10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549 

__________________

FORM 10-K

____________________

  X . ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013

 . TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to _______

Commission File Number 000-32865

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	88-0422023
(State of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1130 West Pender St., Suite 230

Vancouver, BC Canada V6E 4A4

(Address of principal executive offices)

(604) 257-3660

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 . Yes     X . No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

 . Yes     X . No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

  X . Yes    . No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 . Yes     X . No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.          .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer

 .                                      

Accelerated Filer  

 .   

Non-Accelerated Filer

 .                 

Smaller Reporting Company  

  X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  

 . Yes     X . No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2013 was $18,966,427 based upon the price ($0.257) at which the common stock was last sold as of the last business day of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter, multiplied by the approximate number of shares of common stock held by persons other than executive officers, directors and five percent stockholders of the registrant without conceding that any such person is an “affiliate” of the registrant for purposes of the federal securities laws. Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “WLGC.OB”

As of March 26, 2014, there were 95,351,955 shares of the registrant’s $0.001 par value common stock issued and 95,120,415 outstanding.

Documents incorporated by reference: None

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	PART I
Item 1	Business	5
Item 1A	Risk Factors	13
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	13
Item 2	Properties	13
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	13
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	14
	PART II
Item 5	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	15
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	16
Item 7	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	19
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	F-1
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	20
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	20
Item 9B	Other Information	21
	PART III
Item 10	Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	22
Item 11	Executive Compensation	25
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	28
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	29
Item 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	30
	PART IV
Item 15	Exhibits	31

4

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections.  We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted.  These risks and uncertainties include the following:

·

The availability and adequacy of our cash flow to meet our requirements;

·

Economic, competitive, demographic, business and other conditions in our local and regional markets;

·

Changes or developments in laws, regulations or taxes in our industry;

·

Actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties including our competitors, as well as legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities;

·

Competition in our industry;

·

The loss of or failure to obtain any license or permit necessary or desirable in the operation of our business;

·

Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;

·

The availability of additional capital to support capital improvements and development; and

·

Other risks identified in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the SEC.

This report should be read completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.  The forward looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this Report.  We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Use of Term

Except as otherwise indicated by the context hereof, references in this report to “Company,” “WLGC,” “we,” “us” and “our” are references to WordLogic Corporation.  All references to “USD” or United States Dollars refer to the legal currency of the United States of America.

4

PART I

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

Business Overview

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 30, 1999 under the original name of The AmericanWest.com, Inc.  Pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated as of March 11, 2003, we merged with and acquired the assets of WordLogic Corporation, a Delaware corporation.  In anticipation of the closing of the merger, we changed our name to WordLogic Corporation.  WordLogic Corporation, the public Nevada Company, was the surviving corporation after the merger.

We are a software company that develops, markets, licenses and sells advanced predictive text solutions designed to accelerate the entry and retrieval of text and information for personal computing devices focusing on smart phones and tablets as well as hybrid touchscreen devices, wearables and car systems.  As efficient text input becomes more important due to the rapid expansion of application for SMS, email, social networking, and search, the Company seeks to provide a natural input method that could reduce finger movements by over 50%, supply accurate multiple word predictions in just a gesture, and help users to control their input and enhance their communication.

The Company anticipates that more and more enterprise users will be relying on mobile and touchscreen devices and its technology will allow those enterprises to remain efficient and accurate.  The Company's patent-pending data structures, algorithms and powerful prediction and Reach™ engines which are embodied in the iKnowU^® keyboard application represent a new method for text input that is not solely focused on typing with speed and accuracy.  Rather, as people input, search, text, email, and compose, the Company seeks to help individuals communicate and control their message, enhancing accuracy while using semantics in order to help users create meaning and find related information based on that meaning.

The Company’s Reach™ technology provides advertising search to create new revenue opportunities through partnerships with online deal consolidator and advertisers.  The technology provides location-based marketing messages in a timely and efficient manner while remaining unobtrusive and maintaining privacy of the user.  With Reach™ the user never needs to switch between apps or exit the message compose screen to access relevant information.

Business Development  

On January 9, 2007, we developed a new text entry/text messaging input solution for smartphones utilizing our patent pending prediction engine.  This new solution for smartphones is more efficient, user friendly and provides a more compelling text entry interface for users than our existing solutions.  In addition, the functionality and configuration of the technology can be expanded and/or modified to suit a user's or manufacturers' specific needs.

On March 15, 2007, we entered into a worldwide non-exclusive license with Cre8txt Limited of Bolton, United Kingdom.  Cre8txt has developed a keyboard which utilizes the skills of people who already use SMS (Short Message Service) texting on mobile phones.  Texting has become popular in Europe, North America and Asia.  Text message specific abbreviations have been developed which allow certain, experienced users to actually type text faster using a numerical keyboard layout rather than using a traditional computer QWERTY keyboard.  The Cre8txt keyboard is similar to a mobile phone keypad, and will utilize the WordLogic(TM) predictive text technology.  The WordLogic Prediction Engine is a powerful software tool which will predict text selected from a database of frequently used words, and will also be capable of translating SMS Text language into full text.  On July 5, 2007, we delivered the first 1,000 units of our software to Cre8txt Limited of Bolton, UK.

In March 2011, a new finger touchscreen prototype of the Company's WordLogic™ Predictive Keyboard was nominated for a CTIA Wireless 2011 Emerging Technology Award.  The CTIA E-Tech Award category covers new or yet-to-be introduced products that enhance productivity and organization.

In February 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with RPX Corporation (“RPX”), for RPX to license the Company’s advanced predictive input software patents.  Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received a $5 million non-dilutive cash payment, while retaining full ownership of its patent portfolio.  RPX Corporation is a provider of patent risk solutions, offering defensive buying, acquisition syndication, patent intelligence and advisory services.  By acquiring patents, RPX helps to mitigate and manage patent risk for its growing client network.

In October 2012, the iKnowU^® keyboard application for Android powered devices was released.  It leverages the Company’s state-of-the-art patented technology, delivering the most advanced keyboard automation solution available.

In January 2013, the Company released its new predictive text solution, WordLogic for Business, allowing organizations to improve productivity through accurate, faster and more consistent text entry across the workforce.

5

In May 2013, the company announced Reach™ patent-pending technology that understands the context of what you’re typing and instantly gives you access to the relevant app or data source to retrieve and share information.  Users are then able to “reach” into these other sources and pull key information into the message you’re composing.  Whether writing a text, email, IM or social update WordLogic Reach works seamlessly – meaning that the user never needs to switch between apps or exit the message compose screen. 

Reach™ was awarded CTIA 2014 Top 5 show floor pick by Mobile World Live.

In November 2013, the Company announced it will release Reach™ a technology delivers precise and timely context-based and location-aware marketing messages while users are still working in the iKnowU^® predictive keyboard, superseding the need to exit core applications.  Users no longer have to navigate through numerous applications to obtain information such as directions, restaurant listings, ratings, reviews, travel information and latest deals near their location.

Technology Overview

iKnowU™’s award-winning keyboard is the most feature-rich and intuitive application for Android powered devices.  We are the only keyboard provider that has the ability to predict entire phrases and sentences through their WordChunking™ technology, as well as offering the Company’s Gesturing™ capabilities.  This unique feature gives users the ability to enter words and phrases with sub-second input, resulting in rapid entry speeds with full accuracy.  Since October 2012, over 80,000 Android users have downloaded the application and are enjoying the most feature-rich, intelligent keyboard on the market.  The application uniquely features:

	WordChunkingTM Displays possible predictions allowing you to find the word or phrase you’re looking for more quickly accurately		Word and Phrase Prediction Create whole sentences and phrases in a fraction of the time that you’d normally take to type them
	GesturingTM Enter words and phrases with sub-second input resulting in blazing fast entry speeds with full accuracy		Auto Learn iKnowU learns and monitors your style and use of words, adjusting to better predict what you want to type
	Smart Learn Predicts names of people & places, email addresses, website & more		Right or Left Handed Preference iKnowU adjusts its actions and displays based upon the setup for either right or left-handed

6

The Company’s technology is unique in that it encompasses both the desktop PC and mobile device platforms.  This patented technology can improve the way that mobile device users interact with their devices and open the door to new revenue streams as well as provide a competitive advantage against rival companies.

The Company also sells its patented predictive text technology, WordLogic for Business that brings text and phrase prediction to the workplace in one cost-effective solution.  With over ten years’ experience, the Company understands the need for enterprises to offer their workers the ability to rapidly and seamlessly enter industry or company-specific words and sentences into a multitude of devices from PC’s to mobile phones and tablets.  WordLogic for Business is optimized to run on Android tablets and smartphones as well as desktop PCs.  It can also be used with custom touchscreen devices, such as touchscreen PDAs used by couriers and delivery companies.  WordLogic for Business automatically syncs across all devices currently in use and delivers a consistent, high-quality experience for the end-user, irrespective of the device or platform they are using.  Companies seeking to adopt predictive text can build WordLogic for Business into their existing IT infrastructure using WordLogic's simple SDK.

Reach™ the patent-pending technology provides context-aware search – including advertising search – within every app you are working in through the WordLogic predictive keyboard, superseding the need to exit core applications.  Users will no longer have to navigate through numerous applications to obtain information such as directions, restaurant listings, ratings and reviews, travel information and other contextual data from Google or other mobile and content sites.

This unique ability to deliver precise and timely context-based and location-aware marketing messages gives WordLogic an advantage in the massive global pay-per-click advertising market.  WordLogic Reach™ is truly the first technology to solve the problem of monitoring keystrokes in real-time in order to return contextual and location-based marketing messages in a timely and efficient manner while remaining unobtrusive and maintaining privacy of the user.  Reach™ leverages our patented intelligent keyboard to provide advertisers, marketers and handset makers with technology that can potentially drive massive incremental advertising and marketing revenue straight from mobile or tablet touch screen keyboards without the need for other applications or external technologies.

Currently, WordLogic is developing a version of the award winning iKnowU^® keyboard that integrates Reach™ Advertising Search to create new revenue opportunities through partnerships with online deal consolidator and providers that offers thousands of local deals covering hundreds of cities in North America.  Using WordLogic Reach™, allows users’ existing texts to be analyzed for context information, indicating what are they talking about, as well as the location of where they are talking about it.  For example, when users ask about doing a spa day in Whistler, Reach™ can show them relevant information about deals related to what they are discussing with their friends.  With a network of the most popular deal sites gathering over 30,000 offers per month, Reach™ users will be able to directly access money-saving deals within their email or text messaging applications.  These partnerships give way to incredible revenue opportunities for WordLogic by receiving revenue up to 10% of each deal purchased and revenues per advertisement viewed, while allowing users to enjoy deals that might not have been taken advantage of previously.  WordLogic is expanding their portfolio of partnerships, creating unique opportunities for revenue growth and extraordinarily intuitive accessibility for users.

Current projects in development include an iOS version that will work in a custom messaging and note-taking application.

WordLogic recognizes the underserved Apple device market when it pertains to predictive technologies and looks to expand its market to iPads and iPhones.  Also WordLogic is integrating its predictive technologies into voice recognition software to allow for phrase and context aware search by talking to a device.  WordLogic realizes that this is a significant market for auto drivers as state laws ban use of mobile devices with your hands and eye gazing.  WordLogic is also exploring using their tightly constructed set of algorithms and data structures allowing it to operate quickly and efficiently in wearable computing.  Combined with the ability to predict not only words but letters, n-grams including up to 5 word sequences of language that can be defined and predicted better than ever before.  Other current development efforts include adding more language dictionaries to the iKnowU^® product including Mandarin, Japanese, and Arabic.

Intellectual Property

We own the copyright of all of the content of our website, www.WordLogic.com.

On October 21, 2003 we received trademark approval for the mark “WordLogic” under Reg. No. 2,774,468 pending in the United States.  A similar trademark application has been approved and registered in Canada under TMA576,700.

Our intellectual property portfolio includes eight issued U.S. and European patents and nine pending U.S. patent applications, one of which has received a Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”).

7

In conjunction with its wholly owned subsidiary, 602531 British Columbia Ltd., the Company holds U.S. patents 7,293,231, 7,681,124, 7,716,579, and 7,921,361, which relate to data entry for personal computing devices.  U.S. patent 7,293,231, which the Company believes to be one of its pioneering patents, relates to various methods, systems, devices, and computer-readable media for use in connection with computer-assisted data entry and patent 8,552,984 B2, which deals with the redirection of information for the purposes of processing which occurs between the keyboard and the application receiving the input.

Equivalent foreign patents include EP 1171813 (WO 0057265), published under the Patent Cooperation Treaty and accepted by the European Patent Office.  EP 1171813 is also accepted in Germany, France, the UK, Italy, Finland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Portugal.  Additionally, a patent for a data entry method and system for personal computer and corresponding computer-readable medium is published by the World Intellectual Property Organization as WO 0233527 and by the European Patent Office as EP 1356368.

In addition, the Company has five U.S. patent applications filed in connection with its U.S. patent 7,293,231 related to various aspects of computer-assisted data entry.  These entail three divisional patent applications (#11/133,779, #11/134,759, and #11/134,810) and two continuation applications (#11/871,900 and #11/871,904).  These applications are also in the name of the Company's subsidiary 602531 British Columbia.

For the Company's pending applications, the USPTO has recently issued a Notice of Allowance for application #11/871,900 related to keyboard prediction and search utilizing gesturing software technology.

On February 12, 2013 we received trademark notice of allowance for the mark “IKNOWU” under serial number 85678117 in the United States.

In February 2013 the Company filed a new patent covering the Reach™ technology.

On October 8, 2013 the Company received Patent No.  US 8,552,984 B2 associated with application 11/036,267 which covers the processing which occurs between the keyboard and the application it is sending inputs to.

We will principally rely upon trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret and contract law to protect our proprietary rights.  We generally intend to enter into confidentiality agreements, “work-made-for-hire” contracts and intellectual property licenses with our employees, consultants and corporate partners, respectively, as part of our efforts to control access to and distribution of our products, content and other proprietary information.

Summary of the Company’s Patents and Patent Applications

ISSUED PATENTS
Issued Patent Number	Location	Issue Date	Description
1356368	Europe	Jan. 2008	Data Entry Method and System for Personal Computer, and Corresponding Computer Readable Medium
1171813	Europe	Mar. 2004	Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices
7,293,231	U.S.	Nov. 2007	Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices
7,681,124	U.S.	Mar. 2010	Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices
7,716,579	U.S.	May 2010	Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices
7,921,361	U.S.	April 2011	Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices
8,552,984 B2	U.S.	Oct. 2013	Method, System, Apparatus and Computer-Readable Media for Directing Input Associated with Keyboard-Type Device

PATENT APPLICATIONS
Application Number	Location	Type	Recent USPTO Action
#11/133,779	U.S.	Divisional Patent Application
#11/134,759	U.S.	Divisional Patent Application
#11/134,810	U.S.	Divisional Patent Application
#11/871,900	U.S.	Continuation Application
#11,871,904	U.S.	Continuation Application

8

A copy of our patents can be obtained from the USPTO web site located at www.uspto.gov or from our website located at www.WordLogic.com, which provides a direct link to the patents.

Product Availability

The Company released iKnowU^® to support Android-based devices, as Android became a market leader with a more than 75% share by the end of 2012 (Source: Business Insider 2012).  The iKnowU^® is available to download from the Google Play store for $1.99, with a free time-limited trial version also available.

The Company also brings the incredible power of its patented predictive text technology, released its new predictive text solution, WordLogic for Business, allowing organizations to improve productivity through accurate, faster and more consistent text entry across the workforce.  Organizations seeking to adopt predictive text can build WordLogic for Business into their existing IT infrastructure using WordLogic's simple Software Development Kits.  WordLogic for Business is available worldwide to businesses of all sizes as either a fully-hosted service from WordLogic or installed and internally hosted on the customer's systems and is available in multiple languages.

Target Customers

The Company’s target customers will likely include Tier 1 wireless operators in the U.S. as well as smartphone original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).  In the telecommunications industry, a Tier 1 wireless carrier entails a company that is the sole operator of its network, indicating that this provider offers a direct connection to the networks it uses to deliver voice and data as well as to the Internet.  AT&T Inc. (T-NYSE), Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ-NYSE), Sprint Nextel Corp. (S-NYSE), and T-Mobile USA, Inc. are examples of Tier 1 operators.  Conversely, Tier 2 companies may procure a portion of their networks from the Tier 1 carriers, and Tier 3 operators are wholly reliant on the networks of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 firms.  In addition to targeting the Tier 1 carriers, the Company intends to market its technology to smartphone OEMs.  Examples of smartphone OEMs include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Apple, HTC Corp., Huawei, Nokia and LG Electronics Inc. Customers this size may have the potential to apply the Company’s technology in up to 300 million units annually.

The Company will also be targeting its enterprise solution WordLogic for Business to individual corporations, as well as enterprise software manufacturers such as Oracle, Microsoft and SAP.

The launch of iKnowU^® with Reach™ will be targeted at the current consumer android market of 2.5 billion total units in 2014.

Marketing Strategy

The Company designed and implemented a new logo and website design in 2012.  In October of 2012, the Company soft-launched its first Android product iKnowU^® on Google Play and created a specifically branded site iknowu.net.  The Company started marketing campaigns and promotion of the iKnowU^® product via banner advertising campaigns on numerous mobile and internet portals.

The Company has engaged a marketing and public relations firms to disseminate the iKnowU^® and Reach™ - WordLogic message to publishers worldwide.

The Company attended Apps World, CTIA and Mobile World Congress in 2013 to demonstrate WordLogic technologies to the industry.

Future retail-based marketing plans include customer email campaigns featuring corporate news and updated product information, external email marketing campaigns to attract new customers, and affiliate marketing.

WordLogic is also exploring partnerships with other application developers, including VOIP, chat and messaging applications to leverage their existing customer base of millions of users to introduce them to WordLogic iKnowU^® and Reach™.

WordLogic will be executing a marketing plan using paid advertising using Google AdWords, Facebook and Twitter advertising for the iKnowU^® with Reach™ platform in 2014 that will provide millions new customers by end of year 2014.

9

Growth Strategy

In addition to further developing its current product offering, much of the Company’s strategy for growth going forward is based on its U.S. and European patents.  As well as leveraging its intellectual property, the Company seeks to increase emphasis on its predictive text platform, which the Company believes can offer predictive input with a broad range of Internet-enabled control and communication applications.  

Other projects in development include expanding and enhancing the Company’s retail product offerings.  Including the launch of iKnowU^® with Reach™ platform in 2014 pursuing an advertising revenue mode that will drive revenues and downloads in 2014.

WordLogic’s patented approach to contextual natural language prediction is the most powerful one available on the market today.  It’s has a tightly constructed set of algorithms and data structures allowing it to operate quickly and efficiently in form factors that its competitors cannot operate in giving it more range of uses as devices once again turn smaller (wearable computing).

Ultimately, the Company believes that it may become an acquisition target for larger companies within the technology sector due to the breadth of its patent portfolio and the novel characteristics of its technology.

The Industry

Smartphones and mobile devices have become a necessity for many professional and non-professional individuals.  Touchscreens, email, 3G, 4G, and power-packed mobile applications have resulted in considerable growth of new devices.  To this extent, the Company estimates that nearly 75% of phones shipped in the U.S. contain either a QWERTY or touchscreen keyboard.  Over 1 billion smartphones were sold in 2013 and could see up to a 20% increase in 2014.

Likewise, the PC market represents billions of dollars of equipment that uses text input and millions of consumers who could benefit from refined input and search options.  Although not double digit growth in 2014, 300 million desktop PCs, portable computers, and mini-notebooks are expected to ship to consumers, The Company may be of value to PC manufacturers that are seeking innovative advancements to the PC experience in order to remain competitive.  Likewise, versions of the Company's technology can be incorporated into the growing number of tablet computers entering the marketplace (estimated at over 285 million for 2014).

Further, the information technology (IT) industry is experiencing several related trends: (1) rapid growth of mobile devices; (2) tablets gaining in popularity over netbooks; (3) smartphones becoming more advanced; (4) enterprise workers seeking to use their phones for both business and personal tasks; and (5) increasing developer activity online.  Accordingly, there will likely be even greater emphasis on mobile apps going forward, particularly for tablets, and targeted toward enterprise.  In many cases, large enterprises are expected to launch apps specific for their workforces, as these companies seek to reduce costs and leverage time and cost efficiencies (Source: The New Wave of App Development from TechNewsWorld ™, February 1, 2011).

Outsell, Inc., a research and advisory firm for the publishing and information industries, estimates that the global information industry is valued at $506 billion with strong gains coming from web search.  The Company believes that there is considerable unmet need within this market for improved enterprise search tools and, consequently, an opportunity for our technology operating as either a front-end application or as a standalone product.

Wearable technology market revenue was $4.3 billion as of 2012 and is expected to reach to $14.0 billion by 2018, growing at an estimated CAGR of 18.93 % from 2013 to 2018 and provide a significant opportunity for the Company’s technologies because of the structure of the code and small memory footprint.

Competition

The Company believes that speed, ease of use, phrase prediction and a relatively small footprint are advantages of its technology that could further establish the Company as a provider of text input and manipulation software, particularly for mobile phones.  However, as the demand for text-savvy phones accelerates, competition among text input solution providers is also increasing.  Introducing technology and user interface enhancements is crucial to maintaining a competitive advantage.

Altogether, the predictive technology landscape is considered to be relatively competitive.  Yet, within the refined search area, the Company believes that there are fewer competitors because although many developers would like to build better predictive text technologies, many do not possess the existing technology and code to do so.

10

We compete with companies such as SwiftKey and Nuance that offer keyboard solutions that are not as robust as the company offerings but have significant market share among handset manufacturers and carriers.  In 2012, SwiftKey spent more days as Google Play’s No.1 paid download than any other app, validating the global market for better text input for mobile devices.  As we increase marketing and the awareness of the iKnowU™ product we are poised to significantly capture our competitor’s clients and new customers.

Government Regulation

The Company believes that speed, ease of use, phrase prediction and a relatively small footprint are advantages of its technology that could further establish the Company as a provider of text input and manipulation software, particularly for mobile phones.  However, as the demand for text-savvy phones accelerates, competition among text input solution providers is also increasing.  Introducing technology and user interface enhancements is crucial to maintaining a competitive advantage.

Altogether, the predictive technology landscape is considered to be relatively competitive.  Yet, within the refined search area, the Company believes that there are fewer competitors because although many developers would like to build better predictive text technologies, many do not possess the existing technology and code to do so.

We compete with companies such as SwiftKey and Nuance that offer keyboard solutions that are not as robust as the company offerings but have significant market share among handset manufacturers and carriers.  In 2012, SwiftKey spent more days as Google Play’s No.1 paid download than any other app, validating the global market for better text input for mobile devices.  As we increase marketing and the awareness of the iKnowU^® product we are poised to significantly capture our competitor’s clients and new customers.

The Company’s Reach technology is a market differentiator that provides significant advertising revenue opportunities above and beyond the competition’s business models of licensing and consumer purchases.

WordLogic’s patented approach to contextual natural language prediction also provides a significant advantage to the wearable computing market due to the technologies’ approach to language patterns and small memory footprint and CPU requirements.

Government Regulation

Because we sell products through the Internet, we may be subject to rules and regulations around the world, which will affect our business.  The laws and regulations that govern Internet commerce change rapidly.  Also, because we carry on business in Canada, we are subject to laws regarding employment, taxes and other regulatory issues for our Canadian operations.  The following laws and regulations applicable to Internet commerce and are relevant to our business:

Privacy Law.  The state of privacy law is unsettled, and rapidly changing.  Current and proposed federal, state and foreign privacy regulations and other laws restricting the collection, use and disclosure of personal information could limit our ability to use the information in our databases to generate revenues.  In late 1998, COPPA was enacted, mandating that measures be taken to safeguard minors under the age of 13.  The FTC promulgated regulations implementing COPPA on October 21, 1999, which became effective on April 21, 2000.  The principal COPPA requirement is that individually identifiable information about minors under the age of 13 not be collected, used or displayed without first obtaining informed parental consent that is verifiable in light of present technology.

The FTC final regulations create a “sliding scale” of permissible methods for obtaining such consent.  Consent for internal use of the individually identifiable information of children under the age of 13 can be obtained through e-mail plus an additional safeguard, such as confirming consent with a delayed e-mail, telephone call, or letter.  Obtaining verifiable consent from a child’s parent to share that child’s information with a third party or enable the child to publicly distribute the information by, for example, allowing unrestricted access to a chat room or message board is significantly more burdensome.  While the temporary “sliding scale implementation was due to expire on April 21, 2002, on October 31, 2001, the FTC extended the implementation period through April 21, 2005.  On April 21, 2005, the “sliding scale” mechanism was extended indefinitely.

The FTC has required that parental consent for such higher risk activities be verified by more secure methods than e-mail, such as a credit card in connection with a transaction, print-and-sign forms, toll-free numbers staffed by trained operators, or digital signatures.  Complying with the new requirements is costly and may dissuade some of our customers from using our products.  While we will attempt to be fully compliant with the FTC requirements, our efforts may not be entirely successful.  In addition, at times, we rely upon outside vendors to maintain data-collection software, and there can be no assurance that they will at all times comply with our instructions to comply with COPPA.  If our methods of complying with COPPA are inadequate, we may face litigation with the FTC or individuals, which would adversely affect our business.

11

Moreover, we have posted a privacy policy pertaining to all users and visitors to our web site.  By doing so, we will subject ourselves to the jurisdiction of the FTC.  Should any of our business practices be found to differ from our privacy policy, we could be subject to sanctions and penalties from the FTC.  It is also possible that users or visitors could try to recover damages in a civil action as well.

The European Union recently enacted its own privacy regulations that may result in limits on the collection and use of certain user information.  The laws governing the Internet, however, remain largely unsettled, even in areas where there has been some legislative action.  It may take years to determine whether and how existing laws such as those governing intellectual property, privacy, libel and commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws, both in the United States and abroad, that may impose additional burdens on companies conducting business on the Internet.  Furthermore, the Federal Trade Commission has recently investigated the disclosure of personal identifying information obtained from individuals by Internet companies.  Evolving areas of law that are relevant to our business include privacy law, regulation on what websites contain, and sales and use tax.  Because of this rapidly evolving and uncertain regulatory environment, we cannot predict how these laws and regulations might affect our business.  In addition, these uncertainties make it difficult to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations governing the Internet.  These laws and regulations could harm us by subjecting us to liability or forcing us to change how we do business.

Conformance to E-Commerce Statutory Requirements for Formation of Contracts.  We intend to conduct e-commerce on our web site, and through affiliated web sites.  The applicable law on online formation of contracts has been unsettled and is evolving.  On June 30, 2000, the federal government enacted the “E-Sign” statute, which in limited cases permits online formation of contracts.  Similarly, on January 1, 2000, California adopted a standard version of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“UETA”), which also permits electronic signatures and record-keeping for certain types of contracts.  We attempt to comply with these laws, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful.  Judicial interpretation of the applicability of these laws could result in customer contracts being set aside or modified.  In that case, our e-commerce revenue could be materially adversely affected.

Sales Tax.  The tax treatment of goods sold over the Internet is currently unsettled.  A number of proposals have been made at the state and local level that would impose additional taxes on the sale of goods through the Internet.  Such proposals, if adopted, could substantially impair the growth of electronic commerce and could adversely affect our opportunity to derive financial benefit from electronic commerce.  While the Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) has placed a moratorium on new state and local taxes on Internet commerce, the tax moratorium expired on November 1, 2003, and has not been re-enacted.  On November 1, 2007, the "Internet Tax Freedom Act Amendment Acts of 2007" was signed into law.  It extends the prohibitions against multiple and discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce until November 1, 2014. 

12

WHERE YOU CAN GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.  You may read and copy our reports or other filings made with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549.  You can obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.  You can also access these reports and other filings electronically on the SEC’s web site, www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

On June 23, 2010, we entered into a lease agreement for office space located at 1130 West Pender St., Suite 230, Vancouver, BC Canada V6E 4A4. Since that time, we have not sought to move or change our office site.  Our telephone number remains (604) 257-3600. Under the lease, we currently pay a total of $6,954 CAD per month on a month-to-month basis for 2,113 ft of corporate office space.  The space we lease is utilized for general main office purposes.

On January 15, 2013, we also entered into a lease agreement for new office space located at 25 Broadway, 10^th Floor, New York, NY 10004 U.S.A.  Under the lease, we currently pay a total of $1,300 USD per month on a month-to-month basis for 80 ft of corporate office space.  The space we lease is utilized for general office purposes.

On July 10, 2012, we also entered into a lease agreement for new office space located at 3820 Cessna Drive, Suite 190, Richmond, BC Canada V7B 0A2. Under the lease, we currently pay a total of $2,172 CAD per month on a month-to-month basis for 934 ft of corporate office space.  The space we lease is utilized for general office purposes. Additional space may be required as we expand our operations. We do not foresee any significant difficulties in obtaining any required additional space. We do not own any real estate.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In January 2011, Mr. Knaven, a former officer and director of the Company, commenced a complaint to British Columbia’s Employment Standards Branch against the Company (the “ESB Complaint”) alleging that he was owed unpaid wages.  In October 2011, Mr. Knaven initiated two further legal proceedings against the Company in B.C. Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court Actions”), in which he advanced further complaints in respect of claims for shares and interest, a claim for wrongful dismissal, and further claims for general and unspecified damages.

Regarding the ESB Complaint, on October 24, 2012 the Company applied successfully for a ruling placing that complaint in abeyance, to be dealt with by the B.C. Supreme Court rather than the ESB.  In accordance with that ruling, Mr. Knaven on November 9, 2011 delivered a proposed amendment to his Notice of Civil Claim in one of the Supreme Court Actions.  The quantified portion of Mr. Knaven’s claims totals approximately $261,752. He also seeks general and unspecified damages which are unquantified. Notwithstanding, $175,310 had been held in trust by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the subject of a garnishment (See also Note 3).  On July 23, 2013 WordLogic obtained a court order releasing $22,124.83 of those funds.   

The Company vigorously contests the claims, and has filed Responses and Counterclaims regarding all of the above referenced disputes.  The Counterclaims name Mr. Knaven and others as defendants by counterclaim. Mr. Knaven has been served and has filed Responses disputing and denying the Counterclaims.

In November 2013 the Company settled certain claims by Mr. Knaven and certain counterclaims by the Company as against Mr. Knaven.  Following the settlement, the parties discontinued the claim and counterclaim as against each other, and Mr. Knaven withdrew a complaint he had made to the British Columbia’s Employment Standards Branch.  In consideration for the settlement, the Company released $155,328 from the B.C. Supreme Court ordered garnishment to Mr. Knaven and issued 500,000 common shares of the Company valued at $57,500 to him.  As result of the settlement, the Company recorded loss of $24,710.  

13

In the proceedings referenced above, the Company had filed a counterclaim naming Mr. Knaven along with certain other defendants by counterclaim. Those other defendants by counterclaim have not yet been served. They include Mr. Mike Flom who appears to have been involved in assisting Mr. Knaven in formulating and advancing Knaven’s various claims against the Company.

In addition, although Mr. Flom has neither threatened nor served any legal proceedings of his own, Mr. Flom had, during 2012, asserted that the Company owed him a “termination” payment and related sums totaling in excess of $500,000, and the issuance of shares.  The Company has put Mr. Flom on notice that it does not accept those assertions.

In January 2013, the Company received notice from the former Chief Operating Officer Paul Silverstein, threatening a “whistle blower” claim pursuant to the US Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank legislation, to be commenced in the State of New York, alleging he was forced to resign because he was investigating expenses incurred by the Chief Executive Officer.  The Company denies the allegations, and further maintains the matter is to be resolved by arbitration. Accordingly on March 8, 2013 it commenced an arbitration in British Columbia, Canada to resolve the issues.  The Company also appointed an independent director to conduct an investigation into the allegations raised by Silverstein to report to the Board of Directors on the outcome of his investigation, together with recommendations. The report was delivered to the Board of Directors on March 13, 2013. In response to an objection to jurisdiction raised by the former COO, the arbitrator commenced an initial process to determine his jurisdiction and ruled in favour of WordLogic.

On April 2, 2013, a complaint was filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by Silverstein against the Company in regards to certain claims asserted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act by Mr. Silverstein related to allegations of fraud and the termination of Silverstein as President and CEO of the Corporation. On October 3, 2013, the Corporation filed counterclaims against Silverstein related to his misconduct in the last month of his employment and upon his resignation.  The Corporation vigorously denies Silverstein's allegations and will aggressively defend the claim and pursue its claims against Silverstein

On December 30, 2013, the Company reached an out of court settlement with Paul Silverstein regarding the previously disclosed claim filed by Mr. Silverstein and the counter claim filed by the Company. The settlement includes no admission of liability by either party. In consideration for the settlement, the Company issued 4 million warrants to purchase 4 million common shares of the Company to Mr. Paul Silverstein.  Fair value of the warrants was estimated using Black-Sholes pricing model on settlement date.  The Company recorded loss of $773,644 on this settlement.

On June 28, 2013, Biller Communications (“Biller”), a former consulting firm of the Company entered into a settlement agreement on the pending litigation whereby the Company paid Biller $17,000 in full and final settlement of the matter.  This is a significantly reduced amount from the amount of $30,465 plus interest from May, 2012 and costs sued for in the complaint.   The Company agreed to pay this amount in order to avoid any additional costly litigation, including depositions, court appearances and trial.  The settlement amount was recorded as loss on legal settlement as of December 31, 2013.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.

14

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Common Stock

Our Common Stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB).  Our Common Stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board trading under the symbol “WLGC.OB” since April 14, 2003.  Because we are quoted on the OTCBB, our securities may be less liquid, receive less coverage by security analysts and news media, and generate lower prices than might otherwise be obtained if they were listed on a national securities exchange.

The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for our Common Stock per quarter as reported by the OTCBB for the period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, based on our fiscal year end December 31. These prices represent quotations between dealers without adjustment for retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.  

	First Quarter	Second Quarter	Third Quarter	Fourth Quarter
2013 – High	$0.0949	$0.15	$0.26	$0.24
2013 – Low	$0.065	$0.075	$0.1161	$0.08
2012 – High	$0.20	$0.13	$0.1199	$0.1511
2012 – Low	$0.091	$0.101	$0.09	$0.0687

Record Holders

As of March 26, 2014, an aggregate of 95,351,955 and 95,120,415 shares of our Common Stock were issued and outstanding, respectively, and were owned by approximately 26 holders of record, based on information provided by our transfer agent.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None. 

Re-Purchase and Retirement of Equity Securities

See Note 10 – Treasury Stock of the Notes to Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for information regarding share repurchases and retirement of treasury stock.

The repurchases were made using cash resources and occurred in the open market and pursuant to a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock since inception and presently anticipate that all earnings, if any, will be retained for development of our business and that no dividends on our Common Stock will be declared in the foreseeable future. Any future dividends will be subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, operating and financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and other pertinent facts.  Therefore, there can be no assurance that any dividends on our Common Stock will be paid in the future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

On May 14, 2010, the Company registered on Form S-8 the 2010 Share Incentive Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue up to ten million (10,000,000) shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company’s employees, executives and consultants.

15

On July 30, 2012, the Company registered on Form S-8 the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue up to ten million (10,000,000) shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company’s employees, executives and consultants.

On April 11, 2013, the Company registered on Form S-8 the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue up to twenty five million (25,000,000) shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company’s employees, executives and consultants.

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 7.   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections.  We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted.  You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.  The forward-looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this Report.  We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Working Capital

	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Current Assets	$176,055	$1,758,735
Current Liabilities	$802,383	$487,972
Working Capital (deficit)	$ (626,328)	$ 1,270,763

Cash Flows

	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Cash Flows from (used in) Operating Activities	$(2,321,886)	$1,835,245
Cash Flows from (used in) Investing Activities	865,077	$(936,123)
Cash Flows from (used in) Financing Activities	790,555	$(137,408)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	4,367	$(31,200)
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash During Period	$(661,887)	$730,514

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 were $366 and is comprised of product sales.

Operating revenues for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 were $5,000,991 and is comprised of product sales of $991 and license granting of $5,000,000.

Operating Expenses and Net Loss

Operating expenses for the twelve months period ended December 31, 2013 were $3,950,291 and is comprised of $121,657 in rent, $3,227,885 in selling, general and administrative and $600,749 in research and development. Operating expenses for the same period ended December 31, 2012 were $3,640,436 and is comprised of $119,864 in rent, $3,121,636 in selling, general and administrative and $398,936 in research and development.

16

Net loss for the twelve months period ended December 31, 2013 was $4,772,150 and is comprised of $3,949,925 loss from operations, $6,805 in interest expense, $66 in interest income reversed, $815,354 loss from legal settlement. Net income for the twelve months period ended December 31, 2012 was $1,380,832 and is comprised of $1,360,555 income from operations, $6,992 in interest income, $2,113 in interest expense, $2,947 in gain on interest forgiveness, and $12,451 in gain on settled payable.  

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at December 31, 2013, the Company’s cash and current asset balance was $176,055 compared to $1,758,735 as at December 31, 2012. The decrease in current assets of $1,582,680 is attributed to a decrease of $519,814 in cash and cash equivalents, a decrease of $142,073 in restricted cash, a decrease of $865,077 in investments, a decrease of $15,024 in GST/HST refund receivable, a decrease of $14 in employee advances, a decrease of $387 in interest receivable, and a decrease in prepaid expenses of $40,291.

As at December 31, 2013, the Company had current and total liabilities of $802,383 compared with current and total liabilities of $487,972 as at December 31, 2012. The increase in total liabilities of $314,411 is attributed to an increase of $320,804 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, an increase of $25,555 in indebtedness to related parties, and a decrease of $31,948 in accrued interest.

As at December 31, 2013, the Company had a working capital deficit of $626,328 compared with a working capital of $1,270,763 as at December 31, 2012.  The decrease in working capital was primarily attributed to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents, investments and prepaid expenses and an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

Cashflow from Operating Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company used $2,321,886 of cash for operating activities compared to the generation of $1,835,245 of cash for operating activities during the same period ended December 31, 2012. The change in net cash generated in operating activities is primarily attributed to a decrease in revenue from patents licensing. 

Cashflow from Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received $865,077 of cash for investing activities compared to cash used $936,123 for investing activities during the same period ended December 31, 2012. The change in net cash generated in investing activities is primarily attributed to proceeds of investments in term deposits. 

Cashflow from Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received $790,055 of cash from financing activities compared to cash used of $137,408 for the same period ended December 31, 2012.  The change in cash flows from financing activities is primarily attributed to a decrease in repayment of other promissory notes, net of increase in sale of common shares, and increase of proceed from stock options and warrants exercised.

Going Concern

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue any extensive acquisitions and activities. For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report on our audited financial statements that they have substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern without further financing.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Future Financings

We will continue to rely on equity sales of our common shares in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of the equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our operations and other activities.

17

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

We regularly evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our financial statements. A complete summary of these policies is included in the notes to our financial statements. In general, management's estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

-

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

-

Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

18

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect.  These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

19

ITEM 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit	F-7
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F-13

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

WordLogic Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of WordLogic Corporation (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the twelve month periods then ended and for the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013.  The financial statements for the period from May 27, 2003 (Inception) to December 31, 2006 were audited by other auditors whose report expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of WordLogic Corporation (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods described above in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has accumulated net loss since inception, has used significant cash in support of its operating activities and, based upon current operating levels, requires additional capital or significant reconfiguration of its operations to sustain its operations for the foreseeable future, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC

www.mkacpas.com

Houston, Texas

April 7, 2014

F-2

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Expressed in US Dollars)

		December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	61,791	$	581,605
Restricted cash (Note 3)		32,488		174,561
Investments (Note 4)		50,000		915,077
GST/HST refund receivable (Note 5)		17,700		32,724
Employee advances		207		221
Interest receivable		128		515
Prepaid expenses (Note 6)		13,741		54,032
Total Current Assets		176,055		1,758,735
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation (Note 7)		13,676		19,365
Total Assets	$	189,731	$	1,778,100
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	751,285	$	430,481
Indebtedness to related parties (Note 8)		51,098		25,543
Accrued interest		–		31,948
Total Current Liabilities		802,383		487,972
Total Liabilities		802,383		487,972
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Common stock, $.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized 91,248,384  shares issued and 91,016,844 outstanding as of December 31, 2013, and 83,276,717 shares issued and 83,045,177 outstanding as of December 31, 2012, respectively (Note 9)		91,248		83,277
Additional paid-in capital		26,373,776		23,524,244
Stock payable		11,500		4,000
Accumulated deficit		(2,264,854)		(2,264,854)
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(24,151,280)		(19,379,130)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(652,793)		(657,160)
Treasury stock, 231,540 shares as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012  (Note 10)		(20,249)		(20,249)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)		(612,652)		1,290,128
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	189,731	$	1,778,100

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.)

F-3

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Expressed in US Dollars)

		Accumulated from May 27, 2003 (Date of Inception) to	For the Years Ended
		December 31, 2013 (Unaudited)		December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Revenue
Product sales	$	27,114	$	366	$	991
Patents licensing		5,000,000		–		5,000,000
Royalty revenue		32,962		–		–
Total Revenues		5,060,076		366		5,000,991
Operating expenses
Rent (Note 11)		1,069,884		121,657		119,864
Selling, general and administrative		23,716,860		3,227,885		3,121,636
Research and development		3,925,422		600,749		398,936
Total Operating Expenses		28,712,166		3,950,291		3,640,436
Income (Loss) from Operations		(23,652,090)		(3,949,925)		1,360,555
Other income (expenses)
Bad debts		(11,250)		–		–
Interest income		8,686		(66)		6,992
Interest expense:
Related parties		(84,152)		–		–
Amortization of discount on convertible note		(145,243)		–		–
Other notes, advances and amounts		(452,176)		(6,805)		(2,113)
Gain on derivative liability		142,861		–		–
Gain on interest forgiveness		2,947		–		2,947
Gain on issuance of common stock		–		–		–
Gain (loss) on settled payables		(745,509)		-		12,451
Gain (loss) on legal settlement		(815,354)		(815,354)		–
Income (Loss) Before Extraordinary Item		(25,751,280)		(4,772,150)		1,380,832
Net extraordinary gain on litigation settlement, less applicable income taxes of $nil		1,600,000		–		–
Net Income (Loss)		(24,151,280)		(4,772,150)		1,380,832
Other Comprehensive Income
Net Gain (Loss) of Foreign Currency Translation		(652,793)		4,367		(31,200)
Net Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	(24,804,073)	$	(4,767,783)	$	1,349,632
Basic net income (loss) per share			$	(0.06)	$	0.02
Diluted net income (loss) per share			$	(0.06)	$	0.02
Weighted average common shares used in calculating basic net income (loss) per share				85,084,292		83,726,680
Weighted average common shares used in calculating diluted net income (loss) per share				85,084,292		83,726,680

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.)

F-4

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Expressed in US Dollars)

		Accumulated from May 27, 2003 (Date of Inception) to		For the Year Ended
		December 31, 2013 (Unaudited)		December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(24,151,280)	$	(4,772,150)	$	1,380,832
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided  (used) in operating activities:
Bad debts		11,250		–		–
Depreciation and amortization		69,941		4,583		3,577
Common stock issued for services and payables		1,050,425		–		64,333
Stock-based compensation		13,863,963		1,276,734		479,607
Amortization of debt discount		145,243		–		–
Gain on derivative liability		(142,861)		–		–
Gain on interest forgiveness		–		–		–
Gain on issuance of common stock		–		–		–
Loss (gain) on settled liabilities		807,202		-		(15,398)
Loss (gain) on legal settlement		815,354		815,354		–
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Receivables		32,935		15,411		(18,399)
Employee advances		(15,575)		14		(5)
Prepaid expenses		(13,741)		40,291		(41,761)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		985,624		329,825		(18,082)
Accrued interest payable		33,710		(31,948)		541
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(6,507,810)		(2,321,886)		1,835,245
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in term deposits		(50,000)		865,077		(915,077)
Purchases of equipment		(47,988)		–		(21,046)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(97,988)		865,077		(936,123)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from related party advances		1,354,054		25,555		10,373
Repayment of related party advances		(1,015,730)		–		(132,267)
Proceeds from promissory notes issued to related parties		411,509		–		–
Repayment of related party promissory notes		(493,941)		–		–
Proceeds from convertible promissory note		933,926		–		–
Repayment of convertible promissory notes		(947,462)		–		–
Proceeds from other promissory note		993,120		–		–
Repayment of other promissory notes		(449,220)		–		(6,000)
Payments on capital lease obligation		(12,071)		–		–
Proceeds from line of credit		60,659		–		–
Repayment of line of credit		(60,659)		–		(38,074)
Purchase of treasury stock		(101,440)		–		(101,440)
Proceeds from stock options and warrants exercised		927,915		395,000		–
Proceeds from sale of common shares		5,750,680		370,000		130,000
Net cash provided by (used in) by financing activities		7,351,340		790,555		(137,408)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(652,793)		4,367		(31,200)
Net change in cash		92,749		(661,887)		730,514
Cash, beginning of period		1,530		756,166		25,652
Cash, end of period	$	94,279	$	94,279	$	756,166
Non-Cash Information:
Cashless exercise of warrants	$	275	$	–	$	–
Stock issued to settle notes payable plus accrued interest	$	1,445,853	$	–	$	–
Line of credit converted to bank loan	$	44,359	$	–	$	–
Retirement of treasury stock	$	81,191	$	–	$	81,191
Reclass from common stock to stock payable	$	4,000	$	–	$	4,000
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	–	$	–	$	–
Cash paid for interest	$	221,849	$	6,805	$	2,113

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.)

F-6

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(Expressed in US Dollars)

								Deficit Accumulated	Accumulated
	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In	Treasury Stock		Stock	Accumulated	During Development	Other Comprehensive
	Shares	Par Value	Capital	Shares	Cost	Payable (Receivable)	Deficit	Stage	Loss	Total
		$			$	$	$	$	$	$
Balance, May 27, 2003 (inception), prior to reverse merger	19,016,657	19,017	1,504,366	–	–	–	(2,264,854)	–	3,806	(737,665)
Reverse merger with The American West.com, Inc. (Note 1)	2,907,007	2,907	(2,907)	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cancelled shares.	(60,000)	(60)	60	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(408,027)	–	(408,027)
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(270,371)	(270,371)
Balance, December 31, 2003	21,863,664	21,864	1,501,519	–	–	–	(2,264,854)	(408,027)	(266,565)	(1,416,063)
Common stock issued in exchange for services and payables	88,000	88	47,369	–	–	–	–	–	–	47,457
Common stock options granted	–	–	10,344	–	–	–	–	–	–	10,344
Comprehensive income:
Net income	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	938,596	–	938,596
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(97,095)	(97,095)
Balance, December 31, 2004	21,951,664	21,952	1,559,232	–	–	–	(2,264,854)	530,569	(363,660)	(516,761)
Sale of common stock ($0.65/share)	830,770	830	539,170	–	–	–	–	–	–	540,000
Common stock options granted	–	–	204,458	–	–	–	–	–	–	204,458
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(1,221,564)	–	(1,221,564)
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(2,930)	(2,930)
Balance, December 31, 2005	22,782,434	22,782	2,302,860	–	–	–	(2,264,854)	(690,995)	(366,590)	(996,797)
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.60/share)	570,000	570	341,430	–	–	–	–	–	–	342,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share)	100,000	100	29,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	30,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.60/share)	29,150	30	17,460	–	–	–	–	–	–	17,490
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.50/share)	1,000,000	1,000	499,000	–	–	–	–	–	–	500,000
Common stock options and warrants vested	–	–	1,132,512	–	–	–	–	–	–	1,132,512
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(2,214,823)	–	(2,214,823)
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	4,940	4,940
Balance, December 31, 2006	24,481,584	24,482	4,323,162	–	–	–	(2,264,854)	(2,905,818)	(361,650)	(1,184,678)
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.65/share)	200,000	200	129,800	–	–	–	–	–	–	130,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.50/share)	821,000	821	409,679	–	–	–	–	–	–	410,500
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.40/share)	75,000	75	29,925	–	–	–	–	–	–	30,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.30/share)	2,377,297	2,377	710,812	–	–	–	–	–	–	713,189

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.)

F-12

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.25/share)	40,000	40	9,960	–	–	–	–	–	–	10,000
Exercise of warrants ($1.25/share)	20,000	20	24,980	–	–	–	–	–	–	25,000
Common stock options exercised (cashless)	87,736	88	(88)	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Common stock options and warrants vested	–	–	439,393	–	–	–	–	–	–	439,393
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(1,634,324)	–	(1,634,324)
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(103,990)	(103,990)
Balance, December 31, 2007	28,102,617	28,103	6,077,623	–	–	–	(2,264,854)	(4,540,142)	(465,640)	(1,164,910)
Sale of common stock ($0.351.00/share)	100,000	100	99,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	100,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one–half warrant ($0.60/share)	800,000	800	479,200	–	–	–	–	–	–	480,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one–half warrant ($1.00/share)	50,000	50	49,950	–	–	–	–	–	–	50,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share)	112,500	112	22,388	–	–	–	–	–	–	22,500
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.25/share)	200,000	200	49,800	–	–		–	–	–	50,000
Exercise of warrants ($0.50/share)	125,000	125	62,375	–	–	–	–	–	–	62,500
Exercise of warrants ($0.75/share)	100,000	100	74,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	75,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share)	10,000	10	2,990	–	–	–	–	–	–	3,000
Common stock options exercised ($1.00/share)	192,000	192	191,808	–	–	–	–	–	–	192,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.68/share)	200,000	200	135,800	–	–	–	–	–	–	136,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.65/share)	300,000	300	194,700	–	–	–	–	–	–	195,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	3,930,879	3,931	1,568,421	–	–	–	–	–	–	1,572,352
Common stock options and warrants vested	–	–	2,361,327	–	–	–	–	–	–	2,361,327
Comprehensive loss:						–
Net loss	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(4,923,057)	–	(4,923,057)
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	91,309	91,309
Balance, December 31, 2008	34,222,996	34,223	11,371,182	–	–	–	(2,264,854)	(9,463,199)	(374,331)	(696,979)
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)	200,000	200	59,800	–	–	–	–	–	–	60,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.53/share)	30,500	31	16,134	–	–	–	–	–	–	16,165
Common stock issued for services ($0.68/share)	250,000	250	169,750	–	–	–	–	–	–	170,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.40/share)	300,000	300	119,700	–	–	–	–	–	–	120,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.49/share)	100,000	100	48,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	49,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.31/share)	240,000	240	74,160	–	–	–	–	–	–	74,400
Common stock issued for services ($0.45/share)	300,000	300	134,700	–	–	–	–	–	–	135,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.41/share)	55,000	55	22,495	–	–	–	–	–	–	22,550
Common stock issued for services ($0.62/share)	100,000	100	61,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	62,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.43/share)	30,000	30	12,870	–	–	–	–	–	–	12,900

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.)

F-12

Common stock issued for services ($0.36/share)	50,000	50	17,950	–	–	–	–	–	–	18,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.47/share)	100,000	100	46,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	47,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.44/share)	50,000	50	21,950	–	–	–	–	–	–	22,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)	100,000	100	29,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	30,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.33/share)	90,000	90	29,610	–	–	–	–	–	–	29,700
Common stock issued for services ($0.35/share)	120,000	120	41,880	–	–	–	–	–	–	42,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.37/share)	50,000	50	18,450	–	–	–	–	–	–	18,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.28/share)	100,000	100	27,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	28,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share)	127,500	127	33,023	–	–	–	–	–	–	33,150
Common stock options exercised ($0.21/share)	10,000	10	2,090	–	–	–	–	–	–	2,100
Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share)	100,000	100	19,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	20,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.22/share)	40,000	40	8,760	–	–	–	–	–	–	8,800
Common stock options exercised ($0.35/share)	33,333	33	11,633	–	–	–	–	–	–	11,666
Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share)	76,000	76	22,724	–	–	–	–	–	–	22,800
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share)	175,000	175	34,825	–	–	–	–	–	–	35,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.30/share)	456,055	456	136,360	–	–	–	–	–	–	136,816
Sale of common stock ($0.16/share)	3,025,000	3,025	480,975	–	–	–	–	–	–	484,000
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)	265,000	265	39,485	–	–	–	–	–	–	39,750
Sale of common stock ($0.30/share)	100,000	100	29,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	30,000
Sale of common stock ($0.35/share)	20,000	20	6,980	–	–	–	–	–	–	7,000
Common stock options and warrants vested	–	–	2,275,961	–	–	–	–	–	–	2,275,961
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(4,418,579)	–	(4,418,579)
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(115,604)	(115,604)
Balance, December 31, 2009	40,916,384	40,916	15,428,747	–	–	–	(2,264,854)	(13,881,778)	(489,935)	(1,166,904)
Common stock issued for services ($0.39/share)	133,332	133	51,867	–	–	–	–	–	–	52,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.35/share)	320,000	320	111,680	–	–	–	–	–	–	112,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.33/share)	150,000	150	49,350	–	–	–	–	–	–	49,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.31/share)	92,321	92	28,527	–	–	–	–	–	–	28,619
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)	110,000	110	32,890	–	–	–	–	–	–	33,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.29/share)	150,000	150	43,350	–	–	–	–	–	–	43,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.28/share)	200,000	200	55,800	–	–	–	–	–	–	56,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share)	3,200,000	3,200	828,800	–	–	–	–	–	–	832,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.25/share)	10,000	10	2,490	–	–	–	–	–	–	2,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.24/share)	113,750	114	27,186	–	–	–	–	–	–	27,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share)	150,000	150	29,850	–	–	–	–	–	–	30,000

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.)

F-12

Common stock issued for services ($0.19/share)	50,000	50	9,450	–	–	–	–	–	–	9,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.18/share)	172,500	173	30,877	–	–	–	–	–	–	31,050
Common stock issued for services ($0.17/share)	19,412	19	3,281	–	–	–	–	–	–	3,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.16/share)	2,500,000	2,500	397,500	–	–	–	–	–	–	400,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.14/share)	1,495,000	1,495	207,805	–	–	–	–	–	–	209,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.13/share)	710,000	710	91,590	–	–	–	–	–	–	92,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.12/share)	850,000	850	101,150	–	–	–	–	–	–	102,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.11/share)	500,000	500	54,500	–	–	–	–	–	–	55,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.10/share)	210,000	210	20,790	–	–	–	–	–	–	21,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.09/share)	200,000	200	17,800	–	–	–	–	–	–	18,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.08/share)	2,460,000	2,460	194,340	–	–	–	–	–	–	196,800
Common stock issued for services ($0.07/share)	3,300,000	3,300	227,700	–	–	–	–	–	–	231,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.05/share)	2,400,000	2,400	117,600	–	–	–	–	–	–	120,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	2,042,888	2,043	293,778	–	–	–	–	–	–	295,821
Sale of common stock ($0.33/share)	30,000	30	9,870	–	–	–	–	–	–	9,900
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)	919,999	921	136,954	–	–	–	–	–	–	137,875
Sale of common stock ($0.14/share)	140,200	140	19,488	–	–	–	–	–	–	19,628
Sale of common stock ($0.10/share)	1,185,000	1,185	117,315	–	–	–	–	–	–	118,500
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share)	125,000	125	24,875	–	–	–	–	–	–	25,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.15/share)	643,000	643	95,807	–	–	–	–	–	–	96,450
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	1,600,000	1,600	158,400	–	–	–	–	–	–	160,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.40/share)	200,000	200	79,800	–	–	–	–	–	–	80,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.15/share)	500,000	500	74,500	–	–	–	–	–	–	75,000
Common stock options and warrants vested	–	–	1,553,666	–	–	–	–	–	–	1,553,666
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(4,745,811)	–	(4,745,811)
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(144,420)	(144,420)
Balance, December 31, 2010	67,798,786	67,799	20,729,373	–	–	–	(2,264,854)	(18,627,589)	(634,355)	(729,626)
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)	10,000	10	2,990	–	–	–	–	–	–	3,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.265/share)	390,000	390	102,960	–	–	–	–	–	–	103,350
Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share)	100,000	100	25,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	26,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.25/share)	544,220	544	135,510	–	–	–	–	–	–	136,054
Common stock issued for services ($0.235/share)	40,000	40	9,360	–	–	–	–	–	–	9,400
Common stock issued for services ($0.23/share)	225,000	225	53,775	–	–	–	–	–	–	54,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.22/share)	40,000	40	8,760	–	–	–	–	–	–	8,800
Common stock issued for services ($0.21/share)	150,000	150	31,350	–	–	–	–	–	–	31,500

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.)

F-12

Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share)	305,000	305	60,695	–	–	–	–	–	–	61,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.19/share)	830,000	830	156,870	–	–	–	–	–	–	157,700
Common stock issued for services ($0.18/share)	583,000	583	104,357	–	–	–	–	–	–	104,940
Common stock issued for services ($0.15/share)	475,000	475	70,775	–	–	–	–	–	–	71,250
Common stock issued for services ($0.258/share)	110,000	110	28,270	–	–	–	–	–	–	28,380
Common stock issued for services ($0.259/share)	260,000	260	67,080	–	–	–	–	–	–	67,340
Common stock issued for services ($0.13/share)	10,000	10	1,290	–	–	–	–	–	–	1,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.16/share)	307,000	307	48,813	–	–	–	–	–	–	49,120
Common stock issued for services ($0.12/share)	125,000	125	14,875	–	–	–	–	–	–	15,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.105/share)	100,000	100	10,400	–	–	–	–	–	–	10,500
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	300,000	300	59,700	–	–	–	–	–	–	60,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	480,000	480	85,920	–	–	–	–	–	–	86,400
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	480,000	480	81,120	–	–	–	–	–	–	81,600
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	500,000	500	62,000	–	–	–	–	–	–	62,500
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.15/share)	625,000	625	93,125	–	–	–	–	–	–	93,750
Common stock options exercised (cashlessly)	187,500	187	(187)	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)	100,000	100	14,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	15,000
Sale of common stock ($0.10/share)	712,500	713	70,537	–	–	–	–	–	–	71,250
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.18/share)	532,000	532	95,228	–	–	–	–	–	–	95,760
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	6,430,600	6,431	636,629	–	–	–	–	–	–	643,060
Common stock options and warrants vested	–	–	83,647	–	–	–	–	–	–	83,647
Stock receivable	–	–	–	–	–	(10,000)	–	–	–	(10,000)
Cancellation of common stock	(250,000)	(250)	250	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(2,132,373)	–	(2,132,373)
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	8,395	8,395
Balance, December 31, 2011	82,500,606	82,501	22,946,272	–	–	(10,000)	(2,264,854)	(20,759,962)	(625,960)	(632,003)
Stock issued for services ($0.103/share)	35,000	35	3,570	–	–	–	–	–	–	3,605
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and two warrant ($0.10/share)	350,000	350	34,650	–	–	10,000	–	–	–	45,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	850,000	850	84,150	–	–	–	–	–	–	85,000
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.25/share)	111,111	111	27,666	–	–	–	–	–	–	27,777
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.10/share)	200,000	200	19,800	–	–	–	–	–	–	20,000
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.259/share)	50,000	50	12,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	12,950
Common stock options and warrants vested	–	–	479,607	–	–	–	–	–	–	479,607

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.)

F-12

Purchase of treasury stock	–	–	–	1,031,540	(101,440)	–	–	–	–	(101,440)
Retirement of treasury stock	(800,000)	(800)	(80,391)	(800,000)	81,191	–	–	–	–	–
Stock payable	(20,000)	(20)	(3,980)	–	–	4,000	–	–	–	–
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	1,380,832	–	1,380,832
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(31,200)	(31,200)
Balance, December 31, 2012	83,276,717	83,277	23,524,244	231,540	(20,249)	4,000	(2,264,854)	(19,379,130)	(657,160)	1,290,128
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	2,430,000	2,430	240,570	–	–	–	–	–	–	243,000
Sale of units consisting of two share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	250,000	250	24,750	–	–	–	–	–	–	25,000
Sale of common stock ($0.10/share)	1,120,000	1,120	110,880	–	–	–	–	–	–	112,000
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)	100,000	100	14,900	–	–	–	–	–	–	15,000
Exercise of warrant ($0.10/share)	3,425,000	3,425	339,075	–	–	–	–	–	–	342,500
Common stock issued in settlement of legal proceeding	500,000	500	57,000	–	–	–	–	–	–	57,500
Warrants issued in settlement of legal proceeding (Note 12)	–	–	773,644	–	–	–	–	–	–	773,644
Reverse common stock issued in settlement of legal proceeding	(53,333)	(54)	(7,821)	–	–	–	–	–	–	(7,875)
Common stock options exercised ($0.10/share)	200,000	200	19,800	–	–	–	–	–	–	20,000
Common stock options and warrants vested	–	–	1,276,734	–	–	–	–	–	–	1,276,734
Stock payable for exercise of stock options ($0.10/share)	–	–	–	–	–	7,500	–	–	–	7,500
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	(4,772,150)	–	(4,772,150)
Currency translation adjustment	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	4,367	4,367
Balance, December 31, 2013	91,248,384	91,248	26,373,776	231,540	(20,249)	11,500	(2,264,854)	(24,151,280)	(652,793)	(612,652)

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.)

F-12

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1.

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND CONTINUANCE OF BUSINESS

Nature of Operations

WordLogic Corporation (the “Company” or “WLGC”), formerly TheAmericanWest.com, Inc., was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 30, 1999. The Company’s primary business is the development and commercialization of data entry software for handheld computing devices. Its headquarters is located in Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Reverse Merger

On March 11, 2003, WLGC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) with WordLogic Corporation (“WCPC”), a private British Columbia, Canada corporation. On May 27, 2003, WLGC issued 19,016,658 shares of its common stock in exchange for all 19,016,658 outstanding common shares of WCPC, and the two companies merged. This merger has been treated as a recapitalization of WCPC, with WLGC as the surviving legal entity. Since WLGC had, prior to the recapitalization, minimal assets and no operations, the recapitalization has been accounted for as the sale of 2,907,006 shares of WCPC’s common stock for the net assets of WLGC. Following the closing, WLGC remained the surviving corporation with 21,923,664 common shares outstanding, of which the former shareholders of WCPC owned approximately 86.74%.

In connection with the closing of the Agreement, WLGC changed its name to “WordLogic Corporation” (formerly TheAmericanWest.com, Inc.) and changed its OTCBB symbol under which its common stock trades on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board to “WLGC”. WLGC’s directors resigned their positions and the executive officers of WCPC were appointed to fill the vacancies created by the resignations, which resulted in a change in control.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses prior to the current period, has used significant cash in support of its operating activities and, based upon current operating levels, requires additional capital or significant reconfiguration of its operations to sustain its operations for the foreseeable future. At December 31, 2013 the Company has incurred losses of $24,151,280 since inception. These factors, among others, raise significant doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis and ultimately to attain profitability. The Company’s management intends to satisfy cash requirements with working capital acquired in exchange for debt and/or common stock. There is no assurance the cash infusions will continue in the future or that the Company will achieve profitable operations.

The Company’s future success will be dependent upon its ability to create and provide effective and competitive software products that meet customers changing requirements; including the effective use of leading technologies to continue to enhance its current products and to influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes on a timely and cost-effective basis.

Development Stage

Following its reverse merger on May 27, 2003, the Company entered the development stage and became a development stage enterprise.

2.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a)

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

F-13

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

b)

Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of WordLogic Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary 602531 British Columbia Ltd. (the “Subsidiary”), an entity incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Subsidiary does not have any operations. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

c)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.

d)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all investment instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investment securities with original or remaining maturities of more than three months but less than one year are considered short-term investments. Auction rate securities with original or remaining maturities of more than three months are considered short-term investments even if they are subject to re-pricing within three months. The Company was not invested in any auction rate securities as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Investment securities held with the intent to reinvest or hold for longer than a year, or with remaining maturities of one year or more, are considered long-term investments. The Company’s cash equivalents at December 31, 2012 consisted of term deposits with original maturities of three months or less, and are therefore classified as cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheets.

Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash and term deposits of $61,791 and $581,605 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

e)

 Short and Long-term Investments

The Company accounts for its short-term and long-term investments in accordance with ASC 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities. The Company’s short and long-term investments in securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains or losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary, if any, on available-for-sale securities are reported in other income, net. The Company reviews the securities for impairments considering current factors including the economic environment, market conditions, and the operational performance and other specific factors relating to the businesses underlying the securities. The Company records impairment charges equal to the amount that the carrying value of its available-for-sale securities exceeds the estimated fair market value of the securities as of the evaluation date. The fair value for publicly held securities is determined based on quoted market prices as of the evaluation date. In computing realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, the Company determines cost based on amounts paid, including direct costs such as commissions, to acquire the security using the specific identification method. The Company did not have any short or long-term investments in securities at December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

The Company’s investment consisted of certified term deposit with original maturities of more than three months.  The Company realized interest income based on term deposit rate agreed upon with Royal Bank of Canada.  The company had term deposits totaling US $50,000 and $915,077 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  The company has recorded interest receivable of $128 and $515 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

See Note 2.m for further information on fair value.

F-14

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

f)

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company considers its receivables to be fully collectable since the Company has only two receivable accounts, GST/HST (Goods and services tax/harmonized sales tax) receivable and interest receivable; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is required. The Company recognizes an allowance for doubtful accounts on specific accounts identified at risk based on the age of the outstanding receivable and the inability or unwillingness of its customers to make the required payments.

g)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and are amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows:

Asset	Method	Rate
Computer equipment	Straight-line	33.3%
Computer software	Straight-line	100.0%
Furniture and fixtures	Declining balance	20.0%
Other equipment	Declining balance	20.0%

Amortization is recorded at one-half of the normal rate in the year of acquisition. We have compared the depreciation taken using the declining balance method to the straight-line method and have determined the difference to be immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Upon retirement or disposition of equipment, the cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred and expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized.

h)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the carrying value of its long-lived assets under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. If such assets are impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value or fair value, less costs to sell.

i)

Software Development Costs

Software development costs are recorded in accordance with the provisions issued by the FASB as follows. Costs incurred to establish the technological feasibility of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are expensed as incurred as research and development costs. Once technological feasibility is established, the cost of producing product masters for the software is capitalized. Capitalization of the software development costs ceases and amortization of the capitalized costs commences when the product is available for general release to customers. Capitalized costs are amortized based on the greater of (a) the ratio of current gross revenues to the total current and anticipated future gross revenues, or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product.

j)

Research and Development

Expenditures relating to the development of new products and processes, including significant improvements to existing products, are charged to operations as incurred.

F-15

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

k)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company computes tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefit of net operating losses has not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

l)

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with ASC 985-605, Revenue Recognition – Software (“ASC 985-605”), or ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition – Multiple-Element Arrangements.

Pursuant to ASC 985-605, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is probable. The Company applies these criteria as discussed below:

·

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists.  The Company requires a written contract, signed by both the customer and the Company, or a purchase order from those customers that have previously negotiated a standard end-user license arrangement or volume purchase agreement, prior to recognizing revenue on an arrangement.

·

Delivery has occurred.  The Company delivers software and hardware to customers physically.  The standard delivery terms are free on board shipping point.

·

The fee is fixed or determinable.  The Company’s determination that an arrangement fee is fixed or determinable depends principally on the arrangement’s payment terms.  Where these terms apply, the Company regards the fee as fixed or determinable, and recognizes revenue upon delivery (assuming other revenue recognition criteria are met).  If the payment terms do not meet this standard, but rather, involve “extended payment terms,” the fee may not be considered to be fixed or determinable and the revenue would then be recognized when customer installments are due and payable.

·

Collectability is probable.  To recognize revenue, the Company judges collectability of the arrangement fees on a customer-by-customer basis pursuant to a credit review policy.  The Company typically sells to customers with which it has had a history of successful collections.  For new customers, the Company evaluates the customer’s financial position and ability to pay.  If the Company determines that collectability is not probable based upon the credit review process or the customer’s payment history, revenue is recognized when cash is collected.

If there are any undelivered elements, the Company defers revenue for those elements, as long as vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for the undelivered elements.  Payment for product is due upon shipment, subject to specific payment terms.  Payment for professional services is due either upon or in advance of providing the services, subject to specific payment terms.  Reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses and shipping costs, which have not been significant to date, are recognized as revenue in accordance with ASC 605-45, Revenue Recognition – Principal Agent Considerations.

The Company earns revenue from the sale of its software products and from royalties earned on software licensing agreements.  Revenue from the sale of software products is recognized at the point of delivery, which occurs when customers either download the software or are shipped software products.  Royalty revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of licensing agreements and when collectability is reasonably assured, which is usually on receipt of royalty payments.

The Company also recognizes revenue from the licensing of the intellectual property portfolio according to ASC 985-605, based on the terms of agreements involved.

The Company has not established a formal policy affecting warranty or returns.  No estimate of returns from sales has been made.

F-16

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

m)

Fair Value for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments.  Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10 35-37 are described below:

Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.  The Company’s note payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at December 31, 2013.  The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2013, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The Company’s operations are in Canada, which results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates.  The financial risk to the Company’s operations results from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates.  Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.

In accordance with ASC 820, the following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (investments) as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Level	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Level 1	$50,000	$915,077
Level 2	–	–
Level 3	–	–

n)

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar and these financial statements have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with standards issued by the FASB.  The Canadian dollar based accounts of the Company’s foreign operations have been translated into United States dollars using the current rate method.  Assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated using the weighted average exchange rates for the reporting period.  Translation adjustments are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity.    

F-17

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

o)

Stock-based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted standards issued by the FASB, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and shares issued through its employee stock purchase plan, based on estimated fair values.  In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 (“SAB 107”) relating to this standard.  The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of this standard.  The Company adopted the FASB standard using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of the beginning in 2006.  The Company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflect the impact of this standard.  In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s financial statements for prior periods do not include the impact of this standard.

The Company’s determination of estimated fair value of share-based awards utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  The Black-Scholes model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding certain highly complex and subjective variables.  These variables include, but are not limited to the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.

p)

Net Income (Loss) per Share

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock is presented in conformity with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”), for all periods presented.  In accordance with ASC 260, basic net income (loss) per share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period.  Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants that have a dilutive effect when applying the treasury stock method.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

		Year Ended December 31
		2013		2012
Numerator:
Net income (loss) – basic and diluted	$	(4,772,150)	$	1,380,832
Denominator:
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		85,084,292		83,726,680
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		–		–
Warrants		–		–
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		85,084,292		83,726,680
Net income (loss) per share - basic	$	(0.06)	$	0.02
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$	(0.06)	$	0.02

Since the market price of the Company’s share is lower than the exercise price of outstanding stock options and warrants, there is no dilutive effect for the year ended December 31, 2012.  Due to a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013, basic and diluted net loss per share are equivalent as the inclusion of potential common shares in the number of shares used for the diluted computation would be anti-dilutive to the net loss per share.

q)

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company reports its comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with provisions of the FASB.  For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s only component of comprehensive loss was foreign currency translation adjustments.

r)

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred.

F-18

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

s)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications.  Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period.  Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income.  The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements.  All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP.  The new amendments will require an organization to:

-

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

-

Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period.  This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income.  Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual).  The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies.  Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11.  The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users.  In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs.  Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013.  The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04.  The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification.  These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements.  The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012.  The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03.  This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114.  The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02.  This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.  Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance.  The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

F-19

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect.  These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

t)

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period’s financial statements to conform to the current period’s presentation.

3.

RESTRICTED CASH

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had restricted cash balances of $32,488 and $174,561, respectively.  This cash was held in trust by our attorneys for the payment of future legal invoices and by the Supreme Court of British Columbia for a contingent legal obligation as summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Attorney trust	$32,488	$26,764
Garnishment	$nil	$147,797
Total	$32,488	$174,561

The garnished amount of $147,797 had been paid to a plaintiff on December 30, 2013 as a part of settlement related to a legal proceeding filed by Mr. Knaven.  See Note 13 – Legal Proceedings of the Notes to Financial Statements for further information regarding legal proceedings.

4.

INVESTMENTS

TERM DEPOSITS

The company had held-to-maturity certified term deposits with original maturity date more than three months totaling $50,000, $915,077 as of December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively, as follows:

Investment Date	Amount	Maturity Date	Interest Rate
	$
April 10, 2013	50,000	April 10, 2014	0.35%
December 31, 2013	50,000

September 18, 2012	250,000	February 18, 2013	0.30%
December 17, 2012	200,000	April 17, 2013	0.25%
December 17, 2012	200,000	May 17, 2013	0.25%
December 17, 2012	200,000	June 17, 2013	0.25%
April 10, 2012	50,000	April 10, 2013	0.35%
May 29, 2012	15,077	May 29, 2013	1.00%
December 31, 2012	915,077

The Company has recorded an accrued interest receivable of $128 and $515 for above term deposits as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 based on statements provided by financial institutions.

F-20

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

5.

GST/HST REFUND RECEIVABLE

The Good Service Tax (“GST”) is a federal tax that applies to the supply of most property and services in Canada.  As of July 1, 2010, British Columbia (“BC”) harmonized its provincial sales tax (“PST”) with the GST to implement the harmonized sales tax (“HST”) at the rate of 12%.  All businesses operating in BC are responsible for collecting and remitting HST to the Canadian government.  A GST/HST registrant should collect the GST/HST on most of their sales and pay the GST/HST on most purchases they make to operate their business.  They can claim an input tax credit (“ITC”), to recover GST/HST paid or payable on the purchases they use in commercial activities.  However, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company has not collected any GST/HST since all sales were incurred in the United State which sales are not HST taxable.  The Company has filed GST/HST returns quarterly and claimed only ITC’s during the year ended December 31, 2013.  As the result of this, as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had GST/HST refund receivable of $17,700 (CAD $18,826) and $32,724 (CAD $32,558), respectively.

6.

PREPAID EXPENSES

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had prepaid expenses of $13,741 and $54,032, respectively.  Prepaid expenses have been incurred for marketing and advertisement fees and security deposit for an office leased property.  Prepaid expenses consisted of the following:

Vendor	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
	$	$
Bentall L.P.	11,733	12,543
GSMA Ltd.	–	29,710
Vantage Communication Ltd.	–	8,443
Others	2,008	3,336
Total	13,741	54,032

7.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

	Cost $	Accumulated Amortization as of December 31, 2013 $	Net Carrying Amount as of December 31, 2013 $	Net Carrying Amount as of December 31, 2012 $
Office equipment	10,216	5,328	4,888	6,416
Computer equipment	144,391	137,408	6,983	10,573
Computer software	6,666	6,666	-	-
Furniture and fixtures	15,890	14,085	1,805	2,376
	177,163	163,487	13,676	19,365

Depreciation expense totaled $4,583 and $3,577 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

8.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES

The Company incurred the following related party transactions:

a.

The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by a director to provide management services requiring monthly payments of CAD $30,000, expiring December 31, 2014.  Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $349,543 (CAD $360,000) and $360,151 ($CAD 360,000) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $8 and $10,144, respectively.

F-21

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

b.

The Company incurred accounting fees of $34,372 and $32,764 with a private company of which an officer is also an officer for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $9,402 and $5,026, respectively.

c.

The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by an officer to provide management services requiring monthly payments of CAD $20,000 which increased from CAD $17,000 on December 1, 2012, expiring April 1, 2014.  Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $214,581 (CAD $221,000) and $149,878 (CAD $149,815) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $41,688 and $10,373, respectively.

9.

COMMON STOCK

For the year ended December 31, 2013:

a)

In June 2013, the Company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $15,000.

b)

Also in June 2013, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it sold 120,000 shares at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $12,000.

c)

Also in June 2013, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it sold 100,000 shares at a price of $0.15 per share for total proceeds of $15,000.

d)

Also in June 2013, the Company issued 350,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $35,000.

e)

In July 2013, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of compensation warrants, for total proceeds of $25,000.

f)

Also in July 2013, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $5,000.

g)

In August 2013, the Company issued 1,625,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $162,500.

h)

Also in August 2013, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it sold 1,000,000 shares at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $100,000.

i)

In October 2013, the Company issued 300,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $30,000.

j)

In November 2013, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 100,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $10,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

k)

In November 2013, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 250,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $25,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and two warrants to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

l)

In December 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock valued on settlement date of the legal proceeding at $0.115 per share as the part of the settlement.

m)

In December 2013, the Company cancelled 53,333 shares of its common stock as the part of legal proceeding settlement.

n)

In December 2013, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 2,330,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $233,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

F-22

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

o)

In December 2013, the Company issued 700,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $70,000.

p)

In December 2013, the Company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of stock options to an officer for total proceeds of $20,000.

q)

In December 2013, the Company received $7,500 for the exercise of stock options at $0.10 per share but had not yet issued.

For the year ended December 31, 2012:

a)

On December 31, 2012, The Company recorded the issuance of 111,111 shares of its common stock for services.  Shares were valued at $0.25 per share and valued at $27,778 based on the market price on date of the issuance, May 11, 2011.  

b)

Also on December 31, 2012, the Company recorded the issuance of 200,000 shares of its common stock for services.  Shares were valued at $0.10 per share and valued at $20,000 based on the market price on date of the issuance, July 21, 2011.

c)

Also on December 31, 2012, the Company recorded the issuance of 50,000 shares of its common stock at $0.259 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $12,950 based on the market price on date of the issuance, June 1, 2011.

d)

In January 2012, the Company issued 35,000 shares of its common stock at $0.103 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $3,605 based on the price on the date of grant.

e)

In January 2012, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 350,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $35,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and two warrants to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

f)

In February 2012, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 850,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $85,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s share purchases with warrants attached:

	Number of Warrants	Weighted average exercise price $	Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years)
Balance, December 31, 2012	11,137,600	0.11	0.78
Issued	2,930,000	0.10	2.17
Exercised	(3,175,000)	–	–
Expired/Cancelled	(6,312,600)	–	–
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	4,580,000	0.10	2.11

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 2,680,000 common shares with warrants attached for total cash proceeds of $268,000.  The common stock issued included 2,930,000 attached warrants to purchase 2,930,000 common stock at $0.10 per share.  The relative fair value of the warrants attached to the common stock issued was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Sholes pricing model.  The relative fair value of the warrants attached to the common stock issued is $130,595, and the relative fair value of the common stock is $137,405 as of the issue date.  The Black-Sholes pricing model assumption used are as follows: expected dividend yield of 0%; risk-free interest rate of 0.28% - 0.34%; expected volatility of 132% - 137%, and warrant term of 2 years.

10.

TREASURY STOCK

On August 15, 2012, the Company announced that the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing up to five million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock to be repurchased over a 12 month period commencing on August 20, 2012.  Any shares repurchased by the Company shall be returned to the treasury and may be used, if and when needed, for general corporate purposes.  During the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company purchased nil and 1,031,540 shares of common stock from treasury stock, respectively.  During the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company retired nil and 800,000 shares of common stock from treasury stock, respectively.

F-23

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

11.

RENT

On June 23, 2010, the Company originally entered into a lease agreement for office space located at 1130 West Pender St., Suite 230, Vancouver, BC Canada V6E 4A4.  Since that time, we have not sought to move or change our office site.  The term of the lease was fully ended on August 31, 2013 and the term of lease was extended for three years from September 1, 2013.  Under the new term, we currently pay a total of CAD $6,869 per month on a month-to-month basis for 2,113 ft of corporate office space.  The space we lease is utilized for general main office purposes.

On January 15, 2014, we also entered into a lease agreement for new office space located at 25 Broadway, 10^th Floor, New York, NY 10004 U.S.A.  Under the lease, we currently pay a total of $1,300 USD per month on a month-to-month basis for 80 ft of corporate office space.  The space we lease is utilized for general office purposes.

On July 10, 2012, the Company also entered into a lease agreement for new office space located at 3820 Cessna Drive, Suite 190, Richmond, BC Canada V7B 0A2.  Under the lease, we currently pay a total of CAD $2,472 per month on a month-to-month basis for 934 ft of corporate office space.  The space we lease is utilized for general office purposes.

Additional space may be required as the Company expands our operations.  The Company does not foresee any significant difficulties in obtaining any required additional space.  The Company does not own any real estate.

12.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has, since incorporation, adopted three stock option plans.  The first plan is dated February 15, 2001, amended on October 15, 2009, under which the Company is authorized to grant options to acquire up to a total of 6,000,000 shares of common stock.  The second plan is dated February 15, 2005, under which the Company is authorized to grant options to acquire up to a total of 3,000,000 shares of common stock.  The third plan is dated July 30, 2012, under which the Company is authorized to grant options to acquire up to a total of 10,000,000 shares of common stock.  Pursuant to the stock option plans, options granted are subject to vesting terms which range from immediate vesting to various stages over a period of one year including monthly vesting, at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company adopted the 2008 Stock Compensation Plan and the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 500,000 and 2,000,000 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock, to be registered on Form S-8, to the Company’s employees, executives and consultants.  On May 14, 2010, the Company adopted the 2010 Share Incentive Plan on Form S-8 under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 registered shares of its common stock to qualified persons.  On July 30, 2012, the Company adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan on Form S-8 under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 registered shares of its common stock to qualified persons.  On April 11, 2013, the Company adopted the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan on Form S-8 under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 25,000,000 registered shares of its common stock to qualified persons.

Compensation Warrants Granted to Non-employees

On March 25, 2013, the Company granted compensation warrants to purchase a total of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a former director.  The warrants carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The warrants expire March 25, 2018.  The fair value for warrants granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of warrants granted was $109,865.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $109,865 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these warrants.

On December 23, 2013, the Company granted compensation warrants to purchase a total of 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a former officer and his associates.  The warrants carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The warrants expire December 23, 2018.  The fair value for warrants granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of warrants granted was $773,644.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $773,644 as a loss in legal settlement.

F-24

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Options Granted to Employees

On April 15, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire April 15, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $392,597.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $392,597 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.

On April 15, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire April 15, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $39,260.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $39,260 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.

On April 15, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire April 15, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $39,260.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $39,260 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.

On October 1, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire October 1, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $623,767.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $623,767 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.  Above three options and this option could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with the following: 100% of the shares subject to the optionee continuing to be a service provider on such date.

On December 15, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an employee.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The options expire December 15, 2015.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $13,797.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $251 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.  These options could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with followings: 50% of the shares subject to the option shall vest six months after December 15, 2013, and 25% of the shares subject to the option shall vest each quarter thereafter, subject to the optionee continuing to be a service provider on such dates.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized and recorded stock-based compensation of $71,734 related to options granted in the prior year which vested in the current period as a general and administrative expense.

As at December 31, 2013 there was $13,546 total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements.

The fair value for warrants and stock options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $0.0594 and $0.0593 per share, respectively.  The weighted average assumptions used are as follows:

	Years Ended
	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%
Risk-free interest rate	0.37%	0.21%
Expected volatility	181.36%	164.31%
Expected option life (in years)	2.41	1.33

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $nil and $nil respectively.

F-25

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s compensation warrants to non-employees:

	Number of Warrants	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2012	1,605,000	$ 0.12
Granted	5,500,000	0.10
Exercised	(250,000)	0.10
Expired/Cancelled	(1,350,000)	0.10
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	5,505,000	$ 0.10	5.01	$nil
Exercisable, December 31, 2013	5,505,000	$ 0.10	5.01	$nil

The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s stock options granted to employees:

	Number of Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2012	10,890,000	$ 0.24
Granted	17,075,000	0.10
Exercised	(275,000)	0.10
Expired/Cancelled	(6,550,000)	0.22
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	21,140,000	$ 0.11	2.49	$nil
Exercisable, December 31, 2013	21,065,000	$ 0.11	2.49	$nil

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of December 31, 2012, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2013, is presented below:

Nonvested shares	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2012	1,737,500	–
Granted	17,075,000	–
Vested	(18,737,500)	–
Nonvested at December 31, 2013	75,000	–

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized and recorded stock-based compensation of $1,276,734 and $479,607, respectively, as a general and administrative expense related to vested share-based compensation arrangements.

F-26

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

13.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL LITIGATION

In January 2011, Mr. Knaven, a former officer and director of the Company, commenced a complaint to British Columbia’s Employment Standards Branch against the Company (the “ESB Complaint”) alleging that he was owed unpaid wages.  In October 2011, Mr. Knaven initiated two further legal proceedings against the Company in B.C. Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court Actions”), in which he advanced further complaints in respect of claims for shares and interest, a claim for wrongful dismissal, and further claims for general and unspecified damages.

Regarding the ESB Complaint, on October 24, 2012 the Company applied successfully for a ruling placing that complaint in abeyance, to be dealt with by the B.C. Supreme Court rather than the ESB.  In accordance with that ruling, Mr. Knaven on November 9, 2011 delivered a proposed amendment to his Notice of Civil Claim in one of the Supreme Court Actions.  The quantified portion of Mr. Knaven’s claims totals approximately $261,752.  He also seeks general and unspecified damages which are unquantified.  Notwithstanding, $175,310 had been held in trust by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the subject of a garnishment (See also Note 3).  On July 23, 2013 WordLogic obtained a court order releasing $22,124.83 of those funds.   

The Company vigorously contests the claims, and has filed Responses and Counterclaims regarding all of the above referenced disputes.  The Counterclaims name Mr. Knaven and others as defendants by counterclaim.  Mr. Knaven has been served and has filed Responses disputing and denying the Counterclaims.

In November 2013 the Company settled certain claims by Mr. Knaven and certain counterclaims by the Company as against Mr. Knaven.  The terms of settlement are confidential.  Following the settlement, the parties discontinued the claim and counterclaim as against each other, and Mr. Knaven withdrew a complaint he had made to the British Columbia’s Employment Standards Branch.  In consideration for the settlement, the Company released $155,328 from the B.C. Supreme Court ordered garnishment to Mr. Knaven and issued 500,000 common shares of the Company valued at $57,500 to him.  As result of the settlement, the Company recorded loss of $24,710.  

In the proceedings referenced above, the Company had filed a counterclaim naming Mr. Knaven along with certain other defendants by counterclaim.  Those other defendants by counterclaim have not yet been served.  They include Mr. Mike Flom who appears to have been involved in assisting Mr. Knaven in formulating and advancing Knaven’s various claims against the Company.  In addition, although Mr. Flom has neither threatened nor served any legal proceedings of his own, Mr. Flom had, during 2012, asserted that the Company owed him a “termination” payment and related sums totaling in excess of $500,000, and the issuance of shares.  The Company has put Mr. Flom on notice that it does not accept those assertions.

In January 2013, the Company received notice from the former Chief Operating Officer Paul Silverstein, threatening a “whistle blower” claim pursuant to the US Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank legislation, to be commenced in the State of New York, alleging he was forced to resign because he was investigating expenses incurred by the Chief Executive Officer.  The Company denies the allegations, and further maintains the matter is to be resolved by arbitration.  Accordingly on March 8, 2013 it commenced an arbitration in British Columbia, Canada to resolve the issues.  The Company also appointed an independent director to conduct an investigation into the allegations raised by Silverstein to report to the Board of Directors on the outcome of his investigation, together with recommendations.  The report was delivered to the Board of Directors on March 13, 2013.  In response to an objection to jurisdiction raised by the former COO, the arbitrator commenced an initial process to determine his jurisdiction and ruled in favour of WordLogic.

On April 2, 2013, a complaint was filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by Silverstein against the Company in regards to certain claims asserted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act by Mr. Silverstein related to allegations of fraud and the termination of Silverstein as President and CEO of the Corporation.  On October 3, 2013, the Corporation filed counterclaims against Silverstein related to his misconduct in the last month of his employment and upon his resignation.  The Corporation vigorously denies Silverstein's allegations and will aggressively defend the claim and pursue its claims against Silverstein

On December 30, 2013, the Company reached an out of court settlement with Paul Silverstein regarding the previously disclosed claim filed by Mr. Silverstein and the counter claim filed by the Company.  The settlement includes no admission of liability by either party.  In consideration for the settlement, the Company issued 4 million warrants to purchase 4 million common shares of the Company to Mr. Paul Silverstein.  Fair value of the warrants was estimated using Black-Sholes pricing model on settlement date.  The Company recorded loss of $773,644 on this settlement.

F-27

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

On June 28, 2013, Biller Communications (“Biller”), a former consulting firm of the Company entered into a settlement agreement on the pending litigation whereby the Company paid Biller $17,000 in full and final settlement of the matter.  This is a significantly reduced amount from the amount of $30,465 plus interest from May, 2012 and costs sued for in the complaint.  The Company agreed to pay this amount in order to avoid any additional costly litigation, including depositions, court appearances and trial.  The settlement amount was recorded as loss on legal settlement as of December 31, 2013.

14.

INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes reflect the tax consequences on future years of differences between the tax bases.  The deferred tax assets are as follows:

	2013	2012
Deferred tax assets	$2,350,159	$1,461,368
Valuation allowance	(2,350,159)	(1,461,368)
Net future income taxes	–	–

In assessing the realizability of future tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the future tax assets will not be realized.  The ultimate realization of future tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  Management considers the scheduled reversal of future tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.  Management has provided for a valuation allowance on all of its losses as there is no assurance that future tax benefits will be realized.

Our operating loss carry-forwards $6,912,233 at December 31, 2013, $4,298,140 at December 31, 2012 will begin to expire in 2028.

15.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to December 31, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 4,103,571 shares of our common stock related to exercises of warrants, exercise of stock options, and private placement offerings as of March 26, 2014.

Subsequent events have been reviewed through the date of this report.

F-28

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013.  Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, and in light of the material weaknesses found in our internal controls over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).  The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, using the criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").  

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, the Company determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.

1.

We did not maintain appropriate cash controls – As of December 31, 2013, the Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting for the cash process, including failure to segregate cash handling and accounting functions.  

2.

We did not implement appropriate information technology controls – As at December 31, 2013, the Company retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however, there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Company’s data or off-site storage of the data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors.

Accordingly, the Company concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the Company’s internal controls.

As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO. 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation we conducted of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  

20

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Continuing Remediation Efforts to address deficiencies in Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Once the Company is engaged in a business of merit and has sufficient personnel available, then our Board of Directors, in particular and in connection with the aforementioned deficiencies, will establish the following remediation measures:

1.

Our Board of Directors will nominate an independent financial expert on our Board of Directors in the next fiscal year.

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

None.

21

PART III

ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Identification of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the names, ages, date of appointment and other public company directorships of our current directors and officers.

Name and Age	Position(s) Held	Tenure	Other Public Company Directorships
Frank R. Evanshen, 65	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	From May 27, 2003 to present	None
Darrin McCormack, 48	Chief Financial Officer	From August 13, 2007 to present	None
Mark Dostie, 44	Chief Technology Officer	From April 26, 2012 to present	None
T. Allen Rose, 57	Secretary, Treasurer and Director	May 27, 2003 to present	None

Term of Office

Each of our officers is elected by the Board of Directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she dies, resigns or is removed from office.  Each director of the Company serves for a term of one (1) year until our next annual meeting of the shareholders or unless they die, resign or are removed earlier.

Background and Business Experience

The business experience during the past five years of each of the persons presently listed above as an Officer or Director of the Company is as follows:

Franklin R. Evanshen has been the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company since May 27, 2003.  Mr. Evanshen has been a venture capitalist and merchant banker for over 25 years and has extensive experience in raising capital for private and public ventures.  He received his Bachelor of Arts from Loyola College in Montreal in 1970.

Darrin McCormack has been our Chief Financial Officer since August 13, 2007.  Mr. McCormack is a Certified General Accountant and Certified Fraud Examiner and is the managing partner in the firm D. McCormack & Company Inc, CGA’s from July 1995 to present.  Mr. McCormack has been a CGA in public practice since 1988.  He received his diploma in Financial Accounting from Malaspina College in Nanaimo, BC in 1986.

Mark Dostie has over 20 years of professional software engineering experience.  Mr. Dostie is the owner of Echelon Systems Consulting, where he has worked for the past eleven years.  Echelon Systems is a consultancy company specializing in business consulting, systems implementation, and project and portfolio management.  Mr. Dostie also serves as the Principal Consultant, Senior Business Analyst and Senior Software Engineer of Echelon Systems.  His responsibilities include overseeing all operations of the company and developing all software for customers.  Prior to working for Echelon Systems, Mr. Dostie has served as CEO, CTO.  Lead Architect and Project Manager for numerous companies including MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates, PriceWaterhouse Coopers, eMediaIT.  The Board of Directors appointed Mr. Dostie as Chief Technology Officer of the Company on account of his extensive experience in mobile, machine learning and other software technology.

T. Allen Rose has served as a Director and the Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company since May 27, 2003.  Mr. Rose resigned as our Chief Financial Officer on August 13, 2007.  Mr. Rose is a Chartered Accountant and has been in senior financial management for numerous private and public companies since 1983.  He received his Bachelor of Commerce in Finance & Accounting from McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario in 1979.

Significant Employees

Other than the officers and directors described above, we do not expect any other individuals to make a significant contribution to our business.

22

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our officers, directors or persons nominated for such positions.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

During the past ten years no director, executive officer, promoter or control person of the Company has been involved in the following:

(1)

A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law which was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

(2)

Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

(3)

Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

i.

Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

ii.

Engaging in any type of business practice; or

iii.

Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

(4)

Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

(5)

Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

(6)

Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

(7)

Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

i.

Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

ii.

Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

iii.

Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

23

(8)

Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of change in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company.  Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(e) during the year ended December 31, 2013, Forms 5 and any amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the year ended December 31, 2013, and the representations made by the reporting persons to us, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2013, our executive officers and directors and all persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that applies to our senior officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  A written copy of the Code is available on written request to the Company.

Audit Committee

We established a separately-designated standing audit committee on February 19, 2008.  The committee consists of Darrin McCormack, our Chief Financial Officer and T. Allen Rose, a Director, Secretary and Treasurer.  However, Darrin McCormack, the financial expert serving on our audit committee, is also our Chief Financial Officer; therefore, he is not an independent member of our committee.  Further, T. Allen Rose is not an independent member of our committee, as he is also an officer of the Company.  Due to the lack of an independent member, the Company’s audit committee does not function as an audit committee should since there is a lack of independent directors on the committee and the Board of Directors has not identified an audit committee financial expert (as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K), who is knowledgeable about reporting and financial statements requirements, to serve on the audit committee due to the Company’s inability to attract such a person.

The Company intends to establish a new audit committee of the Board of Directors that shall consist of independent directors.  The audit committee’s duties will be to recommend to the Company’s board of directors the engagement of an independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements and to review the Company’s accounting and auditing principles.  The audit committee will review the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls.  The audit committee shall at all times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the Company’s board of directors, free from any relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.

24

ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our executive officers during the years ending December 31, 2013 and 2012. 

Summary Compensation Table

Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Franklin Evanshen President, CEO and Director	2013	nil	nil	nil	$392,597(1)	nil	nil	$349,543 (2)	$742,140
	2012	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	$494,136	$494,136
Darrin McCormack CFO	2013	nil	nil	nil	$39,260 (3)	nil	nil	$34,372 (4)	$73,632
	2012	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	$32,764	$32,764
Paul Silverstein Former Chief Operating Officer (5)	2013	nil	nil	nil	$773,644(6)	nil	nil	nil	$773,644
	2012	nil	nil	nil	$224,302	nil	nil	$168,881	$393,183
Mark Dostie Chief Technology Officer (7)	2013	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	$214,581 (8)	$214,581
	2012	nil	nil	nil	$25,762	nil	nil	$149,878	$175,640
T. Allen Rose Secretary, Treasurer, Director and Former CFO (9)	2013	nil	nil	nil	$39,260 (10)	nil	nil	$2,913	$42,173
	2012	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	$4,002	$4,002
David J. Raffa Former Director (11)	2013	nil	nil	nil	$109,865 (12)	nil	nil	$39,839 (13)	$149,704
	2012	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil

(1) On April 15, 2013, the Company granted to Mr. Franklin Evanshen options to purchase a total of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire April 15, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $392,597.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $392,597 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.

25

(2)	Represents management consulting fees paid to Meridian Capital Corp. (“MCC”).  MCC, a company controlled by Franklin R. Evanshen, has a management agreement with the Company for services provided personally by Mr. Evanshen in his role as our President and Chief Executive Officer.  The agreement currently requires monthly payments of approximately $30,013 USD ($30,000 CAD) for services rendered.  Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $349,543 USD ($CAD 360,000) and $360,151 ($CAD 360,000) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(3)	On April 15, 2013, the Company granted to Mr. Darrin McCormack options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire April 15, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $39,260.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $39,260 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.
(4)	Represents amounts incurred with D. McCormack & Company Inc., a company of which Darrin McCormack is an officer, for accounting and financial management services provided personally by Mr. McCormack in his role as Chief Financial Officer.  Under the agreement, fees are charged at approximately $107 USD ($110 CAD) per hour.
(5)	Mr. Paul Silverstein is our former Chief Operations Officer.  According to Mr. Silverstein’s consulting agreement, Mr. Silverstein will serve as the Company’s Chief Operations Officer from March 6, 2012 until March 5, 2013.  Mr. Silverstein resigned from his position on December 7, 2012.
(6)	On December 23, 2013, the Company granted to Mr. Silverstein and his associates compensation warrants to purchase a total of 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as a legal settlement.  The warrants carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The warrants expire December 23, 2018.  The fair value for warrants granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of warrants granted was $773,644.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $773,644 as a loss in legal settlement.
(7)	Mr. Mark Dostie has served as our Chief Technology Officer since April 25, 2012.  According to Mr. Dostie’s consulting agreement, Mr. Dostie will serve as the Company’s Chief Technology Officer from March 19, 2013 until March 19, 2014.
(8)	The Agreement provided for Mr. Mark Dostie to be paid approximately $19,419 USD ($20,000 CAD) per month in exchange for his services.
(9)	Mr. T. Allen Rose served as our Chief Financial Officer until August 13, 2007 and is a Secretary, Treasurer, and one of our directors.
(10)	On April 15, 2013, the Company granted to Mr. T. Allen Rose options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire April 15, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $39,260.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $39,260 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.
(11)	Mr. David J. Raffa served as our Director from February 14, 2013 to March 25, 2013.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, Mr. Raffa resigned as Director.
(12)	On March 25, 2013, the Company granted to Mr. Raffa compensation warrants to purchase a total of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The warrants carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The warrants expire March 25, 2018.  The fair value for warrants granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of warrants granted was $109,865.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $109,865 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these warrants.
(13)	With an engagement with Mr. Raffa, the Company paid totaled $39,839 (CAD $41,031) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

26

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

There are no compensatory plans or arrangements, including payments to be received from the Company with respect to any executive officer, that would result in payments to such person because of his or her resignation, retirement or other termination of employment with the Company or its subsidiaries, any change in control, or a change in the person’s responsibilities following a change in control of the Company.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The table below summarizes the outstanding equity awards to our executive officers as of December 31, 2013.  

OPTION AWARDS
Name	Number of Common Shares Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Common Shares Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date
Franklin Evanshen	9,800,000	Nil	Nil	$0.10	August 15, 2016
Darrin McCormack	100,000 200,000 1,000,000	Nil Nil Nil	Nil Nil Nil	$0.27 $0.52 $0.10	March 6, 2014 April 27, 2014 August 15, 2016
Mark Dostie	1,000,000 5,000,000	Nil Nil	Nil Nil	$0.10 $0.10	August 1, 2014 October 1, 2016
T. Allen Rose	1,000,000	Nil	Nil	$0.10	August 15, 2016

Long-Term Incentive Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers.

Compensation of Directors

The Company paid $42,752 to our board members for their services during the year ended December 31, 2013.

Compensation Committee

We currently do not have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors.  The Board of Directors as a whole determines executive compensation.

27

ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number of shares of our Common Stock, owned beneficially as of February 20, 2014 by: (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of our named executive officers; and (iii) each person or group known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock.  Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares they own.

As of March 26, 2014, there were 95,120,415 common shares outstanding, 30,980,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase options, and 5,880,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase warrants issued and outstanding.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Title of Class	Amount & Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)	Percent of Class (2)(%)
Franklin R. Evanshen (3) 1280 Braeside Street W. Vancouver BC  V7T 2L2 Canada	Common	21,514,059 (4)	16.30%
Mark Dostie (5) 1130 West Pender Street, Suite 230 Vancouver, BC  V6E 4A4 Canada	Common	8,000,000 (6)	6.06%
Darrin McCormack (7) 1729 Pavenham Rd. Cowichan Bay, BC  V0R 1N1 Canada	Common	1,631,300 (8)	1.24%
T. Allen Rose (9) 2400 – 650 W. Georgia St. Vancouver, BC  V6B 4N7 Canada	Common	1,000,000 (10)	0.76%
All Officers and Directors as a Group (4 Persons)	Common	32,145,359	24.36%

(1) The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.  Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right.  The persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and the information contained in the footnotes to this table.

(2) Based on 95,120,415 outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 26, 2014 plus 30,980,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase options, and 5,880,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase warrants issued and outstanding.

(3) Franklin R. Evanshen is the President, Chief Executive Officer, and a Director of the Company.

(4) Includes 9,708,383 common shares and options to purchase 11,800,000 shares of our Common Stock, held under his own name, and 5,676 common shares held by MCC Meridian Capital Corp., a company controlled by Franklin R. Evanshen.

(5) Mark Dostie is the Chief Technology Officer of the Company.

(6) Includes options to purchase 8,000,000 shares of our Common Stock.

(7) Darrin McCormack is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.  

(8) Includes 331,300 common shares and options to purchase 1,300,000 shares of our Common Stock.

28

(9) T. Allen Rose is the Secretary, Treasurer and a Director of the Company.

(10) Includes options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our Common Stock.

Changes in Control

There are no present arrangements or pledges of the Company’s securities which may result in a change in control of the Company.

ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Director Independence

For purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definitions set forth in NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2).  The OTCBB on which shares of common stock are quoted does not have any director independence requirements.  The NASDAQ definition of “Independent Director” means a person other than an Executive Officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

According to the NASDAQ definition, neither Frank R. Evanshen nor T. Allen Rose is an independent director because they are also executive officers of the Company.

Related Party Transactions

The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by a director to provide management services requiring monthly payments of CAD $30,000, expiring December 31, 2014.  Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $349,543 (CAD $360,000) and $360,151 ($CAD 360,000) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As at December 31, 2013, the amount owing to this private company totaled $8.

The Company incurred accounting fees of $34,372 and $32,764 with a private company of which an officer is also an officer for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As at December 31, 2013, the amount owing to this private company totaled $9,402.

The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by an officer to provide management services requiring monthly payments of CAD $20,000 which increased from CAD $17,000 on December 1, 2012, expiring April 1, 2014.  Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $214,581 (CAD $221,000) and $149,878 (CAD $149,815) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As at December 31, 2013, the amount owing to this private company totaled $41,688.

Other than the foregoing, none of the directors or executive officers of the Company, nor any person who owned of record or was known to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of its Common Stock, nor any associate or affiliate of such persons or companies, has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction that has occurred during the past fiscal year, or in any proposed transaction, which has materially affected or will affect the Company.

With regard to any future related party transaction, we plan to fully disclose any and all related party transactions in the following manner:

·

disclosing such transactions in reports where required;

·

disclosing in any and all filings with the SEC, where required;

·

obtaining disinterested directors consent; and

·

obtaining shareholder consent where required.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

29

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

	Year Ended December 31, 2013	Year Ended December 31, 2012
Audit fees	$21,750	$22,023
Audit-related fees	$nil	$nil
Tax fees	$nil	$nil
All other fees	$nil	$nil
Total	$21,750	$22,023

Audit Fees

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, we incurred approximately $21,750 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, we incurred approximately $22,023 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 for assurance and related services by our principal independent accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements (and are not reported under Item 9(e)(1) of Schedule 14A) was $0 and $0, respectively.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 for professional services rendered by our principal accountant tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $nil and $nil, respectively.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 for products and services provided by our principal independent accountants (other than the services reported in Items 9(e)(1) through 9(e)(3) of Schedule 14A) was $0 and $0, respectively.

30

PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS.

(a)

Documents filed as part of this Report.

Exhibit
Number	Description of Exhibit	Filing
3.01	Articles of Incorporation	Filed with the SEC on ­­­­­­­­­­June 8, 2001 as part of our Registration Statement on Form 10SB12G.
3.01a	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation	Filed with the SEC on May 21, 2003 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB.
3.01b	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation	Filed with the SEC on August 8, 2012 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
3.02	Bylaws	Filed with the SEC on ­­­­­­­­­­June 8, 2001 as part of our Registration Statement on Form 10SB12G.
4.01	2012 Equity Incentive Plan	Filed with the SEC on August 3, 2012 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-8.
4.02	Sample Stock Option Agreement	Filed with the SEC on August 3, 2012 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-8.
4.03	Sample Stock Award Agreement for Restricted Stock	Filed with the SEC on August 3, 2012 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-8.
4.04	Sample Stock Award Agreement for Stock Units	Filed with the SEC on August 3, 2012 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-8.
10.01	Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $6,000 dated August 5, 2010	Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.02	Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $3,500 dated August 5, 2010	Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.03	Settlement Agreement between Richard Kozukan and Jim Yano dated August 25, 2010	Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.04	Website Services Agreement between the Company and Creative Web, Inc. dated August 31, 2010	Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.05	Consulting Agreement between the Company and Douglas Schreiner dated September 8, 2010	Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.06	Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $3,500 dated October 28, 2010	Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.07	Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $2,500 dated October 28, 2010	Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.08	Settlement Agreement between the Company and Luis Carrillo dated November 29, 2010	Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.09	Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $4,900 dated January 13, 2011	Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.10	Settlement Agreement between the Company and Mirador Consulting, Inc. dated February 2, 2011	Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.11	Settlement Agreement between the Company and Luis Carrillo dated March 9, 2011	Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.12	Promissory Note to Anthony Amado for $42,500 dated March 24, 2011	Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.13	Settlement Agreement between the Company and Anthony Amado dated March 24, 2011	Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.14	Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $3,000 dated March 25, 2011	Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.15	Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $14,000 dated May 9, 2011	Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.16	Settlement Agreement between the Company and Luis Carrillo dated October 21, 2011	Filed with the SEC on November 14, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

31

10.17	Cancellation Agreement between the Company and Frank R. Evanshen dated October 27, 2011	Filed with the SEC on November 14, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.18	Promissory Note for Luis Carrillo for $3,500 dated February 27, 2012.	Filed with the SEC on April 13, 2012 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
14.01	Code of Ethics	Filed with the SEC on April 14, 2005 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10K-SB.
16.01	Letter from Former Accountant Manning Elliott LLP dated March 13, 2009	Filed with the SEC on March 16, 2009 as part of our Amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A.
31.01	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14	Filed herewith.
31.02	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14	Filed herewith.
32.01	CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	Filed herewith.
32.02	CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	Filed herewith.
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document	Filed herewith.
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Filed herewith.
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith.
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document	Filed herewith.
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith.
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	Filed herewith.

*Pursuant to Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

32

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

Dated:  April 7, 2014

/s/ Franklin Evanshen       

By: Franklin Evanshen

Its: President & Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  April 7, 2014

/s/ Darrin McCormack     

By: Darrin McCormack

Its:  Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Dated:  April 7, 2014

/s/ Franklin Evanshen      

By: Franklin Evanshen

Its:  Director

Dated:  April 7, 2014

/s/ T. Allen Rose               

By: T. Allen Rose

Its:  Director

33

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification Of The Chief Executive Officer - Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Franklin Evanshen, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wordlogic Corporation.
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

By: /s/ Franklin Evanshen

Franklin Evanshen

President and Chief Executive Officer

April 7, 2014

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification Of The Chief Financial Officer - Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Darrin McCormack, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wordlogic Corporation.
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

By: /s/ Darrin McCormack

Darrin McCormack

Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

April 7, 2014

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wordlogic Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Franklin Evanshen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Franklin Evanshen

Franklin Evanshen

President and Chief Executive Officer

April 7, 2014

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wordlogic Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darrin McCormack, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Darrin McCormack

Darrin McCormack

Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

April 7, 2014

XML

RESTRICTED CASH (Detail Textuals) (USD $)	1 Months Ended
	Dec. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Restricted Cash [Abstract]
Restricted cash balances		$ 32,488	$ 174,561
Garnished amount paid to plantiff	$ 147,797

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION - Summary of weighted average assumptions used (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]
Expected dividend yield	0.00%	0.00%
Risk-free interest rate	0.37%	0.21%
Expected volatility	181.36%	164.31%
Expected option life (in years)	2 years 4 months 28 days	1 year 3 months 29 days

XML

COMMON STOCK - Summary of shares purchased with warrants attached (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Class of Warrant or Right [Line Items]
Number of Warrants, Outstanding, December 31, 2013	2,930,000
Warrants, Outstanding, December 31, 2013	0.10
Warrant
Class of Warrant or Right [Line Items]
Number of Warrants, Balance, December 31, 2012	11,137,600
Number of Warrants, Issued	2,930,000
Exercised	(3,175,000)
Expired/Cancelled	(6,312,600)
Number of Warrants, Outstanding, December 31, 2013	4,580,000	11,137,600
Warrants, Weighted average exercise price, Balance, December 31, 2012	0.11
Granted	0.10
Exercised
Expired/Cancelled
Warrants, Outstanding, December 31, 2013	0.10	0.11
Warrants Outstanding, Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	2 years 1 month 10 days	9 months 11 days
Weighted-average remaining contractual term, issued	2 years 2 months 1 day

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION - Summary of compensation warrants to non employees (Details 1) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Warrants, Outstanding, December 31, 2013	0.10
Warrant
Number of Warrants
Outstanding, Beginning Balance	11,137,600
Exercised	(3,175,000)
Expired/Cancelled	(6,312,600)
Outstanding, Ending Balance	4,580,000	11,137,600
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Warrants, Weighted average exercise price, Balance, December 31, 2012	0.11
Granted	0.10
Exercised
Expired/Cancelled
Warrants, Outstanding, December 31, 2013	0.10	0.11
Warrants Outstanding, Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	2 years 1 month 10 days	9 months 11 days
Warrant | Non employee
Number of Warrants
Outstanding, Beginning Balance	1,605,000
Granted	5,500,000
Exercised	(250,000)
Expired/Cancelled	(1,350,000)
Outstanding, Ending Balance	5,505,000
Exercisable, Ending Balance	5,505,000
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Warrants, Weighted average exercise price, Balance, December 31, 2012	0.12
Granted	0.10
Exercised	0.10
Expired/Cancelled	0.10
Warrants, Outstanding, December 31, 2013	0.10
Exercisable, Ending Balance	0.11
Warrants Outstanding, Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	5 years 0 months 4 days
Warrants Exercisable, Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	5 years 0 months 4 days
Warrants Outstanding, Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Warrants Exercisable, Aggregate Intrinsic Value

XML

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Detail Textuals) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]
Depreciation expense	$ 4,583	$ 3,577

XML

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND CONTINUANCE OF BUSINESS GOING CONCERN (Detail Textuals 1) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		127 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Net income (loss)	$ (4,772,150)	$ 1,380,832	$ (24,151,280)

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION - Summary of change in Nonvested shares (Details 3) (Stock option, USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Stock option
Number of Shares
Nonvested, Beginning Balance	1,737,500
Granted	17,075,000
Vested	(18,737,500)
Nonvested, Ending Balance	75,000
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested, Beginning Balance
Granted
Vested
Nonvested, Ending Balance

XML

RESTRICTED CASH (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Restricted Cash [Abstract]

Schedule of restricted cash

	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Attorney trust	$32,488	$26,764
Garnishment	$nil	$147,797
Total	$32,488	$174,561

XML

COMMON STOCK (Detail Textuals 1) (USD $)	12 Months Ended	1 Months Ended								12 Months Ended				1 Months Ended						1 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2008	Nov. 30, 2013 Private placement	Nov. 30, 2013 Private placement two	Dec. 31, 2013 Common stock	Oct. 31, 2013 Common stock	Aug. 31, 2013 Common stock	Jul. 31, 2013 Common stock	Jun. 30, 2013 Common stock	Jan. 31, 2012 Common stock	Dec. 31, 2013 Common stock	Dec. 31, 2012 Common stock	Dec. 31, 2012 Common stock May 11, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012 Common stock July 21, 2011	Dec. 31, 2013 Common stock Private placement	Feb. 29, 2012 Common stock Private placement	Jan. 31, 2012 Common stock Private placement	Aug. 31, 2013 Common stock Private placement	Jun. 30, 2013 Common stock Private placement	Jun. 30, 2013 Common stock Private placement two	Jan. 31, 2012 Common stock Consultant	Dec. 31, 2012 Common stock Consultant	Dec. 31, 2012 Common stock Consultant June 1, 2011
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Numbers of common stock issued for services												111,111	200,000							35,000		50,000
Common stock issue price per share		$ 0.10	$ 0.10									$ 0.25	$ 0.10	$ 0.10			$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.15		$ 0.103	$ 0.259
Value of common stock issued for services	$ 136,000											$ 27,778	$ 20,000							$ 3,605		$ 12,950
Numbers of units issued in during period		100,000	250,000											2,330,000	850,000	350,000
Stock issue price per share related to exercise of warrants				$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10			$ 0.25				$ 0.10	$ 0.10
Number of shares included in each unit		1	1											1	1	1
Number of warrants included in each unit		1	1											1	1	2
Proceeds from issuance of common stock related to exercise of warrants				$ 70,000	$ 30,000	$ 162,500	$ 5,000	$ 35,000	$ 268,000	$ 268,000	$ 27,778				$ 85,000	$ 35,000

XML

GST/HST RECEIVABLE (Detail Textuals)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2013 CAD	Dec. 31, 2012 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2012 CAD
GST HST RECEIVABLE [Abstract]
Harmonized sales tax (HST)	12.00%	12.00%
GST/HST refund receivable	$ 17,700	18,826	$ 32,724	32,558

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Detail Textuals) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 61,791	$ 581,605
Term deposits	50,000	915,077
Interest receivable	$ 128	$ 515

XML

TREASURY STOCK (Detail Textuals)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Aug. 15, 2012
Treasury Stock [Abstract]
Number of shares authorized for repurchase			5,000,000
Numbers of common stock purchased		1,031,540
Numbers of common stock retired		800,000

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Detail Textuals 3) (USD $)	12 Months Ended	127 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		1 Months Ended		12 Months Ended	0 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		0 Months Ended				12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013 General and administrative expense	Dec. 31, 2012 General and administrative expense	Dec. 23, 2013 Officer	Dec. 30, 2013 Paul Silverstein	Dec. 31, 2013 Stock option	Apr. 15, 2013 Stock option Officer	Dec. 31, 2013 Employee stock option	Dec. 31, 2012 Employee stock option	Dec. 15, 2013 Employee stock option Officer	Oct. 01, 2013 Employee stock option Officer	Apr. 15, 2013 Employee stock option Officer	Apr. 15, 2013 Employee stock option Officer	Dec. 31, 2013 Employee stock option Officer General and administrative expense	Dec. 31, 2013 Employee stock option Officer General and administrative expense	Dec. 31, 2013 Employee stock option Officer General and administrative expense	Dec. 31, 2013 Employee stock option Officer General and administrative expense	Dec. 31, 2013 Employee stock option Officer General and administrative expense	Dec. 31, 2013 Employee stock option Officer General and administrative expense
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Warrants granted					4,000,000	4,000,000
Granted							17,075,000	10,000,000			75,000	5,000,000	1,000,000	1,000,000
Exercise price					$ 0.10		$ 0.10	$ 0.10			$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10
Fair value of warrants granted	$ 773,644
Loss in legal settlement	(815,354)	(815,354)				(773,644)
Fair value of stock options granted								392,597			13,797	623,767	39,260	39,260
Stock-based compensation			1,276,734	479,607											623,767	251	71,734	392,597	39,260	39,260
Percentage of shares subject to optionee								100.00%				100.00%	100.00%	100.00%
Percentage of shares vested in six months after specified date											50.00%
Percentage of shares vested in each quarter after specified date											25.00%
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
Total unrecognized compensation cost	$ 13,546	$ 13,546
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted									$ 0.0594	$ 0.0593

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES (Detail Textuals) (Management services agreement with private company)	12 Months Ended				1 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013 Director USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2013 Director CAD	Dec. 31, 2012 Director USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2012 Director CAD	Nov. 30, 2012 Officer CAD	Dec. 01, 2012 Officer CAD	Dec. 31, 2013 Officer USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2013 Officer CAD	Dec. 31, 2012 Officer USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2012 Officer CAD
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Monthly payment for management services		30,000			20,000	17,000
Management fee incurred	349,543	360,000	360,151	360,000			214,581	221,000	149,878	149,815
Amount owed related to management services	8		10,144				41,688		10,373
Accounting fees incurred							34,372		32,764
Amount owing related to accounting fees							$ 9,402		$ 5,026

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a)

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

b)

Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of WordLogic Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary 602531 British Columbia Ltd. (the “Subsidiary”), an entity incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Subsidiary does not have any operations. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

c)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.

d)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all investment instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investment securities with original or remaining maturities of more than three months but less than one year are considered short-term investments. Auction rate securities with original or remaining maturities of more than three months are considered short-term investments even if they are subject to re-pricing within three months. The Company was not invested in any auction rate securities as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Investment securities held with the intent to reinvest or hold for longer than a year, or with remaining maturities of one year or more, are considered long-term investments. The Company’s cash equivalents at December 31, 2012 consisted of term deposits with original maturities of three months or less, and are therefore classified as cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheets.

Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash and term deposits of $61,791 and $581,605 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

e)

 Short and Long-term Investments

The Company accounts for its short-term and long-term investments in accordance with ASC 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities. The Company’s short and long-term investments in securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains or losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary, if any, on available-for-sale securities are reported in other income, net. The Company reviews the securities for impairments considering current factors including the economic environment, market conditions, and the operational performance and other specific factors relating to the businesses underlying the securities. The Company records impairment charges equal to the amount that the carrying value of its available-for-sale securities exceeds the estimated fair market value of the securities as of the evaluation date. The fair value for publicly held securities is determined based on quoted market prices as of the evaluation date. In computing realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, the Company determines cost based on amounts paid, including direct costs such as commissions, to acquire the security using the specific identification method. The Company did not have any short or long-term investments in securities at December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

The Company’s investment consisted of certified term deposit with original maturities of more than three months.  The Company realized interest income based on term deposit rate agreed upon with Royal Bank of Canada.  The company had term deposits totaling US $50,000 and $915,077 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  The company has recorded interest receivable of $128 and $515 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

See Note 2.m for further information on fair value.

f)

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company considers its receivables to be fully collectable since the Company has only two receivable accounts, GST/HST (Goods and services tax/harmonized sales tax) receivable and interest receivable; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is required. The Company recognizes an allowance for doubtful accounts on specific accounts identified at risk based on the age of the outstanding receivable and the inability or unwillingness of its customers to make the required payments.

g)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and are amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows:

Asset	Method	Rate
Computer equipment	Straight-line	33.3%
Computer software	Straight-line	100.0%
Furniture and fixtures	Declining balance	20.0%
Other equipment	Declining balance	20.0%

Amortization is recorded at one-half of the normal rate in the year of acquisition. We have compared the depreciation taken using the declining balance method to the straight-line method and have determined the difference to be immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Upon retirement or disposition of equipment, the cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred and expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized.

h)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the carrying value of its long-lived assets under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. If such assets are impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value or fair value, less costs to sell.

i)

Software Development Costs

Software development costs are recorded in accordance with the provisions issued by the FASB as follows. Costs incurred to establish the technological feasibility of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are expensed as incurred as research and development costs. Once technological feasibility is established, the cost of producing product masters for the software is capitalized. Capitalization of the software development costs ceases and amortization of the capitalized costs commences when the product is available for general release to customers. Capitalized costs are amortized based on the greater of (a) the ratio of current gross revenues to the total current and anticipated future gross revenues, or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product.

j)

Research and Development

Expenditures relating to the development of new products and processes, including significant improvements to existing products, are charged to operations as incurred.

k)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company computes tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefit of net operating losses has not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

l)

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with ASC 985-605, Revenue Recognition – Software (“ASC 985-605”), or ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition – Multiple-Element Arrangements.

Pursuant to ASC 985-605, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is probable. The Company applies these criteria as discussed below:

·

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists.  The Company requires a written contract, signed by both the customer and the Company, or a purchase order from those customers that have previously negotiated a standard end-user license arrangement or volume purchase agreement, prior to recognizing revenue on an arrangement.

·

Delivery has occurred.  The Company delivers software and hardware to customers physically.  The standard delivery terms are free on board shipping point.

·

The fee is fixed or determinable.  The Company’s determination that an arrangement fee is fixed or determinable depends principally on the arrangement’s payment terms.  Where these terms apply, the Company regards the fee as fixed or determinable, and recognizes revenue upon delivery (assuming other revenue recognition criteria are met).  If the payment terms do not meet this standard, but rather, involve “extended payment terms,” the fee may not be considered to be fixed or determinable and the revenue would then be recognized when customer installments are due and payable.

·

Collectability is probable.  To recognize revenue, the Company judges collectability of the arrangement fees on a customer-by-customer basis pursuant to a credit review policy.  The Company typically sells to customers with which it has had a history of successful collections.  For new customers, the Company evaluates the customer’s financial position and ability to pay.  If the Company determines that collectability is not probable based upon the credit review process or the customer’s payment history, revenue is recognized when cash is collected.

If there are any undelivered elements, the Company defers revenue for those elements, as long as vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for the undelivered elements.  Payment for product is due upon shipment, subject to specific payment terms.  Payment for professional services is due either upon or in advance of providing the services, subject to specific payment terms.  Reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses and shipping costs, which have not been significant to date, are recognized as revenue in accordance with ASC 605-45, Revenue Recognition – Principal Agent Considerations.

The Company earns revenue from the sale of its software products and from royalties earned on software licensing agreements.  Revenue from the sale of software products is recognized at the point of delivery, which occurs when customers either download the software or are shipped software products.  Royalty revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of licensing agreements and when collectability is reasonably assured, which is usually on receipt of royalty payments.

The Company also recognizes revenue from the licensing of the intellectual property portfolio according to ASC 985-605, based on the terms of agreements involved.

The Company has not established a formal policy affecting warranty or returns.  No estimate of returns from sales has been made.

m)

Fair Value for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments.  Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10 35-37 are described below:

Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.  The Company’s note payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at December 31, 2013.  The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2013, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The Company’s operations are in Canada, which results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates.  The financial risk to the Company’s operations results from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates.  Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.

In accordance with ASC 820, the following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (investments) as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Level	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Level 1	$50,000	$915,077
Level 2	–	–
Level 3	–	–

n)

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar and these financial statements have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with standards issued by the FASB.  The Canadian dollar based accounts of the Company’s foreign operations have been translated into United States dollars using the current rate method.  Assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated using the weighted average exchange rates for the reporting period.  Translation adjustments are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

o)

Stock-based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted standards issued by the FASB, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and shares issued through its employee stock purchase plan, based on estimated fair values.  In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 (“SAB 107”) relating to this standard.  The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of this standard.  The Company adopted the FASB standard using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of the beginning in 2006.  The Company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflect the impact of this standard.  In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s financial statements for prior periods do not include the impact of this standard.

The Company’s determination of estimated fair value of share-based awards utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  The Black-Scholes model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding certain highly complex and subjective variables.  These variables include, but are not limited to the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.

p)

Net Income (Loss) per Share

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock is presented in conformity with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”), for all periods presented.  In accordance with ASC 260, basic net income (loss) per share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period.  Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants that have a dilutive effect when applying the treasury stock method.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

		Year Ended December 31
		2013		2012
Numerator:
Net income (loss) – basic and diluted	$	(4,772,150)	$	1,380,832
Denominator:
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		85,084,292		83,726,680
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		–		–
Warrants		–		–
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		85,084,292		83,726,680
Net income (loss) per share - basic	$	(0.06)	$	0.02
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$	(0.06)	$	0.02

Since the market price of the Company’s share is lower than the exercise price of outstanding stock options and warrants, there is no dilutive effect for the year ended December 31, 2012.  Due to a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013, basic and diluted net loss per share are equivalent as the inclusion of potential common shares in the number of shares used for the diluted computation would be anti-dilutive to the net loss per share.

q)

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company reports its comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with provisions of the FASB.  For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s only component of comprehensive loss was foreign currency translation adjustments.

r)

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred.

s)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications.  Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period.  Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income.  The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements.  All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP.  The new amendments will require an organization to:

-

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

-

Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period.  This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income.  Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual).  The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies.  Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11.  The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users.  In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs.  Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013.  The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04.  The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification.  These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements.  The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012.  The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03.  This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114.  The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02.  This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.  Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance.  The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect.  These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

t)

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period’s financial statements to conform to the current period’s presentation.

XML

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Detail Textuals) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended				127 Months Ended	1 Months Ended	0 Months Ended	1 Months Ended
	Dec. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2008	Dec. 31, 2005	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 30, 2013 Paul Silverstein	Nov. 09, 2011 Employment standards branch complaint Knaven	Nov. 30, 2013 Employment standards branch complaint Knaven	Jul. 23, 2013 Employment standards branch complaint Knaven
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Claim amount								$ 261,752
Amount held in trust, subject of a garnishment								175,310
Amount of released funds										22,124.83
Consideration paid	147,797								155,328
Number of common stock shares issued in consideration of legal settlement									500,000
Amount of common stock shares issued in consideration of legal settlement				136,000	540,000				57,500
Gain (loss) on legal settlement		(815,354)				(815,354)	(773,644)		(24,710)
Number of warrants issued							4,000,000
Number of shares called by warrants		2,930,000				2,930,000	4,000,000
Termination payment			$ 500,000

XML

PREPAID EXPENSES - Summary of prepaid expenses (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Schedule Of Prepaid Expense [Line Items]
Total	$ 13,741	$ 54,032
Bentall L.P.
Schedule Of Prepaid Expense [Line Items]
Total	11,733	12,543
GSMA Ltd.
Schedule Of Prepaid Expense [Line Items]
Total		29,710
Vantage Communication Ltd.
Schedule Of Prepaid Expense [Line Items]
Total		8,443
Others
Schedule Of Prepaid Expense [Line Items]
Total	$ 2,008	$ 3,336

XML

COMMON STOCK (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Equity [Abstract]

Schedule of share purchases with warrants attached

	Number of Warrants	Weighted average exercise price $	Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years)
Balance, December 31, 2012	11,137,600	0.11	0.78
Issued	2,930,000	0.10	2.17
Exercised	(3,175,000)	–	–
Expired/Cancelled	(6,312,600)	–	–
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	4,580,000	0.10	2.11

XML

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

Schedule of property and equipment

	Cost $	Accumulated Amortization as of December 31, 2013 $	Net Carrying Amount as of December 31, 2013 $	Net Carrying Amount as of December 31, 2012 $
Office equipment	10,216	5,328	4,888	6,416
Computer equipment	144,391	137,408	6,983	10,573
Computer software	6,666	6,666	-	-
Furniture and fixtures	15,890	14,085	1,805	2,376
	177,163	163,487	13,676	19,365

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION - Summary of continuity of stock options granted (Details 2) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2006	Dec. 31, 2013 Employee stock option	Dec. 31, 2013 Employee stock option
Number of options
Outstanding				10,890,000
Granted				17,075,000
Exercised		(30,000)	(7,500)	(275,000)
Expired/Cancelled				(6,550,000)
Outstanding			21,140,000	21,140,000
Exercisable			21,065,000	21,065,000
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding				$ 0.24
Granted				$ 0.10
Exercised	$ 0.10			$ 0.10
Expired/Cancelled				$ 0.22
Outstanding			$ 0.11	$ 0.11
Exercisable			$ 0.11	$ 0.11
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)
Outstanding				2 years 5 months 27 days
Exercisable				2 years 5 months 27 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding
Exercisable

XML

PREPAID EXPENSES (Detail Textuals) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Deferred Costs Capitalized Prepaid And Other Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Prepaid expenses	$ 13,741	$ 54,032

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

Schedule of weighted average assumptions

	Years Ended
	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%
Risk-free interest rate	0.37%	0.21%
Expected volatility	181.36%	164.31%
Expected option life (in years)	2.41	1.33

Schedule of compensation warrants to non-employees

	Number of Warrants	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2012	1,605,000	$ 0.12
Granted	5,500,000	0.10
Exercised	(250,000)	0.10
Expired/Cancelled	(1,350,000)	0.10
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	5,505,000	$ 0.10	5.01	$nil
Exercisable, December 31, 2013	5,505,000	$ 0.10	5.01	$nil

Schedule of continuity of stock options granted to employees

	Number of Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2012	10,890,000	$ 0.24
Granted	17,075,000	0.10
Exercised	(275,000)	0.10
Expired/Cancelled	(6,550,000)	0.22
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	21,140,000	$ 0.11	2.49	$nil
Exercisable, December 31, 2013	21,065,000	$ 0.11	2.49	$nil

Schedule of status of the nonvested shares

Nonvested shares	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2012	1,737,500	–
Granted	17,075,000	–
Vested	(18,737,500)	–
Nonvested at December 31, 2013	75,000	–

XML

INCOME TAXES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of deferred tax assets

	2013	2012
Deferred tax assets	$2,350,159	$1,461,368
Valuation allowance	(2,350,159)	(1,461,368)
Net future income taxes	–	–

XML

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND CONTINUANCE OF BUSINESS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND CONTINUANCE OF BUSINESS

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND CONTINUANCE OF BUSINESS

Nature of Operations

WordLogic Corporation (the “Company” or “WLGC”), formerly TheAmericanWest.com, Inc., was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 30, 1999. The Company’s primary business is the development and commercialization of data entry software for handheld computing devices. Its headquarters is located in Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Reverse Merger

On March 11, 2003, WLGC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) with WordLogic Corporation (“WCPC”), a private British Columbia, Canada corporation. On May 27, 2003, WLGC issued 19,016,658 shares of its common stock in exchange for all 19,016,658 outstanding common shares of WCPC, and the two companies merged. This merger has been treated as a recapitalization of WCPC, with WLGC as the surviving legal entity. Since WLGC had, prior to the recapitalization, minimal assets and no operations, the recapitalization has been accounted for as the sale of 2,907,006 shares of WCPC’s common stock for the net assets of WLGC. Following the closing, WLGC remained the surviving corporation with 21,923,664 common shares outstanding, of which the former shareholders of WCPC owned approximately 86.74%.

In connection with the closing of the Agreement, WLGC changed its name to “WordLogic Corporation” (formerly TheAmericanWest.com, Inc.) and changed its OTCBB symbol under which its common stock trades on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board to “WLGC”. WLGC’s directors resigned their positions and the executive officers of WCPC were appointed to fill the vacancies created by the resignations, which resulted in a change in control.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses prior to the current period, has used significant cash in support of its operating activities and, based upon current operating levels, requires additional capital or significant reconfiguration of its operations to sustain its operations for the foreseeable future. At December 31, 2013 the Company has incurred losses of $24,151,280 since inception. These factors, among others, raise significant doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis and ultimately to attain profitability. The Company’s management intends to satisfy cash requirements with working capital acquired in exchange for debt and/or common stock. There is no assurance the cash infusions will continue in the future or that the Company will achieve profitable operations.

The Company’s future success will be dependent upon its ability to create and provide effective and competitive software products that meet customers changing requirements; including the effective use of leading technologies to continue to enhance its current products and to influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes on a timely and cost-effective basis.

Development Stage

Following its reverse merger on May 27, 2003, the Company entered the development stage and became a development stage enterprise.

XML

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND CONTINUANCE OF BUSINESS - Reverse Merger (Detail Textuals)	1 Months Ended
	May 27, 2003 Company
Nature Of Operations And Continuance Of Business [Line Items]
Common stock in exchange for outstanding common shares	19,016,658
Surviving corporation with common shares outstanding	21,923,664
Number of companies merged	2
WordLogic Corporation ("WCPC")
Nature Of Operations And Continuance Of Business [Line Items]
Number of common stock shares issued	19,016,658
Sale of number of shares of WCPC's common stock for net assets in recapitalization	2,907,006
Percentage of former shareholder owned	86.74%

XML

INVESTMENTS - Summary of held to maturity certified term deposits (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Investment Date	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Held to maturity certified term deposits	$ 50,000	$ 915,077
April 10, 2014
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Investment Date	Apr. 10, 2013
Held to maturity certified term deposits	50,000
Maturity Date	Apr. 10, 2014
Interest Rate	0.35%
February 18, 2013
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Investment Date		Sep. 18, 2012
Held to maturity certified term deposits		250,000
Maturity Date		Feb. 18, 2013
Interest Rate		0.30%
April 17, 2013
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Investment Date		Dec. 17, 2012
Held to maturity certified term deposits		200,000
Maturity Date		Apr. 17, 2013
Interest Rate		0.25%
May 17, 2013
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Investment Date		Dec. 17, 2012
Held to maturity certified term deposits		200,000
Maturity Date		May 17, 2013
Interest Rate		0.25%
June 17, 2013
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Investment Date		Dec. 17, 2012
Held to maturity certified term deposits		200,000
Maturity Date		Jun. 17, 2013
Interest Rate		0.25%
April 10, 2013
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Investment Date		Apr. 10, 2012
Held to maturity certified term deposits		50,000
Maturity Date		Apr. 10, 2013
Interest Rate		0.35%
May 29, 2013
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Investment Date		May 29, 2012
Held to maturity certified term deposits		$ 15,077
Maturity Date		May 29, 2013
Interest Rate		1.00%

XML

RENT (Detail Textuals)	0 Months Ended	1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		127 Months Ended	0 Months Ended
	Jul. 10, 2012 CAD sqft	Jun. 23, 2010 CAD sqft	Dec. 31, 2013 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2012 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2013 USD ($)	Jan. 15, 2014 Subsequent Event USD ($) sqft
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Amount of rent paid per month	2,472	6,869	$ 121,657	$ 119,864	$ 1,069,884	$ 1,300
Area of corporate office space	934	2,113				80
Extended term of lease		3 years

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets(USD ($))	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 61,791	$ 581,605
Restricted cash (Note 3)	32,488	174,561
Investments (Note 4)	50,000	915,077
GST/HST refund receivable (Note 5)	17,700	32,724
Employee advances	207	221
Interest receivable	128	515
Prepaid expenses (Note 6)	13,741	54,032
Total Current Assets	176,055	1,758,735
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation (Note 7)	13,676	19,365
Total Assets	189,731	1,778,100
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	751,285	430,481
Indebtedness to related parties (Note 8)	51,098	25,543
Accrued interest		31,948
Total Current Liabilities	802,383	487,972
Total Liabilities	802,383	487,972
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Common stock, $.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized 91,248,384 shares issued and 91,016,844 outstanding as of December 31, 2013, and 83,276,717 shares issued and 83,045,177 outstanding as of December 31, 2012, respectively (Note 9)	91,248	83,277
Additional paid-in capital	26,373,776	23,524,244
Stock payable	11,500	4,000
Accumulated deficit	(2,264,854)	(2,264,854)
Deficit accumulated during development stage	(24,151,280)	(19,379,130)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(652,793)	(657,160)
Treasury stock, 231,540 shares as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (Note 10)	(20,249)	(20,249)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	(612,652)	1,290,128
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$ 189,731	$ 1,778,100

XML

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - Summary of property and equipment (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Cost	$ 177,163
Accumulated Amortization	163,487
Net Carrying Amount	13,676	19,365
Office Equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Cost	10,216
Accumulated Amortization	5,328
Net Carrying Amount	4,888	6,416
Computer equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Cost	144,391
Accumulated Amortization	137,408
Net Carrying Amount	6,983	10,573
Computer software
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Cost	6,666
Accumulated Amortization	6,666
Net Carrying Amount
Furniture and fixtures
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Cost	15,890
Accumulated Amortization	14,085
Net Carrying Amount	$ 1,805	$ 2,376

XML

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (USD $)	Common Stock	Additional Paid-In Capital	Treasury Stock	Stock Payable (Receivable)	Accumulated Deficit	Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	Total
Balance at May. 27, 2003	$ 19,017	$ 1,504,366			$ (2,264,854)		$ 3,806	$ (737,665)
Balance (Shares) at May. 27, 2003	19,016,657
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Reverse merger with The American West.com, Inc. (Note 1)	2,907	(2,907)
Reverse merger with The American West.com, Inc. (Note 1) (in shares)	2,907,007
Cancelled shares	(60)	60
Cancelled shares (in shares)	(60,000)
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						(408,027)		(408,027)
Currency translation adjustment							(270,371)	(270,371)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2003	21,864	1,501,519			(2,264,854)	(408,027)	(266,565)	(1,416,063)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2003	21,863,664
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Common stock issued in exchange for services and payables	88	47,369						47,457
Common stock issued in exchange for services and payables (in shares)	88,000
Common stock options granted		10,344						10,344
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						938,596		938,596
Currency translation adjustment							(97,095)	(97,095)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2004	21,952	1,559,232			(2,264,854)	530,569	(363,660)	(516,761)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2004	21,951,664
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Sale of common stock ($0.65/share)	830	539,170						540,000
Sale of common stock ($0.65/share) (in shares)	830,770
Common stock options granted		204,458						204,458
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						(1,221,564)		(1,221,564)
Currency translation adjustment							(2,930)	(2,930)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2005	22,782	2,302,860			(2,264,854)	(690,995)	(366,590)	(996,797)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2005	22,782,434
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.60/share)	570	341,430						342,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.60/share) (in shares)	570,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share)	100	29,900						30,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.60/share)	30	17,460						17,490
Common stock options exercised ($0.60/share) (in shares)	29,150
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.50/share)	1,000	499,000						500,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.50/share) (in shares)	1,000,000
Common stock options and warrants vested		1,132,512						1,132,512
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						(2,214,823)		(2,214,823)
Currency translation adjustment							4,940	4,940
Balance at Dec. 31, 2006	24,482	4,323,162			(2,264,854)	(2,905,818)	(361,650)	(1,184,678)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2006	24,481,584
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.50/share)	821	409,679						410,500
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.50/share) (in shares)	821,000
Common stock options and warrants vested		439,393						439,393
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.65/share)	200	129,800						130,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.65/share) (in shares)	200,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.40/share)	75	29,925						30,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.40/share) (in shares)	75,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.30/share)	2,377	710,812						713,189
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.30/share) (in shares)	2,377,297
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.25/share)	40	9,960						10,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.25/share) (in shares)	40,000
Exercise of warrants ($1.25/share)	20	24,980						25,000
Exercise of warrants ($1.25/share) (in shares)	20,000
Common stock options exercised (cashless)	88	(88)
Common stock options exercised (cashless) (in shares)	87,736
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						(1,634,324)		(1,634,324)
Currency translation adjustment							(103,990)	(103,990)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2007	28,103	6,077,623			(2,264,854)	(4,540,142)	(465,640)	(1,164,910)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2007	28,102,617
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Sale of common stock ($0.65/share)	200	135,800						136,000
Sale of common stock ($0.351.00/share)	100	99,900						100,000
Sale of common stock ($0.351.00/share) (in shares)	100,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one-half warrant ($0.60/share)	800	479,200						480,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one-half warrant ($0.60/share) (in shares)	800,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one-half warrant ($1.00/share)	50	49,950						50,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one-half warrant ($1.00/share) (in shares)	50,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share)	112	22,388						22,500
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share) (in shares)	112,500
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.25/share)	200	49,800						50,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.25/share) (in shares)	200,000
Exercise of warrants ($0.50/share)	125	62,375						62,500
Exercise of warrants ($0.50/share) (in shares)	125,000
Exercise of warrants ($0.75/share)	100	74,900						75,000
Exercise of warrants ($0.75/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share)	10	2,990						3,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share) (in shares)	10,000
Common stock options exercised ($1.00/share)	192	191,808						192,000
Common stock options exercised ($1.00/share) (in shares)	192,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.68/share)	200	135,800						136,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.68/share) (in shares)	200,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.65/share)	300	194,700						195,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.65/share) (in shares)	300,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	3,931	1,568,421						1,572,352
Common stock issued in settlement of debt (in shares)	3,930,879
Common stock options and warrants vested		2,361,327						2,361,327
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						(4,923,057)		(4,923,057)
Currency translation adjustment							91,309	91,309
Balance at Dec. 31, 2008	34,223	11,371,182			(2,264,854)	(9,463,199)	(374,331)	(696,979)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2008	34,222,996
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)	200	59,800						60,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share) (in shares)	200,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.53/share)	31	16,134						16,165
Common stock issued for services ($0.53/share) (in shares)	30,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.68/share)	250	169,750						170,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.68/share) (in shares)	250,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.40/share)	300	119,700						120,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.40/share) (in shares)	300,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.49/share)	100	48,900						49,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.49/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.31/share)	240	74,160						74,400
Common stock issued for services ($0.31/share) (in shares)	240,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.45/share)	300	134,700						135,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.45/share) (in shares)	300,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.41/share)	55	22,495						22,550
Common stock issued for services ($0.41/share) (in shares)	55,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.62/share)	100	61,900						62,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.62/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.43/share)	30	12,870						12,900
Common stock issued for services ($0.43/share) (in shares)	30,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.36/share)	50	17,950						18,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.36/share) (in shares)	50,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.47/share)	100	46,900						47,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.47/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.44/share)	50	21,950						22,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.44/share) (in shares)	50,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)	100	29,900						30,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.33/share)	90	29,610						29,700
Common stock issued for services ($0.33/share) (in shares)	90,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.35/share)	120	41,880						42,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.35/share) (in shares)	120,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.37/share)	50	18,450						18,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.37/share) (in shares)	50,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.28/share)	100	27,900						28,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.28/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share)	127	33,023						33,150
Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share) (in shares)	127,500
Common stock options exercised ($0.21/share)	10	2,090						2,100
Common stock options exercised ($0.21/share) (in shares)	10,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share)	100	19,900						20,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.22/share)	40	8,760						8,800
Common stock issued for services ($0.22/share) (in shares)	40,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.35/share)	33	11,633						11,666
Common stock options exercised ($0.35/share) (in shares)	33,333
Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share)	76	22,724						22,800
Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share) (in shares)	76,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share)	175	34,825						35,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share) (in shares)	175,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.30/share)	456	136,360						136,816
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.30/share) (in shares)	456,055
Sale of common stock ($0.16/share)	3,025	480,975						484,000
Sale of common stock ($0.16/share) (in shares)	3,025,000
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)	265	39,485						39,750
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share) (in shares)	265,000
Sale of common stock ($0.30/share)	100	29,900						30,000
Sale of common stock ($0.30/share) (in shares)	100,000
Sale of common stock ($0.35/share)	20	6,980						7,000
Sale of common stock ($0.35/share) (in shares)	20,000
Common stock options and warrants vested		2,275,961						2,275,961
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						(4,418,579)		(4,418,579)
Currency translation adjustment							(115,604)	(115,604)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2009	40,916	15,428,747			(2,264,854)	(13,881,778)	(489,935)	(1,166,904)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2009	40,916,384
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Common stock issued for services ($0.39/share)	133	51,867						52,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.39/share) (in shares)	133,332
Common stock issued for services ($0.35/share)	320	111,680						112,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.35/share) (in shares)	320,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.33/share)	150	49,350						49,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.33/share) (in shares)	150,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.31/share)	92	28,527						28,619
Common stock issued for services ($0.31/share) (in shares)	92,321
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)	110	32,890						33,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share) (in shares)	110,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.29/share)	150	43,350						43,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.29/share) (in shares)	150,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.28/share)	200	55,800						56,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.28/share) (in shares)	200,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share)	3,200	828,800						832,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share) (in shares)	3,200,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.25/share)	10	2,490						2,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.25/share) (in shares)	10,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.24/share)	114	27,186						27,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.24/share) (in shares)	113,750
Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share)	150	29,850						30,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share) (jin shares)	150,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.19/share)	50	9,450						9,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.19/share) (in shares)	50,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.18/share)	173	30,877						31,050
Common stock issued for services ($0.18/share) (in shares)	172,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.17/share)	19	3,281						3,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.17/share) (jn shares)	19,412
Common stock issued for services ($0.16/share)	2,500	397,500						400,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.16/share) (in shares)	2,500,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.14/share)	1,495	207,805						209,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.14/share) (in shares)	1,495,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.13/share)	710	91,590						92,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.13/share) (in shares)	710,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.12/share)	850	101,150						102,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.12/share) (in shares)	850,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.11/share)	500	54,500						55,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.11/share) (in shares)	500,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.10/share)	210	20,790						21,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.10/share) (in shares)	210,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.09/share)	200	17,800						18,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.09/share) (in shares)	200,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.08/share)	2,460	194,340						196,800
Common stock issued for services ($0.08/share) (in shares)	2,460,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.07/share)	3,300	227,700						231,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.07/share) (in shares)	3,300,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.05/share)	2,400	117,600						120,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.05/share) (in shares)	2,400,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	2,043	293,778						295,821
Common stock issued in settlement of debt (in shares)	2,042,888
Sale of common stock ($0.33/share)	30	9,870						9,900
Sale of common stock ($0.33/share) (in shares)	30,000
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)	921	136,954						137,875
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share) in shares)	919,999
Sale of common stock ($0.14/share)	140	19,488						19,628
Sale of common stock ($0.14/share) (in shares)	140,200
Sale of common stock ($0.10/share)	1,185	117,315						118,500
Sale of common stock ($0.10/share) (in shares)	1,185,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share)	125	24,875						25,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share) (in shares)	125,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.15/share)	643	95,807						96,450
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.15/share) (in shares)	643,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	1,600	158,400						160,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share) (in shares)	1,600,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.40/share)	200	79,800						80,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.40/share) (in shares)	200,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.15/share)	500	74,500						75,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.15/share) (in shares)	500,000
Common stock options and warrants vested		1,553,666						1,553,666
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						(4,745,811)		(4,745,811)
Currency translation adjustment							(144,420)	(144,420)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	67,799	20,729,373			(2,264,854)	(18,627,589)	(634,355)	(729,626)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2010	67,798,786
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)	10	2,990						3,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share) (in shares)	10,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.265/share)	390	102,960						103,350
Common stock issued for services ($0.265/share) (in shares)	390,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share)	100	25,900						26,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.25/share)	544	135,510						136,054
Common stock issued for services ($0.25/share) (in shares)	544,220
Common stock issued for services ($0.235/share)	40	9,360						9,400
Common stock issued for services ($0.235/share) (in shares)	40,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.23/share)	225	53,775						54,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.23/share) (in shares)	225,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.22/share)	40	8,760						8,800
Common stock issued for services ($0.22/share) (in shares)	40,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.21/share)	150	31,350						31,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.21/share) (in shares)	150,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share)	305	60,695						61,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share) (in shares)	305,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.19/share)	830	156,870						157,700
Common stock issued for services ($0.19/share) (in shares)	830,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.18/share)	583	104,357						104,940
Common stock issued for services ($0.18/share) (in shares)	583,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.15/share)	475	70,775						71,250
Common stock issued for services ($0.15/share) (in shares)	475,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.258/share)	110	28,270						28,380
Common stock issued for services ($0.258/share) (in shares)	110,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.259/share)	260	67,080						67,340
Common stock issued for services ($0.259/share) (in shares)	260,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.13/share)	10	1,290						1,300
Common stock issued for services ($0.13/share) (in shares)	10,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.16/share)	307	48,813						49,120
Common stock issued for services ($0.16/share) (in shares)	307,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.12/share)	125	14,875						15,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.12/share) (in shares)	125,000
Common stock issued for services ($0.105/share)	100	10,400						10,500
Common stock issued for services ($0.105/share) (in shares)	100,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	300	59,700						60,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt (in shares)	300,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	480	85,920						86,400
Common stock issued in settlement of debt (in shares)	480,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	480	81,120						81,600
Common stock issued in settlement of debt (in shares)	480,000
Common stock issued in settlement of debt	500	62,000						62,500
Common stock issued in settlement of debt (in shares)	500,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.15/share)	625	93,125						93,750
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.15/share) (in shares)	625,000
Common stock options exercised (cashlessly)	187	(187)
Common stock options exercised (cashlessly) (in shares)	187,500
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)	100	14,900						15,000
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share) (in shares)	100,000
Sale of common stock ($0.10/share)	713	70,537						71,250
Sale of common stock ($0.10/share) (in shares)	712,500
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.18/share)	532	95,228						95,760
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.18/share) (in shares)	532,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	6,431	636,629						643,060
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share) (in shares)	6,430,600
Common stock options and warrants vested		83,647						83,647
Stock receivable				(10,000)				(10,000)
Cancellation of common stock	(250)	250
Cancellation of common stock (in shares)	(250,000)
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						(2,132,373)		(2,132,373)
Currency translation adjustment							8,395	8,395
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011	82,501	22,946,272		(10,000)	(2,264,854)	(20,759,962)	(625,960)	(632,003)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2011	82,500,606
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Stock issued for services ($0.103/share)	35	3,570						3,605
Stock issued for services ($0.103/share) (in shares)	35,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and two warrant ($0.10/share)	350	34,650		10,000				45,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and two warrant ($0.10/share) (in shares)	350,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	850	84,150						85,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share) (in shares)	850,000
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.25/share)	111	27,666						27,777
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.25/share) (in shares)	111,111
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.10/share)	200	19,800						20,000
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.10/share) (in shares)	200,000
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.259/share)	50	12,900						12,950
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.259/share) (in shares)	50,000
Common stock options and warrants vested		479,607						479,607
Purchase of treasury stock			(101,440)					(101,440)
Purchase of treasury stock (in shares)			1,031,540
Retirement of treasury stock	(800)	(80,391)	81,191
Retirement of treasury stock (in shares)	(800,000)		(800,000)					800,000
Stock payable	(20)	(3,980)		4,000
Stock payable (in shares)	(20,000)
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						1,380,832		1,380,832
Currency translation adjustment							(31,200)	(31,200)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2012	83,277	23,524,244	(20,249)	4,000	(2,264,854)	(19,379,130)	(657,160)	1,290,128
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2012	83,276,717		231,540
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)	100	14,900						15,000
Sale of common stock ($0.15/share) (in shares)	100,000
Sale of common stock ($0.10/share)	1,120	110,880						112,000
Sale of common stock ($0.10/share) (in shares)	1,120,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	2,430	240,570						243,000
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share) (in shares)	2,430,000
Sale of units consisting of two share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)	250	24,750						25,000
Sale of units consisting of two share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share) (in shares)	250,000
Exercise of warrant ($0.10/share)	3,425	339,075						342,500
Exercise of warrant ($0.10/share) (in shares)	3,425,000
Common stock issued in settlement of legal proceeding	500	57,000						57,500
Common stock issued in settlement of legal proceeding (in shares)	500,000
Warrants issued in settlement of legal proceeding (Note 12)		773,644						773,644
Reverse common stock issued in settlement of legal proceeding	(54)	(7,821)						(7,875)
Reverse common stock issued in settlement of legal proceeding (in shares)	(53,333)
Common stock options exercised ($0.10/share)	200	19,800						20,000
Common stock options exercised ($0.10/share) (in shares)	200,000
Common stock options and warrants vested		1,276,734						1,276,734
Stock payable for exercise of stock options ($0.10/share)				7,500				7,500
Retirement of treasury stock (in shares)
Comprehensive loss:
Net Income (loss)						(4,772,150)		(4,772,150)
Currency translation adjustment							4,367	4,367
Balance at Dec. 31, 2013	$ 91,248	$ 26,373,776	$ (20,249)	$ 11,500	$ (2,264,854)	$ (24,151,280)	$ (652,793)	$ (612,652)
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2013	91,248,384		231,540

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Detail Textuals 1)	Dec. 31, 2008 2008 stock compensation plan Employees and executives and consultants	Dec. 31, 2008 2008 equity incentive plan Employees and executives and consultants	May 14, 2010 2010 share incentive plan Qualified persons	Jul. 30, 2012 2012 equity incentive plan Qualified persons	Apr. 11, 2013 2013 equity incentive plan Qualified persons
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of common stock authorized	500,000	2,000,000	10,000,000	10,000,000	25,000,000

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Fair Value for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Details 1) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Level 1
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Fair value of financial assets (investments)	$ 50,000	$ 915,077
Level 2
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Fair value of financial assets (investments)
Level 3
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Fair value of financial assets (investments)

XML

INCOME TAXES (Detail Textuals) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Operating loss carry-forwards	$ 6,912,233	$ 4,298,140

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to December 31, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 4,103,571 shares of our common stock related to exercises of warrants, exercise of stock options, and private placement offerings as of March 26, 2014.

Subsequent events have been reviewed through the date of this report.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Net Income (Loss) per Share (Details 2) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		127 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Numerator:
Net income (loss) - basic and diluted (in dollars)	$ (4,772,150)	$ 1,380,832	$ (25,751,280)
Denominator:
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	85,084,292	83,726,680
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options
Warrants
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	85,084,292	83,726,680
Net income (loss) per share - basic (in dollars per share)	$ (0.06)	$ 0.02
Net income (loss) per share - diluted (in dollars per share)	$ (0.06)	$ 0.02

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Schedule of property and equipment stated at cost

Asset	Method	Rate
Computer equipment	Straight-line	33.3%
Computer software	Straight-line	100.0%
Furniture and fixtures	Declining balance	20.0%
Other equipment	Declining balance	20.0%

Schedule of fair value hierarchy for financial assets (investments)

Level	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Level 1	$50,000	$915,077
Level 2	–	–
Level 3	–	–

Schedule of calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share

		Year Ended December 31
		2013		2012
Numerator:
Net income (loss) – basic and diluted	$	(4,772,150)	$	1,380,832
Denominator:
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		85,084,292		83,726,680
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		–		–
Warrants		–		–
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		85,084,292		83,726,680
Net income (loss) per share - basic	$	(0.06)	$	0.02
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$	(0.06)	$	0.02

XML

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Parentheticals) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009	Dec. 31, 2008	Dec. 31, 2007	Dec. 31, 2006	Dec. 31, 2005
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Sale of common stock	$ 0.10		$ 0.15	$ 0.33	$ 0.16	$ 0.351			$ 0.65
Sale of common stock	$ 0.15		$ 0.10	$ 0.15	$ 0.15
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and two warrant		$ 0.10
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant	$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.15	$ 0.20	$ 0.20	$ 0.20	$ 0.65	$ 0.60
Sale of units consisting of two share of common stock and one warrant	$ 0.10
Common stock options exercised	$ 0.10			$ 0.40	$ 0.35	$ 0.30		$ 0.30
Common stock options exercised				$ 0.15	$ 0.30	$ 1.00		$ 0.60
Stock payable for exercise of stock options	$ 0.10
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant			$ 0.18	$ 0.15	$ 0.30	$ 0.25	$ 0.50	$ 0.50
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant			$ 0.10	$ 0.10			$ 0.40
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant							$ 0.30
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant							$ 0.25
Exercise of warrants	$ 0.10					$ 0.50	$ 1.25
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one-half warrant						$ 0.60
Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one-half warrant						$ 1.00
Exercise of warrants						$ 0.75
Common stock issued for services		$ 0.103	$ 0.30	$ 0.39	$ 0.30	$ 0.68
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.265	$ 0.35	$ 0.53	$ 0.65
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.26	$ 0.33	$ 0.68
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.25	$ 0.31	$ 0.40
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.235	$ 0.30	$ 0.49
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.23	$ 0.29	$ 0.31
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.22	$ 0.28	$ 0.45
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.21	$ 0.26	$ 0.41
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.20	$ 0.25	$ 0.62
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.19	$ 0.24	$ 0.43
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.18	$ 0.20	$ 0.36
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.15	$ 0.19	$ 0.47
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.258	$ 0.18	$ 0.44
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.259	$ 0.17	$ 0.30
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.13	$ 0.16	$ 0.33
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.16	$ 0.14	$ 0.35
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.12	$ 0.13	$ 0.37
Common stock issued for services			$ 0.105	$ 0.12	$ 0.28
Common stock issued for services				$ 0.11	$ 0.26
Common stock issued for services				$ 0.10	$ 0.21
Common stock issued for services				$ 0.09	$ 0.20
Common stock issued for services				$ 0.08	$ 0.22
Common stock issued for services				$ 0.07
Common stock issued for services				$ 0.05
Sale of common stock				$ 0.14	$ 0.30
Sale of common stock				$ 0.10	$ 0.35
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date		$ 0.25
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date		$ 0.10
Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date		$ 0.259

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parentheticals) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Common Stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common Stock, shares authorized	250,000,000	250,000,000
Common Stock, shares issued	91,248,384	83,276,717
Common Stock, shares outstanding	91,016,844	83,045,177
Treasury stock, shares	231,540	231,540

XML

TREASURY STOCK

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Treasury Stock [Abstract]

TREASURY STOCK

10. TREASURY STOCK

On August 15, 2012, the Company announced that the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing up to five million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock to be repurchased over a 12 month period commencing on August 20, 2012.  Any shares repurchased by the Company shall be returned to the treasury and may be used, if and when needed, for general corporate purposes.  During the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company purchased nil and 1,031,540 shares of common stock from treasury stock, respectively.  During the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company retired nil and 800,000 shares of common stock from treasury stock, respectively.

XML

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Mar. 26, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	WORDLOGIC CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0001139614
Trading Symbol	wlgc
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		95,120,415
Entity Public Float			$ 18,966,427
Document Type	10-K
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2013
Amendment Flag	false
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY

XML

RENT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Leases [Abstract]

RENT

11. RENT

On June 23, 2010, the Company originally entered into a lease agreement for office space located at 1130 West Pender St., Suite 230, Vancouver, BC Canada V6E 4A4.  Since that time, we have not sought to move or change our office site.  The term of the lease was fully ended on August 31, 2013 and the term of lease was extended for three years from September 1, 2013.  Under the new term, we currently pay a total of CAD $6,869 per month on a month-to-month basis for 2,113 ft of corporate office space.  The space we lease is utilized for general main office purposes.

On January 15, 2014, we also entered into a lease agreement for new office space located at 25 Broadway, 10^th Floor, New York, NY 10004 U.S.A.  Under the lease, we currently pay a total of $1,300 USD per month on a month-to-month basis for 80 ft of corporate office space.  The space we lease is utilized for general office purposes.

On July 10, 2012, the Company also entered into a lease agreement for new office space located at 3820 Cessna Drive, Suite 190, Richmond, BC Canada V7B 0A2.  Under the lease, we currently pay a total of CAD $2,472 per month on a month-to-month basis for 934 ft of corporate office space.  The space we lease is utilized for general office purposes.

Additional space may be required as the Company expands our operations.  The Company does not foresee any significant difficulties in obtaining any required additional space.  The Company does not own any real estate.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations(USD ($))	12 Months Ended		127 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Revenue
Product sales	$ 366	$ 991	$ 27,114
Patents licensing		5,000,000	5,000,000
Royalty revenue			32,962
Total Revenues	366	5,000,991	5,060,076
Operating expenses
Rent (Note 11)	121,657	119,864	1,069,884
Selling, general and administrative	3,227,885	3,121,636	23,716,860
Research and development	600,749	398,936	3,925,422
Total Operating Expenses	3,950,291	3,640,436	28,712,166
Income (Loss) from Operations	(3,949,925)	1,360,555	(23,652,090)
Other income (expenses)
Bad debts			(11,250)
Interest income	(66)	6,992	8,686
Interest expense:
Related parties			(84,152)
Amortization of discount on convertible note			(145,243)
Other notes, advances and amounts	(6,805)	(2,113)	(452,176)
Gain on derivative liability			142,861
Gain on interest forgiveness		2,947	2,947
Gain on issuance of common stock
Gain (loss) on settled payables		12,451	(745,509)
Gain (loss) on legal settlement	(815,354)		(815,354)
Income (Loss) Before Extraordinary Item	(4,772,150)	1,380,832	(25,751,280)
Net extraordinary gain on litigation settlement, less applicable income taxes of $nil			1,600,000
Net Income (Loss)	(4,772,150)	1,380,832	(24,151,280)
Other Comprehensive Income
Net Gain (Loss) of Foreign Currency Translation	4,367	(31,200)	(652,793)
Net Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$ (4,767,783)	$ 1,349,632	$ (24,804,073)
Basic net income (loss) per share (in dollars per share)	$ (0.06)	$ 0.02
Diluted net income (loss) per share (in dollars per share)	$ (0.06)	$ 0.02
Weighted average common shares used in calculating basic net income (loss) per share (in shares)	85,084,292	83,726,680
Weighted average common shares used in calculating diluted net income (loss) per share (in shares)	85,084,292	83,726,680

XML

GST/HST REFUND RECEIVABLE

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

GST HST RECEIVABLE [Abstract]

GST/HST RECEIVABLE

5. GST/HST REFUND RECEIVABLE

The Good Service Tax (“GST”) is a federal tax that applies to the supply of most property and services in Canada.  As of July 1, 2010, British Columbia (“BC”) harmonized its provincial sales tax (“PST”) with the GST to implement the harmonized sales tax (“HST”) at the rate of 12%.  All businesses operating in BC are responsible for collecting and remitting HST to the Canadian government.  A GST/HST registrant should collect the GST/HST on most of their sales and pay the GST/HST on most purchases they make to operate their business.  They can claim an input tax credit (“ITC”), to recover GST/HST paid or payable on the purchases they use in commercial activities.  However, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company has not collected any GST/HST since all sales were incurred in the United State which sales are not HST taxable.  The Company has filed GST/HST returns quarterly and claimed only ITC’s during the year ended December 31, 2013.  As the result of this, as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had GST/HST refund receivable of $17,700 (CAD $18,826) and $32,724 (CAD $32,558), respectively.

XML

INVESTMENTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Investments [Abstract]

INVESTMENTS

4. INVESTMENTS

TERM DEPOSITS

The company had held-to-maturity certified term deposits with original maturity date more than three months totaling $50,000, $915,077 as of December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively, as follows:

Investment Date	Amount	Maturity Date	Interest Rate
	$
April 10, 2013	50,000	April 10, 2014	0.35%
December 31, 2013	50,000

September 18, 2012	250,000	February 18, 2013	0.30%
December 17, 2012	200,000	April 17, 2013	0.25%
December 17, 2012	200,000	May 17, 2013	0.25%
December 17, 2012	200,000	June 17, 2013	0.25%
April 10, 2012	50,000	April 10, 2013	0.35%
May 29, 2012	15,077	May 29, 2013	1.00%
December 31, 2012	915,077

The Company has recorded an accrued interest receivable of $128 and $515 for above term deposits as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 based on statements provided by financial institutions.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

a) Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

Basis of Consolidation

b) Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of WordLogic Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary 602531 British Columbia Ltd. (the “Subsidiary”), an entity incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Subsidiary does not have any operations. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

c) Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

d) Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all investment instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investment securities with original or remaining maturities of more than three months but less than one year are considered short-term investments. Auction rate securities with original or remaining maturities of more than three months are considered short-term investments even if they are subject to re-pricing within three months. The Company was not invested in any auction rate securities as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Investment securities held with the intent to reinvest or hold for longer than a year, or with remaining maturities of one year or more, are considered long-term investments. The Company’s cash equivalents at December 31, 2012 consisted of term deposits with original maturities of three months or less, and are therefore classified as cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheets.

Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash and term deposits of $61,791 and $581,605 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Short and Long-term Investments

e) Short and Long-term Investments

The Company accounts for its short-term and long-term investments in accordance with ASC 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities. The Company’s short and long-term investments in securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains or losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary, if any, on available-for-sale securities are reported in other income, net. The Company reviews the securities for impairments considering current factors including the economic environment, market conditions, and the operational performance and other specific factors relating to the businesses underlying the securities. The Company records impairment charges equal to the amount that the carrying value of its available-for-sale securities exceeds the estimated fair market value of the securities as of the evaluation date. The fair value for publicly held securities is determined based on quoted market prices as of the evaluation date. In computing realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, the Company determines cost based on amounts paid, including direct costs such as commissions, to acquire the security using the specific identification method. The Company did not have any short or long-term investments in securities at December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

The Company’s investment consisted of certified term deposit with original maturities of more than three months.  The Company realized interest income based on term deposit rate agreed upon with Royal Bank of Canada.  The company had term deposits totaling US $50,000 and $915,077 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  The company has recorded interest receivable of $128 and $515 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

See Note 2.m for further information on fair value.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

f) Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company considers its receivables to be fully collectable since the Company has only two receivable accounts, GST/HST (Goods and services tax/harmonized sales tax) receivable and interest receivable; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is required. The Company recognizes an allowance for doubtful accounts on specific accounts identified at risk based on the age of the outstanding receivable and the inability or unwillingness of its customers to make the required payments.

Property and Equipment

g) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and are amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows:

Asset	Method	Rate
Computer equipment	Straight-line	33.3%
Computer software	Straight-line	100.0%
Furniture and fixtures	Declining balance	20.0%
Other equipment	Declining balance	20.0%

Amortization is recorded at one-half of the normal rate in the year of acquisition. We have compared the depreciation taken using the declining balance method to the straight-line method and have determined the difference to be immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Upon retirement or disposition of equipment, the cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred and expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

h) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the carrying value of its long-lived assets under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. If such assets are impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value or fair value, less costs to sell.

Software Development Costs

i) Software Development Costs

Software development costs are recorded in accordance with the provisions issued by the FASB as follows. Costs incurred to establish the technological feasibility of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are expensed as incurred as research and development costs. Once technological feasibility is established, the cost of producing product masters for the software is capitalized. Capitalization of the software development costs ceases and amortization of the capitalized costs commences when the product is available for general release to customers. Capitalized costs are amortized based on the greater of (a) the ratio of current gross revenues to the total current and anticipated future gross revenues, or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product.

Research and Development

j) Research and Development

Expenditures relating to the development of new products and processes, including significant improvements to existing products, are charged to operations as incurred.

Income Taxes

k) Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company computes tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefit of net operating losses has not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

Revenue Recognition

l) Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with ASC 985-605, Revenue Recognition – Software (“ASC 985-605”), or ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition – Multiple-Element Arrangements.

Pursuant to ASC 985-605, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is probable. The Company applies these criteria as discussed below:

·

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists.  The Company requires a written contract, signed by both the customer and the Company, or a purchase order from those customers that have previously negotiated a standard end-user license arrangement or volume purchase agreement, prior to recognizing revenue on an arrangement.

·

Delivery has occurred.  The Company delivers software and hardware to customers physically.  The standard delivery terms are free on board shipping point.

·

The fee is fixed or determinable.  The Company’s determination that an arrangement fee is fixed or determinable depends principally on the arrangement’s payment terms.  Where these terms apply, the Company regards the fee as fixed or determinable, and recognizes revenue upon delivery (assuming other revenue recognition criteria are met).  If the payment terms do not meet this standard, but rather, involve “extended payment terms,” the fee may not be considered to be fixed or determinable and the revenue would then be recognized when customer installments are due and payable.

·

Collectability is probable.  To recognize revenue, the Company judges collectability of the arrangement fees on a customer-by-customer basis pursuant to a credit review policy.  The Company typically sells to customers with which it has had a history of successful collections.  For new customers, the Company evaluates the customer’s financial position and ability to pay.  If the Company determines that collectability is not probable based upon the credit review process or the customer’s payment history, revenue is recognized when cash is collected.

If there are any undelivered elements, the Company defers revenue for those elements, as long as vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for the undelivered elements.  Payment for product is due upon shipment, subject to specific payment terms.  Payment for professional services is due either upon or in advance of providing the services, subject to specific payment terms.  Reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses and shipping costs, which have not been significant to date, are recognized as revenue in accordance with ASC 605-45, Revenue Recognition – Principal Agent Considerations.

The Company earns revenue from the sale of its software products and from royalties earned on software licensing agreements.  Revenue from the sale of software products is recognized at the point of delivery, which occurs when customers either download the software or are shipped software products.  Royalty revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of licensing agreements and when collectability is reasonably assured, which is usually on receipt of royalty payments.

The Company also recognizes revenue from the licensing of the intellectual property portfolio according to ASC 985-605, based on the terms of agreements involved.

The Company has not established a formal policy affecting warranty or returns.  No estimate of returns from sales has been made.

Fair Value for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

m) Fair Value for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments.  Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10 35-37 are described below:

Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.  The Company’s note payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at December 31, 2013.  The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2013, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The Company’s operations are in Canada, which results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates.  The financial risk to the Company’s operations results from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates.  Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.

In accordance with ASC 820, the following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (investments) as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Level	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Level 1	$50,000	$915,077
Level 2	–	–
Level 3	–	–

Foreign Currency Translation

n) Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar and these financial statements have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with standards issued by the FASB.  The Canadian dollar based accounts of the Company’s foreign operations have been translated into United States dollars using the current rate method.  Assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated using the weighted average exchange rates for the reporting period.  Translation adjustments are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

Stock-based Compensation

o) Stock-based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted standards issued by the FASB, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and shares issued through its employee stock purchase plan, based on estimated fair values.  In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 (“SAB 107”) relating to this standard.  The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of this standard.  The Company adopted the FASB standard using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of the beginning in 2006.  The Company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflect the impact of this standard.  In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s financial statements for prior periods do not include the impact of this standard.

The Company’s determination of estimated fair value of share-based awards utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  The Black-Scholes model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding certain highly complex and subjective variables.  These variables include, but are not limited to the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.

Net Income (Loss) per Share

p) Net Income (Loss) per Share

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock is presented in conformity with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”), for all periods presented.  In accordance with ASC 260, basic net income (loss) per share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period.  Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants that have a dilutive effect when applying the treasury stock method.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

		Year Ended December 31
		2013		2012
Numerator:
Net income (loss) – basic and diluted	$	(4,772,150)	$	1,380,832
Denominator:
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		85,084,292		83,726,680
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		–		–
Warrants		–		–
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		85,084,292		83,726,680
Net income (loss) per share - basic	$	(0.06)	$	0.02
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$	(0.06)	$	0.02

Since the market price of the Company’s share is lower than the exercise price of outstanding stock options and warrants, there is no dilutive effect for the year ended December 31, 2012.  Due to a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013, basic and diluted net loss per share are equivalent as the inclusion of potential common shares in the number of shares used for the diluted computation would be anti-dilutive to the net loss per share.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

q) Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company reports its comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with provisions of the FASB.  For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s only component of comprehensive loss was foreign currency translation adjustments.

Advertising Costs

r) Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

s) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications.  Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period.  Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income.  The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements.  All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP.  The new amendments will require an organization to:

-

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

-

Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period.  This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income.  Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual).  The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies.  Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11.  The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users.  In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs.  Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013.  The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04.  The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification.  These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements.  The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012.  The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03.  This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114.  The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02.  This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.  Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance.  The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect.  These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Reclassifications

t) Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period’s financial statements to conform to the current period’s presentation.

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has, since incorporation, adopted three stock option plans.  The first plan is dated February 15, 2001, amended on October 15, 2009, under which the Company is authorized to grant options to acquire up to a total of 6,000,000 shares of common stock.  The second plan is dated February 15, 2005, under which the Company is authorized to grant options to acquire up to a total of 3,000,000 shares of common stock.  The third plan is dated July 30, 2012, under which the Company is authorized to grant options to acquire up to a total of 10,000,000 shares of common stock.  Pursuant to the stock option plans, options granted are subject to vesting terms which range from immediate vesting to various stages over a period of one year including monthly vesting, at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company adopted the 2008 Stock Compensation Plan and the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 500,000 and 2,000,000 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock, to be registered on Form S-8, to the Company’s employees, executives and consultants.  On May 14, 2010, the Company adopted the 2010 Share Incentive Plan on Form S-8 under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 registered shares of its common stock to qualified persons.  On July 30, 2012, the Company adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan on Form S-8 under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 registered shares of its common stock to qualified persons.  On April 11, 2013, the Company adopted the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan on Form S-8 under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 25,000,000 registered shares of its common stock to qualified persons.

Compensation Warrants Granted to Non-employees

On March 25, 2013, the Company granted compensation warrants to purchase a total of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a former director.  The warrants carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The warrants expire March 25, 2018.  The fair value for warrants granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of warrants granted was $109,865.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $109,865 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these warrants.

On December 23, 2013, the Company granted compensation warrants to purchase a total of 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a former officer and his associates.  The warrants carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The warrants expire December 23, 2018.  The fair value for warrants granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of warrants granted was $773,644.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $773,644 as a loss in legal settlement.

Options Granted to Employees

On April 15, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire April 15, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $392,597.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $392,597 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.

On April 15, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire April 15, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $39,260.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $39,260 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.

On April 15, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire April 15, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $39,260.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $39,260 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.

On October 1, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately.  The options expire October 1, 2016.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $623,767.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $623,767 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.  Above three options and this option could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with the following: 100% of the shares subject to the optionee continuing to be a service provider on such date.

On December 15, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an employee.  The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share.  The options expire December 15, 2015.  The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $13,797.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $251 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.  These options could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with followings: 50% of the shares subject to the option shall vest six months after December 15, 2013, and 25% of the shares subject to the option shall vest each quarter thereafter, subject to the optionee continuing to be a service provider on such dates.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized and recorded stock-based compensation of $71,734 related to options granted in the prior year which vested in the current period as a general and administrative expense.

As at December 31, 2013 there was $13,546 total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements.

The fair value for warrants and stock options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $0.0594 and $0.0593 per share, respectively.  The weighted average assumptions used are as follows:

	Years Ended
	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%
Risk-free interest rate	0.37%	0.21%
Expected volatility	181.36%	164.31%
Expected option life (in years)	2.41	1.33

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $nil and $nil respectively.

The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s compensation warrants to non-employees:

	Number of Warrants	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2012	1,605,000	$ 0.12
Granted	5,500,000	0.10
Exercised	(250,000)	0.10
Expired/Cancelled	(1,350,000)	0.10
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	5,505,000	$ 0.10	5.01	$nil
Exercisable, December 31, 2013	5,505,000	$ 0.10	5.01	$nil

The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s stock options granted to employees:

	Number of Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2012	10,890,000	$ 0.24
Granted	17,075,000	0.10
Exercised	(275,000)	0.10
Expired/Cancelled	(6,550,000)	0.22
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	21,140,000	$ 0.11	2.49	$nil
Exercisable, December 31, 2013	21,065,000	$ 0.11	2.49	$nil

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of December 31, 2012, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2013, is presented below:

Nonvested shares	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2012	1,737,500	–
Granted	17,075,000	–
Vested	(18,737,500)	–
Nonvested at December 31, 2013	75,000	–

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized and recorded stock-based compensation of $1,276,734 and $479,607, respectively, as a general and administrative expense related to vested share-based compensation arrangements.

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES

8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES

The Company incurred the following related party transactions:

a.

The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by a director to provide management services requiring monthly payments of CAD $30,000, expiring December 31, 2014.  Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $349,543 (CAD $360,000) and $360,151 ($CAD 360,000) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $8 and $10,144, respectively.

b.

The Company incurred accounting fees of $34,372 and $32,764 with a private company of which an officer is also an officer for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $9,402 and $5,026, respectively.

c.

The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by an officer to provide management services requiring monthly payments of CAD $20,000 which increased from CAD $17,000 on December 1, 2012, expiring April 1, 2014.  Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $214,581 (CAD $221,000) and $149,878 (CAD $149,815) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $41,688 and $10,373, respectively.

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Detail Textuals 2) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013 General and administrative expense	Mar. 25, 2013 Former director
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares called by warrants	2,930,000		1,500,000
Exercise price	0.10		0.10
Fair value of warrants granted			$ 109,865
Warrant expense		$ 109,865
Fair value measurements, method used	Black-Scholes option-pricing model

XML

PREPAID EXPENSES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Deferred Costs Capitalized Prepaid And Other Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

PREPAID EXPENSES

6. PREPAID EXPENSES

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had prepaid expenses of $13,741 and $54,032, respectively.  Prepaid expenses have been incurred for marketing and advertisement fees and security deposit for an office leased property.  Prepaid expenses consisted of the following:

Vendor	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
	$	$
Bentall L.P.	11,733	12,543
GSMA Ltd.	–	29,710
Vantage Communication Ltd.	–	8,443
Others	2,008	3,336
Total	13,741	54,032

XML

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

	Cost $	Accumulated Amortization as of December 31, 2013 $	Net Carrying Amount as of December 31, 2013 $	Net Carrying Amount as of December 31, 2012 $
Office equipment	10,216	5,328	4,888	6,416
Computer equipment	144,391	137,408	6,983	10,573
Computer software	6,666	6,666	-	-
Furniture and fixtures	15,890	14,085	1,805	2,376
	177,163	163,487	13,676	19,365

Depreciation expense totaled $4,583 and $3,577 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

XML

COMMON STOCK

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Equity [Abstract]

COMMON STOCK

9. COMMON STOCK

For the year ended December 31, 2013:

a)

In June 2013, the Company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $15,000.

b)

Also in June 2013, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it sold 120,000 shares at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $12,000.

c)

Also in June 2013, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it sold 100,000 shares at a price of $0.15 per share for total proceeds of $15,000.

d)

Also in June 2013, the Company issued 350,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $35,000.

e)

In July 2013, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of compensation warrants, for total proceeds of $25,000.

f)

Also in July 2013, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $5,000.

g)

In August 2013, the Company issued 1,625,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $162,500.

h)

Also in August 2013, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it sold 1,000,000 shares at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $100,000.

i)

In October 2013, the Company issued 300,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $30,000.

j)

In November 2013, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 100,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $10,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

k)

In November 2013, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 250,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $25,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and two warrants to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

l)

In December 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock valued on settlement date of the legal proceeding at $0.115 per share as the part of the settlement.

m)

In December 2013, the Company cancelled 53,333 shares of its common stock as the part of legal proceeding settlement.

n)

In December 2013, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 2,330,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $233,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

o)

In December 2013, the Company issued 700,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of warrants, for total proceeds of $70,000.

p)

In December 2013, the Company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share related to the exercise of stock options to an officer for total proceeds of $20,000.

q)

In December 2013, the Company received $7,500 for the exercise of stock options at $0.10 per share but had not yet issued.

For the year ended December 31, 2012:

a)

On December 31, 2012, The Company recorded the issuance of 111,111 shares of its common stock for services.  Shares were valued at $0.25 per share and valued at $27,778 based on the market price on date of the issuance, May 11, 2011.  

b)

Also on December 31, 2012, the Company recorded the issuance of 200,000 shares of its common stock for services.  Shares were valued at $0.10 per share and valued at $20,000 based on the market price on date of the issuance, July 21, 2011.

c)

Also on December 31, 2012, the Company recorded the issuance of 50,000 shares of its common stock at $0.259 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $12,950 based on the market price on date of the issuance, June 1, 2011.

d)

In January 2012, the Company issued 35,000 shares of its common stock at $0.103 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $3,605 based on the price on the date of grant.

e)

In January 2012, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 350,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $35,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and two warrants to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

f)

In February 2012, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 850,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $85,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.

The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s share purchases with warrants attached:

	Number of Warrants	Weighted average exercise price $	Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years)
Balance, December 31, 2012	11,137,600	0.11	0.78
Issued	2,930,000	0.10	2.17
Exercised	(3,175,000)	–	–
Expired/Cancelled	(6,312,600)	–	–
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	4,580,000	0.10	2.11

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 2,680,000 common shares with warrants attached for total cash proceeds of $268,000.  The common stock issued included 2,930,000 attached warrants to purchase 2,930,000 common stock at $0.10 per share.  The relative fair value of the warrants attached to the common stock issued was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Sholes pricing model.  The relative fair value of the warrants attached to the common stock issued is $130,595, and the relative fair value of the common stock is $137,405 as of the issue date.  The Black-Sholes pricing model assumption used are as follows: expected dividend yield of 0%; risk-free interest rate of 0.28% - 0.34%; expected volatility of 132% - 137%, and warrant term of 2 years.

XML

INCOME TAXES - Summary of deferred tax assets (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Deferred tax assets	$ 2,350,159	$ 1,461,368
Valuation allowance	(2,350,159)	(1,461,368)
Net future income taxes

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Detail Textuals) (Subsequent Event)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Subsequent Event
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Number of stock issued related to exercise of warrants	4,103,571

XML

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Detail Textuals 1) (Biller communications, Pending litigation, USD $)	1 Months Ended
	Jun. 28, 2013	May 31, 2012
Biller communications | Pending litigation
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amount paid for settlement	$ 17,000	$ 30,465

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Property and Equipment (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Computer equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Method used	Straight-line
Amortization rate	33.30%
Computer software
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Method used	Straight-line
Amortization rate	100.00%
Furniture and fixtures
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Method used	Declining balance
Amortization rate	20.00%
Other equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Method used	Declining balance
Amortization rate	20.00%

XML

COMMON STOCK (Details Textuals 2) (USD $)	12 Months Ended				12 Months Ended		1 Months Ended					12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013 Warrant	Dec. 31, 2012 Warrant	Dec. 31, 2013 Minimum Warrant	Dec. 31, 2013 Maximum Warrant	Dec. 31, 2013 Common stock	Oct. 31, 2013 Common stock	Aug. 31, 2013 Common stock	Jul. 31, 2013 Common stock	Jun. 30, 2013 Common stock	Dec. 31, 2013 Common stock
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Number of stock issued related to exercise of warrants							700,000	300,000	1,625,000	50,000	350,000	2,680,000
Number of warrants	2,930,000
Number of shares called by warrants	2,930,000		4,580,000	11,137,600
Exercise price of warrant	0.10		0.10	0.11
Fair value of shares			$ 130,595				$ 137,405					$ 137,405
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Dividend Rate	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Fair Value Assumptions, Risk Free Interest Rate	0.37%	0.21%			0.28%	0.34%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Volatility Rate	181.36%	164.31%			132.00%	137.00%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Term	2 years 4 months 28 days	1 year 3 months 29 days	2 years

XML

INCOME TAXES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

INCOME TAXES

14. INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes reflect the tax consequences on future years of differences between the tax bases.  The deferred tax assets are as follows:

	2013	2012
Deferred tax assets	$2,350,159	$1,461,368
Valuation allowance	(2,350,159)	(1,461,368)
Net future income taxes	–	–

In assessing the realizability of future tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the future tax assets will not be realized.  The ultimate realization of future tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  Management considers the scheduled reversal of future tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.  Management has provided for a valuation allowance on all of its losses as there is no assurance that future tax benefits will be realized.

Our operating loss carry-forwards $6,912,233 at December 31, 2013, $4,298,140 at December 31, 2012 will begin to expire in 2028.

XML

INVESTMENTS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Investments [Abstract]

Schedule of held-to-maturity certified term deposits with original maturity date more than three months

Investment Date	Amount	Maturity Date	Interest Rate
	$
April 10, 2013	50,000	April 10, 2014	0.35%
December 31, 2013	50,000

September 18, 2012	250,000	February 18, 2013	0.30%
December 17, 2012	200,000	April 17, 2013	0.25%
December 17, 2012	200,000	May 17, 2013	0.25%
December 17, 2012	200,000	June 17, 2013	0.25%
April 10, 2012	50,000	April 10, 2013	0.35%
May 29, 2012	15,077	May 29, 2013	1.00%
December 31, 2012	915,077

XML

COMMON STOCK (Detail Textuals) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		127 Months Ended	1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	1 Months Ended			1 Months Ended									12 Months Ended		1 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2006	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013 Stock option	Dec. 31, 2013 Stock option	Dec. 31, 2013 Officer Stock option	Dec. 31, 2013 Warrant	Dec. 31, 2012 Warrant	Jul. 31, 2013 Compensation warrants	Nov. 30, 2013 Private placement	Nov. 30, 2013 Private placement two	Dec. 31, 2013 Common stock	Oct. 31, 2013 Common stock	Aug. 31, 2013 Common stock	Jul. 31, 2013 Common stock	Jun. 30, 2013 Common stock	Jan. 31, 2012 Common stock	Dec. 31, 2013 Common stock	Dec. 31, 2012 Common stock	Dec. 31, 2013 Common stock Private placement	Aug. 31, 2013 Common stock Private placement	Jun. 30, 2013 Common stock Private placement	Feb. 29, 2012 Common stock Private placement	Jan. 31, 2012 Common stock Private placement	Jun. 30, 2013 Common stock Private placement two	Dec. 31, 2013 Common stock Legal proceeding settlement	Jun. 30, 2013 Common stock one
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Numbers of units issued in during period										100,000	250,000									2,330,000			850,000	350,000
Number of stock issued related to exercise of warrants									250,000			700,000	300,000	1,625,000	50,000	350,000		2,680,000									150,000
Stock issue price per share related to exercise of warrants									$ 0.10			$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10			$ 0.25				$ 0.10	$ 0.10			$ 0.10
Proceeds from issuance of common stock related to exercise of warrants									$ 25,000			$ 70,000	$ 30,000	$ 162,500	$ 5,000	$ 35,000	$ 268,000	$ 268,000	$ 27,778				$ 85,000	$ 35,000			$ 15,000
Number of common stock issued																					1,000,000	120,000			100,000	500,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under private placement										10,000	25,000									233,000	100,000	12,000			15,000
Common stock issue price per share				$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10				$ 0.10	$ 0.10									$ 0.10	$ 0.10	$ 0.10			$ 0.15	$ 0.115
Number of shares included in each unit										1	1									1			1	1
Number of warrants included in each unit										1	1									1			1	2
Number of warrants	2,930,000
Number of shares called by warrants	2,930,000		2,930,000				4,580,000	11,137,600
Exercise price of warrant	0.10		0.10				0.10	0.11		0.10	0.10									0.10
Number of shares cancelled																										53,333
Stock issued on exercise of stock		30,000		7,500	275,000	200,000
Proceeds from stock options exercised	$ 395,000		$ 927,915			$ 20,000

XML

INVESTMENTS (Detail Textuals) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Investments [Abstract]
Interest receivable	$ 128	$ 515
Held to maturity certified term deposits	$ 50,000	$ 915,077

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended		127 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$ (4,772,150)	$ 1,380,832	$ (24,151,280)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) in operating activities:
Bad debts			11,250
Depreciation and amortization	4,583	3,577	69,941
Common stock issued for services and payables		64,333	1,050,425
Stock-based compensation	1,276,734	479,607	13,863,963
Amortization of debt discount			145,243
Gain on derivative liability			(142,861)
Gain on interest forgiveness
Gain on issuance of common stock
Loss (gain) on settled liabilities		(15,398)	807,202
Loss (gain) on legal settlement	815,354		815,354
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Receivables	15,411	(18,399)	32,935
Employee advances	14	(5)	(15,575)
Prepaid expenses	40,291	(41,761)	(13,741)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	329,825	(18,082)	985,624
Accrued interest payable	(31,948)	541	33,710
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(2,321,886)	1,835,245	(6,507,810)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in term deposits	865,077	(915,077)	(50,000)
Purchases of equipment		(21,046)	(47,988)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	865,077	(936,123)	(97,988)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from related party advances	25,555	10,373	1,354,054
Repayment of related party advances		(132,267)	(1,015,730)
Proceeds from promissory notes issued to related parties			411,509
Repayment of related party promissory notes			(493,941)
Proceeds from convertible promissory note			933,926
Repayment of convertible promissory notes			(947,462)
Proceeds from other promissory note			993,120
Repayment of other promissory notes		(6,000)	(449,220)
Payments on capital lease obligation			(12,071)
Proceeds from line of credit			60,659
Repayment of line of credit		(38,074)	(60,659)
Purchase of treasury stock		(101,440)	(101,440)
Proceeds from stock options and warrants exercised	395,000		927,915
Proceeds from sale of common shares	370,000	130,000	5,750,680
Net cash provided by (used in) by financing activities	790,555	(137,408)	7,351,340
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	4,367	(31,200)	(652,793)
Net change in cash	(661,887)	730,514	92,749
Cash, beginning of period	756,166	25,652	1,530
Cash, end of period	94,279	756,166	94,279
Non-Cash Information:
Cashless exercise of warrants			275
Stock issued to settle notes payable plus accrued interest			1,445,853
Line of credit converted to bank loan			44,359
Retirement of treasury stock		81,191	81,191
Reclass from common stock to stock payable		4,000	4,000
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for income taxes
Cash paid for interest	$ 6,805	$ 2,113	$ 221,849

XML

RESTRICTED CASH

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Restricted Cash [Abstract]

RESTRICTED CASH

3. RESTRICTED CASH

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had restricted cash balances of $32,488 and $174,561, respectively.  This cash was held in trust by our attorneys for the payment of future legal invoices and by the Supreme Court of British Columbia for a contingent legal obligation as summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
Attorney trust	$32,488	$26,764
Garnishment	$nil	$147,797
Total	$32,488	$174,561

The garnished amount of $147,797 had been paid to a plaintiff on December 30, 2013 as a part of settlement related to a legal proceeding filed by Mr. Knaven.  See Note 13 – Legal Proceedings of the Notes to Financial Statements for further information regarding legal proceedings.

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Detail Textuals) (Stock option plan)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	1 year
February 15th 2001
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of common stock authorized	6,000,000
February 15th 2005
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of common stock authorized	3,000,000
July 30th 2012
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of common stock authorized	10,000,000

XML

PREPAID EXPENSES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Deferred Costs Capitalized Prepaid And Other Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of prepaid expenses for marketing and advertisement and security deposit

Vendor	December 31, 2013	December 31, 2012
	$	$
Bentall L.P.	11,733	12,543
GSMA Ltd.	–	29,710
Vantage Communication Ltd.	–	8,443
Others	2,008	3,336
Total	13,741	54,032

XML

RESTRICTED CASH - Summary of contingent legal obligation (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Restricted Cash [Abstract]
Attorney trust	$ 32,488	$ 26,764
Garnishment		147,797
Total	$ 32,488	$ 174,561

XML

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Legal Proceedings Abstract

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

13. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL LITIGATION

In January 2011, Mr. Knaven, a former officer and director of the Company, commenced a complaint to British Columbia’s Employment Standards Branch against the Company (the “ESB Complaint”) alleging that he was owed unpaid wages.  In October 2011, Mr. Knaven initiated two further legal proceedings against the Company in B.C. Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court Actions”), in which he advanced further complaints in respect of claims for shares and interest, a claim for wrongful dismissal, and further claims for general and unspecified damages.

Regarding the ESB Complaint, on October 24, 2012 the Company applied successfully for a ruling placing that complaint in abeyance, to be dealt with by the B.C. Supreme Court rather than the ESB.  In accordance with that ruling, Mr. Knaven on November 9, 2011 delivered a proposed amendment to his Notice of Civil Claim in one of the Supreme Court Actions.  The quantified portion of Mr. Knaven’s claims totals approximately $261,752.  He also seeks general and unspecified damages which are unquantified.  Notwithstanding, $175,310 had been held in trust by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the subject of a garnishment (See also Note 3).  On July 23, 2013 WordLogic obtained a court order releasing $22,124.83 of those funds.   

The Company vigorously contests the claims, and has filed Responses and Counterclaims regarding all of the above referenced disputes.  The Counterclaims name Mr. Knaven and others as defendants by counterclaim.  Mr. Knaven has been served and has filed Responses disputing and denying the Counterclaims.

In November 2013 the Company settled certain claims by Mr. Knaven and certain counterclaims by the Company as against Mr. Knaven.  The terms of settlement are confidential.  Following the settlement, the parties discontinued the claim and counterclaim as against each other, and Mr. Knaven withdrew a complaint he had made to the British Columbia’s Employment Standards Branch.  In consideration for the settlement, the Company released $155,328 from the B.C. Supreme Court ordered garnishment to Mr. Knaven and issued 500,000 common shares of the Company valued at $57,500 to him.  As result of the settlement, the Company recorded loss of $24,710.  

In the proceedings referenced above, the Company had filed a counterclaim naming Mr. Knaven along with certain other defendants by counterclaim.  Those other defendants by counterclaim have not yet been served.  They include Mr. Mike Flom who appears to have been involved in assisting Mr. Knaven in formulating and advancing Knaven’s various claims against the Company.  In addition, although Mr. Flom has neither threatened nor served any legal proceedings of his own, Mr. Flom had, during 2012, asserted that the Company owed him a “termination” payment and related sums totaling in excess of $500,000, and the issuance of shares.  The Company has put Mr. Flom on notice that it does not accept those assertions.

In January 2013, the Company received notice from the former Chief Operating Officer Paul Silverstein, threatening a “whistle blower” claim pursuant to the US Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank legislation, to be commenced in the State of New York, alleging he was forced to resign because he was investigating expenses incurred by the Chief Executive Officer.  The Company denies the allegations, and further maintains the matter is to be resolved by arbitration.  Accordingly on March 8, 2013 it commenced an arbitration in British Columbia, Canada to resolve the issues.  The Company also appointed an independent director to conduct an investigation into the allegations raised by Silverstein to report to the Board of Directors on the outcome of his investigation, together with recommendations.  The report was delivered to the Board of Directors on March 13, 2013.  In response to an objection to jurisdiction raised by the former COO, the arbitrator commenced an initial process to determine his jurisdiction and ruled in favour of WordLogic.

On April 2, 2013, a complaint was filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by Silverstein against the Company in regards to certain claims asserted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act by Mr. Silverstein related to allegations of fraud and the termination of Silverstein as President and CEO of the Corporation.  On October 3, 2013, the Corporation filed counterclaims against Silverstein related to his misconduct in the last month of his employment and upon his resignation.  The Corporation vigorously denies Silverstein's allegations and will aggressively defend the claim and pursue its claims against Silverstein

On December 30, 2013, the Company reached an out of court settlement with Paul Silverstein regarding the previously disclosed claim filed by Mr. Silverstein and the counter claim filed by the Company.  The settlement includes no admission of liability by either party.  In consideration for the settlement, the Company issued 4 million warrants to purchase 4 million common shares of the Company to Mr. Paul Silverstein.  Fair value of the warrants was estimated using Black-Sholes pricing model on settlement date.  The Company recorded loss of $773,644 on this settlement.

On June 28, 2013, Biller Communications (“Biller”), a former consulting firm of the Company entered into a settlement agreement on the pending litigation whereby the Company paid Biller $17,000 in full and final settlement of the matter.  This is a significantly reduced amount from the amount of $30,465 plus interest from May, 2012 and costs sued for in the complaint.  The Company agreed to pay this amount in order to avoid any additional costly litigation, including depositions, court appearances and trial.  The settlement amount was recorded as loss on legal settlement as of December 31, 2013.