Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated November 23, 2004

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) is submitted pursuant to Rules 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Subject to the approval of the court, this Stipulation is entered into among Marc D. Reasoner, Fred B. Knadler, on behalf of Lights N Such, Inc., and Warren and Betty Stewart (collectively “Lead Plaintiffs”) on behalf of themselves and the Settlement Class (as hereinafter defined) and Defendants Microtune, Inc. (“Microtune” or the “Company”), Douglas J. Bartek (“Bartek”), William Housley (“Housley”), Everett Rogers (“Rogers”), and Nancy A. Richardson (“Richardson”), by and through their respective counsel.

A. The following securities class actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Microtune and certain of its present or former officers and directors: Angeloni v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv56; Morris v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv64; Yakuboff v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv66; Clark v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv82; Sved v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv104; Xu v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv115;

Aiken v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv123; Fontana v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv133; Pipefitters, Locals 522 & 633 Pension Trust Fund v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv158; and Clemmons v. Microtune, Inc., et al., 4:03cv160.

B. By Order dated May 5, 2003 (the “Consolidation Order”), the court consolidated the ten separately filed securities actions listed above in paragraph A for all purposes. By an Order dated June 17, 2003, the court appointed Marc D. Reasoner, Fred B. Knadler, on behalf of Lights N Such, Inc., and Warren and Betty Stewart as Lead Plaintiffs, appointed Schiffrin & Barroway LLP as Lead Counsel, and appointed the law firm of Sussman Godfrey, LLP as Liaison Counsel for the Class.

C. Pursuant to the Consolidation Order, Lead Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) on August 20, 2003. The Complaint alleges, among other things, that Defendants, in a scheme to artificially inflate the value of Microtune’s securities, issued false and misleading financial documents, press releases and other statements regarding Microtune’s financial condition and the value of Microtune’s wireless technology during the period from July 23, 2001 through and including February 20, 2003 (the “Class Period”);

D. The Complaint further alleges that Lead Plaintiffs and other members of the Class purchased the common stock of Microtune during the Class Period at prices artificially inflated as a result of the defendants’ dissemination of false and misleading statements regarding Microtune in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 78t(a), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5);

E. On October 2, 2003, the Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint. Lead Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the motions to dismiss on November 3, 2003. By Order dated April 12, 2004, the court granted Defendants Housley’s and Roger’s motions to dismiss in their

entirety and granted the remaining Defendants’ motions in part and denied them in part; dismissing the claims related to revenue recognition and lack of controls, and sustaining the claims related to Transilica, Inc.

F. Thereafter, on June 24, 2004, the parties mediated with Gary V. McGowan in a full day mediation. Although the parties did not resolve the Action that day, the parties continued the negotiations telephonically, and reached an agreement as to the Cash Settlement Amount on September 10, 2004.

G. The Settling Defendants (as hereinafter defined) deny any wrongdoing whatsoever, and this Stipulation shall in no event be construed or deemed to be evidence of, or an admission or concession on the part of, any Settling Defendant with respect to any claim of any fault, liability, wrongdoing or damage whatsoever, or any infirmity in the defenses that the Settling Defendants have asserted. The parties to this Stipulation recognize, however, that the Action is being voluntarily settled after advice of counsel. This Stipulation shall not be construed or deemed to be a concession by any Plaintiff of any infirmity in the claims asserted in the Action;

H. Plaintiffs’ Counsel have conducted an investigation relating to the claims and the underlying events and transactions alleged in the Complaint. Plaintiffs’ Counsel have analyzed the information learned during the investigation and have researched the applicable law with respect to the claims of Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class against the Settling Defendants and the potential defenses thereto;

I. Lead Plaintiffs, by their counsel, have conducted discussions and arm’s length negotiations with counsel for Settling Defendants and have participated in a mediation before Gary V. McGowan with respect to a compromise and settlement of the Action as against the Settling Defendants with a view to settling the issues in dispute and achieving the best relief possible consistent with the interests of the Settlement Class; and

J. Based upon their investigation, Plaintiffs’ Counsel have concluded that the terms and conditions of this Stipulation are fair, reasonable and adequate to Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class, and in their best interests, and Lead Plaintiffs have agreed to settle the “Settled Claims” (as defined below), pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Stipulation, after considering (a) the substantial benefits that members of the Settlement Class will receive from settlement of the Action, (b) the attendant risks of litigation, and (c) the desirability of permitting the Settlement (as hereinafter defined) to be consummated as provided by the terms of this Stipulation.

NOW THEREFORE, without any admission or concession on the part of Lead Plaintiffs of any lack of merit of the Action whatsoever, and without any admission or concession of any fault, liability, wrongdoing or damage whatsoever, or lack of merit in the defenses whatsoever, by the Settling Defendants, it is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties to this Stipulation, through their respective attorneys, subject to approval of the court pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in consideration of the benefits flowing to the parties hereto from the Settlement, that all Settled Claims (as hereinafter defined) as against the Released Parties (as hereinafter defined) and all Settled Defendants’ Claims (as hereinafter defined) shall be compromised, settled, released and dismissed with prejudice, upon and subject to the following terms and conditions:

1. As used in this Stipulation, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(a) “Authorized Claimant” means a Class Member who submits a timely and valid Proof of Claim form to the Claims Administrator.

(b) “Claims Administrator” means the firm of The Garden City Group, which shall administer the Settlement.

(c) “Class Period” means, for the purposes of this Stipulation only, the period of time from July 23, 2001 through and including February 20, 2003.

(d) “Effective Date of Settlement” or “Effective Date” means the date upon which the Settlement contemplated by this Stipulation shall become effective, as set forth in ¶ 25 below.

(e) “Insurance Carriers” means the insurance carriers that issued policies of directors and officers insurance to or on behalf of the Settling Defendants covering the claims asserted in this action, namely, The St. Paul Companies, Inc., Sheffield Insurance Company, Westchester Fire Insurance Company, and Greenwich Insurance Company, and including their directors, officers, employees, and attorneys.

(f) “Laddering Claims” means any and all claims asserted in In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 01 MC 92 (SAS) and In re Microtune, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, docket number 01 CIV 6823 (pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York).

(g) “Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel” means the law firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP.

(h) “Order and Final Judgment” means the proposed order to be entered approving the Settlement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B.

(i) “Plaintiffs’ Counsel” means Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel, Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel, and all of the other attorneys representing Plaintiffs in this action.

(j) “Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel” means the law firm of Susman Godfrey, L.L.P.

(k) “Preliminary Order” means the proposed order preliminarily approving the Settlement and directing notice thereof to the Class substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

(l) “Publication Notice” means the Summary Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action for publication substantially in the form attached as Exhibit 3 to Exhibit A.

(m) “Released Parties” means any and all of the Settling Defendants and the Insurance Carriers, their past, present or future subsidiaries, parents, successors and predecessors, including Transilica Inc., and any of their past, present or future officers, directors, agents, accountants, employees and attorneys, and any person, firm, trust, corporation, officer, director or other individual or entity in which any Settling Defendant has a controlling interest or which is related to or affiliated with any of the Settling Defendants, and the legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest or assigns of any such party.

(n) “Settled Claims” means any and all claims, debts, demands, rights or causes of action or liabilities (including, but not limited to, any claims for damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, expert or consulting fees, and any other costs, expenses or liability), whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law or any other law, rule or regulation, whether fixed or contingent, accrued or un-accrued, liquidated or unliquidated, at law or in equity, matured or un-matured, whether class or individual in nature, including both known

claims and Unknown Claims (as defined below), (i) that have been asserted in this Action by the Settlement Class Members or their attorneys or any of them against any of the Released Parties, or (ii) that could have been asserted in any forum by the Settlement Class Members or their attorneys or any of them or the successors and assigns of any of them against any of the Released Parties which arise out of or are based upon or relate in any way to the allegations, transactions, facts, matters or occurrences, representations or omissions involved, set forth, or referred to in the Complaint and which relate to the purchase or ownership of shares of the common stock of Microtune during the Class Period. “Settled Claims” shall not include the Laddering Claims.

(o) “Settled Defendants’ Claims” means any and all claims, rights or causes of action or liabilities whatsoever, whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law or any other law, rule or regulation, including both known claims and Unknown Claims, that have been or could have been asserted in the Action or any forum by the Settling Defendants or any of them or the successors and assigns of any of them against any of the Lead Plaintiffs, Class Members or their attorneys, which arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the Action, except for claims to enforce the Settlement.

(q) “Settlement Class” and “Settlement Class Members” means, for the purposes of this Stipulation only, all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Microtune between July 23, 2001 and February 20, 2003, inclusive, and who were allegedly damaged thereby. Excluded from the Settlement Class are the Defendants in this action; members of the immediate families (parents, spouses, siblings and children) of each of the individual Defendants; any person, firm, trust, corporation, officer, director or other individual or entity in which any Defendant has a controlling interest or which is related to or

affiliated with any of the defendants; and the legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest or assigns of any such excluded party. Also excluded from the Settlement Class are (i) the claims of any putative Settlement Class Members who obtained Microtune stock in the Transilica acquisition and who released their claims in this Action pursuant to the settlement of the arbitration proceeding styled Microtune, Inc. and Jason Mendelson (as shareholder representative on behalf of certain former holders of the capital stock of Transilica Inc.), which was filed before C. Michael Moore on August 7, 2003 and (ii) any putative Settlement Class Members who exclude themselves by filing a request for exclusion in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Settlement Notice.

(r) “Settlement Notice” means the Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Settlement Fairness Hearing, which is to be sent to members of the Settlement Class substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 1 to Exhibit A.

(s) “Settling Defendants” means Microtune, Bartek, Housley, Rogers, and Richardson.

(t) “Settling Defendants’ Counsel” means the law firms of Baker Botts L.L.P. and Siebman, Reynolds & Burg, LLP for Microtune; Haynes and Boone, LLP for Bartek; Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP for Housley; Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, L.L.P. for Rogers; and Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP for Richardson.

(u) “Unknown Claims” means any and all Settled Claims which any Lead Plaintiff or Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Parties, and any Settling Defendants’ Claims which any Settling Defendant does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor. With respect to any

and all Settled Claims and Settled Defendants’ Claims, the parties stipulate and agree that upon the Effective Date, the Lead Plaintiffs and the Settling Defendants shall expressly, and each Settlement Class Member shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to Cal. Civ. Code § 1542, which provides:

Lead Plaintiffs and Settling Defendants acknowledge, and Settlement Class Members by operation of law shall be deemed to have acknowledged, that the inclusion of “Unknown Claims” in the definition of Settled Claims and Settled Defendants’ Claims was separately bargained for and was a key element of the Settlement.

2. (a) The obligations incurred pursuant to this Stipulation shall be in full and final disposition of the Action as against the Settling Defendants and any and all Settled Claims as against all Released Parties and any and all Settled Defendants’ Claims.

(b) For purposes of this Settlement the parties stipulate to the certification of the Settlement Class as defined in Paragraph l (q) above.

3. (a) Upon the Effective Date of this Settlement, Lead Plaintiffs and members of the Settlement Class on behalf of themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, shall, with respect to each and every Settled Claim, release and forever discharge, and shall forever be enjoined from prosecuting, either directly or in any other capacity, any Settled Claims against any of the Released Parties.

(b) Upon the Effective Date of this Settlement, each of the Settling Defendants, on behalf of themselves and the Released Parties, shall release and forever discharge each and every of the Settled Defendants’ Claims, and shall forever be enjoined from prosecuting the Settled Defendants’ Claims.

(a) The Settling Defendants shall cause a total of Five Million Six Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($5,625,000) (the “Cash Settlement Amount”) to be paid into escrow on behalf of the Settlement Class as follows:

(i) No later than forty-five (45) days after preliminary court approval of the Settlement, the Settling Defendants shall instruct the Insurance Carriers to pay Four Million Seven Hundred Eighty-One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($4,781,250) into the Escrow Account; and

(ii) No later than five (5) days after preliminary court approval of the Settlement, Microtune shall pay into the Escrow Account Eight Hundred Forty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($843,750).

5. (a) The Cash Settlement Amount and any interest earned thereon shall be the Gross Settlement Fund. The Gross Settlement Fund, net of any Taxes (as defined below) on the income thereof, shall be used to pay (i) the Notice and Administration Costs referred to in ¶ 7 hereof, (ii) the attorneys’ fee and expense award referred to in ¶ 8 hereof, and (iii) the remaining administration expenses referred to in ¶ 7 hereof. The balance of the Gross Settlement Fund after the above payments shall be the Net Settlement Fund, which shall be distributed to the Authorized Claimants as provided in ¶¶ 17-19 hereof. Any sums required to be held in escrow hereunder prior to the Effective Date shall be held by The Garden City Group as Escrow Agent

for the Settlement Fund. All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed to be in the custody of the court and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the court until such time as the funds shall be distributed or returned to the persons paying the same pursuant to this Stipulation and/or further order of the court. The Escrow Agent shall invest any funds in excess of $100,000 in short term United States Agency or Treasury Securities (or a mutual fund invested solely in such instruments), and shall collect and reinvest all interest accrued thereon. Any funds held in escrow in an amount of less than $100,000 may be held in an interest-bearing bank account insured by the FDIC. The parties hereto agree that the Settlement Fund is intended to be a Qualified Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-l and elect to have such Qualified Settlement Fund treatment apply as of the earliest possible date, and that the Escrow Agent, as administrator of the Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-2(k)(3), shall be responsible for filing tax returns for the Settlement Fund and paying from the Settlement Fund any Taxes owed with respect to the Settlement Fund. Counsel for Microtune agrees to provide promptly to the Escrow Agent the statement described in Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-3(e).

(b) All (i) taxes on the income of the Gross Settlement Fund and (ii) expenses and costs incurred in connection with the taxation of the Gross Settlement Fund (including, without limitation, expenses of tax attorneys and accountants) (collectively “Taxes”) shall be paid out of the Gross Settlement Fund, shall be considered to be a cost of administration of the Settlement and shall be timely paid by the Escrow Agent without prior Order of the court. The Escrow Agent shall indemnify the Settling Parties for any claims that arise resulting from payment or nonpayment of taxes on the income of the Gross Settlement Fund.

6. The Claims Administrator shall administer the Settlement subject to the jurisdiction of the court. Settling Defendants shall cooperate in the administration of the Settlement to the extent reasonably necessary to effectuate its terms, including Microtune’s providing without charge all information from Microtune’s transfer records concerning the identity of Settlement Class Members and their transactions.

7. The Escrow Agent may pay from the Cash Settlement Amount, upon approval from Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel, without further approval from the Settling Defendants or the court, the reasonable costs and expenses associated with identifying members of the Settlement Class and effecting mailed Settlement Notice and Publication Notice to the Settlement Class, and the administration of the Settlement, including without limitation, the actual costs of publication, printing and mailing the Settlement Notice, reimbursements to nominee owners for forwarding notice to their beneficial owners, and the administrative expenses incurred and fees charged by the Claims Administrator in connection with providing notice and processing the submitted claims.

8. Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel will apply to the court for an award on behalf of all Plaintiffs’ Counsel from the Gross Settlement Fund of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses, plus interest on such amounts. Such attorneys’ fees, expenses, and interest as are awarded by the court shall be paid from the Gross Settlement Fund to Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel immediately upon award, notwithstanding the existence of any timely filed objections thereto, or potential for appeal therefrom, or collateral attack on the Settlement or any part thereof, subject to Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s obligation to make appropriate refunds or repayments to the Settlement Fund plus accrued interest at the same net rate as is earned by the Gross Settlement

Fund, if and when, as a result of any appeal and/or further proceedings on remand, or successful collateral attack, the fee or cost award is reduced or reversed. Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall have sole discretion in the allocation of any such attorneys’ fees and expenses as are awarded among Plaintiffs’ Counsel.

9. Any member of the Settlement Class who does not submit a valid Proof of Claim will not be entitled to receive any of the proceeds from the Net Settlement Fund but will otherwise be bound by all of the terms of this Stipulation and the Settlement, including the terms of the Judgment to be entered in the Action and the releases provided for herein, and will be barred from bringing any action against the Released Parties concerning the Settled Claims.

10. The Claims Administrator shall process the Proofs of Claim and, after entry of the Class Distribution Order, distribute the Net Settlement Fund to the Authorized Claimants. The Claims Administrator has the obligation to pay and cause the payment of the Cash Settlement Amount, and to cooperate in the production of information with respect to the identification of Class Members from Microtune’s shareholder transfer records, as provided herein. Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall have the right, but not the obligation, to direct the Claims Administrator to waive what they deem to be formal or technical defects in any Proofs of Claim submitted in the interests of achieving substantial justice.

11. For purposes of determining the extent, if any, to which a Class Member shall be entitled to be treated as an “Authorized Claimant”, the following conditions shall apply:

(a) Each Settlement Class Member shall be required to submit a Proof of Claim (see attached Exhibit 2 to Exhibit A), supported by such documents as are designated therein, including proof of the transactions claimed and the losses incurred thereon, or such other documents or proof as the Claims Administrator, in its discretion, may deem acceptable;

(b) All Proofs of Claim must be submitted by the date specified in the Settlement Notice unless such period is extended by Order of the court. Any Settlement Class Member who fails to submit a Proof of Claim by such date shall be forever barred from receiving any payment pursuant to this Stipulation (unless, by Order of the court, a later submitted Proof of Claim by such Settlement Class Member is approved), but shall in all other respects be bound by all of the terms of this Stipulation and the Settlement including the terms of the Judgment to be entered in the Action and the releases provided for herein, and will be barred from bringing any action against the Released Parties asserting the Settled Claims. Provided that it is received before the motion for the Class Distribution Order is filed, a Proof of Claim shall be deemed to have been submitted when posted, if received with a postmark indicated on the envelope and if mailed by first-class mail and addressed in accordance with the instructions thereon. In all other cases, the Proof of Claim shall be deemed to have been submitted when actually received by the Claims Administrator;

(c) Each Proof of Claim shall be submitted to and reviewed by the Claims Administrator, who shall determine in accordance with this Stipulation the extent, if any, to which each claim shall be allowed, subject to review by the court pursuant to subparagraph (e) below;

(d) Proofs of Claim that do not meet the submission requirements may be rejected. Prior to rejection of a Proof of Claim, the Claims Administrator shall communicate with the Claimant in order to remedy the curable deficiencies in the Proofs of Claim submitted. The Claims Administrator shall notify, in a timely fashion and in writing, all Claimants whose Proofs of Claim they propose to reject in whole or in part, setting forth the reasons therefor, and shall indicate in such notice that the Claimant whose claim is to be rejected has the right to a review by the court if the Claimant so desires and complies with the requirements of subparagraph ( e) below;

(e) If any Claimant whose claim has been rejected in whole or in part desires to contest such rejection, the Claimant must, within twenty (20) days after the date of mailing of the notice required in subparagraph (d) above, serve upon the Claims Administrator a notice and statement of reasons indicating the Claimant’s grounds for contesting the rejection along with any supporting documentation, and requesting a review thereof by the court. If a dispute concerning a claim cannot be otherwise resolved, Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall thereafter present the request for review to the court; and

(f) The administrative determinations of the Claims Administrator accepting and rejecting claims shall be presented to the court, on notice to Settling Defendants’ Counsel, for approval by the court in the Class Distribution Order.

12. Each Claimant shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the court with respect to the Claimant’s claim, and the claim will be subject to investigation and discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provided that such investigation and discovery shall be limited to that Claimant’s status as a Settlement Class Member and the validity and amount of the Claimant’s claim. No discovery shall be allowed on the merits of the Action or Settlement in connection with processing of the Proofs of Claim.

13. Payment pursuant to this Stipulation shall be deemed final and conclusive against all Settlement Class Members. All Settlement Class Members whose claims are not approved by the court shall be barred from participating in distributions from the Net Settlement Fund, but otherwise shall be bound by all the terms of this Stipulation and the Settlement, including the terms of the Judgment to be entered in the Action and the releases provided for herein, and will be barred from bringing any action against the Released Parties concerning the Settled Claims.

14. All proceedings with respect to the administration, processing and determination of claims described by ¶ 11 of this Stipulation and the determination of all controversies relating thereto, including disputed questions of law and fact with respect to the validity of claims, shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the court.

15. The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants by the Claims Administrator only after the Effective Date and after: (i) all Claims have been processed, and all Claimants whose Claims have been rejected or disallowed, in whole or in part, have been notified and provided the opportunity to be heard concerning such rejection or disallowance; (ii) all objections with respect to all rejected or disallowed claims have been resolved by the court, and all appeals therefrom have been resolved or the time therefor has expired; (iii) all matters with respect to attorneys’ fees, costs, and disbursements have been resolved by the court, all appeals therefrom have been resolved or the time therefor has expired; and (iv) all costs of administration have been paid.

16. Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel will apply to the court, on notice to Settling Defendants’ Counsel, for an order (the “Class Distribution Order”) approving the Claims Administrator’s administrative determinations concerning the acceptance and rejection of the claims submitted herein and approving any fees and expenses not previously applied for, including any fees and expenses of the Claims Administrator that require such application, and, if the Effective Date has occurred, directing payment of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants.

17. The Claims Administrator shall determine each Authorized Claimant’s pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund based upon each Authorized Claimant’s Recognized Claim as defined in the Plan of Allocation described in the Settlement Notice annexed hereto as Exhibit 1 to Exhibit A, or in such other Plan of Allocation as the court approves.

18. The Plan of Allocation proposed in the Settlement Notice is not a necessary term of this Stipulation and it is not a condition of this Stipulation that any particular Plan of Allocation be approved. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the proposed Plan of Allocation is not part of the Stipulation and is to be considered by the court separately from the court’s consideration of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceeding relating to the Plan of Allocation shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation or affect the finality of the court’s Judgment approving the Stipulation and the Settlement set forth herein, or any other orders entered pursuant to the Stipulation.

19. Each Authorized Claimant shall be allocated a pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund based on his or her Recognized Claim compared to the total Recognized Claims of all accepted claimants. This is not a claims-made settlement. As of the Effective Date of the Settlement, neither the Settling Defendants nor the Insurance Carriers shall be entitled to a return, recovery, or reversion of any amounts they contribute to the Cash Settlement Amount, the Gross Settlement Fund, or the Net Settlement Fund. Neither the Settling Defendants nor the Insurance Carriers shall have any involvement in reviewing or challenging claims.

20. No person shall have any claim against any Plaintiffs, class members, the claims administrator, the Settling Defendants or their respective counsel based on investments or distributions made substantially in accordance with this Stipulation and the Settlement contained herein, the Plan of Allocation or further orders of the court.

21. The Settling Defendants and their counsel shall have no responsibility for, interest in, or liability whatsoever with respect to:

(a) any act, omission or determination of the Escrow Agent, Claims Administrator, Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel, or any designees or agents of Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel, Escrow Agent or Settlement Administrator;

(b) any act, omission or determination of Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel or their designees or agents in connection with the administration of the Settlement;

(d) the determination, administration, calculation, or payment of any claims asserted against the Settlement Fund; or

22. Promptly after execution of this Stipulation and concurrently with their application for preliminary court approval of the Settlement contemplated by this Stipulation, Plaintiffs’ Counsel and Settling Defendants’ Counsel shall jointly move the court for entry of an Preliminary Order in Connection with Settlement Proceedings, substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A.

23. If the Settlement contemplated by this Stipulation is approved by the court, counsel for the parties shall request that the court enter an Order and Final Judgment substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit B.

24. Simultaneously herewith, Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel and Settling Defendants’ Counsel are executing a “Supplemental Agreement” setting forth certain conditions under which

this Stipulation may be terminated by Microtune, after consultation with the other Settling Defendants, if potential Settlement Class Members with claims and/or losses above a certain threshold percentage of the outstanding shares of Company stock exclude themselves from the Settlement Class. The Supplemental Agreement shall not be filed prior to the Settlement Fairness Hearing unless a dispute arises as to its terms. In the event of a withdrawal from this Stipulation pursuant to the Supplemental Agreement, this Stipulation shall become null and void and of no further force and effect and the provisions of ¶ 27 shall apply. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Stipulation shall not become null and void as a result of the election by Microtune to exercise its option to withdraw from the Stipulation pursuant to the Supplemental Agreement until the conditions set forth in the Supplemental Agreement have been satisfied.

25. The Effective Date of Settlement shall be the date when all the following shall have occurred:

(a) entry of the Preliminary Order for Notice and Hearing in all material respects in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A;

(b) approval by the court of the Settlement, following notice to the Settlement Class and a hearing, as prescribed by Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and

(c) entry by the court of an Order and Final Judgment, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, and the expiration of any time for appeal or review of such Order and Final Judgment, or, if any appeal is filed and not dismissed, after such Order and Final Judgment is upheld on appeal in all material respects and is no longer subject to review upon appeal or review by writ of certiorari, or, in the event that the court enters an order and final judgment in form other than that provided above (“Alternative Judgment”) and none of the parties hereto elect to terminate this Settlement, the date that such Alternative Judgment becomes final and no longer subject to appeal or review.

26. Settling Defendants or Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall have the right to terminate the Settlement and this Stipulation by providing written notice of their election to do so (“Termination Notice”) to all other parties hereto within thirty (30) days of: (a) the court’s declining to enter the Preliminary Order for Notice and Hearing in any material respect; (b) the court’s refusal to approve this Stipulation or any material part of it; (c) the court’s declining to enter the Order and Final Judgment in any material respect; (d) the date upon which the Order and Final Judgment is modified or reversed in any material respect by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court; or (e) the date upon which an Alternative Judgment is modified or reversed in any material respect by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.

27. Except as otherwise provided herein, in the event the Settlement is terminated or fails to become effective for any reason, then the parties to this Stipulation shall be deemed to have reverted to their respective status in the Actions as of the date and time immediately prior to the execution of this Stipulation. If the Settlement is terminated or fails to become effective, except as otherwise expressly provided, the parties shall proceed in all respects as if this Stipulation and any related orders had not been entered, and any portion of the Cash Settlement Amount previously paid by Settling Defendants and/or the Insurance Carriers, together with any interest earned thereon, less any Taxes due with respect to such income, and less costs of administration and notice actually incurred and paid or payable from the Cash Settlement Amount (not to exceed $190,000 unless expenditures in excess of $190,000 have been approved by Settling Defendants or the court) shall be returned to Microtune and the Insurance Carriers within three business days in proportion to the amounts paid by them.

28. This Stipulation, whether or not consummated, and any proceedings taken pursuant to it:

(a) shall not be offered or received against the Settling Defendants as evidence of or construed as or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Settling Defendants with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by any of the plaintiffs or the validity of any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, or the deficiency of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, or of any liability, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing of the Settling Defendants;

(b) shall not be offered or received against the Settling Defendants or Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel as evidence of a presumption, concession or admission of any fault, misrepresentation or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved or made by any Settling Defendant;

(c) shall not be offered or received against the Settling Defendants or Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel as evidence of a presumption, concession or admission with respect to any liability, negligence, fault or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of the Settling Defendants, in any other civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of this Stipulation; provided, however, that if this Stipulation is approved by the court, Settling Defendants may refer to it to effectuate the liability protection granted them hereunder;

(d) shall not be construed as an admission or concession that the consideration to be given hereunder represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered after trial; and

(e) shall not be construed as or received in evidence as an admission, concession or presumption against Lead Plaintiffs or any of the Settlement Class Members that any of their claims are without merit, or that any defenses asserted by the Settling Defendants have any merit, or that damages recoverable under the Complaint would not have exceeded the Gross Settlement Fund.

29. All of the exhibits attached hereto are hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.

30. Microtune warrants that it has not filed or instituted proceedings for any type of bankruptcy (whether voluntary or involuntary), made an assignment for the benefit of creditors or commenced or become subject to any similar action or proceeding, and that its participation in this Settlement will not render it insolvent within the meaning of and/or for the purposes of the United States Bankruptcy Code, including §§ 101 and 547 thereof.

31. If a case is commenced in respect of Microtune or any Insurance Carrier under Title 11 of the United States Code (Bankruptcy), or a trustee, receiver or conservator is appointed under any similar law, and in the event of the entry of a final order of a court of competent jurisdiction determining the transfer of money to the Gross Settlement Fund or any portion thereof to be a preference, voidable transfer, fraudulent transfer or similar transaction and any portion thereof is required to be returned, and such amount is not promptly deposited to the Gross Settlement Fund by others, then, at the election of Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel, the parties shall jointly move the court to vacate and set aside the releases given and Judgment entered in favor of the Settling Defendants pursuant to this Stipulation, which releases and Judgment shall be null and void, and the parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the litigation as of the date a day prior to the date of this Stipulation and any cash amounts in the Gross Settlement Fund shall be returned as provided in ¶ 27 above.

32. The parties to this Stipulation intend the Settlement to be a final and complete resolution of all disputes asserted or which could be asserted by the Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class or their attorneys against the Released Parties with respect to the Settled Claims. Accordingly, Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class and the Settling Defendants agree not to assert in any forum that the litigation was brought by Plaintiffs or defended by the Settling Defendants in bad faith or without a reasonable basis. The parties hereto shall assert no claims of any violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to the prosecution, defense, or settlement of the Action. The parties agree that the amount paid and the other terms of the Settlement were negotiated at arm’s length in good faith by the parties, and reflect a settlement that was reached voluntarily after consultation with experienced legal counsel.

33. This Stipulation may not be modified or amended, nor may any of its provisions be waived except by a writing signed by all parties hereto or their successors-in-interest.

34. The headings herein are used for the purpose of convenience only and are not meant to have legal effect.

35. The administration and consummation of the Settlement as embodied in this Stipulation shall be under the authority of the court and the court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of entering orders providing for awards of attorneys’ fees and expenses to Plaintiffs’ Counsel and enforcing the terms of this Stipulation.

36. The waiver by one party of any breach of this Stipulation by any other party shall not be deemed a waiver of any other prior or subsequent breach of this Stipulation.

37. This Stipulation, its exhibits and the Supplemental Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties hereto concerning the Settlement of the Action, and no representations, warranties, or inducements have been made by any party hereto concerning this Stipulation and its exhibits other than those contained and memorialized in such documents.

38. This Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts. All executed counterparts and each of them shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument provided that counsel for the parties to this Stipulation shall exchange among themselves original signed counterparts.

39. This Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

40. The construction, interpretation, operation, effect and validity of this Stipulation, and all documents necessary to effectuate it, shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Texas without regard to conflicts of laws, except to the extent that federal law requires that federal law governs.

41. This Stipulation shall not be construed more strictly against one party than another merely by virtue of the fact that it, or any part of it, may have been prepared by counsel for one of the parties, it being recognized that it is the result of arm’s-length negotiations between the parties and all parties have contributed substantially and materially to the preparation of this Stipulation.

42. All counsel and any other person executing this Stipulation and any of the exhibits hereto, or any related settlement documents, warrant and represent that they have the full authority to do so and that they have the authority to take appropriate action required or permitted to be taken pursuant to the Stipulation to effectuate its terms.

43. Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel, Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel, and Settling Defendants’ Counsel agree to cooperate fully with one another in seeking court approval of the Order for Notice and Hearing, the Stipulation and the Settlement, and to promptly agree upon and execute all such other documentation as may be reasonably required to obtain final approval by the District Court of the Settlement.


SUSMAN GODFREY LLP

		Terrell W. Oxford
		901 Main Street, Suite 4100
		Dallas, Texas 75202
		Tel: 214.754.1900

LIAISON COUNSEL

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP

By:		/s/ Kay E Sickles
		David Kessler
		Marc I. Willner
		Kay E. Sickles
		Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400
		Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
		Tel: 610.822.2205
		Fax: 610.667.7056

LEAD COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS


SIEBMAN, REYNOLDS & BURG, LLP

		Clyde Siebman
		State Bar No. 18341600
		300 N. Travis Street
		Sherman, Texas 75090
		Tel: 903.870.0070
		Fax: 902.970.0066

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

		James W. Cannon, Jr.
		jim.cannon@bakerbotts.com
		State Bar No. 03746600
		David T. Arlington
		david.arlington@bakerbotts.com
		State Bar No. 00790238
		1500 San Jacinto Center
		98 San Jacinto Boulevard
		Austin, Texas 78701-4039
		Tel: 512.322.2500
		Fax: 512.322.2501

By:		/s/ Timothy W. Mountz
		Timothy W. Mountz
		t.mountz@bakerbotts.com
		State Bar No. 14604300
		Mary L. Scott
		mary.scott@bakerbotts.com
		State Bar No. 17906750
		Aimee Williams Moore
		aimee.moore@bakerbotts.com
		State Bar No. 24013754
		2001 Ross Avenue
		Dallas, Texas 75201-2980
		Tel: 214.953-6500
		Fax: 214.953.6503

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT MICROTUNE, INC.


GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH L.L.P.

By:		/s/ Robert W. Brownlee
		Susan Resley, admitted pro hac vice
		sresley@graycary.com
		State Bar No. 161808 (California)
		Geoffrey R. Unger, admitted pro hac vice
		gunger@graycary.com
		State Bar No. 00797586
		1221 S. MoPac Expressway, Suite 400
		Austin, Texas 78746
		Tel: 512.457.7084
		Fax: 512.457.7001

		Robert W. Brownlie, admitted pro hac vice
		State Bar No. 138793 (California)
		4365 Executive Drive
		Suite 1100
		San Diego, California 92121-2133

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT NANCY A. RICHARDSON

HAYNES AND BOONE, L.L.P.

By:		/s/ Barry F. McNeil
		Barry F. McNeil
		barry.mcneil@haynesboone.com
		State Bar No. 13829500
		901 Main Street
		Suite 3100
		Dallas, Texas 75202-3789
		Tel: 214.651.5000
		Fax: 214.651.5940

ATTORNEYS FOR DOUGLAS J. BARTEK


AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP

By:		/s/ Paule R. Bessette
		Paul R. Bessette
		pbessette@akingump.com
		State Bar No. 02263050
		Jennifer R. Brannen
		jbrannen@akingump.com
		State Bar No. 24006888
		300 West 6th Street, Suite 2100
		Austin, Texas 78701
		Tel: 512.499.6250
		Fax: 512.499.6290

COUNSEL FOR WILLIAM L. HOUSLEY

CARRINGTON, COLEMAN, SLOMAN &
BLUMENTHAL, L.L.P.

By:		/s/ Sharon J. Shumway
		Bruce W. Collins
		bcollins@ccsb.com
		State Bar No. 040604700
		Sharon J. Shumway
		sshumway@ccsb.com
		State Bar No. 00791660
		200 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
		Dallas, Texas 75201
		Tel.: 214.855.3000
		Fax: 214.855.1333

COUNSEL FOR EVERETT ROGERS


GIANNI ANGELONI, individually and	§
on behalf of all others similarly situated,	§
	§
Plaintiff,	§
	§
v.	§	Civil Action No. 4:03cv56
	§	(Judge Schell/Judge Bush)
MICROTUNE, INC., DOUGLAS J.	§
BARTEK, WILLIAM HOUSLEY,	§
EVERETT ROGERS, AND NANCY A.	§
RICHARDSON,	§
	§
Defendants.	§