10-K 1 bms-20121231x10k.htm 10-K BMS-2012.12.31-10K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC  20549
FORM 10-K
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
Commission File Number 1-5277
 
BEMIS COMPANY, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Missouri
 
43-0178130
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
 
Identification No.)
 
One Neenah Center, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 669, Neenah, Wisconsin  54957-0669
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (920) 727-4100
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of Each Class
 
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $.10 per share
 
New York Stock Exchange
 
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:  None
 
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  YES  ý  NO  o
 
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  YES  o  NO  ý
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES  ý  NO  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES  ý  NO  o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§232.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):
 
Large Accelerated Filer x
 
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer o
 
Smaller Reporting Company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  YES  o  NO  ý
 
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant on June 29, 2012, based on a closing price of $31.34 per share as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $3,231,881,370.
 
As of February 22, 2013, the Registrant had 102,998,348 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.
 
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement - Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 2, 2013 - Part III




BEMIS COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2


Forward-looking Statements
This Annual Report contains certain estimates, predictions, and other “forward-looking statements” (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).  Forward-looking statements are generally identified with the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “target,” “may,” “will,” “plan,” “project,” “should,” “continue,” or the negative thereof or other similar expressions, or discussion of future goals or aspirations, which are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters.  Such statements are based on information available to management as of the time of such statements and relate to, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of future performance (financial and otherwise), including those of acquired companies, perceived opportunities in the market and statements regarding our mission and vision.  Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
 
Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expected include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions caused by inflation, interest rates, consumer confidence, rates of unemployment and foreign currency exchange rates; global economic conditions, including the ongoing sovereign debt crisis and continued uncertainties in Europe; investment performance of assets in our pension plans; competitive conditions within our markets, including the acceptance of our new and existing products; customer contract bidding activity; threats or challenges to our patented or proprietary technologies; raw material costs, availability, and terms, particularly for polymer resins and adhesives; price changes for raw materials and our ability to pass these price changes on to our customers or otherwise manage commodity price fluctuation risks; unexpected energy surcharges; broad changes in customer order patterns; our ability to achieve expected cost savings associated with facility consolidation initiatives; a failure in our information technology infrastructure or applications; changes in governmental regulation, especially in the areas of environmental, health and safety matters, fiscal incentives, and foreign investment; unexpected outcomes in our current and future administrative and litigation proceedings; unexpected outcomes in our current and future tax proceedings; changes in domestic and international tax laws; costs associated with the pursuit of business combinations; unexpected costs associated with the integration of acquired businesses; unexpected costs related to plant closings; changes in our labor relations; and the impact of changes in the world political environment including threatened or actual armed conflict.  These and other risks, uncertainties, and assumptions identified from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including without limitation, those described under Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, could cause actual future results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.  In addition, actual future results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statement as a result of changes in the assumptions used in making such forward-looking statement.



3


PART I
 
ITEM 1 — BUSINESS
 
Bemis Company, Inc., a Missouri corporation (the “Registrant” or “Company”), continues a business formed in 1858.  The Company was incorporated in 1885 as Bemis Bro. Bag Company with the name changed to Bemis Company, Inc. in 1965.  The Company is a global manufacturer of packaging products and pressure sensitive materials.  The Company's business activities are organized around its three reportable business segments, U.S. Packaging (59 percent of 2012 net sales), Global Packaging (30 percent) and Pressure Sensitive Materials (11 percent). 
 
The majority of the Company’s products are sold to customers in the food industry.  Other customers include companies in the following types of businesses: chemical, agribusiness, medical, pharmaceutical, personal care, electronics, automotive, construction, graphic industries, and other consumer goods. Further information about the Company’s operations in its business segments and geographic areas is available in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had approximately 19,600 employees, about 13,000 of whom were classified as production employees. Many of the United States production employees are covered by collective bargaining contracts involving five international unions, two independent unions, and 22 individual contracts with terms ranging from one to six years.  During 2012, ten contracts covering 1,792 employees at ten different locations in the United States were successfully negotiated.  Ten domestic labor agreements covering 980 employees are scheduled to expire in 2013.  Many of the production employees and some of the salaried workforce who are located outside the United States are covered by collective bargaining contracts involving 23 different unions with terms ranging from one to six years.
 
Working capital fluctuates throughout the year in relation to the level of customer volume and other marketplace conditions.  Inventory levels reflect a reasonable balance between raw material pricing and availability and the Company’s commitment to promptly fill customer orders.  Manufacturing backlogs are not a significant factor in the industries in which the Company operates.  The business of each of the reportable segments is not seasonal to any significant extent.
 
The Company is the owner or licensee of a number of United States and foreign patents and patent applications that relate to certain of its products, manufacturing processes, and equipment.  The Company also has a number of trademarks and trademark registrations in the United States and in foreign countries.  The Company’s patents, licenses, and trademarks collectively provide a competitive advantage.  However, the loss of any single patent or license alone would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results as a whole or those of any of its segments.
 
The Company’s business activities are organized around its three reportable business segments, U.S. Packaging, Global Packaging and Pressure Sensitive Materials.  Both internal and external reporting conform to this organizational structure.  A summary of the Company’s business activities reported by its three reportable business segments follows. The Company transitioned to these segments in 2012, which reflects the separation of Flexible Packaging into the U.S. Packaging and Global Packaging segments. All information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been recast to conform to this new segment reporting structure.

U.S. Packaging Segment
The U.S. Packaging segment represents all food, consumer, and industrial products packaging-related manufacturing operations located in the United States. This segment manufactures multilayer polymer, blown and cast film structures to produce packaging sold for food and personal care product applications as well as non-food applications. Additional products include custom thermoformed packaging, and multiwall paper bags. Markets for these products include processed and fresh meat, liquids, frozen foods, cereals, snacks, cheese, coffee, condiments, candy, pet food, bakery, seed, lawn and garden, tissue, fresh produce, personal care and hygiene, disposable diapers, agribusiness, and minerals.

4


Global Packaging Segment
The Global Packaging segment includes all packaging-related manufacturing operations located outside of the United States as well as global medical device and pharmaceutical packaging manufacturing operations. This segment manufactures multilayer polymer, blown and cast film structures to produce packaging sold for a variety of food, medical, pharmaceutical, personal care, and industrial applications. Additional products include injection molded plastic and folding carton packaging. Markets for these products include processed and fresh meat, liquids, snacks, cheese, coffee, condiments, candy, bakery, tissue, fresh produce, personal care and hygiene, disposable diapers, agribusiness, pharmaceutical, and medical devices.

Pressure Sensitive Materials Segment
The Pressure Sensitive Materials segment is a global manufacturer of pressure sensitive adhesive coated paper and film substrates sold into label, graphic, and technical product markets. Products for label markets include narrow-web rolls of pressure sensitive paper, film, and metalized film printing stocks used in high-speed printing and die-cutting. Products for graphic markets include pressure sensitive films used for decorative signage through computer-aided plotters, digital and screen printers, and photographic overlaminate and mounting materials including optically clear films with built-in UV inhibitors. Products for technical markets include micro-thin film adhesives used in delicate electronic parts assembly and pressure sensitive applications utilizing foam and tape based stocks to perform fastening and mounting functions.

Marketing, Distribution, and Competition
While the Company’s sales are made through a variety of distribution methods, more than 90 percent of sales are made by the Company’s direct sales force.  Sales offices and plants are located throughout North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia Pacific to provide prompt and economical service to more than 30,000 customers.  The Company’s technically trained sales force is supported by product development engineers, design technicians, and a customer service organization.
 
No single customer accounts for ten percent or more of the Company’s total sales.  Nevertheless, business arrangements with large customers require a large portion of the manufacturing capacity at a few individual manufacturing sites.  Any change in the business arrangement would typically occur over a period of time, which would allow for an orderly transition for both the Company’s manufacturing site and the customer.
 
The major markets in which the Company sells its products are highly competitive.  Areas of competition include service, innovation, quality, and price.  This competition is significant as to both the size and the number of competing firms.  Major competitors in the U.S. and Global Packaging segments include Amcor Limited, Berry Plastics Corporation, Bryce Corporation, Exopack Company, Hood Packaging Corporation, Printpack, Inc., Sealed Air Corporation, Sonoco Products Company, Wihuri OY, and Winpak ltd.  In the Pressure Sensitive Materials segment, major competitors include 3M, Acucote, Inc., Avery Dennison Corporation, FLEXcon Corporation, Green Bay Packaging Inc., Ricoh Company, Ltd., Ritrama Inc., Spinnaker Industries, Inc., Technicote Inc., UPM-Kymmene Corporation, and Wausau Coated Products Inc.
 
The Company considers itself to be a significant participant in the market niches it serves; however, due to the diversity of the U.S. Packaging, Global Packaging, and Pressure Sensitive Materials segments, the Company’s precise competitive position in these markets is not reasonably determinable.  Advertising is limited primarily to business and trade publications emphasizing the Company’s product features and related technical capabilities.
 
Raw Materials
Polymer resins and films, paper, inks, adhesives, aluminum, and chemicals constitute the basic major raw materials.  These are purchased from a variety of global industry sources and the Company is not dependent on any one supplier for its raw materials.  While temporary industry-wide shortages of raw materials may occur, the Company expects to continue to successfully manage raw material supplies without significant supply interruptions.  Currently, raw materials are readily available.
 

5


Research and Development Expense
Research and development expenditures were as follows:
(in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
U.S. Packaging
 
$
19.2

 
$
18.3

 
$
16.3

Global Packaging
 
15.1

 
14.6

 
11.9

Pressure Sensitive Materials
 
5.9

 
4.8

 
6.1

Corporate
 
1.4

 
1.0

 

Total
 
$
41.6

 
$
38.7

 
$
34.3

 
Environmental Control
Compliance with federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations which have been enacted or adopted regulating discharges of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, is not expected to have a material effect on the capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position of the Company and its subsidiaries.
 
Available Information
The Company is a large accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) and is also an electronic filer.  Electronically filed reports (Forms 4, 8-K, 10-K, 10-Q, S-3, S-8, etc.) can be accessed at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) website (http://www.sec.gov) or by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F St., N.E., Washington, DC 20549 (call 1-202-551-8090 or 1-800-732-0330 for hours of operation). Electronically filed and furnished reports can also be accessed through the Company’s own website (http://www.bemis.com), under Investor Relations/SEC Filings or by writing for free information, including SEC filings, to Investor Relations, Bemis Company, Inc., One Neenah Center, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 669, Neenah, Wisconsin 54957-0669, or calling (920) 727-4100.  In addition, the Company’s Board Committee charters, Principles of Corporate Governance, and the Company’s Code of Conduct can be electronically accessed at the Company’s website under Company Overview or, free of charge, by writing directly to the Company, Attention:  Corporate Secretary.  The Company intends to post any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Conduct that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and other persons performing similar functions on the Investor Relations section of its website (www.bemis.com) promptly following the date of such amendment or waiver.

Explanation of Terms Describing the Company’s Products
 
Barrier laminate — A multilayer plastic film made by laminating two or more films together with the use of adhesive or a molten plastic to achieve a barrier for the planned package contents.
Barrier products — Products that provide protection and extend the shelf life of the contents of the package.  These products provide this protection by combining different types of plastics and additives into a multilayered plastic package.  These products protect the contents from such things as oxygen, moisture, light, odor, or other environmental factors.
Blown film — A plastic film that is extruded through an annular die in the form of a tube and then expanded by an internal column of air in the manufacturing process.
Bundling films — A film manufactured by a modified blown film process that is used for wrapping and holding multipacks of products such as canned goods and bottles of liquids, replacing corrugate and fiberboard.
Cast film — A plastic film that is extruded through a straight slot die as a flat sheet during its manufacturing process.
Coextruded film — A blown or cast film extruded with multiple layers extruded simultaneously.
Controlled atmosphere packaging — A package which limits the flow of elements, such as oxygen, carbon dioxide or moisture, into or out of the package.
Crystallized Polyester (PET) — CPET.  The process of using a combination of formulated resin blends and thermoforming conditions to increase the crystalinity of PET trays, which increases the heat distortion temperature of the trays to 450 degrees Fahrenheit.  This allows foods packaged in these trays to go directly from freezer to oven for heating of the food.
EZ Open Packaging — Any one of a series of technologies employed to allow the consumer easy access to a packaged product. Peelable closures, laser or other physical scoring/abrasion of a packaging film may be used. EZ Open can be combined with reclose features such as plastic zippers or the inclusion of pressure sensitive materials into the packaging film.
Flexible polymer film — A non-rigid plastic film. Generally the shape of the package changes as the product contained in it is removed.
Flexographic printing — The most common flexible packaging printing process in North America using a raised rubber or alternative material image mounted on a printing cylinder.
Graphic products — Pressure sensitive materials used for decorative signage, promotional items and displays, and

6


advertisements.
In-line overlamination — The ability to add a protective coating to a printed material during the printing process.
IWS — Individually Wrapped Slices.  A term used to describe individually wrapped slices of process cheese foods.
IWS Inner Wrap — The plastic film used to wrap each slice of process cheese.  Typically, these films are cast coextrusions of polypropylene resins.
Label products — Pressure sensitive materials made up and sold in roll form.
Labelstock — Pressure sensitive material designed for the label markets.
Laminate/Barrier laminate — A multilayer plastic film made by laminating two or more films together with the use of adhesive or a molten plastic to achieve the distribution and use requirements for the planned package contents. Alternately, a barrier layer can also be included as one of the films or in the laminating medium to protect the packaged products from such things as moisture, oxygen or other environmental factors.
Liner or Inner Liner Films — A multilayer coextruded film that is used as the inner liner for bag-in-box packaging applications for products such as cereal or crackers.  The films typically are comprised of high density polyethylenes and may contain barrier resins such as EVOH or nylon.
Modified atmosphere packaging — A package in which the normal atmospheric composition of air inside the package has been modified by replacing it with a gas such as nitrogen.
Monolayer film — A single layer extruded plastic film.
Multiwall paper bag — A package made from two or more layers, at least one of which is paper, which have not been laminated.
Pouches and bags — An option that delivers a semi-finished package, instead of rollstock, to a customer for filling product and sealing/closing the package for distribution.
Pressure sensitive material — A material coated with adhesive such that upon contact with another material it will stick.
Prime label — A pressure sensitive label used as the primary decorative label or secondary label, typically on a consumer product.
Retort — A food processing technique in which the food product is placed in a package and then thermally treated (in the range of 250 degrees Fahrenheit) to extend the food product’s shelf life under room temperature storage conditions.  High oxygen and moisture barrier flexible or rigid packaging materials can be used for the primary package.
Rigid Packaging — A form of packaging in which the shape of the package is retained as its contents are removed in use. Bottles, trays and clamshell packaging are examples.
Rollstock — The principal form in which flexible packaging material is delivered to a customer.  Finished film wound on a core is converted in a process at the end user’s plant that forms, fills, and seals the package of product for delivery to customers.
Rotogravure printing — A high quality, long run printing process utilizing a metal engraved cylinder.
Sheet products — Pressure sensitive materials cut into sheets and sold in sheet form.
Shrink film/ Barrier shrink film — A packaging film consisting of polyethylene and/or polypropylene resins extruded via a tubular process.  The film is cooled and then reheated and stretched at a temperature near its melting point. The film can be irradiated with an electron beam in a second process to cross link the molecules for added heat resistance and strength.  The film is made to shrink around a product to be packaged by an application of a thermal treatment.  Alternately, a layer of an oxygen barrier material can be included to manufacture a barrier shrink film product.
Stretch film — A plastic film with a significant ability to stretch which is used to wrap pallets of goods in the shipping process.
Technical products — Technically engineered pressure sensitive materials used primarily for fastening and mounting functions, for example in cell phones, appliances, and electronic devices.
Thermoformed plastic packaging — A package formed by applying heat to a film to shape it into a tray or cavity and then sealing a flat film on top of the package after it has been filled.
UV inhibitors — Chemical agents included in a film to protect products against ultraviolet rays.
Variable information label — A pressure sensitive label that is typically printed with a bar code or other type of variable information.


7


ITEM 1A — RISK FACTORS
 
The following factors, as well as factors described elsewhere in this Form 10-K, or in other filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could adversely affect the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  Other factors not presently known to us or that we presently believe are not material could also affect our business operations and financial results.
 
Raw materials — Raw material cost increases or shortages could adversely affect our results of operations.
As a manufacturer, our sales and profitability are dependent on the availability and cost of raw materials, which are subject to price fluctuations.  Inflationary and other increases in the costs of raw materials have occurred in the past and are expected to recur, and our performance depends in part on our ability to reflect changes in costs in selling prices for our products.  In the past, we have generally been successful in managing the impact of higher raw material costs by increasing selling prices.  Natural disasters such as hurricanes, in addition to terrorist activity and government regulation of environmental emissions, may negatively impact the production or delivery capacity of our raw material suppliers in the chemical and paper industries.  This could result in increased raw material costs or supply shortages, which may have a negative impact on our profitability if we are unable to pass along the increased costs in our selling prices or, in the case of a shortage, secure raw materials from alternative sources.
 
Facility consolidation activities — Our facility consolidation activities and cost saving initiatives may not achieve the results we anticipate.
We have undertaken and will continue to undertake facility consolidation activities and cost reduction initiatives to optimize our asset base, improve operating efficiencies and generate cost savings.  We cannot be certain that we will be able to complete these initiatives as planned or that the estimated operating efficiencies or cost savings from such activities will be fully realized or maintained over time.  In addition, we may not be successful in migrating production from one facility to another.

Information technology — A failure in our information technology systems could negatively affect our business.
We depend on information technology to record and process customers' orders, manufacture and ship products in a timely manner, and maintain the financial accuracy of our business records.  We are in the process of implementing a global Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system that will redesign and deploy new processes and a common information system across our plants over a period of several years.  There can be no certainty that this system will deliver the expected benefits.  The failure to achieve our goals may impact our ability to (1) process transactions accurately and efficiently and (2) remain in step with the changing needs of the trade, which could result in the loss of customers.  In addition, the failure to either deliver the application on time, or anticipate the necessary readiness and training needs, could lead to business disruption and loss of customers and revenue.  Finally, failure or abandonment of any part of the ERP system could result in a write-off of part or all of the costs that have been capitalized on the project.
 
Our information systems could also be penetrated by outside parties intent on extracting information, corrupting information, or disrupting business processes.  Such unauthorized access could disrupt our business and could result in the loss of assets, which could result in the loss of customer confidence and business, and cause us to incur time and expense in remediation efforts.

Multiemployer pension plans — The withdrawal liabilities related to our multiemployer pension plans may be significant.
We participate in three “multiemployer” pension plans administered by labor unions representing some of our employees.  We make periodic contributions to these plans to allow them to meet their pension benefit obligations to their participants.  Our required contributions to these plans are increasing as a result of the insolvency or withdrawal of other companies that previously contributed to these plans, inability or failure of withdrawing companies to pay their withdrawal liability, lower than expected returns on pension fund assets or other funding deficiencies.  In the event that we withdraw from participation in one of these plans, then applicable law could require us to make an additional lump-sum contribution to the plan, and we would have to reflect that as an expense in our consolidated statement of operations and as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet.  Our withdrawal liability for any multiemployer plan would depend on the extent of the plan’s funding of vested benefits.  In the ordinary course of our renegotiation of collective bargaining agreements with labor unions that maintain these plans, we may decide to discontinue participation in a plan, and in that event, we could face a withdrawal liability.  All multiemployer plans in which we participate are reported to have significant underfunded liabilities.  Such underfunding could increase the size of our potential withdrawal liability. See “Legal Proceedings" included in Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

8


Acquisitions — We may not be able to successfully integrate businesses that we acquire.
We have made numerous acquisitions in the past and are regularly considering new acquisitions that we believe will provide meaningful opportunities to grow our business and improve performance in the future.  Acquired businesses may not achieve the levels of revenue, profit, productivity, or otherwise perform as we expect.  Acquisitions involve special risks, including, without limitation, the potential assumption of unanticipated liabilities and contingencies as well as difficulties in integrating acquired businesses.  While we believe that our acquisitions will improve our competitiveness and future financial performance, we can give no assurance that acquisitions will be successful.
 
Goodwill and other intangible assets — A significant write down of goodwill and/or other intangible assets would have a material adverse effect on our reported results of operations and net worth.
We review our goodwill balance for impairment at least once a year using the business valuation methods allowed in accordance with current accounting standards.  These methods include the use of a weighted-average cost of capital to calculate the present value of the expected future cash flows of our reporting units.  Future changes in the cost of capital, expected cash flows, or other factors may cause our goodwill and/or other intangible assets to be impaired, resulting in a non-cash charge against results of operations to write down these assets for the amount of the impairment.  In addition, if we make changes in our business strategy or if external conditions adversely affect our business operations, we may be required to record an impairment charge for goodwill or intangibles, which would lead to decreased assets and reduced net operating results.  If a significant write down is required, the charge would have a material adverse effect on our reported results of operations and net worth.  We have identified the valuation of intangibles as a critical accounting estimate.  See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments—Intangible assets and goodwill” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Patents and proprietary technology — Our success is dependent on our ability to develop and successfully introduce new products and to acquire and retain intellectual property rights.
Our ability to develop and successfully market new products and to develop, acquire, and retain necessary intellectual property rights is essential to our continued success, but cannot reasonably be assured.

Funded status of pension plans — Recognition of pension liabilities may cause a significant reduction in stockholders’ equity.
Current accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) require balance sheet recognition of the funded status of our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans.  If the fair value of our pension plans’ assets at a future reporting date decreases or if the discount rate used to calculate the projected benefit obligation (PBO) as of that date decreases, we will be required to record the incremental change in the excess of PBO over the fair value of the assets as a reduction of stockholders’ equity.  The resulting non-cash after-tax charge would represent future expense and would be recorded directly as a decrease in the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income component of stockholders’ equity.  While we cannot estimate the future funded status of our pension liability with any certainty at this time, we believe that if the market value of assets or the discount rate used to calculate our pension liability materially decreases, the adjustment could significantly reduce our stockholders’ equity.  A significant reduction in stockholders’ equity may impact our compliance with debt covenants or could cause a downgrade in our credit ratings that could also adversely impact our future cost and speed of borrowing and have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.  We have identified pension assumptions as a critical accounting estimate.  See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments—Pension costs” and “—Pension assumptions sensitivity analysis” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Credit rating — A downgrade in our credit rating could increase our borrowing costs and negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to using cash provided by operations, we regularly issue commercial paper to meet our short-term liquidity needs.  Our credit ratings are important to our ability to issue commercial paper at favorable rates of interest.  A downgrade in our credit rating could increase the cost of borrowing by increasing the spread over prevailing market rates that we pay for our commercial paper or the fees associated with our bank credit facility.  If for any reason the commercial paper market was not available, we would borrow on our existing credit agreements.  If these were no longer available to us, we would be required to seek alternative sources of financing.  We would expect to meet our financial liquidity needs by accessing the bank market, which would further increase our borrowing costs.
 

9


Interest rates — An increase in interest rates could reduce our reported results of operations.
At December 31, 2012, our variable rate borrowings approximated $603.8 million (which includes $400 million fixed rate notes that have been effectively converted to variable rate debt through the use of a fixed to variable rate interest rate swap).  Fluctuations in interest rates can increase borrowing costs and have an adverse impact on results of operations.  Accordingly, increases in short-term interest rates will directly impact the amount of interest we pay.  For each one percent increase in variable interest rates, our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $6.0 million on the $603.8 million of variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2012.
 
Domestic and international economic conditions.
Disruption in the domestic and international equity and financial markets may impact local economies in which we conduct business.  We are not able to predict the future impact of other market disruptions on our liquidity and consolidated statements of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
 
Foreign operations — Conditions in foreign countries and changes in foreign currency exchange rates may significantly reduce our reported results of operations.
We have operations globally.  In 2012, approximately 31 percent of our sales were generated by entities operating outside of the United States.  Fluctuations in currencies can cause transaction and translation losses.  In addition, our revenues and net income may be adversely affected by economic conditions, political situations, and changing laws and regulations in foreign countries, as to which we have no control.

Imports and exports — We are subject to governmental export and import controls that could subject us to liability or impair our ability to compete in international markets. 
Certain of our products are subject to export controls and may be exported only with the required export license or through an export license exception. If we were to fail to comply with export licensing, customs regulations, economic sanctions and other laws, we could be subject to substantial civil and criminal penalties, including fines for the company and incarceration for responsible employees and managers, and the possible loss of export or import privileges. In addition, if our distributors fail to obtain appropriate import, export or re-export licenses or permits, we may also be adversely affected through reputational harm and penalties. Obtaining the necessary export license for a particular sale may be time-consuming and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities.
 
Furthermore, export control laws and economic sanctions prohibit the shipment of certain products to embargoed or sanctioned countries, governments and persons. While we train our employees to comply with these regulations, we cannot assure that a violation will not occur, whether knowingly or inadvertently. Any such shipment could have negative consequences including government investigations, penalties, fines, civil and criminal sanctions, and reputational harm. Any change in export or import regulations, economic sanctions or related legislation, shift in the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or change in the countries, governments, persons or technologies targeted by such regulations, could result in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to existing or potential customers with international operations. Any decreased use of our products or limitation on our ability to export or sell our products could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Numerous other factors over which we may have limited or no control may affect our performance and profitability.
Other factors that may influence our earnings, financial position, and liquidity include:  legal and administrative cases and proceedings (whether civil, such as environmental or product related, or criminal), settlements, judgments, and investigations; adoption of new, or changes in, accounting policies or practices and the application of such policies and practices; changes in business mix; customer and supplier business reorganizations or combinations; ability to retain adequate levels of insurance coverage at acceptable rates; loss of significant contract(s); risks and uncertainties relating to investment in development activities and new facilities; timely development and successful market acceptance of new products; pricing of competitive products; disruptions in transportation networks; reliability of utility services; general or specific economic conditions and the ability and willingness of purchasers to substitute other products for the products that we manufacture; financial condition and inventory strategies of customers and suppliers; credit risks; changes in customer order patterns; employee work stoppages at plants; increased competition; changes in government regulations and the impact of changes in the world political environment, including the ability to estimate the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on financial results; the impact of epidemiological events on the economy and on our customers and suppliers; and acts of war, terrorism, weather, and other natural disasters.


10


ITEM 1B — UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.
 
ITEM 2 — PROPERTIES
 
Properties utilized by the Company at December 31, 2012, were as follows:
 
U.S. Packaging Segment
This segment has 35 manufacturing plants located in 16 states, of which 32 are owned directly by the Company or its subsidiaries and three are leased from outside parties.  Initial building lease terms generally provide for minimum terms of five to 21 years and have one or more renewal options.  The term of building leases in effect at December 31, 2012, expire between 2013 and 2026.

Global Packaging Segment
This segment has 32 manufacturing plants located in three U.S. states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and ten non-U.S. countries, of which 26 are owned directly by the Company or its subsidiaries and six are leased from outside parties.  Initial building lease terms generally provide for minimum terms of five to twelve years and have one or more renewal options.  The term of building leases in effect at December 31, 2012, expire between 2013 and 2018.
 
Pressure Sensitive Materials Segment
This segment has seven manufacturing plants located in three states and two non-U.S. countries, all of which are owned directly by the Company or its subsidiaries.

Corporate and General
The Company considers its plants and other physical properties to be suitable, adequate, and of sufficient productive capacity to meet the requirements of its business.  The manufacturing plants operate at varying levels of utilization depending on the type of operation and market conditions.  The executive offices of the Company, which are leased, are located in Neenah, Wisconsin.
 

11


ITEM 3 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is involved in a number of lawsuits incidental to its business, including environmental related litigation and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business.  Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these cases, the Company believes, except as discussed below, that any ultimate liability would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
 
Environmental Matters
The Company is a potentially responsible party (PRP) pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (commonly known as “Superfund”) and similar state and foreign laws in proceedings associated with seventeen sites around the United States and one in Brazil.  These proceedings were instituted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and certain state and foreign environmental agencies at various times beginning in 1983.  Superfund and similar state and foreign laws create liability for investigation and remediation in response to releases of hazardous substances in the environment. Under these statutes, joint and several liability may be imposed on waste generators, site owners and operators, and others regardless of fault.  Although these regulations could require the Company to remove or mitigate the effects on the environment at various sites, perform remediation work at such sites, or pay damages for loss of use and non-use values, the Company expects its liability in these proceedings to be limited to monetary damages. The Company expects its future liability relative to these sites to be insignificant, individually and in the aggregate.  The Company has accrued an amount that it believes to be adequate to cover its exposure.
 
São Paulo Tax Dispute
Dixie Toga Ltda (Dixie Toga), acquired by the Company on January 5, 2005, is involved in a tax dispute with the City of São Paulo, Brazil (the City).  The City imposes a tax on the rendering of printing services.  The City has assessed this city services tax on the production and sale of printed labels and packaging products.  Dixie Toga, along with a number of other packaging companies, disagree and contend that the city services tax is not applicable to its products and that the products are subject only to the state value added tax (VAT).  Under Brazilian law, state VAT and city services tax are mutually exclusive and the same transaction can be subject to only one of those taxes.  Based on a ruling from the State of São Paulo, advice from legal counsel, and long standing business practice, Dixie Toga appealed the city services tax and instead continued to collect and pay only the state VAT.
 
The City of São Paulo disagreed and assessed Dixie Toga the city services tax for the years 1991-1995.  The assessments for those years are estimated to be approximately $53.7 million at the date the Company acquired Dixie Toga, translated to U.S. dollars at the December 31, 2012 exchange rate.  Dixie Toga challenged the assessments and ultimately litigated the issue in two annulment actions filed on November 24, 1998 and August 16, 1999 in the Lower Tax Court in the city of São Paulo.  A decision by the Lower Tax Court in the city of São Paulo in 2002 canceled all of the assessments for the years 1991-1995.  The City of São Paulo, the State of São Paulo, and Dixie Toga had each appealed parts of the lower court decision.  On February 8, 2010, the São Paulo Court of Justice issued a Decision in favor of Dixie Toga.  This Decision has been appealed by the City of São Paulo.  In the event of a successful appeal by the City and an adverse resolution, the estimated amount for these years could be substantially increased for additional interest, monetary adjustments and costs from the date of acquisition.
 
The City has also asserted the applicability of the city services tax for the subsequent years 1996-2001 and has issued assessments for those years for Dixie Toga and for Itap Bemis Ltda., a Dixie Toga subsidiary.  The assessments for those years were upheld at the administrative level and are being challenged by the companies.  The assessments at the date of acquisition for these years for tax and penalties (exclusive of interest and monetary adjustments) are estimated to be approximately $8.1 million for Itap Bemis and $26.1 million for Dixie Toga, translated to U.S. dollars at the December 31, 2012 exchange rate.  In the event of an adverse resolution, the estimated amounts for these years could be increased by $49.5 million for Itap Bemis and $143.7 million for Dixie Toga for interest, monetary adjustments and costs. The 1996-2001 assessments for Dixie Toga are currently being challenged in the courts. 
 
The City has also asserted the applicability of the city services tax for the subsequent years 2004-2009.  The assessments issued by the City for these years have been received and are being challenged by the Company at the administrative level.  The assessments for tax, penalties, and interest are estimated to be approximately $48.2 million, translated to U.S. dollars at the December 31, 2012 exchange rate.
 
The Company strongly disagrees with the City’s position and intends to vigorously challenge any assessments by the City of São Paulo.  The Company is unable at this time to predict the ultimate outcome of the controversy and as such has not recorded any liability related to this matter.  An adverse resolution could be material to the consolidated results of operations

12


and/or cash flows of the period in which the matter is resolved.
 
Brazil Investigation
On September 18, 2007, the Secretariat of Economic Law (SDE), a governmental agency in Brazil, initiated an investigation into possible anti-competitive practices in the Brazilian flexible packaging industry against a number of Brazilian companies including a Dixie Toga subsidiary.  The investigation relates to periods prior to the Company’s acquisition of control of Dixie Toga and its subsidiaries.  Given the nature of the proceedings, the Company is unable at the present time to predict the outcome of this matter.
 
Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The Company contributes to three multiemployer defined benefit pension plans based on obligations arising under collective bargaining agreements covering union-represented employees.  The Company does not directly manage these multiemployer pension plans, which are generally managed by boards of trustees, half of whom are appointed by the unions and the other half by employers contributing to the plans.  Based on the information provided by the plan administrators, the Company is aware that three of these plans are underfunded.  In addition, pension-related legislation requires underfunded pension plans to improve their funding ratios within prescribed intervals based on the level of their underfunding.  As a result, the Company expects its contributions to these plans to increase in the future.
 
Under current law regarding multiemployer defined benefit plans, a plan’s termination, the Company’s voluntary partial or full withdrawal, or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from any underfunded multiemployer pension plan would require the Company to make payments to the plan for the Company’s proportionate share of the multiemployer pension plan’s unfunded vested liabilities. In addition, if a multiemployer defined benefit pension plan fails to satisfy certain minimum funding requirements, the IRS may impose a nondeductible excise tax of 5 percent on the amount of the accumulated funding deficiency for those employers contributing to the fund.
 
The Company recorded charges related to the planned withdrawal from the GCIU — Employee Retirement Fund in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the second quarter of 2012 as part of the Company’s 2011 and 2012 facility consolidation program. The expense recorded represents the Company’s best estimate of the expected settlement of these planned withdrawal liabilities.  While it is not possible to quantify the potential impact of future actions, further reductions in participation or withdrawal from these multiemployer pension plans could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated annual results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.




 ITEM 4 — MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
 
Not applicable.
 

13


PART II
 
ITEM 5 — MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
The Company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BMS.  On December 31, 2012, there were 3,481 registered holders of record of our common stock.  The Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.  As of December 31, 2012, under authority granted by the Board of Directors, the Company had authorization to repurchase an additional 4,543,800 shares of its common stock.
 
Dividends paid and the high and low common stock prices per share were as follows:
 
For the Quarterly Periods Ended:
 
March 31
 
June 30
 
September 30
 
December 31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Dividend paid per common share
 
$
0.25

 
$
0.25

 
$
0.25

 
$
0.25

Common stock price per share
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

High
 
$
32.79

 
$
33.48

 
$
32.08

 
$
33.93

Low
 
$
29.63

 
$
29.52

 
$
29.59

 
$
31.33

2011
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Dividend paid per common share
 
$
0.24

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.24

Common stock price per share
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

High
 
$
33.32

 
$
33.83

 
$
34.40

 
$
32.16

Low
 
$
30.13

 
$
31.00

 
$
28.41

 
$
27.21

2010
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Dividend paid per common share
 
$
0.23

 
$
0.23

 
$
0.23

 
$
0.23

Common stock price per share
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

High
 
$
30.74

 
$
31.80

 
$
32.00

 
$
34.25

Low
 
$
27.09

 
$
25.50

 
$
26.58

 
$
30.01



14


ITEM 6 — SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED REVIEW
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2008
Operating Data
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Net sales
 
$
5,139.2

 
$
5,322.7

 
$
4,835.0

 
$
3,514.6

 
$
3,779.4

Cost of products sold and other expenses
 
4,789.7

 
4,953.7

 
4,434.2

 
3,232.2

 
3,471.5

Interest expense
 
70.9

 
76.8

 
73.5

 
42.1

 
39.4

Income from continuing operations before income taxes
 
278.6

 
292.2

 
327.3

 
240.3

 
268.5

Provision for income taxes
 
104.8

 
104.9

 
117.6

 
87.8

 
96.3

Income from continuing operations
 
173.8

 
187.3

 
209.7

 
152.5

 
172.2

Income from discontinued operations
 

 

 
1.8

 

 

Net income
 
173.8

 
187.3

 
211.5

 
152.5

 
172.2

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 

 
3.2

 
6.4

 
5.3

 
6.0

Net income attributable to Bemis Company, Inc.
 
173.8

 
184.1

 
205.1

 
147.2

 
166.2

Net income attributable to Bemis Company, Inc. as a percent of net sales
 
3.4
%
 
3.5
%
 
4.2
%
 
4.2
%
 
4.4
%
Common Share Data
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Basic earnings per share
 
$
1.67

 
$
1.73

 
$
1.85

 
$
1.38

 
$
1.61

Diluted earnings per share
 
1.66

 
1.73

 
1.85

 
1.38

 
1.61

Dividends per share
 
1.00

 
0.96

 
0.92

 
0.90

 
0.88

Book value per share
 
15.88

 
15.36

 
17.90

 
17.11

 
13.87

Weighted-average shares outstanding for computation of diluted earnings per share
 
105.0

 
106.6

 
110.7

 
106.9

 
103.4

Common shares outstanding at December 31,
 
103.3

 
103.0

 
107.7

 
108.2

 
99.7

Capital Structure and Other Data
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Current ratio
 
2.4x

 
2.3x

 
2.2x

 
3.8x

 
2.3x

Working capital
 
$
882.0

 
$
867.0

 
$
791.7

 
$
1,480.5

 
$
560.9

Total assets
 
4,185.7

 
4,320.4

 
4,285.8

 
3,928.7

 
2,822.3

Short-term debt
 
8.9

 
15.1

 
2.9

 
31.3

 
26.6

Long-term debt
 
1,417.6

 
1,554.8

 
1,283.5

 
1,227.5

 
660.0

Total equity
 
1,640.9

 
1,582.1

 
1,927.4

 
1,851.7

 
1,382.5

Return on average total equity
 
10.8
%
 
10.5
%
 
10.9
%
 
9.1
%
 
11.1
%
Return on average total capital
 
6.6
%
 
7.0
%
 
7.6
%
 
6.4
%
 
8.0
%
Depreciation and amortization
 
$
204.3

 
$
220.3

 
$
209.7

 
$
159.3

 
$
162.0

Capital expenditures
 
136.4

 
135.2

 
113.2

 
89.2

 
120.5

Number of common shareholders
 
3,481

 
3,618

 
3,758

 
3,870

 
3,920

Number of employees
 
19,564

 
20,165

 
19,796

 
16,040

 
15,394



15



ITEM 7 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 
Three Years Ended December 31, 2012
Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Three-year review of results
 
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Net sales
 
$
5,139.2

 
100.0
 %
 
$
5,322.7

 
100.0
 %
 
$
4,835.0

 
100.0
 %
Cost of products sold
 
4,191.7

 
81.6

 
4,412.5

 
82.9

 
3,941.8

 
81.5

Gross margin
 
947.5

 
18.4

 
910.2

 
17.1

 
893.2

 
18.5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
 
506.7

 
9.9

 
483.4

 
9.1

 
459.1

 
9.5

Research and development
 
41.6

 
0.8

 
38.7

 
0.7

 
34.3

 
0.7

Facility consolidation and other costs
 
68.7

 
1.3

 
38.4

 
0.7

 

 

Other operating (income) expense, net
 
(15.0
)
 
(0.3
)
 
(17.7
)
 
(0.3
)
 
(1.0
)
 

Operating income
 
345.5

 
6.7

 
367.4

 
6.9

 
400.8

 
8.3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
70.9

 
1.4

 
76.8

 
1.4

 
73.5

 
1.5

Other non-operating (income) expense, net
 
(4.0
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(1.6
)
 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before taxes
 
278.6

 
5.4

 
292.2

 
5.5

 
327.3

 
6.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for income taxes
 
104.8

 
2.0

 
104.9

 
2.0

 
117.6

 
2.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
 
173.8

 
3.4

 
187.3

 
3.5

 
209.7

 
4.3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from discontinued operations
 

 

 

 

 
1.8

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
173.8

 
3.4

 
187.3

 
3.5

 
211.5

 
4.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 

 

 
3.2

 
0.1

 
6.4

 
0.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Bemis Company, Inc.
 
$
173.8

 
3.4
 %
 
$
184.1

 
3.5
 %
 
$
205.1

 
4.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effective income tax rate
 
 

 
37.6
 %
 
 

 
35.9
 %
 
 

 
35.9
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share
 
$
1.66

 
 
 
$
1.73

 
 
 
$
1.85

 
 
 


16


Overview
Bemis Company, Inc. is a leading global manufacturer of packaging and pressure sensitive materials supplying a variety of markets.  Historically, about 65 percent of our total net sales are to customers in the food industry.  Sales of our packaging products are widely diversified among food categories and can be found in nearly every aisle of the grocery store.  Our emphasis on supplying packaging to the food industry has typically provided a more stable market environment for our U.S. Packaging and Global Packaging business segments, which accounted for approximately 89 percent of our net sales in 2012.  Our remaining net sales are from our Pressure Sensitive Materials business segment which, while diversified in end use products, is more exposed to economically sensitive end markets.

 
Market Conditions
The markets into which our products are sold are highly competitive.  Our leading market positions in packaging for perishable food and medical device products reflect our focus on value-added, proprietary products that provide food safety and sterility benefits.  We also manufacture products for which our technical know-how and economies of scale offer us a competitive advantage.  The primary raw materials for our business segments are polymer resins and films, paper, inks, adhesives, aluminum and chemicals.
 
Over the past several years, global economic conditions have been weak and prices of food products have increased.  While economic growth in Latin America and Asia has exceeded that of North America and Europe, the pace of growth in these regions has slowed over the past 12 months.  As a result, we have generally experienced a slowdown in demand in the various geographic regions in which we operate.  In addition, foreign currency exchange rates weakened against the U.S. dollar during 2012, reducing operating results reported from our foreign operations as they are translated to U.S. dollars in our consolidated financial statements.

 
Facility Consolidation
To improve efficiencies and reduce fixed costs, we initiated a facility consolidation program during the fourth quarter of 2011 and expanded the program in the second quarter of 2012. In total nine production facilities will be closed and most of the production from these facilities has been transferred to other facilities.  As of December 31, 2012, manufacturing operations had ceased at seven of these manufacturing facilities and the remaining closures are expected to be completed in early 2013.  The most current estimate of the total cost of the programs is $141 million which includes approximately $50 million in employee-related costs, approximately $54 million in fixed asset accelerated depreciation and write-downs, and approximately $37 million in other facility consolidation costs.
 
We recorded $68.7 million and $38.4 million of charges associated with the facility consolidation programs during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  These costs have been recorded on the consolidated statement of income as facility consolidation and other costs.  We expect the remaining approximately $34 million of estimated costs to be expensed during 2013.  Cash payments for these programs in 2012 and 2011 totaled $35.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively.  Cash payments in 2013 are expected to be approximately $50 million.   

Acquisitions

Australia and New Zealand Distributors
On August 22, 2012, we acquired two flexible packaging businesses in Australia and New Zealand. The acquisition of these businesses supports our strategy to enhance our presence in the Asia Pacific region. The combined purchase price was approximately $19.1 million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments.

Shield Pack
On December 1, 2011, we acquired the common stock of Shield Pack, LLC of West Monroe, Louisiana for a cash purchase price of approximately $45 million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments.  Shield Pack is a manufacturer of high barrier liners for bulk container packaging.

Mayor Packaging
On August 1, 2011, we acquired Mayor Packaging, a Hong Kong-based manufacturer of consumer and specialty flexible packaging including a manufacturing facility in Dongguan, China.  The purchase price was approximately $96.7 million.
 

17


Noncontrolling Interest of Dixie Toga Ltda
During the third quarter of 2011, we completed the purchase of the remaining shares owned by the noncontrolling interest of our Brazilian subsidiary, Dixie Toga Ltda, for approximately $90 million.
 
Alcan Packaging Food Americas
On March 1, 2010, we acquired the Food Americas operations of Alcan Packaging (Alcan Packaging Food Americas), a business unit of Rio Tinto plc.  Under the terms of the $1.2 billion transaction, we acquired 23 Food Americas flexible packaging facilities in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and New Zealand.  These facilities are included in our U.S. and Global Packaging business segments and produce flexible packaging principally for the food and beverage industries and augment our product offerings and technological capabilities. 
 
Sale of Discontinued Operations
Under the terms of an order signed by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on February 25, 2010, a portion of the Alcan Packaging Food Americas business acquired on March 1, 2010 was to be divested; accordingly, we had classified the related operating results as discontinued operations.  On July 13, 2010, we sold these discontinued operations to Exopack Holding Corp., an affiliate of private investment firm Sun Capital Partners, Inc.  The transaction was completed for a cash purchase price, net of selling costs, of $75.2 million.  The divested business recorded 2009 net sales of approximately $156 million and included two facilities that manufacture flexible packaging for retail natural cheese and shrink bags for fresh red meat.
 


18


Results of Operations
Consolidated Overview
 
(in millions, except per share amounts)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Net sales
 
$
5,139.2

 
$
5,322.7

 
$
4,835.0

Net income attributable to Bemis Company, Inc.
 
173.8

 
184.1

 
205.1

Diluted earnings per share
 
1.66

 
1.73

 
1.85

 
2012 versus 2011
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased 3.4 percent from the same period of 2011. Currency translation reduced net sales by 3.3 percent.  Acquisitions increased net sales by approximately 1.2 percent during the year.  The remaining organic sales decline reflects lower unit sales volumes during 2012 offset by improved sales mix.
 
Diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $1.66 compared to $1.73 reported in the same period of 2011.  Results for 2012 included a $0.45 charge associated with facility consolidation and other costs and a $0.04 charge for acquisition-related earnout payments. Results for 2011 included a $0.24 charge associated with facility consolidation and other costs and $0.05 of charges for acquisition-related earnout and transaction payments, partially offset by a $0.03 gain associated with a non U.S. pension plan curtailment.

2011 versus 2010
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by 10.1 percent.  We estimate that acquisitions increased net sales by approximately 4.8 percent during the year.  Currency translation increased net sales by 1.7 percent.  The remaining organic sales growth primarily reflects higher selling prices which were partially offset by lower unit sales volume.  Higher selling prices during 2011 reflect higher raw material costs.
 
Diluted earnings per share for 2011 of $1.73 included charges of $0.24 for facility consolidation and other costs and $0.05 related to our Mayor Packaging acquisition, partially offset by a $0.03 gain associated with a non U.S. pension plan curtailment.  This compared to diluted earnings per share for 2010 of $1.85, which included a $0.23 charge related to our Alcan Packaging Food Americas acquisition and a $0.06 charge related to the pre-closing impact of the July 2009 financing of the Alcan Packaging Food Americas acquisition.  Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations were $0.02 in 2010.  Operating results for the year ended December 31, 2011 were negatively impacted by higher raw material costs and lower unit sales volumes during the year.

New Reportable Business Segments
On January 10, 2013, we announced the realignment of our segment reporting. As a result, we now report business segment information for three reportable segments as follows: U.S. Packaging, Global Packaging, and Pressure Sensitive Materials. The expansion from two to three reportable segments reflects the separation of the Flexible Packaging business segment into U.S. Packaging and Global Packaging business segments. The Pressure Sensitive Materials business segment remains unchanged. We transitioned to these segments in 2012, which reflects the separation of Flexible Packaging into the U.S. Packaging and Global Packaging segments. All information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been recast to conform to this new segment reporting structure.

In connection with the implementation of an enterprise resource planning system during 2012, we recorded adjustments primarily to cost of goods sold during the fourth quarter in order to harmonize the application of certain accounting practices and provide consistency among the business segments. These adjustments made to individual locations across the segments substantially offset one another.

 

19


U.S. Packaging Business Segment
Our U.S. Packaging segment represents all food, consumer, and industrial products packaging-related manufacturing operations located in the United States. Our U.S. Packaging business segment provides packaging to a variety of end markets, including applications for meat and cheese, confectionery and snack foods, frozen foods, lawn and garden products, health and hygiene products, beverages, bakery goods, and dry foods.
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Net sales
 
$
3,040.1

 
$
3,110.7

 
$
2,821.6

Operating profit (See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
 
366.7

 
315.0

 
346.7

Operating profit as a percentage of net sales
 
12.1
%
 
10.1
%
 
12.3
%
 
2012 versus 2011
U.S. Packaging net sales decreased 2.3 percent in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period of 2011.  Acquisitions increased net sales by approximately 0.8 percent. Lower net sales in 2012 reflect generally lower unit sales volumes for certain non-barrier packaging, partially offset by increased unit sales volumes of barrier packaging for products such as refrigerated foods where food safety is a requirement.
 
Operating profit for the total year 2012 was $366.7 million, or 12.1 percent of net sales, compared to $315.0 million, or 10.1 percent of net sales in 2011. Operating profit in 2012 and 2011 were negatively impacted by $42.1 million and $26.3 million of facility consolidation and other costs, respectively. The closure of six U.S. Packaging facilities in conjunction with the facility consolidation program is reducing capacity for certain non-barrier packaging, driving improved sales mix and lower fixed costs. Substantially all of the savings generated from the facility consolidation activities in 2012 benefited the U.S. Packaging segment. Operating profit also benefited from a favorable fourth quarter adjustment totaling $13.8 million related to the harmonization of certain accounting practices in connection with an enterprise resource planning system implementation.

2011 versus 2010
U.S. Packaging net sales increased by 10.2 percent in the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. Acquisitions increased net sales by approximately 5.6 percent. The remaining increase in sales represents improved price partially offset by lower unit sales volumes and unfavorable sales mix.

Operating profit for the total year 2011 was $315.0 million, or 10.1 percent of net sales, compared to $346.7 million, or 12.3 percent of net sales, in 2010. The lower percentage of operating profit to net sales in 2011 reflects the impact of higher raw material costs during the first six months of 2011 and lower unit sales volumes during the second half of the year.  In addition, operating profit for 2011 included $26.3 million of facility consolidation and other charges. Total year 2010 operating profit included $14.0 million of Alcan Packaging Food Americas acquisition related charges.
 
Global Packaging Business Segment
Our Global Packaging business segment includes all of our packaging-related manufacturing operations located outside of the United States as well as our global medical device and pharmaceutical packaging manufacturing operations. Our Global Packaging business segment provides packaging to a variety of end markets, including applications for meat and cheese, confectionery and snack foods, frozen foods, lawn and garden products, health and hygiene products, beverages, healthcare products, bakery goods, and dry foods.
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Net sales
 
$
1,543.5

 
$
1,637.2

 
$
1,450.8

Operating profit (See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
 
59.9

 
112.6

 
121.8

Operating profit as a percentage of net sales
 
3.9
%
 
6.9
%
 
8.4
%
 
2012 versus 2011
Global Packaging net sales of $1.5 billion represented a decrease of 5.7 percent compared to 2011.  Acquisitions increased net sales by approximately 2.4 percent, which was more than offset by a 9.7 percent decrease in net sales related to currency translation. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency translation, net sales increased reflecting higher selling prices and improved sales mix, partially offset by the impact of lower unit sales volumes.
 

20


 
Operating profit for the total year 2012 was $59.9 million, or 3.9 percent of net sales, compared to $112.6 million, or 6.9 percent of net sales in 2011. The net effect of currency translation decreased operating profit in 2012 by $10.9 million. Operating profit in 2012 and 2011 were negatively impacted by $26.6 million and $8.6 million of facility consolidation and other costs, respectively. The decline in operating profit as a percentage of net sales in 2012 also reflects both the lower unit sales volumes in 2012 and the impact of an unfavorable fourth quarter adjustment totaling $16.4 million related to the harmonization of certain accounting practices in connection with the enterprise resource planning system implementation. Operating profit included $4.6 million and $4.5 million of Mayor Packaging acquisition-related charges in 2012 and 2011, respectively.  In addition, operating profit for 2011 included a $2.7 million gain associated with a non U.S. pension plan curtailment. Total year 2010 operating profit included $6.1 million of Alcan Packaging Food Americas acquisition related charges.
 
2011 versus 2010
For the total year 2011, Global Packaging net sales increased 12.8 percent compared to 2010.  Acquisitions increased net sales by approximately 5.0 percent, and currency effects accounted for a sales increase of 2.2 percent.  The remaining increase in net sales was driven by the impact of increased price and improved sales mix partially offset by lower volumes.
 
Operating profit for the total year 2011 was $112.6 million, or 6.9 percent of net sales, compared to $121.8 million, or 8.4 percent of net sales, in 2010.  The net effect of currency translation increased operating profit in 2011 by $5.0 million.  The lower percentage of operating profit to net sales in 2011 reflects the impact of higher raw material costs during the first six months of 2011 and lower unit sales volumes during the second half of the year.  In addition, operating profit for 2011 included $8.6 million of facility consolidation and other charges and $4.5 million of Mayor Packaging acquisition-related charges, which was partially offset by a $2.7 million gain associated with a non U.S. pension plan curtailment. 

Pressure Sensitive Materials Business Segment
The Pressure Sensitive Materials business segment offers adhesive products to three markets:  prime and variable information labels, which include roll label stock used in a wide variety of label markets; graphic design, used to create signage and decorations; and technical components, which represent pressure sensitive components for industries such as the medical, automotive, construction and electronics industries.  Paper and adhesive are the primary raw materials used in our Pressure Sensitive Materials business segment.
 
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Net sales
 
$
555.6

 
$
574.8

 
$
562.6

Operating profit (See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
 
37.1

 
33.4

 
33.0

Operating profit as a percentage of net sales
 
6.7
%
 
5.8
%
 
5.9
%
 
2012 versus 2011
For the total year 2012, net sales of Pressure Sensitive Materials were $555.6 million, a 3.3 percent decrease from net sales in 2011.  Currency effects reduced net sales by 3.1 percent. Higher unit sales volumes of label products partially offset lower unit volumes for both graphic and technical products, resulting in a less favorable sales mix during 2012.
   
Operating profit was $37.1 million or 6.7 percent of net sales in 2012, compared to $33.4 million or 5.8 percent of net sales in 2011.  The net effect of currency translation decreased operating profit in 2012 by $1.5 million. Accounting practices harmonization adjustments increased operating profit by $0.5 million in the fourth quarter.  Total year 2011 operating profit included a $2.7 million charge related to facility consolidation and other costs.

2011 versus 2010
For the total year 2011, net sales of Pressure Sensitive Materials were $574.8 million, a 2.2 percent increase from net sales in 2010.  Currency effects increased net sales by 2.4 percent.  Net sales reflected lower unit sales volumes offset by higher selling prices.
 
Operating profit was $33.4 million or 5.8 percent of net sales in 2011, compared to $33.0 million or 5.9 percent of net sales in 2010.  The net effect of currency translation increased operating profit in 2011 by $1.1 million.  Lower unit sales volumes reflecting current weak economic conditions were offset by higher selling prices across all product categories.  Total year 2011 operating profit included a $2.7 million charge related to facility consolidation and other costs. 


21


Consolidated Gross Profit
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Gross profit
 
$
947.5

 
$
910.2

 
$
893.2

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales
 
18.4
%
 
17.1
%
 
18.5
%
Gross profit in 2012 reflects the positive impact of cost reductions, higher selling prices and improved mix, partially offset by lower unit sales volumes and the impact of currency translation. Gross profit in 2011 reflects the negative impact of increasing resin prices during the first half of the year coupled with lower sales volume during the second half of 2011.  Gross profit in 2010 reflects the negative impact of $15.4 million of expenses associated with the purchase accounting impact of the fair value write-up of inventory and a charge for the fair value of the customer order backlog, both related to the Alcan Packaging Food Americas acquisition. 
 
Consolidated Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A)
 
$
506.7

 
$
483.4

 
$
459.1

SG&A as a percentage of net sales
 
9.9
%
 
9.1
%
 
9.5
%
Selling, general, and administrative expenses in 2012 reflect additional expense related to acquired businesses, higher incentive compensation and pension costs, partially offset by the impact of currency translation. Selling, general, and administrative expenses also increased in 2011 primarily reflecting the increased costs associated with the August 1, 2011 purchase of Mayor Packaging, and the March 1, 2010 purchase of Alcan Packaging Food Americas. Selling, general, and administrative expenses in 2012 and 2011 included $4.6 million and $4.5 million, respectively, of Mayor Packaging acquisition-related charges.  Selling, general, and administrative expenses in 2010 included $4.5 million of expenses primarily related to severance and equipment relocation costs associated with our Alcan Packaging Food Americas acquisition.
 
Research and Development (R&D)
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Research and development (R&D)
 
$
41.6

 
$
38.7

 
$
34.3

R&D as a percentage of net sales
 
0.8
%
 
0.7
%
 
0.7
%
For the year 2012, R&D expense increased modestly over 2011 and as a percentage of net sales. Our efforts to introduce new products continue at a steady pace and are an integral part of our daily plant operations.  Our research and development engineers work directly on commercial production equipment, bringing new products to market without the use of pilot equipment.  We believe this approach significantly improves the efficiency, effectiveness, and relevance of our research and development activities and results in earlier commercialization of new products.  Expenditures that are not distinctly identifiable as research and development costs are included in costs of products sold.
 
Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Other operating (income) expense, net
 
$
(15.0
)
 
$
(17.7
)
 
$
(1.0
)
For the year 2012, other operating income and expense included $16.6 million of fiscal incentive income compared to $20.0 million in 2011 and $15.9 million in 2010. The reduction in fiscal incentives reflects the impact of currency translation and includes a general reduction in fiscal incentives which is expected to continue going forward. These fiscal incentives are associated with net sales in South America and are included in Global Packaging segment operating profit. Other operating income and expense for the year 2012 also included $2.5 million of acquisition related expense compared to $3.1 million and $15.6 million of such charges in 2011 and 2010, respectively. 
 


22


Interest Expense
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Interest expense
 
$
70.9

 
$
76.8

 
$
73.5

Effective interest rate
 
4.7
%
 
5.4
%
 
5.8
%
The effective interest rate decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to refinancing public notes totaling $300 million with lower cost commercial paper on April 1, 2012. Interest expense increased in 2011 compared to 2010 as a result of the October 2011 issuance of $400 million long-term notes. These funds were raised in anticipation of the repayment of the $300 million notes which matured on April 1, 2012. 
 
Other Non-operating (Income) Expense, Net
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Other non-operating (income) expense, net
 
$
(4.0
)
 
$
(1.6
)
 
$

During 2012, the increase in net other non-operating (income) expense reflects increased interest income.  During 2011, net other non-operating (income) expense included interest income and a gain on sales of excess land, partially offset by a foreign exchange loss of $1.8 million. 
 
Income Taxes
(dollars in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Income taxes
 
$
104.8

 
$
104.9

 
$
117.6

Effective tax rate
 
37.6
%
 
35.9
%
 
35.9
%
 
Our 2012 effective income tax rate was 37.6 percent.  This higher rate was caused by adjustments to valuation allowances based on the likely realization of the future benefits related to specific net deferred tax assets. The deferred tax assets relate primarily to accumulated operating losses incurred by certain legal entities in foreign countries. Excluding these adjustments, the effective tax rate for 2012 would have been 36.1 percent. The difference between our overall tax rate and the U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent in each of the three years presented principally relates to state and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefits, and the differences between tax rates in the various foreign jurisdictions in which we operate.
 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests primarily represented the outstanding preferred shares of Dixie Toga Ltda., our Brazilian flexible packaging subsidiary.  During the third quarter of 2011, we completed the purchase of the outstanding shares owned by the noncontrolling interest of Dixie Toga for approximately $90 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Debt to Total Capitalization
Net debt to total capitalization (which includes total debt net of cash balances divided by total debt net of cash balances plus equity) was 44.4 percent at December 31, 2012, compared to 48.0 percent at December 31, 2011.  Total debt as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1.4 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. 
 
Credit Rating
Our capital structure and financial practices have earned us investment grade credit ratings from two internationally recognized credit rating agencies. During 2012, one credit rating agency revised their credit rating and the other credit rating agency adjusted their credit rating outlook. The downward adjustments have not impacted our investment grade status or our ability to access the capital markets, including the commercial paper markets, at favorable rates of interest.
Cash Flow
Net cash provided by operations totaled $421.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $420.9 million in 2011 and $368.0 million in 2010.  Increasing raw material costs negatively impacted working capital levels during 2011 and 2010. Net cash provided by operations was reduced by contributions to our defined benefit pension plans of $65.4 million, $19.7 million, and $19.2 million during 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.  Contributions to our defined benefit pension plans are expected to be approximately $41.0 million in 2013.
 

23


Net cash used in investing activities totaled $150.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.  This compares to cash used in investing activities in 2011 totaling $284.1 million, reflecting the acquisitions of Mayor Packaging and Shield Pack, and cash used in investing activities in 2010 totaling $1.2 billion, reflecting the acquisition of Alcan Packaging Food Americas. 
 
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 included repayment of our $300 million notes. Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 included the purchase of 5 million shares of our common stock for $161.1 million, and the purchase of the remaining shares of our Brazilian subsidiary, Dixie Toga, Ltda. owned by the noncontrolling interest for $89.7 million.  This compares to cash used for financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2010 that included the purchase of 1.5 million shares of our common stock for $45.8 million, and the purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests of $15.9 million. 
 
Available Financing
In addition to using cash provided by operations, we issue commercial paper to meet our short-term liquidity needs.  At year-end, our commercial paper debt outstanding was $203.8 million.  Based on our current credit rating, we enjoy ready access to the commercial paper markets.
 
Under the terms of our revolving credit agreement, we have the capacity to borrow up to $800 million.  This facility is principally used as back-up for our commercial paper program.  Our revolving credit facility is supported by a group of major U.S. and international banks.  Covenants imposed by the revolving credit facility include limits on the sale of businesses, minimum net worth calculations, and a maximum ratio of debt to total capitalization.  The revolving credit agreement includes a $100 million multicurrency limit to support the financing needs of our international subsidiaries.  At December 31, 2012, there was no outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility.  If this revolving credit facility was no longer available to us and we were not able to issue commercial paper, we would expect to meet our financial liquidity needs by accessing the bank market, which would increase our borrowing costs.  Borrowings under the credit agreement are subject to a variable interest rate.
 
Liquidity Outlook
On July 21, 2011, we amended our revolving credit facility to increase the total amount available from $625 million to $800 million and to extend the term from April 29, 2013 to July 21, 2016.  As of December 31, 2012, $203.8 million of outstanding debt was supported by this credit facility, leaving $596.2 million of available credit.  As of December 31, 2012, cash and cash equivalents outside of the United States was $107.6 million. We use a notional pooling arrangement with an international bank to help manage global liquidity requirements. Under this pooling arrangement, our participating subsidiaries maintain either a cash deposit or borrowing position through local currency accounts with the bank, so long as the aggregate position of the global pool is a notionally calculated net cash deposit. This notional pooling arrangement allows reasonable access to the our cash in foreign subsidiaries, as well as provides a financing option to foreign subsidiaries beyond our multi-currency credit facility.
 
Management expects cash flow from operations and available liquidity described above to be sufficient to support operations going forward.  There can be no assurance, however, that the cost or availability of future borrowings will not be impacted by future capital market disruptions.  In addition, increases in raw material costs would increase our short term liquidity needs.
 
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures were $136.4 million during 2012, compared to $135.2 million in 2011, and $113.2 million in 2010.  We expect to fund 2013 capital expenditures with cash provided by operating activities.

Dividends
We increased our quarterly cash dividend by 4.2 percent during the first quarter of 2012 to $0.25 per share from $0.24 per share.  This follows increases of 4.3 percent in 2011 and 2.2 percent in 2010.  In February 2013, the Board of Directors approved the 30th consecutive annual increase in the quarterly cash dividend on common stock to $0.26 per share, a 4.0 percent increase.
 
Share Repurchases
During 2011, we purchased 5.0 million shares of our common stock in the open market, compared to 1.5 million shares in 2010. No shares were repurchased during 2012.  As of December 31, 2012, we were authorized to purchase an additional 4.5 million shares of our common stock for the treasury.
 

24


Contractual Obligations
The following table provides a summary of contractual obligations including our debt payment obligations, operating lease obligations, and certain other purchase obligations as of December 31, 2012.  Obligations under capital leases are insignificant.
 
 
 
Contractual Payments Due by Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less than
 
1 to 3
 
3 to 5
 
More than
(in millions)
 
Total
 
1 year
 
years
 
years
 
5 years
Long-term debt obligations (1)
 
$
1,404.0

 
$
204.0

 
$
400.0

 
$

 
$
800.0

Interest expense (2)
 
356.2

 
60.8

 
91.4

 
85.1

 
118.9

Operating leases (3)
 
66.8

 
11.5

 
15.1

 
10.6

 
29.6

Purchase obligations (4)
 
333.8

 
290.0

 
42.9

 

 
0.9

Postretirement obligations (5)
 
23.1

 
2.6

 
4.6

 
4.7

 
11.2

Severance (6)
 
24.7

 
24.7

 

 

 

Total
 
$
2,208.6

 
$
593.6

 
$
554.0

 
$
100.4

 
$
960.6

 
(1)
These amounts are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  A portion of this debt is commercial paper backed by a bank credit facility that expires on July 21, 2016.  Certain amounts have been reflected as being due in less than one year even though they have been classified as long term in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  Commercial paper has been included in Long Term Debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheet in accordance with our ability and intent to refinance these items on a long-term basis.  See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our long term debt.

(2)
A portion of the interest expense disclosed is subject to variable interest rates.  The amounts disclosed above assume that future variable interest rates are equal to rates at December 31, 2012.

(3)
We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business.  Substantially all lease agreements have fixed payment terms based on the passage of time.  Some lease agreements provide us with the options to renew the lease.  Our future operating lease obligations would change if we exercised these renewal options and if we entered into additional operating lease agreements.

(4)
Purchase obligations represent contracts or commitments for the purchase of raw materials, utilities, capital equipment and various other goods and services.

(5)
Postretirement obligations represent contracts or commitments for postretirement healthcare benefits and benefit payments for the unfunded Bemis Supplemental Retirement Plan.  See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our postretirement benefit obligations.

(6)
Severance costs relate to our facility consolidation program, which is further described in Note 2 and Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
We also have long-term obligations related to our income tax liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions, environmental liabilities and multi-employer and pension defined benefit plans. These liabilities have been excluded from the table above due to the high degree of uncertainty as to amounts and timing regarding future payments.  See Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes.

Market Risks and Foreign Currency Exposures
We enter into contractual arrangements (derivatives) in the ordinary course of business to manage foreign currency exposure and interest rate risks.  We do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative trading purposes.  Our use of derivative instruments is subject to internal policies that provide guidelines for control, counterparty risk, and ongoing reporting.  These derivative instruments are designed to reduce the income statement volatility associated with movement in foreign exchange rates and to achieve greater exposure to variable interest rates.
 
A portion of the interest expense on our outstanding debt is subject to short-term interest rates.  As such, increases in short-term interest rates will directly impact the amount of interest we pay.  For each one percent increase in variable interest rates, the annual interest expense on $603.8 million of variable rate debt outstanding (which includes $400 million fixed rate

25


notes that have been effectively converted to variable rate debt through the use of a fixed to variable rate interest rate swap) would increase by approximately $6.0 million.
 
We enter into interest-rate swap contracts to economically convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt to variable rate debt.  During the fourth quarter of 2011, we entered into four interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $400 million.  These contracts were designated as hedges of our $400 million 4.50 percent fixed-rate debt due in 2021.  The variable rate for each of the interest rate swaps is based on the six-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), set in arrears, plus a fixed spread.  The variable rates are reset semi-annually at each net settlement date.  The net settlement benefit to us, which is recorded as a reduction in interest expense, was $7.0 million and $1.6 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively.  At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the fair value of these interest rate swaps was $17.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively, in our favor, using discounted cash flow or other appropriate methodologies, and is included in deferred charges and other assets with a corresponding increase in long-term debt.

Our international operations enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to manage foreign currency exchange rate exposures associated with certain foreign currency denominated receivables and payables.  At December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had outstanding forward exchange contracts with notional amounts aggregating $6.1 million and $9.8 million, respectively.  Forward exchange contracts generally have maturities of less than six months.  Counterparties to the forward exchange contracts are major financial institutions.  Credit loss from counterparty nonperformance is not anticipated.  We have not designated these derivative instruments as hedging instruments.  The net settlement amount (fair value) related to the active forward foreign currency exchange contracts is recorded on the balance sheet within current liabilities and as an element of other operating (income) expense, net, which offsets the related transactions gains and losses on the related foreign denominated asset or liability.  Amounts recognized in income related to forward exchange contracts were $0.8 million of income and $0.5 million of income in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
 
Our business in Brazil held U.S. dollar denominated debt which created exposure to changes in currency rates when compared to its functional currency of the Brazilian real.  In order to hedge this exposure, we entered into currency swap contracts with maturities that matched the underlying debt, effectively converting a portion of the U.S. denominated debt to the local currency.  We had not designated these derivative instruments as hedging instruments.  There were no outstanding currency swap contracts as of December 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.  The net settlement amount (fair value) related to swap contracts was recorded on the balance sheet as either a current or long-term asset or liability and as an expense element of other non-operating (income) expense, net, which offset the related transaction gains or losses.  Amounts recognized related to these currency swaps were $1.8 million of expense in the year ended December 31, 2011.
 


Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.  The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period.  On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to retirement benefits, intangible assets, goodwill, and expected future performance of operations.  Our estimates and judgments are based on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.  Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
We believe the following are critical accounting estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
 
·                  The calculation of annual pension costs and related assets and liabilities; and
·                  The valuation and useful lives of intangible assets and goodwill.
 
Pension costs
Amounts related to our defined benefit pension plans that are recognized in our financial statements are determined on an actuarial basis.  The accounting for our pension plans requires us to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of the pension plans on our balance sheet.  A substantial portion of our pension amounts relate to our defined benefit plans in the United States.  Net periodic pension cost recorded in 2012 was $47.8 million, compared to pension cost of $28.6 million in 2011 and $26.5 million in 2010.
 

26


One element used in determining annual pension income and expense in accordance with accounting rules is the expected return on plan assets. For the year 2012, we maintained a target allocation to equity investments of 60 percent of total assets and an expected long-term rate of return on total U.S. pension plan assets of 8.00 percent.
 
To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, we considered compound historical returns and future expectations based on our target asset allocation.  For the historical long-term investment periods of 10, 15, 20 and 25 years ending December 31, 2012, our U.S. pension plan assets earned annualized rates of return of 7.1 percent, 5.6 percent, 7.8 percent, and 8.7 percent, respectively.  Using our U.S. target asset allocation of plan assets of 60 percent equity securities and 40 percent fixed income securities, our outside actuaries have used their independent economic models to calculate a range of expected long-term rates of return and, based on their results, we have determined our U.S. asset return assumptions to be reasonable.
 
This assumed long-term rate of return on assets is applied to a calculated value of plan assets, which recognizes changes in the fair value of plan assets in a systematic manner over approximately three years.  This process calculates the expected return on plan assets that is included in pension income or expense.  The difference between this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is generally deferred and recognized over subsequent periods.  The net deferral of asset gains and losses affects the calculated value of pension plan assets and, ultimately, future pension income and expense.

At the end of each year, we determine the discount rate to be used to calculate the present value of pension plan liabilities.  This discount rate is an estimate of the current interest rate at which the pension liabilities could be effectively settled at the end of the year.  In estimating this rate, we look to changes in rates of return on high quality, fixed income investments that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized ratings agency.  At December 31, 2012, for our U.S. defined benefit pension plans we determined this rate to be 4.00 percent, a decrease of one-quarter of one percent from the 4.25 percent rate used at December 31, 2011.
 
For our non-U.S. pension plans, we follow similar methodologies in determining the appropriate expected rates of return on assets and discount rates to be used in our actuarial calculations in each individual country.
 
U.S.  Pension assumptions sensitivity analysis
Based on our current discount rate assumption of 4.00 percent and our expected rate of return on pension plan assets of 8.00 percent, we expect pension expense before the effect of income taxes for 2013 to be in a range of $24 million to $26 million.  The following charts depict the sensitivity of estimated 2013 pension expense to incremental changes in the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on assets.
 
Discount rate
 
Total increase (decrease) to pension expense from current assumption (in millions)
 
Rate of Return on Plan Assets
 
Total increase (decrease) to pension expense from current assumption (in millions)
3.00 percent
 
$
8.6

 
7.00 percent
 
$
5.6

3.25 percent
 
6.4

 
7.25 percent
 
4.1

3.50 percent
 
4.2

 
7.50 percent
 
2.8

3.75 percent
 
2.0

 
7.75 percent
 
1.3

4.00 percent — Current Assumption
 

 
8.00 percent — Current Assumption
 

4.25 percent
 
(2.0
)
 
8.25 percent
 
(1.3
)
4.50 percent
 
(3.8
)
 
8.50 percent
 
(2.8
)
4.75 percent
 
(5.5
)
 
8.75 percent
 
(4.1
)
5.00 percent
 
(7.3
)
 
9.00 percent
 
(5.6
)
 
The amount by which the fair value of plan assets differs from the projected benefit obligation of a pension plan must be recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an asset, in the case of an overfunded plan, or as a liability, in the case of an underfunded plan.  The gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise but are not recognized as components of pension cost are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.  The following chart depicts the sensitivity of the total pension adjustment to other comprehensive income to changes in the assumed discount rate.
 

27


 
 
Total increase (decrease) in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Discount rate
 
Income, net of taxes, from current assumptions (in millions)
3.00 percent
 
$
(111.2
)
3.25 percent
 
(81.1
)
3.50 percent
 
(52.6
)
3.75 percent
 
(25.5
)
4.00 percent — Current Assumption
 

4.25 percent
 
24.2

4.50 percent
 
47.0

4.75 percent
 
68.9

5.00 percent
 
89.5

 
Intangible assets and goodwill
The purchase price of each new acquisition is allocated to tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets, liabilities assumed, and goodwill.  Determining the portion of the purchase price allocated to identifiable intangible assets and goodwill requires us to make significant estimates.  The amount of the purchase price allocated to intangible assets is generally determined by estimating the future cash flows of each asset and discounting the net cash flows back to their present values.  The discount rate used is determined at the time of the acquisition in accordance with accepted valuation methods.
 
Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, including intangible assets.  We review our goodwill for impairment annually and assess whether significant events or changes in the business circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill may not be recoverable.  The test for impairment requires us to make estimates about fair value, most of which are based on projected future cash flows.  Our estimates associated with the goodwill impairment tests are considered critical due to the amount of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet and the judgment required in determining fair value amounts, including projected future cash flows.  Goodwill was $1.0 billion as of December 31, 2012.
 
Intangible assets consist primarily of purchased technology, customer relationships, patents, trademarks, and tradenames and are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from one to 30 years, when purchased.  We review these intangible assets for impairment as changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest that the remaining value is not recoverable.  The test for impairment requires us to make estimates about fair value, most of which are based on projected future cash flows.  These estimates and projections require judgments as to future events, condition, and amounts of future cash flows.

New Accounting Pronouncements
There has been no new accounting guidance issued or effective during 2012 that is expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
 
ITEM 7A — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
The information required by this Item 7A is included in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and under the caption “Market Risks and Foreign Currency Exposures” which is part of Management’s Discussion and Analysis included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Based on a sensitivity analysis (assuming a 10 percent adverse change in market rates) of our foreign exchange, currency swaps, and interest rate derivatives and other financial instruments, changes in exchange rates or interest rates would not materially affect our consolidated financial position and liquidity.  The effect on our consolidated results of operations would be substantially offset by the impact of the hedged items.


28


ITEM 8 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
Management’s Responsibility Statement
The management of Bemis Company, Inc. is responsible for the integrity, objectivity, and accuracy of the financial statements of the Company.  The financial statements are prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and using management’s best estimates and judgments, where appropriate.  The financial information presented throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K is consistent with that in the financial statements.
 
The management of Bemis Company, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).  Under the direction, supervision, and participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Company’s management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO-Framework).  Based on the results of this evaluation management has concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.  Item 9A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains management’s favorable assessment of internal controls over financial reporting based on their review and evaluation utilizing the COSO-Framework criteria.
 
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of outside directors, meets quarterly with management, the Internal Audit Director, and independent accountants to review the work of each and to satisfy itself that the respective parties are properly discharging their responsibilities.  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the Internal Audit Director have had and continue to have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee, without the presence of Company management.
 
Henry J. Theisen
Scott B. Ullem
Jerry S. Krempa
President and
Vice President and
Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Controller


29


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Bemis Company, Inc.:
 
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bemis Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.  Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.  We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
 
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
February 28, 2013


30

BEMIS COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(in millions, except per share amounts) 



For the years ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Net sales
 
$
5,139.2

 
$
5,322.7

 
$
4,835.0

Cost of products sold
 
4,191.7

 
4,412.5

 
3,941.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit
 
947.5

 
910.2

 
893.2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses
 
506.7

 
483.4

 
459.1

Research and development
 
41.6

 
38.7

 
34.3

Facility consolidation and other costs
 
68.7

 
38.4

 

Other operating (income) expense, net
 
(15.0
)
 
(17.7
)
 
(1.0
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income
 
345.5

 
367.4

 
400.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
70.9

 
76.8

 
73.5

Other non-operating (income) expense, net
 
(4.0
)
 
(1.6
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
 
278.6

 
292.2

 
327.3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for income taxes
 
104.8

 
104.9

 
117.6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
 
173.8

 
187.3

 
209.7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 

 

 
1.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
173.8

 
187.3

 
211.5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 

 
3.2

 
6.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Bemis Company, Inc.
 
$
173.8

 
$
184.1

 
$
205.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amounts attributable to Bemis Company, Inc.:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Income from continuing operations, net of tax
 
$
173.8

 
$
184.1

 
$
203.3

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 

 

 
1.8

Net income attributable to Bemis Company, Inc.
 
$
173.8

 
$
184.1

 
$
205.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Income from continuing operations
 
$
1.67

 
$
1.73

 
$
1.83

Income from discontinued operations
 

 

 
0.02

Net income attributable to Bemis Company, Inc.
 
$
1.67

 
$
1.73

 
$
1.85

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Income from continuing operations
 
$
1.66

 
$
1.73

 
$
1.83

Income from discontinued operations
 

 

 
0.02

Net income attributable to Bemis Company, Inc.
 
$
1.66

 
$
1.73

 
$
1.85

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

31

BEMIS COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions) 


For the years ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Net income
 
$
173.8

 
$
187.3

 
$
211.5

Other comprehensive (loss) income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrecognized gain reclassified to earnings, net of tax
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.5
)
 
(0.5
)
Translation adjustments
 
(48.3
)
 
(124.2
)
 
24.3

Pension and other postretirement liability adjustments, net of tax of $9.2, $37.9 and $15.1, respectively
 
26.2

 
(66.8
)
 
(3.9
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income
 
(22.2
)
 
(191.5
)
 
19.9

Total comprehensive income (loss)
 
$
151.6

 
$
(4.2
)
 
$
231.4


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


32

BEMIS COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in millions, except per share amounts) 


As of December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
ASSETS
 
 

 
 

Current assets:
 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
114.1

 
$
109.8

Accounts receivable, net
 
645.2

 
665.4

Inventories
 
661.9

 
646.0

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
103.8

 
127.8

Total current assets
 
1,525.0

 
1,549.0

 
 
 
 
 
Property and equipment:
 
 

 
 

Land and land improvements
 
78.4

 
75.1

Buildings and leasehold improvements
 
623.2

 
608.4

Machinery and equipment
 
1,799.8

 
1,810.4

Total property and equipment
 
2,501.4

 
2,493.9

Less accumulated depreciation
 
(1,150.1
)
 
(1,053.0
)
Net property and equipment
 
1,351.3

 
1,440.9

 
 
 
 
 
Other long-term assets:
 
 

 
 

Goodwill
 
1,034.3

 
1,048.4

Other intangible assets, net
 
201.2

 
222.5

Deferred charges and other assets
 
73.9

 
59.6

Total other long-term assets
 
1,309.4

 
1,330.5

TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
4,185.7

 
$
4,320.4

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES
 
 

 
 

Current liabilities:
 
 

 
 

Current portion of long-term debt
 
$
0.3

 
$
13.4

Short-term borrowings
 
8.6

 
1.7

Accounts payable
 
382.1

 
415.8

Accrued salaries and wages
 
107.9

 
95.8

Accrued income and other taxes
 
34.3

 
23.9

Other current liabilities
 
109.8

 
131.4

Total current liabilities
 
643.0

 
682.0

 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt, less current portion
 
1,417.6

 
1,554.8

Deferred taxes
 
198.3

 
175.5

Other liabilities and deferred credits
 
285.9

 
326.0

Total liabilities
 
2,544.8

 
2,738.3

 
 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies
 


 


 
 
 
 
 
EQUITY
 
 

 
 

Bemis Company, Inc. shareholders’ equity:
 
 

 
 

Common stock, $0.10 par value:
 
 

 
 

Authorized — 500.0 shares
 
 

 
 

Issued — 127.2 and 126.9 shares, respectively
 
12.7

 
12.7

Capital in excess of par value
 
545.4

 
532.4

Retained earnings
 
1,900.9

 
1,832.9

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(112.9
)
 
(90.7
)
Common stock held in treasury (24.0 shares at cost)
 
(705.2
)
 
(705.2
)
TOTAL EQUITY
 
1,640.9

 
1,582.1

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
$
4,185.7

 
$
4,320.4

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

33

BEMIS COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)


For the years ended December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Net income
 
$
173.8

 
$
187.3

 
$
211.5

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Depreciation and amortization
 
204.3

 
220.3

 
209.7

Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements
 
(0.6
)
 
(1.4
)
 
(3.9
)
Share-based compensation
 
17.6

 
16.3

 
18.4

Deferred income taxes
 
8.7

 
23.5

 
8.1

Income of unconsolidated affiliated company
 
(2.6
)
 
(2.5
)
 
(2.1
)
Cash dividends received from unconsolidated affiliated company
 
4.4

 
4.3

 

Loss on sale of property and equipment
 
1.7

 
3.3

 
0.7

Net facility consolidation and other costs
 
34.8

 
35.0

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effect of acquisitions:
 
 
 
 

 
 

Accounts receivable
 
9.4

 
(44.7
)
 
(18.5
)
Inventories
 
(20.4
)
 
15.4

 
(92.1
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
23.8

 
(36.1
)
 
(22.2
)
Accounts payable
 
(28.4
)
 
(7.6
)
 
42.9

Accrued salaries and wages
 
12.6

 
(5.7
)
 
1.4

Accrued income and other taxes
 
10.8

 
1.4

 
3.9

Other current liabilities
 
(30.5
)
 
(12.7
)
 
(13.3
)
Changes in other liabilities and deferred credits
 
4.3

 
(1.6
)
 
17.0

Changes in deferred charges and other assets
 
(2.4
)
 
26.4

 
6.5

Net cash provided by operating activities
 
421.3

 
420.9

 
368.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Additions to property and equipment
 
(136.4
)
 
(135.2
)
 
(113.2
)
Business acquisitions and adjustments, net of cash acquired
 
(19.1
)
 
(152.8
)
 
(1,179.7
)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
 
4.7

 
3.9

 
2.3

Net proceeds from sale of discontinued operations
 

 

 
75.2

Net cash used in investing activities
 
(150.8
)
 
(284.1
)
 
(1,215.4
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 

 
400.9

 
17.9

Repayment of long-term debt
 
(321.7
)
 
(11.8
)
 
(51.6
)
Net borrowing (repayment) of commercial paper
 
157.3

 
(114.7
)
 
63.6

Net borrowing (repayment) of short-term debt
 
7.6

 
1.9

 
(8.8
)
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
 
(104.3
)
 
(101.9
)
 
(101.9
)
Common stock purchased for the treasury
 

 
(161.1
)
 
(45.7
)
Purchase of subsidiary shares of noncontrolling interests
 

 
(89.7
)
 
(15.9
)
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements
 
0.6

 
1.4

 
3.9

Stock incentive programs and related withholdings
 
(5.2
)
 
(5.0
)
 
(14.9
)
Net cash used in financing activities
 
(265.7
)
 
(80.0
)
 
(153.4
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
 
(0.5
)
 
(7.4
)
 
(4.5
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
4.3

 
49.4

 
(1,005.3
)
Cash and cash equivalents balance at beginning of year
 
109.8

 
60.4