NOTE 1-THE COMPANY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

Through 2009, Silvergraph International, Inc. ("We" or "Silvergraph" or the "Company") was a designer, manufacturer, marketer and branded retailer of fine-art reproductions, art-based home decorative accessories, collectibles and gift products. In 2007, we experienced significant challenges due to the unexpected contraction of our business with our largest client which caused us in 2008 to evaluate various strategies to best enhance value for our shareholders including the sale to or merger with a larger art or printing organization that would benefit from our technology. In the second half of 2008, we began to wind down our subsidiary New Era Studios, Inc. ("New Era"), and to sell its assets, to pay down its debts and to provide working capital for the Company. We also raised $218,000 in interim bridge capital to support our operations and took steps to significantly lower our cost of operations. In 2011 and beyond, we are continuing to pursue and evaluate strategies to enhance shareholder value including the merger with a private company in industries outside the art and printing industries and we are actively winding down New Era. We continue to take steps to lower our operating costs and continue to sell New Era assets to pay down New Era debts and help fund our working capital needs. However, we cannot guarantee that these actions will ensure our continued operations.

Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Silvergraph and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the fair values of financial instruments. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses from its operations since its inception and has an accumulated deficit of $6,521,080, and a working capital and stockholders' deficiency of $452,485 at December 31, 2011. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue its existence. The recovery of the Company's assets is dependent upon continued operations of the Company. In addition, the Company's recovery is dependent upon future events, the outcome of which is undetermined. The Company intends to continue to attempt to raise additional capital, but there can be no certainty that such efforts will be successful.

Primarily as a result of our recurring losses and our lack of liquidity, we have received a report from our independent registered public accounting firm for our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 that includes an explanatory paragraph describing the uncertainty as to our ability to continue as a going concern. To continue our operations and to grow our current operations and to make acquisitions, if any, under our current business model during the next twelve months, we will need to secure additional working capital, by way of equity or debt financing, or otherwise. After this twelve month period, we may need additional financing for working capital, and in the case of acquisitions for payment of seller notes and future earned cash to sellers of acquired companies. There can be no assurance that we will be able to secure sufficient financing or on terms acceptable to us. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we would need to delay, limit or eliminate some or all of our proposed operations, and we may be unable to successfully promote our products or develop new or enhanced products or prosecute acquisitions, any of which could lower our revenues and net income, if we achieve profitability in the future. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of convertible debt or equity securities, the percentage ownership of our current stockholders is likely to be diluted, unless some of our current stockholders were to invest in subsequent convertible debt or equity financings, and some of the newly issued securities may also have rights superior to those of the common stock. Additionally, if we issue or incur debt to raise funds, we may be subject to limitations on our operations.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from gross product sales, including freight charges, and revenues from the license of products, in compliance with current guidance from Financial Accounting Standards Board which require that title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed and determinable, collectability is reasonably assured, and customer acceptance criteria, if any, have been successfully demonstrated.

Equity-based compensation

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in capital raising transactions, for services and for financing costs. Stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Options vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used in the accounting for revenues, allowance for doubtful accounts, product returns and other sales allowances, inventory reserves, depreciation and amortization, lease guarantees, long-lived assets and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Earnings (loss) per share

Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution, using the treasury stock method, that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. In computing diluted earnings per share, the treasury stock method assumes that outstanding options and warrants are exercised and the proceeds are used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Options and warrants will have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options and warrants. As the Company had a loss in the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, basic and diluted loss per share are the same. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, potentially dilutive securities consisted of outstanding common stock purchase warrants to acquire an aggregate of 205,266 and 212,663 common shares respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value because of their generally short maturities.

The Company uses various inputs in determining the fair value of its investments and measures these assets on a recurring basis. Financial assets recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are categorized by the level of objectivity associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Authoritative guidance provided by the FASB defines the following levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these financial assets:

•

Level 1 - quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

•

Level 2 - other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, market corroborated inputs, etc.)

•

Level 3 - significant unobservable inputs (including the Company's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

As of December 31, 2011, the Company's financial assets subject to measurement included only Level 1 items of cash and short term investments. The fair value of these financial assets was equal to their recorded value. There were no unrealized gains or losses included in earnings resulting from long-term investments associated with Level 2 or 3 financial assets during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Effect of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-4, which amends the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) to help achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-4 does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company will adopt the ASU as required. The ASU will affect the Company's fair value disclosures, but will not affect the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-5, which amends the Comprehensive Income Topic of the ASC. The ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders' equity, and instead requires consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income either in a continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU No. 2011-5 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company will adopt the ASU as required. It will have no effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs". ASU No. 2011-4 does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company will adopt the ASU as required. The ASU will affect the Company's fair value disclosures, but will not affect the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the Securities Exchange Commission (the "SEC") did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.