Form 20-F

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the last fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 ¨ Item 18 x

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, references to “U.S.” or the “United States” are to the United States of America, its territories and its possessions. References to “India” are to the Republic of India. Reference to “$” or “Dollars” or “US Dollars” are to the legal currency of the United States and references to “Rs.” or “Rupees” or “Indian Rupees” are to the legal currency of India. Our financial statements are presented in Indian Rupees and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles or US GAAP. In this annual report, any discrepancies in any table between totals and the sums of the amounts listed are due to rounding. For the convenience of the reader, this Annual Report contains translations of certain Indian Rupee amounts into US Dollars, which should not be construed as a representation that such Indian Rupee or US Dollar amounts referred to herein could have been, or could be, converted to US Dollars or Indian Rupees, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated, or at all. References to “Indian GAAP” are to Indian generally accepted accounting principles. References to a particular “fiscal” year are to the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31 of such year. References to years not specified as being fiscal years are to calendar years.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references herein to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” and “VSNL” are to Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited.

The noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was Rs.43.62 per $1.00 on March 31, 2005 for the conversion of Rupees into US Dollars. Unless otherwise specified herein, financial information has been converted into US Dollars at this rate. Any discrepancies in any table between totals and sums of the amounts listed are due to rounding. For more information regarding rates of exchange between Indian Rupees and US Dollars, see “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Exchange Rates.”

This annual report contains “forward-looking statements” as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about our Company and our industry. These forward looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “probably”, “project”, “will”, “seek”, “target” and similar terms and phrases. The forward-looking statements contained herein are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the telecommunications regulatory environment in India and its impact on tariffs, competition in the telecommunications sector and its impact on tariffs, our commercial arrangements with BSNL, MTNL and other Indian and foreign carriers, international settlement rates, the financial strength of our customers, our ability to implement our strategy, particularly in new businesses such as private leased circuits, broadband and national long distance services, our ability to undertake, finance and integrate completed acquisitions like Dishnet DSL and Tyco Global Network and proposed acquisitions such as that of Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd., our capital expenditures on undersea cable and broadband initiatives, technological change and obsolescence, changes in the Indian government, economy and stock markets, changes in Indian and foreign laws impacting us and the other factors discussed in the sections titled “Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, including the trends discussed therein, and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date of this Annual Report. In addition, readers should carefully review the other information in this Annual Report and in the company’s periodic reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) from time to time.

The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data. The consolidated financial data have been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, our financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP, along with the notes thereto. Our selected income statement data for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the selected balance sheet data as of March 31, 2004 and 2005 are derived from our audited financial statements and related notes included in this annual report, together with the report of Deloitte Haskins & Sells, an independent registered public accounting firm. Our selected income statement data for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001 and 2002 and our selected balance sheet data as of March 31, 2001 and 2002 are derived from our audited US GAAP financial statements not included in this annual report. Our selected financial data and our financial statements are presented in Indian rupees. Financial data as of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 have been translated into US dollars for your convenience.

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Indian Rupee and the US Dollar will affect the US Dollar equivalent of the Indian Rupee price of the Company’s Equity Shares on the Indian stock exchanges and, as a result, will likely affect the market price of the Company’s ADSs that are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and vice versa. Such fluctuations will also affect the US Dollar conversion by the Depositary of any cash dividends paid in Indian Rupees on the Company’s Equity Shares represented by the ADSs.

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years indicated, information concerning the number of Indian Rupees for which one US Dollar could be exchanged based on the average of the Noon Buying Rate in the City of New York on the last business day of each month during the period for cable transfers in Indian Rupees as certified for customs purchases by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The column titled “Average” in the table below is the average of the daily Noon Buying Rate on the last business day of each month during the year.

The following table sets forth the high and low exchange rates for the previous six months and are based on the average of the noon buying rate in the City of New York on the last business day of each month during the period for cable transfers in Indian Rupees as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth in the following risk factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

The reduction in telecommunications tariffs in India has had and is expected to continue to have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Telecommunications tariffs in India have declined significantly in recent years. Tariff reductions by the Department of Telecommunications (“DoT”) caused peak international call tariffs in India to decline from Rs.60 per minute in fiscal 2000 to Rs.48 per minute in fiscal 2002 to Rs.40.80 per minute in fiscal 2003. Following regulatory changes in January 2003, international long distance (“ILD”) charges are no longer fixed by the DoT and are instead determined by service providers. Increased competition in the ILD services business has resulted in the significant lowering of peak international call tariffs in India to Rs.18 per minute in fiscal 2004 and between Rs.7.20 and Rs.18 per minute in fiscal 2005. Since international telephony revenues constitute a significant part of the Company’s total revenues, the decline in tariffs has materially and adversely affected the Company’s revenues and net income. The Company’s international telephony revenues declined by approximately 25 percent in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004. Additionally, while tariffs were declining, we continued to be subject to fixed “access deficit charges” (“ADC”) which are effectively charges to compensate fixed line telephone companies for providing below-cost telecommunications services to underserved areas in India. The ADC is currently Rs. 3.25 per minute and Rs.2.50 per minute for incoming and outgoing international long distance calls respectively and Rs.0.30 per minute for national long distance (“NLD”) calls. This has had the effect of further reducing our margins.

In September 2005, the TRAI issued a tariff order fixing tariff ceilings for international private leased circuit (“IPLC”) services which are 29 to 64 percent lower than the rates being charged by the Company. The Company has appealed against the imposition of the ceilings. In fiscal 2005, IPLC services accounted for approximately 20 percent of the Company’s total traffic revenues and if the Company’s appeals are unsuccessful, its revenues and margins in a business that the Company regards as an important driver of its growth could be adversely affected.

Competition in the Indian telecommunications sector is expected to intensify, further affecting our business adversely.

The Indian telecommunications sector is intensely competitive and we face competition in each of our businesses. We expect further competition as the existing and new operators expand their operations and services, there is more industry consolidation and we enter new businesses. Our competitors in the ILD business have resorted to steep rate cuts that we have had to match to remain competitive. Though these rate cuts stabilized in fiscal 2005, they have affected our traffic minutes, revenues and market share adversely. All fixed line, cellular and NLD operators in India have experienced increased competition in recent years. Faced with downward pressures on tariffs and revenues in their core businesses, these operators have demanded rate cuts from their ILD providers. BSNL, which is a Government owned company and India’s largest fixed line operator, has already begun offering its own ILD services and other fixed line operators such as MTNL have said that they may start offering such services shortly. In addition, unlike us, these competitors and other competitors who have strong NLD and cellular businesses will, in the absence of regulation, be able to cross-subsidize their ILD telephony services, thereby enabling them to erode the Company’s market share in ILD services. In some lines of our international businesses such as private leased circuits, end users are customers of foreign carriers and in case the foreign carriers decide to choose our competitors over us, we may lose revenues in those lines of business. Further, our competitors are in the process of commissioning additional bandwidth capacity and consequently, prices and margins in ILD and many of the data services we offer are likely to fall steeply in the near future. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against our competitors and retain our market share.

The Government legalized the provision of Internet telephony in India with effect from April 1, 2002. Internet telephony has the potential to reduce ILD tariffs significantly below current levels. An increasing number of international calls to and from India are being made through the Internet, and this number is likely to increase substantially. While the effect of Internet telephony has been minimal due the low rates prevailing in the ILD market and the limited penetration of computers in the country, competition from this sector could adversely affect the Company’s telephony revenues in the future.

The Government is also considering a proposal to allow service providers to obtain a single unified license to provide all telecommunications services, including mobile, fixed-line, national and international long distance, data and other services. The recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (“TRAI”) in this regard were submitted to the Government in January 2005. If implemented, this measure is expected to increase competition across all our services, with other competitors also offering integrated services.

The Government has announced that it proposes to increase the limit of foreign direct investment in the telecommunications sector from the currently permitted maximum of 49 percent to 74 percent. A notification to this effect is likely to be issued by the Government shortly. This measure could result in the infusion of a significant amount of capital in Indian telecommunication providers by foreign sources, which could enhance their competitiveness substantially.

We may identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses as we implement procedures designed to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Commencing with our annual report for the year ending March 31, 2007, we are required to include a report from our management duly certified by our statutory auditors relating to evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As a consequence of the systems and procedures currently being implemented in order to comply with these requirements, we may uncover circumstances that may be determined to be significant deficiencies, material weaknesses or other reportable conditions. Our measures to remedy these may involve significant effort, expense and the commitment of significant managerial resources. Additionally, depending on the nature and extent of any identified significant deficiency or material weakness, we may also be required to restate previously issued financial statements. Each of such actions may have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our securities.

We may not receive additional compensation from the Government of India for the early termination of our monopoly in international telephony services.

The Government allowed private operators to start offering ILD services from April 1, 2002, terminating the Company’s exclusivity in offering such services two years ahead of schedule, and compensated the Company with a package of benefits. The Government had given assurance prior to the disinvestment of the Company that it would consider additional compensation if found necessary following a detailed review, when undertaken. However, prior to disinvestment of the Company in February 2002, the Government granted a dispensation as full and final settlement of every sort of claim against preponing of ILD de-monopolisation of the Company by two years and the Company had been pursuing the Government for considering additional compensation. To avoid being barred by the statute of limitations, the Company filed a claim in the Mumbai High Court in January 2005. There can be no assurance that the claim will be successful and the Company will receive compensation from the Government, or if the Company does receive compensation, as to the amount, nature or timing of such compensation.

Our revenues from our commercial arrangements with BSNL and MTNL have been declining and any further adverse changes to these arrangements will adversely affect our business.

The Company derived a significant percentage of its international long distance service revenues in fiscal 2005 and prior years from BSNL and MTNL pursuant to commercial arrangements between the Company and these access providers. Gross revenues from BSNL and MTNL in fiscal 2005 fell to Rs.4.5 billion compared to Rs.7.6 billion and Rs.8.7 billion during fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. As part of the compensation package relating to the termination of the Company’s ILD services monopoly, the Government had directed BSNL and MTNL to route their international calls at market rates through the Company as a “Most Favored Customer” until February 12, 2004. In March 2004, BSNL invited competitive bids from ILD operators to carry its outgoing ILD traffic. Although the Company retained the outgoing traffic of BSNL and MTNL during fiscal 2005 after competing with other ILD operators, the Company’s gross revenues as well as its margins from such traffic declined. If BSNL or MTNL cease to route or reduce the volume of their international traffic through the Company or seek to further renegotiate rates, the amount of call traffic carried by the Company and the Company’s revenues and margins could be further adversely affected.

Furthermore, BSNL has been granted operating licenses for international telephony services by the Government and has started ILD operations. In March 2004, the Company and BSNL signed an agreement pursuant to which BSNL may use our infrastructure to route its ILD traffic. BSNL commenced utilizing our infrastructure under this arrangement during fiscal 2005. There can be no assurance that BSNL will route its ILD traffic through the Company in sufficient volumes or that the terms of the agreement will not be modified to the Company’s detriment. Further, there can be no assurance that the agreement will be renewed after the expiry of its term in October 2005. If BSNL and/or MTNL start carrying their own international telephony traffic, as the largest basic line operators in India, their access to end customers could give them a competitive advantage over the Company, which could adversely affect the Company’s traffic volumes, revenues and net income.

Delays in reaching rate agreements with major international carriers could have an adverse effect on our business.

A substantial portion of the Company’s revenue is derived from foreign telecommunications administrations and carriers for connection to the Indian telecommunications network. As with most developing countries, the volume of incoming calls to India exceeds the volume of outgoing calls from India by a significant margin. However, following the termination of the Company’s monopoly in ILD services, incoming call traffic is also carried by other ILD operators, as a result of which the Company may no longer have positive traffic balances with a number of foreign carriers. Currently the Company’s settlement rates with foreign carriers for ILD traffic are negotiated with them from time to time. Any delay in concluding rate agreements with major international carriers may adversely affect incoming traffic volumes and consequently the Company’s revenues.

Given the competitive scenario in India in the ILD sector, the prevailing settlement rates with respect to foreign carriers, particularly the US carriers, are lower than in previous years and are well below the benchmark rates stipulated by the United States Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). Any further lowering of benchmark rates by the FCC or delays in reaching final agreement with US carriers or other major carriers regarding rates could cause a significant decrease in the Company’s revenues from foreign carriers its working capital which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Illegal international telephony operators have adversely affected our call volumes.

Our call volumes have been adversely affected by the international telephony services offered by illegal operators. These operators offer cheaper services since they do not pay Interconnect Usage Charges (“IUCs”) or ADCs or other regulatory payments including license fees and taxes. According to various market estimates these operators have captured as much as 30-40 percent of the incoming ILD traffic into India. The Company has suggested to the TRAI that the reduction of IUCs by phasing out or reducing the ADCs will ensure that illegal operators have no competitive advantage or arbitrage opportunities. While the ADCs have been reduced by around 23 percent for international traffic terminating in India, there still exists an arbitrage of about Rs.3.25 per minute (being the current applicable ADC) for the illegal operators. Until the TRAI phases out the ADC component in the IUC and the Government implements measures to effectively prevent illegal telephony services, we expect our business to be adversely affected by illegal operators.

As a result of delays in the implementation of the new Carrier Access Code regime, we continue to depend on other telecommunications providers for access to end customers.

All international calls we carry that either originate or terminate in India must pass through access telephone networks, which we do not own or control. Demand for our international outgoing telephony services will depend, to a significant degree, on the rates charged to end users in India, access to whom is controlled by competitors such as BSNL, MTNL, Bharti and Reliance.

The Government’s proposed Carrier Access Code (“CAC”) regime offers end customers the right to choose their NLD or ILD carrier, based on rates and quality, rather than such choice being made by the access provider. Implementation of the CAC regime has been delayed due to technical and other issues. BSNL and MTNL currently control access to a majority of the end customers and, because of their “Most Favored Customer” arrangement with us until February 2004, used the Company as their preferred ILD carrier. After February 2004, we are dependent on the implementation of the CAC regime to develop our own customer base for the outgoing international telephony market. There can be no assurances that the CAC will be implemented in the near future or that even if the CAC is implemented, end customers will choose the Company as their preferred ILD carrier.

Telecommunications carriers that we do business with could suffer decreasing margins and financial distress, which may negatively impact our business.

As an international telecommunications service provider, the Company does significant business with foreign carriers all over the world. Several telecommunications carriers, particularly those in the US, which accounted for over 10 percent of our telephony revenues in fiscal 2005, have in the recent past suffered reduced profit margins as well as significant financial pressures. Some of these companies have been acquired by other US or European

companies and are undergoing restructuring of their businesses. If any of the major carriers that we do business with encounters financial difficulties or files for bankruptcy, we may be unable to recover amounts owed to us. There can be no assurance that all the Company’s receivables can be collected or that the Company will not be adversely affected by the financial difficulties of other carriers.

We are subject to extensive regulation and supervision by the Government, which could adversely affect the operation of our business and prevent us from entering into transactions that are in the best interests of our shareholders.

The Company and its businesses are subject to extensive regulation and supervision by the Government of India and its departments, including the DoT, which issues and implements the telecommunications licenses under the Indian Telegraph Act and the TRAI which, among other things, sets the terms and conditions which telecommunications operators are required to follow in their activities. The DoT as the licensor is empowered to revoke the license granted by it for any breach of the license conditions and to modify the license in the public interest.

TRAI’s clearance is required for all the Company’s new initiatives on issues of pricing or the launch of new products. Failure to follow the TRAI directives may lead to the imposition of fines and other punitive actions. Any disputes between the Company and the Government (as the licensor) regarding the terms of the Company’s telecommunications licenses, as well as any dispute between the Company and the other service providers in the country, is required to be adjudicated by the Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (“TDSAT”). Failure to follow the TRAI directives or TDSAT orders may lead to the imposition of fines and/or other punitive actions. Accordingly, Government regulation and supervision could require us to enter into transactions or conduct our business in a manner that is not in the best interests of our shareholders.

The Government controls our licenses to provide telephony and other services and any material modifications of the terms and conditions of the licenses could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our prospects.

The Company operates substantially all of the ILD services it provides, including basic international telephony services to and from India, pursuant to a new license agreement from the Government that is valid until March 31, 2022. In addition, the Company has also been granted an NLD license and a Category “A” All India ISP license, including for Internet telephony. The DoT retains the right to modify the terms and conditions of the Company’s licenses at any time if in its opinion it is necessary or expedient to do so in the interest of the general public or for the proper operation of the telecommunication sector. A change in certain significant terms of any of the licenses, such as their duration, the range of services permitted or the scope of exclusivity, if any, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and prospects. The Company provides various services such as ILD and NLD services, Internet leased lines, television uplinking and other data services using radio spectrum. The radio spectrum operating license is issued and annually renewed by the Wireless Planning and Co-ordination Wing of the Ministry of Communications. This license expired in March 2003 and the Company is still awaiting its renewal despite having made the due payments and applications for its renewal, although it continues to make use of the radio spectrum for providing its services. The non-renewal of this license, or punitive action by the Government for continuing transmission services without renewal of the license, could adversely affect the Company and result in lost revenues.

Regulatory decisions and changes in the regulatory environment in the jurisdictions in which we do business could adversely affect our business.

The Company has interests in a large number of geographic areas across the world and must comply with an extensive range of requirements that are meant to regulate and supervise the licensing, construction and operation of telecommunications networks and services. These requirements are likely to increase with the Company’s increased overseas expansion. In particular, there are agencies which regulate and supervise the allocation of frequency spectrum and which monitor and enforce regulation and competition laws which apply to the telecommunications industry. Decisions by regulators in various geographic areas regarding the granting, amendment or renewal of licenses, to the Company or to third parties, could adversely affect the Company’s future operations in these geographic areas. The Company cannot provide any assurances that governments in the countries in which it intends to operate will issue the required telecommunications licenses. Additionally, decisions by regulators could further adversely affect the pricing for services the Company offers or intends to offer.

The Company is substantially owned by the Tata Group and the Government, who have significant rights in relation to the election of the Company’s board of directors and may have interests which conflict with those of our other shareholders including holders of our ADSs.

Panatone Finvest Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of companies affiliated with the Tata Group, owns approximately 43.14 percent, and the Government of India owns approximately 26.12 percent, of our total outstanding equity. Other Tata Group companies own approximately 1.58 percent of our total outstanding equity. Panatone Finvest Limited and the Government are parties to a Shareholders’ Agreement pursuant to which they have agreed on certain matters with respect to the governance and operation of the Company, including the composition and election of the board of directors. As of September 30, 2005, our board of directors consisted of eleven members, five of whom were nominated by Panatone Finvest Limited and two of whom were nominated by the Government. There were four independent directors on the board as per the provisions of the Shareholders’ Agreement. As a result of their equity holdings and the Shareholders’ Agreement, Panatone Finvest Limited and the Government together have significant control over the matters coming up for consideration at the meetings of the Board and of the shareholders of the Company and they acting together at the meetings have the power to elect the directors and control all matters submitted to shareholders. There can be no assurance that the interests of Panatone Finvest Limited and/or the Government would be the same and their respective interests could differ from the interests of our other shareholders, including the holders of ADSs.

The Company may face potential conflicts of interest relating to its principal shareholder, the Tata Group.

The Tata Group has diverse business activities and interests, and some of its affiliates could engage in activities, or seek opportunities, that are or could be in competition with the activities or interests of the Company. The Tata Group has interests in other companies in the telecommunications sector, such as Tata Teleservices Limited. The Tata Group companies and Panatone Finvest Limited have agreed in a Shareholders’ Agreement to act in the best interests of the Company in the event that they become engaged in activities in competition with the Company. However, any conflicts of interest between these Tata Group companies and/or Panatone Finvest Limited and the Company could adversely affect the Company’s business.

Disagreements between the Tata Group and the Government concerning activities of the Company could result in a deadlock, which could adversely affect the Company’s business.

Panatone Finvest Limited and the Government have agreed in the Shareholders’ Agreement that the Company shall not undertake certain corporate actions unless at least one director nominated by each of them (in the case of a Board meeting) or at least one authorized representative nominated by each of them (in the case of a shareholder meeting) consents to such action. These actions include any change in the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association, the granting of any security or incurring of indebtedness in excess of the net worth of the Company, winding-up the Company, the making of loans in excess of Rs.500 million other than in the ordinary course of business, the sale or lease of any fixed assets acquired prior to privatization and the entering into of an amalgamation, merger, or consolidation. Panatone Finvest Limited and the Government have also agreed not to transfer their shares in the Company without giving the other certain rights of first refusal and tag along rights. In the event that Panatone Finvest Limited and the Government fail to agree on any such matter, their disagreement could result in the Company not taking action or not taking advantage of a potential opportunity, which could in turn adversely affect the Company’s business or the value of the Company’s ADSs or Equity Shares.

The demerger of surplus land held by the Company may not be completed on satisfactory terms.

Under the terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement, Panatone Finvest Limited agreed that the Company would demerge certain lands that the Company owns in Pune, Kolkata, New Delhi and Chennai into a separate company. No time period was specified in the agreement for such demerger. The Company, Panatone Finvest Limited and the Government are currently discussing various options in connection with the demerger or sale of the land with a view to completing a transaction that is beneficial from a tax and stamp duty perspective. Until such time as the demerger takes place, the lands are under the possession and upkeep of the Company.

The Company cannot predict if the demerger will take place or the expenditure that the Company might have to incur for the security, upkeep and maintenance of the surplus land. The Company may have to bear significant costs, including taxes and duties, relating to the demerger, and the Company cannot predict what effect, if any, the demerger and the legal and valuation process relating to the demerger will have on the Company’s financial condition.

If certain tax claims by the Indian tax authorities are upheld, our financial condition would be adversely impacted.

• License Fees: The Company’s claims of license fees in fiscal 1994 to fiscal 1998 as deductible expenditure have been disputed by the Income Tax Department. However, the Company has received favorable decisions in respect of all these claims. We have not been advised by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal of any appeal that may have been filed by the Income Tax Department. If the decisions in the Company’s favor were to be appealed and all the disputed claims are decided against the Company, the aggregate negative impact on the Company would be approximately Rs.12,543 million (US$ 287.55 million).

• Tax Benefit claims: The Indian tax authorities have disallowed tax benefits claimed by the Company in fiscal 1996 to fiscal 2002 with respect to certain of its profits which the Company claims as having been generated by an enterprise engaged in telecommunications and therefore entitled to a tax holiday under certain regulations. Of the seven fiscal years, rulings in respect of five have been against the Company and have been appealed against while decisions in respect of the other two fiscal years are pending. If all of the disputed claims are decided against the Company, the aggregate negative impact on the Company would be approximately Rs.6,890 million (US$ 157.96 million).

• Tax on Reimbursements: Certain reimbursements received from the Government during fiscal 1994 were not offered for taxation and the Indian tax authorities levied taxes (inclusive of interest but excluding penalties) of Rs.2,853 million (US$ 65.41 million) which the Company paid under protest. The Company’s appeal has been dismissed by the first appellate authority. The Company has appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. If the appeal is unsuccessful, the Company would be negatively impacted by that amount.

We have recently undertaken, and in the future may undertake, strategic acquisitions, which may prove to be difficult to integrate and manage or may not be successful.

We have, in the recent past, pursued acquisitions and strategic partnerships as part of our growth strategy. We recently completed the acquisition of Tyco Global Network (“TGN”) for cash consideration of US$130 million, and have signed an agreement to acquire Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd. (“Teleglobe”) for cash consideration of approximately US$178 million and the assumption of net debt of approximately US$61 million. We have also entered into a joint venture to provide telecommunications services in South Africa, which would require the Company to make significant investments. We may make further acquisitions or enter into other strategic transactions to expand our access to customers, acquire new service offerings, or enhance our technical capabilities. Our acquisitions may not contribute to our profitability, and we may be required to incur or assume debt, or assume contingent liabilities, as part of any acquisition. We could have difficulty in assimilating the personnel, operations, technology and other assets of the acquired company. These difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees and increase our expenses.

We have made, and in the future might make, substantial capital investments in new telecommunications projects which may be subject to liquidity and execution risk and, if not offset by additional revenue, might adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We have made, and might in the future make, substantial additional investments in new telecommunications projects, including in connection with technology upgrades and geographic expansion. These investments could require significant capital expenditures. The Company expended approximately Rs.15 billion (US$ 335 million) towards capital expenditure in fiscal 2005 and expects its capital expenditure in fiscal 2006 to be approximately Rs.35.6 billion (US$816 million). The Company’s acquisition of TGN was funded through bridge loans raised by the acquiring subsidiary in fiscal 2006, and the Company may choose to fund the proposed acquisition of Teleglobe through debt. The Company’s proposed acquisition of Tata Power Broadband and its capital expenditure commitments in South Africa may also be financed from external sources. See “Item 5 - Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources”. A part of the Company’s capital expenditure will be used in enhancing the Company’s sub-sea and land cable networks and its broadband business. Such projects entail engineering, construction, obsolescence and other normal commercial risks, and there can be no assurance that the projects currently contemplated by us will not encounter cost overruns or project delays or will be completed or will operate as planned. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that financing for these investments, whether within India or elsewhere, would be available on attractive terms or at all. Furthermore, telecommunications technology evolves rapidly and there can be no assurance that any investments in new technology will have a positive impact on the Company’s financial results and neither can there be any assurance that the Company’s capital expenditures in such projects will be offset by adequate additional revenue or margins.

The Company’s international expansion plans are subject to the risks inherent in doing business internationally.

Currently the Company has a global presence through its subsidiaries in United States, United Kingdom, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Bermuda, France, Japan, Spain, the Netherlands, Portugal, Guam, Germany, Belgium and Hong Kong and we may establish additional subsidiaries or joint ventures outside India with a view to providing telecommunications services involving these countries. Because of the Company’s limited experience with business outside of India, the Company is subject to additional risks related to its international expansion strategy, including risks related to complying with a wide variety of national and local laws, restrictions on the import and export of certain technologies, multiple and possibly overlapping tax structures and local political and social conditions. In addition, the Company may face competition in other countries from companies that may have more experience with operations in such countries or with international operations generally. The Company may also face difficulties in integrating employees that it hires in different countries into its existing corporate culture. These difficulties could disrupt the Company’s ongoing business, distract our management and employees and increase our expenses, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Any serious damage to the undersea telecommunications cable systems utilized by the Company might adversely affect the Company’s traffic and thereby its revenues.

A major part of the Company’s international traffic is routed through undersea cable systems landing in India as well as through cable systems between different countries. These cables are prone to damage which is normally not serious in nature and during such interruptions the traffic is routed through the other remaining cable systems and satellites. However, serious damage to major cables landing in India could seriously disrupt traffic, leading to losses in revenue.

The Company’s business may be adversely affected by any slowdown in economic growth in India, the United States or other countries where the Company does business or by a slowdown in the growth of the information technology sector.

The growth of telecommunications traffic is related to general economic growth and slowdowns in the Indian economy could result in slower growth rates in telecommunications traffic in India. A significant part of the Company’s revenues are derived from calls originating in the United States. During the year ended March 2005, approximately 10.3 percent of the Company’s operating revenue was from the United States. Slowdowns in the US economy, as well as in other countries where the Company does significant business, may negatively affect our business. The information technology (“IT”) sector is a major contributor to the telephony and leased channel revenues of the Company and therefore the Company’s revenues might be adversely affected by slowdowns in the IT sector.

A substantial portion of the Company’s assets and operations are located in India and the outstanding shares are listed on the Indian stock exchanges. Accordingly, the Company’s performance, the market price and liquidity of the shares and of the ADSs may be affected by changes in exchange rates and controls, interest rates, government policy and taxation and other political, economic or social developments in or affecting India.

Since 1991, successive Governments have pursued policies of economic liberalization, including significantly relaxing restrictions on the private sector. Nevertheless, the role of the Indian central and state governments in the Indian economy as producers, consumers and regulators remains significant in ways that affect all Indian companies, including the Company.

India held elections for a new Government in April-May 2004 and the Government changed for the sixth time since 1996. Since no party won a majority of the seats in the Lok Sabha (the lower house of Parliament) in the elections, the present Government is made up of a multiparty coalition. There can be no assurance that the Government, which is presently supported by other political allies, will continue to receive such support. The next general elections are due to be held in 2009. Political instability could delay the reforms of the Indian economy and could have a material adverse affect on the market for securities of Indian companies, including our shares and ADSs.

While the Government has pledged to go ahead with its reforms, given the dynamics of coalition politics, there can be no assurance that all the previous Government’s reform policies will be carried forward. Although we believe that economic liberalization will continue in the future, there is no assurance that this will be so.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war involving India, the United States and other countries could adversely affect the financial markets and the Company’s business.

Terrorist attacks, such as the ones that occurred in US and India in 2001 and in Mumbai, India in 2003 and other acts of violence or war may negatively affect the Indian markets where the Company’s equity shares trade and also adversely affect the world-wide financial markets. These acts may also result in a loss of business confidence, make travel and other services more difficult and ultimately adversely affect the Company’s business. There can be no assurance that there will not be any further terrorist attacks against India, the United States or any other country.

Also as a result of such events, India, the United States or certain other countries where the Company has or may have major business interests may enter into armed conflict with other countries. The consequences of any potential armed conflicts are unpredictable. In addition, India has from time to time experienced unrest relating to religious and political differences within India’s population, as well as with its neighboring country Pakistan.

Any increase in regional or international hostilities, terrorist attacks or other acts of violence or war could have a significant adverse impact on international or Indian financial markets or economic conditions or on Indian Government policy, thereby disrupting communications and making travel more difficult. Such political tensions could create a greater perception that investment in Indian companies involves a higher degree of risk and could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, or the market price for the Company’s Shares and the ADSs.

Conditions in the Indian securities market may affect the price or liquidity of the shares and the ADSs.

The Indian securities markets are smaller in terms of trading volume and more volatile than the securities markets in the United States and certain European and other countries. The Indian stock exchanges have in the past experienced substantial fluctuations in the prices of listed securities. It is generally perceived that there is a lower level of regulation and monitoring of the Indian securities markets and the activities of investors, brokers and other participants than in securities markets in the United States and certain European and other countries.

The Indian stock exchanges have experienced trading interruptions in the past on account of regulatory interventions as well as operational issues. If these interruptions were to recur, it could affect the market price and liquidity of the securities of Indian companies, including the Shares and ADSs, in both domestic and international markets. In addition, the governing bodies of the Indian stock exchanges have from time to time imposed restrictions on trading in certain securities, limitations on price movements and margin requirements. Similar problems could occur in the future and, if they do, it could affect the market price and liquidity of the Shares and the ADSs.

There may be less company information available in Indian securities markets than securities markets in developed countries.

There is a difference between the level of regulation and monitoring of the Indian securities markets and the activities of investors, brokers and other participants and that in markets in the United States and other developed economies. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) received statutory powers in 1992 to improve disclosure and other regulatory standards for the Indian securities markets. SEBI has prescribed certain regulations and guidelines in relation to disclosure requirements, insider trading and other matters relevant to the Indian securities market. There may, however, be less publicly available information about Indian companies than is regularly made available by public companies in the United States and certain European and other countries.

The Company and you may be subject to potential losses arising out of exchange rate risk on the Indian rupee and risks associated with the conversion rates between the Indian rupee and foreign currencies.

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Rupee and the Dollar will affect, among other things, the Dollar equivalents of the price of the Shares in Rupees as quoted on the Indian stock exchanges and, as a result, may affect the market price of the ADSs. Such fluctuations will also affect the Dollar equivalent of any cash dividends in Rupees received on the Shares represented by the ADSs and the Dollar equivalent of the proceeds in Rupees of a sale of Shares in India.

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Rupee, the SDR (or “Special Drawing Rights”, which are based on a basket of key international currencies and are frequently used in foreign currency payment settlements) and other currencies also affect the Rupee amount of foreign currency settlement payments received by the Company from, and paid by the Company to, foreign telecommunications administrations and therefore the revenue and operating costs of the Company. The Company may as a result be exposed to the risk of fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Rupee and foreign currencies, which effectively may increase the cost in Rupee terms of foreign exchange payments required to be made by the Company, including payments to foreign telecommunications administrations and payments for imported equipment and technology. To reduce the effect of exchange rate fluctuation on our operating result, the Company uses derivative instruments such as forward contracts to cover a portion of outstanding accounts receivables; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to avoid the adverse affects of exchange rate fluctuations.

You may not be able to enforce a judgment of a foreign court against the Company.

The Company is a limited liability company organized under the laws of India. All of the directors and officers of the Company and certain other persons named herein are residents of India, and all or a significant portion of the assets of all of the directors and officers and a substantial portion of the assets of the Company are located in India. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process upon the Company or such directors or

officers outside India or to enforce against them judgments obtained from courts outside India, including judgments predicated on the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws. The statutory basis for determining conclusiveness of foreign judgments in India is provided in Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (the “Code”) of India, which provides that a foreign judgment shall be conclusive as to any matter thereby directly adjudicated upon except (1) where the judgment has not been pronounced by a court of competent jurisdiction, (2) where the judgment has not been given on the merits of the case, (3) where the judgment appears on the face of the proceedings to be founded on an incorrect view of international law or a refusal to recognize the law of India in cases where such law is applicable, (4) where the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained were opposed to natural justice, (5) where the judgment has been obtained by fraud and (6) where the judgment sustains a claim founded on a breach of any law in force in India. Section 44A of the Code, which deals with the enforcement and execution of foreign judgments, provides that where a foreign judgment has been rendered by a court in any country or territory outside India which the Government of India has by notification declared to be a reciprocating territory, it may be enforced in India by proceedings in execution as if the judgment had been rendered by the relevant court in India. The United Kingdom, but not the United States, has been declared by the Government of India to be a reciprocating territory for the purposes of Section 44A. Accordingly, a judgment of a court in the United States may be enforced only by way of a suit instituted upon the judgment in accordance with the Code and not by proceedings in execution. Furthermore, it is uncertain that an Indian court would enforce foreign judgments if it viewed the amount of damages awarded as excessive or inconsistent with Indian practice. A party seeking to enforce a foreign judgment in India is required to obtain approval from the Reserve Bank of India under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, to execute such a judgment or to repatriate any amount recovered.

Sales of our equity shares may adversely affect the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.

Sales of substantial amounts of our equity shares or the perception that such sales may occur could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our equity shares or the ADSs or our ability to raise capital through an offering of our securities. In the future, we may also sponsor the sale of shares currently held by some of our shareholders, or issue new shares. We can make no prediction as to the timing of any such sales or the issue or the effect, if any, that future sales of our equity shares or the availability of our equity shares for future sales, will have on the market price of our equity shares or ADSs prevailing from time to time.

Investors in ADSs have no voting rights unlike holders of the Equity Shares who have voting rights. It is contemplated that the Depositary will exercise its right to vote on the Equity Shares represented by the ADSs as directed by the Company’s Board of Directors. Investors may withdraw the Equity Shares underlying the ADSs and seek to vote the Equity Shares obtained from the withdrawal. However, for foreign investors, this withdrawal process may be subject to delays.

Even though the ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, there is no assurance that any trading market for the ADSs will be sustained. Subsequent to the open/ tender offer by Panatone Finvest Limited, the number of shares represented by ADSs declined from approximately 60 million (21 percent of our issued and outstanding equity shares) as of March 31, 2002 to approximately 16 million (6 percent of our issued and outstanding equity shares) as of September 30, 2005. This may affect the liquidity of the market for the Company’s ADSs and the price at which they trade.

Indian law imposes foreign investment restrictions that limit a holder’s ability to convert equity shares into ADSs, which may cause the Company’s equity shares to trade at a discount or premium relative to the market price of its ADSs.

Until recently, under Indian law it was not permitted for a depositary to accept deposits of outstanding equity shares and issue ADSs evidencing such shares. Thus, an investor in ADSs who surrendered an ADS and withdrew equity shares would not be permitted to redeposit those equity shares to obtain ADSs, nor would an investor who purchased equity shares on the Indian market be permitted to deposit them in the ADS program. The Government of India has recently permitted two-way fungibility of ADSs. However, this is still subject to sectoral caps and certain conditions, including compliance with the provisions of the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through Depositary Receipt Mechanism) Scheme 1993 and the periodic guidelines issued by the Government and also registration requirements in the United States. Such restrictions on foreign ownership of the underlying equity shares may cause the Company’s Equity Shares to trade at a discount or premium to its ADSs.

An investor in our ADSs may not be able to exercise preemptive rights for additional shares and may thereby suffer dilution of his or her equity interest in us.

Under the Companies Act, 1956, or the Indian Companies Act, a company incorporated in India must offer its holders of equity shares preemptive rights to subscribe and pay for a proportionate number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage prior to the issuance of any new equity shares, unless such preemptive rights have been waived by three-fourth of the shares voting on the resolution to waive such rights. Holders of ADSs may be unable to exercise preemptive rights for equity shares underlying ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to such rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. We are not obliged to prepare and file such a registration statement and our decision on whether to do so will depend on the costs and potential benefits of enabling the holders of ADSs to exercise their preemptive rights, and any other factors we consider appropriate at the time. No assurance can be given that we would file a registration statement under these circumstances. If we issue any such securities in the future, such securities may be issued to the depositary, which may sell such securities for the benefit of the holders of the ADSs.

There can be no assurance as to the value, if any, that the depositary would receive upon the sale of such securities. To the extent that holders of ADSs are unable to exercise preemptive rights granted in respect of the equity shares represented by their ADSs, their proportional interests in us would be reduced.

Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited was incorporated on March 19, 1986 as a limited liability company under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. On April 1, 1986, the Company assumed control and management of all of the assets, employees and operations of the Overseas Communications Service, a department of the Ministry of Communications of the Government of India. The Company was wholly owned by the Government of India until 1992. During 1997 and 1999, the Government sold some of its equity holdings in the Company through the issuance of global depositary receipts (“GDRs”). These GDRs were converted into American Depository Receipts upon the Company’s listing on the New York Stock Exchange on August 15, 2000.

Following a competitive bidding process, in February 2002 the Government selected Panatone Finvest Limited as the strategic partner for the sale of the Government’s 71,250,000 equity shares representing 25 percent of the outstanding voting capital of the Company. The Government also simultaneously divested approximately 1.85 percent of the outstanding shares of the Company to its employees. A share purchase agreement (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) giving effect to the above arrangement was entered into between the Government of India and Panatone Finvest Limited on February 6, 2002. In connection with the purchase of the shares from the Government of India, Panatone Finvest Limited was required by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 and subsequent amendments thereto to launch a tender/open offer for an additional 20 percent of the Equity Shares from other shareholders of the Company. Following the offer, Panatone Finvest Limited’s shareholding in the Company increased to 45 percent. Other Tata Group entities have since made open market purchases and sales of the Company’s equity shares, and the consolidated shareholding of the Tata Group in the Company as of September 30, 2005 was approximately 44.71 percent and the Government’s shareholding was approximately 26.12 percent.

The Company, which had been the exclusive provider of public international telecommunications services in India, had its monopoly terminated on March 31, 2002, pursuant to a notice of early termination by the Government of India. With effect from April 2002, the Government of India licensed new operators to provide international telephone services, who now compete with the Company.

In a bid to strengthen and consolidate its presence in the Internet and broadband business in India, in March 2004 the Company executed an agreement with Dishnet to take over the narrowband and broadband businesses of Dishnet’s ISP division for consideration of Rs.2,700 million. The transaction included the acquisition of all Internet assets, employees and customers of Dishnet’s ISP division. The acquisition gave the Company access to a sizable number of customers in both dial-up and broadband services and presence across 38 cities and 200 towns within India.

To augment its international expansion plans the Company has incorporated wholly owned subsidiaries in United States, United Kingdom, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Bermuda, France, Japan, Spain, the Netherlands, Portugal, Guam, Germany, Belgium, Hong Kong and a joint venture in Kingdom of Nepal with a view to providing telecommunications services involving these countries.

In February 2005, the South African government selected the Company as a strategic investor in the country’s proposed second national telecommunications operator and decided to allot a 26 percent equity stake in this new company to VSNL. The other equity partners are the state-owned Eskom and Transnet (15 percent each), Nexus (19 percent) and two private consortia. This new venture will be allowed to provide all telecommunications services including domestic and international voice and data services, with the exception of mobile services. The Shareholders’ Agreement for this company was signed on August 15, 2005.

On July 1, 2005, the Company completed its acquisition of TGN’s approximately 65,000 km undersea cable network across North America, Europe and Asia for $130 million, or approximately Rs. 5,890 million, in cash. This acquisition was a combination of an asset and stock purchase. TGN’s business was acquired as an asset acquisition in the US, UK, the Netherlands, Japan, France and Spain. TGN’s business in Portugal, Belgium, Germany and Guam was acquired as a stock acquisition in each of these countries. The businesses were acquired on a going-concern basis.

On July 25, 2005, the Company, along with its wholly-owned subsidiary VSNL Telecommunications (Bermuda) Ltd., entered into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation (the “Amalgamation Agreement”) with Teleglobe, a leading provider of international voice, data, Internet and mobile roaming services incorporated in Bermuda, pursuant to which Teleglobe will be amalgamated with VSNL Telecommunications (Bermuda) Ltd. and the resulting company will be a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The transaction consideration will be approximately US $178 million, or approximately Rs.7,764 million, in cash, and assumption of net debt of approximately US$61 million (or Rs.2,661 million) by the Company. Teleglobe’s Board of Directors has approved the Amalgamation Agreement. The Amalgamation is conditioned on, among other things, the approval of the Amalgamation Agreement by the required vote of shareholders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares in Teleglobe’s common share capital, expiration or termination of any waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended and other applicable antitrust laws, the receipt of certain regulatory approvals specified in the Amalgamation Agreement, expiration of the time period for any applicable review process by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States without any action or recommendation by such committee to prevent consummation of the Amalgamation, and the number of shares of shareholders properly exercising their appraisal rights pursuant to the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda does not exceed, in the aggregate, 5% of the outstanding Teleglobe’s common shares capital. Teleglobe owns and operates one of the world’s most extensive networks, reaching over 240 countries and territories.

On September 5, 2005, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement with Tata Power Company Ltd. (“TPC”) to acquire TPC’s sake in Tata Power Broadband Limited (“TPBB”), a 100 percent subsidiary of TPC, for cash consideration of Rs.2,390 million (US$ 55 Million). TPBB has approximately 650 km of fiber running through the Indian city of Mumbai and approximately 150 km of fiber running through another Indian city, Pune.

The Company’s Internet website address is http://www.vsnl.in. The information on the Company’s website is not incorporated into this document. The Company’s registered office is located at Mahatma Gandhi Road, Mumbai 400 001, India (+91-22-5657 8765). The process agent for the Company’s ADR facility is State Bank of India, New York office, 460 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10022.

The Company provides public international telecommunication services in India, directly and indirectly linking the Indian domestic telecommunications network to approximately 240 international destinations. As of March 31, 2005, the Company operated eleven international switching and transmission facilities for voice as well as integrated services digital network (“ISDN”) services at seven gateways in Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi, Chennai, Ernakulam, Gandhinagar and Jalandhar, which route international traffic to and from the domestic telecommunications network using a combination of satellite and undersea cable links. The Company also has fourteen other ILD points of presence for carrying voice traffic across the country. The Company also provides a wide range of data related services.

Since the loss of its monopoly in international telephony services in 2002, the Company has enhanced its other product offerings and provides improved and new services to its customers. In recent years, the Company has increased its emphasis on new products and services such as broadband, IP-VPN Services, calling cards, Internet telephony and has also considerably increased the range of services being offered to its corporate customers. The Company has also begun offering national long distance services. The Company is leveraging the services of other Tata group companies (such as Tata Teleservices for the last mile connectivity it has to offer, Tata Power for its broadband connectivity in two cities and Tata Consultancy Services for its software solutions) to provide a range of enterprise solutions to customers. The Company is also globalizing its operations and capitalizing on the liberalization of emerging telecom markets. To drive the Company’s international expansion, an international business group (“IBG”), headquartered in Singapore, was set up on April 1, 2004. In addition to promoting the Company’s offerings such as the new Tata Indicom India Singapore Cable system to both enterprise and carrier customers who require connectivity to India, the IBG supported the establishment of Internet Protocol-based data and voice services in select countries. It enabled the Company to provide extended relationship support to Indian and international enterprise customers. Subsequent to the completion of the TGN acquisition, the IBG team has been integrated with the TGN organization. The Company also operates telecom services in Nepal and Sri Lanka. As a strategic partner to provide services under the second national operator license in South Africa, the Company is licensed to provide all telecommunications services including domestic and international voice and data services, with the exception of mobile services.

The Company continues to derive a substantial portion of its revenue from foreign telecommunications administrations and private carriers for the delivery of international calls to India and from access providers in India for the delivery of international calls abroad. The Company shares revenues received from foreign telecommunications administrations and carriers for incoming international calls terminating in India with access providers in India. The sharing of such revenues is pursuant to the terms of interconnect agreements and commercial terms agreed from time to time with the relevant access providers. The following is a breakdown of the Company’s revenues in terms of the location of the foreign administrations, private carriers and access providers:

The following is a break-down of the Company’s revenues in terms of its major activities:

The Company’s primary business is the provision of public international switched telecommunication services (telephone, telex and telegraph) and specialized and value-added services, such as international private leased circuits, Internet telephony, satellite mobile telecommunications, Internet dial-up access, Internet leased line access throughout India, electronic data interchange, managed data network services, video conferencing, the transmission of television signals, packet switched data transmission and e-mail services. The Company also offers NLD services and has recently begun offering internet broadband services.

The Company carries ILD traffic as an International Long Distance Operator (ILDO) licensed by the Governement. The Company does not operate as an access provider and therefore has no direct access to end customers. As an ILDO, the Company carries outgoing international telephony traffic from local access providers and long distance operators in India to different international termination destinations in accordance with its arrangements with other international carriers. The Company also carries traffic terminating in India from international carriers. Such traffic is terminated on the network of local access providers in India based on its arrangements with them. The Company also provides hub and transit facilities to other international carriers for termination of their traffic to other international destinations. The Company operates the switching and transmission infrastructure to connect the Indian domestic telecommunications network with foreign networks and, in coordination with foreign telecommunications administrations and carriers, to ensure the flow of international traffic between these networks. An outgoing international telephone call from India routed through the Company originates on one of the local Indian telephone exchanges operated by MTNL, BSNL or private fixed line or cellular network operators, and is transferred to one of the Company’s gateways. The call is then switched by the Company’s system to the desired international destination via satellite, undersea cable or both based on a pre-determined routing plan developed by the Company in coordination with the foreign telecommunications administration or carrier. The foreign administration or carrier receiving the call through the international circuit is then responsible for final delivery of the call to the recipient. Similarly, when an international call is received at one of the Company’s gateways, the call is switched from the gateway via the Indian domestic network to one of the local exchanges, from which it is transmitted to the recipient.

International Telephone Services. The Company provides public basic international switched telephone services, including voice, facsimile and data transmission services. The international telephone revenue of the Company constitutes the largest share of the Company’s total traffic revenue (approximately 49.39 percent during fiscal 2005, compared to approximately 66.33 percent during fiscal 2004). The decline in international telephone revenue as a proportion of total traffic revenue is due mainly to increased competition in India, which has resulted in significant reductions in tariffs and in settlement rates with foreign administrations. During fiscal 2004, the Company took advantage of the technology shift to the Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) for incoming voice termination, and concluded traffic agreements with ten new international carriers that use this technology. The Company is also building its ability to pick up traffic overseas through points of presence in various countries and offer more attractive packages to international carriers. During fiscal 2005, the Company’s overseas points of presence in New York, Los Angeles and London became operational. With BSNL and MTNL continuing to provide their outgoing traffic to the Company during fiscal 2005, the volume of outgoing traffic, which has generally increased year-on-year because of the growth of telephone density, economic growth and reduced tariffs in India, was considerably higher in fiscal 2005 than in the previous year.

In fiscal 2005, following negotiations with BSNL after its acquisition of an ILD license, the Company started carrying the outgoing ILD traffic of BSNL under a wholesale carriage agreement with BSNL to share the Company’s infrastructure. This agreement provides for the Company to handle BSNL’s ILD traffic at an agreed cost per minute of traffic handled. The agreement is effective until October 31, 2005.

The Company launched outbound calling cards in April 2004, accessed through a toll-free number. However, these cards could be used only from phones within the Tata Teleservices Limited’s network because other local service providers block calls from their network to the Company’s toll-free number. In February 2005, the TRAI has asked the Company to stop selling outbound calling cards and the Company has approached the TDSAT challenging the TRAI order.

The Company offers International Direct Dialing and Home Country Direct Services and also provides operator assisted international calls. The Company also offers outbound international toll free services.

The Company offers customised, end to end voice and data solutions to key enterprise customers across India. The Company provides the following services to corporate customers:

International Private Leased Circuits (“IPLCs”). The Company offers international dedicated connectivity for customers who need reliable, 24-hour communications from a fixed point in India to a fixed point abroad. These services are provided using the Company’s international gateways, earth stations and cable stations. The IPLC market in India has grown at an annualized rate of over 60-70 percent per year during the last four years primarily as a result of the growing information technology and business processing outsourcing industry in India. To augment this service further, the Company has commissioned its own under-sea cable system connecting Chennai in India with Singapore.

National Private Leased Circuits (“NPLCs”). The Company provides dedicated point-to-point domestic leased lines for customers who need reliable, secure and dedicated connectivity between their offices across the country. The Company has set up a countrywide optical fiber cable backbone, which connects national long distance points of presence on a high capacity network.

IPLCs and NPLCs are services typically used by businesses that have a high volume of communications between two locations. A subscriber contracts with providers like the Company for the right to use a certain amount of bandwidth between two specified points, and this bandwidth can be used for voice, data, high speed graphics or other types of transmission. IPLCs are such services between a point in India and a location in another country, whereas NPLCs are services between two locations within India. The customer is not given any rights in the assets used in providing these services. The customer also does not control access to the cable or satellite. The contract for the service does not give the customer the right to operate the cable or the satellite and the customer does not have the ability to specify any operating policies and procedures of the cable or satellite that the capacity is provided in. The IPLC or NPLC cannot be shared, sublet or assigned by the customer or used for any purpose other than those specified in the agreement with the Company.

Internet Leased Line Circuits. The Company provides Internet leased lines which are a high speed, flexible bandwidth solution that provide constant internet access. These services are an economical solution for data transfer applications which are not security and delay sensitive.

Frame Relay Services. The Company provides frame relay services which are a data transmission technique used to send digital information such as voice, data, local area network, and wide area network traffic quickly and cost-efficiently to many destinations from one port. Frame relay services use shared bandwidth.

In addition to the wholesale and enterprise services described above, the Company offers a number of other services. A brief description of some of these services is set forth below:

National Long Distance (“NLD”). The Company received its NLD license as part of the compensation package received from the Government upon the early termination of the Company’s monopoly in ILD services and in September 2002, the Company entered the NLD services market. Apart from increasing the Company’s overall revenues, the NLD business has helped the Company reduce costs by reducing its dependence on other NLD operators for domestic connectivity. The Company has signed interconnect agreements with most basic and cellular mobile service operators in the country including BSNL and MTNL to terminate NLD traffic on their networks. By March 31, 2005, the Company had received approval from the Department of Telecommunications for interconnection at 200 Long Distance Charging Areas (“LDCAs”), covering 19 of India’s 21 telecom circles. LDCAs are regions in which NLD services may be offered to customers. The Company eventually plans to have coverage of all the 322 LDCAs in India. This rollout will be reviewed in view of the Unified Licensing Regime proposed by TRAI. To increase its footprint and accelerate rollout, the Company has a national network of about 36,000 route kilometres. As a result the Company carried over 1.5 billion minutes in fiscal 2005 compared to about 240 million minutes in fiscal 2004.

Gateway Internet Access Services. The Company has been providing these services since 1995. In December 2003, the Company launched an enhanced integrated retail Internet offering combining multiple services like Internet access, net telephony and value added services. Also called “dial-up” or “narrow band” Internet services, the customers of these services are typically households and small offices.

High Speed Internet Access through Metro Ethernet. In June 2004, the Company launched limited broadband services using metro Ethernet technology, which enables data transfers at high speeds. Ethernet cabling provides end users capacity of upto 10/100 Mbps, resulting in shorter access times for voice, video and Internet.

DSL Net Access using IP DSLAM. The Company has started providing Internet access using Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) technology. The technology provides bandwidth of up to 22 Mbps.

Net Access using Wi-Fi. The Company currently provides Wi-Fi, or Wireless Fidelity, for internet access. This service allows the customer to connect to the Internet without wires at speeds that are almost ten times faster than a regular dial-up connection. Wi-Fi networks operate in the unlicensed 2.4 radio bands, with an 11 Mbps (802.11b) or 54 Mbps (802.11g) data rate, respectively. So far approximately 25 sites across the country have been thus connected. The sites where this service is generally enabled are hotels, airports, food outlets, shopping malls and hospitals. The Company issues prepaid cards to the owner or manager of these sites. These cards are sold to the retail customer who wishes to access wireless Internet (mostly on his/her laptop) at these sites.

Telex and Telegram. The Company offers advanced telex services which include forwarding facsimiles to telex mail boxes, telex to fax transmissions (T-Fax) and transmission from telex to E-mail services. The Company also provides international telegram services. The volume of telex and telegraph traffic has been declining significantly in recent years, consistent with global trends, as users switch to facsimile and other methods of data transmission. The Company expects this trend to continue, but without an adverse impact on the Company since these methods of data transmission generate limited revenue for the Company. Telex services have been phased out by access providers in India during the current fiscal year. The Company is also likely to discontinue its telegraph services. The Company expects that the effect of discontinuance of telex services on its revenues and operating income will be immaterial.

Inmarsat Mobile Services. The Company offers satellite mobile telecommunication services via the Inmarsat system for land-based as well as maritime users. The services offered support voice, fax, data, telex and high-speed data access.

Internet Telephony. In April 2002, the Government of India permitted Internet Service Providers to offer voice telephony over the Internet using the Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). The Company’s self-managed network allows it to offer enhanced features like flexibility in billing and plans and superior voice quality. Low tariffs in Internet telephony could encourage usage and increase international call volumes.

Managed Data Network Services. The Company introduced managed data network services in January 1997, and now offers these services through the networks of AT&T, Cable & Wireless, Equant, Orient Networks (previously Tele Media International), SingTel, Telekom Malaysia and Reach. The Company’s managed data network services provide private data communications services to corporate customers in India.

Internet Data Centers. The Company provides customers the option of outsourcing their mission-critical systems operation through its Internet Data Centers. The data centers combine round-the-clock systems management with onsite personnel trained in the areas of networking, Internet and systems management.

IP VPN Services. The Company offers national internet protocol (“IP”) and multi-protocol label switching (“MPLS”) based virtual private network (“VPN”) services. On its domestic MPLS, a new technology being used for VPN services, the Company has enabled 120 points of presence to deliver the service across various locations within India. The Company also offers international VPN services across seven international points of presence based on this technology.

Television Uplinking. The Company started providing television uplinking facilities in October 1998. The Company also provides international relay of television programs and news services via satellite on a contractual basis and leases satellite transponder capacity owned by the Company to television broadcast companies in India. The Company also uses Digital Satellite News Gathering (DSNG) terminals for “on-site” live video uplinking.

Transponder Lease Services. The Company provides transponder capacity to media broadcasters in India for the purpose of broadcasting services. The Company has long term commitments for these capacities with Intelsat.

To better manage its international operations, the Company has set up subsidiaries in several countries, including Sri Lanka, United States, United Kingdom, Singapore, Hong Kong, Bermuda, Guam, the Netherlands, Japan, France, Spain, Portugal, Germany and Belgium. Some of the Company’s international subsidiaries have started providing services such as international and national private leased circuits, multi-protocol label switching (“MPLS”) based virtual private network (“VPN”) services, Internet leased lines and data center hosting. The Company is also part of a joint venture to provide telecommunications services in Nepal.

As part of its international expansion, the Company has acquired the cable businesses of TGN. We expect that the acquisition of the TGN cable businesses will enable the Company to expand its bandwidth sales, both on an IRU and lease basis, generate operating, administration and maintenance revenues and sell co-location space. The customers of the TGN businesses are expected to be telecommunications carriers and large enterprises with geographic coverage across both the east and west coast of the US, UK, Europe and parts of the Asia-Pacific region.

The Company is also in the process of acquiring Teleglobe, an international telecomunications company. The acquisition is subject to various regulatory and other approvals and, when completed, could add to the Company’s range and volume of services. Teleglobe offers a broad portfolio of transport services and value-added services for fully integrated voice and data services, including:

The Company’s principal source of revenue is traffic revenue from its public telephone services – foreign and domestic, which accounted for 81.86 percent, 67.52 percent and 56.48 percent of the Company’s traffic revenues in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. The Company’s derives its traffic revenue from foreign administrations and telecommunication carriers, BSNL, MTNL and other Indian private fixed line and cellular network operators.

The Company has international services telecommunication agreements with approximately 89 foreign telecommunications administrations or carriers that govern the rates of payment by the Company to the foreign administrations or carriers for use of their facilities in connecting international calls billed in India, and by the foreign administrations or carriers to the Company for the use of its facilities (and the local Indian networks) in connecting international calls billed abroad.

The practice among carriers for settlement of traffic is generally in accordance with International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) recommendations. Based on the accounting rate negotiated with each foreign telecommunications administration or carrier, the Company makes payments to the administration or carrier for outgoing traffic billed in India and receives payments from such administration or carrier for incoming traffic billed outside India. Settlements between the Company and the major carriers, including US carriers, are made monthly. Settlements between the Company and other carriers are normally made quarterly. Settlements are made on a net basis at the applicable settlement rate.

The Company has in the recent past sought to rationalize its accounting rates by moving towards a system of rates linked to volume commitment. The settlement rates applicable to the Company currently range from approximately US$ 0.01 to US$ 0.37 per minute. Subsequent to the advent of competition in India, rate negotiations are held at shorter intervals than the several months in certain cases in the past.

As is typical in developing countries, the volume of incoming calls to India has historically exceeded the volume of outgoing calls, and as a result the Company has received net settlement payments from most foreign administrations and carriers. Following the termination of our ILD monopoly, incoming call traffic is also carried by other ILD operators, as a result of which we no longer have favorable traffic balances with a number of foreign carriers and therefore we are making net settlement payments to those carriers.

Some of the new settlement rate agreements, effective from September 2002, provide for separate settlement rates for incoming and outgoing traffic. The settlement rates for incoming traffic are now dependent upon interconnect usage charges prescribed by the TRAI and payable to access service providers for terminating traffic in India. The settlement rates are market driven and are generally subject to change every month or earlier.

Although the Company provides international gateway access out of and into India, all calls that either originate or terminate in India must pass through the domestic networks of MTNL, BSNL or other private fixed line or cellular network operators. Prior to March 31, 2002, the Company had a revenue sharing arrangement only with BSNL. Under this arrangement, BSNL received payments from the Company in respect of incoming traffic and made payments to the Company in respect of outgoing calls. The revenue sharing arrangement, which was scheduled to terminate on March 31, 2002, was extended until July 31, 2002.

Following the opening up of the ILD business in India to competition from April 1, 2002, the Company was required to have revenue sharing agreements (also called “interconnect agreements”) with every domestic fixed line or mobile operator, including BSNL and MTNL.

With effect from August 1, 2002, the interconnect agreements with BSNL and MTNL provided for payment of amounts ranging from Rs.6 to Rs.14 per paid minute to the Company depending upon which world region the traffic was terminated. For incoming calls, the Company was required to pay BSNL amounts ranging from Rs.4.40 to Rs.13 per paid minute depending upon the distance of the Company’s traffic termination from BSNL’s nearest designated trunk automated exchange level. In case of MTNL, the Company was required to pay Rs.4.40 per minute for calls terminated in the cities of Mumbai and Delhi. Volume based discounts were allowable in respect of incoming calls and the agreements also provided for a committed volume of traffic.

New interconnect agreements in accordance with the Interconnect Usage Charges (“IUC”) regulation announced by the TRAI were executed with BSNL and MTNL effective May 1, 2003. The commercial terms of the agreements were subject to change based on revisions by the TRAI to the IUC from time to time. Under these agreements, BSNL and MTNL paid the Company amounts ranging from Rs.6 to Rs.14 per paid minute depending on the geographic region where the outgoing call terminated. In the case of incoming calls, the Company paid BSNL and MTNL amounts ranging from Rs.5.00 to Rs.6.60 per paid minute depending upon the distance of the Company’s traffic termination from BSNL’s or MTNL’s nearest designated trunk automated exchange level. Volume discounts were availed in respect of incoming calls depending upon the volume of traffic.

With effect from February 2004, revised IUCs were announced by TRAI. The agreements with BSNL, MTNL and other telecom operators require amounts ranging from Rs.1.69 to Rs.14.10 per minute to be paid to the Company for outgoing traffic depending upon the region to which the traffic would be terminated. In the case of incoming calls, in accordance with the IUC, the Company was required to pay to the telecom operators including BSNL and MTNL termination charge for which effective cost to the Company ranged from Rs.4.55 to Rs.5.65 per minute depending on the distance slab to which the incoming traffic is being terminated. With the further revision of IUC charges due to the reduction of the ADC announced by TRAI effective February 1, 2005, the Company is required to pay the telecom operators termination charges for which the effective cost to the Company ranges from Rs.3.55 to Rs.4.65 per minute. This includes an ADC of Rs. 3.25 per minute payable to BSNL for all international incoming traffic. The rates for outgoing traffic are not regulated and are determined by competition. These rates include ADC of Rs.2.50 per minute payable to BSNL for all traffic originating from networks other than fixed line networks.

Under the ILD license agreement signed with the Government, the license fee payable equals 15 percent of Adjusted Gross Revenue (“AGR”). The Government defines AGR as gross call revenues less access charges actually paid to other carriers for carrying of calls less service and sales taxes paid to the Government. In accordance with the terms of the license agreements with DoT, the Company recorded license fee liabilities in its financial statements of Rs.4,037 million and Rs.2,734 million for fiscals 2003 and 2004, respectively against which the Company has made payments of Rs.3,967 million and Rs.2,488 million after excluding certain items of revenue. Provisional assessments of the license fee for fiscals 2003 and 2004 has been completed and the DoT has claimed additional license fees of Rs.477 million (US$10.94 million) including interest. The DoT claim is based on the terms of the license agreement and its non-allowance of the exclusion of certain items of revenues as well as interest on late payments. The Company has filed a petition before the TDSAT against DoT’s claim. The petition is under hearing with the TDSAT.

Since the introduction of the AGR-based license fee regime, the Company has been communicating with the DoT regarding the methodology of computation of the license fee. The Company believes that income from non-licensed and financial activities (such as interest and dividend) and charges passed on to other service providers for voice or data services (such as charges for usage of network elements such as domestic bandwidth and space segments) should be excluded from computation of adjusted gross revenues for the purpose of payment of license fees. The Company has paid license fees from the first quarter of fiscal 2005 onwards, in accordance with a legal opinion received by the Company which upholds its stand. This payment was lower than the fee that the Company would have had to pay if it had followed its existing practice under the AGR-based regime. The payment made by the Company for fiscal 2005 was Rs.1,622 million. The Company has, however, in line with its existing practice under the AGR-based regime, accounted for the license fee liability amounting to Rs.2,811 million (US$ 64.44 million) in its financial statements for fiscal 2005. The Company has also, in its petition to TDSAT mentioned herein above, sought refund of the excess fees paid (computed in accordance with the stand it has taken) for fiscals 2003 and 2004 amounting to approximately Rs.3,291 million (US$75.45 million). In the event that the Company’s petition is not upheld by the TDSAT, the Company would be required to pay the shortfall in the license fees paid during fiscal 2005 and also may be subject to punitive action by the DoT.

The Indian domestic telecommunications network has grown rapidly since 2000. As of March 31, 2005, the Indian telephone system comprised 98 million telephones in service consisting of 46 million of the fixed line subscribers and 52 million mobile subscribers. All subscribers can have the option to select access to international telecommunication services.

Despite significant increases in recent years, the penetration of India’s domestic telephone network of 9.8 telephone subscribers per 100 inhabitants as of March 2005 remained significantly lower than in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) countries and many other developing countries. The following table presents, for selected OECD and neighboring countries, total telephone subscribers per 100 inhabitants as of the latest year for which such information is currently publicly available.

The existing telephone subscribers in India are concentrated in large urban areas. In the four major metropolitan cities of Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi and Chennai, the density of lines in service is considerably higher than in India as a whole.

Cellular mobile service has experienced substantial growth since it was introduced at the end of 1995. As of March 31, 2005 there were approximately 52 million mobile subscribers, representing a compound annual growth rate of 126 percent since March 31, 1996 when the number of mobile subscribers was approximately 77,000. Mobile subscribers increased by 18.5 million during fiscal 2005. As of August 2005, there were approximately 62.57 million mobile subscribers in India. According to TRAI’s estimates, the total number of cellular mobile subscribers in India exceeds the total number of fixed line subscribers.

Interconnect Usage Charges Regime. With the ongoing liberalization of the telecom sector and the presence of multiple-operators and rate settlement arrangements, TRAI introduced a cost-based Interconnect Usage Charges regime in January 2003. It provided for an interconnect usage charge that is payable by service providers to other service providers for usage of their networks for origination, transit or termination of calls. The regime also prices monthly rental and local call charges for fixed telephones (provided primarily by BSNL and MTNL) below cost in order to ensure that these remain affordable and attractive to customers and help attain the objective of higher teledensity in the country. The TRAI notified the implementation of an IUC regulation from December 1, 2003 which included carriage, termination and Access Deficit Charges (“ADCs”). Access deficit arises when the tariff specified for access does not cover the cost of providing access. The regulation had stated that the TRAI would review the ADC calculations annually based on the audited financial results of service providers, and that the next exercise would consider changes in the ADC regime. A revised regulation was made applicable with effect from February 2004. In the context of the ILD segment relevant to the Company, the IUC Regulations, in addition to fixing an origination and termination charge for the access providers, imposed a flat sum of Rs.4.25 per minute as the ADC to be paid by the ILD operator to the access provider in case the access provider happens to be a basic services operator. Effective February 2005, the revised IUC regulations notified by TRAI lowered the ADC payable on ILD traffic and the rate presently applicable is Rs.2.50 per minute and Rs. 3.25 per minute for outgoing and incoming ILD calls, respectively.

The TRAI initiated a consultation paper on March 17, 2005 to review the existing IUC and has invited responses. The Company has submitted its response to the consultation paper. The new ADC regime is likely to be announced after completion of the consultation process in the current fiscal year. The new regime proposes to collect the ADC as part of the license fee, which is based on revenues, rather than as a part of call charges.

The business of the Company is subject to comprehensive regulation by the Ministry of Communications through the Telecom Commission and the Department of Telecommunications pursuant to the provisions of the Indian Telegraph Act of 1885 (the “Telegraph Act”) and the terms of the licenses from the Department of Telecommunications under which the Company operates. While the Telegraph Act sets the legal framework for regulation of the telecommunications sector, much of the supervision and regulation of the Company is implemented more informally through the general administrative powers of the Department of Telecommunications, and of other Government agencies.

In March 1997, the Government first established the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (“TRAI”), an independent regulatory authority under the provisions of the TRAI Act, 1997. Pursuant to an amendment to the TRAI Act, two independent authorities were established: the TRAI and the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (the “TDSAT”). The TRAI has the authority to levy fees and other charges for services and to perform such other functions entrusted to it by the Government. The TDSAT has jurisdiction to adjudicate any dispute between a licensor and a licensee, between two or more service providers, or between a service provider and a group of consumers. The TDSAT also has the jurisdiction to hear and dispose of appeals against any direction, decision or order of the TRAI.

In February 2005, the TRAI issued a show cause notice to the Company, alleging that its outbound international pre-paid calling cards which were being marketed under the brand name “Hello Duniya” were being sold in contravention of the existing regulations. Despite an explanation by the Company, the TRAI directed the Company to stop the sales of outbound international calling cards. The Company has stopped the sales of the calling cards but has appealed against this directive to the TDSAT.

The Communication Convergence Bill 2001, introduced in the Indian Parliament in August 2001, envisages the creation of the Communications Commission of India (“CCI”) which would be an all-encompassing umbrella body to look into licensing, spectrum management, dispute resolution and determination of regulation codes, technical standards, tariffs, rates for licensed services as well as determine the conditions for fair, equitable and non-discriminatory access to network facility and service. It would also have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Pursuant to the Telegraph Act, the provision of any telecommunication services in India requires a license from the Government, obtained through the Department of Telecommunications.

The Company operates substantially all its international telecommunications services under a license granted by the Department of Telecommunications. The ILD License identifies specific services that the Company is permitted to provide, which encompass all of the services currently provided by the Company other than Internet services and NLD services. The Company’s current ILD license is valid from April 1, 2002 for a period of twenty years.

The Company has also been granted a NLD license, which is valid from February 8, 2002 for a period of twenty years and a license to provide Internet services (including Internet telephony), which is valid from January 25, 1999 to January 24, 2014. The Company can assign or transfer its rights under the Internet license with the prior written consent of the Department of Telecommunications.

The Department of Telecommunications retains the right to modify the terms and conditions of the Company’s licenses at any time if in its opinion it is necessary or expedient to do so in the public interest. The Department of Telecommunications may also terminate the licenses before their scheduled expiration upon breach by the Company of any of its terms. In addition, the Department of Telecommunications retains certain rights under the licenses to receive telecommunication services on a priority or emergency basis.

For call centers who are licensed as Other Service Providers (“OSPs”), the Company has on offer, a variant of international private leased circuits (“IPLC”) service called “Variable Charge IPLC” and had filed the tariff for the same as per the filing requirements of TRAI. Based on this filing, TRAI and The Department of Telecommunications (“DoT”) have issued show-cause notices to the Company seeking explanation as to how this service is not in violation of the ILD license agreement and is not a by-pass of payment of Access Deficit Charges (ADC). The Company has duly submitted to TRAI and DoT its replies to the show-cause notices, maintaining that the variable charge IPLC service is a legitimate and legal IPLC service under its ILD license and since this service is offered only to licensed OSPs, ADC is not payable. While the clarification on the issue is still awaited from the DoT, the Company made the ADC payment in respect of traffic flowing on this variant of IPLC.

Under the Telegraph Act, the Government and state governments also have the right to take possession and/or control of the Company’s facilities and business in cases of public emergency or in the interest of public safety. The Government also has the power to intercept communications carried by the Company, subject to certain constitutional safeguards.

The TRAI is currently in the process of implementing a ‘Unified Licensing Regime’ pursuant to which operators can use either wire line or wireless media to provide telephony, Internet, broadband, cable TV, DTH, TV and radio broadcasting services under a single license. The first phase of this regime entailed the implementation of the Unified Access Service License in each of the 23 circles rather than the entire country. The second phase is to apply to all services and to all geographical areas. To this end, the TRAI submitted its recommendations to the Government in January 2005. This regime when in place could increase potential competition in the ILD services business and also adversely impact the Company’s revenues from the NLD business as cellular service providers who are the main users of the Company’s NLD service would be able to switch calls across different circles in their own networks. Currently they are barred from doing so unless they possess a NLD license.

The Company provides uplinking services and contributory feed services to television channels in India. The Company has been informed that certain television channels to which the Company provides uplinking services do not appear to have complied with certain approval requirements, and appear to have violated certain regulations of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. Since such non-compliance by the television channels exposes the Company to the risk of termination of its license to provide uplinking services, the Company has been cooperating with the Government in resolving these issues.

The Company did not control the rates charged to end users of its international telecommunication services until March 31, 2002. The rates for such services were established and collected by the relevant foreign telecommunications administrations or carriers for international calls originating and billed outside of India and by BSNL for international calls originating and billed in India. The Company and the Department of Telecommunications shared revenues received by each entity from international calls pursuant to a revenue sharing arrangement between the two entities, and the Company received settlement payments with respect to international calls from, or made such payments to, foreign telecommunications administrations and carriers based on applicable accounting rates.

With effect from April 1, 2002, for outgoing traffic, ILD operators are authorized to prescribe and introduce rates for their international telecommunication services with clearance from the TRAI. In the face of competition, the ILD tariffs fell below the TRAI ceilings from a peak international call tariff of Rs.48 per minute during 2001-02 to around a range of Rs.7.20 to Rs.18 per minute during most of fiscal 2005.

The rates for the Company’s specialized services, such as leased lines, Inmarsat mobile services, Internet access services, electronic mail and facsimile forwarding services, services through which subscribers may exchange data with users of other data networks and video conferencing are prescribed by the Company, subject to filing with the TRAI.

In March 2005, the TRAI issued a tariff order fixing tariff ceilings for IPLC services which were lower by 30 to 70 percent than the rates being charged by the Company. The Company challenged the TRAI notification with the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (“TDSAT”). The TDSAT upheld the Company’s petition, and TRAI has appealed to the Supreme Court of India against the TDSAT’s decision. Subsequently, TRAI provided the Company information on details of cost calculations which formed the basis of the tariff ceiling. In September 2005, TRAI issued a notification on the tariffs with the same ceilings as notified earlier in March 2005. This was made applicable with effect from September 16, 2005. Though the Company has contested TRAI’s latest order with the TDSAT, there can be no assurance that the petition will be decided in favor of the Company. However, until the next hearing of the petition by TDSAT on October 24, 2005, the tariff order has been kept in abeyance.

Subsequent to the termination of the Company’s monopoly in ILD services, the telephony voice business has witnessed increased competition, falling rates and lower margins. However, the Company believes that the growth and de-regulation of the telecom sector has opened up new opportunities to diversify and grow. The Company’s objectives are to diversify its products and offer specialized, value-added services, take advantage of new technologies in its business, explore further international opportunities and attempt to remain the leading provider of international telecommunications services in India.

Diversifying its business model by increasing its range of service offerings

The Company intends to strengthen its position in the market for value added services, particularly data services, by offering services like virtual private networks, co-location, managed services based on internet data centers and application support services. The Company has already introduced new products and services catering to the needs of corporate customers such as corporate Internet telephony, voice over IP and bandwidth on demand. The Company has integrated its retail offerings under a single package, offering services such as Internet access, net telephony and email to its customers. The Company has also deployed a fully owned Internet telephony infrastructure.

The acquisition of the ISP business of Dishnet DSL Limited has given the Company access to a larger broadband subscriber base and enables it to offer customers additional Internet-based products in almost 43 cities. The Company has started offering pre-paid and post-paid ethernet-based internet broadband connections. Triple-play broadband with an integrated offering of voice, data and video services is a major thrust area and the Company intends to have a significant and large-volume presence in this segment.

The Company is reorganizing parts of its business so as to maximize competitiveness. These initiatives include:

Leveraging its expertise through overseas expansion, greenfield ventures and acquisitions

The Company believes that geographic diversification is important to achieve improved revenues and profits. The Company has recently completed the acquisition of Tyco Global Network, a state-of-the-art undersea cable network that spans 37,280 miles and connects the continents of Asia, North America and Europe. The TGN businesses are being integrated with the International Business Group that the Company had set up in 2004 to manage its international expansion. The focus of this business group will be to offer, in addition to traditional bandwidth services, India-centric communication solutions such as managed network services, business continuity services and network security. The Company now has a direct operating presence in the US, UK, France, Germany, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Hong Kong and Japan. The Company is also in the process of completing the acquisition of Teleglobe, which is a large telecommunications company. These initiatives are meant to leverage the Company’s already existing assets to attain greater synergies in various services.

The Company believes that its strengths complement those of other companies in the Tata Group. Synergies with Tata Group companies could include access to their existing subscriber bases and the opportunity to share their infrastructure. In this regard, the Company has invested Rs.8,358 million (US$ 191.61million) in the share capital of Tata Teleservices (“TTSL”) to provide the Company with access to TTSL’s end customers’ long distance traffic. The Company created a common marketing platform, called the Tata Indicom Enterprise Business Unit (“TIEBU”), with other Tata telecommunications companies. This unit provides sales and marketing coverage to the top 500 Indian corporate accounts based on the needs of their respective industries and offers integrated voice and data solutions under the Tata Indicom brand. The Company also partners other Tata Group companies in the software sector to provide customers a broad range of end-to-end solutions.

Implementation of “Best Practices” Business Models and Reorganizing Internal Processes

In April 2004, the Company achieved the TL 9000—Quality Management System Certification, a set of quality system requirements and metrics designed specifically for the telecom industry, encompassing ISO 9001 and other best practices. The Company is in the process of implementing the Tata Business Excellence Model (“TBEM”), which lays down best practices for Tata Group companies and aims to nurture the core values and concepts embodied in various focal areas such as leadership, strategic planning, customer service, markets, human resources and social responsibility, and translate these into business excellence. The Company intends to use TBEM as a framework to match industry and global best-practice benchmarks in these areas.

In May 2005, four locations of the Company were certified as being compliant with BS 7799 and covered areas like IDC, IP Planning and Operations, IT/IS, Business Support Systems, Operations Support Systems, Transmission Centers, ATM-NMS and ISP. BS 7799 is a standard setting out the requirements for an Information Security Management System and is the most widely recognized security standard in the world. The Company is the first telecom service provider within India to receive this certification. The Company has started the process to make its other locations BS 7799 compliant.

The Company continues to upgrade its internal processes including its information technology systems for customer relationship management, billing and integrated network management. Cost rationalization and profit enhancement exercises that began in 2002 continue to be major thrust areas that are aimed at increasing efficiency and productivity; cutting costs; optimizing telephony traffic, equipment and infrastructure; and improving debt recovery and timely collections.

The Company is a part of the Tata Group which comprises 91 operating companies in seven business sectors: information systems and communications; engineering; materials; services; energy; consumer products; and chemicals. The Tata Group is one of India’s largest and most respected business conglomerates, with revenues of $17.6 billion in fiscal 2005. Tata Group companies collectively employ approximately 220,000 people. The Tata Group has operations in more than 40 countries across six continents, and its companies export products and services to 140 countries.

As of September 30, 2005, Panatone Finvest Limited in conjunction with other companies of the Tata Group held approximately 44.71 percent of the outstanding equity of the Company, and the Government held approximately 26.12 percent. Panatone Finvest Limited is in turn affiliated with the Tata Group of companies and its shares are held by Tata Sons, Tata Power, Tata Steel and Tata Industries. Panatone Finvest Limited, in which the current shareholding of Tata Sons and Tata Power in Panatone Finvest Limited is 60.010 percent and 39.983 percent, respectively, with Tata Steel and Tata Industries holding the remainder equally, acquired this stake as a result of the Government’s decision to sell to a strategic partner through a competitive bidding process. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company.”

The Company’s operations are conducted from owned and leased properties in various locations in India and other countries in which the Company does business. The major services provided by the Company are based on its bandwidth capacity in various undersea cable and land cable systems and satellites. These assets are briefly described below.

As of March 31, 2005, the Company operated 28,599 effective international voice circuits, of which 4,714 were satellite circuits and 23,885 were cable circuits. The Company operated 105,214 data circuits of which only 127 were satellite circuits and 105,087 were cable circuits. The Company also operated 44,680 Internet circuits of which 528 were satellite circuits and 44,152 were cable circuits. The Company’s data and Internet circuits are in terms of 64KB equivalent.

As of March 31, 2005, the Company operated a total of 4,714 satellite voice circuits and 127 satellite data circuits and 528 satellite Internet circuits through 11 earth stations at its seven gateway locations, two earth-stations located at Bangalore and one each located at Pune and Hyderabad. Satellite capacity is obtained from the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (“Intelsat”) and the International Mobile Satellite Organization (“Inmarsat”). We decommissioned one of our earth stations in April 2004.

As of March 31, 2005, the Company operated a total of 23,885 effective voice circuits and 105,087 data circuits on undersea cables landing in India. The Company has ownership interests and access to capacity in undersea cables interconnecting the South Asia region, as well as those linking the region with Europe, North America and Asia/Pacific. The Company also holds a 50 percent ownership interest in an analog undersea cable between Mumbai and Fujairah, U.A.E., which has a total capacity of 1,380 circuits, of which 1,245 were being used as of March 31, 2005.

The Company also holds an interest of approximately 10 percent in the South East Asia-Middle East-Western Europe 2 (SEA-ME-WE2) optical fiber cable, which lands in 13 countries between Singapore and France, including India. This cable, which became fully operational in June 1994, operated 3,820 effective voice and 424 effective data circuits from Mumbai as of March 31, 2005.

The Company has entered into a construction and maintenance agreement with other international telecommunications carriers for the construction of the South East Asia-Middle East-Western Europe 3 (SEA-ME-WE 3), a high capacity undersea optical fiber cable extending from Germany to Japan and Australia that lands in a total of 33 countries (including India, with landing points at Mumbai and Cochin). On this cable a total of 6,861 effective voice and 40,883 data circuits from Mumbai as also 3,741 effective voice and 7,204 data circuits respectively from Cochin were used as of March 2005. The Company also operated a total of 17,880 Internet circuits – 15,648 from Mumbai and 2,232 from Cochin on this cable system.

The Company has in addition purchased 4,650 circuits in the Fibre Optic Link Around the Globe (FLAG-Europe Asia) cable system, a high capacity fiber optic cable with 19 landings in 13 countries (including India) linking Asia and Europe. This cable system was commissioned in December 1997. As of March 31, 2005, the Company operated 5,364 effective voice circuits and 9,478 effective data circuits on this cable system.

The Company has also invested in the South African Telephony-S/West-African Submarine Cable/South Asia Far East (SAT-3/WASC/SAFE) cable. The total length of this link is 27,850 km with a design life of 25 years. As of March 31, 2005, the Company operated 2,165 voice circuits and 14,455 data circuits on this cable system. The Company also utilized 12,160 Internet circuits on this cable.

The Company has built a 3,100 km submarine cable system between Chennai and Singapore. Known as the Tata Indicom Chennai-Singapore Submarine Cables system (TICSCS), the system cost approximately Rs.4,275 million and has a system capacity of 5.12 Terabits (1Terabit = 1,000GB). The cable commenced operations in December 2004. This cable significantly enhances the Company’s and India’s connectivity into the Asia-Pacific region and the U.S, via the Pacific. With the setting up of this new cable and the resultant increased bandwidth infrastructure, the Company is better placed to meet the growth requirements in the corporate data market. The cable system will have an initial capacity of 320 gbps that can be scaled up to 5.12 Terabits. With an estimated life of 25 years, the new cable connects Chennai to Singapore, which is a strong telecom hub for traffic across the world from where onward extension to U. S. and other significant geographies is readily available at competitive prices. As of March 31, 2005, the Company operated 689 voice circuits and 32,643 data circuits on this cable system. The Company also utilized 6,048 Internet circuits on this cable.

The Company also has ownership interests in various undersea cables that do not land in India, but which provide connections between various locations served by the Company. These cables include the Trans-Atlantic 12/13 Cable (connecting the United Kingdom, France and the United States), the Trans-Pacific Cable (connecting the United States, Canada and Japan), TAT 14 (connecting United Kingdom, France, Germany and the United states), Japan-US Cable (connecting the United States and Japan), the Asia Pacific Cable (Segment S-J) (connecting Singapore and Japan) and the Columbus 2-America 1 Cable (connecting Italy and the United States). In addition to its direct ownership interests in such undersea cables, the Company has purchased indefeasible rights of use guaranteeing access to other undersea cables in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

As of March 31, 2005, the Company had the equipped capacity to connect approximately 42,520 international telephone circuits, 850 telex circuits and 64 telegraph circuits or channels to its switches. All of the Company’s telephone capacity is digital, and as of March 31, 2005 were provided by 11 digital switches installed at the Company’s 7 gateway locations spread across the country. Each gateway is linked to the other gateways via either

the Company’s own bandwidth or dedicated digital lines leased from BSNL or other bandwidth providers such as Gas Authority of India Limited, Bharti Infotel Limited, Power Grid Corporation India Limited and others which permits multiple routing options for each call and provides the system with back-up capability in case of equipment failure or over-crowding at any gateway.

In addition to the circuits and switches described above, the Company’s infrastructure includes various facilities used primarily for its various specialized and value-added enterprise and Internet services. As of March 31, 2005, the Company owned a high capacity underground fiber optic cable between Mumbai and Arvi via Pune, approximately 56 earth stations, terrestrial radio communication links connecting the Company’s international switches at four of its locations with its earth stations and a variety of hardware used in 58 cities in India for the Company’s 81 Internet access nodes (inclusive of nodes acquired from Dishnet).

In April 2004, the Company signed a Right to Use agreement for 15 years with Bharti Infotel Limited for 23,000 route kilometers capacity on an existing advanced fiber optic network in India. This agreement is expected to eliminate the cost of leasing additional domestic bandwidth and support growth in the voice, corporate data and the upcoming broadband businesses. A self-managed domestic backbone will also give the Company greater control on quality and reliability of services. This agreement is for approximately Rs.5,000 million.

The Company is one of the founding members of SEA-ME-WE4, a consortium of 16 parties that is setting up a cable system between France and Singapore with India as one of the landing points. The cable has a system capability of 1.28 terabits. In addition to its investment of US$40 million in this system, VSNL has also been assigned the responsibilities of network administration and the running of the network operating center for the entire system. With the setting up of this new cable, the Company expects to increase its bandwidth infrastructure significantly with a view to further capitalizing on the expected future growth in the corporate data market. The Company presently has over 20 Gbps (from India landing stations) of bandwidth on its 5 operational submarine cable systems that include SAT3/WASC/SAFE, SEA-ME-WE3, SEA-ME-WE2 , FLAG and TIISSC.

The acquisition of TGN gave the Company capacity across approximately 65,000 kms on Tyco’s cables across the continents of North America, Europe and Asia. The Company now has capacity across TGN’s cables—Tyco Northern Europe, Tyco Transatlantic, Tyco Transpacific, Tyco Western Europe and on Tyco’s assets on the C2C Cable Network, making the Company one of the world’s largest providers of submarine cable bandwidth. If the Company’s proposed acquisition of Teleglobe is completed, the Company will acquire ownership of over 100 subsea and terrestrial cable systems and will gain access to over 40 teleport antennas and transponder capacity serving the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans. Upon the acquisition of Tata Power Broad band Limited, the Company would acquire approximately 650 km of fiber running through the Indian city of Mumbai and approximately 150 km of fiber through another Indian city, Pune.

Under the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement and the Shareholders’ Agreement, Panatone Finvest Limited has agreed to cause the Company to hive off or demerge certain land the Company owns at Pune, Kolkata, New Delhi and Chennai (the “Surplus Land”) into a separate company (the “Resulting Company”) pursuant to a scheme of arrangement. The Surplus Land consists of properties, which the Company was not actively using for any business purpose at the time of the Government divestment to Panatone Finvest Limited. The Surplus Land consists of the following:

Pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, shares of the Resulting Company would be distributed pro rata to the existing shareholders of the Company. Such a scheme would have to be approved by three-fourths in value of the creditors and of the shareholders of the Company present and voting at a meeting of the creditors and members, respectively. Indian counsel has advised that it generally takes about 4-6 months from the time such a scheme of arrangement is filed before the High Court until the time that a decree of demerger passed by the High Court is filed with the Registrar of Companies.

As part of the consideration for its purchase of a portion of the Government’s shares in the Company, Panatone Finvest Limited agreed to transfer to the Government, without further consideration, a portion of the shares of the Resulting Company that it receives, such portion to be proportionate to the number of shares of the Company purchased by Panatone Finvest Limited from the Government. In the event that the demerger does not occur or the Company sells or develops the Surplus Land, Panatone has agreed to pay to the Government a pro rata portion of any benefit accruing to the Company as a result of such sale or development, as determined by an appraiser. In its tender/open offer, Panatone Finvest Limited made similar undertakings to the persons who tendered their shares of the Company and whose shares were accepted for payment.

It is possible that the Company may have to pay significant capital gains taxes and the Resulting Company may have to pay applicable stamp taxes if the proposed demerger is found by the Indian courts not to fit within the statutory definition of “demerger” under The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Company believes these taxes could be

substantial. To avail of favorable income tax treatment, the Company would have to create a separate realty undertaking comprising the surplus lands. The realty undertaking would then be transferred to the Resulting Company under the scheme of arrangement. Because the Surplus Lands are separately situated and do not generate separate revenues, they may be found not to constitute a “realty undertaking” under the relevant Indian law, and therefore may be found not to be a “demerger” as well. However, a statutory demerger may also include a split or reconstruction according to such conditions as the Government may issue in the Official Gazette. To date, the Government has not issued such conditions pertaining to the Surplus Lands, and the Company has not requested that the Government do so, though it may in the future so request.

The High Court’s decree, if passed, will have to be submitted to the stamp authorities for adjudication to ascertain the amount of stamp duty, which has to be paid by the Company. Under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 the stamp duty shall not exceed an amount equal to 5 percent of the true market value of the immovable property located within the State of Maharashtra transferred by the Company to the Resulting Company or an amount equal to 0.7 percent of the aggregate of the market value of the shares issued by the Resulting Company and the amount of consideration paid for such demerger, whichever is higher. Under the Income-tax Act, the expenditure incurred by the Company wholly and exclusively for the purpose of demerger is expected to be allowed as a deduction equal to 1/5th of such expenditure for five successive years beginning from the year in which demerger takes place.

No time period is specified in the Shareholders’ Agreement or the Share Purchase Agreement for the demerger of the Surplus Land. However, the agreements state that if for any reason the Company cannot hive off or demerge the land into a separate entity, alternative courses as stipulated therein would be explored. The Company presented a draft scheme for the demerger before the Board of Directors on April 11, 2005, and the legality and feasibility of implementing the demerger is currently being examined by the parties. The Company cannot predict if the demerger will take place. Until such time as the demerger takes place, the lands are under the possession and upkeep of the Company. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—The demerger of surplus land held by the Company may not be completed on satisfactory terms.”

The marketing and sales functions of the voice businesses of this unit are undertaken by a carriers relations team, which serves as a single point of contact for all technical and commercial requirements with other telecommunications carriers for interconnection and is also responsible for the launch of new products and services in the wholesale business. The team is organized as follows:

The unit also has teams within India as well as at locations overseas to support the activities of the wholesale voice business and carry out their sales and marketing functions.

The enterprise business division of the Company primarily caters to services provided by the Company to corporate customers. This division is internally called the Tata Indicom Enterprise Business Unit (“TIEBU”) and is made up of three operating sales units and certain support functions as follows:

Apart from the above-mentioned marketing units, TIEBU also focuses on new product developments through its New Products Initiative team, relations with strategic business partners through the Strategic Business Relations team and complex telecommunications solutions through the Solutions team. There is also a Product team which manages the Company’s existing line of products.

The Company has also entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding with Thomson to explore opportunities for the Company and Thomson to jointly explore offering services to the media and entertainment industry.

The Retail Business Unit of the Company primarily caters to various types of dial-up and broadband Internet products. The unit is entrusted with the task of serving retail customers which primarily consist of individuals, small/home offices and small and medium sized enterprises.

The products of this unit are standardized for mass usage and are not specifically tailored services. The businesses marketed and sold by this unit include products and services such as dialup internet access, broadband internet access, internet telephony, “helloworld”, cyber café and Wi-Fi services.

The products are usually mass distributed through indirect channels such as distributors, direct selling associates and retailers and through retail outlets such as walk-in counters. The unit lays specific emphasis on creating awareness and educating prospective customers about the Company’s retail products. The Company has also tied up with cable distributors and local cable operators (“LCOs”) for the broadband network rollout. These cable distributors and LCOs are also involved in marketing the Company’s products to their customers.

The following discussion of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto included elsewhere herein. The following discussion is based on the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended 2003, 2004 and 2005, which have been prepared by the Company in accordance with US GAAP. The Company’s fiscal year ends on March 31 of each year, and therefore all references to a particular fiscal year are to the twelve months ended March 31 of such year.

The Company is the leading provider of public international telecommunication services in India, directly and indirectly linking the domestic telecommunications network to approximately 240 territories worldwide for voice traffic. The Company provides international telephony services, telex and telegraph services and as of March 31, 2005, operated eleven international switching and transmission facilities at seven locations (“gateways”)—Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi, Chennai, Ernakulam, Gandhinagar and Jalandhar, which route international traffic to and from the domestic telecommunications network using a combination of satellite and undersea cable links. The Company also provides national long distance service within India and uplinking and contributory feed services to television channels in India and is a major Internet service provider in India.

The Company derives its revenue substantially from foreign telecommunications administrations and private carriers for the delivery of international calls to India and from BSNL, MTNL and other access providers in India for the delivery of international calls abroad. The Company shares with BSNL, MTNL and other access providers its revenues from foreign telecommunication administrations and carriers on incoming international calls terminating on India’s domestic network, and also revenues received by BSNL, MTNL and other access providers from Indian domestic subscribers on outgoing international calls initiated on such network, in accordance with interconnect agreements between the Company, BSNL, MTNL and the other access providers. The Company also derives revenues from other services such as retail dial-up and broadband Internet services.

The Company’s traffic revenues are affected by the volume of voice and data traffic between India and other countries and the number of circuits it leases to customers, as well as the prices at which it sells these services. Prices for voice and data traffic are based on tariffs the Company agrees bilaterally with foreign telecommunications administrations and on interconnect agreements the Company enters into with domestic fixed line and cellular operators. Over the past several years, the Indian communications market has experienced a significant increase in traffic volumes in all categories, significant growth in teledensity and high growth rates in the number of cellular subscribers. Consistent with global trends, the Indian market has also experienced a significant decrease in communications prices over the past several years, primarily driven by competition, regulatory pressures in India and abroad and overcapacity. The Company expects both these trends to continue for the foreseeable future.

As part of its growth strategy, the Company is significantly expanding its non-voice businesses. Data and media services represent growth opportunities for the Company, and enterprise business such as international and national private leased circuits, frame relay, internet leased lines, Inmarsat mobile services, Internet telephony, managed data network services and television uplinking are potential areas of revenue growth. The primary growth in the data services sector has been significantly influenced by the growth of the information technology and business process outsourcing industries. Given the convergence between voice, data and video services, and the expansion of Indian companies operations worldwide, many companies seek a provider that can serve them across products and geographies. In the data business, the Company faces increased competition from operators like Bharti and Reliance as well as regulatory pricing pressures from TRAI. The Company expects that pricing as well as regulatory pressures will continue to exist in the foreseeable future. With regard to internet services, the Company’s acquisition of Dishnet’s ISP division gave the Company a broadband network, expertise and a new base of both corporate and retail customers. The Company sees broadband services as an important growth initiative. The Company’s key areas of concern in this regard are the lack of computer penetration and awareness of these services in non-metropolitan areas, the pricing and quality of the broadband services currently on offer and the lack of last mile connectivity to the customers’ premises. The Company expects these trends to continue in the foreseeable future.

Acquisitions are an important element of the Company’s growth strategy. On July 1, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of Tyco Global Network, and the financial results of these businesses will be consolidated in the Company’s financial statements from the acquisition date. The Company has also signed an agreement to

acquire Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd. While revenue streams from the Company’s acquisitions or subsidiaries have not had a material impact on the Company’s financial performance in fiscal 2005 and prior years, this may change in future periods.

The principal components of the Company’s operating costs are network and transmission costs, other operating costs including depreciation and the license fee paid to the DoT.

The Company’s network and transmission expenses consist of interconnect or settlement charges payable to foreign telecommunications administrations, BSNL, MTNL and other fixed line and cellular operators, satellite lease costs and other costs related to undersea cable circuits that connect India to other countries. Payments that the Company makes to foreign telecommunications administrations and to Indian fixed line and cellular operators are covered by the same agreements the Company has for the revenues it receives from these administrations or operators. Network and transmission costs are also dependent upon the volume of voice and data traffic, the effect of competition in reducing network costs, local access costs of interconnection (or last mile connectivity costs) and the number of “points of presence” for interconnection with customers and suppliers. License fees are dependent in large part on Government regulation and traffic revenues. License fees as a percentage of revenues have remained substantially unchanged in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 at approximately 15 percent. Variations in depreciation and amortization are primarily due to changes in the asset base on account of additions and impairment and adjustment of accumulated depreciation on goodwill.

The Company’s non-operating income and expenses include foreign exchange gains or losses, gains or losses on the sale of investments, dividend income and miscellaneous income. In fiscal 2005, the Company made gains on the sale of its investments in Intelsat and New Skies Satellite N.V., among others, which generated net non-operating income of Rs.5,514 million.

The Company’s financial condition and results of operations are affected by general economic conditions prevailing in India and the extent to which India’s economy continues to modernize and further integrate with the global economy.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this annual report are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. US GAAP differs in certain material ways from the Company’s general purpose financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with Indian accounting standards and laws. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of these financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the years presented. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following is a discussion of our critical accounting policies:

Goodwill arising on business combination is capitalized and evaluated for impairment annually or when significant events occur that indicate the fair value is less than the carrying amount. The Company determines fair value by estimating the present value of expected future cash flows. An impairment loss is recognized in earnings when the carrying amount exceeds the present value of future cash flows. In March 2004, the acquisition of Dishnet DSL’s assets resulted in goodwill of Rs.1,019 million.

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost includes purchase price, taxes and duties, installation expenses and other direct costs incurred till the date the asset is available for use.

Depreciation is charged on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic useful lives of property, plant and equipment. Land is not depreciated. The estimated useful economic lives are as follows:

We estimate the useful lives of plant and equipment in order to determine the amount of depreciation and amortization expense to be recorded during any reporting period. Such estimated life is based on historical experience with similar assets, as well as taking into account anticipated technological or other changes. If technological changes were to occur more rapidly than anticipated or in a different form than anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened, resulting in the

recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense in future periods. Likewise, if the anticipated technological or other changes occur more slowly than expected, the life of the assets could be extended based on the life assigned to new assets acquired by us. This could result in a reduction of depreciation and amortization expense in future periods. In fiscal 2004, the Company undertook a review of the useful lives of its assets. Based on the review, the Company changed the estimated useful lives of its sea cables (including indefeasible rights of use, or IRUs). From fiscal 2004 onwards, the Company depreciates these assets over a period of 18 years or the contractual period, whichever is shorter. In years previous to fiscal 2004, undersea cables (including IRUs) were amortized over periods which were generally between 10 to 25 years. The review resulted in additional depreciation expense of Rs.230 million in fiscal 2004.

Assets gifted by unrelated parties have been accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 116, Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made at fair value and recognized as revenue and an asset in the period received. These assets are depreciated over their remaining useful economic lives.

Property, plant and equipment includes intangible assets in the nature of indefeasible rights of use (“IRU’s”) for international and domestic telecommunication circuits, which the Company acquires from time to time. These rights extend over specific time periods. The amounts paid according to the terms of these transactions are recorded as additions to property, plant and equipment and are amortized over the management’s estimate of economic useful life of 18 years and the contracted period of use, whichever is lower.

The Company has not and does not trade in IRUs or bandwidth or enter into any swap or other similar agreements relating to IRUs or bandwidth.

The Company evaluates the carrying amount of its long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The Company subjects such assets to a test of recoverability based on the undiscounted cash flows from use or disposition of such assets. If the asset is impaired, the Company recognizes an impairment loss, as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. The adjusted carrying amount is the new-cost basis.

In fiscal 2004, the Company evaluated the carrying values of its tangible assets as a result of the following events and circumstances:

• Significant reduction in anticipated ILD revenues as a result of declining tariffs and increased competition;

• Increase in competition in the leased line business consequent to the acquisition of international bandwidth capacity by competitors;

• Significant reduction in acquisition costs of telecommunications assets on account of improvements in technology, reduction in customs duties and competition amongst telecom equipment suppliers.

As a result of the review, the Company took a charge of Rs.6,709 million in its income statement for fiscal 2004.

Revenues from voice and data services are recognized based upon minutes of traffic processed or contracted fee schedules. Revenues from Internet services are recognized based on usage by subscribers and customers.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of these financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the years presented. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Material estimates included in these financial statements that are susceptible to change as more information becomes available include allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable and other recoverables, useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, retirement benefits, valuation of unlisted investments, impairment loss and deferred tax assets.

The Company’s functional currency is the Indian rupee. Foreign currency transactions are translated into Indian Rupees at the exchange rates prevailing on the date of transaction. Foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Indian Rupees using the exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet dates. Transaction gains and losses are recognized in earnings.

The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are translated into Indian rupees for the purposes of consolidation as follows: income statement items are translated at the weighted average exchange rates for the period; assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet dates. Unrealized translation gains and losses are reported in other comprehensive income.

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s operating revenue for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005.

The principal components of the Company’s revenue are (1) revenues from foreign telecommunications administrations and carriers for incoming traffic, which are typically denominated in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) or US dollars, (2) revenues from domestic operators for outgoing international traffic (prior to deducting amounts payable by the Company for incoming traffic) and national long distance traffic, which are denominated in Rupees, (3) revenues from enterprise business customers for data and other non-voice connectivity services, which are denominated in Rupees, and (4) revenues from customers for various types of internet access services, which are denominated in Rupees. The major factors influencing telephone revenue include traffic volume and its composition in terms of incoming and outgoing calls and country of origination and destination, the interconnection agreements with BSNL, MTNL and other private basic and cellular operators, settlement rates negotiated with foreign administrations and the Rupee/SDR and the Rupee/Dollar exchange rates. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Revenue Sharing Arrangements.” The major factors influencing data and non-voice connectivity revenues include the number and capacity of circuits sold, the contracted period of use of the circuits, the mix of services provided and the terms and conditions of access to last mile connectivity. The major factors influencing internet access services revenue include the number of new customers added, the terms and conditions of access to last mile connectivity, the availability of content and the amount and patterns of customer usage.

Revenues from international telephony traffic constitutes a substantial portion of the Company’s revenue, comprising 81.73 percent, 66.33 percent and 49.38 percent of revenues in fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. The decline in international telephone traffic revenue as a percentage of total revenue is due primarily to increased competition and the resultant decrease in tariffs, a significant decline in settlement rates, and the increasing revenue contribution from specialized and value-added services such as national long distance telephony, leased circuits and Internet access services.

International long distance telephony revenues decreased by 25.07 percent during fiscal 2005 as against the 42.28 percent decrease during fiscal 2004. The Company experienced the first full year of impact of competition during fiscal 2004 which resulted in a substantial decline in traffic volumes. During fiscal 2005, the Company maintained its traffic volume and therefore its revenues, and consequently the decline in revenues was lower as compared to fiscal 2004.

In fiscal 2005, incoming paid minutes of traffic carried by the Company were marginally lower than in fiscal 2004 due to increased competition from other ILD carriers, whereas outgoing paid minutes were higher primarily because of an overall increase in outgoing traffic from India due to the lower call tariffs and increase in the number of telephone customers in the country. Total paid minutes carried by the Company were higher in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004. Tariffs continued to decline, with peak international call tariffs declining from Rs 40.80 per minute in fiscal 2003 to Rs.18.00 per minute in fiscal 2004, and to between Rs.7.00 and Rs.18.00 during fiscal 2005. Though the Company had higher outgoing traffic volumes in 2005, the lower tariffs contributed to the lower overall revenues. The average settlement rate received from foreign administrations and carriers in respect of incoming telephone traffic for fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005 decreased in US Dollar terms from US$0.23 to US$0.16 and to US$ 0.14 per minute, respectively, as a result of decreases in settlement rates applicable to the Company.

The Company is facing further declines in ILD outgoing tariffs as a result of the intense competition in the ILD business. Further though the Company’s “most favored customer” status with BSNL and MTNL expired in February 2004, the Company continued to carry the outgoing traffic of BSNL and MTNL during fiscal 2005 after competing with other ILD operators. Pressure on tariffs could increase significantly if BSNL, MTNL or other service providers that have access to end customers start or expand their ILD services. The Company may face further declines in international settlement rates for incoming traffic as a result of new entrants into the ILD business.

Leased Circuits Revenue. Revenue from leased circuits (international and national) increased by 37.37 percent during fiscal 2005 and by 69.09 percent during fiscal 2004, which is primarily attributable to an increase in transmission capacity in response to the increased bandwidth requirements of information technology and call center customers. The private leased circuits market in India has grown at an annualized rate of 60-70 percent approximately per year during the last four years. The primary drivers for this growth can be attributed to the information technology and business process outsourcing industries in India, which have benefited from the improved performance of the Indian economy and the increased outsourcing of enterprise functions to India.

However, Government regulation in services such as private leased circuits which during fiscal 2005 contributed to approximately 20.84 percent of the Company’s total revenues is likely to adversely affect revenues in the current fiscal year. There have been indications that regulated rates (rather than market determined rates) would be imposed by the regulator. Similarly, the Company faces constraints in last mile connectivity due its dependence on other service providers leading to order execution delays.

Frame Relay Revenues. Revenue from frame relay services increased by 8.39 percent in fiscal 2005 compared to an increase of 12.72 percent in fiscal 2004. Growth in these services, which are a data transmission technique using shared bandwidth, has been lower on account of customer preference for dedicated leased circuits.

Internet leased lines revenues. These revenues increased by approximately 99.80 percent in fiscal 2005 on account of increase in demand for high-speed dedicated internet access by enterprise customers.

National long distance telephony. National long distance voice services’ revenues increased from Rs.386.53 million in fiscal 2004 to Rs.2,301.31 million in fiscal 2005 due to increased traffic as the Company increased its points of interconnection across the country and expanded its NLD network.

Internet Revenue. Revenues from Internet services were Rs.1,193 million, Rs.1,197 million and Rs.1,623 million during fiscal 2003, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005, respectively, representing an increase of approximately 0.33 percent in fiscal 2004 and an increase of over 35.59 percent in fiscal 2005. The increase in fiscal 2005 was primarily on account of retail broadband revenues which increased from Rs.6 million in fiscal 2004 to Rs.1,090 million in fiscal 2005, because of the Company’s acquisition of the broadband division of Dishnet DSL in March, 2004.

Other Revenues. Other traffic revenues include revenues from services such as the transmission of television signals, telegraph services, telex, electronic mail, frame relay and facsimile forwarding services, services through which subscribers may exchange data with users of other data networks, electronic data interchange and video conferencing. Revenue from these services accounted for 4.57 percent of revenues in fiscal 2003, 4.87 percent in fiscal 2004 and 4.14 percent in fiscal 2005. The Company is likely to phase out its telex and telegraph services.

The principal components of the Company’s operating costs are network and transmission costs, other operating costs including depreciation and the license fee paid to the DoT.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the components of the Company’s operating costs for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Network and Transmission Costs. Network and transmission costs include transmission or interconnect costs to domestic operators like BSNL, MTNL and other access providers for incoming traffic and to foreign administrations and carriers for outgoing traffic, as well as the cost of leasing certain transmission facilities, including circuits from BSNL and other private providers as well as satellite circuits from Intelsat, Inmarsat and New Skies Satellites, NV.

Interconnect charges decreased by 30.78 percent in fiscal 2004 on account of decreases in interconnect charges and increased by 9.10 percent during fiscal 2005 principally due to increased national long distance traffic and higher interconnect charges paid thereon. Also, the payments to foreign administrations and carriers for outgoing traffic decreased in fiscal 2004 primarily as a result of decreases in settlement rates for outgoing traffic and increased during fiscal 2005 because of increased volumes of outgoing telephony traffic as well as international data services requiring higher settlement charges to be paid to foreign administrations. The average settlement rate paid to foreign administrations and carriers decreased in US Dollar terms from US$0.19 per minute to US$0.11 per minute and to US$0.09 per minute for the fiscal years ending March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 respectively.

Rent of landlines decreased by 66.37 percent during fiscal 2005. The significant decrease in fiscal 2005 was on account of cost savings following the acquisition of approximately 23,000 route kilometers capacity of an advanced fiber optic network in India in April 2004. Consequently, the Company surrendered the costlier landlines rented from other suppliers of such capacity.

Space Segment utilization charges decreased by 21.05 percent and by 32.28 percent in fiscal 2005 and 2004 respectively because of surrender of satellite capacity upon the acquisition by the Company of adequate amounts of international cable capacity.

Other Operating Costs. Other operating costs consist of staff costs, depreciation, energy costs and other costs, including for repairs, maintenance and marketing. Other operating costs increased by 22.86 percent in fiscal 2004 and increased by 14.82 percent in fiscal 2005. The increase in fiscal 2004 was primarily attributable to the higher employees’ separation cost amounting to Rs.1,029 million as a consequence of the voluntary retirement schemes implemented in fiscal 2004. In addition, in fiscal 2004, the reduction of the useful lives of the Company’s undersea cables from a maximum of 25 years to 18 years resulted in additional depreciation expense of Rs.230 million. Other operating costs increased in fiscal 2005 due to increased marketing and publicity expenses of Rs.750 million compared to Rs.254 million in fiscal 2004, and a one-time expense charge of Rs.473 million on account of pension obligation and payments to employees who were with the Company when it was formerly a Government organization. Proportionate payments of Rs.547 million were recoverable from the Government of India which disputed the amount and offered Rs.74 million as settlement. Pending a final resolution of this matter, the Company has taken a charge of Rs.473 million in its financial statements. Decrease in depreciation from Rs.2,465 million in fiscal 2004 to Rs.2,308 million in fiscal 2005 is primarily on account of additional depreciation expense of Rs.230 million in fiscal 2004 as discussed above.

Impairment in carrying value of property, plant and equipment. In fiscal 2004, the Company evaluated the carrying values of its tangible assets as a result of the following events and circumstances:

• Significant reduction in anticipated ILD revenues as a result of declining tariffs and increased competition;

• Increase in competition in the leased line business consequent to the acquisition of international bandwidth capacity by competitors;

• Significant reduction in acquisition costs of telecommunications assets on account of improvements in technology, reduction in customs duties and competition amongst telecom equipment suppliers.

As a result of the review, the Company took a charge of Rs.6,709 million in its income statement for fiscal 2004.

License Fee. As per the Company’s license agreement with the Government, the license fees payable to the DoT is 15 percent of adjusted gross revenues (which the Government defines as gross call revenues less access charges actually paid to other carriers for carrying of calls less service and sales taxes paid to the Government). In fiscal 2004, our expenditure on license fees decreased by 32.25 percent due to our lower adjusted gross revenue, while there was a marginal increase of 2.93 percent in fiscal 2005. This increase was primarily on account of license fees of Rs.827 million paid on gain on sale of investments in New Skies Satellites N.V and Intelsat Limited.

As part of the compensation to the Company for the early termination of its exclusivity in providing ILD services, the Government provided that the Company would be refunded license fees it paid towards NLD services to the extent of 10 percent.. Accordingly, the Company has taken a net charge of 5 percent of the revenues from NLD services in its financial statements. The Company however has not received any refunds in this regard for the fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s operating income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005.

For the foregoing reasons, the Company’s operating income in fiscal 2005 was Rs.2,895 million. The Company’s operating loss of Rs.4,036 million in fiscal 2004 was mainly attributable to the impairment loss on property, plant and equipment of Rs.6,709 million.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the components of the Company’s investment and other income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005.

In fiscal 2005, the Company sold its shareholding in Intelsat, Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, in connection with Intelsat’s acquisition by a consortium of private equity investors. The sale of the Company’s shares realized approximately US$169 million, representing a gain of US$ 110.82 million, or Rs.4,834 million (exclusive of tax and license fees).

In fiscal 2005, the Company also sold its shareholding in New Skies Satellite N.V. (“NSS”), a Dutch corporation which had been incorporated by Intelsat, in connection with the acquisition of NSS by a consortium of private equity investors. The sale of the Company’s shares realized approximately US$ 27 million, representing a gain of US$ 15.59 million, or Rs.680 million (exclusive of tax and license fees).

In fiscal 2004, VSNL had sold its shareholding in Inmarsat Ventures plc (formerly Inmarsat Holdings Limited) for US$ 30.3 million, representing a gain of US$ 21.57 million, or Rs.941 million (exclusive of tax and license fees).

Net interest represents the net interest amount receivable or payable by the Company on its bank and other deposits and borrowings under its overdraft facilities. Net interest income decreased from Rs.2,368 million during fiscal 2003, which included interest of Rs.535 million on income tax refunds, to Rs.1,419 million during fiscal 2004, which included interest of Rs.490 million on income tax refunds. There were no such incomes during fiscal 2005 resulting in the decrease of this income to Rs.528 million. The decrease in interest income over the fiscal years under discussion is primarily due to the decrease in interest rates and in average bank deposits. The Company’s average bank deposits during fiscal 2004 decreased because the Company shifted funds in bank deposits to mutual fund investments to obtain higher yields. The Company invested fewer of its funds in interest bearing accounts during fiscal 2005 because of the large cash outflows on capital expenditures and strategic investments amounting to approximately Rs.15 billion.

As a result of the above-mentioned factors, income before taxation was Rs.9,345 million in fiscal 2005 compared to the loss before income tax of Rs.1,009 million in fiscal 2004. The main reason for the loss in fiscal 2004 was the impairment loss on property, plant and equipment of Rs.6,709 million that the Company recognized in earnings.

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 36.65 percent for fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2004 the Company had an income tax benefit rate of 66.80 percent. In fiscal 2005, the Company’s effective tax rate was 27.55 percent on income tax expenses of Rs 2,575 million. The statutory income tax rates were 36.75 percent, 35.875 percent and 36.5925 percent for fiscals 2003, 2004 and 2005 respectively. Reasons attributable to the differences between the effective income tax rates and the effective statutory income tax rates in fiscal 2003 were, among others, exchange gains treated as capital receipts and income tax exempt under tax holidays. The effective tax benefit rate in fiscal 2004 was higher than that determined by the statutory tax rate as dividend income from investments in mutual funds were tax exempt and a lower tax rate of 20 percent (excluding surcharge) was applicable to gains on sale of investment in Inmarsat. During fiscal 2005, the primary reasons for variance between the applicable statutory income tax rate and the effective rate for the Company were that dividend income from investments in mutual funds were tax exempt and a lower tax rate of 20 percent was applicable to gains on sale of investment in Intelsat and New Skies Satellites N.V.

The Company is subject to significant claims by the revenue authorities in respect of income tax matters. These are described under “Item 4—Information on the Company—Legal Proceedings.”

The Company’s share in the net loss of equity method investees in fiscals 2004 and 2005 was Rs.1,921 million and Rs.4,156 million (US$ 95.28 million). The increase in the share of loss was due to significant losses incurred by Tata Teleservices Limited (“TTSL”) in such years. During fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005, TTSL had losses amounting to Rs. 9,492 million and Rs.20,172 million (US$ 462 million) respectively.

The Company’s voting interest in TTSL from 19.9 percent to 16.1 percent because of an increase in the effective voting interest of Tata Sons in TTSL to 57.8 percent as of April 1, 2004. Also, following an amendment to TTSL’s shareholder agreement signed in March 2005, the Company currently has no right to representation on the TTSL board of directors. The Company further subscribed to TTSL’s Rights Issue, a preferential share issue to existing shareholders. In accordance with the Company’s holdings in TTSL, it was entitled to subscribe to 117,012,000 shares, which the Company did and paid Rs. 1,755 million (US$ 40.23 million) on August 20, 2005. This further subscription would not change the Company’s equity interest in TTSL.

Net income was Rs.2,891 million in fiscal 2005 as compared to the net loss of Rs.2,566 million in fiscal 2004. The primary reasons for the variance in net income between fiscal 2004 and 2005 are:

In fiscal 2005, as a result of changes in the form and content of segment information provided to and used by the CODM to allocate resources and assess performance, and changes in the Company’s organizational structure, the Company changed its reportable segments. The reportable segments in fiscal 2005 are “Wholesale Business”, “Enterprise Business” and “Others”. The composition of the reportable segments is as follows:

In fiscal 2005 the Company has identified the following operating segments based on its organizational structure and for which discrete financial information including gross margins is available:

ILD and NLD services are managed by the Wholesale Business group, corporate data transmission services and other services are managed by the Enterprise Business group, and Internet services are managed by the Retail business group.

The “Wholesale Business” reportable segment comprises segment information only for ILD, as ILD and NLD do not meet the aggregation criteria. Segment revenues and profits from ILD substantially comprise revenues and profits managed by the Wholesale business group.

The “Enterprise Business” reportable segment comprises segment information only for corporate data transmission services, as these services and services included under other services do not meet the aggregation criteria. Segment revenues and profits from corporate data transmission services substantially comprise revenues and profits managed by the Enterprise Business group.

All other services including NLD and Internet have been reported under “Other Services”, as none of these operating segments meet the reportable quantitative thresholds in FAS 131. Revenues from “Wholesale Business” and “Enterprise Business” exceed 75 per cent of the Company’s consolidated revenues.

In fiscal years 2003 and 2004, the Company’s operating and reportable segments were “International telephony and related services” which included international long distance telephony and corporate data transmission services and “Other services” which included national long distance telephony voice and data service, internet and other value added services. Discrete financial information was available only for these segments.

In accordance with the segmentation basis adopted in fiscal 2005, comparable segment information for fiscal years 2003 and 2004 has not been presented as comparable information for fiscal 2003 and 2004 is unavailable. Accordingly, the discussion below covers only fiscal 2005.

Wholesale business revenues were adversely affected in fiscal 2005 because of the Company’s decreased share of incoming international ILD traffic, together with lower rate realizations for outgoing ILD traffic. Enterprise business revenues in fiscal 2005 benefited from the general growth of enterprise business services in India as a response to the needs of India’s growing information technology and business process outsourcing industries. The Company’s performance in this segment also benefited from its increased focus on corporate consumers of enterprise services. Retail business revenues reflected the Company’s acquisition of the ISP division of DishnetDSL, as well as increased broadband Internet sales to retail customers. Other revenues reflected the growth in national long distance services during fiscal 2005.

Wholesale business margins declined in 2005 as the Company’s net retentions faced further downward pressure on account of increased competition for incoming as well as outgoing traffic. Enterprise business margins benefited from the significant growth in revenues as well as the cost savings resulting from the surrender of leased domestic bandwidth following the Company’s acquisition of 23,000 kms of fiber optic capacity from Bharti Infotel Limited. Operating profits in the “Others” segment reflected the growth of NLD voice revenues coupled with the drop in local bandwidth charges due to the surrender of leased domestic bandwidth from BSNL and other bandwidth providers. There was also growth in revenues and margins from the broadband business.

Revenues and interconnect charges are directly attributable to the Company’s segments. Space segment utilization charges, rent of landlines and other network and transmission costs are allocated based on utilization of satellite, landline and undersea cable bandwidth capacities. License fees for international long distance telephony and corporate data transmission services have been allocated based on net revenues from these services. Depreciation and repairs and maintenance on undersea cables including IRUs are allocated to segments based on utilization of undersea cable bandwidth capacity. Depreciation on all other property, plant and equipment, and all other operating costs are unallocated.

Telecommunication services are provided utilizing the Company’s assets which do not generally make a distinction between the types of service. As a result, assets and expenses relating to those assets, other than depreciation, repairs and maintenance on undersea cables and allowance for uncollectible receivables are not allocated to segments.

Segment total assets and liabilities have not been allocated, in the absence of a meaningful basis to allocate assets and liabilities between segments. Fixed assets are used interchangeably between segments.

The Company’s principal capital resources are primarily generated from its operations. In addition, the Company borrows funds for short-term requirements from time to time in order to meet temporary working capital needs. While the Company anticipates significant liquidity requirements in the near future, the Company believes, based on its current financial condition and market outlook, that its cash and cash equivalents and ability to borrow will be sufficient to meet such requirements.

The Company generated Rs.9,862 million, Rs.13,140 million and Rs. 3,069 million (US$ 70.36 million) in cash flows from its operations for fiscals 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. Net cash provided by operations consisted primarily of net income as increased by depreciation, impairment of property, plant and equipment, share of loss in affiliates, reduction in trade and other receivables, other assets and increase in trade payables and accrued expenses and other liabilities. Cash flow from operations in fiscal 2004 increased significantly over fiscal 2003 as a

result of favorable changes in advance taxes paid, accounts payables, accrued expenses and other current liabilities. Cash flow from operations in fiscal 2005 was reduced by the net gain on the sale of investments, mainly Intelsat and New Skies Satellite, of Rs.5,523 million. The significant decrease in the cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2005 was on account of unfavorable changes in accounts receivables, advance taxes paid, accrued expense and other current liablilites as compared to the previous fiscal year.

The Company used Rs.11,697 million, Rs. 7,262 million and Rs.1,010 million (US$ 23.15 million) of its cash flows during fiscals 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively, in its investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities that involved the acquisition of additional property, plant and equipment was Rs.2,868 million, Rs.4,783 million and Rs.12,708 million (US$ 291.33 million) for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. In fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2005, there was an increase in short term deposits of Rs.5,845 million and Rs.3,627 million respectively whereas in fiscal 2004 there was a withdrawal of Rs.13,149 million to invest in mutual funds. In all, during fiscal 2005 the Company invested Rs.40,729 million (US$ 933.72 million) in mutual funds and sold investments amounting to Rs.50,319 million (US$1,153.58 million). During fiscal 2005, the Company made investments of Rs.2,354 million (US$ 53.97 million) in TTSL and its subsidiaries. In August 2005, the Company made a further investment of Rs.1,755 million (US$ 40.23 million) in TTSL by subscribing to their rights issue. The Company realized Rs. Nil, Rs. 1,393 million and Rs. 7,375 million (US$169.07 million) during fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005 respectively from the sale if its investments in satellite companies, including Intelsat, New Skies Satellite and Inmarsat.

The Company used Rs.5,774 million, Rs.5,963 million and Rs.1,913 (US$ 43.86 million) of its cash flows for its financing activities for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 respectively. This primarily consisted of repayment of short term borrowings of Rs.2,211 million and Rs.3,540 in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004 respectively, together with the dividend paid of Rs.3,563 million and Rs.2,423 million during fiscal 2003 and 2004, respectively. In fiscal 2005, the Company repaid the Rs.630 million (US$ 14.44 million) loan assumed from DishnetDSL Limited on acquiring its broadband division. The Company paid dividends amounting to Rs.1,283 million (US$ 29.41 million) during fiscal 2005.

As of March 31, 2005, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were Rs. 339 million (US$7.77 million) as against Rs.187 million as of March 31, 2004.

The Company’s working capital, which the Company defines as the excess of current assets over current liabilities, increased from Rs.14,215 million as of March 31, 2004 to Rs.18,855 million (US$ 432.25 million) as of March 31, 2005. This increase was primarily due to the following reasons:

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents along with short term deposits with banks as of March 31, 2005 was Rs. 14,131 million (US$323.96 million). Other than the normal business capital expenditures related to its existing businesses and related working capital requirements, the known and likely commitments of the Company towards acquisitions and new ventures, which are discussed below, are approximately Rs.30 billion. This expenditure could be staggered over fiscals 2006 and 2007. The Company will have to explore options to raise financial resources either in the domestic or global markets or both to meet its likely commitments. The terms and conditions under which financing will be available cannot be determined and are subject to fluctuations and uncertainties. Any problems in obtaining favorable credit ratings and access to the financial markets can be detrimental to the Company’s liquidity position and can cause delays and cost escalations in the Company’s business plans.

The following factors are expected to impact the Company’s liquidity and capital resources:

The acquisition of the undersea cable network was completed on July 1, 2005. The acquisition consideration of US$130 million in cash (excluding related expenses of the transaction) was funded initially entirely by the Company. Subsequently, the acquiring subsidiary, VSNL Singapore Pte. Ltd, borrowed bridge loans amounting to US$120 million and repaid the Company. The bridge loans are to be repaid by the subsidiary on December 30, 2005. The bridge loans may be converted into a long-term loan facility. The Company expects that it will be required to fund the working capital needs of the Tyco business until they become cash positive.

The Company announced on July 25, 2005, that it had agreed to acquire Teleglobe. The acquisition remains subject to Teleglobe shareholder approval and government consents in various countries. The Company along with its subsidiary, VSNL Telecommunications (Bermuda) Ltd., entered into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation (the “Amalgamation Agreement”) with Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd. (“Teleglobe”) pursuant to which Teleglobe

will be amalgamated with VSNL Telecommunications (Bermuda) Ltd and the resulting company will be a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The acquisition consideration of US $239 million comprises a payment of $ 4.50 per share to Teleglobe shareholders amounting to approximately US$178 million and assumption of debt of approximately US$61 million. Following the proposed amalgamation, Teleglobe will cease to exist as a publicly held company and the amalgated company will be a privately held, wholly owned subsidiary of VSNL. As a result of the amalgamation, each issued and outstanding common share of Teleglobe will be cancelled. The completion of this transaction, which could occur during fiscal 2006, could cause the Company to borrow in the Indian or international markets. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, Teleglobe reported EBITDA of US$14 million in its quarterly 10-Q filing dated August 10, 2005 with the SEC.

The Company has agreed to acquire Tata Power Broad band Limited (“TPBB”) from Tata Power Company Ltd. The acquisition is expected to be completed in fiscal 2006 and will require the payment of acquisition consideration of Rs. 2,390 million (US$ 57 Million) in cash.

VSNL has been allotted a 26 percent stake in a South African company which is intended to become the second national telecommunications operator in South Africa. The equity capital contribution for the project is expected to be approximately US$900 million, of which the Company’s share will be approximately US$234 million. The Company expects that the investment will be made during fiscals 2006 and 2007 but cannot predict the actual timing or the sources of financing of the investment.

Planned capital expenditure and cash requirements for each of the Company’s operating segments

The Company has forecast total capital expenditure of approximately Rs.36 billion (US$ 816 million) in its annual operating plan for fiscal 2006. Other than approximately Rs.14 billion for some of the above-mentioned acquisitions and investments in fiscal 2006, the rest would involve capital expenditure for upgrading facilities and setting up new networks and facilities.

In terms of the segments of the Company, the Company expects to incur limited capital expenditure in respect of its wholesale business. Certain other components of the capital expenditure would include expenditure on information technology assets, sustenance capital expenditure and enhancement of infrastructure. The bulk of the investments of the balance approximately 22 billion (US $ 504 million) is towards enhancing the transmission capacities and last mile connectivities of the Company, both inland and offshore. Such enhancements are primarily to be used by the data and internet products offered by the Company. Accordingly the enterprise segment and certain other Internet products such as retail broadband which have been classified under “Other” services would entail substantial capital expenditure. Further the Company expects to incur capital expenditure on infrastructure development such as “Centralized Network Management Systems” which are common to all the segments of the Company.

The Company is facing pressure from the Government to agree to tariff reductions of between 29 and 64 percent for its IPLC services. Further, the entry into the enterprise business of at least two other major carriers who have capacities on international cables has caused prices of many of our enterprise businesses to decline. These factors could cause revenues and profits to decline in fiscal 2006 and future periods, which would adversely affect the working capital of the Company.

The Indian telecommunications sector is intensely competitive and we face competition in each of our businesses. However, ILD services continue to be the largest contributor to the Company’s revenues. Our competitors in the ILD business have resorted to steep rate cuts that we have had to match to remain competitive. Though these rate cuts stabilized in the last year, they have affected our traffic minutes, revenues and market share adversely. However, the Company’s share of the market continues to fall especially with regard to outgoing calls due to the dependence on MTNL/BSNL. BSNL has already started its own ILD operations and MTNL is likely to start such operations in fiscal 2006, further reducing the Company’s traffic. This could cause the Company’s revenues and profits to decline, affecting the Company’s working capital.

The Company had the following contractual and commercial commitments related to normal business activities (exclusive of acquisition) as of March 31, 2005:

Subsequent to the privatization of the Company in February 2002, the Company is no longer required to follow the Governmental system of five year plans to implement capital expenditure programs.

The Company now prepares and modifies as necessary its annual capital expenditure plans to reflect the changing competitive market. The Company envisages major investments in construction and acquisition of undersea cables during fiscal 2005. The Company also intends to invest in the NLD business and in acquiring last mile access for its broadband and enterprise data businesses. The Company also expects to incur major capital expenditures to upgrade and implement state-of-the-art systems in information technology such as Internet data facilities, billing mediation systems and customer relationship management systems. The Company expects its capital expenditure in fiscal 2006 to be approximately Rs.21.52 billion (US$ 493 million) excluding its investments in new ventures and acquisitions of approximately Rs.14 billion.

The details of the Company’s known and likely commitment towards acquisitions and new ventures are discussed above.

The Company conducts its own internal research activity in order to achieve its strategic goals and to participate in current technological advancements. The Company plans to invest in internal research and development. The main focus of the Company’s internal research and development activity is the exploration of suitable technologies that enable the Company to best serve its customers, gain competitive advantage in the telecommunications market and reduce its cost of operations. The research and development the Company has focused, in recent years on access technologies, content delivery systems, tools for network optimization, graphic user interface applications for network inventory systems and Internet applications.

In accordance with the accounting policy on research and development adopted by the Company in fiscal year 2000, all costs incurred on research and development by the Company are charged to the income statement under the relevant line items.

The Company expects the intense competitive pressures on its core ILD business to continue, with further decreases in ILD tariffs and settlement rates. The Company expects that these pressures will continue to adversely affect its revenues and margins in fiscal 2006 and beyond.

While the Company generated approximately 49 percent of its revenues from its ILD telephony business in fiscal 2005, this could change significantly in the future. This is because the opening of this business to competition from April 2002 has continued to result in increased competitive pressure for volumes. Simultaneously, prices have also dropped steeply since then because inbound carriers now have the choice of sending traffic through several operators. The Company’s “most favored customer” status over traffic from BSNL and MTNL, which together control a major portion of the outgoing traffic, came to an end in February 2004. Although the Company retained the outgoing traffic of BSNL and MTNL during fiscal 2005 after competing with other ILD operators, the Company’s gross revenues as well as its margins from such traffic declined. The latest tendering by BSNL saw the Company lose out on sectors with significant volumes to competitors. Furthermore, BSNL has been granted operating licenses for international telephony services by the Government and has started ILD operations. In March 2004, the Company and BSNL signed an agreement pursuant to which BSNL commenced utilizing the Company’s infrastructure during fiscal 2005. This agreement is valid until October 2005. It has been widely reported that BSNL is building its own network for carrying ILD traffic. There have also been reports that MTNL would be granted an ILD license in the current fiscal year. Any of the above aforementioned events could negatively affect the revenues of the Company.

The Company’s success in the ILD and NLD business also depends on the ability to access retail customers who choose the Company’s service. A key element in this process is the implementation of the Carrier Access Code system, which will enable customers to choose the ILD and NLD operators of their choice. The pace of implementation of the Carrier Access Code depends on Government policy, which is currently unclear.

The BPO and IT markets in India have been growing rapidly and the trend is expected to continue, which could result in significant growth in the Company’s corporate data transmission business. However, the presence of new competitors with large amounts of bandwidth is reducing prices for these services. Many of the Company’s competitors have acquired large amounts of bandwidth, and the Company is repositioning itself to compete effectively in bandwidth intensive businesses. The Company hopes that the introduction of innovative pricing, differentiated packages and diverse offerings will enable it to compete effectively in these businesses.

The Company is one of the largest Internet service providers in the country. However, the Internet services market in the future may move towards other bandwidth intensive applications, such as video on demand, gaming, interactive education, etc. The Company is planning a major broadband initiative to offer integrated voice, data and video services and is laying down the infrastructure to support a range of information, entertainment and telecom services.

The Company has made significant investments in international businesses mainly through acquisitions. The acquired businesses are prone to uncertainties with respect to the revenues and profit margins. These acquisitions also involve a range of other risks like those related to execution and integration risks and regulatory issues. Further, these ventures could entail the Company to incur or assume debt, or assume contingent liabilities.

The Company continued to be subject to various laws and Government policies in respect of public sector enterprises and to follow procedures appropriate for a public sector entity until its privatization in 2002. Consequently, the Company’s financial and management accounting and reporting systems are not as developed as those of certain comparable companies outside India. In addition, the Company’s procedures for preparing budgets and appraising and monitoring capital expenditure projects could be less precise than those used by comparable private sector companies. In order to address certain of these deficiencies, the Company continues to improve data input for its traffic accounts, has increased the number and quality of its financial and accounting personnel, and has, in fiscal 2005, commissioned an integrated financial accounting and budgeting system.

The Company is managed by its Board of Directors. The Indian Companies Act, 1956 (“Act”) and the Company’s Articles of Association (“Articles”) provide for a Board of not less than three Directors and not more than twelve Directors.

On February 13, 2002 the Government of India (“GOI”), Panatone Finvest Limited (“Strategic Partner”), Tata Sons Limited, Tata Power Company Limited, Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited and Tata Industries Limited (“Principals”) signed a Shareholders’ Agreement (“SHA”) as per the provisions of which the GOI transferred 7,12,50,000 Equity Shares owned by the Government, representing 25 percent of the aggregate number of the issued and outstanding Equity Shares of the Company which were sold to the Strategic Partner pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”). The Articles of Association of the Company were amended at our Annual General Meeting held on August 20, 2002, to conform to the provisions of the SHA and the SPA. The amended Articles prescribe the rights of Panatone Finvest Limited and Government of India, the two largest shareholder of the Company, to nominate Directors on the Board as described in “Item 10. Additional Information—Memorandum and Articles of Association”. As per the provisions of the SPA and SHA, the composition of the Board of Directors of the Company is determined as given below.

(b) As long as the Government holds at least 10 percent of the voting equity share capital of the Company the composition of the Board shall be as follows:

(i) Four out of twelve directors shall be permanent or non-retiring directors, of which the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited shall be entitled to appoint two directors each.

(ii) The remaining eight directors shall be liable to retire by rotation. Of the retiring directors, four directors shall be independent directors on the Board.

(iii) Of the four independent directors Panatone Finvest Limited and the Government shall be entitled to nominate and recommend names of two independent directors each.

(iv) The composition of the remaining four directors i.e. the retiring and non independent directors shall be determined by the following:

i. As long as Panatone Finvest Limited together with its Affiliates holds 25 percent of the voting equity share capital of the Company, two directors shall be nominated each by the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited.

ii. As soon as Panatone Finvest Limited acquires and holds more than 25 percent but less than 30 percent of the voting equity share capital of the Company, Panatone Finvest Limited shall have the right to appoint three directors on the Board and the Government shall have the right to appoint one Director on the Board.

iii. As soon as Panatone Finvest Limited acquires and holds more than 30 percent of the voting equity share capital of the Company, Panatone Finvest Limited shall have the right to appoint all the four directors.

(a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the SPA and SHA (i) the Government shall have the right to appoint two non retiring Directors so long as the Government holds at least 10 percent of the voting equity share capital of the Company and (ii) the Government shall be entitled to appoint one non retiring director on the Board so long as the Government is a shareholder in the Company.

(b) Subject to the provisions of sub clauses (c) above and (e) below, if a Person, other than a Party to the SHA (“Party”), to whom the Government, Panatone Finvest Limited or a party to the SHA (“Shareholder”) as the party to the SHA has transferred its Shares (or any equity rights or interests therein) or renounced the Right pursuant to the SHA, requests the right to nominate one or more directors, and at the time of such request, such request complies with the requirements of the Act, the right to nominate one or more directors (depending on the percentage of the equity share holding in the Company held by the Shareholder who has transferred the Shares or renounced the Right, as the case may be) shall be taken from such Shareholder who has transferred the Shares or renounced the Right, as the case may be and not from the other Shareholders and such request shall not be fulfilled by increasing the total number of directors constituting the Board. For the purpose of clarity and removal of doubt, if at any time after the expiry of three years from the Closing, Panatone Finvest Limited, together with its Affiliates, holds less than 25 percent of the voting equity share capital of the Company, the composition of the Board shall be suitably changed in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, at least three-fourths of the total number of directors on the Board shall, at all times, be Indian nationals.

(d) For purposes of clarity and avoidance of doubt, the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited agree that if additional independent directors are required to be appointed to the Board to comply with any Laws or regulation or to comply with the provisions of any listing agreement, then, by mutual agreement between the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited, either the strength of the Board shall be increased to the extent required or the number of directors that each of the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited shall be entitled to appoint under paragraphs (a) and (b) above shall be proportionately reduced.

(e) The proportion of representation of the Parties to the SHA on any committees or sub-committees of the Board shall be the same as that of the Parties on the Board.

(f) In the event that the Board constitutes a share transfer committee for the purpose of effecting the transfer of the Shares, such share transfer committee shall include one nominee of Panatone Finvest Limited and the Government each.

(g) Panatone Finvest Limited, Principal(s) and the Government shall cause the Company to take all and any steps as may be required under the Act to effect the appointment of the directors. Each of the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited shall be entitled to remove and replace its nominees (except the independent directors) from time to time as provided in Article 5.3 of the SHA. Both the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited shall vote the Equity Shares held by them to elect the directors nominated/appointed in accordance with this Agreement. As long as Panatone Finvest Limited holds 25 percent of the then-outstanding Equity Shares, one of the directors nominated by Panatone Finvest Limited shall be the Managing Director of the Company.

(h) If any director is reasonably expected to be or is absent for a period of not less than three (3) calendar months from India where the registered office of the Company is located, the Board may, at a meeting of the Board or by circulation of a written resolution of the Board in accordance with applicable Law, appoint an alternate director. The alternate director shall be an individual nominated by the director in whose place such alternate director is being appointed, and the Shareholders shall cause their nominees on the Board to approve the appointment of such individual as an alternate director.

(i) Each Shareholder shall be entitled to remove any director appointed by it to the Board by Notice to such director and the other Parties. Any vacancy occurring on the Board by reason of retirement, death, disqualification, resignation, removal or the inability to act of any director for any reason whatsoever shall be filled only by another nominee of the party whose nominee was so affected so as to maintain a Board consisting of the number of nominees specified above. Retirement of any director shall also be subject to any applicable provisions in the Articles of Association.

On February 13, 2002 as per the provisions of the SPA and SHA the Board was reconstituted. As of August 30, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company consisted of eleven directors with four independent directors, two directors nominated by the GOI as non-retiring directors and the remaining five being nominated by Panatone Finvest Limited.

The business address of each of the directors is the registered office of the Company. The current directors and their positions are as follows:

Mr. Ratan N Tata, who was the Chairman of the Board of the Company resigned and ceased to be a Director with effect from April 11, 2005.

The term of Mr. Shailendra Kumar Gupta as Managing Director ended on October 1, 2004 and he ceased to be a Director from that date.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, who was the non-retiring nominee of the Government of India on the Board of the Company, resigned with effect from August 10, 2005. Subsequently, the Government of India nominated Mr. N. Parameswaran as a non-retiring Government Director from August 30, 2005 in place of Mr. Rakesh Kumar.

Mr. Vivek Singhal and Dr. Ashok Jhunjhunwala who were Government appointed independent directors on the Board of the Company resigned with effect from September 9, 2005 and on September 14, 2005, Mr. P.V. Kalyanasundaram and Dr. V.R.S. Sampath joined the Board of the Company as independent directors appointed by the Government of India.

Dr. Mukund Rajan has been nominated by Panatone Finvest Limited as a director. Accordingly, Dr. Rajan joined the Company’s Board with effect from May 6, 2005.

There are no exclusive directors’ service contracts providing for benefits upon termination of employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries except those normal retiral benefits as applicable to the employees of the Company. However, as per the agreement between the Company and Mr. N. Srinath, the employment can be terminated by either party by giving six months notice or by the Company on paying six months’ basic salary in lieu thereof.

The following individuals are the principal executive officers of the Company in addition to those officers who are members of the Board of Directors:

Set forth below is selected biographical information for certain of the Company’s directors and officers:

Mr. Subodh Bhargava holds a degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Roorkee. He started his career in 1962 with Balmer Lawrie & Co. Calcutta. He joined the Eicher Group of Companies in Delhi in 1975 as general manager and retired as group chairman and chief executive in March 2000, to become the Group’s chairman emeritus and advisor.

Mr. Bhargava has been a key spokesperson for Indian industry, as past president of the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and the Association of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, and as vice president of the Tractor Manufacturers Association.

Mr. Bhargava was a member of the central boards of the State Bank of India, the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, the Insurance Tariff Advisory Committee and several other government-appointed committees and task forces. He is currently on the governing bodies of the Centre for Policy Research; the India Trade Promotion Organisation; and the Technology Information Forecasting and Assessment Council.

Mr. Bhargava has been closely associated with technical and management education. He is on the boards of IIM, Indore; the Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, Ahmedabad; and other institutions. He is also on the senior panel of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE); and on the committee set up by the Ministry of Human Resource Department, GoI for policy perspectives for management education. He is a trustee of the India Brand Equity Fund, the National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People and the Bhartiya Yuva Shakti Trust.

Mr. Bhargava is chairman of Wartsila India Ltd. and is on the boards of Samtel Colour Ltd., Samcor Glass Ltd., Rane Engine Valves Ltd., TRF Ltd. and Carborundum Universal Ltd. He is also the mentor of two start-up companies -Autoparts Asia Pvt. Ltd. and Nicco Internet Ventures Ltd.

Mr. Srinath Narasimhan was born on July 8, 1962. He received a degree in mechanical engineering from IIT (Madras) and completed his management degree from IIM (Calcutta), specialising in marketing and systems.

Joining the Tata Administrative Services in 1986 as a probationer, Mr. Srinath has held positions in the project management, sales and marketing, and corporate functions in different Tata companies over the last 17 years. He has been responsible for setting up new projects in high-technology areas like process automation and control, computers and telecommunications. After his probation, he was a project executive in Tata Honeywell from 1987 to 1988, working on getting various approvals and the necessary project funding.

He then moved to Tata Industries as executive assistant to the chairman, an assignment he handled till mid-1992. He was part of the team that set up Tata Information Systems (later Tata IBM). In June 1992 he moved into that company full-time for the next six years, during which period he handled a number of assignments in sales and marketing. In March 1998, he returned to Tata Industries as General Manager (Projects) and worked with Tata Teleservices in this capacity for a year. In April 1999, he moved to Hyderabad as chief operating officer responsible for the operations of the Tata Teleservices. In late 2000 he took over as chief executive officer of Tata Internet Services, a position he held till February 2002, when he moved to VSNL as director (operations).

Mr. Suresh Krishna was born in Madurai, South India, on December 24, 1936. He received a Bachelor of Science degree from Madras Christian College in 1955 and an M.A. in literature from the University of Wisconsin in 1959. He did his post-graduate work in literature in the University of Munich, Germany.

Mr. Krishna is the chairman and managing director of Sundram Fasteners Limited, the leading company in high tensile fasteners in India. He was the president of the Confederation of Engineering Industry (1987-88) and the president of the Automotive Component Manufactures Association of India (1982-84).

He has been involved in several other public bodies set up by the central and state governments. He was a director on the central board of the Reserve Bank of India; a member of the Indo-German Consultative Group, set up by the Prime Minister of India and the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, to improve bilateral relations; and a member of the advisory council on trade and industry to the Prime Minister. The Government of Tamil Nadu appointed him the sheriff of Madras for 1992 and 1993.

Mr. Krishna has won numerous awards and honours, including the Sir Jehangir Ghandy Medal for Industrial Peace from XLRI in 1991; Business India magazine’s Businessman of the Year award, 1995; the Qimpro Platinum Standard 1997 for being a role model for quality leadership; the Juran Quality Medal from the Indian Merchants Chamber, Mumbai; the national award for 2000 (for India) from the Asian Productivity Organisation, Japan; the JRD Tata Corporate Leadership Award 2000 from the All India Management Association; and Ernst & Young’s Entrepreneur of the Year award for manufacturing for 2001.

Mr Ishaat Hussain joined the board of Tata Sons Ltd. as an executive director on July 1, 1999, and has been its finance director since July 28, 2000. Before joining Tata Sons he was senior vice president and executive director – finance at Tata Steel for almost ten years.

Born on September 2, 1947, Mr Hussain completed his schooling from the Doon School in 1963 and then graduated in economics from St. Stephens College Delhi. A chartered accountant from England and Wales, Mr. Hussain also attended the Advanced Management Program at the Harvard Business School. He joined the board of The Indian Tube Company (a Tata Steel associate company) in 1981. He moved to Tata Steel in 1983 after Indian Tube was merged with Tata Steel.

Besides being on the board of Tata Sons, he is the chairman of Voltas Ltd. He is also on the boards of several other Tata companies: Tata Steel, Tata Industries, Tata Teleservices and Titan Industries Ltd.

Mr. Kishor A. Chaukar (57), currently the managing director of Tata Industries Limited (TIL), is a post-graduate in management from the Indian Institute of Management at Ahmedabad.

TIL is one of the two principal holding companies of the Tata Group, acts as its diversification and new projects promotion arm, and spearheads its entry into the emerging high-technology and sunrise sectors of the economy. As managing director of TIL, Mr. Chaukar is responsible for enhancing TIL’s interests in the companies it promotes and adding value, especially by providing strategic direction to these companies. Mr. Chaukar is also a member of the Tata Group executive office and the Group corporate centre, which are engaged in strategy formulation. He is the director on the board of various Tata companies like Tata Teleservices Ltd, Idea Cellular Ltd. Tata Autocomp Systems Ltd. and Tata Investment Corporation Ltd. He also oversees the functions of Tata Economic Consultancy Services (TECS) and the Department of Economics & Statistics (DES). Mr. Chaukar is the Chairman of Tata Council for Community Initiatives (TCCI) – the nodal agency of the Group on all matters related to social development, environmental management, bio-diversity restoration and conservation of wild life.

Mr. Chaukar was previously the managing director of ICICI Securities & Finance Company Ltd. (July 1993 to October 1998), and a board member of ICICI Ltd. from February 9, 1995 to October 15, 1998. His other experiences include stints in Godrej Soaps Ltd. and in Bhartiya Agro Industries Foundation, a public trust engaged in rural development.

Mr. F A Vandrevala, 54, joined Tatas in October 1972 and is the Chairman of Tata Teleservices Limited. Mr. Vandrevala graduated with a Bachelor of Technology degree in electrical engineering (Hon) from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, and subsequently earned a post graduate diploma in business management from XLRI, Jamshedpur.

In his long and fruitful career with Tata Steel and Tata Power, Mr. Vandrevala has spearheaded many change initiatives resulting in improvements at the shop-floor level including production and quality improvements, and has successfully implemented management practices of planning, organizing, people management and customer focus in all business activities.

He has attended specialised training programs including a visit to Malcolm Baldridge award-winning companies in the US, Strategic Marketing Management at Harvard Business School, US and a general management programme at CEDEP INSEAD, France. He is a director on the boards of several Tata companies. He has held various important positions in CII and was the chairman of CII, Eastern & Western Regions.

Mr. Agrawala was born on October 16, 1955. Since May 2002, he has been the joint secretary to the GoI, Department of IT, Ministry of Communications and IT. Mr Agrawala belongs to the 1978 batch of the IAS (Uttar Pradesh cadre). He holds degrees in public administration, development economics and history and was the Mason Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, USA.

Mr. Agrawala has held various important U.P government positions. He has been chief development officer, Lucknow; joint development commissioner, Bundelkhand; joint secretary, Planning Department; collector and district magistrate, Basti and Azamgarh districts; special secretary, power department; and collector and district magistrate, Saharanpur. He has also headed various District Rural Development Agencies.

He took over as director of the then Ministry of Urban Development, GoI in August 1991, and as director, Housing Division, Ministry of Urban Affairs and Employment, GoI in July 1994. He was the secretary of the Indian delegation to the Habitat II city summit, Istanbul. He then worked in decentralised training for the Urban Development Project, an Indo-Dutch collaboration with the Institute for Housing and Urban Development, Rotterdam.

From July 1998 to May 2002, he was secretary to the U.P government, in various departments, including the Department of Planning; the Department of Banking and Private Capital Investments; the Department of Externally Aided Projects, where he was responsible for five World Bank projects; the department of IT and Electronics, when India’s first private-sector IT university was set up; and the department of Small Scale Industries and Export Promotion.

Dr. Rajan was born in Chennai on April 5, 1968. He completed his Bachelors degree in Chemical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi in 1989. He followed this up with a Masters and Doctorate in International Relations at Oxford University, where he studied on a Rhodes Scholarship. His doctoral dissertation was published by Oxford University Press, and is titled “Global Environmental Politics - India and the North-South Politics of Global Environmental Issues.”

Dr. Rajan joined the Tata Group through the Tata Administrative Service (TAS) in January 1995. In his first year with the Group, as part of the TAS’s induction programme, he was assigned to various Tata Companies including Tata International, Indian Hotels, Tata Steel, and Tata AutoComp Systems. On completion of this induction

programme, he was assigned to the office of Mr. Ratan Tata, Chairman, Tata Sons Limited. Dr. Rajan’s current designation is Vice President, Tata Sons Limited, and he continues to support Mr. Tata as a member of his office. He also serves on the boards of several Tata companies, including Tata Teleservices Limited, Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited and Piem Hotels Limited.

Mr. P.V. Kalyanasundaram was born on February 25, 1958. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree in history, from the New College, Chennai in 1977, followed by a Bachelor of Law degree from Madras Law College in 1982.

An advocate by profession, Mr. Kalyanasundaram is a legal advisor for Pallavan Transport Corporation, Chennai, a government of Tamil Nadu undertaking, as well as a legal advisor to the Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board. He is also a trustee of the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, Mumbai, and a member of the Censor Board, Chennai as well as the Presidency Club, Chennai.

Mr. Kalyanasundaram has played a leading role in various public activities. As the managing trustee of the Green Peace World Charitable Trust, Chennai, he took an active part in the various welfare measures organized by the trust. These include organizing free eye camps to treat poor people.

Between 2000 and 2004, Mr. Kalyanasundaram was the chairman and trustee, Pachayappa’s Trust, Chennai. In that position, he managed several educational institutions, including seven colleges and six schools, and looked after immovable properties worth Rs. 10,000 million belonging to the trust. He was also instrumental in conducting several educational seminars and courses in various institutions.

Mr. Parameswaran was born on November 15, 1955. Since July 1998, he has been the Deputy Director General in the Department of Telecom, Government of India. He holds B.Sc. Engineering degree in Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering from College of Engineering Trivandrum, Master of Technology in Electrical Engineering from IIT (Bombay) and Post Graduate Diploma in Business Management from All India Management Association, New Delhi.

Mr. Parameswaran belongs to the Indian Telecommunications Service (1978) and has been with the Department of Telecommunications since January 1980. For the last ten years he has beenI involved in Telecom Licensing and Regulations. He has played a key role in the liberalization of the Telecom Sector in India. Recently, he was on a two-year deputation as the Executive Director of the Information & Communication Technologies Authority, Mauritius, wherein he set up the Authority and facilitated the liberalization of the ICT sector. He has held various positions in DOT and MTNL where he was actively involved in the implementation of IT solutions and New Services.

He has worked as an International Telecommunications Union (ITU) expert in Africa, presented papers and chaired sessions in the ITU / Asia Pacific Telecommunity (APT) seminars/Forums. He was part of a number of Ministerial delegations for bilateral meetings. He has made presentations in Road shows held in a number of countries to attract foreign investment.

Dr. V.R.S Sampath received a Bachelor of Arts degree in History from the Presidency College in 1976, followed by a Bachelor of Law degree from Madras Law College in 1980, a Master of Law degree in 1987 and a PH.D in 1997, all from the University of Madras. He also holds a Master of Arts degree in History from the Madurai Kamaraj University (1985).

Dr. Sampath also holds a Diploma in Tourism and has completed a large number of specialised training programmes and courses, notably in human rights and social work. He was awarded an honorary D.Litt for his contribution to global peace efforts by the World Peace Academy, Chicago, USA in 1994. He has published numerous research papers and traveled widely internationally, including on study tours. He has also published eight books on subjects such as travel, law and society.

Dr. Sampath is currently an empanelled advocate to both Canara Bank and Indian Overseas Bank, and a legal advisor to the Construction Industry Development Board of the Government of Malaysia. He started his career as a junior advocate for the Aiyer and Dalia law firm in 1981 and has since served as a legal advisor to the Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation.

Dr. Sampath has served on various government committees including the advisory committees of the Central Board of Film Certification and the All India Radio, both of the government of India, Chennai. He is the chairman of various non-governmental organisations in Chennai including the Inter-University Cultural Service, the Madras Development Society, the India International Tourism Centre, the Indian Institute for Aids Prevention, the International Centre for Human Rights and the Madras Educational Trust.

Mr. Alin Jayant, Vice President – Planning & Implementation and Head Technology has over seventeen years of experience in the telecommunications industry. He joined the Company from Taral Networks where he was CEO/Founder. Prior to Taral, Alin has worked on Wall Street with Deutsche Bank Alex Brown’s Technology Banking practice, Nortel Networks and Equant/SITA. He holds a Masters in Business Administration from McGill University, an MS from the University of Alabama and is a B.Tech from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.

Mr. Arun Gupta, Vice President and Head (Wholesale Business), joined the Company in 1998. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Gupta worked in finance for 18 years in various capacities at Sikkim Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Ltd., Pradeshiya Industrial & Investment Corporation of UP Ltd., and Risk Capital & Technology Finance Corporation Ltd. (a subsidiary of Industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd.). He also officiated as Managing Director at IFCI Ventures. He held the office of Chief Financial Officer of the Company between February 2002 and June 2003. Mr. Gupta holds a Bachelor of Science degree from University of Delhi, a Master of Business Administration degree with a concentration on finance from A.M. University and a Bachelor of Law degree from the University of Delhi.

Mr. K.P. Tiwari, Vice President (Operations) joined the Overseas Communications Services in 1976 and has been employed by the Company since its establishment. Prior to joining the Overseas Communications Services, Mr. Tiwari worked for the Indian Post and Telegraph Department for 4 years. Mr. K.P. Tiwari holds a Master of Science Degree in Electronics from Kanpur University.

Ms. Madhumati Lele, Head (Customer Service) holds a post graduate degree in banking and finance and hotel management. With over 20 years of work experience in various capacities at the Oberoi Group, the Times of India Group, the Taj Group and BPL Mobile, she has been deputed to the Company as head of customer service from Tata Services Limited.

Mr. Mysore Madhusudhan, Head (Networks) is a Bachelor of Civil Engineering from University of Visweswarayya College of Engg., Bangalore, India. He has also undergone 6 weeks course in CSM-California (Lucent Deputation). He has worked with various companies like NDDB, BPL Mobile and Lucent Technologies before joining the Company in June 2004.

Mr. Rajiv Dhar, Chief Financial Officer is a Chartered Accountant with around 20 yrs of experience of which the last 10 years have been with the Tata Group. Over the years he has worked in the telecommunications, oil and gas, construction and manufacturing industries. He has joined the Company from Tata Industries.

Mr. Sandeep Mathur, Head (EBU) is an Electronics Engineer from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur and a Gold Medalist from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad. He joined Philips India in 1973 and in 1978 he joined Tata Administrative Services from where he was deputed to Nelco as an Area Manager (North). He spent 17 years in Modi Xerox in two stints, with two years in between with the DCM Group. Thereafter he went to TVS Electronics and then to Tata Teleservices (AP Circle). On December 1, 2002 he joined the Tata Indicom Enterprise Business Unit (“TIEBU”) and subsequently when TIEBU was consolidated into the Company on April 1, 2004, he was designated as Head of the Enterprise Business Unit.

Mr. Satish G. Ranade, Vice President (Legal) and Company Secretary, has been with the Company since 1987. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ranade was Deputy Secretary of Maharashtra Elektrosmelt Limited, Mumbai. He is a member of the institute of Company Secretaries of India. Mr. Ranade holds degrees in commerce and law from the University of Mumbai.

Mr. Shashi K .Kalathil, Head (RBU) is an engineer from Delhi College of Engineering and an MBA from the Indian Institute of Management-Bangalore, India. He joined Unilever India in 1983 as a management trainee. During his 12 year career with Unilever, Mr. Kalathil worked in marketing research, sales and distribution and marketing across the Personal Products, Detergents and Foods divisions. In 1995, he moved to the RPG group to set up their cellular telephony project as Head of Marketing, Sales and Customer Services. In November 1998, he joined PepsiCo India as their Brand Director-Colas. In July 2000 he moved to Chennai as Executive Vice President heading up Pepsi’s South India Operations. In December 2002, Mr. Kalathil became Pepsi’s Head of Marketing for South Asia. Mr. Kalathil joined the Tata Group on October 1, 2004 as Chief Operating Officer of the Retail Business Unit of the Company, responsible for the dial up internet and broadband businesses.

Mr. Srinivasa Addepalli is a Post-graduate in management from IIM, Ahmedabad and an Electronics Engineer. He worked with the Tata Strategic Management Group, focusing on the telecom and media industries. He was closely involved with the formulation of the Tata Group’s telecom strategy and business plans, including the acquisition of VSNL and expansion of Tata Teleservices. Later, he joined Tata Industries in the Group Chairman’s Office, responsible for co-ordinating the various telecom activities within the Group. Srinivasa is on deputation to VSNL from Tata Industries.

Mr.Vinod Kumar joined the Company in April 2005, as President of the Company’s International Business Group. He is responsible for expanding the service capabilities and customer facing activities in several strategic markets outside India. His previous experience includes stints in Asia Netcom as Senior Vice-President, President WorldCom Japan and CEO Global One Japan. He has held several senior positions in marketing, sales, product management and strategy in the international telecom industry over the past 18 years. Mr. Kumar holds a Masters in Business Administration from The American University and graduated with honours in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the Birla Institute of Technology and Science in India.

No director or officer of the Company has any family relationship with any other officer or director of the Company.

Other than as described above, there are no arrangements or understandings among any director or any officer and any other person regarding their election to their post with the Company.

The directors, other than the full-time directors and the Government nominee directors, of the Company received a sitting fee not exceeding Rs.5,000 (US$115.20) for attending each Board and Committee meeting. During fiscal 2005, Rs.615,000 (US$14,099) were paid towards sitting fees. The directors are also reimbursed for travel and out-of-pocket expenses in connection with their attendance at Board and Committee meetings. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the aggregate amount of compensation paid by the Company to all directors and principal officers of the Company mentioned herein above was approximately Rs.35.08 million (US$0.80 million), and individual compensation was as follows:

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the aggregate amount set aside or accrued by the Company to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for principal officers and directors directly on the rolls of the Company was approximately Rs.4.11 million (US$0.09 million).

A performance pay scheme is in place that is applicable to all employees and functional directors of the Company. This performance pay is based on both the individual’s performance and the Company’s overall performance during the fiscal year under consideration. The individual’s performance is assessed by his superior and is reviewed by the next level manager, after which the assessed ratings are normalized on a company-wide scale, as appropriate. The performance of the Company is evaluated against the previous year’s performance based on several pre-defined parameters. Differential weightages are given to these two components based on the responsibility level of the employees in the Company with a higher weightage to the Company’s performance for senior level employees and higher weightage to individual performance at junior levels. The performance evaluation process for deputed employees is the same as that for the VSNL employees. Once the final normalized ratings are arrived at for the deputees, these are communicated to their respective parent companies, which are responsible for making the payment.

As of August 15, 2005, the other than one member, none of the other members of the Board of Directors held any shares of the Company. Dr.Mukund Rajan, external director on the Board, held 15 equity shares of the Company. The executive officers of the Company either individually or as a group did not beneficially own more than one percent of the Company’s issued and outstanding equity shares.

The audit committee of the board was first constituted on December 15, 1998. It was subsequently reconstituted several times in accordance with the changing legal and other requirements. The present audit committee consists of three members. The Chairman of the committee is Mr. Subodh Bhargava, an independent director, who previously served as the Chairman and Managing Director of Eicher Motors and has the necessary financial and accounting background.

In September 2005, the other two members, Mr. Vivek Singhal, and Dr. Ashok Jhunjhunwala, resigned from the Company’s Board and ceased to be members of the Audit Committee. The other members of the committee are Mr. P.V. Kalyanasundaram, independent director and Mr. Pankaj Agrawala, government nominee director. Mr.Ishaat Hussain, Director (Finance), Tata Sons Limited, who was a member of the committee, in a meeting of the Board on October 7, 2005, accepted to be an observer at the meetings of the audit committee with no voting powers in the audit committee and accordingly he has ceased to be its member. Mr. Satish Ranade, Company Secretary and VP (Legal) is the audit committee’s Secretary. The broad powers and scope of the committee is as follows:

(iv) to secure attendance of outsiders with relevant expertise, if considered necessary.

(i) oversight of the company’s financial reporting process and the disclosure of its financial information to ensure that the financial statements are correct, sufficient and credible;

(ii) recommending the appointment and removal of external auditors, fixation of audit fee and also approval for payment for any other services, as may be applicable in case of the Company;

(iii) reviewing with management the annual financial statements before submission to the board, focusing primarily on

• compliance with stock exchange and legal requirements concerning financial statements; and

• any related party transactions i.e. transactions of the company of material nature, with promoters or the management, their subsidiaries or relatives etc. that may have potential conflict with the interests of the Company at large.

(iv) reviewing with the management, external and internal auditors, the adequacy of internal control systems;

(v) reviewing the adequacy of internal audit function, including the structure of the internal audit department, staffing and seniority of the official heading the department, reporting structure coverage and frequency of internal audit;

(vi) discussion with internal auditors any significant findings and follow up thereon;

(vii) reviewing the findings of any internal investigations by the internal auditors into matters where there is suspected fraud or irregularity or a failure of internal control systems of a material nature and reporting the matter to the board;

(viii) discussions with external auditors before the audit commences nature and scope of audit as well as have post-audit discussion to ascertain any area of concern;

(x) to look into the reasons for substantial defaults in the payment to the depositors, debenture holders, shareholders (in case of non-payment of declared dividends) and creditors.

In its annual written affirmation to the New York Stock Exchange pursuant to Section 303A of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, the Company stated that since Mr. Ishaat Hussain is the finance director of Tata Sons Limited, which is the owner of approximately 60 percent of the common stock of Panatone, Mr. Hussain may be deemed an affiliated person with respect to VSNL pursuant to Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The Company also stated that while it does not believe that Mr. Ishaat Hussain’s position with TSL affects his ability to be independent with respect to the VSNL Audit Committee, it was currently reviewing ways to address this situation prior to December 31, 2005, including the possibility that Mr. Ishaat Hussain would have only observer status on the Audit Committee, in which case he would be exempt under Rule 10A-3 (b)(1)(iv)(D) of the Exchange Act. The Company also noted in the affirmation that it has a five person Audit Committee, and of the remaining four persons, three persons are independent and one falls within the exemption to the independence requirements contained in Section 10A-3(b)(1)(iv)(E) of the Exchange Act. The Committee now has three members two of whom are independent. In the meeting of the Board held on October 7, 2005, Mr.Ishaat Hussain has accepted to be an observer at the meetings of the audit committee with no voting powers and accordingly has ceased to be its member.

The Company also stated in its NYSE affirmation that while the Company, like other Tata Group companies, is required to follow the Tata Code of Conduct, its audit committee is in the process of drafting and adopting the “whistleblower” procedures referred to in Rule 10A-3(b)(3) of the Exchange Act. The Board of the Company approved the policy in its meeting held on October 7, 2005 and directed the audit committee in its next meeting to finally approve, adopt and implement the same. The Company had also stated in the NYSE affirmation that it is in the process of amending its audit committee charter to provide for the funding requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(5) (c) of the Exchange Act. The Board of the Company, has in the same meeting held on October 7, 2005, approved the changes in the audit committee charter and is now compliant with the requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(5) (c) of the Exchange Act.

The Remuneration Committee consists of three members. The Chairman of the Committee is Mr. Suresh Krishna, an independent director. The other members are Mr. Subodh Bhargava and Mr. Kishor Chaukar. Mr. Kishor Chaukar joined the Remuneration Committee on June 9, 2005. Mr. Ratan Tata ceased to be a member of the Committee with effect from April 11, 2005. Mr. Satish Ranade, Company Secretary and VP (Legal) is the Remuneration Committee’s Convenor. One meeting of the Remuneration Committee was held on June 9, 2005 and decided the remuneration of the whole time director for the fiscal 2006 and commission for the fiscal 2005.

As of March 31, 2005, the Company had 2,479 employees on its rolls. Of these 1,786 were executive employees (technical employees and other employees with the rank of officer or higher, including fulltime directors of the Company) and 693 were non-executive employees. As of March 31, 2004, and March 31, 2003, the Company had 2,130 employees and 2,752 employees, respectively. Upon its establishment in 1986, the Company assumed responsibility for all the 3,148 employees of the Overseas Communications Service (690 executives and 2,458 non-executives). Since then, the Company has gradually rationalized its work force, both reducing the total number of employees and increasing the proportion of employees who are engineers or otherwise highly skilled. The Company seeks to improve employee productivity through continuing education and training and by emphasizing the importance of quality of service and customer satisfaction. There were also about 84 employees deputed from the Tata Group companies.

All non-executive employees of the Company are members of local unions organized at each Company site, which are affiliated as the Federation of the Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited Employees Unions (the “Federation”). The Federation is a Company-wide union and is not affiliated with any larger industry-wide or national union. Officers of the Company meet with the Federation regularly to discuss and resolve issues or concerns of the employees. Employee concerns are resolved through regular meetings/ discussions with the Federation.

During the current fiscal year, the Company continued its focus on its internal communication and training activities. The Company has also introduced a new performance management system for all its employees. During the year, the Company focused on integrating different business units that folded into the Company through communication and confluence programs.

We are incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and our equity shares are listed on the major stock exchanges in India. Our corporate governance framework is in compliance with the Indian Companies Act, 1956, the regulations and guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Board of India and the requirements of the listing agreements entered into with the Indian stock exchanges. We also have American Depositary Shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

On November 4, 2003, the SEC approved new rules proposed by the NYSE intended to strengthen corporate governance standards for listed companies. These new corporate governance listing standards supplement the corporate governance reforms already adopted by the SEC pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards requires listed companies that are foreign private issuers to disclose the significant ways in which their corporate governance practices differ from those followed by U.S. companies under the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards. The table below sets forth the differences between the rules applicable to U.S. companies under the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards and the Company’s practice under Indian law. This table is also publicly available on the Company’s website, www.vsnl.in (specific URL: http://www.vsnl.in/aboutvsnl/corp-governance.php ), along with other information about the Company’s corporate governance practices.

Section 303.A.12 (c) of the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards states that each listed company must submit an executed Written Affirmation annually to the NYSE. The Company submitted its initial Foreign Private Issuer Section 303A Annual Written Affirmation in August 2005.

As of September 30, 2005, approximately 44.71 percent of the outstanding equity of the Company was held by Panatone Finvest Limited in conjunction with other companies of the Tata Group, and approximately 26.12 percent was held by the Government.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s equity shares as of September 30, 2005, including the beneficial ownership of shares of each person or group known by the Company to own beneficially 5 percent or more of the outstanding shares, as reported by such persons.

The Company’s ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Each ADS represents two Equity Shares. As of September 30, 2005, approximately 15,930,584 Equity Shares (5.59 percent of the total Equity Shares outstanding as of such date) were held by the custodian, ICICI Limited (the “Custodian”), for The Bank of New York, as depositary for the Company’s ADSs. The Company is unable to estimate the percentage of ADSs or Equity Shares held in the United States or the number of record holders in the United States.

Under the SHA, excepting matters listed specifically in the SHA or such matters that require a special resolution under the provisions of the Companies Act, the Government of India or any other entity nominated by it is required to, at all shareholders’ meetings of the Company, exercise the voting rights attached to the equity shares of the Company held by the Government in the manner directed in writing by Panatone Finvest Limited.

The Company’s principal related parties consist of its principal shareholders, government departments, government owned or controlled companies and affiliates of the Company. The Company routinely enters into transactions with its related parties, such as providing telecommunication services, paying license fees and subletting premises.

Other related party transactions and balances are immaterial individually and in the aggregate.

The Company grants loans to employees for acquiring assets such as computers and vehicles and for purchase of equity shares of the Company. The annual rate of interest at which the loans have been made to employees is 4 percent. The loans are secured by the assets acquired by the employees. As of March 31, 2004 and 2005, amounts receivable from employees aggregated to Rs.144 million and Rs.114 million, respectively, and are included in other current assets. Interest free short-term advances made to employees aggregated Rs.4 million and Rs.3 million as of March 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

The Company also grants an interest subsidy in excess of 4 percent of the interest rate for loans taken by the employees for the purchase of property. The cost of the interest subsidy of Rs.20 million, Rs.23 million and Rs.29 million for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively, is included in staff costs.

Loans to executive officers include an advance to Mr. Satish Ranade of Rs.207,264 towards the purchase of shares of the Company in connection with an offer made by the Government of India to eligible Company employees as part of the disinvestment of its holding in the Company and a loan of Rs.37,000 towards the purchase of a vehicle. The loans were made in February 2002 and August 2001, respectively. On August 31, 2005, the latest practicable date, the amounts outstanding were Rs.120,234 and Rs.17,262, respectively. The interest rates on the loans is 4 percent. Loans to executive officers include an advance to Mr. K.P. Tiwari of Rs.202,392 towards the purchase of shares of the Company as above. The loan was made in February 2002. On August 31, 2005, the latest practicable date, the amount outstanding was Rs.111,956. The interest rate on the loan is 4 percent.

We have elected to provide financial statements of the Company pursuant to Item 18 of this Form 20-F and the following are incorporated herein by reference:

We have also provided financial statements of TTSL as of and for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, as further discussed below under “Item — 18 — Financial Statements”.

There have not been any significant changes in the Company’s financial condition, other than those stated in the consolidated financial statements attached to this annual report and as otherwise described in this annual report, since the date of the attached annual consolidated financial statements.

The Company has been claiming the license fees paid by it to the Department of Telecommunications as a deductible expenditure. The Income Tax Department has disputed this claim of the Company from fiscal 1994 to fiscal 1998. The year-wise status of this issue is as follows:

Fiscal 1994: The Company’s claim had been disallowed. The Company has recently received a favorable ruling from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

Fiscal 1995: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had passed an order in favor of the Company. The Income Tax Department has gone on appeal over this decision to the Mumbai High Court. The Central Board of Direct Taxes has asked the Income Tax Department to withdraw the case when it comes for hearing before the High Court.

Fiscal 1996,1997 and 1998: The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has allowed this expenditure in favor of the Company.

We have not been advised by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal of any appeal that may have been filed by the Income Tax Department. If the decisions in the Company’s favor were to be appealed and all the disputed claims are decided against the Company, the aggregate negative impact on the Company would be approximately Rs.12,543 million (US$ 287.55 million).

The Indian tax authorities have taken the position that the Company is not entitled to certain tax benefits claimed by it in the fiscal years 1996 to 2002 with respect to a portion of its profits which the Company claims as having been generated by an enterprise engaged in telecommunications and therefore entitled to a tax holiday under certain regulations. The tax authorities have not accepted this claim of the Company and have disallowed it in their assessments. The year-wise tax imposed by the Income Tax Department (including interest but excluding penalties and measured as of March 31, 2005) is as follows:

The Company has paid all the above amounts under protest but has not recognized the entire expense in its profit statements. The Company has disputed these claims for all the years. The Company’s claim has been dismissed by the first appellate authorities in respect of fiscal 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000 and 2001, while claims in respect of fiscal 1999 and 2002 are still pending before the appellate authority. The Company is now in appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect these years.

If all the disputed claims are dismissed against the Company, the aggregate negative impact on the Company will be approximately Rs.6,890 million including interest but excluding penalties and measured as of March 31, 2005.

The Indian tax authorities have taken the position that the Company has not offered for taxation certain reimbursements it had received from the Government during fiscal 1994. The tax authorities claim that the Company owes approximately Rs.2,853 million in respect of taxes due (including interest but excluding penalties measured as on March 31, 2004) in connection with such reimbursements. The Company has paid the entire amount under protest with respect to this claim. The Company’s appeal has been dismissed by the first appellate authority. The Company is now in appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. If the appeal is decided against the Company, the aggregate negative impact would be by this amount. The Company has not provided for this amount in its books.

For fiscal 2000 and 2001 the tax authorities have disallowed the Company’s write off in its books of accounts of its investment in the equity shares of ICO Global Communications Inc., which filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States in 2000. The write-offs amounted to Rs.5,128 million and Rs.52 million, respectively. The tax and interest demanded in this regard amounts to Rs.2,000 million and Rs.21 million respectively which has already been paid under protest. The Company has also provided for in its books Rs.1,974 million and 20 million, respectively. The Company’s appeal has been dismissed by the first appellate authority. The Company is now in appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. If the appeal is decided against the Company, the aggregate negative impact would be approximately Rs.27 million.

The aggregate negative impact stated in each of the above cases, which considers certain eventualities such as the impact of unfavorable decisions and appeals, is higher than the amounts stated as contingent liabilities in the Company’s financial statements, which are based on tax demands raised by the Indian Income tax authorities and disputed by the Company.

Polargrid LLC,one of the initial bidders for TGN, brought suit against the Company in December, 2004 in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York in connection with an alleged breach of contract between the parties. Polargrid’s complaint seeks in excess of $1.5 billion in damages arising from the Company’s alleged breach. The Company filed its answer to the complaint denying all liability and asserting its belief that the case is without merit. The Company and Polargrid have sought, and continue to seek, discovery from one another in this action in accordance with a discovery schedule agreed upon by the parties.

In addition, the Company is involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, which arise in the normal course of its business. There are no such matters pending that the Company expects to be material to its business.

Although the amount varies, it is customary for public companies in India to pay cash dividends. Under Indian law, a corporation pays dividends upon a recommendation by the Board of Directors and approval by a majority of the shareholders attending the annual general meeting of shareholders, who have the right to decrease but not increase the amount of the dividend recommended by the Board of Directors. In addition, the Board of Directors is empowered to approve interim dividends. Under the Indian Companies Act, dividends may be paid out of profits of a company in the year in which the dividend is declared or out of the undistributed profits of previous fiscal years. Owners of ADRs are entitled to receive dividends payable in respect of the Equity Shares represented by their ADSs. The Equity Shares represented by ADSs rank pari passu with existing Equity Shares of the Company in respect of dividends. Cash dividends in respect of the Equity Shares represented by the ADSs will be paid to the Company’s depositary for the ADSs, The Bank of New York (the “Depositary”) in Rupees and except as otherwise described in the Deposit Agreement will be converted by the Depositary into US Dollars and distributed, net of Depositary fees and expenses, to the holders of such ADRs.

With respect to Equity Shares issued by the Company during a particular fiscal year, dividends declared and paid for such fiscal year generally would be prorated from the date of issuance to the end of such fiscal year. Holders of ADRs would only receive dividends prorated from the date of issuance of the underlying Equity Shares to the end of the fiscal year for which such dividends are declared and paid.

The following table sets forth the annual dividends paid per Equity Share for each of the fiscal years indicated.

Although the Company has no current intention to discontinue dividend payments, there can be no assurance that any future dividends will be declared or paid or that the amount thereof will not be decreased.

The Company’s shares are currently listed on stock exchanges at Kolkata, Mumbai and the National Stock Exchange in India. The ordinary shares of the Company have been delisted from the stock exchanges of New Delhi, Kolkata and Chennai.

The Company’s American Depositary Shares (ADSs) represented by American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and on October 14, 2004, the last reported sale price was US$ 14.12 per ADS on the New York Stock Exchange. Each ADS represents two Shares. The ADSs were issued by The Bank of New York (the “Depositary”), pursuant to a Deposit Agreement.

The number of outstanding Shares of the Company as of March 31, 2005 was 285,000,000. As of March 31, 2005, there were 67,150 record holders of the Shares listed and traded on the Indian Stock Exchanges. As of September 30, 2005, there were approximately 7,965,292 of the Company’s ADRs (equivalent to 15,930,584 Shares).

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices on the New York Stock Exchange for the ADSs since August 15, 2000, the original date of listing of the ADSs.

On October 14, 2005, the closing price of the Company’s ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange was US$ 14.12.

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low share prices on the BSE and the National Stock Exchange.

The ordinary shares of the Company have been delisted from the Stock Exchanges of New Delhi and Chennai. The Company’s application for delisting is pending with the Kolkata Stock Exchange. The Company is not aware of trading having taken place at the stock exchanges in Kolkata. The shares of the Company are compulsorily traded in dematerialised form in the Mumbai Stock Exchange, the National Stock Exchange and the Kolkata Stock Exchange.

Under India’s Takeover Code, upon the acquisition of more than 5 percent, 10 percent and 14 percent of the shares (taken together with shares, if any, held by it) of a public Indian company, a purchaser is required at each stage to disclose the aggregate of its holding to the Company and all the stock exchanges on which the shares of that company are listed. Furthermore, any purchaser who has acquired such number of shares shall be mandated to disclose any purchase or sale aggregating 2 percent or more of the share capital of the Indian public company along with the aggregate shareholding on such purchase or sale to that public company and stock exchanges where shares of that public company are listed within two days of such purchase or sale. Upon the acquisition of 15 percent or more of such shares or a change in control of the Company, the purchaser is required to make an open offer to the other shareholders offering to purchase at least 20 percent of all the outstanding shares of the Company at a minimum offer price as determined pursuant to the rules of the Takeover Code. Upon conversion of ADSs into Equity Shares, an ADS holder will be subject to the Takeover Code. Open market purchases of securities of Indian companies in India by Foreign Direct Investors or investments by Non-Resident Indians, Overseas Corporate Bodies and Foreign Institutional Investors above the ownership levels set forth above require approval of the Government of India on a case-by-case basis.

Set forth below is information relating to the share capital of the Company, including certain provisions of its Articles and the Companies Act, 1956 (the “Companies Act”). The Company is registered under the Companies Act with the Registrar of Companies, Mumbai, India with Company No. 39266. The following description of the Company’s Articles of Association and Memorandum of Association does not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the Company’s Articles of Association and Memorandum of Association that were filed on September 29, 2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits to the annual report for fiscal 2004.

The Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company were drafted and adopted by the Company in the year 1986 when the Company was formed as a wholly owned Government company, and were designed to provide necessary authority to The President of India (the then majority shareholder) in terms of appointment of Directors, powers of the Board and other operational aspects subject to applicable statutory provisions. The Memorandum and Articles of Association were amended several times since 1986 to suit the changing business activities and structure of the Company as it changed from a wholly owned Government Company due to disinvestments from time to time. Since the Objects Clause contained in the Memorandum of Association and the Articles of Association were framed in year 1986 and were largely based on the activities of the erstwhile Overseas Communications Service at the time of its conversion into a company, as a result of privatization it needed to be suitably amended. Over the years from 1986 to 2002, the shareholding of Government of India was reduced to 52.97 percent, and the Company continued to be a Government Company, and accordingly the restrictive provisions appropriate to a Government Company in the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company were implemented.

The Companies Act is the governing legislation of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company and where any specific requirement is silent, the regulations as defined in the Companies Act shall be construed to be applicable.

On 13 February, 2002, a 25 percent stake of the Company was transferred to Panatone Finvest Limited by the Government pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”). A further transfer of 1.85 percent stake to the employees through Employee Stock Purchase Scheme reduced the stake held by Government of India in Company to 26.12 percent.

The shareholders, by way of postal ballot approved the amendment to the Memorandum of Association of the Company and by way of a special resolution at their meetings held on August 20, 2002 and April 2, 2004 approved the amendments to the Articles of Association of the company. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Officers of the Company.”

• Managing, controlling and maintaining the operations of the Overseas Communications Service of the Department of Telecommunication, Ministry of Communications, Government of India, with all its assets and liabilities including contractual rights and obligations on such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the Government of India from time to time.

• Planning, establishing, developing, providing, operating and maintaining all types of international telecommunication networks, systems and services including, Telephone, Telex, Message Relay, Data transmission, Facsimile, Television, Telematics, value Added Network Services, New Business Services, Audio and Video Services, Maritime and Aeronautical Communication Services and other international telecommunications services as are in use elsewhere or to be developed in future.

• Planning, establishing, developing, providing, operating and maintaining telecommunications systems and networks within India as are found necessary for international telecommunications.

• Designing, developing, installing, maintaining and operating long distance domestic and international basic and value added telecommunications, global mobile telecommunications, electronic mail services, globally managed data networks, data telecom networks, video conferencing, international gateway networks and satellite networks in and outside India.

• Raising necessary financial resources for its development needs for telecommunication services or facilities.

The Company’s authorized share capital is Rs.3,000,000,000, divided into 300,000,000 Shares with a face value of Rs.10 each. At the date hereof, 285,000,000 Shares were issued and fully paid. SEBI has allowed Indian companies to split the par value of their Equity Shares into denominations lower than Rs.10 per share.

The Shares are in registered form. The Shares are the only class of share capital of the Company currently in existence. There are no convertible debentures or warrants of the Company currently in existence.

Pursuant to Article 5.1 of the Shareholders’ Agreement, the board of directors of VSNL has been reconstituted and shall consist of up to twelve directors. So long as the Government holds 10% of the voting equity share capital of the Company, the composition of its Board shall be: Four of the directors shall be permanent and non-retiring directors, of which the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited are entitled to nominate two each. Four of the directors shall be retiring and independent directors, of which the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited are entitled to recommend two each. Four of the directors shall be retiring and non-independent directors, of which the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited are entitled to nominate two each, unless Panatone Finvest Limited owns (a) more than 25.0 percent but less than 30.0 percent of the Shares, in which case Panatone Finvest Limited will be entitled to nominate three of the four directors and the Government will be entitled to nominate one of the four directors, or (b) more than 30.0 percent of the Shares, in which case Panatone Finvest Limited will be entitled to nominate all four directors. In addition, Panatone Finvest Limited has the right to designate one of the directors nominated by it as the managing director of the Company so long as it owns at least 25.0 percent of the Shares.

The remaining directors of the Company are liable to retire by rotation, and one-third of such directors are elected by the shareholders each year at the Company’s Annual General Meeting. The directors to retire in every year shall be those who have been longest in office since their last election, but as between persons who became directors on the same day shall be determined by lot unless they otherwise agree between themselves. The retiring directors shall be eligible for re-election.

Compensation. The fulltime directors are entitled to receive compensation for their service to the Company. The external directors are entitled to receive a sitting fee for each meeting of the Board or a committee thereof that they attend. The fee for attending any meeting may be determined by the Board from time to time but must be within the maximum limit prescribed under the Companies Act. Subject to any provisions of the Companies Act, directors may be entitled to additional remuneration, if the director is called upon to perform an extraordinary service in behalf of the Company. In addition, directors may be reimbursed for reasonable traveling and other related expenses in connection with attending any meetings of the Board or a committee thereof. According to the Companies Act, an interested director shall not participate in any discussions on such matters and his presence shall not be counted for the purpose of forming a quorum for such matters. In absence of quorum such matters shall be decided by the shareholders at a general meeting.

Borrowing Powers. Subject to the provisions of the Company Act, the Board may pass a resolution at a meeting of the Board from time to time to borrow and/or secure the payment of any sum or sums of money for the purposes of the Company. The Board has the power, in its discretion, to determine the terms and conditions of such borrowing, including issuing bonds, debentures or any mortgage, charge or other security on the undertaking of any property of the Company.

Qualification; Retirement. A director need not hold any of the Company’s Shares to qualify as a director. There is no age limit requirement for a director’s retirement. However with respect to a wholetime director who has attained the age of 70 years, his appointment/ continuation has to be approved either by the shareholders by a special resolution, or by the Central Government.

Voting on Proposals. The Companies Act specifies that a director’s power to vote on a proposal, arrangement, or contract in which the director is materially interested should be through a disclosure to the Board by the concerned director of the nature of his concern or interest. Such disclosure can be made as a general notice to the Board and this notice of disclosure shall expire at the end of the financial year in which it is given.

Voting Rights attached to a Class of Shares. There are no voting rights to decide on the eligibility of a retiring director to offer himself for re election at staggered intervals. There is no concept of cumulative voting. The Companies Act provides for two third of the total strength on the Board to be appointed as directors to retire by rotation. Out of these retiring directors, one third shall retire every year at the Annual General Meeting. Such retiring Directors being eligible can offer themselves for re-election.

Rights to shares in company’s profits. There are no provisions entitling a shareholder or directors for rights to share in the Company’s profits. The shareholders are entitled to dividend (cash and/or stock) if recommended by the Board and approved by the shareholders.

Sinking Fund & OtherProvisions. Subject to Section 205 of the Companies Act, the Board may, before recommending any dividend, set apart out of the profits of the Company such sums as they think proper as a reserve fund to meet contingencies or for equalising dividends, or for special dividends, or for repairing, improving and maintaining any of the property of the Company, and for amortisation of capital and for such other purposes as the Board of Directors shall, in their absolute discretion, think conducive to the interest of the Company, and may invest the several sums so set aside upon such investments, (other than shares of the company) as they may think fit from time to time to deal with and vary such investments and dispose of all or any part thereof for the benefit of the Company, and may divide the reserve funds into such special funds, as they think fit and employ the reserve funds or any part thereof in the business of the company and that without being bound to keep the same separate from the other assets.

Changing Rights of shareholders. New shares shall be issued upon such terms and conditions and with such rights and privileges annexed thereto as the general meeting resolving upon the creation thereof shall direct and if no direction be given as the Board of the Company shall determine. Section 86 of the Companies Act provides for issue of new shares with differential rights and privileges to voting, dividend or otherwise as the shareholders may decide at a general meeting. Therefore the Memorandum of Association of the Company needs to be amended accordingly for changing the composition of the share capital after which such class of shares can be issued. The Articles provide for variation of the rights attached to each class of shares with the consent of three fourth majority of a general meeting as provided in the Companies Act ( Section 106).

Preventing Change of Control. The Company’s articles gives a right to the Board, subject to the Companies Act provisions, to refuse a transfer and give a notice of refusal of such transfer within one month of such refusal. However in the current scenario where the shares are in dematerialized form, any change in ownership of the shares may not require the approval of the Board.

There are no provision discriminating against any existing or prospective holder of such securities as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of shares in the Articles or Memorandum of Association. However, such provisions are discussed later under “Takeover Code”.

The Company’s shareholders, acting at the Annual General Meeting, may declare a dividend upon the recommendation of the Board of Directors. The amount of the dividend so declared may not exceed the amount recommended by the Board although a lesser amount may be declared. Dividends are distributed and paid within 30 days of the approval by the shareholders. The Company’s Board also is authorized under the Articles to declare and pay interim dividends to shareholders. In India, the dividends are generally declared as a percentage of the par value of the Company’s equity shares. It is customary in India to pay to the holders of shares issued in any fiscal year a pro rata portion of the annual dividend from the date of issuance to the end of the fiscal year, unless otherwise stated.

Under the Indian Companies Act, dividends are payable only in cash to registered shareholders, the shareholder’s order or the shareholder’s banker’s order on a record date fixed prior to the relevant Annual General Meeting. The Indian Companies Act provides that any dividends that remain unpaid or unclaimed after the 30-day period are to be transferred to a special bank account opened by the company at an approved bank. We transfer any dividends that remain unclaimed for seven years from the date of the transfer to an Investor Education and Protection fund established by the Government of India. After the transfer to this fund, such unclaimed dividends may not be claimed.

Dividends may be paid only out of profits of the Company for the relevant year, after transfer to the reserves of the Company of a percentage of its profits for that year of not less then 2.5 percent if the dividend is in excess of 10 percent of the par value of its equity shares. The Companies Act further provides that, in the event of inadequacy or absence of profits in any year, a dividend may be declared for such year out of the Company’s accumulated profits, subject to certain limitations.

At any general meeting, voting is by show of hands (where each shareholder has one vote) unless a poll is demanded by at least ten percent of those entitled to vote on the resolution or those holding Shares with a paid-up value of at least Rs.50,000. Upon a poll, every shareholder entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy has one vote for every Share held by the shareholder. The Chairman has a deciding vote in the case of any tie.

Any shareholder of the Company may appoint a proxy. The instrument appointing a proxy must be lodged with the Company at least 48 hours before the time of the meeting. A corporate shareholder may appoint an authorized representative who may vote in all respects as if a shareholder, both on a show of hands and upon a poll.

Ordinary resolutions may be passed by simple majority of those present and voting at any General Meeting for which the required period of notice has been given. However, certain resolutions, such as alteration or amendment of the Articles and the Memorandum of Association, commencement of a new line of business, issuance of further Shares without preemptive rights and reduction of share capital, require that the votes cast in favor of the resolution (whether by show of hands or upon a poll) be not less than three times the number of votes, if any, cast against the resolution.

In addition to permitting dividends to be paid out of current or retained earnings, the Companies Act permits a company to distribute an amount transferred from the general reserve or other permitted reserves, including surplus in the company’s profit and loss account in the form of bonus Shares to shareholders (similar to a stock dividend). The Companies Act also permits the issuance of bonus shares from a share premium account. Bonus shares are distributed to shareholders in the proportion recommended by the Board of Directors. Shareholders of record on a fixed record date are entitled to receive such bonus shares.

The Company may by ordinary resolution increase its share capital by the issue of new Shares or create a new class of shares. In addition, the rights attached to the shares of any class may be varied with the consent of shareholders holding not less than three-fourths of the issued shares of that class. The Companies Act gives shareholders the right to subscribe for new Shares in proportion to their existing shareholdings unless otherwise determined by special resolution to that effect adopted at an Annual General Meeting of shareholders. Under the Companies Act, in the event of an issuance of securities, subject to the limitations the Company must first offer such Shares to existing shareholders by notice specifying (1) the number of Shares offered and the date within which the offer must be accepted, which may not be less than 15 days from the date of offer and (2) the right, exercisable by the shareholder, to renounce the shares offered in favor of any other person. The Board is entitled to distribute the Shares in respect of which preemptive rights have not been exercised in the manner that it deems most beneficial to the Company in accordance with the Articles.

The Company is required to convene an Annual General Meeting of its shareholders within six months after the end of each fiscal year or within 15 months of the previous Annual General Meeting and may convene an Extraordinary General Meeting of shareholders when necessary or at the request of a shareholder or shareholders holding not less than ten percent of the paid-up capital of the Company on the date of the request. The Annual General Meeting of the shareholders is generally convened by the Company Secretary in accordance with a resolution of the Board. Written notice setting out the agenda of the meeting must be given at least 21 days (excluding the day of service) prior to the date of the General Meeting to the shareholders whose names are on the register at the record date. Those shareholders who are registered as shareholders on the date of the General Meeting are entitled to attend or vote at such meeting.

The Annual General Meeting of shareholders must be held at the registered office of the Company or at such other place within the city in which the registered office is located; meetings other than the Annual General Meeting may be held at any other place if so determined by the Board.

The Articles provide that a quorum for a General Meeting is the presence of at least five shareholders, including a representative of the President of India and Panatone Finvest Limited.

Article 47 provides that the Board may, whenever they think fit and shall, on the requisition of the holders of not less than one tenth of the paid up-capital of the Company upon which all calls or other sums then due have been paid, as at the date carry the right of voting in regard to that matter forthwith proceed to convene an extraordinary meeting of the Company, and in the case of such requisition, the following provisions shall have effect:

If, after a requisition has been received, it is not possible for a sufficient number of Directors to meet in time so as to form a quorum, any Director may convene an extraordinary general meeting in the same manner as early as possible as that in which meetings may be convened by the Board.

The Company’s share transfer agent maintains a register of shareholders of the Company. For the purpose of determining Shares entitled to annual dividends the register is closed for a specified period prior to the Annual General Meeting. The date on which this period begins is the record date. To determine which shareholders are entitled to specified shareholder rights, the Company may close the register of shareholders. The Companies Act and the Company’s listing agreement with the BSE (and the other Indian Stock Exchanges) permit the Company, pursuant to a resolution of the Board and upon at least 30 days’ advance notice to the BSE (and such stock exchanges), to set the record date and upon seven days’ public notice to close the register of shareholders for not more than 30 days at a time, and not more than 45 days in a year, in order for the Company to determine which shareholders are entitled to certain rights pertaining to the Shares. Trading of Shares may, however, continue while the register of shareholders is closed.

Following introduction of the Depositories Act, 1996, and the repeal of Section 22A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, which enabled companies to refuse to register transfers of shares in certain circumstances, the shares of a company are freely transferable, subject only to the provisions of Section 111A of the Companies Act. Pursuant to Section 111A, if the transfer of shares is in contravention of any of the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, or the regulations issued thereunder or the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, or any other Indian laws, the Company Law Board (a statutory body which administers various laws affecting companies in India) may, on application made by an investor, SEBI or certain other parties, direct the rectification of the register of records. The Company Law Board may, in its discretion, issue an interim order suspending the voting rights attached to the relevant shares, before making or completing its inquiry into the alleged contravention. Pending such inquiry, the rights of a holder to transfer the shares would not be restricted, although the voting rights attached to the shares may remain suspended if the Company Law Board so orders.

Transfer of Shares of the Company is effected by an instrument of transfer in the form prescribed by the Indian Companies Act and the rules thereunder, together with delivery of the share certificates. The transfer agent of the Company is M/s. Sharepro Services, located in Mumbai, India.

The above procedure is not applicable where the Shares are dematerialized and transferred electronically. To encourage “dematerialization” of securities in India, SEBI has required certain types of securities of certain Indian companies to be traded and settled in book-entry form. The Shares of the Company have been designated as one of such securities. To effect transfer of Shares in book-entry form, the seller and purchaser must establish accounts with a depositary participant appointed by the National Securities Depositary Limited or Central Securities Depositary Limited, a depositary established pursuant to the Depositories Act, 1996. Charges for opening an account with a Securities Depositary Limited participant, transaction charges for each trade and custodian charges for securities held in each account vary depending upon the business practice of each Securities Depositary Limited participant. Upon delivery, the Shares purchased will be registered in the name of the Securities Depositary Limited participant and held by such Securities Depositary Limited participant for the account of the purchaser. So long as the Shares are traded through the book-entry system of Securities Depositary Limited, ownership of beneficial interest in the Shares will be shown on, and transfer of such ownership will be effected only through, records maintained by Securities Depositary Limited participants.

The requirement for dematerialization of the Shares may apply to the ADR holders when the underlying Shares are withdrawn from the depositary facility upon surrender of the ADRs. In order to trade the underlying Shares in the Indian market, the withdrawing ADR holder will be required to hold such Shares in book-entry form and to comply with the Securities Depositary Limited procedures described above. If dematerialization of any underlying Shares is requested by an ADR holder, the cost incurred by the Depositary therefor will be borne by the withdrawing ADR holder. Transfer of Shares in book-entry form is not subject to any Indian transfer tax. See “Taxation—Indian Taxation.”

Section 187C of the Companies Act requires beneficial owners of shares of Indian companies who are not holders of record to declare to the company details of the beneficial owner. While it is unclear under Indian law whether Section 187C applies to holders of ADRs of a company, investors who exchange ADRs for shares are subject to Section 187C. Failure to comply with Section 187C would not affect the obligation of a company to register a transfer of shares or to pay any dividends to the registered holder of any shares in respect of which such declaration has not been made, but any person who fails to make the required declaration within 30 days may be liable for a fine of up to Rs.l,000 for each day such failure continues. Furthermore, any charge, promissory note or any other collateral agreement created, executed or entered into by the registered owner of any share in respect of which a declaration required under Section 187C has not been made is not enforceable by the beneficial owner or any person claiming through him.

At least 21 days before the Annual General Meeting of shareholders, the Company must circulate a detailed version of the Company’s audited balance sheet and profit and loss account and the reports of the Board of Directors and the auditors thereon. The Company also is required under the Companies Act to make available upon request of any shareholder a complete balance sheet and profit and loss account of the Company in the case of circulation of abridged accounts.

Under the Companies Act, the Company must file with the Registrar of Companies the balance sheet and annual profit and loss account presented to the shareholders within 30 days of the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting and an annual return within 60 days of the conclusion of the meeting.

Rights of the Government of India Under the Shareholders’ Agreement (“SHA”) to be Exercised Through its Nominee Directors on the Board

(a) The property, business and affairs of the Company shall be managed exclusively by and be under the direction of the Board. The Board may exercise all such powers of the Company and have such authority and do all such lawful acts and things as are permitted by applicable Law and the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association. Subject to (b) below, all decisions, actions and resolutions of the Board shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the members of Board.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of SHA or otherwise permitted or provided under the Act, no obligation of the Company or any of its subsidiaries shall be entered into, no decision shall be made and no action shall be taken by or with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries in relation to the following matters unless such obligation, decision or action as the case may be, is approved if, at any meeting of the Company’s shareholders, duly called for the purpose of considering such obligation, decision or action, by an affirmative vote of the one authorized representative of both the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited, and if at the meeting of the Board by an affirmative vote of, at least one nominee director of each of the Government and Panatone Finvest Limited:

(ii) The granting of any security or the creation of any Encumbrance on the assets of the Company or the incurrence of any indebtedness or guaranteeing the debts of any Person which in the aggregate at any time exceeds the net worth of the Company;

(iii) The taking of any steps to wind-up or terminate the corporate existence of the Company or any of its Affiliates or entering into any arrangement with the creditors of the Company in relation to all or substantial part of the assets of the Company;

(iv) Any one or a series of transactions which causes a sale, lease, exchange or disposition of land and building of the Company or its subsidiary which are acquired by the Company at any time prior to the Closing (as defined in the SHA);

(v) Subject to (xv) hereunder, any sale, lease, exchange or disposition of any property, assets or equipments (other than land and building) of the Company or its subsidiary which are acquired by the Company at any time prior to the Closing;

(vi) The making, directly or indirectly, of loans or advances in excess of Rs.500 million to any Person other than in the ordinary course of business of the Company;

(vii) The entering into of an amalgamation, merger or consolidation with any other company or body corporate;

(viii) Any change in the number of directors of the Company from that provided in this Agreement;

(ix) Any agreement with or commitment to any Shareholder or its Principal(s) or their respective Affiliates, except where, and to the extent, (a) such agreement or commitment between the Company or any of its Affiliates on the one hand and the Government or any Government Authority on the other is required under applicable Law or (b) such agreement is on an arms’ length basis and in good faith;

(xi) Transfer of any rights or interest in Affiliates of the Company including, without limitation, Transfer of Relevant Interests in securities of such Affiliates held by the Company;

(xii) Any agreement, license or permission in respect of the use of the name and/or logo of the Company (except where such agreement, license or permission is for the purpose of, or in connection with, advertising or promotional activities only by the Company);

(xiii) the delegation by the Board to any Person of the Board’s authority to approve or authorize any matter described in this article (b);

(xiv) change directly or indirectly in the use of land and building of the Company other than for the purposes of the main objects of the Company as defined in the Memorandum of Association of the Company;

(xv) Any one or a series of transactions, which causes a sale, lease, exchange or disposition of obsolete equipments or equipments not in use, of the Company or its subsidiary having an aggregate value exceeding 25 percent of the total value of the net fixed assets of the Company as specified in the Audited Financial Statement; or

(c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the SHA in the event any of the aforesaid items of business mentioned in (b) above is not approved by the Board or Shareholders at a meeting or otherwise then such non-approved items shall not be implemented by the Company and the Strategic Partner and the Government (Parties to SHA) shall not directly or indirectly take any steps to cause the Company to implement such items of business. The non-approval of the aforesaid items of business at a meeting or otherwise of the Board or the Shareholders shall not be considered as subject matter of dispute, difference, disagreement or the like between the Government and the Strategic Partner and the non approval of such item of business will not be referred to Arbitration under SHA.

Under the Companies Act, approval of at least 75 percent of a company’s shareholders voting on the matter and approval of the High Court or National Company Law Tribunal of the state in which the registered office of the company is situated is required to reduce a company’s share capital. A company may, under some circumstances, acquire its own equity shares without seeking the approval of the High Court or National Company Law Tribunal. However, a company would have to extinguish the shares it has so acquired within the prescribed time period. A company is not permitted to acquire its own shares for treasury operations.

An acquisition by a company of its own shares that does not rely on an approval of the High Court/National Company Law Tribunal must comply with prescribed rules, regulations and conditions of the Companies Act. In addition, public companies which are listed on a recognized stock exchange in India must comply with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Buy-back of Securities) Regulations, 1998, or Buy-back Regulations.

ADR holders will not be eligible to participate in a buyback in case of tender offers, odd lots and open market purchases unless they surrender their ADSs and receive delivery of the underlying Shares. ADR holders should note that Shares withdrawn from the depositary facility may not be redeposited into such depositary facility.

There can be no assurance that the underlying Shares offered by the ADR holders in any buyback of Shares by the Company will be accepted by the Company. The regulations relating to the buyback of securities have only been introduced recently and there is very limited experience in the interpretation of such regulations. ADR Holders are advised to consult their Indian legal advisers prior to participating in any buyback by the Company, including in relation to any tax issues relating to such buyback.

Foreign Institutional Investors should note that in the event of a buyback by the Company, the prescribed threshold limit for shareholdings by Foreign Institutional Investors may be exceeded by default regardless of any participation or non-participation by them in the buyback. The treatment of the Foreign Institutional Investors threshold limits in the buyback context is uncertain, and Foreign Institutional Investors are advised to consult their Indian legal advisers in this regard.

Subject to the rights of creditors, employees and of the holders of any other shares entitled by their terms to preferential repayment over the Shares, if any, in the event of winding up of the Company, the holders of the Shares are entitled to be repaid the amounts of capital paid up or credited as paid up on such Shares. All surplus assets after payments due to the holders of any preference shares belong to the holders of the Shares in proportion to the amount paid up or credited as paid up on such Shares, respectively, at the commencement of the winding up.

Disclosure and mandatory bid obligations in respect of certain share acquisitions or consolidations under Indian law are governed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (the “Takeover Code”), which prescribes certain thresholds or trigger points that give rise to these obligations. The Takeover Code is under constant review by SEBI and was recently amended in December 2004.

• Any acquirer (meaning a person who, directly or indirectly, acquires or agrees to acquire shares or voting rights in a company, either by himself or with any person acting in concert) who acquires shares or voting rights that, taken together with shares or voting rights, if any, held by it would entitle him to more than 5 percent or 10 percent or 14 percent or 54 percent or 74 percent of the shares or voting rights in a company is required to disclose at every stage, the aggregate of its shareholding or voting rights in that company to that company and to each of the stock exchanges on which that company’s shares are listed within two working days of (a) the receipt of allotment information or (b) the acquisition of shares or voting rights, as the case may be.

• A person who holds more than 15 percent of the shares or voting rights in any company is required to make within 21 days from the financial year ending March 31, annual disclosure of its holdings to that company (which in turn is required to disclose the same to each of the stock exchanges on which the company’s shares are listed within 30 days from the financial year ending March 31, as well as the record date of the company for the purposes of declaration of dividend).

• Promoters or persons in control of a company are also required to make annual disclosure in respect of their holdings in the same manner within 21 days from the financial year ending March 31, as well as the record date of the company for the purposes of declaration of dividend.

With respect to takeovers (other than bail-out takeovers) of listed companies, the Takeover Code, as amended, provides for mandatory bid and open offer requirements, summarized below:

• An acquirer cannot acquire shares or voting rights which (taken together with existing shares or voting rights, if any, held by him or by persons acting in concert with it) would entitle such acquirer to exercise 15 percent or more of the voting rights in a company, unless such acquirer makes a public announcement offering to acquire an additional 20 percent of the shares of the company.

• An acquirer who, together with persons acting in concert with it, holds between 15 percent and 55 percent shares or voting rights of a company cannot acquire additional shares or voting rights that would entitle it to exercise more than 5 percent of the voting rights in any financial year ending on 31 March unless such acquirer makes a public announcement offering to acquire an additional 20 percent of the shares of the company.

• Any further acquisition of shares or voting rights by an acquirer who holds 55 percent of the shares or voting rights in a company triggers the same public announcement requirements.

• In addition, regardless of whether there has been any acquisition of shares or voting rights in a company, an acquirer acting in concert cannot directly or indirectly acquire control over a company unless such acquirer makes a public announcement offering to acquire a minimum of 20 percent of the shares of the company. The change of control for the purpose of this act shall exclude those which take place pursuant to a special resolution passed by the shareholders in a general meeting.

The Takeover Code sets out the contents of the required public announcements as well as the minimum offer price.

The Takeover Code, as amended, permits conditional offers as well as the acquisition and subsequent delisting of all shares of a company and provides specific guidelines for the gradual acquisition of shares or voting rights. Specific obligations of the acquirer and of the board of directors of the target company in the offer process have also been set out. Acquirers making a public offer will be required to deposit in an escrow account 25 percent of the total consideration or less up to and including Rs.1 billion and 10 percent for the excess over Rs.1 billion where the total consideration exceeds Rs.1 billion, which amount will be forfeited in the event that the acquirer does not fulfill its obligations. In addition, the Takeover Code introduces the “chain principle” whereby the acquisition of a holding company will obligate the acquirer to make a public offer to the shareholders of each of the publicly listed companies acquired through the acquisition of the holding company.

The general requirements to make such a public announcement do not, however, apply entirely to bail-out takeovers when a promoter (i.e., person or persons in control of the company, persons named in any offer document as promoters and certain specified corporate bodies and individuals) is taking over a financially weak company (but not a “sick industrial company”) pursuant to a rehabilitation scheme approved by a public financial institution or a scheduled bank. A “financially weak company” is a company which has, at the end of the previous fiscal year, accumulated losses resulting in erosion of more than 50 percent (but less than 100 percent) of the total sum of its paid-up capital and free reserves at the end of the previous fiscal year. A “sick industrial company” is a company registered for more than five years which has, at the end of any fiscal year, accumulated losses equal to or exceeding its entire net worth.

Provided that the transferor(s) as well as the transferee(s) have been holding shares in the target company for a period of at least three years prior to the proposed acquisition;

In addition, the Takeover Code does not apply to shares represented by ADSs so long as such shares remain in the ADR depositary facility.

The Company has entered into a listing agreement with each of the other Indian Stock Exchanges on which the Shares are listed. Clause 40A of the listing agreements provides that if an acquisition of a listed company’s equity shares results in the acquirer and its associates holding 5 percent or more of the company’s outstanding equity shares, the acquirer must report it’s holding to the company and the relevant stock exchange(s) where the company’s shares are listed. When any person acquires or agrees to acquire equity shares exceeding 15 percent of the voting rights in any company or if any person who holds equity shares which in aggregate carries less than 15 percent of the voting rights of the company and seeks to acquire equity shares exceeding 15 percent of the voting rights, such person shall, in accordance with Clause 40B, not acquire any equity shares exceeding 15 percent of the voting rights of the company without making an offer on a uniform basis to all the remaining shareholders to acquire equity shares that have an additional 20 percent of the voting rights of the total outstanding shares at a prescribed price.

The acquisition of shares of a company listed on an Indian stock exchange beyond certain threshold amounts is subject to regulations governing takeovers of Indian companies. Clauses 40A and 40B and such regulations will not apply to shares so long as they are represented by ADRs.

The Company’s material contracts are entered into in the ordinary course of business and include rate sharing agreements and interconnect agreements with international and domestic telecommunication providers and agreements for the use of cable capacity to provide the Company’s services.

Foreign Investments in India are governed by the provisions of Section 6 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) 1999 and are subject to the Regulations issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) under FEMA 1999. The Foreign Direct Investment Scheme under the Reserve Bank’s Automatic Route enables Indian Companies (other than those specifically excluded in the scheme) to issue shares to persons resident outside India without prior permission from the RBI, subject to certain conditions. General permission has been granted for the transfer of shares and convertible debentures by a person resident outside India as follows: (i) for transfers of shares or convertible debentures held by a person resident outside India other than Non Resident Indians (“NRIs”) or overseas corporate bodies, or OCBs, to any person resident outside India, provided that the transferee has obtained permission of the Central Government and if that person had any previous venture or tie up in India through investment in any manner or a technical collaboration or trademark agreement in the same field or allied field in which the Indian company whose shares are being transferred is engaged (ii) NRIs or OCBs are permitted to transfer shares or convertible debentures of Indian company to other NRIs or OCBs, and (iii) a person resident outside India may gift securities of an Indian company to a person resident in India.

In all other cases, prior approval of the RBI is necessary. For transfer of existing shares or convertible debentures of an Indian company by a resident to a non resident by way of sale the transferor should obtain the approval of the central Government and thereafter make an application to RBI for permission. In such cases the RBI may permit the transfer subject to such terms and conditions including the price at which the sale may be made.

Restrictions on Sale of the Equity Shares Underlying the Company’s American Depositary Receipts and for Repatriation of Sale Proceeds

American Depositary Receipts issued by Indian companies to non-residents have free transferability outside India. Until recently, under Indian law it was not permitted for a depositary to accept deposits of outstanding equity shares and issue ADSs evidencing such shares. Thus, an investor in ADSs who surrendered an ADS and withdrew equity shares would not be permitted to redeposit those equity shares to obtain ADSs, nor would an investor who purchased equity shares on the Indian market have been permitted to deposit them in the ADS program. The Government of India has recently permitted two-way fungibility of ADRs. However, this is still subject to sectoral caps and certain conditions, including compliance with the provisions of the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through Depositary Receipt Mechanism) Scheme 1993 and the periodic guidelines issued by the Government. Such restrictions on foreign ownership of the underlying equity shares may cause the Company’s Equity Shares to trade at a discount or premium to its ADSs.

In February 2002, the RBI issued a circular stating that the terms of Regulations 4A of the Reserve Bank of India Notification FEMA 20/2000-RB dated May 3, 2000, as amended by Notification No. FEMA 41/2001-RB dated March 2, 2001, allow a registered broker to purchase shares of an Indian company on behalf of a person resident outside of India for the purpose of converting those shares into ADSs/GDSs. However, such conversion is subject to compliance with the provisions of the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through Depository Receipt Mechanism) Scheme 1993 and the periodic guidelines issued by the Central Government. This would mean that ADSs converted into Indian shares may be converted back into ADSs, subject to the limits of sectoral caps.

The Operative Guidelines for the limited two-way fungibility under the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through Depository Receipt Mechanism) Scheme 1993 has also been approved by the Government of India.

These guidelines provide that a re-issuance of ADSs/GDSs are permitted to the extent that ADSs/GDSs have been redeemed for underlying shares and sold in the domestic market. The re-issuance must be within specified limits. The conditions to be satisfied in this regard are: (i) the shares are purchased on a recognized stock exchange; (ii) the Indian company has issued ADS/GDS; (iii) the shares are purchased with the permission of the custodian of the ADSs/GDSs of the Indian company and are deposited with the custodian; and (iv) the number of shares so purchased shall not exceed the number of ADSs/GDSs converted into underlying shares.

The procedure for conversion of shares into ADSs/GDSs is as follows: (i) on request by the overseas investor for the acquisition of shares for re-issuance of ADSs/GDSs, the SEBI registered broker will purchase shares from a stock exchange after verifying with the custodian as to the availability of “Head Room” (i.e. the number of ADSs/GDSs originally issued minus the number of ADSs/GDSs outstanding further adjusted for ADSs/GDSs redeemed into underlying shares and registered in the name of the non-resident investor(s)); (ii) an Indian broker purchases the shares in the name of the overseas depositary; (iii) after the purchase, the Indian broker places the domestic shares with the Custodian; (iv) the Custodian advises the overseas depositary on the custody of domestic shares and to issue corresponding ADSs/GDSs to the investor; and (v) the overseas depositary issues ADSs/GDSs to the investor.

Holders who seek to sell in India any Equity Shares received upon surrender of any ADS, and to convert the Rupee proceeds of such sale into foreign currency and remit such foreign currency outside of India, will require the approval of the Reserve Bank of India for each such transaction. Although such approvals are generally forthcoming, there can be no assurance that any such approval can be obtained in a timely manner or at all.

Shares of Indian companies represented by ADSs may be approved for issuance to foreign investors by the Government of India under the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Equity Shares (through Depositary Receipt Mechanism) Scheme, 1993 (the “1993 Regulation”), as modified from time to time, promulgated by the Government. The 1993 Regulation is distinct from other policies or facilities, as described below, relating to investments in Indian companies by foreign investors. The issuance of ADSs pursuant to the 1993 Regulation also affords to holders of the ADSs the benefits of Section 115AC of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 for purposes of the application of Indian tax law.

Foreign Direct Investment in India is allowed automatically and without prior approval route in almost all sectors except:

1. Proposals that require an industrial license and cases where foreign investment is more than 24% in the equity capital of units manufacturing items reserved for the small scale industries.

2. Proposals in which foreign collaborator has a previous venture/tie up in India.

3. Proposals relating to acquisition of shares in an existing Indian Company in favor of a Foreign/ Non resident Indian/ OCB investor.

4. Proposals falling outside notified sectoral policy/ caps or under sectors in which FDI is not permitted and/ or whenever any investor chooses to make an application to the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) and not to avail of the automatic route.

The FIPB is the competent body to consider and recommend FDI which does not fall within the automatic route. The FIPB is under the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance. With respect to the activities of the Company, Foreign Investment Promotion Board approval is required for any direct foreign investment that exceeds 51 percent of the total issued share capital of the Company.

In May 1994, the Government announced that purchases by foreign investors of ADSs as evidenced by ADRs and foreign currency convertible bonds of Indian companies would be treated as direct foreign investment in the equity issued by Indian companies for such offerings. Therefore, offerings that involve the issuance of equity that results in Foreign Direct Investors holding more than the stipulated percentage of direct foreign investments (which depends on the category of industry) would require approval from the Foreign Investment Promotion Board. In addition, in connection with offerings of any such securities to foreign investors, approval of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board is required for Indian companies whether or not the stipulated percentage limit would be reached, if the proceeds there from are to be used for investment in non-high priority industries.

Foreign Direct Investment ceiling in the telecom sector varies from 49 percent to 74 percent depending on the nature of service being provided. The total composite foreign holding including but not limited to investment by FIIs, NRI/OCB, FCCB, ADRs, GDRs, convertible preference shares, proportionate foreign investment in Indian promoters/investment companies including their holding companies etc., should not exceed the allowable per cent.

Foreign direct investment upto 100% permitted in respect of the following telecom services: -

Investment by Non-Resident Indians, Persons of Indian Origin and Overseas Corporate Bodies

A variety of special facilities for making investments in India in shares of Indian companies are available to individuals of Indian nationality or origin residing outside India, persons of Indian origin and to overseas corporate bodies (“OCBs”), at least 60 percent owned by such persons. These facilities permit Non-Resident Indians, Persons of Indian Origin and OCBs to make portfolio investments in shares and other securities of Indian companies on a basis not generally available to other foreign investors. These facilities are different and distinct from investments by Foreign Direct Investors described above.

In September 1992, the Government issued guidelines which enable Foreign Institutional Investors, including institutions such as pension funds, investment trusts, asset management companies, nominee companies and incorporated/institutional portfolio managers, to invest in all the securities traded on the primary and secondary markets in India. Under the guidelines, Foreign Institutional Investors are required to obtain an initial registration from SEBI and a general permission from the Reserve Bank of India to engage in transactions regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999. Foreign Institutional Investors must also comply with the provisions of the SEBI Foreign Institutional Investors Regulations, 1995. When it receives the initial registration, Foreign Institutional Investors also obtain general permission from the Reserve Bank of India to engage in transactions regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999. Together, the initial registration and the Reserve Bank of India’s general permission enable registered Foreign Institutional Investors to buy (subject to the ownership restrictions discussed below) and sell freely securities issued by Indian companies, to realize capital gains on investments made through the initial amount invested in India, to subscribe or renounce rights offerings for shares, to appoint a domestic custodian for custody of investments held and to repatriate the capital, capital gains, dividends, and income received by way of interest and any compensation received towards sale or renunciation of rights offerings of shares.

SEBI and the Reserve Bank of India regulations restrict investments in Indian companies by Foreign Direct Investors. Under current SEBI regulations applicable to the Company, Foreign Direct Investors in aggregate may hold no more than 40 percent of the Company’s Equity Shares, excluding the Equity Shares underlying the ADSs, and Non-Resident Indians and Overseas Corporate Bodies in aggregate may hold no more than 10 percent of the Company’s Equity Shares, excluding the Equity Shares underlying the ADSs. Furthermore, SEBI regulations provide that no single Foreign Institutional Investor may hold more than 10 percent of the Company’s total Equity Shares and no single Non-Resident Indian or OCB may hold more than 5 percent of the Company’s total Equity Shares.

Foreign Institutional Investors may only purchase securities of public Indian companies (other than ADSs) through a procedure known as a “preferential allotment of shares,” which is subject to certain restrictions. These restrictions will not apply to Equity Shares issued as stock dividends or in connection with rights offerings applicable to the Equity Shares underlying ADSs. There is uncertainty under Indian law about the tax regime applicable to Foreign Institutional Investors which hold and trade ADSs. Foreign Institutional Investors are urged to consult with their Indian legal and tax advisers about the relationship between the Foreign Institutional Investors guidelines and the ADSs and any Equity Shares withdrawn upon surrender of ADSs.

More detailed provisions relating to Foreign Institutional Investors investment have been introduced by the SEBI with the introduction of the SEBI Foreign Institutional Investors Regulations, 1995. These provisions relate to the registration of Foreign Institutional Investors, their general obligations and responsibilities, and certain investment conditions and restrictions. One such restriction is that the total investment in equity and equity-related instruments should not be less than 70 percent of the aggregate of all investments of the Foreign Institutional Investors in India. The SEBI has also permitted private placements of shares by listed companies with Foreign Institutional Investors, subject to the prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973. Such private placement must be at the average of the weekly highs and lows of the closing price over the preceding six months of the preceding two weeks, whichever is higher.

Holders of the Company’s ADSs will not be entitled to instruct the Depositary how to vote the Shares underlying the ADSs. Rather, each holder, by accepting an ADR, authorized and directed the Depositary to vote as set forth below.

The Depositary will vote the deposited Shares as instructed by the Company’s Board of Directors or give a proxy or power of attorney to vote the deposited Shares to a person designated by the Board of Directors. However, the Depositary will only do this upon the Company’s legal counsel issuing an opinion to the Depositary stating that it is legal for the Depositary to do so and that doing so will not expose the Depositary to legal liability. If the Company does not provide the legal opinion referred to above, the Depositary will not vote the deposited Shares or give a proxy or power of attorney to anyone else to vote the deposited Shares.

General. The following summary is based on the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Indian Tax Act”), including the special tax regime contained in Section 115AC (the “Section 115AC Regime”) and the 1993 Regulation. The Indian Tax Act is amended every year by the Finance Act of the relevant year. Some or all of the tax consequences of the Section 115 AC Regime may be amended or changed by future amendments of the Indian Tax Act.

The summary set forth below is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of the individual tax consequences to non-resident holders under Indian law for the acquisition, ownership and sale of ADSs and Equity Shares by non-resident holders. Personal tax consequences of an investment may vary for investors in various circumstances and potential investors should therefore consult their own tax advisers on the tax consequences of such acquisition, ownership and sale, including specifically the tax consequences under the law of the jurisdiction of their residence and any tax treaty between India and their country of residence.

For purposes of the Indian Tax Act, an individual is considered to be a resident of India during any fiscal year if he or she is in India in that year for:

• 60 days or more and, in case of a citizen of India or a person of Indian origin, who, being outside India, comes on a visit to India, is in India for more than 182 days in each case within the four preceding years has been in India for a period or periods amounting to 365 days or more.

A company is resident in India if it is registered in India or the control and management of its affairs is situated wholly in India.

Pursuant to the Finance Act, 2004, withholding tax is not applicable on dividends. Henceforth, the Company has to pay a dividend distribution tax of approximately 12.8 percent on the amount of dividend declared. Further, an additional educational cess of 2 percent is levied on all direct and indirect taxes including dividend distribution tax.

The acquisition by a non-resident holder of Shares upon surrender of ADSs does not constitute a taxable event for Indian income tax purposes. Such exchange will, however, give rise to stamp duty as described below under “Stamp Duty and Transfer Tax.”

Any gain realized on the sale of ADSs or Equity Shares by a non-resident holder to another non-resident holder outside India is not subject to Indian capital gains tax. However, as Rights are not expressly covered by the Indian Tax Act, it is unclear, as to whether capital gain derived from the sale of Rights by a non-resident holder (not entitled to an exemption under a tax treaty) to another non-resident holder outside India will be subject to Indian capital gains tax. If such Rights are deemed by the Indian tax authorities to be situated within India, the gains realized on the sale of such Rights will be subject to customary Indian taxation as discussed below.

Since the issuance of the ADSs has been approved by the Government of India under the Section 115AC Regime, Non-resident Holders of the ADSs will have the benefit of tax concessions available under the Section 115AC Regime. The Section 115AC Regime provides that if the Equity Shares are sold on an Indian Stock Exchange against payment in Indian rupees, they will no longer be eligible for such concessional tax treatment. However, the Section 115AC Regime is unclear, as to whether such tax treatment is available to a non-resident who acquires Equity Shares outside India from a non-resident holder of Equity Shares after receipt of the Equity Shares upon surrender of the ADSs. If concessional tax treatment is not available, gains realized on the sale of such Equity Shares will be subject to customary Indian taxations discussed below.

Subject to any relief provided pursuant to an applicable tax treaty, any gain realized on the sale of Equity Shares to an Indian resident or inside India generally will be subject to Indian capital gains tax. For the purpose of computing capital gains tax, the cost of acquisition of Equity Shares received in exchange for ADSs will be determined on the basis of the prevailing price of the shares on any of the Indian stock exchanges on the date that the Depositary instructs the custodian to deliver Equity Shares in exchange for ADSs. A non-resident holder’s holding period (for purpose of determining the applicable Indian capital gains tax rate) in respect of Equity Shares received in exchange for ADSs commences on the date of the notice of the redemption by the Depositary to the Custodian. The Indo-US Treaty does not provide an exemption from the imposition of Indian capital gains tax.

Taxable gain realized on Equity Shares (calculated in the manner set forth in the prior paragraph) held for more than 12 months (long-term gain) is subject to tax at the rate of 10 percent. Taxable gain realized on Equity Shares held for 12 months for less (short-term gain) is subject to tax at variable rates with a maximum rate of 48 percent. The actual rate of tax on short-term gain depends on a number of factors, including the legal status of the Non-resident and the type of income chargeable in India.

Upon issuance of the Equity Shares, the Company is required to pay a stamp duty of 0.1 percent per share of the issue price of the underlying Equity Shares. A transfer of ADSs is not subject to the Indian stamp duty. However, upon the acquisition of Equity Shares from the Depositary in exchange for ADSs, the holder will be liable for Indian stamp duty at the rate of 0.5 percent of the market value of the ADSs or Equity Shares exchanged. A sale of Equity Shares by a registered holder will also be subject to Indian stamp duty at the rate of 0.5 percent of the market value of the Equity Shares on the trade date, although customarily such tax is borne by the transferee. However, in case of Equity Shares held with the Depositary in electronic mode, there will not be any incidence of stamp duty.

ADSs held by non-resident holders and the underlying Equity Shares held by the Depositary and the transfer of ADSs between non-resident holders and the Depositary will be exempt from Indian gift tax and Indian wealth tax.

Under current Indian law, there is no estate duty applicable to a non-resident holder of ADSs or Equity Shares.

The following summary describes the material United States federal income and estate tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Shares and ADSs as of the date hereof. The discussion set forth below is applicable to US Holders (as defined below). Except where noted, it deals only with Shares and ADSs held as capital assets and does not deal with special situations, such as those of dealers in securities or currencies, traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings, financial institutions, tax-exempt entities, life insurance companies, persons holding Shares or ADSs as part of a hedging, integrated, conversion or constructive sale transaction or a straddle, corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid US federal income tax, persons owning 10 percent or more of the voting stock of the Company, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax or persons whose “functional currency” is not the United States dollar. Furthermore, the discussion below is based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions thereunder as of the date hereof, and such authorities may be repealed, revoked or modified, in each case, possibly with retroactive effect so as to result in United States federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below. In addition, this summary is based, in part, upon representations made by the Depositary to the Company and assumes that the Deposit Agreement, and all other related agreements, will be performed in accordance with their terms. Persons considering the purchase, ownership or disposition of Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors concerning the United States federal income tax consequences in light of their particular situations as well as any consequences arising under foreign, state or local tax laws.

As used herein, the term “US Holder” means a beneficial holder of a Share or ADS that is (1) a citizen or resident of the United States, (2) a corporation, or entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, (3) an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source or (4) a trust (X) which is subject to the supervision of a court within the United States and is under the control of one or more United States persons as described in section 7701(a)(30) of the Code or (Y) that has a valid election in effect under applicable US Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.

If a partnership holds our Shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding our Shares or ADSs, you should consult your tax advisor.

In general, for United States federal income tax purposes, US holders of ADSs will be treated as the owners of the underlying Shares that are represented by such ADSs. Deposits or withdrawal of Shares by US Holders for ADSs will not be subject to United States federal income tax. However, the United States Treasury has expressed concerns that parties to whom depositary shares are pre-released may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by the holders of ADSs. Accordingly, the analysis of the creditability of Indian taxes paid with respect to the ADSs could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the United States Treasury.

To the extent that distributions paid by us with respect to our Shares or ADSs do not exceed our earnings and profits, as calculated for United States federal income tax purposes, such distributions will be taxed as dividends. If these dividends constitute qualified dividend income (“QDI”), individual U.S. holders of our Shares or ADSs will generally pay tax on such dividends received during taxable years before 2009 at a maximum rate of 15 percent, provided that certain holding period requirements are satisfied. Assuming we are not a passive foreign investment company (as discussed below), foreign personal holding company or foreign investment company, dividends paid by us will be QDI if we are a qualified foreign corporation (“QFC”) at the time the dividends are paid. We believe that we are currently, and will continue to be, a QFC so as to allow all dividends paid by us to be QDI for United States federal income tax purposes. Corporate holders receiving dividends paid by us will not benefit from the reduced tax rate on dividends available to individual holders. In addition, dividends paid by us will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.

The amount of any dividend paid in Indian Rupees will equal the United States dollar value of the Indian Rupees received calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date the dividend is received by the US Holder, in the case of Shares, or by the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, regardless of whether the Indian Rupees are converted into United States dollars. If the Indian Rupees received as a dividend are not converted into United States dollars on the date of receipt, a US Holder will have a basis in the Indian Rupees equal to their United States dollar value on the date of receipt. Any gain or loss realized on a subsequent conversion or other disposition of the Indian Rupees will be treated as ordinary income or loss that is United States source.

For tax years beginning before January 1, 2007 dividends paid on the Shares or ADSs will be treated as income from sources outside the United States and will generally constitute “passive income” or, in the case of certain US Holders, “financial services income” and for tax years beginning after December 31, 2006, dividends will be treated as “passive category income” or “general category income”. Subject to certain limitations, a US Holder may be entitled to a credit or deduction against its United States federal income taxes for the amount of any Indian taxes that are withheld from dividend distributions made to such US Holder. The decision to claim either a credit or deduction must be made annually, and will apply to all foreign taxes paid by the US Holder to any foreign country or United States possession with respect to the applicable tax year. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. The rules regarding the availability of foreign tax credits are complex and US Holders may be subject to various limitations on the amount of foreign tax credits that are available. US Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

To the extent that the amount of any distribution by the Company exceeds the Company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined under United States federal income tax principles for a taxable year, the distribution will first be treated as a tax-free return of capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of the Shares or ADSs (thereby increasing the amount of gain, or decreasing the amount of loss, to be recognized by the US Holder on a subsequent disposition of the Shares or ADSs), and the balance in excess of adjusted basis will be taxed as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange. Consequently, such distributions in excess of the Company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits would not give rise to foreign source income.

Distributions of Shares or rights to subscribe for Shares that are received as part of a pro rata distribution to all shareholders of the Company in certain circumstances should not be subject to United States federal income tax. The basis of the new Shares or rights so received will be determined by allocating the US Holder’s basis in the old Shares between the old Shares and the new Shares or rights received, based on their relative fair market values on the date of distribution. However, the basis of the rights will be zero if (1) the fair market value of the rights is less than 15 percent of the fair market value of the old Shares at the time of distribution or (2) the rights are not exercised and thus expire.

A non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a passive foreign investment company for U.S. Federal income tax purposes if either:

• on average for the taxable year by value, or, if it is not a publicly traded corporation and so elects, by adjusted basis, if 50% or more of its assets produce or are held for the production of passive income.

The Company does not believe that it satisfies either of the tests for passive foreign investment company status for fiscal 2005. The Company will be required to determine its status as a passive foreign investment company on an annual basis. No assurance can be given that the Company will not be considered a passive foreign investment company in future taxable years. If the Company were to be a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year, U.S. holders would be required to either:

• pay an interest charge together with tax calculated at ordinary income rates on “excess distributions,” as the term is defined in relevant provisions of the U.S. tax laws and on any gain on a sale or other disposition of equity shares;

• if a “qualified electing fund election” (as the term is defined in relevant provisions of the U.S. tax laws) is made, include in their taxable income their pro rata share of undistributed amounts of the Company’s income; or

• if the equity shares are “marketable” and a mark-to-market election is made, mark-to-market the equity shares each taxable year and recognize ordinary gain and, to the extent of prior ordinary gain, ordinary loss for the increase or decrease in market value for such taxable year.

If the Company is treated as a passive foreign investment company, the Company does not plan to provide information necessary for the “qualified electing fund” election.

For United States federal income tax purposes, a US Holder will recognize taxable gain or loss on the sale or exchange of a right, Share or ADS in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized for the right, Share or ADS and the US Holder’s tax basis in the right, Share or ADS. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and it will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period of the US Holder exceeds one year. Current law generally provides that long-term capital gains realized by individuals are subject to federal income tax at a maximum rate of 15 percent for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2009 (20 percent thereafter). Any gain or loss recognized by a US holder will generally be treated as United States source gain or loss. Certain limitations exist on the deductibility of capital losses for both corporate and individual taxpayers.

Under certain circumstances described under “Indian Taxation—Taxation of Capital Gains” in this report, a US Holder may be subject to Indian tax upon the disposition of rights, Shares or ADSs. In such circumstances and subject to applicable limitations, such US Holder may elect to treat the gain as foreign source income and to credit the Indian tax against its United States federal income tax liability with respect to the gain. US Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

For cash-basis US Holders who receive foreign currency in connection with a sale or other taxable disposition of rights, equity shares or ADSs, the amount realized will be based upon the United States dollar value of the foreign currency received with respect to such rights, equity shares or ADSs as determined on the settlement date of such sale or other taxable disposition.

Accrual-basis US Holders may elect the same treatment required of cash-basis taxpayers with respect to a sale or other taxable disposition of rights, equity shares or ADSs, provided that the election is applied consistently from year to year. Such election cannot be changed without the consent of the IRS. Accrual-basis US Holders that do not elect to be treated as cash-basis taxpayers (pursuant to the Treasury Regulations applicable to foreign currency transactions) for this purpose may have a foreign currency gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes because of differences between the United States dollar value of the foreign currency received prevailing on the date of such sale or other taxable disposition and the value prevailing on the date of payment. Any such currency gain or loss will generally be treated as ordinary income or loss that is United States source, in addition to the gain or loss, if any, recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of rights, Equity Shares or ADSs.

An individual shareholder who is a citizen or resident of the United States for United States federal estate tax purposes will have the value of the equity Shares or ADSs owned by such holder included in his or her gross estate for United States federal estate tax purposes.

In general, information reporting requirements will apply to dividends in respect of the Shares or ADSs or the proceeds received on the sale, exchange, or redemption of the Shares or ADSs paid within the United States (and in certain cases, outside of the United States) to US Holders other than certain exempt recipients (such as corporations), and a 28 percent backup withholding rate may apply to such amounts if the US Holder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number to the Company or its payment agent or to report interest and dividends required to be shown on its United States federal income tax returns. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a US Holder will generally be allowed as a credit against the US Holder’s United States federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.

This report and other information filed or to be filed by the Company can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at:

Copies of these materials can also be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 450th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20549, at prescribed rates. The public may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC in the United States at 1-800-SEC-0330.

The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings with the SEC using its EDGAR system. We intend to continue to make our future SEC filings available over the Internet.

Additionally, documents referred to in this Form 20-F may be inspected at our corporate offices which are located at Videsh Sanchar Bhavan, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Mumbai 400001, India.

The Company does not face material commodity price or equity price market risks. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk in its mutual fund investments, particularly with regard to debt funds. The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates because its costs and revenues are denominated in several different currencies (primarily Rupees, SDRs and US Dollars). Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Rupee, SDRs, US Dollars and other currencies affect the Rupee amount of foreign currency settlement payments received by the Company from, and paid by the Company to, foreign telecommunications administrations, the revenues and operating costs of the Company and payments for imported equipment and technology. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had significant amounts of foreign currency denominated receivables (Rs.2,432 million or US$ 55.75 million) and payables (Rs.1,066 million or US$ 24.44 million), which expose the Company to foreign exchange risks.

The following table sets forth the Company’s (excluding its subsidiaries) operating revenues, operating costs and notional margin for fiscal 2005 in major currencies:

A 1% strengthening or weakening of the rupee against the foreign currencies shown above would have had an aggregate adverse or beneficial impact of Rs.65 million, respectively, on our income from operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.

We also have significant exposure on account of trade receivables and trade payables. The following table sets forth the Company’s trade receivables and trade payables in major currencies as of March 31, 2005:

A 1% strengthening or weakening of the rupee against the foreign currencies shown above would have had an aggregate adverse or beneficial impact of Rs.14 million on our income statement, respectively, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.

In view of the recent fluctuations of the Indian Rupee vis-à-vis the US Dollar, effective fiscal 2004, the Company started hedging its foreign currency exposure by entering into forward contracts and options. The following table sets forth the amount of such contracts which were outstanding as of March 31, 2005:

In fiscal 2004, the Company started investing in mutual funds (debt funds) which are subject to interest rate risks. The Company does not have any loans denominated in foreign currencies.

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation (under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer), pursuant to Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report such disclosure controls and procedures were reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Mr. Subodh Bhargava, one of the Company’s directors, joined the Board of the Company on May 2, 2002 and was nominated as a member and the Chairman of the Audit Committee on May 17, 2002. The Company’s Board has determined Mr. Subodh Bhargava as an audit committee financial expert. Mr. Bhargava’s relevant experience is described under “Item 6 — Directors and Senior Management” above.

The Company has adopted the Tata Code of Conduct that is applicable to all companies of the Tata Group. This code of conduct is applicable to all employees of the Company including the executive directors, the Chief Financial Officer and all other key executive officers of the Company.

The Company undertakes to provide a copy of the code of ethics to any person without charge on request by writing to it at Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, Office of Company Secretary and Vice President (Legal), Lokmanya Videsh Sanchar Bhavan, Opp. Kirti College, Kashinath Dhruv Marg, Prabhadevi, Mumbai—400028, India.

The following table sets forth for the fiscal years indicated the fees paid to our principal accountant and its associated entities for various services they provided us in these periods:

The above professional services are covered within the scope of audit and permitted non-audit services as defined by SEC regulations. All fees disclosed for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, including the fees for tax services set forth above, have been approved by the Company’s audit committee subject to the policy and procedures described below. The appointment of and services provided by our principal accountant for our subsidiaries were ratified by the Audit Committee of the Company. Any fees paid in currency other than Indian Rupees have been converted as per the exchange rate as of March 31, 2005.

The audit committee will pre-approve following professional services provided to the Company and its subsidiaries by its external auditors:

1. Review and approve on an annual basis the specific financial/statutory audits for the fiscal year to be rendered by the external auditors. The approval will be prior to the engagement of the external auditors.

2. Approve specific categories of audit-related services annually up to a fee limit. Specific approval of the audit committee is required to exceed the pre-approved fee limit. All other audit-related services to be performed by the external auditors that are incremental to the annual pre-approved services list will be specifically approved by the audit committee prior to the engagement for the service.

3. Pre-approve annually permitted tax services to be rendered by the external auditors up to a fee limit. Specific approval of the audit committee is required to exceed the pre-approved fee limit. All other tax services to be performed by the external auditors that are incremental to the annual pre-approved services list will be specifically approved by the audit committee prior to the engagement for the service.

4. Pre-approve any other non-audit service by the external auditors not prohibited by Company policy or SEC regulations on a case by case basis.

The audit committee may delegate to one or more designated members of the audit committee the authority to grant pre-approvals required by the policy and procedures. The decisions of any audit committee member to whom authority is delegated to pre-approve a service shall be presented to the full audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.

ITEM 16 E . PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

The Company has elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 18 of Form 20-F.

The following financial statements comprising of consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of March 31, 2003, March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 and the related statements of income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three year period ended March 31, 2003 prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been audited by Deloitte Haskins & Sells, an independent registered public accounting firm, in accordance with Standards of Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB). The financial statement pages appear on pages F-1 through F-33.

Also attached are financial statements of Tata Teleservices Limited (“TTSL”) comprising of consolidated balance sheets for the years ended March 31, 2004, and March 31, 2005 which have been audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India and in the United States by independent auditors. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in India (“Indian GAAP”). These financial statements include a discussion of differences between Indian GAAP and US GAAP as well as a reconciliation of net income and shareholders equity under Indian GAAP to US GAAP in note no. 17 in Schedule R.

TTSL is not a majority-owned subsidiary nor is it a consolidated subsidiary for purposes of the Company’s financial statements. The Company accounted for its interest in TTSL in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 in accordance with the equity method. These financial statements are being included pursuant to Rule 3.09 of Regulation S-X in accordance with the income significance test under Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.


VIDESH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED,

By:		/s/ NARASIMHAN SRINATH
Name:		Narasimhan Srinath
Title:		Executive Director

By:		/s/ RAJIV DHAR
Name:		Rajiv Dhar
Title:		Chief Financial Officer

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of March 31, 2004 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years ended March 31, 2005, all expressed in Indian rupees. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Tata Teleservices Limited (TTSL), the Company’s investment in which is accounted for by use of the equity method. The Company’s equity of Rs.719 million in TTSL’s net assets at March 31, 2005 and of Rs.4,006 million in TTSL’s net loss for the year then ended are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The financial statements of TTSL for the year ended and as of March 31, 2005 were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for such company, is based solely on the report of such other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years ended March 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As described in Note 2(a) to the financial statements, these financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which differ in certain material respects from accounting principles generally accepted in India, which form the basis of the Company’s general purpose financial statements.

Our audit for the year ended and as of March 31, 2005 also comprehended the translation of the Indian rupee amounts into U.S. dollar amounts and, in our opinion, such translation has been made in conformity with basis stated in Note 2(u). Such U.S. dollar amounts are presented solely for the convenience of the readers in the United States of America.

Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (“VSNL”) provides international and national voice and data transmission services, internet, and other value-added services such as transponder lease, gateway packet switching services (GPSS), telex and telegraph, and television uplinking.

Tata Sons Limited through its subsidiary Panatone Finvest Limited and the Government of India (GOI) owned 46.6% and 26.1%, respectively of VSNL’s equity shares, as of March 31, 2005.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). US GAAP differs in certain material respects from accounting principles generally accepted in India and the requirements of India’s Companies Act, 1956 (collectively Indian GAAP), which form the basis of the Company’s general purpose financial statements.

Principal differences insofar as they relate to the Company include differences in the measurement basis for acquisitions accounted using the purchase method, valuation of investments, measurement and accounting for impairment loss of long - lived assets, accounting for deferred income taxes, accounting for retirement benefits, compensated absences, foreign exchange differences, and the presentation and format of the financial statements and related notes.

The Company consolidates all entities in which it has control. Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized profits and losses on such transactions are eliminated on consolidation.

The results of subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition or incorporation. Purchase consideration paid in excess of fair value of net assets acquired is recognized as goodwill. The excess of fair value of net assets over the purchase consideration is first allocated to reduce the amounts otherwise assigned to the eligible long-lived assets of the acquired subsidiary and any excess remaining is recognized as extraordinary gain in the income statement in the period in which the business combination is consummated.

Investments in entities where the Company exerts significant influence, generally where the Company controls between 20% and 50% of the voting stocks of these entities, are accounted using the equity method. Investments in entities where the Company controls less than 20% of the voting stocks but exercises significant influence through its contractual right to appoint directors and participate in the operating and financial policies of these entities are accounted using the equity method. Inter-company unrealized profits and losses on transactions with such entities are eliminated.

The effect of dilution from change in ownership interest arising from issuance of shares by equity method investees are recognized in additional-paid-in capital, a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

The Company considers all highly liquid financial instruments, which are readily convertible into cash and have an original maturity of three months or less on the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.

Accounts receivable are stated at their expected realizable values, net of allowances for uncollectible receivables. Accounts receivable and payable are disclosed on a net basis where a legal right of set-off exists. These payables and receivables are generally settled on a net basis.

Investments in securities with readily determinable market values are classified available-for-sale securities and recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on such securities, net of applicable taxes, are reported in other comprehensive income, a separate component of shareholders’ equity. The cost in respect of available-for-sale securities sold is determined on a weighted average basis.

The Company does not have any debt securities and has not classified any securities as trading.

Equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values are recorded at original cost. Fair values of these securities are not estimated if there are no events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant effect on the carrying amount. Other than temporary declines in fair values below cost are reflected in earnings as realized losses.

Goodwill arising on business combination is capitalized and evaluated for impairment annually or when significant events occur, which indicate that the fair value is less than the carrying amount. The Company determines fair value by estimating the present value of expected future cash flows. An impairment loss is recognized in earnings when the carrying amount exceeds the present value of future cash flows.

The Company has not and does not enter into any swap or other similar agreements relating to IRU’s or bandwidth.

The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. The liability for asset retirement cost is capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset and is depreciated over its useful life.

The Company recognizes all derivatives as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measures them at fair value. Changes in fair value are reported in earnings. Fair values of derivative financial instruments are generally based on quotations obtained from inter-bank market participants.

Revenues from voice and data services are recognized based upon minutes of traffic processed or contracted fee schedules. Revenues from internet services are recognized based on usage by subscribers/customers.

Cost and expenses are recognized as incurred and are classified according to their primary functions as follows:

Network and transmission costs primarily include interconnect charges, rent of landlines from other telecom operators and space segment utilization charges.

License fees are payable to the Department of Telecommunication (DoT), GOI for international and national long-distance licenses and are computed in accordance with the license fee agreements.

Other operating costs primarily include employee compensation and other related costs, repairs and maintenance, utilities, advertising, allowances for uncollectible accounts receivables and other current assets, travel, insurance and other administrative costs.

The Company provides for the cost of vacation earned based on the number of days of unutilized leave entitled at each balance sheet date.

Income tax expense comprises current income tax expense and the net change in the deferred tax asset or liability in the year.

Current income tax expense is determined in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Income Tax Act of 1961 or applicable law in foreign tax jurisdictions.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and unutilized business loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed separately for each taxable entity in the consolidated enterprise. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more than not likely that a tax benefit will not be realized and are separately estimated at each entity without offsetting.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be received or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the income statement in the period of enactment of the change.

Basic earnings per equity share have been computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding for the period. The Company did not have any dilutive potential equity shares outstanding in any of the periods presented.

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenues, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, translation adjustments arising on the consolidation of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates and net income are components of comprehensive income.

In December, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) revised SFAS 123 (SFAS NO.123R, Share-based payments) requiring companies to record share-based payment transactions as compensation expense at fair value. The provisions of this statement will be effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. During the year-ended and as of March 31, 2005, there were no share based payments or stock options.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair values of the assets exchanged. SFAS No. 153 amends opinion 29, eliminating the exception to fair value accounting for non-monetary exchanges that do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of an entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The statement is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect this statement to have a material effect on the financial statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Correction, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. This statement requires retrospective application of prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principles, unless it impracticable to determine either the period –specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. When it is impracticable to determine the period-specific effects of an accounting change on one or more individual prior periods presented, this statement requires that the new accounting principle be applied to the balance of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application is practicable and that a corresponding adjustment be made to retained earnings for that period rather than being reported in an income statement. When it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect of applying a change in accounting principle to all prior periods, this statement requires that the new accounting principle be applied as if it were applied prospectively from the earliest date practicable. This statement also redefines restatement as revising the previously issued financial statements to reflect the correction of an error. This statement shall be effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect this statement to have any material effect on the financial statements.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been expressed in Indian rupees (“Rs.”), the Company’s functional currency. For the convenience of the reader, the financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2005 have been translated into US dollars at US$1.00 = Rs. 43.62 based on the noon buying rate for cable transfers on March 31, 2005, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Such convenience translation should not be construed as a representation that the Indian rupee amounts have been or could be converted into US dollars at this or at any other rate of exchange, or at all.

On March 30, 2004, the Company purchased the internet service provider (ISP) business from DishnetDSL Limited for a cash consideration of Rs. 2,700 million. The purpose of the acquisition was to strengthen internet business.

In accordance with the terms of the agreement, Rs. 10 million is paid by the Company each month for certain services to be rendered by DishnetDSL Limited in the conduct of ISP business. The amount is being paid over a period of eighteen months from April 1, 2004.

As of March 31, 2004 and 2005, short-term deposits with banks, held in Indian rupees, includes Rs.5,972 million in respect of proceeds from issue of Global Depository Receipts in fiscal 1997, which were subsequently converted to American Depository Receipts in fiscal 2000. In accordance with the terms of the GDR issue, these proceeds are restricted for use to purchase plant and equipment from foreign countries.

Changes in the allowances for uncollectible accounts receivables are as follows:

Margin money held with banks is in the nature of restricted cash and is provided in support of letters of credit issued by the banks.

As of March 31, 2004, Rs.547 million was recoverable from the GOI for its share of pension obligation in respect of certain employees who were transferred to the Company from the Overseas Communication Services (OCS), division of the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), GOI. The GOI has disputed the amount recoverable and the Company is in the process of negotiation with the GOI. In fiscal 2005, an allowance of Rs.473 million has been made based on management’s best estimate of the amount that may be realizable upon resolution of the matter.

Information on unrealized gains and losses from investments in available-for-sale securities is as follows:

Dividends from investments were Rs.405 million and Rs.285 million in fiscals 2004 and 2005, respectively. In fiscal 2003, there was no dividend income.

In fiscal 2004, the Company sold its investment in Inmarsat Plc for a cash consideration of Rs.1,393 million and recognized a gain of Rs.941 million in earnings. In fiscal 2005, the Company sold its investment in Intelsat Limited for a cash consideration of Rs.7,375 million and recognized a gain of Rs.4,834 million in earnings. These investments were in equity securities without readily determinable market values and were carried at cost.

In fiscals 2004, the proceeds and gross realized gains from available-for sale securities were Rs.54,938 million and Rs.60 million, respectively.

In fiscal 2005, the proceeds and gross realized gains from sale from sale of available-for sale securities were Rs.50,319 million and Rs.689 million, respectively. On sale of these securities, unrealized gains of Rs.346 million were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings.

As of March 31, 2004 and 2005, the equity method investees were Tata Teleservices Limited (TTSL) and United Telecom Limited (UTL).

As of March 31, 2004 and 2005, the ownership interest in TTSL was 19.86%. TTSL has been considered as an equity method investee, as the Company exercises significant influence through its contractual right to appoint directors.

Summarized combined financial information of entities accounted under the equity method is:

As of March 31, 2005, the Company’s investments exceed its underlying equity in net assets of its equity method investees by Rs. 1,943 million. The difference represents goodwill, which is annually tested for impairment.

The summarized information as to the assets, liabilities and results of operations of TTSL, a significant equity method investee, is as follows:

As a result of issue of shares by TTSL’s subsidiary in fiscal 2005, TTSL’s ownership interest decreased from 50.83% to 47.91%. Rs. 393 million representing the Company’s share in the dilution gain arising from decrease in TTSL’s ownership interest has been credited to additional-paid-in capital.

As of March 31, 2004 and 2005, property, plant and equipment include intangible assets in the nature of IRUs in international and domestic telecommunications circuits as follows:

Depreciation expense of Rs. 2,078 million, 2,465 million and 2,308 million, in fiscals 2003, 2004 and 2005 respectively includes IRU amortization expense of Rs .69 million, Rs.67 million and Rs. 104 million, respectively.

The estimated amortization for each of the five fiscal years subsequent to March 31, 2005 is as follows:

As a consequence of steep decline in inbound and outbound settlement rates due to intense competition for long distance traffic, the Company’s revenues declined significantly. There has also been a significant decline in the acquisition cost of telecommunications plant and equipment. Following these trigger events, the Company performed an impairment test as of December 31, 2003. The fair values of property, plant and equipment were determined based on independent valuation. The valuation was based on market price of the assets appropriately adjusted to reflect their age and present condition. As of December 31, 2003, the carrying amount of the assets was Rs.21, 225 million and the fair value was Rs.14, 516 million. Impairment loss of Rs.6, 709 million including Rs. 177 million on IRUs was recognized in earnings in fiscal 2004.

Effective January 1, 2004, the Company revised the estimated economic useful lives of undersea cables (including IRUs) from 10 - 25 years to the lower of 18 years and contracted period of use, resulting in additional depreciation expense of Rs. 230 million in fiscal 2004.

As of March 31, 2004, the Company had an unsecured and interest-free borrowing of Rs. 630 million. In fiscals 2004 and 2005, weighted average interest rate was 6.5% and 4.5% respectively.

The maximum amounts outstanding for the year ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 were Rs 3,540 million and Rs.630 million, respectively. Unused short term credit facilities as of March 31, 2004 and 2005 were Rs. 3,331 million and Rs.5, 188 million.

The following is the reconciliation of estimated income taxes at the Indian statutory income tax rate to income tax expense as reported:

Unutilized business losses of Rs. 231 million and Rs.67 million in respect of the Company’s subsidiaries in Singapore and United Kingdom, respectively can be carried forward indefinitely unless there is substantial change in ownership. Unutilized business loss of Rs.103 million in respect of the Company’s subsidiary in the United States of America expires in fiscal 2025.

As of March 31, 2004 and 2005, tax effect of Rs. 94 million and 14 million, respectively, on unrealized gains on available-for sale securities have been allocated to other comprehensive income

At an extra-ordinary general meeting held on April 2, 2004, the shareholders of VSNL approved and the High Court Judicature at Mumbai confirmed, in its order passed on May 6, 2004, the utilization of the Securities Premium account towards reduction in carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment. Consequently, Rs. 9,564 million has been adjusted against the Securities Premium account under Indian GAAP. In fiscal 2004, an impairment test on the carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment was undertaken and impairment loss of Rs. 6,709 million has been expensed under US GAAP.

In accordance with Indian law, the Company provides for gratuity, a defined benefit plan covering all eligible employees. The plan provides for lump sum payment to vested employees at retirement, death while in employment or on termination of employment in an amount equivalent to 15 days salary payable for each completed year of service. Vesting occurs upon completion of five years of service. The Company makes annual contributions to a fund administered by trustees, based on an annual external actuarial valuation. The measurement date of the plan is March 31.

The following table sets out the funded status of the gratuity plan and the amounts recognized in the Company’s financial statements as of March 31, 2004 and 2005.

The expected return on plan assets is determined considering several applicable factors mainly the composition of the plan assets held, assessed risks of asset management, historical results of the return on plan assets and the Company’s policy for plan asset management.

The Company’s plan asset allocation as of March 31, 2004 and 2005 is as follows:

The Company’s policy and objective for plan asset management is to maximize return on plan assets to meet future benefit payment requirements while at the same time accepting a low level of risk. The asset allocation for plan assets is determined based on investment criteria approved under the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, and is also subject to other exposure limitations. The Company evaluates the risks, transaction costs and liquidity for potential investments. To measure plan asset performance, the Company compares actual returns for each asset category with published benchmarks.

Accumulated benefit obligation was Rs.148 million and Rs.130 million, as of March 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

The expected benefit payments to be paid for future service are based on the same assumptions used to measure the Company’s gratuity obligation as of March 31, 2005 and are as follows:

The Company is expected to contribute Rs. 16 million to gratuity fund in fiscal 2006.

Pension obligation is in respect of certain employees transferred to the Company from the OCS. The plan provides for pension payments to these employees at retirement, death in service or on termination.

The Company accounts for the liability for future benefits based on an annual external actuarial valuation. The measurement date of the plan is March 31.

The following table sets out the unfunded status of the pension plan and the amounts recognized in the Company’s financial statements as of March 31, 2004 and 2005.

In fiscals 2004 and 2005, the Company contributed Rs.25 and Rs.26 million, respectively.

Accumulated benefit obligation was Rs.300 million and Rs.259 million, as of March 31, 2004 and 2005 respectively.

The expected benefit payments to be paid for future service are based on the same assumptions used to measure the Company’s pension obligations as of March 31, 2005 and are as follows:

In accordance with Indian law, eligible employees of the Company are entitled to receive benefits under the provident fund, a defined contribution plan in which both the employee and employer make monthly contributions to the plan equal to 12% of the employee’s salary (basic and dearness allowance). These contributions are made to a fund set up as an irrevocable trust and are expensed as incurred. The Company is generally liable for future provident fund benefits to the extent of its annual contribution and any shortfall in fund assets based on government specified minimum rates of return, and recognizes such contributions and shortfall, if any, as an expense in the year incurred.

The Company contributed Rs.70 million, Rs.68 million and Rs. 66 million to provident fund in fiscals 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

Eligible employees of the Company are entitled to receive benefits under the Superannuation, a defined contribution plan in which the employer makes monthly contributions equal to 15% of the employee’s basic salary.

The plan was effective in fiscal 2004 and the Company contributed Rs.8 million and Rs.17 million in fiscals 2004 and 2005, respectively

The Company has leased property, plant and equipment under operating lease arrangements. Operating lease rent expense was Rs. 2,434 million, 1,651 million and Rs. 1,328 million in fiscals 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

IRUs with gross carrying amounts of Rs.505 million and accumulated depreciation of Rs.14 million has been leased under operating lease arrangements.

In respect of these IRUs, lease rental income of Rs. 18 million has been recognized in earnings in fiscal 2005.

Future non-cancelable lease rent receipts will be recognized in earnings as follows:

The Company has leased certain premises under operating lease arrangements. Lease rental income in respect of these leases will be recognised in earnings as follows:

In respect of these leases, rental income of Rs. 26 million and Rs. 32 million has been recognised in earnings in fiscals 2004 and 2005 respectively.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term bank deposits, accounts receivable, advance income taxes, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and short-term borrowings, approximate their fair values due to the short- term nature of these instruments. The carrying amounts of other non-current assets and liabilities approximate their fair values.

Available-for-sale securities are carried at their fair values, which are generally based on market price quotations. The fair values of securities without readily determinable market values cannot be reasonably estimated.

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments; however there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value are not necessarily indicative of all the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction as of either March 31, 2004 or 2005. The estimated fair value amounts as of March 31, 2004 and 2005 have been measured as of those dates, and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements.

The Company, in accordance with its risk management policies and procedures, enters into foreign currency forward contracts to manage its exposure in foreign exchange rates. The counter party is generally a bank. Although these contracts are effective as hedges from an economic perspective they are not designated as hedges.

Foreign exchange contracts held by the Company as of March 31, 2004 and 2005 were Rs. 1,897 million and Rs. 691 million, respectively. These contracts are for a period between two and ten months.

In fiscals 2004 and 2005, exchange loss of Rs.49 million and Rs.42 million, respectively on foreign currency forward exchange contracts have been recognized in earnings.

The Board of Directors and the Managing Director allocate resources to and assess the performance of the segments and as a group constitute the chief operating decision maker (CODM).

In fiscal 2005, as a result of changes in the form and content of segment information provided to and used by the CODM to allocate resources and assess performance, and change in the organizational structure, the Company changed its reportable segments. The reportable segments in 2005 are “Wholesale Business”, “Enterprise Business” and “Others”. The composition of the reportable segments is as follows:

In fiscal 2005 the Company has identified the following operating segments based on the organizational structure and for which discrete financial information including gross margins is available:

ILD and NLD services are managed by the Wholesale business group, corporate data transmission services and other services are managed by the Enterprise business group, and internet services are managed by the Retail business group.

All other services including NLD and internet have been reported under “Other Services”, as none of these operating segments meet the reportable quantitative thresholds. Revenues from “Wholesale Business” and “Enterprise Business” exceed seventy five per cent of the Company’s consolidated revenues.

In fiscals 2003 and 2004, the Company’s operating and reportable segments were “International telephony and related services” which included international long distance telephony and corporate data transmission services and “Other services” which included national long distance telephony voice and data service, internet and other value added services. Discrete financial information was available only for these segments.

In accordance with the segmentation basis adopted in fiscal 2005, comparable segment information for fiscals 2003 and 2004 has not been presented, as comparable information for fiscal 2003 and 2004 is unavailable. As a result segment information for fiscals 2003 and 2004, and comparable segment information for fiscal 2005 have been presented under old segmentation basis.

Summarized segment information based on the new segmentation basis for fiscal 2005 is as follows:

Revenues and interconnect charges are directly attributable to the segments. Space segment utilization charges, rent of landlines and other network and transmission costs are allocated based on utilization of satellite, landlines and undersea cable bandwidth capacities. License fee for international long distance telephony and corporate data transmission services have been allocated based on net revenues from these services. Depreciation and repairs and maintenance on undersea cables including IRUs are allocated to segments based on utilization of undersea cable bandwidth capacity. Depreciation on all other property, plant and equipment, and all other operating costs are unallocated.

Summarized segment information based on old segmentation basis for fiscals 2003, 2004 and 2005 is as follows:

Revenues and interconnect charges were directly identifiable and have been attributed to the segments. Space segment charges, rent of landlines and other network and transmission costs were allocated based on segment revenues. License fee for international long distance telephony and corporate data transmission services were allocated based on net revenues from these services. Net revenues are determined as revenues less interconnect charges.

Depreciation and amortization and all other operating costs were not allocated. Telecommunication services were provided utilizing the Company’s assets which do not generally make a distinction between the types of service. As a result, assets and expenses relating to those assets were not allocated to segments.

Revenues have been allocated to geographies based on location of the customers and are as follows:

In fiscal 2005, revenues from customers comprise mainly revenues from wholesale and enterprise segments under the new segmentation basis. In fiscals 2003, 2004 and 2005, revenues from customers comprised revenues mainly from international telephony and related services segment.

Substantially all of the Company’s property, plant and equipment, other than undersea cables are located in India.

Concentrations of credit risk exist when changes in economic, industry or geographic factors similarly affect groups of counter parties whose aggregate credit exposure is material in relation to the Company’s total credit exposure.

The Company has a customer concentration of risk, as illustrated in the table below showing the aggregated accounts receivable for five largest customers as of March 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively. The Company’s exposure to other customers is diversified, and no other single customer explains more than 2.8% and 3.4% of outstanding accounts receivable at March 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

The Company’s principal related parties consist of its principal shareholders, government departments; government owned or controlled companies, its own subsidiaries, equity method investees, and its key managerial personnel. As described elsewhere in these financial statements, the Company routinely enters into transactions with its related parties, such as providing telecommunication services, paying license fees and subletting premises. Transactions and balances with its own subsidiaries and equity method investees are eliminated on consolidation.

Other related party transactions and balances are immaterial individually and in the aggregate.

The Company grants loans to employees for acquiring assets such as computers and vehicles and for purchase of equity shares of the Company. The annual rate of interest at which the loans have been made to employees is at 4%. The loans are secured by assets acquired by the employees. As of March 31, 2004 and 2005, amounts receivable from employees aggregated to Rs.144 million and Rs. 114 million respectively. Interest free short-term advances made to employees aggregated to Rs.4 million and Rs. 3 million as of March 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

The Company also grants interest subsidy in excess of 4% of the interest rate for loans to employees for purchases of property. The cost of interest subsidy of Rs.20 million, Rs.23 million and Rs.29 million for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively, is included in staff costs.

Capital commitments represent expenditure, principally relating to the construction of new buildings, undersea cables and expansion of transmission equipment, which had been committed under contractual arrangements with the majority of payments due within a one-year period. The amount of these commitments totalled Rs.5,442 million as of March 31, 2005. Out of this total amount Rs. 333 million is expected to be purchased in 2007. In accordance with the shareholders’ agreement of UTL the Company has an obligation to contribute additional capital of Rs. 100 million. The amount is payable on demand.

In the normal course of business, claims and assertions are made by various parties against the Company. The Company assesses these claims and monitors these on an ongoing basis, with the assistance of external legal counsel wherever necessary. The Company records a liability for any claims where a potential loss is probable and capable of being estimated, and discloses such matters in the financial statements if material. The Company discloses in the financial statements potential losses that are considered reasonably possible, but not probable, but does not record a liability unless the loss becomes probable.

The following is a description of material claims and losses where a potential loss is reasonably possible but not probable.

(a) In fiscal 1995, the Income tax authorities in India disallowed expenditure on licence fees as deductible item for the purposes of income tax computation. The management is contesting this disallowance in the High Court and believes that the outcome of this dispute will be in the Company’s favor, as license fee has been allowed as deductible expenditure for computing income tax in other fiscal years. As of March 31, 2005, the possible income tax liability and interest on disallowance of license fee is Rs.1,400 million.

(b) The Income tax authorities in India have disallowed certain tax holiday claims made by the Company. The Company is contesting these disallowances in the Income Tax Appellate Authority. As of March 31, 2005, possible income tax liability and interest on disallowance of these claims is Rs.6,890 million.

(c) The Income tax authorities have claimed income tax on certain reimbursements made by the DoT. The Company is contesting the claim in the Income Tax Appellate Authority. As of March 31, 2005, the income tax claim and interest was Rs.2,853 million.

As of March 31, 2005, sales tax amounting to Rs.229 million has been claimed by the Sales tax authorities of Chennai and Delhi. These claims are made for sale of internet and certain corporate data transmission services. The Company has challenged the applicability of sales tax on these services in the Supreme Court of India.

A claim of Rs.65,430 million (US$1,500 million) have been made against the Company by a strategic business alliance associate for breach of contract relating to access and sale of bandwidth capacity on the Company’s TGN network acquired subsequent to March 31, 2005. The claim has been made in the US Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Company has filed its answer to the complaint denying all liability and believes that the probability of the claim succeeding is remote.

As of March 31, 2005, there were other claims of Rs. 381 million which includes price escalation claims of Rs. 292 million made by contractors. An amount of Rs. 90 million has been accrued for these claims based on management’s best estimate of probable loss arising from these claims.

Any dividends declared by the Company are based on the profit available for distribution as reported in the statutory financial statements of the Company prepared in accordance with Indian GAAP. Accordingly, in certain years, the net income reported in these financial statements may not be fully distributable. As of March 31, 2004 and 2005, the amounts available for distribution, net of dividend tax, are Rs. 8,452 million and Rs. 13,812 million, respectively. Subsequent to March 31, 2005, the Board of Directors recommended a dividend of Rs. 6 per equity share, which has been approved by the shareholders in the Annual General Meeting held on September 14, 2005.

In June 2005, the Company consummated the acquisition of TYCO Global Network (TGN), an undersea cable network across North America, Europe and Asia. The purchase consideration is Rs. 5,890 million (US$ 130 million).

In July 2005 the Company entered into an agreement to acquire Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd (“Teleglobe”) for a consideration of Rs.10,425 million(US$ 239 million). The acquisition is subject to regulatory approvals.

In September 2005, the Company entered into an agreement for acquisition of the entire stake held by Tata Power Company (“TPC”) in Tata Power Broad Band Limited for a purchase consideration of Rs.2,390 million (US$ 55 million).

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tata Teleservices Limited as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated profit and loss accounts and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited (‘TTML’), a subsidiary, which statements reflect total assets of Rs 28,590 million and Rs 25,312 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively and total revenues of Rs 8,075 million and Rs 5,975 million for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for TTML, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in India, which differ in certain respects from those generally accepted in the United States (see Note 22 of Schedule R of the schedules forming part of the consolidated financial statements).

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited (“Company”), a Company incorporated in India, as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related profit and loss accounts and the cash flow statements for the each of the years then ended (all expressed in crores of Indian Rupees). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in India.

Accounting principles generally accepted in India vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The application of the latter would have affected the determination of net loss and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the determination of stockholder’s equity as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, to the extent summarized in note no. 23 of Schedule 15.

The schedules referred to above and notes to accounts form an integral part of the balance sheet.

The schedules referred to above and notes to accounts form an integral part of the profit and loss account.

K: MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURE (to the extent not written-off or adjusted) (See Schedule R, Note 2.9 and 12)

Tata Teleservices Limited (‘the Company’ or ‘TTSL’), part of the Tata Group, was formed to provide basic telephony services. On December 26, 2002, Tata Power Company Limited, Tata Industries Limited (‘TIL’), Tata Sons Limited and TTSL executed a shareholders agreement with Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (‘VSNL’) wherein VSNL agreed to acquire up to 19.9 per cent equity shares of the Company at any given point in time subject to a maximum contribution of Rs 8,358 million towards equity share capital. The shareholders agreement was amended effective March 11, 2005 to incorporate certain changes with respect to constitution of the Board of Directors. TTSL commenced the provision of basic telephony in the state of Andhra Pradesh in 1999 and Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Delhi in 2002 (collectively referred to as ‘Existing Circles’).

Further to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (‘TRAI’) recommendations of October 27, 2003 and the Department of Telecommunication’s (‘DoT’) guidelines on Unified Access (Basic and Cellular) Services License (‘UASL’) dated November 11, 2003, the Company migrated to the UASL in November 2003 by making a payment of Rs 5,445 million for Existing Circles, taking the total license entry fees for the Existing Circles to Rs 8,810.million. The Company, in January 2004, signed the UASL for 11 New Circles of Haryana, Kerala, UP (West), UP (East), Kolkata, Punjab, Rajasthan, West Bengal, Himachal Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa; and on April 30, 2005 for Madhya Pradesh by paying an aggregate license fees of Rs 4,344 million (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘New Circles’). During January 2005, the Company launched its services in 12 New Circles, thereby becoming a pan India operator.

On September 6, 2004, the Company launched its pre-paid mobile services “True Paid”, initially launched as an introductory offer valid up to November 15, 2004, offering free local airtime and SMS. As of March 31, 2005, True Paid services have been successfully launched across all circles.

During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Group won a bid to provide rural telephony covering 213 Short Distance Charging Areas (42 Short Switching Areas) under the universal service obligation fund and is required to complete the roll out within a period of six months from the date of signing the agreement i.e. March 28, 2005. As at September 30, 2005, the Group has completed the roll out for 32 Short Switching Areas. The Group has requested an extension till March 31, 2006 for completing the roll out in the remaining 10 Short Switching Areas. The Group is confident of getting an extension for the other Short Switching Areas as well.

In December 2002, the Company acquired 50.83 per cent of the paid-up equity capital of Hughes Telecom Limited (‘HTIL’), the basic telephony service provider in the state of Maharashtra, from HTIL’s erstwhile promoters through the issue of 714,317,891 0.1 per cent RPS of Rs 10 each redeemable at the end of 51 months at Rs 8 per share and to the extent not redeemed after such period, at the end of 75 months at Rs 10 per share [See Note 2.9 (ii)]. On February 13, 2003, the name of HTIL was changed to Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited.

The Company’s holding of 50.83 per cent of TTML at April 1, 2004 was reduced to 47.91 per cent pursuant to Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (‘FCCBs’) offer by TTML into equity during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and grant of certain employee options. Accordingly, considering the voting rights of equity shares held by TTSL, TTML ceased to be the subsidiary of TTSL. However, TTSL, based on the commitment received from the Tata Group, continues to control TTML. Hence, TTML has been consolidated with the Group as of March 31, 2005 (see Schedule R, Note 2.2).

The Company has pledged the investments (aggregating 47.91 per cent) to the lenders of TTML and also undertaken that the percentage of shares pledged by it would not be less than 50.83 per cent of the total equity share capital (subject to any dilution as a result of exercise of employee stock options). The dilution on account of the above is expected to be covered by the pledge of shares held by other Tata group companies in TTML.

As part of its initiative to optimize synergies between the basic telephony, internet, virtual private network (‘VPN’) and data center services, the Company had invested Rs1,500 million in TISL to make it, a fully owned subsidiary.

TISL has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (‘MOU’) with Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (‘VSNL’) on March 15, 2005 for VSNL to manage TISL assets and most of the existing customer base. Under the agreement, TISL earns a minimum guaranteed amount from VSNL for a period of nine years (with an initial period of 3 years, whereupon VSNL has a right to terminate the agreement) with an upside based on the revenue share of Internet Data Center (‘IDC’) and VPN business generated by VSNL. As a part of the arrangement, VSNL has the right to use the assets of TISL and most of the employees of TISL will move to VSNL. In the event that VSNL terminates the arrangement, VSNL and TISL shall explore options of mutual benefit, so as to ensure that no party is put to a financial loss of a material nature on termination of the said agreement.

TISL has been granted an ‘A’ category license from DoT to operate internet services in the whole of India. TISL is the only Indian company operating a Suntone certified data center (certified by Sun Microsystems Inc.) in India and is one of the service providers with the highest number of points (56) of presence to operate VPN services in India.

(iii) Investment in Wireless TT Info Services Limited (‘WTISL’) (formerly known as Tata Tele Info Limited)

As part of its initiative to optimize synergies between the basic telephony, data content and related value added services, the Company, on March 17, 2004, invested in 49,994 equity shares (while six shares are held by employees of the Company) of Rs 10 each, of Wireless TT Info Services Limited, at par, as a subscriber to the memorandum of association, thereby making WTISL a wholly owned subsidiary.

TTSL, together with its subsidiaries, TTML, TISL and WTISL, is hereinafter collectively referred to as the ‘Group’.

Industrial Development Bank of India Limited has reappraised the Group’s revised Business Plan for the consolidated operations of the Group across the country. The plan envisages initial network rollout till March 31, 2007 and the project is proposed to be financed equally by way of debt and equity. The Group has already commenced the syndication process for rupee loans, issued and raised Non-convertible debentures (‘NCDs’) during the year, and has received sanctions from various financial institutions to the extent of almost 80 per cent of its debt requirements. The shareholders are committed to fund/arrange the equity, directly or through new shareholders.

The Group, during the year ended March 31, 2005, also successfully completed a Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs) issue aggregating to US$ 125 million which was utilized towards part financing the expansion of TTML’s network. As of March 31, 2005, FCCBs aggregating to US$ 46.96 million have been converted into TTML’s equity at a premium of Rs14.96 per share.

The Group has a negative working capital of Rs 12,541 million at March 31, 2005 and loans of Rs 21,121 million are due for repayment within the next twelve months. Further, the net worth of the Group (including RPS) as at March 31 2005 is Rs 8,354 million (after setting-off the unamortized balance of Miscellaneous Expenditure of Rs 2,901 Million) i.e. an erosion of over 83 per cent.

Based on the commitments and funding provided by the Shareholders and the lenders so far, the Group is confident that it would be able to successfully arrange the long term financing for its projects. In the event of delay in arranging of long-term debt loan funding for its projects, the Board of Directors of the Company are committed to arrange the future capital and operating fund requirements.

These consolidated financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention, on the accrual basis of accounting, to comply in all material respects with the mandatory accounting standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (‘ICAI’) to reflect the financial position and the results of operations of TTSL together with its subsidiary companies, TTML, TISL and WTISL. Further, the financial statements are presented in the general format specified in Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956 (‘the Act’). These financial statements are not statutory financial statements.

For the convenience of readers, the consolidated balance sheet, consolidated profit and loss account and consolidated statement of cash flows at and for the year ended March 31, 2005 have been translated into United States Dollars (“US$”) at the noon buying rate in New York city on March 31, 2005 for cable transfers in Indian Rupees, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve bank of New York of US$1 = Rs 43.62. The convenience translation should not be construed as a representation that the Indian Rupee amounts referred to in these financial statements have been, could have been, or could in the future be, converted into US$, at this or at any other rate of exchange, or at all.

The consolidated financial statements of the Group have been prepared based on a line-by-line consolidation of the balance sheet, statement of profit and loss and cash flows of TTSL, TTML, TISL and WTISL. The results of operations of TISL are included in the consolidated financial statement from October 27, 2003, the date TISL became a wholly owned subsidiary of TTSL. TISL was accounted for as an associate Company under the equity method upto October 23, 2003. All material inter-company transactions and balances between the entities included in consolidated financial statements have been eliminated.

During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company’s holding in TTML diluted from 50.75 per cent to 47.91 per cent due to exercise of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds into equity shares. However, the Company continues to control TTML. Accordingly, as at March 31, 2005, the Group has consolidated TTML as subsidiary and recorded the balance holding i.e. 52.09 per cent as minority interest. Gain/loss due to dilution of holding in TTML has been recorded to profit and loss account. Though the dilution of equity in TTML from 50.75 per cent to 47.91 per cent happened during the quarter ended March 31, 2005, for the purposes of convenience and considering the materiality, the dilution is effected as of March 31, 2005.

Minority interest represents that part of the net results of operations and of the net assets of a subsidiary attributable to interests, which are not owned directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, by TTSL.

The significant accounting policies adopted by the Group, in respect of the consolidated financial statements are detailed as follows:

Investments that are readily realizable and intended to be held for not more than a year are classified as current investments; all other investments are classified as long-term investments. Current investments are carried at the lower of cost and fair market value determined on an individual investment basis. Long-term investments are carried at cost, except the cost of investments acquired or partly acquired by the issue of shares or other securities, which are carried at the sum total of the fair value of the securities issued and other acquisition costs. Provision for diminution in value of long-term investments is made to recognize only a decline other than temporary in the value of the investments.

Investments in associated companies where a significant influence is exercised are accounted for by using the equity method. Goodwill arising from equity basis of accounting for investments in associates is amortized over a five year period from the month of acquisition.

Inventories comprise public telephony booth equipment and network equipment, which are recorded at cost and are expensed upon their sale at moving weighted average cost. Provision for obsolescence is made based upon a periodic technical evaluation undertaken by the Group.

The License Entry Fee has been recognized as an intangible asset and is amortized over the remainder of the license period of 20 years from the date of commencement of commercial operations in the respective circles. License entry fee includes interest on funding of license entry fee and bank guarantee commission up to the date of commencement of commercial operations in the respective New Circles. Fees paid for migration of the original licenses to the UASL are amortized over the remainder of the license period of 20 years from the date of migration to UASL.

Revenue sharing fee is expensed in the Profit and Loss Account in the year in which the related income from providing unified access services is recognized.

An additional revenue share towards spectrum charges is computed at the rate of 2 per cent of the service revenue, earned from the customers who are provided services through the CDMA wireless technology. This is expensed in the Profit and Loss Account in the year in which the related income is recognized.

Preliminary, pre-bid and deferred revenue expenditure, customer acquisition costs and interest on funding of license fees (incurred after commencement of operations of the respective licenses) are expensed as incurred.

Fixed assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Whenever the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized in the Profit and Loss account for items of fixed assets carried at cost. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s net selling price and value in use. The net selling price is the amount obtained from the sale of an asset in an arm’s length transaction while value in use is the present value of estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the continuing use of an asset, up to its disposal at the end of its useful life. Recoverable amounts are estimated for individual assets or, if not possible, for the cash generating unit. Impairment loss recognized for an asset in earlier accounting periods is reversed, to the extent of its recoverable amount, if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized.

The carrying value of license entry fees are assessed for recoverability by reference to the estimated future discounted net cash flows that are expected to be generated by the asset. Where this assessment indicates a deficit, the assets are written down to the market value or fair value as computed above.

Indefeasible Right to Use (‘IRU’) taken for bandwidth capacities by the Company are capitalized as intangible assets at the amounts paid for acquiring the right and are amortised over the period of agreement or twenty years, whichever is lower.

Effective April 1, 2004, the Company has adopted Accounting Standard 28, Impairment of Assets, which has not given rise to any impairment loss to be recognized in the financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2005.

The carrying values of long-lived assets i.e. license entry fees are assessed for recoverability by reference to the estimated future discounted net cash flows that are expected to be generated by the asset. Where this assessment indicates a deficit, the assets are written down to the market value or fair value as computed above.

Preliminary and deferred revenue expenditure is expensed off as they are incurred.

The Group amortizes the cost of arranging long-term loans over the period of the loan or five years, whichever is lower, commencing from the date of the first draw-down of the related loan, on a straight-line basis. The amortization charge of finance set up costs incurred for the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset are capitalized as part of the cost of the underlying class of assets.

As discussed in Note 1(b)(i) to the financial statements, the Company acquired 50.83 per cent equity shares in HTIL through the issue of 714,317,891 RPS of Rs 10 each. The differential between the fair value of RPS issued and its face value is treated as ‘Expenditure for funding of HTIL investment and amortized on a straight line basis over the 75-month period from the month of acquisition of HTIL.

Discount on issue of debentures represents the difference between the face value and issue price of non-convertible debentures. This cost is deferred and amortised on a straight-line basis over the redemption period of debentures commencing from the date of issue of debentures.

A provision is recognized for a present obligation as a result of past event; it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and in respect of which a reliable estimate can be made. Provisions are not discounted to its present value and are determined based on best management estimate required to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date. These are reviewed at each balance sheet date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimates.

Revenues are recognized as services are rendered and are net of discounts and service tax. Unbilled revenues resulting from unified access services provided from the billing cycle date to the end of each month are estimated and recorded. Revenues from unified access service rendered through prepaid cards are recognized based on actual usage by the customers. Billings made but not expected to be collected due to significant delays in billing if any, are estimated by the management and not recognized as revenues in accordance with Accounting Standard 9 on Revenue Recognition.

Revenues from sale of equipment primarily consist of sale of customer terminal equipment and network equipment, and are recognized at the time of delivery of the equipment to the customers.

Internet services revenues include revenue from internet access services and corporate network/data services and are net of service taxes. Revenue from internet services is recognized based on usage by subscribers/customers. Revenue from corporate network/data services is recognized as and when services are rendered.

The TRAI issued Interconnection Usage Charges Regulation 2003 (‘IUC regime’) effective May 1, 2003 and subsequently amended twice with effect from February 1, 2004 and February 1, 2005. Under the IUC regime, with the objective of sharing of call revenues across different operators involved in origination, transit and termination of every call, the Group pays interconnection charges (prescribed as Rs per minute of call time) for all outgoing calls originating in its network to other operators, depending on the termination point of the call i.e. mobile, fixed line, and distance i.e. local, national long distance and international long distance. The Group receives certain interconnection charges from other operators for all calls terminating in its network.

Accordingly, interconnect revenue are recognized as those on calls originating in another telecom operator network and terminating in the Group’s network. Interconnect cost is recognized as charges incurred on termination of calls originating from the Group’s network and terminating on the network of other telecom operators. The interconnect revenue and costs are recognized in the financial statement on a gross basis and included in service revenue and network operation expenditure, respectively.

Further, interconnect cost also includes the related interconnect cost on free prepaid recharge vouchers (‘RCVs’) distributed by the Company even though these may be used in a later period.

Retirement benefits to employees comprise contributions to provident fund, gratuity and superannuation funds in respect of which, the Company’s contributions are charged to the Profit and Loss Account. The contributions towards provident fund are made to the statutory authorities and to the Tata Teleservices Provident Fund Trust. For the year ended March 31, 2005 the Company has made contribution towards a shortfall of interest in the Tata Teleservices Provident Fund Trust. The contributions towards gratuity and superannuation funds are made to Life Insurance Corporation of India. In respect of gratuity, provision for the year has been made on the basis of an independent actuarial valuation at March 31, 2005.

Liability for leave encashment is in accordance with the rules of the Group and is recognized provided on the basis of an independent actuarial valuation as at March 31, 2005.

Foreign currency transactions are recorded in the reporting currency, by applying to the foreign currency amount the exchange rate between the reporting currency and the foreign currency at the date of the transaction.

Foreign currency monetary items are reported using the closing rate. Non-monetary items which are carried in terms of historical cost denominated in a foreign currency are reported using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction; and non-monetary items which are carried at fair value or other similar valuation denominated in a foreign currency are reported using the exchange rates that existed when the values were determined.

Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items or on restatement of the Company’s monetary items at rates different from those at which they were initially recorded during the year, or reported in previous financial statements, are recognized as income or as expenses in the year in which they arise except those arising from investments in non-integral operations. Exchange differences in respect of fixed assets acquired from a country outside India are capitalized as part of the asset cost.

The premium or discount arising at the inception of forward exchange contracts is amortized as expense or income over the life of the contract. Exchange differences on such contracts are recognized in the Profit and Loss account in the year in which the exchange rates change. Any profit or loss arising on cancellation or renewal of forward exchange contract is recognized as income or as expense for the year.

Borrowing costs attributable to the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset, including interest attributable to the funding of license fees with respect to New Licenses and New Circles up to the date of commencement of commercial operations, are capitalized as a part of the cost of that asset (see Note 2.7(i) and Note 6(b)). The accounting treatment of loan arrangement fees has been discussed in Note 2.9 (i) to the financial statements. Other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense in the year in which they are incurred.

Income taxes comprise both current and deferred taxes. Current tax is measured at the amount expected to be paid to the taxation authorities, using the applicable tax rates and laws.

Deferred income taxes reflects the impact of current year timing differences between taxable income and accounting income for the year and reversal of timing differences of earlier years. Deferred tax is measured based on the tax rates and the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.

Deferred tax assets, other than unabsorbed depreciation and tax losses carried forward, are recognized and carried forward only to the extent that there is a reasonable certainty that sufficient future taxable income will be available against which such deferred tax assets can be realized. Deferred tax assets from unabsorbed depreciation and tax losses carried forward are recognized and carried forward only to the extent that there is a virtual certainty that such deferred tax assets can be realized against future taxable profits. Unrecognized deferred tax assets of earlier years are re-assessed and recognized to the extent that it has become virtually certain that future taxable income will be available against which such deferred tax assets can be realized.

In accordance with the Accounting Standard on Accounting for Taxes on Income (‘AS 22’) and the guidance provided by the ICAI, the Group has not recognized any deferred tax assets resulting from the carry forward tax losses. Further, no deferred tax liabilities on account of temporary timing differences have been recognized since they are expected to reverse in the tax holiday period (see note 11).

Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss for the year attributable to equity shareholders by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the year.

The number of shares used in computing diluted loss per share comprises the weighted average shares considered for deriving basic loss per share, and also the weighted average number of shares, if any, which would have been issued on the conversion of all dilutive potential equity shares, except where the results are anti dilutive.

Leases of assets that transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incident to ownership of an asset are classified as finance leases. All assets acquired under finance lease are recognized as assets and liabilities at the inception of lease. These assets are depreciated in accordance with the fixed assets and depreciation policy of the Group.

The payments made pursuant to the finance lease are apportioned between the interest charge and the reduction of the outstanding liability recognized at the inception of lease. The interest is charged to the profit and loss account on the diminishing balance method over the period of the finance lease.

Leases of assets under which the lessor effectively retains all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. Lease payments under operating leases are recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Pre-operating costs includes employee costs, travel, communication and other expenses relating to the marketing and administrative activities incurred prior to the commencement of commercial operations of the New Circles. These costs, are identified specifically for each of the new licenses, and are expensed as incurred in the books of account as they are not directly related to the construction of the network and are separately disclosed in the Profit and Loss account. Network implementation costs pertaining to the New Circles that are specifically attributable to the fixed assets acquired are capitalized.

The compensation cost of stock options granted to the employees is measured by the difference between the market value of TTML’s shares on the date of the grant and the exercise price to be paid by the option holders. The compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line method basis over the vesting period of the options (see Schedule R, Note 19).

The Company’s operating businesses are organized and managed separately according to the nature of services rendered, with each segment representing a strategic business unit that offers different products to different markets. The analysis of geographical segments is based on the areas in which the Company’s services are sold.

Common allocable costs are allocated to each segment according to the relative contribution of each segment to the total common costs.

The Corporate and other segment include general corporate income and expense items, which are not allocated to any business segment.

The primary reporting of the Company has been performed on the basis of business segments. The Company has only one business segment, which is providing unified access services. Accordingly, the amounts appearing in these financial statements relate of this primary business segment. Further, the Company provides services only in India and, accordingly, no disclosures are required under secondary segment reporting.

Customer acquisition costs include cost of start up kits and subsidy on handsets for acquisition of pre-paid subscribers. These costs are recognized at the time of sale of the pre-paid handset to the distributors. Handset subsidy is recorded based on expected realization of handsets distributed to the Company’s distribution agents and expected to be used for acquisition of the subscribers. The subsidy is determined by the Company based on the estimated realizable value of the handsets.

Premium payable on redemption of bonds is fully provided for on issue of the bonds. The Securities Premium Account is applied in providing for premium on redemption in accordance with section 78 of the Act. On conversion of the bonds to equity the redemption premium is reversed.

Expenses on issue of bonds are written off to the Securities Premium Account in accordance with section 78 of the Act.

Claims against the Company not acknowledged as debts and commitments includes the following:

The Company issued 200 million equity warrants of Rs Nil face value to TIL on September 9, 1999, granting a right to TIL to subscribe to one equity share of the Company, at par for each equity share warrant issued. The equity share warrants can be exercised at any time within a period of seven years from the date of issuance. As at March 31, 2005, TIL has not exercised any of the above warrants.

Loans of Rs 12,877 million (2004 – Rs 593 million) from banks and FIs is fully secured by way of a first charge on all the immovable and moveable assets, both present and future, of the Company, which ranks pari-passu with the charges created/to be created in favor of the other banks/FIs.

The Company has availed long-term facilities from various banks and FIs amounting to Rs 5,720 million and Rs 500 million, respectively. At the year end, the Company is in the process of securing these loans against the assets of the Company.

TTML’s loans from banks of Rs 9,171 million (2004 – Rs 9,865 million) are secured/to be secured by either one or more of the following as per terms of arrangements with the respective banks:

During the year ended March 31, 2004, TISL, in order to repay high cost loans, took a term loan of Rs 300 million from IDBI Bank Limited, for a period of three years, repayable on a quarterly basis. Further, the Company borrowed Term Loan of Rs 280 million during the current year. The balance outstanding as at March 31, 2005 was Rs 344 million. The loans are fully secured by way of a first charge on all the moveable assets, both present and future of TISL.

The total long-term loans repayable within one year amount to Rs 916 million (2004 – Rs 142 million).

As at March 31, 2005, the Company had issued two series of debentures by way of private placement: Secured Redeemable Non-Convertible Debentures Series I on July 23, 2004 (‘NCD Series I) and Secured Redeemable Non-Convertible - Deep Discount Bond Series II (‘NCD Series II’) also on July 23, 2004, aggregating Rs 9,990 million.

9,700 NCD Series I issued with the maturity amount aggregating Rs 9,700 million at a discount of 1.16 per cent and carries an interest rate of 6.45 per cent per annum. This series is for a period of seven years, repayable in five equal annual installments commencing from the end of the third year from the date of allotment i.e. July 23, 2004, with a call option at the end of the third year.

290 NCD Series II issued with the maturity amount aggregating Rs 290 million at a discount of 58.62 per cent and is interest free. This series is for a period of seven years, repayable at the end of the seventh year from the date of allotment i.e. July 23, 2004.

The above NCDs are secured by way of a charge on the assets of the Company with an asset cover of 1.1 times the obligations under the Debentures and a pari-passu first charge on the entire present and future assets (movable and immovable) of the existing five circles, namely, Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, Gujarat, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu and the assignment of licenses in these circles. With an additional irrevocable and unconditional guarantee for 30 per cent of the principal amount and a guarantee for one quarter’s interest payment by Tata Sons and an irrevocable and unconditional guarantee for 30 per cent of the principal amount to be amortized in the ratio of 4:4:2 at the end of the 3^rd, 4^th and 5^th years, respectively, by Barclays Bank for NCD Series I; and an irrevocable and unconditional guarantee equivalent for Rs 12.6 million on the issue date increasing by Rs 0.3 million every quarter to a maximum of Rs 21 million i.e. 70 percent of the principal amount by Tata Sons.

The proceeds of the NCDCD Series I and Series II issue have been utilized for the purpose of expansion and operations of the Company and towards refinancing of debts. As at the Balance Sheet date, no amount of the said issue is unutilized.

The Company has entered into various short-term loan facilities with Banks and FIs which are secured by a first charge on all the immovable and movable assets, both present and future, of the Company, which ranks pari-passu with the charges created/to be created in favor of other banks/FIs and subordinate/subservient to the charge on the movable assets of the Company. The entire balance of short-term loan of Rs 10,976 million (2004 – Rs 23,058 million) is repayable within one year. The Company has sufficient long-term funding for the discharge of its financial commitments.

The Company has entered into various equipment purchase agreements with vendors for the supply of telecommunication equipment aggregating to US$ 477.7 million (2004 – US$ 294 million). The payments are to be made through and covered by an irrevocable letter of credit with usance of three years with the vendor entitled to draw down based on completion of the agreed payment milestones. Interest ranging between LIBOR plus 0.5 to 1.00 per cent is payable by the Company over the usance period of three years. As at March 31, 2005, equipment aggregating Rs 15,162 million (2004 – Rs 5,428 million) have been supplied by the vendors. The irrevocable letters of credit have been issued by the Company’s bankers, against hypothecation of equipment, partial cash margin and partial promoters support letter. The loan repayable within one year amounts to Rs Nil (2004 – Rs Nil).

Of the total unsecured loans of Rs 8,056 million (2004 – Rs 5,495 million) from banks, Rs 900 million (2004 – Rs 4,945 million) is secured by a counter-guarantee/letter of comfort from promoters. Unsecured loans from others of Rs 1,171 million comprise inter-corporate deposits arranged from promoter group companies and through other entities secured by a counter-guarantee/letter of awareness from promoters. Unsecured loans from others includes Rs 470 million where the lender will have the right to share assets of the Company mortgaged to secured lenders, in the event of enforcement of the security and subject to consent of the secured lenders. Unsecured loans repayable within one year are Rs 9,229 million (2004 – Rs 9,914 million).

During the year, TTML issued Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds of USD 125 million at an interest rate of 1 per cent per annum (payable semi-annually). The holders of these bonds have an option to convert the bonds into equity shares of TTML on or after July 1, 2004 at a pre-determined price of Rs 24.96. The bonds that are not converted into equity, are redeemable at a premium of 19.38 per cent at the end of five years from the date of issue. As at March 31, 2005 bonds of USD 47 million have been converted, resulting in addition of Rs 836 million to equity share capital and Rs 1,250 million to Securities Premium.

Loans and advances include Rs 1,048 million (2004 – Rs 1,888 million) and Rs 917 million (2004 – Rs Nil) receivable from DriveIndia.com Limited and Sterling Infotech Limited, the marketing associates of the Company.

During the year ended March 31, 2005 the Group has incurred losses resulting into a tax loss carry forward situation. The Group is eligible for a tax holiday under section 80IA of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961, allowing the Group a tax deduction equivalent to 100 per cent of profits and gains for any five consecutive financial years and 30 per cent for the next five financial years, out of 15 financial years, beginning with the financial year in which the Group started providing telecommunication services. Though management is confident of generating profits in the future, there is currently no convincing evidence of virtual certainty that the Group would reverse the tax loss carry forwards beyond the tax holiday period. Accordingly, the Group has not recognized any deferred tax assets resulting from the carry forward tax losses. Further, no deferred tax liabilities on account of temporary timing differences have been recognized since they are expected to reverse in the tax holiday period.

Discount on issue of debentures comprises discount between the face value and issue price of NCD Series I and NCD Series II of 1.16 per cent and 58.62 per cent of the face value respectively aggregating Rs 283 million. This cost is deferred and amortized over the respective redemption period of the NCDs.

Pre-operating costs include salaries, travel, communication and other expenses relating to marketing and administration activities of the New Circles prior to the commencement of commercial operations. The Company separately tracks these costs for each of the New Circles.

The primary reporting of the Group has been performed on the basis of business segments. The Group had only one business segment, which is the provision of unified access service and related internet services. Accordingly, the amounts appearing in these financial statements relate to this primary business segment. Further, the Group provides services only in the domestic markets in India and, accordingly, no disclosures are required under secondary segment reporting.

The total of minimum lease payments and their present values of computers acquired under finance lease are as follows:

The Group has entered into various lease agreements for leased premises, which expire at various dates over the next twenty years. Gross rental expenses for the year ended March 31, 2005 aggregated Rs 887 million (2004 – Rs 586 million).

On November 1999, TTML established the ESOP Plan, for the grant of stock options to the eligible employees of TTML. A compensation committee has been constituted to administer the plan through the Hughes Tele.com (India) Limited Employees Stock Option Trust (‘the Trust’).

In terms of the ESOP Plan, 12 million warrants were issued to the Trust, to be held by it on behalf of TTML for awarding eligible employees as and when advised by the compensation committee. Each allotted warrant grants a right to the warrant holder to subscribe to one equity share of TTML, at an exercise price of Rs 10 per share. The warrants will vest with the employees equally over a four-year period from the grant date, other than 240,000 fully vested warrants allotted in an earlier year. The equity warrants can be exercised at any time within a period of ten years from the date of the vesting.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has issued the Employee Stock Option Scheme and Stock Purchase Guidelines, which are applicable to stock option schemes for employees of all listed companies. In accordance with these guidelines, the excess of market price of the underlying equity shares on the date of grant of the stock options over the exercise price of the options is to be recognized in the books of account and amortized over the vesting period. However, no compensation was recorded, as the market value of TTML’s equity shares on the date of the grant did not exceed the exercise price.

As discussed in Note 5(b), on July 15, 2004 and July 23, 2004, the Company has issued NCD Series I and NCD Series II aggregating to Rs 9,990 million repayable over the specified period. As per section 117C (1) of the Act, a debenture redemption reserve (‘DRR’) is to be created to which adequate amounts is to be credited out of the profits of each year until such debentures are redeemed.

During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company has incurred losses of Rs 18,964 million, hence, in accordance with the clarification received from the Department of Company Affairs vide circular No 6/3/2001 –CL.V dated April 18, 2002, the Company has not created Debenture redemption reserve.

The consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2004, have been reclassified, where necessary, to conform with the current year’s presentation, whenever applicable.

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

The Group financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the India (‘Indian GAAP’) which differ from those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The significant differences, as they apply to the Group, are summarized below.

The Group accounted for the TTML acquisition at the TTML net asset value on an historical basis. The purchase consideration, which consisted of redeemable preference shares, was calculated at the fair value of the preference shares and the difference between the consideration and the net asset value of TTML was recorded as goodwill. In connection with the acquisition, TTSL issued preference shares and warrants to one of the sellers to settle a payable from TTML to the seller. No value was assigned to warrants issued. The preference shares issued to settle the payable were accounted for at the nominal or face value of the preference shares.

Under US GAAP, the cost of an acquisition in excess of the fair value of the net assets (including intangible assets) acquired would be recorded as goodwill. All preference shares and warrants issued in connection with the acquisition and related transactions would be valued at fair value in determining the purchase consideration.

The Company acquired 50 per cent of TISL in September 2001. The amount paid in excess of the proportionate net book value was recorded as goodwill. During the period from September 2001 to October 2003, the Company recorded its share of TISL’s loss. The Company acquired the remaining 50 per cent in October 2003 and recorded the amount paid in excess of the proportionate net book value as goodwill. TISL was consolidated with effect from October 2003.

Under US GAAP, in a common control transaction, amounts paid in excess of the proportionate share of net book value would be considered as a distribution and accounted for as an increase to the profit and loss account – debit balance (accumulated deficit). In addition, the acquisition of the remaining 50 per cent would be recorded as though the transaction occurred at the beginning of the period, in a manner similar to pooling of interests and the results of operations of TISL would have been consolidated from April 1, 2003.

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (continued)

Goodwill is amortized on a straight line basis over a period of five years from the month of acquisition. Accounting standard (“AS”) 26 – Intangible assets and AS 28 – Impairment of assets, under Indian GAAP, were applicable to the Company from April 1, 2004 and hence the Group did not test the goodwill for impairment as at March 31, 2004.

Under US GAAP, goodwill would be allocated to a reporting unit, which is defined as a segment or a level below that for which a discrete set of cash flows is available. Goodwill would not be amortized; but it would be evaluated for impairment, at least annually at a reporting unit level. The impairment test would be conducted at the reporting unit level by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value. Fair value is primarily determined by computing the future discounted cash flows expected to be generated by the reporting unit. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, goodwill may be impaired. If this occurs, the fair value of the reporting unit is then allocated to its assets and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. This implied fair value is then compared with the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill, and if it were less, an impairment loss would be recognized for the difference. Impairment tests performed for US GAAP purposes determined that goodwill was not impaired at March 31, 2005 and 2004.

The Group records a liability computed on the basis of an independent actuarial valuation for only the unutilized leave (vacation), which is expected to be paid in cash.

Under US GAAP, the determination of the liability would also take into consideration vacation that may be availed or utilized.

The Group records a liability for gratuity benefits on the basis of an independent actuarial valuation. Under Indian GAAP, the actuary can choose a method for (i) expense determination, (ii) determining the discount rate and (iii) valuing plan assets.

Under US GAAP, the liability for gratuity benefits requires the use of the projected unit credit method. The discount rate (reflecting the rate of interest which would provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the accumulated benefits when due) reflects current market rates for high quality debt instruments.

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (continued)

The Group defers the finance set up cost on loans and amortizes such costs over the period of the loan or five years, whichever is shorter, commencing from the date of the first draw-down of the related loan, on a straight-line basis.

Under US GAAP, the finance setup cost is amortized over the period of the loan in such a way as to result in a constant rate of interest (effective interest rate).

Discounts on issue of debentures are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the redemption period of the debentures commencing from the date of issue of debentures.

Under US GAAP, the discount on issue of debentures would be amortized over the redemption periods in such a way as to result in a constant rate of interest (effective interest rate). The difference as a result of applying the effective interest rate method for discounts on issue of debentures was not significant for the year ended March 31, 2004.

Amortization of discount on debentures and finance setup costs is included under Amortization in the Profit and Loss Account.

Under US GAAP, the amortization of discount on debentures and finance setup costs would be recorded as Finance Charges.

Redeemable preference shares issued as consideration for the investment in TTML were recorded at their face (nominal) value and the difference between the face value and the fair value of the preference shares was deferred and recorded as Expenditure for funding TTML investment. Such deferred expenditure is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the redemption term of the redeemable preference shares and recorded as Amortization. The Group classified preference shares as part of shareholders’ equity.

Under US GAAP, the redeemable preference shares issued as consideration would be recorded at their fair value and the difference between the fair value and the redemption value is increased by periodic accretions, using the effective interest rate method, such that the carrying amount will equal the redemption amount at the redemption date. Such accretion would be recorded as Finance Charges. Also under US GAAP, these preference shares would not be classified as part of shareholders’ equity, but as a separate caption between liabilities and equity.

Under Indian GAAP, premium payable on redemption of FCCB and expenses incurred on issue of FCCB were adjusted against the Securities Premium Account. Under US GAAP, these costs would be amortized by the interest rate method over the life of the FCCB. On holders exercising the option to convert the FCCB to equity the premium payable on redemption is reversed and the unamortised issue expenses adjusted against Additional paid in Capital. The FCCB does not contain a beneficial conversion feature at the time of issue.

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (continued)

Foreign exchange differences relating to the acquisition of fixed assets are adjusted to the cost of the fixed asset.

Under US GAAP, foreign exchange differences related to the acquisition of fixed assets would be recorded as an expense and included in Administration and Selling Costs.

Preoperative expenses incurred by TTML up to the commencement of new business were capitalized as part of fixed assets.

Amounts payable by TTML to two vendors for the purchase of fixed assets were subsequently waived during the year ended March 31, 2003 based on a re-negotiation. TTML reduced the cost of fixed assets by the amount waived.

Under US GAAP, the amounts waived would be accounted for as credit to profit and loss account of the relevant year.

TTML reconciliation adjustments related to depreciation and accumulated depreciation has been disclosed on an aggregate basis in the following reconciliation statement.

Certain Installation cost incurred in respect of Network Interface Units (‘NIUs’) is capitalized by group as part of fixed assets.

Finance cost incurred on borrowings used to finance the acquisition of licenses has been capitalized as part of the cost of the license and is amortized over the remaining life of the license.

The Group classifies all investments that are readily realizable and intended to be held for not more than a year as current investments. Current investments are carried at lower of cost and fair market value determined on an individual investment basis and difference charged to profit and loss account.

Under US GAAP, investment in marketable securities would be classified as available-for-sale. Unrealized gains and losses for available-for-sale securities (including those classified as current assets) would be excluded from earnings and reported as other comprehensive income, which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Unrealized gains for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were not significant.

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (continued)

The Group recorded a gain on dilution of its holding in TTML as a result of conversion of FCCBs.

Under US GAAP, in accordance with the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin (‘SAB’) No. 51, “Accounting for sale of stock by a Subsidiary”, gain recognition is not appropriate in situations where subsequent capital transactions are contemplated that raise s concern that the gain may not be realized. As TTSL or its parent company may make additional equity contribution in TTML, the gain on dilution of TTSL’s holding in TTML would be accounted for as a capital transaction.

The Group recognizes revenues from amounts paid by customers towards activation services upon the activation of the service. Direct cost related to the activiation of services is expensed upon activation.

Under US GAAP, in accordance with provision of SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”, activation revenues would be deferred and recognised over the estimated customer relationship period. Direct cost attributable to the activation of service will be deferred, up to an amount equal to the activation revenue and expensed over the estimated customer relationship period.

Under US GAAP, FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (‘FIN 46(R)’), which addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities, requires the primary beneficiary of interests in a variable interest entity to consolidate that entity. For variable interest entities created before December 2003, non-public entities need to apply the guidance in the year beginning after December 15, 2004. The Company entered into an arrangement in September 2003, with an entity related to the Company’s ultimate parent, to distribute mobile handsets to the Company’s customers. The entity has minimal equity and its operations are financed principally by guarantees and subsidies provided by the Company. Accordingly, it is a variable interest entity. Due to the related party relationship, the arrangement and the guarantees and subsidies provided, the Company concluded that it is the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, for the purposes of its US GAAP reconciliation, the Company will apply the provisions of the guidance from April 1, 2005 and consolidate that entity.

The adoption of FIN 46(R) will materially increase revenues, cost of revenues, current assets (including accounts receivable and inventory) and current liabilities (including borrowings, accounts payable and accrued expenses). Certain transactions between the Company and this entity, such as payments for logistical services and advances, will be eliminated on consolidation. The Company does not have US GAAP financial information for that entity and is in the process of determining such information for consolidation in 2006. However, because the Company has no equity interest in the entity, the adoption of FIN 46(R) will have no impact on net loss for the year ending March 31, 2006.

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (continued)

The profit and loss account includes a measure of Loss (profit) before amortization, depreciation, finance charges, pre-operating costs and tax. Such a measure is not appropriate under US GAAP.

The presentation of certain items in the balance sheet and profit and loss account is not consistent with financial statement presentation under US GAAP. These items have been reclassified and were as follows:

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (continued)

The significant adjustments required to convert loss in accordance with Indian GAAP to net loss in accordance with US GAAP are:

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (continued)

The significant adjustments required to convert shareholders’ funds in accordance with Indian GAAP to shareholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP are:

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (continued)

The condensed consolidated statement of operations for the year ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and balance sheet as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 presented below reflect the US GAAP adjustments described and summarized above.

22. Differences between Indian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (continued)

The consolidated statement of cash flows prepared under Indian GAAP presents substantially the same information as that required under US GAAP but may differ with regard to classification of items within the statement of cash flows. Under Indian GAAP, cash flows related to finance charges are included in financing activities. Such cash flows will be included in operating activities under US GAAP. Also, under Indian GAAP, cash flows related interest and other investment income are included in investing activities. Such cash flows will be included in operating activities under US GAAP.


Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
American Depositary Shares*		New York Stock Exchange
Equity Shares, par value Rs.10 per share**		New York Stock Exchange


CURRENCY OF PRESENTATION AND CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS		3

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		3

PART I
ITEM 1.	IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS	3
ITEM 2.	OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE	3
ITEM 3.	KEY INFORMATION	3
ITEM 4.	INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY	13
ITEM 5.	OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS	26
ITEM 6.	DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES	38
ITEM 7.	MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	48
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	49
ITEM 9.	THE OFFER AND LISTING	51
ITEM 10.	ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	53
ITEM 11.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	67
ITEM 12.	DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES	68

PART II
ITEM 13.	DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES	68
ITEM 14.	MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS	68
ITEM 15.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	68
ITEM 16.	RESERVED	68
ITEM 16 A.	AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT	68
ITEM 16 B.	CODE OF ETHICS	68
ITEM 16 C.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	68
ITEM 16 D.	EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES	69
ITEM 16 E.	PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS	69

PART III
ITEM 17.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	69
ITEM 18.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	69
ITEM 19.	EXHIBITS	70

SIGNATURES		71


	Years ended March 31,
	2001			2002			2003			2004			2005			2005
	(millions of Rs.) (1)															(millions of US$) (1)
Income Statement Data
Operating revenue
Revenues from telecommunication services		73,076			65,050			45,341			32,248			32,448			744

Cost of revenues:
Network and transmission costs		45,150			39,577			26,044			19,375			18,167			416
License fees		5,022			5,393			4,037			2,735			2,815			65
Total cost of revenues		50,172			44,970			30,081			22,110			20,982			481

Other operating costs:
Depreciation		1,728			1,890			2,078			2,465			2,308			53
Other operating costs		3,024			4,811			3,998			5,000			6,263			144
Impairment loss on property, plant and equipment		—			—			—			6,709			—			—
Operating income / (loss)		18,152			13,379			9,184			(4,036	)		2,895			66
Net income/(loss) from operations per equity share		63.69			46.94			32.22			(14.16	)		10.16			0.23

Non-operating income (expense), net:
Gain on sale of investments		(5	)		(2	)		—			1,001			5,523			127
Interest income on income tax refunds		—			—			535			490			—			—
Interest income from banks and others		3,964			4,607			1,866			934			529			12
Interest expense		(1	)		(227	)		(33	)		(5	)		(1	)		—
Other non-operating income, net		3,063			1,373			425			607			399			9
Total non-operating income (expense), net:		7,021			5,751			2,793			3,027			6,450			148

Income / (loss) before income tax		25,173			19,130			11,977			(1,009	)		9,345			214
Income tax (expense) / benefit		(9,646	)		(5,959	)		(4,390	)		674			(2,575	)		(59	)
Dividend tax		(105	)		(3,634	)		—			(310	)		(168	)		(4	)
Equity in net loss of equity method investees		—			—			(143	)		(1,921	)		(4,156	)		(95	)
Net income / (loss)		15,422			9,537			7,444			(2,566	)		2,446			56
Basic Earnings per equity share	Rs.	54.11		Rs.	33.46		Rs.	26.12		Rs.	(9.00	)	Rs.	8.58		US$	0.19
Weighted average number of Equity Shares outstanding(2)		285			285			285			285			285
Basic Earnings per ADS (where each ADS represents two equity shares)	Rs.	108.22		Rs.	66.92		Rs.	52.24		Rs.	(18.00	)	Rs.	17.16			0.39
Dividends per share	Rs.	2.67		Rs.	125		Rs.	12.50		Rs.	8.50		Rs.	4.50			0.10

Other Financial Data
Net cash provided by operating activities		23,075			9,691			9,862			13,140			3,069			70
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities		(41,416	)		26,068			(11,697	)		(7,262	)		(1,010	)		(23	)
Dividends		(760	)		(35,625	)		(3,563	)		(2,423	)		(1,283	)		(29	)
Net cash used by financing activities		(760	)		(29,874	)		(5,774	)		(5,963	)		(1,913	)		(43	)


	As at March 31,
	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2005
	(Millions of Rs.)					(Millions of US $)
Balance Sheet Data
Total assets	100,492	75,097	73,548	67,581	71,199	US$	1,633

Short term borrowings	—	5,751	3,540	630	—		—
Accounts payable	15,314	10,344	6,222	6,722	8,744		200
Accrued expenses, deferred tax and other non-current liabilities	6,793	5,960	7,041	8,210	9,213		212
Total liabilities	22,107	22,055	16,803	15,562	17,957		412
Total shareholders’ equity/ Net Assets	78,385	53,042	56,745	52,019	53,242		1,222
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	100,492	75,097	73,548	67,581	71,199		1,633


Fiscal Year Ended March 31,	Period End	Average	High	Low
2005	43.62	44.87	46.45	43.27
2004	43.40	45.78	47.46	43.40
2003	47.53	48.36	49.07	47.53
2002	48.83	47.81	48.83	46.88
2001	46.85	45.88	46.90	43.70


Month	High (Rs.)	Low (Rs.)
March 2005	43.70	43.44
April 2005	43.72	43.48
May 2005	43.62	43.21
June 2005	43.71	43.44
July 2005	43.59	43.05
August 2005	44.00	43.36
September 2005	43.98	43.75


	Year ended March 31,
	2003		2004		2005		2005
	Rs. Millions						US$ Millions
India	Rs.	16,912	Rs.	17,970	Rs.	18,949	US$	434
United States of America		10,774		5,216		3,343		77
United Arab Emirates		5,468		2,822		2,634		60
Other		12,187		6,240		7,522		173

Total	Rs.	45,341	Rs.	32,248	Rs.	32,448	US$	744


India⁽¹⁾	10.12(2005)	Iceland	164.45(2004)
Pakistan	6.29(2004)	Ireland	145.01(2004)
China	49.29(2004)	Italy	154.69(2004)
Mexico	53.87(2004)	Luxembourg	199.13(2003)
United States	120.88(2004)	Netherlands	139.78(2004)
Japan	117.58(2004)	Norway	139.53(2003)
Austria	144.74(2004)	Portugal	144.34(2004)
Belgium	134.33(2004)	Spain	137.07(2004)
Denmark	160.75(2004)	Sweden	174.62(2003)
Finland	141.03(2004)	Switzerland	160.90(2004)
France	129.76(2004)	United Kingdom	159.52(2004)
Germany	152.52(2004)	Australia	137.20(2004)
Greece	147.60(2004)	New Zealand	123.62(2004)


Location		Area (in Acres)
Dighi—Pune		524.00
Halishahar—Kolkata		35.19
Chattarpur—Delhi		58.00
Greater Kailash—Delhi		70.00
Padianallur—Chennai		85.94
Total		773.13


		Years
Buildings		58
Plant and machinery:
Earth stations		12
Cables		15-18
Exchanges		12
Other network equipment		5-8
Office equipment		3-20
Computers		6
Furniture and fittings		3-15
Motor vehicles		10


Wholesale Business		International long distance telephony (ILD)

Enterprise Business		Corporate data transmission services

Others		National long distance telephony (NLD), Internet, GPSS, transponder lease, telex and telegraph and television uplinking


	For the year ended March 31, 2005
Segment	Revenues				Operating Income
	(Rs.Million)		(US$ Million)		(Rs.Million)	(US$ Million)
Wholesale Business	Rs.	16,026	US$	367	2,044	47
Enterprise Business		11,156		256	7,632	175
Other		5,266		121	778	18

Total		32,448		744	10,454	240


	Payments Due by Period (Rs. millions)
	Total	Less Than 1 year	1-3 Years	3-5 Years	More than 5 Years
Purchase obligations	2,986	2,653	333	—	—
Other long term contractual commitments(1)	6,542	5,301	741	501	—
Total	9,529	7,954	1,074	501


Name	Age	Position	Term	Director Since
Subodh Bhargava (1)	63	Chairman and External Director	Liable to retire by rotation	May 2002
Srinath Narasimhan	43	Executive Director	Up to February 2007	February 2002
Suresh Krishna (1)	69	External Director	Liable to retire by rotation	May 2002
Ishaat Hussain	58	External Director	Liable to retire by rotation	July 2002
Kishor A. Chaukar	57	External Director	Liable to retire by rotation	July 2002
Firdose A. Vandrevala	54	External Director	Liable to retire by rotation	February 2003
Pankaj Agrawala (2)	49	Government Nominee	Non-retiring Director	January 2004
Mukund Rajan	37	External Director	Liable to retire by rotation	May 2005
N. Parameswaran (2)	48	Government Nominee	Non-retiring Director	August 2005
P.V. Kalyana Sundaram (1)	47	External Director	Additional Director, eligible to be appointed as director liable to retire by rotation	September 2005
V.R.S. Sampath (1)	49	External Director	Additional Director, eligible to be appointed as director liable to retire by rotation	September 2005


	Gross Remuneration in fiscal 2005
Name	(Rs.)	(US$)
S.K. Gupta¹	2,496,135	57,225
N. Srinath	5,251,873	120,401
Amitabh Khanna²	4,900,843	112,353
S.G Ranade	2,866,565	65,717
K.P Tiwari	2,927,660	67,117
Arun Gupta	2,734,372	62,686
Madhumati Lele	3,682,992	84,434
Radhakrishnan Nair³	3,606,761	82,686
Sandeep Mathur	3,303,078	75,724
Shashi Kalathil	1,442,544	33,071
Mysore Madhusudhan	1,863,357	42,718


NYSE rule applicable to U.S. listed companies		Indian law and the Company’s practice
Companies must have a majority of independent directors. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.01)		Under Indian law, if the chairman of the board of directors is not an executive officer of the company, at least one third of the directors should be independent. If the chairman is an executive officer, at least 50% of the company’s directors should be independent. The chairman of our board of directors (the “Board”) is not an executive of the Company and four out of twelve members of our Board are independent, which satisfies the requirement under Indian law.

Certain heightened standards apply to “independent directors” (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.02)		Under Indian law, a director is “independent” so long as he or she does not have any material pecuniary relationship or transactions (apart from director’s remuneration) with the company, its promoters, its management or its subsidiaries, which in the judgment of the Board may affect the independence or judgment of the director. The company applies this definition in its corporate governance practices and the Company’s four independent directors satisfy the requirements of the definition.

Non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.03)		Under Indian law, there is no such requirement. However, the Board has constituted a Committee of the Board (the “CoB”), which presently meets on monthly basis to review the Company’s operations. All members of the CoB (except the Managing Director of the Company who is also a member of the CoB) are non-executive directors.

Companies must have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.04)		Under Indian law, a nominating/corporate governance committee is not required. The Company does not have such a committee.


The nominating/corporate governance committee must have a written charter that addresses certain specific committee purposes and responsibilities and provides for an annual performance evaluation of the committee. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.04)		Since Indian law does not require a nominating/corporate governance committee, it also does not require a charter for such a committee. The Company does not have such a charter.

Companies must have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.05)		Under Indian law, a company’s board of directors sets the compensation for non-executive directors. Non-mandatory Indian law recommends that companies establish a remuneration committee composed of non-executive directors and an independent chairman to determine the compensation of executive directors. The Company has such a committee composed of one non-executive director and two independent directors.

The compensation committee must have a written charter that addresses certain specific purposes and responsibilities of the committee and provides for an annual performance evaluation of the committee. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.05)		Indian law does not require that the compensation committee have a charter. The scope of the Company’s remuneration committee includes determination of the Board’s compensation and the Company’s policy on specific remuneration packages for executive directors including pension rights and any other compensation payments.

Companies must have an audit committee that satisfies the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the requirements of NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.02. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standards 303A.06 and 303A.07)		An audit committee is required under Indian law. The Company has an audit committee composed of three non-executive directors out of which two are independent, including the committee’s chairman.

The audit committee must have a written charter that addresses certain specific purposes and responsibilities of the committee, provides for an annual performance evaluation of the committee and sets forth certain minimum duties and responsibilities. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.07)		The Company has a written audit committee charter that provides for specific purposes and responsibilities as set forth in the Company’s listing agreement with the Indian stock exchanges.

Companies must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.09)		Indian law does not require the adoption and disclosure of corporate governance guidelines. However, information with respect to corporate governance can be found in our annual report for 2004-05 (Page 19 to Page 31) under the headings: • Report on corporate governance for the year 2004-05 • Secretary’s Responsibility Statement • Auditors’ certificate on compliance with the conditions of corporate governance under Clause 49 of the Listing Agreements

Companies must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. (NYSE Corporate Governance Standard 303A.10)		As required by the Securities and Exchange Board of India regulations, the Company has adopted a code governing trading in the Company’s securities by insiders. The Company has also adopted the Tata Code of Conduct laying down norms for business conduct and ethics for companies in the Tata Group.


Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)	Percentage
Panatone Finvest Limited	122,939,857	43.14
Government of India (2)	74,446,885	26.12
Life Insurance Corporation of India	16,353,356	5.73


Fiscal year	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002
Claim of Tax (Rs. Million)	124	333	1,101	1,643	1,790	1,218	1,079


For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31,	Actual Dividend paid per Share(1)
	Indian Rupees	US$(2)
2005(1)	6.00	0.14
2004	4.50	0.10
2003	8.50	0.19
2002	12.50	0.26
2002(3)	75.00	1.55


	ADS Price
	High	Low
	in US Dollars
Yearly Period:
Fiscal 2001 (beginning August 15, 2000)	18.75	9.50
Fiscal 2002	15.74	5.55
Fiscal 2003	8.08	3.10
Fiscal 2004	9.63	2.95
Fiscal 2005	11.10	5.46

Quarterly Periods:

Fiscal 2004
First Quarter	5.49	2.95
Second Quarter	6.25	4.55
Third Quarter	6.80	5.27
Fourth Quarter	9.63	6.85

Fiscal 2004
First Quarter	9.39	5.46
Second Quarter	8.24	6.81
Third Quarter	10.71	7.05
Fourth Quarter	11.10	7.83

Fiscal 2005 Monthly Periods:
April	9.61	8.30
May	9.83	9.20
June	11.35	9.45
July	19.70	11.34
August	19.94	16.29
September	18.22	15.45


	The Stock Exchange, Mumbai1		National Stock Exchange²
	Price per Share		Price per Share
	(in Indian Rupees)		(in Indian Rupees)
Period	High	Low	High	Low
Yearly Periods:
Fiscal 2001	1938.60	198.35	1990.00	210.00
Fiscal 2002	402.00	134.65	400.00	134.70
Fiscal 2003	202.00	71.50	197.40	71.20
Fiscal 2004	210.80	68.00	210.40	68.50
Fiscal 2005	252.60	115.00	252.00	110.05

Quarterly Periods:
Fiscal 2004
First Quarter	131.40	68.00	131.40	68.50
Second Quarter	142.00	109.05	142.10	109.00
Third Quarter	161.00	116.80	161.75	109.10
Fourth Quarter	210.80	148.00	210.40	148.90

Fiscal 2005
First Quarter	210.00	115.00	209.90	110.05
Second Quarter	188.00	157.10	195.00	155.00
Third Quarter	247.90	210.00	249.00	163.30
Fourth Quarter	252.60	175.70	252.00	175.80

Fiscal 2006 Monthly Periods:
April	218.00	180.00	218.00	161.00
May	215.00	196.00	215.00	202.10
June	251.90	206.50	251.95	206.50
July	444.00	243.00	444.60	243.30
August	444.70	347.15	444.00	347.35
September	408.70	328.00	409.00	327.10


	(Amounts in millions)
	Operating Revenues		Operating Costs		Margin
Currency	Foreign Currency	Rupees	Foreign Currency	Rupees	Foreign Currency		Rupees
US Dollars	199	8,716	126	5,503	73		3,213
Special Drawing Rights (“SDRs”)	76	5,002	26	1,702	50		3,300
Golden Francs* converted to Rupees through SDRs	0	9	0	5	0		4
Euro		1	1	58	(1	)	(57	)
Hong Kong Dollars			1	3	(1	)	(3	)

Total		13,728		7,271			6,457


	(Amounts in millions)
	Trade Receivables		Trade Payables				Net Exposure
Currency	Foreign Currency	Rupees	Foreign Currency		Rupees		Foreign Currency		Rupees
US Dollars	15	644	(19	)	(838	)	(4	)	(194	)
SDRs	26	1,727	(0	)	(2	)	26		1,725
Golden Francs converted to INR through SDR	1	11	0				1		11
Hong Kong Dollars	2	9					2		9
Euro	0	24	0		(83	)	0		(59	)
GBP	0	17	(2	)	(142	)	(2	)	(125	)

Total		2,432			(1,065	)			1,367


Forward Contracts:	US$	15.75 million
Option Contracts:		Nil
Option Contracts (Euro):		Nil


	Fiscal Year ended
Type of Service	March 31, 2004		March 31, 2005		Description of Service
a) Audit Fees	Rs.	7,020,000	Rs.	9,896,164	Audit of financial statements under US GAAP and Indian GAAP.
b) Audit-Related Fees	Rs	1,620,000	Rs.	1,653,000	Services related to performance of quarterly review of financial statements
c) Tax Fees	Rs.	1,355,000	Rs.	1,351,703	Tax audit fees and tax consulting services.
d) Other Fees	Rs.	Nil	Rs.	16,951,556	Statutory and regulatory attestations and fees for acquisition due diligence.


Exhibit Number		Description
1.1*		Certificate of Incorporation of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, dated March 19, 1986 and as currently in effect.

1.2^#		Articles of Association of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, dated April 02, 2004 and as currently in effect.

1.3^#		Memorandum of Association of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, dated April 02, 2004 and as currently in effect.

1.4*		Certificate for Commencement of Business, dated March 21, 1986 and as currently in effect.

1.5*		Specimen Certificate for Equity Shares of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited.

2.1*		Form of Deposit Agreement, among Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, The Bank of New York, as Depositary and owners and beneficial owners of American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder (including as an exhibit, the form of American Depositary Receipt).

2.2**		Amendment No. 1 to Deposit Agreement, among Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, The Bank of New York, as Depositary and owners and beneficial owners of American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder (including as an exhibit the form of American Depositary Receipt).

2.3***		Shareholders’ Agreement among the President of India, Panatone Finvest Limited, Tata Sons Limited, Tata Power Company Limited, Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, and Tata Industries Limited, dated 13 February 2002.

2.4***		Share Purchase Agreement among the Government of India, Panatone Finvest Limited, Tata Sons Limited, Tata Power Company Limited, Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, and Tata Industries Limited and the Company dated 6 February 2002.

4.8****		License Agreement for national long distance services between the President of India and the Company, dated February 8, 2002.

4.9****		License Agreement for Provision of Internet Service (Including Internet Telephony) between the President of India and the Company, dated May 3, 2002.

10.3^#		License Agreement for International long distance services between the Department of Telecommunications, Government of India and the Company, dated February 5, 2004.

10.4**		Letter from the Ministry of Communications, Department of Telecommunications regarding termination of the monopoly granted to Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, dated September 7, 2000.

Exhibit Number		Description
12.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

12.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.1		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2004 and 2005		F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005		F-3

Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005		F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005		F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-6


	As of March 31,
	2004		2005		2005
	(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
ASSETS:

Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Rs.	187	Rs.	339	US$	8
Short-term bank deposits (Rs.5,972 million restricted)		10,165		13,792		316
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of Rs.1,603 million and Rs. 1,264 million, respectively)		5,304		5,640		129
Advance income taxes, net		9,806		11,512		264
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (net of allowances of Rs. 38 million and Rs. 547 million, respectively)		2,929		2,742		63

Total current assets		28,391		34,025		780
Investments		14,982		3,137		72
Equity method investees		4,284		2,770		64
Property, plant and equipment, net		18,162		29,424		674
Goodwill		1,019		1,019		23
Other non-current assets		743		824		19

Total assets	Rs.	67,581	Rs.	71,199	US$	1,632

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	Rs.	6,722	Rs.	8,744	US$	200
Short-term borrowings		630		—		—
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		6,824		6,426		148

Total current liabilities		14,176		15,170		348
Other non-current liabilities		1,386		2,787		64

Total liabilities		15,562		17,957		412

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 26)		—		—		—

Shareholders’ equity:
Equity shares: par value – Rs. 10 each; authorized: 300,000,000 shares; issued : 285,000,000 shares		2,850		2,850		65
Additional paid-in-capital		15,377		15,770		362
Retained earnings		33,446		34,609		793
Accumulated other comprehensive income		346		13		—

Total shareholders’ equity		52,019		53,242		1,220

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	Rs.	67,581	Rs.	71,199	US$	1,632


	Number of equity shares	Equity share capital		Additional paid- in- capital (See Note 17)		Retained earnings			Accumulated other comprehensive income			Total shareholders’ equity			Comprehensive income (loss)
	(In millions, except number of equity shares)
Balance at April 1, 2002	285,000,000		Rs.2,850		Rs.15,377		Rs.34,554			Rs.261			Rs.53,042
Net income							7,444						7,444		Rs.	7,444
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale-securities, net of taxes										(184	)		(184	)		(184	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment										6			6			6
Dividends paid							(3,563	)					(3,563	)

Comprehensive income															Rs.	7,266

Balance at March 31, 2003	285,000,000		2,850		15,377		38,435			83			56,745
Net loss							(2,566	)					(2,566	)	Rs.	(2,566	)
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes										271			271			271
Foreign currency translation adjustment										(8	)		(8	)		(8	)
Dividends paid							(2,423	)					(2,423	)

Comprehensive loss															Rs.	(2,303	)

Balance at March 31, 2004	285,000,000		2,850		15,377		33,446			346			52,019
Net income							2,446						2,446		Rs.	2,446
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of realized gains and taxes										(323	)		(323	)		(323	)
Effect of dilution in ownership interest in equity method investee (see note 9)					393								393
Foreign currency translation adjustment										(10	)		(10	)		(10	)
Dividends paid							(1,283	)					(1,283	)

Comprehensive income															Rs.	2,113

Balance at March 31, 2005	285,000,000	Rs.	2,850	Rs.	15,770	Rs.	34,609		Rs.	13		Rs.	53,242

		US$	65	US$	362	US$	793		US$	—		US$	1,220		US$	48


	Allocation of purchase price
	(In millions)
Net assets acquired, at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents	Rs.	191		US$	4
Property, plant and equipment		1,934			45
Accounts receivable		314			7
Other assets		391			9
Short-term borrowing		(630	)		(14	)
Other liabilities, net		(519	)		(12	)

Fair value of net assets acquired		1,681			39
Goodwill		1,019			23

Total purchase consideration	Rs.	2,700		US$	62


	Amortized Cost		Gross unrealized gains		Fair value
	(In millions)
Available-for sale- securities
As of March 31, 2004:
Equity shares	Rs.	562	Rs.	436	Rs.	998
Mutual funds		11,441		3		11,444

Total available- for- sale securities	Rs.	12,003	Rs.	439	Rs.	12,442

As of March 31, 2005:
Mutual funds		3,101		36		3,137

Total available- for- sale securities	Rs.	3,101	Rs.	36	Rs.	3,137


Year ending March 31,	(In millions)
2006	Rs.	189
2007		189
2008		189
2009		189
2010		180


Years ending March 31,	( In Millions)
2006	Rs.	721	US$	17
2007		403		10
2008		228		5
2009		193		4
2010		100		2
Thereafter		93		2

Total minimum lease commitments	Rs.	1,738	US$	40


	Year ended March 31, 2005
	Wholesale - ILD only			Enterprise- Corporate Data Transmission Services only			Others		Total
	(In millions)
Revenues	Rs.	16,026		Rs.	11,156		Rs	5,266	Rs	32,448		US$	744
Interconnect charges		12,961			422			1,924		15,307			351

Net revenues		3,065			10,734			3,342		17,141			393

Other network and transmission costs		508			1,013			1,339		2,860			65
License fee		460			1,083			311		1,854			43
Depreciation		32			394			21		447			10
Repairs and maintenance		47			573			30		650			15
Advertising		20			81			588		689			16
Allowances for (recoveries of) uncollectible accounts receivable		(46	)		(42	)		275		187			4

Segment results		2,044			7,632			778		10,454			240

Unallocated depreciation										1,861			43
Unallocated license fee										961			22
Unallocated advertising										37			1
Other unallocated operating costs										4,700			108
Operating income										2,895			66
Non operating income, net										6,450			148
Income before income tax										9,345			214
Income tax expense										(2,575	)		(59	)
Dividend tax										(168	)		(4	)
Equity in net loss of equity method investees										(4,156	)		(95	)

Net income										Rs.2,446		US$	56