Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

a)	Basis of Presentation
	The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) instructions for companies filing Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position as of March 31, 2013, and the results of operations and cash flows for the period then ended. The financial data and other information disclosed in the notes to the interim consolidated financial statements related to this period are unaudited. The results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarter or the entire year ending December 31, 2013. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been condensed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and regulations and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Therefore, these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed on April 29, 2013 with the SEC.
	These consolidated financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the accounts of an unincorporated venture, Arkose Mining Venture (“Arkose”) in which the Company holds an 81% interest and maintains majority voting control. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

b)	Cash and Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

c)	Mineral Property Costs
	The Company is primarily engaged in the acquisition, exploration and exploitation of mineral properties with the objective of extracting minerals from these properties.
	Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Costs for acquired mineral property databases are capitalized and then impaired if the criteria for capitalization are not met. Capitalization of mine development costs that meet the definition of an asset commence once all operating mineralization is classified as a commercially mineable deposit (reserve).

Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized and then impaired if the criteria for capitalization are not met unless the Company determines a property can be classified as a commercially mineable deposit (reserve). In the event that a mineral property is acquired through the issuance of the Company’s shares, the mineral property is recorded at the fair value of the respective property or the fair value of common shares and other instruments issued, whichever is more readily determinable.

When mineral properties are acquired under option agreements with future acquisition payments to be made at the sole discretion of the Company, those future payments, whether in cash, shares, or other instruments are recorded only when the Company has made or is obliged to make the payment or issue the shares or instruments.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, mineral property expenditures totalling $2,790,318 (2012 - $6,365,807) were expensed, including processing facility construction and wellfield expenditures totalling $2,542,436 (2012 - $6,128,020). As of March 31, 2013, the Company has expensed processing facility construction and wellfield expenditures related to our Nichols Ranch ISR Uranium Project totalling $33,576,691 (December 31, 2012 - $31,034,255).

e)	Restoration and Reclamation Costs (Asset Retirement Obligations)
	United States regulatory authorities require the Company to restore and reclaim its mine area after mining is completed. Pursuant to ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations , the fair value of asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. Upon initial recognition of a liability, the fair value of the liability is expensed or added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. Future reclamation and remediation costs are accrued based on management's best estimate at the end of each period of the costs expected to be incurred to remediate each project.
	Estimations and assumptions used in applying the expected present value technique to determine fair values are reviewed periodically. At March 31, 2013, the Company had accrued $1,122,996 for restoration and reclamation obligations (December 31, 2012 - $1,071,843).
	Estimated site restoration costs for exploration activities are accrued when incurred. Costs for environmental remediation are estimated each period by management based on current regulations, actual expenses incurred, available technology and industry standards. Any change in these estimates is included in mineral property expenditures during the period and the actual restoration expenditure incurred is charged to the accumulated asset retirement obligation provision as the restoration work is completed. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company has recorded $39,000 for well reclamation obligations in accrued liabilities for which work is required as part of its ongoing exploration expenses.

f)

Income Taxes

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740, Income Taxes as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740 the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward and mineral property acquisition, exploration and development costs. The potential benefits of deferred income tax assets have not been recognized in these consolidated financial statements because the Company cannot be assured that it is more likely than not to utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

g)	Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
	The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its consolidated financial statements.
	Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
	In February, 2013, ASC guidance was issued related to items reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The new standard requires either in a single note or parenthetically on the face of the financials statements: (i) the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source and (ii) the income statement line items affected by the reclassification. The update is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2013. The guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities

In November 2011, ASC guidance was issued related to disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The new standard requires disclosures to allow investors to better compare financial statements prepared under U.S GAAP with financial statements prepared under IFRS. The update is effected for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Retrospective application is required. The Company adopted ACU 2011-11 as of January 1, 2013. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2013, ASC guidance was issued to clarify that the disclosure requirements are limited to derivatives, repurchase agreements, and securities lending transactions to the extent that they are (i) offset in the financial statements or (ii) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The Company does not expect the updated guidance to have an impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

h)	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company categorizes its financial instruments into a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. Fair value is determined based upon the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants exclusive of any transaction costs.
	The Company’s financial assets recorded at fair value are categorized as follows:
	Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
	Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs or significant value-drivers are observable in active markets.
	Level 3 – Model-derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value-drivers are unobservable.