XML 83 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
PRODUCT RECALL
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
PRODUCT RECALL  
PRODUCT RECALL

NOTE 2 – PRODUCT RECALL

In March 2013, the China Food and Drug Administration (“CFDA”) issued a nationwide notice (the “CFDA Notice”) for the cessation of the production, sale and use of Buflomedil effective immediately. The CFDA Notice was a result of the reevaluation done by the CFDA based on the indications from the recent China and international research materials, which found that the side effect risks of Buflomedil to the nerve system and the cardiovascular system have surpassed its clinical treatment effect risks. The CFDA Notice was applicable to all the manufacturers and distributors in China who are in the business of the production and sale of Buflomedil-related products.

 

Pursuant to the CFDA Notice, the Company ceased the production and sale of Buflomedil-based products and ceased all promotional and marketing activities for Buflomedil-based products. Furthermore, the Company recognized an inventory obsolescence allowance of approximately $3.7 million for Buflomedil-related raw materials and finished goods inventory. This was recorded as inventory obsolescence on the accompanying statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

In addition, the Company recalled Buflomedil-based products from the market. It authorized the return of its previously sold Buflomedil-related products through April 30, 2013. The loss from the refunds to customers was $27,507 and was recognized as a reduction of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Under CFDA regulatory provisions, the CFDA notice does not impose legal liability to the manufacturers of Buflomedil as long as they act pursuant to the CFDA Notice to cease the production, sale and use of Buflomedil and destroy such finished goods immediately.

 

Pursuant to the CFDA Notice, the CFDA revoked the production licenses for Buflomedil-based products. The carrying value of the Company’s Buflomedil-related intangible assets was zero; therefore, no impairment of the Company’s intangible assets was necessary.