XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Derivative Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments
Derivative Instruments

We enter into various futures, forwards, options and swaps to economically hedge certain seed capital investments.  Also, we have currency forwards that economically hedge certain balance sheet exposures. In addition, our options desk trades long and short exchange-traded equity options. We do not hold any derivatives designated in a formal hedge relationship under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging.

The notional value and fair value as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 for derivative instruments (excluding derivative instruments relating to our options desk trading activities and consolidated VIEs discussed below) not designated as hedging instruments were as follows:

 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Notional Value
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
(in thousands)
September 30, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
Exchange-traded futures
$
91,229

 
$
1,197

 
$
600

Currency forwards
137,224

 
3,275

 
3,437

Interest rate swaps
42,608

 
798

 
1,664

Credit default swaps
46,165

 
1,421

 
903

Total return swaps
85,572

 
253

 
446

Total derivatives
$
402,798

 
$
6,944

 
$
7,050

 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
Exchange-traded futures
$
160,755

 
$
1,539

 
$
2,651

Currency forwards
262,873

 
4,604

 
4,077

Interest rate swaps
65,484

 
2,945

 
3,745

Credit default swaps
29,421

 
2,089

 
774

Option swaps
24

 
9

 
2

Total return swaps
146,001

 
1,402

 
972

Total derivatives
$
664,558

 
$
12,588

 
$
12,221



As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the derivative assets and liabilities are included in both receivables and payables to brokers and dealers on our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

The gains and losses for derivative instruments (excluding our options desk trading activities) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 recognized in investment gains (losses) in the condensed consolidated statements of income were as follows:

 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exchange-traded futures
$
(4,975
)
 
$
16,683

 
$
(2,542
)
 
$
13,124

Currency forwards
(641
)
 
5,900

 
(2,461
)
 
8,058

Interest rate swaps
(251
)
 
(438
)
 
(2,182
)
 
(768
)
Credit default swaps
(352
)
 
422

 
(958
)
 
207

Options swaps
(157
)
 
80

 
(70
)
 
59

Total return swaps
(1,666
)
 
1,086

 
(8,438
)
 
(529
)
Net (losses) gains on derivative instruments
$
(8,042
)
 
$
23,733

 
$
(16,651
)
 
$
20,151



We may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments. We minimize our counterparty exposure through a credit review and approval process. In addition, we have executed various collateral arrangements with counterparties to the over-the-counter derivative transactions that require both pledging and accepting collateral in the form of cash. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we held $0.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of cash collateral payable to trade counterparties. This obligation to return cash is reported in payables to brokers and dealers in our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

Although notional amount is the most commonly used measure of volume in the derivative market, it is not used as a measure of credit risk. Generally, the current credit exposure of our derivative contracts is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of derivative contracts at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements and any collateral received. A derivative with positive value (a derivative asset) indicates existence of credit risk because the counterparty would owe us if the contract were closed. Alternatively, a derivative contract with negative value (a derivative liability) indicates we would owe money to the counterparty if the contract were closed. Generally, if there is more than one derivative transaction with a single counterparty, a master netting arrangement exists with respect to derivative transactions with that counterparty to provide for aggregate net settlement.

Certain of our standardized contracts for over-the-counter derivative transactions (“ISDA Master Agreements”) contain credit risk related contingent provisions pertaining to each counterparty’s credit rating. In some ISDA Master Agreements, if the counterparty’s credit rating, or in some agreements, our assets under management (“AUM”), falls below a specified threshold, either a default or a termination event permitting the counterparty to terminate the ISDA Master Agreement would be triggered. In all agreements that provide for collateralization, various levels of collateralization of net liability positions are applicable, depending on the credit rating of the counterparty. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we delivered $5.1 million and $12.8 million, respectively, of cash collateral into brokerage accounts. We report this cash collateral in cash and cash equivalents in our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we held $3.5 million and $5.9 million, respectively, of long exchange-traded equity options, which are classified as trading investments and included in other investments on our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. In addition, as of both September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we held $4.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of short exchange-traded equity options, which are included in securities sold not yet purchased on our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Our options desk provides our clients with equity derivative strategies and execution for exchange-traded options on single stocks, exchange-traded funds and indices. While predominately agency-based, the options desk may commit capital to facilitate a client’s transaction. Our options desk hedges the risks associated with this activity by taking offsetting positions in equities. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recognized $10.9 million and $27.6 million, respectively, of losses on equity options activity. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized $14.1 million and $54.5 million, respectively, of losses on equity options activity. These losses are recognized in investment gains (losses) in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

As of September 30, 2016, our consolidated VIEs held $0.3 million (net) of futures, forwards and swaps within their portfolios. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recognized $2.0 million of losses and $0.7 million of gains, respectively, on these derivative positions. These gains are recognized in investment gains (losses) in the condensed consolidated statements of income. As of September 30, 2016, the consolidated VIEs held $0.4 million of cash collateral payable to trade counterparties. This obligation to return cash is reported in the liabilities of consolidated VIEs in our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. As of September 30, 2016, the consolidated VIEs delivered $3.0 million of cash collateral into brokerage accounts. The consolidated VIEs report this cash collateral in the consolidated VIEs cash and cash equivalents in our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.