TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )
Filed by the Registrant
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
STRIDE, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
No fee required.
 
 
 
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
 
 
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stride, Inc.
11720 Plaza America Drive
9th Floor
Reston, VA 20190


October 25, 2024
Dear Fellow Stockholders:
On behalf of our Board of Directors, I cordially invite you to attend the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Stride, Inc. (“Annual Meeting”) to be held at the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP, 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004-1304, on Thursday, December 5, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time. Details regarding the Annual Meeting and the matters to be considered by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting are described in detail in the accompanying proxy materials.
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU BE REPRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU OWN OR WHETHER OR NOT YOU ARE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON.
We urge you to vote promptly, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Please vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone, if permitted by the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares, or if you receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, please complete, sign, date and return the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction form. Voting electronically, by telephone or by returning your proxy card or voting instruction form in advance of the Annual Meeting does not deprive you of your right to attend the Annual Meeting. Thank you for your continued support of Stride.
Sincerely,

Dr. Craig R. Barrett
Chair of the Board

TABLE OF CONTENTS


NOTICE OF 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
December 5, 2024
The annual meeting of stockholders of Stride, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), will be held at the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP, 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004-1304, on Thursday, December 5, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time (“Annual Meeting”).
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to:
1.
Elect eight (8) directors to the Company’s Board of Directors each to serve for a one-year term;
2.
Consider and vote upon the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025;
3.
Consider and vote upon a non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of the named executive officers of the Company (“Say-on-Pay”); and
4.
Act upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on October 14, 2024, the record date, will receive notice of and be allowed to vote at the Annual Meeting. The foregoing matters are described in more detail in the Proxy Statement. In addition, financial and other information about the Company is contained in the Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 (“Annual Report”), which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 (“fiscal 2024”), as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 7, 2024.
We have elected to distribute our proxy materials primarily over the Internet rather than mailing paper copies of those materials to each stockholder, which will decrease our printing and distribution costs and allow for convenient access to and delivery of materials in an easily searchable format. If you would prefer to receive paper copies of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that was mailed to our stockholders on or about October 25, 2024.
For admission to the Annual Meeting, stockholders should come to the stockholder check-in table. Those who hold shares of our common stock in their own names should provide identification and have their ownership verified against the list of registered stockholders as of the close of business on the record date, October 14, 2024. Those who have beneficial ownership of stock through a broker, bank or other nominee must bring account statements or letters from the broker, bank or other nominee indicating that they owned our common stock as of the close of business on the record date, October 14, 2024. To vote at the meeting, those who have beneficial ownership of stock through a broker, bank or other nominee must bring a legal proxy, which can be obtained only from the broker, bank or other nominee.
A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting, during regular business hours, for a period of 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting, at the Company’s principal place of business at 11720 Plaza America Drive, 9th Floor, Reston, VA, 20190.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Your vote is important to us. We encourage you to read the Proxy Statement and promptly submit your proxy or voting instructions by Internet, telephone, or mail. Voting before the Annual Meeting will not prevent you from voting your shares at the Annual Meeting, if you desire to do so.
Sincerely,

​James J. Rhyu
Chief Executive Officer
Reston, VA
October 25, 2024
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder
Meeting to be Held on December 5, 2024:
The Company’s 2024 proxy statement and the 2024 Annual Report are available at
www.proxyvote.com
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please promptly submit your proxy or voting instructions by Internet, telephone, or mail. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the instructions found on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail or, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS


TABLE OF CONTENTS

STRIDE, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
December 5, 2024
This Proxy Statement is provided in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Stride, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for use at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held at the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP, 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004-1304, on Thursday, December 5, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). “Stride,” “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” each refer to Stride, Inc. The mailing address of our principal executive offices is 11720 Plaza America Drive, 9th Floor, Reston, VA, 20190. This Proxy Statement will be made available on or about October 25, 2024, to holders of record as of the close of business on October 14, 2024 of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”).
We are providing access to our proxy materials primarily over the Internet rather than mailing paper copies of those materials to each stockholder. On or about October 25, 2024, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, except for those stockholders who received paper copies of the proxy materials. The Notice tells you how to:
view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, including this Proxy Statement and the Stride, Inc. Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, on the Internet and vote; and
instruct us to send proxy materials to you by mail or email.
Record Date; Outstanding Shares; Shares Entitled to Vote
Our Board has fixed the close of business on October 14, 2024 as the record date (“Record Date”) for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, we had 43,591,694  shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Holders of record of Common Stock on the Record Date will be entitled to one vote per share on any matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
Quorum and Vote Required
A majority of the shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, the holders of which are present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting, we expect that the Annual Meeting will be adjourned or postponed to solicit additional proxies.
If a quorum is present, a plurality of votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors is required to elect the members of the Board; and an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required for (i) the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025 (“fiscal 2025”), (ii) the non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of the named executive officers (“NEOs”) of the Company, and (iii) such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Broker non-votes occur when a nominee holding shares of voting securities for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power on that proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Under the rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of shares that are held in “street name” for their clients, brokers may vote such shares on behalf of their clients with respect to “routine” matters (such as the ratification of auditors in Proposal 2), but not with respect to non-routine matters (such as Proposals 1 and 3).
Abstentions, withheld votes, and broker non-votes are included in determining whether a quorum is present. Withheld votes and broker non-votes do not affect the voting results with respect to the election of directors. However, because abstentions and broker non-votes are considered present in person or represented by proxy, abstentions and broker non-votes (if any) will have the effect of a vote against the approval of Proposals 2 and 3, which require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting.
Voting; Proxies
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please promptly submit your proxy or voting instructions by Internet, telephone, or mail. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the instructions found on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail or, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, the enclosed proxy card. If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you should have received voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from us. Simply vote using one of the methods provided by your broker, bank or other nominee to ensure that your vote is counted.
If you are a stockholder of record as of the close of business on the Record Date, you may attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares of Common Stock in person instead of voting by Internet or telephone or returning your signed proxy card (if you request a paper copy). However, we urge you to vote in advance even if you are planning to attend the Annual Meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Common Stock registered in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee to vote your shares of Common Stock in person at the Annual Meeting.
Shares of our Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting by properly executed proxies received prior to or at the Annual Meeting, and not revoked prior to or at the Annual Meeting, will be voted at the Annual Meeting, and at any adjournments, continuations or postponements of the Annual Meeting, in accordance with the instructions on the proxies.
If a proxy is duly executed and submitted without instructions, the shares of Common Stock represented by that proxy will be voted:
FOR the election of each of the Board nominees named in Proposal 1;
FOR Proposal 2, the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025;
FOR Proposal 3, the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the NEOs of the Company; and
In the discretion of the proxy holders regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Revocation
A record holder who executes a proxy may revoke it before or at the Annual Meeting by: (i) delivering to our corporate secretary a written notice of revocation of a previously delivered proxy, with such notice dated after the previously delivered proxy; (ii) duly executing, dating and delivering to our corporate secretary a subsequent proxy card; (iii) voting again by telephone; (iv) voting again via the Internet; or (v) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, in and of itself, constitute revocation of a proxy. Any written notice revoking a proxy should be delivered to Stride, Inc., Attn: General Counsel and Secretary, 11720 Plaza America Drive, 9th Floor, Reston, VA, 20190. If your shares of Common Stock are registered in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must follow the instructions of such broker, bank or other nominee to revoke a proxy.
Attending the Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting will be held on December 5, 2024 at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP, 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004-1304. For admission to the Annual Meeting, stockholders should come to the stockholder check-in table. Those who hold shares of Common Stock in their own names should provide identification and have their ownership verified against the list of registered stockholders as of the close of business on the Record Date. Those who have beneficial ownership of stock through a broker, bank or other nominee must bring account statements or letters from the broker, bank or other nominee indicating that they owned Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date.
Rules of conduct regarding the Annual Meeting will be provided during the Annual Meeting. To vote at the Annual Meeting, those who have beneficial ownership of Common Stock through a broker, bank or other nominee must bring a legal proxy, which can be obtained only from the broker, bank or other nominee.
Proxy Solicitation
We are soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting from our stockholders, and we will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies from our stockholders. Copies of solicitation materials will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians holding Common Stock for the benefit of others, so that such brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians may forward the solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. We may reimburse persons representing beneficial owners of Common Stock for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to those beneficial owners. Original solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone or personal solicitation by our directors, officers or other regular employees of the Company. No additional compensation will be paid to our directors, officers or other regular employees for these services.
The Company has retained D. F. King & Co. (“DF King”) to assist in obtaining proxies from stockholders for the Annual Meeting. The estimated cost of such services is $17,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses. DF King may be contacted at (866) 829-1035 (banks and brokers may call (212) 269-5550) or via email at Stride@dfking.com.
Business; Adjournments
We do not expect that any matter other than the proposals presented in this Proxy Statement will be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting, then the proxy holders will vote in their discretion with respect to those matters.
If a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned from time to time upon the approval of the holders of shares of Common Stock representing a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, until a quorum is present or
3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

represented. Any business may be transacted at the adjourned meeting (at which a quorum shall be present or represented) which might have been transacted at the meeting originally noticed. If the adjournment is for more than 30 days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting. We do not currently intend to seek an adjournment of the Annual Meeting.
4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(Proposal 1)
Summary
The Board currently consists of nine members, each of whose term expires at the Annual Meeting. Eight of our nine directors have been nominated for election for a term expiring at the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders. The eight nominees are: Aida M. Alvarez, Steven B. Fink, Robert E. Knowling, Jr., Allison Lawrence, Liza McFadden, James J. Rhyu, Ralph Smith and Joseph A. Verbrugge. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a director if elected, and the Company believes that each nominee will be available to serve. As previously announced, Dr. Craig R. Barrett determined not to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting and is retiring from the Board and from his role as Chair of the Board, effective at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting.
The following table highlights the balance in age and tenure and the gender and ethnic diversity of our director nominees. Also highlighted is the wide range of backgrounds and experience of the director nominees. The Board believes that this balance in age and tenure, mix of diversity and wide range of backgrounds and experience will help bring broad and valuable perspectives to the Board that will lead to a well-functioning Board.

5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Information Regarding Nominees
The names and ages of the nominees, their principal occupations and employment during the past five years, and other information regarding them are as follows.
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES
AIDA M. ALVAREZ




Age: 75

Director Since: 2017

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Independent
Professional Experience:
 
Ms. Alvarez currently serves as Chair Emerita of the Latino Community Foundation. As Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration, she was a member of President Clinton’s Cabinet from 1997 to 2001. Previously, Ms. Alvarez served as the Director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight from 1993 to 1997, where she was charged with financial oversight of the secondary housing market, the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”). Prior to that, she worked for the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Bear Stearns & Company, Inc. and the First Boston Corporation. She has served on the boards of directors of Fastly, Inc. since August 2019; Bill.com since May 2022 and HP Inc. since February 2016. From 2006 to June 2016, Ms. Alvarez served on the board of directors of Wal-Mart Stores Inc., and from 2004 to 2014, served on the boards of directors of MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation (formerly UnionBanCal Corporation) and MUFG Union Bank N.A. (formerly Union Bank N.A.). From 2014 to 2019, she served on the board of directors of Zoosk, Inc., and from 2011 to November 2022, on the board of Oportun Financial Corp. (formerly Progress Financial Corporation).
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications:
 
Ms. Alvarez holds a B.A. from Harvard College. Ms. Alvarez was selected as a director because of her financial expertise, government experience and ability to bring diverse perspectives to the Board.
6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STEVEN B. FINK



Age: 73

Director Since: 2003

Audit Committee Chair

Compensation Committee

Independent
Professional Experience:
 
Mr. Fink is the Co-Chairman of Heron International. He served as a director of Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. from 2003 to 2011 and as Chairman of the Board of Life Storage, LLC from 2013 to 2016. In addition, Mr. Fink is a member of the boards of The Jackson Laboratory, City of Hope, St. Helena Hospital, OLE Health Foundation and the Herb Ritts Foundation. From 1999 to 2009, Mr. Fink served as a director of Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. and was its Chairman from 2004 to 2009. From 2000 to 2008, Mr. Fink was the Chief Executive Officer of Lawrence Investments, LLC. Mr. Fink has also previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Anthony Manufacturing, Chairman and Managing Director of Knowledge Universe and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nextera Enterprises, Inc.
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications:
 
Mr. Fink holds a B.S. in Psychology from the University of California, Los Angeles and a J.D. and an L.L.M. from New York University. Mr. Fink was selected as a director based on his significant experience in operations and financial oversight gained as serving as director or chairman for various public and private companies, in addition to his membership on various company audit committees which enables him to contribute significantly to the financial oversight, risk oversight and governance of the Company.
7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROBERT E. KNOWLING, JR.



Age: 69

Director Since: 2018

Compensation Committee Chair

Audit Committee

Independent
Professional Experience:
 
Mr. Knowling serves as Chairman of Eagles Landing Partners, which specializes in helping senior management formulate strategy, lead organizational transformations and re-engineer businesses. From 2002 to 2005, he served as Chief Executive Officer of the NYC Leadership Academy, an independent non-profit corporation created by Chancellor Joel I. Klein and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg that is chartered with developing the next generation of principals in the New York City public school system. Mr. Knowling previously held roles as Chief Executive Officer of Telwares, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SimDesk Technologies, Inc. and Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Covad Communications. He was awarded the Wall Street Project’s Reginald Lewis Trailblazers Award by President Clinton and the Reverend Jesse Jackson in 1999. Mr. Knowling serves on the board of directors for Rite Aid Corporation, CECO Environmental Corp., Rocket Software and Stream Companies. He also previously served on the board of directors of Citrix Systems Inc. from 2020 to September 2022, Heidrick & Struggles, Inc. from 2001 to 2015, Convergys Corporation from 2017 to 2018 and Roper Technologies, Inc. from 2008 to 2021.
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications:
 
Mr. Knowling holds a B.A. in theology from Wabash College and an M.B.A. from Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University. Mr. Knowling was selected as a director based on his experience in public education, public company leadership roles, technology and organizational development.
8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ALLISON LAWRENCE



Age: 43

Director Since: 2023

Compensation Committee

Independent
Professional Experience:
 
Ms. Lawrence serves as chief impact and inclusion officer at Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., where she has held progressive leadership roles since joining in 2003, most recently as president of eCommerce in the tools and outdoor division, business president, vice president and chief of staff to the chief executive officer. As president of eCommerce, Allison led a global team as they drove the strategic expansion of the eCommerce business and evolved the organization’s digital capabilities to address the end-to-end customer journey. Ms. Lawrence currently leads the strategic development of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.’s enterprise culture and inclusion activities focused on driving business outcomes and maximizing positive impact for customers and end-users.

Ms. Lawrence also serves on the board of Hartford Hospital, one of the largest teaching hospitals in New England.
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications:
 
Ms. Lawrence holds a Bachelor of Science degree in marketing from Oklahoma State University. She also earned a Master of Business Administration from the University of Texas at Dallas. She was selected as a director because of her expertise in brand development, digital media, and eCommerce.
LIZA MCFADDEN



Age: 62

Director Since: 2017

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair

Independent
Professional Experience:
 
Ms. McFadden founded LIZA and Partners LLC which provides consulting services for nonprofits and foundations. She is the inaugural recipient of the Women Who Mean Business Award in her hometown of Tallahassee for her community service and serves on the boards of the Florida State Parks Foundation, Village Square and the Suwannee River Area Council Boy Scouts of America. Previously, she was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy from 2012 to 2018. She is a former high school teacher, Florida Department of Education administrator and served in Governor Jeb Bush’s administration. Additionally, Ms. McFadden was appointed by President George W. Bush to serve on the National Institute for Literacy Board.
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications:
 
Ms. McFadden holds an M.A. from Florida State University and a B.A. from Fitchburg State University. Ms. McFadden was selected as a director because of her expertise in educational policy and programming for adults and children, as well as her experience in working with local and state governments.
9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

JAMES J. RHYU



Age: 54

Director Since: 2021

Stride, Inc. Chief Executive Officer
Professional Experience:
 
Mr. Rhyu joined us in June 2013, serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer until April 2020. In April 2020, he was appointed the Company’s President, Corporate Strategy, Marketing and Technology. In January 2021, Mr. Rhyu was appointed and currently serves as Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Rhyu served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of Match.com, a subsidiary of publicly traded IAC/InterActiveCorp, from June 2011 to June 2013. In those roles, he was responsible for overseeing a broad range of functions, including finance, human resources, legal, information technology and operations, certain international operations and product development. Prior to his roles at Match.com, Mr. Rhyu was a Senior Vice President of Finance at Dow Jones & Company from January 2009 until May 2011, where he ran the global financial function. Previously, Mr. Rhyu served for three years as the Corporate Controller of Sirius XM Radio Inc. and its predecessor company, XM Satellite Radio, as well as serving in the same role for Graftech International. Mr. Rhyu also served six years as an auditor with Ernst & Young LLP in the United States and South America.
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications:
 
Mr. Rhyu holds a B.S. from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the London Business School.
10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RALPH SMITH



Age: 77

Director Since: 2023

Audit Committee

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Independent
Professional Experience:
 
Mr. Smith currently serves as the Managing Director of The Campaign for Grade-Level Reading (“CGLR”), which he launched in May 2010 as a project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation. The CGLR supports a national network of 350+ communities in developing and implementing plans to ensure early school success for children of economically challenged families.

From 1994 to 2016, Mr. Smith served on the senior management team at the Annie E. Casey Foundation (“AECF”), first as Director of Planning and Development, then Senior Vice President, and Executive Vice President. At AECF, Mr. Smith led a comprehensive effort to assist local communities committed to improving economic and educational outcomes for families and children in disinvested communities across the nation. He also previously served on the boards of directors of LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc. from 2005 to 2009 and Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. from 2008 to 2011. From 1983 to 1990, Mr. Smith served as Special Counsel and then as Chief of Staff and Chief Operating Officer for the School District of Philadelphia. From 1991 to 1993, he served as a senior advisor to Philadelphia’s mayor, focusing on children and family policy. Mr. Smith was a tenured member of the law faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, where he taught education law and policy, corporations, and securities regulation from 1975 to 1997.
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications:
 
Mr. Smith holds Bachelor of Arts degree from Loyola University of Los Angeles and a law degree from the University of California, Los Angeles. Mr. Smith was selected as a director because of his leadership experience in education and improving access to educational resources.
11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

JOSEPH A. VERBRUGGE



Age: 55

Director Since: 2022

Compensation Committee

Independent
Professional Experience:
 
Mr. Verbrugge served as Chief Commercial Officer of Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (“Sirius XM”), where he oversaw all commercial activities focused on marketing, subscription revenue, automotive and streaming partnerships and retail product development and sales for various SiriusXM brands from June 2022 to July 2024. Mr. Verbrugge held various senior roles at SiriusXM since 2004, including Executive Vice President, Sirius XM Digital Subscriptions. He served as a member of the board of directors of Sirius XM Canada Inc. (previously, Toronto: XSR), and since July 2020 also serves as a member of the Board of Advisors for Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business. From 1997 to 2004, Mr. Verbrugge worked as a management consultant with The Dealy Strategy Group LLC, where he advised senior leaders of media, technology and services companies on strategy, operations and transactions.
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications:
 
Mr. Verbrugge holds a doctorate in philosophy in management studies from University of Oxford, an M.B.A. from Georgetown University and a B.A. from the University of Michigan. Mr. Verbrugge was selected as a director because of his leadership experience in marketing, partnership development, strategy, operations and human resources.
Executive Officers
Set forth below is biographical information for each of our current executive officers who is not also a director.
DONNA BLACKMAN



Age: 58

Chief Financial Officer
Professional Experience:
 
Ms. Blackman has served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since July 2022, and she previously served as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer from May 2020 to June 2022. Prior to joining the Company, she served as the Senior Vice President of Business Operations at BET Networks from May 2017 to January 2019, where she oversaw finance, strategy, research, live events, security, facilities and operations. From July 2013 to May 2017, she held other senior roles at BET Networks, including Senior Vice President and Head of Finance, Senior Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis and Senior Vice President Finance and Controller. Earlier in her career, Ms. Blackman worked for Marriott International and KPMG in a variety of leadership roles in accounting and finance. Ms. Blackman earned an MBA from the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business and a B.A. in Accounting from North Carolina State University and is a certified public accountant.
12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TODD GOLDTHWAITE




Age: 54

Managing Director, Portfolio Companies
Professional Experience:
 
Mr. Goldthwaite has served as the Company’s Managing Director of Portfolio Companies since January 2022. Prior to this role, he was the Company’s Chief Marketing Officer from November 2017 to January 2022, Senior Vice President of School Management and Services from January 2015 to October 2017, and Vice President of Enrollment Operations from January 2013 to January 2015. Before joining the Company, Mr. Goldthwaite was the Vice President of Operations at Blackboard from January 2011 to January 2013. Earlier in his career, he held several executive roles in sales, marketing, customer service, and operations at MCI, which later became Verizon.
VINCENT W. MATHIS





Age: 60

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Professional Experience:
 
Mr. Mathis joined us in September 2018 and serves as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. In this role, he has executive responsibility for providing comprehensive legal counsel for our business. As previously disclosed, on October 21, 2024, Mr. Mathis submitted his resignation from all of his positions with the Company, effective November 3, 2024.
13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
Board Meetings; Attendance at Annual Meetings
Our Board met six times in person or telephonically during fiscal 2024. Each director serving on the Board in fiscal 2024 attended at least 75% of the total Board and committee meetings to which they were assigned. Our policy with respect to director attendance at the annual meeting of stockholders is to encourage, but not require, director attendance. Dr. Barrett and Mr. Rhyu were the only then-serving members of our Board to attend our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. Our director attendance policy is included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at https://investors.stridelearning.com/governance.
Independence of Directors
Our Board has affirmatively determined that each of our non-employee directors is “independent” as defined in the currently applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Mr. Rhyu is not independent under either NYSE or SEC rules because he is the CEO of the Company. If the nominees for the Board are duly elected at the Annual Meeting, then each of our directors, other than Mr. Rhyu, will serve as an independent director.
Committees
The standing committees of our Board are the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The specific functions and responsibilities of each committee are set forth in its charter, which is available on the Company’s web site at https://investors.stridelearning.com/governance and is also available in print to any stockholder who requests it.
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, membership on the committees of the Board is as follows:
Director
Audit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
Aida M. Alvarez
X
Craig R. Barrett
 
 
 
Steven B. Fink
Chair
X
Robert E. Knowling, Jr.
X
Chair
 
Allison Lawrence
X
Liza McFadden
 
 
Chair
James J. Rhyu
Ralph Smith
X
 
X
Joseph A. Verbrugge
X
14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AUDIT COMMITTEE
Members: Messrs. Fink (Chair), Knowling and Smith
Number of Meetings: 15, excluding informal meetings throughout the year
Independence and Qualifications: The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Fink, Knowling and Smith qualifies as independent under the listing standards of the NYSE and SEC regulations and that each of Messrs. Fink, Knowling and Smith is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC.
Responsibilities: The Audit Committee has a charter, available on our website at https://investors.stridelearning.com/governance, setting forth its structure, powers and responsibilities. Pursuant to the charter, the Audit Committee is comprised of at least three members appointed by our Board, each of whom satisfies the requirements of independence and financial literacy. Under its charter, the responsibilities of the Audit Committee include, among other things:
selecting an independent registered public accounting firm, including responsibility for the compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm;
discussing with our independent registered public accounting firm the conduct of the annual audit, the adequacy and effectiveness of our accounting, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and applicable requirements regarding auditor independence;
reviewing and recommending to the Board that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K;
reviewing and discussing with management quarterly financial statements, earnings press releases and other financial information or earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies;
reviewing and discussing with management significant accounting matters and disclosures;
discussing with management and assessing the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including the Company’s information technology, privacy and data security risks as informed by semi-annual presentations to the Audit Committee; and
discussing with management the Company’s significant financial risk exposure, including, but not limited to, those associated with the Company’s posture regarding environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) matters, and the actions management has taken to limit, monitor or control such measures.
In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Audit Committee charter provide that members of the Audit Committee may not serve on the audit committees of more than two other public companies at the same time as they serve on our Audit Committee unless the Board determines that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such member to effectively serve on the Audit Committee and such determination is disclosed in the Company’s annual proxy statement.
15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Members: Messrs. Fink, Knowling (Chair) and Verbrugge and Ms. Lawrence
Number of Meetings: 4
Independence and Qualifications: The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Fink, Knowling and Verbrugge and Ms. Lawrence qualifies as independent under the listing standards of the NYSE.
Responsibilities: The Compensation Committee has a charter, available on our website at https://investors.stridelearning.com/governance, setting forth its structure, powers and responsibilities. These include, among other things:
reviewing the compensation strategy of our Company;
reviewing, approving and recommending corporate goals and objectives relating to the compensation of our CEO and, based upon an evaluation of the achievement of these goals, recommending to the Board our CEO’s total compensation;
reviewing and approving salaries, bonuses and other forms of compensation for our other executive officers, including, without limitation, stock options, restricted shares and other forms of equity compensation;
considering and adopting changes to our compensation structure as applicable to all non-executive officer employees, including, but not limited to, salaries and benefits;
performing such duties and exercising such authority as may be assigned by the Board, including under the terms of our equity incentive and bonus plans;
reviewing and, if applicable, discussing with management the Company’s programs and practices for human capital management, including diversity and inclusion and internal pay and promotions equity; and
reviewing and adopting, or recommending to the Board for adoption, and overseeing and administering the Company’s compliance with, any Company clawback or compensation recovery policy (including any such policy required by applicable SEC and NYSE rules).
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Members: Mses. Alvarez and McFadden (Chair) and Mr. Smith
Number of Meetings: 4
Independence and Qualifications: The Board has determined that each of Mses. Alvarez and McFadden and Mr. Smith qualifies as independent under the listing standards of the NYSE.
Responsibilities: The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a charter, available on our website at https://investors.stridelearning.com/governance, setting forth its structure, powers and responsibilities. These include, among other things:
recommending to the Board nominees to stand for election at the annual meeting of stockholders and recommending individuals to fill vacancies on the Board;
reviewing the performance of each current director and overseeing the Board in the Board’s annual review of its performance (including its composition and organization) and the performance of management;
reviewing the Board committee structure and recommending to the Board the directors to serve as members of each committee;
making recommendations to the Board regarding governance matters; and
recommending to the Board any proposed change to the Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The director nomination process and the factors considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee when reviewing candidates are described below in “Director Nomination Process.”
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assists the Board in its oversight of the Company’s ESG programs, including the Company’s policies and practices concerning corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability.
16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Director Nomination Process
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider the following criteria, as well as any other factors it deems appropriate, in recommending candidates for election to our Board:
personal and professional integrity, ethics, values and leadership skills;
experience in corporate management, such as serving as an officer or former officer of a publicly traded company, and a general understanding of marketing, finance, accounting, operations, governance, executive compensation, cybersecurity and other elements relevant to the success of the Company in today’s business environment;
experience in the Company’s industry and political environment and an understanding of the relevant social and public policy issues facing the Company’s business, strategy and product offerings;
whether the candidate has the time required for preparation, participation and attendance at Board meetings and, if applicable, committee meetings;
potential conflicts of interest with the candidate’s other professional and personal pursuits;
experience as a board member of another publicly traded company;
academic or policy expertise in an area of the Company’s operations;
practical and mature business judgment, including the ability to make independent analytical inquiries; and
diversity of the Board, which includes gender, racial and ethnic diversity, as well as a diversity of backgrounds and experiences.
The Board strives to nominate directors with a variety of complementary skills so that, as a group, the Board will possess a mix of the appropriate backgrounds, gender, race/ethnicity, perspectives, skills and expertise to oversee the Company’s business. Our nine-member Board has one Hispanic director, one Asian American director, three African American directors and three female directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders, in the same manner and using the same criteria as for other candidates, provided such recommendations are submitted in writing not later than the close of business on the 90th day, or earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, prior to the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Such recommendations should include the name and address and other pertinent information about the candidate as is required to be included in the Company’s proxy statement. Recommendations should be submitted to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at Stride, Inc., 11720 Plaza America Drive, 9th Floor, Reston, VA, 20190, Attention: General Counsel and Secretary. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the criteria set forth above and other relevant information when evaluating director candidates recommended by stockholders.
Communications with Directors
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Board, individually or as a group, by sending an email to our General Counsel at OGC@K12.com, or by mailing a letter to Stride, Inc., 11720 Plaza America Drive, 9th Floor, Reston, VA, 20190, Attention: General Counsel and Secretary. Our General Counsel will monitor these communications and provide summaries of all received communications to our Board at its regularly scheduled
17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

meetings. Where the nature of a communication warrants, our General Counsel may decide to seek the more immediate attention of the appropriate committee of the Board or an individual director, or our management or independent advisors and will determine whether any response is necessary.
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board is comprised of independent, accomplished and experienced directors who provide advice and oversight of management to further the interests of the Company and its stockholders. Our governance framework provides the Board with the flexibility to determine an optimal organizational structure for leadership and engagement while ensuring appropriate insight into, and oversight of, the operations, management and strategic issues of the Company. The Board has evaluated its leadership structure and determined that, effective at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, Mr. Rhyu should serve as CEO and Executive Chair of the Board, and Mr. Fink should serve as the Lead Independent Director. The Board believes that having Mr. Rhyu as the Executive Chair and CEO and Mr. Fink as the Lead Independent Director will provide effective independent oversight of management while allowing both the Board and management to benefit from Mr. Rhyu’s leadership and years of experience in the Company’s business and industry.
Chief Executive Officer. Our Board elects a CEO who is responsible for the strategic direction and day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, subject to the overall direction and supervision of the Board and its committees. The CEO is responsible for developing our culture and overall Company vision, managing, overseeing and evaluating the executive officers and other key employees that report directly to the CEO and serving as the principal external spokesperson for the Company.
Executive Chair. Our Board elects a chair from among the directors and determines whether to separate or combine the roles of Chair and CEO based on what it believes best serves the needs of the Company and its stockholders at any particular time. Both approaches have been taken depending on the circumstances, and this determination is communicated to stockholders. The determination to elect Mr. Rhyu as Executive Chair of the Board, effective at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, was based on a number of factors that made him particularly well-suited for the role. These factors included his position as the Company’s CEO and his prior positions as the Company’s CFO and President, Corporate Strategy, Marketing and Technology, along with his understanding of the Company’s business and day-to-day operations, growth opportunities, challenges and risk management practices. This combination of Company experience and expertise enables Mr. Rhyu to provide strong and effective leadership to the Board and to ensure that the Board is informed of important issues.
Role and Responsibilities of the Executive Chair of the Board include:
in consultation with our Lead Independent Director, setting the agenda for the regular and special meetings of the Board;
chairing meetings of the Board;
presiding at the annual meeting of stockholders; and
performing such other functions and responsibilities as set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, or as requested by the Board.
Lead Independent Director. A Lead Independent Director is appointed by the Board to serve in such role at any time that the Chair of the Board is not independent. The Board may also designate a Lead Independent Director at such other times as the Board deems appropriate and may modify its leadership structure in the future as it deems appropriate. The determination to elect Mr. Fink as Lead Independent Director, effective at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, was based on a
18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

number of factors that made him particularly well-suited for the role. These factors included his current service as Chair of our Audit Committee, along with his significant experience in operations and financial oversight gained as serving as director or chairman for various public and private companies and his understanding of the Company’s business, growth opportunities, challenges and risk management practices. A key role of the Lead Independent Director is to facilitate communications between the Executive Chair and CEO and independent directors and the committees of the Board. The Board believes that the Lead Independent Director will provide additional independent oversight of executive management and Board matters.
Role and Responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director include:
chairing and setting the agenda for all executive sessions of the independent directors and any sessions of independent directors that a management director is invited to attend;
chairing meetings of the Board when the Executive Chair and CEO is unable to attend;
consulting with the Executive Chair and CEO as to the agenda for Board meetings and with the committee Chairs as to the agendas for committee meetings where appropriate;
calling meetings of the independent directors and/or the non-management directors as needed;
meeting regularly with the Executive Chair and CEO to discuss information required from management by the Board to perform its duties;
reviewing with the Executive Chair and CEO and the Chair of the Compensation Committee the results of the annual performance evaluation of the Executive Chair and CEO;
serving as a liaison between the Executive Chair and CEO and the other directors with respect to informal communications between Board meetings, if desired, thereby giving guidance to management in meeting the objectives set by the Board and monitoring compliance with corporate governance policies; and
meeting with stockholders without management present, together with one or more independent directors selected by the Lead Independent Director, if requested by a stockholder and otherwise deemed appropriate by the Lead Independent Director, and reporting to the Board regarding any such meetings.
Executive Sessions of the Board. Our Board holds executive sessions without management directors or management present at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. The independent directors also may meet without management present at other times as requested by any independent director. The Lead Independent Director will have the authority to call meetings of the independent directors and chair executive sessions of the Board during which no members of management are present. These meetings are intended to provide the Lead Independent Director with information that he can use to assist the Executive Chair and CEO to function in the most effective manner. Mr. Fink will chair the executive sessions of the Board once he begins to serve as Lead Independent Director, effective at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting.
Risk Oversight
Our Board believes full and open communication with management is essential for effective enterprise risk management and oversight. Members of our Board discuss strategy and risks facing the Company with our CEO and our senior management at meetings of the Board, or when members of our Board seek to raise and focus on a particular area of risk, such as meeting state academic accountability standards at the schools we manage, ensuring the privacy of student information, compliance with state regulatory and reporting requirements, or information
19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

technology cybersecurity protections and preparedness. Because our CEO and Chair of the Board set the agenda for Board meetings, each functional division of the Company can identify and bring to our Board’s or Board committees’ attention risk-related topics that may require added focus, which have included: evolving state curriculum standards, student engagement and retention, education technology, legal and policy matters, information security and succession planning. Our CEO also periodically presents to our Board on the strategic, financial and operational issues facing the Company, which frequently includes a review of associated risks and opportunities.
Management is responsible for identifying, prioritizing, remediating and monitoring the day-to-day management of risks that the Company faces and applying the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, while our Board, as a whole and through its committees, is responsible for the oversight of enterprise risk management. In fiscal 2024, the Audit Committee continued to work directly with a major independent accounting firm to support the Company’s internal audit function in risk management. This combination provides us with the focus, scope, expertise, alignment and continuous attention necessary for effective risk management and disclosures.
While our Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, three of its committees concentrate on specific risk areas:
The Audit Committee oversees financial reporting and internal controls, school and corporate compliance, cybersecurity and operations risk and discusses with management the Company’s policies with respect to those matters. Our internal audit department prepares risk management reports that are provided to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis, or as needed. The Audit Committee receives regular reports from management, including the Chief Information Security Officer, on our cybersecurity risks. In addition, management updates the Committee on any cybersecurity incidents it considers to be significant or potentially significant. The Audit Committee reports to the full Board regarding its activities, including those related to cybersecurity. In addition, the Audit Committee assists the Board in the oversight of legal risk management. A Legal Compliance and Ethics Committee (consisting of senior management members) maintains a Legal Compliance and Ethics Program, which includes a Chief Compliance Officer. The Legal Compliance and Ethics Committee provides reports to the Audit Committee on the Company’s legal risks and compliance-related matters in the schools we serve and at the corporate level.
Our Compensation Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs and retains outside compensation and legal experts for that purpose.
Finally, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with the organization, membership and structure, or design, of the Board, succession planning and corporate governance.
The Board committees may retain independent counsel, experts or advisors as provided for in their charters, and the Board as a whole has access to such advisors and such other independent advisors that the Company retains or that the Board considers necessary to discharge its responsibilities, including in connection with risk oversight.
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
In fiscal 2024, pursuant to our Amended Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan (“Directors Compensation Plan”), our non-employee directors were eligible to receive annual cash retainers for service on our Board and assigned committees and restricted stock awards. Mr. Rhyu, our CEO, received no additional compensation for his service on our Board.
Pursuant to the terms of the Directors Compensation Plan, each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer of $70,000, the Lead Independent Director, if applicable, receives
20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

an additional $25,000, the non-executive Chair of our Board, if applicable, receives an additional $100,000 and each non-employee director receives an additional amount for each committee on which the non-employee director serves, as shown below:
Additional Cash Retainer
Committee
Chair
Member
Audit Committee
$35,000
$10,000
Compensation Committee
$25,000
$10,000(1)
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
$15,000
$10,000(2)
(1)
Effective July 31, 2024, our Board increased the annual cash retainer for members of the Compensation Committee to $10,000 from $5,000.
(2)
Effective July 31, 2024, our Board increased the annual cash retainer for the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to $10,000 from $5,000.
In December 2023, each non-employee director received an annual restricted stock award valued at $200,000 as of the grant date, with the shares of our Common Stock underlying such awards vesting fully on the earlier of (a) one year from the date of grant, or (b) the date of the next annual meeting of our stockholders occurring after the date of grant. In addition, the restricted stock awards vest on an accelerated basis upon a non-employee director’s termination of service by reason of death, disability or upon a change in control of the Company. The annual cash retainer, including the committee fees, and the annual restricted stock awards may be deferred in the form of deferred stock units under our Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“Directors Deferred Compensation Plan”). In July 2024, the Board approved an increase to the value of the annual restricted stock award to $250,000 from $200,000, effective as of the Annual Meeting.
Fiscal 2024 Director Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for their services during fiscal 2024, including amounts that were deferred under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan:
Name
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
Stock Awards
($)(1)
All Other
Compensation
($)(2)
Total
($)
Aida M. Alvarez(3)
75,000
200,000
275,000
Craig R. Barrett(4)
170,000
200,000
370,000
Robert L. Cohen(5)
63,750
200,000
63,750
327,500
Steven B. Fink(6)
110,000
200,000
310,000
Robert E. Knowling, Jr.(7)
104,266
200,000
304,266
Allison Lawrence(8)
75,000
200,000
275,000
Liza McFadden(9)
84,633
200,000
284,633
Ralph Smith(10)
49,093
232,749
281,842
Joseph A. Verbrugge(11)
75,000
200,000
275,000
(1)
Represents the aggregate grant date fair values of restricted stock awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 718. On December 7, 2023, each non-employee director who held such position on the date of the annual meeting was eligible to receive a restricted stock award as discussed above. Ms. McFadden,
21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ms. Lawrence and Mr. Verbrugge elected to receive their awards in deferred stock units under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Additionally, Mr. Smith elected to receive his award partially in deferred stock units. Mr. Smith has also elected to receive a portion of his board compensation in deferred stock units.
(2)
Represents consulting fees paid to Mr. Cohen. Concurrent with Mr. Cohen’s resignation from our Board, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Cohen dated February 8, 2024 (the “Consulting Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Cohen would provide certain strategic advisory services. The term of the Consulting Agreement ended on February 23, 2024.
(3)
As of June 30, 2024, Ms. Alvarez held 3,324 unvested restricted shares.
(4)
As of June 30, 2024, Mr. Barrett held 3,324 unvested restricted shares.
(5)
Effective February 8, 2024, Mr. Cohen resigned from our Board. As of June 30, 2024, Mr. Cohen held no unvested restricted shares.
(6)
As of June 30, 2024, Mr. Fink held 3,324 unvested restricted shares.
(7)
As of June 30, 2024, Mr. Knowling held 3,324 unvested restricted shares.
(8)
As of June 30, 2024, Ms. Lawrence held 3,324 unvested deferred stock units.
(9)
As of June 30, 2024, Ms. McFadden held 3,324 unvested deferred stock units.
(10)
As of June 30, 2024, Mr. Smith held 831 unvested restricted shares and 2,493 unvested deferred stock units.
(11)
As of June 30, 2024, Mr. Verbrugge held 3,324 unvested deferred stock units.
Please see the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management table below for additional information on the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock by each of our directors.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Company encourages each director to purchase shares of our Common Stock and to maintain a minimum ownership level during his or her tenure to foster alignment with our stockholders. To reinforce this objective, we maintain minimum director stock ownership guidelines for all of our non-employee directors. Pursuant to those guidelines, non-employee directors must hold shares of our Common Stock equal to the lesser of: (i) three times the annual cash retainer or (ii) 15,000 shares. Non-employee directors must be in compliance with this policy by September 28, 2021 or five years after they begin service on our Board, whichever date is later. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, all of our non-employee directors are in compliance with this policy or are within the period to accumulate the specified level of ownership.
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
Our non-employee directors may elect, pursuant to our Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, to defer payment of all or a portion of their cash and equity compensation for service on our Board. In the case of a deferral of an equity award, the non-employee director is granted an equal amount of deferred stock units in lieu of restricted shares. Deferred stock units granted in lieu of a restricted stock award are subject to the same vesting requirements or other restrictions that would have applied to such restricted stock award.
In the case of a deferral of cash compensation, the non-employee director receives a number of deferred stock units equal to the amount of the cash compensation being deferred, divided by the per-share closing price of a share of our Common Stock on the date that the cash compensation would have been paid but for the deferral. Deferred stock units credited in lieu of cash compensation are fully vested.
Deferred stock units generally become payable, in a lump sum, within 90 days of the date the non-employee director no longer serves on our Board. Deferred stock units are settled in shares of our Common Stock or cash, at the Company’s discretion.
22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Board oversees the management of the Company and its business for the benefit of our stockholders in order to enhance stockholder value over the long term and to achieve its educational mission. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to assist it in the exercise of its responsibilities. The Guidelines are reviewed annually and periodically amended as the Board enhances the Company’s corporate governance practices. The Board has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees. The purpose of this code is to promote honest and ethical conduct for conducting the business of the Company, consistent with the highest standards of business ethics. The Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on our website at https://investors.stridelearning.com/governance.
Our corporate governance and business conduct best practices include:
regular executive sessions of non-management directors;
independent directors except our CEO;
a Chair of the Board who is an independent director;
an over-boarding policy limiting other board service;
non-employee director and executive officer stock ownership guidelines; and
a policy prohibiting hedging, pledging and short sales of our securities.
We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), regarding any amendment to, or waiver from a material provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics involving our principal executive, financial or accounting officer or controller by posting such information on our website.
Related Party Transactions
We recognize that related party transactions present a heightened risk of conflicts of interest and have adopted a written policy to which all related party transactions shall be subject. Pursuant to the policy, the Audit Committee of our Board, or in the case of a transaction in which the aggregate amount is, or is expected to be, in excess of $250,000, the Board, will review the relevant facts and circumstances of all related party transactions, including, but not limited to: (i) whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party; and (ii) the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction. Pursuant to the policy, no director, including the Chair of the Audit Committee, may participate in any approval of a related party transaction to which he or she is a related party. The Board or Audit Committee, as applicable, will then, in its sole discretion, either approve or disapprove the transaction.
Certain types of transactions, which would otherwise require individual review, have been pre-approved by the Audit Committee. These types of transactions include, for example: (i) compensation to an officer or non-employee director where such compensation is required to be disclosed in our proxy statement; (ii) transactions where the interest of the related party arises only by way of a directorship or minority stake in another organization that is a party to the transaction; and (iii) transactions involving competitive bids or fixed rates. Material related party transactions are required to be disclosed to the full Board. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of our related party transaction policy, all related party transactions are required to be disclosed in our applicable filings with the SEC, to the extent required by applicable SEC rules and regulations. We have established internal policies relating to disclosure controls and procedures, which include policies relating to the reporting of related party transactions that must be pre-approved under our related party transactions policy.
23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During all or a portion of fiscal 2024, Messrs. Fink, Knowling and Verbrugge and Ms. Lawrence served on our Compensation Committee. During fiscal 2024, there were no interlocking relationships existing between members of our Board and our Compensation Committee and members of the board of directors or the compensation committee of any other company. During fiscal 2024, no members of the Compensation Committee were current or former officers of the Company or were employees of the Company and no members of the Compensation Committee had any relationship requiring disclosure by the Company under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.
Audit Committee Report
In accordance with a written charter adopted by the Board, the Audit Committee, or the “Committee,” assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial reporting processes and its internal audit function. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls and for assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and for issuing reports thereon.
In this context, the Committee has met and held discussions with management, the independent auditors and internal audit, as well as legal counsel. Management represented to the Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent auditors. The Committee discussed with the independent auditors matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC.
In addition, the Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence from the Company and its management.
The Committee discussed with the Company’s internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Committee meets with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, the evaluations of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s accounting principles.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, filed with the SEC on August 7, 2024.
Members of the Audit Committee

Steven B. Fink (Chair)
Robert E. Knowling, Jr.
Ralph Smith
The foregoing report is not “soliciting material,” shall not be deemed “filed” and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy
24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Exchange Act (together, the “Acts”), except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under the Acts.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services
BDO USA, P.C. (“BDO”) was the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2024 and June 30, 2023. BDO has billed the Company the following fees for professional services rendered in respect of fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023:
2024
2023
Audit Fees
$1,612,000
$1,404,000
Audit-Related Fees
$47,120
Tax Fees
All Other Fees
$61,623
Total
$1,673,623
$1,451,120
Audit fees are for professional services for the Company’s annual audit, including the audit of internal control over financial reporting for fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, reviews of the interim financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other professional services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit-related fees in fiscal 2023 were for professional services associated with audits of certain managed schools and other minor matters. All other fees in fiscal 2024 were related to a legal matter.
The Audit Committee maintains policies and procedures for the pre-approval of work performed by the independent auditors in that, under the Audit Committee charter, all auditor engagements must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. All of the services provided to the Company by BDO during fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
(Proposal 2)
The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2025. Although ratification is not required by law, our Board believes that our stockholders should be given the opportunity to express their view on the subject. While not binding on the Audit Committee, if our stockholders do not ratify this appointment, the appointment will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. A representative of KPMG is expected to attend the Annual Meeting, and this representative will be provided with an opportunity to make a statement, if he or she desires, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders, if any. We do not expect that a representative of BDO will be present at the Annual Meeting.
As previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2024, on August 15, 2024, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025 and the dismissal of BDO as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, each effective immediately.
BDO’s (i) reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which were included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, and (ii) reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which were included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that the reports of BDO dated August 15, 2023 noted that BDO audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2023 and expressed an adverse opinion thereon due to a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting relating to a lack of effective information technology general controls related to user access, program change, and data processing over information technology systems used by the Company for financial reporting.
During fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, and the subsequent interim period through August 15, 2024, there were: (i) no disagreements within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K between the Company and BDO on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to BDO’s satisfaction, would have caused BDO to make reference thereto in BDO’s reports; and (ii) other than the material weakness noted above, no “reportable events” within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
During fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, and the subsequent interim period through August 15, 2024, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf has consulted with KPMG regarding: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the Company that KPMG concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue; (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K; or (iii) any “reportable event” within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify the appointment of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2025.
27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
(Proposal 3)
In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our stockholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the fiscal 2024 compensation of our NEOs, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the design and effectiveness of our executive compensation program.
As described in detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain our NEOs, who are critical to our success. Under this program, our NEOs are rewarded for the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals, and the realization of increased stockholder value. Please read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the compensation tables that follow for additional details about our executive compensation program, including information about the fiscal 2024 compensation of our NEOs, our engagement with stockholders in fiscal 2024 relating to our executive compensation program and the responsive actions we have taken in and subsequent to fiscal 2024.
We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our NEOs as described in this Proxy Statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote FOR the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.”
The Say-on-Pay vote is advisory and, therefore, not binding on the Company, our Compensation Committee, or our Board. Our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders, and to the extent there is a significant vote against the NEO compensation, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and will evaluate what, if any, further actions are necessary to address those concerns. We expect to hold our next Say-on-Pay vote at our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the compensation of our NEOs.
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE “FOR” THE NON-BINDING ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NEOs, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SEC.
28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP BY CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of October 14, 2024, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of Common Stock by each beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s voting securities (based solely on review of filings with the SEC), each director and each NEO and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, except as qualified by the information set forth in the notes to this table. To our knowledge, except as noted below, no person or entity is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the voting power of the Company’s voting securities. As of October 14, 2024, 43,591,694 shares of our Common Stock were outstanding.
Unless otherwise noted, the address for each director and executive officer is c/o Stride, Inc., 11720 Plaza America Drive, 9th Floor, Reston, VA, 20190.
Shares Beneficially Owned(1)
Shares of
Common
Stock
Percent
James J. Rhyu(2)
686,278
1.57%
Donna Blackman(3)
85,452
*
Todd Goldthwaite(4)
93,086
*
Vincent W. Mathis(5)
60,759
*
Les Ottolenghi(6)
54,547
*
Aida M. Alvarez(7)
41,803
*
Craig R. Barrett(8)
77,452
*
Steven B. Fink(9)
173,610
*
Robert E. Knowling, Jr.(10)
37,770
*
Allison Lawrence(11)
6,859
*
Liza McFadden(12)
28,274
*
Ralph Smith(13)
8,021
*
Joseph A. Verbrugge(14)
10,853
*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (12 persons)(15)
1,310,217
3.00%
BlackRock, Inc.(16)
6,747,241
15.48%
The Vanguard Group(17)
4,946,552
11.35%
Dimensional Fund Advisors(18)
2,990,025
6.86%
*
Denotes less than 1%.
(1)
Beneficial ownership of shares is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person or entity exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to applicable community property laws, to our knowledge, each stockholder identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by the stockholder. The number of shares beneficially owned by a person or entity includes shares of Common Stock subject to options held by that person or entity that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of October 14, 2024 and not subject to repurchase as of that date. Shares issuable pursuant to options and deferred stock units are deemed outstanding for calculating the percentage ownership of the person holding the options but are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person.
(2)
Includes 208,418 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock that are subject to forfeiture.
(3)
Includes 56,922 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock that are subject to forfeiture.
(4)
Includes 6,914 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock that are subject to forfeiture.
29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(5)
Includes 27,538 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock that are subject to forfeiture.
(6)
Based solely on publicly available filings with the SEC, including the Form 4 filed on February 21, 2024.
(7)
Includes 3,324 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock that are subject to forfeiture.
(8)
Includes 3,324 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock that are subject to forfeiture.
(9)
Includes 3,324 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock that are subject to forfeiture. Mr. Fink has voting and investment control with respect to the securities held by S&C Fink Living Trust.
(10)
Includes 3,324 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock that are subject to forfeiture.
(11)
Includes 3,324 deferred stock units that are subject to forfeiture.
(12)
Includes 3,324 deferred stock units that are subject to forfeiture.
(13)
Includes 831 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock and 2,493 deferred stock units. The unvested shares of restricted Common Stock and deferred stock units are subject to forfeiture.
(14)
Includes 3,324 deferred stock units that are subject to forfeiture.
(15)
Includes 313,919 unvested shares of restricted Common Stock and 12,465 deferred stock units. The unvested shares of restricted Common Stock and deferred stock units are subject to forfeiture.
(16)
Based solely on publicly available filings with the SEC, including the Schedule 13G/A filed on January 22, 2024. The address for BlackRock, Inc. is 50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001.
(17)
Based solely on publicly available filings with the SEC, including the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2024. The address for The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(18)
Based solely on publicly available filings with the SEC, including the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 9, 2024. The address for Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One, Austin, TX 78746.
30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Section
Page
Executive Summary
What Guides our Program
Compensation-Setting Process
Fiscal 2024 Executive Compensation Program in Detail
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements
Other Executive Compensation Practices and Policies
This section sets forth the objectives and elements of our executive compensation program, describes the related processes of our Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) and discusses the compensation earned or received by and paid to our named executive officers (our “NEOs”) for fiscal 2024. For fiscal 2024, our NEOs were:
Named Executive Officer
Role
James J. Rhyu
Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”)
Donna Blackman
Chief Financial Officer
Todd Goldthwaite
Managing Director, Portfolio Companies(1)
Vincent W. Mathis
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary(2)
Les Ottolenghi
Former Chief Information and Technology Officer(3)
(1)
Mr. Goldthwaite was designated as an executive officer in December 2023.
(2)
On October 21, 2024, Mr. Mathis submitted his resignation as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, effective as of November 3, 2024.
(3)
Effective March 8, 2024, we terminated the employment of Mr. Ottolenghi, our former Chief Information and Technology Officer (“CITO”), without cause. In connection with the termination of his employment, we entered into a separation agreement and release of claims with Mr. Ottolenghi, pursuant to which Mr. Ottolenghi is entitled to certain severance payments and benefits, as described in the section “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Employment Agreements” below.
Executive Summary
Fiscal 2024 Overview — Where We Are Today
Stride delivered strong financial and operational performance during fiscal 2024. We achieved our eighth straight year of revenue growth and delivered record profitability. Increased demand for our online educational solutions led to year-over-year first quarter enrollment growth for the first time since the pandemic. We also saw strong in-year enrollments and retention, resulting in the second straight year where we finished the school year with more enrollments than we started with. We believe that our business remains uniquely positioned to help the academic community by offering a seamless education experience for students, families and school districts, as the world continues to change. In November 2023, we outlined fiscal 2028 financial targets, and our results this year leave us confident in our ability to achieve those targets.
From our inception in 1999, we have offered curriculum, instructional support services and products through our educational platform, which is designed to facilitate individualized learning for students in kindergarten through 12th grade. We have also expanded our offerings to address the nation’s growing skills and labor gap with programs in Career Learning and solutions for the Adult Learning market.
31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fiscal 2024 Business Highlights
The Committee believes that performance-based compensation incentivizes our executive officers to promote the overall success of our business and aligns managements’ interests with those of our stockholders. Consistent with this philosophy, we reward our executive officers for great performance relative to our key financial and operational metrics that drive stockholder value creation.
Fiscal 2024 highlights include:
Strong Operating Performance. We set rigorous goals for the financial performance metrics under our Executive Bonus Plan and long-term incentive performance awards and delivered solid results for the year. The following table illustrates our strong financial performance for fiscal 2024 (in millions).
Metric
Fiscal 2024
Actual
Performance
Fiscal 2023
Actual
Performance
Percentage
Increase over
Fiscal 2023
Revenue
$2,040.1
$1,837.4
11.0%
Income from Operations
$249.6
$165.5
50.8%
Net Income
$204.2
$126.9
60.9%
Adjusted Operating Income
$293.9
$201.0
46.2%
Adjusted EBITDA
$390.7
$296.2
31.9%
Please refer to the discussion titled “Fiscal 2024 Executive Compensation Program in Detail” beginning on page 43 for a discussion of how Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP financial measures, are calculated. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are provided in Appendix A.
Strong Demand for Offerings. We continue to see strong demand for our full-time, online educational offering, finishing our third quarter fiscal 2024 with more than 198,000 students – a record number of enrollments for Stride. Parents, families and students continue to seek alternatives to the current educational system with surveys showing more than 50% of parents are likely to consider a different school for their student over the next year.
32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fiscal 2024 Financial Results





33

TABLE OF CONTENTS



Fiscal 2024 Executive Compensation Program Highlights
Our executive compensation program for fiscal 2024 largely retained the same design used in fiscal 2023, except that our NEOs, other than our CEO, were granted long-term incentive awards in newly-formed Company subsidiaries, as described further below under “Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”
Market Driven Base Salary Increases. Our NEOs received base salary increases based on an assessment of pay levels in our compensation peer group and to ensure internal equity alignment.
Annual Bonus Payments Tied to Strong Financial Performance. For purposes of our Executive Bonus Plan, our NEOs’ performance for fiscal 2024 was, consistent with the fiscal 2023 design, measured based on the attainment of pre-established targets for two individual metrics: revenue and Adjusted EBITDA (with each metric equally weighted). Bonus payments to our executive officers were to be paid at 50% of an individual’s target bonus if threshold performance was achieved, target bonus was to be earned if target performance was achieved, and there was the ability to earn up to 200% of target bonus if the maximum “outperform” performance level was achieved. Results between performance levels were to be interpolated linearly. Performance on both metrics, revenue and Adjusted EBITDA, exceeded the target performance level for fiscal 2024.
34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Long-Term Incentives Weighted Towards Performance-Based Awards. With respect to our long-term incentive compensation awards, 60% of the total annual equity award value granted to our NEOs was granted as performance stock unit (“PSU”) awards tied to three-year performance metrics related to financial performance (adjusted operating income) and stock price growth, and the remaining 40% was granted as restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) with back-loaded, semi-annual vesting over three years, consistent with fiscal 2023. As with our Executive Bonus Plan, threshold, target and “outperform” performance levels were established for the PSU awards, with award earning potential for our executive officers at 50%, 100% and 200% of the target award payments, respectively.
Compensation Mix
The following charts illustrate the target total direct compensation mix of our CEO and our other NEOs for fiscal 2024, excluding our former CITO. These charts show that a majority of our NEOs’ target total direct compensation was performance-based (60% for our CEO and an average of 55% for our other NEOs (excluding our former CITO)).

Good Governance Practices
We employ certain executive compensation policies and practices to align our executive officers’ compensation with stockholder interests. Listed below are the key compensation policies and practices we employ and certain policies and practices we do not employ because we believe they would not serve the long-term interests of our stockholders.
What We Do
What We Don’t Do
Pay for Performance. A significant portion of our executive officers’ target total direct compensation is not guaranteed but is linked to our financial and operational performance. In fiscal 2024, in the case of our CEO, 60% of his target total direct compensation was performance-based, while 40% was retention-oriented. As for our other NEOs (excluding our former CITO), on average, 55% of their target total direct compensation was performance-based, while 45% was retention-oriented.
No Guaranteed Bonuses or Equity Awards. We do not pay guaranteed bonuses and have no guaranteed equity-based awards. This ensures that we are able to base all compensation awards (other than retention-based equity awards) on measurable performance-based objectives and operational results.
35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What We Do
What We Don’t Do
Align Compensation to Growth in Stockholder Value. A portion of our multi-year long-term equity incentive program is tied to growth in our stock price which directly aligns to stockholder interests.
No Excessive Executive Perquisites. We provide nominal perquisites to our executive officers, which are limited to payment of supplemental long-term disability and life insurance premiums, the opportunity to receive a Company-paid physical examination and, when appropriate, reimbursement of relocation expenses and temporary housing expenses.
Establish Performance Objectives Aligned to Business Strategy. Our Executive Bonus Plan and long-term equity incentive program utilize performance-based objectives that the Committee believes are rigorous and challenging.
No Tax Reimbursements or Gross-Ups. We do not provide income tax “gross-ups” for personal or broad-based benefits nor excise tax “gross-ups” for change in control payments or benefits.
Target Pay Competitively. We seek to target total direct compensation within a competitive range of our compensation peer group and seek to deliver greater compensation only for superior performance.
No Pension or Supplemental Retirement Plans. We do not provide retirement benefits to our executive officers that reward longevity rather than contributions to Company performance.
Use Meaningful Vesting Conditions to Promote Retention. Performance-based equity awards under our long-term equity incentive program are earned and vest only to the extent that the applicable performance targets are attained and remain subject to additional time-based vesting thereafter to encourage retention if the performance period is less than three years. Generally, time-based RSAs vest over three years, with greater vesting in years two and three to further promote retention.
No Repricing of Stock Options without Stockholder Approval. Our Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Award Plan expressly prohibits repricing of stock options without stockholder approval.
Carefully Consider Stockholder Input. We regularly seek and engage in dialogue with our stockholders on executive compensation matters. Ongoing enhancements to our executive compensation program are influenced by these discussions.
 
 
Maintain a Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy. We have adopted a compensation recovery policy as required by Rule 10D-1 under the Exchange Act and the corresponding listing standards of The New York Stock Exchange, which provides for the mandatory recovery of certain erroneously awarded incentive compensation from our current and former executive officers in the event of an accounting restatement.
No “Single Trigger” Cash Change in Control Payments. We maintain a “double trigger” policy with respect to cash severance, whereby severance in connection with a change in control of the Company also generally requires a qualifying termination of employment.
36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What We Do
What We Don’t Do
Require Mandatory Stock Ownership. All of our executive officers and our non-employee directors are required to maintain a minimum ownership level of our Common Stock. These minimum share ownership requirements are five times base salary for our CEO, three times base salary for all other executive officers and the lesser of three times their annual cash retainer or 15,000 shares for our non-employee directors.
No Hedging or Pledging. Our insider trading policy specifically prohibits short sales, hedging and margin transactions and our Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Award Plan prohibits pledging of any award granted under the plan unless otherwise permitted by the plan Administrator.
Perform Competitive Market Analysis. The Committee reviews competitive market data provided by its independent compensation consultant for our executive officers prior to making annual executive compensation decisions. These reviews are done semi-annually.
 
 
Analyze Compensation Program Risk. We review our executive and other compensation programs annually to ensure that they do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking.
 
 
Say-on-Pay Results and Stockholder Engagement
At our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 93% of the votes cast (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) voted to approve the compensation of our NEOs for fiscal 2023. The Committee believes this advisory vote affirmed stockholder support of actions taken with respect to executive compensation for fiscal 2023, and, therefore, the Committee did not fundamentally change the executive compensation program in fiscal 2024. However, even with this high level of support, the Committee continues to proactively engage with and gather feedback from our stockholders and, where appropriate, may implement additional changes in our executive compensation program in an effort to further enhance the effectiveness of such program and the competitiveness of our pay relative to our peers, and to continue to align compensation with the interests of our stockholders. The Committee will continue to consider the outcome of our annual say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for our executive officers, and the Company will continue to engage with and seek feedback from our stockholders to understand their views on our executive compensation program.
As a part of our ongoing commitment to stockholder engagement, at various times during fiscal 2024 we invited our top stockholders, representing more than 75% of our shares outstanding, to speak with our Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Chief Human Resources Officer, VP of Investor Relations and the Compensation Committee Chair. Five of our significant stockholders accepted this invitation and met with Company representatives to discuss various topics, including executive compensation. We also received written feedback from other stockholders which was shared with management and the Board. The stockholders we spoke with were appreciative of our continued outreach and transparent disclosure and were supportive of our executive compensation program, which rewards executives for delivering long-term value for our stockholders.
37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What Guides Our Program
Our Principles-Based Philosophy
Our executive compensation program is guided by basic principles that we seek to incorporate in our executive pay practices:

Link Compensation to Performance and Stockholder Interests
Compensation levels should reflect our actual performance, consistent with our business strategy, and be aligned with stockholder interests. Compensation programs should also reflect best practices and stockholder input.
Engage Independent Compensation Consultant
The Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to advise the Committee and evaluate the alignment of pay and performance relative to our compensation peer group and compensation risk.
Maintain Competitive Compensation Levels
Levels of compensation should be competitive with those in our peer group, as well as comparable companies in the technology industry to attract, retain and reward our employees.
Reflect our Industry Circumstances and Unique Business
We strive to tailor our executive compensation program to take account of the interests of our stockholders and our industry as we execute on our long-term financial and operational business strategy.
38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay Versus Performance
Our performance assessment framework and executive compensation program is designed to link pay and performance in the following ways:
Metric
Determination and Link to Performance
Purpose
Base Salary
Evaluated annually by the Committee and reviewed in light of market pay practices, retention, and each individual’s experience and critical skills.
Provide an annual income necessary to retain our executive officers.
Executive Bonus Plan
Annual performance determines payments. Ties a meaningful portion of target annual cash compensation to attaining pre-established performance goals.
Focus our executive officers on attaining financial, operational and strategic performance objectives from year to year.
Long-Term Incentives
Time-based restricted stock awards: Encourage retention of our executive officers by vesting over three years.

Performance-based restricted stock unit awards: Performance targets are established based on meaningful and rigorous metrics that drive stockholder value creation. No awards will be earned if performance fails to achieve threshold performance level.
Enhance retention of key executive officers who drive consistent performance.

Motivate and reward our executive officers for achievement of long-term performance objectives that increase stockholder value.
Other Compensation
Our executive officers may participate in benefit programs on the same terms as our other employees, such as health and welfare benefit plans, a 401(k) plan, life insurance and executive life and disability plans.

Our executive officers may elect to participate in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan providing tax-efficient savings but receive no additional Company contributions.

Premiums for executive life and disability insurance benefits are paid by the Company.
Provides benefits having high perceived values and offers tax advantages.
39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation-Setting Process

Role of the Committee
The Committee is responsible for overseeing our executive compensation program, as specified in its charter. The Committee’s role includes:
Determining and recommending the compensation for our CEO and non-employee directors, subject to approval by the independent members of our Board.
Evaluating and approving our CEO’s recommendations for the compensation of our executive officers (other than our CEO).
Proposing revisions to the Committee’s charter for our Board’s approval to ensure compliance with SEC rules and NYSE listing standards.
Examining management’s performance around ESG efforts, including, but not limited to, diversity and inclusion at all levels of the Company and employee policies that drive the Company’s involvement in the community.
40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In performing its responsibilities with respect to approving the compensation of our executive officers (other than our CEO), the Committee considers a number of factors. These factors include advice from its independent compensation consultant, market data regarding the compensation practices of competitors and other relevant companies, advice from outside legal counsel specializing in executive compensation, tally sheets showing prior compensation awards, the recommendations of our CEO and an assessment of the outstanding equity holdings of our executive officers. The Committee also takes into account feedback from different stakeholders, including our stockholders and the major proxy advisory firms.
Role of Senior Management
Our management, under the leadership of our CEO, plays an important role in establishing and maintaining our executive compensation program. Management’s role includes recommending plans and programs to the Committee, implementing the Committee’s decisions and administering executive compensation plans such as our Executive Bonus Plan and long-term incentive compensation awards. Our CEO provides information on the individual performance of our NEOs and other executive officers and makes recommendations to the Committee on compensation levels (other than his own compensation). Our CEO is not present when the Committee discusses and determines recommendations regarding his compensation.
Role of Compensation Consultant
The Committee’s charter gives it the authority to retain and approve fees and other terms of engagement for compensation consultants and other advisors to assist it in performing its duties. In fiscal 2024, the Committee continued to retain Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm, as its compensation consultant. Compensia’s work for the Committee included, among other services, a review and update of the compensation peer group, a subsequent executive compensation market analysis based on an assessment of the compensation practices of the companies in the compensation peer group and companies in adjacent industries, a review and analysis of the compensation of the non-employee members of our Board and a review and report on the risk profile of our executive compensation program. Compensia also provides the Committee with assessments of the Company’s executive compensation policies and practices and makes recommendations based on best practices. In addition, Compensia meets on a frequent basis with the Chair of the Committee to discuss a host of compensation matters, including, but not limited to, compensation strategy, trends and to review the policies and viewpoints of the major proxy advisory firms. Compensia reports directly to the Committee, which will annually review its performance, independence and fees. In fiscal 2024, the Committee assessed Compensia’s independence and concluded that Compensia’s work for the Committee did not raise any conflict of interest.
Assessing Competitive Market Data
The Committee believes that peer group comparisons are useful guides to measure the competitiveness of our executive compensation program and related policies and practices. To assess our executive compensation against the competitive market, the Committee reviews and considers the compensation levels and practices of a select group of peer companies. In certain cases, this peer group data was supplemented by broader competitive market analyses.
41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For purposes of reviewing and updating the compensation peer group for fiscal 2024, Compensia engaged in discussions with the Committee about the peer selection process and additional discussions with management. In evaluating the composition of our compensation peer group for fiscal 2024, the Committee considered the following primary factors which are intended to identify a reasonable group of peers from a number of related industry sectors for consideration in our unique situation, where there are, at present, no other publicly traded providers of online and blended schools in the kindergarten through 12th grade market:
Industry and business focus – companies in the education services, software and human resources or employment services sectors;
Revenue – companies with revenue ranging from approximately 0.4x to approximately 3.0x the Company’s last four quarters revenue (which produced a target range of approximately $700 million to $5.3 billion);
Market capitalization – companies with market capitalizations ranging from approximately 0.25x to approximately 7.0x the Company’s market capitalization (which produced a target range of approximately $415 million to $11.7 billion);
Companies with subscription business models;
Companies in industries suggested by members of the executive team;
Companies in the gaming/artificial intelligence industries; and
Companies that are peers of companies that have selected Stride as a peer.
Based on these criteria and the informed judgment of the Committee, five companies were removed from the then-current compensation peer group (2U, Avaya Holdings, iHeartMedia, Perdoceo Education and TrueBlue) and four companies were added to the peer group (DocuSign, Match Group, RingCentral and Roku) to better align with the Company’s ongoing business focus.
Accordingly, the Committee approved the following compensation peer group for fiscal 2024:
ACI Worldwide
Kforce
Strategic Education
Adtalem Global Education
Laureate Education
Teradata
Blackbaud
Match Group
Yelp
Chegg
RingCentral
Ziff Davis
DocuSign
Roku
Graham Holdings Company
Scholastic
 
At the beginning of fiscal 2024, Compensia used this peer group to prepare an analysis for the Committee that compared the compensation levels of our executive officers to comparable executive positions at the companies in the peer group. The Committee used data drawn from the companies in our compensation peer group to evaluate the competitive market when reviewing and adjusting the target total direct compensation packages for our NEOs, including annual base salary, target annual bonus opportunities and long-term incentive compensation opportunities, for fiscal 2024. At the time of peer group approval, the Company was positioned below the 25th percentile in terms of market capitalization and between the 50th and 75th percentiles in terms of revenue.
The Committee reviews our compensation peer group regularly and makes adjustments to its composition annually, taking into account changes in both our business and the businesses of the companies in the peer group.
42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fiscal 2024 Executive Compensation Program in Detail
Base Salary
The base salaries for our NEOs are generally set at levels deemed necessary to attract and retain individuals with superior talent, while taking into account the target total direct compensation package provided to each NEO. Base salaries are reviewed annually by the Committee and are adjusted from time to time as deemed necessary in conjunction with recommendations made by our CEO (other than his own base salary), to ensure that our executive compensation program remains aligned with our compensation objectives and retention of critical talent. Compensation adjustments for our CEO are recommended by the Committee and reviewed and approved by the independent members of our Board.
In considering base salary adjustments for each of our NEOs (other than Mr. Goldthwaite) for fiscal 2024 in July 2023, the Committee, after reviewing a competitive market assessment of executive compensation levels prepared by Compensia, considered:
each named executive officer’s position, level of responsibility, and seniority;
each executive officer’s performance during the prior fiscal year and, in the case of our CEO, his exemplary leadership of and vision for our Company, and his anticipated contributions in driving our future growth;
its desire to recognize our CEO’s and CFO’s criticality to successful achievement of our long-range business objectives; and
the costs associated with replacing each executive officer with an experienced, qualified person with comparable skills and expertise and the relative strength and readiness of the internal candidates identified to assume his or her role.
The Committee does not assign a specific weight to any single factor in making decisions regarding base salary adjustments, nor is the impact of any single factor on the determination of base salary levels quantifiable. As reflected in the various factors considered by the Committee, the Committee determined that it was appropriate to approve increases to our NEO base salaries (including the significant increase for our CEO, which was approved by the independent members of our Board) to recognize their high level of performance and, in the case of Ms. Blackman, her strong performance in her increasing role and responsibilities as part of her ongoing transition as our principal financial officer. Mr. Goldthwaite’s annual base salary was not set by the Committee in July 2023 because he was not serving as an executive officer at such time.
The annual base salaries of our NEOs for fiscal 2024 were as follows:
Named Executive
Officer
Fiscal 2023
Base Salary
Fiscal 2024
Base Salary
Percentage
Increase
James J. Rhyu
$850,000
$1,000,000
17.6%
Donna Blackman
$525,000
$625,000
19.0%
Todd Goldthwaite
$375,000
$400,000
6.7%
Vincent W. Mathis
$500,000
$525,000
5.0%
Les Ottolenghi
$475,000
$525,000
10.5%
43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Annual Incentive Compensation
Our Executive Bonus Plan is designed to ensure that a meaningful portion of our NEOs’ target total cash compensation is “at risk.” For the fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan, the Committee selected two corporate performance management objectives (“PMOs”) – revenue and Adjusted EBITDA – for the plan which are the key metrics for gauging our profitability and growth, which ultimately enhances stockholder value.
Target Annual Bonus Opportunities
Target annual bonus opportunities for our NEOs (which represent a percentage of each NEO’s base salary) are reviewed by the Committee annually and set at levels that, when combined with base salary levels, are intended to provide market-competitive target total cash compensation opportunities. Following its review of a competitive market analysis prepared by Compensia, the Committee recommended, and the independent members of our Board approved, leaving our CEO’s target bonus opportunity at its 2023 level and determined to leave the target annual bonus opportunities of our other NEOs at their fiscal 2023 levels. Mr. Goldthwaite’s target annual bonus for fiscal 2024 was not set by the Compensation Committee because he was not serving as an executive officer at such time.
The target annual bonus opportunities for our NEOs for fiscal 2024 were as follows:
Named Executive Officer
Fiscal 2024 Target Annual
Bonus Opportunity
(as a percentage of base salary)
Fiscal 2023 Target
Annual Bonus
Opportunity
(as a percentage of base salary)
James J. Rhyu
150%
150%
Donna Blackman
100%
100%
Todd Goldthwaite
50%
50%
Vincent W. Mathis
80%
80%
Les Ottolenghi
80%
80%
Goal Setting Process and Rationale
The Committee spends considerable time evaluating the appropriate corporate PMOs to be included in our Executive Bonus Plan each fiscal year. After such evaluation for fiscal 2024, the Committee determined that it was appropriate to continue to use revenue and Adjusted EBITDA, each equally weighted, as the corporate PMOs for the fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan, consistent with the approach in fiscal 2023.
Category
Corresponding Metric
Profitability
Adjusted EBITDA
Growth
Revenue
In setting performance levels for each metric, the Committee remained committed to establishing rigorous performance goals to ensure alignment of realized pay amounts with our actual corporate performance. The Committee evaluates a number of factors in determining appropriate metrics and establishing the threshold, target and “outperform” performance levels for each metric, including, but not limited to, impact on long-term strategy, prior financial performance, delivering value to our stockholders and stockholder performance expectations. After careful consideration, the Committee set the target performance levels for the revenue and Adjusted EBITDA metrics at $1,950.0 million and $330.8 million, respectively. For fiscal 2024, the threshold performance levels for the revenue metric and the Adjusted EBITDA metric (as detailed in the table below under the heading “Performance Results”) were set just above our actual results for fiscal 2023.
44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Payments under the fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan for our NEOs were based solely on the achievement of these corporate PMOs, including payments to Mr. Goldthwaite, which the Committee determined was appropriate to focus the efforts of our NEOs on improving Company performance and increasing stockholder value.
Fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan Formula:

Performance Results
The corporate PMOs under our fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan are set forth in the table below. Each PMO provided our NEOs with the opportunity to earn an above target award for that PMO in the event the Company exceeded the pre-established performance level for the PMO, but also provided for no award payments below minimum thresholds of performance. Achievement of a PMO at the threshold level resulted in a payout at 50% of the target level, and achievement at the “outperform” level resulted in a payout at 200% of the target level. Performance between levels was extrapolated on a straight-line basis. In July 2024, the Committee reviewed our achievement against these corporate PMOs, with the results as follows (in millions):
Metric
Weighting
Performance
Level
(Threshold)
Performance
Level
(Target)
Performance
Level
(Outperform)
Actual
Results
Payment
Percentage
Revenue(1)
50%
$1,852.5
$1,950.0
$2,145.0
$2,040.1
146%
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
50%
$314.3
$330.8
$363.9
$390.7
200%
Overall Weighted Payment Percentage
173%
(1)
For purposes of the fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan, “revenue” could be adjusted at the Committee’s discretion for any unusual, non-recurring event that was separately identified and quantified in our financial statements. No adjustments were made to revenue for purposes of determining results under the fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan.
(2)
For purposes of the fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan, “Adjusted EBITDA” means earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, less stock-based compensation, and subject to adjustment in the Committee’s discretion for any acquisition-related charges and/or any unusual, non-recurring gain or loss that was separately identified and quantified in our financial statements. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is provided in Appendix A.
45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan Payments
The following table sets forth, for each NEO, other than our CITO, the Committee’s approved annual bonus award payments under our fiscal 2024 Executive Bonus Plan based upon performance against the corporate PMOs. Our CITO was not eligible to receive an annual bonus award payment for fiscal 2024 due to his termination of employment with the Company on March 8, 2024.
Named
Executive Officer
Revenue
Achievement
(50% Weighting)
Adjusted
EBITDA
Achievement
(50% Weighting)
Percentage of
Target Annual
Bonus Earned
(%)
Bonus
Amount
($)
James J. Rhyu
146%
200%
173%
$2,596,538
Donna Blackman
146%
200%
173%
$1,081,891
Todd Goldthwaite
146%
200%
173%
$346,205
Vincent W. Mathis
146%
200%
173%
$727,031
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
We believe that providing long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards promotes our philosophy of aligning executive pay with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Consistent with our redesigned long-term incentive compensation program launched in fiscal 2023, the Committee weighted the fiscal 2024 long-term incentive compensation awards for our NEOs to be 60% performance-based and continued the use of three-year performance metrics for our performance-based long-term incentive awards, and 40% time-based restricted stock awards. The Company also launched a new subsidiary equity incentive program in fiscal 2024, pursuant to which our NEOs, other than our CEO, received equity awards in various Company subsidiaries.
Fiscal Year 2024 Long-Term Incentive Awards
The Committee considered various factors in determining long-term incentive award levels for each NEO, including an analysis prepared by Compensia of competitive market data and our executive retention objectives (see the considerations set forth in the section above titled “Base Salary”). The following table sets forth the target award values for our NEOs for fiscal 2024 and the resulting number of shares of Common Stock subject to each award type. The awards granted to our CEO were recommended by the Committee and reviewed and approved by the independent members of our Board. The fiscal 2024 target award levels were established both to respond to competitive market forces while, at the same time, recognizing each individual NEO’s contribution to our continued success and incenting them to continue to execute on our long-term financial, operational, and strategic objectives. The awards granted to Mr. Goldthwaite were determined by our CEO during the company’s annual compensation planning and review process, which includes a review of internal equity alignment and market trends collected through surveys.
46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Named
Executive
Officer
Target Annual
Equity Award
Value1
Time-Based
Shares –
RSAs (#)2
Performance-Based Shares – PSUs1
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Outperform
(#)
James J. Rhyu
$12,000,000
117,930
88,445
176,890
353,780
Donna Blackman
$3,500,000
34,390
25,790
51,580
103,160
Todd Goldthwaite
$500,000
4,910
3,680
7,360
14,720
Vincent W. Mathis
$1,600,000
15,720
11,790
23,580
47,160
Les Ottolenghi
$1,750,000
17,190
12,890
25,780
51,560
(1)
The Committee determined the number of shares underlying the RSAs and target number of PSUs by dividing the target award value shown in the table above by the fair market value of our Common Stock on August 18, 2023, the date on which the RSAs and PSUs were granted.
(2)
The RSAs granted to our NEOs for fiscal 2024 vest subject to our standard vesting schedule, which is semi-annually over a three-year period, with 20% of the shares of our Common Stock subject to the awards vesting in the first year and 40% vesting in each of the next two years following the grant date.
Fiscal Year 2024 PSU Award Performance Metrics. As set forth in the table below, the PSU awards granted to our NEOs for fiscal 2024 are to be earned based on two performance metrics: adjusted operating income, a metric tied to financial performance, and stock price performance associated with established levels of compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”), as the Committee believes this combination best reflect a means for monitoring our executive officers’ execution of our long-term strategy aimed at delivering greater value to our stockholders and ensuring a strong alignment between management and our stockholders. The Committee evaluates a number of factors in determining appropriate metrics and establishing the threshold, target and “outperform” performance levels for each metric, including, but not limited to, impact on long-term strategy, prior financial performance, delivering value to our stockholders and stockholder performance expectations. Each metric is to be measured at the end of a three-year performance period, with adjusted operating income weighted 75% and stock price CAGR weighted 25%. After considerable discussion, the Committee determined that the weighting between the two metrics should be adjusted from the prior fiscal year as the executive officers’ greatest ability to deliver results that drive stockholder value is through continued and consistent focus on adjusted operating income. Any earned shares will be immediately vested upon the attainment of the performance metric at the end of the three-year performance period. For each metric, below threshold performance will result in no shares being earned for the corresponding portion of the PSU awards.
Metric
Weighting
Performance
Level
(Threshold)
50% Payout
Performance
Level
(Target) 100% Payout
Performance
Level
(Outperform)
200% Payout
FY 2026 Adjusted Operating Income
75%
$193.5 million
$215.0 million
$258.0 million
Stock Price CAGR
25%
10% CAGR
20% CAGR
40% CAGR
Adjusted Operating Income Metric (75% weighting). For purposes of the PSU awards, adjusted operating income is defined as operating income as determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding the stock-based compensation expense associated with any long-term equity incentive awards granted by the Committee during the three-year performance period. In addition, adjusted operating income may, at the Committee’s discretion, exclude any acquisition related charges (which would include amortization subsequent to an acquisition transaction) and any other unusual, non-recurring gain or loss that is
47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

separately identified in our financial statements. The Committee believes these adjustments are appropriate as the results are more representative of the Company’s actual performance during the three-year performance measurement period. As a point of clarification, adjusted operating income for purposes of the PSU awards differs from adjusted operating income used in our earnings releases in that the latter is defined as operating income as determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding all stock-based compensation expense, as well as the amortization of intangible assets. Adjusted operating income will be measured over fiscal year 2026 for purposes of the fiscal 2024 PSUs. Financial achievement falling between the specified levels will be interpolated linearly between performance levels for the adjusted operating income metric.
Stock Price CAGR Metric (25% weighting). The other metric used for PSU awards granted to our NEOs is related to our stock price CAGR as measured at the end of the three-year performance period. The starting point for these calculations will be equal to the average closing stock price over the 20 calendar days preceding the grant date of the award. Performance against the stock price CAGR portion of the PSU award will be assessed as of September 15, 2026 (or the next following date if September 15, 2026 is a non-trading day) and will be based on the average closing stock price over the preceding 20 calendar days. Achievement falling between the specified levels will be interpolated linearly between performance levels for the stock price CAGR metric, measured at 2.5% intervals between performance levels.
Achievement of Fiscal 2022 PSU Awards. The PSU awards granted to our NEOs for fiscal 2022 were eligible to be earned based on the attainment of (i) a pre-established gross margin percentage as measured at the end of a three-year performance period ending June 30, 2024, and (ii) our three-year stock price CAGR as measured on September 15, 2024. Each metric is weighted equally. On September 15, 2024, the Compensation Committee assessed the Company’s performance on each of these metrics, with the results as follows:
Metric
Weighting
Performance
Level
(Threshold
50%)
Performance
Level
(Target
100%)
Performance
Level
(Outperform
200%)
Actual
Results
Percentage
Earned
Gross Margin Percentage (%)
50%
37%
38%
40%
37.4%
70%
Stock Price CAGR(%)
50%
10%
20%
40%
35%
175%
Overall Percentage of PSUs Earned
122.5%
The following table sets forth, for each NEO, other than our CITO, the number of shares earned by such NEO with respect to the 2022 PSU awards as a result of the 122.5% achievement level noted in the table above.
Number of 2022 PSUs Earned
Named
Executive Officer
Gross Margin Metric
CAGR Metric
Total
James J. Rhyu
29,477
73,693
103,170
Donna Blackman
1,176
2,940
4,116
Todd Goldthwaite
2,121
5,303
7,424
Vincent W. Mathis
7,368
18,419
25,787
48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Subsidiary Equity Awards
In August 2023, our NEOs, other than our CEO, were granted long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards from newly-formed indirect subsidiaries of the Company (and direct subsidiaries of K12 Management Inc.) intended to reward our NEOs for value creation at the relevant subsidiary. The Committee designed the subsidiary equity program to motivate employees of the Company to create value in under-appreciated assets and to foster a more innovative culture. The Committee determined that our NEOs (other than our CEO) should participate in the subsidiary equity program to incentivize them to drive subsidiary growth, consistent with other employees.
The subsidiary equity awards were granted in the form of restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards and are intended to be one-time awards, except in limited situations where the scope of an individual executive’s involvement has increased. The subsidiary equity awards vest and become payable only upon a liquidity event of the applicable subsidiary, which includes the first to occur of a change in control of the relevant subsidiary or the Company, a spin-off affecting the relevant subsidiary, or an initial public offering of the relevant subsidiary, subject to the NEO’s continued employment with the Company through the date of such liquidity event. Through this design, employees, including our NEOs who hold such equity awards, may only realize liquidity from their equity awards when the Company has achieved liquidity with respect to its ownership stake in the subsidiary and will forfeit their equity awards if their employment terminates for any reason prior to the date of such liquidity event, thereby aligning the NEOs’ incentives with those of the Company and our stockholders.
Other Compensation
Deferred Compensation Plan
We maintain a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, or the Deferred Compensation Plan, under which our NEOs are eligible to elect to defer the receipt of up to 50% of their annual base salary and up to 100% of any payment under our Executive Bonus Plan until retirement. Earnings are credited on deferred amounts based upon a variety of investment options that may be elected by each participant. We do not make any contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan. Certain information with respect to amounts deferred by our NEOs under this plan is set forth in our “Fiscal 2024 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table” below.
Defined Contribution Plan
We maintain a Section 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan, or the 401(k) Plan, in which certain of our employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate. All employees, including our NEOs, are automatically enrolled in the 401(k) Plan at a 3% deferral rate with the ability to opt-out. The 401(k) Plan allows participants to defer a portion of their annual compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The Company makes matching contributions to the 401(k) plan equal to $0.50 for each dollar of a participant’s contributions on the first 5% of eligible base salary that they contribute each pay period, subject to certain statutory limits.
Employee Benefits and Perquisites
Our NEOs participate in the same medical, dental, vision, disability and life insurance plans that are available to all employees. We provide our NEOs with certain perquisites and other personal benefits, which we do not consider to be a significant component of our executive compensation program but recognize to be an important factor in attracting and retaining talented executive officers. We pay for supplemental long-term disability and life insurance premiums for our executive officers and provide them with the opportunity to receive annual Company-paid executive physical examinations and reimburse certain executive officers for their relocation
49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

expenses when appropriate and for temporary housing expenses they may incur in connection with their provision of services. We provide these supplemental benefits to our executive officers due to their relatively low cost and the value they provide in assisting us in attracting and retaining talented executive officers. None of our executive officers receive tax “gross-ups” or other tax payments in connection with our provision of any perquisites or personal benefits.
The value of the perquisites and other personal benefits we provided to each of our NEOs in fiscal 2024 is set forth in our “Fiscal 2024 Summary Compensation Table” below.
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements
We consider severance arrangements to be an integral part of the overall compensation package for our executive officers. We provide severance to attract and retain individuals with superior ability and managerial talent and to provide our executive officers with appropriate protections due to their vulnerability to terminations of employment due to a change in control, merger, or other acquisition of the Company and encourage our executive officers to focus their attention on their work duties and responsibilities in all situations.
We believe that providing our NEOs with severance payments and benefits upon certain terminations of employment are key retention tools that help us remain competitive with the companies in our compensation peer group, provide our executive officers with incentives to focus on the best interests of our stockholders in the context of a potential change in control and appropriately protect our executive officers in the event of an involuntary termination of employment without creating a windfall due solely to a change in control.
We are party to an employment letter with Mr. Rhyu (that was most recently amended and restated on February 25, 2022). For more information about this employment arrangement and the severance provisions thereunder, see “Employment Letter Agreement with Mr. Rhyu” below.
Our other NEOs are generally entitled to receive severance payments and benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment under the Company’s severance guidelines and individual change in control severance agreements, as described under “Severance Guidelines for Other Named Executive Officers” and “Change in Control Arrangements with Other Named Executive Officers,” respectively, below.
Other Executive Compensation Practices and Policies
Equity Award Grant Policy
We do not have any program, plan, or practice to time the grant of equity awards to our employees in coordination with the release of material non-public information. We generally grant awards at the time employment commences and annually in connection with our annual compensation review process in the first quarter of our fiscal year, at a regularly scheduled Board or Committee meeting. Neither our Board nor the Committee seek to time the grant of equity awards based on potential movement of our stock price.
Stock Ownership Policy
We maintain a stock ownership policy that is designed to ensure that our executive officers hold a significant equity stake in the Company to align their interests with those of our stockholders. Our stock ownership policy requires our CEO and Executive Chair (if applicable) to each maintain ownership of our Common Stock having a value equal to five times their base salary, and all other executive officers to maintain ownership of our Common Stock having a value equal to three times
50

TABLE OF CONTENTS

their base salary. Our executive officers have five years from the date the policy became applicable to them to accumulate the specified level of ownership. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, all of our NEOs are in compliance with this policy or are still within the five-year period to accumulate the specified level of ownership.
Role
Ownership Requirement
CEO or Executive Chair
5.0x base salary
Chief Financial Officer
3.0x base salary
Other Executive Officers
3.0x base salary
Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy
We maintain a compensation recovery policy as required by Rule 10D-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the corresponding listing standards of The New York Stock Exchange, which provides for the mandatory recovery from current and former officers of incentive-based compensation that was erroneously awarded during the three years preceding the date that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, including to correct an error that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period. The amount required to be recovered is the excess of the amount of incentive-based compensation received over the amount that otherwise would have been received had it been determined based on the restated financial measure.
Insider Trading, Anti-Hedging Policy, and Anti-Pledging Prohibition
We maintain a Policy Statement for the Prevention of Insider Trading that governs the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of our securities by directors, officers and employees and is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations and NYSE listing standards. Company employees (including executive officers), non-employee directors and consultants are prohibited from purchasing Common Stock on margin or engaging in transactions, in puts, calls, or other derivative securities designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s equity securities. In addition, our Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Award Plan prohibits the pledging of any award granted under the plan unless otherwise determined by the plan Administrator.
Risk Assessment and Mitigation of Compensation Policies and Practices
Consistent with SEC rules, we periodically evaluate the risk profile associated with our Company’s executive and other compensation programs. In fiscal 2024, the Committee engaged Compensia to review our Company’s existing executive compensation program and assess whether our executive compensation policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. Among other factors, this assessment considered the program structure, design characteristics and performance-based measures associated with our executive compensation program and concluded that our executive compensation program contains a number of safeguards that are expected to minimize excessive risk taking, including a reasonable mix of cash and equity compensation opportunities, a compensation recovery (“clawback”) policy, a balanced annual incentive plan design that emphasizes top and bottom line performance, formal policies for the administration of our equity compensation program, a succession plan for key executives and stock ownership policies for our non-employee directors and executive officers. Similarly, management conducted an analysis of non-executive compensation policies and practices.
51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Based on the foregoing, we believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company as a whole. We also believe that our incentive compensation arrangements provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond our Company’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks. We believe we have effective internal controls.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, requires us to recognize an expense for the fair value of equity-based compensation awards. Grants of equity-based awards under our equity incentive award plans are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 718. The Committee considers the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity incentive award plans and programs. As accounting standards change, the Committee may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deduction certain employers may take for otherwise deductible compensation payable to certain current or former executive officers of the employer to the extent the compensation paid to such an executive officer for the taxable year exceeds $1 million. The Committee believes that tax deductibility is only one of several relevant considerations when structuring our executive compensation program and strives to balance the effectiveness and overall goals of our executive compensation program with the materiality of reduced tax deductions. Accordingly, the Committee may approve compensation that is not deductible for federal income tax purposes in order to achieve the desired flexibility in the design and delivery of compensation.
52

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above. Based on its review and discussion with management, the Committee recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the Committee:
Members of the Compensation Committee
Robert E. Knowling, Jr. (Chair)
Steven B. Fink
Allison Lawrence
Joseph A. Verbrugge
The foregoing report is not “soliciting material,” shall not be deemed “filed” and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended (together, the “Acts”), except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under the Acts.
53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION TABLES
Fiscal 2024 Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows the compensation we paid to our NEOs for services rendered during fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022.
Name
Fiscal
Year
Base Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock Awards
($)(1)
Nonequity Incentive
Plan Compensation
($)(2)
All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
Total
($)
James J. Rhyu
Chief Executive Officer
2024
$1,000,000
$12,011,113
$2,596,538
$15,473
$15,623,124
2023
$880,769
$7,146,186
$1,695,886
$14,892
$9,737,733
2022
$784,615
$5,056,893
$1,834,683
$15,803
$7,691,994
Donna Blackman
Chief Financial Officer
2024
$625,000
$3,814,459
$1,081,891
$12,393
$5,533,743
2023
$534,423
$2,551,925
$698,306
$13,192
$3,797,846
Todd Goldthwaite
Managing Director, Portfolio Companies
2024
$400,000
$759,886
$346,205
$15,411
$1,521,502
Vincent W. Mathis
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
2024
$525,000
$1,861,100
$727,031
$17,263
$3,130,394
2023
$518,077
$1,530,933
$532,043
$15,818
$2,596,871
2022
$466,154
$1,263,865
$574,867
$14,698
$2,319,584
Les Ottolenghi
Former Chief Information and Technology Officer
2024
$385,108
$1,893,368
$531,527
$2,810,003
2023
$491,154
$1,275,777
$505,440
$8,280
$2,280,651
2022
$420,000
$37,500
$758,389
$385,283
$7,128
$1,608,300
(1)
This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Refer to Note 9, “Equity Incentive Plan,” to the consolidated audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of these awards, or, in the case of the restricted stock units covering shares in certain of our subsidiaries granted to each of our NEOs, other than our CEO (“Subsidiary RSUs”), is based on the fair market value of the common stock of the relevant subsidiary on the date of grant, multiplied by the probability of achievement.
For the portion of the performance-based stock unit awards (“PSUs”) granted during fiscal 2024 tied to adjusted operating income, amounts are shown based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as determined at the date of grant, which was determined to be the target level of performance. For the portion of the PSUs granted during fiscal year 2024 tied to stock price CAGR, amounts are shown based on fair value determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model and the following assumptions: the Company’s Common Stock price at the date of grant of $40.70; a three-year continuously compounded equivalent risk-free rate of 4.53%; an expected stock price volatility of 50%; a dividend yield of 0%; and an expected term of approximately three years.
If “maximum” performance is assumed for the PSUs granted to our NEOs during fiscal 2024, the total grant date value of such PSUs for each NEO would be as follows: Mr. Rhyu: $12,611,031, Ms. Blackman: $3,677,469, Mr. Goldthwaite: $524,713, Mr. Mathis: $1,681,279, and Mr. Ottolenghi: $1,838,123.
For the portion of the PSUs granted during fiscal 2023 tied to gross margin percentage, amounts are shown based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as determined at the date of grant, which was determined to be the target level of performance. For the portion of the PSUs granted during fiscal year 2023 tied to stock price CAGR, amounts are shown based on fair value determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model and the following assumptions: the Company’s Common Stock price at the date of grant of $38.77; a three-year continuously compounded equivalent risk-free rate of 3.49%; an expected stock price volatility of 55%; a dividend yield of 0%; and an expected term of approximately three years. On October 28, 2022, the Compensation Committee voted to change the metric related to the PSUs granted during fiscal 2023. Instead of being measured against gross margin percentage,
54

TABLE OF CONTENTS

recipients would earn these awards based on adjusted operating income metrics. This resulted in a change to the fair market value from $38.77 to $33.16 per share. The revised values above for each NEO would be as follows: Mr. Rhyu: $9,410,137, Ms. Blackman: $3,680,850, Mr. Mathis: $2,526,690, and Mr. Ottolenghi: $2,222,167.
For the portion of the PSUs granted during fiscal 2022 tied to gross margin percentage, amounts are shown based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as determined at the date of grant, which was determined to be the target level of performance. For the portion of the PSUs granted during fiscal year 2022 tied to stock price CAGR, amounts are shown based on fair value determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model and the following assumptions: the Company’s Common Stock price at the date of grant of $35.62; a three-year continuously compounded equivalent risk-free rate of 0.44%; an expected stock price volatility of 55%; a dividend yield of 0%; and an expected term of approximately three years.
The grant date fair value of the Subsidiary RSUs associated with Stride Professional Development Platform, Inc., Stride Learning Intelligence, Inc., and Stride Enrichment Programs, Inc. was determined to be zero in accordance with ASC 718. As of the grant date, we were not forecasting positive cash flows from these entities, and therefore the grant date fair value of the associated RSUs would be zero. The grant date fair value of the Subsidiary RSUs associated with Stride Esports, Inc., Stride Online Tutoring, Inc., and Stride Learning Hub, Inc. was determined using an income-based valuation methodology and a discounted cash flow analysis in accordance with ASC 718. The grant date fair values for Ms. Blackman, Mr. Goldthwaite, Mr. Mathis, and Mr. Ottolenghi in aggregate were $312,000, $260,000, $260,000, and $142,750, respectively.
(2)
All amounts are reported in the fiscal year earned, regardless of when they are paid.
(3)
The amounts in this column for fiscal year 2024 consist of 401(k) plan matching contributions, Company-paid life insurance, and long-term disability premiums. In addition, for Mr. Ottolenghi, the amount for fiscal 2024 includes $525,000 of severance payments and benefits paid or accrued to him in connection with his termination of employment. A description of his separation agreement is provided below under the section “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fiscal 2024 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs during fiscal 2024. The equity awards described in the following table were granted under our Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Award Plan.
Name
Grant Date
Estimated Possible
Payouts under
Nonequity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Possible Payouts under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
(#)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
($)(11)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
James J. Rhyu
Chief Executive Officer
750,000
1,500,000
3,000,000
8/18/2023(2)
66,335
132,670
265,340
5,399,669
8/18/2023(3)
22,110
44,220
88,440
1,811,693
8/18/2023(4)
117,930
4,799,751
Donna Blackman Chief Financial Officer
312,500
625,000
1,250,000
8/18/2023(2)
19,345
38,690
77,380
1,574,683
8/18/2023(3)
6,445
12,890
25,780
528,103
8/18/2023(4)
34,390
1,399,673
8/18/2023(5)
60,000
8/18/2023(6)
60,000
91,800
8/18/2023(7)
60,000
8/18/2023(8)
60,000
210,000
8/18/2023(9)
60,000
10,200
8/18/2023(10)
60,000
​Todd Goldthwaite
Managing Director,
Portfolio Companies
100,000
200,000
400,000
8/18/2023(2)
2,760
5,520
11,040
224,664
8/18/2023(3)
920
1,840
3,680
75,385
8/18/2023(4)
4,910
199,837
8/18/2023(5)
50,000
8/18/2023(6)