XML 38 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) related to the fair value measurement of certain of its assets and liabilities. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions. When estimating fair value, depending on the nature and complexity of the asset or liability, the Company may use one or all of the following approaches:
Market approach, which is based on market prices and other information from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
Cost approach, which is based on the cost to acquire or construct comparable assets less an allowance for functional and/or economic obsolescence.
Income approach, which is based on the present value of the future stream of net cash flows.
To measure fair value, the Company uses the following fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, as described in ASC 820, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 — observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 3 — unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data available, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions
The assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement standards at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are cash equivalents, consisting of money market funds, and long-term debt which are both based on Level 1 inputs.
Certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities are carried at cost, which approximates their fair value because of the short-term maturity of these financial instruments.
The following tables provides a summary of financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall (in thousands):
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Cash Equivalents - Money Market Funds
$
123,155

 
$
123,155

 
$

 
$

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Cash Equivalents - Money Market Funds
$
123,141

 
$
123,141

 
$

 
$



Debt
The estimated fair value of debt is based on the Level 1 quoted market prices for the same or similar issues and included the impact of the conversion features.
The carrying amounts and the estimated fair values of financial instruments as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, are as follows (in thousands):
 
March 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated Fair
Value
2% Convertible Senior Notes
$
170,595

 
$
202,377

 
$
168,994

 
$
237,475


The Company issued $201.3 million in principal amount of 2% Notes (as defined below) in June 2014. The carrying value of the 2% Notes at March 31, 2015 includes a debt discount of $30.7 million which is being amortized as non-cash interest expense over the term of the 2% Notes. The decrease in the estimated fair values of these liabilities from December 31, 2014 to March 31, 2015 represents the impact of the quoted bond prices at those dates.