XML 30 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.1
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Description of Business

Description of Business

 

Deep Down, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Deep Down Nevada”), and its directly wholly owned subsidiary, Deep Down, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Deep Down Delaware”); (collectively referred to as “Deep Down”, “we”, “us” or the “Company”), is an oilfield services company specializing in complex deepwater and ultra-deepwater oil production distribution system support services and technologies used between the production facility and the wellhead. Our services and technological solutions include distribution system installation support and engineering services, umbilical terminations, loose-tube steel flying leads, and related services. Additionally, our highly experienced, specialized service teams can support subsea engineering, installation, commissioning, and maintenance projects located anywhere in the world.

Liquidity

Liquidity

 

The Company’s cash on hand was $3,745 and working capital was $4,080 as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, cash on hand and working capital was $3,523 and $4,939, respectively. Other than loans obtained under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), the Company does not have a credit facility in place and depends on cash on hand, cash flows from operations, and the potential opportunistic sales of Property, Plant & Equipment (“PP&E”). See Note 11 and Note 12 for further discussion of the PPP loans.

 

The Company believes it will have adequate liquidity to meet its future operating requirements through a combination of cash on hand, cash expected to be generated from operations, cash received from a second PPP loan, and potential opportunistic sales of PP&E in addition to pursuing a disciplined approach to making capital investments. However, given the abrupt decline in oil prices and global economic activity caused by COVID-19 in 2020, the Company cannot predict this with certainty. To mitigate this uncertainty and preserve liquidity, the Company will continue to pursue opportunistic cost containment initiatives, which can include workforce reductions, limiting overhead spending and research and development efforts to only critical items, and actively pursuing further cost reduction opportunities as they become available.

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Deep Down and its wholly owned subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and judgments that may affect assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and related allowances, contract assets and liabilities, impairments of long-lived assets, income taxes including the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, contingencies and litigation, and share-based payments. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Segments

Segments

 

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we only had one operating and reporting segment, Deep Down Delaware.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities from date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit with domestic banks and, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We utilize a fair value hierarchy, which maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy has three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 - Quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

 

Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

 

Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash, accounts receivables and payables, and notes receivable (included in other assets). The carrying values of cash, accounts receivables, and payables approximated their fair values at December 31, 2020 and 2019 due to their short-term maturities. The carrying values of our notes receivable approximate their fair values at December 31, 2020 and 2019 because the interest rates approximate current market rates.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts Receivable

 

Accounts receivable are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms. The Company provides an allowance on accounts receivables based on a specific review of each customer’s accounts receivable balance with respect to its ability to make payments. Generally, the Company does not charge interest on past due accounts.  When specific accounts are determined to require an allowance, they are expensed by a provision for bad debts in that period.  At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company estimated the allowance for doubtful accounts requirement to be $84 and $50, respectively.  Bad debt expense totaled $238 and $20 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Concentration of Revenues and Credit Risk

Concentration of Revenues and Credit Risk

 

Deep Down’s revenues are derived from the sale of products and services to customers who participate in the offshore sector of the oil and gas industry. Customers may be similarly affected by economic and other changes in the oil and gas industry. For the year ended December 31, 2020, our five largest customers accounted for 43 percent, 10 percent, 8 percent, 8 percent, and 5 percent of total revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2019, our five largest customers accounted for 44 percent, 20 percent, 7 percent, 6 percent, and 5 percent of total revenues. The loss of one or more of these customers could have a material impact on our results of operations and cash flows.

 

As of December 31, 2020, three of our customers accounted for 52 percent, 12 percent, and 9 percent of total accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2019, three of our customers accounted for 41 percent, 17 percent, and 9 percent of total accounts receivable.

Property Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment

 

PP&E is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, amortization, and related impairments. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Replacements and betterments are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. It is our policy to include amortization expense on assets acquired under finance leases with depreciation expense on owned assets. Additionally, we record depreciation and amortization expense related to revenue-generating assets as a component of cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

If circumstances associated with our PP&E have changed or a significant event has occurred that may affect the recoverability of the carrying amount of our PP&E, an impairment indicator exists, and we test the PP&E for impairment. Before testing for impairment, we group PP&E with other finite-lived long-lived assets (“long-lived assets”) at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows from other assets or groups of assets. Testing long-lived assets for impairment is a two-step process:

 

Step 1 - We test the long-lived asset group for recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the asset group with the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows from use and the eventual disposal of the asset group. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group is determined to be greater than the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows from use and disposal, we would need to perform step 2.

 

Step 2 - If the long-lived group of assets fails the recoverability test in step 1, we would record an impairment expense for the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the long-lived asset group.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a charge of $4,490 for the impairment of certain idle, long-lived assets, which were evaluated at the asset level. The impairment was the result of an analysis of the carrying value of the assets and our inability to objectively project future cash flows from the sale or lease of these assets, particularly in light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting global economic disruption.

 

Prior to performing the impairment analysis of our long-lived assets on a group level as of December 31, 2019, the Company conducted an evaluation of the carrying amount of certain specific long-lived assets that are non-strategic to the core operations of the business and recorded impairment charges of $396. The Company did not record any further impairment of its long-lived assets.

 

The valuation of impaired equipment is a Level 3 non-recurring fair value measurement. Impaired assets discussed above were written down to zero value.

Equity Method Investments

Equity Method Investments

 

Equity method investments in joint ventures are reported as investments in joint venture on the consolidated balance sheets, and our share of earnings or losses in the joint venture is reported as equity in net income or loss of joint venture in the consolidated statements of operations. We currently have no investments in joint ventures.

Lease Obligations

Lease Obligations

 

At the inception of a lease, Deep Down evaluates the agreement to determine whether the lease will be accounted for as an operating or finance lease. The term of the lease used for such an evaluation includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal option can be reasonably assured, and if the contract contains a substantial penalty for failure to renew or extend the lease, it could lead the lessee to conclude it has a significant economic incentive to extend the lease beyond the base rental period.

 

Deep Down leases land, buildings, vehicles, and certain equipment under non-cancellable operating leases. The Company leases office, indoor manufacturing, warehouse, and operating space in Houston, Texas and leases storage space in Mobile, Alabama to house its 3,400 metric ton carousel system.

Lease Concessions

Lease Concessions

 

As it relates to lease concessions related to its leases affected by economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company elected to account for the deferred payments as variable lease payments. As such, the Company recorded a reduction to rent expense in the period of the deferral. When the Company later incurs the deferred rent, it will recognize it as variable rent expense.

PPP Loan Payable

PPP Loan Payable

 

The Company elected to account for the PPP loan received as a debt arrangement. This debt is recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as a liability, both current and long-term. Interest is accrued over the term of the loan at the effective interest rate. Debt will be derecognized when the debt is extinguished. Debt is extinguished when either the debtor pays the creditor or the debtor is legally released from being the primary obligor.

 

A PPP loan is forgiven in total or in part only after the SBA has paid the lender the amount of the PPP loan the SBA has determined is eligible for forgiveness, at which point, the lender should notify the borrower of the forgiveness of the PPP loan. When the debt is extinguished, any amount that is forgiven (including accrued but unpaid interest) is recognized in the income statement as a gain upon debt extinguishment; however, there is no guarantee that any portion of the debt balance will be forgiven.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

 

We follow the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method considers the differences between financial statement treatment and tax treatment of certain transactions. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

We record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will expire before realization of the benefit or that future deductibility is not probable. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends upon our ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in the future. This requires management to use estimates and make assumptions regarding significant future events such as the taxability of entities operating in the various taxing jurisdictions. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all reasonably available positive and negative evidence, including our past operating results, the existence of cumulative losses in the most recent years and our forecast of future taxable income. In estimating future taxable income, we develop assumptions, including the amount of future state and federal pre-tax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment. When the likelihood of the realization of existing deferred tax assets changes, adjustments to the valuation allowance are charged in the period in which the determination is made, either to income or goodwill, depending upon when that portion of the valuation allowance was originally created.

 

We record an estimated tax liability or tax benefit for income and other taxes based on what we determine will likely be paid in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate. We use our best judgment in the determination of these amounts. However, the liabilities ultimately realized and paid are dependent upon various matters, including resolution of tax audits, and may differ from amounts recorded. An adjustment to the estimated liability would be recorded as a provision or benefit to income tax expense in the period in which it becomes probable that the amount of the actual liability or benefit differs from the recorded amount.

 

Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. If and when our deferred tax assets are no longer fully reserved, we will begin to provide for taxes at the full statutory rate. In addition, we are subject to the examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-Based Compensation

 

We record share-based awards exchanged for employee service at fair value on the date of grant and expense the awards in the consolidated statements of operations over the requisite employee service period. Share-based compensation expense includes an estimate for forfeitures and is generally recognized over the expected term of the award on a straight-line basis. At December 31, 2020 and 2019 we had two types of share-based compensation: stock options and restricted stock. See further discussion in Note 6.

Earnings or Loss per Common Share

Earnings or Loss per Common Share

 

Basic earnings or loss per common share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net earnings or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net earnings or loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents (stock options) outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options and warrants to purchase common stock were exercised for shares of common stock. In periods where losses are reported, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2019-12 “Income Taxes (Topic 740).” Topic 740 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020. This update simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions such as the exception to the incremental approach for intra-period tax allocation, the exception to the requirement to recognize a deferred tax liability for equity method investments, the exception to the ability not to recognize a deferred tax liability for a foreign subsidiary and the exception to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period. The adoption of ASU No. 2019-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements and disclosures.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” as modified by subsequently issued ASU No. 2018-19, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses.” The guidance introduces a new credit reserving model known as the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model, which is based on expected losses, and differs significantly from the incurred loss approach used today. The CECL model requires estimating all expected credit losses for certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables, held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. These ASUs affect an entity to varying degrees depending on the credit quality for the assets held by the entity, their duration and how the entity applies current US GAAP. These ASUs were initially effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020.

 

In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-10 “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates.” The FASB issued this update to extend and simplify how effective dates are staggered between larger public companies and all other entities for the aforementioned major updates.  Topic 326 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2022 for smaller reporting companies. We are currently evaluating the impact of these updates on our financial statements and related disclosures, but at this time, we do not expect a material impact on our financial statements and disclosures.