XML 34 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
9 Months Ended
Apr. 01, 2017
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]  
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using only the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the applicable period, while diluted net income (loss) per share is computed assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, such as stock options, unvested restricted stock units and awards, warrants and convertible notes during such period.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
April 1, 2017
 
March 26, 2016
 
April 1, 2017
 
March 26, 2016
 
(Thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income (loss)
$
38,214

 
$
89

 
$
71,832

 
$
(3,264
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average shares - Basic
166,808

 
110,882

 
155,037

 
110,212

Effect of dilutive potential common shares from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock options and stock appreciation rights
651

 
280

 
712

 

Restricted stock units and awards
2,382

 
2,537

 
2,484

 

Convertible notes

 

 
5,004

 

Weighted-average shares - Diluted
169,841

 
113,699

 
163,237

 
110,212

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic net income (loss) per share
$
0.23

 
$
0.00

 
$
0.46

 
$
(0.03
)
Diluted net income (loss) per share
$
0.22

 
$
0.00

 
$
0.44

 
$
(0.03
)

For the three and nine months ended April 1, 2017, we excluded 0.6 million and 0.8 million, respectively, of outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights and unvested restricted stock awards from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
For the three and nine months ended March 26, 2016, we excluded 35.5 million and 38.3 million, respectively, of outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights, unvested restricted stock awards and shares issuable in connection with convertible notes from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.