XML 36 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS  
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

NOTE 17 —  BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Overview

On January 30, 2017, the Company announced that it had agreed upon the material terms to acquire Red Wolf, a Sanford, North Carolina-based, privately held fabricator, kitter and assembler of industrial systems primarily supporting the global gas turbine market, for approximately $18,983, subject to certain adjustments. The transaction closed on February 1, 2017, and Red Wolf is being operated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Accounting for the Transaction

The Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance with guidance found in ASC 805, Business Combinations. The guidance requires consideration given, including contingent consideration, assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be valued at their fair market values at the acquisition date. The guidance further provides that: (1) in-process research and development will be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset; (2) acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred, (3) restructuring costs associated with a business combination will generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and (4) changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. ASC 805 requires that any excess of purchase price over fair value of assets acquired, including identifiable intangibles and liabilities assumed, be recognized as goodwill. Red Wolf’s results are included in the Company’s results from the acquisition date of February 1, 2017.

The purchase price of the transaction totaled $18,983 net of working capital adjustments that occurred after the acquisition date. The purchase price includes $16,449 which was paid in cash and $2,534 which was the expected value of contingent future earn-out payments. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay the former owners of Red Wolf a payout if Red Wolf achieves a targeted profitability benchmark. The potential undiscounted amount of all future payments that the Company could have been required to make under the contingent consideration arrangement was between $0 and $9,900. Annual earn-out payments may not exceed $4,950. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement of $2,534 was estimated by using a Monte Carlo simulation. Key assumptions include a short-term weighted average cost of capital of 15% and historical volatility of public company comparables. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement was determined using significant unobservable inputs, or level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company released $1,394 of this contingency into operating income because management determined that Red Wolf’s full-year financial performance during the first year of ownership by the Company was unlikely to meet the threshold required to pay the first installment of the contingent earn-out. During the second quarter of 2018, the Company released the final contingent earn-out liability of $1,140 into operating income as the Company does not expect Red Wolf to achieve the targeted profitability benchmark for the second year of ownership. The release of the earn-out is reflected in the selling, general, and administrative line item of these condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company’s allocation of the $18,983 purchase price to Red Wolf’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values as of February 1, 2017, is included in the table below. Goodwill is recorded based on the amount by which the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the net assets acquired and is not deductible for tax purposes. The measurement period adjustments were a result of changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement and adjustments to working capital accounts. The purchase price allocation was finalized at December 31, 2017. The decrease in goodwill from March 31, 2017 is due to opening balance sheet changes noted in the table below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The purchase price allocation as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation as of 3/31/2017

 

Measurement Period Adjustments

 

Allocation as of 12/31/2017

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

63

$

(63)

$

 -

Receivables

 

2,796

 

(96)

 

2,700

Inventories

 

4,998

 

179

 

5,177

Property and equipment

 

462

 

 -

 

462

Noncompete agreements

 

170

 

 -

 

170

Customer relationships

 

12,000

 

 -

 

12,000

Trade names

 

1,100

 

 -

 

1,100

Goodwill

 

5,568

 

(575)

 

4,993

Accounts payable

 

(1,354)

 

 2

 

(1,352)

Accrued expenses

 

(809)

 

(67)

 

(876)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

(5,391)

 

 -

 

(5,391)

Total purchase price

$

19,603

$

(620)

$

18,983

 

The allocation of the purchase price is based on valuations performed to determine the fair value of such assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. The acquired noncompete agreements, customer relationships, and trade names have weighted average amortization periods of 6.0 years, 9.0 years, and 14.0 years, respectively, and the total weighted average life of the acquired intangible assets is 9.4 years. Goodwill from this transaction has been allocated to the Company’s Process Systems segment.