XML 46 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  
Basis of Presentation

(a)          Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly‑owned, controlled subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Events occurring subsequent to December 31, 2016 have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates

(b)          Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, the realizable value of inventories, valuing stock-based compensation instruments and valuation allowances for deferred tax assets. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known.

Foreign Currency

(c)          Foreign Currency

 

The functional currency for substantially all operations outside the United States is the local currency. Financial statements for these operations are translated into United States dollars at year‑end rates as to assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during the year as to revenue and expenses. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in stockholders’ equity as an element of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in other income (expense) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company had $0.6 million in foreign exchange losses. For the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company did not have any material foreign exchange gains or losses. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company realized $1.8 million of foreign exchange gains. 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

(d)          Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original maturities of ninety days or less. Cash equivalents consist primarily of money market securities and certificates of deposit. Cash equivalents are carried on the balance sheet at fair market value.

Inventories

(e)          Inventories

 

Inventories are carried at lower of cost, determined using the first‑in, first‑out (“FIFO”) method, or market. The Company periodically reviews its inventories and makes provisions as necessary for estimated obsolescence or damaged goods to ensure values approximate lower of cost or market. The amount of such markdowns is equal to the difference between cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demands, selling prices, and market conditions.

 

The Company records an allowance for estimated excess inventory. The allowance is determined using management’s assumptions of materials usage, based on estimates of demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions become less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write‑downs may be required.

Property, Plant and Equipment

(f)          Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.

 

Depreciation and amortization are recorded using the straight‑line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset Classification

    

Estimated Useful Life

Land and buildings (under lease)

 

 

Lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset

 

 

Machinery and equipment

 

 

3 to 10 years

 

 

 

On January 30, 2015, the Company sold its corporate headquarters facility. As part of this sale, the Company also entered into a 22-year lease agreement. The Company accounted for the sale leaseback transaction as a financing arrangement for financial reporting purposes. The Company retained the historical costs of the property and the related accumulated depreciation on its financial books within property, plant and equipment and will continue to depreciate the property for financial reporting purposes over the lesser of its remaining useful life or its initial lease term of 22 years. 

 

Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

(g)          Impairment of Long‑Lived Assets

 

The Company records impairment losses on long-lived assets when events and circumstances indicate that these assets might not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by a comparison of the assets’ carrying amount to their expected future undiscounted net cash flows. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment is measured based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds its fair value.

 

The Company did not have any indicators of impairment during the period ending December 31, 2016. The Company did not record an impairment charge in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, or 2014.

 

Actual performance could be materially different from our current forecasts, which could impact estimates of undiscounted cash flows and may result in the impairment of the carrying amount of the long-lived assets in the future. This could be caused by strategic decisions made in response to economic and competitive conditions, the impact of the economic environment on our customer base, or a material adverse change in the Company’s relationships with significant customers.

Concentration of Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Risk

(h)         Concentration of Risk and Off‑Balance Sheet Risk

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are principally cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company’s cash equivalents are principally maintained in an investment grade money‑market fund or certificates of deposit.

 

The Company has no significant off‑balance‑sheet risk such as exchange contracts, option contracts or other hedging arrangements.

 

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to cash equivalents. The primary objective of the Company’s investment activities is to preserve principal without significantly increasing risk. This is accomplished by investing in marketable high investment grade securities. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments to manage its investment portfolio and does not expect operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by any change in market interest rates.

 

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally requires no collateral to secure accounts receivable. For selected overseas sales, the Company requires customers to obtain letters of credit before product is shipped. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based on its assessment of the collectability of accounts receivable. The Company reviews the allowance for doubtful accounts monthly. The Company does not have any off‑balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

 

The Company’s customers consist of semiconductor chip manufacturers located throughout the world and net sales to its ten largest customers accounted for 70.2%,  76.8% and 68.1% of revenue in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had one customer representing 17.0% of total revenue.  For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had two customers representing 29.3% and 10.5% of total revenue, respectively. For the year ended December 2014 the Company had two customers representing 17.4% and 12.3% of total revenue, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had four customers account for 22.0%,  12.3%, 12.0% and 10.6% of consolidated accounts receivable, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had three customers account for 22.9%, 12.7% and 11.6% of consolidated accounts receivable, respectively.

 

Some of the components and sub‑assemblies included in the Company’s products are obtained either from a sole source or a limited group of suppliers. Disruption to the Company’s supply source, resulting either from economic conditions or other factors, could affect its ability to deliver products to its customers.

Revenue Recognition

(i)          Revenue Recognition

 

The Company’s revenue recognition policy involves significant judgment by management. The Company considers a broad array of facts and circumstances in determining when to recognize revenue, including contractual obligations to the customer, the complexity of the customer’s post‑delivery acceptance provisions, payment history, customer creditworthiness and the installation process.

 

The Company’s system sales transactions are made up of multiple elements, including the system itself and elements that are not delivered simultaneously with the system. These undelivered elements might include a combination of installation services, extended warranty and support and spare parts, all of which are covered generally by a single sales price.

 

The Company’s system revenue arrangements with multiple elements are divided into separate units of accounting if specified criteria are met, including whether the delivered element has stand‑alone value to the customer. If the criteria are met, then the consideration received is allocated among the separate units based on their relative selling price, and the revenue is recognized separately for each of the separate units.

 

The Company determines selling price for each unit of accounting (element) using vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) or third‑party evidence (TPE), if they exist, otherwise, the Company uses best estimated selling price (BESP). The Company generally expects that it will not be able to establish TPE due to the nature of its products, and, as such, the Company typically will determine selling price using VSOE or BESP.

 

Where required, the Company determines BESP for an individual element based on consideration of both market and Company‑specific factors, including the selling price and profit margin for similar products, the cost to produce the deliverable and the anticipated margin on that deliverable and the characteristics of the markets in which the deliverable is sold.

 

Systems are not sold separately and VSOE or TPE is not available for the systems element. Therefore the selling price associated with systems is based on BESP. The allocated value for installation in the arrangement includes either (i) the relative selling price of the installation or (ii) the portion of the sales price that will not be received until the installation is completed (the “retention”). The selling price of elements such as extended warranty for support, spare parts and support labor is also based on BESP.  For the majority of regions, the selling price of installation is based upon the fair value of the service performed, including labor, which is based upon the estimated time to complete the installation at hourly rates, and material components, both of which are sold separately, or VSOE. In regions where VSOE does not exist the Company uses BESP.

 

Product revenue for products which have demonstrated market acceptance, is generally recognized upon shipment provided title and risk of loss has passed to the customer, evidence of an arrangement exists, prices are contractually fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured through historical collection results and regular credit evaluations, and there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance. Revenue from installation services is recognized at the time acceptance has occurred, as defined in the sales documentation or, for certain customers, when both acceptance has occurred and retention payment has been received. Revenue for other elements is recognized at the time products are shipped or the related services are performed.

 

The Company generally recognizes revenue for systems which have demonstrated market acceptance at the time of shipment because the customer’s post‑delivery acceptance provisions and installation process have been established to be routine, commercially inconsequential and perfunctory. The Company believes the risk of failure to complete a system installation is remote.

 

For initial shipments of systems with new technologies or in the small number of instances where the Company is unsure of meeting the customer’s specifications or obtaining customer acceptance upon shipment of the system, it will defer the recognition of systems revenue and related costs until written customer acceptance of the system is obtained. This deferral period is generally within twelve months of shipment.

 

Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts, or based on parts usage, where appropriate. Revenue related to service hours is recognized when the services are performed.

 

Product revenue includes revenue from system sales, sales of spare parts, the spare parts component of maintenance and service contracts and product upgrades. Services revenue includes the labor component of maintenance and service contract amounts charged for on‑site service personnel.

 

Axcelis reports revenue net of any taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities, with the collected taxes recorded as current liabilities until remitted to the relevant government authority.

Shipping and Handling Costs

(j)          Shipping and Handling Costs

 

Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of revenue.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

(k)         Stock‑Based Compensation

 

The Company generally recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of employee stock options, based on the grant‑date fair value of those stock‑based payments using the Black‑Scholes option pricing model, adjusted for expected forfeitures. Other valuation models may be utilized in the limited circumstances where awards with market-based vesting considerations, such as the price of the Company’s common stock, or performance based awards, are granted. Stock‑based compensation expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period. For each stock option grant with vesting based on a combination of time, market or performance conditions, where vesting will occur if either condition is met, the related compensation costs are recognized over the shorter of the explicit service period or the derived service period.

 

See Note 14 for additional information relating to stock‑based compensation.

Income Taxes

(l)         Income Taxes

 

The Company records income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax basis, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements contain certain deferred tax assets which have arisen primarily as a result of operating losses, as well as other temporary differences between financial and tax accounting. The Company establishes a valuation allowance if the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets is reduced based on an evaluation of objective verifiable evidence. Significant management judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against those net deferred tax assets. The Company evaluates the weight of all available evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred income tax assets will not be realized.

 

Income taxes include the largest amount of tax benefit for an uncertain tax position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit based on the technical merits of the tax position. Settlements with tax authorities, the expiration of statutes of limitations for particular tax positions, or obtaining new information on particular tax positions may cause a change to the effective tax rate. The Company recognizes accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense and penalties as operating expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Computation of Net Income (Loss) per Share

(m)         Computation of Net Income (Loss) per Share

 

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted‑average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) for the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued, calculated using the treasury stock method.

 

The Company incurred a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2014, and has excluded 1,165,855 of incremental shares attributable to outstanding stock options and restricted stock units from the calculation of net loss per share because the effect would have been anti‑dilutive.

 

The components of net income (loss) per share are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2014

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

 

$

11,001

 

$

14,678

 

$

(11,266)

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing basic income (loss) per share

 

 

29,195

 

 

28,595

 

 

27,862

 

Incremental options and RSUs

 

 

1,752

 

 

1,634

 

 

 —

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share

 

 

30,947

 

 

30,229

 

 

27,862

 

Net income (loss) per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.51

 

$

(0.40)

 

Diluted

 

$

0.36

 

$

0.49

 

$

(0.40)

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

(n)          Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

 

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, by component for the year ended December 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Foreign

    

Defined benefit

    

 

 

 

 

 

currency

 

pension plan

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

(744)

 

$

(687)

 

$

(1,431)

 

Other comprehensive loss and pension reclassification

 

 

(847)

 

 

(1)

 

 

(848)

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

(1,591)

 

$

(688)

 

$

(2,279)

 

 

 

Recent Accounting Guidance

(o)         Recent Accounting Guidance

 

Accounting Standards or Updates Recently Adopted

 

In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” The amendments in this ASU require entities that present classified statements of financial position to classify deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent. They apply to all entities that present a classified statement of financial position. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU No. 2015-17 early, effective June 30, 2016, on a prospective basis. As a result, the Company presented all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, reducing current deferred tax assets by $0.2 million, long-term deferred tax assets by $0.3 million and short-term deferred tax liabilities by $0.5 million. The current deferred tax assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, have not been reclassified.

 

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” ASU 2014-15 introduces an explicit requirement for management to assess if there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. In connection with each annual and interim period, management must assess if there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the issuance date. Disclosures are required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Accounting Standards or Updates Not Yet Effective

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which provides guidance for revenue recognition. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which further clarifies performance obligations in a contract with a customer. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which provides a more narrow interpretation of ASU No. 2014-09. These ASUs are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact the adoption of these standards will have on the financial statements.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which changes the inventory measurement principles for entities using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost methods. For entities utilizing one of these methods, the inventory measurement principle will change from lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The amendments are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases.” The ASU requires lessees to recognize the rights and obligations created by most leases as assets and liabilities on their balance sheet and continue to recognize expenses on their income statement over the lease term. It will also require disclosures designed to give financial statement users information on the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02 on the consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09 “Compensation — Stock Compensation,” which changes the accounting for stock-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for all entities and any entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period.  The adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

 

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” This ASU requires the statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.  ASU No. 2016-18 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.