XML 35 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
Investments and Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Investments and Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Investments and Fair Value Measurements
4. Investments and Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market, and we consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of non-performance.

Our financial instruments are measured and recorded at fair value. Our non-financial assets, including property and equipment and goodwill, are measured at fair value upon acquisition, reviewed at least annually for impairment, and are fully assessed if there is an indicator of impairment. An adjustment would be made to the fair value of non-financial assets if an impairment charge is recognized.
 
Fair value is determined for assets and liabilities using a three-tiered hierarchy, based upon significant levels of inputs as follows:

-Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

-Level 2 – Observable inputs, other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

-Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

The below tables summarize the composition of our investments at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands).  For both periods, all investments have been recorded to short-term available-for-sale securities on the consolidated balance sheet.

June 30, 2015
 
Amortized Cost
  
Unrealized
 Losses
  
Aggregate
Fair Value
 
Short term municipal securities funds1
 
$
64,302
  
$
(340
)
 
$
63,962
 
Total
 
$
64,302
  
$
(340
)
 
$
63,962
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
Amortized Cost
  
Unrealized
Losses
  
Aggregate
 Fair Value
 
Short term municipal securities funds1
 
$
59,520
  
$
(18
)
 
$
59,502
 
Total
 
$
59,520
  
$
(18
)
 
$
59,502
 
 
1 Do not have a set maturity date.
 
The following tables detail the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities within the three levels of the fair value hierarchy at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

  
  
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
 
June 30, 2015
 
Fair Market
Value
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
Financial assets:
        
Municipal securities1
  
63,962
   
63,962
   
-
   
-
 
Foreign currency exchange contracts
  
2
   
-
   
2
   
-
 
Total financial assets
 
$
63,964
  
$
63,962
  
$
2
  
$
-
 
Financial liabilities:
                
Foreign currency exchange contracts
  
326
   
-
   
326
   
-
 
Total financial liabilities
 
$
326
  
$
-
  
$
326
  
$
-
 

December 31, 2014
 
Fair Market
Value
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
Financial assets:
        
Municipal securities1
  
59,502
   
59,502
   
-
   
-
 
Foreign currency exchange contracts
  
14
   
-
   
14
   
-
 
Total financial assets
 
$
59,516
  
$
59,502
  
$
14
  
$
-
 
Financial liabilities:
                
Foreign currency exchange contracts
  
1,359
   
-
   
1,359
   
-
 
Total financial liabilities
 
$
1,359
  
$
-
  
$
1,359
  
$
-
 

1 At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, municipal securities consisted solely of holdings in short-term municipal security funds.

Municipal securities are classified as Level 1 assets because market prices are readily available for these investments. Level 2 financial assets and liabilities represent the fair value of our foreign currency exchange contracts that were valued using pricing models that take into account the contract terms, as well as multiple inputs where applicable, such as currency rates.