

9.8

10.6

0.40

0.98

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Long-term borrowings

477

DCF

Loss severities

12.7

99.5

79.8

Lower fair value

Not applicable

DCF/

option models

Volatilities

Correlations

5.0

51.5

44.1

67.9

(1.00

) -

0.99

—

igher fair value

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Other liabil

itie

DCF

Credit spreads Recovery rates

0.8

7.1

91.0

99.5

1.0

93.8

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

September 30, 2025

Financial Instrument

Fair
value in
billions
of yen

Valuation

technique

Significant

unobservable input

Range of

valuation inputs

(1)

Weighted

Average

(2)(3)

Impact of

increases in

ign

ificant

unobservable

valuation

inputs

(4)(5)

Interrelationships

between valuation

inputs

(6)

Assets:

Trading assets and private equity and debt investments

Equities

DCF/ Option models

Credit spreads

1.6

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Private equity and debt investments

122

DCF

WACC

Growth rates

Credit spreads

Liquidity discounts

12.9

15.1

0.0

2.0

7.9

10.9

20.0

30.0

14.1

1.3

9.8

22.8

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

Lower fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Market multiples

EV/EBITDA ratios

PE Ratios

Liquidity discounts

7.5

18.5

11.7 -

32.3

10.0

20.0

10.9

19.1

12.8

Higher fair value

Lower fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Foreign government, agency and municipal securities

DCF

Credit spreads

Recovery rates

0.0

2.9

12.5

18.0

1.1

13.9

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes

169

DCF

Credit spreads

Recovery rates

0.0

55.5

0.0

100.0

7.1

79.0

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)

DCF

Yields

Prepayment rates

Loss severities

21.5

15.0

0.0

100.0%

21.5

15.0

8.9

Lower fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Real estate-backed securities

202

DCF

Loss severities

0.0

27.3

0.5

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other

DCF

Yields

Prepayment rates

Default probabilities

Loss severities

Credit spreads

8.0

28.0

20.0

2.0

0.0

100.0

0.2

20.7

14.5

20.0

2.0

43.8

7.2

Lower fair value

Change in default

probabilities typically

accompanied by

directionally similar

change in loss severities

and opposite change in

prepayment rates

Investment trust funds and other

DCF

Liquidity discounts

2.0

9.8

3.4

Lower fair value

Not applicable

September 30, 2025

Financial Instrument

Fair
value in
billions
of yen

Valuation

technique

Significant

unobservable input

Range of

valuation inputs

(1)

Weighted

Average

(2)(3)

Impact of

increases in
significant
unobservable
valuation

inputs

(4)(5)

Interrelationships

between valuation

inputs

(6)

Derivatives, net:

Equity contracts

(18

)

Option models

Dividend yield

Volatilities

Correlations

0.0

13.2

3.5

82.4

(0.85

) -

0.99

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Interest rate contracts

(22

)

DCF/ Option models

Interest rates

Volatilities

Correlations

0.6

4.7

9.7

13.1

40.4

193.4

(1.00

) -

1.00

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Credit cont

rac

(46

)

DCF/ Option models

Credit spreads

Recovery rates

Volatilities

Correlations

0.0

90.7

1.0

90.0

36.9

60.0

0.30

0.85

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Foreign exchange contracts

(13

)

Option models

Volatilities

Correlations

1.8

15.1

0.30

0.70

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Loans and receivables

494

DCF

Credit spreads

Recovery rates

0.0

55.5

40.0

100.0

6.5

98.3

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

No predictable interrelationship

Collateralized agreements

DCF

Repo rate

6.3

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Other assets

Non-trading

debt securities

DCF

Credit spreads

5.1

81.3

8.0

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Other

(7)(8)

392

DCF

WACC

Growth rates

Cre

dit

rea

9.9

3.0

0.7

21.8

9.9

3.0

8.3

Lower fair value

Higher fair value

Lower fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Market multiples

Liquidity discounts

25.0

Lower fair value

Not applicable

Option models

Dividend yield

Volatilities

2.2

23.0

2.2

23.0

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Liabilities:

Trading liabilities

Short-term borrowings

DCF/

option

models

Volatilities

Correlations

11.7

63.7

(0.75

) -

0.96

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Payable and deposits

DCF/

option

models

Volatilities Correlations

9.7

10.8

0.40

0.98

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Long-term borrowings

469

DCF

Loss severities

14.4

18.4

15.3

Lower fair value

Not applicable

DCF/

option

models

Volatilities

Correlations

9.7

63.7

56.9

67.9

(1.00

) -

0.98

—

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

Other liabilities

130

DCF

Credit spreads

Recovery rates

0.7

7.2

91.0

99.5

1.0

94.3

Higher fair value

No predictable

interrelationship

(1)

Range information is provided in percentages,

coefficients

and multiples and represents the highest and lowest level significant unobservable valuation input used to value that type of financial instrument. A wide dispersion in the range does not necessarily reflect increased uncertainty or subjectivity in the valuation input and is typically just a consequence of the different characteristics of the financial instruments themselves.

(2)	Weighted average information for non-derivatives is calculated by weighting each valuation input by the fair value of the financial instrument.

(3)	Nomura has not provided weighted average information for derivatives as unlike cash products the risk on such products is distinct from the balance sheet value and is subject to netting.

(4)

The above table only considers the impact of an increase in each significant unobservable valuation input on the fair value measurement of the financial instrument. However, a decrease in the significant unobservable valuation input would have the opposite effect on the fair value measurement of the financial instrument. For example, if an increase in a significant unobservable valuation input would result in a lower fair value measurement, a decrease in the significant unobservable valuation input would result in a higher fair value measurement.

(5)

The impact of an increase in the significant unobservable valuation input on the fair value measurement for a derivative assumes Nomura is long risk to the input (such as being long volatility). Where Nomura is short such risk, the impact of an increase would have a converse effect on the fair value measurement of the derivative.

(6)	Consideration of the interrelationships between significant unobservable valuation inputs is only relevant where more than one unobservable valuation input is used to determine the fair value measurement of the financial instrument.

(7)	Valuation techniques and unobservable valuation inputs in respect of equity securities reported within Other assets in the consolidated bala nc e sheets.

(8)	Includes non-financial assets carried at fair value on a recurring basis.

Qualitative discussion of the ranges of significant unobservable valuation inputs

The following comments present qualitative discussion about the significant unobservable valuation inputs used by Nomura for certain categories of financial instruments classified in Level 3.

Derivatives

—

Equity contracts

—The significant unobservable valuation inputs are dividend yield, volatilities and correlations. The range of dividend yields varies as some companies do not pay any dividends, for example due to a lack of profits or as a policy during a growth period, and hence have a zero dividend yield while others may pay high dividends, for example to return money to investors. The range of volatilities is wide as the volatilities of shorter-dated equity derivatives or those based on single equity securities can be higher than those of longer-dated instruments or those based on indices. Correlations represent the relationships between one input and another (“pairs”) and can either be positive or negative amounts. The range of correlations moves from positive to negative because the movement of some pairs is very closely related and in the same direction causing highly positive correlations while others generally move in opposite directions causing highly negative correlations with pairs that have differing relationships throughout the range.

Derivatives

—

Interest rate contracts

—The significant unobservable valuation inputs are interest rates, volatilities and correlations. The range of interest rates is due to interest rates in different countries/currencies being at different levels. The range of volatilities is wide as volatilities of shorter-dated interest rate derivatives are typically higher than those of longer-dated instruments. The range of correlations moves from positive to negative because the movement of some pairs is very closely related and in the same direction causing highly positive correlations while others generally move in opposite directions causing highly negative correlations with pairs that have differing relationships through the range. All significant unobservable valuation inputs are spread across the ranges.

Derivatives

—

Credit contracts

—The significant unobservable valuation inputs are credit spreads, recovery rates, volatilities and correlations. The range of credit spreads reflects the different risk of default present within the portfolio. At the low end of the range, underlying reference names have a very limited risk of default whereas at the high end of the range, underlying reference names have a much greater risk of default. The range of recovery rates varies primarily due to the seniority of the underlying exposure with senior exposures having a higher recovery than subordinated exposures. The range of volatilities is wide as the volatilities of shorter-dated credit contracts are typically higher than those of longer-dated instruments. The correlation range is positive since credit spread moves are generally in the same direction. Highly positive correlations are those for which the movement is very closely related and in the same direction, with correlation falling as the relationship becomes less strong.

Derivatives

—

Foreign exchange contracts

—The significant unobservable valuation inputs are interest rates, volatilities and correlations. The range of interest rates is due to interest rates in different countries/currencies being at different levels with some countries having extremely low levels and others being at levels that while still relatively low are less so. The range of volatilities is mainly due to the lower end of the range arising from currencies that trade in narrow ranges (e.g., versus the U.S. Dollar) while the higher end comes from currencies with a greater range of movement such as emerging market currencies. The range of correlations moves from positive to negative because the movement of some pairs is very closely related and in the same direction causing highly positive correlations while others generally move in opposite directions causing highly negative correlations with pairs that have differing relationships through the range.

Short-term borrowings and Long-term borrowings

—The significant unobservable valuation inputs are yields, prepayment rates, default probabilities, loss severities, volatilities and correlations. The range of volatilities is wide as the volatilities of shorter-dated instruments are typically higher than those in longer-dated instruments. The range of correlations moves from positive to negative because the movement of some pairs is very closely related and in the same direction causing highly positive correlations while others generally move in opposite directions causing highly negative correlations with pairs that have differing relationships through the range.

Movements in Level 3 financial instruments

The following tables present gains and losses as well as increases and decreases of financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis which Nomura classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the six months ended September 30, 2024 and 2025. Financial instruments classified in Level 3 are often hedged with instruments within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The gains or losses presented below do not reflect the offsetting gains or losses for these hedging instruments. Level 3 financial instruments are also measured using both observable and unobservable valuation inputs. Fair value changes presented below, therefore, reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses resulting from movements in both observable and unobservable valuation inputs.

For the six months ended September 30, 2024 and 2025, gains and losses related to Level 3 assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on Nomura’s liquidity and capital resources management.


	Billions of yen
	Six months ended September 30, 2024
	Beginning balance as of six months ended September 30, 2024			Total gains (losses) recognized in net revenue (1)			Total gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income		Purchases / issues (2)		Sales / redemptions (2)			Settlements			Foreign exchange movements			Transfers into Level 3 (4)(5)			Transfers out of Level 3 (5)(6)			Balance as of six months ended September 30, 2024
Assets:
Trading assets and private equity and debt investments
Equities	¥	8		¥	0		¥	—	¥	1	¥	(4	)	¥	—		¥	0		¥	2		¥	(1	)	¥	6
Private equity and debt investments		80			2			—		18		(3	)		—			0			—			—			97
Japanese agency and municipal securities		0			—			—		—		0			—			—			—			—			0
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities		3			0			—		3		(3	)		—			0			3			(3	)		3
Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes		173			(1	)		—		186		(199	)		—			(8	)		31			(5	)		177
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)		0			2			—		4		(2	)		—			—			7			—			11
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)		35			3			—		10		(5	)		—			(2	)		2			(4	)		39
Real estate-backed securities		122			5			—		176		(127	)		—			(8	)		—			—			168
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other		46			(3	)		—		42		(35	)		—			0			—			(16	)		34
Investment trust funds and other		3			0			—		52		(51	)		—			0			0			—			4

Total trading assets and private equity and debt investments		470			8			—		492		(429	)		—			(18	)		45			(29	)		539

Derivatives, net (3)
Equity contracts		5			(1	)		—		—		—			(1	)		0			1			0			4
Interest rate contracts		32			(18	)		—		—		—			(8	)		(1	)		(3	)		2			4
Credit contracts		(46	)		(30	)		—		—		—			33			3			(3	)		3			(40	)
Foreign exchange contracts		3			(5	)		—		—		—			(3	)		0			2			(4	)		(7	)

Total derivatives, net		(6	)		(54	)		—		—		—			21			2			(3	)		1			(39	)

Subtotal	¥	464		¥	(46	)	¥	—	¥	492	¥	(429	)	¥	21		¥	(16	)	¥	42		¥	(28	)	¥	500

Loans and receivables		291			8			—		116		(89	)		—			(27	)		126			(17	)		408
Collateralized agreements		12			0			—		2		—			—			(1	)		—			1			14
Other assets
Non-Trading Debt Securities		21			0			—		—		(4	)		—			0			—			—			17
Other		253			43			—		33		(5	)		—			(17	)		0			(28	)		279

Total	¥	1,041		¥	5		¥	—	¥	643	¥	(527	)	¥	21		¥	(61	)	¥	168		¥	(72	)	¥	1,218

Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities	¥	0		¥	0		¥	—	¥	0	¥	0		¥	—		¥	0		¥	0		¥	0		¥	0
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Bank and corporate debt securities		1			0			—		1		(2	)		—			0			0			0			0
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other		—			—			—		0		0			—			0			—			0			—
Investment trust funds and other		0			0			—		0		0			—			0			—			—			0

Total trading liabilities	¥	1		¥	0		¥	—	¥	1	¥	(2	)	¥	—		¥	0		¥	0		¥	0		¥	0

Short-term borrowings		23			0			0		46		(11	)		—			0			0			(8	)		50
Payables and deposits		15			0			0		0		—			—			—			2			(3	)		14
Long-term borrowings		474			2			4		150		(112	)		—			(2	)		8			(24	)		488
Other liabilities		44			0			—		44		(9	)		—			(3	)		0			0			76

Total	¥	557		¥	2		¥	4	¥	241	¥	(134	)	¥	—		¥	(5	)	¥	10		¥	(35	)	¥	628


	Billions of yen
	Six months ended September 30, 2025
	Beginning balance as of six months ended September 30, 2025			Total gains (losses) recognized in net revenue (1)			Total gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income			Purchases / issues (2)		Sales / redemptions (2)			Settlements			Foreign exchange movements			Transfers into Level 3 (4)(5)			Transfers out of Level 3 (5)(6)			Balance as of six months ended September 30, 2025
Assets:
Trading assets and private equity and debt investments
Equities	¥	21		¥	(1	)	¥	—		¥	12	¥	(6	)	¥	—		¥	0		¥	3		¥	(3	)	¥	26
Private equity and debt investments		103			5			—			52		(26	)		—			0			1			(13	)		122
Japanese agency and municipal securities		0			0			—			2		0			—			—			—			—			2
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities		6			0			—			2		(4	)		—			0			4			(3	)		5
Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes		181			(1	)		—			67		(98	)		—			1			29			(10	)		169
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)		10			0			—			0		(10	)		—			—			—			0			0
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)		48			(2	)		—			0		(30	)		—			0			1			—			17
Real estate-backed securities		207			2			—			249		(255	)		—			(1	)		—			—			202
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other		42			(2	)		—			22		(28	)		—			0			—			—			34
Investment trust funds and other		3			0			—			35		(29	)		—			0			2			(2	)		9

Total trading assets and private equity and debt investments		621			1			—			441		(486	)		—			0			40			(31	)		586

Derivatives, net (3)
Equity contracts		1			(11	)		—			—		—			9			0			(14	)		(3	)		(18	)
Interest rate contracts		6			(3	)		—			—		—			(21	)		3			14			(21	)		(22	)
Credit contracts		(36	)		(4	)		—			—		—			(10	)		(1	)		13			(8	)		(46	)
Foreign exchange contracts		(13	)		(2	)		—			—		—			3			0			0			(1	)		(13	)
Other contracts		(4	)		1			—			—		—			0			(2	)		2			—			(3	)

Total derivatives, net		(46	)		(19	)		—			—		—			(19	)		0			15			(33	)		(102	)

Subtotal	¥	575		¥	(18	)	¥	—		¥	441	¥	(486	)	¥	(19	)	¥	0		¥	55		¥	(64	)	¥	484

Loans and receivables		448			14			—			95		(125	)		—			0			91			(29	)		494
Collateralized agreements		15			0			—			—		—			—			0			—			—			15
Other assets
Non-Trading Debt Securities		17			1			—			4		(2	)		—			0			4			—			24
Other (7)		275			56			—			64		(2	)		—			0			0			(1	)		392

Total	¥	1,330		¥	53		¥	—		¥	604	¥	(615	)	¥	(19	)	¥	0		¥	150		¥	(94	)	¥	1,409

Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities	¥	1		¥	0		¥	—		¥	0	¥	0		¥	—		¥	0		¥	0		¥	(1	)	¥	0
Bank and corporate debt securities		0			0			—			0		0			—			0			0			—			0
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other		0			(1	)		—			0		(1	)		—			0			—			—			0
Investment trust funds and other		0			—			—			—		0			—			0			—			—			—

Total trading liabilities	¥	1		¥	(1	)	¥	—		¥	0	¥	(1	)	¥	—		¥	0		¥	0		¥	(1	)	¥	0

Short-term borrowings		36			(1	)		0			40		(23	)		—			0			1			(5	)		50
Payables and deposits		14			1			0			—		—			—			—			—			—			13
Long-term borrowings		477			(15	)		(1	)		63		(73	)		—			0			17			(31	)		469
Other liabilities		65			0			—			68		(3	)		—			0			1			(1	)		130

Total	¥	593		¥	(16	)	¥	(1	)	¥	171	¥	(100	)	¥	—		¥	0		¥	19		¥	(38	)	¥	662

(1)

Includes gains and losses reported primarily within

Net gain on trading, Gain on private equity and debt investments,

and also within

Gain (Loss) on investments in equity securities, Revenue

—

Other

and

Non-interest

expenses

—

Other,

Interest and dividends

and

Interest expense

in the consolidated statements of income.

(2)	Amounts reported in Purchases / issues include increases in trading liabilities while Sales / redemptions include decreases in trading liabilities.

(3)	Derivatives which contain multiple types of risk are classified based on the primary risk type of the instrument.

(4)	Amounts of gains and losses on these transfers which were recognized in the period when the Transfers into Level 3 occurred were not significant for the six months ended September 30, 2024 and 2025.

(5)

Transfers into Level

indicate certain valuation inputs of a financial instrument become unobservable or significant.

Transfers out of Level

indicate certain valuation inputs of a financial instrument become observable or insignificant. See “

Quantitative and qualitative information regarding significant unobservable valuation inputs”

above for the valuation inputs of each financial instruments.

(6)	Transfers out of Level 3 include financial instruments that moved out of level 3 by application of measurement alternative. See Note 6 “ Non-trading investments ” for further information of financial instruments under the measurement alternative.

(7)	Includes non-financial assets carried at fair value on a recurring basis.

Unrealized gains and losses recognized for Level 3 financial instruments

The following table presents the amounts of unrealized gains (losses) for the six months ended September 30, 2024 and 2025, relating to those financial instruments which Nomura classified in Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy and that were still held by Nomura at the relevant consolidated balance sheet date.


	Billions of yen
	Six months ended September 30
	2024			2025
	Unrealized gains / (losses) (1)
Assets:
Trading assets and private equity and debt investments
Equities	¥	0		¥	0
Private equity and debt investments		0			(1	)
Foreign government, agency and municipal securities		0			0
Bank and corporate debt securities and loans for trading purposes		(1	)		(1	)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)		7			0
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)		3			(2	)
Real estate-backed securities		5			2
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other		(3	)		(2	)
Investment trust funds and other		0			0

Total trading assets and private equity and debt investments		11			(4	)

Derivatives, net (2)
Equity contracts		(2	)		(7	)
Interest rate contracts		(31	)		(26	)
Credit contracts		(32	)		(15	)
Foreign exchange contracts		(5	)		(2	)
Other contracts		—			1

Total derivatives, net		(70	)		(49	)

Subtotal	¥	(59	)	¥	(53	)

Loans and receivables		5			12
Collateralized agreements		0			0
Other assets
Non-Trading debt Securities		0			1
Other (3)		42			56

Total	¥	(12	)	¥	16

Liabilities:
Trading liabilities
Equities	¥	0		¥	0
Bank and corporate debt securities		0			0

Total trading liabilities	¥	0		¥	0

Short-term borrowings (4)		1			0
Payables and deposits (4)		0			1
Long-term borrowings (4)		13			(7	)
Other liabilities		0			0

Total	¥	14		¥	(6	)

(1)	Includes gains and losses reported within Net gain on trading, Gain on private equity and debt investments, Gain (loss) on investments in equity securities, Revenue — Other, Non-interest expenses — Other, Interest and dividends and Interest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

(2)	Derivatives which contain multiple types of risk are classified based on the primary risk type of the instrument.

(3)	Includes non-financial assets carried at fair value on a recurring basis.

(4)	Includes unrealized gains and losses of ¥5 billion and ¥(1) billion for the six months ended September 30, 2024 and 2025, recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period.

Investments in investment funds that calculate NAV per share

In the normal course of business, Nomura invests in

non-consolidated

funds which meet the definition of investment companies or are similar in nature and which do not have readily determinable fair values. For certain of these investments, Nomura uses NAV per share as the basis for valuation as a practical expedient. Some of these investments are redeemable at different amounts from NAV per share.

The following tables present information on these investments where NAV per share is calculated or disclosed as of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025. Investments are presented by major category relevant to the nature of Nomura’s business and risks


	Billions of yen
	March 31, 2025
	Fair value		Unfunded commitments (1)		Redemption frequency (if currently eligible) (2)		Redemption notice (3)
Hedge funds	¥	11	¥	4		Monthly		Same day-30 days
Venture capital funds		19		3		—		—
Private equity funds		43		10		—		—
Real estate funds		4		0		—		—

Total	¥	77	¥	17


	Billions of yen
	September 30, 2025
	Fair value		Unfunded commitments (1)		Redemption frequency (if currently eligible) (2)		Redemption notice (3)
Hedge funds	¥	14	¥	3		Monthly		Same day-30 days
Venture capital funds		20		3		—		—
Private equity funds		53		9		—		—
Real estate funds		4		0		—		—

Total	¥	91	¥	15

(1)	The contractual amount of any unfunded commitments Nomura is required to make to the entities in which the investment is held.

(2)	The frequency with which Nomura is permitted to redeem investments.

(3)	The range in prior notice period for redemption.

Hedge funds:

These investments include funds of funds that invest in multiple asset classes. The fair values of these investments are determined using NAV per share. Although majority of these funds are redeemable monthly, certain funds cannot be redeemed within one month due to contractual, liquidity or gating issues. The redemption period is unknown for certain suspended or liquidating funds. Some of these investments contain restrictions against transfers of the investments to third parties.

Venture capital funds:

These investments include primarily

start-up

funds. The fair values of these investments are determined using NAV per share. Most of these funds cannot be redeemed within six months. The redemption period is unknown for certain suspended or liquidating funds. Some of these investments contain restrictions against transfers of the investments to third parties.

Private equity funds:

These investments are made mainly in various sectors in Europe, U.S. and Japan. The fair values of these investments are determined using NAV per share. Redemption is restricted for most of these investments. The redemption period is unknown for certain suspended or liquidating funds. Some of these investments contain restrictions against transfers of the investments to third parties.

Real estate funds:

These are investments in commercial and other types of real estate. The fair values of these investments are determined using NAV per share. Redemption is restricted for most of these investments. The redemption period is unknown for certain suspended or liquidating funds. Some of these investments contain restrictions against transfers of the investments to third parties.

Fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities

Nomura measures certain eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value through the election of the fair value option permitted by ASC 815 “

Derivatives and Hedging

” and ASC 825 “

Financial Instruments.

” When Nomura elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in that item’s fair value are recognized through earnings. Election of the fair value option is generally irrevocable unless an event occurs that gives rise to a new basis of accounting for that instrument.

The financial assets and financial liabilities primarily elected for the fair value option by Nomura, and the reasons for the election, are as follows:

•

Equity method investments reported within

Trading assets and private equity and debt investments

and

Other assets

held for capital appreciation or current income purposes which Nomura generally has an intention to exit rather than hold indefinitely. Nomura elects the fair value option to more appropriately represent the purpose of these investments in these consolidated financial statements.

•

Certain loans receivables and receivables from customers reported within

Loans and

Receivables

which are risk managed on a fair value basis and undrawn loan commitments related to such loans receivables expected to be funded. Nomura elects the fair value option to mitigate volatility through earnings caused by the difference in measurement basis that otherwise would arise between loans and the derivatives used to risk manage those instruments.

•

Reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements reported within

Collateralized agreements

and

Collateralized financing

which are risk managed on a fair value basis. Nomura elects the fair value option to mitigate volatility through earnings caused by the difference in measurement basis that otherwise would arise between the reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements and the derivatives used to risk manage those instruments.

•

All structured notes issued on or after April 1, 2008 reported within

Short-term borrowings

Long-term borrowings

. Nomura elects the fair value option for those structured notes primarily to mitigate the volatility through earnings caused by differences in the measurement basis for structured notes and the derivatives Nomura uses to risk manage those positions. Nomura also elects the fair value option for certain notes issued by consolidated VIEs for the same purpose and for certain structured notes issued prior to April 1, 2008. Certain subsidiaries elect the fair value option for structured loans and vanilla debt securities issued by those subsidiaries.

•

Certain structured deposit issuances reported within

Deposits received at banks.

Nomura elects the fair value option for those structured deposits primarily to mitigate the volatility through earnings caused by differences in the measurement basis for structured deposits and the derivatives Nomura uses to risk manage those positions.

•

Financial liabilities reported within

Long-term borrowings

recognized in transactions which are accounted for as secured financing transactions under ASC 860. Nomura elects the fair value option for these financial liabilities to mitigate volatility through earnings that otherwise would arise had this election not been made. Even though Nomura usually has little or no continuing economic exposure to the transferred financial assets, they remain on the consolidated balance sheets and continue to be carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through earnings.

•

Financial reinsurance contracts reported within

Other assets

. Nomura elects the fair value option to mitigate income volatility caused by the difference in measurement basis that would otherwise exist. Changes in the fair value of the reinsurance contracts carried at fair value are reported in the consolidated statements of income.

•

Loans for trading purposes and

non-trading

debt securities held by subsidiaries that are not registered as a broker-dealer

(“non-BD

entities”) before March 31, 2024. Moreover, originations or purchases of loans held for trading purposes by

non-BD

entities and

non-trading

debt securities that are not classified as

held-to-maturity

or available for sale held by

non-BD

entities from April 1, 2024. Nomura elects the fair value option to these loans and

non-trading

debt securities for its holding purpose or to mitigate volatility through earnings that otherwise would arise had this election not been made.

Interest and dividends arising from financial instruments for which the fair value option has been elected are recognized within

Interest and dividends, Interest expense

Revenue

—

Net gain on trading

The following table presents gains (losses) due to changes in fair value for financial instruments carried at fair value using the fair value option for the six months ended September 30, 2024 and 2025.


	Billions of yen
	Six months ended September 30
	2024			2025
	Gains / (Losses) (1)
Assets:
Trading assets and private equity and debt investments (2)
Trading assets	¥	5		¥	6
Private equity and debt investments		2			1
Loans and receivables		23			(1	)
Collateralized agreements (3)		10			4
Other assets (2)(4)		47			55

Total	¥	87		¥	65

Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings (5)	¥	97		¥	17
Payables and deposits		(2	)		26
Collateralized financing (3)		(18	)		(15	)
Long-term borrowings (5)(6)		(112	)		(145	)
Other liabilities (7)		(3	)		(15	)

Total	¥	(38	)	¥	(132	)

(1)	Includes gains and losses reported primarily within Revenue—Net gain on trading and Revenue — Other in the consolidated statements of income.

(2)	Includes equity investments that would have been accounted for under the equity method had Nomura not chosen to elect the fair value option.

(3)	Includes reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements.

(4)	Include non-trading debt securities.

(5)	Includes structured notes and other financial liabilities.

(6)	Includes secured financing transactions arising from transfers of financial assets which did not meet the criteria for sales accounting.

(7)	Includes unfunded written loan commitments.

As of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025, Nomura held an economic interest of 39.74% and 40.42% in American Century Companies, Inc., respectively. The investment is carried at fair value on a recurring basis through election of the fair value option and is reported within

Other assets—Other

in the consolidated balance sheets.

For the six months ended September 30, 2024 and 2025, there was no significant impact on financial assets for which the fair value option was elected attributable to instrument-specific credit risk.

Nomura calculates the impact of changes in its own creditworthiness on certain financial liabilities for which the fair value option is elected by revaluation techniques using a rate which incorporates observable changes in its credit spread.

The following table presents changes in the valuation adjustment for Nomura’s own creditworthiness recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) during the six months ended September 30, 2024 and 2025 in respect of financial liabilities elected for the fair value option recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) during the years. The following table also presents amounts reclassified to the consolidated statements of income from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on early settlement of such financial liabilities during the six months ended September 30, 2024 and 2025 and the cumulative amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2024 and 2025.


	Billions of yen
	Six months ended or as of September 30
	2024		2025
Changes recognized as a credit (debit) to other comprehensive income (loss)	¥	13	¥	(49	)
Credit (debit) Amounts reclassified to earnings		—		(1	)
Cumulative credit balance recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income		69		29

As of March 31, 2025, the fair value of the aggregate unpaid principal balance (which is contractually principally protected) of

Loans and receivables

for which the fair value option was elected was ¥105 billion less than the principal balance of such

Loans and receivables

. There were no

Loans and receivables

for which the fair value option was elected that were 90 days or more past due. The fair value of the aggregate unpaid principal balance (which is contractually principally protected) of

Short-term borrowings and Long-term borrowings

for which the fair value option was elected was ¥473 billion less than the principal balance of such

Short-term borrowings and Long-term borrowings

As of September 30, 2025, the fair value of the aggregate unpaid principal balance (which is contractually principally protected) of

Loans and receivables

for which the fair value option was elected was ¥20 billion less than the principal balance of such

Loans and receivables

. There were no

Loans and receivables

for which the fair value option was elected that were 90 days or more past due. The fair value of the aggregate unpaid principal balance (which is contractually principally protected) of

Short-term borrowings and

Long-term borrowings

for which the fair value option was elected was ¥382 billion less than the principal balance of such

Short-term borrowings and Long-term borrowings

Investment by Investment companies

Nomura carries all of investments by investment companies under ASC 946 “

Financial

Services—Investment Companies

” (“ASC 946”) at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through the consolidated statements of income.

Concentrations of credit risk

Concentrations of credit risk may arise from trading, securities financing transactions and underwriting activities, and may be impacted by changes in political or economic factors. Nomura has credit risk concentrations on debt securities issued by the Japanese Government, U.S. Government, British Government (“U.K.”), Governments within the European Union (“EU”), their states and municipalities, and their agencies. These concentrations generally arise from taking trading positions and are reported within

Trading assets

in the consolidated balance sheets. Government, agency and municipal securities, including

Securities pledged as collateral,

represented 17% of total assets as of March 31, 2025 and 18% as of September 30, 2025.

The following tables present geographic allocations of Nomura’s trading assets related to government, agency and municipal securities as of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025. See Note 3 “

Derivative instruments and hedging activities

” for further information regarding the concentration of credit risk for derivatives.


	Billions of yen
	March 31, 2025
	Japan		U.S.		EU & U.K.		Other		Total (1)
Government, agency and municipal securities	¥	2,896	¥	2,629	¥	2,655	¥	1,470	¥	9,650

	Billions of yen
	September 30, 2025
	Japan		U.S.		EU & U.K.		Other		Total (1)
Government, agency and municipal securities	¥	3,392	¥	3,362	¥	2,939	¥	1,401	¥	11,094

(1)

Other than above, there were ¥313 billion and ¥501 billion of government, agency and municipal securities reported within

Other assets

—

Non-trading

debt securities

in the consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025, respectively. These securities are primarily Japanese government, agency and municipal securities.

Estimated fair value of financial instruments not carried at fair value

Certain financial instruments are not carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheets since they are neither held for trading purposes nor are elected for the fair value option. These are typically carried at contractual amounts due or amortized cost.

The carrying value of the majority of the financial instruments detailed below approximates their fair value since they are short-term in nature and contain minimal credit risk. These financial instruments include financial assets reported within

Cash and cash equivalents, Time deposits, Deposits with stock exchanges and other segregated cash, Receivables from customers, Receivables from other than customers, Securities purchased under agreements to resell

and

Securities borrowed

and financial liabilities reported within

Short-term borrowings, Payables to customers, Payables to other than customers, Deposits received at banks, Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Securities loaned

and

Other secured borrowings

in the consolidated balance sheets.

The fair values of other financial instruments which are longer-term in nature or may contain more than minimal credit risk may be different to their carrying value. Financial assets of this type primarily include certain loans which are reported within

Loans receivable

while financial liabilities primarily include long-term borrowings which are reported within

Long-term borrowings

The following tables present carrying values, fair values and classification within the fair value hierarchy for certain classes of financial instrument as of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025.


	Billions of yen
	March 31, 2025 (1)
	Carrying value		Fair value		Fair value by level
	Carrying value		Fair value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	¥	4,424	¥	4,424	¥	4,424	¥	—	¥	—
Time deposits		642		642		—		642		—
Deposits with stock exchanges and other segregated cash		448		448		—		448		—
Loans receivable (2)		6,022		6,020		—		3,436		2,584
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		14,005		14,005		—		13,991		14
Securities borrowed		4,659		4,659		—		4,659		—

Total	¥	30,200	¥	30,198	¥	4,424	¥	23,176	¥	2,598

Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings	¥	1,117	¥	1,117	¥	—	¥	1,081	¥	36
Deposits received at banks		3,106		3,106		—		3,092		14
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		16,288		16,288		—		16,288		—
Securities loaned		1,965		1,965		—		1,965		—
Other secured borrowings		393		393		—		393		—
Long-term borrowings		13,374		13,385		10		12,879		496

Total	¥	36,243	¥	36,254	¥	10	¥	35,698	¥	546


	Billions of yen
	September 30, 2025 (1)
	Carrying value		Fair value		Fair value by level
	Carrying value		Fair value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	¥	5,867	¥	5,867	¥	5,867	¥	—	¥	—
Time deposits		567		567		—		567		—
Deposits with stock exchanges and other segregated cash		397		397		—		397		—
Loans receivable (2)		6,430		6,429		—		3,774		2,655
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		13,401		13,401		—		13,387		14
Securities borrowed		4,427		4,427		—		4,427		—

Total	¥	31,089	¥	31,088	¥	5,867	¥	22,552	¥	2,669

Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings	¥	1,222	¥	1,222	¥	—	¥	1,172	¥	50
Deposits received at banks		3,288		3,288		—		3,275		13
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		15,626		15,626		—		15,626		—
Securities loaned		2,193		2,193		—		2,193		—
Other secured borrowings		369		369		—		369		—
Long-term borrowings		14,408		14,444		10		13,946		488

Total	¥	37,106	¥	37,142	¥	10	¥	36,581	¥	551

(1)	Includes financial instruments which are carried at fair value on a recurring basis.

(2)	Carrying values are shown after deducting relevant allowances for current expected credit losses.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

In addition to financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis, Nomura also measures other financial and

non-financial

assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, where the primary measurement basis is not fair value. Fair value is only used in specific circumstances after initial recognition such as to measure impairment.

As of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025, there were no significant amount of assets or liabilities which were carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

Equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions

The following table presents a summary of equity securities primarily reported within

Other assets—Other

in consolidated balance sheet which are subject to contractual sale restrictions as of March 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025.


	Millions of yen
	March 31, 2025
	Fair value		Remaining duration
	Fair value		Less than 1 year		1 to 5 years		More than 5 years
Restriction on transfer	¥	200,658	¥	9	¥	200,621	¥	28
Consent from third parties		7,806		18		—		7,788
Others		2,148		—		—		2,148

Total	¥	210,612	¥	27	¥	200,621	¥	9,964


	Millions of yen
	September 30, 2025
	Fair value		Remaining duration
	Fair value		Less than 1 year		1 to 5 years		More than 5 years
Restriction on transfer	¥	252,729	¥	252,729	¥	—	¥	—
Consent from third parties		10,195		1,688		—		8,507
Others		2,249		—		—		2,249

Total	¥	265,173	¥	254,417	¥	—	¥	10,756

(1)	No specific conditions could cause a lapse in the sale restrictions as disclosed above.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (bbb)(1)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-2

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 55
-Paragraph 107
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482078/820-10-55-107

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 55
-Paragraph 100
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482078/820-10-55-100

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (c)(3)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-2

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6A
-Subparagraph (a)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-6A

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2E
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-2E

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6A
-Subparagraph (h)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-6A

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6A
-Subparagraph (f)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-6A

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6A
-Subparagraph (e)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-6A

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 6A
-Subparagraph (d)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-6A

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (h)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-2

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 820
-SubTopic 10
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-Subparagraph (g)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482106/820-10-50-2

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef
-Topic 940
-SubTopic 820
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (a)
-Publisher FASB
-URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478119/940-820-50-1

+ Details