XML 88 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Variable interest entities
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Variable interest entities
Variable interest entities
 
(a)    VIEs of which OEH is the primary beneficiary
 
OEH holds a 19.9% equity investment in Charleston Center LLC, owner of Belmond Charleston Place.  OEH has also made a number of loans to the hotel.  OEH concluded that Charleston Center LLC is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) because the total equity at risk is insufficient for the entity to fund its operations without additional subordinated financial support, the majority of which has been provided by OEH. OEH is the primary beneficiary of this VIE because it is expected to absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses and residual gains through the subordinated financial support it has provided, and has the power to direct the activities that impact the VIE’s performance, based on the current organizational structure.

The carrying amount of consolidated assets and liabilities of Charleston Center LLC included within OEH’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are summarized as follows:
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
21,903

 
10,517

Property, plant and equipment
 
191,471

 
187,854

Goodwill
 
40,395

 
40,395

Other assets
 
1,690

 
1,895

 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
255,459

 
240,661

 
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
6,665

 
6,722

Third-party debt, including $1,772 and $1,805 current portion
 
95,700

 
96,150

Long-term accrued interest on subordinated debt
 
15,490

 
15,340

Deferred income taxes
 
61,034

 
60,892

 
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities
 
178,889

 
179,104

 
 
 
 
 
Net assets (before amounts payable to OEH of $94,039 and $92,692)
 
76,570

 
61,557


 
The third-party debt of Charleston Center LLC is secured by its net assets and is non-recourse to its members, including OEH. The hotel’s separate assets are not available to pay the debts of OEH and the hotel’s separate liabilities do not constitute obligations of OEH.  This non-recourse obligation is presented separately on the condensed consolidated balance sheets of OEH.

(b)    VIEs of which OEH is not the primary beneficiary
 
OEH holds a 50% equity investment in its rail joint venture in Peru which operates the infrastructure, rolling stock, stations and services on a portion of the state-owned railways in Peru. OEH concluded that the Peru rail joint venture is a VIE because the total equity at risk is insufficient for it to fund its operations without additional subordinated financial support. The joint venture is under joint control as all the budgetary and capital decisions require a majority of approval of the joint venture’s board of directors, which has equal representation from both joint venture partners. The joint venture is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and included in earnings/(losses) from unconsolidated companies, net of tax in the statements of condensed consolidated operations.

The carrying amounts and maximum exposures to loss as a result of OEH’s involvement with its Peru rail joint venture are as follows:
 
 
Carrying amounts
 
Maximum exposure
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
$’000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment
 
38,396

 
38,095

 
38,396

 
38,095

Due from unconsolidated company
 
4,197

 
4,957

 
4,197

 
4,957

Guarantees
 

 

 
5,486

 
5,920

Contingent guarantees
 

 

 
13,995

 
14,731

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
42,593

 
43,052

 
62,074

 
63,703



The maximum exposure to loss for the Peru rail joint venture exceeds OEH’s carrying amounts in the joint venture due to guarantees, which, as discussed below, are not recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The contingent guarantees may only be enforced in the event there is a change in control in the joint venture, which would occur only if OEH’s ownership of the economic and voting interests in the joint venture falls below 50%, an event which has not occurred and is not expected to occur. As at March 31, 2014, OEH does not expect that it will be required to fund these guarantees relating to this joint venture as the entity has the ability to repay the loans.

The Company has guaranteed $5,486,000 and contingently guaranteed $7,019,000 of the debt obligations of the rail joint venture in Peru through 2017. The Company has also contingently guaranteed the rail joint venture’s obligations relating to the performance of its governmental rail concessions, currently in the amount of $6,976,000, through May 2014.

Long-term debt obligations of the rail joint venture in Peru at March 31, 2014 totaling $5,486,000 have been classified within current liabilities of the joint venture in its stand-alone financial statements, as it was out of compliance with a debt service coverage ratio covenant in its loan facilities. Discussions with the lenders to bring the joint venture into compliance are continuing, although this non-compliance is not expected to have a material impact on OEH’s financial flexibility.