2.2.0.7 false Income Taxes 0209 - Disclosure - Income Taxes true false false false 1 USD false false USD Standard http://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217 USD iso4217 0 Pure Standard http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance pure xbrli 0 USDEPS Divide http://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217 USD iso4217 http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance shares xbrli 0 Shares Standard http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance shares xbrli 0 $ 2 Income Taxes [Abstract] 0 us-gaap_IncomeTaxExpenseBenefitAbstract us-gaap true na duration No definition available. false false false false false true false false false false false false 1 false false false false 0 0 false false false xbrli:stringItemType string No definition available. false 3 Income Taxes 1 us-gaap_IncomeTaxDisclosureTextBlock us-gaap true na duration No definition available. false false false false false false false false false false false verboselabel false 1 false false false false 0 0   <div style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',Times,serif"> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 12pt"><b>9. INCOME TAXES</b> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     Income tax expense for interim periods is based on estimates of the effective tax rate for the entire fiscal year. The Company’s income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $16.6 million, or 30.6% of pretax income, compared to an income tax benefit of $3.3 million, or 5.0% of pretax losses, for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The Company’s income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $33.4 million, or 30.0% of pretax income, compared to $22.0 million, or 147.7% of pretax income, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The effective tax rates in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were adversely impacted by reported losses and a significant portion of the goodwill impairment charge recognized during the periods being non-deductible for tax purposes. Excluding the goodwill impairment recognized during the periods, the effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 would have approximated 24.0% and 29.3%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate (excluding the goodwill impairment) from the prior year was largely the result of an increased proportion of domestic earnings in 2010 compared to 2009, which is taxed at higher statutory rates. </div> </div>  <!-- Begin Block Tagged Note false false false us-types:textBlockItemType textblock Description containing the entire income tax disclosure. Examples include net deferred tax liability or asset recognized in an enterprise's statement of financial position, net change during the year in the total valuation allowance, approximate tax effect of each type of temporary difference and carryforward that gives rise to a significant portion of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets, utilization of a tax carryback, and tax uncertainties information. This element may be used as a single block of text to encapsulate the entire disclosure including data and tables. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Section 08 -Paragraph h -Article 4 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 109 -Paragraph 136, 172 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 109 -Paragraph 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 false 1 2 false UnKnown UnKnown UnKnown false true