XML 50 R35.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Commitments and contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Commitments and contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments and contingencies
28
Commitments and contingencies
 
Commitments
a)
Concession fees
Pursuant to the concession to operate the cruise and automobile terminal in the Port of Acapulco, Guerrero, the Company must make fixed and variable monthly payments. These payments totaled $ 7,536 and $ 7,139 in the years of 2019 and 2018, respectively.
 
Contingencies
a)
RPS Claim
On August 7, 2007, Transportación Marítima Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (‘TMM’) filed a claim for arbitration against Refined Product Services (“RPS”) for US$50 thousand, for various expenses incurred by TMM due to the delay of the re-delivery of the tanker vessel Palenque.
 
On October 19, 2007, RPS filed a countersuit for US$3.0 million, for alleged faults and lack of maintenance involving the tanker vessel Palenque, and also consequential damages for having lost a contract while the vessel was being repaired. The consolidated financial statements did not present any significant claims for payments of loss (RPS) during 2018, 2019 and up to the authorization date hereof.
 
The Company’s Management and its legal advisors consider the position against this countersuit is strong, as there are sufficient elements and arguments for defense, also the amount claimed by RPS would appear to be excessive and for non-supported issues.
 
b)
Mutual loans between WWS y TMM
In December 2007, TMM and Worldwide Services, Ltd. (“WWS”) filed mutual claims; TMM for $394 thousand dollars, claiming fuel and low return on the performance of the tanker ship Veracruz A, and WWS in the amount of $938 thousand dollars, primarily claiming a presumed over-performance of the same ship.
 
As of the date of the authorization of the consolidated financial statements, total claims against TMM amount to $2.4 million dollars. However, those claims are considered weak.
 
TMM filed an appeal to have the case dismissed, claiming that the Court has no jurisdiction since the arbitration proceedings were started with the name of the incorrect plaintiff, a partial ruling was handed down in which the case was not dismissed in January 2017. The final ruling will be handed down in the forthcoming months of the authorization of the consolidated financial statements.
 
Company Management believes it has strong arguments to support the claim and to defend its position on the arbitration that is being carrying out.
 
c)
ADEMSA secured Certificates of Deposit
During 2011 and 2010, ADEMSA issued secured Certificates of Deposit in favor of various financial institutions, goods and/or amounts consigned thereto, which, as a result of the defaults by the producers and on exercising the right conferred by the Certificates, filed claim against ADEMSA for compliance with the obligations to deliver goods covered or payment of the amounts secured.
 
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company held a reserve of $2,461, to settle the ADEMSA obligations, and also in these years, payments were made to financial institutions for $2,893, respectively. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the reserve is included in ‘Accounts payable and accrued expenses’.
 
d)
Tax liabilities determined on TMM
Suit filed by TMM against the rulings handed down on which various tax liabilities were determined for presumed omitted income tax, corresponding to tax year 2005.

On November 5, 2012, the appeal for annulment was allowed to proceed before the former Federal Court of Tax and Administrative Justice. That appeal for annulment was forwarded for study and resolution to the Metropolitan Regional First Division of the Federal Court of Tax and Administrative Justice.

On January 30, 2018, TMM was notified of the decision whereby the matter was forwarded to the Full Federal Tax Court of Administrative Justice sitting in Mexico City, and in February 2020, a favorable judgment was issued for the interests of the Company.

e)
Motions for Annulment against various tax provisions
During 2017 and 2016, Grupo TMM filed Motions for Annulment with the Federal Court of Administrative Justice against various decisions of the Tax Administration Service (SAT), on the rejection of deductions (tax year 2007), modifications to the Consolidation Regime for controlled companies (tax year 2005), deferred income tax on consolidation (tax year 2010), and the termination of the consolidation regime (tax year 2013), on which rulings have not been handed down by the courts with competent jurisdiction.
 
f)
Other legal proceedings
The Company is party to various other legal proceedings and administrative actions, all of which are of an ordinary or routine nature and incidental to its operations. Although it is impossible to predict the outcome of any legal proceeding, in the opinion of the Company’s management, such proceedings and actions should not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
 
g)
Operations with related parties
Under the Income Tax Law, companies that conduct operations with related parties, nationals or nonresidents, are subject to fiscal limitations and obligations regarding the determination of the prices negotiated, as these must be comparable to those that would be used with or between independent parties on similar operations.
 
In the event the tax authorities were to review the prices and reject the amounts determined, they may demand, an addition to the taxes and accessory charges corresponding (adjustments and surcharges), fines on omitted taxes, which could be for up to 100% of the adjusted tax amount.
 
The Company has significant transactions and relations with related parties, for which the Company holds documentation that confirms the terms of these transactions were conducted in 2018 similarly to transactions between unrelated parties. The Company and its subsidiaries are in the process of completing this study for 2019.
 
h)
Other legislation
Grupo TMM and Subsidiaries are subject to the laws and ordinances of other countries, as well as international regulations governing maritime transportation and the observance of safety and environmental regulations.