Basis of Presentation (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of ProAssurance Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries (ProAssurance, PRA or the Company). The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, have been included. ProAssurance’s results for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes contained in ProAssurance’s December 31, 2017 report on Form 10-K. In connection with its preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, ProAssurance evaluated events that occurred subsequent to March 31, 2018 for recognition or disclosure in its financial statements and notes to financial statements.

ProAssurance operates in four reportable segments as follows: Specialty P&C, Workers' Compensation, Lloyd's Syndicate and Corporate. For more information on the nature of products and services provided and for financial information by segment, refer to Note 12.

Reclassifications

In the second quarter of 2017, ProAssurance began presenting separately the components of underwriting, policy acquisition and operating expense as operating expense and DPAC amortization on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in order to provide additional details for investors. The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Total underwriting, policy acquisition and operating expense as well as net income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was not affected by the change in presentation.

Certain other insignificant prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Accounting Changes Adopted and Not Yet Adopted

Accounting Changes Adopted

Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance related to the classification of restricted cash presented in the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. Under the new guidance, entities are required to include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts as presented on the statement of cash flows. ProAssurance adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2018. Adoption of the guidance had no material effect on ProAssurance’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory (ASU 2016-16)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance which reduces the complexity in accounting standards related to the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory between tax-paying components. A tax-paying component is an individual entity or group of entities that is consolidated for tax purposes. Under the new guidance, entities are required to recognize income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs instead of delaying recognition until the asset has been sold to an outside party. ProAssurance adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2018. Adoption of the guidance had no material effect on ProAssurance’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (ASU 2016-15)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance related to the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments presented in the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. ProAssurance adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2018 and elected to use the cumulative earnings approach for presenting distributions from equity method investees. Adoption of the guidance had no material effect on ProAssurance’s results of operations or financial position; however, ProAssurance reclassified approximately $10.9 million in distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries from investing activities to operating activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 the FASB issued guidance related to revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of the new guidance is that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ProAssurance adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective method. Adoption of the guidance had no material effect on ProAssurance’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance that requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The new guidance also specifies that an entity use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes and present financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset. Other provisions of the new guidance include: revised disclosure requirements related to the presentation in comprehensive income of changes in the fair value of liabilities; elimination, for public companies, of disclosure requirements relative to the methods and significant assumptions underlying fair values disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost; and simplified impairment assessments for equity investments without readily determinable fair values. ProAssurance adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective application and recorded a cumulative-effect after-tax adjustment of approximately $8.3 million to beginning retained earnings in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Capital for the three months ended March 31, 2018. Adoption of the guidance had no material effect on ProAssurance’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Modification Accounting for Employee Share-Based Payment Awards (ASU 2017-09)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance which reduces the complexity in accounting standards when there is a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The new guidance clarifies that an entity should apply the modification accounting guidance if the value, vesting conditions or classification of the award changes. ProAssurance adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2018. Adoption of the guidance had no material effect on ProAssurance’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from AOCI (ASU 2018-02)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted, the FASB issued guidance which permits a reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the newly enacted federal corporate tax rate from the TCJA. The amount of the reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings will be the difference between the historical corporate tax rate and the newly enacted 21% corporate tax rate on deferred tax items originally established through OCI and not net income. The guidance allows entities to adopt in any interim or annual period for which financial statements have not yet been issued and apply the guidance either (1) in the period of adoption or (2) retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the tax rate is recognized. ProAssurance adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2018 and elected to apply this guidance in the period of adoption using the specific identification method. Using a modified retrospective application, ProAssurance recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment which increased beginning AOCI by approximately $3.4 million and decreased beginning retained earnings by the same amount in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Capital for the three months ended March 31, 2018. Adoption of this guidance had no material effect on ProAssurance's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Accounting Changes Not Yet Adopted

Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments - Overall (ASU 2018-03)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2018, the FASB amended the new standard on recognizing and measuring financial assets and financial liabilities to clarify certain aspects of the guidance. Under the amended guidance, an entity that uses the measurement alternative for equity investments without readily determinable fair values can change its measurement approach to a fair value method through an irrevocable election that would apply to that security and all identical or similar investments of the same issuer. Also, entities are required to use the prospective transition approach only for equity investments they elect to measure using the new measurement alternative. Additionally, the guidance clarifies how to apply the measurement alternative and presentation requirements for financial liabilities measured under the fair value option. ProAssurance plans to adopt the guidance beginning July 1, 2018. As of March 31, 2018, ProAssurance does not have any equity investments without readily determinable fair values or financial liabilities measured under the fair value option; therefore, adoption of the guidance is not expected to have a material effect on ProAssurance’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Leases (ASU 2016-02)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance that requires a lessee to recognize for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) a lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ProAssurance plans to adopt the guidance beginning January 1, 2019 and is currently in the process of evaluating all of its leases. As the majority of ProAssurance's leases are real estate operating leases and are not considered to be material, adoption of the guidance is not expected to have a material effect on ProAssurance’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities (ASU 2017-08)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance that will require the premium for certain callable debt securities to be amortized over a shorter period than is currently required. Currently amortization is permitted over the contractual life of the instrument and the guidance shortens the amortization to the earliest call date. The purpose of the guidance is to more closely align the amortization period of premiums to expectations incorporated in market pricing on the underlying securities. ProAssurance plans to adopt the guidance beginning January 1, 2019. As ProAssurance amortizes premium on callable debt securities to the earliest call date, adoption of the guidance is not expected to have a material effect on ProAssurance’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Derivatives and Hedging (ASU 2017-12)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance to improve financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the entity's risk management activities in the consolidated financial statements. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and requires the entire change in the fair value of a hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. ProAssurance plans to adopt the guidance beginning January 1, 2019. ProAssurance's derivative instrument at March 31, 2018 is not designated as a hedging instrument; therefore, adoption is not expected to have a material effect on ProAssurance's results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Improvements to Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (ASU 2016-13)

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance that replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology, which delays recognition of credit losses until a probable loss has been incurred, with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. Under the new guidance, credit losses are required to be recorded through an allowance for credit losses account and the income statement reflects the measurement for newly recognized financial assets, as well as increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. ProAssurance is in the process of evaluating the effect the new guidance would have on its results of operations and financial position and plans to adopt the guidance beginning January 1, 2020.

Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (ASU 2017-04)

Effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years, the FASB issued guidance that simplifies the requirements to test goodwill for impairment for business entities that have goodwill reported in their financial statements. The guidance eliminates the second step of the impairment test which measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount. In addition, the guidance also eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment. ProAssurance plans to adopt the guidance beginning January 1, 2020. Adoption is not expected to have a material effect on ProAssurance’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Fair Value Policy

The fair values for securities included in the Level 2 category, with the few exceptions described below, were developed by one of several third party, nationally recognized pricing services, including services that price only certain types of securities. Each service uses complex methodologies to determine values for securities and subject the values they develop to quality control reviews. Management selected a primary source for each type of security in the portfolio and reviewed the values provided for reasonableness by comparing data to alternate pricing services and to available market and trade data. Values that appeared inconsistent were further reviewed for appropriateness. Any value that did not appear reasonable was discussed with the service that provided the value and adjusted, if necessary. There were no material changes to the values supplied by the pricing services during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

Level 2 Valuations

Below is a summary description of the valuation methodologies primarily used by the pricing services for securities in the Level 2 category, by security type:

U.S. Treasury obligations were valued based on quoted prices for identical assets, or, in markets that are not active, quotes for similar assets, taking into consideration adjustments for variations in contractual cash flows and yields to maturity.

U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise obligations were valued using pricing models that consider current and historical market data, normal trading conventions, credit ratings, and the particular structure and characteristics of the security being valued, such as yield to maturity, redemption options, and contractual cash flows. Adjustments to model inputs or model results were included in the valuation process when necessary to reflect recent regulatory, government or corporate actions or significant economic, industry or geographic events affecting the security’s fair value.

State and municipal bonds were valued using a series of matrices that considered credit ratings, the structure of the security, the sector in which the security falls, yields, and contractual cash flows. Valuations were further adjusted, when necessary, to reflect the expected effect on fair value of recent significant economic or geographic events or ratings changes.

Corporate debt, multiple observable inputs consisted primarily of corporate bonds, but also included a small number of bank loans. The methodology used to value Level 2 corporate bonds was the same as the methodology previously described for U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise obligations. Bank loans were valued based on an average of broker quotes for the loans in question, if available. If quotes were not available, the loans were valued based on quoted prices for comparable loans or, if the loan was newly issued, by comparison to similar seasoned issues. Broker quotes were compared to actual trade prices to permit assessment of the reliability of the quotes; unreliable quotes were not considered in quoted averages.

Residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities were valued using a pricing matrix which considers the issuer type, coupon rate and longest cash flows outstanding. The matrix used was based on the most recently available market information. Agency and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations were both valued using models that consider the structure of the security, current and historical information regarding prepayment speeds, ratings and ratings updates, and current and historical interest rate and interest rate spread data.

Other asset-backed securities were valued using models that consider the structure of the security, monthly payment information, current and historical information regarding prepayment speeds, ratings and ratings updates, and current and historical interest rate and interest rate spread data. Spreads and prepayment speeds consider collateral type.

Short-term investments were securities maturing within one year, carried at cost which approximated the fair value of the security due to the short term to maturity.

Other investments consisted primarily of convertible bonds valued using a pricing model that incorporated selected dealer quotes as well as current market data regarding equity prices and risk free rates. If dealer quotes were unavailable for the security being valued, quotes for securities with similar terms and credit status were used in the pricing model. Dealer quotes selected for use were those considered most accurate based on parameters such as underwriter status and historical reliability.

Other assets consisted of an interest rate cap derivative instrument valued using a model which considers the volatilities from other instruments with similar maturities, strike prices, durations and forward yield curves.

Level 3 Valuations

Below is a summary description of the valuation processes and methodologies used as well as quantitative information regarding securities in the Level 3 category.

Level 3 Valuation Processes


•	Level 3 securities are priced by the Chief Investment Officer.


•	Level 3 valuations are computed quarterly. Prices are evaluated quarterly against prior period prices and the expected change in prices.


•	ProAssurance's Level 3 securities are primarily NRSRO rated debt instruments for which comparable market inputs are commonly available for evaluating the securities in question. Valuation of these debt instruments is not overly sensitive to changes in the unobservable inputs used.

Level 3 Valuation Methodologies

Corporate debt, limited observable inputs consisted of corporate bonds valued using dealer quotes for similar securities or discounted cash flow models using yields currently available for similar securities. Similar securities are defined as securities of comparable credit quality that have like terms and payment features. Assessments of credit quality were based on NRSRO ratings, if available, or were subjectively determined by management if not available. At March 31, 2018, 87% of the securities were rated and the average rating was BBB. At December 31, 2017, 84% of the securities were rated and the average rating was BBB+.

Residential mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities consisted of securitizations of receivables valued using dealer quotes for similar securities or discounted cash flow models using yields currently available for similar securities. Similar securities are defined as securities of comparable credit quality that have like terms and payment features. Assessments of credit quality were based on NRSRO ratings, if available, or were subjectively determined by management if not available. At March 31, 2018, 78% of the securities were rated and the average rating was AAA. At December 31, 2017, 21% of the securities were rated and the average rating was AAA.

Other investments consisted of convertible securities for which limited observable inputs were available at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The securities were valued internally based on expected cash flows, including the expected final recovery, discounted at a yield that considered the lack of liquidity and the financial status of the issuer.