FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTE 9 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the Company is required to provide disclosure and categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the assumptions (i.e., inputs) used in the valuation. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input significant to the fair value measurement. Financial instruments are assessed quarterly to determine the appropriate classification within the fair value hierarchy. Transfers between fair value classifications are made based upon the nature and type of the observable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is defined as follows:

Level 1 — Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices in markets that are not active for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. For the Company’s municipal bonds, we noted that although quoted prices are available and used to value said assets, they are traded less frequently.

Level 3 — Valuations are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The Company used market negotiations to value its Gearing assets.  The Company used real estate appraisals to value the Clintonville, WI facility.

The following table represents the fair values of the Company’s financial assets as of September 30 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	September 30, 2013
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Municipal bonds	$	—	$	9,053	$	—	$	9,053
Assets measured on a nonrecurring basis:
Gearing equipment	—		—		1,331		1,331
Clintonville, WI facility	—		—		821		821
Total assets at fair value	$	—	$	9,053	$	2,152	$	11,205

	December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Municipal bonds	$	—	$	52	$	—	$	52
Total assets at fair value	$	—	$	52	$	—	$	52

Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and customer deposits, approximate their respective fair values due to the relatively short-term nature of these instruments. Based upon interest rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms, the carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt is approximately equal to its fair value.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

The fair value measurement approach for long-lived assets utilizes a number of significant unobservable inputs or Level 3 assumptions. These assumptions include, among others, projections of the Company’s future operating results, the implied fair value of these assets using an income approach by preparing a discounted cash flow analysis and a market-based approach based on the Company’s market capitalization, and other subjective assumptions. To the extent projections used in the Company’s evaluations are not achieved, there may be a negative effect on the valuation of these assets.

Due to the Company’s operating losses in each of the first three quarters of 2013 combined with its history of continued operating losses, the Company continues to evaluate the recoverability of certain of its identifiable intangible assets and certain property and equipment assets. Based upon the Company’s September 30, 2013 assessment, the recoverable amount of undiscounted cash flows based upon the Company’s most recent projections exceeded the carrying amount of invested capital by 120% and 56% for the Gearing and Services segments, respectively, and no impairment to these assets was indicated.

During the first half of 2013, the Company took a $288 charge to adjust the carrying value of its Clintonville, Wisconsin facility assets to fair value, and reclassified the resulting $790 carrying value from property and equipment to Assets Held for Sale. This treatment was due to management’s decision to list the property for sale as a result of its determination that the property was no longer required in its operations. Additionally, the Company took a $345 charge to adjust the carrying value of certain Gearing equipment to fair value, and reclassified the resulting $1,400 carrying value to Assets Held for Sale as a result of the decision to sell this equipment.