against us.
 
To the extent
 
these expenditures, as with all costs,
 
are not ultimately reflected in
 
the prices of our 
products and services, our business, financial condition, results
 
of operations and cash flows in future
 
periods 
could be materially adversely affected. 
Existing and future laws, regulations and internal initiatives
 
relating to global climate change, such as 
limitations on GHG emissions may impact or limit our business plans,
 
result in significant expenditures, promote 
alternative uses of energy or reduce demand for our products. 
Continuing political and social attention
 
to the issue of global climate change has resulted
 
in both existing and 
pending international agreements
 
and national, regional or local legislation and regulatory
 
measures to limit GHG 
emissions, such as cap and trade regimes, specific
 
emission standards, carbon taxes,
 
restrictive permitting, 
increased fuel efficiency standards
 
and incentives or mandates for renewable
 
energy.
 
Although we may support 
many of these legislative and regulatory
 
measures, how and when they are enacted could
 
result in a material 
adverse effect to our
 
business, financial condition, results of operations
 
and cash flows in future periods.
 
For example, in November 2021,
 
the U.S. Environmental Protection
 
Agency published a Proposed Rule that would 
revise the regulations governing
 
the emission of GHG and volatile organic compounds
 
from new oil and gas 
production facilities, and emission guidelines
 
for states to use when revising
 
Clean Air Act implementation plans to 
limit GHG emissions from existing oil and gas
 
facilities.
 
Although the company supports the direct federal 
regulation of methane from new and existing
 
sources,
 
the final form and substance of any regulations
 
are not 
currently known and could result in additional
 
capital expenditures and compliance,
 
operating and maintenance 
costs, any of which may have
 
an adverse effect on our business
 
and results of operations. 
Additionally,
 
in 2021, the U.S. joined the international community at
 
the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26).
 
At the conclusion of COP26, the U.S. and nearly
 
200 other counties agreed to the Glasgow Climate
 
Pact, 
committing to revisiting and strengthening
 
their current emissions targets
 
to 2030 in 2022 and finalizing the 
outstanding elements of the Paris
 
Agreement.
 
In addition, our operations continue
 
in countries around the world 
which are party to the Paris Agreement.
 
The implementation of current
 
agreements and regulatory measures,
 
as 
well as any future agreements
 
or measures addressing climate change and
 
GHG emissions, may adversely impact 
the demand for our products, impose taxes
 
on our products or operations or require
 
us to purchase emission 
credits or reduce emission of GHGs from our operations.
 
As a result, we may experience declines in commodity 
prices or incur substantial capital expenditures
 
and compliance, operating, maintenance
 
and remediation costs, 
any of which may have an
 
adverse effect on our business
 
and results of operations. 
In September 2021, we announced an improvement
 
to our Paris-aligned climate risk framework,
 
whereby we 
committed to an improvement
 
to our targets for reduc
 
ing our scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity on both a
 
gross 
operated and net equity basis and reaffirmed
 
our commitment to advocate
 
for the reduction of scope 3 emissions 
through our support for a U.S. carbon
 
price.
 
Compliance with, and achievement of,
 
climate change-related 
internal initiatives such as the foregoing
 
may increase costs, require
 
us to purchase emission credits, or limit or 
impact our business plans.
 
If we are not successful in select internal initiatives,
 
we may be adversely affected
 
and 
potentially need to reduce
 
economic end-of-field life
 
of certain assets and impair associated
 
net book value.
 
Increasing attention to
 
global climate change has also resulted in pressure
 
from and upon stockholders,
 
financial 
institutions and/or financial markets
 
to modify their relationships with oil and gas
 
companies and to limit 
investments and/or funding to
 
such companies.
 
For example, Harvard University
 
announced in September 2021 
that it will stop investing
 
its $42 billion endowment in fossil fuels and will let its current
 
investments expire without 
renewal.
 
As public pressure continues to
 
mount, our access to capital on terms we
 
find favorable (if it is available 
at all) may be limited and our costs
 
may increase,
 
our reputation could be damaged or our business
 
and results of 
operations may be otherwise adversely
 
affected.
 
Furthermore, increasing attention
 
to global climate change has resulted
 
in an increased likelihood of governmental 
investigations and private
 
litigation, which could increase our costs
 
or otherwise adversely affect our business.
 
Beginning in 2017, cities, counties, governments
 
and other entities in several states
 
in the U.S. have filed lawsuits 
against oil and gas companies,
 
including ConocoPhillips, seeking compensatory
 
damages and equitable relief to