XML 18 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Certain Other Risks
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Certain Other Risks
18. Concentrations of Credit Risk and Certain Other Risks

 

Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash equivalents, foreign exchange transactions, long-term investments and trade receivables. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market funds. Long-term investments consist of ARS, which are generally illiquid and experienced significant impairment losses beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007 due to the adverse credit and financial markets conditions that prevailed at the time. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in ARS has declined 33% from its original book value, or par, as of December 31, 2011. Although beginning in 2009, the value of these investments stabilized significantly, further impairment losses may be incurred. Foreign exchange transactions consist primarily of short-term foreign currency transactions with highly rated financial institutions.

 

LeapFrog manufactures and sells its products primarily to national and regional mass-market retailers in the U.S. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customers’ financial condition; generally, collateral is not required. Allowances for credit losses are provided for in the consolidated financial statements at the time of sale. Three major retailers accounted for 74% and 67% of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Should any of these three retailers experience difficulties paying their debts to LeapFrog, this could have a significant negative impact on the Company’s statement of operations and cash flows.

 

Seasonality of Sales

 

Sales of LeapFrog’s products have historically been highly seasonal with a substantial majority of the sales occurring during the third and fourth quarters. Failure to predict accurately and respond appropriately to changes in retailer and consumer demand may cause LeapFrog to produce excess inventory, which could adversely affect operating results and financial condition. Conversely, if a product achieves greater success than anticipated, the Company may not have sufficient inventory to meet customer demand, which could adversely impact LeapFrog’s relations with its customers.

 

Manufacturing Vendor Concentration

 

LeapFrog’s manufacturing and operations strategy is designed to maximize the use of outsourced services, particularly with respect to the actual production and physical distribution of its products. The Company believes that its outsourcing strategy enhances the scalability of the manufacturing process. Since the Company does not have its own manufacturing facilities, it is dependent on close working relationships with its contract manufacturers for the supply and quality of its products and the computer chips contained in these products. LeapFrog uses contract manufacturers located in Asia, primarily in China, to manufacture its finished products. Given the highly seasonal nature of its business, any unusual delays or quality control problems could have a material adverse effect on LeapFrog’s operating results and financial condition. LeapFrog’s top three vendors supplied a total of 65%, 57% and 64% of LeapFrog’s products in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In 2011, LeapFrog’s largest individual vendor, Wynnewood Corp. Ltd., located in China, supplied 35% of LeapFrog’s products. In 2010 and 2009, WKK Technology Limited, located in China, supplied 24% and 26%, respectively, of LeapFrog’s products. The Company expects to continue to use a limited number of contract manufacturers and fabricators.

 

Customer Concentration

 

A limited number of customers historically have accounted for a substantial portion of the Company’s gross sales. For the last three fiscal years, the Company’s top three customers have been Target, Toys “R” Us and Wal-Mart. The relative percentage of gross sales to the top three customers to total Company gross sales were as follows for the three years shown below:

 

    Years Ended December 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  
Gross sales:                        
Wal-Mart     23 %     21 %     22 %
Toys "R" Us     18 %     20 %     19 %
Target     14 %     17 %     16 %
Total     55 %     58 %     57 %

 

Wal-Mart, Target and Toys “R” Us accounted for 38%, 16% and 20% of total Company gross accounts receivable, respectively at December 31, 2011, as compared to 23%, 21% and 23%, respectively at December 31, 2010.