Our financial statements include all of our majority-owned subsidiaries. We account for our investments in less-than-majority-owned joint ventures, for which we have the ability to exercise significant influence, under the equity method. Effects of transactions between related companies are eliminated in consolidation.

Noncontrolling interests are presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements as if parent company investors (controlling interests) and other minority investors (noncontrolling interests) in partially owned subsidiaries have similar economic interests in a single entity. As a result, investments in noncontrolling interests are reported as equity in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, our Consolidated Financial Statements include 100% of a controlled subsidiary’s earnings, rather than only our share. Transactions between the parent company and noncontrolling interests are reported in equity as transactions between stockholders, provided that these transactions do not create a change in control.

Our business is dependent on external weather factors. Historically, we have experienced strong sales and net income in our first, second and fourth fiscal quarters comprising the three-month periods ending August 31, November 30 and May 31, respectively, with weaker performance in our third fiscal quarter (December through February).

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We account for business combinations and asset acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the acquired entities are recorded at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date.

During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, we completed a total of four acquisitions in each of our four reportable segments. Within our Consumer reportable segment, we acquired a manufacturer of sandpaper and other abrasives headquartered in Fairborn, Ohio. Within our PCG reportable segment, we acquired a manufacturer of raised flooring systems headquartered in Denver, Colorado. We also completed immaterial acquisitions within our SPG and CPG reportable segments.

During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020, we completed a total of three acquisitions among three of our four reportable segments. Within our CPG reportable segment, we acquired a manufacturer and marketer of joint sealants for commercial construction headquartered in Hudson, New Hampshire. Within our PCG reportable segment, we acquired a manufacturer of trenchless pipe rehabilitation equipment headquartered in Quebec, Canada. Lastly, within our SPG reportable segment, we acquired a manufacturer of dry stabilizer and emulsifier blends for the food industry headquartered in Elgin, Illinois.

The purchase price for each acquisition has been allocated to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition. We have finalized the purchase price allocation for our fiscal 2020 acquisitions. For acquisitions completed during fiscal 2021, the valuations of consideration transferred, total assets acquired and liabilities assumed are substantially complete. The primary areas that remain preliminary relate to working capital adjustments. Acquisitions are aggregated by year of purchase in the following table:

	Fiscal 2021 Acquisitions					Fiscal 2020 Acquisitions
(In thousands)	Weighted-Average Intangible Asset Amortization Life (In Years)	Total				Weighted-Average Intangible Asset Amortization Life (In Years)	Total
Current assets		$	50,310				$	10,649
Property, plant and equipment			27,012					1,694
Goodwill	N/A		41,654			N/A		28,291
Trade names - indefinite lives	N/A		16,694			N/A		1,555
Other intangible assets	20		53,894			16		31,046
Other long-term assets			6,831					56
Total Assets Acquired		$	196,395				$	73,291
Liabilities assumed			(24,232	)				(7,135	)
Net Assets Acquired		$	172,163		⁽¹⁾		$	66,156		⁽²⁾

Our Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the results of operations of acquired businesses as of their respective dates of acquisition. Pro-forma results of operations for the years ended May 31, 2021 and 2020 were not materially different from reported results and, consequently, are not presented.

The functional currency for each of our foreign subsidiaries is its principal operating currency. Accordingly, for the periods presented, assets and liabilities have been translated using exchange rates at year end, while income and expense for the periods have been translated using a weighted-average exchange rate.

The resulting translation adjustments have been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity, and will be included in net earnings only upon the sale or liquidation of the underlying foreign investment, neither of which is contemplated at this time. Transaction gains and losses have moderated during the last three fiscal years based on more modest fluctuations in the strength of the U.S. dollar, resulting in net transactional foreign exchange losses in fiscal 2021 and 2019 of approximately $2.8 million and $4.8 million, respectively, and net transactional foreign exchange gains for fiscal 2020 of approximately $0.3 million.

We consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We do not believe we are exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value.

May 31,	2021		2020
(In thousands)
Land	$	93,455	$	85,860
Buildings and leasehold improvements		518,205		469,483
Machinery and equipment		1,355,822		1,199,847
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost		1,967,482		1,755,190
Less: allowance for depreciation and amortization		1,002,300		905,504
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	965,182	$	849,686

We review long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying values of these assets may not be recoverable. For assets that are to be held and used, an impairment charge is recognized when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with the asset or group of assets are less than their carrying value. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the asset down to its fair value, and a loss is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the fair value. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows, internal appraisals or external appraisals, as applicable. Assets to be disposed of are carried at the lower of their carrying value or estimated net realizable value.

Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the following ranges of useful lives:

Total depreciation expense for each fiscal period includes the charges to income that result from the amortization of assets recorded under finance leases. For the periods ended May 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recorded depreciation expense of $99.4 million, $108.5 million, and $94.0 million, respectively.

Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised products or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those products or services. The majority of our revenue is recognized at a point in time. However, we also record revenues generated under construction contracts, mainly in connection with the installation of specialized roofing and flooring systems and related services. For certain polymer flooring installation projects, we account for our revenue using the output method, as we consider square footage of completed flooring to be the best measure of progress toward the complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. In contrast, for certain of our roofing installation projects, we account for our

revenue using the input method, as that method was the best measure of performance as it considers costs incurred in relation to total expected project costs, which essentially represents the transfer of control for roofing systems to the customer. In general, for our other construction contracts, we record contract revenues and related costs as our contracts progress on an over-time model.

Effective June 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” and all the related amendments included within Accounting Standards Codification 606 (“ASC 606”).

We identify shipping and handling costs as costs paid to third-party shippers for transporting products to customers, and we include these costs in cost of sales in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Our primary allowance for credit losses is the allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts reduces the trade accounts receivable balance to the estimated net realizable value equal to the amount that is expected to be collected. The allowance is established using assessments of current creditworthiness of customers, historical collection experience, the aging of receivables and other currently available evidence. Trade accounts receivable balances are written-off against the allowance if a final determination of uncollectibility is made. All provisions for allowances for doubtful collection of accounts are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Actual collections of trade receivables could differ from our estimates due to changes in future economic or industry conditions or specific customer’s financial conditions.

For the periods ended May 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, bad debt expense approximated $10.0 million, $16.7 million and $18.6 million, respectively. Bad debt expense was elevated in fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019 due to additional write-offs associated with exiting unprofitable product lines and regions in conjunction with our MAP to Growth. Fiscal 2020 bad debt expense also reflects, although to a much lesser degree, due to the impact Covid had on some of our customers’ ability to pay timely. Refer to Note B, “Restructuring,” for further information.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, cost being determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and net realizable value being determined on the basis of replacement cost. Inventory costs include raw materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. We review the net realizable value of our inventory in detail on an on-going basis, with consideration given to various factors, which include our estimated reserves for excess, obsolete, slow-moving or distressed inventories. If actual market conditions differ from our projections, and our estimates prove to be inaccurate, write-downs of inventory values and adjustments to cost of sales may be required. Historically, our inventory reserves have approximated actual experience.

For the periods ended May 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, charges related to slow moving and/or obsolete inventory on hand approximated $3.7 million, $39.6 million and $29.4 million, respectively. Charges recorded during fiscal 2021 were more normalized in comparison to fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, which both had elevated inventory charges associated with our MAP to Growth restructuring activities. During fiscal 2020, we recorded $28.8 million within our Consumer reportable segment consisting of proactive management of excess quantities of inventory in order to accelerate cash conversion, SKU rationalization, and exiting unprofitable product lines and regions and $3.2 million within our PCG segment related to exiting unprofitable product lines and regions. During fiscal 2019, we recorded $10.5 million in charges resulting from more proactive management of inventory at our Consumer segment, and $9.0 million and $1.0 million of inventory charges related to restructuring activities at our PCG and CPG segments, respectively.

May 31,	2021		2020
(In thousands)
Raw materials and supplies	$	447,220	$	282,579
Finished goods		490,875		527,869
Total Inventory	$	938,095	$	810,448

We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of ASC 350 and account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the entities acquired are recorded at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of net assets acquired, including the amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assigned to reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination as of the acquisition date. Once goodwill has been allocated to the reporting units, it no longer retains its identification with a particular acquisition and becomes identified with the reporting unit in its entirety. Accordingly, the fair value of the reporting unit as a whole is available to support the recoverability of its goodwill. We evaluate our reporting units when changes in our operating structure occur, and if necessary, reassign goodwill using a relative fair value allocation approach.

We test our goodwill balances at least annually, or more frequently as impairment indicators arise, at the reporting unit level. Our annual impairment assessment date has been designated as the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter. Our reporting units have been identified at the component level, which is one level below our operating segments.

We follow the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance found in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350 that simplifies how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. It provides an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, and whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test.

We assess qualitative factors in each of our reporting units that carry goodwill. We assess these qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. The quantitative process is required only if we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. However, we have an unconditional option to bypass a qualitative assessment and proceed directly to performing the quantitative analysis. We applied the quantitative process during our annual goodwill impairment assessments performed during the fourth quarters of fiscal 2021 and 2020 and applied both the qualitative and quantitative processes during our annual goodwill impairment assessment performed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019.

In applying the quantitative test, we compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. If the calculated fair value is less than the current carrying value, then impairment of the reporting unit exists. Calculating the fair value of a reporting unit requires our use of estimates and assumptions. We use significant judgment in determining the most appropriate method to establish the fair value of a reporting unit. We estimate the fair value of a reporting unit by employing various valuation techniques, depending on the availability and reliability of comparable market value indicators, and employ methods and assumptions that include the application of third-party market value indicators and the computation of discounted future cash flows determined from estimated cashflow adjustments to a reporting unit’s annual projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), or adjusted EBITDA, which adjusts for one-off items impacting revenues and/or expenses that are not considered by management to be indicative of ongoing operations. Our fair value estimations may include a combination of value indications from both the market and income approaches, as the income approach considers the future cash flows from a reporting unit’s ongoing operations as a going concern, while the market approach considers the current financial environment in establishing fair value.

In applying the market approach, we use market multiples derived from a set of similar companies. In applying the income approach, we evaluate discounted future cash flows determined from estimated cashflow adjustments to a reporting unit’s projected EBITDA. Under this approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. In applying the discounted cash flow methodology utilized in the income approach, we rely on a number of factors, including future business plans, actual and forecasted operating results, and market data. The significant assumptions employed under this method include discount rates; revenue growth rates, including assumed terminal growth rates; and operating margins used to project future cash flows for a reporting unit. The discount rates utilized reflect market-based estimates of capital costs and discount rates adjusted for management’s assessment of a market participant’s view with respect to other risks associated with the projected cash flows of the individual reporting unit. Our estimates are based upon assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which by nature are uncertain and unpredictable. We believe we incorporate ample sensitivity ranges into our analysis of goodwill impairment testing for a reporting unit, such that actual experience would need to be materially out of the range of expected assumptions in order for an impairment to remain undetected.

On June 1, 2019, the composition of our reportable segments was revised, as further discussed in Note R, “Segment Information.” Prior to implementing the revised segment reporting structure beginning in fiscal 2020, our previously disclosed Industrial segment comprised two operating segments, the CPG operating segment and the PCG operating segment. Each of these operating segments comprised several reporting units, all of which were tested during the annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, 2020 and 2021.

Also, in connection with our Map to Growth, we realigned certain businesses and management structure within our SPG segment. As such, our former Wood Finishes Group reporting unit was split into two separate reporting units: Guardian and Wood Finishes Group. Additionally, our former Kop-Coat Group reporting unit was split into two reporting units: Kop-Coat Industrial Protection Products and Kop-Coat Group. We performed an interim goodwill impairment test for each of the new reporting units upon the change in reportable segments, business realignment and management structure using a quantitative assessment. We concluded that the estimated fair values exceeded the carrying values for these new reporting units, and accordingly, no indications of impairment were identified as a result of these changes during the first quarter of fiscal 2020.

As a result of the annual impairment assessments performed for fiscal 2021, 2020 and 2019, there were no goodwill impairments.

Additionally, we test all indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually during our fiscal fourth quarter. We follow the guidance provided by ASC 350 that simplifies how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. It provides an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount before applying traditional quantitative tests. We applied both qualitative and quantitative processes during our annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment assessments performed during the fourth quarters of fiscal 2021, 2020 and 2019.

The annual impairment assessment involves estimating the fair value of each indefinite-lived asset and comparing it with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, we record an impairment loss equal to the difference. Calculating the fair value of the indefinite-lived assets requires our significant use of estimates and assumptions. We estimate the fair values of our intangible assets by applying a relief-from-royalty calculation, which includes discounted future cash flows related to each of our intangible asset’s projected revenues. In applying this methodology, we rely on a number of factors, including actual and forecasted revenues and market data.

Our required annual impairment test of each of our indefinite-lived intangible assets performed during fiscal 2021, 2020 and 2019 did not result in an impairment charge.

Although no impairment losses were recorded as a result of our annual impairment tests, we did record an intangible impairment charge in both fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019. In fiscal 2020, in connection with Map to Growth, we recorded an impairment charge of $4.0 million included in restructuring expense in our Consumer reportable segment for impairment losses on indefinite-lived trade names. In fiscal 2019, we recorded an impairment charge of $4.2 million, of which $2.0 million was recorded by our CPG reportable segment for impairment losses on indefinite-lived trade names and approximately $2.2 million was recorded by our SPG reportable segment for impairment losses on definite-lived customer-related intangibles. Refer to Note C “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” for additional details on these indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges.

Advertising costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in SG&A expenses. For the years ended May 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, advertising costs were $61.1 million, $49.7 million and $57.5 million, respectively.

Research and development costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in SG&A expenses. The amounts charged to expense for the years ended May 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 were $77.6 million, $76.5 million and $71.6 million, respectively.

Stock-based compensation represents the cost related to stock-based awards granted to our employees and directors, which may include restricted stock and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”). We measure stock-based compensation cost at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the award. We recognize the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the related vesting period. Refer to Note J, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for further information.

Year Ended May 31,	2021			2020			2019
(In thousands)
Interest (income)	$	(3,555	)	$	(5,313	)	$	(4,885	)
Net (gain) loss on marketable securities		(38,774	)		(1,629	)		8,366
Dividend (income)		(2,121	)		(2,797	)		(4,211	)
Investment (income), net	$	(44,450	)	$	(9,739	)	$	(730	)

Year Ended May 31,	2021			2020			2019
(In thousands)
Unrealized (gains) losses on marketable equity securities	$	(16,133	)	$	(1,457	)	$	5,827
Realized (gains) losses on marketable equity securities		(22,680	)		(237	)		2,322
Realized losses on available-for-sale debt securities		39			65			217
Net (gain) loss on marketable securities	$	(38,774	)	$	(1,629	)	$	8,366

Year Ended May 31,	2021			2020			2019
(In thousands)
Royalty expense (income), net (a)	$	(387	)	$	5,206		$	(96	)
(Income) related to unconsolidated equity affiliates		(516	)		(165	)		(332	)
Pension non-service costs		14,542			6,076			1,647
Loss on extinguishment of debt (b)		-			-			3,051
Loss on divestiture (c)		-			949			-
Other expense, net	$	13,639		$	12,066		$	4,270

The provision for income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount of assets and liabilities and the amounts used for income tax purposes and for certain changes in valuation allowances. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce certain deferred tax assets when, in our estimation, it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.

Earnings per share (EPS) is computed using both the treasury stock and two-class method, as our unvested share-based payment awards contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends are considered participating securities. We calculate both Basic and Diluted EPS under each method and compare the results, reporting the method that is most dilutive.

Basic EPS of common stock is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS of common stock is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock, plus the effect of dilutive potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential shares of common stock include outstanding SARS, restricted stock awards and convertible notes. The treasury stock method also assumes that we use the proceeds from the hypothetical exercise of the stock compensation awards to repurchase common stock at the average market price during the period.

The two-class method determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends and dividend equivalents and their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings.

See Note L, “Earnings Per Share,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses,” which requires an organization to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Additionally, the standard amends the current available-for-sale securities other-than-temporary impairment model for debt securities. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods therein. The adoption of this new guidance, effective June 1, 2020, using the modified retrospective transition method, did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at June 1, 2020 and did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Note Q, “Revenue” for additional information.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” to eliminate step two from the goodwill impairment test in order to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this new guidance, effective June 1, 2020, did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), – Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement,” which makes a number of changes meant to add, modify or remove certain disclosure requirements associated with the movement amongst or hierarchy associated with Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this new guidance, effective June 1, 2020, did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic 715-20), Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans,” which makes a number of changes meant to add, modify or remove certain disclosure requirements associated with employers that sponsor defined benefit or other postretirement plans. This guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020. Early adoption was permitted for all entities and the amendments in this update are required to be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. The adoption of this new guidance, effective for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2021, did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740),” which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption of the amendments is permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued. Depending on the amendment, adoption may be applied on the retrospective, modified retrospective or prospective basis. We are currently reviewing the provisions of this new pronouncement, but do not expect our adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

From June 1, 2021 through July 23, 2021, we have repurchased 133,388 shares of RPM common stock since May 31, 2021, at a cost of approximately $12.5 million, or an average of $93.71 per share, under the stock repurchase program described further in Note I, “Stock Repurchase Program.”