UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
	THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

OR

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
	SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For transition period from __________ to ___________

Commission File Number 0-33203

LANDMARK BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	43-1930755
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

701 Poyntz Avenue, Manhattan, Kansas   66505

(Address of principal executive offices)       (Zip Code)

(785) 565-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:	Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
	Preferred Share Purchase Rights
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:	None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨   No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes ¨   No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act 0f 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x   No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ¨   No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):  Large accelerated filer ¨  Accelerated filer  ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller Reporting Company  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes ¨   No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the last sales price quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market on June 30, 2009, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $38.2 million.  At March 24, 2010, the total number of shares of common stock outstanding was 2,504,265.

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 19, 2010, are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof, to the extent indicated herein.

LANDMARK BANCORP, INC.

2009 Form 10-K Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	3
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	20
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	27
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	27
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	27
ITEM 4.	RESERVED	27
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCK HOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	28
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	29
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	30
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	44
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	47
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	82
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	82
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	82
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	83
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	83
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTAND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	84
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	84
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	84
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	85
SIGNATURES		86

2

PART I.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

The Company

Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.  Currently, the Company’s business consists solely of the ownership of Landmark National Bank (the “Bank”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.  As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $584.2 million in consolidated total assets.

The Company is headquartered in Manhattan, Kansas and has expanded its geographic presence through acquisitions in the past several years.  In May 2009, the Company acquired a second branch in Lawrence, Kansas.  Effective January 1, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of First Manhattan Bancorporation, Inc. (“FMB”), the holding company for First Savings Bank F.S.B.  In conjunction with the transaction, FMB was merged into the Bank (the “2006 Acquisition”). In August 2005, the Company acquired 2 branches in Great Bend, Kansas. Effective April 1, 2004, the Company acquired First Kansas Financial Corporation (“First Kansas”), the holding company for First Kansas Federal Savings Association (“First Kansas Federal”).  In conjunction with the transaction, First Kansas was merged into the Bank (the “2004 Acquisition”).  Effective October 9, 2001, Landmark Bancshares, Inc., the holding company for Landmark Federal Savings Bank, and MNB Bancshares, Inc., the holding company for Security National Bank, completed their merger into Landmark Merger Company, which immediately changed its name to Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “2001 Merger”).  In addition, Landmark Federal Savings Bank merged with Security National Bank and the resulting bank changed its name to Landmark National Bank.

As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”).  The Company is also subject to various reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Pursuant to the 2006 Acquisition, the 2004 Acquisition and the 2001 Merger, the Bank succeeded to all of the assets and liabilities of FMB, First Savings Bank F.S.B., First Kansas, First Kansas Federal, Landmark Federal Savings Bank and Security National Bank.  The Bank is principally engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and using such deposits, together with borrowings and other funds, to originate commercial, commercial real estate, one-to-four family residential mortgage and consumer loans in the Bank’s principal market areas, as described below.  Since the 2001 Merger, the Bank has focused on originating greater numbers and amounts of commercial, commercial real estate and agricultural loans.  Additionally, greater emphasis has been placed on diversification of the deposit mix through expansion of core deposit accounts such as checking, savings, and money market accounts.  The Bank has also diversified its geographical markets as a result of the 2006 Acquisition, the 2004 Acquisition and the 2001 Merger.  The Company’s main office is in Manhattan, Kansas with branch offices in central, eastern and southwestern Kansas.  The Company continues to explore opportunities to expand its banking markets through mergers and acquisitions, as well as branching opportunities.  In light of the recent turmoil in the financial industry, additional attractive opportunities may become available to the Company.

The results of operations of the Bank and the Company are dependent primarily upon net interest income and, to a lesser extent, upon other income derived from loan servicing fees and customer deposit services.  Additional expenses of the Bank include general and administrative expenses such as salaries, employee benefits, federal deposit insurance premiums, data processing, occupancy and related expenses.

Deposits of the Bank are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) up to the maximum amount allowable under applicable federal law and regulation.  The Bank is regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), as the chartering authority for national banks, and the FDIC, as the administrator of the DIF.  The Bank is also subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System with respect to reserves required to be maintained against deposits and certain other matters.  The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and the Federal Home Loan Bank (the “FHLB”) of Topeka.

3

The Company’s executive office and the Bank’s main office are located at 701 Poyntz Avenue, Manhattan, Kansas 66502.  The telephone number is (785) 565-2000.

Market Area

The Bank’s primary deposit gathering and lending markets are geographically diversified with locations in eastern, central, and southwestern Kansas.  The primary industries within these respective markets are also diverse and dependent upon a wide array of industry and governmental activity for their economic base.  The Bank’s markets have not been immune to the effects of the recent economic downturn.  To varying degrees, the Bank’s markets have experienced either flat or declining real estate values, falling consumer confidence, increased unemployment, and decreased consumer spending.  However, the economic and credit crises have so far been less severe in Kansas than many markets across the U.S. have experienced.  A brief description of these three geographic areas and the communities which the Bank serves within these communities is summarized below.

Shawnee, Douglas, Miami, Osage, and Bourbon counties are located in eastern Kansas and encompass the Bank locations in Topeka, Auburn, Lawrence, Paola, Louisburg, Osawatomie, Osage City, and Fort Scott.  Shawnee County’s market, which encompasses the Bank locations in Topeka and Auburn, is strongly influenced by the State of Kansas, City of Topeka, two regional hospitals and several major private firms and public institutions.  The Bank’s Lawrence locations are located in Douglas County and are significantly impacted by the University of Kansas, the largest university in Kansas, in addition to several private industries and businesses in the community.  The communities of Paola, Louisburg, and Osawatomie, located within Miami County, are influenced by the Kansas City market resulting in housing growth and small private industries and business.  Additionally, the Osawatomie State Hospital is a major government employer within the county.  Bourbon and Osage Counties are primarily agricultural with small private industries and business firms, while Bourbon County is also influenced by a regional hospital and Fort Scott Community College.

Bank locations within central Kansas include the communities of Manhattan within Riley County, Wamego which is located within Pottawatomie County, Junction City which is located in Geary County, Great Bend and Hoisington within Barton County, and LaCrosse located in Rush County.  The Riley, Pottawatomie and Geary County economies are significantly impacted by employment at Fort Riley Military Base and Kansas State University, the second largest university in Kansas, which is located in Manhattan.  Several private industries and businesses are also located within these counties.  Agriculture, oil, and gas are the predominant industries in Barton County.  Additionally, manufacturing and service industries also play a key role within this central Kansas market.  LaCrosse, located within Rush County, is primarily an agricultural community with an emphasis on crop and livestock production.

The Bank’s southwestern Kansas branches are located in the cities of Dodge City and Garden City, which reside in Ford County and Finney County, respectively.  The counties of Ford and Finney were founded on agriculture, which continues to play a major role in the economy.  Predominant activities involve crop production, feed lot operations, and food processing.   Dodge City is known as the “Cowboy Capital of the World” and maintains a significant tourism industry.  Both Dodge City and Garden City are recognized as regional commercial centers within the state with small business, manufacturing, retail, and service industries having a significant influence upon the local economies.  Additionally, each community has a community college which also attracts a number of individuals from the surrounding area to live within the community to participate in educational programs and pursue a degree.

Competition

The Company faces strong competition both in attracting deposits and making real estate, commercial and other loans.  Its most direct competition for deposits comes from commercial banks and other savings institutions located in its principal market areas, including many large financial institutions which have greater financial and marketing resources available to them.  The ability of the Company to attract and retain deposits generally depends on its ability to provide a rate of return, liquidity and risk comparable to that offered by competing investment opportunities.  The Company competes for loans principally through the interest rates and loan fees it charges and the efficiency and quality of services it provides borrowers.

4

Employees

At December 31, 2009, the Bank had a total of 223 employees (208 full time equivalent employees).  The Company has no direct employees.  Employees are provided with a comprehensive benefits program, including basic and major medical insurance, life and disability insurance, sick leave, and a 401(k) profit sharing plan.  Employees are not represented by any union or collective bargaining group and the Bank considers its employee relations to be good.

Lending Activities

General.  The Bank strives to provide each market area it serves a full range of financial products and services to small and medium sized businesses and to consumers.  The Bank targets owner-operated businesses and utilizes Small Business Administration and Farm Services Administration lending as a part of its product mix.  Each market has an established loan committee which has authority to approve credits, within established guidelines.  Concentrations in excess of those guidelines must be approved by either a corporate loan committee comprised of the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer, the Credit Risk Manager, and other senior commercial lenders or the Bank’s board of directors.  When lending to an entity, the Bank generally obtains a guaranty from the principals of the entity.  The loan mix is subject to the discretion of the Bank’s board of directors and the demands of the local marketplace.

Residential loans are priced and originated following global underwriting standards that are consistent with guidelines established by the major buyers in the secondary market.  Commercial and consumer loans generally are issued at or above the national prime rate.  While the origination of one-to-four family residential loans continues to be a key component of our business, the majority of these loans are sold in the secondary market.  The Bank is focusing on the generation of commercial and commercial real estate loans to grow and diversify the loan portfolio.  The Bank has no potential negative amortization loans.  The following is a brief description of each major category of the Bank’s lending activity.

Commercial Lending.  Loans in this category include loans to service, retail, wholesale and light manufacturing businesses, including agricultural operations.  Commercial loans are made based on the financial strength and repayment ability of the borrower, as well as the collateral securing the loans.  The Bank targets owner-operated businesses as its customers and makes lending decisions based upon a cash flow analysis of the borrower as well as a collateral analysis.  Accounts receivable loans and loans for inventory purchases are generally on a one-year renewable term and loans for equipment generally have a term of seven years or less.  The Bank generally takes a blanket security interest in all assets of the borrower.  Equipment loans are generally limited to 75% of the cost or appraised value of the equipment.  Inventory loans are generally limited to 50% of the value of the inventory, and accounts receivable loans are generally limited to 75% of a predetermined eligible base.

The Bank also provides short-term credit for operating loans and intermediate term loans for farm product, livestock and machinery purchases and other agricultural improvements.  Farm product loans have generally a one-year term and machinery and equipment and breeding livestock loans generally have five to seven year terms.  Extension of credit is based upon the borrower’s ability to repay, as well as the existence of federal guarantees and crop insurance coverage.  These loans are generally secured by a blanket lien on livestock, equipment, feed, hay, grain and growing crops.  Equipment and breeding livestock loans are generally limited to 75% of appraised value.

Real Estate Lending.  Commercial, residential, construction and multi-family real estate loans represent the largest class of loans of the Bank.  Generally, residential loans retained in portfolio are variable rate with adjustment periods of five years or less and amortization periods of either 15 or 30 years.  Commercial real estate loans, including agricultural real estate, generally have amortization periods of 15 or 20 years.  The Bank has a security interest in the borrower’s real estate.  The Bank also generates long-term, fixed-rate residential real estate loans which are sold in the secondary market.  Commercial real estate, construction and multi-family loans are generally limited, by policy, to 80% of the appraised value of the property.  Commercial real estate, including agricultural real estate loans, are also supported by an analysis demonstrating the borrower’s ability to repay.  Residential loans that exceed 80% of the appraised value of the real estate generally are required, by policy, to be supported by private mortgage insurance, although on occasion the Bank will retain non-conforming residential loans to known customers at premium pricing.

5

Consumer and Other Lending.  Loans classified as consumer and other loans include automobile, boat, home improvement and home equity loans, the latter two secured principally through second mortgages.  With the exception of home improvement loans and home equity loans, the Bank generally takes a purchase money security interest in collateral for which it provides the original financing.  The terms of the loans typically range from one to five years, depending upon the use of the proceeds, and generally range from 75% to 90% of the value of the collateral.  The majority of these loans are installment loans with fixed interest rates.  Home improvement and home equity loans are generally secured by a second mortgage on the borrower’s personal residence and, when combined with the first mortgage, limited to 80% of the value of the property unless further protected by private mortgage insurance.  The home improvement loans are generally made for terms of five to seven years with fixed interest rates.  The home equity loans are generally made for terms of ten years on a revolving basis with the interest rates adjusting monthly tied to the national prime interest rate.

Loan Origination and Processing

Loan originations are derived from a number of sources.  Residential loan originations result from real estate broker referrals, direct solicitation by the Bank’s loan officers, present depositors and borrowers, referrals from builders and attorneys, walk-in customers and, in some instances, other lenders. Consumer and commercial real estate loan originations emanate from many of the same sources. Residential loan applications are underwritten and closed based upon standards which generally meet secondary market guidelines.  The average loan is less than $500,000.

The loan underwriting procedures followed by the Bank conform to regulatory specifications and are designed to assess both the borrower’s ability to make principal and interest payments and the value of any assets or property serving as collateral for the loan.  Generally, as part of the process, a loan officer meets with each applicant to obtain the appropriate employment and financial information as well as any other required loan information.  The Bank then obtains reports with respect to the borrower’s credit record, and orders, on real estate loans, and reviews an appraisal of any collateral for the loan (prepared for the Bank through an independent appraiser).

Loan applicants are notified promptly of the decision of the Bank.  Prior to closing any long-term loan, the borrower must provide proof of fire and casualty insurance on the property serving as collateral, and such insurance must be maintained during the full term of the loan.  Title insurance is required on loans collateralized by real property.

The difficult economic and credit environments experienced in 2009 and 2008 have materially impacted our commercial and commercial real estate loan origination and processing as a result of decreased loan demand that met our credit standards.  In several of our markets there is an oversupply of newly constructed, speculative residential real estate properties and developed vacant lots.  As a result of these issues we have severely curtailed land development and construction lending.  We do not expect this type of lending to be resumed until the economic outlook improves and the supply and demand of residential housing and vacant developed lots is in balance.  The economic downturn has also caused us to increase our underwriting requirements on other types of loans to insure borrowers can meet repayment requirements in the current economic environment.

6

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

Financial institutions, their holding companies and their affiliates are extensively regulated under federal and state law.  As a result, the growth and earnings performance of the Company may be affected not only by management decisions and general economic conditions, but also by the requirements of federal and state statutes and by the regulations and policies of various bank regulatory authorities, including the OCC, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) and the FDIC.  Furthermore, taxation laws administered by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities and securities laws administered by the SEC and state securities authorities have an impact on the business of the Company. The effect of these statutes, regulations and regulatory policies may be significant, and cannot be predicted with a high degree of certainty.

Federal and state laws and regulations generally applicable to financial institutions regulate, among other things, the scope of business, the kinds and amounts of investments, reserve requirements, capital levels relative to operations, the nature and amount of collateral for loans, the establishment of branches, mergers and consolidations and the payment of dividends. This system of supervision and regulation establishes a comprehensive framework for the respective operations of the Company and its subsidiaries and is intended primarily for the protection of FDIC-insured deposits and depositors of the Bank, rather than stockholders.  In addition to this generally applicable regulatory framework, turmoil in the credit markets in recent years has prompted the enactment of unprecedented legislation that has allowed the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) to make equity capital available to qualifying financial institutions to help restore confidence and stability in the U.S. financial markets, which imposes additional requirements on institutions in which the Treasury invests.

The following is a summary of the material elements of the regulatory framework that currently applies to the Company and its subsidiaries.  It does not describe all of the statutes, regulations and regulatory policies that apply, nor does it restate all of the requirements of those that are described.  Additionally, in response to the global financial crisis that began in 2007, various legislative and regulatory proposals have been issued addressing, among other things, the restructuring of the federal bank regulatory system, more stringent regulation of consumer products such as mortgages and credit cards, and safe and sound compensation practices. At this time, the Company is unable to determine whether any of these proposals will be adopted as proposed.  As such, the following is qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable law.  Any change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies may have a material effect on the business of the Company and its subsidiaries.

The Company

General.  The Company, as the sole shareholder of the Bank, is a bank holding company.  As a bank holding company, the Company is registered with, and is subject to regulation by, the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”).  In accordance with Federal Reserve policy, the Company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to the Bank and to commit resources to support the Bank in circumstances where the Company might not otherwise do so.  Under the BHCA, the Company is subject to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve.  The Company is also required to file with the Federal Reserve periodic reports of the Company’s operations and such additional information regarding the Company and its subsidiaries as the Federal Reserve may require.

Acquisitions, Activities and Change in Control.  The primary purpose of a bank holding company is to control and manage banks. The BHCA generally requires the prior approval of the Federal Reserve for any merger involving a bank holding company or any acquisition by a bank holding company of another bank or bank holding company.  Subject to certain conditions (including deposit concentration limits established by the BHCA), the Federal Reserve may allow a bank holding company to acquire banks located in any state of the United States. In approving interstate acquisitions, the Federal Reserve is required to give effect to applicable state law limitations on the aggregate amount of deposits that may be held by the acquiring bank holding company and its insured depository institution affiliates in the state in which the target bank is located (provided that those limits do not discriminate against out-of-state depository institutions or their holding companies) and state laws that require that the target bank have been in existence for a minimum period of time (not to exceed five years) before being acquired by an out-of-state bank holding company.

7

The BHCA generally prohibits the Company from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank and from engaging in any business other than that of banking, managing and controlling banks, or furnishing services to banks and their subsidiaries.  This general prohibition is subject to a number of exceptions. The principal exception allows bank holding companies to engage in, and to own shares of companies engaged in, certain businesses found by the Federal Reserve to be “so closely related to banking ... as to be a proper incident thereto.”  This authority would permit the Company to engage in a variety of banking-related businesses, including the ownership and operation of a thrift, or any entity engaged in consumer finance, equipment leasing, the operation of a computer service bureau (including software development), and mortgage banking and brokerage. The BHCA generally does not place territorial restrictions on the domestic activities of non-bank subsidiaries of bank holding companies.

Additionally, bank holding companies that meet certain eligibility requirements prescribed by the BHCA and elect to operate as financial holding companies may engage in, or own shares in companies engaged in, a wider range of nonbanking activities, including securities and insurance underwriting and sales, merchant banking and any other activity that the Federal Reserve, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines by regulation or order is financial in nature, incidental to any such financial activity or complementary to any such financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety or soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally.  As of the date of this filing, the Company has not applied for approval to operate as a financial holding company.

Federal law also prohibits any person or company from acquiring “control” of an FDIC-insured depository institution or its holding company without prior notice to the appropriate federal bank regulator.  “Control” is conclusively presumed to exist upon the acquisition of 25% or more of the outstanding voting securities of a bank or bank holding company, but may arise under certain circumstances between 10% and 24.99% ownership.

Capital Requirements.  Bank holding companies are required to maintain minimum levels of capital in accordance with Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.  If capital levels fall below the minimum required levels, a bank holding company, among other things, may be denied approval to acquire or establish additional banks or non-bank businesses.

The Federal Reserve’s capital guidelines establish the following minimum regulatory capital requirements for bank holding companies: (i) a risk-based requirement expressed as a percentage of total assets weighted according to risk; and (ii) a leverage requirement expressed as a percentage of total assets.  The risk-based requirement consists of a minimum ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets of 8% and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets of 4%.  The leverage requirement consists of a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3% for the most highly rated companies, with a minimum requirement of 4% for all others.  For purposes of these capital standards, Tier 1 capital consists primarily of permanent stockholders’ equity less intangible assets (other than certain loan servicing rights and purchased credit card relationships). Total capital consists primarily of Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital, which consists of other non-permanent capital items such as certain other debt and equity instruments that do not qualify as Tier 1 capital and a portion of the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses.

The risk-based and leverage standards described above are minimum requirements. Higher capital levels will be required if warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profiles of individual banking organizations. For example, the Federal Reserve’s capital guidelines contemplate that additional capital may be required to take adequate account of, among other things, interest rate risk, or the risks posed by concentrations of credit, nontraditional activities or securities trading activities.  Further, any banking organization experiencing or anticipating significant growth would be expected to maintain capital ratios, including tangible capital positions (i.e., Tier 1 capital less all intangible assets), well above the minimum levels.  As of December 31, 2009, the Company had regulatory capital in excess of the Federal Reserve’s minimum requirements.

8

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.  Events in the U.S. and global financial markets over the past several years, including the deterioration of the worldwide credit markets, have created significant challenges for financial institutions throughout the country.  In response to this crisis affecting the U.S. banking system and financial markets, on October 3, 2008, the U.S. Congress passed, and the President signed into law, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”).  The EESA authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to implement various temporary emergency programs designed to strengthen the capital positions of financial institutions and stimulate the availability of credit within the U.S. financial system.  Financial institutions participating in certain of the programs established under the EESA are required to adopt the Treasury’s standards for executive compensation and corporate governance.

The TARP Capital Purchase Program.  On October 14, 2008, the Treasury announced that it would provide Tier 1 capital (in the form of perpetual preferred stock) to eligible financial institutions.  This program, known as the TARP Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”), allocated $250 billion from the $700 billion authorized by the EESA to the Treasury for the purchase of senior preferred shares from qualifying financial institutions.  Under the program, eligible institutions were able to sell equity interests to the Treasury in amounts equal to between 1% and 3% of the institution’s risk-weighted assets.  The Company was preliminarily approved but elected not to participate in the CPP.

Dividend Payments.  The Company’s ability to pay dividends to its stockholders may be affected by both general corporate law considerations and policies of the Federal Reserve applicable to bank holding companies. As a Delaware corporation, the Company is subject to the limitations of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”). The DGCL allows the Company to pay dividends only out of its surplus (as defined and computed in accordance with the provisions of the DGCL) or if the Company has no such surplus, out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year.

Additionally, as a bank holding company, the Company’s ability to declare and pay dividends is subject to the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends.  The Federal Reserve guidelines generally require the Company to review the effects of the cash payment of dividends on common stock and other Tier 1 capital instruments (i.e., perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities) in light of the Company’s earnings, capital adequacy and financial condition.  As a general matter, the Federal Reserve indicates that the board of directors of a bank holding company should eliminate, defer or significantly reduce the dividends if:  (i) the company’s net income available to stockholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (ii) the prospective rate of earnings retention is inconsistent with the company’s capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (iii) the company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios.  The Federal Reserve also possesses enforcement powers over bank holding companies and their non-bank subsidiaries to prevent or remedy actions that represent unsafe or unsound practices or violations of applicable statutes and regulations.  Among these powers is the ability to proscribe the payment of dividends by banks and bank holding companies.

Federal Securities Regulation.  The Company’s common stock is registered with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Consequently, the Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading and other restrictions and requirements of the SEC under the Exchange Act.

The Bank

General.  The Bank is a national bank, chartered by the OCC under the National Bank Act.  The deposit accounts of the Bank are insured by the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”) to the maximum extent provided under federal law and FDIC regulations.  The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Home Loan Bank System.  As a national bank, the Bank is subject to the examination, supervision, reporting and enforcement requirements of the OCC, the chartering authority for national banks. The FDIC, as administrator of the DIF, also has regulatory authority over the Bank.

Deposit Insurance. As an FDIC-insured institution, the Bank is required to pay deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC.  The FDIC has adopted a risk-based assessment system whereby FDIC-insured depository institutions pay insurance premiums at rates based on their risk classification.  An institution’s risk classification is assigned based on its capital levels and the level of supervisory concern the institution poses to the regulators.  Under the regulations of the FDIC, as presently in effect, insurance assessments range from 0.07% to 0.78% of total deposits, depending on an institution’s risk classification, its levels of unsecured debt and secured liabilities, and, in certain cases, its level of brokered deposits.

9

Furthermore, as a result of the increased volume of bank failures in 2008 and 2009, on May 22, 2009, the FDIC approved a final rule imposing a special assessment on all depository institutions whose deposits are insured by the FDIC.  This one-time special assessment was imposed on institutions in the second quarter, and was collected on September 30, 2009.  Pursuant to the final rule, the FDIC imposed on the Bank a special assessment in the amount of $277,000, which was due and payable on September 30, 2009.

On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule that required insured depository institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009, their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012.  On December 30, 2009, the Bank paid the FDIC $2.8 million in prepaid assessments.  The FDIC determined each institution’s prepaid assessment based on the institution’s: (i) actual September 30, 2009 assessment base, increased quarterly by a five percent annual growth rate through the fourth quarter of 2012; and (ii) total base assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009, increased by an annualized three basis points beginning in 2011.  The FDIC will begin to offset prepaid assessments on March 30, 2010, representing payment of the regular quarterly risk-based deposit insurance assessment for the fourth quarter of 2009.  Any prepaid assessment not exhausted after collection of the amount due on June 30, 2013, will be returned to the institution.

FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.  In conjunction with Treasury’s actions to address the credit and liquidity crisis in financial markets, on October 14, 2008, the FDIC announced the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.  One component of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program is the Transaction Account Guarantee Program, which temporarily provides participating institutions with unlimited deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing and certain low-interest bearing transaction accounts maintained at FDIC insured institutions.  All institutions that did not opt out of the Transaction Account Guarantee Program were subject to a 10 basis point per annum assessment on amounts in excess of $250,000 in covered transaction accounts through December 31, 2009.  On August 26, 2009, the FDIC extended the Transaction Account Guarantee Program for an additional six months through June 30, 2010.  Beginning January 1, 2010, the assessment levels increased to 15 basis points, 20 basis points or 25 basis points per annum, based on the risk category to which an institution is assigned for purposes of the risk-based premium system.  The Bank did not opt out of the six-month extension of the Transaction Account Guarantee Program.  As a result, the Bank, like every other FDIC-insured depository institution in the United States that did not opt out of the Transaction Account Guarantee Program, is incurring fees on amounts in excess of $250,000 in covered transaction accounts.

FICO Assessments.  The Financing Corporation (“FICO”) is a mixed-ownership governmental corporation chartered by the former Federal Home Loan Bank Board pursuant to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation Recapitalization Act of 1987 to function as a financing vehicle for the recapitalization of the former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.  FICO issued 30-year non-callable bonds of approximately $8.2 billion that mature by 2019.  Since 1996, federal legislation has required that all FDIC-insured depository institutions pay assessments to cover interest payments on FICO’s outstanding obligations.  These FICO assessments are in addition to amounts assessed by the FDIC for deposit insurance.  During 2009, the FICO assessment rate was approximately 0.01% of deposits.

Supervisory Assessments.  National banks are required to pay supervisory assessments to the OCC to fund the operations of the OCC.  The amount of the assessment is calculated using a formula that takes into account the bank’s size and its supervisory condition.  During 2009, the Bank paid supervisory assessments to the OCC totaling $149,000.

Capital Requirements.  Banks are generally required to maintain capital levels in excess of other businesses.  Under federal regulations, the Bank is subject to the following minimum capital standards: (i) a leverage requirement consisting of a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3% for the most highly-rated banks with a minimum requirement of at least 4% for all others; and (ii) a risk-based capital requirement consisting of a minimum ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets of 8% and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets of 4%.  In general, the components of Tier 1 capital and total capital are the same as those for bank holding companies discussed above.

10

The capital requirements described above are minimum requirements.  Higher capital levels will be required if warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profiles of individual institutions.  For example, OCC regulations provide that additional capital may be required to take adequate account of, among other things, interest rate risk or the risks posed by concentrations of credit, nontraditional activities or securities trading activities.

Further, federal law and regulations provide various incentives for financial institutions to maintain regulatory capital at levels in excess of minimum regulatory requirements. For example, a financial institution that is “well-capitalized” may qualify for exemptions from prior notice or application requirements otherwise applicable to certain types of activities and may qualify for expedited processing of other required notices or applications. Additionally, one of the criteria that determines a bank holding company’s eligibility to operate as a financial holding company is a requirement that all of its financial institution subsidiaries be “well-capitalized.”  Under OCC regulations, in order to be “well-capitalized” a financial institution must maintain a ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets of 10% or greater, a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets of 6% or greater and a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 5% or greater.

Federal law also provides the federal banking regulators with broad power to take prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized institutions.  The extent of the regulators’ powers depends on whether the institution in question is “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized,” in each case as defined by regulation.  Depending upon the capital category to which an institution is assigned, the regulators’ corrective powers include: (i) requiring the institution to submit a capital restoration plan; (ii) limiting the institution’s asset growth and restricting its activities; (iii) requiring the institution to issue additional capital stock (including additional voting stock) or to be acquired; (iv) restricting transactions between the institution and its affiliates; (v) restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on deposits; (vi) ordering a new election of directors of the institution; (vii) requiring that senior executive officers or directors be dismissed; (viii) prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; (ix) requiring the institution to divest certain subsidiaries; (x) prohibiting the payment of principal or interest on subordinated debt; and (xi) ultimately, appointing a receiver for the institution.

As of December 31, 2009: (i) the Bank was not subject to a directive from the OCC to increase its capital to an amount in excess of the minimum regulatory capital requirements; (ii) the Bank exceeded its minimum regulatory capital requirements under OCC capital adequacy guidelines; and (iii) the Bank was “well-capitalized,” as defined by OCC regulations.

Dividends.  The primary source of funds for the Company is dividends from the Bank.  Under the National Bank Act, a national bank may pay dividends out of its undivided profits in such amounts and at such times as the bank’s board of directors deems prudent.  Without prior OCC approval, however, a national bank may not pay dividends in any calendar year that, in the aggregate, exceed the bank’s year-to-date net income plus the bank’s retained net income for the two preceding years.

The payment of dividends by any financial institution is affected by the requirement to maintain adequate capital pursuant to applicable capital adequacy guidelines and regulations, and a financial institution generally is prohibited from paying any dividends if, following payment thereof, the institution would be undercapitalized.  As described above, the Bank exceeded its minimum capital requirements under applicable guidelines as of December 31, 2009.  As of December 31, 2009, approximately $3.0 million was available to be paid as dividends by the Bank.  Notwithstanding the availability of funds for dividends, however, the OCC may prohibit the payment of any dividends by the Bank if the OCC determines such payment would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.

Insider Transactions.  The Bank is subject to certain restrictions imposed by federal law on extensions of credit to the Company, on investments in the stock or other securities of the Company and the acceptance of the stock or other securities of the Company as collateral for loans made by the Bank.  Certain limitations and reporting requirements are also placed on extensions of credit by the Bank to its directors and officers, to directors and officers of the Company, to principal stockholders of the Company, and to “related interests” of such directors, officers and principal stockholders.  In addition, federal law and regulations may affect the terms upon which any person who is a director or officer of the Company or the Bank or a principal stockholder of the Company may obtain credit from banks with which the Bank maintains a correspondent relationship.

11

Safety and Soundness Standards.  The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines that establish operational and managerial standards to promote the safety and soundness of federally insured depository institutions.  The guidelines set forth standards for internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality and earnings.

In general, the safety and soundness guidelines prescribe the goals to be achieved in each area, and each institution is responsible for establishing its own procedures to achieve those goals.  If an institution fails to comply with any of the standards set forth in the guidelines, the institution’s primary federal regulator may require the institution to submit a plan for achieving and maintaining compliance. If an institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan, or fails in any material respect to implement a compliance plan that has been accepted by its primary federal regulator, the regulator is required to issue an order directing the institution to cure the deficiency. Until the deficiency cited in the regulator’s order is cured, the regulator may restrict the institution’s rate of growth, require the institution to increase its capital, restrict the rates the institution pays on deposits or require the institution to take any action the regulator deems appropriate under the circumstances. Noncompliance with the standards established by the safety and soundness guidelines may also constitute grounds for other enforcement action by the federal banking regulators, including cease and desist orders and civil money penalty assessments.

Branching Authority.  National banks headquartered in Kansas, such as the Bank, have the same branching rights in Kansas as banks chartered under Kansas law, subject to OCC approval.  Kansas law grants Kansas-chartered banks the authority to establish branches anywhere in the State of Kansas, subject to receipt of all required regulatory approvals.

Federal law permits state and national banks to merge with banks in other states subject to: (i) regulatory approval; (ii) federal and state deposit concentration limits; and (iii) state law limitations requiring the merging bank to have been in existence for a minimum period of time (not to exceed five years) prior to the merger.  The establishment of new interstate branches or the acquisition of individual branches of a bank in another state (rather than the acquisition of an out-of-state bank in its entirety) is permitted only in those states the laws of which expressly authorize such expansion.

Financial Subsidiaries.  Under Federal law and OCC regulations, national banks are authorized to engage, through “financial subsidiaries,” in any activity that is permissible for a financial holding company and any activity that the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Federal Reserve, determines is financial in nature or incidental to any such financial activity, except: (i) insurance underwriting, (ii) real estate development or real estate investment activities (unless otherwise permitted by law), (iii) insurance company portfolio investments and (iv) merchant banking.  The authority of a national bank to invest in a financial subsidiary is subject to a number of conditions, including, among other things, requirements that the bank must be well-managed and well-capitalized (after deducting from capital the bank’s outstanding investments in financial subsidiaries).  The Bank has not applied for approval to establish any financial subsidiaries.

Federal Reserve System.  Federal Reserve regulations, as presently in effect, require depository institutions to maintain reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts), as follows: for transaction accounts aggregating $55.2 million or less, the reserve requirement is 3% of total transaction accounts; and for transaction accounts aggregating in excess of $55.2 million, the reserve requirement is $1.335 million plus 10% of the aggregate amount of total transaction accounts in excess of $55.2 million.  The first $10.7 million of otherwise reservable balances are exempted from the reserve requirements.  These reserve requirements are subject to annual adjustment by the Federal Reserve.  As of December 31, 2099, the Bank was in compliance with the foregoing requirements.

12

Company Website

The Company maintains a corporate website at www.landmarkbancorpinc.com.  The Company makes available free of charge on or through its website the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.  Many of the Company’s policies, including its code of ethics, committee charters and other investor information are available on the web site.  The Company will also provide copies of its filings free of charge upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at the address listed on the front of this Form 10-K.

STATISTICAL DATA

The Company has a fiscal year ending on December 31.  The information presented in this annual report on Form 10-K presents information on behalf of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The statistical data required by Guide 3 of the Guides for Preparation and Filing of Reports and Registration Statements under the Exchange Act is set forth in the following pages.  This data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

I. Distribution of Assets, Liabilities, and Stockholders’ Equity; Interest Rates and Interest Differentials

The following table describes the extent to which changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities affected the Company’s interest income and expense during the periods indicated.  The table distinguishes between (i) changes attributable to rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume), (ii) changes attributable to volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), and (iii) net change (the sum of the previous columns).  The net changes attributable to the combined effect of volume and rate, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2009 vs 2008									2008 vs 2007
	Increase/(decrease) attributable to									Increase/(decrease) attributable to
	Volume			Rate			Net			Volume			Rate			Net
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income:
Investment securities	$	979		$	(1,402	)	$	(423	)	$	548		$	(358	)	$	190
Loans		(1,144	)		(2,700	)		(3,844	)		(360	)		(3,641	)		(4,001	)
Total		(165	)		(4,102	)		(4,267	)		188			(3,999	)		(3,811	)
Interest expense:
Deposits		194			(4,271	)		(4,077	)		(209	)		(3,400	)		(3,609	)
Other borrowings		(452	)		-			(452	)		654			(1,298	)		(644	)
Total		(258	)		(4,271	)		(4,529	)		445			(4,698	)		(4,253	)
Net interest income	$	93		$	169		$	262		$	(257	)	$	699		$	442

13

The following table sets forth information relating to average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.  This table reflects the average yields on assets and average costs of liabilities for the periods indicated (derived by dividing income or expense by the monthly average balance of assets or liabilities, respectively) as well as the "net interest margin" (which reflects the effect of the net earnings balance) for the periods shown.

	Year ended December 31, 2009								Year ended December 31, 2008								Year ended December 31, 2007
	Average balance		Interest			Average yield/rate			Average balance		Interest			Average yield/rate			Average balance		Interest			Average yield/rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Investment securities (1)	$	185,578	$	7,876			4.24	%	$	170,011	$	8,299			4.88	%	$	157,376	$	8,109			5.15	%
Loans receivable, net (2)		359,940		20,690			5.75	%		375,208		24,534			6.49	%		383,078		28,535			7.45	%
Total interest-earning assets		545,518		28,566			5.24	%		548,219		32,833			5.99	%		540,454		36,644			6.78	%
Non-interest-earning assets		61,135								59,715								60,689
Total	$	606,653							$	607,934							$	601,143
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Certificates of deposit	$	215,159	$	5,101			2.37	%	$	221,412	$	8,075			3.65	%	$	237,831	$	10,656			4.48	%
Money market and NOW accounts		155,142		643			0.41	%		142,968		1,741			1.22	%		132,813		2,769			2.08	%
Savings accounts		28,684		76			0.26	%		27,081		81			0.30	%		27,048		81			0.30	%
FHLB advances and other borrowings		92,855		3,266			3.52	%		105,544		3,718			3.52	%		94,171		4,362			4.63	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		491,840		9,086			1.85	%		497,005		13,615			2.74	%		491,863		17,868			3.63	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		61,852								60,211								59,146
Stockholders' equity		52,961								50,718								50,134
Total	$	606,653							$	607,934							$	601,143
Interest rate spread (3)							3.39	%							3.25	%							3.15	%
Net interest margin (4)			$	19,480			3.57	%			$	19,218			3.51	%			$	18,776			3.47	%
Tax equivalent interest - imputed				1,300								1,186								1,093
Net interest income			$	18,180							$	18,032							$	17,683
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities				111	%							110	%							110	%

(1) Income on investment securities includes all securities and interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions.  Income on tax exempt investment securities is presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis, using a 34% federal tax rate.

(2) Includes loans classified as non-accrual.  Income on tax exempt loans is presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis, using a 34% federal tax rate.

(3) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

(4) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

14

II. Investment Portfolio

Investment Securities.  The following table sets forth the carrying value of the Company’s investment securities at the dates indicated.  None of the investment securities held as of December 31, 2009 were issued by an individual issuer in excess of 10% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity, excluding the securities of U.S. federal agency obligations.  The Company’s federal agency obligations consist of obligations of U.S. government sponsored enterprises, primarily the FHLB.  The Company’s mortgage backed securities portfolio consisted of securities predominantly underwritten to the standards and guaranteed by the government-sponsored agencies of FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA.  The Company’s investments in certificates of deposits consisted of FDIC insured certificates of deposits with other financial institutions.

	As of December 31,
	2009		2008		2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
Investment Securities:
U.S. federal agency obligations	$	19,090	$	29,514	$	48,708
Municipal obligations tax-exempt		68,859		64,309		62,113
Municipal obligations taxable		1,343		-		-
Mortgage-backed securities		64,695		56,582		36,216
Common stock		865		1,074		1,122
Pooled trust preferred securities		261		740		2,493
Certificates of deposits		6,515		10,026		5,227
Total available-for-sale, at fair value	$	161,628	$	162,245	$	155,879
FHLB stock		6,237		7,303		7,099
FRB stock		1,754		1,749		1,746
Total other securities, at cost	$	7,991	$	9,052	$	8,845

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the carrying values, weighted average yields, and maturities of the Company's investment securities portfolio, excluding common stocks, as of December 31, 2009.  Yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis, using a 34% federal tax rate.  The table includes scheduled principal payments and estimated prepayments for mortgage-backed securities, where actual prepayments will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.

	As of December 31, 2009
	One year or less					One to five years					Five to ten years					More than ten years					Total
	Carrying		Average			Carrying		Average			Carrying		Average			Carrying		Average			Carrying		Average
	value		yield			value		yield			value		yield			value		yield			value		yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Investment securities:
U.S. federal agency obligations	$	10,972		4.01	%	$	7,060		2.67	%	$	1,058		5.50	%	$	-		0.00	%	$	19,090		3.60	%
Municipal obligations tax exempt		1,706		5.03	%		17,369		5.11	%		29,303		5.76	%		20,481		6.15	%		68,859		5.69	%
Municipal obligations taxable		110		3.25	%		1,233		2.31	%		-		0.00	%		-		0.00	%		1,343		2.39	%
Mortgage-backed securities		5,415		4.10	%		56,876		3.97	%		1,249		4.38	%		1,155		3.27	%		64,695		3.98	%
Pooled trust preferred securities		-		0.00	%		-		0.00	%		-		0.00	%		261		2.05	%		261		2.05	%
Certificates of deposits		265		2.35	%		6,250		1.54	%		-		0.00	%		-		0.00	%		6,515		1.57	%
Total	$	18,468		4.10	%	$	88,788		3.90	%	$	31,610		5.70	%	$	21,897		5.95	%	$	160,763		4.55	%

15

III. Loan Portfolio

Loan Portfolio Composition.  The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.

	As of December 31,
	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	98,333		$	112,815		$	126,459		$	151,300		$	114,935
Commercial		106,470			105,488			94,885			81,298			66,358
Construction and land		36,864			41,107			46,260			50,616			24,083
Commercial loans		98,213			101,976			103,099			90,758			63,494
Consumer loans		7,884			7,937			9,164			9,596			8,842
Total gross loans		347,764			369,323			379,867			383,568			277,712
Deferred loan fees/(costs) and loans in process		442			320			462			(214	)		5
Allowance for loan losses		(5,468	)		(3,871	)		(4,172	)		(4,030	)		(3,151	)
Loans, net	$	342,738		$	365,772		$	376,157		$	379,324		$	274,566
Percent of total
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential		28.3	%		30.5	%		33.3	%		39.4	%		41.4	%
Commercial		30.6	%		28.6	%		25.0	%		21.2	%		23.9	%
Construction and land		10.6	%		11.1	%		12.2	%		13.2	%		8.7	%
Commercial loans		28.2	%		27.6	%		27.1	%		23.7	%		22.9	%
Consumer loans		2.3	%		2.2	%		2.4	%		2.5	%		3.1	%
Total gross loans		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

The following table sets forth the contractual maturities of loans as of December 31, 2009.  The table does not include unscheduled prepayments.

	As of December 31, 2009
	< 1 year		1-5 years		> 5 years		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	15,692	$	50,397	$	32,244	$	98,333
Commerical		13,959		49,595		42,916		106,470
Construction and land		31,030		4,041		1,793		36,864
Commercial		61,793		32,085		4,335		98,213
Consumer		3,730		3,950		204		7,884
Total gross loans	$	126,204	$	140,068	$	81,492	$	347,764

16

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans due after December 31, 2010 and whether such loans had fixed interest rates or adjustable interest rates:

	As of December 31, 2009
	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	27,675	$	54,966	$	82,641
Commerical		24,055		68,456		92,511
Construction and land		1,651		4,183		5,834
Commercial		20,773		15,647		36,420
Consumer		3,725		429		4,154
Total gross loans	$	77,879	$	143,681	$	221,560

Nonperforming Assets. The following table sets forth information with respect to nonperforming assets, including non-accrual loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure (“real estate owned”).  Under the original terms of the Company’s non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2009, interest earned on such loans for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 would have increased interest income by $794,000, $252,000 and $520,000, respectively.

	As of December 31,
	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Total non-accrual loans	$	11,830		$	5,748		$	10,037		$	3,567		$	3,332
Accruing loans over 90 days past due		-			-			-			-			-
Nonperforming investments, at fair value		261			-			-			-			-
Real estate owned		1,129			1,934			492			456			749
Total nonperforming assets	$	13,220		$	7,682		$	10,529		$	4,023		$	4,081
Total nonperforming loans to total loans, net		3.5	%		1.6	%		2.7	%		0.9	%		1.2	%
Total nonperforming assets to total assets		2.3	%		1.3	%		1.7	%		0.7	%		0.9	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans		46.2	%		67.3	%		41.5	%		113.0	%		94.6	%

The Company’s non-accrual loans increased from $5.7 million at December 31, 2008 to $11.8 million at December 31, 2009.  The increase in non-accrual loans was primarily the result of two loan relationships that were placed on non-accrual status during 2009.  These two loans consisted of a $4.2 million construction loan and a $2.4 million commercial agriculture loan.  The Company’s non-accrual loans declined to $5.7 million at December 31, 2008 from $10.0 million as of December 31, 2007.  The decline during 2008 was primarily the result of the collection of the outstanding balances of two loan relationships totaling $3.0 million and increased charge-offs of balances in non-accrual at December 31, 2007.  As part of the Company’s credit risk management, the Company continues to aggressively manage the loan portfolio to identify problem loans and has placed additional emphasis on its commercial real estate and construction relationships.  This aggressive loan portfolio management, combined with the current economic recession, has led to an increase in our real estate owned.  As discussed in more detail in the “Asset Quality and Distribution” section, we believe the Company’s allowance for loan losses is adequate based on the Company’s evaluation of the loan portfolio’s inherent risk as of December 31, 2009.

17

IV. Summary of Loan Loss Experience

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s allowance for loan losses at the dates indicated:

	As of December 31,
	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balances at beginning of year	$	3,871		$	4,172		$	4,030		$	3,151		$	2,894
Provision for loan losses		3,300			2,400			255			235			385
Allowance of merged bank		-			-			-			891			-
Charge-offs:
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential		(153	)		(1,443	)		(16	)		(23	)		(25	)
Commercial		(17	)		-			-			(55	)		-
Construction and land		(330	)		(453	)		(29	)		-			-
Commercial		(1,404	)		(728	)		(12	)		(3	)		(37	)
Consumer		(122	)		(145	)		(147	)		(258	)		(160	)
Total charge-offs		(2,026	)		(2,769	)		(204	)		(339	)		(222	)
Recoveries:
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential		9			4			4			5			5
Commercial		-			-			-			1			-
Construction and land		200			-			-			-			-
Commercial		72			9			25			25			59
Consumer		42			55			62			61			30
Total recoveries		323			68			91			92			94
Net charge-offs		(1,703	)		(2,701	)		(113	)		(247	)		(128	)
Balances at end of year	$	5,468		$	3,871		$	4,172		$	4,030		$	3,151
Allowance for loan losses as a  percent of total gross loans outstanding		1.57	%		1.05	%		1.10	%		1.05	%		1.13	%
Net loans charged off as a percent of average net loans outstanding		0.48	%		0.72	%		0.03	%		0.06	%		0.05	%

Net loan charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $1.7 million compared to $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Net loan charge-offs declined in 2009 as the result of the timing of the collection process on non-performing loans as the Company pursues recovery options prior to charging off a loan.  Net loan charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $2.7 million compared to $113,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007.  The increased net loan charge-offs during 2009 and 2008 were primarily related to loans for which the Company had previously provided a specific loss reserve allocation.  Commercial loan charge-offs increased during 2009 as the result of a commercial loan relationship that was liquidated in bankruptcy.  The significant increase in the 2008 one-to-four family residential charge-offs is primarily from the liquidation of a pool of non-owner occupied, one-to-four family residential loans, made to a single entity in the Kansas City, Missouri area.  The loans were secured by houses located in deteriorating neighborhoods and originally obtained as part of an acquisition and are not representative of the quality and performance of the remaining one-to-four family residential mortgage loan portfolio.  The loans were sold in early 2009 at a price that had an immaterial impact on earnings.

18

The distribution of the Company’s allowance for losses on loans at the dates indicated and the percent of loans in each category to total loans is summarized in the following table.  This allocation reflects management’s judgment as to risks inherent in the types of loans indicated, but in general, the Company’s total allowance for loan losses included in the table is not restricted and is available to absorb all loan losses.  The amount allocated in the following table to any category should not be interpreted as an indication of expected actual charge-offs in that category.

	As of December 31,
	2009					2008					2007					2006					2005
	Amount		% Loan type to total loans			Amount		% Loan type to total loans			Amount		% Loan type to total loans			Amount		% Loan type to total loans			Amount		% Loan type to total loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	625		28.3	%	$	672		30.5	%	$	1,189		33.3	%	$	827		39.4	%	$	722		41.4	%
Commercial		1,042		30.6	%		730		28.6	%		640		25.0	%		823		21.2	%		882		23.9	%
Construction and land		1,326		10.6	%		833		11.1	%		879		12.2	%		834		13.2	%		384		8.7	%
Commercial		2,389		28.2	%		1,507		27.6	%		1,191		27.1	%		1,308		23.7	%		941		22.9	%
Consumer		86		2.3	%		129		2.2	%		273		2.4	%		238		2.5	%		222		3.1	%
Total	$	5,468		100.0	%	$	3,871		100.0	%	$	4,172		100.0	%	$	4,030		100.0	%	$	3,151		100.0	%

The decline in the allocation of the allowance for losses on loans to one-to-four family residential loans since December 31, 2007 is primarily the result of the decline in the outstanding balances in our one-to-four family residential loan portfolio and also from the 2008 charge-off associated with one loan relationship on a pool of non-owner occupied, one-to-four family residential loans in the Kansas City, Missouri area which had a specific reserve associated with the balance at December 31, 2007.  The increases in the allocation for commercial real estate, construction and land and commercial allowance for losses on loans, was related primarily to declines in the estimated fair value of certain collateral dependent impaired loans, increased historical charge-offs and management’s judgment to increase the risk factors used to determine the allowance for loan losses.  The allowance for losses on loans is discussed in more detail in the “Nonperforming Assets” and “Asset Quality and Distribution” sections.  We believe the Company’s allowance for loan losses continues to be adequate based on the Company’s evaluation of the loan portfolio’s inherent risk as of December 31, 2009.

V. Deposits

The following table presents the maturities of jumbo certificates of deposit (amounts of $100,000 or more) at December 31, 2009 and 2008:

(Dollars in thousands)	As of December 31,
	2009		2008
Three months or less	$	15,799	$	17,745
Over three months through six months		8,214		11,126
Over six months through 12 months		13,925		13,524
Over 12 months		10,484		7,570
Total	$	48,422	$	49,965

VI. Return on Equity and Assets

	As of or for the years ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2007
Return on average assets		0.54	%		0.75	%		0.90	%
Return on average equity		6.18	%		8.98	%		10.78	%
Equity to total assets		9.23	%		8.54	%		8.62	%
Dividend payout ratio		55.3	%		38.1	%		32.7	%

19

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, stockholders or prospective investors should carefully consider the following risk factors:

Difficult economic and market conditions have adversely affected our industry.

Dramatic declines in the housing market, with decreasing home prices and increasing delinquencies and foreclosures, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage and commercial real estate loans and resulted in significant write-downs of assets by many financial institutions across the United States.  General downward economic trends, reduced availability of commercial credit and increasing unemployment have negatively impacted the credit performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional write-downs.  Concerns over the stability of the financial markets and the economy have resulted in decreased lending by many financial institutions to their customers and to each other.  This market turmoil and tightening of credit has led to increased commercial and consumer deficiencies, lack of customer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reductions in general business activity.  Financial institutions have also generally experienced decreased access to certain liquidity sources.  The resulting economic pressure on consumers and businesses and the lack of confidence in the financial markets may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.  A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on us and others in the financial institutions industry.  In particular, we may face the following risks in connection with these events:

· we potentially face increased regulation of our industry and compliance with such regulation may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities;

· customer demand for loans secured by real estate could be reduced due to weaker economic conditions, an increase in unemployment, a decrease in real estate values or an increase in interest rates;

· the process we use to estimate losses inherent in our credit exposure requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic conditions might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans.  The level of uncertainty concerning economic conditions may adversely affect the accuracy of our estimates which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the process;

· the value of the portfolio of investment securities that we hold may be adversely affected;

· we may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums because market developments have significantly depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits; and

· declines in our stock price, as well as changes to other risk factors discussed herein, could result in impairment of our goodwill which would have an adverse effect on our earnings.

We cannot predict the effect on our operations of recent legislative and regulatory initiatives that were enacted in response to the ongoing financial crisis.

United States federal, state and foreign governments have taken or are considering extraordinary actions in an attempt to deal with the worldwide financial crisis.  To the extent adopted, many of these actions have been in effect for only a limited time, and have produced limited or no relief to the capital, credit and real estate markets.  There is no assurance that these actions or other actions under consideration will ultimately be successful.

In the United States, the federal government has adopted the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.  With authority granted under these laws, the U.S. Treasury has proposed a financial stability plan that is intended to:

· invest in financial institutions and purchase troubled assets and mortgages from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the United States financial markets;

· temporarily increase the limit on FDIC deposit insurance coverage to $250,000 per depositor through December 31, 2009 (which was extended to December 31, 2013 under the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009); and

· provide for various forms of economic stimulus, including to assist homeowners restructure and lower mortgage payments on qualifying loans.

20

Numerous other actions have been taken by the United States Congress, the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, the FDIC, the SEC and others to address the liquidity and credit crisis that has followed the subprime mortgage crisis that commenced in 2007, including the financial stability plan adopted by the U.S. Treasury.  In addition, President Obama announced a financial regulatory reform proposal, and the House and Senate are expected to consider competing proposals over the coming years.

There can be no assurance that the financial stability plan proposed by the U.S. Treasury, the other proposals under consideration or any other legislative or regulatory initiatives will be effective at dealing with the ongoing economic crisis and improving economic conditions globally, nationally or in our markets, or that the measures adopted will not have adverse consequences. The terms and costs of these activities, or the failure of these actions to help stabilize the financial markets, asset prices, market liquidity and a continuation or worsening of current financial market and economic conditions could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and the trading prices of our securities.

Negative developments in the financial industry and the credit markets may subject us to additional regulation.

As a result of ongoing challenges facing the United States economy, the potential exists for new laws and regulations regarding lending and funding practices and liquidity standards to be promulgated, and bank regulatory agencies are expected to be active in responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations, including the expected issuance of many formal enforcement orders.  Negative developments in the financial industry and credit markets, and the impact of new legislation in response to those developments, may negatively impact our operations by restricting our business operations, including our ability to originate or sell loans, and may adversely impact our financial performance.

Our allowance for loan losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio.

We established our allowance for loan losses and maintain it at a level considered adequate by management to absorb loan losses that are inherent in the portfolio.  Additionally, our Board of Directors regularly monitors the adequacy of our allowance for loan loses.  The amount of future loan losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates, which may be beyond our control, and such losses may exceed current estimates.  At December 31, 2009 and 2008, our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.57% and 1.05%, respectively, and as a percentage of total non-performing loans was 46.2% and 67.3%, respectively.  Although management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb losses on any existing loans that may become uncollectible, we cannot predict loan losses with certainty nor can we assure you that our allowance for loan losses will prove sufficient to cover actual loan losses in the future.  Loan losses in excess of our reserves will adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.  The increased levels of provision for loan losses experienced during 2009 and 2008, as compared to historical levels, may continue for some period of time.

Declines in value may adversely impact the carrying amount of our investment portfolio and result in other-than-temporary impairment charges.

As of December 31, 2009, we had three investments in pooled trust preferred securities with an aggregate par value of $2.5 million and book value of $1.5 million after recording other-than-temporary impairment charges of $961,000 in 2009.  The remaining unrealized non-credit related losses on these securities totaled approximately $1.3 million at December 31, 2009.  We may be required to record additional impairment charges on our investment securities if they suffer further declines in value that are considered other-than-temporary.  If the credit quality of the securities in our investment portfolio further deteriorates, we may also experience a loss in interest income from the suspension of either interest or dividend payments.  Numerous factors, including lack of liquidity for resales of certain investment securities, absence of reliable pricing information for investment securities, adverse changes in business climate or adverse actions by regulators could have a negative effect on our investment portfolio in future periods.

21

Higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments could adversely affect our financial condition.

FDIC insurance premiums increased substantially in 2009, and we expect to pay higher FDIC premiums in the future.  Bank failures have significantly depleted the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund and reduced the Deposit Insurance Fund's ratio of reserves to insured deposits.  The FDIC adopted a revised risk-based deposit insurance assessment schedule on February 27, 2009, which raised deposit insurance premiums.  On May 22, 2009, the FDIC also implemented a special assessment equal to five basis points of each insured depository institution's assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, but no more than 10 basis points times the institution's assessment base for the second quarter of 2009, collected on September 30, 2009.  Additionally, on November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule that required insured depository institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009, their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012.  Additional special assessments may be imposed by the FDIC for future periods.

We participate in the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, or TLG, for non-interest-bearing transaction deposit accounts.  Banks that participate in the TLG's non-interest-bearing transaction account guarantee will pay the FDIC an annual assessment of 10 basis points on the amounts in such accounts above the amounts covered by FDIC deposit insurance.  To the extent that these TLG assessments are insufficient to cover any loss or expenses arising from the TLG program, the FDIC is authorized to impose an emergency special assessment on all FDIC-insured depository institutions.  The FDIC has authority to impose charges for the TLG program upon depository institution holding companies, as well.  The TLG was scheduled to end December 31, 2009, but the FDIC has extended it to June 30, 2010 at an increased charge of 15 to 25 basis points beginning January 1, 2010, depending on the depository institution's risk assessment category rating assigned with respect to regular FDIC assessments if the institution elects to remain in the TLG.  These changes have caused the premiums and TLG assessments charged by the FDIC to increase.  These actions have increased our noninterest expense in 2009 and are expected to increase our costs for the foreseeable future.

Our concentration of one-to-four family residential mortgage loans may result in lower yields and profitability.

One-to-four family residential mortgage loans comprised $98.3 million and $112.8 million, or 28.3% and 30.5%, of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These loans are secured primarily by properties located in the state of Kansas.  Our concentration of these loans results in lower yields relative to other loan categories within our loan portfolio.  While these loans generally possess higher yields than investment securities, their repayment characteristics are not as well defined and they generally possess a higher degree of interest rate risk versus other loans and investment securities within our portfolio.  This increased interest rate risk is due to the repayment and prepayment options inherent in residential mortgage loans which are exercised by borrowers based upon the overall level of interest rates.  These residential mortgage loans are generally made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayments from his or her employment and the value of the property securing the loan.  Thus, as a result, repayment of these loans is also subject to general economic and employment conditions within the communities and surrounding areas where the property is located.

The effects of ongoing mortgage market challenges, combined with the ongoing correction in residential real estate market prices and reduced levels of home sales, has the potential to adversely affect our one-to-four family residential mortgageportfolio in several ways, each of which could adversely affect our operating results and/or financial condition.

Commercial loans make up a significant portion of our loan portfolio.

Commercial loans comprised $98.2 million and $102.0 million, or 28.2% and 27.6%, of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  Our commercial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower.  Most often, this collateral is accounts receivable, inventory, or machinery.  Credit support provided by the borrower for most of these loans and the probability of repayment is based on the liquidation of the pledged collateral and enforcement of a personal guarantee, if any exists.  As a result, in the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.  The collateral securing other loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.

22

Our agricultural loans involve a greater degree of risk than other loans, and the ability of the borrower to repay may be affected by many factors outside of the borrower’s control.

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, agricultural real estate loans totaled $7.0 million and $7.2 million, or 2.0% and 1.9% of our total loan portfolio, respectively.  Agricultural real estate lending involves a greater degree of risk and typically involves larger loans to single borrowers than lending on single-family residences. Payments on agricultural real estate loans are dependent on the profitable operation or management of the farm property securing the loan. The success of the farm may be affected by many factors outside the control of the farm borrower, including adverse weather conditions that prevent the planting of a crop or limit crop yields (such as hail, drought and floods), loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agricultural products (both domestically and internationally) and the impact of government regulations (including changes in price supports, subsidies and environmental regulations). In addition, many farms are dependent on a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death may significantly affect the successful operation of the farm.  If the cash flow from a farming operation is diminished, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. The primary crops in our market areas are wheat, corn and soybean.  Accordingly, adverse circumstances affecting wheat, corn and soybean crops could have an adverse effect on our agricultural real estate loan portfolio.

We also originate agricultural operating loans. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, these loans totaled $31.2 million and $36.0 million, respectively, or 9.0% and 9.7% respectively, of our total loan portfolio. As with agricultural real estate loans, the repayment of operating loans is dependent on the successful operation or management of the farm property.  Likewise, agricultural operating loans involve a greater degree of risk than lending on residential properties, particularly in the case of loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets such as farm equipment, livestock or crops.  We generally secure agricultural operating loans with a blanket lien on livestock, equipment, food, hay, grain and crops.  Nevertheless, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation.

Our business is concentrated in and dependent upon the continued growth and welfare of the markets in which we operate, including eastern, central and southwestern Kansas.

We operate primarily in eastern, central and southwestern Kansas, and as a result, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are subject to changes in the economic conditions in those areas.  Although each market we operate in is geographically and economically diverse, our success depends upon the business activity, population, income levels, deposits and real estate activity in each of these markets.  Although our customers’ business and financial interests may extend well beyond our market area, adverse economic conditions that affect our specific market area could reduce our growth rate, affect the ability of our customers to repay their loans to us and generally affect our financial condition and results of operations. Because of our geographic concentration, we are less able than other regional or national financial institutions to diversify our credit risks across multiple markets.

We may experience difficulties in managing our growth and our growth strategy involves risks that may negatively impact our net income.

As part of our general strategy, we may acquire banks, branches and related businesses that we believe provide a strategic fit with our business.  In the past, we have acquired a number of local banks and branches and, to the extent that we continue to grow through future acquisitions, we cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately and profitably manage this growth. Acquiring other banks and businesses will involve risks commonly associated with acquisitions, including:

· potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of banks and businesses we acquire;

· exposure to potential asset quality issues of the acquired bank or related business;

· difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of banks and businesses we acquire;

· potential disruption to our business;

· potential diversion of our management’s time and attention; and

· the possible loss of key employees and customers of the banks and businesses we acquire.

In addition to acquisitions, we may expand into additional communities or attempt to strengthen our position in our current markets by undertaking additional branch openings.  We believe that it generally takes several years for new banking facilities to first achieve operational profitability, due to the impact of organization and overhead expenses and the start-up phase of generating loans and deposits.  To the extent that we undertake additional branch openings, we are likely to continue to experience the effects of higher operating expenses relative to operating income from the new operations, which may have an adverse effect on our levels of reported net income, return on average equity and return on average assets.

23

We face intense competition in all phases of our business from other banks and financial institutions.

The banking and financial services business in our market is highly competitive.  Our competitors include large regional banks, local community banks, savings and loan associations, securities and brokerage companies, mortgage companies, insurance companies, finance companies, money market mutual funds, credit unions and other non-bank financial service providers, many of which have greater financial, marketing and technological resources than us.  Increased competition in our market may result in a decrease in the amounts of our loans and deposits, reduced spreads between loan rates and deposit rates or loan terms that are more favorable to the borrower.  Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow and remain profitable.  If increased competition causes us to significantly discount the interest rates we offer on loans or increase the amount we pay on deposits, our net interest income could be adversely impacted.  If increased competition causes us to relaxour underwriting standards, we could be exposed to higher losses from lending activities.  Additionally, many of our competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets and offer a broader range of financial services than we can offer.

Interest rates and other conditions impact our results of operations.

Our profitability is in part a function of the spread between the interest rates earned on investments and loans and the interest rates paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities.  Like most banking institutions, our net interest spread and margin will be affected by general economic conditions and other factors, including fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government, that influence market interest rates and our ability to respond to changes in such rates.  At any given time, our assets and liabilities will be such that they are affected differently by a given change in interest rates.  As a result, an increase or decrease in rates, the length of loan terms or the mix of adjustable and fixed rate loans in our portfolio could have a positive or negative effect on our net income, capital and liquidity.  We measure interest rate risk under various rate scenarios and using specific criteria and assumptions.  A summary of this process, along with the results of our net interest income simulations is presented in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.”  Although we believe our current level of interest rate sensitivity is reasonable and effectively managed, significant fluctuations in interest rates may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We must effectively manage our credit risk.

There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, risks of nonpayment, risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral and risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions.  We attempt to minimize our credit risk through prudent loan application approval procedures, careful monitoring of the concentration of our loans within specific industries and periodic independent reviews of outstanding loans by our credit review department.  However, we cannot assure you that such approval and monitoring procedures will reduce these credit risks.  Most of our loans are commercial, real estate, or agriculture loans, each of which is subject to distinct types of risk.  To reduce the lending risks we face, we generally take a security interest in borrowers’ property for all three types of loans.  In addition, we sell certain residential real estate loans to third parties.  Nevertheless, the risk of non-payment is inherent in all three types of loans and if we are unable to collect amounts owed, it may materially affect our operations and financial performance.

For a more complete discussion of our lending activities see Part 1 of Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our loan portfolio has a large concentration of real estate loans, which involve risks specific to real estate value.

Real estate lending (including commercial, construction, and residential) is a large portion of our loan portfolio. These categories were $241.7 million, or approximately 69.5% of our total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2009, as compared to $259.4 million, or approximately 70.2%, as of December 31, 2008.  The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located.  Although a significant portion of such loans are secured by a secondary form of collateral, adverse developments affecting real estate values in one or more of our markets could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio.  Additionally, real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of the loans generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. Economic events or governmental regulations outside of the control of the borrower or lender could negatively impact the future cash flow and market values of the affected properties.

24

If the loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled during a time when market conditions are declining or have declined, then we may not be able to realize the amount of security that we anticipated at the time of originating the loan, which could cause us to increase our provision for loan losses and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.  In particular, if the declines in values that have occurred in the residential and commercial real estate markets worsen, particularly within our market area, the value of collateral securing our real estate loans could decline further.  In light of the uncertainty that exists in the economy and credit markets nationally, there can be no guarantee that we will not experience additional deterioration resulting from the downturn in credit performance by our real estate loan customers.

Our anticipated pace of growth may require us to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.

We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations.  We anticipate that our existing capital resources will satisfy our capital requirements for the foreseeable future and this is a major reason why we did not participate in the CPP.  However, we may at some point need to raise additional capital to support continuing growth.  Our ability to raise additional capital is particularly important to our strategy of continual growth through acquisitions.  Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial performance.  Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise additional capital if needed on terms acceptable to us.  If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to further expand our operations through internal growth and acquisitions could be materially impaired.

Attractive acquisition opportunities may not be available to us in the future.

We expect that other banking and financial service companies, many of which have significantly greater resources than us, will compete with us in acquiring other financial institutions if we pursue such acquisitions.  This competition could increase prices for potential acquisitions that we believe are attractive. Also, acquisitions are subject to various regulatory approvals.  If we fail to receive the appropriate regulatory approvals, we will not be able to consummate an acquisition that we believe is in our best interests.  Among other things, our regulators consider our capital, liquidity, profitability, regulatory compliance and levels of goodwill and intangibles when considering acquisition and expansion proposals.  Any acquisition could be dilutive to our earnings and stockholders' equity per share of our common stock.

Our community banking strategy relies heavily on our management team, and the unexpected loss of key managers may adversely affect our operations.

Much of our success to date has been influenced strongly by our ability to attract and to retain senior management experienced in banking and financial services and familiar with the communities in our market area.  Our ability to retain executive officers, the current management teams, branch managers and loan officers of our operating subsidiaries will continue to be important to the successful implementation of our strategy.  It is also critical, as we grow, to be able to attract and retain qualified additional management and loan officers with the appropriate level of experience and knowledge about our market area to implement our community-based operating strategy.  The unexpected loss of services of any key management personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Government regulation can result in limitations on our operations.

We operate in a highly regulated environment and are subject to supervision and regulation by a number of governmental regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the FDIC and the OCC.  Regulations adopted by these agencies, which are generally intended to provide protection for depositors and customers rather than for the benefit of stockholders, govern a comprehensive range of matters relating to ownership and control of our shares, our acquisition of other companies and businesses, permissible activities for us to engage in, maintenance of adequate capital levels and other aspects of our operations. These bank regulators possess broad authority to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of law. The laws and regulations applicable to the banking industry could change at any time and in light of the recent economic downturn, the industry has experienced a general strengthening of these laws and regulations.  Increased regulation could increase our cost of compliance and adversely affect profitability.  For example, new legislation or regulation may limit the manner in which we may conduct our business, including our ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans and achieve satisfactory interest spreads.

25

We have a continuing need for technological change and we may not have the resources to effectively implement new technology.

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services.  In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency as well as enables financial institutions to reduce costs.  Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations as we continue to grow and expand our market area.  Many of our larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements.  As a result, they may be able to offer additional or superior products to those that we will be able to offer, which would put us at a competitive disadvantage.  Accordingly, we cannot provide you with assurance that we will be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing such products and services to our customers.

There is a limited trading market for our common shares, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you paid for them.

Although our common shares are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “LARK”, the trading in our common shares has substantially less liquidity than many other publicly traded companies.  A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the market of willing buyers and sellers of our common shares at any given time.  This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control.  We cannot assure you that volume of trading in our common shares will increase in the future.

System failure or breaches of our network security could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other liabilities.

The computer systems and network infrastructure we use could be vulnerable to unforeseen problems.  Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our computer equipment against damage from physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or a similar catastrophic event, as well as from security breaches, denial of service attacks, viruses, worms and other disruptive problems caused by hackers.  Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in our operations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  Computer break-ins, phishing and other disruptions could also jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network infrastructure, which may result in significant liability to us and may cause existing and potential customers to refrain from doing business with us.  Although we, with the help of third-party service providers, intend to continue to implement security technology and establish operational procedures to prevent such damage, there can be no assurance that these security measures will be successful. In addition, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms we and our third-party service providers use to encrypt and protect customer transaction data.  A failure of such security measures could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, customer or employee fraud and data processing system failures and errors.

Employee errors and misconduct could subject us to financial losses or regulatory sanctions and seriously harm our reputation. Misconduct by our employees could include hiding unauthorized activities from us, improper or unauthorized activities on behalf of our customers or improper use of confidential information. It is not always possible to prevent employee errors and misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Employee errors could also subject us to financial claims for negligence.

26

We maintain a system of internal controls and insurance coverage to mitigate against operational risks, including data processing system failures and errors and customer or employee fraud. Should our internal controls fail to prevent or detect an occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to pay interest on our debt may adversely impact our ability to pay dividends.

Our $16.5 million of subordinated debentures are held by two business trusts that we control.  Interest payments on the debentures must be paid before we pay dividends on our capital stock, including our common stock.  We have the right to defer interest payments on the debentures for up to 20 consecutive quarters.  However, if we elect to defer interest payments, all deferred interest must be paid before we may pay dividends on our capital stock.  Deferral of interest payments could also cause a decline in the market price of our common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company owns its main office in Manhattan, Kansas and 17 branch offices and leases three branch offices.  The Company also leases a parking lot for one of the branch offices it owns.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company or the Bank is a party, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the Bank’s business.  While the ultimate outcome of current legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the resolution of these legal actions should not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4. RESERVED

27

PART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock has traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol "LARK" since 2001. At December 31, 2009, the Company had approximately 1,085 stockholders, consisting of approximately 375 owners of record and approximately 710 beneficial owners of our common stock.  Set forth below are the reported high and low sale prices of our common stock and dividends paid during the past two years.  Information presented below has been adjusted to give effect to the 5% stock dividends declared in December 2009 and 2008.

Year ended December 31, 2009	High		Low		Cash dividends paid
First Quarter	$	19.51	$	12.61	$	0.1810
Second Quarter		16.41		13.76		0.1810
Third Quarter		15.47		14.30		0.1810
Fourth Quarter	$	15.51	$	14.01	$	0.1810

Year ended December 31, 2008	High		Low		Cash dividends paid
First Quarter	$	23.58	$	21.53	$	0.1723
Second Quarter		22.66		20.17		0.1723
Third Quarter		20.18		14.42		0.1723
Fourth Quarter	$	19.50	$	15.88	$	0.1723

The Company’s ability to pay dividends is largely dependent upon the dividends it receives from the Bank.  The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory limitations on the amount of cash dividends it may pay.  See “Business – Supervision and Regulation – The Company – Dividend Payments” and “Business - Supervision and Regulation – The Bank – Dividend Payments” for a more detailed description of these limitations.

In May 2008, our Board of Directors announced the approval of a stock repurchase program permitting us to repurchase up to 113,400 shares, or 5% of our outstanding common stock.  Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Board of Directors, the May 2008 Repurchase Program will expire when we have repurchased all shares authorized for repurchase thereunder.  As of December 31, 2009 there were 108,006 shares remaining to repurchase under the plan.  The Company did not repurchase any shares pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

28

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

	At or for the years ended December 31,
	2009		2008		2007		2006		2005
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Selected Financial Data:
Total assets	$	584,167	$	602,214	$	606,455	$	590,568	$	465,110
Loans		342,738		365,772		376,157		379,324		274,566
Investment securities		169,619		171,297		164,724		145,884		140,131
Cash and cash equivalents		12,379		13,788		14,739		14,752		21,491
Deposits		438,595		439,546		452,652		444,485		331,273
Borrowings		82,183		104,366		93,088		90,416		85,258
Stockholders’ equity	$	53,895	$	51,406	$	52,296	$	49,236	$	44,073