EX-99.1 2 d314977dex991.htm INVESTOR PRESENTATION Investor Presentation
This is an oral presentation which is accompanied by slides. Investors are urged to review our SEC filings.
This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements regarding various oil and gas discoveries, oil
and gas exploration, development and production activities, anticipated and potential production and flow
rates; anticipated revenues; the economic potential of properties and estimated exploration costs. Accuracy
of the projections depends on assumptions about events that change over time and is thus susceptible to
periodic
change
based
on
actual
experience
and
new
developments.
Endeavour
cautions
readers
that
it
assumes no obligation to update or publicly release any revisions to the projections in this presentation and,
except
to
the
extent
required
by
applicable
law,
does
not
intend
to
update
or
otherwise
revise
the
projections.
Important
factors
that
might
cause
future
results
to
differ
from
these
projections
include:
variations
in
the
market prices of oil and natural gas; drilling results; access to equipment and oilfield services; unanticipated
fluctuations in flow rates of producing wells related to mechanical, reservoir or facilities performance; oil and
natural
gas
reserves
expectations;
the
ability
to
satisfy
future
cash
obligations
and
environmental
costs;
and
general exploration and development risks and hazards.
The Securities and Exchange Commission permits oil and gas companies in their filings with the SEC to
disclose
only
proved
reserves
that
a
company
has
demonstrated
by
actual
production
or
conclusive
formation
tests to be economically and legally producible under existing economic and operating conditions. SEC
guidelines
prohibit
the
use
in
filings
of
terms
such
as
“probable,”
“possible,”
P2
or
P3
and
“non-proved”
reserves, reserves “potential”
or “upside”
or other descriptions of volumes of reserves potentially recoverable
through additional drilling or recovery techniques. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than
estimates of proved reserves and accordingly are subject to greater risk of being actually realized by the
company.
Certain
statements
should
be
regarded
as
“forward-looking”
statements
within
the
meaning
of
the
securities laws. These statements speak only as of the date made. Such statements are subject to
assumptions, risk and uncertainty. Actual results or events may vary materially. The estimates of recoverable
resources per well and completed well costs included herein are based upon other typical results in these
shale plays and may not be indicative of actual results.
Disclosures
Exhibit 99.1


Corporate Strategy
Bill Transier, Chief Executive Officer


UK Operations
March 13, 2012


UK Business Unit
and Strategy
March 13, 2012


3
UK Business Unit and Strategy
The Four Key Questions
Why the UK North Sea?
What is the UK business unit 
comprised of today?
What comes next?
How will we get there?


4
Why the North Sea?
A mature proven, active petroleum system
24 billion barrels of oil and gas still left to be produced
Further exploration opportunities through License Rounds
and Farm-ins
Business Development
Opportunity rich environment
Most Majors are re-evaluating their portfolios
ConocoPhillips acquisition demonstrates potential upside
Markets
Strong commodity prices with long term forecast stability
Brent Oil $124;  NBP Gas $9.80
Intellectual Capacity
Deep talent pool of experienced personnel with a  huge
amount of intellectual knowledge across the basin,
particularly in the Central North Sea area
Political Landscape
Strong signs of improved fiscal stability and recognition of
the importance of the oil industry to UK economy


5
The
UK
Business
Unit
Today
-
Building
on
Past
Success
The UK Business –
Brief History
Starting in 2004, built a stable platform of production
with significant reserves increases
Active value driven portfolio management with
acquisitions, exploration success, divestments
Acknowledged, experienced offshore operator and
asset developer
Evolved a focus on the UK Central North Sea
Built a strong and experienced team able to manage
full cycle E&P activity
Vision
To be the fastest growing Independent E&P company
in the North Sea
Current Production
Development Projects
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Rochelle
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
London Office
Aberdeen Operations Center


6
UK
Business
Unit
Growth
Strategy
Key Business Focus Areas in 2012
Deliver on key development projects
Rochelle
Bacchus
Close on the ConocoPhillips acquisition
Assume operatorship of MacCulloch FPSO
Success in bidding for additional blocks in
the 27
th
Licensing Round
Future Objectives
Sustained reserves and production growth
will come from a balanced strategy of:
Low risk exploration and appraisal
Acquisitions
Realizing existing portfolio upside potential
Funded from internally generated cash
flows


7
Illustration of Growth Potential


8
66%
34%
Significant UK Production Growth Through Near-Term Projects
Pro forma Production with
Bacchus on-line and the
acquisition of North Sea Assets
UK Oil
UK Gas
Pro forma Production
with Rochelle on-line
17,000 –
24,500 boepd
11,000 –
17,000 boepd


9
Expected 2012 Exit Position of Endeavour


10
UK
Business
Unit
How
Will
We
Realize
Our
Strategy?
Strong Leadership team with an average of 25 years UK and International
experience with a proven track record of bringing developments on-line
Core technical competencies retained in-house.  Internal technical capability covers
the full cycle of E&P activity
Subsurface -
Exploration / Development Geology / Reservoir Engineering
Development Engineering / Drilling and Production Operations / Commercial
Today’s UK Presenters
Carl Grenz
EVP International
36 years UK and International experience, formerly Chief of Global production for BHP Billiton. 
Experienced in delivery  of new developments and the management of E&P operations
Derek Neilson
Director, Subsurface Engineering
28 years UK and International development and reservoir management experience, formerly Chief
Reservoir Engineer, Total UK
Nick Ritchie
Director, Facilities Engineering
15 years experience,  Rochelle project director.  Extensive project and operations experience of
UKCS / deepwater FPSOs.  Formerly Talisman and CNR
Nick Terrell
Director, Exploration
Talented
geoscientist
leading
the
highly
experienced
Exploration
team.
With
Endeavour,
since
the
Company entered North Sea, proven track record of exploration success.


UK
Producing
Assets
March 13, 2012


12
Overview of the UK Assets (Post Acquisition)
Project
Operator
END
WI%
Production
Status
International
Alba
(1)
26%
Producing
Infill Drilling
Bittern
2%
Producing
Enoch
8%
Producing
Bacchus
30%
First production
expected 1Q2012
MacCulloch
(1)
40%
Producing
Nicol
(1)
18%
Producing
Rochelle
44%
First production
expected 4Q2012
Columbus
25%
In Development
R Block Redev.
52%
In Progress
Notes:
(1) 23.43% Alba, MacCulloch (+Operatorship) and Nicol pending completion of CoP Acquisition
Current Production
Development Projects
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Rochelle


13
Alba Field -
Overview
Block 16/26a, 450ft water depth
Discovered 1984, first production 1994
Late Eocene reservoir at ~6,200ft
Massive homogeneous unconsolidated sands
with excellent quality
92% Net-Gross / ~35% porosity / ~3,000mD
permeability
Oil-in-place ~1033 MMbbls
19°
API, 7 to 10 cP viscosity, GOR 330 scf/stb
Facilities
ANP platform, with 31 slots
25 platform producers / 6 water injectors
12 slot AXS manifold
10 subsea producers / 2 water injectors
Seawater and produced water re-injection
Oil exported by tanker, gas to Britannia
Company
Equity (%)
Endeavour
25.68*
Chevron (Operator)
23.37
Statoil
17.00
BP
13.30
Total
12.65
CIECO / Itochu
8.00
*Pro Forma including CoP Acquisition
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Britannia


14
Alba Field -
Metrics
Large, high quality North Sea oil asset
with strong upside development and
reserves potential
A specific target due to strong
performance metrics
2P Reserves 23.6 MMboe at YE2011
2P NPV10 > $1,000mm
Oil trades at low differential to Brent
Average 2011 differential of -
$3.50
Low operating costs
Low future CAPEX exposure
Majority for development drilling campaign
with high return and short payback
~20 year remaining field life
Based
on
YE2012
2P
Audited
Reserves
Report


15
Alba Field -
Future Development
Sustain current production and increase
reserves through continued development
drilling
Current production rate
25,000 –
30,000 bopd gross
Cumulative production to date
~373 MMbbls gross
Infill drilling since 2009 has largely
sustained production
Continuation of Infill drilling program
2012 campaign extended from 6 to 9 months
Continuation of drilling included in Operator’s
business plan
Large basket of further drilling opportunities
identified
Addition to current reserves
Low economic threshold
Short payback time


Central North Sea Assets
Current Production
Development Projects
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Rochelle


Bittern
Field
-
Overview
Block 29/1b, 305ft water depth
Discovered 1996, first production 2000
Eocene reservoir at ~6,750ft
Good quality Rogaland and Forties channel
sands
85% NTG / ~33% porosity / ~1,000mD perm
Oil-in-place ~256 MMbbls with 77 Bcf Gas cap
39°
API, 0.34 cP viscosity, GOR 1250 scf/stb
Facilities
Triton FPSO
Oil offload to tanker, gas export to Fulmar
pipeline to St. Fergus
2 subsea drill centers
5 subsea producers / 2 water injectors
Dual production flowlines + test line
Water injection and gas lift lines
Company
Equity (%)
Shell (Operator)
39.63
Hess
28.28
ExxonMobil
25.00
Dana
4.67
Endeavour*
2.42
*Plus 1.62% equity in Triton FPSO
Triton FPSO
Bittern
16


Bittern
Field
-
Status
Production increase and reserves added
in 2010 and 2011 through 2 infill wells
Current production rate
15,000 to 20,000 bopd gross
Cumulative production to date
130 MMbbls Gross
Recently announced change of Triton
Operator (Dana)
Increase production efficiency on Triton
vessel
Open infill wells to full potential to further
increase production and add reserves
Evaluate potential for future infill drilling
17


Central North Sea Assets
Current Production
Development Projects
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Rochelle


Enoch
Enoch
Field
-
Overview
Company
Equity (%)
Talisman (Operator)
25.2
Dana
20.8
Dyas
14.0
RocOil
12.0
Statoil
11.8
Endeavour
8.0
Noreco
4.4
Dong
2.0
Noil
1.9
* Cross UK / Norway border 80 / 20 split
18


Enoch Field -
Status
19


Central North Sea Assets
Current Production
Development Projects
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Rochelle


20
MacCulloch
Field
-
Overview
ConocoPhillips currently operates the field,
Endeavour seeking transfer of Operatorship
Block 15/24b, 490ft water depth
Discovered in 1990
First  production August 1997
Paleocene reservoir at ~6,200ft
Channelized turbidite sands of good quality
40
90%
NTG
/
~28%
porosity
/
200
2000
mD
Oil-in-place ~241 MMbbl
32-37°
API, 0.85 cP viscosity, GOR 410 scf/stb
Facilities
Converted FPSO North Sea Producer (NSP)
Oil and Gas export to Piper “B”
Subsea production drill centers (11 wells)
Subsea water injection flowbase, never
commissioned
Company
Equity (%)
Endeavour (Operator**)
40.00*
Eni
40.00
Noble Energy
14.00
Talisman
6.00
*
Pro Forma including CoP Acquisition
**Pending assignment of Operatorship


MacCulloch
Field
-
Status
Control in future Operated Asset with
upside potential
Current production rate
7,000 bopd gross
Cumulative production to date
114 MMbbl gross
Plan to assume Operatorship from
ConocoPhillips on completion of
acquisition
Plans to perform a detailed asset
performance review:
Evaluation of infill / near field potential
Opportunity to return shut-in wells to
production
Optimization of gas lift rates and distribution
Debottlenecking, improvement to compressor
performance and availability
Improve operational efficiency
Manage offshore duty holder (NSPC) to
implement operational improvements
21


UK
Development
Assets
March 13, 2012


Central North Sea Assets
Current Production
Development Projects
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Rochelle


Rochelle
Field
-
Overview
* Unit interests following Unitisation
Company
Equity (%)
Endeavour (Operator)
44.0
Nexen
41.0
Premier
15.0
23


24
Rochelle
Field
-
Organic
Reserve
Additions
Bringing a stranded discovery to first
production
Rochelle discovered in 2000 by 15/27-9
well
Acquired in 2006 from Talisman
Undeveloped stranded discovery with ~4
MMboe contingent resources
Technically unlocked by Endeavour
Reprocessed seismic to identify stratigraphic
potential
Leveraged the regional knowledge of the
Kopervik gained through Goldeneye Field
15/27-11 (East Rochelle) appraisal in 2009
Evaluated development and upside potential
Appraisal well drilled in 2011 proved West
Rochelle
Field Development Plan (FDP) approved with        
31 MMboe 2P Reserves
15/27-9
Discovery
East Rochelle
15/27-11 DST
42 MMcsf/d


25
ER dev. well
WR dev. well
Rochelle
Field
-
Reservoir
Development
Reservoir Description
3 way stratigraphic trap in Kopervik fairway
Lower Cretaceous Kopervik turbidite sands
of good quality
50%
NTG
/
~21%
porosity
/
~100
1,000mD
perm
Regionally extensive active aquifer
Reservoir Development
2 x 500m horizontal development wells
High potential wells at100 MMscf/d per well
Gravel pack with pre-drilled liner
5 ½”
completion with permanent downhole
pressure / temperature gauges
Potential reserve additions through
production post water breakthrough
15/26
East Rochelle
West Rochelle
GOLDENEYE


Rochelle
Field
-
Application
of
Proven
Technology
Optimized and added value to the
development
Ocean Bottom Cable (OBC) seismic to image
sands within the gross Britannia package
Use of seismic attributes / simultaneous inversion
to aid mapping and evaluate uncertainties
Regional aquifer knowledge / modelling
Schlumberger Periscope deep reading resistivity
planned to optimize geo-steering for delivery of
successful development wells
‘Pipe in Pipe’
development solution
ER OBC inversion through East Rochelle
Geosteering producers through the
Rochelle reservoir -
forward modelling
RXT Vikland
OBC vessel
26


Rochelle
Field
-
Development


Rochelle
Field
-
Surface
Development
Greenfield Installation
Individual well metering
Manifolds at East and West
7.8km long 10/14”
Pipe-in-pipe (West)
30km long 10/14”
Pipe-in-pipe (East)
New subsea safety valve at Scott
New umbilical and flexible risers on Scott
Brownfield modifications (Scott)
Re-wheel compressors
New 2-phase vertical separator
Modifications to chemical system
Piping tie-ins
Subsea control system upgrade
Designed for upside and future
expansion
Separation
Controls
Flexible
riser
Methanol Injection
& Storage
Chemical
Injection
28


Rochelle
Field
-
Development
Status
29


30
Rochelle
Field
-
March
2012
Above:
Rochelle
Christmas
Tree
Right:
Manufactured
sections
of
14”
pipe
in
Evanton
spoolbase
Below:
New
methanol
tank
for
Rochelle,
quayside
and
installed


Central North Sea Assets
Current Production
Development Projects
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Rochelle


31
Bacchus
Field
-
Overview
Company
Equity (%)
Apache (Operator)
50.0
Endeavour*
30.0
First Oil
20.0
*Endeavour equity increased from 10% through purchase
of Shell interest in February 2011
Bacchus


Bacchus
Field
-
Subsurface
Development
Plan
3 well development
Horizontal wells
Maximize productivity
Drilled through faults
Mitigate seal risk
Phase 1
Depletion from 3 wells
Phase 2
Commence water injection in southern well
Increase reserves through secondary recovery
32


Bacchus
Field
-
Development
Subsea development to Forties Alpha
4 slot subsea production and injection manifold
Tied-back to Forties Alpha via a 6.7 km bundle and
new riser caisson attached to jacket
Forties Alpha topsides facilities
Pig launcher and receivers, multi-phase flow meter
HIPS valves, methanol tanks & pumps
Connections from gas lift manifold and produced water
injection pumps
Control and chemical injection systems
6.7 km subsea bundle
2 x 6”
production
2 x 4”
water
4”
gas lift
3”
scale squeeze line
2”
methanol line
Power, control and
hydraulic lines.
Riser
Caisson
Topsides Pipework
33


34
Bacchus
Field
-
Development
Status
SSIV Towhead


UK
Exploration
March 13, 2012


UK North Sea Exploration
UK Exploration and Appraisal Drilling
Forecast 2012-2015
Sources:
The
Oil
&
Gas
UK
2011
Economic
Report,
DECC,
Hannon
&
Westwood,
WoodMac,
company
information
36


Exploration Overview
Centurion South
Ravel
Buffalo
Hoylake
Rye
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Rochelle
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Current Production
Development Projects
Prospects / Discoveries
37


38
Centurion
-
Focus
Area
Bittern
Centurion
Extension of Centurion discovery
29/6a-3 well flowed 5,200 bopd
Centurion South well –
Q3 2012
Endeavour equity
33.3%
High quality Fulmar reservoir, oil-prone block
Strategy is to appraise Centurion South first
Attractive 27
th
Round acreage nearby
Centurion South
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Rochelle
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Current Production
Development Projects
Prospects / Discoveries
West Curlew
CENTURION
CENTURION SOUTH
29/6a-CS
29/6a-3
Centurion South
Ravel
Buffalo
Hoylake
Rye


39
Ravel Prospect
Low risk oil prospect
Strong seismic anomaly with flat spot
Drill Ravel prospect to add contingent resources
Close to other R-Block assets
Oil developments/discoveries/prospects
Optimize future R-Block development
Other prospectivity on held acreage
Future Growth
Attractive 27
th
Round acreage near-by
Farm-in opportunities identified
R-Block
-
Focus
Area
Rochelle
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe/RobRoy
Buffalo
Hoylake
Ravel
Centurion South
Ravel
Buffalo
Hoylake
Rye
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Rochelle
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Current Production
Development Projects
Prospects / Discoveries
Top Forties depth map (TVDSS)
Ravel


40
Buffalo and Hoylake
Rochelle look-alikes on Kopervik Fairway
Discovered hydrocarbons (Hoylake)
Excellent quality reservoirs
Extensive regional knowledge
Close to Rochelle development
Gas condensate tie-backs to Rochelle
Future Growth
Attractive 27
th
Round acreage available 
near-by
Farm-in opportunities identified
West Rochelle
East Rochelle
Buffalo
Hoylake
Rochelle
-
Focus
Area
Rochelle
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe/RobRoy
Buffalo
Hoylake
Ravel
Centurion South
Ravel
Buffalo
Hoylake
Rye
Bacchus
Enoch
Columbus
Bittern
Alba
MacCulloch
Nicol
Rochelle
Renee
Rubie
Ivanhoe /
RobRoy
Current Production
Development Projects
Prospects / Discoveries


27
th
Licensing Round
Bid deadline 1
st
May 2012
More than 8 million acres available in Central
North Sea
2
nd
Round Licence extension expiries
Focus on Central North Sea core area
Region is prolific generator of discoveries
Jurassic, Cretaceous and Tertiary play focus
Focus on high quality acreage close to
infrastructure
Building on existing focus areas
Rochelle / R-Block and Centurion
New Focus Areas
MacCulloch (ConocoPhillips) / Rye (Block 21/11)
27
th
Round
acreage
Endeavour acreage
Licensed acreage
Pending award
41


US Assets and
New Ventures Strategy
March 13, 2012


US Management Team
(prior companies)
Jim Emme –
Executive (Anadarko, Elk)
Dave Davenport –
Land (Marathon, Orion, Encana, Elk, EXCO)
Eric Kolstad –
Drilling/Ops (Texaco, UPR/APC, Williams, Newfield)
Corey Meyer –
Reservoir Engineering (Chevron, Cimarex)
Chip Oakes –
Geosciences (Sun/Oryx, Forest)
Richard Rowe –
Engineering (Amoco, Anadarko, Stonegate)
Our Experienced Management Team
2


3
US Shale Oil and Gas Resource Systems
Jarvie 2010
Play Types
Oil
Gas
Oil and Gas
Biogenic Gas


4
New Ventures Criteria
Proven petroleum systems
Underutilized technologies
Acceptable entry cost
Competitive niche
Operational control or influence
Market access
Manageable regulatory environment
Reasonable cycle time to production
Attractive returns


5
Overview of Endeavour’s US Assets
Heath
Shale
Oil
Play
-
MT
Marcellus Play -
PA
Haynesville
Play
LA/
E.
TX
Cretaceous
Plays
-
CO
US 2011 Year-End Totals
582,000 gross / 159,000 net acres
20 MMCFe/D net production (exit rate)
61 BCFe Proved / 89 BCFe 2P reserves


Heath
Shale
‘Tight
Oil’
Play
in
Central
Montana
25% joint venture with two independent
Montana producers
430,000+ gross acres primarily in Garfield
and Rosebud Counties (94,000 net to END)
Four well vertical pilot drilling program
completed
Evaluating extensive core/log data
Indentifying future horizontal re-entry targets
(likely Q3/Q4 2012 horizontal testing program)
6
‘Bakken-like’
play, but shallower       
(4000-
5500 ft. depth)
A proven petroleum system ~ 137 MMBO
cumulative production (Heath Shale is the
primary source rock)
Rich, oil-prone source rock, up to 20%
total organic carbon content, light oil
Heath Play Attributes
END
CMR
Cirque
Cabot          Fidelity             Heath sourced oil fields
Heath Play, END Activity
Heath Fairway outline


Heath Shale -
Geological Setting
Heath Shale Cox Ranch Member 10-16% TOC (MBMG, 1985)
Tyler Creek photo by Great Northern Gas Co, 2009
7
Primary
Objective


Historical
Type
Log
-
Sumatra
Field  
Exeter 8-36 Kincheloe well (ne ne sec. 36 11N 31E)
Gamma Ray
Resistivity
Heath Formation
Organic-rich shales; 
Limestone and
dolomite inter-beds
Tyler Sandstone
Conventional reservoir
8


9
Heath Shale Petroleum System
DST 1700
clean oil
IP 73 BOPD, 35.3 API
Key components:
Middle
Carbonate
Member
(up
to
40’
thick)
Thin limestones and dolomites
Porosity developed in places (up to13%, 5% avg)
Possible ‘carrier’
beds; tested oil
Over 100 mbo produced from Sumatra well
Cox Ranch Member (“Hot”
Shale)
10
to
60
feet
thick
(4
20%
porosity,
11%
avg)
High organic content
Thermally mature to volatile oil window
Tested
30
35.5
API
gravity
oil
NE 26-11N-32E
Middle
Carbonate
Cox Ranch
‘Hot’
Shale
Top Heath Formation


10
Tyler/Heath Type Well Log
Middle
Carbonate
Cox Ranch
Top Heath
18%   10%   2%
Gamma Ray
Resistivity
Porosity
Oil stained, porous Tyler Sandstone
Possible local trap configuration
High TOC black Cox Ranch Oil shale
Potentially porous, Middle carbonate


11
Oil-stained, porous
Tyler Sandstone
Oil-stained, calcareous
intervals interbedded
with oil-prone Heath
source shales
Tyler/Heath
Core
Photos
Multiple,
Stacked
Objectives


12
Reflector that contains oil-stained Tyler thickens off structure and develops amplitude
Seismic line courtesy of Seismic Exchange, Inc.
Sub-Play:  Potential Tyler Sand Stratigraphic Trap


13
Highly Active,
Competitive
Niobrara Oil Fields
Niobrara Gas Fields
Abbreviations denote Rocky Mtn Basins
S. Sonnenberg, CSM 2011
END focused on less active,
emerging areas
Targeting stacked, proven
Cretaceous petroleum systems,
including Niobrara
Oil and gas with liquids
potential
Significant land positions are
still available
Lower cost of entry
Forming 20,000 acre federal
unit for first optional test well
Niobrara-Mancos Shale Oil and Gas Productive Areas


14
Cretaceous
Outcrop
-
Subsurface
Reservoir
Analog


15
50% joint venture with JW-Operating in 
15,600 gross acres (7,100 net to END)
120 + future horizontal drilling locations
being held by current production
Drilling successful to date
2 year participation in 24 successful
Haynesville and 3 successful Cotton
Valley Sand horizontal producing wells
January 2012 record production rates of 
18-20 MMCF/D net (77-88 MMCF/D
gross)
Haynesville Shale and Cotton Valley Sand Plays


16
Bull Bayou Gas Rate vs. Cumulative Production Comparison
Restricted Rate Strategy is Working


17
50% joint venture with JW-Operating in 38,000
gross acres (18,400 net to END)
200+ potential horizontal drilling locations
END prospects are well situated
Proximity to East Coast markets yields price
premiums, steady demand for production
Initial horizontal drilling at Daniel Prospect in
Cameron County
Results consistent with reported industry results
Requires only two horizontal wells per year to
hold key Daniel Pardee block
Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Gas Play 


18
2
3
Ohio
PA
NY
Pennsylvania
Shale
Fairways
END’s
Strategic
Position
Daniel
(Marcellus
and dry Utica)
NE Potter
(Geneseo)
Clarion
(dry Utica)
2
1
3
1


19
Solid well results in adjacent areas
on trend with Cameron County
Seneca –
Elk Co.
Reported EUR’s of 3 -
5 BCF
EOG/Seneca –
N. Clearfield Co.
Recent IP’s 7 -
9+ MMCF/D with
“High Rate Frac Technology”
PGE/Exxon –
SE McKean Co.
5000’
7600’
laterals
IP rates of 6-9 MMCF/D
Multi-pay Upside
Seneca –
Central Potter Co.
Geneseo Shale IP’s of 2-4.5 MMCF/D
Seneca –
McKean Co.
Utica Shale test well “encouraging”
with
400’
gross reservoir at 10,000’
depth
END               EOG             Seneca            Ultra      
PGE/Exxon
Seneca Geneseo
Seneca Utica well
Ultra long laterals
Seneca 3-5 Bcf
EOG
PGE long laterals
7000+’
5000+’
Daniel
Commercial Marcellus Activity Continues on Trend  


20
Size of the Cameron Prize
21,000 gross / 10,600 net acres
to END’s interest (50% WI)
180 -
200 locations
3 -
5 BCF/well EUR
540 –
1,000 BCFG recoverable
Potential to add 35 -
50k acres
via leasing, trades, deals
1 -
2 TCFG ultimate potential
Planned Activities 2012
Expand gathering infrastructure
Pardee C14H and C20H
drilled/cased, waiting on completion
Evaluate new 3D seismic
Drill two lease obligation wells Q4
2012 (prior to March 2013)
Negotiate access to un-leased
State Forest Lands minerals
Pardee C-4V
Pardee C-10H
Pardee C-7H
Pardee C-9H
Pardee C-5V
Pardee C-12H
Pardee C-13H
Pardee C-14H
Pardee C-20H
Daniel
Project
Update
Cameron
County,
PA


Shale Gas Play Economics vs. Wellhead Gas Prices*
*Henry Hub wellhead gas prices, net of local price differentials, gathering, treating or marketing fees
21


Reserves
March 13, 2012


2
Corporate Reserves Growth
Sustained 1P and 2P Reserves Growth since company inception
Even accounting for sale of assets to realize best value in portfolio management process
2009 Norway -
$150mm
2010 Cygnus -
$110mm


3
Reserves and Production Growth (Pro Forma CoP)
Step change in reserves and
production post acquisition
Addition of 19.5  / 31.0 MMboe
1P /2P reserves respectively
~10,000 boe/d production
Entering the North Sea mid-cap
peer group
Further increase in production
and proved reserves with
Bacchus and Rochelle
developments on production
Proved Undeveloped (PUD)
reserves move to Proved
Developed Producing (PDP)
2P reserves move to 1P with
reduction of uncertainty post
development and start-up


4
Reserves Breakdown
Balanced reserves portfolio post
ConocoPhillips acquisition
By Class
Good
balance
of
developed
vs
.
undeveloped
reserves due to:
UK Alba and MacCulloch mainly developed
producing
UK Rochelle, Bacchus and Columbus
undeveloped
US large volume of Haynesville PUDs
By Country
Growth in US reserves due to active drilling
program in Haynesville
Growth in UK reserves due to ConocoPhillips
acquisition
Lower relative US value due to depressed US gas
prices
By Fluid
Good balance of oil and gas exposure, portfolio
previously weighted more heavily towards gas
25.4, 33%
50.5, 67%
2P by Class
Dev
Undev
32.1, 76%
10.2, 24%
1P by Country
UK
US
61.2, 81%
14.8, 19%
2P by Country
UK
US
1,273,079
, 96%
49,759 ,
4%
1P NPV10 By Country
UK
US
2,417,478
, 98%
55,075 ,
2%
2P NPV
10
By Country
UK
US
23.4 ,
55%
0.0 , 0%
18.9 ,
45%
1P by Fluid
OIL
NGL
GAS
45.0 ,
59%
0.0 , 0%
30.9 ,
41%
2P by Fluid
OIL
NGL
GAS
19.0, 45%
23.2, 55%
1P by Class
Dev
Undev


5
Reserves Growth
Growth in 1P and PDP reserves through maturation of large 2P reserves base
56% of 2P reserves are Proved
Execution of developments and drilling program will
Move PUD reserves to PDP reserves
Reduce uncertainty and move 2P to 1P reserves
Additional production history (no additional CAPEX)
Reduces uncertainty and moves 2P to 1P reserves
Mature Contingent and Prospective Resources
Exploration and appraisal drilling
Future Acquisitions


Financial Review
March 13, 2012


Capital Structure Vision and Goals
Mid-cap company consistently moving toward investment grade
Deleverage each year
High-yield term loan and borrowing base for short-term working
capital/letter of credit needs
Covenant-light emphasis
Debt/EBITDA of 2:1 or better
Maintain tax efficiency between US and UK
2


Capital Structure
3
Shares Outstanding - assuming all converted
Common Stock
36.0
      
Series C Preferred Stock, convertible @ $8.75
4.2
        
Convertible Bonds, 11.5%, due 2016 @ $16.52
3.8
        
Convertible Senior Notes, 5.5%, due 2016 @ $18.51
7.3
        
Options, warrants and stock-based compensation
0.1
        
51.4
      
($ mm)
December 31,
Notes Offering
and NS Asset
Acquisition
Adjusted
December 31,
2011
2011
Cash and Deposits
106.0
$          
(10.0)
$               
96.0
$            
Senior Term Loan, 12% plus 3% PIK, due 2013
240.3
            
(240.3)
               
-
                 
Senior Notes, 12%, due 2018
-
                 
500.0
                
500.0
            
Convertible Bonds, 11.5%, due 2016 @ $16.52
62.5
              
-
                       
62.5
              
Convertible Senior Notes, 5.5%, due 2016 @ $18.51
135.0
            
-
                       
135.0
            
Subordinated Notes, 12%, due 2014
32.0
              
-
                       
32.0
              
Total Net Debt
363.8
$          
633.5
$          
Series C Preferred Stock, convertible @ $8.75
37.0
              
-
                       
37.0
              
Stockholders' Equity
154.1
            
-
                       
154.1
            
Equity Component
191.1
$          
191.1
$          


Capital Structure Evolution
Ideal capital structure includes a small revolver for short-term working
capital, high-yield bonds and equity
Always focused on covenant-light instruments
Consistently simplifying and de-risking capital structure
No maturities until 2016
4
($ mm)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
As of December 31,
2007
Activity
2008
Activity
2009
Activity
2010
Activity
2011
Activity
Estimate
Debt Securities:
Senior Bank Facility, variable rate, due 2011
110.0
$          
113.0
$          
(60.0)
$  
49.9
$            
(49.9)
$  
Second Lien Term Loan, variable rate, due 2011
75.0
              
(75.0)
    
Senior Term Loan, 12% plus 3% PIK, due 2013
160.0
   
161.4
            
75.0
     
240.3
            
(240.3)
  
Senior Notes, 12%, due 2018
500.0
   
500.0
            
Subordinated Notes, 12%, due 2014
50.0
     
50.1
              
51.1
              
(20.0)
    
32.0
              
(32.0)
    
  Total
185.0
$          
113.0
$          
100.0
$          
212.5
$          
272.3
$          
500.0
$          
Equity-Based Securities:
Convertible Bonds, 11.5%, due 2016 @ $16.52
40.0
     
44.5
              
49.8
              
55.8
              
62.5
              
62.5
              
Convertible Senior Notes, 6%, due 2012 @ $35.14
81.3
              
81.3
              
81.3
              
81.3
              
(81.3)
    
-
                 
Convertible Senior Notes, 5.5%, due 2016 @ $18.51
135.0
   
135.0
            
135.0
            
Series C Preferred Stock, convertible @ $8.75
125.0
            
125.0
            
(75.0)
    
50.0
              
(5.0)
     
45.0
              
(8.0)
     
37.0
              
37.0
              
Common Stock Issuance
118.4
   
118.4
            
118.4
            
  Total
206.3
$          
250.8
$          
181.1
$          
182.1
$          
352.9
$          
352.9
$          


Deleveraging Opportunities
Grow EBITDA and reserve base
Convert or repurchase/retire convertible securities and preferred stock
over time
Repay Subordinated Notes due 2014 ($32 mm at December 31, 2011-
callable now)
5


Our Growing Resource Base
(1) Proved and probable reserves after asset sales of 6.0mmboe in 2009.
(2) Proved and probable reserves after asset sales of 13.7mmboe in 2010; pro forma for acquisition of an additional 20% WI in Bacchus acquired February 2011.
(3) Pro forma for reserves of assets acquired in the North Sea.
Reserve Growth
6


$2,467
$1,288
$730
$624
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
2P PV-10
1P PV-10
Total Debt
Net Debt
7
Reserve Valuation
Net Asset Valuation
(1) Pre-tax PV-10 as of December 31, 2011 pro forma for the acquisition of assets in the North Sea per NSAI audited reserve reports for respective assets.
(2)
As
of
December
31,
2011
pro
forma
for
the
issuance
of
Senior
Notes.
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
Our Reserve Base Provides Significant Value


$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
1P PV-10
1P PV-10
Over Time = 2P
Rochelle
Bacchus
Alba
Other
Reserves Value Make-Up and Migration
Reserves
Migrate
from
Probable
to
Proved
from
Known
Fields,
with
Little
Capital
Investment
8


9
Example: Goldeneye Reserve Migration
Natural Growth of Proved Reserves with Minimal Capital Expenditure


Significant
Production
Growth
Acquisition
and
Near-Term
Projects
3,500 –
4,500 boepd
13,000 –
18,000 boepd
Current Production
Pro forma Production -
Bacchus
and acquired North Sea Assets
UK Oil
US Gas
UK Gas
Pro forma Production -
Rochelle
20,000 –
28,500 boepd
10
30%
70%
82%
18%
57%
30%
13%
Minimal Capital to Maintain, Upside from US Heath and Gas


Net Debt / Production
Net Debt / EBITDA
Improving Credit Metrics
(1)
2012 and 2013 based on Wall Street research consensus estimates of $297.26 mm and $482.17 mm, respectively.  2014 and 2015 are Endeavour estimates.
(2)
Assumes theoretical reserve migration from probable to proved from existing reserve base.
EBITDA
Proved Reserves
Credit Ratings will Be Notched Up as Targets for Production & EBITDAX are Met and Reserve Migration
of Existing Reserve Base Occurs
11


Project Net Back Metrics
12
Alba
Bacchus
MacCulloch
Rochelle
Haynesville
$/bbl
$/bbl
$/bbl
$/mcfe
$/mcf
Revenue
125.0
$         
125.0
$         
125.0
$         
10.0
$           
3.0
$             
Operating Expense
(1)
15.2
             
7.7
               
39.7
             
1.4
               
1.1
               
Discretionary Cash Flow
109.8
           
117.3
           
85.3
             
8.6
               
1.9
               
Capital Expenditures
(1)
9.8
               
0.7
               
0.6
               
0.1
               
0.2
               
PRT
(2)
50.0
             
-
               
-
               
-
               
-
               
Net Cash Flow before
Corporate Income Tax
50.0
             
116.7
           
84.7
             
8.6
               
1.7
               
(1) Ongoing expenses at current run rate
(2) Alba is Endeavour's only field subject to PRT
Oil
Gas


2012
Capital
Plan
by
Project
-
$175mm
to
$200mm
2012 is About Turning On and Maintaining North Sea Production
(1)
Includes ongoing infill drilling at Alba for $20mm
Note: Capital Plan is pro forma for the North Sea Acquisition
13


Hedging Strategy
Protect against downside oil and gas price volatility
Ensure consistent cash flow to meet financial and strategic goals
Meet debt hedging requirements
Target 50-75% of volumes exposed to price risk
Utilize instruments with minimal up-front cash or margin requirements
14


Endeavour Tax Attributes
Total
NOL’s
($mm)
Pro Forma
UK
356
US
136
UK Net Operating Loss (NOL) buildup from 2009 is attributable to
Cygnus/Rochelle exploration expenditure with subsequent NOL’s primarily
from Bacchus/Rochelle development capital expenditure
US NOL buildup attributable to exploration and development capital
expenditure in onshore resource shale plays
UK includes ±
$100mm from the North Sea Acquisition
UK NOL has no expiration date, US NOL expires in 2032
Corporate structure enables cash to move tax efficiently from UK
to US
15


Theoretical UK Tax on a PRT Field
16
$/bbl
$/bbl
$/bbl
Oil revenue
75
100
125
Operating expense
(15)
(15)
(15)
Operating income
60
85
110
Capital expenditures
(10)
(10)
(10)
Net income per bbl before tax
50
75
100
PRT tax rate
50%
50%
50%
PRT tax expense
25
38
50
Net income less PRT tax expense
25
38
50
Note:  Alba is Endeavour's only field subject to PRT


North
Sea
Acquisition
-
Effective
Purchase
Price
Detail
($ mm)
Reserve Value
$275
Tax Benefit Allocation
55
Purchase Price
330
Interim Cash Flows
(95)
(1)
Net Purchase Price
$235
(1) Estimated as of March 31, 2012
Why Endeavour Likes This Deal
Significant free cash flow generation from proved developed producing reserves
Expands exposure to higher price North Sea liquids
Adds scope and scale, de-risking business model
Improves operating profile & credit metrics
Monetizes existing tax shields at high rates
MacCulloch will give Endeavour more operating exposure
Likely upside in reserves
17


Alba –
2.25% Interest Purchased Reserves in 2006
18
Endeavour Purchased Alba 2P Reserves in October 2006


Alba –
2.25% Interest Current Reserves
19
Alba Reserves Have Increased 35% Since Acquisition


Financial
Philosophy
Tactical
Approach
Exercise disciplined, conservative approach to capital
Allocate capital to optimize and grow our asset base
Make appropriate adjustments in anticipated  periods of lower commodity prices
Focus on assets that have controllable capex requirements and low cost
abandonment obligations
Rely minimally on institutional banks
Banking environment not reliable
Enter into revolver for working capital and liquidity purposes during 2012
Maintain covenant-light bias
Warehouse cash to use opportunistically to de-lever and grow
Tax structure keeps UK/US flexibility for cash
Continue non-speculative hedging policy to minimize cash flow volatility
Target 50%-75% of forecasted total production over 12-24 month period, subject to
market conditions
Focus on low cost solutions to protect against commodity volatility
20


Key Financial Highlights
2012 a transitional year for production and cash flow
North Sea assets will significantly increase production, cash flow and the oil weighting of our asset base
2012 and 2013  financial focus on deleveraging and simplifying
Continue to simplify and de-risk capital structure to set foundation for next growth
phase
Improving credit metrics each year
Maintain balanced business strategy based on North Sea and US conventional and
unconventional assets, invest when returns meet requirements
Continue to hedge and take advantage of high North Sea prices
Option on US gas and Heath oil upside to business model
21