10-K

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our financial statements include all of our majority-owned subsidiaries, except for certain subsidiaries that were deconsolidated during the period from May 31, 2010 through December 31, 2014. We reconsolidated such subsidiaries as of January 1, 2015 (refer to Note A[2] to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information). Investments in less-than-majority-owned joint ventures for which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over are accounted for under the equity method. Preparation of our financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We continually evaluate these estimates, including those related to our allowances for doubtful accounts; inventories; allowances for recoverable taxes; uncertain tax positions; useful lives of property, plant and equipment; goodwill and other intangible assets; environmental, warranties and other contingent liabilities; income tax valuation allowances; pension plans; and the fair value of financial instruments. We base our estimates on historical experience, our most recent facts, and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of our assets and liabilities. Actual results, which are shaped by actual market conditions, may differ materially from our estimates.

We have identified below the accounting policies and estimates that are the most critical to our financial statements.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenues are recognized when realized or realizable, and when earned. In general, this is when title and risk of loss pass to the customer. Further, revenues are realizable when we have persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. We reduce our revenues for estimated customer returns and allowances, certain rebates, sales incentives and promotions in the same period the related sales are recorded.

We also record revenues generated under long-term construction contracts, mainly in connection with the installation of specialized roofing and flooring systems, and related services. In general, we account for long-term construction contracts under the percentage-of-completion method, and therefore record contract revenues and related costs as our contracts progress. This method recognizes the economic results of contract performance on a timelier basis than does the completed-contract method; however, application of this method requires reasonably dependable estimates of progress toward completion, as well as other dependable estimates. When reasonably dependable estimates cannot be made, or if other factors make estimates doubtful, the completed-contract method is applied. Under the completed-contract method, billings and costs are accumulated in the balance sheet as the contract progresses, but no revenue is recognized until the contract is complete or substantially complete.

TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS

Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. However, the functional currency for each of our foreign subsidiaries is its principal operating currency. We translate the amounts included in our Consolidated Statements of Income from our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars at weighted-average exchange rates, which we believe are representative of the actual exchange rates on the dates of the transactions. Our foreign subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars from local currency at the actual exchange rates as of the end of each reporting period, and we record the resulting foreign exchange translation adjustments in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If the U.S. dollar strengthens, we reflect the resulting losses as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Conversely, if the U.S. dollar weakens, foreign exchange translation gains result, which favorably impact accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Translation adjustments may be included in net earnings in the event of a sale or liquidation of certain of our underlying foreign investments. If we determine that the functional currency of any of our foreign subsidiaries should be the U.S. dollar, our financial statements will be affected. Should this occur, we will adjust our reporting to appropriately account for any such changes.

As appropriate, we use permanently invested intercompany loans as a source of capital to reduce exposure to foreign currency fluctuations at our foreign subsidiaries. These loans, on a consolidated basis, are treated as being analogous to equity for accounting purposes. Therefore, foreign exchange gains or losses on these intercompany loans are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

GOODWILL

We test our goodwill balances at least annually, or more frequently as impairment indicators arise, at the reporting unit level. Our annual impairment assessment date has been designated as the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter. Our reporting units have been identified at the component level, which is the operating segment level or one level below our operating segments.

We follow the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance found in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350 that simplifies how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. It provides an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test.

We assess qualitative factors in each of our reporting units that carry goodwill. Among other relevant events and circumstances that affect the fair value of our reporting units, we assess individual factors such as:

•

a significant adverse change in legal factors or the business climate;

•

an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;

•

unanticipated competition;

•

a loss of key personnel; and

•

a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of.

We assess these qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The traditional two-step quantitative process is required only if we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. However, we have an unconditional option to bypass a qualitative assessment and proceed directly to performing the traditional two-step quantitative analysis.

In applying the first step of the quantitative test, we compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. Calculating the fair value of a reporting unit requires our use of estimates and assumptions. We use significant judgment in determining the most appropriate method to establish the fair value of a reporting unit. We estimate the fair value of a reporting unit by employing various valuation techniques, depending on the availability and reliability of comparable market value indicators, and employ methods and assumptions that include the application of third-party market value indicators and the computation of discounted future cash flows for a reporting unit’s annual projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”).

We evaluate discounted future cash flows for a reporting unit’s projected EBITDA. Under this approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired. An indication that goodwill may be impaired results when the carrying value of the net assets of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. At that point, the second step of the impairment test is performed, which requires a fair value estimate of each tangible and intangible asset in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we record an impairment loss equal to the difference.

In applying the discounted cash flow methodology, we rely on a number of factors, including future business plans, actual and forecasted operating results, and market data. The significant assumptions employed under this method include discount rates; revenue growth rates, including assumed terminal growth rates; and operating margins used to project future cash flows for a reporting unit. The discount rates utilized reflect market-based estimates of capital costs and discount rates adjusted for management’s assessment of a market participant’s view with respect to other risks associated with the projected cash flows of the individual reporting unit. Our estimates are based upon assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which by nature are uncertain and unpredictable. We believe we incorporate ample sensitivity ranges into our analysis of goodwill impairment testing for a reporting unit, such that actual experience would need to be materially out of the range of expected assumptions in order for an impairment to remain undetected. As previously reported, we have monitored the performance of our Kirker nail enamel business throughout fiscal 2016, which had $143.3 million of goodwill at May 31, 2016 and is included in our consumer reportable segment results. We performed our annual goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, which resulted in an excess of fair value over carrying value of 8% for our Kirker reporting unit. In calculating the fair value of Kirker, we utilized market studies and other industry analyses to reflect growth in line with industry and market expectations. Further, in order to evaluate the sensitivity of our fair value calculation of our Kirker goodwill impairment test, we reduced growth expectations for each of the next five years by 1%, which resulted in a fair value that was still slightly above carrying value. We will continue to monitor the business performance for our Kirker nail enamel business over the coming months. If the expected level of business growth, timing of projected new business opportunities or

improvements in customer demand for our nail enamel business are not achieved, impairment of intangible assets, including goodwill, and our other long-lived assets, could result.

Our annual goodwill impairment analysis for fiscal 2016 did not result in any indicators of impairment. Should the future earnings and cash flows at our reporting units decline and/or discount rates increase, future impairment charges to goodwill and other intangible assets may be required.

OTHER LONG-LIVED ASSETS

We assess identifiable, amortizable intangibles and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in facts and circumstances indicate the possibility that the carrying values of these assets may not be recoverable over their estimated remaining useful lives. Factors considered important in our assessment, which might trigger an impairment evaluation, include the following:

•

significant under-performance relative to historical or projected future operating results;

•

significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets;

•

significant changes in the strategy for our overall business; and

•

significant negative industry or economic trends.

Measuring a potential impairment of amortizable intangibles and other long-lived assets requires the use of various estimates and assumptions, including the determination of which cash flows are directly related to the assets being evaluated, the respective useful lives over which those cash flows will occur and potential residual values, if any. If we determine that the carrying values of these assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above-described indicators or other factors, any impairment amounts would be measured based on the projected net cash flows expected from these assets, including any net cash flows related to eventual disposition activities. The determination of any impairment losses would be based on the best information available, including internal estimates of discounted cash flows; market participant assumptions; quoted market prices, when available; and independent appraisals, as appropriate, to determine fair values. Cash flow estimates would be based on our historical experience and our internal business plans, with appropriate discount rates applied.

Additionally, we test all indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually during our fiscal fourth quarter. We follow the guidance provided by ASC 350 that simplifies how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. It provides an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. Our fiscal 2016 annual impairment tests of each of our indefinite-lived intangible assets did not result in any impairment loss.

INCOME TAXES

Our provision for income taxes is calculated using the liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and certain changes in valuation allowances. We provide valuation allowances against deferred tax assets if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

In determining the adequacy of valuation allowances, we consider cumulative and anticipated amounts of domestic and international earnings or losses of the appropriate character, anticipated amounts of foreign source income, as well as the anticipated taxable income resulting from the reversal of future taxable temporary differences. We intend to maintain any recorded valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence (for example, cumulative positive foreign earnings or capital gain income) exists to support a reversal of the tax valuation allowances.

Further, at each interim reporting period, we estimate an effective income tax rate that is expected to be applicable for the full year. Significant judgment is involved regarding the application of global income tax laws and regulations and when projecting the jurisdictional mix of income. Additionally, interpretation of tax laws, court decisions or other guidance provided by taxing authorities influences our estimate of the effective income tax rates. As a result, our actual effective income tax rates and related income tax liabilities may differ materially from our estimated effective tax rates and related income tax liabilities. Any resulting differences are recorded in the period they become known.

CONTINGENCIES

We are party to various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. Although we cannot precisely predict the amount of any liability that may ultimately arise with respect to any of these matters, we record provisions when we consider the liability probable and estimable. Our provisions are based on historical experience and legal advice, reviewed quarterly and adjusted according to developments. In general, our accruals, including our accruals for environmental, warranty and tax liabilities, discussed further below, represent the best estimate of a range of probable losses. Estimating probable losses requires the analysis of multiple factors that often depend on judgments about potential actions by third parties, such as regulators, courts, and state and federal legislatures. Changes in the amounts of our loss provisions, which can be material, affect our Consolidated Statements of Income. To the extent there is a reasonable possibility that potential losses could exceed the amounts already accrued, we believe that the amount of any such additional loss would be immaterial to our results of operations, liquidity and consolidated financial position. We evaluate our accruals at the end of each quarter, or sometimes more frequently, based on available facts, and may revise our estimates in the future based on any new information becoming available.

Our environmental-related accruals are similarly established and/or adjusted as more information becomes available upon which costs can be reasonably estimated. Actual costs may vary from these estimates because of the inherent uncertainties involved, including the identification of new sites and the development of new information about contamination. Certain sites are still being investigated; therefore, we have been unable to fully evaluate the ultimate costs for those sites. As a result, accruals have not been estimated for certain of these sites and costs may ultimately exceed existing estimated accruals for other sites. We have received indemnities for potential environmental issues from purchasers of certain of our properties and businesses and from sellers of some of the properties or businesses we have acquired. If the indemnifying party fails to, or becomes unable to, fulfill its obligations under those agreements, we may incur environmental costs in addition to any amounts accrued, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We offer warranties on many of our products, as well as long term warranty programs at certain of our businesses, and thus have established corresponding warranty liabilities. Warranty expense is impacted by variations in local construction practices, installation conditions, and geographic and climate differences. Although we believe that appropriate liabilities have been recorded for our warranty expense, actual results may differ materially from our estimates.

Additionally, our operations are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign tax laws and regulations that govern, among other things, taxes on worldwide income. The calculation of our income tax expense is based on the best information available, including the application of currently enacted income tax laws and regulations, and involves our significant judgment. The actual income tax liability for each jurisdiction in any year can ultimately be determined, in some instances, several years after the financial statements have been published.

We also maintain accruals for estimated income tax exposures for many different jurisdictions. Tax exposures are settled primarily through the resolution of audits within each tax jurisdiction or the closing of a statute of limitation. Tax exposures and actual income tax liabilities can also be affected by changes in applicable tax laws, retroactive tax law changes, or other factors, which may cause us to believe revisions of past estimates are appropriate. Although we believe that appropriate liabilities have been recorded for our income tax expense and income tax exposures, actual results may differ materially from our estimates.

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

An allowance for anticipated uncollectible trade receivable amounts is established using a combination of specifically identified accounts to be reserved and a reserve covering trends in collectibility. These estimates are based on an analysis of trends in collectibility and past experience, but are primarily made up of individual account balances identified as doubtful based on specific facts and conditions. Receivable losses are charged against the allowance when we confirm uncollectibility. Actual collections of trade receivables could differ from our estimates due to changes in future economic or industry conditions or specific customer’s financial conditions.

INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and market being determined on the basis of replacement cost or net realizable value. Inventory costs include raw materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. We review the net realizable value of our inventory in detail on an on-going basis, with consideration given to various factors, which include our estimated reserves for excess, obsolete, slow moving or distressed inventories. If actual market conditions differ from our projections, and our estimates prove to be inaccurate, write-downs of inventory values and adjustments to cost of sales may be required. Historically, our inventory reserves have approximated actual experience.

MARKETABLE SECURITIES

Marketable securities, included in other current and long-term assets, are composed of available-for-sale securities and are reported at fair value. Realized gains and losses on sales of investments are recognized in net income on the specific identification basis. Changes in fair values of securities that are considered temporary are recorded as unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, in accumulated other

comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity. Other-than-temporary declines in market value from original cost are reflected in operating income in the period in which the unrealized losses are deemed other than temporary. In order to determine whether an other-than-temporary decline in market value has occurred, the duration of the decline in value and our ability to hold the investment to recovery are considered in conjunction with an evaluation of the strength of the underlying collateral and the extent to which the investment’s amortized cost or cost, as appropriate, exceeds its related market value.

PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT PLANS

We sponsor qualified defined benefit pension plans and various other nonqualified postretirement plans. The qualified defined benefit pension plans are funded with trust assets invested in a diversified portfolio of debt and equity securities and other investments. Among other factors, changes in interest rates, investment returns and the market value of plan assets can (i) affect the level of plan funding, (ii) cause volatility in the net periodic pension cost, and (iii) increase our future contribution requirements. A significant decrease in investment returns or the market value of plan assets or a significant decrease in

interest rates could increase our net periodic pension costs and adversely affect our results of operations. A significant increase in our contribution requirements with respect to our qualified defined benefit pension plans could have an adverse impact on our cash flow.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we elected to change our approach in estimating the service and interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost. Please refer to Note L, “Pension Plans,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Changes in our key plan assumptions would impact net periodic benefit expense and the projected benefit obligation for our defined benefit and various postretirement benefit plans. Based upon May 31, 2016 information, the following tables reflect the impact of a 1% change in the key assumptions applied to our defined benefit pension plans in the U.S. and internationally:


	U.S.				International
(In millions)	1% Increase		1% Decrease		1% Increase		1% Decrease
Discount Rate
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2016	$	(7.0)	$	8.7	$	(1.6)	$	2.2
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2016	$	(49.0)	$	58.1	$	(25.5)	$	35.9
Expected Return on Plan Assets
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2016	$	(3.3)	$	3.3	$	(1.6)	$	1.6
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2016		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Compensation Increase
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2016	$	5.4	$	(4.8)	$	1.0	$	(0.9)
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2016	$	26.2	$	(23.8)	$	5.8	$	(5.1)
Based upon May 31, 2016 information, the following table reflects the impact of a 1% change in the key assumptions applied to our various postretirement health care plans:
	U.S.				International
(In millions)	1% Increase		1% Decrease		1% Increase		1% Decrease
Discount Rate
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2016	$	-	$	-	$	(0.5)	$	0.6
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2016	$	(0.7)	$	0.8	$	(4.2)	$	5.5
Healthcare Cost Trend Rate
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2016	$	-	$	-	$	0.5	$	(0.4)
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2016	$	0.3	$	(0.3)	$	5.6	$	(4.3)

BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

In July 2015, our Board of Directors approved the realignment of certain businesses and management structure to recognize how we allocate resources and analyze the operating performance of our operating segments. During August 2015, we made the determination to combine our former RPM2-Industrial operating segment and our former SPHC operating segment into a single operating segment, called the “Specialty Products Group,” which is discussed in further detail below and constitutes a new reportable segment. Information for all periods presented has been recast to reflect this change.

segment, the specialty reportable segment and the consumer reportable segment. Within each reportable segment, we aggregate operating segments or product lines that consist of individual companies or groups of companies and product lines, which generally address common markets, share similar economic characteristics, utilize similar technologies and can share manufacturing or distribution capabilities. Our seven operating segments represent components of our business for which separate financial information is available that is utilized on a regular basis by our chief operating decision maker in determining how to allocate the assets of the company and evaluate performance. These seven operating segments are each managed by an operating segment manager, who is responsible for the day-to-day operating decisions and performance evaluation of the operating segment’s underlying businesses. We evaluate the profit performance of our segments primarily based on income before income taxes,

Our consumer reportable segment manufactures and markets professional use and do-it-yourself (“DIY”) products for a variety of mainly consumer applications, including home improvement and personal leisure activities. Our consumer reportable segment’s major manufacturing and distribution operations are located primarily in North America, along with a few locations in Europe and other parts of the world. Our consumer reportable segment’s products are sold throughout North America primarily to mass merchants, home improvement centers, hardware stores, paint stores, craft shops, cosmetic companies and to other smaller customers through distributors. The consumer reportable segment comprises three operating segments — Rust-Oleum Group, DAP Group and SPG-Consumer Group. Products within this reportable segment include specialty, hobby and professional paints; nail care enamels; caulks; adhesives; silicone sealants and wood stains.

In addition to our three reportable segments, there is a category of certain business activities and expenses, referred to as corporate/other, that does not constitute an operating segment. This category includes our corporate headquarters and related administrative expenses, results of our captive insurance companies, gains or losses on the sales of certain assets and other expenses not directly associated with any reportable segment. Assets related to the corporate/other category consist primarily of investments, prepaid expenses and headquarters’ property and equipment. These corporate and other assets and expenses reconcile reportable segment data to total consolidated income before income taxes, interest expense and earnings before interest and taxes.

The following table reflects the results of our reportable segments consistent with our management philosophy, and represents the information we utilize, in conjunction with various strategic, operational and other financial performance criteria, in evaluating the performance of our portfolio of product lines. Information for all periods presented has been recast to reflect the current-year change in reportable segments.

SEGMENT INFORMATION

(In thousands)


Year Ended May 31,	2016			2015			2014
Net Sales
Industrial	$	2,444,120		$	2,533,476		$	2,464,266
Specialty		732,091			457,245			305,391
Consumer		1,637,438			1,603,829			1,606,696
Total	$	4,813,649		$	4,594,550		$	4,376,353
Income Before Income Taxes ^(a)
Industrial Segment
Income Before Income Taxes ^(a)	$	252,781		$	246,997		$	234,123
Interest (Expense), Net ^(b)		(5,987	)		(8,190	)		(10,482)
EBIT ^(c)	$	258,768		$	255,187		$	244,605
Specialty Segment
Income Before Income Taxes ^(a)	$	111,945		$	68,340		$	61,628
Interest Income (Expense), Net ^(b)		730			534			255
EBIT ^(c)	$	111,215		$	67,806		$	61,373
Consumer Segment
Income Before Income Taxes ^(a)	$	268,218		$	274,001		$	251,229
Interest Income (Expense), Net ^(b)		40			34			122
EBIT ^(c)	$	268,178		$	273,967		$	251,107
Corporate/Other
(Expense) Before Income Taxes ^(a)	$	(149,478	)	$	(136,085	)	$	(122,493)
Interest (Expense), Net ^(b)		(76,101	)		(61,416	)		(55,131)
EBIT ^(c)	$	(73,377	)	$	(74,669	)	$	(67,362)
Consolidated
Income Before Income Taxes ^(a)	$	483,466		$	453,253		$	424,487
Interest (Expense), Net ^(b)		(81,318	)		(69,038	)		(65,236)
EBIT ^(c)	$	564,784		$	522,291		$	489,723

(a)	The presentation includes a reconciliation of Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes, a measure defined by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) in the U.S., to EBIT.

(b)	Interest (expense), net includes the combination of interest expense and investment expense (income), net.

(c)

EBIT is defined as earnings (loss) before interest and taxes. We evaluate the profit performance of our segments based on income before income taxes, but also look to EBIT as a performance evaluation measure because interest expense is essentially related to acquisitions, as opposed to segment operations. We believe EBIT is useful to investors for this purpose as well, using EBIT as a metric in their investment decisions. EBIT should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, income before taxes as determined in accordance with GAAP, since EBIT omits the impact of interest in determining operating performance, which represent items necessary to our continued operations, given our level of indebtedness. Nonetheless, EBIT is a key measure expected by and useful to our fixed income investors, rating agencies and the banking community, all of whom believe, and we concur, that this measure is critical to the capital markets’ analysis of our segments’ core operating performance. We also evaluate EBIT because it is clear that movements in EBIT impact our ability to attract financing. Our underwriters and bankers consistently require inclusion of this measure in offering memoranda in conjunction with any debt underwriting or bank financing. EBIT may not be indicative of our historical operating results, nor is it meant to be predictive of potential future results.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal 2016 Compared with Fiscal 2015

Net Sales Consolidated net sales of $4.81 billion for fiscal 2016 grew by approximately 4.8% from net sales of $4.59 billion for fiscal 2015. Organic sales improved 2.8%, while acquisitions added 6.7%. Our SPHC businesses, all of which are included in our specialty segment, were reconsolidated as of January 1, 2015. Therefore, year-to-date results through December 2015 for the SPHC group are reflected in acquisition growth. Consolidated net sales for fiscal 2016 were offset by an unfavorable foreign exchange impact of 4.7%.

Industrial segment net sales declined by 3.5%, to $2.44 billion for fiscal 2016 versus net sales of $2.53 billion during fiscal 2015. The decline was due to unfavorable foreign exchange, which impacted net sales by 6.6% during fiscal 2016. Many of our international businesses continued to feel the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against most foreign currencies throughout fiscal 2016, and although we anticipate the impact

to be less severe in fiscal 2017, the United Kingdom’s recent vote to exit the European Union may result in a continuation of the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange going forward. Additionally, there was a continued slowdown during fiscal 2016 in net sales for our industrial segment businesses serving the energy sector. The impact of these unfavorable items was partially offset by organic growth in net sales of 2.5%, which included growth throughout fiscal 2016 in our North American-based industrial companies serving the commercial construction market. Lastly, recent acquisitions contributed 0.6% to net sales during fiscal 2016.

Specialty segment net sales for fiscal 2016 grew by 60.1% to $732.1 million, primarily due to acquisition growth of 60.4%, which includes the reconsolidated SPHC businesses and a few other small product line acquisitions during the year. Organic growth in net sales provided 2.7% to the specialty segment during fiscal 2016, while foreign currency negatively impacted net sales for fiscal 2016 by 3.0%.

Consumer segment net sales for fiscal 2016 grew by 2.1% to $1.64 billion from $1.60 billion during fiscal 2015, primarily reflecting organic growth in sales of 3.3%, which relate to new product introductions and strategic product placements early in the year. The consumer segment benefited from continued strength in the U.S. housing market and sales growth at many of our major retail customers. Despite an overall decline in demand in the nail enamel market year-over-year, we saw growth during the last quarter of fiscal 2016, and we expect this positive trend to continue. Acquisitions provided 0.9% growth in net sales for fiscal 2016 in the consumer segment. Foreign currency negatively impacted consumer segment net sales for fiscal 2016 by 2.1%.

Gross Profit Margin Our consolidated gross profit margin improved to 43.4% of net sales for fiscal 2016 from a consolidated gross profit margin of 42.3% for the comparable period a year ago. The current-period improvement reflects a favorable impact from selling price increases of approximately 0.4% and lower manufacturing costs of approximately 1.1% during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015. Unfavorable foreign exchange impacted current-period gross profit margin by approximately 0.4%. Foreign exchange has had a significant impact recently upon the costs of sales, since several of our foreign operations pay their suppliers in U.S. dollars, which has strengthened recently against many other foreign currencies. Additionally, although certain petroleum-based raw materials have eased lately, the costs of the raw materials we use are under generally upward pressure, and over the longer term we expect raw materials costs to increase, due to escalating energy and related feedstock costs, increased levels of global demand, and improved levels of supplier pricing discipline.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”) Our consolidated SG&A expense increased by approximately $98.0 million during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015, and increased to 31.6% of net sales from 31.0% of net sales for the prior-year period. SG&A for fiscal 2016 reflects overall added expenses recorded by our recently acquired businesses, mainly our recent reconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries, all of which are included in our specialty segment. SG&A expense for fiscal 2016 and 2015 was favorably impacted by the reversal of certain contingent consideration obligations relating to recent acquisitions, and totaled $14.5 million and $29.7 million, respectively. During fiscal 2016, there was also higher employee compensation expense, including commissions on higher sales, as well as increases in advertising, promotional and professional services expense. Warranty expense for fiscal 2016 decreased by $3.8 million from the amount recorded a year ago, and it is typical that warranty expense will fluctuate from period to period.

Our industrial segment SG&A expense was approximately $19.6 million lower during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015, but slightly higher as a percentage of net sales. This reflects the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus nearly all foreign currencies, which unfavorably impacted fiscal 2016 industrial segment sales by 6.6%.

Our specialty segment SG&A expense was approximately $92.6 million higher during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015, and higher as a percentage of net sales, primarily reflecting the recent reconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries, as well as a few small product line acquisitions.

Our consumer segment SG&A expense was $26.4 million higher during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015, and it was also slightly higher as a percentage of net sales, reflecting higher advertising and promotional expense during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015. Consumer segment SG&A expense for fiscal 2016 and 2015 was favorably impacted by the reversal of certain contingent consideration obligations relating to recent acquisitions, and totaled $14.5 million and $29.7 million, respectively.

SG&A expenses in our corporate/other category of $73.4 million during fiscal 2016 was slightly lower versus $74.7 million during fiscal 2015, reflecting favorable experience in benefit costs.

We recorded total net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs of $47.6 million and $48.2 million for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. The $0.6 million decrease in pension expense was primarily the result of lower service and interest cost of $2.8 million during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015 combined with a favorable impact of $0.4 million from larger returns on higher plan asset levels during fiscal 2016. The reduction in service and interest cost also impacted deferred actuarial losses to be amortized in future periods. Partially offsetting those reductions in costs was an unfavorable impact of approximately $2.6 million resulting from larger actuarial losses recognized during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015. During fiscal 2016, we elected to change our approach in estimating the service and interest cost components of net periodic benefit expense by applying the split discount rate approach, which reduced pension expense for fiscal 2016 by approximately $6.4 million. See Note L, “Pension Plans,” for additional information regarding this change.

We expect that pension and postretirement expense will fluctuate on a year-to-year basis, depending primarily upon the investment performance of plan assets and potential changes in interest rates, but such changes are not expected to be material to our consolidated financial results. A decrease of 1% in the discount rate or the expected return on plan assets assumptions would result in $11.5 million and $4.9 million higher expense, respectively. The assumptions and estimates used to determine the discount rate and expected return on plan assets are more fully described in Note L, “Pension Plans,” and Note M, “Postretirement Benefits,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Further discussion and analysis of the sensitivity surrounding our most critical assumptions under our pension and postretirement plans is discussed on page 17 of this report under, “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Pension and Postretirement Plans.”

Interest Expense Interest expense was $91.7 million for fiscal 2016 versus $87.6 million for fiscal 2015. Included in interest expense a year ago was a $4.0 million make-whole payment related to the early redemption of our 6.7% Senior Notes. Higher average borrowings increased interest expense during fiscal 2016 by approximately $4.6 million versus fiscal 2015. Our average borrowings were higher due to recent acquisitions, primarily from our $450.0 million payment to the 524(g) trust for the reconsolidation of SPHC, which was paid in December 2014. The payment was funded from our New Revolving Credit Facility and AR Program, part of which was ultimately replaced with a 30-year bond issued in May 2015. Despite the decrease in interest rates, which averaged 4.11% overall for fiscal 2016 compared with 4.26% for fiscal 2015, interest expense increased by approximately $3.5 million due to the overall higher average borrowings outstanding during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015.

Investment (Income), Net Net investment income of approximately $10.4 million for fiscal 2016 compares to net investment income of $18.6 million during fiscal 2015. Dividend and interest income totaled $7.7 million and $9.9 million during fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. Net realized gains on the sales of investments totaled $6.5 million during fiscal 2016, while those gains were $8.7 million during fiscal 2015. Impairments recognized on securities that management has determined are other-than-temporary declines in value totaled $3.8 million during fiscal 2016, compared with $0.02 million of such losses recorded during fiscal 2015.

Other Expense (Income), Net Other expense of $1.3 million for fiscal 2016 compared with other income of $3.9 million for fiscal 2015. Items reflected in this balance include net royalty expense of $2.0 million for fiscal 2016 and net royalty income of $1.9 million during fiscal 2015. Also included in this balance is our equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates totaling approximately $2.1 million and $2.0 million for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we incurred a legal settlement charge of approximately $9.3 million, which was in relation to certain deck coating products. Lastly, during fiscal 2016 we acquired the remaining 51% interest in our Chinese joint venture, Carboline Dalian Paint Production Co., Ltd (“Carboline Dalian”), which increased our ownership to 100%. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we retained an independent, third-party valuation firm to assist us in determining the fair value of Carboline Dalian. Under ASC 805, a step up to fair value is required when an equity interest changes from a non-controlling interest to a controlling interest. Based on the step up from our 49% to a 100% interest in Carboline Dalian, we recorded a remeasurement gain for approximately $8.0 million during fiscal 2016.

Income Before Income Taxes (“IBT”) Our consolidated pretax income for fiscal 2016 of $483.5 million compares with $453.3 million for fiscal 2015.

Our industrial segment had IBT of $252.8 million, or 10.3% of industrial net sales, for fiscal 2016, versus IBT of $247.0 million, or 9.7% of industrial net sales, for fiscal 2015. Our industrial segment experienced the continuing impact of unfavorable foreign exchange, and although we anticipate a lesser impact during fiscal 2017, the Brexit decision may cause the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange to continue. Our specialty segment had IBT of $111.9 million, or 15.3% of net sales, during fiscal 2016, versus IBT of $68.3 million, or 14.9% of net sales, for fiscal 2015. Our consumer segment IBT increased to $268.2 million, or 16.4% of net sales for fiscal 2016, compared with $274.0 million, or 17.1% of net sales, for fiscal 2015.

Income Tax Rate The effective income tax rate was 26.1% for fiscal 2016 compared to an effective income tax rate of 49.6% for fiscal 2015. The decrease in the effective tax rate from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 was primarily attributable to a fiscal 2015 deferred income tax charge of $106.2 million for the estimated tax cost associated with unremitted foreign earnings not considered to be permanently reinvested. The comparable provision amount in fiscal 2016 is a benefit of $3.7 million.

Net Income Net income of $357.5 million for fiscal 2016 compares to net income of $228.3 million for fiscal 2015. During fiscal 2016, we elected to change our approach in estimating the service and interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost by applying the split discount rate approach, which resulted in an increase in net income of approximately $4.7 million. During fiscal 2016, we recognized net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2.7 million versus net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of $11.2 million during fiscal 2015. The loss from noncontrolling interests during fiscal 2015 resulted from the $106.2 million tax charge for the potential repatriation of foreign earnings. Net income attributable to RPM International Inc. stockholders for fiscal 2016 was $354.7 million, which compared to net income of $239.5 million for fiscal 2015.

Diluted earnings per share of common stock for fiscal 2016 of $2.63 compares with diluted earnings per share of common stock of $1.78 for fiscal 2015. As discussed above, we changed our approach in estimating the service and interest cost components of net periodic benefit expense, which resulted in an increase in diluted earnings per share of $0.03 during fiscal 2016.

Fiscal 2015 Compared with Fiscal 2014

Net Sales Consolidated net sales of $4.59 billion for fiscal 2015 grew by approximately 5.0% from net sales of $4.38 billion for fiscal 2014. Organic sales improved 3.3%, while acquisitions added 5.2%. The reconsolidated SPHC businesses, all of which are included with our specialty reportable segment, are included in acquisition growth. Consolidated net sales for fiscal 2015 were offset by an unfavorable foreign exchange impact of 3.5%.

Industrial segment net sales for fiscal 2015 grew by 2.8% to $2.53 billion, due to organic growth of 6.4% and also from acquisitions, which added 1.0%. During the last half of fiscal 2015, our businesses serving the U.S. commercial construction and U.S. residential markets saw steady improvement in net sales, however, we also saw a slowdown in net sales for our businesses serving the energy sector. Foreign currency negatively impacted industrial segment sales for fiscal 2015 by 4.6%.

Specialty segment net sales for fiscal 2015 grew by 49.7% to $457.2 million, primarily due to acquisition growth of 58.7%, which includes the reconsolidated SPHC businesses. The specialty segment had an organic decline in net sales from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2015, which approximated 5.3%. Foreign currency negatively impacted specialty segment net sales for fiscal 2015 by 3.7%.

Consumer segment net sales for fiscal 2015 fell by 0.2% to $1.60 billion, reflecting the negative impact of foreign currency during fiscal 2015 of 1.6%. Growth in consumer segment organic net sales was approximately 0.1%, while acquisitions contributed 1.3%. Certain of our smaller, higher-margin niche businesses in this segment, such as Kirker and Synta, have struggled due to a slowdown in global demand during fiscal 2015 as well as difficult comparisons to fiscal 2014, negatively impacting net sales during fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014.

Gross Profit Margin Our consolidated gross profit margin declined to 42.3% of net sales for fiscal 2015 from a consolidated gross profit margin of 42.9% for fiscal 2014. All of the decline in our gross profit margin resulted from a less profitable mix of product sold during fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014. Our product mix was unfavorably impacted by a decline in some of our smaller, higher-margin niche businesses, such as Kirker and Synta, that have struggled due to a slowdown in global demand during fiscal 2015 as well as difficult comparisons to fiscal 2014, negatively impacting our margins.

SG&A Our consolidated SG&A increased by $32.8 million, but decreased to 31.0% of net sales for fiscal 2015 compared with 31.8% of net sales for fiscal 2014. Fiscal 2015 consolidated SG&A includes five months of additional expense relating to our recent reconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries. Fiscal 2015 SG&A expense was favorably affected by the reversal of certain contingent consideration obligations relating to recent acquisitions, primarily Kirker and Synta, for approximately $29.7 million. Fiscal 2015 SG&A expense also includes $14.5 million of higher legal and professional expense related to: the SEC and audit committee investigation of timing of the previously disclosed GSA accrual; the SPHC settlement agreement; and our voluntary self-disclosure agreement with the State of Delaware for unclaimed property reviews. Fiscal 2015 expense also includes higher employee compensation-related expense, including commissions on higher sales. Fiscal 2015 results also reflect higher distribution, rental and lease expense on building and equipment, as well as higher severance expense versus fiscal 2014. Warranty expense for fiscal 2015 decreased by approximately $1.1 million from the amount recorded during fiscal 2014, and it is typical that warranty expense will fluctuate from period to period.

Our industrial segment SG&A was approximately $6.3 million higher during fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014, but lower as a percentage of net sales, reflecting this segment’s growth in organic sales of 6.4% during fiscal 2015. The industrial segment SG&A as a percent of net sales improved due to lower bad debt expense and lower legal settlement expense during fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014. Fiscal 2015 expense reflects higher employee compensation-related expense, including commissions on higher sales, as well as higher distribution expense, and higher rental and lease expense on buildings and equipment.

Our specialty segment SG&A was approximately $47.7 million higher during fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014, and higher as a percentage of net sales, reflecting this segment’s growth from acquisitions. Specialty segment results for fiscal 2015 included five months of additional expense relating to our recent reconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries, all of which are included in the specialty segment.

Our consumer segment SG&A was approximately $28.5 million lower during fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014, and lower as a percentage of net sales, which directly reflects the fiscal 2015 reversal of certain contingent consideration obligations in this segment for approximately $29.7 million. During fiscal 2015, this segment’s SG&A expense was impacted by higher expense from additional sales and marketing personnel, higher distribution expense and higher severance expense versus fiscal 2014, which was offset by a decrease in advertising expense.

SG&A expenses in our corporate/other category increased by $7.3 million during fiscal 2015 to $74.7 million from $67.4 million during fiscal 2014. The increase in SG&A expense reflects the combination of higher pension expense and insurance expense, combined with higher professional and legal services expense related to the recent SPHC settlement. Additionally, SG&A increased due to the discontinuation of shared services income after the reconsolidation of SPHC occurred. These increases were partially offset by lower healthcare and acquisition-related expenses.

We recorded total net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs of $48.2 million and $46.8 million during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. The $1.4 million increase in pension and postretirement expense was primarily the result of higher service and interest cost of $5.2 million during fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014, partially offset by a favorable impact of approximately $3.8 million due to larger returns on higher plan asset levels. We expect that pension expense will fluctuate on a year-to-year basis, depending primarily upon the investment performance of plan assets and potential changes in interest rates, but such changes are not expected to be material to our consolidated financial results.

Interest Expense Interest expense was $87.6 million for fiscal 2015 versus $80.9 million for fiscal 2014. Included in interest expense for fiscal 2015 was a $4.0 million make-whole payment related to the early redemption of our 6.7% Senior Notes on May 29, 2015, which increased interest expense by $4.0 million. Higher average borrowings, related to recent acquisitions and including payments made to fund the SPHC bankruptcy trust, increased interest expense during fiscal 2015 by approximately $7.2 million versus fiscal 2014. Excluding acquisition-related borrowings, lower average borrowings year-over-year decreased interest expense by approximately $1.8 million. Lower interest rates, which averaged 4.26% overall for fiscal 2015 compared with 5.06% for fiscal 2014, decreased interest expense by approximately $2.7 million during fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014.

Investment Expense (Income), Net Net investment income of $18.6 million during fiscal 2015 compares to net investment income of $15.7 million for fiscal 2014. Dividend and interest income totaled $9.9 million and $8.5 million during fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. Net realized gains on the sales of investments resulted in a net gain of $8.7 million for fiscal 2015 versus a net gain of $7.4 million for fiscal 2015. Impairments recognized on securities that management has determined are other-than-temporary declines in value approximated $0.2 million for fiscal 2014, versus impairments of approximately $0.02 million during fiscal 2015.

Other (Income), Net Other income of $3.9 million for fiscal 2015 compared with other income of $4.0 million for fiscal 2014. Reflected in this balance is net royalty income, which approximated $1.9 million and $1.2 million for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. Also reflected in other income is our equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, which totaled approximately $2.0 million and $2.8 million for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively.

IBT Our consolidated pretax income for fiscal 2015 of $453.3 million compares with pretax income of $424.5 million for fiscal 2014, resulting in a pretax profit margin on net sales of 9.9% for fiscal 2015 versus a pretax profit margin on net sales of 9.7% during fiscal 2014. As discussed above, fiscal 2015 results reflect the unfavorable impact of both translational and transactional foreign exchange, as many international currencies weakened versus the U.S. dollar, and we expect that trend to continue into the majority of fiscal 2016.

Our industrial segment had IBT of $247.0 million, for a profit margin on net sales of 9.7% for fiscal 2015, versus IBT of $234.1 million, for a profit margin on net sales of 9.5%, for fiscal 2014. Our specialty segment had IBT of $68.3 million, for a profit margin on net sales of 14.9% for fiscal 2015, versus IBT of $61.6 million, for a profit margin on net sales of 20.2%, for fiscal 2014. Specialty segment IBT for fiscal 2015 includes the impact of our January 1, 2015 reconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries. Our consumer segment IBT increased to $274.0 million, or 17.1% of net sales for the period, from fiscal 2014 IBT of $251.2 million, or 15.6% of net sales. The increase in IBT as a percent of sales for the consumer segment resulted primarily from the reversal of certain contingent consideration obligations approximating $29.7 million during fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014.

Income Tax Rate The effective income tax rate was 49.6% for fiscal 2015 compared to an effective income tax rate of 27.9% for fiscal 2014. The increase in the effective income tax rate is primarily due to a deferred income tax charge of $106.2 million recorded in fiscal 2015 for the estimated tax cost associated with unremitted foreign earnings not considered to be permanently reinvested. The comparable provision amount in fiscal 2014 was $2.5 million. See Note F, “Income Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding unremitted foreign earnings. The increase in the effective tax rate from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2015 was also attributable to a decrease in the benefit from the domestic manufacturing deduction. The above increases to the effective tax rate were partially offset by increases in the benefit from the impact of foreign operations and valuation allowance reversals.

Additionally, a non-recurring net tax benefit was recorded in fiscal 2014 that was primarily comprised of the benefit associated with recognition of a foreign deferred income tax asset resulting from the merger of certain foreign subsidiaries, partially offset by the impact of the enactment of a Canadian tax law change, Canada Bill C-48, Technical Tax Amendments Act, 2012, enacted as of June 26, 2013.

Net Income Net income of $228.3 million for fiscal 2015 compares to net income of $306.0 million for fiscal 2014. Net income as a percentage of net sales of 5.0% for fiscal 2015 compares with 7.0% for fiscal 2014. Net income for fiscal 2015 reflects the leverage of the 3.3% organic growth in sales, combined with the reconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries and reversals of $29.7 million of contingent consideration obligations that were not met. During fiscal 2015, we had a net loss from noncontrolling interests of $11.2 million versus net income of $14.3 million during fiscal 2014. The loss from noncontrolling interests during fiscal 2015 resulted from the $106.2 million tax charge for the potential repatriation of foreign earnings. Net income attributable to RPM International Inc. stockholders was $239.5 million for fiscal 2015, versus $291.7 million for fiscal 2014.

Diluted earnings per share of common stock for fiscal 2015 of $1.78 compares with $2.18 for fiscal 2014.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Operating Activities

Approximately $474.7 million of cash was provided by operating activities during fiscal 2016, compared with $330.4 million of cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2015.

The net change in cash from operations includes the change in net income, which increased by $129.1 million during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015, primarily reflecting the $106.2 million tax charge taken during fiscal 2015 for the estimated future tax cost of repatriating undistributed foreign earnings. Other items impacting the net change in cash from operations were items adjusting net income for non-cash expenses and income, which increased by $53.7 million during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015. Changes in working capital accounts and all other accruals provided approximately $68.9 million more cash flow during fiscal 2016 than fiscal 2015.

The change in accounts receivable during fiscal 2016 used cash of $24.6 million versus $90.2 million of cash used by accounts receivable during fiscal 2015, or approximately $65.6 million less cash used year over year. The $90.2 million of cash used a year ago resulted from the timing of sales and collections on accounts receivable that resulted from slower sales during the early part of our fourth fiscal quarter, which ended with strong sales during the month of May and pushed collections into early fiscal 2016. During fiscal 2016, we also experienced an increase in foreign sales and receivables versus the prior year, which typically have longer collection periods, as we expand our foothold into places such as the Middle East and Far East. Days sales outstanding at May 31, 2016 decreased to 57.7 days from 60.0 days sales outstanding at May 31, 2015.

Inventory balances used $17.7 million of cash during fiscal 2016, compared with a use of $31.3 million in cash during fiscal 2015, or $13.6 million less cash used year over year. This resulted from the timing of purchases by retail customers. Days of inventory outstanding at May 31, 2016 increased to 79.2 days from 78.4 days of inventory outstanding at May 31, 2015.

The change in accounts payable during fiscal 2016 used cash of $6.0 million versus $16.2 million of cash used during fiscal 2015, or approximately $10.2 million less cash than fiscal 2015, resulting from a change in the timing of certain payments. Accrued compensation and benefits provided approximately $19.0 million more cash during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015, due to higher bonus accruals made during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015. Other accruals and prepaids, including those for other short-term and long-term items and changes, used

$64.8 million more cash during fiscal 2016 versus fiscal 2015, primarily from the timing of pension plan contributions and upfront funds used for long-term customer contracts.

Cash provided from operations, along with the use of available credit lines, as required, remain our primary sources of liquidity.

Investing Activities

Capital expenditures, other than for ordinary repairs and replacements, are made to accommodate our continued growth to achieve production and distribution efficiencies, expand capacity, introduce new technology, improve environmental health and safety capabilities, improve information systems, and enhance our administration capabilities. Capital expenditures of $117.2 million during fiscal 2016 compare with depreciation of $66.7 million. We believe our current production capacity, along with moderate plant modifications or additions will be adequate to meet our immediate needs based on anticipated growth rates. We are increasing our capital spending in fiscal 2017 in an effort to more aggressively invest in our internal growth initiatives, especially in overseas markets. We anticipate that additional shifts at our production facilities, coupled with the capacity added through acquisition activity and our planned increase in future capital spending levels, will enable us to meet increased demand throughout fiscal 2017 and into fiscal 2018 and beyond.

Our captive insurance companies invest their excess cash in marketable securities in the ordinary course of conducting their operations, and this activity will continue. Differences in the amounts related to these activities on a year-over-year basis are primarily attributable to differences in the timing and performance of their investments balanced against amounts required to satisfy claims. At May 31, 2016, the fair value of our investments in marketable securities totaled $147.0 million, of which investments with a fair value of $89.3 million were in an unrealized loss position. At May 31, 2015, the fair value of our investments in marketable securities totaled $154.8 million, of which investments with a fair value of $59.0 million were in an unrealized loss position. The fair value of our portfolio of marketable securities is based on quoted market prices for identical, or similar, instruments in active or non-active markets or model-derived-valuations with observable inputs. We have no marketable securities whose fair value is subject to unobservable inputs. Total pretax unrealized losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income at May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015 were $10.2 million and $3.8 million, respectively.

We regularly review our marketable securities in unrealized loss positions in order to determine whether or not we have the ability and intent to hold these investments. That determination is based upon the severity and duration of the decline, in addition to our evaluation of the cash flow requirements of our businesses. Unrealized losses at May 31, 2016 were generally related to the normal volatility in valuations over the past several months for a portion of our portfolio of investments in marketable securities. The unrealized losses generally relate to investments whose fair values at May 31, 2016 were less than 15% below their original cost or that have been in a loss position for less than six consecutive months. From time to time, we may experience significant volatility in general economic and market conditions. If we were to experience unrealized losses that were to continue for longer periods of time, or arise to more significant levels of unrealized losses within our portfolio of investments in marketable securities in the future, we may recognize additional other-than-temporary impairment losses. Such potential losses could have a material impact on our results of operations in any given reporting period. As such, we continue to closely evaluate the status of our investments and our ability and intent to hold these investments.

As of May 31, 2016, approximately $243.8 million of our consolidated cash and cash equivalents were held at various foreign subsidiaries. Undistributed earnings held at our foreign subsidiaries that are considered permanently reinvested will be used, for instance, to expand operations organically or for acquisitions in foreign jurisdictions. Further, our operations in the U.S. generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy U.S. operating requirements. Refer to Note F, “Income Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding unremitted foreign earnings.

Financing Activities

Our available liquidity, including our cash and cash equivalents and amounts available under our committed credit facilities, stood at $1.06 billion at May 31, 2016. Our debt-to-capital ratio was 54.6% at May 31, 2016, compared with 56.2% at May 31, 2015.

Revolving Credit Agreement

During fiscal 2015, we entered into an $800.0 million unsecured syndicated revolving credit facility (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”), which expires on December 5, 2019. The New Revolving Credit Facility replaced our prior $600.0 million revolving credit facility that was set to expire on June 29, 2017.

The New Revolving Credit Facility includes sublimits for the issuance of swingline loans, which are comparatively short-term loans used for working capital purposes and letters of credit. The aggregate maximum principal amount of the commitments under the New Revolving Credit Facility may be expanded upon our request, subject to certain conditions, up to $1.0 billion. The New Revolving Credit Facility is available to refinance existing indebtedness, to finance working capital and capital expenditures, to satisfy all or a portion of our obligations relating to the plan of reorganization for our SPHC subsidiary, and for general corporate purposes.

The New Revolving Credit Facility requires us to comply with various customary affirmative and negative covenants, including a leverage covenant and interest coverage ratio. Under the terms of the leverage covenant, we may not permit our consolidated indebtedness as of any fiscal quarter end to exceed 65% of the sum of such indebtedness and our consolidated shareholders’ equity on such date. The minimum required consolidated interest coverage ratio for EBITDA to interest expense is 3.50 to 1. The interest coverage ratio is calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter for the four fiscal quarters then ended using an EBITDA as defined in the credit agreement.

As of May 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all financial covenants contained in our New Revolving Credit Facility, including the leverage and interest coverage ratio covenants. At that date, our leverage ratio was 53.4%, while our interest coverage ratio was 9.5 to 1. Our available liquidity under our New Revolving Credit Facility stood at $597.7 million at May 31, 2016.

Our access to funds under our New Revolving Credit Facility is dependent on the ability of the financial institutions that are parties to the New Revolving Credit Facility to meet their funding commitments. Those financial institutions may not be able to meet their funding commitments if they experience shortages of capital and liquidity or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests within a short period of time. Moreover, the obligations of the financial institutions under our New Revolving Credit Facility are several and not joint and, as a result, a funding default by one or more institutions does not need to be made up by the others.

Accounts Receivable Securitization Program

On May 9, 2014, we entered into a new, three-year, $200.0 million accounts receivable securitization facility (the “AR Program”). The maximum availability under the AR Program is $200.0 million. Availability is further subject to changes in the credit ratings of our customers, customer concentration levels or certain characteristics of the accounts receivable being transferred and therefore at certain times we may not be able to fully access the $200.0 million of funding available under the AR Program.

As of May 31, 2016, there was no outstanding balance under the AR Program, which compares with the maximum availability on that date of $200.0 million. The interest rate under the Purchase Agreement is based on the Alternate Base Rate, LIBOR Market Index Rate, one-month LIBOR or LIBOR for a specified tranche period, as selected by us, plus in each case, a margin of 0.70%. In addition, we are obligated to pay a monthly unused commitment fee based on the daily amount of unused commitments under the Agreement, which fee ranges from 0.30% to 0.50% based on usage. The AR Program contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants and also contains customary default and termination provisions.

Our failure to comply with the covenants described above and other covenants contained in the Revolving Credit Facility could result in an event of default under that agreement, entitling the lenders to, among other things, declare the entire amount outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility to be due and payable. The instruments governing our other outstanding indebtedness generally include cross-default provisions that provide that under certain circumstances, an event of default that results in acceleration of our indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Facility will entitle the holders of such other indebtedness to declare amounts outstanding immediately due and payable.

2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020

On December 9, 2013, we issued $205 million of 2.25% convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “Convertible Notes”). We will pay interest on the Convertible Notes semi-annually on June 15th and December 15th of each year, and began doing so on June 15, 2014. Net proceeds of approximately $200.1 million from the sale were used to refinance $200 million in principal amount of unsecured senior notes due December 15, 2013, which had an interest rate of 6.25%.

The Convertible Notes will be convertible under certain circumstances and during certain periods at an initial conversion rate of 18.8905 shares of RPM common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (representing an initial conversion price of approximately $52.94 per share of common stock), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. In April 2016, we declared a dividend in excess of $0.24 per share, and consequently, the adjusted conversion rate at May 31, 2016 was 18.96864. The initial conversion price represents a conversion premium of approximately 37% over the last reported sale price of RPM common stock of $38.64 on December 3, 2013. Prior to June 15, 2020, the Convertible Notes may be converted only upon specified events, and, thereafter, at any time. Upon conversion, the Convertible Notes may be settled, at RPM’s election, in cash, shares of RPM’s common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of RPM’s common stock.

the debt discount was $2.8 million and $2.7 million for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. At May 31, 2016, the remaining period over which the debt discount will be amortized was 4.5 years, the unamortized debt discount was $14.1 million, and the carrying amount of the equity component was $20.7 million.

3.45% Notes due 2022

On October 23, 2012, we sold $300 million aggregated principal amount of 3.45% Notes due 2022 (the “Notes”). The net proceeds of $297.7 million from the offering of the Notes were used to repay short-term borrowings outstanding under our $600 million revolving credit facility on that date.

5.25% Notes due 2045

On May 26, 2015, we issued $250 million of 5.25% notes due 2045 (the “New Notes”). The New Notes were priced at 99.401% of the $250 million principal, and at that price, the New Notes have a yield to maturity of 5.29%. We will pay interest on the New Notes semi-annually on June 1st and December 1st of each year, and began doing so on December 1, 2015. Net proceeds of approximately $245.7 million from the offering of the New Notes were used to repay a portion of short-term borrowings outstanding under our New Revolving Credit Facility.

The following table summarizes our financial obligations and their expected maturities at May 31, 2016 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in the periods indicated.

Contractual Obligations


	Total Contractual		Payments Due In
(In thousands)	Payment Stream		2017		2018-19		2020-21		After 2021
Long-term debt obligations	$	1,651,045	$	4,713	$	249,597	$	848,210	$	548,525
Capital lease obligations		482		160		237		85
Operating lease obligations		199,123		50,668		65,158		31,514		51,783
Other long-term liabilities ⁽¹⁾:
Interest payments on long-term debt obligations		608,295		71,900		135,675		68,808		331,912
Promissory note payments on 524(g) Trust		347,500		102,500		245,000
Contributions to pension and postretirement plans ⁽²⁾		422,400		61,100		78,900		90,700		191,700
Total	$	3,228,845	$	291,041	$	774,567	$	1,039,317	$	1,123,920

(1)

Excluded from other long-term liabilities are our gross long-term liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, which totaled $16.1 million at May 31, 2016. Currently, we cannot predict with reasonable reliability the timing of cash settlements to the respective taxing authorities related to these liabilities.

(2)

These amounts represent our estimated cash contributions to be made in the periods indicated for our pension and postretirement plans, assuming no actuarial gains or losses, assumption changes or plan changes occur in any period. The projection results assume the required minimum contribution will be contributed.

The U.S. dollar fluctuated throughout the year, and was stronger against other major currencies where we conduct operations at the fiscal year end versus the previous year end, causing an unfavorable change in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (refer to Note I to the Consolidated Financial Statements) component of stockholders’ equity of $(59.6) million this year versus an unfavorable change of $(216.8) million last year. The change in fiscal 2016 was in addition to (unfavorable) net changes of $(38.4) million and $(8.5) million related to adjustments required for minimum pension and other postretirement liabilities and unrealized gains on securities, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet financings, other than the minimum operating lease commitments included in the above Contractual Obligations table and further described in Note K, “Leases,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We have no subsidiaries that are not included in our financial statements, nor do we have any interests in, or relationships with, any special purpose entities that are not reflected in our financial statements.

QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates because we fund our operations through long- and short-term borrowings and denominate our business transactions in a variety of foreign currencies. We utilize a sensitivity analysis to measure the potential loss in earnings based on a hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates and a 10% change in foreign currency rates. A summary of our primary market risk exposures follows.

Interest Rate Risk

Our primary interest rate risk exposure results from our floating rate debt, including various revolving and other lines of credit (refer to Note E, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements). At May 31, 2016, approximately 12.23% of our debt was subject to floating interest rates.

If interest rates were to increase 100 bps from May 31, 2016 and, assuming no changes in debt from the May 31, 2016 levels, the additional annual interest expense would amount to approximately $2.0 million on a pretax basis. A similar increase in interest rates in fiscal 2015 would have resulted in approximately $2.1 million in additional interest expense.

All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet and measured at fair value. Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments that do not qualify as hedges and/ or any ineffective portion of hedges are recognized as a gain or loss in our Consolidated Statement of Income in the current period. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used effectively as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings (losses), along with the change in the value of the hedged item. Such derivative transactions are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

Foreign Currency Risk

Our foreign sales and results of operations are subject to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations (refer to Note A, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Because our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars, increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other

currencies in which we transact business could materially adversely affect our net revenues, operating income and the carrying values of our assets located outside the U.S. Global economic uncertainty continues to exist, both related to the United Kingdom’s vote to leave the European Union (“Brexit”) and otherwise. For example, Brexit caused significant volatility in global stock markets and currency exchange rate fluctuations that resulted in the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies in which we conduct business. Such strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies may adversely affect our operating results. However, our foreign debt is denominated in the respective foreign currency, thereby eliminating any related translation impact on earnings.

If the U.S. dollar were to strengthen, our foreign results of operations would be unfavorably impacted, but the effect is not expected to be material. A 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates would not have resulted in a material impact to net income for the years ended May 31, 2016 and 2015. We do not currently use financial derivative instruments for trading purposes, nor do we engage in foreign currency, commodity or interest rate speculation.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The foregoing discussion includes forward-looking statements relating to our business. These forward-looking statements, or other statements made by us, are made based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors (including those specified below), which are difficult to predict and, in many instances, are beyond our control. As a result, our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any such forward-looking statements. These uncertainties

and factors include (a) global markets and general economic conditions, including uncertainties surrounding the volatility in financial markets, the availability of capital and the effect of changes in interest rates, and the viability of banks and other financial institutions; (b) the prices, supply and capacity of raw materials, including assorted pigments, resins, solvents, and other natural gas- and oil-based materials; packaging, including plastic containers; and transportation services, including fuel surcharges; (c) continued growth in demand for our products; (d) legal, environmental and litigation risks inherent in our construction and chemicals businesses and risks related to the adequacy of our insurance coverage for such matters; (e) the effect of changes in interest rates; (f) the effect of fluctuations in currency exchange rates upon our foreign operations; (g) the effect of non-currency risks of investing in and conducting operations in foreign countries, including those relating to domestic and international political, social, economic and regulatory factors; (h) risks and uncertainties associated with our ongoing acquisition and divestiture activities; (i) risks related to the adequacy of our contingent liability reserves; and (j) other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2016, as the same may be updated from time to time. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events, information or circumstances that arise after the filing date of this document.

Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)


May 31,	2016		2015
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	265,152	$	174,711
Trade accounts receivable (less allowances of $24,600 and $24,526, respectively)		963,092		956,211
Inventories		685,818		674,205
Deferred income taxes		-		29,892
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		224,280		264,827
Total current assets		2,138,342		2,099,846
Property, Plant and Equipment, at Cost		1,344,830		1,258,304
Allowance for depreciation		(715,377)		(668,658)
Property, plant and equipment, net		629,453		589,646
Other Assets
Goodwill		1,219,630		1,215,688
Other intangible assets, net of amortization		575,401		604,130
Deferred income taxes, non-current		19,771		5,685
Other		193,444		179,245
Total other assets		2,008,246		2,004,748
Total Assets	$	4,776,041	$	4,694,240
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	500,506	$	512,165
Current portion of long-term debt		4,713		2,038
Accrued compensation and benefits		183,768		169,370
Accrued losses		35,290		22,016
Other accrued liabilities		277,914		197,647
Total current liabilities		1,002,191		903,236
Long-Term Liabilities
Long-term debt, less current maturities		1,646,332		1,654,037
Other long-term liabilities		702,979		752,821
Deferred income taxes		49,791		90,681
Total long-term liabilities		2,399,102		2,497,539
Commitments and contingencies (Note N)
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; authorized 50,000 shares; none issued
Common stock, par value $0.01; authorized 300,000 shares; issued 140,195 and outstanding 132,944 as of May 2016; issued 138,828 and outstanding 133,203 as of May 2015		1,329		1,332
Paid-in capital		921,956		872,127
Treasury stock, at cost		(196,274)		(124,928)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)		(502,047)		(394,135)
Retained earnings		1,147,371		936,996
Total RPM International Inc. stockholders’ equity		1,372,335		1,291,392
Noncontrolling Interest		2,413		2,073
Total equity		1,374,748		1,293,465
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	4,776,041	$	4,694,240

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)


Year Ended May 31,	2016			2015			2014
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income	$	357,458		$	228,328		$	305,984
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		66,732			62,188			58,543
Amortization		44,307			36,988			31,526
Reversal of contingent consideration obligations		(14,500	)		(29,665	)
Asset impairment charge		4,471			818
Other-than-temporary impairments on marketable securities		3,811			22			161
Deferred income taxes		9,399			97,502			6,572
Stock-based compensation expense		31,287			31,741			23,568
Other non-cash interest expense		9,750			5,624			653
Gain on remeasurement of joint venture ownership		(7,972	)
Realized (gains) on sales of marketable securities		(6,457	)		(8,692	)		(7,353)
Other		(15	)		(1,954	)		(1,833)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect from purchases and sales of businesses:
(Increase) in receivables		(24,582	)		(90,230	)		(79,080)
(Increase) in inventory		(17,733	)		(31,348	)		(59,001)
(Increase) in prepaid expenses and other current and long-term assets		(25,617	)		(4,590	)		(12,586)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable		(5,958	)		(16,249	)		42,216
Increase (decrease) in accrued compensation and benefits		17,681			(1,297	)		19,193
Increase (decrease) in accrued loss reserves		13,514			(7,218	)		(146)
Increase in other accrued liabilities		8,011			51,761			14,202
(Decrease) in contingent payment								(63,014)
Other		11,119			6,719			(1,456)
Cash Provided By Operating Activities		474,706			330,448			278,149
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures		(117,183)			(85,363	)		(93,792)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired		(51,992)			(467,573	)		(39,248)
Purchase of marketable securities		(32,280)			(61,511	)		(83,536)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		32,631			48,971			70,249
Proceeds from sales of assets and businesses		866			4,079			2,794
Other		2,092			1,944			(6,178)
Cash (Used For) Investing Activities		(165,866	)		(559,453	)		(149,711)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Additions to long-term and short-term debt		142,130			460,560			208,532
Reductions of long-term and short-term debt		(147,155)			(162,318	)		(215,011)
Cash dividends		(144,350)			(136,179	)		(125,743)
Shares of common stock repurchased and returned for taxes		(71,346)			(39,528	)		(12,906)
Payments of acquisition-related contingent consideration		(2,088)			(22,179	)		(5,000)
Exercise of stock options and awards, including tax benefit		18,540			8,560			11,934
Other		(1,836)			1,277			951
Cash (Used For) Provided By Financing Activities		(206,105)			110,193			(137,243)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		(12,294)			(39,345	)		(1,881)
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents		90,441			(158,157	)		(10,686)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		174,711			332,868			343,554
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	265,152		$	174,711		$	332,868
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flows Information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	73,087		$	79,371		$	81,505
Income taxes	$	63,208		$	27,486		$	103,338

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


Treasury Stock		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)		Retained Earnings		Total RPM International Inc. Equity		Non-Controlling Interests		Total Equity
$	(72,494)	$	(159,253)	$	667,774	$	1,200,858	$	154,075	$	1,354,933
	-		-		291,660		291,660		14,324		305,984
	-		2,371		-		2,371		5,475		7,846
	-		-		(125,743)		(125,743)		-		(125,743)
	-		-		-		(21,876)		21,876		-
	-		-		-		11,937		-		11,937
	(12,906)		-		-		10,659		-		10,659
	-		-		-		13,470		-		13,470
	-		-		-		(492)		-		(492)
	(85,400)		(156,882)		833,691		1,382,844		195,750		1,578,594
	-		-		239,484		239,484		(11,156)		228,328
	-		(227,653)		-		(227,653)		(4,586)		(232,239)
	-		-		(136,179)		(136,179)		-		(136,179)
	-		-		-		-		(668)		(668)
	-		(9,600)		-		32,124		(177,267)		(145,143)
	(27,588)		-		-		(27,588)		-		(27,588)
	-		-		-		8,561		-		8,561
	(11,940)		-		-		19,799		-		19,799
	(124,928)		(394,135)		936,996		1,291,392		2,073		1,293,465
	-		-		354,725		354,725		2,733		357,458
	-		(107,912)		-		(107,912)		(27)		(107,939)
	-		-		(144,350)		(144,350)		-		(144,350)
	-		-		-		-		(2,366)		(2,366)
	(35,098)		-		-		(35,098)		-		(35,098)
	-		-		-		18,540		-		18,540
	(36,248)		-		-		(4,962)		-		(4,962)
$	(196,274)	$	(502,047)	$	1,147,371	$	1,372,335	$	2,413	$	1,374,748

NOTE A — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

1) Consolidation, Noncontrolling Interests and Basis of Presentation

Our financial statements include all of our majority-owned subsidiaries, except for certain subsidiaries that were deconsolidated for the period from May 31, 2010 through December 31, 2014 (please refer to Note A[2]). We account for our investments in less-than-majority-owned joint ventures, for which we have the ability to exercise significant influence, under the equity method. Effects of transactions between related companies are eliminated in consolidation.

Noncontrolling interests are presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements as if parent company investors (controlling interests) and other minority investors (noncontrolling interests) in partially owned subsidiaries have similar economic interests in a single entity. As a result, investments in noncontrolling interests are reported as equity in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, our Consolidated Financial Statements include 100% of a controlled subsidiary’s earnings, rather than only our share. Transactions between the parent company and noncontrolling interests are reported in equity as transactions between stockholders, provided that these transactions do not create a change in control.

Our business is dependent on external weather factors. Historically, we have experienced strong sales and net income in our first, second and fourth fiscal quarters comprising the three-month periods ending August 31, November 30 and May 31, respectively, with weaker performance in our third fiscal quarter (December through February).

Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current-year presentation.

2) Specialty Products Holding Corp. (“SPHC”)

Prior to May 31, 2010, Bondex International, Inc. (“Bondex”) and its parent, SPHC, were defendants in various asbestos-related bodily injury lawsuits filed in various state courts. These cases generally sought unspecified damages for asbestos-related diseases based on alleged exposures to asbestos-containing products. On May 31, 2010, Bondex and SPHC, filed voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) to reorganize under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. SPHC and Bondex took this action in an effort to permanently and comprehensively resolve all pending and future asbestos-related liability claims associated with Bondex and SPHC.

Similarly, Republic Powdered Metals, Inc. (“Republic”) and NMBFiL, Inc. (“NMBFiL”), both of which are indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of RPM International Inc. (“RPM”), filed to reorganize under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in August 2014 to resolve all their pending and future asbestos-related liability claims. Both Republic and NMBFiL remained consolidated subsidiaries of RPM, considering the short-term nature of the bankruptcy and that RPM maintained control of them from a participating rights perspective.

On December 10, 2014 a plan of reorganization was confirmed (the “Bankruptcy Plan”), and, effective as of December 23, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), Bondex, SPHC, Republic and NMBFiL emerged from bankruptcy. In accordance with the Bankruptcy Plan, trusts were established under Section 524(g) of the United States Bankruptcy Code (together, the “Trust”) and funded with first installments. Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Plan, the Trust assumed all liability and responsibility for current and future

asbestos personal injury claims of Bondex, SPHC, Republic and NMBFiL, and such entities will have no further liability or responsibility for, and will (along with affiliates) be permanently protected from, such asbestos claims.

The Trust was funded with $450.0 million in cash and a promissory note, bearing no interest and maturing on or before the fourth anniversary of the Effective Date (the “Bankruptcy Note”). The net present value of the Bankruptcy Note, or $335.0 million, is classified as other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities for approximately $101.5 million and $233.5 million, respectively, in our Consolidated Financial Statements at May 31, 2016. Borrowings under our $800.0 million revolving credit facility were used to fund the initial payment of $450.0 million, which is classified as long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. A portion of the payments due under the Bankruptcy Note is secured by a right to the equity of SPHC, Republic and Bondex. The Bankruptcy Plan and Bankruptcy Note, provide for the following additional contributions to the Trust:

•

On or before the second anniversary of the Effective Date, an additional $102.5 million in cash, RPM stock or a combination thereof (at our discretion in this and all subsequent cases) will be deposited into the Trust;

•

On or before the third anniversary of the Effective Date, an additional $120.0 million in cash, RPM stock or a combination thereof will be deposited into the Trust; and

•

On or before the fourth anniversary of the Effective Date, a final payment of $125.0 million in cash, RPM stock or a combination thereof will be deposited into the Trust.

Total current and future contributions to the Trust are deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.

Effective with the filing of the Notice of Entry of Order confirming the Bankruptcy Plan, which required the funding of the Trust, we regained control of SPHC and its subsidiaries, and accordingly, we have accounted for the event as a business combination. The funding of the Trust represents the total consideration transferred in the transaction, or $772.6 million. The opening balance sheets are based upon closing balances as of December 31, 2014 and results of operations have been included in our Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on January 1, 2015 (the “Accounting Effective Date”) forward, as we concluded that the activity occurring between the date control was obtained (December 23, 2014) and the Accounting Effective Date was not significant.

The fair values of SPHC and its subsidiaries have been determined as of January 1, 2015. Additionally, the fair value of RPM Holdco, of which SPHC owns 21.39% of the outstanding common stock, has been determined in order to account for our increase in ownership of the noncontrolling interest as an equity transaction. The total consideration has been allocated on a relative fair value basis between the noncontrolling interest in RPM Holdco, or approximately $208.4 million, and the net assets of SPHC, or approximately $564.2 million. The difference between the fair value of the noncontrolling interest in RPM Holdco and the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest was recorded as an equity transaction. The portion of the transaction accounted for as a business combination resulted in goodwill of $118.7 million and intangible assets of $176.0 million. The acquired intangible assets totaling $176.0 million comprise the following $118.7 million of customer and distributor relationships, $2.0 million of definite-lived tradenames,

$52.7 million of indefinite-lived tradenames and $2.6 million of formulas. Income tax assets of $271.7 million were recorded in connection with the deductibility of current and future contributions to the Trust. Additionally, deferred tax liabilities of $72.3 million were recorded for the excess of the fair value book basis of certain assets over the corresponding tax basis. The fair values of net tangible assets, intangible assets and the noncontrolling interest were based upon valuations, which required our significant use of estimates and assumptions. The valuations of consideration transferred and total assets acquired and liabilities assumed are complete as of May 31, 2016.

3) Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

4) Acquisitions/Divestitures

We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the acquired entities are recorded at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date.

During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, we completed seven acquisitions. Two of the current-year acquisitions report through our consumer reportable segment, which included the following: the assets associated with nail enamel filling lines and related equipment, based in Newburgh, New York; and a manufacturer of concrete care coatings and sealants for the retail market based in Auburndale, Florida. There were also two product line acquisitions during the year that will report through our industrial reportable segment, which included the following: a manufacturer of construction adhesives, sealants and tapes based on Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and a manufacturer of extruded silicone sheets for the North American commercial construction and OEM markets based in Harbor Springs, Michigan. Lastly, there were three acquisitions of product lines during the year that report through our specialty reportable segment, which included the following: a distributor of a full line of fuel additives based in Battle Creek, Michigan; a plastic molding supplier and manufacturer of fans and radiators for the

auto aftermarket based in Fife, Washington; and a manufacturer of high-strength egg white products and specialized stabilizers for meringue toppings and desserts based in LaGrange, Illinois. During the current fiscal year, we also executed the divestiture of one small product line.

During fiscal 2016, we also acquired the remaining 51% of our Chinese joint venture, as further described in Note A(17) below.

As described in Note A(2) above, effective January 1, 2015, we regained control of SPHC and its subsidiaries, and accordingly, we have accounted for a portion of the transaction as a business combination, while the other portion of the transaction relating to our increase in ownership of RPM Holdco has been accounted for as an equity transaction. The fair values of SPHC and its subsidiaries that were determined as of January 1, 2015, are described in more complete detail in Note A(2).

In addition to the reconsolidation of SPHC, during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015, we completed six acquisitions. Three of the fiscal 2015 acquisitions report through our industrial reportable segment, which included the following: a waterproofing products manufacturer in Brazil; a manufacturer of powder construction products based in Phoenix, Arizona; and a manufacturer of firestopping products for the construction industry based in London, UK. Reporting through our specialty reportable segment is our acquisition of a manufacturer of high performance wood finishes based in Manchester, U.K. The other two acquisitions, which included a producer of specialty cleaners based in Cumming, Georgia and a producer of aerosol paints based in Johannesburg, South Africa, report through our consumer reportable segment.

The purchase price for each acquisition, excluding the reconsolidated SPHC entities, has been allocated to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition. While the valuations of consideration transferred and total assets acquired and liabilities assumed are substantially complete, measurement period adjustments may be recorded in the future as we finalize certain fair value estimates. The primary areas that remain preliminary relate to the fair values of deferred income taxes for acquisitions completed during fiscal 2016. Acquisitions are aggregated by year of purchase in the following table:


	Fiscal 2016 Acquisitions				Fiscal 2015 Acquisitions
(In thousands)	Weighted-Average Intangible Asset Amortization Life (In Years)		Total		Weighted-Average Intangible Asset Amortization Life (In Years)		Total
Current assets			$	20,094			$	27,533
Property, plant and equipment				4,771				11,506
Goodwill		N/A		29,762		N/A		27,833
Tradenames - indefinite lives		N/A		-		N/A		7,209
Other intangible assets		9		18,441		14		26,781
Other long-term assets				27				202
Total Assets Acquired			$	73,095			$	101,064
Liabilities assumed				(21,379)				(28,363)
Net Assets Acquired			$	51,716⁽¹⁾			$	72,701⁽²⁾

(1)	Figure includes cash acquired of $6.5 million.

(2)	Figure includes cash acquired of $2.8 million.

Our Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the results of operations of acquired businesses as of their respective dates of acquisition. Pro-forma results of operations for the years ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015 were not materially different from reported results and, consequently, are not presented.

5) Foreign Currency

The functional currency for each of our foreign subsidiaries is its principal operating currency. Accordingly, for the periods presented, assets and liabilities have been translated using exchange rates at year end, while income and expense for the periods have been translated using a weighted-average exchange rate.

The resulting translation adjustments have been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity, and will be included in net earnings only upon the sale or liquidation of the underlying foreign investment, neither of which is contemplated at this time. Transaction gains and losses increased during the last three fiscal years due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, resulting in net transactional foreign exchange losses for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 of approximately $24.4 million, $22.3 million and $17.7 million, respectively.

6) Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We do not believe we are exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value.

7) Property, Plant & Equipment


May 31,	2016		2015
(In thousands)
Land	$	60,223	$	58,555
Buildings and leasehold improvements		363,036		349,682
Machinery and equipment		921,571		850,067
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost		1,344,830		1,258,304
Less: allowance for depreciation and amortization		715,377		668,658
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	629,453	$	589,646

We review long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying values of these assets may not be recoverable. For assets that are to be held and used, an impairment charge is recognized when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with the asset or group of assets are less than their carrying value. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the asset down to its fair value, and a loss is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the fair value. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows, internal appraisals or external appraisals, as applicable. Assets to be disposed of are carried at the lower of their carrying value or estimated net realizable value.

Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the following ranges of useful lives:


Land improvements		3 to 40 years
Buildings and improvements		1 to 50 years
Machinery and equipment		1 to 32 years

Total depreciation expense for each fiscal period includes the charges to income that result from the amortization of assets recorded under capital leases.

8) Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recognized when realized or realizable, and when earned. In general, this is when title and risk of loss pass to the customer. Further, revenues are realizable when we have persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. We reduce our revenues for estimated customer returns and allowances, certain rebates, sales incentives, and promotions in the same period the related sales are recorded.

We also record revenues generated under long-term construction contracts, mainly in connection with the installation of specialized roofing and flooring systems, and related services. Certain long-term construction contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method, and therefore we record contract revenues and related costs as our contracts progress. This method recognizes the economic results of contract performance on a timelier basis than does the completed-contract method; however, application of this method requires reasonably dependable estimates of progress toward completion, as well as other dependable estimates. When reasonably dependable estimates cannot be made, or if other factors make estimates doubtful, the completed-contract method is applied. Under the completed-contract method, billings and costs are accumulated on the balance sheet as the contract progresses, but no revenue is recognized until the contract is complete or substantially complete.

9) Shipping Costs

Shipping costs paid to third-party shippers for transporting products to customers are included in SG&A expenses. For the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, shipping costs were $145.3 million, $142.9 million and $133.0 million, respectively.

10) Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

11) Inventories


May 31,	2016		2015
(In thousands)

Raw material and supplies	$	227,900	$	235,649

Finished goods		457,918		438,556
Total Inventory	$	685,818	$	674,205

12) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of ASC 350 and account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the entities acquired are recorded at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of net assets acquired, including the amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets.

We performed the required annual goodwill impairment assessments as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter at the reporting unit level. Our reporting units have been identified at the component level, which is the operating segment level or one level below. First, we assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The traditional two-step quantitative process is required only if we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. However, we have an unconditional option to bypass a qualitative assessment and proceed directly to performing the traditional two-step quantitative analysis. We applied both the qualitative and traditional two-step quantitative processes during our annual goodwill impairment assessment performed during the fourth quarters of fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014.

The traditional two-step quantitative goodwill impairment assessment involves estimating the fair value of a reporting unit and comparing it with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, additional steps are followed to determine and recognize, if appropriate, an impairment loss. Calculating the fair value of the reporting units requires our significant use of estimates and assumptions. We estimate the fair values of our reporting units by applying a combination of third-party market-value indicators, when observable market data is available, and discounted future cash flows to each of our reporting unit’s projected EBITDA. In applying this methodology, we rely on a number of factors, including actual and forecasted operating results and market data. As a result of the assessments performed for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, there were no impairments, including no reporting units that were at risk of failing step one of the traditional two-step quantitative analysis. However, within our consumer segment, the estimated fair value of our Kirker reporting unit with $143.3 million of goodwill, exceeded its carrying value by approximately 8%. The discounted cash flow

used in the goodwill impairment test for Kirker assumed discrete period revenue growth through fiscal 2020 that was reflective of market opportunities related to contracting with certain retailers to fill nail polish for their respective private label brands as well as the growing core liquid nail polish business in line with the expected liquid nail polish growth rates for the markets in which Kirker operates. In the terminal year we assumed a long-term earnings growth rate of 3.0% that we believe is appropriate given the current industry specific expectations. As of the valuation date, we utilized a weighted-average cost of capital of 8.0%, which we believe is appropriate as it reflects the relative risk, the time value of money, and is consistent with Kirker’s peer group.

Additionally, we test all indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually. We perform the required annual impairment assessments as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter. We may elect to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount before applying traditional quantitative tests. We applied both qualitative and quantitative processes during our annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment assessments performed during the fourth quarters of fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014.

The annual impairment assessment involves estimating the fair value of each indefinite-lived asset and comparing it with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, we record an impairment loss equal to the difference. Calculating the fair value of the indefinite-lived assets requires our significant use of estimates and assumptions. We estimate the fair values of our intangible assets by applying a relief-from-royalty calculation, which includes discounted future cash flows related to each of our intangible asset’s projected revenues. In applying this methodology, we rely on a number of factors, including actual and forecasted revenues and market data. As a result of the assessments performed for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, there were no impairments.

Should the future earnings and cash flows at our reporting units decline and/or discount rates increase, future impairment charges to goodwill and other intangible assets may be required.

13) Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in SG&A expenses. For the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, advertising costs were $49.7 million, $40.8 million and $49.6 million, respectively.

14) Research and Development

Research and development costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in SG&A expenses. The amounts charged to expense for the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $61.5 million, $56.7 million and $54.6 million, respectively.

15) Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation represents the cost related to stock-based awards granted to our employees and directors, which may include restricted stock and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”). We measure stock-based compensation cost at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the award. We recognize the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the related vesting period. Refer to Note H, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for further information.

16) Investment (Income), Net

Investment (income), net, consists of the following components:


Year Ended May 31,	2016		2015		2014
(In thousands)
Interest (income)	$	(5,975)	$	(8,304)	$	(6,327)
(Gain) on sale of marketable securities		(6,457)		(8,692)		(7,353)
Other-than-temporary impairment on securities		3,811		22		161
Dividend (income)		(1,744)		(1,603)		(2,196)
Investment (income), net	$	(10,365)	$	(18,577)	$	(15,715)

17) Other Expense (Income), Net

Other expense (income), net, consists of the following components:


Year Ended May 31,	2016		2015		2014
(In thousands)
Royalty expense (income), net	$	2,039	$	(1,843)	$	(1,195)
Loss on litigation settlement		9,300		-		-
(Gain) on remeasurement of joint venture ownership		(7,972)		-		-
(Income) loss related to unconsolidated equity affiliates		(2,080)		(2,023)		(2,888)
Other expense (income), net	$	1,287	$	(3,866)	$	(4,083)

Loss on Litigation Settlement

A consolidated class-action complaint is pending against Rust-Oleum Corporation (“Rust-Oleum”) seeking to have a class certified and alleging breach of warranty, breach of contract and other claims regarding certain deck coating products of Rust-Oleum. In May 2016, the parties executed a term sheet outlining the agreed-upon terms of settlement. Upon final court approval, Rust-Oleum would deposit $9.3 million into a settlement fund in satisfaction of the claims. The amount of the settlement is reflected in other expense (income), net, in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016.

Gain on Remeasurment of Joint Venture Ownership

In May 2016, we acquired the remaining 51% interest in our Chinese joint venture, Carboline Dalian Paint Production Co., Ltd (“Carboline Dalian”), which increased our ownership to 100%. We had acquired our initial 49% interest in the company during fiscal 2009. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we retained an independent, third party valuation firm to assist us in determining the fair value of Carboline Dalian. Under ASC 805, a step up to fair value is required when an equity interest changes from a non-controlling interest to a controlling interest. Based on the step up from our 49% to a 100% interest in Carboline Dalian, we recorded a remeasurement gain for approximately $8.0 million during fiscal 2016. The gain is reflected in other expense (income), net in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016.

18) Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is calculated using the liability method. Under the liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount of assets and liabilities and the amounts used for income tax purposes and for certain changes in valuation allowances. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce certain deferred tax assets when, in our estimation, it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.

19) Earnings Per Share of Common Stock

Earnings per share (EPS) is computed using the two-class method. The two-class method determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends and dividend equivalents and their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings. Our unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends are considered participating securities. Basic EPS of common stock is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS of common stock is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock, plus the effect of dilutive potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential shares of common stock include outstanding SARS, restricted stock awards and convertible notes. See Note J, “Earnings Per Share of Common Stock,” for additional information.

20) Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which establishes a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries in GAAP. Under the original issuance, the new standard would have applied to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. However, in August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which extends the standard effective date by one year and includes an option to apply the standard on the original effective date. We are currently reviewing the revised guidance and assessing the potential impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03 “Interest-Imputation of Interest,” which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements and specifies that debt issuance costs related to a note shall be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the face amount of the note. The guidance does not change the current requirements surrounding the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs, and the amortization of debt issuance costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. The guidance is effective for years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is allowed for all entities and the new guidance shall be applied to all prior periods retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations, although it will change the financial statement classification of the deferred debt cost. As of May 31, 2016, we had $3.0 million and $8.2 million of current and long-term net deferred debt costs, respectively. As of May 31, 2015, we had $3.0 million and $11.5 million of current and long-term net deferred debt costs, respectively. Current and long-term deferred debt costs are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and other long-term assets, respectively. Under the new guidance, the net deferred debt costs would offset the carrying amount of the respective debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, “Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments,” which simplifies the treatment of adjustments to provisional amounts recognized in the period for items in a business combination for which the accounting is incomplete at the end of the reporting period. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and for interim periods therein. We will apply the provisions of this ASU beginning on June 1, 2016. We anticipate that our adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which increases lease transparency and comparability among organizations. Under the new standard, lessees will be required to recognize all assets and liabilities arising from leases on the balance sheet, with the exception of leases with a term of 12 months or less, which permits a lessee to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and liabilities. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. The new standard requires the recognition and measurement of leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach, which includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which

makes a number of changes meant to simplify and improve accounting for share-based payments. The new guidance includes amendments to share based accounting for income taxes, the related classification in the statement of cash flows and share award forfeiture accounting. ASU 2016-09 is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. We will early adopt ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, and we do not anticipate our adoption to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” which requires entities to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. This guidance simplifies the current guidance, which requires entities to separately present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2015-17 may be either applied prospectively to all deferred tax assets and liabilities or retrospectively to all periods presented. We have elected to early adopt ASU 2015-17 prospectively in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. As a result, we have presented all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 31, 2016, but have not reclassified current deferred tax assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 31, 2015. There was no impact on our results of operations as a result of our adoption of ASU 2015-17.

NOTE B — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by reportable segment, for the years ended May 31, 2016 and 2015, are as follows:


(In thousands)	Industrial Segment			Specialty Segment		Consumer Segment		Total
Balance as of June 1, 2014	$	521,528		$	50,630	$	575,216	$	1,147,374
Acquisitions		8,504			8,539		10,790		27,833
SPHC reconsolidation		-			118,713		-		118,713
Translation adjustments		(62,083	)		(3,196)		(12,953)		(78,232)
Balance as of May 31, 2015		467,949			174,686		573,053		1,215,688
Acquisitions		18,834			7,168		3,760		29,762
Translation adjustments		(19,755	)		(1,759)		(4,306)		(25,820)
Balance as of May 31, 2016	$	467,028		$	180,095	$	572,507	$	1,219,630

Total accumulated impairment losses were $14.9 million at May 31, 2016 and 2015, which was recorded during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 by our industrial reportable segment.

The aggregate intangible asset amortization expense for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $40.5 million, $32.9 million and $28.2 million, respectively. For the next five fiscal years, we estimate annual intangible asset amortization expense related to our existing intangible assets to approximate the following: 2017 — $39.7 million, 2018 — $37.0 million, 2019 — $35.1 million, 2020 — $32.9 million and 2021 — $30.4 million.

The following tables summarize marketable securities held at May 31, 2016 and 2015 by asset type:



	Available-For-Sale Securities
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value (Net Carrying Amount)
May 31, 2015
Equity securities:
Stocks - foreign	$	3,722	$	339	$	(85)	$	3,976
Stocks - domestic		34,368		5,649		(559)		39,458
Mutual funds - foreign		32,657		2,114		(230)		34,541
Mutual funds - domestic		56,442		228		(2,779)		53,891
Total equity securities		127,189		8,330		(3,653)		131,866
Fixed maturity:
U.S. treasury and other government		21,340		171		(162)		21,349
Corporate bonds		1,218		171		-		1,389
Foreign bonds		36		2		-		38
Mortgage-backed securities		81		47		-		128
Total fixed maturity securities		22,675		391		(162)		22,904
Total	$	149,864	$	8,721	$	(3,815)	$	154,770

Marketable securities, included in other current and long-term assets totaling $74.2 million and $72.8 million at May 31, 2016, respectively, and included in other current and long-term assets totaling $69.3 million and $85.5 million at May 31, 2015, respectively, are composed of available-for-sale securities and are reported at fair value. We carry a portion of our marketable securities portfolio in long-term assets since they are generally held for the settlement of our general and product liability insurance claims processed through our wholly owned captive insurance subsidiaries.

Marketable securities are composed of available-for-sale securities and are reported at fair value. Realized gains and losses on sales of investments are recognized in net income on the specific identification basis. Changes in the fair values of securities that are considered temporary are recorded as unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity. Other-than-temporary declines in market value from original cost are reflected in operating income in the period in which the unrealized losses are deemed other than temporary. In order to determine whether other-than-

temporary declines in market value have occurred, the duration of the decline in value and our ability to hold the investment are considered in conjunction with an evaluation of the strength of the underlying collateral and the extent to which the investment’s amortized cost or cost, as appropriate, exceeds its related market value.

Gross gains realized on sales of investments were $6.9 million and $8.8 million for the years ended May 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During fiscal 2016 and 2015, we recognized gross realized losses on sales of investments of $0.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively. During fiscal 2016, we recognized losses of approximately $3.8 million for securities deemed to have other-than-temporary impairments. During fiscal 2015, such losses were insignificant. These amounts are included in investment (income), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Summarized below are the securities we held at May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015 that were in an unrealized loss position and that were included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), aggregated by the length of time the investments had been in that position:


	May 31, 2016				May 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Total investments with unrealized losses	$	89,360		$ (10,182)	$	58,978		$ (3,815)
Unrealized losses with a loss position for less than 12 months		41,762		(4,856)		32,693		(1,441)
Unrealized losses with a loss position for more than 12 months		47,598		(5,326)		26,285		(2,374)

We have reviewed all of the securities included in the table above and have concluded that we have the ability and intent to hold these investments until their cost can be recovered, based upon the severity and duration of the decline. Therefore, we did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairment losses on these investments. The unrealized losses generally relate to investments whose fair values at May 31, 2016 were less than 15% below their original cost. From time to time, we may experience significant volatility in general economic and market conditions. If we were to experience unrealized losses that were to continue for longer periods of time, or arise to more significant levels of unrealized losses within our portfolio of investments in marketable securities in the future, we may recognize additional other-than-temporary impairment losses. Such potential losses could have a material impact on our results of operations in any given reporting period. As such, we continue to closely evaluate the status of our investments and our ability and intent to hold these investments.

The net carrying values of debt securities at May 31, 2016, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.


(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due:
Less than one year		$ 5,155	$	5,160
One year through five years		13,040		13,079
Six years through ten years		3,224		3,293
After ten years		1,172		1,330
		$ 22,591	$	22,862

The following tables present our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.

but are not quoted market prices, and therefore, the forward currency forward contract is considered a Level 2 liability on the fair value hierarchy.

The contingent consideration represents the estimated fair value of the additional variable cash consideration payable in connection with recent acquisitions that is contingent upon the achievement of certain performance milestones. We estimated the fair value using expected future cash flows over the period in which the obligation is expected to be settled, and applied a discount rate that appropriately captures a market participant’s view of the risk associated with the obligation, which are considered to be Level 3 inputs. During fiscal 2016, we reversed approximately $14.5 million for contingent earnout targets that were not expected to be met. Additionally, during fiscal 2016 we paid approximately $2.1 million for settlements of contingent consideration obligations relating to certain performance milestones that were established in prior periods and achieved during the current period, and these amounts are reported in payments of acquisition-related contingent consideration in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Also during fiscal 2016, we accrued an additional $0.8 million for new acquisitions.

The carrying value of our current financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. At May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015,

the fair value of our long-term debt was estimated using active market quotes, based on our current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements, which are considered to be Level 2 inputs. Based on the analysis performed, the fair value and the carrying value of our financial instruments and long-term debt as of May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015 are as follows:


	At May 31, 2016
(In thousands)	Carrying Value		Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	265,152	$	265,152
Marketable equity securities		124,094		124,094
Marketable debt securities		22,862		22,862
Long-term debt, including current portion		1,651,045		1,927,922

	At May 31, 2015

(In thousands)	Carrying Value		Fair Value

Cash and cash equivalents	$	174,711	$	174,711

Marketable equity securities		131,866		131,866

Marketable debt securities		22,904		22,904
Long-term debt, including current portion		1,656,075		1,783,962

NOTE E — BORROWINGS

A description of long-term debt follows:


May 31,	2016		2015
(In thousands)
Revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks, through December 5, 2019⁽¹⁾	$	201,881	$	111,043
Accounts Receivable Securitization Program with two banks, through May 9, 2017		-		100,000
Unsecured 6.50% senior notes due February 14, 2018⁽²⁾		249,364		248,996
Unsecured 6.125% senior notes due October 15, 2019⁽³⁾		455,372		456,802
Unsecured $205,000 face value at maturity 2.25% senior convertible notes due December 15, 2020		190,949		188,158
Unsecured 3.45% senior notes due November 15, 2022		300,000		300,000
Unsecured 5.25% notes due June 1, 2045⁽⁴⁾		248,525		248,504
Other obligations, including capital leases and unsecured notes payable at various rates of interest due in installments through 2018		4,954		2,572
		1,651,045		1,656,075
Less: current portion		4,713		2,038
Total Long-Term Debt, Less Current Maturities	$	1,646,332	$	1,654,037

(1)

Interest was tied to AUD LIBOR at May 31, 2016, and averaged 2.92% for AUD denominated debt ($13,050), 1.075% on EUR denominated debt ($131,692) and 1.544% on our swing-line ($57,139). Interest was tied to AUD LIBOR at May 31, 2015, and averaged 3.095% for AUD denominated debt ($10,316), 1.075% on EUR denominated debt ($16,490), 1.265% on Euro LIBOR denominated debt ($70,000) and 1.259% on our swing-line ($14,237).

(2)

The $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of the notes due 2018 is adjusted for the amortization of the original issue discount, which approximated $0.6 million and $1.0 million at May 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The original issue discount effectively reduced the ultimate proceeds from the financing. The effective interest rate on the notes, including the amortization of the discount, is 6.704% for both years presented.

(3)

Includes the combination of the October 2009 initial issuance of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount and the May 2011 issuance of an additional $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of these notes. The $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of the notes due 2019 from the initial issuance is adjusted for the amortization of the original issue discount, which approximated $0.1 million and $ 0.1 million at May 31, 2016 and 2015. The original issue discount effectively reduced the ultimate proceeds from the October 2009 financing. The effective interest rate on the notes issued in October 2009, including the amortization of the discount, is 6.139%. The additional $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of the notes due 2019 issued in May 2011 is adjusted for the unamortized premium received at issuance, which approximated $5.5 million and $6.9 million at May 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The premium effectively increased the proceeds from the financing. The effective interest rate on the $150.0 million notes issued in May 2011 is 4.934%.

(4)

The $250.0 million face amount of the notes due 2045 is adjusted for the amortization of the original issue discount, which approximated $1.5 million at May 31, 2016 and 2015. The original issue discount effectively reduced the ultimate proceeds from the financing. The effective interest rate on the notes, including the amortization of the discount, is 5.29%.

The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to May 31, 2016 are as follows: 2017 — $4.7 million; 2018 — $249.6 million; 2019 — none; 2020 — $657.3 million; 2021 — $190.9 million and thereafter $548.5 million. Additionally, at May 31, 2016, we had unused lines of credit totaling $797.7 million.

Revolving Credit Agreement

During fiscal 2015, we entered into an $800.0 million unsecured syndicated revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), which expires on December 5, 2019. The Revolving Credit Facility replaced our prior $600.0 million revolving credit facility that was set to expire on June 29, 2017.

The Revolving Credit Facility includes sublimits for the issuance of swingline loans, which are comparatively short-term loans used for working capital purposes and letters of credit. The aggregate maximum principal amount of the commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility may be expanded upon our request, subject to certain conditions, up to $1.0 billion. The Revolving Credit Facility is available to refinance existing indebtedness, to finance working capital and capital expenditures, to satisfy all or a portion of our obligations relating to the plan of reorganization for our SPHC subsidiary, and for general corporate purposes.

The Revolving Credit Facility requires us to comply with various customary affirmative and negative covenants, including a leverage covenant and interest coverage ratio. Under the terms of the leverage covenant, we may not permit our consolidated indebtedness as of any fiscal quarter end to exceed 65% of the sum of such indebtedness and our consolidated shareholders’ equity on such date. The minimum required consolidated interest coverage ratio for facility calculated EBITDA, as defined in the facility, to interest expense is 3.50 to 1. The interest coverage ratio is calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter for the four fiscal quarters then ended.

As of May 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all financial covenants contained in our Revolving Credit Facility, including the leverage and interest coverage ratio covenants. At that date, our leverage ratio was 53.4%, while our interest coverage ratio was 9.5 to 1. Our available liquidity under our Revolving Credit Facility stood at $597.7 million at May 31, 2016.

Our access to funds under our Revolving Credit Facility is dependent on the ability of the financial institutions that are parties to the Revolving Credit Facility to meet their funding commitments. Those financial institutions may not be able to meet their funding commitments if they experience shortages of capital and liquidity or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests within a short period of time. Moreover, the obligations of the financial institutions under our Revolving Credit Facility are several and not joint and, as a result, a funding default by one or more institutions does not need to be made up by the others.

Accounts Receivable Securitization Program

transferred and therefore at certain times we may not be able to fully access the $200.0 million of funding available under the AR Program.

2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020

We account for the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes separately, and in a manner that will reflect our nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. The effective interest rate on the liability component is 3.92%. Contractual interest was $4.6 million for both fiscal 2016 and 2015, and amortization of the debt discount was $2.8 million and $2.7 million for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. At May 31, 2016, the remaining period over which the debt discount will be amortized was 4.5 years, the unamortized debt discount was $14.1 million, and the carrying amount of the equity component was $20.7 million.

3.45% Notes due 2022

5.25% Notes due 2045

On May 26, 2015, we issued $250 million of 5.25% notes due 2045 (the “New Notes”). The New Notes were priced at 99.401% of the $250 million principal, and at that price, the New Notes have a yield to maturity of 5.29%. We will pay interest on the New Notes semi-annually on June 1st and December 1st of each year, and will begin doing so on December 1, 2015. Net proceeds of approximately $245.7 million from the offering of the New Notes were used to repay a portion of short-term borrowings outstanding under our New Revolving Credit Facility.

NOTE F — INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes is calculated in accordance with ASC 740, which requires the recognition of deferred income taxes using the liability method.

Income (loss) before income taxes as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Income is summarized below for the periods indicated. Certain foreign operations are branches of RPM International Inc.’s subsidiaries and are therefore subject to income taxes in both the United States and the respective

foreign jurisdictions. Accordingly, the provision (benefit) for income taxes by jurisdiction and the income (loss) before income taxes by jurisdiction may not be directly related.


Year Ended May 31,	2016			2015			2014
(In thousands)
United States	$	310,695		$	273,278		$	209,626
Foreign		172,771			179,975			214,861
Income Before Income Taxes	$	483,466		$	453,253		$	424,487
Provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following for the periods indicated:
Year Ended May 31,	2016			2015			2014
(In thousands)
Current:
U.S. Federal	$	75,200		$	77,374		$	46,846
State and local		6,230			4,876			5,660
Foreign		35,179			45,173			59,425
Total Current		116,609			127,423			111,931
Deferred:
U.S. Federal		17,625			97,112			16,747
State and local		1,907			1,494			1,292
Foreign		(10,133	)		(1,104	)		(11,467)
Total Deferred		9,399			97,502			6,572
Provision for Income Taxes	$	126,008		$	224,925		$	118,503

The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:


(In thousands)	2016		2015
Deferred income tax assets related to:
Inventories	$	12,894	$	8,530
Allowance for losses		11,014		8,575
Bankruptcy note liability		118,551		117,263
Accrued compensation and benefits		132,707		111,843
Accrued other expenses		20,310		15,932
Other long-term liabilities		20,570		21,911
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards		66,438		87,595
Net unrealized loss on securities		27,540		21,562
Total Deferred Income Tax Assets		410,024		393,211
Less: valuation allowances		(60,103)		(68,043)
Net Deferred Income Tax Assets		349,921		325,168
Deferred income tax (liabilities) related to:
Depreciation		(64,506)		(56,636)
Pension and other postretirement benefits		(17,975)		(16,256)
Amortization of intangibles		(198,940)		(198,872)
Unremitted foreign earnings		(98,520)		(108,508)
Total Deferred Income Tax (Liabilities)		(379,941)		(380,272)
Deferred Income Tax Assets (Liabilities), Net	$	(30,020)	$	(55,104)

At May 31, 2016, we had U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $16.2 million, which expire in various years ending in 2026. Additionally, at May 31, 2016, we had approximately $61.6 million of state net operating loss carryforwards that expire at various dates beginning in 2017 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $158.6 million, of which approximately $24.2 million will expire at various dates beginning in 2017 and approximately $134.4 million that have an indefinite carryforward period. Also, as of May 31, 2016, we had foreign capital loss carryforwards of approximately $14.7 million that can be carried forward indefinitely. These net operating loss, capital loss and foreign

tax credit carryforwards may be used to offset a portion of future taxable income and, thereby, reduce or eliminate our U.S. federal, state or foreign income taxes otherwise payable.

When evaluating the realizability of deferred income tax assets, we consider, among other items, whether a jurisdiction has experienced cumulative pretax losses and whether a jurisdiction will generate the appropriate character of income to recognize a deferred income tax asset. More specifically, if a jurisdiction experiences cumulative pretax losses for a period of three years, including the current fiscal year, or if a jurisdiction does not have sufficient income of the appropriate character in the relevant

At May 31, 2015, we determined that it was possible that we could repatriate approximately $419.1 million of unremitted foreign earnings in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, as of May 31, 2015, we recorded a deferred income tax liability of $108.5 million, which represented our estimate of the U.S. income and foreign withholding tax associated with the $419.1 million of undistributed foreign earnings not considered permanently reinvested. As of May 31, 2016, the amount of undistributed earnings that may be repatriated is $377.3 million and the corresponding deferred tax liability has been reduced to $98.5 million. This reduction in the amount of unremitted foreign earnings that are not considered permanently reinvested is primarily due to foreign currency revaluations and actual distributions of foreign earnings during the year. The reduction to the deferred tax liability related to foreign currency revaluation was approximately $6.0 million, which was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

We have not provided for U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on the remaining $1.1 billion of foreign undistributed earnings because such earnings have been retained and reinvested by the foreign subsidiaries as of May 31, 2016. Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes, which may become payable if the remaining undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were distributed to the U.S. Due to the uncertainties and complexities involved in the various options for repatriation of foreign earnings, it is not practical to calculate the deferred taxes associated with the remaining foreign earnings.

NOTE G — COMMON STOCK

On January 8, 2008, we announced our authorization of a stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase shares of RPM International Inc. common stock at management’s discretion for general corporate purposes. Our current intent is to limit our repurchases to approximately one to two million shares per year, which would include amounts required to offset dilution created by stock issued in connection with our equity-based compensation plans and other repurchases. As a result of this authorization, we may repurchase shares from time to time in the open market or in private transactions at various times and in amounts and for prices that our management deems appropriate, subject to insider trading rules and other securities law restrictions. The timing of our purchases will depend upon prevailing market conditions, alternative uses of capital and other factors. We may limit or terminate the repurchase program at any time. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, we repurchased 800,000 shares of our common stock at a cost of approximately $35.1 million, or an average cost of $43.88 per share, under this program. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015, we repurchased 595,106 shares of our common stock at a cost of approximately $27.6 million, or an average cost of $46.36 per share, under this program. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under this program.

NOTE H — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation represents the cost related to stock-based awards granted to our employees and directors; these awards include restricted stock, restricted stock units and SARs. We grant stock-based incentive awards to our employees and/or our directors under various share-based compensation plans. Plans that are active or provide for stock option grants or share-based payment awards include the Amended and Restated 2004 Omnibus Equity and Incentive Plan (the “2004 Omnibus Plan”) and the 2014 Omnibus Equity and Incentive Plan (the “2014 Omnibus Plan”), which includes provisions for grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance stock units and SARs. Other plans, which provide

for restricted stock grants only, include the 2003 Restricted Stock Plan for Directors (the “2003 Plan”) and the 2007 Restricted Stock Plan (the “2007 Plan”).

We measure stock-based compensation cost at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the award. We recognize the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the related vesting period.

The following table represents total stock-based compensation expense included in our Consolidated Statements of Income:


Year Ended May 31,	2016		2015		2014
(In thousands)
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	31,287	$	31,741	$	23,568
Income tax (benefit)		(9,184)		(10,027)		(7,776)
Total stock-based compensation cost	$	22,103	$	21,714	$	15,792

SARs

SARs are awards that allow our employees to receive shares of our common stock at a fixed price. We grant SARs at an exercise price equal to the stock price on the date of the grant. The fair value of SARs granted is estimated as of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected life of options granted is derived from the input of the option-pricing model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. Expected volatility rates are based on historical volatility of shares of our common stock.

The following is a summary of our weighted-average assumptions related to SARs grants made during the last three fiscal years:


Year Ended May 31,	2016		2015		2014
Risk-free interest rate		2.2%		2.3%		2.2%
Expected life of option		7.0 yrs		7.5 yrs		7.5 yrs
Expected dividend yield		2.2%		2.2%		2.7%
Expected volatility rate		25.6%		25.7%		26.1%

The 2014 Omnibus Plan was approved by our stockholders on October 9, 2014. The 2014 Omnibus Plan provides us with the flexibility to grant a wide variety of stock and stock-based awards, as well as dollar-denominated performance-based awards, and is intended to be the primary stock-based award program for covered employees. This plan replaces the 2004 Omnibus Plan, which expired under its own terms on October 7, 2014. A wide variety of stock and stock-based awards, as well as dollar-denominated performance-based awards, may be granted under these plans. SARs are issued at fair value at the date of grant, have up to ten-year terms and have graded-vesting terms over four years. Compensation cost for these awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related vesting period. Currently all SARs outstanding are to be settled with stock. As of May 31, 2016, there were 3,212,500 SARs outstanding.

The following table summarizes option and share-based payment activity (including SARs) under these plans during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016:

At May 31, 2016, the aggregate intrinsic value and weighted-average remaining contractual life of options outstanding was $58.8 million and 6.4 years respectively, while the aggregate intrinsic value and weighted-average remaining contractual life of options exercisable was $47.5 million and 5.1 years, respectively.

At May 31, 2016, the total unamortized stock-based compensation expense related to SARs that were previously granted was $9.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over 3.25 years. We anticipate that approximately 1.3 million shares at a weighted-average exercise price of $41.98 and a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 8.2 years will ultimately vest under these plans.

Restricted Stock Plans

We also grant stock-based awards, which may be made in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock and performance stock units. These awards are granted to eligible employees or directors, and entitle the holder to shares of our common stock as the award vests. The fair value of the awards is determined and fixed based on the stock price at the date of grant. A description of our restricted stock plans follows.

Under the Omnibus Plan, a total of 12,000,000 shares of our common stock may be subject to awards. Of the 12,000,000 shares of common stock issuable under the Omnibus Plan, up to 6,000,000 shares may be subject to “full-value” awards such as restricted stock, restricted stock unit, performance stock and performance stock unit awards.

Under the 2014 Omnibus Plan, a total of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock may be subject to awards. Of those issuable shares, up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock may be subject to “full-value” awards similar to those issued under the Omnibus Plan.

The following table summarizes the share-based performance- earned restricted stock (“PERS”) activity during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016:


	Weighted-Average Grant-Date
(Shares in thousands)	Fair Value			2016
Balance at June 1		$	35.40		1,441
Shares granted			45.79		476
Shares forfeited			38.75		(21)
Shares vested			26.99		(489)

Balance at May 31		$	41.78		1,407

The weighted-average grant-date fair value was $45.79, $44.28 and $35.11 for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The restricted stock cliff vest after three years. Nonvested restricted shares of common stock under the Omnibus Plan are eligible for dividend payments. At May 31, 2016, unamortized deferred compensation expense of $24.5 million remained and is being amortized over the applicable vesting period for each participant.

On October 7, 2010, our Compensation Committee approved contingent awards of PCRS, (the “2011 PCRS”), for certain executives. During October 2010, 680,000 shares were granted at a weighted-average grant-date price of $20.73. Additional grants were made in July 2011, June 2012 and July 2012, totaling 115,000 shares, 10,000 shares and 50,000 shares, respectively, and were granted at a weighted-average grant-date price of $22.16, $25.76 and $25.87, respectively. The awards are contingent upon the level of attainment of performance goals for the three-year and five-year periods from June 1, 2010 ending May 31, 2013, and from June 1, 2010 ending May 31, 2015, respectively. During fiscal 2016, there were 751,450 shares of stock that vested in relation to these awards. Compensation cost for these awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related performance period, with consideration given to the probability of attaining the performance goals.

On July 31, 2015, our Compensation Committee approved contingent awards of PCRS, (the “2015 PCRS”), for certain executives. During July 2015, 329,000 shares were granted at a weighted-average grant-date price of $46.87. The awards are contingent upon the level of attainment of performance goals for the three-year performance period from June 1, 2015 ending May 31, 2018. Vesting of 67% of the 2015 PCRS relates to an increase in EBIT for the period, and vesting of the remaining 33% relates to an increase in EBIT margin for the period. Compensation cost for these awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related performance period, with consideration given to the probability of attaining the performance goals. As of May 31, 2016, there were 324,000 2015 PCRS shares outstanding and $7.8 million unamortized stock-based compensation expense assuming attaining 75% of the goal.

The 2003 Plan was approved on October 10, 2003 by our stockholders, and was established primarily for the purpose of recruiting and retaining directors, and to align the interests of directors with the interests of our stockholders. Only directors who are not our employees are eligible to participate. Under the 2003 Plan, up to 500,000 shares of our common stock may be awarded, with awards cliff vesting over a three-year period. The following table summarizes the share-based activity under the 2003 Plan during fiscal 2016:


(Shares in thousands)	Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value		2016
Balance at June 1	$	35.57		92
Shares granted to Directors		43.71		31
Shares vested		28.50		(37)
Balance at May 31	$	41.51		86

The weighted-average grant-date fair value was $43.71, $43.89 and $36.63 for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Unamortized deferred compensation expense relating to restricted stock grants for directors of $1.8 million at May 31, 2016, is being amortized over the applicable remaining vesting period for each director. Nonvested restricted shares of common stock under the 2003 Plan are eligible for dividend payments. As of May 31, 2016, there were 101,550 shares available for future grant.

Under the 2007 Plan, up to 1,000,000 shares may be awarded to certain employees, generally subject to forfeiture. The shares vest upon the latter of attainment of age 55 and the fifth anniversary of the May 31st immediately preceding the date of the grant. In addition, we also grant restricted stock units to certain employees under this plan. The following table sets forth awards and restricted stock units issued under the 1997 Plan and the 2007 Plan for the year ended May 31, 2016:


(Shares in thousands)	Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value		2016
Balance at June 1	$	21.04		859
Shares granted		46.63		64
Shares exercised		17.53		(120)
Balance at May 31	$	23.53		803

The weighted-average grant-date fair value was $46.63, $44.60 and $33.80 for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of May 31, 2016, 45,480 shares were available for future issuance under the 2007 Plan. At May 31, 2016, unamortized stock-based compensation expense of $5.1 million and $0.7 million relating to the 2007 Plan and the Restricted Stock Units, respectively, are being amortized over the applicable vesting period associated with each participant.

The following table summarizes the activity for all nonvested restricted shares during the year ended May 31, 2016:


(Shares in thousands)	Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value		Number of Shares
Balance at June 1	$	28.75		2,994
Granted		46.17		900
Vested		22.75		(1,502)
Forfeited		31.76		(51)
Balance at May 31	$	39.10		2,341

The remaining weighted-average contractual term of nonvested restricted shares at May 31, 2016 is the same as the period over which the remaining cost of the awards will be recognized, which is approximately 3.5 years. The fair value of the nonvested restricted share awards have been calculated using the market value of the shares on the date of issuance. For the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the weighted-average grant-date fair value for restricted share grants was $46.17, $44.29 and $35.02, respectively. The total fair value of shares that vested during the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $34.2 million, $14.7 million and $12.8 million, respectively. We anticipate that approximately 2.2 million shares at a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $39.10 and a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 3.5 years will ultimately vest, based upon the unique terms and participants of each plan. Approximately 172,855 shares of restricted stock were vested at May 31, 2015, with 263,857 restricted shares vested as of May 31, 2016. The total intrinsic value of restricted shares converted during the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $32.3 million, $13.9 million and $10.4 million, respectively.

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to all nonvested awards of restricted shares of common stock was $39.9 million as of May 31, 2016. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.5 years. We did not receive any cash from employees as a result of employee vesting and release of restricted shares for the year ended May 31, 2016.

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the following components:

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

NOTE K — LEASES

We lease certain property, plant and equipment under long-term operating lease agreements, some of which provide for increased rental payments based upon increases in the cost-of-living index. The following table illustrates our future minimum lease commitments under all non-cancelable lease agreements, for each of the next five years and in the aggregate, as of May 31, 2016:


May 31,
(In thousands)
2017	$	50,828
2018		39,191
2019		26,204
2020		17,240
2021		14,359
Thereafter		51,783
Total Minimum Lease Commitments	$	199,605

Total rental expense for all operating leases amounted to $57.5 million, $53.8 million and $50.9 million for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

NOTE L — PENSION PLANS

We sponsor several pension plans for our employees, including our principal plan (the “Retirement Plan”), which is a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all domestic non-union employees. Pension benefits are provided for certain domestic union employees through separate plans. Employees of our foreign subsidiaries receive pension coverage, to the extent deemed appropriate, through plans that are governed by local statutory requirements.

The Retirement Plan provides benefits that are based upon years of service and average compensation with accrued benefits vesting after five years. Benefits for union employees are generally based upon years of service, or a combination of years of service and average compensation. Our pension funding policy is to contribute an amount on an annual basis that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes, using a different actuarial cost method and different assumptions from those

used for financial reporting. For the fiscal year ending May 31, 2017, we expect to contribute approximately $54.1 million to the retirement plans in the U.S. and approximately $6.0 million to our foreign plans.

Historically, we estimated the service and interest cost components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost by applying a single weighted-average discount rate, derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we elected to change our approach in estimating service and interest cost by applying the split discount rate approach. Under the split discount rate approach, we estimate service and interest cost by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. We made this change in order to more precisely measure our service and interest costs, and the split discount rate approach achieves this by improving the correlation between projected benefit cash flows and the corresponding spot yield curve rates. This change will not affect the measurement of our total benefit obligation at our annual measurement date, as the change in service and interest cost is completely offset by deferred actuarial (gains)/ losses that will arise at the next annual measurement date. As this change is treated as a change in estimate, the impact was reflected in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 and prospectively, and historical measurements of service and interest cost were not affected.

This change in estimate reduced our fiscal 2016 annual net periodic benefit expense by approximately $5.4 million for our U.S. Plans and by approximately $1.0 million for our non-U.S. plans versus the amounts that would have been recorded had we not elected to change our approach. Accordingly, for fiscal 2016, total service cost and interest cost for all plans was $36.9 million and $23.1 million, respectively, a reduction of $0.8 million and $5.6 million, respectively, as a result of implementing the new approach. This resulted in an increase in income from continuing operations and net income for fiscal 2016 of approximately $6.4 million and $4.7 million, respectively, and an increase in basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.04 and $0.03, respectively, versus what would have been recorded had we not elected to change our approach.

Net periodic pension cost consisted of the following for the year ended May 31:


	U.S. Plans							Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2016			2015		2014		2016			2015		2014
Service cost	$	32,808		$	30,359	$	27,056	$	4,061		$	4,611	$	4,375
Interest cost		17,995			20,119		18,039		5,070			7,184		7,382
Expected return on plan assets		(25,749	)		(24,308)		(20,761)		(7,571	)		(8,611)		(8,411)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost		234			294		334		(2	)		39		19
Net actuarial losses recognized		16,759			13,890		13,222		1,739			2,004		2,448
Curtailment/settlement (gains) losses		87							57					44
Net Pension Cost	$	42,134		$	40,354	$	37,890	$	3,354		$	5,227	$	5,857

The changes in benefit obligations and plan assets, as well as the funded status of our pension plans at May 31, 2016 and 2015, were as follows:

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended May 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

The following table summarizes the relationship between our plans’ benefit obligations and assets:


	U.S. Plans
			2016				2015
(In thousands)		Benefit Obligation		Plan Assets		Benefit Obligation		Plan Assets
Plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets		$	589,046	$	314,216	$	536,365	$	326,323
Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets			483,944		314,216		440,206		326,323
Plans with assets in excess of projected benefit obligations			-		-		1,100		1,104
Plans with assets in excess of accumulated benefit obligations			-		-		1,100		1,104
	Non-U.S. Plans
			2016				2015
(In thousands)		Benefit Obligation		Plan Assets		Benefit Obligation		Plan Assets
Plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets		$	141,627	$	119,730	$	141,149	$	124,920
Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets			46,464		31,868		47,242		33,083
Plans with assets in excess of projected benefit obligations			45,437		49,734		50,237		51,517
Plans with assets in excess of accumulated benefit obligations			128,930		137,596		132,756		143,354

The following table presents the pretax net actuarial loss and prior service (costs) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) not affecting retained earnings:


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2016			2015			2016			2015
Net actuarial loss	$	(271,456	)	$	(212,828)		$	(43,272	)	$	(39,307)
Prior service (costs)		(469	)		(703	)		9			(357)
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income not affecting retained earnings	$	(271,925	)	$	(213,531	)	$	(43,263	)	$	(39,664)
The following table includes the changes recognized in other comprehensive income:
	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2016			2015			2016			2015
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
Prior service cost	$	-		$	-		$	(349	)	$	-
Net loss (gain) arising during the year		75,474			41,398			7,731			(5,518)
Effect of exchange rates on amounts included in AOCI								(1,953	)		(5,771)
Amounts recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost:
Amortization or curtailment recognition of prior service (cost)		(234	)		(294	)		(7	)		(39)
Amortization or settlement recognition of net (loss)		(16,846	)		(13,890	)		(1,823	)		(2,004)
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)	$	58,394		$	27,214		$	3,599		$	(13,332)

The following table presents the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of May 31, 2016 that have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost, but will be recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income during the fiscal year ending May 31, 2017:


(In thousands)	U.S. Plans			Non-U.S. Plans
Net actuarial loss	$	(20,804	)		$ (2,292)
Prior service (cost) credit	$	(217	)		$ 2

In measuring the projected benefit obligation and net periodic pension cost for our plans, we utilize actuarial valuations. These valuations include specific information pertaining to individual plan participants, such as salary, age and years of service, along with certain assumptions. The most significant assumptions applied include discount rates, expected return on plan assets and rate of compensation increases. We evaluate these assumptions, at a minimum, on an annual basis, and make required changes, as applicable. In developing our expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, we consider

the current and expected target asset allocations of the pension portfolio, as well as historical returns and future expectations for returns on various categories of plan assets. Expected return on assets is determined by using the weighted-average return on asset classes based on expected return for the target asset allocations of the principal asset categories held by each plan. In determining expected return, we consider both historical performance and an estimate of future long-term rates of return. Actual experience is used to develop the assumption for compensation increases.

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine our year-end benefit obligations and net periodic pension cost under the plans:

The following tables illustrate the weighted-average actual and target allocation of plan assets:

The following tables present our pension plan assets as categorized using the fair value hierarchy at May 31, 2016 and 2015:



	U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Fair Value at May 31, 2015
U.S. Treasury and other government		$	-		$	9,245		$	-		$	9,245
State and municipal bonds						461						461
Foreign bonds						2,608						2,608
Mortgage-backed securities						11,536						11,536
Corporate bonds						17,894						17,894
Stocks - large cap			36,554									36,554
Stocks - mid cap			14,575									14,575
Stocks - small cap			20,175									20,175
Stocks - international			3,756									3,756
Mutual funds - equity						148,207						148,207
Mutual funds - fixed						54,112						54,112
Cash and cash equivalents			8,019									8,019
Limited partnerships									285			285
Total		$	83,079		$	244,063		$	285		$	327,427

	Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Fair Value at May 31, 2015
Pooled equities		$	-		$	74,159		$	-		$	74,159
Pooled fixed income						68,773						68,773
Foreign bonds						195						195
Insurance contracts									31,384			31,384
Mutual funds						1,502						1,502
Cash and cash equivalents			424									424
Total		$	424		$	144,629		$	31,384		$	176,437

The following table includes the activity that occurred during the years ended May 31, 2016 and 2015 for our Level 3 assets:


		Actual Return on Plan Assets For:
(In thousands)	Balance at Beginning of Period	Assets Still Held at Reporting Date		Assets Sold During Year		Purchases, Sales and Settlements, net ⁽¹⁾			Balance at End of Period
Year ended May 31, 2016	$ 31,669		191		9		(1,196	)		$	30,673
Year ended May 31, 2015	29,568		7,659		888		(6,446	)			31,669

(1)	Includes the impact of exchange rate changes during the year.

The primary objective for the investments of the Retirement Plan is to provide for long-term growth of capital without undue exposure to risk. This objective is accomplished by utilizing a strategy of equities, fixed income securities and cash equivalents in a mix that is conducive to participation in a rising market, while allowing for adequate protection in a falling market. Our Investment Committee oversees the investment allocation process, which includes the selection and evaluation of investment managers, the determination of investment objectives and risk guidelines, and the monitoring of actual investment performance. In order to manage investment risk properly, Plan policy prohibits short selling, securities lending, financial futures, options and other specialized investments except for certain alternative investments specifically approved by the Investment Committee. The Investment Committee reviews, on a quarterly basis, reports of actual Plan investment performance provided by independent third parties, in addition to its review of the Plan investment policy on an annual basis. The investment objectives are similar for our plans outside of the U.S., subject to local regulations. In general, investments for all plans are managed by private investment managers, reporting to our Investment Committee on a regular basis.

The goals of the investment strategy for pension assets include: The total return of the funds shall, over an extended period of time, surpass an index composed of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (equity), the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index (fixed income), and 30-day Treasury Bills (cash), weighted appropriately to match the asset allocation of the plans. The equity portion of the funds shall surpass the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index over a full market cycle, while the fixed income portion shall surpass Barclays Aggregate Bond Index over a full market cycle. The purpose of the core fixed income fund is to increase return in the form of cash flow, provide a hedge against inflation and to reduce the volatility of the fund overall. Therefore, the primary objective of the core fixed income portion is to match the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index. The purpose of including opportunistic fixed income assets such as, but not limited to, global and high yield securities in the portfolio is to enhance the overall risk-return characteristics of the Fund.

In determining the postretirement benefit amounts outlined above, measurement dates as of May 31 for each period were applied.

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended May 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

The following table presents the pretax net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service credits recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) not affecting retained earnings:


	U.S. Plans				Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2016		2015		2016			2015
Net actuarial gain (loss)	$	94	$	124	$	(5,986	)	$	(5,968	)
Prior service credits		1,341		1,587
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income not affecting retained earnings	$	1,435	$	1,711	$	(5,986	)	$	(5,968	)

The following table includes the changes recognized in other comprehensive income:
	U.S. Plans				Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2016		2015		2016			2015
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
Prior service cost	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-
Net loss (gain) arising during the year		29		820		536			(1,751	)
Effect of exchange rates on amounts included in AOCI						(290	)		(1,026	)
Amounts recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost:
Amortization or curtailment recognition of prior service credit (cost)		247		247
Amortization or settlement recognition of net gain (loss)		-		136		(229	)		(391	)
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)	$	276	$	1,203	$	17		$	(3,168	)

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine our year-end benefit obligations and net periodic postretirement benefit costs under the plans:
	U.S. Plans				Non-U.S. Plans
Year-End Benefit Obligations	2016		2015		2016			2015
Discount rate		3.76%		3.95%		3.92%			4.00%
Current healthcare cost trend rate		10.37%		11.34%		5.98%			6.06%
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate		4.36%		4.50%		4.20%			4.20%
Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate will be realized		2037		2029		2030			2030


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
Net Periodic Postretirement Cost	2016		2015		2014		2016		2015		2014
Discount rate		3.95%		4.00%		3.95%		4.00%		4.40%		4.50%
Healthcare cost trend rate		11.34%		12.28%		7.54%		6.06%		6.31%		6.43%
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate		4.50%		4.50%		4.50%		4.20%		4.20%		4.20%
Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate will be realized		2029		2029		2029		2030		2030		2030

Increasing or decreasing current healthcare cost trend rates by 1% would affect our accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net postretirement expense by the following amounts for the years ended May 31, 2016 and 2015:


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2016			2015			2016			2015
1% Increase in trend rate
Accumulated Benefit Obligation	$	313		$	334		$	5,552		$	6,430
Postretirement Cost		11			10			504			675
1% Decrease in trend rate
Accumulated Benefit Obligation	$	(272	)	$	(290	)	$	(4,289	)	$	(3,295	)
Postretirement Cost		(9	)		(8	)		(383	)		(499	)

We expect to pay approximately $0.9 million to $1.3 million in estimated postretirement benefits in each of the next five years. In the five years thereafter (2022-2026) we expect to pay a cumulative total of $7.7 million.

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”), was signed into law on December 8, 2003. The Act provides for prescription drug benefits under Medicare Part D and contains a subsidy to plan

sponsors who provide “actuarially equivalent” prescription drug plans. Our actuary has determined that the prescription drug benefit provided by our postretirement plan is considered to be actuarially equivalent to the benefits provided under the Act for all years since inception. However, effective January 1, 2014, we changed our retiree medical offering to a Medicare Advantage Plan. Under the Medicare Advantage Plan, any Part D subsidy belongs to the insurance carrier. Our results reflect this change.

We provide, through our wholly owned insurance subsidiaries, certain insurance coverage, primarily product liability coverage, to our other subsidiaries. Excess coverage is provided by third-party insurers. Our product liability accruals provide for these potential losses as well as other uninsured claims. Product liability accruals are established based upon actuarial calculations of potential liability using industry experience, actual historical experience and actuarial assumptions developed for similar types of product liability claims, including development factors and lag times. To the extent there is a reasonable possibility that potential losses could exceed the amounts already accrued, we believe that the amount of any such additional loss would be immaterial to our results of operations, liquidity and consolidated financial position.

We also offer warranties on many of our products, as well as long-term warranty programs at certain of our businesses, and have established product warranty liabilities. We review these liabilities for adequacy on a quarterly basis and adjust them as necessary. The primary factors that could affect these liabilities may include changes in performance rates as well as costs of replacement. Provision for estimated warranty costs is recorded at the time of sale and periodically adjusted, as required, to reflect actual experience. It is probable that we will incur future losses related to warranty claims we have received but that have not been fully investigated and related to claims not yet received. While our warranty liabilities represent our best estimates at May 31, 2016, we can provide no assurances that we will not experience material claims in the future or that we will not incur significant costs to resolve such claims beyond the amounts accrued or beyond what we may recover from our suppliers. Product warranty expense is recorded within selling, general and administrative expense.

Also, due to the nature of our businesses, the amount of claims paid can fluctuate from one period to the next. While our warranty liabilities represent our best estimates of our expected losses at any given time, from time-to-time we may revise our estimates based on our experience relating to factors such as weather conditions, specific circumstances surrounding product installations and other factors.

The following table includes the changes in our accrued warranty balances:


Year Ended May 31,	2016			2015			2014
(In thousands)
Beginning Balance	$	11,663		$	14,741		$	9,330
Deductions ⁽¹⁾		(18,061	)		(29,543	)		(19,155)
Provision charged to SG&A expense		19,653			23,487			24,566
Acquisitions, including SPHC reconsolidation		59			2,978			-
Ending Balance	$	13,314		$	11,663		$	14,741

(1)	Primarily claims paid during the year.

In addition, like other companies participating in similar lines of business, some of our subsidiaries are involved in several proceedings relating to environmental matters. It is our policy to accrue remediation costs when it is probable that such efforts will be required and the related costs can be reasonably estimated. These liabilities are undiscounted and are not material to our financial statements during any of the periods presented.

We were notified by the SEC on June 24, 2014, that we are the subject of a formal investigation pertaining to the timing of our disclosure and accrual of loss reserves in fiscal 2013 with respect to the previously disclosed U.S. Department Of Justice (the “DOJ”) and the U.S. General Services Administration (the “GSA”) Office of Inspector General investigation into compliance issues relating to Tremco Roofing Division’s GSA contracts. As previously disclosed, our audit committee completed an investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding the timing of our disclosure and accrual of loss reserves with respect to the GSA and DOJ investigations, and determined that it was appropriate to restate our financial results for the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2013. These restatements had no impact on our audited financial statements for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013 or 2014. The audit committee’s investigation concluded that there was no intentional misconduct on the part of any of our officers.

We are cooperating with the SEC in its ongoing investigation and continue to be engaged in discussions with the staff of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement (the “Staff”) concerning potential issues arising out of the SEC’s investigation. As previously disclosed, on October 26, 2015, we and our General Counsel received Wells notices from the SEC’s Division of Enforcement in connection with its investigation. A Wells notice is not a formal allegation or a finding of wrongdoing, but is a preliminary determination by the Staff that it may recommend to the SEC that a civil enforcement action or administrative proceeding be brought against the recipient. Our Wells notice also indicated that the Staff had preliminarily determined to recommend that the SEC pursue a clawback claim relating to

incentive compensation payments paid to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer during the periods prior to the restatement. The Staff did not indicate an intention to recommend any charges against either of these officers.

Under SEC procedures, a recipient of a Wells notice has an opportunity to respond in the form of a Wells submission that seeks to persuade the SEC that such an action should not be brought. In November 2015, we made a Wells submission to further explain RPM’s views concerning such matters and our belief that no enforcement action is warranted against us or our officers. We intend to contest any charges that may be brought.

Any action by the SEC could result in sanctions against us and/or certain of our officers. An enforcement action by the SEC could impose substantial additional costs and distractions, regardless of its outcome. We have determined that it is probable that we will incur a loss relating to this matter and have estimated a range of potential loss. We have accrued at the low end of the range of loss, as no amount within the range is more likely to occur, and no amount within the estimated range of loss would have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2014, we received notice of a claim seeking damages against one of our industrial segment subsidiaries alleging failure of coating systems. Insurance is covering the defense of this claim; however, coverage discussions are ongoing. Based on our current understanding of the claim, and given the ongoing insurance coverage discussions, we have determined that it is reasonably possible that we may incur a loss related to this claim, and have estimated a range of potential loss. We have accrued at the low end of the range of loss, as no amount within the range is more likely to occur, and no amount within the estimated range of loss would have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE O — SEGMENT INFORMATION

As previously disclosed, during July 2015, our Board of Directors approved the realignment of certain businesses and management structure to recognize how we allocate resources and analyze the operating performance of our operating segments. During August 2015, we made the determination to combine our former RPM2-Industrial operating segment and our former SPHC operating segment into a single operating segment, called the “Specialty Products Group,” which is discussed in further detail below. Information for all periods presented has been recast to reflect this change.

We operate a portfolio of businesses and product lines that manufacture and sell a variety of specialty paints, protective coatings and roofing systems, sealants and adhesives. We manage our portfolio by organizing our businesses and product lines into three reportable segments: the industrial reportable segment, the specialty reportable segment and the consumer reportable segment. Within each reportable segment, we aggregate operating segments or product lines that consist of individual companies or groups of companies and product lines, which generally address common markets, share similar economic characteristics, utilize similar technologies and can share manufacturing or distribution capabilities. Our seven operating segments represent components of our business for which separate financial information is available that is utilized on a regular basis by our chief operating decision maker in determining how to allocate the assets of the company and evaluate performance. These seven operating segments are each managed by an operating segment manager, who is responsible for the day-to-day operating decisions and performance evaluation of the operating segment’s underlying

businesses. We evaluate the profit performance of our segments primarily based on income before income taxes, but also look to earnings (loss) before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) as a performance evaluation measure because interest expense is essentially related to acquisitions, as opposed to segment operations.

Our industrial reportable segment products are sold throughout North America and also account for the majority of our international sales. Our industrial product lines are sold directly to contractors, distributors and end-users, such as industrial manufacturing facilities, public institutions and other commercial customers. The industrial reportable segment comprises three separate operating segments — Tremco Group, tremco illbruck Group and Performance Coatings Group. Products and services within this reportable segment include construction chemicals, roofing systems, weatherproofing and other sealants, and polymer flooring.

Our specialty reportable segment products are sold throughout North America and a few international locations, primarily in Europe. Our specialty product lines are sold directly to contractors, distributors and end-users, such as industrial manufacturing facilities, public institutions and other commercial customers. The specialty reportable segment is a single operating segment, which offers products that include industrial cleaners, restoration services equipment, colorants, exterior finishes, edible coatings and specialty glazes for pharmaceutical and food industries, and other specialty OEM coatings. As discussed in Note A(2), this segment includes the SPHC businesses, which were reconsolidated as of January 1, 2015.

Our consumer reportable segment manufactures and markets professional use and do-it-yourself (“DIY”) products for a variety of mainly consumer applications, including home improvement and personal leisure activities. Our consumer segment’s major manufacturing and distribution operations are located primarily in North America, along with a few locations in Europe and other parts of the world. Our consumer reportable segment products are primarily sold directly to mass merchandisers, home improvement centers, hardware stores, paint stores, craft shops, cosmetic companies and through distributors. This reportable segment comprises three operating segments — Rust-Oleum Group, DAP Group and SPG-Consumer Group. Products within this reportable segment include specialty, hobby and professional paints; nail care enamels; caulks; adhesives; silicone sealants and wood stains. Sales to the Home Depot represented less than 10% of our consolidated net sales for fiscal 2016, 10% and 11% of our consolidated net sales for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, and 28%, 29% and 29% of our consumer segment net sales for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

We reflect income from our joint ventures on the equity method, and receive royalties from our licensees.

The following tables reflect the results of our reportable segments consistent with our management philosophy, and represent the information we utilize, in conjunction with various strategic, operational and other financial performance criteria, in evaluating the performance of our portfolio of businesses. Information for all periods presented has been recast to reflect the current-year change in reportable segments.


Year Ended May 31,	2016		2015		2014
(In thousands)
Net Sales (based on shipping location) ^(a)
United States	$	3,155,810	$	2,856,723	$	2,581,208
Foreign
Canada		310,817		337,869		342,312
Europe		928,519		941,820		1,031,686
Other Foreign		418,503		458,138		421,147
Total Foreign		1,657,839		1,737,827		1,795,145
Total	$	4,813,649	$	4,594,550	$	4,376,353

Long-Lived Assets ^(b)
United States	$	1,764,090	$	1,704,468	$	1,374,340
Foreign
Canada		111,524		114,717		125,401
Europe		271,796		293,685		340,146
United Kingdom		257,935		273,118		259,829
Other Foreign		212,583		202,721		208,411
Total Foreign		853,838		884,241		933,787
Total	$	2,617,928	$	2,588,709	$	2,308,127

(a)	It is not practicable to obtain the information needed to disclose revenues attributable to each of our product lines.

(b)	Long-lived assets include all non-current assets, excluding non-current deferred income taxes.

NOTE P — QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the years ended May 31, 2016 and 2015:


	For Quarter Ended
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	August 31		November 30		February 29		May 31
2016
Net Sales	$	1,242,526	$	1,155,984	$	988,555	$	1,426,584
Gross Profit	$	532,958	$	493,934	$	412,962	$	647,194
Net Income Attributable to RPM International Inc. Stockholders	$	99,815	$	83,433	$	18,582	$	152,895
Basic Earnings Per Share	$	0.76	$	0.63	$	0.14	$	1.16
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.74	$	0.62	$	0.14	$	1.13
Dividends Per Share	$	0.260	$	0.275	$	0.275	$	0.275
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	August 31		November 30		February 28 ^(a)		May 31
2015
Net Sales	$	1,203,896	$	1,071,128	$	946,367	$	1,373,159
Gross Profit	$	508,393	$	453,943	$	379,738	$	599,295
Net Income Attributable to RPM International Inc. Stockholders	$	99,079	$	69,766	$	(57,348)	$	127,987
Basic Earnings Per Share	$	0.74	$	0.52	$	(0.44)	$	0.97
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.73	$	0.52	$	(0.44)	$	0.94
Dividends Per Share	$	0.240	$	0.260	$	0.260	$	0.260

(a)

Reflects the reconsolidation of SPHC effective January 1, 2015, and adjustments of $106.2 million to the Provision for Income Taxes related to the recognition of an ASC 740-30 tax liability for the potential repatriation of foreign earnings and related impact on Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. Refer to Note F, “Income Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding unremitted foreign earnings.

Quarterly earnings per share may not total to the yearly earnings per share due to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding in each quarter.

Shares of our common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RPM. The high and low sales prices for the shares of common stock, and the cash dividends paid on the common stock, for each quarter of the two most recent fiscal years are set forth in the table below.

Cash dividends are payable quarterly, upon authorization of the Board of Directors. Regular payment dates are approximately the last day of July, October, January and April.

The number of holders of record of our common stock as of June 1, 2016 was approximately 22,587, in addition to 85,598 beneficial holders.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of RPM International Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. RPM’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of RPM’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2016. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of May 31, 2016, RPM’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

The independent registered public accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP, has also audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2016 and their report thereon is included on page 63 of this report.

Frank C. Sullivan

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Russell L. Gordon

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

July 28, 2016

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of RPM International Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of May 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of RPM International Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated July 28, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries as of May 31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended May 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries at May 31, 2015 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended May 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF RPM INTERNATIONAL INC.

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of RPM International Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of May 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended May 31, 2016, of the Company and our report dated July 28, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

LOGO

Cleveland, Ohio

July 28, 2016

World Headquarters

RPM International Inc.

2628 Pearl Road

P.O. Box 777

Medina, OH 44258


Telephone:		330-273-5090 or 800-776-4488
Fax:		330-225-8743
Website:		www.rpminc.com
E-mail:		info@rpminc.com

Annual Meeting

RPM stockholders are invited to attend RPM’s Annual Meeting, which will be held at 2:00 p.m. EDT on Thursday, October 6, 2016 at the Holiday Inn, 15471 Royalton Road, Strongsville, Ohio. Directions can be found on the RPM website.

Form 10-K and Other Financial Information

Investors may obtain, at no charge, a copy of the RPM Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K, a corporate video and other investor information by contacting Kathie M. Rogers, Manager of Investor Relations, at RPM, 800-776-4488.

Form 10-K, other public financial reports and news releases may also be obtained electronically through the website, www.rpminc.com.

Corporate Governance

Copies of the RPM Board of Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the Committee Charters and RPM’s Governance Documents, are available on the company’s website at www.rpminc.com, under “About RPM/Corporate Governance.” Copies of these materials are also available, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of RPM.

Institutional Investor and Security Analyst Inquiries

Security analysts and investment professionals with questions regarding RPM should contact Barry M. Slifstein, Vice President - Investor Relations, at 330-273-5090 or bslifstein@rpminc.com.

Dividend Payments

Common stock cash dividends are payable quarterly, upon authorization of the Board of Directors. Regular payment dates are typically the 31st of July, October and January and the 30th of April. RPM has increased the cash dividend payments to its stockholders for 42 consecutive years.

Stock Exchange Listing

RPM International Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “RPM.”

LOGO

Stock Transfer Agent, Registrar and Dividend Disbursing Agent

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. maintains RPM’s stockholder records and is responsible for disbursing dividend checks. Questions concerning your account, change of address, transfer of ownership, lost certificates, safekeeping of stock certificates, dividend payments, direct deposit of dividends and other related items should be directed to:

Wells Fargo Shareowner Services

P.O. Box 64854

St. Paul, MN 55164-0854


Telephone:		800-988-5238 or
		651-450-4064 (outside the United States)
Fax:		651-450-4085
Website:		www.shareowneronline.com

Certified/Overnight Mail:

Wells Fargo Shareowner Services

1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101

Mendota Heights, MN 55120-4100

Internet Account Access

Stockholders of record may access their accounts via the Internet to view their account holdings, change address, complete certain transactions and get answers to other stock-related inquires through Wells Fargo Shareowner Online at www.shareowneronline.com.

Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan

RPM offers a direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan administered by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The plan allows new investors to purchase RPM common stock directly, and existing stockholders to increase their holdings. There is no commission cost for shares purchased. The minimum initial investment is $200. Additional cash investments must be at least $25 and not more than $5,000 per month. For more details on the plan or questions concerning existing Dividend Reinvestment accounts, please contact Wells Fargo Shareholder Services (see above).

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Deloitte & Touche LLP, Cleveland, Ohio

Counsel

Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, Cleveland, Ohio

The RPM App

For up-to-date investment information on RPM, download the RPM app for Apple and Android devices. Scan this QR code or visit your app market.

LOGO


Year Ended May 31,	2016		2015		2014
Net Sales	$	4,813,649	$	4,594,550	$	4,376,353
Cost of Sales		2,726,601		2,653,181		2,500,585
Gross Profit		2,087,048		1,941,369		1,875,768
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses		1,520,977		1,422,944		1,390,128
Interest Expense		91,683		87,615		80,951
Investment (Income), Net		(10,365)		(18,577)		(15,715)
Other Expense (Income), Net		1,287		(3,866)		(4,083)
Income Before Income Taxes		483,466		453,253		424,487
Provision for Income Taxes		126,008		224,925		118,503
Net Income		357,458		228,328		305,984
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		2,733		(11,156)		14,324
Net Income Attributable to RPM International Inc. Stockholders	$	354,725	$	239,484	$	291,660
Average Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding:
Basic		129,383		129,933		129,438
Diluted		136,716		134,893		132,288
Earnings per Share of Common Stock Attributable to RPM International Inc. Stockholders:
Basic	$	2.70	$	1.81	$	2.20
Diluted	$	2.63	$	1.78	$	2.18
Cash Dividends Declared per Share of Common Stock	$	1.085	$	1.020	$	0.945
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In thousands)
Year Ended May 31,	2016		2015		2014
Net Income	$	357,458	$	228,328	$	305,984
Other Comprehensive Income, Before Tax:
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		(65,607)		(222,255)		14,272
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Liabilities
Net (Loss) Gain Arising During the Period		(83,770)		(34,949)		(33,040)
Prior Service Cost Arising During the Period		349		-		1,087
Less: Amortization of Prior Service Cost Included in Net Periodic Pension Cost		(6)		86		200
Less: Amortization of Net Loss and Settlement Recognition		18,898		16,149		16,086
Effect of Exchange Rates on Amounts Included for Pensions		2,009		8,842		140
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Liability Adjustments		(62,520)		(9,872)		(15,527)
Unrealized Gains on Available-For-Sale Securities
Unrealized Holding (Losses) Gains During the Period		(9,049)		(2,025)		7,394
Less: Reclassification Adjustments for (Gains) Included in Net Income		(2,793)		(6,068)		(1,806)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities		(11,842)		(8,093)		5,588
Unrealized (Loss) on Derivatives		-		(946)		(1,463)
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Before Tax		(139,969)		(241,166)		2,870
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Components of Other Comprehensive Income		32,030		8,927		4,976
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, After Tax		(107,939)		(232,239)		7,846
Comprehensive (Loss) Income		249,519		(3,911)		313,830
Less: Comprehensive (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		2,706		(15,742)		19,799
Comprehensive Income Attributable to RPM International Inc. Stockholders	$	246,813	$	11,831	$	294,031


	Common Stock
	Number of Shares		Par/Stated Value		Paid-In Capital
Balance at June 1, 2013		132,596	$	1,326	$	763,505
Net income		-		-		-
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-
Dividends paid		-		-		-
Other noncontrolling interest activity		-		-		(21,876)
Stock option exercises		241		3		11,934
Stock compensation expense, shares granted less shares returned for taxes		436		4		23,561
Equity component convertible bond		-		-		13,470
Deferred financing convertible bond		-		-		(492)
Balance at May 31, 2014		133,273		1,333		790,102
Net income		-		-		-
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-
Dividends paid		-		-		-
Other noncontrolling interest activity		-		-		-
Increase in equity ownership of SPHC		-		-		41,724
Shares repurchased		(595)		(6)		6
Stock option exercises		59		1		8,560
Stock compensation expense, shares granted less shares returned for taxes		466		4		31,735
Balance at May 31, 2015		133,203		1,332		872,127
Net income		-		-		-
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-
Dividends paid		-		-		-
Other noncontrolling interest activity		-		-		-
Shares repurchased		(800)		(8)		8
Stock option exercises		-		-		18,540
Stock compensation expense, shares granted less shares returned for taxes		541		5		31,281
Balance at May 31, 2016		132,944	$	1,329	$	921,956


(In thousands)	Amortization Period (In Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Other Intangible Assets
As of May 31, 2016
Amortized intangible assets
Formulae		3 to 33	$	234,483	$	140,376	$	94,107
Customer-related intangibles		3 to 33		331,008		114,469		216,539
Trademarks/names		5 to 40		30,742		15,817		14,925
Other		2 to 20		47,744		27,745		19,999
Total Amortized Intangibles				643,977		298,407		345,570
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Trademarks/names				229,831				229,831
Total Other Intangible Assets			$	873,808	$	298,407	$	575,401
As of May 31, 2015
Amortized intangible assets
Formulae		3 to 33	$	229,721	$	131,031	$	98,690
Customer-related intangibles		3 to 33		324,867		91,104		233,763
Trademarks/names		3 to 40		33,985		14,550		19,435
Other		2 to 40		46,789		25,817		20,972
Total Amortized Intangibles				635,362		262,502		372,860
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Trademarks/names				231,270				231,270
Total Other Intangible Assets			$	866,632	$	262,502	$	604,130


	Available-For-Sale Securities
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value (Net Carrying Amount)
May 31, 2016
Equity securities:
Stocks - foreign	$	5,051	$	439	$	(247)	$	5,243
Stocks - domestic		27,717		3,831		(911)		30,637
Mutual funds - foreign		35,903		802		(4,357)		32,348
Mutual funds - domestic		60,354		99		(4,587)		55,866
Total equity securities		129,025		5,171		(10,102)		124,094
Fixed maturity:
U.S. treasury and other government		21,704		214		(80)		21,838
Corporate bonds		887		137		-		1,024
Total fixed maturity securities		22,591		351		(80)		22,862
Total	$	151,616	$	5,522	$	(10,182)	$	146,956


Year Ended May 31,	2016			2015			2014
(In thousands)
Income tax expense (benefit) at the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate	$	169,213		$	158,638		$	148,570
Impact of foreign operations		(29,969	)		(32,706	)		(27,374)
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit		4,310			4,140			4,519
Tax benefits from the domestic manufacturing deduction		(8,030	)		-			(4,878)
Nondeductible business expense		2,224			1,782			1,508
Valuation allowance		(3,357	)		(10,455	)		(2,998)
Unremitted foreign earnings		(3,712	)		106,227			2,500
Non-taxable gain from joint venture remeasurement		(2,790	)		-			-
Other		(1,881	)		(2,701	)		(3,344)
Provision for Income Tax Expense	$	126,008		$	224,925		$	118,503
Effective Income Tax Rate		26.1%			49.6%			27.9%


(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)				Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Fair Value at May 31, 2016
U.S. Treasury and other government		$	-		$	21,838			$	-		$	21,838
Corporate bonds						1,024							1,024
Stocks - foreign			5,243										5,243
Stocks - domestic			30,637										30,637
Mutual funds - foreign						32,348							32,348
Mutual funds - domestic						55,866							55,866
Foreign currency forward contract						(159	)						(159	)
Contingent consideration										(11,771)			(11,771	)
Total		$	35,880		$	110,917			$	(11,771)		$	135,026

(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)				Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Fair Value at May 31, 2015
U.S. Treasury and other government		$	-		$	21,349			$	-		$	21,349
Foreign bonds						38							38
Mortgage-backed securities						128							128
Corporate bonds						1,389							1,389
Stocks - foreign			3,976										3,976
Stocks - domestic			39,458										39,458
Mutual funds - foreign						34,541							34,541
Mutual funds - domestic						53,891							53,891
Foreign currency forward contract						(6,369	)						(6,369	)
Contingent consideration										(27,598)			(27,598	)
Total		$	43,434		$	104,967			$	(27,598)		$	120,803


	2016
Share-Based Payments	Weighted Average Exercise Price						Number of Shares Under Option
(Shares in thousands)
Balance at June 1		$	27.04					3,530
Options granted			47.14					570
Options exercised			22.45					(887)

Balance at May 31			31.88					3,213

Exercisable at May 31		$	24.32					1,838

SARs	2016			2015					2014
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per SAR		$	10.73		$	10.63				$	7.38
Intrinsic value of options exercised		$	22.3		$	7.5				$	15.6
Tax benefit from options exercised		$	8.1		$	2.5				$	5.2
Fair value of SARS vested		$	4.0		$	3.3				$	2.0


(In thousands)	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments				Pension And Other Postretirement Benefit Liability Adjustments, Net of Tax				Unrealized Gain (Loss) On Derivatives, Net of Tax				Unrealized Gain (Loss) On Securities, Net of Tax				Total
Balance at June 1, 2013		$	(24,428	)		$	(143,555	)		$	1,196			$	7,534			$	(159,253)
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income, net of tax benefit of $586															(1,220	)			(1,220)
Other comprehensive income			9,533				(16,418	)			(1,215	)			6,715				(1,385)
Deferred taxes							6,325				304				(1,653	)			4,976
Balance at May 31, 2014			(14,895	)			(153,648	)			285				11,376				(156,882)
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income, net of tax benefit of $2,307											(125	)			(4,209	)			(4,334)
Increase in equity ownership - SPHC							(9,600	)											(9,600)
Other comprehensive income			(216,755	)			(10,817	)			(341	)			(3,884	)			(231,797)
Deferred taxes							5,733				181				2,564				8,478
Balance at May 31, 2015			(231,650	)			(168,332	)			-				5,847				(394,135)
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income, net of tax benefit of $946											-				(1,847	)			(1,847)
Other comprehensive income			(65,580	)			(62,520	)			-				(9,995	)			(138,095)
Deferred taxes			5,997				22,646				-				3,387				32,030
Balance at May 31, 2016		$	(291,233	)		$	(208,206	)		$	-			$	(2,608	)		$	(502,047)


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
Year-End Benefit Obligations	2016			2015			2016			2015
Discount rate		3.85	%		4.25	%		3.13	%		3.26%
Rate of compensation increase		3.80	%		3.80	%		2.81	%		2.81%


	U.S. Plans			Non-U.S. Plans
Net Periodic Pension Cost	2016	2015	2014	2016			2015			2014
Discount rate	4.25%	4.30%	4.45%		3.26	%		3.82	%		3.95%
Expected return on plan assets	7.90%	8.25%	8.50%		4.49	%		5.18	%		5.37%
Rate of compensation increase	3.80%	3.81%	3.14%		2.81	%		3.30	%		3.32%


U.S. Plans
	Target Allocation			Actual Asset Allocation
(Dollars in millions)	as of May 31, 2016			2016		2015
Equity securities		55	%	$	234.7	$	223.2
Fixed income securities		25	%		72.1		95.9
Cash					7.1		8.0
Other		20	%		0.3		0.3
Total assets		100	%	$	314.2	$	327.4


Non-U.S. Plans
	Target Allocation			Actual Asset Allocation
(Dollars in millions)	as of May 31, 2016			2016		2015
Equity securities		43	%	$	71.7	$	75.7
Fixed income securities		38	%		67.4		68.9
Cash							0.4
Property and other		19	%		30.4		31.4
Total assets		100	%	$	169.5	$	176.4


Fiscal 2016	High		Low		Dividends paid per share	Fiscal 2015	High		Low		Dividends paid per share
First Quarter	$	51.27	$	40.11	0.260	First Quarter	$	47.33	$	42.80	0.240
Second Quarter	$	47.48	$	40.15	0.275	Second Quarter	$	48.30	$	39.57	0.260
Third Quarter	$	47.79	$	36.77	0.275	Third Quarter	$	51.97	$	44.95	0.260
Fourth Quarter	$	51.60	$	41.03	0.275	Fourth Quarter	$	51.13	$	46.65	0.260