EX-99 2 proxyfinal2.htm MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR DATED MARCH 15, 2007 SECAL1-#281545-v2-PrimeWest_Proxy_Circular_-_2005.DOC

 [proxyfinal2002.gif]


PRIMEWEST ENERGY TRUST

MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR

For the Annual General Meeting of Unitholders to be held on
Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 10:30 A.M. (Calgary time)
at the Metropolitan Conference Centre,
333 – Fourth Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2P 0H9


GENERAL PROXY INFORMATION

Solicitation of Proxy

This Management Proxy Circular is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by PrimeWest Energy Inc. (“PrimeWest”), on behalf of Computershare Trust Company of Canada (the “Trustee”), in its capacity as trustee of PrimeWest Energy Trust (the “Trust”), for use at the annual general meeting (the “Meeting”) of the holders (the “Unitholders”) of trust units (“Trust Units”) of the Trust to be held at the time and place and for the purposes set forth in the notice of Meeting of Unitholders (the “Notice of Meeting”).  In addition to the use of mail, proxies may be solicited by personal interviews, telephone, or facsimile by Directors and senior Officers, employees and agents of PrimeWest, and arrangements may be made with banks, brokerage firms and others to forward proxy material to beneficial owners of Trust Units and Class A Exchangeable Shares (as defined herein).  The cost of the solicitation will be borne by the Trust.  Information contained herein is given as of the date hereof, being the Record Date, unless otherwise specifically stated.

For the purpose of this Management Proxy Circular, unless the context otherwise requires, capitalized terms shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the declaration of trust (the “Declaration of Trust”) dated as of the 2nd day of August, 1996, restated as of November 6, 2002 and amended as of May 6, 2004 between PrimeWest and the Trustee.  A copy of the Declaration of Trust is available to Unitholders from the head office of the Trust on demand and upon payment of reasonable reproduction costs.

Appointment of Proxies

Unitholders who wish to vote their Trust Units should complete, execute and deliver by regular mail the attached form of proxy to Computershare Trust Company of Canada, 100 University Avenue, 9th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1, Attention:  Proxy Department (or by courier or hand delivery to Computershare’s Calgary office at 600, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8), not less than 24 hours (i.e. not later than 10:30 a.m. (Calgary time) on Wednesday, May 2, 2007) before the time for the holding of the Meeting or any adjournment thereof or with the Chair of the Meeting prior to the commencement thereof.  By a resolution of the Board of Directors of PrimeWest (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”), the record date for the Meeting has been established as the close of business on Thursday, March 15, 2007 (the “Record Date”).  Only Unitholders of record as at the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting.  A Unitholder of record on the Record Date will be entitled to vote those Trust Units included in the list of Unitholders entitled to vote at the Meeting prepared as at the Record Date, even though the Unitholder may subsequently dispose of his or her Trust Units.  No Unitholder who has become a Unitholder after the Record Date shall be entitled to attend or vote at the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The document appointing a proxy shall be in writing and shall be executed by the Unitholder or his attorney authorized in writing or, if the Unitholder is a corporation, under its corporate seal or by an Officer or attorney thereof duly authorized.

A Unitholder submitting a form of proxy has the right to appoint a person to represent him or her at the Meeting (who need not be a Unitholder) other than the persons designated in the form of proxy furnished on behalf of the Trustee.  To exercise such right, the names of the persons designated by PrimeWest should be crossed out and the name of the Unitholder’s appointee should be legibly printed in the blank space provided.  In addition, the Unitholder should notify the appointee of his or her appointment, obtain his or her consent to act as appointee and instruct him or her on how the Unitholder’s Trust Units are to be voted.

Notice to Beneficial Holders of Trust Units

The information set forth in this section is of significant importance to many Unitholders, as a substantial number of the Unitholders do not hold Trust Units in their own name.  Unitholders who do not hold their Trust Units in their own name (referred to herein as “Beneficial Unitholders”) should note that only proxies deposited by Unitholders whose names appear on the records of the Trust as the registered holders of Trust Units can be recognized and acted upon at the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.  If Trust Units are listed in an account statement provided to a Unitholder by a broker, then in almost all cases those Trust Units will not be registered in the Unitholder’s name on the records of the Trust.  Such Trust Units will more likely be registered under the name of the Unitholder’s broker or an agent of that broker.  In Canada, the vast majority of such Trust Units are registered under the name of CDS & Co. (the registration name for CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc., which acts as nominee for many Canadian brokerage firms).  Trust Units held by brokers or their nominees can only be voted (for or against resolutions) upon the instructions of the Beneficial Unitholder.  Without specific instructions, the broker/nominees are prohibited from voting Trust Units for their clients.  The Trust does not know for whose benefit the Trust Units registered in the name of CDS & Co., a broker or another nominee, are held.

Applicable regulatory policy requires intermediaries/brokers to seek voting instructions from Beneficial Unitholders in advance of Unitholders’ meetings.  Every intermediary/broker has its own mailing procedures and provides its own return instructions, which should be carefully followed by Beneficial Unitholders in order to ensure that their Trust Units are voted at the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.  Often, the form of proxy supplied to a Beneficial Unitholder by its broker is identical to the form of proxy provided to registered Unitholders; however, its purpose is limited to instructing the registered Unitholder how to vote on behalf of the Beneficial Unitholder.  The majority of brokers now delegate responsibility for obtaining instructions from clients to ADP Investor Communications Inc. (“ADP”).  ADP typically mails a scannable voting instruction form in lieu of the proxy.  The Beneficial Unitholder is requested to complete and return the voting instruction form to them by mail or facsimile.  Alternatively, the Beneficial Unitholder can call a toll-free telephone number to vote the Trust Units held by the Beneficial Unitholder or they may access ADP’s dedicated voting website at www.proxyvotecanada.com to deliver their voting instructions.  ADP then tabulates the results of all instructions received and provides appropriate instructions respecting the voting of Trust Units to be represented at the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.  A Beneficial Unitholder receiving a voting instruction form cannot use that voting instruction form to vote Trust Units directly at the Meeting or any adjournment thereof as the voting instruction form must be returned as directed by ADP well in advance of the Meeting or any adjournment thereof, as the case may be, in order to have the Trust Units voted.

Revocability of Proxy

A Unitholder who has submitted a form of proxy as directed hereunder may revoke it at any time prior to the exercise thereof.  If a person who has given a proxy attends personally at the Meeting at which such proxy is to be voted, such person may revoke the proxy and vote in person.  In addition to the revocation in any other manner permitted by law, a proxy may be revoked by instrument in writing executed by the Unitholder or his attorney or authorized agent and deposited either at the registered office of the Trustee at any time up to 10:30 a.m. (Calgary time) on the last business day preceding the date of the Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, or with the Chair of the Meeting on the day of the Meeting or any adjournment thereof, in either case prior to its commencement, and upon either of such deposits, the proxy is revoked.

Exercise of Discretion by Proxy

The Trust Units represented by proxy in favour of the listed nominees will be voted on any ballot at the Meeting and, where the Unitholder specifies a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, such Trust Units shall be voted on any ballot in accordance with the specification so made.  In the absence of such specification, Trust Units will be voted in favour of the proposed resolutions contained herein.  The persons appointed under the form of proxy furnished on behalf of the Trust by PrimeWest are conferred with discretionary authority with respect to amendments or variations of those matters specified in the proxy and notice of meeting and as to other matters which may properly come before the Meeting.  At the time of mailing of this Management Proxy Circular, neither the Trustee nor the management of PrimeWest know of any such amendment, variation or other matter.

VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF

Trust Units

The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Trust Units.  As at the Record Date, 90,369,234 Trust Units were issued and outstanding.  Unitholders of record are entitled to notice of and to attend at the Meeting, in person or by proxy, and to one vote per Trust Unit held on any ballot thereat.  All votes on matters to be brought before the Meeting that require approval by a special resolution, if any, shall be conducted by a poll.

When any Trust Unit is held jointly by several persons, any one of them may vote at the Meeting in person or by proxy in respect of such Trust Unit, but if more than one of them shall be present at the Meeting in person or by proxy, and such joint owners of the proxy so present disagree as to any vote to be cast, the joint owner present or represented whose name appears first in the register of Unitholders maintained by the Trustee shall be entitled to cast such vote.

Class A Exchangeable Shares

In accordance with the Amended and Restated Class A Exchangeable Shares Voting and Exchange Trust Agreement dated November 6, 2002 among the Trust, PrimeWest and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, in its capacity as voting and exchange trustee (the “Voting and Exchange Trustee”), the Trust has issued a special voting unit (the “Special Voting Unit”) to the Voting and Exchange Trustee, for the benefit of the holders (other than the Trust and PrimeWest) of the non-voting Class A exchangeable shares of PrimeWest (the “Class A Exchangeable Shares”).  The Special Voting Unit carries a number of votes exercisable at the Meeting equal to the number of Trust Units (rounded down to the nearest whole number) into which the Class A Exchangeable Shares are exchangeable on the Record Date.  

Each holder of a Class A Exchangeable Share on the Record Date is entitled to direct the Voting and Exchange Trustee to exercise that number of votes attached to the Special Voting Unit equal to the number of Trust Units (rounded down to the nearest whole number) into which the Class A Exchangeable Share of such holder is exchangeable.  Alternatively, such holder is entitled to direct the Voting and Exchange Trustee to give a proxy to such holder or his designee to exercise personally such votes or to give a proxy to a designated agent or other representative of the management of the Trust or PrimeWest to exercise such votes.  The Voting and Exchange Trustee will exercise each vote attached to the Special Voting Unit only as directed by the holder and, in the absence of instructions from a holder as to voting, will not exercise such votes.  Only holders of Class A Exchangeable Shares of record on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, and vote at, the Meeting.  Holders of Class A Exchangeable Shares of record on the Record Date will be entitled to direct the voting of the corresponding votes attached to the Special Voting Unit to the extent of the rights attached to the Class A Exchangeable Shares included in the list of such holders prepared as at the Record Date, even though such a holder may subsequently dispose of his or her Class A Exchangeable Shares.  No one who acquires Class A Exchangeable Shares after the Record Date shall be entitled to attend or vote at the Meeting on the basis of such Class A Exchangeable Shares.

The Voting and Exchange Trustee has sent the Notice of Meeting to the holders of the Class A Exchangeable Shares, together with the related Meeting materials and a statement as to the manner in which the holder may instruct the Voting and Exchange Trustee to exercise the votes attaching to the Special Voting Unit.  Such instructions may be delivered by regular mail to Computershare Trust Company of Canada, 100 University Avenue, 9th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1 Attention:  Proxy Department (or by courier or hand delivery to Computershare’s Calgary office at 600, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2P 3S8).  In order to be valid such instructions must be received by the Voting and Exchange Trustee not later than 10:30 a.m. (Calgary time) on Wednesday, May 2, 2007.

A holder of Class A Exchangeable Shares who has submitted instructions to the Voting and Exchange Trustee with respect to the exercise of votes attached to the Special Voting Unit may revoke it at any time prior to the exercise thereof.  In addition to the revocation in any other manner permitted by law, a direction to the Voting and Exchange Trustee may be revoked by instrument in writing executed by the holder of the Class A Exchangeable Share or his attorney or authorized agent and deposited with Computershare Trust Company of Canada at any time up to 10:30 a.m. (Calgary time) on Wednesday, May 2, 2007, and upon such deposit, the direction is revoked.

As at the Record Date, PrimeWest had 1,161,557 issued and outstanding Class A Exchangeable Shares exchangeable in the aggregate into 765,582 Trust Units.

Principal Holders of Trust Units

To the best of the knowledge of the Directors and Executive Officers of PrimeWest, no person or company beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, Trust Units and Class A Exchangeable Shares carrying more than five percent (5%) of the votes which may be cast at the Meeting.

Quorum for Meeting

At the Meeting, a quorum shall consist of two or more persons either present in person or represented by proxy and representing in the aggregate not less than 5% of the outstanding Trust Units.  If a quorum is not present at the Meeting within one-half hour after the time fixed for the holding of the Meeting, it shall stand adjourned to such day being not less than 14 days later and to such place and time as may be determined by the Chair of the Meeting.  At such Meeting, the Unitholders present either personally or by proxy shall constitute a quorum.

Approval Requirements

The specific resolutions that Unitholders will be asked to approve at the Meeting include resolutions that would elect the Board of Directors of PrimeWest and appoint the auditors of the Trust and PrimeWest.  In order to be effective, these resolutions require the approval of more than 50% of the votes cast in respect of those resolutions by or on behalf of Unitholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting, provided that the quorum requirements applicable to such Meeting are met.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE MEETING

1.

Financial Statements

At the Meeting, the consolidated financial statements of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the auditors’ report thereon will be presented.  These consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion & Analysis (“MD&A”) relating thereto are included in the 2006 Annual Report of the Trust.

2.

Election of Directors

The Board of Directors currently consists of eight members.

The following persons are proposed by PrimeWest on behalf of the Trustee as the nominees for election as Directors of PrimeWest to serve until the next annual meeting of Unitholders or until their successors are duly elected or appointed.  If any vacancies occur in the slate of such nominees because any nominee is unable to serve or will not serve, the discretionary authority conferred by the proxies will be exercised to grant approval to the Trustee to cause PrimeWest to vote for the election of any other person or persons nominated by PrimeWest on behalf of the Trustee.  The names of the nominees for election as Directors, their municipalities of residence, principal occupations, experience and qualifications, memberships on other boards and the year in which each became a Director of PrimeWest are set out in the table below.  For further information on each nominee’s memberships on other boards, see “Corporate Governance - Disclosure of Directors’ Directorships in other Public Entities.”  For information relating to the numbers of Trust Units beneficially owned or over which control or direction is exercised by the nominees, see “Executive Officer and Director Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Executive Officer and Director Minimum Trust Unit Ownership Requirements and Equity Holdings.”

Name, Present Principal Occupation or Employment and Age (1)

Director of PrimeWest Since (2)

Municipality of
Residence

Trust Units Beneficially Owned or over which Control or Discretion is Exercised as at
December 31, 2006(#/%)(3)

Harold P. Milavsky (4) (5)

Chair

Quantico Capital Corp.

Age: 75

1996

Calgary,

Alberta

34,113 (6) / 0.0398

Mr. Milavsky, B.Comm, CA, FCA, is Chair of Quantico Capital Corp., a privately held company engaged in merchant banking, principal investments and acquisitions.  Mr. Milavsky also serves as a Director, member of the Audit Committee and member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of Saskatchewan Wheat Pool and as a Director, Chair of the Board and Chair of the Audit Committee of the various investment trusts and corporations comprising the Citadel Group of FundsTM.  Mr. Milavsky was President and Chief Executive Officer of Trizec Corporation from 1976 to 1986 and Chair and Chief Executive Officer from 1986 to 1993.  He has been a Director of TransCanada Corporation, Telus Corporation, Northrock Resources Ltd., Encal Energy Ltd., Wascana Energy Inc., ENMAX Corporation and many other corporations.  Mr. Milavsky is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Alberta and, in 2002, he received the Institute’s Lifetime Achievement Award.  Mr. Milavsky is also a member of the Institute of Corporate Directors and received that Institute’s Fellowship Award in 2005.

Barry E. Emes (4) (5)

Corporate Director

Age:  61

1996

Calgary,

Alberta

6,943 (7) / 0.0081

Until July 31, 2006, Mr. Emes, B.A., LLB., was a partner with Stikeman Elliott LLP, a leading national and international law firm.  Mr. Emes’ practice focused on complex corporate commercial matters, including public and private mergers and acquisitions/dispositions, banking, corporate governance matters, commercial real estate transactions, oil and gas transactions, debt restructuring transactions, derivatives and a wide range of other corporate and commercial matters.  Prior to concentration on corporate commercial matters, Mr. Emes carried on a high level commercial litigation practice.  Mr. Emes was managing partner of the Stikeman Elliott Calgary office for 7 years and was a member of the firm’s national partnership board for 7 years.  Mr. Emes has also worked for Mobil Oil (Canada) as an economist in their planning group.  

Mr. Emes has served on audit committees, compensation committees, nominating committees, corporate governance committees and special committees and is currently a Director of Parkbridge Lifestyle Communities Inc. and Realex Properties Corp.  

In addition to attaining a Bachelor of Arts in Economics, Mr. Emes has completed the Royal Bank of Canada’s management training program and undertaken additional studies in accounting and corporate finance.  Mr. Emes is also a graduate of the Institute of Corporate Directors, Corporate Governance College, Director Education Program.  

Harold N. Kvisle (8) (9)

President and CEO

TransCanada Corporation

Age:  54

1996

Calgary,

Alberta

26,805 (7) / 0.0313

Mr. Kvisle, B.Sc., MBA, P.Eng., is President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of both TransCanada Corporation and TransCanada Pipelines Limited and also serves as a Director and member of the Human Resources and Management Compensation Committee of the Bank of Montreal.  Prior to May 2001, Mr. Kvisle was Executive Vice President, Trading and Business Development of TransCanada Pipelines Limited (October 1999 to May 2001).

Kent J. MacIntyre  (8) (9)

Independent Businessman

Age:  48

1996

Calgary,

Alberta

180,444 (10) / 0.2104

Mr. MacIntyre, B.Sc., Eng., MBA, is Chair of the Board of the Canadian Income Fund Group Inc., a private company engaged in capital origination and principal investment activities in the financial services and energy areas.  With more than 25 years of oil and gas experience, Mr. MacIntyre has acted as a principal to the formation and start-up of a number of companies, including PrimeWest (having held the office of Vice-Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer from inception in 1996 until his retirement in 2003), the various investment trusts and corporations comprising the Citadel Group of FundsTM, in which he also serves as a Director, Triad Energy Inc. and Olympia Energy Ventures Ltd.  Mr. MacIntyre also serves as a Director of a number of private companies.

Michael W. O’Brien (4) (5)

Corporate Director

Age:  62

2000

Canmore, Alberta

8,544 / 0.0100

Mr. O’Brien, B.A., MBA, serves, among other responsibilities, as a Director and Chair of the Audit Committee of Shaw Communications Inc., as a Director, member of the Audit Committee and member of the Environment Health and Safety Committee of Suncor Energy Inc. and, as a member of the Advisory Board of CRA International.  Mr. O’Brien is also past Chair of the Canadian Petroleum Products Institute, Canada’s Voluntary Challenge Registry for Climate Change and the Nature Conservancy of Canada.  Prior to retirement in 2002, Mr. O’Brien was the Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief Financial Officer of Suncor Energy Inc.  (December 1999 – June 2002).

W. Glen Russell (8) (9)

Management Consultant

Age:  59

2003

Calgary,

Alberta

3,425 / 0.0040

Mr. Russell, B.Sc., P.Eng., is principal of Glen Russell Consulting.  Mr. Russell serves, among other responsibilities, as a Director and Chair of the Board of Evoco Inc. (a private company), a Director, Chair of the Board, Chair of the Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee and member of the Operations and Reserves Committee of Petro Andina Resources Inc. (a private company in Argentina) and Director of Insight Limited Partnership (a Micro-Cap Investment Partnership).  He was previously President and Chief Operating Officer of Chauvco Resources Limited and Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Gulf Canada Resources Limited.  Mr. Russell also acted as Executive Advisor with regard to mergers and acquisitions and corporate strategy for a major Canadian investment banking firm.

James W. Patek (8) (9)

President

Patek Energy Consultants

Age:  61

2003

Fripp Island,
South Carolina,
U.S.A.

1,000 / 0.0012

Mr. Patek, B.Sc., M.Sc., is the President of Patek Energy Consultants, based in the United States.  He was previously Chief Executive Officer of Petrocorp Exploration Limited, Chief Executive Officer of Fletcher Challenge Petroleum, Senior Reservoir Engineer at Conoco, Division Engineer and Division Manager of Husky Oil Operations Limited and Operations Manager at Petrocorp Exploration Limited.  Prior to June 2000, Mr. Patek was President of Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada.

Peter Valentine (4)

Senior Advisor to the President and Chief Executive Officer, Calgary Health Region

Age:  70

2004

Calgary,

Alberta

577 / 0.0007

Mr. Valentine, B.Comm, FCA, ICD.D, is currently Senior Advisor to the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Calgary Health Region.  Mr. Valentine is a trustee, a member of the Audit Committee and a member of the Governance Committee of Fording Canadian Coal Trust, a director and Chair of the Audit Committee of Livingston International Income Fund, a director and member of the Audit Committee of Superior Plus Income Fund and a director and Chair of the Audit Committee of Resmor Trust Company (a private corporation).  

Mr. Valentine was previously the Auditor General of the Province of Alberta (March 1995 to January 2002), Chair of the Financial Advisory Committee of the Alberta Securities Commission, member of the Accounting Standards Board and Public Sector Accounting Board of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, Chair of the Canadian Comprehensive Audit Foundation and also held senior positions at KPMG.  In addition, for the period of December 2003 to June 2004, Mr. Valentine was Interim Vice President, Finance and Services at the University of Calgary and, for the period of May 7, 2005 to July 18, 2005, was Interim Chair of the Alberta Securities Commission.


Notes:

(1)

Age is as at December 31, 2006.

(2)

The term of office of each Director expires at the next annual meeting, unless earlier terminated.

(3)

Number and percentage of ownership based upon number of Trust Units, Class A Exchangeable Shares and Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Series I Debentures (the “Series I Debentures) and Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Series II Debentures (the “Series II Debentures”) (the Series I Debentures and Series II Debentures are collectively referred to as, the “Debentures”) beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or over which control is exercised by each nominee for Director, collectively, relative to the total Trust Units and Class A Exchangeable Shares issued and outstanding, Trust Units issuable pursuant to the conversion of the Debentures and Trust Units issuable under the Long Term Incentive Plan, diluted at December 31, 2006 (85,772,858 Trust Units).   Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise set out in these Notes, such ownership consists exclusively of Trust Units.  The information as to voting securities beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, is based upon information furnished to us by the nominees.

(4)

Member of the Audit and Finance Committee.  Mr. Emes was appointed to such Committee on August 2, 2006.

(5)

Member of the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee.

(6)

Trust Units held through Quantico Capital Corp.

(7)

Includes five year Series I Debentures convertible to Trust Units at a price of $26.50 per Trust Unit, 37.7358 Trust Units per $1,000.00 Series I Debenture, which, in the case of Mr. Emes, consists of 25 Series I Debentures convertible into 943 Trust Units and, in the case of Mr. Kvisle, consists of 50 Series I Debentures convertible into 1,886 Trust Units.

(8)

Member of the Compensation Committee.  Mr. MacIntyre was appointed to such Committee on August 2, 2006.  

(9)

Member of the Operations and Reserves Committee.

(10)

Includes 100,000 Class A Exchangeable Shares (which, at December 31, 2006, were exchangeable into 63,765 Trust Units at an exchange ratio of 0.63765 Trust Units for each Class A Exchangeable Share), all of which were held by Canadian Income Fund Group Inc., a corporation wholly-owned by Mr. MacIntyre.


3.

Appointment of Auditors

Unless it is specified in a proxy that the Unitholder withholds approval for the Trustee to cause the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PWC”) as auditors of PrimeWest and the Trust, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy intend to grant approval to PrimeWest on behalf of the Trustee to cause the appointment of PWC as auditors of PrimeWest and the Trust, to hold office until the next annual meeting of Unitholders following the Meeting, with remuneration to be determined by PrimeWest and approved by the Board of Directors.  Fees paid to PWC during 2006 totalled $786,071, ($618,300 for 2005) broken down as follows:

Auditor Fees Paid

Year ended
December 31, 2006

Year ended
December 31, 2005

Audit fees (1)

$ 768,521

$ 492,000

Audit related fees (2)

$     8,750

$     9,000

Tax fees (3)

$     8,800

$   22,300

All other fees (4)

-

$   95,000

TOTAL

$ 786,071

$ 618,300

Notes:

(1)

Audit fees were for professional services rendered by PWC for the audit of the Trust’s annual financial statements and reviews of the Trust’s quarterly financial statements, as well as services provided in connection with prospectus fees, Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 compliance, statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.  

(2)

Audit related fees are those fees billed for assurance and related services by PWC that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Trust’s financial statements but not included in Audit Fees.  

(3)

Tax fees were for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.  The fees were for services performed by the Trust’s auditors’ tax division except those tax services related to the audit.

(4)

All other fees are those fees billed for products and services provided by PWC, other than Audit Fees, Audit-related Fees and Tax Fees.  In 2005, the fees relate to the Trust’s enterprise risk assessment.

Representatives of PWC will be present at the Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Composition and Mandate of the Compensation Committee and Report on Executive and Director Compensation

The Board of Directors of PrimeWest has a Compensation Committee that has been organized to ensure compliance with all applicable securities laws, corporate governance rules and policies and PrimeWest’s compensation philosophy.  This Committee is currently comprised of four members, W. Glen Russell, as Chair, Harold N. Kvisle, Kent J. MacIntyre and James W. Patek, all of whom are independent Directors (“Independent Directors”) for the purposes of the tests under Canadian securities laws and the NYSE Rules, as defined under “Corporate Governance - Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors” (the “Independence Tests”).  The principal mandates of the Compensation Committee, further details of which are provided under “Corporate Governance – Board Committees” and in Schedule “A” – Statement of Corporate Governance Practices under the heading “Compensation”, are to assess and make recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding employee, Executive Officer and Director compensation, including benefits and short and long term incentive programs, and to establish a process for identifying, recruiting, appointing and reappointing the Executive Officers of PrimeWest.  Based on the considerations of pay for performance and market based pay, as well as the desire to reward the achievement of specific annual, long term and strategic corporate goals, and to align the Executive Officers’ interests with those of the Trust’s Unitholders (with the ultimate objective of improving Unitholder value), the Board of Directors annually reviews, makes any modifications determined to be necessary and approves the Compensation Committee’s recommendations with respect to the compensation structure applicable to the Executive Officers of PrimeWest.  Such reviews are undertaken to ensure that compensation levels are competitive and appropriate and that PrimeWest is able, and continues to be able to, attract and retain qualified and experienced individuals to its team of Executive Officers and to motivate these individuals to perform to the best of their ability and in the best interests of the Trust.  The Board of Directors believes that compensation packages provided by PrimeWest to its Executive Officers and Directors should include both cash and security based compensation that reward performance as measured against established corporate goals.

The Compensation Committee undertakes independent reviews of the compensation packages of PrimeWest’s Executive Officers on an annual basis, with a view to ensuring that the total direct compensation paid to such Executive Officers is commensurate with compensation packages provided by a peer group of Canadian oil and gas companies and royalty trusts of a similar size and capitalization and with a similar performance to that of PrimeWest on an ongoing basis.  Executive Officer compensation levels are benchmarked against industry survey data and proxy comparator groups.  Total direct compensation, which includes base salary, short term incentives and the expected value of long term incentives, is targeted at the market median, while top performers may receive total compensation at the 75th percentile level.  While a significant portion of total direct compensation is allocated to various forms of incentives, PrimeWest does not have a pre-established policy relating to the split between cash and non-cash and short and long term incentive compensation.  The Compensation Committee considers information and recommendations provided by its independent compensation consultants to determine the appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation.  Income from such incentive compensation is realized as a result of the performance of PrimeWest and the individual Executive Officer, depending on the form of compensation in question, and compared to applicable targets.  A description of the criteria used in determining the various elements of compensation and the relative emphasis placed on each such element is set out below.

PrimeWest’s Director compensation levels are based on the considerations discussed above.  However, in formulating its recommendations to the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee emphasizes the proxy survey data and the recommendations of the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultants.  The Trust uses a combination of cash and security based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board.  In setting Director compensation, PrimeWest considers all relevant factors, including the significant amount of time that Directors expend in fulfilling their duties to the Trust as well as the performance and skill-levels required of members of the Board.  

On an annual basis, the Directors set objectives to be fulfilled by the Board of Directors and its Committees and, at the end of each year, the Board reviews the status of such objectives, as well as compliance with the Board and Committee Mandates.  In addition, the Board, through the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee, conducts an annual detailed review of the composition of the Board and its Committees and the performance of the Board, the Committees and the Board and Committee Chairs.  Finally, every two years, the Board conducts Director peer reviews.  As PrimeWest does not have a specific retirement policy for Directors, these peer reviews serve as a check on the continued ability of the individual Directors to carry out their duties.  See also “Corporate Governance – Board Committees – Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee.”

For 2006, the Compensation Committee and PrimeWest participated in and utilized the results of surveys conducted by Towers Perrin and Mercer Human Resource Consulting LLC (“Mercer”).  In addition, Towers Perrin was retained as independent compensation consultants to the Compensation Committee to provide specific data and recommendations with respect to the compensation of the Executive Officers.  These recommendations were based on the review of publicly available proxy data as well as Towers Perrin’s own survey data and the Mercer data.  For decisions regarding Director compensation arrangements for 2006, the Compensation Committee utilized the services of Total Compensation Planners (a division of K.J. Robertson Management Consultants Inc.) to assist with industry data analysis of competitive market information.  During 2006, the Compensation Committee also utilized the services of Towers Perrin to supply specific data and recommendations with respect to Director compensation and to provide general feedback with respect to Executive Officer compensation, the Chief Executive Officer evaluation procedure, the competitiveness of overall employee compensation and the appropriate levels of staff salary increases.  Fees paid to compensation consultants during 2006 totalled $52,816, ($53,456 for 2005) broken down as follows:

Compensation Consultants

Year ended
December 31, 2006

Year ended
December 31, 2005

Fees Paid to Towers Perrin

$  31,296

$  41,388

Fees Paid to Mercer Human Resource Consulting LLC

$    9,671

$    6,301

Fees paid to Total Compensation Planners

$  11,849

$    5,767

TOTAL

$  52,816

$  53,456


2006 Executive Officer Compensation Components

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the components of compensation for Executive Officers were:

(a)

Base Salary;

(b)

Savings Plan;

(c)

Short Term Incentives;

(d)

Long Term Incentives; and

(e)

Perquisites and Other Benefits.

PrimeWest does not have a Retirement Plan, a Death Benefit Plan, a Compensation Deferral Plan or a Pension Plan for Executive Officers or other employees.  However, as required by law, PrimeWest makes employer contributions to the Canada Pension Plan for all of such Executive Officers and other employees.


2006 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements

Base Salary

The salary of the Executive Officers of PrimeWest, including the Chief Executive Officer, have been generally targeted at the market median of salaries paid among industry peer issuers of similar size.  For the remainder of employees, salaries are competitive within the industry and, again, are generally set at the market median level.  

Base salary ranges for Executive Officers are also determined for each Executive Officer based on his or her position and responsibility by using market data, an internal review of the Officer’s compensation, both individually and relative to other Officers, and the individual performance of each Officer.  Salary levels are considered annually as part of the Trust’s performance review process as well as upon a promotion or other change in job responsibility.

Savings Plan

In addition to base salary and the other components of total direct compensation, employees of PrimeWest, including Executive Officers, participate in a group savings plan (the “Savings Plan”).  Employees may elect to participate in the Savings Plan on a registered (“RRSP”) or on a non-registered basis.  The Savings Plan is administered on behalf of the participants by a nationally recognized insurance company, offering such participants a wide variety of investment options, including the purchase of Trust Units.  Under the terms of the Savings Plan, PrimeWest contributed 9% of each employee’s base salary (in addition to such base salary) for calendar year 2006.  Contributions to the Savings Plan vest immediately and there are no restrictions in respect of the withdrawal or transfer of funds contributed to the Savings Plan on behalf of the participants.

Short Term Incentives

Employees of PrimeWest, including Executive Officers, also participate in a short term incentive plan (the “STIP”) under which annual cash bonuses are paid to employees in amounts to be determined based on a combination of individual and corporate performance factors.  Payments to Executive Officers under the STIP are made prior to the end of February in the year after the performance year in which the bonuses are earned and are consistent with industry standards.  

As with the other participants under the STIP, bonuses payable to Executive Officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, are determined by the achievement of both corporate and personal performance objectives, as evaluated by the Compensation Committee, and approved by the Board of Directors.  The 2006 corporate performance targets consisted of weighted measures set for production (30%), operating and general and administrative costs (15%), cash flow from operations (15%), relative Unitholder return (15%), net asset value added ratio (10%), operational excellence index (5%) and other factors at the discretion of the Board of Directors (10%).  The Chief Executive Officer’s personal performance targets, which are set each year by the Board of Directors, are closely aligned to the corporate goals established for the year.  For 2006, the Chief Executive Officer’s personal performance assessment was based on such considerations as steps taken with respect to the achievement of the short and long term goals of PrimeWest, the execution of strategic plans, leadership skills, ethics and integrity, succession planning and interaction with the Board of Directors and stakeholders.

Long Term Incentives

The purpose of the PrimeWest long term incentive plan (“Long Term Incentive Plan” or “LTIP”) is to provide effective long term incentives to employees, advisors, consultants, Executive Officers and Directors of PrimeWest (collectively, “Participants”) and to reward such persons on the basis of the long term performance of the Trust.  PrimeWest believes that the unit appreciation rights (“Unit Appreciation Rights”) issued under the LTIP are an integral part of the compensation package that is required to attract individuals with the relevant industry skills and knowledge that are critical to PrimeWest’s continued success.  PrimeWest also believes that the LTIP aligns the interests of Participants and Unitholders, and that it is in the best interests of Unitholders to settle amounts payable under the LTIP in the form of Trust Units.  The alternative is to settle those amounts payable in the form of cash, which would reduce the cash otherwise available for distribution to Unitholders.   

The Long Term Incentive Plan provides that the maximum number of Trust Units issuable to Participants is a "rolling" maximum equal to 7.5% of the outstanding Trust Units, without regard to the number of Trust Units issuable upon the exchange of any outstanding exchangeable securities, including without limitation, the Class A Exchangeable Shares of PrimeWest.  Any increase in the number of issued and outstanding Trust Units results in an increase in the number of Trust Units issuable under the LTIP, and any exercises of rights makes new grants available, effectively resulting in a re-loading of the number of Unit Appreciation Rights available to grant under the LTIP.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, PrimeWest takes steps to ensure that the annual grant rate under the LTIP does not result in significant dilution to Unitholders and, as noted above, that the LTIP continues to align the interests of Participants and Unitholders by encouraging Participants to focus on long term performance and by providing an opportunity for Executive Officers and Directors to increase their holdings of Trust Units through the exercise of Unit Appreciation Rights.  In addition, PrimeWest will be required to obtain the approval of the Unitholders for the continuation of the LTIP for a further three year period in 2009, being the third anniversary of the meeting at which the LTIP was last instituted and approved by Unitholders.

Under the terms of the Long Term Incentive Plan, the Board of Directors may in its discretion and from time to time grant Unit Appreciation Rights to any persons who are LTIP Participants.  Unit Appreciation Rights granted to Participants are non-assignable.  The Board of Directors determines at the time of grant the issue price of the Unit Appreciation Rights (which will not be less than the market price of the Trust Units at that time), the terms of vesting of the Unit Appreciation Rights, the expiry of the Unit Appreciation Rights (which will not be more than six years from the date of grant) and any other conditions which may be prescribed by the Board of Directors.  The Board of Directors has resolved that the issue price of outstanding Unit Appreciation Rights will not be changed to a lower value without the approval of Unitholders regardless of whether the TSX or any other securities regulatory authority would otherwise require such approval.

In determining the long term incentive component of Executive Officer compensation, the Compensation Committee considers PrimeWest’s performance and relative Unitholder return, the value of similar incentive awards made to officers of industry peer issuers of similar size and the awards granted to the Executive Officers in prior years.  PrimeWest has adopted a policy to issue semi-annual grants of Unit Appreciation Rights to LTIP Participants, including the Executive Officers and Directors.  Under the terms of the Long Term Incentive Plan, Executive Officers and Directors are eligible to receive Unit Appreciation Rights, which on exercise are settled in Trust Units or a cash payment, to the extent that the total return to Unitholders exceeds the performance threshhold contained in the LTIP (see discussion below).  Unit Appreciation Rights issued under the Long Term Incentive Plan are leveraged, meaning that for higher levels of total return compounded over several years, the LTIP will yield top decile values.  The leverage built into the program is an effective retention tool and, therefore, a significant portion of the total compensation of the Executive Officers and Directors is made up of Unit Appreciation Rights.

A Participant who exercises a Unit Appreciation Right is entitled to receive that number of Trust Units or, at the option of the Board of Directors, an equivalent payment in cash, equal to the total return to Unitholders (measured by both changes in Trust Unit prices and cash distributions made to Unitholders) from the date of grant to the date of exercise, less a performance threshold equal to a 5% compounded annual return, divided by the closing price of the Trust Units on the TSX on the trading date preceding the date of exercise.  No Trust Units will be issuable, and no cash amounts will be payable, on the exercise of Unit Appreciation Rights unless the total return to Unitholders from the date of grant to the date of exercise is greater than 5% per year, compounded annually.  The total return is determined as follows:

(a)

the aggregate of all distributions paid or payable on a Trust Unit from the date of grant of the Unit Appreciation Rights to the date on which the Participant exercises those Unit Appreciation Rights, plus the aggregate of all distributions which would have been paid during the same period on Trust Units purchased as a result of the reinvestment of all distributions made during that period;

(b)

plus the amount, if any, by which the closing price of the Trust Units on the trading date immediately preceding the date of exercise exceeds the issue price of the Unit Appreciation Rights, together with the aggregate of the amounts by which the closing price of the Trust Units on the trading date immediately preceding the date of exercise exceeds, in each case, the price per Trust Unit at which distributions were deemed to have been reinvested in Trust Units; and

(c)

minus the amount, if any, by which the closing price of the Trust Units on the trading date immediately preceding the date of exercise is less than the issue price of the Unit Appreciation Rights, together with the aggregate of the amounts by which the closing price of the Trust Units on the trading date immediately preceding the date of exercise is less than, in each case, the price per Trust Unit at which distributions were deemed to have been reinvested in Trust Units.

With the exception of Unit Appreciation Rights issued to Directors, and the ability of the Board of Directors to accelerate vesting upon the occurrence of any one of a number of specified events, Unit Appreciation Rights vest and become exercisable in equal one-third proportions on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of issue.  Unit Appreciation Rights issued to Directors vest immediately and the purposes of this immediate vesting are to further foster the alignment of the Board to the interests of Unitholders and to encourage the Directors to increase their holdings of Trust Units, all as early as possible.  Subject to the Board’s authority to reduce the term of a grant of Unit Appreciation Rights, all Unit Appreciation Rights issued under the LTIP expire on the sixth anniversary of the grant date.  The applicable vesting dates, vesting percentages and expiry dates are as follows:


Percentage

Vesting Date

Expiry Date

33%

First Anniversary of the Date of Issue

Sixth Anniversary of the Date of Issue

33%

Second Anniversary of the Date of Issue

Sixth Anniversary of the Date of Issue

34%

Third Anniversary of the Date of Issue

Sixth Anniversary of the Date of Issue

Perquisites and Other Benefits

Employees of PrimeWest, including Executive Officers, are entitled to certain perquisites and other benefits that PrimeWest believes are reasonable and consistent with the overall compensation philosophy.  The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other benefits provided to the Executive Officers.  The Executive Officers receive or are entitled to receive certain medical, dental, life insurance, disability insurance benefits, the reimbursement of expenses, including those relating to parking, professional dues and membership fees for a professional club, and a perquisite account, which can be used for health spending, a fitness membership, taxable spending or vacation day purchase.  The value of the perquisites and other benefits received by the Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 are included in the Summary Compensation Table set out below under the column entitled “Other Annual Compensation.”

Executive Officer Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information pursuant to the requirement to disclose the total compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of PrimeWest, as well as the other three most highly compensated Executive Officers whose total salary and bonus exceeded $150,000 during the year ended December 31, 2006 (collectively the “Named Executive Officers”).  PrimeWest had only four Executive Officers in 2005.  Effective February 23, 2006, Mr. Brian J. Lynam, B.A. Sc., P.Eng., joined PrimeWest in the newly created position of Vice President, Operations.  Also effective February 23, 2006, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Gordon D. Haun, BA, LLB, Corporate Counsel and Secretary, as an Officer and General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Trust.  For the purposes of the Summary Compensation Table (as well as the additional tables that follow), and for completeness, PrimeWest has treated all six of its Officers as Named Executive Officers.  In addition, effective January 31, 2007, Mr. Haun was appointed to the position of Vice President Legal and General Counsel.  



 

 

Annual Compensation

Long Term Compensation

Total Compensation
($)(5)

 

 

 

 

 

Awards

Payouts

Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary
($)

Bonus
($) (1)

Other Annual
Compen-sation
($)(2)

Unit
Appreciation
Rights Granted (#)(3)

Trust Units Subject to Resale Restriction
($)

LTIP Payouts ($)

All Other
Compen-sation
($)(4)

Donald A. Garner
President & Chief Executive Officer

2006

2005

2004

400,000

350,000

350,000

140,000

300,000

250,000

53,720

49,219

49,244

106,410

128,600

131,126

-

-

-

-2,659,604

-

745,446

864,416

604,969

1,339,166

4,223,239

1,254,213

Timothy S. Granger
Chief Operating Officer

2006

2005

2004

265,000

245,000

245,000

140,000

165,000

160,000

37,570

35,769

37,794

44,339

50,368

57,971

-

-

-

1,186,256

610,766

-

298,172

345,759

241,982

1,926,998

1,402,294

684,776

Dennis G. Feuchuk
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

2006

2005

2004

275,000

260,000

260,000

140,000

165,000

165,000

44,470

41,119

41,144

59,413

64,300

61,521

-

-

-

740,395

1,582,458

77,738

298,172

345,759

241,982

1,498,037

2,394,336

785,864

Ronald J. Ambrozy
Vice President, Business Development

2006

2005

2004

230,000

195,000

195,000

84,000

100,000

150,000

34,420

31,269

31,221

44,339

43,939

30,760

-

-

-

29,651

1,098,997

445,515

149,086

172,879

120,991

527,157

1,598,145

942,727

Brian J. Lynam (6)
Vice President Operations

2006

2005

2004

169,744

N/A

N/A

50,000

N/A

N/A

23,201

N/A

N/A

26,668

N/A

N/A

-

N/A

N/A

-

N/A

N/A

-

N/A

N/A

242,945

N/A

N/A

Gordon D. Haun (7)
Vice President Legal and General Counsel

2006

2005

2004

216,792

205,000

190,000

90,000

90,000

90,000

28,732

26,567

37,523

26,444

29,522

29,971

-

-

-

-

252,045

-

-

-

-

335,524

573,612

317,523


Notes:

(1)

The amounts disclosed represent bonuses earned under the STIP based on individual and corporate performance in the referenced year but paid in the following year.  

(2)

Amounts include benefits paid to the Named Executive Officers, such as the Savings Plan, and Perquisites and Other Benefits.

(3)

The Unit Appreciation Rights are described elsewhere in this Management Proxy Circular.  See “2006 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements - Long Term Incentives” and “Executive Officer Unit Appreciation Rights”.

(4)

This compensation represents the value of Class A Exchangeable Shares issued to Mr. Garner, Mr. Granger, Mr. Feuchuk and Mr. Ambrozy on November 6, 2004, November 7, 2005 and November 6, 2006 under the employee retention agreements.  See “2006 Executive Officer Employment Agreements – Retention Agreements”.

(5)

Total Compensation does not include Unit Appreciation Right grants.  See “2006 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements - Long Term Incentives” and “Executive Officer Unit Appreciation Rights”.

(6)

Mr. Lynam’s 2006 base salary of $200,000, as well as the other components of his 2006 compensation arrangements, were prorated to his February 23, 2006 start date.  

(7)

Mr. Haun’s base salary, which as of January 1, 2006, was $213,000, was increased to $226,000 effective September 16, 2006 and has been prorated accordingly.  Prior to January 31, 2007, Mr. Haun held the position of General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.

Executive Officer Unit Appreciation Rights

Except as set out below, including the discussion under “Retention Agreements,” no options or other Trust Unit rights have been granted to any Named Executive Officer of PrimeWest.  The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Unit Appreciation Rights issued to the Named Executive Officers under the Long Term Incentive Plan during the year ended December 31, 2006.


Name

Grant Date

Unit

Appreciation

Rights

Granted

(#)

% of Total Unit Appreciation Rights Granted in Fiscal Period

Base Price of Trust Units underlying Unit Appreciation Rights

($/Unit)

Market Value of Trust Units
Underlying Unit Appreciation Rights
on the Date of Grant
($/Unit)

Expiration Date

Donald A. Garner

Jan. 3, 2006

July 4, 2006

51,008

55,402

4.2%

4.7%

Total: 8.9%

36.06

33.20

36.06

33.20

Jan. 3, 2012

July 4, 2012

Timothy S. Granger

Jan. 3, 2006

July 4, 2006

21,254

23,085

1.8%

1.9%

Total: 3.7%

36.06

33.20

36.06

33.20

Jan. 3, 2012

July 4, 2012

Dennis G. Feuchuk

Jan. 3, 2006

July 4, 2006

28,480

30,933

2.4%

2.6%

Total: 5.0%

36.06

33.20

36.06

33.20

Jan. 3, 2012

July 4, 2012

Ronald J. Ambrozy

Jan. 3, 2006

July 4, 2006

21,254

23,085

1.8%

1.9%

Total: 3.7%

36.06

33.20

36.06

33.20

Jan. 3, 2012

July 4, 2012

Brian J. Lynam (1)

Feb. 23, 2006

July 4, 2006

10,970

15,698

0.9%

1.3%

Total: 2.2%

33.86

33.20

33.86

33.20

Feb. 23, 2012

July 4, 2012

Gordon D. Haun

Jan. 3, 2006

July 4, 2006

12,676

13,768

1.1%

1.1%

Total: 2.2%

36.06

33.20

36.06

33.20

Jan. 3, 2012

July 4, 2012


Notes:

(1)

Mr. Lynam’s initial grant of Unit Appreciation Rights was prorated to his February 23, 2006 start date.  


The following table sets forth information concerning aggregated exercises of Unit Appreciation Rights by the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2006 together with the number and value of unexercised Unit Appreciation Rights held by each of the Named Executive Officers as at December 31, 2006.

Name

Trust Units Acquired on Exercise
(#)

Aggregate Value Realized
($)

Unexercised Unit Appreciation Rights at Year End
(#)

Value of Unexercised in-the-Money Unit Appreciation Rights at Year End
($)

Vested

Unvested

Vested

Unvested

Donald A. Garner

-

-

406,668

237,155

1,239,403

63,102

Timothy S. Granger

33,180

1,186,254

137,673

  97,796

400,884

27,898

Dennis G. Feuchuk

21,955

  740,395

  71,823

123,411

88,972

29,605

Ronald J. Ambrozy

 1,084

   29,651

  70,972

  84,238

199,785

14,804

Brian J. Lynam

-

-

-

  26,668

-

-

Gordon D. Haun

-

-

33,948

53,149

62,238

14,423


Executive Officer Employment Arrangements

Employment Agreements

PrimeWest is a party to employment agreements with Mr. Garner and the other Named Executive Officers, which are designed to promote the stability and continuity of senior management.  Under the agreement with Mr. Garner, in the event of a change of control of the Trust or, if PrimeWest terminates his employment without just cause, Mr. Garner will be entitled to a severance payment equal to between 2 and 2.5 times his base salary, plus the average of the annual bonus payments received in the last two years, depending on his period of service at the time of the termination or change of control.  If Mr. Garner’s employment is terminated as a result of resignation, retirement, death or disability, he will be entitled to all base salary and benefits earned up to the termination date, as well as a specified period of time (which varies with the type of termination) in which to exercise vested Unit Appreciation Rights.  The agreements with each of the other Named Executive Officers contain similar provisions, except that the severance payment in the event that there is a change of control of the Trust or, if PrimeWest terminates their employment without just cause, will be equal to between 1.5 and 2 times their base salary, plus the average of the annual bonus payments received in the last two years, depending on the period of service at the time of the termination or change of control.  In the event of a termination without just cause or a change of control, each of the Named Executive Officers will also be entitled to exercise all Unit Appreciation Rights which had then vested or which would have vested within the notice period.

Retention Agreements

From the inception of the Trust in October 1996 until October 1, 2002, the Trust and PrimeWest retained PrimeWest Management Inc. (the “Manager”) to provide management and administrative services.  The Executive Officers of the Manager and PrimeWest were identical, and the Manager provided the Officers with their full employment compensation.  PrimeWest would then reimburse the Manager for all of its general and administrative expenses, including those relating to the compensation of the Executive Officers.

In November 2002, the Trust and PrimeWest completed the “internalization” of the Manager, effective October 1, 2002, by acquiring all of the outstanding shares of the Manager.  The transaction resulted in the elimination of all management, acquisition and disposition fees and other incentive payments and dividends (commonly referred to as the retained royalty) which were payable to the Manager from time to time.

In connection with the internalization transaction, the Manager entered into certain employee retention agreements with each of Mr. Garner, Mr. Granger, Mr. Feuchuk and Mr. Ambrozy at the time the management internalization transaction was completed.  Those agreements and other arrangements were assumed by PrimeWest as part of the internalization transaction.  The retention agreements provided for consideration for those Executive Officers agreeing to remain employed with PrimeWest following completion of the management internalization transaction.  Under the employee retention agreement with Mr. Garner, PrimeWest granted to Mr. Garner on each of November 6, 2004, November 7, 2005 and November 6, 2006, and has agreed to issue to Mr. Garner on November 6, 2007, 47,171 Class A Exchangeable Shares.  The issuance of those shares will be accelerated in the event of a change of control of the Trust or if PrimeWest terminates Mr. Garner’s employment without just cause.  Mr. Garner will forfeit all of the unissued Class A Exchangeable Shares in the event that his employment is terminated for cause or for any other reason.  The employee retention agreements with each of Mr. Granger, Mr. Feuchuk and Mr. Ambrozy contain similar provisions, except that their annual entitlements are equal to 18,868, 18,868 and 9,434 Class A Exchangeable Shares, respectively.

2006 Director Compensation Components

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the components of compensation for the Directors of PrimeWest were:

(a)

Retainers;

(b)

Meeting Fees; and

(c)

Long Term Incentives.

PrimeWest does not have a Retirement Plan, a Death Benefit Plan, a Compensation Deferral Plan or a Pension Plan for its Directors.  In addition, the Directors do not have employment or retention agreements.  However, as required by law, PrimeWest makes employer contributions to the Canada Pension Plan for the Directors.

2006 Director Compensation Arrangements

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Chair of the Board of PrimeWest was paid an annual base retainer of $90,500 and an additional $1,800 for each Board of Directors and Committee meeting attended.  The other Directors received an annual base retainer of $27,500 and $1,500 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended.  Committee Chairs received an additional annual retainer of $7,500 and $1,800 for each Committee meeting attended, and Committee members received an additional annual retainer of $5,000 and $1,500 for each Committee meeting attended.  All Directors received an annual grant of a number of Unit Appreciation Rights determined by the formula applicable to such Directors.  The Chair of the Board of Directors was granted 20,218 Unit Appreciation Rights in 2006.  The other Directors were each granted 13,479 Unit Appreciation Rights in 2006.  For more information on Unit Appreciation Rights, see “2006 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements - Long Term Incentives” above and “Director Unit Appreciation Rights” below.

For 2007, the Board of Directors has determined that no changes will be made to Director compensation arrangements.  Therefore, the Chair of the Board of PrimeWest will receive an annual base retainer of $90,500 and an additional $1,800 for each Board of Directors and Committee meeting attended.  The other Directors will receive an annual base retainer of $27,500 and an additional $1,500 for each Board of Directors meeting attended.  Committee Chairs will receive an additional annual retainer of $7,500 and $1,800 for each Committee meeting attended, and other Committee members will receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000 and $1,500 for each Committee meeting attended.  

Director Summary Compensation Tables

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to each Director for 2006.

Name

Annual Compensation

Long Term Compensation

Total Compensa-tion
($)(2)

Awards

Payouts

Retainer
($)

Meeting Fees
($)

LTIP Payouts ($)

Unit
Appreciation
Rights Granted
(#)(1)

Trust Units Subject to Resale Restriction
($)

Harold P. Milavsky

100,500

50,400

192,391

20,218

-

343,291

Barry E. Emes (3)

34,586

31,500

-

13,479

-

66,086

Harold N. Kvisle (4)

39,076

28,800

436,819

13,479

-

504,695

Kent J. MacIntyre (4)(5)

35,543

35,100

2,327,120(6)

13,479

-

2,397,763

Michael W. O’Brien

40,000

39,600

40,756

13,479

-

120,356

W. Glen Russell (4)

40,000

40,800

-

13,479

-

80,800

James W. Patek

37,500

31,500

-

13,479

-

69,000

Peter Valentine

35,000

36,300

-

13,479

-

71,300


Notes:

(1)

A more detailed description of the terms of these Unit Appreciation Rights is set forth in the table below under “Director Unit Appreciation Rights”.

(2)

Total Compensation does not include Unit Appreciation Right grants.  See “Director Unit Appreciation Rights”.

(3)

Mr. Emes was appointed as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee on August 2, 2006 and his retainer was pro-rated accordingly.

(4)

Mr. Kvisle resigned as Chair of the Compensation Committee effective August 15, 2006 but thereafter continued as a member of such Committee.  On the same date, Mr. Russell was appointed as Chair of the Compensation Committee and Mr. MacIntyre was appointed as Chair of the Operations and Reserves Committee, replacing Mr. Russell in that capacity.  Mr. Russell thereafter continued as a member of the Operations and Reserves Committee.  The respective retainers of these Directors were pro-rated accordingly.

(5)

Mr. MacIntyre was appointed as a member of the Compensation Committee on August 2, 2006 and his retainer was pro-rated accordingly.

(6)

This LTIP payout amount in 2006 for Mr. MacIntyre represents the exercise of Unit Appreciation Rights received in 2000 while Mr. MacIntyre was the CEO of PrimeWest.

Director Unit Appreciation Rights

Except as set out below, no options or other Trust Unit rights have been granted to any Director of PrimeWest.  The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Unit Appreciation Rights issued to the Directors under the Long Term Incentive Plan during the year ended December 31, 2006.

Name

Grant Date

Unit
Appreciation
Rights
Granted
(#)

% of Total Unit Appreciation Rights Granted in Fiscal Period

Base Price of Trust Units underlying Unit Appreciation Rights
($/Unit)

Market Value of Trust Units
Underlying Unit Appreciation Rights
on the Date of Grant
($/Unit)

Expiration Date

Harold P. Milavsky

Jan. 3, 2006
July 4, 2006

9,692
10,526

0.81%
0.89%
Total: 1.70%

36.06
33.20

36.06
33.20

Jan. 3, 2012
July 4, 2012

Barry E. Emes

Jan. 3, 2006
July 4, 2006

6,461
7,018

0.54%
0.59%
Total: 1.13%

36.06
33.20

36.06
33.20

Jan. 3, 2012
July 4, 2012

Harold N. Kvisle

Jan. 3, 2006
July 4, 2006

6,461
7,018

0.54%
0.59%
Total: 1.13%

36.06
33.20

36.06
33.20

Jan. 3, 2012
July 4, 2012

Kent J. MacIntyre

Jan. 3, 2006
July 4, 2006

6,461
7,018

0.54%
0.59%
Total: 1.13%

36.06
33.20

36.06
33.20

Jan. 3, 2012
July 4, 2012

Michael W. O’Brien

Jan. 3, 2006
July 4, 2006

6,461
7,018

0.54%
0.59%
Total: 1.13%

36.06
33.20

36.06
33.20

Feb. 23, 2012
July 4, 2012

W. Glen Russell

Jan. 3, 2006
July 4, 2006

6,461
7,018

0.54%
0.59%
Total: 1.13%

36.06
33.20

36.06
33.20

Jan. 3, 2012
July 4, 2012

James W. Patek

Jan. 3, 2006
July 4, 2006

6,461
7,018

0.54%
0.59%
Total: 1.13%

36.06
33.20

36.06
33.20

Jan. 3, 2012
July 4, 2012

Peter Valentine

Jan. 3, 2006
July 4, 2006

6,461
7,018

0.54%
0.59%
Total: 1.13%

36.06
33.20

36.06
33.20

Jan. 3, 2012
July 4, 2012


The following table sets forth information concerning aggregated exercises of Unit Appreciation Rights by the Directors during the year ended December 31, 2006 together with the number and value of unexercised Unit Appreciation Rights held by each of the Directors as at December 31, 2006.


Name

Trust Units Acquired on Exercise
(#)

Aggregate Value Realized
($)

Unexercised Unit Appreciation Rights at Year End
(#)

Value of Unexercised in-the-money Unit Appreciation Rights at Year End
($)

Vested

Unvested

Vested

Unvested

Harold P. Milavsky

6,100

192,391

158,898

-

404,651

-

Barry E. Emes

-

-

90,277

-

234,974

-

Harold N. Kvisle

13,297

436,819

83,506

-

169,675

-

Kent J. MacIntyre

67,453

2,327,120 (1)

268,670

-

1,259,005

-

Michael W. O’Brien

1,649

40,756

83,506

-

169,675

-

W. Glen Russell

-

-

66,968

-

111,405

-

James W. Patek

-

 

59,639

-

59,102

-

Peter Valentine

-

-

43,824

-

26,981

-

Notes:  

(1)

This LTIP payout amount in 2006 for Mr. MacIntyre represents the exercise of Unit Appreciation Rights received in 2000 while Mr. MacIntyre was the CEO of PrimeWest.


Director Board and Committee Meeting Attendance

The following table sets forth information concerning the number of Board and Committee meetings in 2006 and the number of such meetings attended by each Director.


Name

Board of Directors

Audit and Finance Committee

Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee

Compensation Committee

Operations and Reserves Committee

Other Meetings
(1)

Harold P Milavsky (2)

18/18

6/6

2/2

2/2 (3)

-

1/1

Barry E. Emes (4)

18/18

1/1

2/2

-

-

1/1

Harold N. Kvisle (5)

12/18

-

-

2/2

6/7

-

Kent J. MacIntyre (5) (6)

18/18

-

-

0/1

6/7

-

Michael W. O’Brien (7)

18/18

6/6

2/2

-

-

1/1

W. Glen Russell (7)

18/18

-

-

2/2

7/7

-

James W. Patek

15/18

-

-

2/2

5/7

-

Peter Valentine (7)

18/18

6/6

-

-

-

-

Total Attendance Rate

94%

100%

100%

89%

86%

100%


Notes:

(1)

Consists of a meeting of an Ad Hoc Committee of the Board of Directors that took place on June 21, 2006, for which the members of such Committee received the appropriate meeting fees.

(2)

Chair of the Board.

(3)

While not a member of the Compensation Committee, Mr. Milavsky attended certain meetings of that Committee as an invitee.

(4)

Appointed as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee on August 2, 2006.

(5)

Committee Chair for portion of 2006.

(6)

Appointed as a member of the Compensation Committee on August 2, 2006.

(7)

Committee Chair.

Liability Insurance of Executive Officers and Directors

PrimeWest maintains Executive Officer and Director liability insurance coverage for losses to PrimeWest if it is required to reimburse Executive Officers and Directors, where permitted, and for direct indemnity of Executive Officers and Directors where corporate reimbursement is not permitted by law.  This insurance protects PrimeWest’s Executive Officers and Directors against liability (including costs), subject to standard policy exclusions, which may be incurred by such individuals in acting in their respective capacities for PrimeWest.  All Executive Officers and Directors of PrimeWest are covered by the policy and the amount of insurance, which has an aggregate limit of US $25,000,000, applies on a collective basis.

Executive Officer and Director Minimum Trust Unit Ownership Requirements and Equity Holdings

In 2004, the Board of Directors of PrimeWest implemented minimum Trust Unit ownership levels for Executive Officers and Directors.  Such levels consist of the market value equivalent of two times the base salary for Executive Officers and five times the base retainer for Directors, to be attained prior to the expiry of the five year period commencing November 2, 2004 (i.e. on or before November 1, 2009).  The purpose of this program is to ensure that the interests of Executive Officers and Directors are aligned with those of Unitholders.  The following Table sets forth certain information relating to minimum Trust Unit ownership requirements and Trust Unit ownership for each of the Executive Officers and the Directors as of December 31, 2006.


Name

2006 Annual Base Retainer / Salary

($)

Target investment

($)

# of Trust Units Required to Satisfy Minimum Ownership Requirements (1)

# of Qualifying Trust Units Owned to Satisfy Minimum Ownership Requirements (2) (3)

# of Trust Units Pledged as Security

Level of
Compliance of Achieving Minimum Ownership Level

Harold P. Milavsky

90,500

452,500

21,024

34,113 (4)

-

> 100%

Barry E. Emes

27,500

137,500

6,396

6,000

-

93.82%

Harold N. Kvisle

27,500

137,500

6,396

24,919

-

> 100%

Kent J. MacIntyre

27,500

137,500

6,396

180,444 (5)

63,765

> 100%

Michael W. O’Brien

27,500

137,500

6,396

8,544

-

> 100%

W. Glen Russell

27,500

137,500

6,396

3,425

-

53.55%

James W. Patek

27,500

137,500

6,396

1,000

-

15.64%

Peter Valentine

27,500

137,500

6,396

577

-

9.02%

Donald A. Garner

400,000

800,000

37,209

123,273 (6)

-

> 100%

Dennis G. Feuchuk

275,000

550,000

25,581

15,442

-

60.36%

Timothy S. Granger

265,000

530,000

24,651

14,279

-

57.92%

Ronald J. Ambrozy

230,000

460,000

21,395

16,898

-

78.98%

Brian J. Lynam

200,000

400,000

18,605

488

-

2.62%

Gordon D. Haun

226,000

452,000

21,023

3,173

-

15.09%


Notes:

(1)

Based on a December 31, 2006 closing price for Trust Units of $21.50 per unit.  

(2)

Qualifying ownership is based upon number of Trust Units and Class A Exchangeable Shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or over which control is exercised by each nominee for Director.   Qualifying ownership does not include existing Unit Appreciation Rights, existing Debentures or future rights under the Executive Officer Retention Agreements.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise set out in these Notes, such qualifying ownership consists exclusively of Trust Units.  This qualifying ownership information is based upon information furnished to PrimeWest by the individual Executive Officers and Directors.

(3)

This ownership information is based upon information furnished to PrimeWest by the individual Executive Officers and Directors.

(4)

Trust Units held through Quantico Capital Corp.

(5)

Includes 100,000 Class A Exchangeable Shares (which, at December 31, 2006, were exchangeable into 63,765 Trust Units at an exchange ratio of 0.63765 Trust Units for each Class A Exchangeable Share), all of which were held by Canadian Income Fund Group Inc., a corporation wholly-owned by Mr. MacIntyre.

(6)

Includes 47,170 Class A Exchangeable Shares (which, at December 31, 2006, were exchangeable into 30,078 Trust Units at an exchange ratio of 0.63765 Trust Units for each Class A Exchangeable Share).

Performance Analysis

The following graph compares the percentage cumulative total Unitholder return of the Trust (assuming a $100 investment in Trust Units) with the cumulative total return of the S&P/TSX Composite Index, the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Trust Index and the S&P/TSX Oil and Gas Index, assuming the reinvestment of distributions, where applicable, for the relevant period.


Index

Dec. 31, 2002

Dec. 31, 2003

Dec. 31, 2004

Dec. 31, 2005

Dec. 31, 2006

PrimeWest

$100.00

$128.03

$140.51

$212.79

$143.41

S&P/TSX Composite

$100.00

$126.68

$145.02

$180.30

$211.52

S&P/TSX Capped Energy Trust Index

$100.00

$146.40

$190.94

$285.54

$274.88

S&P/TSX Composite Oil and Gas Index

$100.00

$124.85

$162.37

$265.82

$285.71


Note:

(1)

The S&P/TSX Composite Index was previously referred to as the TSX 300 Index.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets forth the number of Trust Units to be issued pursuant to equity compensation plans, the weighted average exercise price of the outstanding rights and the number of Trust Units remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans of the Trust.


Plan Category

Number of Trust Units to be issued upon exercise of outstanding rights

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding rights

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column)

Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders (LTIP)

326,065 (1)

-(1)

5,918,181 (2)

Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders (employee retention agreements)

60,156 (3)

-(3)

60,156 (3)

Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders

-

-

-

Total

386,221

-

5,978,337


Notes:

(1)

The number of Trust Units issuable pursuant to a Unit Appreciation Right is determined by dividing the market price of the Trust Units into the difference between the Unit Appreciation Right price and the Unit Appreciation Right hurdle price, each at the date of the exercise.  The Unit Appreciation Right price is calculated on the basis of the Unit Appreciation Right price at the date of issue: (i) increased by the amount of distributions in respect of a Trust Unit (and Trust Units deemed to be obtained on the reinvestment of distributions) since such issue, and (ii) increased or decreased by the amount of any increase or decrease in the market price of Trust Units between the date of issue of the Unit Appreciation Right and the date of exercise.  The Unit Appreciation Right hurdle price is calculated on the basis of the Unit Appreciation Right price at the date of its issue increased by five per cent per annum to the date of exercise.

(2)

This figure represents the maximum number of Trust Units issuable under the LTIP, being 7.5% of the issued and outstanding Trust Units as of December 31, 2006 (calculated without regard to the number of Trust Units issuable upon the exchange of any outstanding exchangeable securities, including without limitation, the Class A Exchangeable Shares), less the number of Trust Units to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding rights.  See “Executive Officer and Director Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2006 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements - Long Term Incentives.”

(3)

Consists of a total of 94,340 Class A Exchangeable Shares issuable to Mr. Garner, Mr. Granger, Mr. Feuchuk and Mr. Ambrozy on November 6, 2007 converted to Trust Units at an exchange ratio on December 31, 2006 of one Class A Exchangeable Share for 0.63765 Trust Units.  The number of Trust Units obtained upon exercise of Class A Exchangeable Shares is adjusted based on the distributions in respect of Trust Units prior to the date of exchange.  See “Executive Compensation - Employment Arrangements - Retention Agreements.”

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Declaration of Trust

Under the terms of the Declaration of Trust, Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, is given broad powers and authorities over the administration and management of the Trust.  Pursuant to the Declaration of Trust, the Trustee has delegated to the Board of Directors the supervision of the management of the business and affairs of the Trust.  Among other things, the Board of Directors is given responsibility for all matters relating to offerings of securities of the Trust, take-over bids or similar transactions involving the Trust or its subsidiaries, the terms, amendment or execution of material contracts on behalf of the Trust, the voting of securities held by the Trust, the redemption of Trust Units, any borrowings or acquisitions made by the Trust or its subsidiaries and the approval of the Trust’s public disclosure documents.

The Trust, as the sole voting shareholder of PrimeWest, is entitled to elect the Board of Directors of PrimeWest and must do so in accordance with a vote of the Unitholders.  Holders of the Class A Exchangeable Shares of PrimeWest do not have the right to vote their shares directly, but can effectively exercise voting rights at meetings of Unitholders through the Special Voting Unit of the Trust.

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors has responsibility for the stewardship of the Trust and PrimeWest, including responsibilities for planning and evaluation, financial management, operations, human resources and environment and safety.  Pursuant to the terms of the mandate of the Board of Directors, a copy of which is set out in Schedule “B” to this Management Proxy Circular, the Board has taken specific responsibility for:

·

adopting a strategic planning process;

·

identifying principal risks and implementing risk management systems;

·

succession planning, including nominating, training and monitoring Executive Officers;

·

implementation of and compliance with a communications and disclosure policy;

·

implementation of and compliance with an insider trading policy; and

·

ensuring the integrity of internal control and management information systems.

The Board of Directors is currently comprised of eight members, all of whom are  Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests (see “Corporate Governance - Independent Director Determinations” below).

Board Committees

The Board of Directors discharges its responsibilities acting either in its entirety or through one of its Committees.  The Board of Directors has an Audit and Finance Committee, a Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee, a Compensation Committee and an Operations and Reserves Committee, all of which are comprised solely of Independent Directors.  

Audit and Finance Committee

The Audit and Finance Committee is responsible for the integrity of PrimeWest’s financial reporting process and financial statements, the system of internal controls, the management of financial risks and the internal and external audit process, including the appointment, qualification and independence of the external auditors.  The Committee reviews and recommends for approval PrimeWest’s quarterly and annual financial statements, MD&A, press releases, annual reports and other annual filings.  This Committee also implements processes for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations, the disclosure of material information, including equity offering prospectuses, the maintenance of management of information systems and the implementation of loss prevention and disaster recovery programs.

Additional details of the mandate of the Audit and Finance Committee are set out in Schedule “A” to this Management Proxy Circular.  In addition, the complete text of the Audit and Finance Committee’s mandate, and further information in respect of the Audit and Finance Committee’s members, functions, oversight and external auditors, is contained in Schedule “C” to the Trust’s Annual Information Form dated March 15, 2007.  The Annual Information Form is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.  

In January 2006, PrimeWest hired a Director of Internal Audit whose mandate includes the review of compliance with and testing of internal controls, the conduct of general audit reviews in accordance with an internal audit plan, the identification of areas of significant risk and the conduct of special audits as requested by the Audit and Finance Committee or the Chief Executive Officer.

The Audit and Finance Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Valentine, Mr. Milavsky, Mr. O’Brien and Mr. Emes, all of whom are Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.  Mr. Valentine is the Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee.  Mr. Emes was appointed as a member of this Committee on August 2, 2006.   

Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee

The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee’s principal mandate is to ensure that PrimeWest has an effective system of corporate governance, which complies with applicable laws and regulations.  In order to accomplish this important function, this Committee assesses and makes recommendations regarding the effectiveness of the Board of Directors and its Committees and establishes processes for identifying, recruiting, appointing, evaluating and providing for ongoing development of Directors.  The Committee review policies and procedures relating to disclosure and enforces conflict of interest and insider trading policies.  The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee also monitors the environmental, health and safety practices of PrimeWest, to ensure compliance with applicable legislation, and conformance with industry standards, with the overall goal of preventing or mitigating losses.

In discharging its mandate, the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee conducts annual assessments of the performance of the Board and each Committee, as well as the performance of the Chair of the Board and the Committee Chairs.  In addition, every two years, the Committee conducts an evaluation of the performance of individual Board and Committee members and oversees the completion and evaluation of Director peer reviews.  The Committee also conducts annual assessment of the size and composition of the Board, taking into consideration the current strengths, skills, experience and time demands on Directors, proposed retirements, and the strategic direction of PrimeWest.  Further, the Committee develops and approves Board and Committee eligibility criteria, identifies individuals qualified to become Board and Committee members, in consultation with the Chair of the Board, provides annual recommendations of nominees for election as members of the Board and, as necessary, recommends appointments to and removals from Board Committees.

The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee is currently comprised of Mr. O’Brien Mr. Milavsky and Mr. Emes, all of whom are Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.  Mr. O’Brien is the Chair of the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee.  

Operations and Reserves Committee

The Operations and Reserves Committee assists the Board of Directors in conducting PrimeWest’s oil and natural gas reserves evaluation process and in the public disclosure of reserves data and related information in connection with oil and gas activities.  This Committee also assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to general aspects of oil and gas operations and development, including capital allocation and budgeting, producing asset performance, performance benchmarking and portfolio management, as well as the responsibilities relating to acquisitions and divestments, including reserves determinations and property valuations.

The Operations and Reserves Committee is currently comprised of Mr. MacIntyre, Mr. Russell, Mr. Kvisle and Mr. Patek, all of whom are Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.  Effective August 15, 2006, Mr. MacIntyre was appointed Chair of the Operations and Reserves Committee, replacing Mr. Russell in that capacity.  

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include duties to assess and make recommendations regarding PrimeWest’s compensation, benefits, short term incentive and long term incentive programs, including recommending to the Board of Directors the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, and monitoring the audit and disclosure of compensation arrangements.  This Committee is also responsible for the establishment of processes for identifying, recruiting, appointing and evaluating the Executive Officers of PrimeWest, along with the training, development and orderly succession of management.  The Compensation Committee monitors PrimeWest’s compensation schemes and practices to ensure congruence between the performance of the Executive Officers and PrimeWest when compared to the objectives and goals of PrimeWest and the Trust.  For further information relating to the functions of the Compensation Committee, see “Executive Compensation - Composition of Compensation Committee and Report on Executive Compensation.”

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Russell, Mr. Kvisle, Mr. Patek and Mr. MacIntyre, all of whom are Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.  Mr. MacIntyre was appointed as a member of the Compensation Committee on August 2, 2006.  Effective August 15, 2006, Mr. Russell was appointed Chair of this Committee, replacing Mr. Kvisle in that capacity.

Position Descriptions

PrimeWest has developed position descriptions for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chair of the Board and the Committee Chairs.  The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the general management and direction of the business and affairs of PrimeWest in accordance with the strategies and objectives approved by the Board of Directors, which are designed to maximize Unitholder value, taking into account available opportunities and the risks of the business.  The Chief Executive Officer works with the other Executive Officers and the Board of Directors to develop and implement the short and long term strategies and objectives of PrimeWest and the Trust and is responsible for developing operating plans to ensure that such strategies and objectives are implemented and carried out.  The Chief Executive Officer’s position description also sets out specific responsibilities with respect to personal ethics and integrity, leadership and organizational planning, management development and succession planning, operational effectiveness, board relations and communication and unitholder, stakeholder and community relations.

The Chair of the Board of Directors of PrimeWest, who must be an Independent Director for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests, is responsible for the management, development and effective functioning of the Board of Directors and for the provision of leadership in every aspect of the Board’s affairs.  The Chair ensures that the Board is properly organized, functions effectively and discharges its obligations in relation to the oversight of the management of the business and affairs of PrimeWest.  The Chair’s position description also sets out specific responsibilities with respect to board and annual meetings, board performance and communication, Chief Executive Officer and management performance and corporate performance.

The Chair of a Committee of the Board of Directors of PrimeWest, who must also be an Independent Director for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests, is responsible for the management, development and effective functioning of the Committee and the provision of leadership in every aspect of the Committee’s affairs.  The Committee Chair ensures that the Committee is properly organized, functions effectively and discharges its mandate and any other duties that have been delegated to it by the Board of Directors.  As required, and in consultation with the Committee, the Committee Chair retains, oversees and terminates independent legal and other professional advisors that assist the Committee in discharging its duties.

Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors

The Canadian Securities Administrators have prescribed that all reporting issuers must annually disclose their corporate governance practices in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 58-101 - Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (“NI 58-101”).  PrimeWest has structured its corporate governance so as to be in compliance with NI 58-101 and other applicable legislation and policies, including National Policy 41-201 - Income Trusts and Other Indirect Offerings, Multilateral Instrument 52-110 - Audit Committees (“MI 52-110”) and National Policy 58-201 - Corporate Governance Guidelines (“NP 58-201”).  In addition, PrimeWest continually reviews its corporate governance to ensure substantial compliance with certain other published policies, including the corporate governance guidelines set forth in Section 303A (the “NYSE Rules”) of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) Listed Company Manual and the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002.  Finally, PrimeWest stays abreast of legislative and other initiatives pertaining to corporate governance matters and proactively seeks to adjust its corporate governance to address such potential requirements.  In that respect, PrimeWest is monitoring proposed changes to Canadian securities laws and the NYSE Rules, along with additional disclosure requirements under consideration by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and the requirements that each would potentially impose on both PrimeWest’s corporate governance practices and the disclosure thereof.  PrimeWest will ensure that it is in compliance with all new applicable requirements as, if and when they have been finalized and implemented.

Attached as Schedule “A” to this Management Proxy Circular is a description of PrimeWest’s corporate governance practices with specific reference to NI 58-101, MI 52-110 and the NYSE Rules, including a discussion of significant ways in which its corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies under the NYSE Rules.  This discussion is also contained on PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com.

Independent Director Determinations

Independence Tests

The Independence Tests are summarized below.

NP 58-201, NI 58-101 and the NYSE Rules – All Board Committees

For the purposes of NP 58-201 and NI 58-101, a Director is independent if he or she has no direct or indirect “material relationship” with the Trust, where a “material relationship” is generally a relationship which could, in the view of the Board of Directors, be reasonably expected to interfere with the exercise of that member’s independent judgment.  

Similarly, for the purposes of the NYSE Rules, a Director may only qualify as independent if the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that the Director has no “material relationship” with the Trust, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or Executive Officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Trust.  

Notwithstanding the foregoing, under each of NP 58-201, NI 58-101 and the NYSE Rules, there are specific relationships which are automatic bars to a determination of independence, including without limitation:

·

Being an employee or Executive Officer, or an immediate family member being an Executive Officer, of the Trust within the last three years; and

·

Receiving, or an immediate family serving as an Executive Officer receiving, during any twelve month period within the last three years, direct compensation in excess of a certain threshold.

MI 52-110 and Rule 10A-3 – Audit Committee

For the purposes of both MI 52-110 and the NYSE Rules (by reference to the Audit Committee requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as they apply specifically to Audit Committee membership, the standard of independence of a Director also requires that the Director not accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Trust or PrimeWest, subject to limited exceptions, or be an affiliated person of the Trust or PrimeWest.  In the context of this independence determination, a Director would be determined to be indirectly receiving a fee if received through an immediate family member or an entity in which such Director is a partner, member or Executive Officer (except as a limited partner, non-managing member or if such Director does not otherwise play an active role in providing services to the Trust or PrimeWest) and which provides accounting, consulting, legal, investment banking or financial advisory services to the Trust or PrimeWest.

Independence Determinations

Mr. MacIntyre has been determined to be an Independent Director for all purposes of the Independence Tests because it has now been in excess of three years since he was an Executive Officer of PrimeWest, because he does not have an interest in or relationship with PrimeWest, other than as a Director or as a result of holding securities of PrimeWest, because the Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that he does not have a material relationship with PrimeWest and because none of the other per se bars are applicable to Mr. MacIntyre.   

Prior to his retirement effective July 31, 2006, Mr. Emes was a partner in Stikeman Elliott LLP, a law firm that provides legal services to PrimeWest and that receives advisory fees in connection therewith.  The Board of Directors previously affirmatively determined that this relationship did not interfere with Mr. Emes’ ability to exercise his independent judgment, that such relationship was not a material relationship with PrimeWest and that none of the per se bars applicable for purposes other than those relating to Audit Committees applied to Mr. Emes.  Therefore, Mr. Emes was considered to be an Independent Director for the purposes of NI 58-101 and the NYSE Rules that do not apply to Audit Committees.  While Mr. Emes was not considered to be an Independent Director for the purposes of either MI 52-110 or the NYSE Rules that apply to Audit Committees because of the application of a per se bar relating to his position as a partner in Stikeman Elliott LLP, his retirement from the partnership had the effect of terminating his entire relationship with Stikeman Elliott LLP.  Therefore, Mr. Emes is no longer subject to that per se bar and he is now considered to be an Independent Director for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests, including those under Multilateral Instrument 52-110 and the NYSE Rules that apply to Audit Committees.  Based on this determination, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Emes as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee of PrimeWest effective August 2, 2006.

Mr. Kvisle is President and Chief Executive Officer of TransCanada Corporation, a company that transports a portion of PrimeWest’s natural gas production.  The Board of Directors does not believe that this relationship interferes, or could be perceived to interfere with Mr. Kvisle’s ability to exercise his independent judgement and, as a result, Mr. Kvisle is independent for purposes of NI 58-101.  The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Mr. Kvisle’s relationship with PrimeWest, as President and Chief Executive Officer of a company that transports a portion of PrimeWest’s natural gas production, is not a material relationship with PrimeWest.  In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that none of the per se bars contained in MI 52-110 or the NYSE Rules are applicable to Mr. Kvisle.  

Mr. Kvisle is also a Director of the Bank of Montreal, a financial institution that indirectly provides banking services to PrimeWest and the Trust.  The Board of Directors does not believe that this relationship interferes, or could be perceived to interfere with Mr. Kvisle’s ability to exercise his independent judgement and, as a result, Mr. Kvisle is independent for purposes of NI 58-101.  The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Mr. Kvisle’s relationship with PrimeWest, as a Director of the Bank of Montreal, a financial institution that indirectly provides banking services to PrimeWest and the Trust, is not a material relationship with PrimeWest.  In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that none of the per se bars contained in MI 52-110 or the NYSE Rules are applicable to Mr. Kvisle because he is not a partner, member, officer or employee of the Bank of Montreal.  Therefore, Mr. Kvisle is an Independent Director for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.

None of the other Directors have an interest in or relationship with PrimeWest other than as a Director or as a result of holding securities of PrimeWest.  Therefore, the Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that none of the Directors has a material relationship with PrimeWest and that none of the per se bars are applicable to such Directors.  Based on the foregoing, the Board of Directors has determined that all of the Directors of PrimeWest are Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.

The NYSE Rules further require the Board of Directors of PrimeWest to determine whether any Audit Committee member’s simultaneous service on the Audit Committees of more than three public companies will impair his ability to effectively carry out his role as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee.  Mr. Milavsky and Mr. Valentine serve on the Audit Committees of more than three public corporations.  The Board of Directors has reviewed the roles of each of Mr. Milavsky and Mr. Valentine as members of other Audit Committees and has affirmatively determined that each of these members’ simultaneous service on the Audit Committees of more than three public companies will not impair his ability to effectively carry out his role as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee of PrimeWest.

Disclosure of Directors’ Directorships in other Public Entities

Name

Positions

Harold P. Milavsky

Mr. Milavsky is a Director, Chair of the Board and Chair of the Audit Committee of the various investment trusts and corporations comprising the Citadel Group of FundsTM

Mr. Milavsky is a Director, a member of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of Saskatchewan Wheat Pool and a Director of Lansborough Real Estate Investment Trust and Realex Properties Corp.

Barry E. Emes

Mr. Emes is a Director of Parkbridge Lifestyle Communities Inc. and a Director of Realex Properties Corp.

Harold N. Kvisle

Mr. Kvisle is a Director of TransCanada Corporation, TransCanada Pipelines Limited and the Bank of Montreal.  He also serves as a member of the Human Resources and Management Compensation Committee of the Bank of Montreal.

Kent J. MacIntyre

Mr. MacIntyre is a Director of the various investment trusts and corporations comprising the Citadel Group of FundsTM

Michael W. O’Brien

Mr. O’Brien is a Director and Chair of the Audit Committee of Shaw Communications Inc. and a Director, member of the Audit Committee and member of the Environmental, Health & Safety Committee of Suncor Energy Inc.

W. Glen Russell

Mr. Russell is not a Director of any other public entities.

James W. Patek

Mr. Patek is not a Director of any other public entities.

Peter Valentine

Mr. Valentine is a Trustee, member of the Audit Committee and a member of the Governance Committee of Fording Canadian Coal Trust, a Director, Chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Governance Committee of Livingston International Income Fund, and a Director and member of the Audit Committee of Superior Plus Income Fund.


INTEREST OF INFORMED PERSONS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

PrimeWest is not aware of any material interest, direct or indirect, of any informed person of the Trust, any nominee Director of PrimeWest, or any associate or affiliate of any informed person or nominee Director, in any transaction since the commencement of the Trust’s most recently completed financial year, or in any proposed transaction, that has materially affected or would materially affect the Trust or any of its subsidiaries.

For the purposes of this Information Circular an “informed person” means, in the context of the Trust, a Director or Executive Officer of any subsidiary of the Trust, including without limitation PrimeWest.

INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS OR COMPANIES IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON

Management of PrimeWest is not aware of any material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, of any Director or Executive Officer or anyone who has held office as such since the beginning of the last financial year or any nominee for Director or of any associate or affiliate of any of the foregoing in any matter to be acted on at the Meeting, save as is disclosed herein.

INDEBTEDNESS OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

PrimeWest is not aware of any individuals who are, or who at any time during the most recently completed financial year were, a Director or Executive Officer of PrimeWest, a proposed nominee for election as a Director of PrimeWest, or an associate of any of those Directors, Executive Officers or proposed nominees, who are, or have been at any time since the beginning of the most recently completed financial year of the Trust, indebted to the Trust or any of its subsidiaries or whose indebtedness to another entity is, or at any time since the beginning of the most recently completed financial year of the Trust, has been, the subject of a guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar arrangement or understanding provided by the Trust or any of its subsidiaries.

OTHER MATTERS

PrimeWest knows of no amendment, variation or other matter to come before the Meeting other than the matters referred to in the Notice of Meeting; however, if any other matter properly comes before the Meeting, the accompanying proxy will be voted on such matter in accordance with the best judgment of the person or persons voting the proxy.

PrimeWest shall provide without charge, upon request being made to the Vice President Legal and General Counsel, who also acts as the Corporate Secretary of PrimeWest, a copy of the Trust’s Annual Information Form, together with any document, or the pertinent pages of any document, incorporated by reference therein, the Trust’s most recently filed comparative annual financial statements, together with the accompanying report of the auditor, the Trust’s most recently filed annual MD&A, any interim financial statements of the Trust that have been filed thereafter and the interim MD&A relating thereto and the Management Proxy Circular for the Trust’s most recent annual meeting of Unitholders.

PrimeWest’s Corporate Governance Practices, Board and Committee mandates and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available at PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in print form to any Unitholder upon request.  Additional information relating to PrimeWest and the Trust is available on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) at www.sedar.com and on the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval System (EDGAR) on which submissions by companies and others required by law to file forms with the SEC are filed and accessible at www.sec.gov.




SCHEDULE “A”
STATEMENT OF GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

The following table sets forth the disclosure requirements for Corporate Governance Disclosure set forth in NI 58-101F1 together with the Trust’s governance approach.  In addition, where applicable, the table references the requirements contained in MI 52-110 and the NYSE Rules and the Trust’s compliance therewith.  The Board of Directors believes that the Trust’s corporate governance policies and practices fully comply with the requirements of MI 52-110 and NI 58-101 and the guidelines of NP 58-201.

As a Canadian company listed on the NYSE, PrimeWest is not required to comply with most of the corporate governance requirements set forth in Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “NYSE Rules”) and instead may comply with domestic requirements.  As a “foreign private issuer”, PrimeWest is only required to comply with four of the NYSE Rules: 1) have an Audit Committee that satisfies the requirement of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934; 2) the Chief Executive Officer must promptly notify the NYSE in writing after an Executive Officer becomes aware of any material non-compliance with the applicable NYSE Rules; 3) provide a brief description of any significant ways in which its governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies under the NYSE Rules; and 4) submit to the NYSE an Annual Written Affirmation each year and an Interim Written Affirmation each time there is a change to the Board of Directors or any Committee thereof. However, PrimeWest has voluntarily chosen to adopt corporate governance practices that substantially comply with the NYSE Rules.  The differences between PrimeWest’s corporate governance practices and those followed by domestic companies under the NYSE Rules are discussed below, and elsewhere in the Management Proxy Circular, and are also contained on PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com.

(a) YES

(a)

a. YES

(a)

a. YES

 

REQUIREMENT AND PRIMEWEST RESPONSE

 

Compliance

NI
58-101F1

NYSE Rules

MI 52-110

1.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.

Disclose the identity of Directors who are independent.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

Barry E. Emes *
Harold N. Kvisle

Michael W. O’Brien
Kent J. MacIntyre
Harold P. Milavsky
W. Glen Russell
James W. Patek
Peter Valentine

* Mr. Emes was not considered to be an independent director (“Independent Director”) for Audit Committee purposes until his retirement from the partnership of Stikeman Elliott LLP effective July 31, 2006.  Mr. Emes was not a member of the Audit and Finance Committee of PrimeWest until after such retirement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

b.

Companies must identify which Directors are independent and disclose the basis for that determination.

 

YES

 

X

 

 

All of the Directors are Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.  See the discussion under the heading “Corporate Governance - Independent Director Determinations” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.

Disclose the identity of Directors who are not independent, and describe the basis for that determination.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

Effective August 1, 2006, all of the Directors were considered to be Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the tests under Canadian securities laws and the NYSE Rules (the “Independence Tests”).  Prior thereto, Mr. Emes, by virtue of his position as a partner of Stikeman Elliott LLP, was not considered to be independent for Audit Committee purposes only.  See the discussion under the heading “Corporate Governance - Independent Director Determinations” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

 

d.

Disclose whether or not a majority of Directors are independent.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

Listed companies must have a majority of independent Directors

 

YES

 

X

 

 

Effective August 1, 2006, all of the Directors were considered to be Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.  Prior thereto, Mr. Emes, by virtue of his position as a partner of Stikeman Elliott LLP, was not considered to be independent for Audit Committee purposes only.  See the discussion under the heading “Corporate Governance - Independent Director Determinations” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

 

e.

Disclose Directors’ Directorships in other Public Entities.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

See the discussion of Directorships under the heading “Corporate Governance - Disclosure of Directors’ Directorships in other Public Entitles” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

 

f.

Disclose whether or not the independent Directors hold regularly scheduled meetings at which non-independent Directors and members of management are not in attendance.  If the independent Directors hold such meetings, disclose the number of meetings held since the beginning of the issuer’s most recently completed financial year.  If the independent Directors do not hold such meetings, describe what the Board does to facilitate open and candid discussion among its independent Directors.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

To empower non-management Directors to serve as a more effective check on management, the non-management Directors of each listed company must meet at regularly scheduled Executive sessions without management.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currently the Board of Directors, which consists of only non-management Directors, meets a minimum of five times per year and each Committee meets at least two times per year.  All Board and Committee meetings are followed by a meeting of Directors without the presence of management.  In addition, at least once annually the Board of Directors conducts a session with Independent Directors only, to the extent that there are any non-Independent Directors then on the Board.  Prior to August 1, 2006, the Board of Directors held one such independent session in 2006.  Subsequent to August 1, 2006, all Board meetings included a session with Independent Directors only.

 

 

 

 

 

 

g.

Disclose whether or not the Chair of the Board is an independent Director.  If the Board has a Chair or lead Director who is an independent Director, disclose the identity of the independent Chair or lead Director, and describe his or her role and responsibilities.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

Harold P. Milavsky is the Chair of the Board of Directors and is considered an Independent Director for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.  Mr. Milavsky also acts as Chair of all meetings of “non-management Directors” (as that term is defined in the NYSE Rules) and all meetings of Independent Directors and is the presiding director (the “Presiding Director”) at such sessions.  Interested parties wishing to communicate directly with the Chair/ Presiding Director may send private and confidential correspondence to PrimeWest Energy Trust, Suite 5100, 150 – 6th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2P 3Y7, Attention:  Chair/Presiding Director.  Such correspondence will be delivered, unopened, to the Chair/ Presiding Director.

For a description of the Chair’s role and responsibilities, see the discussion under the heading “Corporate Governance - Position Descriptions” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

 

h.

Disclose the attendance record of each Director for all Board meetings held since the beginning of the issuer’s most recently completed financial year.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

See disclosure of attendance record under the heading “Executive Compensation - Compensation of Directors” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

2.

BOARD MANDATE – DISCLOSE THE TEXT OF THE BOARD’S WRITTEN MANDATE

 

YES

X

 

 

 

The mandate of the Board of Directors is attached as Schedule “B” to the Management Proxy Circular.  In addition, the Board mandate is available at PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in printed form to any Unitholder that requests it.  

 

 

 

 

 

3.

POSITION DESCRIPTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.

Disclose whether or not the Board has developed written position descriptions for the Chair and the Chair of each Board Committee.  If the Board has not developed written position descriptions for the Chair and/or the Chair of each Board Committee, briefly describe how the Board delineates the role and responsibilities of each such position.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

The Board of Directors has developed position descriptions for the Board Chair and the Committee Chairs.  See the discussion under the heading “Corporate Governance - Position Descriptions” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

 

b.

Disclose whether or not the Board and CEO have developed a written position description for the CEO.  If the Board and CEO have not developed such a written position description, briefly describe how the Board delineates the role and responsibilities of the CEO.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

The Board of Directors has developed a position description for the CEO.  See the discussion under the heading “Corporate Governance - Position Descriptions” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

4.

ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.

Briefly describe what measures the Board takes to orient new Directors regarding

(i)

the role of the Board, its Committees and its Directors, and

(ii)

the nature and operation of the issuer’s business.  

 

YES

X

 

 

 

The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee is responsible for establishing orientation, development and education programs and materials for new Directors.

Every new Director appointed to the Board of Directors is briefed thoroughly about PrimeWest and the oil and gas royalty trust sector.

PrimeWest does not provide formal education programs for new Directors, but does provide such other orientation, information and education as individual Directors may request and is in the process of developing a defined Director orientation and education program.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

b.

Briefly describe what measures, if any, the Board takes to provide continuing education for its Directors.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

Refer to the response above under Section 4(a).

 

 

 

 

 

5.

ETHICAL BUSINESS CONDUCT

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.

Disclose whether or not the Board has adopted a written code for the Directors, Officers and employees.  If the Board has adopted a written code:

 

YES

X

 

 

 

(i)

disclose how a person or company may obtain a copy of the code;

(ii)

describe how the Board monitors compliance with the code, or if the Board does not monitor compliance, explain whether and how the Board satisfies itself regarding compliance with its code; and

(iii)

provide a cross-reference to any material change report filed since the beginning of the issuer’s most recently completed financial year that pertains to any conduct of a Director or Executive Officer that constitutes a departure from the code.

Listed companies must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for Directors, Officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for Directors or Executive Officers.

 

YES

 

X

 

 

The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the Code).

A copy of the Code is available on the Trust’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in printed form to any Unitholder that requests it.

The Board of Directors monitors compliance with the Code through reports of management to the Board Committees with responsibility for various aspects of the Code.  In addition, the Trust has established a third party service provider hotline for complaints.  Complaints to the third party service provider are provided to the Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee.

Since the beginning of the Trust’s most recently completed financial year, there have not been any waivers of the Code for Directors or Executive Officers or any material change reports filed that pertain to any conduct of a Director or Executive Officer that constitutes a departure from the Code.

 

 

 

 

 

 

b.

Describe any steps the Board takes to ensure Directors exercise independent judgement in considering transactions and agreements in respect of which a Director or Executive Officer has a material interest.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

Any Director with a material interest in a transaction or agreement being considered by the Board of Directors is required to declare such conflict and either absent himself from the Board of Director’s meeting where such transaction or agreement is being considered or abstain from voting with respect to such transaction or agreement.

Activities that could give rise to conflicts of interest are prohibited unless specifically approved in advance by the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee.  It is not always easy to determine whether a conflict of interest exists, so any potential conflicts of interest must be reported immediately to senior management or PrimeWest’s legal counsel.

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.

Describe any other steps the Board takes to encourage and promote a culture of ethical business conduct.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee is responsible for the development of the overall governance of the Trust, for conducting a continuing assessment of corporate governance matters, and for making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding PrimeWest’s approach to corporate governance.  Included in the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee’s mandate is a requirement to review and make recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding PrimeWest’s approach to ethical business conduct as set forth in the Code.

In addition to following the Code, employees are expected to seek guidance in any case where there is a question about compliance with both the letter and spirit of PrimeWest’s policies and applicable laws.  The Code sets forth general principles and does not supersede the specific policies and procedures that are covered in PrimeWest’s specific policies statements.  The Code recognizes that each employee’s cooperation and commitment is necessary for the continued success of the Trust and the cultivation and maintenance of its reputation as a good corporate citizen.

 

 

 

 

 

6.

NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.

Describe the process by which the Board identifies new candidates for Board nomination.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee’s mandate includes recommending Directors to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors.  The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee develops and approves Director eligibility criteria and identifies individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors from time to time.  In conjunction with the appropriate Committee, the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee also develops and approves Committee member eligibility criteria and identifies individuals qualified to become Committee members from time to time.  

 

YES

 

X

 

 

b.

Disclose whether or not the Board has a Nominating Committee composed entirely of independent Directors.  

Listed companies must have a Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee composed entirely of independent Directors which must have a written charter that addresses the Committees purpose and responsibilities and an annual performance evaluation of the Committee.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee is currently composed of Michael W. O’Brien, Harold P. Milavsky and Barry E. Emes, all of whom are Independent Directors.  Mr. O’Brien is the Chair of the Committee.

The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee mandate is in place and addresses the Committee’s purpose and responsibilities and provides for an annual performance evaluation of the Committee.  All members of the Committee have been determined by the Board of Directors to be Independent Directors for the purposes of their membership in such Committee.  See the discussion of the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee’s mandate under the heading “Corporate Governance - Board Committees - Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee” in the Management Proxy Circular.  In addition, the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee’s mandate is available at PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in printed form to any Unitholder that requests it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.

If the Board has a Nominating Committee, describe the responsibilities, powers and operation of the nominating Committee.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee’s mandate includes making recommendations to the Board of Directors to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors.  The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee develops and approves Director eligibility criteria and identifies individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors from time to time.  In conjunction with the appropriate Committees, the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee also develops and approves Committee member eligibility criteria and identifies individuals qualified to become Committee members from time to time.  

See the discussion of the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee’s mandate under the heading “Corporate Governance - Board Committees - Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee” in the Management Proxy Circular.  In addition, the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee’s mandate is available at PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in printed form to any Unitholder that requests it.

 

 

 

 

 

7.

COMPENSATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.

Describe the process by which the Board determines the compensation for the issuer’s Directors and Officers.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

See the discussions of compensation processes under the headings “Executive Compensation - Composition of Compensation Committee and Report on Executive Compensation” and “Executive Compensation - Compensation of Directors” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

 

b.

Disclose whether or not the Board has a compensation Committee composed entirely of independent Directors.

Listed companies must have a Compensation Committee composed entirely of independent Directors which must have a written charter that addresses the Committee’s purpose and responsibilities and an annual performance evaluation of the Committee.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of W. Glen Russell, Harold N. Kvisle, James W. Patek and Kent J. MacIntyre, all of whom are Independent Directors.  Effective August 15, 2006, Mr. Russell was appointed Chair of the Compensation Committee, replacing Mr. Kvisle in that capacity.

The Compensation Committee mandate is in place and addresses the Committee’s purpose and responsibilities and provides for an annual performance evaluation of the Committee.  All members of the Committee have been determined by the Board of Directors to be Independent Directors for the purposes of their membership in such Committee.  See the discussions under the headings “Executive Compensation - Composition of Compensation Committee and Report on Executive Compensation” and “Corporate Governance - Board Committees - Compensation Committee” in the Management Proxy Circular.  In addition, the Compensation Committee mandate is available at PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in printed form to any Unitholder that requests it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.

If the Board has a Compensation Committee, describe the responsibilities, powers and operation of the Compensation Committee.  

 

YES

X

 

 

 

The Compensation Committee’s mandate includes duties to assess and make recommendations regarding PrimeWest’s compensation programs, to monitor the audit and disclosure of compensation arrangements and to establish processes for appointing training, developing and evaluating the Executive Officers of PrimeWest.  See the discussions under the headings “Executive Compensation - Composition of Compensation Committee and Report on Executive Compensation” and “Corporate Governance - Board Committees - Compensation Committee” in the Management Proxy Circular.  In addition, the Compensation Committee mandate is available at PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in printed form to any Unitholder that requests it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

d.

If a compensation consultant or advisor has, at any time since the beginning of the issuer’s most recently completed financial year, been retained to assist in determining compensation for any of the issuer’s Directors and Officers, disclose the identity of the consultant or advisor and briefly summarize the mandate for which they have been retained.  If the consultant or advisor has been retained to perform any other work for the issuer, state that fact and briefly describe the nature of the work.  

 

YES

X

 

 

 

See the discussion of the compensation consultants utilized by PrimeWest since the beginning of the most recently completed financial year under the heading “Executive Compensation - Composition of Compensation Committee and Report on Executive Compensation” in the Management Proxy Circular.

 

 

 

 

 

8.

OTHER BOARD COMMITTEES

 

 

 

 

 

 

If the Board has other standing Committees other than audit, compensation and nominating Committees, identify the Committee and describe their function.  

 

YES

X

 

 

 

In addition to the Audit and Finance Committee, the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee and the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors has established the Operations and Reserves Committee, the mandate of which includes assisting the Board of Directors in the reserves evaluation process, the public disclosure of reserves data and fulfilling responsibilities relating to general aspects of oil and gas operations and development.  See the discussion under the heading  “Corporate Governance - Board Committees - Operations and Reserves Committee” in the Management Proxy Circular.  In addition, the Operations and Reserves Committee mandate is available at PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in printed form to any Unitholder that requests it.

The Operations and Reserves Committee is currently comprised of Kent J. MacIntyre, W. Glen Russell, Harold N. Kvisle and James W. Patek, all of whom are Independent Directors.  Effective August 15, 2006, Mr. MacIntyre was appointed Chair of the Operations and Reserves Committee, replacing Mr. Russell in that capacity.

 

 

 

 

 

9.

ASSESSMENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disclose whether or not the Board, its Committees and individual Directors are regularly assessed with respect to their effectiveness and contribution.  If assessments are regularly conducted, describe the process used for the assessments.

 

YES

X

 

 

 

See the discussion of Board, Committee, Chair and Director performance evaluations under the heading “Corporate Governance - Board Committees - Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee”.

 

 

 

 

 

10.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF THREE MEMBERS, EACH OF WHOM MUST BE “INDEPENDENT” AND “FINANCIALLY LITERATE”.

 

YES

 

X

 

 

Prior to August 2006, the Audit and Finance Committee was composed of three Directors, being Peter Valentine, Harold P. Milavsky and Michael W. O’Brien, all of whom were Independent Directors for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.  On August 2, 2006, Barry E. Emes was appointed as the fourth member of the Audit and Finance Committee after he was determined by the Board of Directors to be an Independent Director for the purposes of all of the Independence Tests.  Mr. Valentine is the Chair of the Committee.

All members of the Audit and Finance Committee are “financially literate”, based on criteria established by the Board of Directors in accordance with MI 52-110 and the NYSE Rules (the Board of Directors has adopted the definition of “financially literate” set forth in MI 52-1101).  In addition, with the exception of Mr. Emes, all members of the Audit and Finance Committee have “accounting or related financial management expertise,” based on the foregoing criteria.

 

YES

 

 

X

11.

THE AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MUST HAVE A WRITTEN CHARTER THAT SETS OUT ITS PURPOSE AND RESPONSIBILITIES AND COMPLIES WITH MI 52-110 AND THE NYSE RULES.

 


YES

 

X

 

 

The Audit and Finance Committee has a mandate in place which outlines the Committee’s roles and responsibilities, which provides appropriate guidance to Committee members as to their duties and which addresses the annual performance evaluation of the Committee.  This mandate is reviewed annually by the Board of Directors.  The Audit and Finance Committee is responsible for the integrity of PrimeWest’s financial reporting process and financial statements, the system of internal controls, the management of financial risks and the internal and external audit process.  The Committee reviews the annual and interim financial statements of the Trust and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to such statements.  The Audit and Finance Committee also reviews the nature and scope of the annual audit as proposed by the auditors and management, and the adequacy and reporting of the internal accounting control procedures and systems within the Trust and its affiliates.  The Audit and Finance Committee is also responsible for monitoring compliance with the law, the disclosure of material information, the maintenance of management of information systems and the implementation of loss prevention and disaster recovery programs.

The Audit and Finance Committee meets with the Trust’s auditors regularly, independent of management, and has direct communication channels with the Trust’s external auditors to discuss and review specific issues as appropriate.

See Schedule “C” to the Trust’s Annual Information Form dated March 15, 2007 for the complete text of the Audit and Finance Committee mandate.  In addition, the mandate is available at PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in printed form to any Unitholder that requests it.

It should be noted that the NYSE Rules provide that an Audit Committee mandate address, among other things, the obligation of the Audit Committee to prepare an Audit Committee report as required by the SEC, to be included in the issuer’s annual proxy statement.  While PrimeWest’s Audit and Finance Committee mandate satisfies the requirements of the NYSE Rules in relation thereto, the Audit and Finance Committee does not require the filing of such a report, for a number of reasons.    

Firstly, the Audit Committee report mandated by the SEC directs itself to United States accounting and auditing processes and procedures which are not applicable to an issuer such as PrimeWest whose financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

Secondly, while the SEC Audit Committee report would require that the Audit and Finance Committee state whether it has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and recommended to the Board of Directors the inclusion of the audited financial statements in PrimeWest’s Annual Report, those requirements are already effectively covered by other express obligations contained in the Audit and Finance Committee’s mandate.  For instance, the Audit and Finance Committee must meet at least quarterly with management of PrimeWest and, in particular, review the audited annual financial statements and auditors’ report with management.  It must also review and recommend to the Board of Directors those financial statements, as well as the Annual Report in which they are contained.

Finally, MI 52-110 mandates the inclusion of the Audit and Finance Committee mandate in its entirety, among other things, in the Trust’s Annual Information Form.  Reiterating the same information in its entirety in the Management Proxy Circular would be duplicitous when reference to where it can be reviewed can simply be incorporated as above.  

 

YES

 

 

X

12.

EVERY ISSUER MUST REQUIRE ITS EXTERNAL AUDITOR TO REPORT DIRECTLY TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE.

 

YES

 

 

X

 

The Audit and Finance Committee mandate provides the authority to, among other things, retain and terminate the external auditors (subject to Unitholder approval) and to otherwise deal directly with all matters relating to the relationship of PrimeWest with its auditors.

 

 

 

 

 

13.

AN AUDIT COMMITTEE MUST HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ENGAGE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL AND OTHER ADVISORS AS IT DETERMINES NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT ITS DUTIES, TO SET AND PAY THE COMPENSATION FOR ANY ADVISORS EMPLOYED BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, AND TO COMMUNICATE DIRECTLY WITH THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDITORS.

 

YES

 

 

X

 

The Audit and Finance Committee mandate provides the Committee with the authority to do all of the foregoing.

 

 

 

 

 

14.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MUST SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 10A-3 UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT WHICH SPECIFIES THAT THIS COMMITTEE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND OVERSIGHT OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITORS AND THE HANDLING OF COMPLAINTS RELATING TO ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING MATTERS.  THIS RULE ALSO REQUIRES THAT THE COMMITTEE HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ENGAGE ADVISORS AND THAT THE ISSUER MUST PROVIDE FUNDING FOR SUCH ADVISORS AND OTHER AUDIT COMMITTEE EXPENSES.  FINALLY, ALL COMMITTEE MEMBERS MUST BE INDEPENDENT MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.  

 

YES

 

X

 

 

The Audit & Finance Committee is structured in compliance with Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.  

 

 

 

 

 

15.

EACH LISTED COMPANY MUST HAVE AN INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION.  

 

YES

 

X

 

 

PrimeWest has an internal audit function that is staffed through the position of Director - Internal Audit.  

 

 

 

 

 

16.

SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL OF EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS.

SHAREHOLDERS MUST BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE ON EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS AND MATERIAL REVISIONS THERETO, EXCEPT FOR EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT AWARDS, CERTAIN GRANTS, PLANS AND AMENDMENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, AND CERTAIN SPECIFIC TYPES OF PLANS

 

YES

 

X

 

 

PrimeWest’s only equity compensation plan is its Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), which compensation plan has been previously approved by Unitholders.  However, under the NYSE Rules there is a further obligation to obtain Unitholder approval for every increase in the number of Trust Units available thereunder absent a finite term imposed on the LTIP of 10 years, given that the LTIP has a “rolling” maximum number of Trust Units issuable thereunder.  The LTIP requires that Unitholders approve the renewal of the LTIP every three years, failing which it will terminate without further action.  The inclusion of this requirement effectively incorporates into the LTIP a finite term of less than 10 years.

 

 

 

 

 

17.

LISTED COMPANIES MUST ADOPT AND DISCLOSE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

 

YES

 

X

 

 

PrimeWest’s Corporate Governance guidelines are contained in this Schedule “A”, and elsewhere in the Management Proxy Circular, and are available at PrimeWest’s website at www.primewestenergy.com and in print form to any Unitholder that requests them.  

 

 

 

 

 

18.

LISTED FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUERS MUST DISCLOSE SIGNIFICANT WAYS IN WHICH THEIR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES DIFFER FROM THOSE FOLLOWED BY DOMESTIC COMPANIES UNDER NYSE LISTING STANDARDS.

 

YES

 

X

 

 

PrimeWest discloses the ways in which its corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies under NYSE Listing Standards in this Schedule ”A”, and elsewhere in the Management Proxy Circular, and on its website at www.primewestenergy.com.

 

 

 

 

 

19.

EACH LISTED COMPANY CEO MUST CERTIFY TO THE NYSE EACH YEAR THAT HE OR SHE IS NOT AWARE OF ANY VIOLATION BY THE COMPANY OF NYSE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE LISTING STANDARDS, QUALIFYING THE CERTIFICATION TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY.  

 

YES

 

X

 

 

As required, the CEO will certify that he is not aware of any violation by PrimeWest or the Trust of NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

 

 

 

 

 

20.

EACH LISTED COMPANY CEO MUST PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE NYSE IN WRITING AFTER ANY EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE LISTED COMPANY BECOMES AWARE OF ANY MATERIAL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE NYSE RULES.

 

YES

 

X

 

 

The CEO will provide such notification if such circumstances arise.  The Trust and PrimeWest do not anticipate any such event.

 

 

 

 

 

21.

EACH LISTED COMPANY CEO MUST SUBMIT AN EXECUTED WRITTEN AFFIRMATION ANNUALLY TO THE NYSE.  IN ADDITION, EACH LISTED COMPANY MUST SUBMIT AN INTERIM WRITTEN AFFIRMATION EACH TIME A CHANGE OCCURS TO THE BOARD OR ANY OF THE COMMITTEES SUBJECT TO THE NYSE RULES.  THE ANNUAL AND INTERIM WRITTEN AFFIRMATIONS MUST BE IN THE FORM SPECIFIED BY THE NYSE.  

 

YES

 

X

 

 

The Trust will submit the Annual Written Affirmation to the NYSE within the timelines prescribed in the NYSE Rules and will submit an Interim Written Affirmation if any change warranting such submission occurs.

 

 

 

 

 

22.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, ACTING ALONE OR TOGETHER WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, MUST APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.  

 

YES

 

X

 

 

The Compensation Committee, which consists of only Independent Directors, reviews and recommends to the Board of Directors the approval of corporate goals and objectives relating to Chief Executive Officer compensation and recommends to the Board of Directors the approval of the Chief Executive Officer’s annual compensation package.  All members of the Board of Directors are considered to be Independent Directors for the purpose of the approval of the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer.  

 

 

 

 

 

23.

LISTED COMPANIES MUST HAVE AND MAINTAIN A PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE WEBSITE.

 

Yes

 

X

 



SCHEDULE “B”

MANDATE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


1.0

Overall Purpose/Objectives

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) is responsible under law to supervise the management of the business and affairs of PrimeWest Energy Inc. (the “Corporation”) including the business and affairs of PrimeWest Energy Trust (the “Trust”) delegated to the Corporation by the Trustee (references to the Corporation in this Mandate shall be deemed to include the Trust, as applicable).  The Board has the statutory authority and obligation to protect and enhance the assets of the Corporation, the Directors are charged with protecting the interests of all Unitholders, both present and future, of the Trust.

The principal mandate of the Board is to oversee the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation, and monitor the performance of the Officers of the Corporation.

In keeping with generally accepted corporate governance practices, including those contained in National Policy 41-201 – Income Trusts and Other Indirect Offerings, Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees, National Policy 58-201 – Corporate Governance Guidelines, National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (collectively, the “Canadian Corporate Governance Guidelines”), the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) corporate governance guidelines contained in Section 303A of the NYSE listed company manual (the “NYSE Corporate Governance Guidelines”), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and any similar legislation as it becomes applicable to the Corporation, the Board assumes responsibility for the stewardship of the Corporation and, as part of the overall stewardship responsibility, explicitly assumes responsibility for the following:

2.0

Organization and Independence

The Board retains the responsibility for managing its own affairs including planning its composition, selecting its Chair (or acting Chair if the Chair is absent from the meeting), appointing Board Committees and determining Directors' compensation.  While it is appropriate to confer with management of the Corporation (“Management”) on the selection of candidates to be nominated as members of the Board, the ultimate selection shall be determined by the existing members of the Board.

In that the Board must develop and voice objective judgement on corporate affairs, independently of Management, practices promoting Board independence will be pursued.  This includes constituting the Board with a majority of independent Directors.  Certain tasks suited to independent judgements will be delegated to specialized Board Committees that are comprised exclusively of independent Directors wherever possible.  The Board will develop broad standards to determine whether Directors are independent, which standards will comply with Canadian Corporate Governance Guidelines, NYSE Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any similar legislation as it becomes applicable to the Corporation.  In accordance with these standards, the Board will make a positive determination with respect to the independence of each Director at least once per year.  The Board will disclose both the standards and the annual determinations as required by law.

The Board will ensure that the Non-Management Directors conduct a session without the presence of Management at all regularly scheduled Board meetings.  The Board will also ensure that it meets without the presence of any Directors who are not independent at least once per year.

The Board will establish specific criteria for Board and Board member performance, and pursue a self-evaluation process for evaluating both overall Board performance and contributions of individual Directors.  In addition, the Board will be constituted based on the following general membership criteria:

2.1

Background

The Board will seek members from diverse professional and personal backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with a reputation for integrity.  This assessment will include an individual’s independence, as well as consideration of diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board and the Corporation.

2.2

Character

Directors shall be persons of good character and thus should possess all of the following personal characteristics:

2.2.1

Integrity:  Directors should demonstrate high ethical standards and integrity in their personal and professional dealings;

2.2.2

Accountability:  Directors should be willing to be accountable for their decisions as Directors;

2.2.3

Judgment:  Directors should possess the ability to provide wise and thoughtful counsel on a broad range of issues;

2.2.4

Responsibility:  Directors should interact with each other in a manner which encourages responsible, open, challenging and inspired discussion;

2.2.5

High Performance Standards:  Directors should have a history of achievements which reflects high standards for themselves and others;

2.2.6

Commitment and Enthusiasm:  Directors should be committed to, and enthusiastic about, their performance for the Corporation as Directors, both in absolute terms and relative to their peers; and

2.2.7

Courage:  Directors should possess the courage to express views openly, even in the face of opposition.

2.3

Expectations

Each Director shall be expected to:

2.3.1

dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to the Corporation in order to ensure the diligent performance of his or her duties;

2.3.2

comply with the duties and responsibilities set forth herein and in the By-laws of the Corporation;

2.3.3

comply with all duties of care, loyalty and confidentiality applicable to Directors of publicly traded corporations; and

2.3.4

adhere to the Corporation’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and other applicable Policies.

3.0

Leadership in Corporate Strategy

The Board ultimately has the responsibility to oversee the development and approval of the mission of the Corporation, its goals and objectives, and the strategy by which these objectives will be reached.  In guiding the strategic choices of the Corporation, the Board must understand the inherent prospects and risks of such strategic choices.

While the leadership for the strategic planning process comes from the Management of the Corporation, the Board shall bring objectivity and a breadth of judgement to the strategic planning process and will annually review and approve the strategy developed by Management and ensure that the strategic plan takes into account, among other things, the opportunities and risks of the Corporation’s business.

The Board is responsible for monitoring Management’s success in implementing the strategy and monitoring the Corporation's progress in achieving its goals; as well as revising and altering direction in light of changing circumstances.

The Board has the responsibility to ensure congruence between the strategic plan, Unitholder expectations and Management’s performance.

4.0

Policies and Procedures

The Board is responsible for:

4.1

approving and, through the Internal Auditor, monitoring compliance with all significant policies and procedures, by which the Trust is operated, including corporate governance principles and guidelines;

4.2

approving policies and procedures designed to ensure that the Trust operates at all times within applicable laws and regulations and to the highest ethical and moral standards;

4.3

enforcing obligations of the Directors respecting confidential treatment of the Trust’s proprietary information and Board deliberations; and

4.4

ensuring that individual Directors are appropriately prepared for meetings of the Board and maintain an acceptable attendance record.

5.0

Management of Risk

The Board shall identify and understand the principal risks of all aspects of the business in which the Corporation is engaged, recognizing that business decisions require the incurrence of risk.  The Board is responsible for providing a balance between risks incurred and the potential returns to Unitholders.  This requires that the Board ensure that systems are in place to effectively monitor and manage risks with a view to the long term viability of the Corporation and its assets, and that it conduct an annual review of the associated risks.

6.0

Oversight of Management

The Board must ensure that the execution of plans and operations are of the highest calibre.  The key to the effective discharge of this responsibility is the approval of the appointment of the Officers of the Corporation and the assessment of each Officer's contribution to the achievement of the Corporation's strategy.  In this respect, performance of the Chief Executive Officer and the other Officers of the Corporation against objectives established by the Board is important, as is a formal process for determining the Officers' compensation, in part, by using established criteria and objectives for measuring performance to monitor an Officer’s development.  A fundamental consideration in the approval of appointments of Officers of the Corporation is that the Officers appointed to Management, including the Chief Executive Officer, are persons of integrity and create a culture of integrity throughout the Corporation.

In addition to the appointment of Officers of the Corporation, to ensure that the Corporation’s long-term strategy is achieved, the Board must also, either directly or through a Committee, develop succession planning procedures, including identifying potential candidates, training Officers and monitoring their development and contributions to the achievement of the Corporation’s strategy.

7.0

Unitholder Communications and Disclosure

The Board is responsible to ensure that the Corporation has policies in place to ensure effective and timely communication and disclosure to its Unitholders, other stakeholders and the public in general.  This communications and disclosure policy must effectively and fairly present the operations of the Corporation to Unitholders and should accommodate feedback from Unitholders, which could be considered in future business decisions.  

Unitholders wishing to communicate directly with the independent Directors may send private and confidential correspondence to PrimeWest Energy Trust, Suite 5100, 150 – 6th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2P 3Y7, Attention:  Chair.  Such correspondence will be delivered, unopened, to the Chair of the Board.

The Board has the responsibility for ensuring that the financial performance of the Corporation is reported to Unitholders on a timely and regular basis and for ensuring that such financial results are reported fairly, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Board has the responsibility for ensuring that procedures are in place to effect the timely reporting of any developments that have a significant and material impact on the value of Unitholder assets.

The Board has the responsibility for reporting annually to Unitholders on its stewardship for the preceding year.

8.0

Integrity of Corporate Internal Controls and Management Information Systems

To effectively discharge its duties, the Board shall ensure that the Corporation has in place effective internal controls and management information systems so that it can track those criteria needed to monitor the implementation of the Corporation's strategy.

Similarly, in reviewing and approving financial information, the Board shall ensure that the Corporation has an audit system, which can inform the Board of the integrity of the data and compliance of the financial information with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Board's management of the important areas of corporate conduct, such as the commitment of the Corporation's assets to different businesses or material acquisitions, shall also be supported by effective control and information systems.

9.0

Conflicts of Interest

Directors shall avoid any action, position or interest that conflicts with an interest of the Corporation, or gives the appearance of a conflict.  The Corporation annually solicits information from Directors in order to monitor potential conflicts of interest and Directors are expected to be mindful of their fiduciary obligations to the Corporation.

10.0

Assessing Board Performance

Annually, in conjunction with the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee, the Board, through its Chair, will assess Committee Chair performance and conduct an evaluation of the performance of the Board and each Committee as a whole, including their processes and effectiveness.  The Chair of the Board shall also conduct the bi-annual Director peer reviews.  The Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee will conduct the annual evaluation of the performance of the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Corporate Governance and EH&S Committee will review the peer review results for the Board Chair.  

11.0

Access to Officers and Employees

Board members shall have complete and open access to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President Legal and General Counsel and, Director, Internal Audit.  Board members who wish to have access to other members of Management may coordinate such access through one of the foregoing or may contact such members of Management directly.  

12.0

Board Authority

The Board and each Committee shall have the power to hire independent legal, financial or other advisors as they may deem necessary, without consulting or obtaining the approval of any member of Management of the Corporation in advance.

13.0

Legal Requirements

The Board is responsible for ensuring that routine legal requirements are adhered to and that documents, and records have been properly prepared, approved and maintained by the Corporation.

14.0

Board Delegation to Committees

The Board can delegate specific responsibilities to Committees of the Board in order to effectively manage the affairs of the Corporation.

15.0

Authorization

This Board of Directors Mandate is hereby approved on behalf of the Board of PrimeWest Energy Inc. on the 31st day of January, 2007.