XML 49 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

12. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company leases office space under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms ranging from one to five years. Additionally, the Company leases certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases at its facilities and its leased data center operations.

Aggregate Future Contractual Obligations and Lease Commitments

As of September 30, 2015, the Company’s minimum payments under its non-cancelable operating and capital leases are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Operating Leases

 

 

Capital Leases

 

2015, remaining three months

$

886

 

 

$

17

 

2016

 

3,577

 

 

 

52

 

2017

 

1,524

 

 

 

22

 

2018

 

1,478

 

 

 

18

 

2019

 

1,460

 

 

 

1

 

2020 and thereafter

 

1,352

 

 

 

 

Total minimum payments

$

10,277

 

 

$

110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less: Amount representing interest

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Present value of capital lease obligations

 

 

 

 

 

104

 

Less: Current portion

 

 

 

 

 

54

 

Capital lease obligation, net of current portion

 

 

 

 

$

50

 

 

Other Future Commitments

The Company has other long-term commitments for the years 2015 to 2034 in the amount of $7.2 million for marketing arrangements.

The Company entered into service agreements under which the Company is obligated to prepay non-refundable payments upon the achievement of certain milestones.  As of September 30, 2015, the Company made payments of $10.4 million under these arrangements and has remaining obligations for payment of $3.7 million which are expected to be paid over two years.  These prepayments will be recognized as cost of revenues over the related service period. The unamortized balance is included in other assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Indemnification

In the normal course of business, to facilitate transactions related to the Company’s operations, the Company indemnifies certain parties, including CPGs, advertising agencies and other third parties including retailers. The Company has agreed to hold certain parties harmless against losses arising from claims of intellectual property infringement or other liabilities relating to or arising from our products or services. The term of these indemnity provisions generally survive termination or expiration of the applicable agreement. To date, the Company has not recorded any liabilities related to these agreements.

Litigation

On March 11, 2015, a putative stockholder class action lawsuit was filed against us, the members of our board of directors, certain of our executive officers and the underwriters of our initial public offering (“IPO”): Nguyen v. Coupons.com Incorporated, Case No. CGC-15-544654 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County). The complaint asserts claims under the Securities Act and seeks unspecified damages and other relief on behalf of a putative class of persons and entities who purchased stock pursuant or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus for our IPO. Plaintiff Nguyen requested and obtained a dismissal without prejudice of his San Francisco action and filed another complaint with substantially the same allegations in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, Nguyen v. Coupons.com Incorporated, Case No. 1-15-CV-278777 (California Superior Court, Santa Clara County) (Mar. 30, 2015). Three other complaints with substantially the same allegations have also been filed: O’Donnell v. Coupons.com Incorporated, Case No. 1-15-CV-278399 (California Superior Court, Santa Clara County) (Mar. 20, 2015); So v. Coupons.com Incorporated, Case No. 1-15-CV-278774 (California Superior Court, Santa Clara County) (Mar. 30, 2015); and Silverberg v. Coupons.com Incorporated, Case No. 1-15-CV-278891 (California Superior Court, Santa Clara County) (Apr. 2, 2015).  On May 7, 2015, the Santa Clara court consolidated the Nguyen, So and Silverberg actions with the O’Donnell action.  On July 23, 2015, defendants filed a demurrer to the consolidated complaint. The Court held a hearing on the Company’s demurrer, along with a case management conference, on November 6, 2015 (moved from October 30).  The Court sustained defendants’ demurrer with leave to amend.  We intend to defend this litigation vigorously. Based on information currently available, we believe that the potential for liability for the above claims is remote.

In addition, in the ordinary course of business, the Company may be involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations, and proceedings consisting of intellectual property, commercial, employment, and other matters. The Company records a provision for these claims when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss, or a range of the potential loss, can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed regularly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information or events pertaining to a particular case. In the event that one or more of these matters were to result in a claim against the Company, an adverse outcome, including a judgment or settlement, may cause a material adverse effect on the Company’s future business, operating results, or financial condition.

The Company believes that liabilities associated with any claims are remote, therefore the Company has not recorded any accrual for claims as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.