XML 53 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

Linde Lawsuit. On December 23, 2019, Linde Engineering North America Inc. (Linde) filed a lawsuit in Harris County, Texas alleging that Arrow Field Services, LLC, our consolidated subsidiary, and Crestwood Midstream breached a contract entered into in March 2018 under which Linde was to provide engineering, procurement and construction services to us related to the completion of the construction of the Bear Den II cryogenic processing plant. Linde claims damages of $55 million in unpaid invoices and other damages. This matter is not an insurable event based on our insurance policies and, we are unable to predict the outcome for this matter.

General. We are periodically involved in litigation proceedings. If we determine that a negative outcome is probable and the amount of loss is reasonably estimable, then we accrue the estimated amount. The results of litigation proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. We could incur judgments, enter into settlements or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of certain matters, and such developments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in the period in which the amounts are paid and/or accrued. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, both CEQP and CMLP had approximately $10.7 million and $0.1 million accrued for outstanding legal matters. Based on currently available information, we believe it is remote that future costs related to known contingent liability exposures for which we can estimate will exceed current accruals by an amount that would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. As we learn
new facts concerning contingencies, we reassess our position both with respect to accrued liabilities and other potential exposures.

Any loss estimates are inherently subjective, based on currently available information, and are subject to management’s judgment and various assumptions. Due to the inherently subjective nature of these estimates and the uncertainty and unpredictability surrounding the outcome of legal proceedings, actual results may differ materially from any amounts that have been accrued.

Regulatory Compliance

In the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to various laws and regulations. In the opinion of our management, compliance with current laws and regulations will not have a material effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Environmental Compliance

Our operations are subject to stringent and complex laws and regulations pertaining to worker health, safety, and the environment. We are subject to laws and regulations at the federal, state, regional and local levels that relate to air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste management and disposal, and other environmental matters. The cost of planning, designing, constructing and operating our facilities must incorporate compliance with environmental laws and regulations and safety standards. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may trigger a variety of administrative, civil and potentially criminal enforcement measures.

During 2014, we experienced three releases totaling approximately 28,000 barrels of produced water on our Arrow water gathering system located on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in North Dakota. We immediately notified the National Response Center, the Three Affiliated Tribes and numerous other regulatory authorities. Thereafter, we contained and cleaned up the releases, and placed the impacted segments of these water lines back into service. In May 2015, we experienced a release of approximately 5,200 barrels of produced water on our Arrow water gathering system, immediately notified numerous regulatory authorities and other third parties, and thereafter contained and cleaned up the releases.

In August 2015, we received a notice of violation from the Three Affiliated Tribes’ Environmental Division related to our 2014 produced water releases on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation. The notice of violation imposes fines and requests reimbursements exceeding $1.1 million; however, the notice of violation was stayed on September 15, 2015. Our discussions regarding the notice of violation continue with the Three Affiliated Tribes.

During September 2019, we experienced two produced water releases totaling approximately 5,000 barrels on our Arrow system located on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in North Dakota. We immediately notified the National Response Center, the State of North Dakota, the Three Affiliated Tribes, affected landowners and numerous other regulatory authorities. We are substantially complete with the remediation efforts and continue to monitor the impact of both spills.

In response to the water releases on our Arrow system, we removed approximately 30 miles of water gathering pipeline from service and incurred a $4.3 million impairment charge during the three months ended December 31, 2019 related to idling those facilities. In addition, we are currently in the process of replacing approximately 12 miles of water gathering pipeline with pipeline composed of higher capacity material that is more suitable to the environment and climate conditions in the Bakken, which will increase water gathering capacity on the Arrow system and further our commitment to sustainability and environmental stewardship in the areas where we live and operate.

We will continue our remediation efforts to ensure the impacted lands are restored to their prior state. We believe these releases are insurable events under our policies, and we have notified our carriers of these events. We have not recorded an insurance receivable as of December 31, 2019.

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, our accrual of approximately $6.7 million and $1.8 million was based on our undiscounted estimate of amounts we will spend on compliance with environmental and other regulations, and any associated fines or penalties. We estimate that our potential liability for reasonably possible outcomes related to our environmental exposures could range from approximately $6.7 million to $11.1 million at December 31, 2019.

Self-Insurance

We utilize third-party insurance subject to varying retention levels of self-insurance, which management considers prudent. Such self-insurance relates to losses and liabilities primarily associated with medical claims, workers’ compensation claims and general, product, vehicle and environmental liability. Losses are accrued based upon management’s estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using certain assumptions followed in the insurance industry and based on past experience. The primary assumption utilized is actuarially determined loss development factors. The loss development factors are based primarily on historical data. Our self insurance reserves could be affected if future claim developments differ from the historical trends. We believe changes in health care costs, trends in health care claims of our employee base, accident frequency and severity and other factors could materially affect the estimate for these liabilities. We continually monitor changes in employee demographics, incident and claim type and evaluate our insurance accruals and adjust our accruals based on our evaluation of these qualitative data points. We are liable for the development of claims for our disposed retail propane operations, provided they were reported prior to August 1, 2012. The following table summarizes CEQP’s and CMLP’s self-insurance reserves at December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
 
 
CEQP
CMLP
 
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2019
 
2018
Self-insurance reserves(1)
 
$
9.7

 
$
11.3

 
$
8.3

 
$
9.6


(1)
At December 31, 2019, CEQP and CMLP classified approximately $6.2 million and $5.2 million, respectively of these reserves as other long-term liabilities on their consolidated balance sheets.
 
Leases

The following table summarizes the balance sheet information related to our operating and finance leases at December 31, 2019 (in millions):
Operating Leases
 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net
$
53.8

 
 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
$
18.1

Other long-term liabilities
41.5

Total operating lease liabilities
$
59.6

Finance Leases
 
Property, plant and equipment
$
14.9

Less: accumulated depreciation
5.4

Property, plant and equipment, net
$
9.5

 
 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
$
3.2

Other long-term liabilities
5.2

Total finance lease liabilities
$
8.4



The following table presents the weighted-average remaining lease term and the weighted-average discount rate associated with our operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2019:
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years):
 
Operating leases(1)
4.4

Finance leases(2)
2.6

Weighted-average discount rate:
 
Operating leases(3)
5.9
%
Finance leases(3)
7.3
%

(1)
Remaining terms vary from one year to 20 years.
(2)
Remaining terms vary from one year to four years.
(3)
We utilized discount rates ranging from 3.5% to 8.3% to estimate the discounted cash flows used in estimating our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019, which were primarily based on our credit-adjusted collateralized incremental borrowing rate.

The estimation of our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities requires us to make significant assumptions and judgments about the terms of the leases, variable payments, and discount rates. Our operating leases have renewal options to extend the leases from one year to 10 years at the end of each lease term, or terminate the leases at our sole discretion. In addition, our finance leases have options to purchase the lease property by the end of the lease term. We make significant assumptions on the likelihood on whether we will renew our leases or purchase the property at the end of the lease terms in determining the discounted cash flows to measure our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. The estimation of variable lease payments in determining discounted cash flows, including those with usage-based costs, also requires us to make significant assumptions on the timing and nature of the variability of those payments based on the lease terms.

We recognize operating lease expense and amortize our right-of-use assets for our finance leases on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective leases. We have applied the practical expedient of not separating the lease and non-lease components for our leases where the predominant consideration paid related to the underlying operating and finance lease contracts relate to the lease component. The following table presents the costs and sublease income associated with our operating and finance leases for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in millions):
Operating leases:
 
Operating lease expense(1)(2)
$
28.3

Sublease income(3)
(1.0
)
Total operating lease expense, net
$
27.3

Finance leases:
 
Amortization of right-of-use assets(4)
$
3.6

Interest on lease liabilities(5)
0.7

Total finance lease expense
$
4.3


(1)
Approximately $17.5 million is included in costs of product/services sold and $10.8 million is included in operations and maintenance expense on our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.
(2)
Includes short-term and variable lease costs of approximately $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
(3)
Included in marketing, supply and logistics service revenues on our consolidated statements of operations.
(4)
Included in depreciation, amortization and accretion expense on our consolidated statements of operations.
(5)
Included in interest and debt expense, net on our consolidated statements of operations.

The following table presents supplemental cash flow information for our operating and finance leases for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in millions):
Cash paid for lease liabilities:
 
Operating cash flows from operating leases
$
22.9

Operating cash flows from finance leases
$
0.7

Financing cash flows from finance leases
$
3.5

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:
 
Operating leases(1)
$
4.2

Finance leases
$
1.8

(1)
Includes approximately $2.9 million of operating leases obtained from the Jackalope Acquisition, which is further discussed in Note 3.

The following table presents the future minimum lease liabilities under Topic 842 for our leases as of December 31, 2019 for the next five years and in total thereafter (in millions):
Year Ending December 31,
Operating Leases
 
Finance Leases
 
Total
2020
$
20.9

 
$
3.6

 
$
24.5

2021
16.3

 
3.6

 
19.9

2022
11.1

 
1.9

 
13.0

2023
6.7

 
0.1

 
6.8

2024
6.0

 

 
6.0

Thereafter
7.5

 

 
7.5

Total lease payments
68.5

 
9.2

 
77.7

Less: Interest
8.9

 
0.8

 
9.7

Present value of lease liabilities
$
59.6

 
$
8.4

 
$
68.0



Purchase Commitments

We periodically enter into agreements with suppliers to purchase fixed quantities of NGLs, distillates, crude oil and natural gas at fixed prices. At December 31, 2019, the total of these firm purchase commitments was $792.4 million, of which approximately $712.3 million will occur over the course of the next twelve months. We also enter into non-binding agreements with suppliers to purchase quantities of NGLs, distillates and natural gas at variable prices at future dates at the then prevailing market prices.

We have entered into certain purchase commitments primarily related to our gathering and processing segment. At December 31, 2019, our total purchase commitments were approximately $126.6 million, which primarily relate to future growth projects and maintenance obligations in our gathering and processing segment. The purchases associated with these commitments are expected to occur over the next twelve months.

Guarantees and Indemnifications

We are involved in various joint ventures that sometimes require financial and performance guarantees. In a financial guarantee, we are obligated to make payments if the guaranteed party fails to make payments under, or violates the terms of, the financial arrangement. In a performance guarantee, we provide assurance that the guaranteed party will execute on the terms of the contract. If they do not, we are required to perform on their behalf. We also periodically provide indemnification arrangements related to assets or businesses we have sold. For a further description of our guarantees associated with our joint ventures, see Note 6.

Our potential exposure under guarantee and indemnification arrangements can range from a specified amount to an unlimited dollar amount, depending on the nature of the claim, specificity as to duration, and the particular transaction. As of December 31, 2019, we have no amounts accrued for these guarantees.