10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-16545

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	13-4146982 (IRS Employer Identification No.)
2000 Westchester Avenue, Purchase, New York (Address of principal executive offices)	10577 (Zip Code)

(914) 701-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of September 30, 2011, there were 26,302,167 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)		1
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)		2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)		3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity as of and for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)		4
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		5
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		27
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		28
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		29
Item 1A. Risk Factors		29
Item 6. Exhibits		29
Signatures		30
Exhibit Index		31
EX-10.1
EX-10.2
EX-10.3
EX-10.4
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	417,352		$	588,852
Short-term investments		7,913			6,211
Restricted cash		120,252			—
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,644 and $1,900, respectively		84,802			78,334
Prepaid maintenance		38,154			26,102
Deferred taxes		3,288			3,721
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		27,775			24,212
Total current assets		699,536			727,432
Property and Equipment
Flight equipment		897,216			766,681
Ground equipment		32,338			29,124
Less: accumulated depreciation		(154,930	)		(138,851	)
Purchase deposits for flight equipment		396,030			336,969
Property and equipment, net		1,170,654			993,923
Other Assets
Long-term investments and accrued interest		133,200			127,094
Deposits and other assets		58,934			45,026
Intangible assets, net		41,157			42,627
Total Assets	$	2,103,481		$	1,936,102
Liabilities and Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	37,571		$	22,954
Accrued liabilities		196,128			149,892
Current portion of long-term debt		57,819			96,197
Total current liabilities		291,518			269,043
Other Liabilities
Long-term debt		466,174			391,036
Deferred taxes		109,246			103,150
Other liabilities		129,938			122,783
Total other liabilities		705,358			616,969
Commitments and contingencies
Equity
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 27,458,043 and 26,955,923 shares issued, 26,302,167 and 25,937,014, shares outstanding (net of treasury stock), at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		275			270
Additional paid-in-capital		522,650			505,297
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,155,876 and 1,018,909 shares, respectively		(41,446	)		(32,248	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(14,471	)		458
Retained earnings		635,236			572,666
Total stockholders’ equity		1,102,244			1,046,443
Noncontrolling interest		4,361			3,647
Total equity	$	1,106,605		$	1,050,090
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	2,103,481		$	1,936,102

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

1

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Operating Revenue
ACMI	$	163,406		$	144,685		$	469,883		$	383,917
AMC charter		122,581			72,506			316,230			303,314
Commercial charter		70,353			104,044			206,956			275,525
Dry leasing		3,065			2,157			6,742			5,384
Other		3,471			3,275			10,246			9,940
Total Operating Revenue	$	362,876		$	326,667		$	1,010,057		$	978,080
Operating Expenses
Aircraft fuel		103,663			74,221			278,188			222,336
Salaries, wages and benefits		61,911			56,244			185,173			177,677
Maintenance, materials and repairs		47,770			44,747			144,699			115,967
Aircraft rent		41,055			38,764			120,976			115,097
Landing fees and other rent		12,813			11,487			36,756			35,974
Travel		11,284			8,941			30,328			24,354
Depreciation and amortization		9,964			8,403			27,069			26,049
Ground handling and airport fees		6,036			6,423			17,141			17,645
Gain on disposal of aircraft		(163	)		(161	)		(464	)		(3,541	)
Other		25,043			22,702			72,580			80,177
Total Operating Expenses		319,376			271,771			912,446			811,735
Operating Income		43,500			54,896			97,611			166,345
Non-operating Expenses / (Income)
Interest income		(5,004	)		(5,490	)		(15,200	)		(14,620	)
Interest expense		9,801			10,176			30,009			30,396
Capitalized interest		(6,982	)		(4,401	)		(18,584	)		(11,007	)
Other (income) expense, net		(121	)		(614	)		(485	)		(9,236	)
Total Non-operating Income		(2,306	)		(329	)		(4,260	)		(4,467	)
Income before income taxes		45,806			55,225			101,871			170,812
Income tax expense		17,464			21,186			38,595			70,386
Net Income		28,342			34,039			63,276			100,426
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		136			235			706			176
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	28,206		$	33,804		$	62,570		$	100,250
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.07		$	1.31		$	2.39		$	3.90
Diluted	$	1.07		$	1.29		$	2.37		$	3.85
Weighted average shares:
Basic		26,291			25,855			26,201			25,736
Diluted		26,452			26,143			26,416			26,038

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

2

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Operating Activities:
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	62,570		$	100,250
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		706			176
Net Income		63,276			100,426
Adjustments to reconcile Net Income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		27,069			26,049
Amortization of debt discount		3,753			4,011
Amortization of operating lease discount		1,789			1,750
Amortization of debt issuance costs		300			219
Accretion of debt securities discount		(6,208	)		(5,979	)
Provision for (release of) allowance for doubtful accounts		(17	)		75
Gain on disposal of aircraft		(464	)		(3,541	)
Deferred taxes		14,882			18,071
Stock-based compensation expense		9,497			10,489
Changes in:
Accounts receivable		(4,573	)		(5,539	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(21,801	)		(6,576	)
Deposits and other assets		(12,622	)		(2,200	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		43,757			76,838
Net cash provided by operating activities		118,638			214,093
Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures		(205,359	)		(59,590	)
Changes in restricted cash		(120,252	)		—
Investment in debt securities		—			(100,090	)
Proceeds from short-term investments		4,662			4,374
Proceeds from disposal of aircraft		1,165			5,018
Net cash used for investing activities		(319,784	)		(150,288	)
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from stock option exercises		4,733			3,522
Purchase of treasury stock		(9,198	)		(5,777	)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation expense		3,128			1,677
Proceeds from loan		120,250			20,637
Payment of debt issuance costs		(2,024	)		—
Payments of debt		(87,243	)		(152,316	)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		29,646			(132,257	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(171,500	)		(68,452	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period		588,852			613,740
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period	$	417,352		$	545,288

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

									Accumulated
						Additional			Other				Total
	Common		Treasury			Paid-In			Comprehensive		Retained		Stockholders’			Noncontrolling		Total
	Stock		Stock			Capital			Income (Loss)		Earnings		Equity			Interest		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	266	$	(26,394	)	$	481,074		$	471	$	430,856	$	886,273		$	2,484	$	888,757
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders		—		—			—			—		100,250		100,250			176		100,426
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—			—			51		—		51			66		117
Comprehensive income		—		—			—			—		—		100,301			—		100,543
Stock option and restricted stock compensation		—		—			10,489			—		—		10,489			—		10,489
Purchase of 124,855 shares of treasury stock		—		(5,777	)		—			—		—		(5,777	)		—		(5,777	)
Exercise of 111,320 employee stock options		—		—			3,522			—		—		3,522			—		3,522
Issuance of 200,137 shares of restricted stock		3		—			(3	)		—		—		—			—		—
Tax benefit on restricted stock and stock options		—		—			1,677			—		—		1,677			—		1,677
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	269	$	(32,171	)	$	496,759		$	522	$	531,106	$	996,485		$	2,726	$	999,211

									Accumulated
						Additional			Other					Total
	Common		Treasury			Paid-In			Comprehensive			Retained		Stockholders’			Noncontrolling		Total
	Stock		Stock			Capital			Income (Loss)			Earnings		Equity			Interest		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	270	$	(32,248	)	$	505,297		$	458		$	572,666	$	1,046,443		$	3,647	$	1,050,090
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders		—		—			—			—			62,570		62,570			706		63,276
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—			—			(14,929	)		—		(14,929	)		8		(14,921	)
Comprehensive income		—		—			—			—			—		47,641			—		48,355
Stock option and restricted stock compensation		—		—			9,497			—			—		9,497			—		9,497
Purchase of 136,967 shares of treasury stock		—		(9,198	)		—			—			—		(9,198	)		—		(9,198	)
Exercise of 122,354 employee stock options		1		—			4,732			—			—		4,733			—		4,733
Issuance of 379,766 shares of restricted stock		4		—			(4	)		—			—		—			—		—
Tax benefit on restricted stock and stock options		—		—			3,128			—			—		3,128			—		3,128
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	275	$	(41,446	)	$	522,650		$	(14,471	)	$	635,236	$	1,102,244		$	4,361	$	1,106,605

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2011

1. Basis of Presentation

     Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the holding company, Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (“AAWW”) and its consolidated subsidiaries. AAWW is the parent company of its principal operating subsidiary, Atlas Air, Inc. (“Atlas”), and of Polar Air Cargo LLC (“Old Polar”). AAWW is also the parent company of several subsidiaries related to our dry leasing services (collectively referred to as “Titan”). In addition, we are the primary beneficiary of Global Supply Systems Limited (“GSS”), a consolidated subsidiary. AAWW has a 51% equity interest and 75% voting interest in Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. (“Polar”). We record our share of Polar’s results under the equity method of accounting.

     The terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” mean AAWW and all entities included in its consolidated financial statements.

     We provide outsourced aircraft and aviation operating services throughout the world, serving Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America through: (i) contractual service arrangements, including contracts through which we provide aircraft to customers and value-added services, including crew, maintenance and insurance (“ACMI”), as well as contracts through which we provide crew, maintenance and insurance, with the customer providing the aircraft (“CMI”); (ii) military charter services (“AMC Charter”); (iii) seasonal, commercial and ad-hoc charter services (“Commercial Charter”); and (iv) dry leasing or sub-leasing of aircraft and engines (“Dry Leasing” or “Dry Lease”).

     The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes (the “Financial Statements”) have been prepared in accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) requirements for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and consequently, exclude certain disclosures normally included in audited consolidated financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes included in the AAWW Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which included additional disclosures and a summary of our significant accounting policies. In our opinion, the Financial Statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary to fairly state the financial position of AAWW and its consolidated subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and shareholders’ equity as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

     For interim accounting purposes, we recognize income taxes using an estimated annual effective tax rate.

     Our quarterly results are subject to seasonal and other fluctuations, and the operating results for any quarter are therefore not necessarily indicative of results that may be otherwise expected for the entire year.

     Except for per share data, all dollar amounts are in thousands unless otherwise noted.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board amended its guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The new guidance requires that all components of comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance is effective as of the beginning of 2012 and its adoption will not have any impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

3. DHL Investment and Polar

     Polar provides air cargo capacity to its customers, including DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. (“DHL”), through a blocked-space agreement that began on October 27, 2008. The aggregate carrying value of our Polar investment, included within Deposits and other assets, was $4.9 million at September 30, 2011 and $5.3 million at December 31, 2010.

     Polar currently operates six 747-400 freighter aircraft that are subleased from us. An additional two aircraft are operated by Atlas to support the Polar network and DHL through an alliance agreement whereby Atlas provides ACMI

5

services to Polar. We also provide incremental charter capacity to Polar on an as-needed basis. Atlas and Polar have entered into various agreements under which we provide Polar with crew, maintenance and insurance for the subleased aircraft. Collectively, these service agreements and the subleases are referred to as “Express Network ACMI”. We provide Polar with certain management and administrative services under a shared services agreement. In addition, Polar and Atlas provide each other with sales and ground support services under a general sales and services agreement. The following table summarizes our transactions with Polar:

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
Revenue and Expenses:	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
ACMI revenue from Polar	$	61,089	$	47,212	$	167,739	$	138,952
Other revenue from Polar	$	2,837	$	2,837	$	8,512	$	8,512
Ground handling and airport fees to Polar	$	280	$	519	$	840	$	1,645

Accounts receivable/payable as of:	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Receivables from Polar	$	3,116	$	8,009
Payables to Polar	$	4,329	$	2,945

4. Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

     We are exposed to concentration of credit risk by our customers. The following table summarizes our significant exposure to Polar and the U.S. Military Air Mobility Command (“AMC”). We have not experienced credit issues with either of these customers. No other customer accounted for 10.0% or more of our Total Operating Revenue.

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
Revenue as a % of Total Operating Revenue:	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
AMC		33.8	%		22.2	%		31.3	%		31.0	%
Polar		17.6	%		15.3	%		17.4	%		15.1	%

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
Revenue as a % of Total ACMI Revenue:	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Polar		37.4	%		32.6	%		35.7	%		36.2	%

Accounts receivable as a % of Total Accounts
receivable, net of allowance, as of:	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
AMC		24.9	%		10.5	%
Polar		3.7	%		10.2	%

5. Debt

     On September 30, 2011, we borrowed $120.3 million for the pending purchase of our first 747-8F aircraft under a twelve-year term loan with a final payment of $32.6 million due in September 2023 (the “September 2011 Term Loan”). The proceeds from the September 2011 Term Loan were pledged as collateral to the lender and classified as Restricted cash at September 30, 2011. The proceeds were subsequently released upon delivery of our first 747-8F aircraft on November 2, 2011. The September 2011 Term Loan, which is secured by a mortgage against aircraft tail number N853GT, contains customary covenants and events of default and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.16%, payable quarterly. In addition, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, the September 2011 Term Loan is cross-defaulted to our aircraft pre-delivery deposit (“PDP”) financing facility.

6. Financial Instruments

     Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). Inputs used to measure fair value are classified in the following hierarchy:

     Level 1     Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

6

Level 2     Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or inactive quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets;

Level 3     Unobservable inputs reflecting assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

     We endeavor to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value.

     We maintain Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term investments and Restricted cash, which include cash on hand, demand deposits, other cash investments that are highly liquid in nature and have original maturities of three months or less at acquisition, certificates of deposit, current portion of debt securities and money market funds. The carrying value for Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term investments, and Restricted cash is based on cost, which approximates fair value.

     Long-term investments consist of debt securities for which we have both the ability and the intent to hold until maturity. These investments are classified as held-to-maturity and reported at amortized cost. The fair value of our Long-term investments was based on a discounted cash flow analysis using the contractual cash flows of the investments and a discount rate derived from unadjusted quoted interest rates for debt securities of comparable risk. Such debt securities represent investments in Pass-Through Trust Certificates related to enchanced equipment trust certificates (“EETCs”) issued by Atlas in 1998, 1999 and 2000. Interest on debt securities and accretion of discounts using the effective interest method are included in Interest income.

     The fair value of our EETCs was estimated based on Level 3 inputs. We obtained Level 2 inputs of quoted market prices of our equipment notes and used them as a basis for valuing the EETCs.

     The fair value of our PDP financing facility and term loans was based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current borrowing rates for instruments with similar terms.

     The fair value of our interest rate derivatives was based on Level 2 inputs utilized in expected cash flow models. The incorporated market inputs include the implied forward London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) yield curve for the same period as the future interest swap settlements. These derivatives are designated as hedging instruments.

     The following table summarizes the carrying amount, estimated fair value and classification of our financial instruments as of:

	September 30, 2011
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	417,352	$	417,352	$	417,352	$	—	$	—
Short-term investments		7,913		7,913		—		—		7,913
Restricted cash		120,252		120,252		120,252		—		—
Long-term investments and accrued interest		133,200		162,313		—		—		162,313
	$	678,717	$	707,830	$	537,604	$	—	$	170,226
Liabilities
Interest rate derivatives	$	23,011	$	23,011	$	—	$	23,011	$	—
1998 EETCs		133,121		142,071		—		—		142,071
1999 EETCs		148,942		150,889		—		—		150,889
2000 EETCs		56,035		58,476		—		—		58,476
Term loans		185,895		185,895		—		—		185,895
	$	547,004	$	560,342	$	—	$	23,011	$	537,331

7

	December 31, 2010
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	588,852	$	588,852	$	588,852	$	—	$	—
Short-term investments		6,211		6,211		—		—		6,211
Long-term investments and accrued interest		127,094		157,787		—		—		157,787
	$	722,157	$	752,850	$	588,852	$	—	$	163,998
Liabilities
1998 EETCs	$	145,012	$	164,379	$	—	$	—	$	164,379
1999 EETCs		159,043		171,478		—		—		171,478
2000 EETCs		58,485		65,230		—		—		65,230
PDP financing facility		46,871		46,861		—		—		46,861
Term loans		77,822		79,198		—		—		79,198
	$	487,233	$	527,146	$	—	$	—	$	527,146

     The following table presents the carrying value, gross unrealized gains and fair value of our long-term investments by contractual maturity as of:

	September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
			Gross Unrealized						Gross Unrealized
	Carrying Value		Gains		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Gains		Fair Value
Debt securities
Due after five but within ten years	$	133,200	$	29,113	$	162,313	$	73,356	$	18,363	$	91,719
Due after ten years		—		—		—		53,738		12,330		66,068
Total	$	133,200	$	29,113	$	162,313	$	127,094	$	30,693	$	157,787

Interest Rate Derivatives

     We are exposed to changes in interest rates for projected issuances of debt related to the future financing of the Boeing 747-8F aircraft that we have on order. We use forward-starting interest rate swaps to effectively fix the interest rate for anticipated 747-8F financings in 2011. The use of forward-starting interest rate swaps effectively converts our floating-rate forecasted debt issuance to a fixed rate basis. When entering into forward-starting interest rate swaps, we become exposed to both credit risk and market risk. We are subject to counterparty credit risk when the value of the forward-starting interest rate swaps are a gain and the risk exists that the counterparty will fail to perform under the terms of the contract. We are subject to market risk with respect to changes in the underlying benchmark interest rate that impacts the fair value of the forward-starting interest rate swaps. We manage our counterparty credit risk by only entering into forward-starting interest rate swaps with major financial institutions with investment-grade credit ratings. We manage our market risk by matching the terms of each forward-starting interest rate swap with a specified expected debt issuance. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

     We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge. This process includes specific identification of the hedging instrument and the hedged transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged and how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness will be assessed. Both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, we assess whether the derivatives used in a projected transaction are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or the fair value of hedged items.

     In May 2011, we entered into two forward-starting interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $237.5 million to hedge the risk of changes in quarterly interest payments due to fluctuations in the forward 90-day LIBOR swap rate for anticipated fixed-rate debt issuances in 2011. We designated these forward-starting interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair value of the effective portion of the forward-starting interest rate swaps are recorded as a gain or loss in other comprehensive income (loss) until the underlying hedged item is recognized in net income. We classify both the net earnings and cash flow impact from these forward-starting interest rate swaps consistent with the underlying hedged item. In the event the debt is not issued and the forward-starting interest rate swaps are terminated, any gain or loss from the termination would be recorded in net income immediately. Hedging ineffectiveness and a net earnings impact would occur if the change in the value of the hedge did not offset the change in the value of the underlying hedged item.

8

     The forward-starting interest rate swaps outstanding as of September 30, 2011 relate to anticipated debt issuances in the fourth quarter of 2011. As of September 30, 2011, the fair value of these forward-starting interest rate swaps was $23.0 million, offset by cash collateral of $15.6 million, resulting in a net carrying value of $7.4 million included within Accrued liabilities.

     We recorded unrealized pre-tax and after-tax losses of $22.2 million and $14.1 million in Other comprehensive loss for changes in the fair value of our forward-starting interest rate swaps for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and $23.0 million and $14.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. There was no ineffectiveness associated with these hedges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

7. Accrued Liabilities

     Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Maintenance	$	75,359	$	57,552
Salaries, wages and benefits		41,252		33,542
Aircraft fuel		26,360		17,710
Other		53,157		41,088
Accrued liabilities	$	196,128	$	149,892

8. Segment Reporting

     We have the following reportable segments: ACMI, AMC Charter, Commercial Charter and Dry Leasing. We use an economic performance metric (“Direct Contribution”) that shows the profitability of each segment after allocation of direct ownership costs. Direct Contribution consists of Income before income taxes and excludes the following: special charges, nonrecurring items, gains on the disposal of aircraft, unallocated revenue and unallocated fixed costs. Direct ownership costs include crew costs, maintenance, fuel, ground operations, sales costs, aircraft rent, interest expense related to aircraft debt, interest income on debt securities and aircraft depreciation. Unallocated income and expenses include corporate overhead, non-aircraft depreciation, interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses, other revenue and other non-operating costs, including special items. Management uses Direct Contribution to measure segment profitability as it shows each segment’s contribution to unallocated fixed costs. Each segment has different operating and economic characteristics that are separately reviewed by our senior management.

     Management allocates the costs attributable to aircraft operation and ownership among the various segments based on the aircraft type and activity levels in each segment. Depreciation and amortization expense, aircraft rent, maintenance expense, and other aircraft related expenses are allocated to segments based upon aircraft utilization because individual aircraft are utilized across segments interchangeably. In addition, certain ownership costs are directly apportioned to the ACMI segment. Other allocation methods are standard activity-based methods that are commonly used in the industry.

     The ACMI segment provides aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance services to customers. Also included in the ACMI segment are the results of operations for CMI, which we began providing in the second quarter of 2010. CMI provides crew, maintenance and insurance services, with the customer providing the aircraft. Under both services, the customers utilize an insured and maintained aircraft with crew in exchange for a guaranteed monthly level of operation at a predetermined rate for a defined period of time. The customer bears the commercial revenue risk and the obligation for other direct operating costs, including fuel. The Direct Contribution from Express Network ACMI flying is reflected as ACMI.

     The AMC Charter segment provides full-planeload charter flights to the U.S. Military. In addition to cargo flights, the AMC Charter segment includes passenger flights, which we began providing in the second quarter of 2011. We also earn commissions on subcontracting certain flying of oversized cargo, or in connection with flying cargo into areas of military conflict where we cannot perform these services on our own. Revenue from the AMC Charter business is typically derived from one-year contracts on a cost-plus basis with the AMC. Our current AMC contract runs from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Although we are responsible for the direct operating costs of the aircraft, the price paid for fuel consumed during AMC flights is fixed by the U.S. Military. We receive reimbursement from the AMC each month if the price of fuel paid by us to vendors for AMC missions exceeds the fixed price. Alternatively, if the price of fuel paid by us is less than the fixed price, we pay the difference to the AMC each month.

9

     The Commercial Charter segment provides aircraft charters to freight forwarders, airlines and other air cargo customers. Charters are often paid in advance and we typically bear the direct operating costs.

     The Dry Leasing segment provides for the leasing of aircraft and engines to customers.

     Other represents revenue for services that are not allocated to any segment, including administrative and management support services and flight simulator training.

     The following table sets forth Operating Revenue and Direct Contribution for our reportable business segments reconciled to Operating Income and Income before Income Taxes:

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Operating Revenue:
ACMI	$	163,406		$	144,685		$	469,883		$	383,917
AMC Charter		122,581			72,506			316,230			303,314
Commercial Charter		70,353			104,044			206,956			275,525
Dry Leasing		3,065			2,157			6,742			5,384
Other		3,471			3,275			10,246			9,940
Total Operating Revenue	$	362,876		$	326,667		$	1,010,057		$	978,080
Direct Contribution:
ACMI	$	38,924		$	34,809		$	97,990		$	87,097
AMC Charter		21,709			18,819			55,651			95,096
Commercial Charter		7,142			26,205			24,772			78,372
Dry Leasing		1,387			1,565			3,400			3,692
Total Direct Contribution for Reportable Segments		69,162			81,398			181,813			264,257
Add back (subtract):
Unallocated income and expenses		(23,519	)		(26,334	)		(80,406	)		(96,986	)
Gain on disposal of aircraft		163			161			464			3,541
Income before Income Taxes		45,806			55,225			101,871			170,812
Add back (subtract):
Interest income		(5,004	)		(5,490	)		(15,200	)		(14,620	)
Interest expense		9,801			10,176			30,009			30,396
Capitalized interest		(6,982	)		(4,401	)		(18,584	)		(11,007	)
Other (income) expense, net		(121	)		(614	)		(485	)		(9,236	)
Operating Income	$	43,500		$	54,896		$	97,611		$	166,345

9. Commitments and Contingencies

     In 2006, we entered into an agreement with The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) providing for our purchase of 12 747-8F aircraft (the “Boeing 747-8F Agreement”). The Boeing 747-8F Agreement provided for deliveries of the aircraft to begin in 2010, with all 12 deliveries originally contractually scheduled for delivery by the end of 2011. In addition, the Boeing 747-8F Agreement provides us with rights to purchase up to an additional 14 747-8F aircraft, of which one is being held under option.

     Since the initial date of the Boeing 747-8F Agreement, Boeing has announced several delays in the delivery schedule of the 12 747-8F aircraft. In September 2011, after lengthy delays and performance considerations, we exercised our termination rights in connection with three early build 747-8F aircraft. We now have nine 747-8F aircraft on order.

     As a result of the announced delays, Boeing proposed a revised delivery and payment schedule in September 2011. Estimated expenditures under the proposed schedule as of September 30, 2011, including estimated amounts for contractual price escalations and advance payments, are $546.1 million for the remainder of 2011, $454.9 million in 2012 and $211.8 million in 2013. Although we do not agree with the payment schedule that Boeing has proposed, we made an advance payment of $210.4 million in October 2011, while reserving all rights with respect to such payment. The proposed delivery schedule provides that our first three 747-8F aircraft are to be delivered in the fourth quarter of 2011, one of which was

10

delivered on November 2, 2011. We accepted this delivery, subject to a reservation of rights regarding certain matters under the purchase agreement.

10. Labor and Legal Proceedings

Labor

     The pilots, flight engineers and dispatchers of Atlas and Polar are represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”). These employees represented approximately 54.1% of our workforce as of September 30, 2011. We are subject to risks of work interruption or stoppage as permitted by the Railway Labor Act of 1926 (the “Railway Labor Act”) and may incur additional administrative expenses associated with union representation of our employees.

     The collective bargaining agreement for Atlas pilots and flight engineers became amendable in 2006. The collective bargaining agreement for Polar pilots and flight engineers became amendable in 2007. While both units have filed Railway Labor Act “Section 6” notices to begin negotiations for amended agreements, those negotiations were placed on hold in favor of completing the merger of the two crew forces. In 2004, we initiated steps to merge the represented crewmember bargaining units of Atlas and Polar. The respective collective bargaining agreements provide for a seniority integration process and the negotiation of a single collective bargaining agreement (“SCBA”). This seniority list integration process was completed in 2006.

     We received the integrated seniority lists and the parties have concluded negotiations for a five-year SCBA. In accordance with both the Atlas and Polar contracts, an arbitrator was assigned to resolve the few open contract issues that remained after we concluded negotiations. Those issues were submitted to the arbitrator in December 2010 for final and binding interest arbitration. The arbitrator issued a final ruling resulting in a new SCBA, with an effective date of September 8, 2011, which will not become amendable until September 2016. Under the terms of the new SCBA, the merger of the pilots and flight engineers of Atlas and Polar results in a single workforce that will serve both Atlas and Polar.

     In 2009, the IBT was certified as the collective bargaining representative of the dispatchers employed by Atlas and Polar. Formal negotiations began in 2009 between the IBT and us regarding the first collective bargaining agreement for these dispatchers. Other than the crewmembers and dispatchers, there are no other Atlas or Polar employees represented by a union.

Legal Proceedings

Department of Justice Investigation and Related Litigation

     In 2010, Old Polar entered into a plea agreement with the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) relating to the previously disclosed DOJ investigation concerning alleged manipulation by cargo carriers of fuel surcharges and other rate components for air cargo services (the “DOJ Investigation”). Under the terms of the agreement, approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Old Polar will pay a fine of $17.4 million, payable in five annual installments, the first of which was made in November 2010. The fine relates to an alleged agreement by Old Polar with respect to fuel surcharges on cargo shipped from the United States to Australia during the time period from January 2000 through April 2003.

     As a result of the DOJ Investigation, the Company and Old Polar have been named defendants, along with a number of other cargo carriers, in several class actions in the United States arising from allegations about the pricing practices of a number of air cargo carriers that have now been consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The consolidated complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants, including the Company and Old Polar, manipulated the market price for air cargo services sold domestically and abroad through the use of surcharges, in violation of United States, state, and European Union antitrust laws. The suit seeks treble damages and injunctive relief.

     In 2007, the Company and Old Polar commenced an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court against each of the plaintiffs in this class action litigation seeking to enjoin the plaintiffs from prosecuting claims against the Company and Old Polar that arose prior to 2004, the date on which the Company and Old Polar emerged from bankruptcy. In 2007, the plaintiffs consented to the injunctive relief requested and the bankruptcy court entered an order enjoining plaintiffs from prosecuting Company claims arising prior to 2004.

     The court in the antitrust class actions has heard and decided a number of procedural motions. Among those was the plaintiffs’ motion to join Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. as an additional defendant, which the court granted on April 13,

11

2011. The case is currently in the class certification discovery phase. There has been substantial pre-trial written discovery and document production, and a number of depositions have been taken. The plaintiffs’ motion for class certification was filed on October 28, 2011, and the Company intends to oppose the motion. We are unable to predict the court’s ruling on the motion or the ultimate outcome of the litigation.

     The Company, Old Polar and a number of other cargo carriers have also been named as defendants in civil class action suits in the provinces of British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec, Canada that are substantially similar to the class action suits in the United States. The plaintiffs in the British Columbia case have indicated they do not intend to pursue their lawsuit against the Company and Old Polar. We are unable to reasonably predict the outcome of the litigation in Ontario and Quebec.

     If the Company or Old Polar were to incur an unfavorable outcome in connection with one or more of the matters described above, such outcome is not expected to materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows.

Brazilian Customs Claim

     Old Polar was cited for two alleged customs violations in Sao Paulo, Brazil, relating to shipments of goods dating back to 1999 and 2000. Each claim asserts that goods listed on the flight manifest of two separate Old Polar scheduled service flights were not on board the aircraft upon arrival and therefore were improperly brought into Brazil. The two claims, which also seek unpaid customs duties, taxes and penalties from the date of the alleged infraction, are approximately $10.8 million and $5.9 million, respectively, plus interest based on September 30, 2011 exchange rates.

     In both cases, we believe that the amounts claimed are substantially overstated due to a calculation error when considering the type and amount of goods allegedly missing, among other things. Furthermore, we may seek appropriate indemnity from the shipper in each claim as necessary. In the pending claim for $10.8 million, we received an administrative decision dismissing the claim in its entirety, which remains subject to a mandatory appeal by the Brazil customs authorities. As required to defend such claims, we have made deposits pending resolution of these matters. The balances were $6.6 million at September 30, 2011 and $6.8 million at December 31, 2010, and are included in Deposits and other assets.

     We are currently defending these and other Brazilian customs claims and the ultimate disposition of these claims, either individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Trademark Matters

     Since 2005, we have been involved in ongoing litigation in Europe against Atlas Transport, an unrelated and unaffiliated entity, over the use of the name “Atlas”. Following application by us to register the mark “ATLAS AIR” in the European Union (“EU”), opposition from Atlas Transport and follow-up filings by us, the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (“OHIM”), which handles trademark matters in the EU, declared Atlas Transport’s own trademark “ATLAS” partially invalid because of the prior existence of our Benelux trademark registration. In 2008, OHIM’s First Board of Appeal upheld the lower panel’s decision, and Atlas Transport appealed that decision to the EU General Court (formally the Court of First Instance), which upheld the court’s decision on May 18, 2011. Atlas Transport has recently appealed that ruling to the European Court of Justice.

     In 2007, Atlas Transport also filed a lawsuit in the Netherlands challenging the validity of our Benelux trademark. In 2009, following completion of its proceedings, the court issued a judgment in favor of us. Atlas Transport has appealed that decision to the Dutch Court of Appeal, but the judgment took effect immediately upon entry.

     In 2009, Atlas Transport instituted a trademark infringement lawsuit against us in the regional court in Hamburg, Germany. The amended complaint alleges that Atlas Air has been unlawfully using Atlas Transport’s trademark in Germany without permission and should be required to render information on the scope of use and pay compensation. In a supplementary motion, Atlas Transport asserts a cease and desist claim against Atlas Air, to be considered if the court denies the claim for compensation. On May 31, 2011, the court dismissed the case and Atlas Transport filed an appeal, which remains pending.

     We believe that the ultimate disposition of these claims, either individually or in the aggregate, will not materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

12

Other

     We have certain other contingencies incident to the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the ultimate disposition of such other contingencies is not expected to materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

11. Earnings Per Share

     Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) represents net income attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period. Diluted EPS represents net income attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period while also giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the period. There were no anti-dilutive restricted shares and options that were out of the money and excluded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

     The calculations of basic and diluted EPS were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
Numerator:
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	28,206	$	33,804	$	62,570	$	100,250
Denominator:
Basic EPS weighted average shares outstanding		26,291		25,855		26,201		25,736
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock		161		288		215		302
Diluted EPS weighted average shares outstanding		26,452		26,143		26,416		26,038
EPS:
Basic	$	1.07	$	1.31	$	2.39	$	3.90
Diluted	$	1.07	$	1.29	$	2.37	$	3.85

     Diluted shares reflect the potential dilution that could occur from stock options and restricted shares using the treasury stock method. The calculation does not include restricted shares and units in which performance or market conditions were not satisfied of 0.3 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, and 0.2 million and 0.3 million for the three and nine months September 30, 2010, respectively.

12. Comprehensive Income

     Comprehensive income includes changes in the fair value of certain financial derivative instruments, which qualify for hedge accounting, and other items. The differences between net income attributable to common stockholders and comprehensive income were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	28,206		$	33,804		$	62,570		$	100,250
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives		(22,203	)		—			(23,011	)		—
Other		(516	)		97			(439	)		68
Income taxes related to items of Other comprehensive income (loss)		8,238			(26	)		8,521			(17	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(14,481	)		71			(14,929	)		51
Comprehensive income	$	13,725		$	33,875		$	47,641		$	100,301

13. Income Taxes

     Our effective income tax rates were 38.1% and 38.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and were 37.9% and 41.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The changes in the effective rates from 2010 to 2011 were primarily due to non-deductible litigation settlements in 2010. The effective rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate due to the income tax impact of global operations, U.S. state income taxes, the non-deductibility of certain expenses for tax purposes, and the relationship of these items to our projected operating results for the year.

13

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited Financial Statements appearing in this report and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Background

Certain Terms — Glossary

     The following represents terms and statistics specific to the airline and cargo industries. They are used by management to evaluate and measure operations, results, productivity and efficiency.

Block Hour	The time interval between when an aircraft departs the terminal until it arrives at the destination terminal.
C Check	High-level or “heavy” airframe maintenance checks, which are more intensive in scope than line maintenance, are generally performed between 18 and 24 months depending on aircraft type.
D Check	High-level or “heavy” airframe maintenance checks, which are the most extensive in scope and are generally performed every six to nine years depending on aircraft type.
Revenue Per Block Hour	An amount calculated by dividing operating revenues by Block Hours.
Yield	The average amount a customer pays to fly one tonne of cargo one mile.

Business Overview

     We are a leading global provider of outsourced aircraft and aviation operating services. As such, we manage and operate the world’s largest fleet of Boeing 747 freighters. We provide unique value to our customers by giving them access to highly reliable new production freighters that deliver the lowest unit cost in the marketplace combined with outsourced aircraft operating services that we believe lead the industry in terms of quality and global scale. Our customers include airlines, express delivery providers, freight forwarders, the U.S. military and charter brokers. We provide global services with operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America.

     Our primary service offerings encompass the following:

• ACMI, whereby we provide outsourced aircraft operating solutions, including the provision of an aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance, while customers assume fuel, demand and Yield risk. Included within ACMI is the provision of Express Network ACMI, whereby we provide 747-400 aircraft to Polar that service the requirements of DHL’s global express operations and meet the needs of other Polar customers;

• CMI, which is also part of our ACMI business segment, whereby we provide cargo and passenger outsourced aircraft operating solutions including the provision of crew, maintenance and insurance, while customers provide the aircraft and assume fuel, demand and Yield risk;

• Dry Leasing, whereby we provide aircraft and/or engine leasing solutions to third parties;

• AMC Charter services, whereby we provide cargo and passenger charter services for the AMC. The AMC pays a fixed charter fee that includes fuel, insurance, landing fees, overfly and all other operational fees and costs; and

• Commercial Charter, whereby we provide cargo and passenger aircraft charters to customers, including brokers, freight forwarders, direct shippers and airlines. The customer pays a fixed charter fee that includes fuel, insurance, landing fees, overfly and all other operational fees and costs.

14

     We look to achieve our growth plans to enhance stakeholder value through:

• Delivering superior service quality to our valued customers;

• Actively managing our fleet with a focus on leading-edge aircraft;

• Diversifying our service offerings;

• Focusing on securing long-term customer contracts with attractive terms;

• Driving significant ongoing efficiencies and productivity improvements;

• Selectively pursuing and evaluating future acquisitions and alliances; and

• Building our brand and increasing our market share.

     See “Business Overview” and “Business Strategy” in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

Business Developments

     Our ACMI results for the first three quarters of 2011, compared to the same period in 2010, were positively impacted by the following events that occurred during 2010 and 2011:

• In May 2010, we began to fly on a CMI basis for SonAir — Serviço Aéreo, S.A. (“SonAir”), an agent of the United States-Africa Energy Association. SonAir is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Sonangol Group, the multinational energy company of Angola. This passenger service, known as the “Houston Express”, operates three weekly nonstop roundtrip flights between Houston, Texas and Luanda, Angola on two customized 747-400 passenger aircraft provided by SonAir.

• In July 2010, we began to fly CMI service for Boeing to operate their Dreamlifter fleet of four modified 747-400 aircraft. These aircraft transport major sub-assemblies for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft from suppliers around the world to Boeing production facilities in the United States.

• In October 2010, we began ACMI flying for a second 747-400 aircraft for Panalpina Air & Ocean Ltd (“Panalpina”). This aircraft is based at Panalpina’s European hub in Luxembourg.

• In March 2011, we began ACMI flying two additional 747-400 aircraft for Polar and DHL to operate in Express Network ACMI. This increases the size of our Express Network ACMI flying for DHL from six to eight aircraft.

     In September 2011, we signed an ACMI agreement with Panalpina for two of our new 747-8F aircraft. These aircraft will replace the two 747-400 aircraft currently in use by Panalpina when they are delivered during 2012.

     In September 2011, we signed a CMI agreement with DHL to operate five 767 freighters owned by DHL in its North American network. This service is expected to begin with one aircraft in the first quarter of 2012 and to expand to five aircraft by the third quarter of 2012.

     On November 2, 2011, we took delivery of the first of three 747-8F aircraft that we placed with British Airways Plc under an ACMI agreement through GSS. The remaining two aircraft are scheduled to enter service during the fourth quarter of 2011. The 747-8F aircraft are replacing 747-400 aircraft, which will be redeployed and placed into service with other customers.

     AMC demand was exceptionally strong during the first five months of 2010, primarily due to the surge in U.S. Military activity in Afghanistan. During that period, we flew a significant number of missions in support of the U.S. Military’s deployment of mine resistant, ambush-protected, all-terrain vehicles (“M-ATV”) from the U.S. to Afghanistan and averaged approximately 1,800 Block Hours a month. We also earned a premium rate for utilizing additional 747-400 aircraft to meet most of this demand. In the third quarter of 2011, we have had stronger demand for AMC Charters, averaging just under 1,700 Block Hours a month compared to the third quarter of 2010, when we averaged just over 1,200 Block Hours per month.

15

     In May 2011, we began flying passenger charters for the U.S. Military. These charters are similar to our existing AMC Charters in that the AMC pays a fixed charter fee that includes fuel, insurance, landing fees, overfly and all other operational fees and costs. This service utilizes the 747-400 passenger aircraft we leased in January 2011 under a one-year lease. During June and August 2011, we purchased two 767-300ER passenger aircraft for this operation. During August and September 2011, we purchased two 747-400 passenger aircraft, one of which will replace the leased 747-400 passenger aircraft when the lease expires. These aircraft will provide capacity to meet expected growth in this operation.

     Commercial Charter Yields and volumes have been impacted by the return of aircraft capacity in the Asian markets during the first three quarters of 2011. As a result, the Commercial Charter Yields were not able to fully absorb the rise in aviation fuel prices that occurred during 2011. However, we were able to mitigate most of the impact from this increase in the South American markets through Yields and fuel surcharges. Our Commercial Charter Block Hours were impacted by our redeployment of 747-400 aircraft to support increased ACMI flying in 2011. In addition, softer demand out of Asia resulted in fewer opportunities to utilize the return legs of one-way AMC missions for Commercial Charters during the third quarter of 2011.

     In January and February 2011, we leased two 747-400 Boeing converted freighters for an average of approximately three and a half years, which were placed in service in April and May of 2011. These two aircraft provide us with increased capacity in both AMC Charter and Commercial Charter to replace aircraft that were reallocated to ACMI during 2011.

     In April and June 2011, Titan purchased two Boeing 737-800 passenger aircraft. Both aircraft are dry leased to customers on a long-term basis.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Operating Statistics

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and other financial information appearing and referred to elsewhere in this report.

     The table below sets forth selected Operating Statistics for the three months ended September 30:

					Increase /			Percent
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			Change
Block Hours
ACMI		26,426		24,251		2,175			9.0	%
AMC Charter		5,033		3,729		1,304			35.0	%
Commercial Charter		3,358		5,090		(1,732	)		(34.0	)%
Other		366		207		159			76.8	%
Total Block Hours		35,183		33,277		1,906			5.7	%
Revenue Per Block Hour
ACMI	$	6,184	$	5,966	$	218			3.7	%
AMC Charter		24,355		19,444		4,911			25.3	%
Commercial Charter		20,951		20,441		510			2.5	%
Fuel
AMC
Average fuel cost per gallon	$	3.97	$	2.68	$	1.29			48.1	%
Fuel gallons consumed (000s)		16,108		12,280		3,828			31.2	%
Commercial Charter
Average fuel cost per gallon	$	3.20	$	2.32	$	0.88			37.9	%
Fuel gallons consumed (000s)		12,414		17,786		(5,372	)		(30.2	)%

16

					Increase /			Percent
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			Change
Fleet (average during the period)
ACMI*		21.6		19.0		2.6			13.7	%
AMC Charter		6.3		4.3		2.0			46.5	%
Commercial Charter		3.5		5.9		(2.4	)		(40.7	)%
Dry Leasing		3.0		1.0		2.0			200.0	%
Operating Aircraft		34.4		30.2		4.2			13.9	%
Out-of-service**		0.5		—		0.5		NM

*	ACMI average fleet excludes spare aircraft provided by CMI customers.
**	All of our out-of-service aircraft are completely unencumbered. Permanently parked aircraft, all of which are also completely unencumbered, are not included in the operating statistics above.

Operating Revenue

     The following table compares our Operating Revenue for the three months ended September 30 (in thousands):

					Increase /			Percent
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			Change
Operating Revenue
ACMI	$	163,406	$	144,685	$	18,721			12.9	%
AMC Charter		122,581		72,506		50,075			69.1	%
Commercial Charter		70,353		104,044		(33,691	)		(32.4	)%
Dry Leasing		3,065		2,157		908			42.1	%
Other		3,471		3,275		196			6.0	%
Total Operating Revenue	$	362,876	$	326,667	$	36,209			11.1	%

     ACMI revenue increased $18.7 million, or 12.9%, due to increases in Block Hours and Revenue per Block Hour. ACMI Block Hours were 26,426 in the third quarter of 2011, compared to 24,251 in 2010, representing an increase of 2,175 Block Hours, or 9.0%. The increase in Block Hours was primarily driven by flying a second aircraft for Panalpina beginning in October 2010 and two incremental aircraft for DHL beginning in March 2011. In addition, we started CMI Dreamlifter flights for Boeing in July 2010. In the third quarter of 2011, there was an average of 21.5 747-400 aircraft and 0.1 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared to an average of 19.0 747-400 aircraft and no 747-200 aircraft in 2010. Revenue per Block Hour was $6,184 for the third quarter of 2011, compared to $5,966 for the third quarter of 2010, an increase of $218 per Block Hour, or 3.7%. The increase in Revenue per Block Hour primarily reflects contractual rate increases in existing customer contracts and higher rates on new contracts.

     AMC Charter revenue increased $50.1 million, or 69.1%, due to increases in Block Hours and Revenue per Block Hour. AMC Charter Block Hours were 5,033 in the third quarter of 2011 compared to 3,729 in 2010, an increase of 1,304 Block Hours, or 35.0%. The increase in AMC Block Hours was primarily due to an increase in AMC cargo demand to support U.S. Military activity and the addition of 467 Block Hours for AMC passenger missions, which we began flying in May 2011. In the third quarter of 2011, there was an average of 2.8 747-400 aircraft and 3.5 747-200 aircraft supporting AMC Charter compared to an average of 0.6 747-400 aircraft and 3.7 747-200 aircraft in 2010. AMC Charter Revenue per Block Hour increased from $19,444 for the third quarter of 2010 to $24,355 in 2011, an increase of $4,911 per Block Hour, or 25.3%, primarily due to an increase in the average “pegged” fuel price and higher rates per Block Hour on 747-400 aircraft utilized during the third quarter of 2011. For the third quarter of 2011, the AMC average “pegged” fuel price was $3.97 per gallon compared to an average “pegged” fuel price of $2.68 for the third quarter of 2010.

     Commercial Charter revenue decreased $33.7 million, or 32.4%, due to a decrease in Block Hours partially offset by an increase in Revenue per Block Hour. Commercial Charter Block Hours were 3,358 in the third quarter of 2011, compared to 5,090 in 2010, representing a decrease of 1,732 Block Hours, or 34.0%. The decrease in Block Hours was primarily due to our redeployment of 747-400 aircraft to support increased ACMI flying in 2011. In addition, softer demand out of Asia resulted in a reduction of the utilization of the return legs of AMC one-way missions for Commercial Charters compared to the third quarter of 2010. There was an average of 2.1 747-400 aircraft and 1.4 747-200 aircraft supporting Commercial Charter in the third quarter of 2011, compared to an average of 3.7 747-400 aircraft and 2.2 747-200 aircraft in

17

2010. Revenue per Block Hour was $20,951 in the third quarter of 2011, compared to $20,441 in 2010, an increase of $510 per Block Hour, or 2.5%. The increase in Revenue per Block Hour was primarily driven by the recovery of increased aircraft fuel costs in the South American markets during the third quarter of 2011, partially offset by lower Yields on Commercial Charters out of Asia.

Operating Expenses

     The following table compares our Operating Expenses for the three months ended September 30 (in thousands):

							Increase /			Percent
	2011			2010			(Decrease)			Change
Operating Expenses
Aircraft fuel	$	103,663		$	74,221		$	29,442			39.7	%
Salaries, wages and benefits		61,911			56,244			5,667			10.1	%
Maintenance, materials and repairs		47,770			44,747			3,023			6.8	%
Aircraft rent		41,055			38,764			2,291			5.9	%
Landing fees and other rent		12,813			11,487			1,326			11.5	%
Travel		11,284			8,941			2,343			26.2	%
Depreciation and amortization		9,964			8,403			1,561			18.6	%
Ground handling and airport fees		6,036			6,423			(387	)		(6.0	)%
Gain on disposal of aircraft		(163	)		(161	)		2			(1.2	)%
Other		25,043			22,702			2,341			10.3	%
Total Operating Expenses	$	319,376		$	271,771

     Aircraft fuel increased $29.4 million, or 39.7%, as a result of approximately $33.3 million in fuel price increases partially offset by $3.8 million in decreased consumption. The average fuel price per gallon for the AMC Charter business was $3.97 in the third quarter of 2011, compared to $2.68 in 2010, an increase of 48.1%. AMC fuel consumption increased by 3.8 million gallons, or 31.2%, commensurate with the increase in Block Hours operated. The average fuel price per gallon for the Commercial Charter business was $3.20 for the third quarter of 2011, compared to $2.32 in 2010, an increase of 37.9%. Fuel consumption for this business decreased by 5.4 million gallons, or 30.2%, commensurate with the decrease in Block Hours operated. We do not incur fuel expense in our ACMI business as the cost of fuel is borne by the customer.

     Salaries, wages and benefits increased $5.7 million, or 10.1%, primarily driven by higher Block Hours.

     Maintenance, materials and repairs increased $3.0 million, or 6.8%, due to approximately $2.7 million of increased line and other non-heavy maintenance expense and approximately $3.1 million of increased heavy airframe check expense. Partially offsetting these increases was approximately $2.8 million of reductions in engine overhaul expense. Heavy maintenance events and engine overhauls for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were:

Events	2011		2010		Increase / (Decrease)
747-200 C Checks		2		—		2
747-400 C Checks		2		1		1
747-400 D Checks		1		2		(1	)
CF6-50 engine overhauls		—		2		(2	)
CF6-80 engine overhauls		4		5		(1	)

     Aircraft rent increased $2.3 million, or 5.9%, primarily due to the leasing of additional aircraft and spare engines in 2011.

     Landing fees and other rent increased $1.3 million, or 11.5%, primarily due to flying to more costly locations in 2011 and additional equipment rental.

     Travel increased $2.3 million, or 26.2%, primarily due to the increased cost of international crew travel related to higher airfares and increased flying. Ground staff travel also increased as a result of on-boarding new aircraft and maintenance activities.

18

     Depreciation and amortization increased $1.6 million, or 18.6%, due to additional aircraft and spare parts in 2011.

     Other operating expenses increased $2.3 million, or 10.3%, primarily due to commissions related to increased AMC Charter Revenue, and contract services for flight attendants and passenger catering.

Non-operating Expenses / (Income)

     The following table compares our Non-operating Expenses / (Income) for the three months ended September 30 (in thousands):

							Increase /
	2011			2010			(Decrease)			Percent Change
Non-operating Expenses / (Income)
Interest income	$	(5,004	)	$	(5,490	)	$	(486	)		(8.9	)%
Interest expense		9,801			10,176			(375	)		(3.7	)%
Capitalized interest		(6,982	)		(4,401	)		2,581			58.6	%
Other (income) expense, net		(121	)		(614	)		(493	)		(80.3	)%

     Capitalized interest increased $2.6 million, or 58.6%, primarily due to higher interest rates on PDP balances outstanding during the period.

     Income taxes. Our effective income tax rates were 38.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 38.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Our effective rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to the income tax impact of global operations, U.S. state income taxes, the non-deductibility of certain expenses for tax purposes, and the relationship of these items to our projected operating results for the year.

Segments

     The following table compares the Direct Contribution for our reportable segments (see Note 8 to our Financial Statements for the reconciliation to Operating income) for the three months ended September 30 (in thousands):

					Increase /
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			Percent Change
Direct Contribution:
ACMI	$	38,924	$	34,809	$	4,115			11.8	%
AMC Charter		21,709		18,819		2,890			15.4	%
Commercial Charter		7,142		26,205		(19,063	)		(72.7	)%
Dry Leasing		1,387		1,565		(178	)		(11.4	)%
Total Direct Contribution	$	69,162	$	81,398	$	(12,236	)		(15.0	)%
Unallocated income and expenses	$	23,519	$	26,334	$	(2,815	)		(10.7	)%

ACMI Segment

     Direct Contribution related to the ACMI segment increased $4.1 million, or 11.8%, primarily due to increases in Block Hours and Yields, partially offset by an increase in volume-driven operating expenses. During the third quarter of 2011, there was an average of 21.5 747-400 aircraft and 0.1 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared to an average of 19.0 747-400 aircraft and no 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI in 2010. The increase in Block Hours was driven by flying a second aircraft for Panalpina beginning in October 2010 and two incremental aircraft for DHL beginning in March 2011. In addition, we started CMI Dreamlifter flights for Boeing in July 2010. The increase in ACMI Yields primarily reflects contractual rate increases in existing contracts and higher rates on new customer contracts. ACMI Direct Contribution was also impacted by increased aircraft ownership costs, crew expenses and line maintenance driven by the increased flying.

AMC Charter Segment

     Direct Contribution related to the AMC Charter segment increased $2.9 million, or 15.4%, primarily due to increases in Block Hours and Yields from premiums earned on flying more 747-400s during the third quarter of 2011, partially offset by an increase in volume-driven operating expenses and an increase in heavy maintenance expense. During the third quarter of 2011, there was an average of 2.8 747-400 aircraft and 3.5 747-200 aircraft supporting AMC Charter compared to an average of 0.6 747-400 aircraft and 3.7 747-200 aircraft supporting AMC Charter in 2010.

19

Commercial Charter Segment

     Direct Contribution related to the Commercial Charter segment decreased $19.1 million, or 72.7%, primarily due to a decrease in Block Hours and lower Commercial Charter Yields that were negatively impacted by softer demand during the third quarter of 2011. In addition, Commercial Charter Direct Contribution was impacted by our redeployment of 747-400 aircraft to support increased ACMI flying in 2011 and a reduction of the utilization of the return legs of AMC one-way missions for Commercial Charters compared to the third quarter of 2010. Partially offsetting the decrease in revenue was a decrease in volume-driven operating costs due to the reduction in Commercial Charter Block Hours flown. Direct Contribution was also impacted by lower fuel consumption, which was partially offset by fuel price increases. During the third quarter of 2011, there was an average of 2.1 747-400 aircraft and 1.4 747-200 aircraft supporting Commercial Charter compared to an average of 3.7 747-400 aircraft and 2.2 747-200 aircraft supporting Commercial Charter in 2010.

Dry Leasing Segment

     Direct Contribution related to the Dry Leasing segment was relatively unchanged.

Unallocated income and expenses

     Unallocated income and expenses decreased $2.8 million, or 10.7%, primarily due to $2.6 million of increased capitalized interest on our PDPs in 2011.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Operating Statistics

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and notes thereto and other financial information appearing and referred to elsewhere in this report.

     The table below sets forth selected Operating Statistics for the nine months ended September 30:

					Increase /			Percent
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			Change
Block Hours
ACMI		76,313		65,405		10,908			16.7	%
AMC Charter		14,087		14,323		(236	)		(1.6	)%
Commercial Charter		9,736		13,032		(3,296	)		(25.3	)%
Other		797		569		228			40.1	%
Total Block Hours		100,933		93,329		7,604			8.1	%
Revenue Per Block Hour
ACMI	$	6,157	$	5,870	$	287			4.9	%
AMC Charter		22,448		21,177		1,271			6.0	%
Commercial Charter		21,257		21,142		115			0.5	%
Fuel
AMC
Average fuel cost per gallon	$	3.56	$	2.68	$	0.88			32.8	%
Fuel gallons consumed (000s)		45,571		44,030		1,541			3.5	%
Commercial Charter
Average fuel cost per gallon	$	3.25	$	2.32	$	0.93			40.1	%
Fuel gallons consumed (000s)		35,663		45,060		(9,397	)		(20.9	)%

20

					Increase /			Percent
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			Change
Fleet (average during the period)
ACMI*		21.6		17.5		4.1			23.4	%
AMC Charter		5.7		5.9		(0.2	)		(3.4	)%
Commercial Charter		3.4		4.9		(1.5	)		(30.6	)%
Dry Leasing		2.0		0.7		1.3			185.7	%
Operating Aircraft		32.7		29.0		3.7			12.8	%
Out-of-service**		0.5		0.2		0.3			150.0	%

*	ACMI average fleet excludes spare aircraft provided by CMI customers.
**	All of our out-of-service aircraft are completely unencumbered. Permanently parked aircraft, all of which are also completely unencumbered, are not included in the operating statistics above.

Operating Revenue

     The following table compares our Operating Revenue for the nine months ended September 30 (in thousands):

					Increase /			Percent
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			Change
Operating Revenue
ACMI	$	469,883	$	383,917	$	85,966			22.4	%
AMC Charter		316,230		303,314		12,916			4.3	%
Commercial Charter		206,956		275,525		(68,569	)		(24.9	)%
Dry Leasing		6,742		5,384		1,358			25.2	%
Other		10,246		9,940		306			3.1	%
Total Operating Revenue	$	1,010,057	$	978,080	$	31,977			3.3	%

     ACMI revenue increased $86.0 million, or 22.4%, due to increases in Block Hours and Revenue per Block Hour. ACMI Block Hours were 76,313 in the first nine months of 2011, compared to 65,405 in 2010, an increase of 10,908 Block Hours, or 16.7%. The increase in Block Hours was primarily driven by flying a second aircraft for Panalpina beginning in October 2010 and two incremental aircraft for DHL beginning in March 2011. In addition, we started CMI passenger flights for SonAir in May 2010 and CMI Dreamlifter flights for Boeing in July 2010. In the first nine months of 2011, there was an average of 21.4 747-400 aircraft and 0.2 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared to an average of 17.5 747-400 aircraft and no 747-200 aircraft for the comparable period in 2010. Revenue per Block Hour was $6,157 for the first nine months of 2011, compared to $5,870 in 2010, an increase of $287 per Block Hour, or 4.9%. The increase in Revenue per Block Hour primarily reflects contractual rate increases in existing customer contracts and higher rates on new customer contracts.

     AMC Charter revenue increased $12.9 million, or 4.3%, primarily due to an increase in Revenue per Block Hour. AMC Charter Revenue per Block Hour increased from $21,177 for the first nine months of 2010 to $22,448 in 2011, an increase of $1,271 per Block Hour, or 6.0%, primarily due to an increase in the “pegged” fuel price in 2011. For the first nine months of 2011, the AMC average “pegged” fuel price was $3.56 per gallon compared to an average “pegged” fuel price of $2.68 in 2010. Partially offsetting this increase was a decrease in the premiums earned on M-ATV missions flown on our 747-400 aircraft in 2010. AMC Charter Block Hours were 14,087 in the first nine months of 2011 compared to 14,323 in 2010, a decrease of 236 Block Hours, or 1.6%. AMC demand was exceptionally strong through the first five months of 2010 primarily due to a surge in AMC demand to support U.S. Military activity in Afghanistan. During that period, we flew a significant number of missions to support the U.S. Military’s deployment of M-ATVs from the U.S. to Afghanistan. Partially offsetting the overall decline in Block Hours for the first nine months of 2011 was an increase in AMC cargo demand for the third quarter of 2011, as well as the addition of 644 Block Hours for AMC passenger missions, which we began flying in May 2011. In the first nine months of 2011, there was an average of 1.8 747-400 aircraft and 3.9 747-200 aircraft supporting AMC Charter compared to an average of 1.9 747-400 aircraft and 4.0 747-200 aircraft in 2010.

     Commercial Charter revenue decreased $68.6 million, or 24.9%, due to a decrease in Block Hours. Commercial Charter Block Hours were 9,736 in the first nine months of 2011, compared to 13,032 in 2010, representing a decrease of 3,296 Block Hours, or 25.3%. The decrease in Block Hours was primarily due to our redeployment of 747-400 aircraft to support increased ACMI flying in 2011. In addition, softer demand out of Asia in 2011 resulted in a reduction of the utilization of the return legs of AMC one-way missions for Commercial Charters compared to 2010. There was an average

21

of 1.9 747-400 aircraft and 1.5 747-200 aircraft supporting Commercial Charter in the first nine months of 2011, compared to an average of 3.2 747-400 aircraft and 1.7 747-200 aircraft in 2010. Commercial Charter Revenue per Block Hour was relatively unchanged when compared to the first nine months of 2010.

Operating Expenses

     The following table compares our Operating Expenses for the nine months ended September 30 (in thousands):

							Increase /			Percent
	2011			2010			(Decrease)			Change
Operating Expenses
Aircraft fuel	$	278,188		$	222,336		$	55,852			25.1	%
Salaries, wages and benefits		185,173			177,677			7,496			4.2	%
Maintenance, materials and repairs		144,699			115,967			28,732			24.8	%
Aircraft rent		120,976			115,097			5,879			5.1	%
Landing fees and other rent		36,756			35,974			782			2.2	%
Travel		30,328			24,354			5,974			24.5	%
Depreciation and amortization		27,069			26,049			1,020			3.9	%
Ground handling and airport fees		17,141			17,645			(504	)		(2.9	)%
Gain on disposal of aircraft		(464	)		(3,541	)		(3,077	)		(86.9	)%
Other		72,580			80,177			(7,597	)		(9.5	)%
Total Operating Expenses	$	912,446		$	811,735

     Aircraft fuel increased $55.9 million, or 25.1%, as a result of approximately $75.5 million in fuel price increases partially offset by $19.6 million from decreased consumption. The average fuel price per gallon for the AMC Charter business was $3.56 in the first nine months of 2011, compared to $2.68 in 2010, an increase of 32.8%. AMC fuel consumption increased by 1.5 million gallons, or 3.5%, as a greater proportion of flying in 2010 utilized more fuel efficient 747-400 aircraft for M-ATV missions. The average fuel price per gallon for the Commercial Charter business was $3.25 for the first nine months of 2011, compared to $2.32 in 2010, an increase of 40.1%. Fuel consumption for this business decreased by 9.4 million gallons, or 20.9%, commensurate with the decrease in Block Hours operated. We do not incur fuel expense in our ACMI business as the cost of fuel is borne by the customer.

     Salaries, wages and benefits increased $7.5 million, or 4.2%, primarily driven by higher Block Hours.

     Maintenance, materials and repairs increased by $28.7 million, or 24.8%, primarily due to approximately $13.1 million of increased line maintenance expense and other non-heavy maintenance expense, approximately $9.4 million of heavy airframe check expense and approximately $6.2 million of engine overhaul expense. Heavy maintenance events and engine overhauls for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were:

Events	2011		2010		Increase / (Decrease)
747-200 C Checks		4		2		2
747-400 C Checks		6		7		(1	)
747-400 D Checks		5		4		1
CF6-50 engine overhauls		2		2		—
CF6-80 engine overhauls		12		13		(1	)

     Aircraft rent increased $5.9 million, or 5.1%, primarily due to the leasing of additional aircraft and spare engines in 2011.

     Travel increased $6.0 million, or 24.5%, primarily due to the increased cost of international crew travel resulting from higher airfares and increased flying. Ground staff travel also increased related to on-boarding new aircraft, maintenance activities and the increased cost of international travel.

     Depreciation and amortization increased $1.0, or 3.9%, primarily due to additional aircraft in 2011.

     Gain on disposal of aircraft resulted from the sale of retired airframes and engines during the first three quarters of 2011 compared to the sale of three previously held-for-sale spare engines and retired engines in 2010.

22

     Other operating expenses decreased $7.6 million, or 9.5%, primarily related to a net accrual for legal settlements of $16.2 million in 2010, as well as a reduction in legal fees in 2011. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in contract services for flight attendants and passenger catering, freight related to the movement of 747-200 spare parts and engines to be utilized on aircraft in lieu of incurring more costly repairs, and commissions related to increased AMC Charter revenue.

Non-operating Expenses / (Income)

     The following table compares our Non-operating Expenses / (Income) for the nine months ended September 30 (in thousands):

							Increase /			Percent
	2011			2010			(Decrease)			Change
Non-operating Expenses / (Income)
Interest income	$	(15,200	)	$	(14,620	)	$	580			4.0	%
Interest expense		30,009			30,396			(387	)		(1.3	)%
Capitalized interest		(18,584	)		(11,007	)		7,577			68.8	%
Other (income) expense, net		(485	)		(9,236	)		(8,751	)		(94.7	)%

     Capitalized interest increased by $7.6 million, or 68.8%, primarily due to higher interest rates on PDP balances outstanding during the period.

     Other (income) expense, net decreased by $8.8 million, due to a litigation settlement received in 2010.

     Income taxes. Our effective income tax rates were 37.9% and 41.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The change in the effective rate from 2010 to 2011 was primarily due to non-deductible litigation settlements in 2010. Our effective rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to the income tax impact of global operations, U.S. state income taxes, the non-deductibility of certain expenses for tax purposes, and the relationship of these items to our projected operating results for the year.

Segments

     The following table compares the Direct Contribution for our reportable segments (see Note 8 to our Financial Statements for the reconciliation to Operating income) for the nine months ended September 30 (in thousands):

					Increase /			Percent
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			Change
Direct Contribution:
ACMI	$	97,990	$	87,097	$	10,893			12.5	%
AMC Charter		55,651		95,096		(39,445	)		(41.5	)%
Commercial Charter		24,772		78,372		(53,600	)		(68.4	)%
Dry Leasing		3,400		3,692		(292	)		(7.9	)%
Total Direct Contribution	$	181,813	$	264,257	$	(82,444	)		(31.2	)%
Unallocated income and expenses	$	80,406	$	96,986	$	(16,580	)		(17.1	)%

ACMI Segment

     Direct Contribution related to the ACMI segment increased $10.9 million, or 12.5%, primarily due to increases in Block Hours and ACMI Yields. During the first nine months of 2011, there was an average of 21.4 747-400 aircraft and 0.2 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared to an average of 17.5 747-400 aircraft and no 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI in 2010. The increase in Block Hours was primarily driven by flying a second aircraft for Panalpina beginning in October 2010 and two incremental aircraft for DHL beginning in March 2011. In addition, we started CMI passenger flights for SonAir in May 2010 and CMI Dreamlifter flights for Boeing in July 2010. The increase in ACMI Yields primarily reflects contractual rate increases in existing customer contracts and higher rates on new customer contracts. ACMI Direct Contribution was also impacted by increased aircraft ownership costs, crew and line maintenance expenses driven by the increased flying and an increase in heavy maintenance.

23

AMC Charter Segment

     Direct Contribution related to the AMC Charter segment decreased $39.4 million, or 41.5%, primarily due to the reduction in premiums earned on M-ATV missions flown on our 747-400 aircraft during 2010 and an increase in heavy and line maintenance expenses. During the first nine months of 2011, there was an average of 1.8 747-400 aircraft and 3.9 747-200 aircraft supporting AMC Charter operations compared to an average of 1.9 747-400 aircraft and 4.0 747-200 aircraft supporting the AMC Charter business in 2010.

Commercial Charter Segment

     Direct Contribution related to the Commercial Charter segment decreased $53.6 million, or 68.4%, primarily due to a decrease in Block Hours and lower Commercial Charter Yields that were negatively impacted by the return of aircraft capacity to the Asian markets and softer demand. Direct Contribution was also impacted by the higher cost of fuel, which was partially offset by lower fuel consumption in Commercial Charter during 2011. Partially offsetting the decrease in revenue was an improvement in volume-driven operating costs due to the reduction in Commercial Charter Block Hours flown. We also experienced lower ownership costs from the redeployment of 747-400 aircraft to the ACMI segment in the first nine months of 2011. During the first nine months of 2011, there was an average of 1.9 747-400 aircraft and 1.5 747-200 aircraft supporting Commercial Charter compared to an average of 3.2 747-400 aircraft and 1.7 747-200 aircraft supporting Commercial Charter in 2010.

Dry Leasing Segment

     Direct Contribution related to the Dry Leasing segment was relatively unchanged.

Unallocated income and expenses

     Unallocated income and expenses decreased $16.6 million, or 17.1%, primarily due to a net accrual for legal settlements of $16.2 million in 2010 and $7.6 million of increased capitalized interest on our PDPs in 2011. Partially offsetting these items was an $8.8 million litigation settlement received in 2010.

Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures

     To supplement our Financial Statements presented in accordance with GAAP, we present certain non-GAAP financial measures to assist in the evaluation of our business performance. These non-GAAP measures include Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders and Adjusted Diluted EPS, which exclude certain items. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

     We use these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing the performance of our ongoing operations and in planning and forecasting future periods. We believe that these adjusted measures provide meaningful information to assist investors and analysts in understanding our financial results and assessing our prospects for future performance.

24

     The following is a reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders and Diluted EPS to the corresponding non-GAAP measures (in thousands, except per share data):

	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,			September 30,			Percent
	2011			2010			Change
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	28,206		$	33,804			(16.6	%)
After-tax impact from:
Gain on disposal of aircraft		(104	)		(101	)
Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	28,102		$	33,703			(16.6	%)
Diluted EPS	$	1.07		$	1.29			(17.1	%)
After-tax impact from:
Gain on disposal of aircraft		—			—
Adjusted Diluted EPS	$	1.07		$	1.29			(17.1	%)

	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			September 30,			Percent
	2011			2010			Change
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	62,570		$	100,250			(37.6	%)
After-tax impact from:
Net accrual for legal settlements		—			16,200
Litigation settlement received		—			(5,513	)
Gain on disposal of aircraft		(296	)		(2,231	)
Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	62,274		$	108,706			(42.7	%)
Diluted EPS	$	2.37		$	3.85			(38.4	%)
After-tax impact from:
Net accrual for legal settlements		—			0.62
Litigation settlement received		—			(0.21	)
Gain on disposal of aircraft		(0.01	)		(0.09	)
Adjusted Diluted EPS	$	2.36		$	4.17			(43.4	%)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     At September 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $417.4 million, compared to $588.9 million at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $171.5 million, or 29.1%. The decrease was driven by net cash used for investing activities of $319.8 million and net cash used for financing activities of $29.6 million, partially offset by cash provided by operating activities of $118.6 million.

     In February 2011, we entered into a twelve-year term loan commitment in the amount of $240 million with a syndicate of four banks (the “2011 Term Loan Commitment”). The 2011 Term Loan Commitment, when drawn, will be collateralized by a mortgage on two future 747-8F aircraft deliveries, which we expect to be delivered during the fourth quarter of 2011.

     In April 2011, we repaid $46.9 million of our PDP financing facility.

     On September 30, 2011, we borrowed $120.3 million under the September 2011 Term Loan and the proceeds were classified as Restricted cash as of September 30, 2011. On November 2, 2011, the proceeds were released to us when we took delivery of our first 747-8F aircraft.

25

     In October 2011, we paid $210.4 million in PDPs to Boeing under a proposed payment and delivery schedule, while reserving all rights with respect to such payment.

     Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the first nine months of 2011 was $118.6 million, compared to $214.1 million for 2010. The decrease was primarily due to changes in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and Prepaid expenses and other current assets.

     Investing Activities. Net cash used for investing activities was $319.8 million for the first nine months of 2011, consisting primarily of capital expenditures of $205.4 million, which included capitalized interest on our 747-8F aircraft order of $18.6 million and changes in restricted cash of $120.3 million, partially offset by proceeds from short-term investments of $4.7 million. Capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2011 included the acquisition of two 747-400, two 767-300ER and two 737-300 passenger aircraft. Capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2011 were funded through working capital. Net cash used for investing activities was $150.3 million for the first nine months of 2010, consisting primarily of capital expenditures of $59.6 million, which included capitalized interest on our Boeing 747-8F aircraft order of $11.0 million, and $100.1 million of investments in debt securities, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of aircraft of $5.0 million. Capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2010 were funded through working capital, although we subsequently funded $8.1 million for the 757-200SF, which we purchased with a term loan.

     Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $29.6 million for the first nine months of 2011, which primarily reflects the proceeds from a loan of $120.3 million and proceeds from stock option exercises of $4.7 million, partially offset by $87.2 million of payments on debt obligations and $9.2 million in purchases of treasury stock to settle employment taxes on the vesting of restricted stock. Net cash used for financing activities was $132.3 million for the first nine months of 2010, which primarily reflected $152.3 million of payments on debt obligations and $5.8 million in purchases of treasury stock to settle employment taxes on the vesting of restricted stock.

     We consider Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term investments and Net cash provided by operating activities to be sufficient to meet our debt and lease obligations and to fund capital expenditures during 2011. Capital expenditures for the remainder of 2011 are expected to be approximately $43.0 million, which excludes PDPs, aircraft and capitalized interest. Our estimated 747-8F aircraft PDP and delivery payment requirements for the remainder of 2011 are approximately $546.1 million, of which $210.4 million was paid in October 2011. We expect our Restricted cash, PDP financing facility and 2011 Term Loan Commitment to be sufficient to fund our 747-8F aircraft PDP and delivery payment requirements for 2011.

     We may access external sources of capital from time to time depending on our cash requirements, assessments of current and anticipated market conditions, and the after-tax cost of capital. To that end, we filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC in 2009 that enables us to sell up to $500 million of debt and/or equity securities over the subsequent three years, depending on market conditions, our capital needs and other factors. Approximately $112.6 million of net proceeds from our stock offering in the fourth quarter of 2009 was drawn down from this shelf registration statement. Our access to capital markets can be adversely impacted by prevailing economic conditions and by financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. Additionally, our borrowing costs are affected by market conditions and may be adversely impacted by a tightening in credit markets.

     Our U.S. cash income tax payments in 2011 will be commensurate with our earnings, applicable income tax deductions and limitations on the utilization of net operating losses. As a result of recently enacted tax legislation, we can deduct 100% of the cost of qualified assets placed in service during 2011 or 2012 and 50% of the cost of qualified assets placed in service during 2013. Based on the existing estimated delivery schedule, we expect a substantial portion of our order for new 747-8F aircraft will qualify for this bonus tax depreciation, which would reduce or eliminate our U.S. federal income tax payments starting in the year we take delivery of qualified aircraft. As a result, we expect to receive a refund of almost all U.S. federal cash income tax paid in 2010 and 2011. Furthermore, our business operations are subject to income tax in several non-U.S. jurisdictions, but we believe that these operations will not result in any significant non-U.S. income tax payments in 2011.

Contractual Obligations and Debt Agreements

     See Note 5 to our Financial Statements for a description of our new debt obligation, the September 2011 Term Loan. See our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a tabular disclosure of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010 and a description of our debt obligations and amendments thereto.

     On February 11, 2011, we entered into the 2011 Term Loan Commitment in the amount of $240 million for a period of twelve years with a syndicate of four banks. The 2011 Term Loan Commitment, when drawn, will be

26

collateralized by a mortgage on two future 747-8F aircraft deliveries. In connection with entering into the 2011 Term Loan Commitment, we have agreed to pay usual and customary commitment and other fees. Borrowings under the 2011 Term Loan Commitment will accrue interest at a variable rate, payable quarterly, at LIBOR plus a margin and contains customary covenants and events of default. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, the 2011 Term Loan Commitment is cross-defaulted to our PDP financing facilities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     Sixteen of our thirty-three operating aircraft are under operating leases (this excludes aircraft provided by CMI customers). Five are leased through trusts established specifically to purchase, finance and lease aircraft to us. These leasing entities meet the criteria for variable interest entities. All fixed price options were restructured to reflect a fair market value purchase option, and as such, we are not the primary beneficiary of the leasing entities. We are generally not the primary beneficiary of the leasing entities if the lease terms are consistent with market terms at the inception of the lease and the leases do not include a residual value guarantee, fixed-price purchase option or similar feature that would obligate us to absorb decreases in value or entitle us to participate in increases in the value of the aircraft. We have not consolidated any additional aircraft in the related trusts upon application of accounting for consolidations, because we are not the primary beneficiary based on the fact that all fixed price options were restructured to reflect a fair market value purchase option. In addition, we reviewed the other eleven Atlas aircraft that are under operating leases but not financed through a trust and determined that none of them would be consolidated upon the application of accounting for consolidations. Our maximum exposure under all operating leases is the remaining lease payments, which amounts are reflected in future lease commitments described in Note 10 to the audited consolidated financial statements in the AAWW Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     There were no material changes in our off-balance sheet arrangements during the three months ended September 30, 2011.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     See Note 2 to our Financial Statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Forward Looking Statements

     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”), as well as other reports, releases and written and oral communications issued or made from time to time by or on behalf of AAWW, contain statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those statements are based on management’s beliefs, plans, expectations and assumptions, and on information currently available to management. Generally, the words “may,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “continue,” “believe,” “seek,” “project,” “estimate” and similar expressions used in this Report that do not relate to historical facts are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

     The forward-looking statements in this Report are not representations or guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Such risks, uncertainties and assumptions include, but are not limited to, those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Many of such factors are beyond AAWW’s control and are difficult to predict. As a result, AAWW’s future actions, financial position, results of operations and the market price for shares of AAWW’s common stock could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Readers are therefore cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. AAWW does not intend to publicly update any forward-looking statements that may be made from time to time by, or on behalf of, AAWW, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     For additional discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to Part II, Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest Rate Risk

     During the second quarter of 2011, we began to hedge the variability of forecasted interest payments associated with changes in interest rates through the date of an anticipated debt issuance in 2011 using forward-starting interest swaps. In May 2011, we entered into two forward-starting interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $237.5 million with terms

27

calling for us to receive interest quarterly at a variable rate equal to the forward 90-day LIBOR swap rate and to pay interest quarterly at a fixed rate. The forward-starting interest swaps effectively fix the interest rate on $237.5 million of an anticipated debt issuance in 2011.

     Assuming a hypothetical ten percent increase in interest rates at September 30, 2011, the fair value of the forward-starting interest rate swaps would increase by approximately $3.6 million to a net liability of $19.4 million. Conversely, assuming a hypothetical ten percent decrease in interest rates at September 30, 2011, the fair value of the forward-starting interest rate swaps would decrease by approximately $3.5 million to a net liability of $26.5 million.

     When entering into forward-starting interest rate swaps, we become exposed to both counterparty credit risk and market risk. We are subject to counterparty credit risk when the value of the forward-starting interest rate swap represents a gain and the risk exists that the counterparty will fail to perform under the terms of the contract. We manage our counterparty credit risk by only entering into forward-starting interest rate swaps with major financial institutions with investment-grade credit ratings. We are subject to market risk with respect to changes in the underlying benchmark interest rate that impacts the fair value of the forward-starting interest rate swaps. We manage market risk by matching the terms of the forward-starting interest rate swaps with the critical terms of the expected debt issuance.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2011. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

28

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     With respect to the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2011, the information required in response to this Item is set forth in Note 10 to our Financial Statements and such information is incorporated herein by reference. Such description contains all of the information required with respect hereto.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

     The following is an update of a risk factor that is set forth in Item 1A — Risk Factors of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The update reflects a change to the relevant date within the risk factor appearing below. For additional risk factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, please refer to our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     Our insurance coverage may become more expensive and difficult to obtain and may not be adequate to insure all of our risks.

     Aviation insurance premiums historically have fluctuated based on factors that include the loss history of the industry in general, and the insured carrier in particular. Future terrorist attacks and other adverse events involving aircraft could result in increases in insurance costs and could affect the price and availability of such coverage. We have, as have most other U.S. airlines, purchased our war-risk coverage through a special program administered by the U.S. federal government. The FAA is currently providing war-risk hull and cargo loss, crew and third-party liability insurance through September 30, 2012. If the federal war-risk coverage program terminates or provides significantly less coverage in the future, we could face a significant increase in the cost of war-risk coverage, and because of competitive pressures in the industry, our ability to pass this additional cost on to customers may be limited.

     We participate in an insurance pooling arrangement with DHL and their affiliates. This allows us to obtain aviation hull and liability and hull deductible coverage at reduced rates. If we were to withdraw from this arrangement for any reason or if other pool members have higher incidents, we could incur higher insurance costs.

     There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our existing coverage on terms favorable to us, that the premiums for such coverage will not increase substantially or that we will not bear substantial losses and lost revenue from accidents or other adverse events. Substantial claims resulting from an accident in excess of related insurance coverage or a significant increase in our current insurance expense could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, while we carry insurance against the risks inherent to our operations, which we believe are consistent with the insurance arrangements of other participants in our industry, we cannot provide assurance that we are adequately insured against all risks. If our liability exceeds the amounts of our insurance coverage, we would be required to pay the excess amount, which could be material to our business, financial condition and operations.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

  a. Exhibits

     See accompanying Exhibit Index included after the signature page of this report for a list of exhibits filed or furnished with this report.

29

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Dated: November 3, 2011	/s/ William J. Flynn
	William J. Flynn
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: November 3, 2011	/s/ Spencer Schwartz
	Spencer Schwartz
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

30

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number	Description
10.1	Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 1, 2011, to the Employment Agreement between Atlas Air, Inc. and William J. Flynn.
10.2	Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 1, 2011, to the Employment Agreement between Atlas Air, Inc. and John W. Dietrich.
10.3	Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Annual Incentive Program for Senior Executives, amended as of July 1, 2011.
10.4	Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Benefits Program for Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents, amended and restated as of July 1, 2011.
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, furnished herewith.
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, furnished herewith.
32.1	Section 1350 Certifications, furnished herewith.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document. *
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. *
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. *
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. *
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document. *
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. *

* Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and (v) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

31

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of this 1st day of July, 2011, by and between Atlas Air, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Atlas”), and William J. Flynn (the “Employee”).

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto previously entered into an employment agreement dated as of April 21, 2006, as amended by an amendment dated December 31, 2008 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”); and

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with the terms set forth herein;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1. Section 1.4 of the Employment Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“1.4. “Change in Control” means a “change in control event” (as that term is defined at Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) of the Treasury Regulations) with respect to the Company, subject to such additional rules and requirements as may be set forth from time to time in the Treasury Regulations and related guidance.”

     2. Section 4.1 of the Employment Agreement is amended by adding at the end thereof the following:

“Employee will be treated as having resigned for Good Reason only if he provides the Company with a notice of termination within 90 days of the initial existence of one of the conditions described in the definition of Good Reason below, following which the Company shall have 30 days from the receipt of the notice of termination to cure the event specified in the notice of termination and, if the Company fails to so cure the event, Employee terminates his employment not later than thirty (30) days following the end of such cure period.”

     3. Section 4.2(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“(a)(i) If the Employment Period is terminated by Atlas for reasons other than Cause or if the Employment Period is terminated by the Employee for Good Reason, and subject to the Employee’s execution and the effectiveness of a general release no later than the sixtieth (60^th) day following the date upon which the Employment Period terminates, upon terms and conditions consistent with this Agreement and acceptable to Atlas and Employee, which release must be presented to Employee upon or promptly after termination of the Employment Period, then the

Employee shall be entitled to receive:

(1) an amount equal to two times the Employee’s then-current Annual Base Salary, with one-third of such amount payable in a lump-sum on the first day of the seventh month following the date on which the Employment Period terminates (the “Lump-Sum Payment Date”), and with the remaining two-thirds of such amount payable in accordance with Atlas’ normal pay schedule beginning on the day after the Lump-Sum Payment Date and continuing through the first anniversary of the Lump-Sum Payment Date; and

(2) continued coverage at Employee’s expense under the Employer’s health (medical, dental and vision) benefit plan in accordance with Section 3.5 for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of termination (with COBRA coverage to follow thereafter, if timely elected); provided, however, that any such continued coverage shall cease in the event Employee obtains comparable coverage in connection with subsequent employment.

(3) The above benefits are in addition to the Employee’s right to receive accrued but unused vacation pay through the date the Employment Period terminates, and all other benefits in which the Employee is vested pursuant to other plans and programs of Atlas at the time of the employment termination date.

(4) Assuming the employment is terminated without Cause (as defined in this Agreement) or is for Good Reason (as defined in this Agreement), the Employee shall be entitled to receive a payment with respect to an annual bonus award for the year in which such termination occurred, as if he or she had been employed by Atlas on the last day of such year in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the amount he or she would have received if he was employed by Atlas on the last day of the such year, based upon actual company performance measured pursuant to the plan (and assuming for such purpose that 50% of any individual business objectives have been achieved), or (2) his target bonus percentage, such payment shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the plan under which the award was granted, including without limitation any provisions related to whether all required performance measures for the payment of an award have been satisfied and the provisions of the plan regarding time of payment of such award.

2

(ii) If Employee elects to retire from employment with the Company after the date of this Amendment, Employee shall be entitled to continued coverage under the Employer’s health plan (medical, dental and vision) in effect as of the date of his retirement from employment (and as the same may thereafter be amended from time to time generally for employees of the company); provided that Employee and the Company will each contribute on an after-tax basis to Employee’s monthly premium in an amount equal to the percent of premium each was contributing at the time of the Employee’s retirement from employment, as adjusted from time to time to reflect any changes in the Company’s contribution toward active employee health plan premiums; and provided, further, that any such continued coverage shall cease in the event Employee obtains comparable coverage in connection with subsequent employment or becomes eligible for Medicare coverage.

     4. Section 4.2(d) of the Employment Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“(d)(i) If, within the twelve-month period immediately following a Change of Control, the Employment Period is terminated by Atlas for reasons other than Cause or if the Employment Period is terminated by the Employee for Good Reason, and subject to satisfaction by the Employee of the release requirements of Section 4.2(a), then the Employee shall be entitled to (and not in addition to) the compensation and benefit coverage set forth in Section 4.2(a) above, except that the amount of the payments under Section 4.2(a)(i) above shall be equal to three times the Employee’s then-current Annual Base Salary, with one-fourth of such amount payable in a lump sum on the Lump-Sum Payment Date, and with the remaining three-fourths of such amount payable in accordance with Atlas’ normal pay schedule beginning on the day after the Lump-Sum Payment Date and continuing through the 18-month anniversary of the Lump-Sum Payment Date.

(ii) If, within the six-month period immediately following a termination of the Employment Period by Atlas for reasons other than Cause or by the Employee for Good Reason, a Change of Control occurs, and subject to satisfaction by the Employee of the release requirements of Section 4.2(a) above, then, in addition to the payments set forth in Section 4.2(a)(i) above, the Employee shall receive payments in an amount equal to the Employee’s then-current Annual Base Salary, payable in accordance with Atlas’ normal pay schedule beginning on the day after the first anniversary of the Lump-Sum Payment Date and continuing for the six-month period immediately thereafter.”

3

     5. Continued Validity of the Employment Agreement. Except as amended and superseded by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, will continue to bind the parties hereto, and will continue to govern the terms and conditions of the Employee’s continued employment with Atlas. To the extent that the terms of this Amendment conflict or are inconsistent with the terms of the

Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment will govern. Nothing in this Amendment shall be interpreted to limit the Employee from participating in any plans or programs offered by Atlas to senior executives and not specifically referenced in the Employment Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

     6. Amendment Effective Date. This Amendment will become binding and effective on July 1, 2011.

     7. Governing Law. This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without reference to principles of conflict of law.

     8. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts when taken together will constitute one and the same original.

[Signature page follows]

4

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement on the day and year first written above.

ATLAS AIR, INC.

By:	/s/ Adam R. Kokas
	Name: Adam R. Kokas
	Title:   Senior Vice President, General Counsel,             Chief Human Resources Officer and             Secretary
	/s/ William J. Flynn
	William J. Flynn

5

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT No.2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of this 1st day of July, 2011, by and between Atlas Air, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Atlas”), and John W. Dietrich (the “Employee”).

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto previously entered into an amended and restated employment agreement dated as of September 8, 2006, as amended on December 31, 2008 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”); and

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with the terms set forth herein;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1. Section 1.4 of the Employment Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     “1.4. “Change in Control” means a “change in control event” (as that term is defined at Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) of the Treasury Regulations) with respect to the Company, subject to such additional rules and requirements as may be set forth from time to time in the Treasury Regulations and related guidance.”

     2. Section 4.1 of the Employment Agreement is amended by adding at the end thereof the following:

     “Employee will be treated as having resigned for Good Reason only if he provides the Company with a notice of termination within 90 days of the initial existence of one of the conditions described in the definition of Good Reason above, following which the Company shall have 30 days from the receipt of the notice of termination to cure the event specified in the notice of termination and, if the Company fails to so cure the event, Employee terminates his employment not later than 30 days following the end of such cure period.”

     3. Section 4.2(a)(i) of the Employment Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     ”(a) If the Employment Period is terminated by Atlas for reasons other than Cause or if the Employment Period is terminated by the Employee for Good Reason, and subject to the Employee’s execution and the effectiveness of a general release no later than the sixtieth (60^th) day following the date upon which the Employment Period terminates upon terms and conditions consistent with this Agreement and acceptable to Atlas and Employee, which release must be presented to Employee upon or promptly after termination of the Employment Period, then the Employee shall be entitled to receive:

1

(i) an amount equal to twenty four (24) months of the Employee’s then-current monthly Base Salary, payable in a lump-sum on the first day of the seventh month following the date on which the Employment Period terminates (the “Lump-Sum Payment Date”);

     4. Section 4.2(a)(iii) of the Employment Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

          “continued coverage at Employee’s expense under the Employer’s health (medical, dental and vision) benefit plan in accordance with Section 3.4 for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of termination (with COBRA coverage to follow thereafter, if timely elected); provided, however, that any such continued coverage shall cease in the event Employee obtains comparable coverage in connection with subsequent employment.”

     5. Section 4.2(a) is amended by adding the following new subsection after subsection (iii) there of :

     “; and (iv) assuming such termination is without Cause (as defined in this Agreement) or is for Good Reason (as defined in this Agreement), to receive a payment with respect to an annual bonus award for the year in which such termination occurred, as if he or she had been employed by Atlas on the last day of such year in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the amount he would have received if he was employed by Atlas on the last day of the such year, based upon actual performance measured pursuant to the plan (and assuming for such purpose that 50% of any individual business objectives have been achieved), or (2) his target bonus percentage, such payment shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the plan under which the award was granted, including without limitation any provisions related to whether all required performance measures for the payment of an award have been satisfied and the provisions of the plan regarding time of payment of such award.”

     6. Section 4.2(e) of the Employment Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     “(e) (i) If, within the twelve-month period immediately following a Change of Control, the Employment Period is terminated by Atlas for reasons other than Cause or if the Employment Period is terminated by the Employee for Good Reason, and subject to the Employee’s execution and the effectiveness of a general release no later than the sixtieth (60^th) day following upon terms and conditions consistent with this Agreement and acceptable to Atlas and Employee (such acceptance not to be unreasonably withheld), which release must be presented to Employee upon or promptly after termination of the Employment Period, then the Employee shall be entitled to (and not in addition to) the compensation, relocation benefits, and benefit coverage set forth in Section 4.2(a) above, except that the amount of the lump-sum payment under Section 4.2(a)(i) above shall be equal to thirty six (36) months of the Employee’s then-current monthly Base Salary.

2

     (ii) If, within the six-month period immediately following a termination of the Employment Period by Atlas for reasons other than Cause or by the Employee for Good Reason, a Change of Control occurs, and subject to satisfaction by the Executive of the release requirements of Section 4.2(e)(i) above, then, in addition to the lump-sum payment set forth in Section 4.2(a)(i) above, the Employee shall receive a lump-sum payment on the Lump-Sum Payment Date equal to twelve (12) months of the Employee’s then-current monthly Base Salary.

     7. Continued Validity of the Employment Agreement. Except as amended and superseded by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, will continue to bind the parties hereto, and will continue to govern the terms and conditions of the Employee’s continued employment with Atlas. To the extent that the terms of this Amendment conflict or are inconsistent with the terms of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment will govern. Nothing in this Amendment shall be interpreted to limit the Employee from participating in any plans or programs offered by Atlas to senior executives and not specifically referenced in the Employment Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

     8. Amendment Effective Date. This Amendment will become binding and effective on July 1,2011.

     9. Governing Law. This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without reference to principles of conflict of law.

     10. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts when taken together will constitute one and the same original.

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

3

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2 your Employment Agreement on the day and year first written above.

ATLAS AIR, INC.
By:	/s/ Adam R. Kokas
	Adam R. Kokas,
	Senior Vice President,General Counsel and Chief Human Resources Officer
	John W. Dietrich
	/s/ John W. Dietrich
	John W. Dietrich

4

EX-10.3

Exhibit 10.3

ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC.

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM

FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVES

Amended by Compensation Committee: As of July 1, 2011

ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC.

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM

FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVES

Section 1. Purpose.

     The purpose of the Program is to set forth certain terms and conditions governing cash awards made under Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.’s (“AAWW”) 2007 Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”). The Program shall be treated for all purposes as a sub-plan or arrangement for the grant of Cash Awards under the Plan. Awards under the Program are intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exception to the limitations on tax deductibility imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code and together with the applicable terms of the Plan and Program shall be construed accordingly. The Program shall be effective as of January 1, 2007, and shall be applicable for the 2007 Program Year and subsequent Program Years during the continuance of the Plan unless amended or terminated by the Committee pursuant to Section 10. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given in the Plan.

Section 2. Definitions.

     2.1. Award shall mean an opportunity to earn benefits under the Program.

     2.2. Atlas shall mean AAWW or its subsidiaries, as applicable.

     2.3. Base Salary shall mean an Eligible Employee’s actual base salary for the applicable period.

     2.4. Board shall mean the Board of Directors of AAWW.

     2.5. Beneficiary shall mean a Participant’s beneficiary designated pursuant to Section 8.

     2.6. Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

     2.7. Committee shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board.

     2.8. Eligible Employee means any of the Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents of AAWW and such other Atlas senior executive officers as shall be designated by the Committee.

     2.9. Participant shall mean any Eligible Employee during such Eligible Employee’s period of participation in the Program.

     2.10. Program shall mean this Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Annual Incentive Program for Senior Executives, as it may be amended from time to time.

     2.11. Program Year shall mean the calendar year.

1

Section 3. Administration.

     The Program shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have full power and authority in its sole discretion to construe and interpret the Program, establish and amend administrative regulations to further the purpose of the Program, determine the extent to which Award payments have been earned by virtue of satisfying the financial goal described in Section 5.2, determine whether to reduce under Sections 5.2(b) through 5.2(e), to the extent that cost control, service reliability, management-business objectives and any other performance criteria have not been satisfied, the amount otherwise payable under Section 5.2, determine whether to settle a portion of the Award in Atlas stock and take any other action necessary to administer the Program. All decisions, actions or interpretations of the Committee shall be final, conclusive, and binding upon all Participants.

Section 4. Participation.

     Each Eligible Employee shall participate in the Program if he or she is employed as an Eligible Employee on the first day of the Program Year. An individual who becomes an Eligible Employee during a Program Year but prior to September 30 of the applicable year will participate only with respect to Base Salary earned on and after the date he or she first becomes an Eligible Employee. Any determination by the Committee to provide incentive compensation to an Eligible Employee other than as described in the preceding two sentences shall be treated as a separate award made outside the Program.

Section 5. Section 5: Determination of Awards.

     5.1. Target Bonus Award, Maximum Bonus Award. The maximum bonus payable under an Award for each Program Year will be the lesser of (i) the dollar limit set forth in Section 4.c of the Plan, and (ii) the following percentage of Base Salary for each Participant, as such percentages may be increased by the Committee from time to time: two-hundred percent (200%) of Base Salary for the Chief Executive Officer, one-hundred and seventy percent (170%) for Executive Vice Presidents and one-hundred and fifty percent (150%) of Base Salary for each other Participant.

     5.2. Performance Measures. Payment under an Award is conditioned upon achievement of the threshold Financial Goal, as described below. If the threshold Financial Goal is achieved, the Award payment will be the maximum bonus amount described in Section 5.1 minus such adjustments, if any, as the Committee determines to be appropriate to reflect levels of achievement with respect to the Financial Goal (if that Goal is achieved at a level below the maximum level) and/or one or more of the other factors described below and/or such other factors as shall be designated by the Committee.

     (a) Financial Goal. The financial goal is based on Atlas’s pre-tax profits. For each Program Year, the threshold pre-tax profit level (which must be met before any amounts will be payable under Awards), the maximum pre-tax profit level, intermediate pre-tax profit levels, and the percentage of each Participant’s target bonus award that will be deemed achieved at each such profit level, will be determined by the Committee.

     (b) Cost Control Adjustment. The Committee may reduce maximum Award payments, if any, to reflect the level of achievement of such cost control goal or goals as the Committee may establish for the Program Year.

2

     (c) Service Reliability. The Committee may also reduce maximum Award payments, if any, to reflect the level of achievement of such service reliability factors as the Committee may determine for the Program Year.

     (d) Management Business Objectives Adjustment. The Committee may also reduce maximum Award payments, if any, to reflect the level of achievement of such individual management business objectives as the Committee may determine in the case of any Participant for the Program Year.

     (e) Effect of Corporate Transactions and other Exigencies. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee shall have the authority, to the extent consistent with the requirements for satisfying the performance-based compensation exception under 162(m) of the Code, to identify objectively determinable events (for example, but without limitation, acquisitions or dispositions) which, if they occur, would have a material effect on objective Performance Criteria applicable to Awards under the Program, and to adjust such Performance Criteria in an objectively determinable manner to reflect such events.

Section 6. Payment of Awards under this Program.

     6.1. General. Subject to Section 6.4, Participant will be entitled to receive payment, if any, under an Award if the Participant is still employed by Atlas on the last day of the Program Year for which the Award is paid, unless in the period between the last day of the Program Year and any payout under the Program, the Participant is terminated by Atlas for Cause (as defined in Section 7) or the Participant terminates his employment with Atlas for any reason. A Participant will receive an Award in the manner and at the times set forth in this Sections 6.

     6.2. Time of Payment. Any amount payable for an Award for a Program Year shall be paid by Atlas within two weeks following certification by the Committee as to achievement of the performance goals following the completion of the year-end audit for the applicable Program Year, but in no event later than March 15 of the year following the applicable Program Year.

     6.3. Form of Payment. All amounts payable for an Award shall be paid in cash or Atlas stock, but Atlas stock may be used, if at all, only for the portion of the Award that exceeds fifty percent (50%) of Base Salary.

     6.4. Termination of Employment.

3

     (a) In General. Except as provided otherwise in this Section 6.4, a Participant whose employment terminates for any reason prior to the last day of the Program Year for which an Award is payable shall forfeit such Award.

     (b) Death or Disability. If a Participant’s employment terminates during a Program Year by reason of death or Disability (as defined in the Plan), the Committee may, in its sole discretion, direct that all or a portion of a Participant’s Award be paid, taking into account the duration of employment during the Program Year, the Participant’s performance, and such other matters as the Committee shall deem appropriate.

     (c) Retirement; Involuntary Termination; Good Reason. If a Participant’s employment terminates during a Program Year by reason of (i) an involuntary termination by Atlas not for Cause (as defined in Section 7 below), (ii) termination by the Participant for Good Reason (as defined below), or (iii) in the sole discretion of the Committee, normal retirement under a retirement program of Atlas, the Participant shall be entitled to receive a payment with respect to an Award for the Program Year in which such termination occurred, if he or she had been employed by Atlas on the last day of such Program Year in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the amount he or she would have received if he or she was employed by Atlas on the last day of the Program Year based upon actual company performance measured pursuant to the plan (and assuming for such purpose that 50% of his or her Individual MBOs have been achieved), or (2) his or her Target Bonus Percentage. Such payment shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the Program, including without limitation the provisions of Section 5 (relating to determination of the Award) and Section 6.2 (relating to the time of payment of the Award). This Section 6.4 shall not apply to the extent the rights of a Participant in such circumstances are governed by another agreement. “Good Reason” under this Section 6 shall mean (i) a material reduction in Participant’s duties and responsibilities from those of Participant’s most recent position with Atlas, or (ii) a reduction of Participant’s aggregate salary, benefits and other compensation (other than bonus opportunity, which shall be paid as provided above) from that which the Participant was most recently entitled during employment with Atlas other than in connection with a reduction as part of a general reduction applicable to all participants in the Program.

Section 7. Change in Control.

     In the event Atlas undergoes a Change in Control, Awards will be determined and paid in accordance with this Section 7 based on the assumption that each of the Financial Goal, the Cost Control Goal, the Management-Based Objectives and any other Performance Criteria have been achieved at a level of 100% of target for the Plan Year in which the Change in Control takes place pursuant to Section 5 of the Program; provided, however, if upon completion of the year-end audit for the applicable Program Year it is determined that the Financial Goal or any other Performance Criteria was achieved at a level higher than 100% of target, Awards will be correspondingly adjusted pursuant to Section 5 of the Program. Notwithstanding the above, a Participant whose employment with Atlas terminates prior to the Change in Control shall forfeit such Award, unless such termination is by reason of (i) death, (ii) Disability (as defined in the Plan), (iii) normal retirement under a retirement program of Atlas, (iv) by Atlas not for Cause, or

4

(v) by the Participant for Good Reason (as defined below). For purposes of this Program, “Change in Control of Atlas” shall mean and shall be deemed to have occurred if (i) any Person (within the meaning of the Exchange Act) or any two or more Persons acting in concert shall have acquired beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule l3d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of voting securities of Atlas (or other securities convertible into voting securities of Atlas) representing 40% or more of the combined voting power of all securities of Atlas entitled to vote in the election of directors, other than securities having such power only by reason of the happening of a contingency, or (ii) the Board of Directors of Atlas shall not consist of a majority of Continuing Directors. For purposes of this Program, “Continuing Directors” shall mean the directors of Atlas on the date hereof and each other director, if such other director’s nomination for election to the Board of Directors of Atlas is recommended by a majority of the then Continuing Directors. “Cause” shall mean (i) the Participant’s refusal or failure (other than during periods of illness or Disability (as defined in the Plan)) to perform his or her material duties and responsibilities to Atlas, (ii) the conviction or plea of guilty or nolo contendere of the Participant in respect of any felony, other than a motor vehicle offense, (iii) the commission of any act which causes material injury to the reputation, business or business relationships of Atlas including, without limitation, any material breach of written policies of Atlas with respect to trading in securities, (iv) other acts of fraud in connection with the Participant’s duties and responsibilities to Atlas, including, without limitation, misappropriation, theft or embezzlement in the performance of the Participant’s duties and responsibilities as an employee of Atlas, or (v) a violation of any material Atlas policy, including, without limitation, a violation of the laws against workplace discrimination. “Good Reason” under this Section 7 shall mean the failure of the surviving entity in the Change in Control, of failure of an affiliate of the surviving entity, to continue the Participant in a position with the surviving entity or affiliate that (a) is not located within 40 miles of the location of such Participant’s most recent principal location of employment with Atlas, (ii) does not involve substantially comparable duties and responsibilities as such Participant’s most recent position with Atlas, or (iii) does not entitle the Participant to salary, benefits and other compensation (other than bonus opportunity, which shall be paid as provided above) that, in the aggregate, are substantially comparable or more favorable than those to which the Participant most recently was entitled during employment with Atlas.

Section 8. Beneficiary Designation.

     8.1. Designation and Change of Designation. Each Participant shall file with Atlas a written designation of one or more persons as the Beneficiary who shall be entitled to receive the Award, if any, payable under the Program upon the Participant’s death. A Participant may, from time to time, revoke or change his Beneficiary designation without the consent of any prior Beneficiary by filing a new designation with Atlas. The last such designation received by Atlas shall be controlling; provided, however, that no designation, or change or revocation thereof, shall be effective unless received by Atlas prior to the Participant’s death, and in no event shall it be effective as of any date prior to such receipt.

     8.2. Absence of Valid Designation. If no such Beneficiary designation is in effect at the time of a Participant’s death, or if no designated Beneficiary survives the Participant, or if such designation conflicts with law, the Participant’s estate shall be deemed to have been designated as the Participant’s Beneficiary and shall receive the payment of the amount, if any, payable under the Program upon his death. If Atlas is in doubt as to the right of any person to

5

receive such amount, Atlas may retain such amount, without liability for any interest thereon, until the rights thereto are determined, or Atlas may pay such amount into any court of appropriate jurisdiction and such payment shall be a complete discharge of the liability of the Program and Atlas therefor.

Section 9. General Provisions.

     9.1. Plan to be Unfunded. The Program is intended to constitute an unfunded incentive compensation arrangement. Nothing contained in the Program, and no action taken pursuant to the Program, shall create or be construed to create a trust of any kind. A Participant’s right to receive an Award shall be no greater than the right of an unsecured general creditor of Atlas. All Awards shall be paid from the general funds of Atlas, and no special or separate fund shall be established and no segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of such Awards. There shall not vest in any Participant or Beneficiary any right, title, or interest in and to any specific assets of Atlas.

     9.2. Section 409A of the Code. Awards under the Program are intended to be exempt from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and shall be construed and administered accordingly. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Program, neither Atlas, nor any affiliate, nor the Committee, nor any person acting on behalf of Atlas, any affiliate, or the Committee, shall be liable to any Participant or to the estate or beneficiary of any Participant or to any other holder of an Award by reason of any acceleration of income, or any additional tax, asserted by reason of the failure of an Award to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A or by reason of Section 4999 of the Code; provided, that nothing in this Section 9.3 shall limit the ability of the Committee or Atlas to provide by separate express written agreement with a Participant for a gross-up payment or other payment in connection with any such tax or additional tax.

     9.3. Rights Limited; Conflicts. Nothing contained in the Program shall give any Eligible Employee the right to continue in the employment of Atlas, or limit the right of Atlas to discharge an Eligible Employee. If there is a conflict between this Program and another senior executive employment program or arrangement, such other program or arrangement shall control.

     9.4. Governing Law. The Program shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

     9.5. Taxes. There shall be deducted from all amounts paid under the Program all federal, state, local and other taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payments.

Section 10. Amendment, Suspension, or Termination.

Except with respect to 6.4(c) for any Program Year in effect, the Committee reserves the right to amend, suspend, or terminate the Program at any time.

6

EX-10.4

Exhibit 10.4

ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC.

BENEFITS PROGRAM

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENTS

AND

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENTS

Amended and Restated as of July 1, 2011

          This document describes the benefits program for individuals employed as Executive Vice Presidents or Senior Vice Presidents of Atlas Air, Inc. (“Atlas”), Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. (“Polar”) and Titan Aviation Leasing, Ltd. (“Titan”) (such individuals are hereinafter referred to as “Executives”), as in effect on July 1, 2011 and amends and restates the document dated December 31, 2008. Individuals employed as Executive Vice Presidents or Senior Vice Presidents by other subsidiaries of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings,” and collectively with Atlas, Polar and Titan, the “Company”) may participate in this program only if expressly approved for such participation by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Holdings. All references in this document to the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors refers to those bodies of Holdings. All references to the Employer are to the company employing the Executive.

I. Annual Salary.

          The Executive will receive a base annual salary (“Base Annual Salary”) reviewed annually for possible increases by the Compensation Committee. Included among other considerations in the annual review will be the Executive’s individual job performance. Increases, if any, shall be at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

II. Bonus Plan.

          The Executive shall be eligible to participate in Holdings’ Annual Incentive Plan or successor plan at the Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President level, as appropriate. The level of the bonus available to the Executive will be set forth in the Annual Incentive Plan and will be awarded in consideration of individual and corporate performance based on performance goals and objectives determined by the Compensation Committee. A fuller description of how corporate and individual performance operate in tandem to determine the calculation of bonuses is described in the Annual Incentive Plan. The Annual Incentive Plan document is developed by the Compensation Committee and is subject to amendment from time to time with changes as adopted by the Compensation Committee or full Board of Directors of Holdings. As further described in the Annual Incentive Plan, corporate and individual performance in combination may permit the Executive to earn a target bonus equal to at least 75% of Base Annual Salary for Senior Vice Presidents and at least 85% for Executive Vice Presidents, as may be adjusted upward by the Compensation Committee. Lesser corporate or individual performance may cause bonus payments to be in an amount less than 75% or 85%, as applicable, of such Base Annual Salary or result in no bonus being payable. Greater corporate and individual performances may result in the bonus being more than 75% or 85%, as applicable, of such Base Annual Salary. When the bonus payment reaches more than 75% or 85%, as applicable, of such Base Annual Salary, the Employer reserves the right to pay some or all of the portion of the bonus that is above 50% of Base Annual Salary in Holdings unrestricted company stock payable under the Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan, as may be amended or superseded. Any bonus paid to Executive under the Annual Incentive Plan will be paid no later than two weeks following the completion of the year-end audit for the applicable year, but in no event later than March 15 of the year following the applicable year.

III. Health Benefits.

          The Executive and Executive’s dependents shall be entitled to participate in the health insurance plan offered by Executive’s Employer, provided that the Executive and the Employer will each contribute to the Executive’s monthly premium as provided by such plan. The Employer reserves the right to discontinue any health insurance plan at any time with the understanding that the Employer will comply in full measure with all state and federal laws regarding continuation of coverage, including the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as may be amended or superseded (“COBRA”).

IV. Severance.

          A. If the Executive’s employment is terminated by the Employer for reasons other than Cause (as defined below) or if the Executive resigns for Good Reason (as defined below), and subject to the Executive’s execution of a release upon terms and conditions reasonably acceptable to the Employer and Executive (such acceptance not to be unreasonably withheld), which release must be presented to Executive, executed, no longer be subject to revocation, and become effective no later than the sixtieth (60th) day following the date of termination, then the Executive shall be entitled to:

          (i) receive a severance payment equal to eighteen (18) months of the Executive’s monthly Base Annual Salary for Senior Vice Presidents and twenty four (24) months of the Executive’s Base Annual Salary for Executive Vice Presidents, and except as otherwise required by Section XI below, all severance pay to which the Executive is entitled shall be in the form of salary continuation, payable in accordance with the normal payroll practices of the Employer for its executives (each such payment to be treated as a separate payment under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code), with the first payment, which shall be retroactive to the day immediately following the date the Executive’s employment terminated, being due and payable on the later of the sixty-first (61st) day following the date of termination or the date specified in Section XI below (if applicable) (the “Lump-Sum Payment Date);

          (ii) continued coverage at Executive’s expense under the Employer’s health (medical, dental and vision) benefit plan in accordance with Section III for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of termination (with COBRA coverage to follow thereafter, if timely elected); provided, however, that any such continued coverage shall cease in the event the Executive obtains comparable coverage in connection with subsequent employment; and

          (iii) assuming the Executive’s employment is terminated without Cause (as defined below) or is for Good Reason (as defined below), the Executive shall be entitled to receive a payment with respect to an annual bonus award under the Annual Incentive Plan for the year in which such termination occurred, as if Executive had been employed by Employer on the last day of such year in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the amount Executive would have received if Executive was employed by Employer on the last day of the such year, based upon actual company performance measured pursuant to the Annual Incentive Plan (and assuming for such purpose that 50% of any individual business objectives have been achieved), or (2) Executive’s target bonus percentage, such payment shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the Annual Incentive Plan under which the

award was granted, including without limitation any provisions related to whether all required performance measures for the payment of an award have been satisfied and the provisions of the Annual Incentive Plan regarding time of payment of such award.

          The above benefits are in addition to the Executive’s right to receive accrued but unused vacation pay through the date the employment period terminates, and all other benefits in which the Executive is vested pursuant to other plans and programs of the Company at the time of the Executive’s date of termination.

          Upon the death of Executive while severance payments are due to Executive, the Executive’s personal representative shall be entitled to the unpaid severance payments described in this Section IV.A and Executive’s spouse and covered dependents, if any, shall be entitled to the health benefit coverage described in this Section IV.A, except that the remaining severance payments under this Section IV.A shall be made in a lump sum within (10) days immediately following the Executive’s date of death.

          An Executive will be treated as having resigned for Good Reason only if he or she provides Employer with a Notice of Termination within 90 days of the initial existence of one of the conditions described in the definition of Good Reason below, following which the Employer shall have 30 days from the receipt of the Notice of Termination to cure the event specified in the Notice of Termination and, if Employer fails to so cure the event, the Executive terminates his or her employment not later than thirty (30) days following the end of such cure period.

          B. If the Executive’s employment is terminated by the Employer for Cause or if the Executive resigns but not for Good Reason, the Executive shall be entitled to receive only the Executive’s accrued but unpaid Base Annual Salary as of the date of termination.

          C. If the Executive’s employment is terminated as a result of Permanent Disability (as defined below), the Executive shall be entitled to receive the Executive’s accrued but unpaid Base Annual Salary as of the date of termination, the benefits described in Section IV.A above (payable in accordance with the payment rules of Section IV.A. above), plus any benefits to which he is then entitled under the Employer’s disability program, if any.

          D. “Good Reason” as used herein shall mean for any Executive subject to this Benefits Program, any of (i) a reduction in the Executive’s Base Annual Salary from the Base Annual Salary the previous year, except where such reduction is part of a general salary reduction for the Employer, or Executive ceasing to be eligible for an annual bonus under the Annual Incentive Plan, (ii) the Executive ceasing to hold the title of Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President, as the case may be, other than through promotion or through reassignment to another job title of comparable responsibility, and (iii) any reduction in job responsibilities which diminishes the opportunity for the Executive to earn the same bonus under the Annual Incentive Plan for which the Executive was previously eligible.

          E. “Cause” as used herein shall mean (i) any act or acts of material dishonesty by the Executive, (ii) the failure of the Executive to comply with any of the Executive’s material obligations to the Employer within ten (10) days of written notice from the Employer, (iii) any material violations by the Executive of the Employer’s corporate

policies as set forth in the Employer’s compliance manual or program, employee handbook or related corporate policies, provided that, if such violation is subject to cure, the Executive shall have ten (10) days within which to cure such violation, or (iv) the conviction of or “no contest” plea by the Executive to any misdemeanor of moral turpitude or any felony.

          F. “Permanent Disability” as used herein shall be deemed to have been sustained by the Executive if the Executive shall have been continuously disabled from performing the duties assigned to the Executive for a period of six (6) consecutive calendar months, and such Permanent Disability shall be deemed to have commenced on the day following the end of such six (6) consecutive calendar months. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that, as a result of an absence because of mental or physical incapacity or other impairment, the Executive incurs an earlier “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as may be amended (“Section 409A”), the Executive shall on such date automatically be terminated from employment as a result of Permanent Disability.

V. Change of Control.

A.	If, within the twelve-month period immediately following a Change of Control (defined below), the Executive’s employment is terminated by the Employer for reasons other than Cause or if the Executive resigns for Good Reason, and subject to the Executive’s execution of a general release upon terms and conditions consistent with this Agreement and acceptable to the Employer and Executive (such acceptance not to be unreasonably withheld), which release must be presented to Executive upon or promptly after termination of the Executive’s employment, fully executed, no longer subject to revocation, and become effective no later than the sixtieth (60th) day following the date on which the Executive’s employment terminates, then the Executive shall be entitled to the compensation and benefit coverage set forth in Section IV.A above, except that the severance payments in Section IV.A shall be in the form of a single lump-sum payment payable on the Lump-Sum Payment Date in an amount equal to thirty six (36) months of the Executive Vice President’s Base Annual Salary or twenty four (24) months of the Senior Vice President’s Base Annual Salary, as applicable.
B.	If, within the six-month period immediately following a termination of the Executive’s employment by Employer for reasons other than Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason, a Change of Control occurs, then, in addition to the payment set forth in Section IV.A above (which shall be paid in the manner specified in Section IV.A above), and subject to satisfaction by the Executive of the release requirements of Section IV.A above, the Executive shall receive a lump-sum payment on the Lump-Sum Payment Date equal to twelve (12) months (in the case of an Executive Vice President) or six (6) months (in the case of a Senior Vice President) of the Executive’s Annual Base Salary, as applicable.
C.	For purposes of this Benefits Program, “Change in Control of the Company” means a “change in control event” (as that term is defined at Section 1.409A- 3(i)(5) of the Treasury Regulations) with respect to the Company, which generally will include the following events, subject to such additional rules

and requirements as may be set forth in the Treasury Regulations and related guidance:

          (1) a transfer or issuance of stock of the Company, where stock in the Company remains outstanding after the transaction, and one person, or more than one person acting as a group (as determined under the Treasury Regulations), acquires ownership of stock in the Company that, together with stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of the Company (however, if a person or group is considered to own more than 50% of the total fair market value or 30% of the total voting power of the stock of the Company, the acquisition of additional stock by the same person or group will not be considered a change in control for purposes of this Section 2(f));

          (2) the acquisition by a person or group, during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or group, of ownership of stock possessing 30% or more of the total voting power of the Company (however, if a person or group is considered to control the Company within the meaning of this sentence (i.e., owns stock of the Company possessing 30% of the total voting power of the Company), then the acquisition of additional control will not be considered a change in control for purposes of this Section 2(1));

          (3) the replacement of a majority of members of the Company’s Board of Directors during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors before the appointment or election; or

          (4) the acquisition by a person or group, during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or group, of assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all the assets of the Company, as determined under the Treasury Regulations (however, a transfer of assets to certain related persons, as provided under the Treasury Regulations, or to an entity that is controlled by the shareholders of the Company immediately after the transfer, will not be considered a change in control for purposes of this Section 2(f)).

VI. Vacation.

The Executive shall be entitled to four weeks of paid vacation per year, prorated for partial years of employment.

VII. 401(k) Plan and other benefits.

          The Executive shall be eligible to participate in the Employer’s 401(k) plan and any other pension or welfare plan generally available from time to time to Executives or other employees of the Employer, as determined by the Compensation Committee, as well as an annual executive physical.

VIII. Non-Competition

          As a condition of employment and participation in this Benefits Program, the Executive shall execute a Non-Competition Agreement in a form approved by Holdings.

IX. Principal Residence

          The Executive shall be required to maintain his or her principal residence in the Purchase, New York area, except as may be otherwise expressly agreed in Section X, below, based upon Employer’s specific business need.

X. Variations from Benefits Program

          Any variation from the provisions of this Benefits Program (whether by separate employment agreement otherwise) shall be effective only if such variation is contained in a writing provided to the affected Executive and signed by the CEO, President or Chief Human Resources Officer of Holdings or of the Employer; provided, however, that no such modification or amendment after the date on which the Executive’s employment has been terminated for reasons other than Cause, for Good Reason or after the occurrence of a Change in Control shall adversely affect an Executive’s entitlement to severance benefits under Sections IV or V above.

XI. Section 409A.

          Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Benefits Program, if at the time of an Executive’s termination of employment, the Executive is a “specified employee,” as defined below, any and all amounts payable under this Benefits Program on account of such separation from service that constitute deferred compensation and would (but for this provision) be payable within six (6) months following the date of termination, shall instead be paid on the next business day following the expiration of such six (6) month period or, if earlier, upon the Executive’s death; except (A) to the extent of amounts that do not constitute a deferral of compensation within the meaning of Treasury regulation Section 1.409A-1 (b) (including without limitation by reason of the safe harbor set forth in Section 1.409A-1 (b)(9)(iii), as determined by the Company in its reasonable good faith discretion); (B) benefits that qualify as excepted welfare benefits pursuant to Treasury regulation Section 1.409A-1(a)(5); or (C) other amounts or benefits that are not subject to the requirements of Section 409A.

          For purposes of this Benefits Program, all references to “termination of employment” and correlative phrases shall be construed to require a “separation from service” (as defined in Section 1.409A-1 (h) of the Treasury regulations after giving effect to the presumptions contained therein), and the term “specified employee” means an individual determined by the Company to be a specified employee under Treasury regulation Section 1.409A-l(i).

          Each payment made under this Benefits Program shall be treated as a separate payment and the right to a series of installment payments under this Benefits Program is to be treated as a right to a series of separate payments.

          In no event shall the Company have any liability relating to the failure or alleged failure of any payment or benefit under this Benefits Program to comply with, or be exempt from, the requirements of Section 409A.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

      I, William J. Flynn, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the Financial Statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 3, 2011	/s/ William J. Flynn
	William J. Flynn
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

      I, Spencer Schwartz, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the Financial Statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting ( as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 3, 2011	/s/ Spencer Schwartz
	Spencer Schwartz
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, William J. Flynn and Spencer Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company certify that to our knowledge:

     1. the Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     Date: November 3, 2011

/s/ William J. Flynn  

William J. Flynn 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

/s/ Spencer Schwartz  

Spencer Schwartz 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parentheticals) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable	$ 1,644	$ 1,900
Preferred stock par value	$ 1	$ 1
Preferred stock shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock shares issued	0	0
Common stock par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock issued	27,458,043	26,955,923
Common stock outstanding	26,302,167	25,937,014
Treasury stock shares	1,155,876	1,018,909

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Operating Revenue
ACMI	$ 163,406	$ 144,685	$ 469,883	$ 383,917
AMC charter	122,581	72,506	316,230	303,314
Commercial charter	70,353	104,044	206,956	275,525
Dry leasing	3,065	2,157	6,742	5,384
Other	3,471	3,275	10,246	9,940
Total Operating Revenue	362,876	326,667	1,010,057	978,080
Operating Expenses
Aircraft fuel	103,663	74,221	278,188	222,336
Salaries, wages and benefits	61,911	56,244	185,173	177,677
Maintenance, materials and repairs	47,770	44,747	144,699	115,967
Aircraft rent	41,055	38,764	120,976	115,097
Landing fees and other rent	12,813	11,487	36,756	35,974
Travel	11,284	8,941	30,328	24,354
Depreciation and amortization	9,964	8,403	27,069	26,049
Ground handling and airport fees	6,036	6,423	17,141	17,645
Gain on disposal of aircraft	(163)	(161)	(464)	(3,541)
Other	25,043	22,702	72,580	80,177
Total Operating Expenses	319,376	271,771	912,446	811,735
Operating Income	43,500	54,896	97,611	166,345
Non-operating Expenses / (Income)
Interest income	(5,004)	(5,490)	(15,200)	(14,620)
Interest expense	9,801	10,176	30,009	30,396
Capitalized interest	(6,982)	(4,401)	(18,584)	(11,007)
Other (income) expense, net	(121)	(614)	(485)	(9,236)
Total Non-operating Income	(2,306)	(329)	(4,260)	(4,467)
Income before income taxes	45,806	55,225	101,871	170,812
Income tax expense	17,464	21,186	38,595	70,386
Net Income	28,342	34,039	63,276	100,426
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	136	235	706	176
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$ 28,206	$ 33,804	$ 62,570	$ 100,250
Earnings per share:
Basic	$ 1.07	$ 1.31	$ 2.39	$ 3.90
Diluted	$ 1.07	$ 1.29	$ 2.37	$ 3.85
Weighted average shares:
Basic	26,291	25,855	26,201	25,736
Diluted	26,452	26,143	26,416	26,038

XML

Financial Instruments (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Long Term Investments And Financial Instruments Tables [Abstract]

Carrying Amount, Estimated Fair Value and Classification of Our Financial Instruments

			September 30, 2011
			Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	417,352	$	417,352	$	417,352	$	-	$	-
	Short-term investments		7,913		7,913		-		-		7,913
	Restricted cash		120,252		120,252		120,252		-		-
	Long-term investments and accrued interest		133,200		162,313		-		-		162,313
		$	678,717	$	707,830	$	537,604	$	-	$	170,226
Liabilities
	Interest rate derivatives	$	23,011	$	23,011	$	-	$	23,011	$	-
	1998 EETCs		133,121		142,071		-		-		142,071
	1999 EETCs		148,942		150,889		-		-		150,889
	2000 EETCs		56,035		58,476		-		-		58,476
	Term loans		185,895		185,895		-		-		185,895
		$	547,004	$	560,342	$	-	$	23,011	$	537,331

			December 31, 2010
			Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	588,852	$	588,852	$	588,852	$	-	$	-
	Short-term investments		6,211		6,211		-		-		6,211
	Long-term investments and accrued interest		127,094		157,787		-		-		157,787
		$	722,157	$	752,850	$	588,852	$	-	$	163,998
Liabilities
	1998 EETCs	$	145,012	$	164,379	$	-	$	-	$	164,379
	1999 EETCs		159,043		171,478		-		-		171,478
	2000 EETCs		58,485		65,230		-		-		65,230
	PDP financing facility		46,871		46,861		-		-		46,861
	Term loans		77,822		79,198		-		-		79,198
		$	487,233	$	527,146	$	-	$	-	$	527,146

Carrying Value, Gross Unrealized Gains and Fair Value of Our Long-term Investments by Contractual Maturity

			September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Fair Value
Debt securities
Due after five but within ten years		$	133,200	$	29,113	$	162,313	$	73,356	$	18,363	$	91,719
Due after ten years			-		-		-		53,738		12,330		66,068
	Total	$	133,200	$	29,113	$	162,313	$	127,094	$	30,693	$	157,787

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Document period end date	Sep. 30, 2011
Amendment flag	false
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Current fiscal year end date	--12-31
Entity central index key	0001135185
Entity current reporting status	Yes
Entity filer category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity registrant name	ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS INC
Entity voluntary filers	No
Entity well known seasoned issuer	Yes
Entity common stock shares outstanding	26,302,167

XML

Earnings Per Share (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Earnings Per Share Tables [Abstract]

Calculations of Basic and Diluted EPS

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
Numerator:
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	28,206	$	33,804	$	62,570	$	100,250
Denominator:
Basic EPS weighted average shares outstanding		26,291		25,855		26,201		25,736
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock		161		288		215		302
Diluted EPS weighted average shares outstanding		26,452		26,143		26,416		26,038
EPS:
Basic	$	1.07	$	1.31	$	2.39	$	3.90
Diluted	$	1.07	$	1.29	$	2.37	$	3.85

XML

Debt

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Debt [Abstract]

Debt

5. Debt

On September 30, 2011, we borrowed $120.3 million for the pending purchase of our first 747-8F aircraft under a twelve-year term loan with a final payment of $32.6 million due in September 2023 (the “September 2011 Term Loan”). The proceeds from the September 2011 Term Loan were pledged as collateral to the lender and classified as Restricted cash at September 30, 2011. The proceeds were subsequently released upon delivery of our first 747-8F aircraft on November 2, 2011. The September 2011 Term Loan, which is secured by a mortgage against aircraft tail number N853GT, contains customary covenants and events of default and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.16%, payable quarterly. In addition, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, the September 2011 Term Loan is cross-defaulted to our aircraft pre-delivery deposit (“PDP”) financing facility.

XML

Comprehensive Income (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Schedule of Comprehensive Income Loss Table [Abstract]

Comprehensive Income

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	28,206	$	33,804	$	62,570	$	100,250
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives		(22,203)		-		(23,011)		-
Other		(516)		97		(439)		68
Income taxes related to items of Other comprehensive income (loss)		8,238		(26)		8,521		(17)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(14,481)		71		(14,929)		51
Comprehensive income	$	13,725	$	33,875	$	47,641	$	100,301

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011
Commitments And Contingencies Details [Abstract]
747-8F aircraft under purchase contracts	12
Rights to acquire additional number of 747-8F aircraft	14
747-8F aircraft purchases terminated	3
747-8F aircraft currently on order	9
747-8F aircraft to be delivered in fourth quarter 2011	3
747-8F aircraft delivered	1
Estimated expenditures for aircraft purchases 2011	$ 546.1
Estimated expenditures for aircraft purchases 2012	454.9
Estimated expenditures for aircraft purchases 2013	211.8
Advance payment for 747-8F aircraft	$ 210.4

XML

Segment Reporting (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Segment Reporting Tables [Abstract]

Schedule Of Segment Reporting Information By Segment Text Block

		For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
Operating Revenue:
ACMI	$	163,406	$	144,685	$	469,883	$	383,917
AMC Charter		122,581		72,506		316,230		303,314
Commercial Charter		70,353		104,044		206,956		275,525
Dry Leasing		3,065		2,157		6,742		5,384
Other		3,471		3,275		10,246		9,940
Total Operating Revenue	$	362,876	$	326,667	$	1,010,057	$	978,080

Direct Contribution:
ACMI	$	38,924	$	34,809	$	97,990	$	87,097
AMC Charter		21,709		18,819		55,651		95,096
Commercial Charter		7,142		26,205		24,772		78,372
Dry Leasing		1,387		1,565		3,400		3,692
Total Direct Contribution for Reportable Segments		69,162		81,398		181,813		264,257
Add back (subtract):
Unallocated income and expenses		(23,519)		(26,334)		(80,406)		(96,986)
Gain on disposal of aircraft		163		161		464		3,541
Income before Income Taxes		45,806		55,225		101,871		170,812
Add back (subtract):
Interest income		(5,004)		(5,490)		(15,200)		(14,620)
Interest expense		9,801		10,176		30,009		30,396
Capitalized interest		(6,982)		(4,401)		(18,584)		(11,007)
Other (income) expense, net		(121)		(614)		(485)		(9,236)
Operating Income	$	43,500	$	54,896	$	97,611	$	166,345

XML

Labor and Legal Proceedings

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Labor And Legal Proceedings [Abstract]

Labor and Legal Proceedings

10. Labor and Legal Proceedings

Labor

The pilots, flight engineers and dispatchers of Atlas and Polar are represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”). These employees represented approximately 54.1% of our workforce as of September 30, 2011. We are subject to risks of work interruption or stoppage as permitted by the Railway Labor Act of 1926 (the “Railway Labor Act”) and may incur additional administrative expenses associated with union representation of our employees.

The collective bargaining agreement for Atlas pilots and flight engineers became amendable in 2006. The collective bargaining agreement for Polar pilots and flight engineers became amendable in 2007. While both units have filed Railway Labor Act “Section 6” notices to begin negotiations for amended agreements, those negotiations were placed on hold in favor of completing the merger of the two crew forces. In 2004, we initiated steps to merge the represented crewmember bargaining units of Atlas and Polar. The respective collective bargaining agreements provide for a seniority integration process and the negotiation of a single collective bargaining agreement (“SCBA”).  This seniority list integration process was completed in 2006.

We received the integrated seniority lists and the parties have concluded negotiations for a five-year SCBA. In accordance with both the Atlas and Polar contracts, an arbitrator was assigned to resolve the few open contract issues that remained after we concluded negotiations. Those issues were submitted to the arbitrator in December 2010 for final and binding interest arbitration. The arbitrator issued a final ruling resulting in a new SCBA, with an effective date of September 8, 2011, which will not become amendable until September 2016. Under the terms of the new SCBA, the merger of the pilots and flight engineers of Atlas and Polar results in a single workforce that will serve both Atlas and Polar.

In 2009, the IBT was certified as the collective bargaining representative of the dispatchers employed by Atlas and Polar. Formal negotiations began in 2009 between the IBT and us regarding the first collective bargaining agreement for these dispatchers. Other than the crewmembers and dispatchers, there are no other Atlas or Polar employees represented by a union.

Legal Proceedings

Department of Justice Investigation and Related Litigation

In 2010, Old Polar entered into a plea agreement with the United States Department of Justice (the "DOJ") relating to the previously disclosed DOJ investigation concerning alleged manipulation by cargo carriers of fuel surcharges and other rate components for air cargo services (the “DOJ Investigation”). Under the terms of the agreement, approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Old Polar will pay a fine of $17.4 million, payable in five annual installments, the first of which was made in November 2010. The fine relates to an alleged agreement by Old Polar with respect to fuel surcharges on cargo shipped from the United States to Australia during the time period from January 2000 through April 2003.

As a result of the DOJ Investigation, the Company and Old Polar have been named defendants, along with a number of other cargo carriers, in several class actions in the United States arising from allegations about the pricing practices of a number of air cargo carriers that have now been consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The consolidated complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants, including the Company and Old Polar, manipulated the market price for air cargo services sold domestically and abroad through the use of surcharges, in violation of United States, state, and European Union antitrust laws. The suit seeks treble damages and injunctive relief.

In 2007, the Company and Old Polar commenced an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court against each of the plaintiffs in this class action litigation seeking to enjoin the plaintiffs from prosecuting claims against the Company and Old Polar that arose prior to 2004, the date on which the Company and Old Polar emerged from bankruptcy. In 2007, the plaintiffs consented to the injunctive relief requested and the bankruptcy court entered an order enjoining plaintiffs from prosecuting Company claims arising prior to 2004.

The court in the antitrust class actions has heard and decided a number of procedural motions. Among those was the plaintiffs' motion to join Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. as an additional defendant, which the court granted on April 13, 2011. The case is currently in the class certification discovery phase. There has been substantial pre-trial written discovery and document production, and a number of depositions have been taken. The plaintiffs' motion for class certification was filed on October 28, 2011, and the Company intends to oppose the motion. We are unable to predict the court's ruling on the motion or the ultimate outcome of the litigation.

The Company, Old Polar and a number of other cargo carriers have also been named as defendants in civil class action suits in the provinces of British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec, Canada that are substantially similar to the class action suits in the United States. The plaintiffs in the British Columbia case have indicated they do not intend to pursue their lawsuit against the Company and Old Polar. We are unable to reasonably predict the outcome of the litigation in Ontario and Quebec.

If the Company or Old Polar were to incur an unfavorable outcome in connection with one or more of the matters described above, such outcome is not expected to materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows.

Brazilian Customs Claim

Old Polar was cited for two alleged customs violations in Sao Paulo, Brazil, relating to shipments of goods dating back to 1999 and 2000. Each claim asserts that goods listed on the flight manifest of two separate Old Polar scheduled service flights were not on board the aircraft upon arrival and therefore were improperly brought into Brazil. The two claims, which also seek unpaid customs duties, taxes and penalties from the date of the alleged infraction, are approximately $10.8 million and $5.9 million, respectively, plus interest based on September 30, 2011exchange rates.

In both cases, we believe that the amounts claimed are substantially overstated due to a calculation error when considering the type and amount of goods allegedly missing, among other things. Furthermore, we may seek appropriate indemnity from the shipper in each claim as necessary. In the pending claim for $10.8 million, we received an administrative decision dismissing the claim in its entirety, which remains subject to a mandatory appeal by the Brazil customs authorities.As required to defend such claims, we have made deposits pending resolution of these matters. The balances were $6.6 million at September 30, 2011 and $6.8 million at December 31, 2010, and are included in Deposits and other assets.

We are currently defending these and other Brazilian customs claims and the ultimate disposition of these claims, either individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Trademark Matters

Since 2005, we have been involved in ongoing litigation in Europe against Atlas Transport, an unrelated and unaffiliated entity, over the use of the name “Atlas”. Following application by us to register the mark “ATLAS AIR” in the European Union (“EU”), opposition from Atlas Transport and follow-up filings by us, the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (“OHIM”), which handles trademark matters in the EU, declared Atlas Transport's own trademark “ATLAS” partially invalid because of the prior existence of our Benelux trademark registration.  In 2008, OHIM's First Board of Appeal upheld the lower panel's decision, and Atlas Transport appealed that decision to the EU General Court (formally the Court of First Instance), which upheld the court's decision on May 18, 2011. Atlas Transport has recently appealed that ruling to the European Court of Justice.

In 2007, Atlas Transport also filed a lawsuit in the Netherlands challenging the validity of our Benelux trademark. In 2009, following completion of its proceedings, the court issued a judgment in favor of us. Atlas Transport has appealed that decision to the Dutch Court of Appeal, but the judgment took effect immediately upon entry.

In 2009, Atlas Transport instituted a trademark infringement lawsuit against us in the regional court in Hamburg, Germany. The amended complaint alleges that Atlas Air has been unlawfully using Atlas Transport's trademark in Germany without permission and should be required to render information on the scope of use and pay compensation. In a supplementary motion, Atlas Transport asserts a cease and desist claim against Atlas Air, to be considered if the court denies the claim for compensation. On May 31, 2011, the court dismissed the case and Atlas Transport filed an appeal, which remains pending.

We believe that the ultimate disposition of these claims, either individually or in the aggregate, will not materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Other

We have certain other contingencies incident to the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the ultimate disposition of such other contingencies is not expected to materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

XML

Basis of Presentation

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Basis Of Presentation [Abstract]

Basis Of Presentation

1. Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the holding company, Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (“AAWW”) and its consolidated subsidiaries. AAWW is the parent company of its principal operating subsidiary, Atlas Air, Inc. (“Atlas”), and of Polar Air Cargo LLC (“Old Polar”). AAWW is also the parent company of several subsidiaries related to our dry leasing services (collectively referred to as “Titan”). In addition, we are the primary beneficiary of Global Supply Systems Limited (“GSS”), a consolidated subsidiary. AAWW has a 51% equity interest and 75% voting interest in Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. (“Polar”). We record our share of Polar's results under the equity method of accounting.

The terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” mean AAWW and all entities included in its consolidated financial statements.

We provide outsourced aircraft and aviation operating services throughout the world, serving Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America through: (i) contractual service arrangements, including contracts through which we provide aircraft to customers and value-added services, including crew, maintenance and insurance (“ACMI”), as well as contracts through which we provide crew, maintenance and insurance, with the customer providing the aircraft (“CMI”); (ii) military charter services (“AMC Charter”); (iii) seasonal, commercial and ad-hoc charter services (“Commercial Charter”); and (iv) dry leasing or sub-leasing of aircraft and engines (“Dry Leasing” or “Dry Lease”).

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes (the “Financial Statements”) have been prepared in accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) requirements for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and consequently, exclude certain disclosures normally included in audited consolidated financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes included in the AAWW Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which included additional disclosures and a summary of our significant accounting policies. In our opinion, the Financial Statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary to fairly state the financial position of AAWW and its consolidated subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, cash flows for thenine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and shareholders' equity as of and for the ninemonths ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

For interim accounting purposes, we recognize income taxes using an estimated annual effective tax rate.

Our quarterly results are subject to seasonal and other fluctuations, and the operating results for any quarter are therefore not necessarily indicative of results that may be otherwise expected for the entire year.

Except for per share data, all dollar amounts are in thousands unless otherwise noted.

XML

Financial Instruments (Text Details) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011
Interest Rate Derivatives [Abstract]
Notional amount of interest rate derivatives	$ 237.5	$ 237.5
Pre-tax loss in OCI for changes in fair value interest rate derivatives	22.2	23.0
After-tax loss in OCI for changes in fair value interest rate derivatives	14.1	14.7
Interest rate derivatives at fair value and net carrying value	7.4	7.4
Cash collateral on forward-starting interest rate derivatives	$ 15.6	$ 15.6

XML

Accrued Liabilities

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Accrued Liabilities [Abstract]

Accrued Liabilities

7. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of:

		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Maintenance	$	75,359	$	57,552
Salaries, wages and benefits		41,252		33,542
Aircraft fuel		26,360		17,710
Other		53,157		41,088
Accrued liabilities	$	196,128	$	149,892

XML

Comprehensive Income

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Comprehensive Income [Abstract]

Comprehensive Income

12. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes changes in the fair value of certain financial derivative instruments, which qualify for hedge accounting, and other items. The differences between net income attributable to common stockholders and comprehensive income were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	28,206	$	33,804	$	62,570	$	100,250
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives		(22,203)		-		(23,011)		-
Other		(516)		97		(439)		68
Income taxes related to items of Other comprehensive income (loss)		8,238		(26)		8,521		(17)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(14,481)		71		(14,929)		51
Comprehensive income	$	13,725	$	33,875	$	47,641	$	100,301

XML

Segment Reporting

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Segment Reporting

8. Segment Reporting

We have the following reportable segments: ACMI, AMC Charter, Commercial Charter and Dry Leasing. We use an economic performance metric (“Direct Contribution”) that shows the profitability of each segment after allocation of direct ownership costs. Direct Contribution consists of Income before income taxes and excludes the following: special charges, nonrecurring items, gains on the disposal of aircraft, unallocated revenue and unallocated fixed costs. Direct ownership costs include crew costs, maintenance, fuel, ground operations, sales costs, aircraft rent, interest expense related to aircraft debt, interest income on debt securities and aircraft depreciation. Unallocated income and expenses include corporate overhead, non-aircraft depreciation, interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses, other revenue and other non-operating costs, including special items. Management uses Direct Contribution to measure segment profitability as it shows each segment's contribution to unallocated fixed costs. Each segment has different operating and economic characteristics that are separately reviewed by our senior management.

Management allocates the costs attributable to aircraft operation and ownership among the various segments based on the aircraft type and activity levels in each segment. Depreciation and amortization expense, aircraft rent, maintenance expense, and other aircraft related expenses are allocated to segments based upon aircraft utilization because individual aircraft are utilized across segments interchangeably.In addition, certain ownership costs are directly apportioned to the ACMI segment. Other allocation methods are standard activity-based methods that are commonly used in the industry.

The ACMI segment provides aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance services to customers. Also included in the ACMI segment are the results of operations for CMI, which we began providing in the second quarter of 2010. CMI provides crew, maintenance and insurance services, with the customer providing the aircraft. Under both services, the customers utilize an insured and maintained aircraft with crew in exchange for a guaranteed monthly level of operation at a predetermined rate for a defined period of time. The customer bears the commercial revenue risk and the obligation for other direct operating costs, including fuel. The Direct Contribution from Express Network ACMI flying is reflected as ACMI.

The AMC Charter segment provides full-planeload charter flights to the U.S. Military. In addition to cargo flights, the AMC Charter segment includes passenger flights, which we began providing in the second quarter of 2011. We also earn commissions on subcontracting certain flying of oversized cargo, or in connection with flying cargo into areas of military conflict where we cannot perform these services on our own. Revenue from the AMC Charter business is typically derived from one-year contracts on a cost-plus basis with the AMC. Our current AMC contract runs from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Although we are responsible for the direct operating costs of the aircraft, the price paid for fuel consumed during AMC flights is fixed by the U.S. Military. We receive reimbursement from the AMC each month if the price of fuel paid by us to vendors for AMC missions exceeds the fixed price. Alternatively, if the price of fuel paid by us is less than the fixed price, we pay the difference to the AMC each month.

The Commercial Charter segment provides aircraft charters to freight forwarders, airlines and other air cargo customers. Charters are often paid in advance and we typically bear the direct operating costs.

The Dry Leasing segment provides for the leasing of aircraft and engines to customers.

Other represents revenue for services that are not allocated to any segment, includingadministrative and management support servicesand flight simulator training.

The following table sets forth Operating Revenue and Direct Contribution for our reportable business segments reconciled to Operating Income and Income before Income Taxes:

		For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
Operating Revenue:
ACMI	$	163,406	$	144,685	$	469,883	$	383,917
AMC Charter		122,581		72,506		316,230		303,314
Commercial Charter		70,353		104,044		206,956		275,525
Dry Leasing		3,065		2,157		6,742		5,384
Other		3,471		3,275		10,246		9,940
Total Operating Revenue	$	362,876	$	326,667	$	1,010,057	$	978,080

Direct Contribution:
ACMI	$	38,924	$	34,809	$	97,990	$	87,097
AMC Charter		21,709		18,819		55,651		95,096
Commercial Charter		7,142		26,205		24,772		78,372
Dry Leasing		1,387		1,565		3,400		3,692
Total Direct Contribution for Reportable Segments		69,162		81,398		181,813		264,257
Add back (subtract):
Unallocated income and expenses		(23,519)		(26,334)		(80,406)		(96,986)
Gain on disposal of aircraft		163		161		464		3,541
Income before Income Taxes		45,806		55,225		101,871		170,812
Add back (subtract):
Interest income		(5,004)		(5,490)		(15,200)		(14,620)
Interest expense		9,801		10,176		30,009		30,396
Capitalized interest		(6,982)		(4,401)		(18,584)		(11,007)
Other (income) expense, net		(121)		(614)		(485)		(9,236)
Operating Income	$	43,500	$	54,896	$	97,611	$	166,345

XML

Debt Percentage (Details)	Sep. 30, 2011
Debt [Abstract]
September 2011 Term Loan fixed rate	6.16%

XML

Financial Instruments

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Long Term Investments And Financial Instruments [Abstract]

Long-term Investments and Financial Instruments

6. Financial Instruments

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). Inputs used to measure fair value are classified in the following hierarchy:

Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2       Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in

active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or inactive quoted prices for identical

assets or liabilities in inactive markets;

Level 3Unobservable inputs reflecting assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the

asset or liability.

We endeavor to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value.

We maintain Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term investments and Restricted cash, which include cash on hand, demand deposits, other cash investments that are highly liquid in nature and have original maturities of three months or less at acquisition, certificates of deposit, current portion of debt securities and money market funds. The carrying value for Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term investments, and Restricted cash is based on cost, which approximates fair value.

Long-term investments consist of debt securities for which we have both the ability and the intent to hold until maturity. These investments are classified as held-to-maturity and reported at amortized cost. The fair value of our Long-term investments was based on a discounted cash flow analysis using the contractual cash flows of the investments and a discount rate derived from unadjusted quoted interest rates for debt securities of comparable risk. Such debt securities represent investments in Pass-Through Trust Certificates related to enchanced equipment trust certificates (“EETCs”) issued by Atlas in 1998, 1999 and 2000. Interest on debt securities and accretion of discounts using the effective interest method are included in Interest income.

The fair value of our EETCs was estimated based on Level 3 inputs. We obtained Level 2 inputs of quoted market prices of our equipment notes and used them as a basis for valuing the EETCs.

The fair value of our PDP financing facility and term loans was based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current borrowing rates for instruments with similar terms.

The fair value of our interest rate derivatives was based on Level 2 inputs utilized in expected cash flow models. The incorporated market inputs include the implied forward London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) yield curve for the same period as the future interest swap settlements. These derivatives are designated as hedging instruments.

The following table summarizes the carrying amount, estimated fair value and classification of our financial instruments as of:

			September 30, 2011
			Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	417,352	$	417,352	$	417,352	$	-	$	-
	Short-term investments		7,913		7,913		-		-		7,913
	Restricted cash		120,252		120,252		120,252		-		-
	Long-term investments and accrued interest		133,200		162,313		-		-		162,313
		$	678,717	$	707,830	$	537,604	$	-	$	170,226
Liabilities
	Interest rate derivatives	$	23,011	$	23,011	$	-	$	23,011	$	-
	1998 EETCs		133,121		142,071		-		-		142,071
	1999 EETCs		148,942		150,889		-		-		150,889
	2000 EETCs		56,035		58,476		-		-		58,476
	Term loans		185,895		185,895		-		-		185,895
		$	547,004	$	560,342	$	-	$	23,011	$	537,331

			December 31, 2010
			Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	588,852	$	588,852	$	588,852	$	-	$	-
	Short-term investments		6,211		6,211		-		-		6,211
	Long-term investments and accrued interest		127,094		157,787		-		-		157,787
		$	722,157	$	752,850	$	588,852	$	-	$	163,998
Liabilities
	1998 EETCs	$	145,012	$	164,379	$	-	$	-	$	164,379
	1999 EETCs		159,043		171,478		-		-		171,478
	2000 EETCs		58,485		65,230		-		-		65,230
	PDP financing facility		46,871		46,861		-		-		46,861
	Term loans		77,822		79,198		-		-		79,198
		$	487,233	$	527,146	$	-	$	-	$	527,146

The following table presents the carrying value, gross unrealized gains and fair value of our long-term investments by contractual maturity as of:

			September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Fair Value
Debt securities
Due after five but within ten years		$	133,200	$	29,113	$	162,313	$	73,356	$	18,363	$	91,719
Due after ten years			-		-		-		53,738		12,330		66,068
	Total	$	133,200	$	29,113	$	162,313	$	127,094	$	30,693	$	157,787

Interest Rate Derivatives

We are exposed to changes in interest ratesfor projected issuances of debt related to the future financing of the Boeing 747-8F aircraft that we have on order. We use forward-starting interest rate swaps to effectively fix the interest rate for anticipated 747-8F financings in 2011.The use of forward-starting interest rate swaps effectively converts our floating-rate forecasted debt issuance to a fixed rate basis. When entering into forward-starting interest rate swaps, we become exposed to both credit risk and market risk. We are subject to counterparty credit risk when the value of the forward-starting interest rate swaps are a gain and the risk exists that the counterparty will fail to perform under the terms of the contract. We are subject to market risk with respect to changes in the underlying benchmark interest rate that impacts the fair value of the forward-starting interest rate swaps. We manage our counterparty credit risk by only entering into forward-starting interest rate swaps with major financial institutions with investment-grade credit ratings. We manage our market risk by matching the terms of each forward-starting interest rate swap with a specified expected debt issuance. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge. This process includes specific identification of the hedging instrument and the hedged transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged and how the hedging instrument's effectiveness will be assessed. Both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, we assess whether the derivatives used in a projected transaction are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or the fair value of hedged items.

In May 2011, we entered into two forward-starting interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $237.5 million to hedge the risk of changes in quarterly interest payments due to fluctuations in the forward 90-day LIBOR swap rate for anticipated fixed-rate debt issuances in 2011. We designated these forward-starting interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair value of the effective portion of the forward-starting interest rate swaps are recorded as a gain or loss in other comprehensive income (loss) until the underlying hedged item is recognized in net income. We classify both the net earnings and cash flow impact from these forward-starting interest rate swaps consistent with the underlying hedged item. In the event the debt is not issued and the forward-starting interest rate swaps are terminated, any gain or loss from the termination would be recorded in net income immediately. Hedging ineffectiveness and a net earnings impact would occur if the change in the value of the hedge did not offset the change in the value of the underlying hedged item.

The forward-starting interest rate swaps outstanding as of September 30, 2011 relate to anticipated debt issuances in the fourth quarter of 2011. As of September 30, 2011, the fair value of these forward-starting interest rate swaps was $23.0 million, offset by cash collateral of $15.6 million, resulting in a net carrying valueof $7.4 millionincluded within Accrued liabilities.

We recorded unrealized pre-tax and after-tax losses of $22.2 million and $14.1million in Other comprehensive loss for changes in the fair value of our forward-starting interest rate swaps forthe threemonths ended September 30, 2011and $23.0 million and $14.7 millionfor the nine months ended September 30, 2011. There was no ineffectiveness associated with these hedges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands	Total	Total Stockholders Equity	Common Stock	Treasury Stock	Additional Paid In Capital	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Retained Earnings	Noncontrolling Interest
Balance at at Dec. 31, 2009	$ 888,757	$ 886,273	$ 266	$ (26,394)	$ 481,074	$ 471	$ 430,856	$ 2,484
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	100,426	100,250					100,250	176
Other comprehensive income (loss)	51	51				51
Other comprehensive income (loss) including noncontrolling interest	117							66
Comprehensive income	100,543	100,301
Stock option and restricted stock compensation	10,489	10,489			10,489
Purchase of shares of treasury stock	(5,777)	(5,777)		(5,777)
Exercise of employee stock options	3,522	3,522			3,522
Issuance of shares of restricted stock	0	0	3		(3)
Tax benefit on restricted stock and stock options	1,677	1,677			1,677
Balance at at Sep. 30, 2010	999,211	996,485	269	(32,171)	496,759	522	531,106	2,726
Balance at at Dec. 31, 2010	1,050,090	1,046,443	270	(32,248)	505,297	458	572,666	3,647
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	63,276	62,570					62,570	706
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(14,929)	(14,929)				(14,929)
Other comprehensive income (loss) including noncontrolling interest	(14,921)							8
Comprehensive income	48,355	47,641				0	0
Stock option and restricted stock compensation	9,497	9,497			9,497
Purchase of shares of treasury stock	(9,198)	(9,198)		(9,198)
Exercise of employee stock options	4,733	4,733	1		4,732
Issuance of shares of restricted stock	0	0	4		(4)
Tax benefit on restricted stock and stock options	3,128	3,128			3,128
Balance at at Sep. 30, 2011	$ 1,106,605	$ 1,102,244	$ 275	$ (41,446)	$ 522,650	$ (14,471)	$ 635,236	$ 4,361

XML

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board amended its guidance on the presentation ofcomprehensive income to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The new guidance requires that all components of comprehensive income in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.The new guidance is effective as of the beginning of 2012 and itsadoption will not have any impact on ourfinancial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

XML

Earnings Per Share (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Numerator
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$ 28,206	$ 33,804	$ 62,570	$ 100,250
Denominator
Basic EPS weighted average shares outstanding	26,291	25,855	26,201	25,736
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock	161	288	215	302
Diluted EPS weighted average shares outstanding	26,452	26,143	26,416	26,038
Earnings per share:
Basic	$ 1.07	$ 1.31	$ 2.39	$ 3.90
Diluted	$ 1.07	$ 1.29	$ 2.37	$ 3.85
Restricted shares and units in which performance or market conditions were not satisfied	0.3	0.2	0.3	0.3

XML

Debt (Details) (USD $) In Millions	Sep. 30, 2011
Debt [Abstract]
September 2011 Term Loan	$ 120.3
September 2011 Term Loan final payment	$ 32.6

XML

DHL Investment and Polar

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

DHL Investment And Polar [Abstract]

DHL Investment And Polar

3. DHL Investment and Polar

Polar provides air cargo capacity to its customers, including DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. ("DHL"), through a blocked-space agreement that began on October 27, 2008. The aggregate carrying value of our Polar investment,included within Deposits and other assets, was $4.9millionat September 30, 2011and $5.3millionat December 31, 2010.

Polar currently operates six 747-400 freighter aircraft that are subleased from us.  An additional two aircraft are operated by Atlas to support the Polar network and DHL through an alliance agreement whereby Atlas provides ACMI services to Polar. We also provide incremental charter capacity to Polar on an as-needed basis. Atlas and Polar have entered into various agreements under which we provide Polar with crew, maintenance and insurance for the subleased aircraft. Collectively, these service agreements and the subleases are referred to as “Express Network ACMI”. We provide Polar with certain management and administrative services under a shared services agreement. In addition, Polar and Atlas provide each other with sales and ground support services under a general sales and services agreement. The following table summarizes our transactions with Polar:

		For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
Revenue and Expenses:			September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
	ACMI revenue from Polar	$	61,089	$	47,212	$	167,739	$	138,952
	Other revenue from Polar	$	2,837	$	2,837	$	8,512	$	8,512
	Ground handling and airport fees to Polar	$	280	$	519	$	840	$	1,645
Accounts receivable/payable as of:			September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	Receivables from Polar	$	3,116	$	8,009
	Payables to Polar	$	4,329	$	2,945

XML

Income Taxes (Details)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Effective Income Tax Rate Continuing Operations Tax Rate Reconciliation [Abstract]
Effective income tax rate	38.10%	38.40%	37.90%	41.20%

XML

DHL Investment and Polar (Tables Details) (Polar [Member], USD $) In Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Dec. 31, 2010
Polar [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
ACMI revenue from Polar	$ 61,089	$ 47,212	$ 167,739	$ 138,952
Other revenue from Polar	2,837	2,837	8,512	8,512
Ground handling and airport fees to Polar	280	519	840	1,645
Receivables from Polar	3,116		3,116		8,009
Payables to Polar	$ 4,329		$ 4,329		$ 2,945

XML

Financial Instruments (Fair Value Table Details) (USD $) In Thousands	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Sep. 30, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 417,352	$ 588,852	$ 545,288	$ 613,740
Short-term investments	7,913	6,211
Restricted cash	120,252	0
Long-term investments and accrued interest	133,200	127,094
Carrying Value
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	417,352	588,852
Short-term investments	7,913	6,211
Restricted cash	120,252
Long-term investments and accrued interest	133,200	127,094
Financial instruments assets	678,717	722,157
Liabilities
Interest rate derivatives	23,011
1998 EETCs	133,121	145,012
1999 EETCs	148,942	159,043
2000 EETCs	56,035	58,485
PDP financing facility		46,871
Term loans	185,895	77,822
Financial instruments liabilities	547,004	487,233
Fair Value
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	417,352	588,852
Short-term investments	7,913	6,211
Restricted cash	120,252
Long-term investments and accrued interest	162,313	157,787
Financial instruments assets	707,830	752,850
Liabilities
Interest rate derivatives	23,011
1998 EETCs	142,071	164,379
1999 EETCs	150,889	171,478
2000 EETCs	58,476	65,230
PDP financing facility		46,861
Term loans	185,895	79,198
Financial instruments liabilities	560,342	527,146
Level 1
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	417,352	588,852
Short-term investments	0	0
Restricted cash	120,252
Long-term investments and accrued interest	0	0
Financial instruments assets	537,604	588,852
Liabilities
Interest rate derivatives	0
1998 EETCs	0	0
1999 EETCs	0	0
2000 EETCs	0	0
PDP financing facility		0
Term loans	0	0
Financial instruments liabilities	0	0
Level 2
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	0	0
Short-term investments	0	0
Restricted cash	0
Long-term investments and accrued interest	0	0
Financial instruments assets	0	0
Liabilities
Interest rate derivatives	23,011
1998 EETCs	0	0
1999 EETCs	0	0
2000 EETCs	0	0
PDP financing facility		0
Term loans	0	0
Financial instruments liabilities	23,011	0
Level 3
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	0	0
Short-term investments	7,913	6,211
Restricted cash	0
Long-term investments and accrued interest	162,313	157,787
Financial instruments assets	170,226	163,998
Liabilities
Interest rate derivatives	0
1998 EETCs	142,071	164,379
1999 EETCs	150,889	171,478
2000 EETCs	58,476	65,230
PDP financing facility		46,861
Term loans	185,895	79,198
Financial instruments liabilities	$ 537,331	$ 527,146

XML

Comprehensive Income (Details) (USD $) In Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Tax [Abstract]
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$ 28,206	$ 33,804	$ 62,570	$ 100,250
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments	(22,203)	0	(23,011)	0
Other	(516)	97	(439)	68
Income taxes related to items of Other comprehensive income (loss)	8,238	(26)	8,521	(17)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(14,481)	71	(14,929)	51
Comprehensive income	$ 13,725	$ 33,875	$ 47,641	$ 100,301

XML

Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers (Details)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Dec. 31, 2010
AMC
Revenue Percentage Total Revenue [Abstract]
Revenue as a percentage of Total Operating Revenue	33.80%	22.20%	31.30%	31.00%
Receivables Percentage Total Receivables [Abstract]
Accounts Receivable as a percentage of Total Accounts receivable, net of allowance	24.90%				10.50%
Polar
Revenue Percentage Total Revenue [Abstract]
Revenue as a percentage of Total Operating Revenue	17.60%	15.30%	17.40%	15.10%
ACMI Revenue Net Percentage [Abstract]
Revenue as a percentage of Total ACMI Revenue	37.40%	32.60%	35.70%	36.20%
Receivables Percentage Total Receivables [Abstract]
Accounts Receivable as a percentage of Total Accounts receivable, net of allowance	3.70%				10.20%

XML

Earnings Per Share

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share

11. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) represents net income attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period. Diluted EPS represents net income attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period while also giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the period. There were no anti-dilutive restricted shares and options that were out of the money and excluded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

The calculations of basic and diluted EPS were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
Numerator:
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	28,206	$	33,804	$	62,570	$	100,250
Denominator:
Basic EPS weighted average shares outstanding		26,291		25,855		26,201		25,736
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock		161		288		215		302
Diluted EPS weighted average shares outstanding		26,452		26,143		26,416		26,038
EPS:
Basic	$	1.07	$	1.31	$	2.39	$	3.90
Diluted	$	1.07	$	1.29	$	2.37	$	3.85

Diluted shares reflect the potential dilution that could occur from stock options and restricted shares using the treasury stock method. The calculation does not include restricted shares and units in which performance or market conditions were not satisfied of 0.3 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, and 0.2 million and 0.3 million for the threeand nine months September 30, 2010, respectively.

XML

Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Concentration Of Credit Risk And Significant Customers [Abstract]

Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

4. Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

We are exposed to concentration of credit risk by our customers. The following table summarizes our significant exposure to Polar andthe U.S. Military Air Mobility Command (“AMC”). We have not experienced credit issues with either of these customers.No other customer accounted for 10.0% or more of our Total Operating Revenue.

		For the Three Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended
Revenue as a % of Total Operating Revenue:		September 30, 2011	September 30, 2010	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2010
	AMC	33.8%	22.2%	31.3%	31.0%
	Polar	17.6%	15.3%	17.4%	15.1%
		For the Three Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended
Revenue as a % of Total ACMI Revenue:		September 30, 2011	September 30, 2010	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2010
	Polar	37.4%	32.6%	35.7%	36.2%
Accounts receivable as a % of Total Accounts receivable, net of allowance, as of:		September 30, 2011	December 31, 2010
	AMC	24.9%	10.5%
	Polar	3.7%	10.2%

XML

DHL Investment and Polar (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

DHL Investment And Polar Tables [Abstract]

Related Party Disclosure for Polar

		For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
Revenue and Expenses:			September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
	ACMI revenue from Polar	$	61,089	$	47,212	$	167,739	$	138,952
	Other revenue from Polar	$	2,837	$	2,837	$	8,512	$	8,512
	Ground handling and airport fees to Polar	$	280	$	519	$	840	$	1,645
Accounts receivable/payable as of:			September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	Receivables from Polar	$	3,116	$	8,009
	Payables to Polar	$	4,329	$	2,945

XML

Labor and Legal Proceedings (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Labor And Legal Proceedings [Abstract]
Union work force percentage	54.10%
Old Polar DOJ agreement	$ 17.4
Brazilian claim one	10.8
Brazilian claim two	5.9
Amounts on deposit for claims	$ 6.6	$ 6.8

XML

DHL Investment and Polar (Text Details) (USD $) In Millions	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Equity Method Investment, Summarized Financial Information [Abstract]
The aggregate carrying value of our Polar investment	$ 4.9	$ 5.3

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Operating Activities:
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders	$ 62,570	$ 100,250
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	706	176
Net Income	63,276	100,426
Adjustments to reconcile Net Income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	27,069	26,049
Amortization of debt discount	3,753	4,011
Amortization of operating lease discount	1,789	1,750
Amortization of debt issuance costs	300	219
Accretion of debt securities discount	(6,208)	(5,979)
Provision for (release of) allowance for doubtful accounts	(17)	75
Gain on disposal of aircraft	(464)	(3,541)
Deferred taxes	14,882	18,071
Stock-based compensation expense	9,497	10,489
Changes in:
Accounts receivable	(4,573)	(5,539)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(21,801)	(6,576)
Deposits and other assets	(12,622)	(2,200)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	43,757	76,838
Net cash provided by operating activities	118,638	214,093
Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures	(205,359)	(59,590)
Changes in restricted cash	(120,252)	0
Investment in debt securities	0	(100,090)
Proceeds from short-term investments	4,662	4,374
Proceeds from disposal of aircraft	1,165	5,018
Net cash used for investing activities	(319,784)	(150,288)
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from stock option exercises	4,733	3,522
Purchase of treasury stock	(9,198)	(5,777)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation expense	3,128	1,677
Proceeds from loan	120,250	20,637
Payment of debt issuance costs	(2,024)	0
Payments of debt	(87,243)	(152,316)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities	29,646	(132,257)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(171,500)	(68,452)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period	588,852	613,740
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period	$ 417,352	$ 545,288

XML

Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Concentration Of Credit Risk And Significant Customers Tables [Abstract]

Concentration of Credit Risk by Our Customers

		For the Three Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended
Revenue as a % of Total Operating Revenue:		September 30, 2011	September 30, 2010	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2010
	AMC	33.8%	22.2%	31.3%	31.0%
	Polar	17.6%	15.3%	17.4%	15.1%
		For the Three Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended
Revenue as a % of Total ACMI Revenue:		September 30, 2011	September 30, 2010	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2010
	Polar	37.4%	32.6%	35.7%	36.2%
Accounts receivable as a % of Total Accounts receivable, net of allowance, as of:		September 30, 2011	December 31, 2010
	AMC	24.9%	10.5%
	Polar	3.7%	10.2%

XML

Accrued Liabilities (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Accrued Liabilities [Abstract]

Accrued Liabilities

		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Maintenance	$	75,359	$	57,552
Salaries, wages and benefits		41,252		33,542
Aircraft fuel		26,360		17,710
Other		53,157		41,088
Accrued liabilities	$	196,128	$	149,892

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Parentheticals)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Unaudited)
Purchase of shares of treasury stock	136,967	124,855
Exercise of employee stock options	122,354	111,320
Issuance of shares of restricted stock	379,766	200,137

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure

9. Commitments and Contingencies

In 2006, we entered into an agreement with The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) providing for our purchase of 12 747-8F aircraft (the “Boeing 747-8F Agreement”). The Boeing 747-8F Agreement provided for deliveries of the aircraft to begin in 2010, with all 12 deliveries originally contractually scheduled for delivery by the end of 2011. In addition, the Boeing 747-8F Agreement provides us with rights to purchase up to an additional 14 747-8F aircraft, of which one is being held under option.

Since the initial date of the Boeing 747-8F Agreement, Boeing has announced several delays in the delivery schedule of the 12 747-8F aircraft. In September 2011, after lengthy delays and performance considerations, we exercised our termination rights in connection with three early build 747-8F aircraft.We now have nine 747-8F aircraft on order.

As a result of the announced delays, Boeing proposed a revised delivery and payment schedule in September 2011.Estimated expenditures under the proposed schedule as of September 30, 2011, including estimated amounts for contractual price escalations and advance payments, are $546.1 million for the remainder of 2011, $454.9 million in 2012 and $211.8 million in 2013. Although we do not agree with the payment schedule that Boeing has proposed, we made an advance payment of $210.4 million in October 2011, while reserving all rights with respect to such payment. The proposed delivery schedule provides that our first three 747-8F aircraft are to be delivered in the fourth quarter of 2011, one of which was delivered on November 2, 2011. We accepted this delivery, subject to a reservation of rights regarding certain matters under the purchase agreement.

XML

Financial Instruments (Contractual Maturity Table Details) (USD $) In Thousands	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Debt securities
Due after five but within ten years, carrying value	$ 133,200	$ 73,356
Due after ten years, carrying value	0	53,738
Total, carrying value	133,200	127,094
Due after five but within ten years, gross unrealized gains	29,113	18,363
Due after ten years, gross unrealized gains	0	12,330
Total, gross unrealized gains	29,113	30,693
Due after five but within ten years, fair value	162,313	91,719
Due after ten years, fair value	0	66,068
Total, fair value	$ 162,313	$ 157,787

XML

Income Taxes

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Taxes

13. Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rates were 38.1% and 38.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and2010, respectively, and were 37.9% and 41.2%for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The changes in the effective ratesfrom 2010 to 2011 were primarily due to non-deductible litigation settlements in 2010. The effective rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate due to the income tax impact of global operations, U.S. state income taxes, the non-deductibility of certain expenses for tax purposes, and the relationship of these items to our projected operating results for the year.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 417,352	$ 588,852
Short-term investments	7,913	6,211
Restricted cash	120,252	0
Accounts receivable, net of allowance	84,802	78,334
Prepaid maintenance	38,154	26,102
Deferred taxes	3,288	3,721
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	27,775	24,212
Total current assets	699,536	727,432
Property and Equipment
Flight equipment	897,216	766,681
Ground equipment	32,338	29,124
Less: accumulated depreciation	(154,930)	(138,851)
Purchase deposits for flight equipment	396,030	336,969
Property and equipment, net	1,170,654	993,923
Other Assets
Long-term investments and accrued interest	133,200	127,094
Deposits and other assets	58,934	45,026
Intangible assets, net	41,157	42,627
Total Assets	2,103,481	1,936,102
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	37,571	22,954
Accrued liabilities	196,128	149,892
Current portion of long-term debt	57,819	96,197
Total current liabilities	291,518	269,043
Other Liabilities
Long-term debt	466,174	391,036
Deferred taxes	109,246	103,150
Other liabilities	129,938	122,783
Total other liabilities	705,358	616,969
Commitments and contingencies	0	0
Equity
Preferred stock	0	0
Common stock	275	270
Additional paid-in-capital	522,650	505,297
Treasury stock, at cost	(41,446)	(32,248)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(14,471)	458
Retained earnings	635,236	572,666
Total stockholders equity	1,102,244	1,046,443
Noncontrolling interest	4,361	3,647
Total equity	1,106,605	1,050,090
Total Liabilities and Equity	$ 2,103,481	$ 1,936,102

XML

Accrued Liabilities (Details) (USD $) In Thousands	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Accrued Liabilities Details [Abstract]
Maintenance	$ 75,359	$ 57,552
Salaries, wages and benefits	41,252	33,542
Aircraft fuel	26,360	17,710
Other	53,157	41,088
Accrued liabilities	$ 196,128	$ 149,892

XML

Segment Reporting (Details) (USD $) In Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Operating Revenue
ACMI	$ 163,406	$ 144,685	$ 469,883	$ 383,917
AMC charter	122,581	72,506	316,230	303,314
Commercial charter	70,353	104,044	206,956	275,525
Dry leasing	3,065	2,157	6,742	5,384
Other	3,471	3,275	10,246	9,940
Total Operating Revenue	362,876	326,667	1,010,057	978,080
Direct Contribution
ACMI	38,924	34,809	97,990	87,097
AMC Charter	21,709	18,819	55,651	95,096
Commercial Charter	7,142	26,205	24,772	78,372
Dry Leasing	1,387	1,565	3,400	3,692
Total Direct Contribution for Reportable Segments	69,162	81,398	181,813	264,257
Unallocated income and expenses	(23,519)	(26,334)	(80,406)	(96,986)
Gain on disposal of aircraft	163	161	464	3,541
Income before income taxes	45,806	55,225	101,871	170,812
Interest income	(5,004)	(5,490)	(15,200)	(14,620)
Interest expense	9,801	10,176	30,009	30,396
Capitalized interest	(6,982)	(4,401)	(18,584)	(11,007)
Other (income) expense, net	(121)	(614)	(485)	(9,236)
Operating Income	$ 43,500	$ 54,896	$ 97,611	$ 166,345