2.2.0.7 false Commitments and Contingencies 0210 - Disclosure - Commitments and Contingencies true false false false 1 USD false false USD Standard http://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217 USD iso4217 0 USDEPS Divide http://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217 USD iso4217 http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance shares xbrli 0 Shares Standard http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance shares xbrli 0 $ 2 Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract] 0 dndn_CommitmentsAndContingenciesAbstract dndn false na duration Commitments and Contingencies. false false false false false true false false false false false false 1 false false false false 0 0 false false false xbrli:stringItemType string Commitments and Contingencies. false 3 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 1 us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock us-gaap true na duration No definition available. false false false false false false false false false false false verboselabel false 1 false false false false 0 0   <div style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',Times,serif"> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 12pt"><b>10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES</b> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     We have a supply agreement with Diosynth covering the commercial production of the recombinant antigen used in connection with PROVENGE. We currently have a commitment with Diosynth to purchase antigen through the second quarter of 2011 for a total of $78.7 million. As of June 30, 2010, we have paid a deposit of $29.6 million and expect to receive shipments of the order beginning in 2010. We have a remaining obligation related to this commitment of approximately $49.1 million as of June 30, 2010. In May 2010, we placed an order with Diosynth for shipment of antigen to commence delivery in mid 2011. The commitment for this order is $39.2 million of which $9.3 million was prepaid to Diosynth in May 2010. On May 12, 2010, we entered into a Second Amendment to the supply agreement to extend the term of the agreement through December 31, 2018, and unless terminated, the agreement will renew automatically thereafter for additional 5-year terms. The agreement may be terminated upon written notice by us or Diosynth at least 24 months before the end of the initial term or a renewal term or by either party in the event of an uncured material breach or default by the other party. We have entered into a technology transfer agreement with a second source supplier for the antigen and are in discussions for a second source supply agreement. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     In June 2009, we entered into a construction agreement with The Henderson Corporation of PA, Inc. (“Henderson”) to retain Henderson to perform construction related services and to arrange for, monitor, supervise, administer and contract for the construction of Phase II and Phase III of our New Jersey Facility. The guaranteed maximum price for the completion of all work under the construction agreement is approximately $51.1 million, of which $45.7 million has been paid through June 30, 2010. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     In December 2009 and January 2010, we entered into construction agreements with Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) to retain Turner to perform construction related services and to arrange for, monitor, supervise, administer and contract for the construction of the build-out of the Atlanta Facility and Orange County Facility, for a maximum total cost of $87.7 million of which $56.6 million has been paid through June 30, 2010. The agreements include incentives for the completion of work prior to milestone dates and penalties for failing to meet such deadlines. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     Beginning on May 24, 2007, four proposed securities class action suits were filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s common stock, purporting to state claims for securities law violations stemming from our disclosures related to PROVENGE and the FDA’s actions regarding our BLA for PROVENGE. The complaints seek compensatory damages, attorney’s fees and expenses. On October 4, 2007, the Court consolidated these actions under the caption <i>McGuire v. Dendreon Corporation, et al.</i>, and designated a lead plaintiff. The lead plaintiff designated the complaint filed June 6, 2007 in <i>McGuire, et al. v. Dendreon Corporation, et al</i>., as the operative complaint. Between December 2007 and January 2009, Dendreon and the individual defendants filed motions to dismiss the original complaint, the amended complaint, and the second amended complaint. The Court granted these motions in part, and denied them in part, allowing plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint each time. Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on June 8, 2009. The third amended complaint includes claims against Dendreon, our chief executive officer, and a senior vice president, challenging disclosures related to the FDA’s actions regarding our BLA for PROVENGE, and the sale of Dendreon stock by our chief executive officer. On June 29, 2009, defendants filed an answer to the third amended complaint. Discovery was completed on June 22, 2010 and defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment is currently pending. Trial in this action has been set for October 18, 2010. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     On March 31, 2009, a complaint captioned <i>Mountanos v. Dendreon Corporation, et al.</i>, was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, naming Dendreon, our chief executive officer, and a senior vice president as defendants. The complaint in <i>Mountanos</i> makes similar factual and legal allegations as the second amended complaint filed in the <i>McGuire</i> action described above, but <i>Mountanos </i>is not a class action and the named plaintiffs allegedly purchased options rather than the Company’s common stock. It seeks compensatory damages, attorney’s fees and expenses. On July 2, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, which the defendants answered on August 3, 2009. Discovery was completed on June 22, 2010, and defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment is currently pending. Trial in this action has been set for October 18, 2010, to take place concurrently with the trial in <i>McGuire v. Dendreon Corporation</i>. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">     Management currently believes that resolving these matters, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, our results of operations, or our cash flows. However, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and the actual cost, as well as the distraction from the conduct of our business, will depend upon many unknown factors and management’s view of these may change in the future. Thus, these matters could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. </div> </div>  <!-- Begin Block Tagged Note false false false us-types:textBlockItemType textblock Includes disclosure of commitments and contingencies. This element may be used as a single block of text to encapsulate the entire disclosure including data and tables. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name FASB Interpretation (FIN) -Number 14 -Paragraph 3 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 5 -Paragraph 9, 10, 11, 12 false 1 2 false UnKnown UnKnown UnKnown false true