UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

———————

FORM 10-Q

———————

þ    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2009

or

¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

———————

PC Universe, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

———————

Nevada	0-52804	65-0620172
(State or Other Jurisdiction	(Commission	(I.R.S. Employer
of Incorporation or Organization)	File Number)	Identification No.)

9605 Parkview Ave, Boca Raton, FL 33428

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

(561) 504-9746

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

———————

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller Reporting Company þ
Accelerated filer ¨	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yes þ  No ¨

There were 43,592,383 shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), outstanding on August 13, 2009.

PC UNIVERSE, INC.

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Ex-31.1 Section 302 Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer

Ex-31.2 Section 302 Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer

Ex-31.3 Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Ex-32 Section 906 Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officers and Principal Financial Officer

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

PC Universe, Inc.

BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
ASSETS		(unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,990	$	60,217
Accounts receivable
(net of allowance of $43,644 and $121,985 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)
		—		291,050
Other receivables		500		18,662
Prepaid expenses and deposits		5,005		47,855
Total current assets		11,495		417,784
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment		—		49,596
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(49,596	)
Property and equipment, net		—		—
Total assets	$	11,495	$	417,784

See accompanying notes to financial statements

1

PC Universe, Inc.

BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

(Continued)

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	(unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Capital lease obligation	$	—		$	21,101
Accounts payable		265,500			537,310
Accrued expenses		1,200,071			1,156,504
Total current liabilities		1,465,571			1,714,915
LONG-TERM DEBT
Capital lease obligation, less current portion		—			2,859
Total liabilities		1,465,571			1,717,774
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		—			—
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized, and no shares issued and outstanding
		—			—
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding 43,592,383 and 43,592,383 shares, respectively
		43,592			43,592
Additional paid-in capital		2,488,432			2,475,528
Accumulated deficit		(3,986,100	)		(3,819,110	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(1,454,075	)		(1,299,990	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	11,495		$	417,784

See accompanying notes to financial statements

2

PC Universe, Inc.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Sales and services, net of returns	$	(117	)	$	6,374,547
Cost of sales and services		8			5,724,787
Gross margin		(125	)		649,760
Selling and advertising expenses		10,041			388,499
Provision for doubtful accounts		(12,080	)		(11,298	)
General and administrative expenses		149,277			558,962
Total operating expenses		147,238			936,163
Loss from operations		(147,363	)		(286,403	)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(13,764	)		(6,618	)
Gain on sale of asset		—			26,448
Gain on settlement of debt		1,704			—
Miscellaneous income (expense)		3			(435	)
Total other income, net		(12,057	)		19,395
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(159,420	)	$	(267,008	)
Weighted average - number of common shares outstanding
Basic		43,592,383			38,617,754
Diluted		43,592,383			38,617,754
Net income (loss) per common share
Basic	$	0.00		$	(0.01	)
Diluted	$	0.00		$	(0.01	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements

3

PC Universe, Inc.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Sales and services, net of returns	$	(14,888	)	$	13,545,438
Cost of sales and services		15,820			12,308,755
Gross margin		(30,708	)		1,236,683
Selling and advertising expenses		51,733			867,713
Provision for doubtful accounts		(47,101	)		4,975
General and administrative expenses		417,388			1,167,096
Total operating expenses		422,020			2,039,784
Loss from operations		(452,728	)		(803,101	)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(13,952	)		(11,328	)
Gain on sale of asset		4,000			26,448
Gain on settlement of debt		290,788			—
Miscellaneous income		4,903			8,001
Total other income, net		285,739			23,122
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(166,989	)	$	(785,780	)
Weighted average - number of common shares outstanding
Basic		43,592,383			38,556,592
Diluted		43,592,383			38,556,592
Net income (loss) per common share
Basic	$	0.00		$	(0.02	)
Diluted	$	0.00		$	(0.02	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements

4

PC Universe, Inc.

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

(unaudited)

	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated deficit			Total
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Balance, December 31, 2008		—	$	—		43,592,383	$	43,592	$	2,475,528	$	(3,819,110	)	$	(1,299,990)
Stock option expense		—		—		—		—		12,904		—			12,904
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		(166,989	)		(166,989)
Balance, June 30, 2009		—	$	—		43,592,383	$	43,592	$	2,488,432	$	(3,986,100	)	$	(1,454,075)

See accompanying notes to financial statements

5

PC Universe, Inc.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Six Months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2009			2008
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(166,989	)	$	(785,780	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		—			129,579
Gain on settlement of liabilities		(290,787	)		—
Provision for doubtful accounts		(47,101	)		12,894
Stock based compensation		12,904			78,983
Stock issued for services		—			20,500
(Increase) decrease in operating assets
Accounts receivable		338,151			(187,041	)
Employee advances		—			862
Other receivables		13,157			34,626
Inventories		—			202,195
Prepaid expenses and deposits		47,855			(64,925	)
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities
Accounts payable		18,977			(259,143	)
Accrued expenses		43,566			(217,916	)
Deferred revenue		—			(9,725	)
Customer deposits		—			(15,936	)
Total adjustments		136,722			(275,047	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(30,267	)		(1,060,827	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements

6

PC Universe, Inc.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2009				2008
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment			—				(103,772	)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment, net			—				33,534
Net cash used in investing activities			—				(70,238	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Repayment on capital lease obligations			(23,960	)			(116,539	)
Proceeds from revolving lines of credit			—				10,011,432
Repayments of revolving lines of credit			—				(10,379,364	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities			(23,960	)			(484,471	)
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
			(54,227	)			(1,615,537	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning			60,217				2,040,029
Cash and cash equivalents, ending		$	5,990			$	424,492
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest		$	—			$	11,249

See accompanying notes to financial statements

7

PC Universe, Inc.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2009

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The financial information included herein for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The financial information as of December 31, 2008 is derived from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of PC Universe, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“we,” “our” and the “Company”), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 15, 2009. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN AND MANAGEMENT’S PLANS

The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. During 2008 the Company had net losses and cash used in operations and its only line of credit with IBM which was financing its operations was terminated.  During the six months ended June 30, 2009 the Company used cash in operations. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had no financing arrangements to provide cash for operations. On December 19, 2008, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with eMedia Management LLC (eMedia), whereby eMedia agreed to purchase and the Company agreed to sell substantially all of its assets comprising the web business of the Company including the Company’s customized web stores for customers through Internet portals at www.pcuniverse.com and www.patriotpc.us. The Company ceased all other operations other than activities to wind down the business. The transaction with eMedia closed on April 30, 2009.

These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible effects on recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from its inability to continue as a going concern.

Management's plans to cease operations started on December 19, 2008 and continued into early 2009 by disposing of all remaining assets of the company and settling with remaining creditors.  Management intends on merging the inactive Company with another operating company.

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Significant estimates as of June 30, 2009 includes the allowance for doubtful accounts, the deferred taxes and valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and estimates of liabilities related to legal actions and sales tax assessments against the Company.

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Other Concentrations

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. Management believes the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

8

PC Universe, Inc.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2009

(Unaudited)

Net Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share are presented in conformity with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” for all periods presented. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, basic and diluted net loss per share has been computed using the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period, less any shares subject to repurchase or forfeiture.

We have excluded all outstanding stock options and warrants from the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share because these securities are antidilutive for all years presented. Securities that could potentially dilute basic net loss per share in the future, and that were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share, are as follows:  

	June 30,
	2009	2008
Outstanding stock options	1,025,000	880,000
Warrants	3,602,564	333,334
Total potential common shares excluded from diluted net loss per share computation	4,627,564	1,213,334

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of prior period’s balances have been made to conform to the fiscal year 2009 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on shareholders’ equity or net income as previously reported.

Pronouncements Implemented

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Staff Position EITF 03-06-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (FSP EITF 03-06-1). FSP EITF 03-06-1 provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method in Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 128, “Earnings per Share”. The Company’s unvested share-based payment awards are not eligible to receive dividends; therefore EITF 03-06-1 will not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (FSP 157-3). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which the Company adopted as of April 1, 2008, in cases where a market is not active.  The Company has considered the guidance provided by FSP 157-3 in its determination of estimated fair values, and the impact was not material.

Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, non-controlling interest in the acquiree and goodwill acquired, and expands disclosures about business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires the acquirer to recognize changes in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax assets to be recognized in operations. These changes in deferred tax benefits were previously recognized through a corresponding reduction to goodwill. With the exception of the provisions regarding acquired deferred taxes, which are applicable to all business combinations, SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

9

PC Universe, Inc.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2009

(Unaudited)

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require:

·

The ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity;

·

The amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income;

·

Changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently;

·

When a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained non-controlling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value;

·

Entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners.

SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. SFAS No. 160 shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We  do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS No. 161 enhances the current disclosure framework in SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” by requiring entities to provide detailed disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

NOTE 4 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain members of management. These agreements specify minimum annual salaries as well as objective-based performance bonus amounts to be paid over the next year.

Litigation

The Company is involved with litigation in the normal course of business.

The landlord for the Company's former corporate offices has filed a lawsuit against the Company, seeking damages of approximately $183,000. This potential amount has been fully accrued in a prior period. During June 2009, the landlord and the Company agreed on a settlement in full for a payment of $30,000, however the company does not have the cash to make the settlement effective. The full $183,000 remains accrued at June 30, 2009.

A leasing company has filed a lawsuit against the Company for approximately $68,000 of which amounts have been accrued as of December 31, 2008.

During August 2007, the Company filed an action against three of its former employees and a Florida corporation established by such employees in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for

10

PC Universe, Inc.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2009

(Unaudited)

Broward County, Florida for certain claims including breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriations, tortuous interference with business relationships, civil conspiracy and violations of the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act and also requested a permanent injunction enjoining the employees from their continued alleged wrongful conduct. The Company asserted in the complaint that certain former employees conspired to resign from the Company and then began to directly compete with the Company in the same territories and for the same customers by incorporating, selling products and recruiting employees for a direct competitor of the ours. On September 6, 2007, the defendants filed a counterclaim against us alleging that the Company breached employment contracts of two of the defendants and tortuously interfered with certain of the defendants business relationships. The Company intends to vigorously defend against the counterclaims. Management is unable to determine the outcome of the lawsuit at this time, or estimate the probability of prevailing in connection with the request for an injunction or on the merits of these claims.

California Sales Tax Audit

In January 2008, the Company was were notified by California’s Board of Equalization (the Board) of the Board’s intent to audit the business operations relating to sales of our products in California back to January 1, 2005. As of December 31, 2008 the Company has included in General and Administrative expenses, $654,128 in back sales tax, interest and penalty the Board has levied against the Company.  The Company still has the appeal process open to appeal the audit findings.

NOTE 5 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

In 2007, the Company adopted a Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to which the Company’s Board of Directors may grant stock options to key employees, non-employee directors, consultants and others. The Plan authorized grants of options to purchase up to 4,000,000 shares of authorized but un-issued common stock. Stock options are granted with an exercise price not less than the stock’s fair market value at the date of grant. All stock options granted have terms not to exceed ten years. The number of shares granted, vesting period, and price per share are determined by the Board of Directors. Stock options generally vest over one to five years per vesting schedule. At June 30, 2009, there were 2,975,000 shares available for future grant under the Plan.

Included in the Plan are options granted to our Board of Directors.  In 2007, the Company has granted options to purchase 75,000 shares to its Board of Directors.  In 2008, the Company granted options to purchase 25,000 shares to one new member of the Board of Directors. Of all the options granted to the Board, 25,000 remain vested and 75,000 were forfeited in June 2009.

The Company values stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and recognizes this value as an expense over the vesting period. Option valuation models require the company to make subjective assumptions. Changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. The expected dividend yield is based on expected annual dividends and the market value of the company’s stock. The expected stock volatility assumption is based on historical volatility of the company’s stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Strip rate posted at the grant date for the expected term of the option. The expected term represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.  

Forfeiture rate is the estimated percentage of options granted that are expected to be forfeited or cancelled on an annual basis before becoming fully vested. The Company estimates the forfeiture rate based on past turnover data.

The compensation expense that has been recognized in the statements of operations for the Company’s stock option plans for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $3,776 and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $12,904. The compensation expense that has been recognized in the statements of operations for the Company’s stock option plans for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $25,381 and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $78,983. For stock subject to graded vesting, the Company has utilized the “straight-line” method for allocating compensation cost by period.

11

PC Universe, Inc.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2009

(Unaudited)

Stock option activity under the Plan, relating to qualified and nonqualified options during the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:

	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted Average Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2008	1,386,000		$0.147	3.71	—
Granted	—		—	—	—
Exercised	—		—	—	—
Forfeited	(361,000	)	$0.359	1.50	—
Expired	—		—	—	—
Outstanding at June 30, 2009	1,025,000		$0.094	3.81	—
Exercisable at June 30, 2009	20,000		$0.375	0.46	—

The total net fair value of stock options vested was $12,904 and $78,983 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. As June 30, 2009, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options was $38,429 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.81 years.

NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES

As of June 30, 2009, there have been no material changes to our uncertain tax positions disclosures as provided in Note 7 of the December 31, 2008 Financial Statements in the 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2009. We do not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change prior to June 30, 2010.

12

Item 2.

Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis presents a review of the operating results of PC Universe, Inc. (the “Company”, “we” and “our”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively, and the financial condition of the Company at June 30, 2009. The discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and accompanying notes included herein, as well as the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 15, 2009 (“2008 Annual Report”).

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Quarterly Report”) that do not relate to present or historical conditions are called “forward-looking statements.” Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements relating to our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions and are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “believes,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “possible,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” and “plans” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict projected results or the effect of events on our operating results is inherently uncertain. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by which, such performance or results will be achieved. Important factors that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by, forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) our ability to identify and attract a suitable partner to consummate a business combination transaction, (ii) our ability to reach a settlement with the California Board of Equalization) and  (iii) our ability to successfully defend and/or settle outstanding legal proceedings.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other forward-looking statements.

Our Company

The Company has operated in recent years as a direct marketer and value-added reseller of IT products and services. Our customers have historically included businesses, consumers, educational institutions and local, state and federal governments in the United States. Our customers placed orders through our web sites, PCUniverse.com and PatriotPC.us, by calling a representative , through electronic communications such as e-mail, by fax, or through our revenue sharing arrangements such as our merchant web site on Amazon.com. Our products and services were marketed primarily through Internet marketing activities, a direct sales force, direct mail, e-mail marketing and our company web sites. On April 30, 2009, we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets comprising our web business to eMedia Management LLC.

History of the Business

We were formed as a Florida corporation in November 1995. Initially, we generated revenue through direct marketing activities such as print ads in national computer hardware publications and limited distribution of catalogs. In 1996, we launched our first web site, PCUniverse.com. In 2003, we launched PatriotPC.us. PatriotPC.us is an e-commerce site similar to PCUniverse.com in product content, but customized to service active and retired military personnel, their spouses and dependents. PatriotPC customers receive special discounts and offers and have the option of paying with their military issued “Star” card. A “Star” card is a private label credit card issued by the Army Air Force Exchange Service (“AAFES”) exclusively to military personnel and qualified recipients. In June 2006, we completed a merger (the “Share Exchange”) of PC Universe, Inc., a privately held operating Florida corporation, with The Poker TV Network, Inc. (“Poker TV”), a shell corporation incorporated in Nevada with no assets, liabilities or material operations. Poker TV (formerly known as Coyote Sports, Inc. and then known as Techsecure Partners, Inc.) was formed in Nevada on October 24, 1994. A bankruptcy action In Re: Coyote Sports, Inc., Case No. 99-22185, was filed by the corporation in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado on September 28, 1999. A Certificate of Amendment was filed with the State of Nevada on May 26, 2005

13

providing for a name change from Coyote Sports, Inc. to Techsecure Partners, Inc. On July 29, 2005, Techsecure Partners, Inc., filed Articles of Merger with another Nevada entity, The Poker TV Network, Inc. with the surviving entity known as The Poker TV Network, Inc. The bankruptcy action was discharged on April 3, 2006. Prior to the Share Exchange, management of Poker TV had planned to create a broadband, Internet based TV network dedicated to providing information, news, trends, updates, non-fiction entertainment, and educational programming related to the game of poker. Poker TV’s planned operations related to poker gaming were never effectuated.

In connection with the Share Exchange, each issued and outstanding share of the operating company, PC Universe, was converted into 449,390 fully paid and non-assessable shares of the surviving corporation, Poker TV. The Share Exchange was intended to constitute a tax exempt plan of reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In conjunction with the Share Exchange, Poker TV changed its name to PC Universe, Inc.

We entered into the Share Exchange to enhance our capital raising efforts and access to private equity markets and so that investors in our Company could have additional assurance of a market and potential liquidity in the Common Stock of the Company at some future date as the Common Stock of the Company is quoted on the Pink Sheets interdealer electronic quotation service. The merger transaction was arrived at pursuant to normal competitive negotiation and the parties acted independently of each other. The parties had no relationship to each other nor interlocking board members, officers or other conflicts of interest.

Since the consummation of the Share Exchange, we have raised $2.9 million in a private placements of our Common Stock to accredited investors.

On December 19, 2008, we entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with eMedia Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“eMedia” or the “Buyer”), whereby eMedia agreed to purchase and we agreed to sell substantially all of our assets (the “Assets”) comprising the web business of the Company (the “Asset Sale”). The Company’s web business includes the Company’s customized web stores for customers through Internet portals at www.pcuniverse.com and www.patriotpc.us.

Loss of Significant Customers

The Company has a history of net losses during the past three years. In addition, we reported for the year ended December 31, 2007 that we had lost two of our significant customers during the quarter ended December 31, 2007, specifically, Océ North America, Inc. and Eclypsis Corporation. Because we were unable to replace these customers, our financial results were negatively impacted.

Termination of the Financing Agreement with IBM

The Company was party to a secured line of credit of up to $4,000,000 with IBM Credit, LLC (“IBM”), which was collateralized by accounts receivable and inventory, which could be utilized as both a working capital line of credit and a flooring facility used to purchase inventory from several suppliers under certain terms and conditions. The agreement for Wholesale Financing-Flexible Payment Plan which was executed on November 1, 2007 (the “Financing Agreement”) had an annual automatic renewal which was to occur on November 1 of each fiscal year. The facility contained various restrictive covenants relating to tangible net worth, leverage, dispositions and use of collateral, other asset dispositions and merger and consolidation of the Company. At December 31, 2007, the Company was not compliant with all financial covenants contained in the Financing Agreement. At December 31, 2007, there were no amounts owed for working capital advances and $2.1 million was owed under the facility for flooring arrangements related to inventory purchases. At December 31, 2007, the total amount available for future borrowing was $543,000 at an interest rate in effect at that time of 7.25%. On March 20, 2008, the Company received a notice of default from IBM notifying us that we were out of compliance with one or more financial performance covenants and that we were in default under the Financing Agreement.

The Financing Agreement with IBM was terminated as of October 15, 2008. As of November 7, 2008, we owed IBM $578,028 in aggregate principal and interest under the Financing Agreement. Because we were unable to obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms we evaluated all of our options, and we took steps to downsize the business and aggressively reduced our overhead costs to compensate for the Company’s insufficient liquidity. The Company has experienced significant liquidity issues since the reduction of our line of credit and termination of our Financing Agreement with IBM due to, among other reasons, our inability to identify a replacement lender and our inability to raise adequate capital on acceptable terms. Moreover, as a result of our liquidity issues, we

14

experienced delays in the repayment of the amounts outstanding due to IBM and the payment of trade payables to vendors and others when due. We have historically relied upon the line of credit under the Financing Agreement and a previous credit facility to fund our operations. Because of the termination of the Financing Agreement, we were required to implement significant expense reducing measures which included the termination of a number of our full-time employees during the fourth quarter of 2008. In addition, number of our full-time employees voluntarily resigned their positions during the fourth quarter, including four sales representatives and two members of management.

Evaluation of Restructuring Options

In light of these recent developments in the Company, we were required to reevaluate our options under the assumption that we would not be able to sustain our business in the ordinary course. Prior to execution of the Purchase Agreement with eMedia Management, LLC, we considered and explored several options including a merger opportunity, selling all or some portion of our assets, seeking protection under the federal bankruptcy laws, and ceasing some or all of our operations. The members of management who participated in strategic discussions were the Company’s two co-chief executive officers, Mr. Thomas M. Livia and Mr. Gary Stern.

The Company’s management and the independent committee of the Board weighed the following factors in their analysis of the restructuring options: (i) the ability to repay the creditors of the Company, including IBM, in an orderly and timely manner; (ii) the ability of the restructuring option to provide cash liquidity at a low cost, while conserving the Company’s remaining business operations; (iii) preservation of stockholder value; and (iv) the ability to retain some goodwill in the Company, the integrity of the accounts and retention of value of the PC Universe, Inc. brand.

From April 2008 through November 2008, the Company consulted with two financial advisory firms each of which provided strategic financing and merger & acquisition advisory services, including Allen, Goddard, McGowan, Pak & Partners, LLC and the Noble Financial Group.

The Company solicited a number of companies in the technology reseller industry, including Staples and PC Connection, regarding the Company’s interest in a partnership. The Company’s expression of interest in Staples and PC Connection did not lead to substantive discussions.

On October 7, 2008, the Company and Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Beacon”), entered into a non-binding letter of intent (“Letter of Intent”) whereby Beacon proposed to purchase the assets of and assume certain liabilities of the Company’s business. The proposed transaction was subject to negotiation of definitive agreements, due diligence, and necessary corporate and regulatory approvals, as well as certain other closing conditions. Under the terms of the Letter of Intent, the purchase price for the Company’s assets and liabilities were expected to be paid by Beacon’s issuance of up to 3,160,000 shares of its common stock.  The Company disclosed the Letter of Intent in an Item 8.01 Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 9, 2008.

The proposed transaction with Beacon was conditioned upon the Company receiving cash financing which would enable it to discharge all or a portion of its obligations to IBM. The Company did not receive the financing following discussions with a number of banks and factoring finance companies. When it became apparent that the Company would not be able to meet the financing requirement by repaying IBM, the Company provided written notice to Beacon on November 18, 2008 terminating the Letter of Intent.

Additionally, during the second and third fiscal quarters of 2008, the Company entered into preliminary discussions to be acquired by another public company in the homeland security industry and a private company in the computer technology reseller industry.  These discussions did not lead to term sheets or definitive agreements between the parties.

During the third quarter of 2008, the Company had preliminary discussions with a Florida bank concerning a factoring arrangement intended to replace the IBM credit facility.  The costs of borrowing and the required personal guarantees from the executive officers under the proposed factoring arrangement were determined to be unacceptable to the Company.  Additionally, the factoring facility would not have provided sufficient liquidity to repay the Company’s existing creditors.

15

During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company considered the possibility of a corporate liquidation or reorganization bankruptcy filing as an alternative to the Asset Sale.  The Company determined that the potential costs and expenses of a bankruptcy would significantly reduce the size of the assets available for potential distribution to the Company’s creditors and shareholders. A Chapter 11 reorganization was not a viable alternative because without the necessary credit facility to replace IBM to fund inventory purchases, the Company would not be able to sustain operations following a reorganization.  Management of the Company and an independent committee of the Board believed the Asset Sale provided the Company with enough immediate liquidity to pursue its credit facility workout and settlement with IBM, satisfy additional obligations to vendors and preserve some shareholder value.

Independent Committee Analysis

The Asset Sale transaction was considered by an independent committee of the Board and determined to be fair and in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders. The members of the independent committee include Randall N. Paulfus, Bruce Martin, Victor Grillo and Dean J. Rosenbach. The members of the independent committee were selected based upon the members’ status as non-employee and non-affiliate members of the Board. The Company did not retain the services of an independent evaluation firm to evaluate the fairness of the Asset Sale to our stockholders.

The Company began discussions with eMedia following the termination of its Letter of Intent with Beacon.  At the time, the Company was unable to procure alternative financing on reasonable terms as a replacement to the IBM credit facility, and at that time, the Company’s only two alternatives were bankruptcy and the proposed transaction with eMedia.

The independent committee determined that because the Company would be able to discharge all of its obligations to its financing lender IBM through the consummation of the Purchase Agreement with eMedia, the Company could discharge the majority of its debt obligations and improve the Company’s overall balance sheet.  The independent committee determined that the Asset Sale was a preferable alternative to bankruptcy as the potential costs and expenses of a bankruptcy would significantly reduce the size of the assets available for distribution to the Company’s creditors and stockholders without providing any liquidity for repayment of creditors.

Each of the Company’s co-chief executive officers, Mr. Gary Stern and Mr. Thomas M. Livia, the majority stockholders who voted in favor of the Asset Sale, executed consulting agreements with eMedia in connection with the Asset Sale on December 19, 2008, agreeing to provide consulting services to eMedia on an independent contractor basis. Subject to the terms of these consulting agreements, Messrs. Stern and Livia agreed to provide to eMedia certain consulting services to assist eMedia in the operation of the web business (the “Consulting Services”), including assistance and advice with respect to the web business, including, but not limited to: (i) managing relationships with existing clients; (ii) transition of ownership of the web business; and (iii) training of one or more employees of eMedia to perform the duties currently performed by the consultant with respect to the web business.

The consulting agreements provide that Mr. Livia and Mr. Stern be required to provide the Consulting Services for a minimum of twenty-five (25) hours and thirty-five (35) hours per week, respectively, during the respective sixty (60) day and six (6) month terms of the agreements. The consulting agreements are effective as of December 19, 2008, and will continue in full force and effect during their respective terms or until terminated in connection with the terms of the consulting agreements or due to the death or disability of the consultant.

With respect to Mr. Stern’s agreement, eMedia and the Company agreed to negotiate in good faith to extend the term for an additional six (6) month period starting on the first (1st) day after the expiration of the term; provided however, that the failure of eMedia to enter into an extension term would not give rise to a cause of action of any kind in favor of the consultant.

As compensation for the performance of the consulting services, eMedia will be required to pay to each of Mr. Stern and Mr. Livia aggregate amounts equal to $72,000 and $45,000, respectively, for the Consulting Services.

16

The consulting agreements between eMedia and Messrs. Livia and Stern were determined by the independent committee to be fair to the Company.  The consulting agreements represent temporary transitional arrangements with eMedia to ensure that eMedia management is properly trained in the management of existing customer accounts and to preserve some value in the PC Universe, Inc. brand.  The independent committee believes that, at least until the Company identifies an appropriate business combination partner, the co-chief executive officers will be able to adequately fulfill their existing obligations to both the Company and to eMedia under the consulting agreements.

Following consummation of the Asset Sale, the Company has nominal operations and limited assets consisting of accounts receivable and minimal cash. Following the Asset Sale, management of the Company is seeking an operating company candidate for potential merger or share exchange or other reorganization of the Company.

Employees

As of June 30, 2009, we employed 2 part-time employees located at the Company’s current offices at 9605 Parkview Ave, Boca Raton, Florida 33428.

Neither of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Critical Accounting Policies

In Item 7 (“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”) of our 2008 Annual Report, we included a discussion of the most significant accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements. There has been no material change in the policies and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements since the filing of our 2008 Annual Report.

Results of Operations

The Asset Sale transaction materially affected our reported sales and services as substantially all of the assets comprising our web business were sold.  Our current operations include only the winding down of business activities and contracts, and sale of the remaining nominal assets of the Company.  Following completion of the Asset Sale, the Company may be considered a “shell company” as that term is defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (i.e., a company which has (i) no or nominal operations, and (ii) either (x) no or nominal assets; (y) assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents, or (z) assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets).

Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Net Sales and Services. Net sales and services decreased 100.0% to approximately nil in the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $6.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008, due to an decrease in the volume of goods being sold primarily attributable to ceasing of operations and miscellaneous returns charged to revenues.

Gross Margin. Gross margin decreased to a loss of nil in the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to a gross profit of $650,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2008. Gross margin decreased due to the ceasing of operations.  

Selling and Advertising Expenses. Selling and advertising expenses, which primarily consisted of salesperson and marketing salaries, decreased to $10,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $388,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to decreased salesperson salaries and commissions and the ceasing of all marketing activities.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses, which primarily consisted of administration and officer expenses, and professional fees, decreased to $149,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $559,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2008. The changes in general and administrative expenses were due to the following:

·

Salaries, wages and benefits decreased $178,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the prior year due to fewer employees.

17

·

Depreciation expense decreased $68,000 due to sale of the majority of fixed assets in the three months ended December 31, 2008.

·

Other operating expenses decreased $164,000 due to the Company ceasing operations.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to approximately $14,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $7,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2008. The interest expense in the three months ended June 30, 2009 is due to an accrual of interest for the State of California in back sales tax.  The interest expense in the three months ended June 30, 2008 was due to interest owed on the former outstanding capital leases. All obligations under the capital leases were sold in the Asset Sale during 2008 or settled during the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Gain on sale of asset. Gain on sale of asset was for the sale of an automobile in the three months ended June 30, 2008.

Net Income (Loss). As a result of the foregoing, net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $159,000, or $0.00 per diluted share, as compared to a net loss of $267,000, or $0.01 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Net Sales and Services. Net sales and services decreased 100.0% to approximately nil in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $13.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008, due to an decrease in the volume of goods being sold primarily attributable to ceasing of operations and miscellaneous returns charged to revenues.

Gross Margin. Gross margin decreased to a loss of $31,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to a gross profit of $1,237,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008. Gross margin decreased due to the ceasing of operations.  

Selling and Advertising Expenses. Selling and advertising expenses, which primarily consisted of salesperson and marketing salaries, decreased to $52,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $867,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to decreased salesperson salaries and commissions and the ceasing of all marketing activities.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses, which primarily consisted of administration and officer expenses, and professional fees, decreased to $417,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $1,167,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008. The changes in general and administrative expenses were due to the following:

·

Salaries, wages and benefits decreased $426,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the prior year due to fewer employees.

·

Depreciation expense decreased $130,000 due to sale of the majority of fixed assets in the three months ended December 31, 2008.

·

Other operating expenses decreased $194,000 due to the Company ceasing operations.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased to approximately $14,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $11,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008. The interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2009 is due to an accrual of interest for the State of California in back sales tax.  The interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2008 was due to interest owed on the former outstanding capital leases.  All obligations under the capital leases were sold in the Asset Sale during 2008 or settled during the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Gain on sale of asset. Gain on sale of asset was for the sale of residual fixed assets that were fully depreciated.

Gain on debt settlements. The Company negotiated with several product and service providers to reduce the liability of the Company for $291,000.

18

Other Income. Other income decreased to $4,900 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $8,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and consisted primarily of customers abandoning deposits.

Net Income (Loss). As a result of the foregoing, net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $167,000, or $0.00 per diluted share, as compared to a net loss of $786,000, or $0.02 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that inflation will not have such an effect in future periods.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our total assets were $11,000 at June 30, 2009, of which all were current assets. As of June 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $6,000 and had a working capital deficit of $1,454,000. The decrease in working capital is primarily a result of ceasing operations, accruing $665,000 for the California sales tax audit and the net operating loss the company experienced during the year ended December 31, 2008.

We measure liquidity as the sum of total cash. At June 30, 2009, our liquidity was $6,000.

During the past four years, we have experienced net losses. We have fluctuations in operating cash flows that are not correlated with any certainty. In the years we have had net losses, operating cash flows have been both positive and negative.  We anticipate our operating cash flows to continue to be negative while we wind down operations.

Our current operations, only include the winding down of business activities and contracts, and sale of remaining assets of the Company.

The Company had no capital expenditures in 2009 and we anticipate no further spending for capital expenditures.

While we currently operate as a going concern, we have incurred significant losses since inception. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue to operate as a going concern.

Cash Flows

Operating Activities: Net cash flow used in operating activities was $30,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to a reduction of accounts payable and gains on debt settlements to product and service providers. Additionally, accounts receivable experienced a significant reduction in the six months ended June 30, 2009 due to a ceasing of operations and collecting from previous customers who were given payment terms and establishment of an allowance on remaining balances. At the end 2008, we no longer extend credit to any customers and remaining customer balances have been given to at a collections agency.

Net cash flow used in operating activities was $1,061,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to a pay-down of our accounts payable  and accrued expenses due to the timing of the invoiced due dates. Additionally, our inventory was significantly reduced in the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to holding less inventory for Océ North America and Eclypsis in our warehouse.

Investing Activities. No cash was used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $70,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008 mainly for enhancements to our web properties.

Financing Activities. Net cash used by financing activities was $24,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, which primarily was comprised by the settlement on our remaining capital leases.

Net cash used in financing activities was $484,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008, which was due to the reduction of available borrowings from $4,000,000 to $2,000,000 under our line of credit with IBM.

19

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures

At the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Co-Principal Executive Officers and Principal Financial Officer, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13 a-15(e).  Based upon that evaluation, the Co-Principal Executive Officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

20

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

During January 2008, we were notified by California’s Board of Equalization of the board’s intent to audit our business operations relating to sales of our products in California back to January 1, 2005. The State of California taxing authorities completed their audit and have sent a Notice of Determination that the Company owes the California Board of Equalization $654,128 as of April 23, 2009. As of June 30, 2009 we have accrued as General and Administrative expenses, $665,911 in back sales tax, interest and penalty the Board has levied against the Company. The Company still has the appeal process open to appeal the audit findings.

During February 2009, we were notified by US Bank Corp of legal actions against us for certain non-payment of capital leases. US Bank Corp has initiated legal proceedings against the Company in the State of Minnesota District Court County of Lyon Fifth Judicial District for amounts plus interest of approximately $68,000.

During April 2009, our landlord, Boca Industrial Park, Ltd., initiated legal proceedings against us in The Circuit Court of the 15^th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, for non-payment of past due and future rent under the Company’s lease agreement totaling approximately $183,000. During 2009 The landlord and the Company agreed on a settlement in full for a payment of $30,000, however, the company does not have the cash to make the settlement effective. The full $183,000 remains accrued at June 30, 2009

Except as set forth above there have been no material developments in the previously reported legal proceedings during the period covered by this report.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security holders.

None.

Item 5.

Other Information.

None.

Item 6.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report.

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Co-Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act.
31.2	Co-Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act.
31.3	Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act.
32	Co-Principal Executive Officers and Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

21

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	PC UNIVERSE, INC.
Date: August 14, 2009	By:	/s/ GARY STERN
		Gary Stern, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 14, 2009	By:	/s/ THOMAS M. LIVIA
		Thomas M. Livia, President, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

22

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Co-Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act.
31.2	Co-Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act.
31.3	Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act.
32	Co-Principal Executive Officers and Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

23