Form 20-F

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 14,810,178 Equity Shares.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933. Yes ¨ No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

See “Exchange Rates”, “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and “Risk Factors”.

See “Business”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Additional Information”.

See “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

See “Principal Shareholders,” “Related Party Transactions” and “Additional Information”.

See the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for Rediff.com India Limited for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the related three-year period ended March 31, 2013. See also “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, “Exchange Controls”, “Restriction on Foreign Ownership of Indian Securities”, “Taxation” and “Additional Information”.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Market Risks”.

See “Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers”.

See the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for Rediff.com India Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the related three-year period ended March 31, 2013.

In this annual report, all references to “we”, “our”, “us”, “Rediff”, “Rediff.com” and the “Company”, unless otherwise relevant to the context, are to Rediff.com India Limited, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the Republic of India, and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to “U.S.” or the “United States” are to the United States of America, its territories and its possessions. References to “India” are to the Republic of India.

In this annual report, references to “$” or “US$” or “dollars” or “U.S. dollars” are to the legal currency of the United States and references to “ LOGO

” or “Rs” or “Rs.” or “Rupees” or “Indian Rupees” are to the legal currency of India. Our financial statements are prepared in Indian Rupees and presented in U.S. dollars except for the financial statements of our U.S. subsidiaries which are prepared and presented in U.S. dollars. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). References to a particular “fiscal” or “financial” year are to Rediff’s fiscal year ended March 31 of such year.

Although we have presented Indian Rupee amounts in this annual report in U.S. dollars, this does not mean that the Indian Rupee amounts referred to have been, or could be, converted into dollars at any particular rate, the rates stated below in the section of this annual report entitled “Exchange Rates”, or at all. Except as otherwise stated in this annual report and except for the information derived from our financial statements included in this annual report, all translations from Indian Rupees to U.S. dollars contained in this annual report are based on the exchange rates published by The Reserve Bank of India, as at the close of March 31, 2013 which was LOGO

54.39 to US$1.00. The translation from Indian Rupees to U.S. dollars of the information derived from our financial statements included in this annual report are based on daily rates published by the Reserve Bank of India.

During fiscal 2013, the LOGO

came under sustained selling pressure driven by growing anxiety about domestic growth prospects, concerns about the elevated current account deficit and global risk aversion (the high and low during fiscal 2013 was LOGO

57.22 per US$ and LOGO

50.56 per US$ respectively). The Indian rupee has fallen significantly against the U.S. dollar, from 54.39 rupees per U.S. dollar at March 29, 2013 to 60.80 rupees per U.S. dollar at August 12, 2013, a depreciation of 11.8%. The recent sharp decline was caused mainly by the increasing strength of the U.S. dollar, however India was particularly affected because of continued concerns about its domestic growth prospects, elevated current account deficit and global risk aversion.

We have included statements in this annual report which contain words or phrases such as “may”, “will”, “aim”, “will likely result”, “believe”, “expect”, “will continue”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “intend”, “plan”, “contemplate”, “seek to”, “future”, “objective”, “goal”, “project”, “should”, “will pursue” and similar expressions or variations of such expressions, all of which are “forward-looking statements”, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and reflect our current expectations. We have made forward-looking statements with respect to the following, among others:

These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. These include, but are not limited to, risks or uncertainties associated with our ability to successfully implement our strategy, our ability to successfully integrate the businesses we have acquired with our business, demand for e-commerce and changes in the Internet marketplace, technological changes, investment income, cash flow projections and our exposure to market risks. By their nature, certain of our market risk disclosures are only estimates and could be materially different from what actually occur in the future. As a result, actual future gains, losses or impacts on net interest income could materially differ from those that have been estimated.

In addition, other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by the forward-looking statements contained in this document include, but are not limited to, the slowdown in the U.S. and Indian economies and in the sectors in which our clients are based, the slowdown in the Internet and IT sectors world-wide, general economic and political conditions in India and the United States, acceptance of new products and services, the development of broadband Internet and 3G networks in India, changes in the value of the Rupee, foreign currency exchange rates, equity prices or other rates or prices, the level of Internet penetration in India and globally, changes in domestic and foreign laws, regulations and taxes, changes in competition, and other factors beyond our control. For further discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ, see the discussions under “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in this annual report. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. In addition, readers should review the other information contained in this annual report and in our periodic reports filed from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We undertake no obligation to update or revise this annual report in order to amend its forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Indian Rupee and the U.S. dollar may affect the market price of our American Depositary Shares (the “ADSs”), which trade on the NASDAQ Global Market. Such fluctuations may also affect U.S. dollar conversions made by our depositary for the ADSs, Citibank, N.A. (the “Depositary”), of any cash dividends paid in Indian Rupees on our Equity Shares represented by the ADSs.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information concerning the exchange rates between Indian Rupees and U.S. dollars based on rates published by the Reserve Bank of India:

The following table sets forth the high and low exchange rates for the previous six months and are based on daily closing rates published by the Reserve Bank of India:

Our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars and prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The selected balance sheet data set forth below as of March 31, 2012 and 2013, and the selected statement of comprehensive loss data for the fiscal years ended March 31 2011, 2012 and 2013, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this annual report. The selected balance sheet data set forth below as of March 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 and the selected statement of comprehensive loss data for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2010 are derived from U.S. GAAP financial statements which are not included in this annual report. (See note 1 below)

An investment in our ADSs involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following information about risks, together with the other information contained in this annual report on Form 20-F, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes, before you decide to buy our ADSs. If any of the circumstances or events described below actually arises or occurs, our business, results of operations and financial condition would likely suffer. In any such case, the market price of our ADSs could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. This annual report also contains forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this annual report.

We face significant competition in the India market for users, advertisers, publishers and distributors, principally from Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Microsoft, AOL, eBay and Snapdeal and also from other traditional media companies and a host of other smaller competitors.

We face significant competition from Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Microsoft, AOL, eBay and Snapdeal, among other companies, each offering an integrated variety of Internet products, advertising services, technologies, online services and content in a manner similar to us.

These large competitors offer products and services that directly compete with our offerings, including consumer e-mail, search, instant messaging, photos, maps, video and photo sharing, content channels, mobile applications, and shopping services, among other offerings.

We also compete with traditional media companies to attract advertising revenues, both domestically and internationally. Currently, many advertisers allocate a portion of their advertising budgets to Internet advertising. In response, traditional media companies are increasingly expanding their content offerings on the Web and are competing for both offline and online revenues. We also compete with a variety of other providers of online services, including social media and networking sites like Facebook and Orkut for users, advertisers and developers. Social networking sites in particular are attracting a substantial and increasing share of users and user’s online time, which could enable them to attract an increasing share of online advertising.

Some of our existing competitors and possible market entrants may have greater brand recognition for certain products and services, more expertise in a particular segment of the market, and/or greater operational, strategic, technological, financial, personnel, or other related resources than we do. In addition, Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Microsoft, among other companies, have access to considerable financial and technical resources with which to compete aggressively, including funding future growth and expansion by investing in acquisitions and/or in research and development. Further, emerging start-ups may be able to innovate and provide products and services faster than we can and in a manner more appealing to our target users. In addition, competitors may consolidate with each other or collaborate, and new competitors may enter the market.

We are also subject to competition from companies known as “aggregators”, which aggregate advertising space in third-party websites and resell such space to our customers or potential customers. There has also been a trend toward industry consolidation so our smaller competitors today may become part of larger competitors in the future.

We may also face competition from companies engaged in providing mailing services to mobile users. Some of our existing competitors and possible additional entrants may have greater brand recognition for certain products and services and greater operational, strategic, technological, financial, personnel, or other resources than we do. In addition our e-commerce services face competition from the existing leading e-commerce companies who have significantly greater financial resources, longer operating histories and more experience in attracting and retaining users and managing customers than we do.

We may also face competition from companies engaged in procuring advertisement from advertisers who want to reach out to a niche customer segment by choosing to advertise in a particular city or specific area within a city and cannot afford to advertise on television channels. Some of our existing competitors and possible additional entrants may have greater brand recognition for certain products and services and greater operational, strategic, technological, financial, personnel, or other resources than we do.

If our competitors are more successful than we are in developing compelling products or services or attracting and retaining users, advertisers, publishers, developers, or distributors, our revenues and potential growth rates could decline. In addition, new competitors may enter the market which may adversely impact our financial performance.

Competition for visitors, customers, subscribers, advertisers and shopping partners is intense and is expected to increase significantly in the future as there are no substantial barriers to entry into our market. Furthermore, it is difficult to predict which online advertising pricing model, if any, will emerge as the industry standard. This makes it difficult to predict our future advertising rates and revenues. Intense competition in our businesses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, including our ability to achieve and sustain profitability. For additional information regarding our competition, please see “Business – Competition” in this annual report.

Our future results and growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected if our expansion into new business segments and verticals is not successful.

We, as part of our growth strategy, have, from time to time, entered into new Internet business segments by leveraging our large Internet user base to generate additional revenue streams. For each new Internet business or segment we enter into, we may face competition from existing leading players in that business. Further the operating and marketing challenges of the new Internet business segment(s) may be different from those that we currently face. If we cannot successfully compete and meet the challenges in the new Internet business segment(s), we may not be able to recover costs incurred for developing and marketing new businesses and accordingly our future results and growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected.

Our business could be disrupted if our investment in new products, services, technologies and new business strategy is not successful. Our current plans for growth depend in part on the further development of broadband Internet and 3G and 4G networks in India.

We have invested significantly in the development of new products, services, technologies and new business strategies and will continue to so invest in the future. Such investment may involve significant risks and uncertainties including but not limited to inadequate returns on capital on our investments, and distractions of management from current and future operations. On account of the inherent risk involved in such investments, we offer no assurance that such investments will be successful and will not adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and operating results. Additionally, delay in rollout of 3G and 4G network in India will affect internet penetration and therefore, our revenue growth.

The success of our products and services depends on the acceptance of the Internet in India, which may be slowed by cost and affordability issues, technical obstacles and unfavorable Government policies.

The growth of our India Online business is highly dependent on the growth in India of the number of PCs in use, the growth of Internet and broadband use and the growth of use of smart phones and other mobile devices such as tablets.

The growth of the telecom and mobile industry in India will be a significant factor in determining whether we can grow our business. As with many developing nations, the fixed line telecommunications infrastructure in India is not fully developed. Although this industry has been opened for private sector participation, service levels remain inferior to service levels in most developed countries. Further, telephone penetration rates, measured by the number of telephone lines per one thousand persons in India, are low when compared to most developed countries. In addition, limitations in network architecture in India sometimes limit Internet connection speeds to 28 Kbps or less, which are less than the 56 Kbps connection speeds on conventional dial-up telephone lines, and significantly less than the up to 1.5 Mbps connection speeds on direct satellite links, digital subscriber lines and cable modems in the United States. These speed and cost constraints may severely limit the quality and desirability of using the Internet in India, which consequently may limit our ability to expand our pool of customers and reduce our desirability to online advertisers.

Further, our growth could be limited by the cost of obtaining hardware, software and communications links necessary to connect to the Internet in India. If much of India’s population is not able to afford access to the Internet, it may be difficult for us to execute our business strategy.

In other developing Asian markets such as South Korea and Malaysia, an increase in broadband penetration rates led to rapid growth in the number of online subscribers. Currently, broadband penetration rates in India are very low compared to other developing countries. According to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (the “TRAI”), India had an estimated broadband subscriber base of 15.09 million as of April 2013, which has increased by 8.2% over the past year from April 2012. Several industry and government agencies believe that India could be a hotbed for broadband growth in future years based on the population and country demographics. However, if the broadband and telecom industry in India fails to register significant growth, our potential growth may also be affected.

If we are unable to develop new services or enhance existing services in anticipation of our users’ needs, our users’ level of engagement with our services may decline and our business could suffer as a result.

Our success is dependent, in part, on our ability to anticipate customers’ needs in advance and develop new services or enhance the existing services to fulfill those needs, on a cost-effective and timely basis. For example, on February 21, 2012, we formally launched “Rediff Realtime News Search” an innovative news search engine which delivers fresh and recent news from India and the world and also predicts user search terms and returns results within milliseconds of a query being made. We also relaunched “Rediffmail PRO” a web solutions for professionals. The development and implementation of such services and any new services including the enhancement of existing service(s), entails significant technical and business risks. There can be no assurance that we will successfully implement new services or that any of our new products or services will be accepted by our users.

New technologies are giving rise to new business opportunities, such as in local search and social networking. We believe that much of our future growth will depend on our ability to seize upon these opportunities and successfully launch new products and services, and our ability to retain or improve the level of user engagement with our services. If we are unable, for technical, legal, financial or other reasons, to adapt in a timely manner to changing market conditions or customer requirements, our business and our future financial performance could be materially adversely affected.

Our strategy of acquiring businesses to complement our existing market offering may fail.

As part of our growth strategy, we have made selective strategic and opportunistic acquisitions of businesses that complement our existing market offering. Such acquisitions may involve uncertainties and risks, including but not limited to, government regulations, diversion of resources and management attention, costs and difficulties of integrating acquired businesses and managing a larger business, unforeseen liabilities and ongoing financial obligations.

If we fail to address such risks successfully, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and growth prospects. Further, such acquisition(s) could require a significant amount of capital investment, which could decrease the amount of cash available to us for working capital or capital expenditures. In addition, if we fund the acquisition(s) through the use of our equity securities, we may dilute the value of our ADSs and the underlying ordinary shares.

More individuals are utilizing non-PC devices to access the Internet, and versions of our services developed for these devices might not gain widespread adoption by the devices’ users, manufacturers, or distributors or might fail to function as intended on some devices.

The number of individuals, who access the Internet through devices other than a PC, such as mobile telephones and related “smartphones” or “tablet-based” devices, has substantially increased, and the trend is likely to continue. While we have dedicated significant resources over the past few years to develop offerings for mobile devices and believe we are highly competitive in the mobile arena, our services were originally designed for rich, graphical environments such as those available on the desktop and PC. The different hardware and software, memory, operating systems, resolution, and other functionality associated with alternative devices may make our services unusable or difficult to use on such devices, and the versions of our services developed for these devices may not be compelling to users, manufacturers, or distributors of alternative devices. Similarly, the licenses we have negotiated to present third-party content to desktop and PC users may not extend to users of alternative devices. In those cases, we may need to enter into new or amended agreements with content providers in order to present a similar user-experience on the new devices. The content providers may not be willing to enter into such new or amended agreements on reasonable terms or at all.

Further, new devices, operating systems, networks, and platforms are continually being released. It is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in developing versions of our services for use on these alternative devices and platforms. We may also need to devote significant resources to the creation, support and maintenance of such versions.

If we fail to detect click fraud or other invalid clicks, we could lose the confidence of our advertisers, which would cause our business to suffer.

We are exposed to the risk of fraudulent clicks and other invalid clicks on our ads from a variety of potential sources. Invalid clicks are clicks that we have determined are not intended by the user to link to the underlying content, such as inadvertent clicks on the same ad twice and clicks resulting from click fraud. Click fraud occurs when a user intentionally clicks on an ad displayed on a website for a reason other than to view the underlying content. An increase in click fraud or invalid clicks could cause our advertisers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our services, which could negatively damage our brand and impact our performance.

Technologies have been developed that can block the display of industry ads, including our own. Most of our revenues are derived from fees paid to us by advertisers in connection with the display of ads on web pages. As a result, ad-blocking technology could adversely affect our operating results.

The ongoing global slowdown, especially in India and the United States, could continue to negatively impact revenues from some of our key customers and thus, negatively impact our business.

We are dependent on the health of the Indian and U.S. economies. A continued slowdown in the United States and Indian economies, an overall reduction in consumer and business spending, or future difficulties experienced in either country could have a material adverse impact on our business and our prospects.

Advertisement expenditures tend to be cyclical, reflecting overall economic conditions and the nature of industry, budgeting and buying patterns. Since a significant portion of our revenue is derived from advertisements, the adverse economic conditions have caused, and a continuation of adverse economic conditions could cause, additional decreases in or delays in advertising spending, a reduction in our revenues and a negative impact on our short-term ability to grow our revenues.

A significant portion of our Indian advertising revenues include revenues from the Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI) segments and from other Internet companies, including those engaged in the business of jobs, travel, matrimonial, real estate and online shopping. Some of these companies are startups without proven long-term business models and are dependent on external funding for future growth. These companies have been adversely affected by the global economic slowdown, resulting in lower online advertising revenues than in the past. While general economic conditions have recently improved compared to the heart of the global economic recession, the robustness and pace of the global economic recovery remains uncertain and there is no assurance that these and other segments will recover from the impact of the recession, succeed in raising financial resources and increase online advertising spends.

Further, a future slowdown in the Indian and U.S. economies may make it difficult for us to raise money in the equity and debt markets on terms favorable to us or at all, if we choose to conduct capital raises in accordance with our business plan and future growth opportunities, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

Our publication business in the United States faces competition and industry-wide declines.

Our publication business in the United States faces competition from not only Internet-based publications but also from other publications targeted at Indian-Americans and from television channels featuring Indian news and programming. In addition, competition to provide news and information regarding India or content that is of interest to Indian-Americans in these markets for paying subscribers for our India Abroad newspaper, which is subscription-based, is intense due to the presence of other paid newspapers such as News India Times, Indian Express and India West, among others. Further, our publications also face competition from free newspapers and from electronic media, such as television channels dedicated to Indian news and programming and online publications and services. If our U.S. publishing businesses are unable to successfully compete, our results of operation could be adversely affected.

A slowdown in economic growth, in particular, a slowdown in the growth of companies that advertise products or services targeted at Indian-Americans, may also reduce advertising revenues for our U.S. publications. Further, as is the case with our contracts with online advertisers, our contracts with advertising customers for our India Abroad business usually do not commit them to continue to provide us with a specific volume of business and can typically be terminated by them with or without cause, with little or no advance notice and without penalty. Any of these factors could have an adverse effect on our business and our future financial performance.

We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our intangible assets, long-lived assets, or investments in equity interests become impaired.

We are required under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to review our intangible assets, long-lived assets and investments in equity interests for impairment when events or changes in circumstance indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that could lead to impairment of intangible assets and long-lived assets include significant adverse changes in the business climate and declines in the financial condition of our business. Factors that could lead to impairment of investments in equity interests include a prolonged period of decline in the operating performance of, or adverse changes in the business outlook of the company in which we invested. Our online businesses in India and the United States have been facing pressures on account of the economic slowdown and increasing competition for online revenues. We have recorded in the past and may be required in the future to record additional significant charges to earnings if a portion of our intangible assets, long-lived assets and investments in equity interests becomes impaired. Any such charge would adversely impact our results of operations.

We have a history of losses. We may incur losses in the future and we may not achieve or maintain profitability, which may impact our balance sheet and thus, the successful implementation of our growth plan.

We have incurred significant net losses and negative cash flows since our inception in January 1996. As of March 31, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately US$87.7 million. We incurred a net loss of US$11.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. We may in the future incur additional net losses and negative operating cash flows which could have a material adverse impact on our balance sheet and lead to the need for additional capital to implement our growth strategy.

In order to grow our online user base and attract new advertisers, we expect to continue to invest in new and innovative products and product enhancements, expand the content and services on our network and procure more bandwidth and network equipment. At present, we believe we have enough resources to continue to invest in our product and service offerings, though we may, at any time, expedite or intensify our investments should market conditions improve and new opportunities avail themselves. If we do so, and if we are not yet generating free cash flow, we may need additional capital to implement this facet of our growth plans.

We have incurred and in the future may incur expenses in connection with acquisitions and investments. Accordingly, we will need to generate significant additional revenues in order to become profitable and may not be able to do so. If we are not yet profitable or generating free cash flow, we may need to raise additional capital. Our business model is not yet proven in India or the United States, and we cannot assure you that we will achieve profitability or that we will not incur operating losses in the future. If we are unable to achieve profitability, we will be unable to build a sustainable business. In this event, the price of our ADSs and the value of investments in our company would likely decline.

Our revenues could be adversely affected if we are unable to successfully adapt to new forms of pricing for the services and products we offer.

Any one of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. For additional information regarding our competition, please see “Business – Competition” in this annual report.

Increasing consumer resistance to online advertising may result in loss of revenues

There is a growing consumer resistance to intrusive advertising online. In our desire to improve the user experience on our site, we have reduced the number of advertisements on our site and in particular, eliminated all advertising from our home page. As a consequence of this, we experienced a decline in our advertising revenues and expect the same to continue based on current market conditions. Although we are hopeful that a better user experience will lead to a higher number of users over time, we can however give no assurances that this will happen. If we are unable to compensate for the loss of advertising revenues from such restriction with incremental revenues due to increased user traffic, our results of operations could be materially adversely impacted.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly and may fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which may cause the price of our ADSs to decline.

Our quarterly results have fluctuated significantly in the past and may continue to fluctuate significantly in the future based on a variety of factors. These factors could affect both our near and long-term performance. Some of these factors include but are not limited to:

Our operating results are volatile and can be difficult to predict. As a result, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results may not be good indicators of our future performance. In addition, it is possible that our operating results in any future quarter could be below the expectations of investors generally and any published reports or analyses on us. In that event, the market price of our ADSs may decline.

We may not be able to grow our business if online advertising in our markets does not expand.

Our business strategy depends heavily on the anticipated growth of online advertising in our markets and the growth of our revenues depends on increased revenues generated by online advertising. We anticipate that a high portion of our future revenues will continue to be derived from online advertising on our website. Online advertising is an evolving business and our ability to generate and maintain significant advertising revenues will (among other factors) depend on:

Different pricing models are used to sell online advertising, and it is difficult to predict which, if any, of the models will emerge as the industry standard or standards. This makes it difficult to project our future advertising rates and revenues. A reduction in traffic on our website may cause new advertisers not to enter into contracts with us and could cause existing advertisers not to renew their contractual arrangements with us, each of which, in turn, would reduce our potential advertising revenues. Additionally, any development of Internet software that blocks advertisements before they appear on a user’s screen, may hinder the growth of online advertising and could materially and adversely affect our ability to grow our online advertising revenues and our business. Also, a slowdown in economic growth, whether in India or the United States, and in particular a slowdown in the growth of companies that advertise on the Internet, may result in a reduction in our advertising revenues.

Our contracts with advertising customers do not commit them to continue to provide us with a specific volume of business and can typically be terminated by them with or without cause, with little or no advance notice and without penalty. Additionally, our contracts with advertising customers are usually limited to a specific project and/or for a specific time period and not any future work. There are also a number of factors, other than our performance, which are not within our control that could cause the loss of advertising customers. Early termination of material contracts or non-renewal of an expired material contract could have a material adverse effect on our business and our future financial performance.

The loss of one or more significant advertisers could adversely affect our revenues.

We derive a considerable portion of our revenues from certain key advertisers. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, our top ten advertisers in India accounted for approximately 28% of our India Online advertising revenues and 9% of our India Online receivables. For the same period, for our U.S. publishing business, our top ten advertisers contributed approximately 11% of total U.S. publishing revenues. Any failure to meet advertiser expectations could result in the cancellation or non-renewal of contracts, which typically can be terminated by advertisers with or without cause, with little or no advance notice and without penalty. The loss of, or a significant reduction in the volume of business from, one or more of our large advertisers could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Our operations could be disrupted by unexpected network interruptions caused by system failures, natural disasters or unauthorized tampering of our systems.

Our online businesses rely heavily on the Internet and, accordingly, depend upon the continuous, reliable and secure operation of Internet servers, related hardware and software and network infrastructure, such as telephone lines leased from service providers. The continual accessibility of our websites and the performance and reliability of our network infrastructure are critical to our reputation, and our ability to attract and retain users, advertisers and merchants. Any system failure or performance inadequacy that causes interruptions in the availability of our services or increases the response time of our services could reduce our appeal to advertisers and consumers. Factors that could significantly disrupt our operations include but are not limited to:

While we have taken steps to improve security and network reliability, we have limited backup systems and redundancy. The failure of these backup systems could lead to the disruption of our services and the loss of important data. We have suffered temporary service outages in the past from time to time that have resulted in a disruption of our services. Future disruptions or the occurrence of any of the foregoing factors may result in users being temporarily unable to access our services. Any sustained disruption will reduce the number of visitors to our website and could have a material adverse impact on the transactions handled through our website. Such disruptions could also reduce the number of advertisers and online shopping on our site and materially affect our operating results, which may lead to a decline in the market price of our ADSs.

We seek to protect our computer systems and network infrastructure from physical break-ins, as well as security breaches and other disruptive problems. We employ security systems, including firewalls and password encryption, designed to minimize the risk of security breaches. There can be no assurance that these security measures will be effective.

If someone breaches our network security or otherwise misappropriates sensitive data about our users, we could be subject to liability. These liabilities could include fraud claims and other claims for misuses of personal information, such as unauthorized marketing purposes. These claims could result in litigation and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We do not carry material business interruption insurance to protect us in the event of a catastrophe, even though such an event could lead to a significant negative impact on our business. Any sustained disruption in Internet access provided by third parties could also adversely affect our business.

We may lose a significant portion of our assets if banks in India collapse.

A significant portion of our assets is held in the form of cash and cash equivalents. We maintain a majority of such cash and cash equivalents in Indian Rupees with banks in India. In case one or more of these banks collapses due to the current financial crisis, or any futures ones, we may lose a substantial portion of our cash and cash equivalents. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not benefit from our acquisitions and investments and our acquired businesses could increase our net losses.

We have made several strategic and opportunistic acquisitions and investments in order to penetrate new markets, generate additional revenue streams and provide value-added services to our users. We may, if opportunities arise, acquire or invest in developing products, technologies or companies in the future. However, there can be no assurance that our acquisition and investment strategy will be successful or that we will realize the anticipated benefits from such acquisitions or investments. Lack of success in our acquisition and investment strategy could result in significant write-offs relating to such acquisitions and investments and thus, adversely impact our financial performance. Such transactions are accompanied by a number of risks, including:

Any or all of our future acquisitions may face similar risks and we may not be successful in addressing these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions.

Our business and growth will be impaired if we are unable to retain our existing key personnel and hire additional skilled employees.

We are dependent on certain key members of our management team. In particular, our success depends upon the continued efforts of our Chairman and Managing Director, Ajit Balakrishnan. We do not carry any key employee insurance. All of our employees are located in India and the United States, and each may voluntarily terminate his or her employment with us. Our planned activities will require additional expertise in sales and marketing, technology and other areas. The labor market for skilled employees is extremely competitive, and the process of hiring employees with the necessary skills is time consuming and may lead to the diversion of resources. We may not be able to continue to retain existing personnel or identify, hire and successfully integrate additional qualified personnel in the future. The loss of the services of key personnel, especially the unexpected death or disability of such personnel, or the inability to attract additional or replacement qualified personnel, could impair the growth of our business.

We are dependent on our agreements with mobile service providers for service delivery and fee collection.

Our mobile value added services, depend mainly on the cooperation of a large number of private and government mobile phone operators who have the necessary licenses to provide mobile services to consumers across various states/cities in India. We rely on all of these mobile phone operators to provide network and gateways for our mobile value added services. We also utilize their billing systems to collect service fees from customers. Certain of these mobile phone operators also provide services to their customers (such as the downloading of ringtones), which compete with the mobile services we offer. This may make them less eager to cooperate with us. If any or all of these mobile service providers encounter technical problems, or if they refuse to cooperate with us or reduce fees payable to us, our ability to provide mobile services may cease or be severely disrupted, which may have a significant and adverse impact on our future operating results.

We rely on increased sales of, and high renewal rates for, our subscription and fee-based products and services.

Growth in our India Online revenues will depend on the increase in users of our fee-based Internet services, including paid e-mail services, other subscription services and mobile value added service in India. If not enough users adopt and use our fee-based Internet services, our India Online revenue may not increase.

We have arrangements with most Indian mobile operators which allow the customers of such mobile operators to download ringtones, wallpapers and other products from our servers. These customers can also access information relating to news, business and other information from us by using short messaging services. Some operators permit us to selectively send SMS messages, advertising our mobile products to a section of their customer base. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (“TRAI”) framed rules to prevent unsolicited commercial communications to mobile phone users who sign up for a “Do Not Disturb” registry. Subsequently, recently TRAI has directed operators to get written consent from users for activating value-added services (VAS) such as call ring back tone and hello tunes on their mobile phones. These and any other regulatory actions may have a material adverse impact on our future mobile VAS revenues.

Potential liability for information we publish may require us to defend against legal claims, which may cause significant operational expenditures and have an adverse impact on our financial results.

We may be subject to claims for defamation, libel, copyright or trademark infringement or other legal actions relating to the information we publish. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against news and opinion publishing businesses in the past. Our insurance coverage may not adequately protect us against these claims. Liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation and to pay significant damages. As a result, liability claims, whether or not successful, could seriously damage our reputation and business.

For information regarding pending litigation filed against us, please see “Business — Litigation and other legal matters” in this annual report.

We may be liable to third parties for information uploaded on or retrieved from our website.

We could be exposed to liability for content that may be accessible through our website or content and materials that we develop or that our users may upload or post in our social networking sites, message boards, chat rooms, blogs or via our other interactive services. For example, we are a party to a criminal writ petition filed in the High Court of Mumbai, India, which alleged that we, through our website, www.rediff.com, provided a search facility that enabled Internet users to view pornographic, objectionable and obscene material.

We may also be subject to claims for defamation, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement, personal injury or other legal theories relating to the information we post or products sold by third parties on our website. For example, we had been named as a defendant in proceedings filed by The Board of Control of Cricket in India (“BCCI”) in the High Court of Madras, where BCCI sought to obtain a permanent injunction against a vendor who depicted the image of “IPL”. We could also become liable if confidential information is disclosed inappropriately on or through our website.

It is also possible that if any information provided through our services contains errors, third parties could make claims against us for losses incurred in reliance on the information. Please see the section entitled “Business – Litigation and other legal matters” in this annual report for more information on the litigation described above.

We also offer Internet-based e-mail services, which could expose us to potential liabilities or claims resulting from:

Our video sharing platform, called iShare, allows members to upload and share music, videos and photos. Under our terms of use, our members are responsible for their accounts and must agree and undertake not to post or upload any material that violates or infringes any copyright or other privacy laws and acknowledge that Rediff.com assumes no responsibility for the content accessed or uploaded through this service. Nonetheless, we could be subject to litigation within or outside of India which could include civil or criminal prosecution and civil liability. Defending such litigation could involve substantial management time and cost and we can give no assurance that we would succeed in defending any such litigation.

The laws in India and the United States relating to the liability of companies which provide online services, like ours, for activities of their users, are still relatively unclear. Investigating and defending these claims is an expensive process, even if they do not result in liability. We do not carry insurance to protect us against all types of claims, and there is no precedent governing such liabilities under Indian law. Further, our business is based on establishing the Rediff.com website as a trustworthy and dependable provider of content and services. Allegations of impropriety, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation, disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, reduce our revenues and increase our expenses.

For information regarding pending litigation filed against us, please see “Business — Litigation and other legal matters” in this annual report.

If we are unable to provide innovative search experiences and other services that generate significant traffic to our website(s), our business could be harmed, causing our revenues to decline.

Internet search is characterized by rapidly changing technology, significant competition, evolving industry standards, and frequent product and service enhancements. We must continually invest in improving our users’ search experience—including improving the relevance of our search results, as well as presenting users with a search experience that is responsive to their needs and preferences in order to continue to attract, retain, and expand our user base. We currently deploy our own technology to provide search results on our network and failure to keep pace with industry and/or develop new innovative search offering could adversely impact our operating results.

Consumers may sue us if any of the products or services offered on our website’s marketplace are defective, fail to perform properly and/or injures the user. Although our agreements with manufacturers and distributors whose products are displayed on our website’s marketplace typically contain provisions intended to limit our exposure to such liability claims, these provisions may not be sufficient to limit all of our liability from such claims. Product warranties are the responsibility of those who sell products on our website’s marketplace, although our reputation can be adversely affected if a user is not satisfied with a purchase. Liability claims could require us to spend a considerable amount of resources, time and money in litigation and to pay significant damages. Allegations of impropriety, even if unfounded, or poor service provided by manufacturers and distributors on our website’s marketplace, could damage our reputation, disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, reduce our revenues and increase our expenses.

For information regarding pending litigation filed against us, please see “Business — Litigation and other legal matters” in this annual report.

In addition, the laws relating to the online sale of goods and services are not fully developed. The various laws and regulations covering online sale of products and their interpretation involve a significant degree of uncertainty. Further, the application of tax law as it relates to online transactions for goods and services is likewise uncertain. Our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially affected if we were required to obtain such registrations or comply with various additional laws and regulations or pay additional taxes.

Privacy concerns may prevent us from selling demographically targeted advertising in the future and make us less attractive to advertisers.

We collect personal data from our user base in order to better understand our users and their needs and to help our advertisers target specific demographic groups. If privacy concerns or regulatory restrictions prevent us from selling demographically targeted advertising, we may become less attractive to advertisers. For example, as part of our future advertisement delivery system, we may integrate user information such as advertisement response rate, name, address, age or e-mail address, with third-party databases to generate comprehensive demographic profiles for individual users. However, if we are unable to construct demographic profiles for Internet users because users refuse to give consent, we will be less attractive to advertisers and our business may suffer.

Regulatory authorities around the world are considering a number of legislative proposals concerning data protection. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.

Further, failure or perceived failure by us to comply with our policies, applicable legal and other requirements, related to the collection, use, sharing or security of personal information, or other privacy, data-retention or data-protection matters could result in a loss of user confidence in us, damage to our brands, resulting in a loss of users, advertising partners, or affiliates, which could adversely affect our business.

We may not be able to manage our operations effectively if we grow, which could harm our business.

We anticipate expansion of our business in India as we address growth in our customer base and market opportunities. In order to manage the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we will be required to improve existing and implement new operational and financial systems, procedures and controls, and to expand, train and manage our employee base. Further, our management will be required to maintain and expand our relationships with various other partners, including but not limited to, mobile phone operators, Internet and other online service providers and other third parties necessary to operate and grow our business. We cannot assure you that our current and planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls will be adequate to support our future operations or that such relationships will be maintained or developed.

Currency exchange rate fluctuations may adversely impact our operating results and financial condition.

The exchange rate between the Indian Rupee and the U.S. dollar has fluctuated substantially both historically and in recent years, and could continue to fluctuate substantially in the future. Our Indian revenues are translated into U.S. Dollars for reporting purposes at average annual U.S. Dollar/Indian Rupee exchange rates, which are computed by us based on daily closing rates published by the Reserve Bank of India. If the Indian Rupee depreciates further, such depreciation may adversely affect our reported revenues and operating results in U.S. Dollars.

Additionally, because a substantial portion of our cash and cash equivalents is currently held in Indian Rupees, devaluation or depreciation of the value of the Indian Rupee will adversely affect the value of our cash reserves in foreign currency terms. In addition, our market valuation could be materially adversely affected by the devaluation of the Indian Rupee if U.S. investors analyze our value and performance based on the U.S. dollar equivalent of our financial condition and operating results.

A small group of our existing shareholders control our Company and may have interests which conflict with those of our other shareholders or owners of our ADSs

As of March 31, 2013 our six largest shareholders beneficially owned an aggregate of approximately 63% of our Equity Shares.

As a result, such shareholders could act collectively to exercise control over most matters requiring approval by our shareholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions among other matters. Under Indian law, a simple majority is sufficient to control all shareholder action except for those items which require approval by a special resolution. In case of a special resolution, approval of three-fourths of the shareholders present and voting is required. Examples of actions that require a special resolution include:

Further, Ajit Balakrishnan, Diwan Arun Nanda and Rediffusion Holdings Private Limited (formerly Rediffusion Advertising Private Limited), are entitled to appoint and have appointed Mr. Balakrishnan as a Director and as our Chairman so long as they hold, singly or jointly, not less than 10% of our issued, subscribed and paid-up capital. Mr. Balakrishnan currently serves an indefinite term as a Director and is not required to retire by rotation.

The interests of our controlling shareholders may differ from our other shareholders or owners of our ADSs and could result in a delay or prevention of a change in control of our Company even if a transaction of that sort would be beneficial to our other shareholders, including the owners of our ADSs, or in the best interest of our Company.

For additional information regarding our principal shareholders, please see “Principal Shareholders” in this annual report.

The laws of India do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as those of the United States, and we may be unsuccessful in protecting our intellectual property rights, which could lead to a reduction in our revenues and an increase in our expenses.

Our intellectual property rights are important to our business. We rely on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property.

Our efforts to protect our intellectual property may not be adequate. Our competitors may independently develop similar technology or duplicate our products or services. Unauthorized parties may infringe upon or misappropriate our products, services or proprietary information. In addition, the laws of India do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, and the global nature of the Internet makes it difficult to control the ultimate destination of our products and services. The misappropriation or duplication of our intellectual property could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, reduce our revenues and increase our expenses. We may need to litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Any such litigation could be time-consuming and costly and may not ultimately prove successful which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

We could be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of our competitors grows and the content and functionality of our website or other product or service offerings overlap with

competitive offerings. Defending against these claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive and divert our attention and resources from operating our business. If we become liable to third parties for infringing their intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay substantial damages awards and forced to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the applications that contain the infringing technology. We may be unable to develop non-infringing technology or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

For additional information regarding our intellectual property rights, please see “Business - Intellectual Property” in this annual report.

The limited installed personal computer base in India limits our pool of potential customers and restricts the growth of our business.

The market penetration of, or access to, personal computers, or PCs, and, consequently, the Internet in India is far lower than in the United States. Alternate methods of obtaining access to the Internet, such as through smart phones, cable television modems or set-top boxes for televisions, although available, are available in a limited manner in India. We cannot assure you that the market penetration of personal computers in India will increase rapidly or at all, or that alternate means of accessing the Internet will develop and become widely available in India. If these events do not occur we may not be able to expand our customer base, which will make it difficult for us to execute our business strategy.

The success of our e-commerce platform depends on its acceptance and growth in India, which is uncertain.

Many of our existing and proposed products and services are designed to facilitate e-commerce in India, and demand and market acceptance for these products and services by consumers is highly uncertain. Critical issues concerning the commercial use of the Internet, such as legal recognition of electronic records, validity of contracts entered into through the Internet and the validity of digital signatures, are governed in India by the Information Technology Act, 2000 (the “IT Act”). In addition, many Indian businesses have deferred deploying e-commerce initiatives for a number of reasons, including the existence or perception of, among other things:

If usage of the Internet, credit cards and e-commerce in India does not substantially increase and the legal infrastructure and network infrastructure in India are not further developed, we are not likely to achieve significant growth of our e-commerce products and services which could adversely impact our operating result.

Compliance with corporate governance and public disclosure requirements may increase our costs of compliance.

Regulations and standards relating to accounting, corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations, Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011, Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedure and sensitive personal data or information) Rules, 2011 are resulting in additional costs for companies like ours. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs of compliance.

In particular, continuing compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related regulations regarding our required assessment of our internal control over financial reporting requires the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources and external auditor’s independent assessment of the internal control over financial reporting.

In connection with this annual report, our management assessed our internal controls over financial reporting, and determined that our internal controls were effective as of March 31, 2013 and our independent auditors have expressed an unqualified opinion over the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of such period. However, we will undertake management assessments of our internal controls over financial reporting in connection with each annual report, and any deficiencies uncovered by these assessments or any inability of our auditors to issue an unqualified opinion could harm our reputation and the price of our equity shares and ADSs. Our efforts to comply with laws, regulations and standards in this regard have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Further, if we fail to comply with new or changed laws or regulations, our business and reputation may be harmed.

We are incorporated in India, and a large part of our assets, business operations and employees are located in India. Consequently, our financial performance and the market price of our ADSs will be affected by social and economic developments in India and the policies of the Government of India, including taxation and foreign investment policies, as well as changes in exchange rates, interest rates and controls, among other matters.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war involving India, the United States, and other countries could adversely affect the financial markets, result in a loss of business confidence and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Terrorist attacks, such as the ones that occurred in New York and Washington, D.C., on September 11, 2001, New Delhi on December 13, 2001, the Mumbai train bombings on July 11, 2006, the terror attacks in Mumbai on November 26, 2008 and July 13, 2011 as well as other acts of violence or war, including those involving India, the United States or other countries, may adversely affect Indian and worldwide financial markets. These acts may also result in a loss of business confidence and have other consequences that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Travel restrictions as a result of such attacks may have an adverse impact on our ability to operate effectively. Increased volatility in the financial markets can have an adverse impact on the economies of India and other countries, including economic recession.

If communal disturbances or riots erupt in India, or if regional hostilities increase, this would adversely affect the Indian economy, the health of which our business depends upon.

Some parts of India have experienced communal disturbances, terrorist attacks and riots during recent years. If such events recur, the market for our services may be adversely affected, resulting in a decline in our income.

The Asian region has from time to time, experienced instances of civil unrest and hostilities among neighboring countries, including those between India and Pakistan. Since May 1999, military confrontations between India and Pakistan have occurred in Kashmir. The hostilities between India and Pakistan are particularly threatening because both India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Hostilities and tensions may occur in the future and on a wider scale. Also, since 2003, there have been military hostilities and continuing civil unrest and instability in Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Syria and other part of Middle East. Events of this nature in the future, as well as social and civil unrest within other countries in Asia, could influence the Indian economy and could have a material adverse effect on the market for securities of Indian companies, including our ADSs, and on the market for our services.

Future political instability in India could halt or delay the liberalization of the Indian economy and adversely affect economic conditions in India generally and our business in particular.

The Government of India has traditionally exercised and continues to exercise significant influence over many aspects of the economy. Our business, and the market price and liquidity of our ADSs, may be affected by interest rates, changes in Government policy, taxation, social and civil unrest and other political, economic or other developments in or affecting India.

Since 1991, successive Indian governments have pursued policies of economic liberalization, including significantly relaxing restrictions on the private sector. We cannot assure you that these liberalization policies will continue in the future. Any significant change in India’s economic liberalization and deregulation policies could adversely affect business and economic conditions in India generally, including our business.

Indian law limits our ability to raise capital and the ability of others to acquire us, which could prevent us from operating our business or entering into a transaction that is in the best interests of our shareholders.

Indian law constrains our ability to raise capital through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities. Foreign investment in an Indian company may require approval from relevant government authorities in India including the Reserve Bank of India. The Government of India has classified existing businesses into various categories for automatic approval of foreign direct investment up to certain prescribed percentages. Under the current guidelines, the Government of India provides for approval under the automatic route for foreign direct investment proposals relating to the information technology sector.

We cannot assure you that equity or other forms of financing will be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, our ability to fund our operations, take advantage of anticipated or unanticipated opportunities, develop or enhance our infrastructure and services, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited. Our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected by any such limitation.

Our ability to acquire companies organized outside of India may depend on the approval of the Government of India and the Reserve Bank of India. Our failure to obtain approval for acquisitions of companies organized outside India may restrict our growth, which could negatively affect our revenues.

As part of our business strategy, we may plan to acquire complementary businesses, including businesses based outside of India. For the acquisition of a business based outside India we may, under certain circumstances, be required to obtain approval of the Reserve Bank of India and/or the Government of India. Under guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the acquisition of companies organized outside India is permitted under certain circumstances without prior approval if such acquisition does not exceed 400% of the net worth of the acquiring company as of the date of the last audited balance sheet or unless the acquisition is funded with cash from acquiring company’s existing foreign currency accounts or with cash proceeds from the issuance of ADRs/ADSs. This ceiling includes contribution to the capital of companies organized outside India, loans granted by the Indian party to such companies organized outside India and all of the guarantees issued by the Indian party to or on behalf of such companies organized outside India.

If we move forward with such an acquisition outside of India, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain any required approval from the Reserve Bank of India and/or the Government of India. Our failure to obtain approval from the Reserve Bank of India and/or the Government of India for acquisitions of companies organized outside India may restrict our growth, which could negatively impact our business and prospects and the market value of our ADSs.

Statistical and third-party data in this document and documents incorporated by reference herein may be incomplete or unreliable.

We have not independently verified data from industry publications and other third-party sources and therefore cannot assure you that they are complete or reliable. Such data may also be produced on different bases from those used in Western countries. Therefore, discussions of matters relating to India, its economy or our industry are subject to the caveat that the statistical and other data upon which such discussions are based may be incomplete or unreliable.

It may be difficult for you to enforce any judgment obtained in the United States against us, or our affiliates.

We are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of India and many of our directors and executive officers reside outside of the United States. In addition, a large part of our assets and the assets of many of these persons are located outside of the United States. As a result, you may be unable to:

We have been advised by our Indian counsel that the United States and India do not currently have a treaty providing for reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts in the United States in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any federal or state court in the United States on civil liability, whether or not predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States, would not be enforceable in India. However, the party in whose favor such final judgment is rendered may bring a new suit in a competent court in India based on a final judgment which has been obtained in the United States. A judgment of the courts in the United States shall be conclusive as to any matter directly adjudicated between the parties to the suit except if Indian courts were of the opinion that such judgment:

Trading volume in our ADSs is inconsistent and we cannot assure you that an active, liquid trading market in our ADSs will be established. Holders of our ADSs are entitled to withdraw the Equity Shares underlying the ADSs from our depositary facility at any time, subject to certain legal restrictions.

In addition, under current Indian law, Equity Shares may only be deposited into our depositary facility in exchange for ADSs and, under certain circumstances, the number of ADSs that can be outstanding at any time is limited as follows: after any offering of ADSs, Equity Shares can be deposited for issuance of ADSs only to the extent that (a) holders have surrendered ADSs and withdrawn Equity Shares from the ADS facility and (b) such holders sold such Equity Shares through stockbrokers registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) in a domestic Indian stock market. Therefore, unless the law is changed, the number of outstanding ADSs and the trading volumes for all ADSs may significantly decrease at any time to the extent that Equity Shares are withdrawn from our depositary facility and not deposited for the re-issuance of ADSs, which may adversely affect the market price and the liquidity of the market for our ADSs.

Currently there is no public trading market for our Equity Shares in India or elsewhere, which, together with existing Indian laws that restrict the conversion of outstanding equity shares into ADSs, reduces your ability to sell our Equity Shares represented by ADSs.

Currently there is no public trading market for our Equity Shares in India or elsewhere, and we cannot assure you that we will take steps to develop one or that we will be able to meet applicable listing guidelines or regulations to list our Equity Shares on a stock exchange in India or elsewhere. Our Equity Shares are currently only traded on the NASDAQ Global Market in the form of ADSs. Under current Indian laws and regulations, outstanding Equity Shares not listed in India may not be deposited into our depositary facility except in certain limited circumstances or with certain regulatory approvals. Thus, if you elect to surrender your ADSs and receive Equity Shares, you will not be able to trade those Equity Shares on any securities market. Further, you will be prohibited from re-depositing such unlisted outstanding Equity Shares with our Depositary.

Under current Indian regulations and practice, approval of the Reserve Bank of India is not required for a renunciation in favor of a resident of India of rights to subscribe to equity shares pursuant to a rights offering or for the sale of equity shares underlying ADSs by a non-resident of India to a resident of India, unless the sale breaches the pricing guidelines laid down for this purpose by the RBI, which specify that where the equity shares of an Indian company are not listed on a stock exchange in India, the transfer of shares shall be at a price not less than the fair value to be determined by a SEBI registered Category-I Merchant Banker or a Chartered Accountant as per the discounted free cash flow method. The price per share arrived at should be certified by a SEBI registered Category-I Merchant Banker/Chartered Accountant.

Our management has broad discretion in using the proceeds from our securities offerings and cash from operations and therefore investors will be relying on the judgment of our management to invest those funds effectively.

Our management has broad discretion with respect to the use of the net proceeds from our securities offerings and cash from our operations. As of March 31, 2013, we held approximately US$20 million as cash and cash equivalents and short term deposits with banks on which we are earning interest.

We intend to use these funds primarily to develop additional platforms for the growth of our online business, product development, and general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures and strategic investments, partnerships and acquisitions. However, there is a possibility that we may be unable to make successful strategic investments, partnerships or acquisitions in the near future. Further, there could be a risk that our management may use these funds in an inefficient or ineffective manner.

Our ADS market price is highly volatile and could drop unexpectedly in the future. Should our ADS market price drop below $1.00, our ADSs may be delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market.

The stock markets in the United States have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices for the securities of technology companies, particularly Internet companies. Volatility in the price of our ADSs may be caused by factors outside of our control and may be unrelated or disproportionate to our operating results. In the event that the bid price of our ADSs falls below $1.00 and remains below $1.00 for more than 30 consecutive days, our ADSs may be delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market. The delisting of our ADSs from the NASDAQ Global Market could negatively affect the market price of our ADSs and impair your ability to sell such ADSs.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a public company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against that company. Securities class action litigation had been instituted against us in the United States in the past. Such litigation, if brought against us in the future, even if unsuccessful, could damage our reputation and result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Owners of our ADSs may be restricted in their ability to exercise preemptive rights and thereby may suffer future dilution of their ownership position.

Under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, as amended (the “Companies Act”), a company incorporated in India must offer its holders of equity shares preemptive rights to subscribe and pay for a proportionate number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentages prior to the issuance of any new equity shares, unless the preemptive rights have been waived by adopting a special resolution by holders of three-fourths of the company’s equity shares which are voted on the resolution. U.S. owners of ADSs may not be able to exercise preemptive rights for Equity Shares underlying ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to the rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. Our decision to file a registration statement will depend on the costs and potential liabilities associated with any given registration statement as well as the perceived benefits of enabling the owners of our ADSs to exercise their preemptive rights and any other factors that we deem appropriate to consider at the time the decision must be made. We may elect not to file a registration statement related to preemptive rights otherwise available by law to our shareholders. In the case of such future issuance, the new securities may be issued to our Depositary, which, if there is a trading market for such new securities which may not be the case, may sell the securities for the benefit of the owners of our ADSs. The value, if any, our Depositary would receive upon the sale of such securities cannot be predicted. To the extent that owners of ADSs are unable to exercise preemptive rights granted in respect of the Equity Shares represented by their ADSs, their proportional interests in our Company would be reduced.

Owners of our ADSs may be restricted in their ability to exercise voting rights because of the practical and legal limitations associated with instructing our Depositary to vote on your behalf.

Holders of ADSs may exercise voting rights only through a depositary, unlike an owner of Equity Shares, who can exercise voting rights directly. An owner of ADSs generally will have the right under the deposit agreement to instruct our Depositary to exercise the voting rights for the Equity Shares represented by the ADSs. Owners of ADSs have no rights pursuant to the Companies Act, under which we are incorporated, and are limited to those rights granted to them pursuant to the depository agreement.

If our Depositary timely receives voting instructions from an owner of ADSs, it will endeavor to vote the securities represented by those ADSs in accordance with such voting instructions. In the event that voting takes place by a show of hands, our Depositary will cause the custodian to vote all deposited securities in accordance with the instructions received from owners of a majority of the ADSs for which our Depositary receives voting instructions. However, the ability of our Depositary to carry out voting instructions may be limited by practical and legal limitations and the terms of the securities on deposit. We cannot assure that holders of ADSs will receive voting materials in time to enable them to return voting instructions to our Depositary in a timely manner.

In June 2009 The Ministry of Company Affairs (MCA) of the Government of India has clarified that a depositary receipt holder cannot be considered to be a shareholder of the Company until such time as the holder elects to transfer / redeem depositary receipts for underlying equity shares. It has been further clarified that the depositary bank cannot be considered a nominee of the holder under the Indian Companies Act.

We do not pay dividends and currently have no plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We currently do not pay cash dividends and do not anticipate paying cash dividends to the owners of our Equity Shares or ADSs in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their Equity Shares or ADSs, which may increase or decrease in value, as the only way to realize cash from their investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our ADSs.

We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company for United States federal income tax purposes, which could subject United States investors in the ADSs or Equity Shares to adverse tax consequences.

We do not expect to be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for United States federal income tax purposes for the most recent taxable year ended March 31, 2013 . However, there is no guarantee that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with our determination. Moreover, it is uncertain whether we will be classified as a PFIC for any future taxable year. PFIC status is a factual determination made annually on the basis of the composition of our income and the value of our active versus passive assets. We currently maintain a significant amount of passive assets, including cash, which contributes significantly to the risk that we may be or become classified as a PFIC. If we do not spend substantial amounts of our liquid assets for business development purposes or if our market capitalization does not substantially increase, we may also be classified as a PFIC for one or more future taxable years. If we are or become classified as a PFIC, United States investors holding our ADSs or our Equity Shares may be subject to penalizing tax and interest charge rules on gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of our ADSs or our Equity Shares and on the receipt of distributions on our ADSs or Equity Shares to the extent such gain or distribution is treated as an “excess distribution” under the United States federal income tax rules. Please see the section in this annual report entitled “Taxation – United States Federal Income Tax Considerations – Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules”.

Sales of substantial amounts of securities in the public market could depress the price of our ADSs and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional Equity Shares.

The market price of our ADSs could decline as a result of sales of a large number of Equity Shares represented by ADSs on a U.S. stock exchange or elsewhere, or the perception that such sales could occur. Such sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell Equity Shares in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate. As of March 31, 2013, we had an aggregate of 14,810,178 Equity Shares outstanding. Of the outstanding Equity Shares, 9,295,956 ADSs, representing 4,647,978 Equity Shares, are freely tradable. Our remaining Equity Shares may be sold in the United States pursuant to a registration statement under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. Further, certain holders of at least 30% of our Equity Shares can require us, subject to limitations, to effect a registration of such Equity Shares and/or to list the Equity Shares either on the NASDAQ Global Market (formerly the NASDAQ National Market), the National Stock Exchange of India or the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (formerly The Stock Exchange, Mumbai).

We may be required to list our Equity Shares on an Indian stock exchange. If we were to list our Equity Shares on an Indian stock exchange, conditions in the Indian securities market may affect the price or liquidity of our Equity Shares and indirectly of our ADSs.

On June 28, 2006, the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of India issued amendments to the “Issue Of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds And Ordinary Shares (Through Depositary Receipt Mechanism) Scheme, 1993” (the “Scheme”). The amendments included a statement that Indian companies that have issued depositary receipts and/or foreign currency convertible bonds prior to August 31, 2005 will be permitted to comply with listing conditions on the Indian stock exchanges within three years of having started to make profits. At present, the manner in which the amendments to the Scheme prescribed by the Ministry of Finance will be interpreted and implemented, and how they would apply to us, is still uncertain.

We may be required by the Government of India at some point in time to list on a local Indian stock exchange. We may not be able to comply with any timeline for listing and other standards imposed on us, and we are uncertain as to the consequences to us of any non-compliance.

The Indian securities markets are smaller than securities markets in more developed economies and are more volatile than the securities markets in other countries. Indian stock exchanges have in the past experienced substantial fluctuations in the prices of listed securities.

Indian stock exchanges have also experienced problems that have affected the market price and liquidity of the securities of Indian companies. These problems have included temporary exchange closures, broker defaults, settlement delays and strikes by brokers. In addition, the governing bodies of the Indian stock exchanges have from time to time restricted securities from trading, limited price movements and restricted margin requirements. Further, from time to time, disputes have occurred between listed

companies and the Indian stock exchanges and other regulatory bodies that, in some cases, have had a negative effect on market sentiment. If we were to list our Equity Shares on an Indian Stock Exchange and similar problems occur in the future, they could harm the market price and liquidity of the Equity Shares and this could have an adverse effect on the price and liquidity of our ADSs.

Our legal name is Rediff.com India Limited and our commercial name is Rediff.com. We were incorporated in India on January 9, 1996 as Rediff Communication Private Limited under the Indian Companies Act. We converted to a public company on May 29, 1998. On February 15, 2000, we changed our name to Rediff.com India Limited. Our principal office is located at Mahalaxmi Engineering Estate, 1st Floor, L.J. First Cross Road No-1, Mahim (West), Mumbai 400 016, India, and our telephone number is +91-22-6182-0000. Our Internet address is www.rediff.com.

We are a leading Internet destination in India, focusing on providing world-class online business and consumer offerings in India and to the global Indian community. Our websites in India and North America consist of communication services, such as email, news and information channels, community features including a social networking platform, photo/video and music sharing capabilities, local search, and mobile and online marketplace services. We re-launched our web hosting and business email service under the WebPro brand, offering an affordable and easy-to-use way to set up and own domain-name e-mail services plus a web presence with video streaming and ecommerce facilities. In February 2012, we launched a real-time news search service, Rediff Real Time News, that delivers fresh and recent news sourced from over 30,000 news sites from India and the world.

We also publish two weekly newspapers, “India Abroad” and “India in New York”. These news publications are targeted at the Indian-American community based in the United States and Canada.

In June 2000, we issued 5.3 million ADSs, representing 2.65 million Equity Shares, at a price of US$12.00 per ADS, raising net proceeds of US$57.3 million, after underwriting discounts and other expenses, and we listed our ADSs on the NASDAQ Global Market (formerly the NASDAQ National Market). In November 2005, we issued an additional 3.0 million ADSs, representing 1.5 million Equity Shares, at a price of US$15.86 per ADS, raising net proceeds of US$44.1 million, after underwriting discounts and other expenses, and these ADSs were also listed on the NASDAQ Global Market. Our ADSs are listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the ticker symbol REDF. The net proceeds of our ADS offerings have been used by us, and in future, are intended to be used by us, to develop content for our Internet website, to advertise and promote our brand, to improve the technological capabilities of our company, and for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures, strategic investments, partnerships and acquisitions.

On November 26, 2010, we acquired Vubites India Private Limited (“Vubites”) for approximately US$0.30 million in cash and the assumption of a $2.7 million loan. Vubites helps small and local businesses advertise on national TV channels within their cities to reach their target audiences.

We believe that the growth of our revenues and profits from our India Online business is dependent on the growth of the Indian Internet market and mobile phone, smartphone and tablet user base, improvements in broadband infrastructure in the mass-Indian market and particularly in highly populated areas, the evolution of adequate online payment mechanisms in India, a consequent increase in online advertising, and our ability to capture as revenues a sizeable share of any increases in online advertizing spending.

The growth of the user base for Internet, mobile phones and related devices is dependent on Indian government policies that facilitate a competitive and financially healthy telecom industry and stimulate broadband Internet investments by telecom companies. During the last few years, the Government of India has taken a number of steps in this direction, opening most sectors of the telecom industry to the private sector and foreign capital, establishing independent regulatory authorities and reducing taxes (mainly indirect taxes) on personal computers and smart phones The Indian mobile phone user base stood at 867 million as of April 30, 2013 (source: TRAI). We expect that the growth of the Internet market in India will be driven by an increase in broadband subscribers. The number of such subscribers stood at 15.09 million as of April 2013 (source: TRAI).

The growth of our international business, particularly our North American operations, is dependent on our ability to launch new services that appeal to our worldwide user base, which consists principally of Indians living outside India, and potential new users of our service, as well as revenue growth from our weekly newspapers, India Abroad and India in New York.

Our overall growth is also dependent on general economic conditions in all our markets, particularly India and the United States, and on the pace of economic expansion in India and other emerging markets where we do business.

In India, Internet access and usage through PCs, smart phones and related devices is still at an early stage of development and adoption. Given the demographics in India and market dynamics, principally driven by both the Government of India and private sector investments in the Indian market, we believe that over time there will be growth in demand for the services provided by our Company. We believe our opportunities are driven by the following factors, among others:

We believe that, as an operator of a website with a large number of users, we are well positioned to benefit from the anticipated growth of revenues generated from these services, as well as new services we may offer in the future.

We are focused on providing a full range of culturally relevant online products and services to Indians living in India and other parts of the world. We intend to continue this strategy, and may from time to time introduce new products and services or make strategic investments in related areas to further increase our brand name recognition and our user base to improve our operating and financial performance. The products and services we currently offer include:

Our Rediff.com India website consists of information, communication and content services, free community products and platforms, e-commerce and mobile services. With 14.6 million monthly active users in India and 17.1 million monthly active users worldwide, as reported by ComScore Media Metrix (June 2013 report) we believe Rediff.com is one of the most recognized online brands in India and among the Indian community worldwide.

We deliver information and content to our users in an easy-to-use interface. The information and content channels currently available to our users include news, business, movies, cricket/sports and several other topics of interest. We currently offer this information and content without charge to our users.

In our endeavor to enhance the user’s browsing experience, our website now sports a tiled design, clean user interface and easy navigation aids, all of which make it convenient for the user to discover content. We have aggressively focused on improving the user experience on Rediff.com to retain our current subscriber base and attract new users to our site.

We believe that a significant percentage of our online users are in the 18- to 34-year old age group. As such, we place emphasis on reaching younger users through focused information and content relevant to this audience, and target our marketing efforts to reach this demographic, as well as others, both in rural and urban regions across India.

Our primary information and content channels are broadly classified into news content and interest specific subjects. News content includes current affairs, business and finance, movies and sports. We provide our users with up-to-date news of interest to Indians, including feature stories, interviews and online chats with leading Indian personalities in public life, as well as sports and entertainment, breaking news and in-depth coverage of significant events. We use our in-house staff to generate this content as well as freelancers and news feeds from wire services and other online and offline media houses. This content can be in text, audio and video formats and we offer our users tools to search this content, opt to get news items by e-mail or on their mobile phones and share the content with other users in their network by adding it to their individualized web page using our “MyPage” service.

Recently, we introduced a Real-time News service that delivers recent news from across 30,000 news sources in India and worldwide, within minutes of the news appearing on these sources. The service also offers the latest images from these sources and currently has an index size of 55 million images. In addition to high quality images published on news sites, it also contains a real-time feed of photographs taken at live Bollywood and sports celebrity events. We believe the functionality, ease of use and search results of our Rediff Realtime News service offers us a competitive advantage in the India market.

Through a single login facility, we provide a combination of free and paid community features and products to consumers and businesses. Our offerings include e-mail, blogs, message boards, shopping, social networking and mobile related services. Some of these features and products are offered without charge, while others are offered on a subscription or fee basis. Payment for our fee-based services can be made by credit card and within India by check/demand draft or through direct debit of the user’s Internet banking account. In case of shopping, we also offer the additional payment option of cash on delivery.

We offer our users a variety of e-mail solutions tailored to their needs. We believe that we have priced each of our branded e-mail products competitively. All of our e-mail services offer spam control and support the use of English and eight Indian languages — Hindi, Gujarati, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Bengali and Kannada. Our e-mail offerings are described below.

Vubites enables local businesses to advertise on national TV channels within their city. Vubites works with TV broadcasters and cable multi-system operators (MSOs) in the principal cities of India, enhancing local advertiser’s revenues by helping to make advertising on TV more affordable. Vubites offers web-based tools that small merchants can use to create low cost TV ads in mpeg2 format, which play on television directly, an online media planning tool with which advertisers can create their media plan without any assistance, and a technology to insert TV ads at the city level. The addition of Vubites has expanded our reach in local markets and provides our customers and prospects with an added conduit to reach their target audiences.

Rediff Blogs enables users to set up their own blogs and publish their thoughts and ideas directly and instantly on the web as well as the ability to visit other blogs and comment on them. Users can also post pictures and create multiple blogs under a single username and password. We provide users with the option of blogging in eight different Indian languages — Hindi, Gujarati, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Bengali and Kannada.

Our video sharing platform, Rediff iShare, continues to increase in popularity since its launch. Rediff iShare videos are now available for viewing on iPhones and other operating systems (OS). Video files are now available in both MP4 and flash video formats.

Rediff MyPage is our free online social networking product which allows users to become part of a network by creating and uploading profiles that include details about their profession, education and interests. Thereafter, users can invite friends to join their network and can become linked to a larger network. Our MyPage service enables users to capture photos via mobile devices and upload and share them within their social network on the service. Other features include bookmarks, viewing profiles of persons, adding friends, posting on message boards, receiving updates from other social networks and personalization tools. Rediff MyPage allows companies, colleges, celebrities and individuals to create their respective profiles where their communities can connect with them and receive updates on their latest offerings, events and releases.

Get Ahead, our editorial content channel, also supports a forum for questions and answers. This social media platform allows users to post questions and answers on various issues, and vote for the most relevant answers within a community environment.

Our Finance platform, Moneywiz, provides stock market quotes, company information and a personal portfolio tracker. In addition, we provide business news, feature articles, expert columns and interviews. Our business channel offers business news from India and coverage of Indian stock markets. This channel also provides regular columns and feature stories, as well as personal finance information. Our free, real-time stock market indices and stock quotes tool, which enables users to benchmark returns on their investments has been well received by users.

Rediff Shopping is an online marketplace which allows users to purchase products and services from various merchants. We offer products and services from merchants in various categories, the most popular of which currently include electronics, apparel, personal accessories, flowers and jewelry.

Customers can pay for their purchases using a variety of payment options, including credit cards, debit cards, online banking services, cash on delivery, gift vouchers and checks/demand drafts. We have entered into agreements with leading Indian banks to facilitate payment processes. In our effort to provide more users with the convenience of online shopping, we have recently partnered with India Post as a logistics partner. This allows us to service more than 26,000 pin codes (similar to zip codes in the United States) across the country. We also continue to work with our vendors to improve delivery cycles to better serve our customers.

Rediff Shopping also features a vendor rating system to enable online shoppers on our e-commerce platform to rate their shopping experience with different online merchants. Customers are invited to provide feedback when items are delivered, rating their experience with the vendor as satisfactory, unsatisfactory or undecided. Vendors are rated based on the feedback provided.

We are focused on further developing and enhancing our social media, e-commerce and search capabilities and believe our individual and collective offerings will help us grow our market presence, expand our reach and increase Rediff’s brand name recognition throughout India and to Indians worldwide.

Our India online business primarily includes revenues from advertising and fee-based services. Online advertising includes revenues from advertisements and sponsorships of events on web. Fee-based services include revenues from online shopping, subscription services and mobile value-added services.

Advertising includes revenues from banner advertising, performance-based advertising, e-mail and text link campaigns and sponsorships of events on web. Our advertisers enter into agreements pursuant to which they either pay a fixed fee per thousand banner impressions for a given time-period, usually ranging from a few weeks to one year, or a variable fee depending upon the number of clicks or leads provided to them through our website.

Some of our advertisers also enter into agreements pursuant to which they pay a fixed fee for a guaranteed number of impressions on our site. Our rate per thousand impressions, commonly referred to as CPMs, for banner advertisements varies depending on banner size, location of the advertisements on our site, the targeted geographical areas and the extent to which the advertisements are targeted to a particular audience. Discounts from standard CPM rates may be provided for higher volume and longer-term advertising contracts. We have introduced other formats for advertisers to broaden the appeal of the advertisements to our users, such as text links, image ads, video ads and any combinations of these options.

We had over 418 advertisers on our Rediff.com India website during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. Our top ten advertisers accounted for approximately 28% of our India advertising revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.

Revenues from fee-based services primarily includes income from various paid subscription service products, and from our online shopping marketplace.

Subscription service revenues primarily include income from our various paid e-mail service products and our domain name registration and web hosting services. The revenue for subscription based products is recognized ratably over the period of subscription.

Online shopping revenues primarily consist of commissions earned on the sale of electronics, books, music, apparel, confectionery, gifts and other items to customers who shop from vendors on our online store. Revenues from online shopping services also include fees charged to vendors for creating, designing and hosting the vendors’ product information on our website.

Our operating infrastructure is scalable and has been designed with a view to serve and deliver millions of page views per day and allow users to access our products and services quickly and efficiently from different locations worldwide. Our infrastructure is also designed to provide high-speed access by forwarding queries to web-hosting sites with greater resources or lower loads. Our web pages are generated, served and cached by servers located at co-location web hosting sites in India.

We use Apache and IIS servers that run on Linux and Windows platforms. Servers in India are maintained mainly at service providers in India and elsewhere as needed to support our customer base. We have the capability to deliver content using our own content delivery network and also use an external content delivery network where we are not present if and as needed. We believe that using these hosting services enhances our ability to protect our systems from power loss, break-ins and other potential external causes of service interruption. These hosting services also provide continuous customer service, multiple Internet connections and continuous power supply to our systems. In addition, we conduct online monitoring of all our systems for accessibility, load, system resources, network-server intrusion and timeliness of content. We have built a scalable column store data warehouse to cater to the increasing demand of storage and faster retrieval of users’ data.

Our services are accessible with equal ease over PCs and mobile devices, such as smart phones and tablets. We have the ability to detect the browser capabilities and geographic location of the user to serve pages with appropriate layouts and supported features. We can engage in real time log capturing and the analyzing of internally developed systems in order to provide an online capability to mine information. The domain + mailbox product is improved to cater to large enterprises with capabilities to access mail on mobile, web or mail clients such as Outlook. We have also added the support for calendar and contacts synchronization across devices. We have improved upon our search technology and have introduced social and collective intelligence features across all our services. Data mining technologies are used in news products for data oriented journalism.

Our sales and marketing professionals are responsible for securing advertisers and shopping merchants, planning and creating advertising campaigns and obtaining and analyzing customer feedback. Sales team members are based in Mumbai, New Delhi, Bangalore, Chennai, Hyderabad and New York. The sales team coordinates regularly regarding advertising across all of our businesses. Our sales team includes designers, copywriters, programmers and campaign managers.

In India, our sales team focuses its sales efforts on major advertisers as well as smaller corporations. Our sales team consults regularly with advertisers on the design and placement of their web-based advertising, provides advertisers with advertising measurement analysis and focuses on providing a high level of customer service satisfaction.

In the past few years, a number of advertising agencies have been established in India to promote the Internet as an advertising medium among Indian advertisers. In addition, several full-service advertising agencies in India have expanded their operations by creating and growing their Internet / interactive advertising divisions. Our advertising business from digital agencies were accounted for approximately 66% of our advertisement revenues during fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.

Our shopping platform has a host of user-friendly features such as product search and detailed product category listings. The “tracking order”, “view account”, “shopping bag details” and “order status update by automated e-mail” features make online shopping convenient for users. Users can place orders from anywhere in the world for delivery in India. They can pay for purchases by credit card, local check,

cash-on-delivery or direct debit to an Internet banking account with designated Indian banks. Our customer service officers address customer inquiries and solicit feedback from users to seek to continuously improve our offerings. Customers are invited to provide feedback when items are delivered using our vendor rating system, rating their experience with three options — satisfied, unsatisfied or undecided.

Once a user places an order on our website, we process and collect payment (except where the method of payment is C.O.D.) and notify the merchant, who then packages the product and arranges for delivery through one of our designated couriers or the user’s designated courier. We make payment to the merchant once we receive proof that the merchant has delivered the product. Most products purchased through our website are delivered within ten business days. Product warranties are the responsibility of those who sell products on our website’s marketplace, although our reputation can be adversely affected if a user is not satisfied with a purchase. Therefore, we monitor complaints and merchant’s rating and remove merchant with bad satisfaction record.

Pursuant to the terms of our agreements with merchants, we may receive a one-time entry fee and a separate commission on the sale of each product posted on our website.

Our sales force targets manufacturers and vendors of the leading products in India for them to offer their products through the Rediff Shopping platform. We also target manufacturers and vendors that supply products in categories that are fast moving over the Internet.

We were among the first Internet companies in India to accept credit cards for online payments. Users can use all leading international and Indian credit cards and online money transfer methods for online payments. All online transactions are secured by VeriSign Secure Socket Layer (SSL) technology.

We have entered into agreements with Axis Bank, Citibank N.A., Federal Bank and ICICI Bank Limited to automate Visa and MasterCard credit card payments through our website.

We also have arrangements with a number of major banks in India to facilitate online money transfers.

Our United States publishing business consists primarily of the Rediff India Abroad website, which is targeted at the Indian-American community in North America, and our two flagship newspapers, India Abroad and India in New York.

The Rediff India Abroad website offers information and content that is similar to the information and content on our Rediff.com India website, along with additional offerings relevant to North American users.

India Abroad, which we acquired in April 2001, was established over 39 years ago and is one of the oldest weekly newspapers focused on the Indian community residing in North America. The newspaper is published in four North America editions - New York “Tristate”, Chicago, Dallas and Los Angeles.

The paper is divided into five sections: News, Community, Business and Sports, Classifieds and Magazine. India Abroad’s content is targeted at Indians living in North America.

India Abroad offers classified advertising, which includes advertisements listed together in sequence by the nature of the advertisement, such as matrimonial, business/finance, employment, medical and real estate. The paper also has a Bulletin Board on the back cover which offers enhanced classified

advertising. India Abroad also has an associated website, www.indiaabroad.com, which allows users to start and renew subscriptions, make payments and change their delivery addresses. Users can also place classified advertisements through this website. Recently, we launched the e-edition of this publication. Subscribers can have copies e-mailed to them for their convenience.

India in New York was started in 1997 as a sister publication of India Abroad. India in New York features news, events, sports and entertainment and a wide array of classifieds. The India in New York newspaper is distributed free in the Tristate area of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. India in New York is available at restaurants, Hindu temples, Indian associations, community events and Indian grocery stores in the Tristate area.

There are a number of companies that provide websites focusing on India and the global Indian community. These companies compete with us for website visitors, online advertising and shopping, and subscription revenues. Competition is intense and is expected to increase in the future, as there are no substantial barriers to entry into these markets, although we believe our current position in the market and strength of the Rediff brand provide us with competitive advantages today and will continue to do so in the future. Our competitive ability is determined by how quickly we adopt new technologies, the user friendliness of our site designs, our ability to develop and roll out new popular online products and services, our execution skills and our financial management skills.

We compete with providers of Indian content over the Internet, including web directories, search engines, content sites, websites, horizontal sites and Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”). Our current and anticipated competitors include Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Microsoft, AOL, eBay and Snapdeal, as well as a host of other international and Indian companies. As we embark on new initiatives in the mobile arena, we anticipate that competition will intensify and we are taking steps to address this competition.

Consequently, we continue to make strategic investments in our business and in our marketing efforts to reach a wider demographic.

We also compete for advertising revenue with other forms of media, such as print media, radio and television, as well as companies known as “aggregators”, which aggregate advertising space in third party websites and resell such space to, among others, our customers and potential customers.

Many of our competitors have a longer operating history, greater name recognition, larger customer base and greater management, financial, technical, marketing, sales, brand and other resources than we do. They can use their superior experience and resources in a variety of competitive ways, including by investing more aggressively in research and development, creating superior content, making acquisitions and competing more aggressively for advertisers. In addition, emerging start-ups may be able to innovate and provide products and services faster than we can. There has also been a trend toward industry consolidation, as a result of which our smaller competitors today may become larger in the future. If our competitors are more successful than we are at generating visitors and website traffic, our revenues may decline.

There are a limited number of companies in the United States that provide newspapers focusing on India and the global Indian community. These newspapers compete with our US publishing outlets for advertising revenues. One of our newspaper competitors is India West.

Intellectual property rights are important to our business. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property. We require employees, independent contractors and, when practicable, vendors to enter into confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of their relationships with us. These agreements generally provide that confidential information developed or made known during the course of a relationship with us must be kept confidential.

Our efforts to protect our intellectual property may not be adequate. Our competitors may independently develop similar technology or duplicate our products or services. Unauthorized parties may infringe upon or misappropriate our products, services or proprietary information, including our domain name. For example, there are some parties who have registered domain names similar to or slightly different from our domain name, Rediff.com, and we have taken legal action in India and overseas to protect our rights in respect of our domain names. We do not believe that the outcome of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on our business. However, the laws of India do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Further, the global nature of the Internet makes it difficult to control the ultimate destination of our products and services. In the future, further litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Any such litigation could be time-consuming and costly, and there can be no assurance we would prevail in it.

We could be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of our competitors grows and the content and functionality of our websites or other product or service offerings overlap with competitive offerings. Defending against these claims, even if they are not meritorious, could be expensive and divert our attention from our operations. If we become liable to third parties for infringing their intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay substantial damage awards and be forced to try to obtain or develop non-infringing assets, obtain a license or cease selling the applications that contain the infringing matter. If this were to occur, we may be unable to develop non-infringing assets or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

We rely on a variety of technologies that are licensed from third parties. The software developed by these third parties is used in our website to perform key functions. These and other third-party licenses may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms in the future. The loss or inability to obtain or retain any of these licenses could delay the introduction of software enhancements, interactive tools and other features until equivalent technology can be licensed or developed. Any such delays could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We have registered our trademarks for “Rediff”, “Rediff on the Net and Design (Square)” and “Rediff.com” under various classes with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We have received registration for our trademarks “Rediff”, “Rediff.com”, “Rediffmail”, “Rediffmail Mobile”, “Rediff Mobile”, “Rediff Bol”, “Rediffmail NG Mobile”, “Rediff iShare”, “Sociali” and “Rediff Shopping”, and have applied for registration for “RediffDeal Ho Jaye” and “Rediff ZaraBol”, in India. We have also received copyright registration for our artworks entitled “How Hot Is This Stock”, “origami dog” and “sociali” and for 40 “profile photo illustrations” in India.

Our corporate headquarters are located in Mumbai, India, where we lease approximately 22,700 square feet in two buildings. In one facility we lease approximately 10,800 square feet and in the other we lease a total of approximately 11,900 square feet under three separate lease agreements. The lease for our 10,800 square-foot facility expires on January 20, 2014. In regard to our 11,900 square-foot facility, one lease, for 3,000 square feet, expires on October 31, 2015, a second lease, for 3,000 square feet of adjoining offices, expires on September 30, 2014 and the third lease, for 5,900 square feet, will expire on April 30, 2014.

We lease office space for our branch offices in India. Our lease for approximately 3,165 square feet of office space in New Delhi will expire on November 30, 2015 and our lease for 5,200 square feet of office space in Bangalore, will expire on January 31, 2014.

Our U.S. subsidiary leases approximately 6,300 square feet of office space in New York, the lease for which expires on May 31, 2018.

We do not anticipate having material difficulties renewing any of our current leases or, alternatively, entering into different space arrangements if necessary.

Seasonal fluctuations in Internet advertising have affected, and are likely to continue to affect, our business. Internet advertising in India is generally slow during the first half of the fiscal year for most Indian companies (April 1 to March 31). Such seasonal trends have in the past caused, and will likely continue to cause, fluctuations in our quarterly results, including fluctuations in sequential revenue growth rates.

On June 21, 2000, the Company, certain of our directors and others (Ajit Balakrishnan, Arun Nanda, Abhay Havaldar, Sunil Phatarphekar, Charles Robert Kaye and Tony Janz) were named as defendants in a criminal complaint (RCC Complaint Number 76 of 2000) filed by Mr. Abinav Bhatt, who was then a 22-year old student, before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pune, India, alleging commission of an offence under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for distributing, publicly exhibiting and putting into circulation obscene, pornographic and objectionable material. The RCC Complaint alleged that we, through our website www.rediff.com, provided a search facility that enabled Internet users to view obscene, pornographic and objectionable material. On November 27, 2000, the Judicial Magistrate passed an order on the complaint holding that a prima facie case under Section 292 of the IPC had been made out against us and directed commencement of criminal proceedings against all the defendants. A criminal writ petition was filed in the High Court of Mumbai (Sunil N. Phatarphekar & Ors. v. Abhinav Bhatt and Ors., Mumbai High Court, Criminal Writ Petition No. 1754 of 2000), seeking, among other relief, the setting aside of the order of the Judicial Magistrate. The High Court of Mumbai, in its order dated December 20, 2000, while granting interim relief to the petitioners in the Writ Petition, stayed the order of the Judicial Magistrate pending final disposal of the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition has been admitted by the High Court of Mumbai and currently hearings have commenced. While we believe that the lawsuit is without merit, and that we and our directors have a valid defense to the charges, in the event that we are unsuccessful in our defense, we and our directors may face both criminal penalties and monetary fines or damages. Under Indian law, any person who publishes or transmits or causes to be published in electronic form any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest, or whose effect is such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it, shall be punished (i) for the first conviction, with imprisonment of up to five years and with a fine of up to Rs.100,000 (approximately US$2,000); and (ii) in the event of a second conviction, with imprisonment of up to ten years and with a fine of up to Rs.200,000 (approximately US$4,000).

In May, 2008, a complaint was filed by The Board of Control of Cricket in India (“BCCI”) against Sandeep Goyal and us, alleging that the depiction of images in the online game known as Indian Fantasy League, started by Sandeep Goyal and hosted on the Web through our hosting services, infringed the Indian Premier League (“IPL”) trademark. BCCI is seeking (a) a permanent injunction restraining defendants from the use of logo “Indian Fantasy League.com”; (b) shutdown of the website

Indianfantasyleague.com; and (c) a rendering of the accounts of all profits earned by the website and damages of Rs.1.0 million (approximately US$20,000). We have filed our response to the BCCI complaint, and among the defenses we have raised are: (a) it is Sandeep Goyal who has infringed the trademark of IPL and not Rediff.com; (b) Rediff.com only provides the domain hosting and web based e-mail solution services which enables the subscriber to set up and manage their website as per the terms and conditions of Rediff business solutions; and (c) subscribers such as Sandeep Goyal are required to abide by and comply with the terms and conditions we impose on our subscribers, which provide that the subscriber shall be solely responsible for producing, electronically uploading and maintaining such subscriber’s website, and such subscriber shall ensure that all uploaded material shall be owned and/or properly licensed by the subscriber and shall not adversely affect any rights of any third party. Although we believe we have valid defenses to the charges, if we are unsuccessful in our defense, we could be subject to monetary fines or damages.

In February, 2006, a complaint was filed by Marksman Pvt. Ltd. against various telecom operators and internet service providers and Rediff.com, alleging infringement of Marksman’s copyright by way of the dissemination of information relating to scores, alerts, updates and other events, via Short Message Service (SMS) technology on wireless and mobile telephones, in respect of One Day International Cricket Matches (“ODIs”) during India’s tour of Pakistan scheduled in February, 2006. We have filed our response, and among the defenses we have raised are: (a) Rediff.com, along with other telecom operators and service providers, has not infringed Marksman copyrights; and (b) the information relating to scores, alerts, updates and other events were sourced from the public domain and as such no exclusivity can be claimed. The one-judge panel, while dismissing a request for an interim order, has directed the defendants to maintain the accounts of the SMSs received during the ODIs. Marksman would have to first amend the suit to seek damages before any claim could stand against Rediff.com. In 2006, Marksman sought to amend the suit to include damages. Although we believe we have valid defenses to the charges, if we are unsuccessful in our defense, we could be subject to monetary fines or damages.

In March, 2009, a complaint was filed against Rediff.com and 12 other defendants by S. Ramkumar, alleging violation of his patent rights in respect of mobile phones with a plurality of SIM cards sold through the Rediff Shopping website. S. Ramkumar is seeking a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, including us, from infringing upon his patent with respect to mobile phones with a plurality of SIM cards allocated to different communication networks. S. Ramkumar is also claiming damages in the amount of Rs.1.0 million (approximately US$20,000). We have filed our response, based on the following defenses: (a) it is the vendors, and not Rediff.com, that sell shopping products on the Rediff website, and we have not infringed any of Ramkumar’s intellectual property rights; (b) the Rediff Shopping website only provides an online platform that enables customers and sellers to enter into sale/purchase transactions and we are not involved in the sale or purchase of the goods/products listed on our website; and (c) vendors are required to comply with the terms and conditions we impose on them in exchange for using Rediff Shopping, which include providing us with a description of their products, prices and product images, and which require that vendors do not infringe third party rights, including third-party intellectual property rights. Although we believe that we have valid defenses to the charges, if we are unsuccessful in our defense, we could be subject to monetary fines or damages. However, given the nature of the suit and pleadings, there should not be any substantial monetary claim against us.

We cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits, nor can we predict the amount of time and expense that may be required to resolve these lawsuits. If these lawsuits become time-consuming and expensive, or if there are unfavorable outcomes against us in these cases, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may be subject to additional lawsuits filed in the future.

We currently hold insurance policies for the benefit of our directors and officers (the “D&O Policy”), which provide coverage against certain claims. However, the amount of coverage may not be sufficient for our needs, or the various exclusions in the D&O Policy could result in denial of coverage. In any such case, we would have to self-fund all or a substantial portion of our indemnification obligations.

We are also subject to other legal proceedings and claims, which have arisen in the ordinary course of our business and which include some claims from the Indian tax authorities. These proceedings and claims, when ultimately concluded and determined, will likely not, in the opinion of management, have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Rediff Holdings, Inc. (“Rediff Holdings”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of ours and is incorporated in the State of Delaware. Rediff Holdings holds all of the outstanding voting shares of Rediff.com, Inc. (formerly thinkindia.com) and all of the outstanding voting shares of India Abroad Publications Inc.

Rediff.com, Inc. runs our North America - based Internet website operations, is incorporated in Delaware. India Abroad Publications Inc., which publishes India Abroad, is a New York corporation,. Value Communication Corporation, an Illinois corporation incorporated in 1996, is another subsidiary of ours. In April 2004, we sold its business to Worldquest Networks, Inc. (“WQN”).

In November 2010, we acquired a 100% equity stake in Vubites India Private Limited. Vubites is an Indian-incorporated entity that offers affordable local TV advertising in India.

The following discussion of our financial condition and operating results should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report particularly in the “Risk Factors” section of this annual report.

We are a leading Internet destination in India focusing on providing world-class online business and consumer offerings in India and to the global Indian community. Our websites in India and the U.S. consist of communication services, such as e-mail, news and information channels, community features including a social networking platform, photo/video and music sharing capabilities, local search and mobile and online marketplace services including mobile-based email and daily deal offerings.

As per the latest available statistics from ComScore June 2013 report, the Indian Internet market is now at 77 million active users with a growth rate of 26% year on year. Additionally, with 14.6 million active users, Rediff commands a 19% market share in the Indian Internet market. We believe Rediff.com is one of the most recognized online brands both in India and among the Indian community worldwide.

We also publish two weekly newspapers aimed at the Indian-American community based in the United States and Canada: “India Abroad” and “India in New York”.

By providing a platform for users that combines our technology, content, and communities and allow our users to personalize and integrate products and services across devices, we aim to become more relevant to our existing users and to increase the number of users of our products and services. We believe that a deeper engagement with new and existing users, coupled with expected growth of PC and mobile based Internet in India as an advertising medium, may enable us to increase our revenues in the future.

We have incurred significant net losses and negative cash flows since our inception in January 1996. We incurred a net loss of US$11.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, and as of the same date, we had an accumulated deficit of US$87.7 million, compare to a net loss of US $7.7 million and an accumulated deficit of US $76.3 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. We are focused on generating additional revenues, while controlling our expenses, to achieve profitability and to reduce our accumulated deficit.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The

preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including but not limited to allowances for doubtful trade accounts receivables, impairment of goodwill, property, plant and equipment, intangible and investments, useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, valuation of deferred tax assets, stock based compensation and employee benefits. We base our estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The following are the critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more complete discussion of all of the Company’s significant accounting policies.

Revenues from display of advertisement and sponsorships are recognized ratably based on delivery over the contractual period of the advertisement, commencing from the time the advertisement is placed on our website or broadcast. Revenues are also derived from sponsor buttons placed in specific areas of our website, which generally provide users with direct links to sponsor websites. Such revenues are recognized ratably over the period in which the advertisement is displayed, provided that no significant obligations remain and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. Our obligations sometimes include guarantee of a minimum number of impressions or the number of times that an advertisement appears in pages viewed by users of our website. To the extent that minimum guaranteed impressions are not met, we defer recognition of corresponding revenues until the guaranteed impression levels are achieved. We also earn revenues from sending e-mail messages to some of our users on behalf of advertisers and these revenues are recognized ratably over the contacted period.

Fee-based services include online shopping, subscription services and mobile value-added services. Online shopping marketplace revenues primarily consist of commission from the sale of electronics, apparel, books, music, confectionery, gifts and other items. Customers place orders directly with vendors through our website. When an order is placed, we inform the vendor through an intranet connection and also confirm whether payment has already been collected by us through credit card/debit card or checks, or whether the payment is to be made by the customer on a cash on delivery (C.O.D.) basis. The vendor then dispatches the products to the customers. The vendor sends a periodic summary of transactions executed for which we collected payments on its behalf. We make payment to the vendor after deduction of our share of commission and costs. We recognize as revenues commissions earned on these transactions and shipping costs recovered from customers at the time of delivery of goods as evidenced by delivery receipts provided by the vendor. Revenues from online shopping services also include fees charged to vendors for creating, designing and hosting the vendors’ product information on our website.

Subscription service revenues primarily include income from our various paid e-mail service products and our domain name registration and web hosting services. Revenues for subscription based products are deferred and recognized pro-rata as fulfilled over the terms of such subscription.

We also derive revenues from providing mobile value-added services such as ring tones, picture messages, logos, wallpapers and other related products to mobile phone users. Our contracts are with third-party mobile phone operators from whom we receive a share of revenues for such services. Mobile value added services revenues are recognized when the service is first performed.

Our US Publishing business primarily includes revenues from subscription and advertising services from the publication of India Abroad, India in New York and our Rediff India Abroad website.

We recognize advertising revenues at the time of publication of the related advertisement. Subscription income is deferred and recognized pro rata over the term of the subscription. Revenues from

banners and sponsorships on our Rediff India Abroad website are recognized over the contractual period of the advertisement, commencing from the date the advertisement is placed on the website, provided that no significant obligations remain and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. Obligations may include guarantee of a minimum number of impressions, or times that an advertisement appears in pages viewed by users of our website. To the extent that minimum guaranteed impressions are not met, we defer recognition of the corresponding revenues until the guaranteed impression levels are achieved.

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and other recoverables for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make contractually agreed payments. We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts receivable after considering the financial condition of the customer, ageing of the accounts receivable, historical experience and the current economic environment. Trade account receivable balances are written off against allowances only after all means of collections have been exhausted and potential of recovery is considered remote.

We depreciate/amortize our assets on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the assets, which range from one to ten years.

Goodwill is tested for potential impairment on an annual basis, which is performed on January 1 or in interim periods if events and circumstances indicate a potential impairment. As reporting units are determined after an acquisition or evolve with changes in business strategy, goodwill is assigned and it may no longer retain its association with a particular transaction. All revenue streams and related activities of a reporting unit, whether acquired or organic, are available to support the carrying amount of goodwill. The reporting units for impairment assessment have been identified as the US Publishing business. Under the applicable accounting standard, goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first step of the goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed. The second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated possible impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. The adjustments to measure the assets, liabilities and intangibles at fair value are only for the purpose of measuring the implied fair value of goodwill and these adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversals of goodwill impairment losses are not permitted.

Estimating the fair value of reporting units is a subjective process that requires significant estimates and assumptions, particularly related to cash flows and the appropriate discount rates. The fair values of the reporting units were determined using a valuation technique consistent with the income approach. For the purposes of the income approach, internal forecasts were used to estimate the future cash flows (including a terminal value approach to estimate cash flows beyond the final year of the forecast) after considering current economic conditions and trends, estimated future operating results and growth rates. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making those estimates, actual results could differ from the estimates. The Company evaluates the merits of each significant assumption, both individually and in aggregate, used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit, as well as the fair values of the corresponding assets and liabilities within the reporting unit, for reasonableness. Cash flows are discounted based on a discount rate which the Company believes adequately reflects the inherent risk in the businesses of the reporting unit, uncertainty in the economic environment and risks associated with the internally developed forecasts.

During the fiscal year 2013, we tested the goodwill of the US Publishing business, which arose from the acquisition of the print newspaper India Abroad in 2001, for impairment. As a result of the goodwill impairment test, we concluded that goodwill was impaired and accordingly we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of US$2.0 million. The impairment was on account of the weakness in the publishing industry which resulted in reduction of the US publishing business projected operating results and estimated future cash flows.

We evaluate long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and purchased or internally developed intangible assets with finite lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. When such events occur, we assess the recoverability of the assets group based on the undiscounted future cash flow the assets group is expected to generate and recognize an impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to result from the use of the assets group plus net proceeds expected from disposition of the assets group, if any, is less than the carrying value of the assets group. If we identify an impairment, we reduce the carrying amount of the assets group to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach or, when available and appropriate, to comparable market values. We use estimates and judgments in our impairment tests and if different estimates or judgments had been utilized, the timing or the amount of any impairment charges could be different.

Intangible assets consist of customer contracts and intellectual property carried at cost and amortized over their estimated useful lives, generally on a straight-line basis over three and seven years, respectively, that best reflects the economic benefits of the intangible assets.

Intangible assets, such as purchased technology, are generally recorded in connection with a business acquisition. The value assigned to intangible assets is usually based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for the success and life cycle of the acquired technology. We monitor acquired intangible assets for impairment on a periodic basis by reviewing indicators of impairment. If an indicator exists we compare the fair value to the unamortized cost of the intangible asset. The recoverability of the intangible assets is primarily dependent upon our ability to commercialize the acquired technology, secure new customers and retain existing customers, increase and maintain awareness of the acquired technology and the related service. The fair value of the acquired intangible assets is based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows derived from such intangible asset. Our assumptions about future revenues and expenses require significant judgment associated with forecast of the performance of the acquired technology and the related service, ability to secure customers and maintain our market position. Actual revenues and costs could vary significantly from these forecasted amounts. As of March 31, 2013, the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected from acquired intangible assets is sufficient to recover the carrying value. If the technology and the related services are not ultimately accepted by our customers or if we fail to successfully market acquired technology, retain or acquire customers, we could determine that some or all of the remaining US$1.9 million carrying value of our acquired intangible asset is impaired. In the event of impairment, we would record an impairment charge to earnings.

Our overall revenues for fiscal 2013 decreased by 21% to $15.66 million, as compared to $19.94 million for fiscal 2012. Our revenues from India Online and US Publishing decreased by 23% and 16%, respectively from fiscal 2012 to 2013.

Our India Online business is comprised of 68% of our online advertising business and 32% of our fee-based services business. During the fiscal year 2013, our online advertising business continued to face challenges. Nevertheless, our India Online business segment revenue grew by 10% from the quarter ended December 31, 2012 to the quarter ended March 31, 2013. The quarter ended March 31, 2013 was the third consecutive quarter in fiscal 2013 in which Online advertising registered 9% revenue growth. During this quarter, we saw an increase in online advertising spending by our clients primarily in the Banking, Financial Services and Insurance sectors, as well as in Telecom, Education, Tourism and Real Estate sectors. Online adverting spending levels are still well below pre-recession days, but we are seeing momentum and modest increases in overall spend. Our India online revenues are also affected by the fluctuation in the value of the rupee versus the US dollar and general weaknesses in the Indian economies. The 23% downturn in India online revenues from fiscal 2012 to fiscal 2013 is attributable to the approximately 13% loss of value of the Indian rupee against the US dollar over the same period.

During fiscal 2013, our India Online fee-based services business was increased by 9% from fiscal 2012. The total number of merchants on our online marketplace has increased to 690 as at June 30, 2013 from 400 as at June 30, 2012, while our SKU range has also increased to 281,348 from 138,350 over the same time period. We experienced over 72% growth in our vendor base and over 100% growth in Stock Keeping Unit (SKUs). We have successfully grown our ecommerce business while maintaining a positive operating margin of 12%. We expect this operating margin to increase over time as our ecommerce generated revenues increase.

We continue to believe Rediff will be one of the primary beneficiaries of the anticipated growth in India broadband and mobile expansion over the coming years. We are being patient. We are managing our business in anticipation of a coming growth cycle.

In our US publishing segment our focus has been to drive revenues through hosting conferences that we publicized in our periodicals.

During fiscal 2013, we managed our capital spend to ensure that our balance sheet remains healthy and that we have the necessary resources to spend when the time is right. During the fiscal year we cut cost and gained savings in category of cost of revenues, sales and marketing expenses, product development expenses and general and administrative expenses.

We believe that the growth of our revenues and profits from our India Online business is dependent on the growth of the Indian Internet market and mobile phone user base, the evolution of adequate online payment mechanisms, a consequent increase in advertising and fee-based revenues and our ability to capture a sizeable share of any increases in revenues from such developments. We continue to make strategic investments to improve our technology platform and website functionality and launch new Internet and mobile-based services, and we remain focused on growing our subscriber base within India and in Indian communities worldwide.

In order to grow our online user base and attract new advertisers, we expect to continue to invest in new products and product enhancements, expand the content and services on our network and procure more bandwidth and network equipment.

Actual results may differ materially from those suggested by our forward-looking statements due to certain risks or uncertainties associated with our expectations with respect to, but not limited to, the impact on our business of a continued economic slowdown or a downturn in the sectors in which our

clients operate, our ability to successfully implement our strategy, acceptance of new products and services, the development of broadband Internet and 3G and 4G networks in India, our ability to successfully integrate the businesses we have acquired, demand for our online and offline service offerings, changes in the Internet marketplace, technological changes, investment income, cash flow and our exposure to market risks. By their nature, certain of our disclosures are only estimates and could be materially different from what actually occurs in the future. As a result, actual future gains, losses or impacts could materially differ from those that have been estimated. For further discussion of forward-looking statements, see the discussion under the “Forward-Looking Statements” section of this annual report.

Results of our reportable business segments were as follows (amount in US$ million):

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2013 compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2012

Total revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 decreased by 21% to US$15.7 million from US$19.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012.

We recognized US$12.5 million in revenues from our India Online business for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, as compared to US$16.2 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, representing a decrease of US$3.7 million, or 23%, over the previous fiscal year. This decrease resulted from a decline in India Online advertising revenue mostly due to weakness in the BFSI Sector.

In addition, our reported revenues in fiscal year 2013 were adversely affected by currency translation of Indian Rupee to US dollar. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Indian rupee depreciated against the US dollar by approximately 13%. Had the exchange rate between Indian rupees and US dollars remained constant, our India Online revenues in constant currency terms for fiscal 2013 would have been US$14.2 million, rather than our reported revenues of US$12.5 million, or a decrease of 12% rather than our reported decline of 23%.

We recognized US$3.2 million in revenues for the U.S. Publishing business for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, as compared to US$3.7 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, representing a decrease of US$0.5 million, or 14%, over the previous fiscal year. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to a decrease in print revenues from our weekly newspapers “India Abroad” and “India in New York”.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, cost of revenues was US$10.0 million, or 64% of total revenues, compared to US $10.7 million, or 54% of total revenues in the previous fiscal year.

Cost of revenues for the India online business includes Internet communication, data storage and software usage costs, the cost of content for the Rediff websites, the cost of editorial functions (including payroll costs and travel costs of staff in the editorial department), stock-based compensation costs, the direct costs of providing fee-based services such as courier charges, content cost for mobile value-added services and the cost of domain registrations.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 cost of revenues for the India Online business was US $7.5 million (60% of revenue) as compared to US $8.2 million (51% of revenue) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. This represents a decrease of US$0.7 million, or 9% over the previous fiscal year, although cost of revenues increased as a percentage of revenues due to the decline in revenues.

We anticipate that our cost of revenues in absolute dollar terms for our India Online business will increase during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, as we expect to incur additional costs to continue to grow our business.

Cost of revenues for the U.S. Publishing business includes printing and circulation costs (including payroll costs) for the “India Abroad” and “India in New York” newspapers.

In the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 cost of revenues for the U.S. Publishing business remained steady at US$2.5 million (78% of revenue for fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 as compared to 68% of revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012), although cost of revenues increased as a percentage of revenues due to the decline in revenues. As majority of our costs for the US Publishing business are on account of salary, printing and rent which are fixed in nature in the short term, decline in revenues has not resulted in an immediate reduction in the costs and therefore cost of revenues as percentage of revenues has increased from 68% to 78% of revenue.

Analysis of the results presented below is based on the segment results as assessed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker and has been determined as revenues less cost of revenues before operating expenses.

As a result of the decrease in the revenues described in the preceding paragraphs, segment profit of the India Online business decreased by 38% to US$5.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, as compared to US$8.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. The decline was due to decline in the online advertising revenues.

As a result of the decrease in the revenues described in the preceding paragraph, segment profit of the U.S. publishing business decreased by 42% to US$0.7 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, as compared to US$1.2 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, mainly on account of the reduction in revenues.

Sales and marketing expenses primarily include employee compensation for sales and marketing personnel, stock-based compensation cost, advertising and promotion expenses, and market research costs. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, sales and marketing expenses were US$3.3 million, compared to US$5.3 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, representing a decrease of US $2.0 million, or 39%, over the previous fiscal year. This decrease was mainly attributable to strategically lower marketing spend.

We expect our sales and marketing expenses in absolute dollar terms will increase for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, as we launch more products and services, expand the range of offerings on our websites and invest further in brand building, advertising and personnel. All of these investments are being made to position the Company for expected growth, in terms of revenues and subscribers in the coming years given the increased investments by the Government of India and many global corporations in India’s telecommunication infrastructure.

Product development expenses primarily include software development expenses and compensation for product development personnel including stock-based compensation costs. Third-party technology and development expense, and other related operating costs are also included in product development. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, product development expenses were US$2.9 million, compared to US$3.1 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, representing a decrease of US $0.2 million, or 7%, over the previous fiscal year. This decreased was mainly on account of optimizing the technical support cost.

We expect to continue to invest in product development to maintain our position as a leading Internet destination for the global Indian community. Therefore, we expect our product development expenses in absolute dollar terms to increase in the future.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, depreciation and amortization expense was US$3.7 million compared to US$3.5 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, representing an increase of US$0.2 million, or 5%. This increase was due to higher capital expenditure in previous two years and resulted in a higher base of depreciable assets.

General and administrative costs primarily consist of compensation for administrative personnel, fees for legal and professional services, allowances for doubtful accounts and promissory notes, insurance premium, stock-based compensation cost and sundry administrative costs. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, general and administrative expenses were US$7.6 million, compared to US$7.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, decrease of US$0.3 million or 4%. This decrease was represented by the saving in office establishment expenses.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of US$2.0 million which arose at the time of acquisition of India Abroad Publication Inc. in the fiscal 2001. The impairment was on account of the weakness in the publishing industry which resulted in reduction of the US publishing business’s projected operating results and estimated future cash flows. The Company used an income-based valuation approach to determine the fair value of the reporting unit by estimating the present value of future cash flows after considering current economic conditions and trends, estimated future operating results and growth rates.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, we recorded a US$0.1 million foreign exchange loss, arising from the conversion of U.S. dollar amounts held by us into our functional currency for financial reporting purposes (i.e., the Indian Rupee).

Other income (expenses), net, primarily comprised of interest income, gain on sale of equity method investee, promissory note impairment and miscellaneous income. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, net other income were US$2.3 million and US$3.4 million, respectively.

Interest income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 was US$2.0 million, compared to US$2.6 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, representing a decrease of US$0.6 million, or 24%. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to utilization of bank deposits held under cash and cash equivalents.

During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company recorded an other than temporary impairment of US$1.1 million because the Company does not expect to recover the carrying amount of promissory note.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Company sold its equity investment in Imere Technology Private Limited for a consideration of US$1.5 million and recorded a gain of US$1.3 million.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, we recorded a earnings of approximately US$0.1 million as our share of the earning of our investee companies as compared to a loss of US$0.2 million in the previous fiscal year.

As a result of the foregoing, our net loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 was US$11.4 million, as compared to a net loss of US$7.7 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, an increase in net loss of 49%. The prime reason for this decline was decline in our overall revenues and charge of goodwill and promissory note impairment.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2012 compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2011

Total revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 decreased by 9% to US$19.9 million from US$21.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.

We recognized US$16.2 million in revenues from our India Online business for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as compared to US$17.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, representing a decrease of US$1.7 million, or 9%, over the fiscal year 2011. This decrease resulted from a decline in India Online advertising revenue mostly due to weakness in the BFSI Sector and a decline in our mobile business, which was negatively affected by the TRAI’s “DO NOT DISTURB” policy.

In addition, our reported revenues in fiscal year 2012 were adversely affected by currency translation of Indian Rupee to US Dollar. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, the Indian rupee

depreciated against the US dollar by approximately 6%. Had the exchange rate between Indian rupees and US dollars remained constant, our India Online revenues in constant currency terms for fiscal 2012 would have been US$17.1 million, rather than our reported revenues of US$16.2 million, or a decrease of 4% rather than our reported decline of 9%.

We recognized US$3.7 million in revenues for the U.S. Publishing business for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as compared to US$3.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, representing a decrease of US$0.2 million, or 5%, over the fiscal year 2011. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to a decrease in print revenues from our weekly newspapers “India Abroad” and “India in New York”.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, cost of revenues was US$10.8 million, or 54% of total revenues, compared to US $10.8 million, or 50% of total revenues in the fiscal year 2011.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, cost of revenues for the India Online business was US $8.2 million (51% of revenue) as compared to US $8.3 million (46% of revenue) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. This represents a decrease of US $0.1 million, or 1% over the fiscal year 2011, although cost of revenues increased as a percentage of revenues due to the decline in revenues.

Cost of revenues for the U.S. Publishing business includes printing and circulation costs (including payroll costs) for the “India Abroad” and “India in New York” newspapers.

In the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 cost of revenues for the U.S. Publishing business remained steady at US$2.5 million (68% of revenue for fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 as compared to 65% of revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011), although cost of revenues increased as a percentage of revenues due to the decline in revenues.

As a result of the decrease in the revenues described in the preceding paragraphs, segment profit of the India Online business decreased by 17% to US$8.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as compared to US$9.6 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.

As a result of the decrease in the revenues described in the preceding paragraph, segment profit of the U.S. publishing business decreased by 14% to US$1.2 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as compared to US$1.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.

Sales and marketing expenses primarily include employee compensation for sales and marketing personnel, stock-based compensation cost, advertising and promotion expenses, and market research costs. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, sales and marketing expenses were US$5.3 million, compared to US$5.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, representing a decrease of US $0.1 million, or 2%, over the fiscal year 2011. This decrease was mainly attributable to lower marketing spend.

Product development expenses primarily include software development expenses and compensation for product development personnel including stock-based compensation costs. Third-party technology and development expense, and other related operating costs are also included in product development. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, product development expenses were US$3.1 million, compared to US$3.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, representing a decrease of US $0.7 million, or 18%, over the fiscal year 2011. This decreased was mainly on account of reduced spending on the product development. We have optimized our in-house development team who has been working on multiple projects/products, the cost of which is constantly being benchmarked against third party development expenses.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, depreciation and amortization expense was US$3.5 million compared to US$3.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, representing a decrease of US$0.3 million, or 8%. This decline was primarily due to a lower base of depreciable assets. The lower base was primarily due to the continuing depreciation of existing assets.

General and administrative costs primarily consist of compensation for administrative personnel, fees for legal and professional services, allowances for doubtful accounts, insurance premium, stock-based compensation cost and sundry administrative costs. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, general and administrative expenses were US$7.9 million, compared to US$6.6 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, representing an increase of US$1.3 million, or 20%. An increase in payroll by US$1.0 million and other administrative expenses by US$0.3 million contributed US$1.3 million increase in general and administrative expenses. Payroll increased primarily on account of hiring of employees for the Deals business.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, we abandoned certain projects due to changes in the technological environment and recorded an impairment charge of US$0.1 million. There was no such impairment charge in the fiscal year 2012.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we recorded a US$0.1 million foreign exchange loss as compared to a foreign exchange loss of US$0.02 million in the fiscal year 2011, arising from the conversion of U.S. dollar amounts held by us into our functional currency for financial reporting purposes (i.e., the Indian Rupee).

Other income (expenses), net, primarily comprised of interest income, gain on sale of equity method investee and miscellaneous income. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, net other income were US$3.4 million, as compared to net other income of US$2.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, representing an increase of US$0.5 million.

Interest income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 was US$2.6 million, compared to US$3.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, representing a decrease of US$0.8 million, or 23%. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to utilization of bank deposits held under cash and cash equivalents.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded an investment impairment of US$0.5 million, whereas no investment impairment was recorded in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, the Company sold its investment in Eterno Infotech Private Limited for a consideration of US$0.9 million and recorded a gain of US$0.7 million.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we recorded a loss of US$0.2 million as our share of the losses of our investee companies as compared to a loss of US$0.8 million in the fiscal year 2011. These losses are determined under the equity method of accounting.

As a result of the foregoing, our net loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 was US$7.7 million, as compared to a net loss of US$6.6 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, representing an increase of 14%.

Our primary liquidity needs have been to finance our losses from operations, acquisitions and capital expenditures. These have been funded primarily from the private sales of equity securities and sale of ADSs.

As of March 31, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of US$20.0 million as compared to US$24.5 million as at March 31, 2012.

As of March 31, 2013, our accounts receivable balance was US$3.8 million compared to US$6.1 million as of March 31, 2012, net of allowances of US$0.9 million and US$3.2 million as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. There was a decrease of US$2.4 million in account receivable balances on account of improved collection and lower sale.

Net cash used in operations was US$2.5 million, after adjusting our net loss of US$11.4 million to account for non-cash items and changes in working capital. Non-cash items, comprising the sale of equity investments, depreciation, amortization, allowances for doubtful debts, goodwill and promissory note impairment and stock-based compensation costs, totaled US$6.1 million. Our working capital decreased by US$2.8 million. The decrease was contributed by better cash management process in receivables and payables.

Net cash used in investing activities was US$0.5 million, consisting of purchases of servers and other capital equipment aggregating US$1.9 million in connection with the expansion of our network and data storage facility, partially offset by the sale of an equity investment that generated cash of US$1.4 million.

Net cash used in operations was US$5.2 million, after adjusting our net loss of US$7.7 million to account for non-cash items and changes in working capital. Non-cash items, comprising the sale of equity investments, depreciation, amortization, allowances for doubtful debts and stock-based compensation costs, totaled US$3.9 million. Our working capital increased by US$1.4 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was US$4.4 million, consisting of purchases of servers and other capital equipment aggregating to US$5.4 million in connection with the expansion of our network and data storage facility, partially offset by the sale of an equity investment that generated cash of US$0.9 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities was US$1.4 million, which represented the cash proceeds from the issue of shares during the year due to the exercise of stock options by our employees.

We generated net cash from operations of US$0.5 million, after adjusting our net loss of US$6.6 million to account for non-cash items and changes in working capital. Non-cash items, comprising impairments, depreciation, amortization, allowances for doubtful debts and stock-based compensation costs, totaled US$5.6 million. Our working capital decreased by US$1.5 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was US$7.3 million, consisting of purchases of servers and other capital equipment aggregating to US$4.0 million in connection with the expansion of our network and data storage facility, the purchase of promissory notes of US$0.3 million, the acquisition of all of the equity interests of Vubites India Private Limited for US$0.3 million and the repayment of an assumed principal shareholder’s loan aggregating to US$2.7 million.

Net cash used in financing activities was US$1.3 million. We repurchased a total amount of US$1.3 million of our own Equity Shares through our ESOP trust, which was formed during the fiscal year 2010.

Our contractual obligations relate to operating leases and capital commitments, payments for which are to be made as per the table below:

Our principal capital expenditures are for purchase of computer equipment, such as servers for our websites. In the fiscal years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011, we had capital expenditures of US$1.9 million, US$5.4 million and US$4.0 million, respectively.

Internal and external costs incurred to develop internal use software during an application development stage is capitalized when the Company’s managing director has authorized and committed to funding the development, and it is probable that the software development will be complete and the software will perform the function intended. Upgrades and enhancements are capitalized only when these relate to additional features or result in additional functionality that the existing software is incapable of performing. All costs incurred during the preliminary project, post-implementation and operation stages are expensed as incurred.

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our equity shares since our inception and we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business. For additional information, please see the sections of this annual report entitled “Risk Factors — Risks Related to our Business” and “Taxation”.

We believe our cash balances and liquid assets and cash generated from future operations will be adequate to satisfy anticipated working capital requirements, capital expenditures and investment commitments for the next twelve months. As business and market conditions permit, we may from time to time, invest in or acquire complementary businesses, products or technologies. These activities may require us to seek additional equity or debt financing to fund such activities, which could result in ownership dilution to existing shareholders, including holders of our ADSs. We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present requirements.

The reconciliation of estimated income tax expense at Indian statutory income tax rate to income tax expense reported in our statement of comprehensive loss is as follows:

Rediff’s net operating loss carry forwards aggregating approximately US$7,676,956 as of March 31, 2013 will expire between April 2013 and March 2019

As of March 31, 2013, ValuCom has net operating loss carry forwards available to offset future federal taxable income of US$3,033,000, which expire in years 2021 through 2031.

As of March 31, 2013, Rediff Holdings, Inc. has net operating loss carry forwards of approximately US$7,126,000 for federal income tax purposes, which expire in years 2020 through 2032.

The functional currency for our Indian operations is the Indian Rupee. We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, principally the fluctuations of the U.S. dollar to Indian Rupee exchange rate. We face foreign currency exchange risk with respect to funds held in foreign currencies and in particular will have foreign exchange losses with respect to these funds, if there is an appreciation in the value of the Indian Rupee compared to such foreign currency. We also face foreign currency exchange risk from accounts payable to overseas vendors, which we partially mitigate with receivables in foreign currency from overseas customers and balances in foreign currency with overseas banks.

The following table sets forth information about our net foreign currency exchange (U.S. dollars) exposure as of March 31, 2013:

We are currently not trying to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations by using hedging transactions. However, we may choose to do so in the future. We may not be able to do this successfully. Accordingly, we may experience economic losses and negative impacts on earnings and equity as a result of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. If the Indian Rupee appreciates against the U.S. dollar by one Rupee, the net foreign currency exchange loss as of March 31, 2013 would be approximately US$20,000.

We hold interest-bearing accounts in India and fluctuations in interest rates affected our interest earnings for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. These interest rates are linked to the interest rates prevailing in India. We expect that our interest earnings will continue to be affected in the future by fluctuations in interest rates. A hypothetical 1% increase or decrease in the prevailing interest rates applicable to cash deposits during such period would have affected our interest income by approximately US$188,000.

As of the date of this annual report, we are not a party to any off-balance sheet obligations or arrangements.

notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The revised guidance is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012 for public entities. The revised guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2013, the name, age and position of each of our directors and executive officers.

Ajit Balakrishnan is the founder, Chairman and Managing Director of the Company. He is a director of Rediffusion Holdings Private Limited, Rediffusion Dentsu Young & Rubicam Private Limited, Quintrol Technologies Private Limited, Rediff Holdings Inc USA, India Abroad Publications, Inc., India In New York, Inc., India Abroad Publications (Canada) Inc., Rediff.com Inc USA and Value Communications Corporation. Mr. Balakrishnan is also Chairman of the Board of Governors of The Indian Institute of Management Calcutta and Chairman of the Working Group of Internet Governance set up by the Government of India. Mr. Balakrishnan holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Physics from Kerala University and a Post Graduate Diploma in Management from the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta. At our annual general meeting held on September 24, 2008, our shareholders re-appointed Mr. Balakrishnan [for a five-year term as Managing Director with effect from August 23, 2008.

Swasti Bhowmick joined us in February 2012 as our Chief Financial Officer. He joined us from Tata TeleServices Ltd., where he helped create the Finance Transformation Roadmap. He has over 20 years of experience in Sales Accounting, Cost Management, MIS, Budgeting, Credit Control and Operations Finance in IT/Telecom, including managing startups and established FMCG brands. Swasti is a member of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and a member of The Institute of Cost Accountants of India. He also holds an Executive MBA from the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta.

Diwan Arun Nanda has been a director of the Company since its incorporation in 1996. Mr. Nanda is also a director of Rediffusion Holdings Private Limited, Arion Horse Company Private Limited, Rediffusion Dentsu, Young & Rubicam Private Ltd., Wunderman India Private Limited, Rediffusion Dentsu, Young & Rubicam Pvt. Ltd. Sri Lanka, Everest Brand Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Clariant Chemicals (India) Limited, Yes Bank. and Oriental Hotels Ltd. Mr. Nanda holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Commerce from Loyola College, Chennai University, and a Post Graduate Diploma in Management from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.

Sunil N. Phatarphekar is an Attorney and has been a director of the Company since 1998. Mr. Phatarphekar is also a director of several other Indian companies. Mr. Phatarphekar is proprietor of SNP Legal (Advocates), a Mumbai law firm. Prior to that, he was a partner of Doijode, Phatarphekar & Associates. After obtaining his Bachelor’s Degree in Commerce from Jai Hind College, Bombay University, and a Bachelor’s Degree in Law from Government Law College, Bombay University, he joined Crawford Bayley & Company. Thereafter, he was a partner at two Mumbai law firms, Mahimtura & Co. and Shah Desai Doijode & Phatarphekar.

Ashok Narasimhan has been a director of the Company since 2002. He is currently Chairman and CEO of Runa Inc. He is a limited partner and advisor for a number of U.S. and Indian venture capital funds. He is also a director on the board of Tarang Software Technologies Pvt. Limited, Genie

Technologies India Pvt. Limited, Atma Investments and Resources Pvt. Limited. Earlier, he was Chairman and Co-Founder of July Systems Inc and prior to that, he was founder of Prio, Inc., where he served as Chairman and CEO from early 1996 until its merger with InfoSpace. He subsequently served on the Board of InfoSpace. Prior to that, he served as Head of Worldwide Marketing and Business Development of VeriFone, a leader in automated electronic payment transactions. Earlier, he was the founding President of Wipro’s IT organizations. He holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Physics from Madras University and a Post-Graduate Diploma in Management from the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta.

Sridar A. Iyengar has been a director of the Company since September 2004. He is co-founder of ‘The Sounding Board’ and serves on the Board of various companies, and other companies in India and the United States. He also advises many early-stage companies in the United States and India. He is a member of the boards of the American India Foundation Inc. From 1968 until his retirement in March 2002, he was employed by KPMG, retiring as the Partner-in-Charge of KPMG’s Emerging Business Practice. He worked as a partner in all three of KPMG’s regions - Europe, America and Asia Pacific - as well as in all four of KPMG’s functional disciplines - assurance, tax, consulting and financial advisory services. He was Chairman and CEO of KPMG’s India operations between 1997 and 2000 and during that period was a member of the Executive Board of KPMG’s Asia Pacific practice. Prior to that, he headed up the International Services practice on the west coast of the United States. On his return from India in 2000 he was asked to lead a major effort of KPMG’s focused on delivering audit and advisory services to early stage companies. He also served as a member of the Audit Strategy group of KPMG LLP. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, and holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Commerce (Honors) from the University of Calcutta.

Rashesh Shah is the founder and Chairman of Edelweiss Group, one of India’s most diversified financial services group with businesses ranging from Credit including Housing Finance, Financial Markets, Commodities, and Life Insurance. Rashesh has served on the Boards of various companies and public institutions. He has in the past served on the Executive Committee of the National Stock Exchange and presently serves as Chairman, Maharashtra Council of FICCI. He currently serves on the SEBI committee to review Insider Trading Regulations. Rashesh is a graduate in Statistics from Mumbai University and has an MBA from IIM Ahmedabad. He started his career as development officer in ICICI.

M. Madhavan Nambiar has spent over 36 years in the Indian Administrative Service with many years focused on Information Technology. Mr. Nambiar most recently served as Secretary to the Government of India, first in the Ministry of Information Technology and then in the Ministry of Civil Aviation. Mr. Nambiar is a Fellow at the Judge Business School, University of Cambridge. He holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree from Loyola College, Madras University and a Master of Business Administration Degree from the Faculty of Management Studies, Delhi University.

On March 16, 2000, we amended our Articles of Association to set the minimum number of directors at three and the maximum number of directors at seven. We currently have seven directors. Our Articles of Association provide as follows:

As of the date of this annual report, our Board has determined that the following members qualify as independent directors: Sunil N. Phatarphekar; Sridar A. Iyengar; Rashesh C. Shah and M. Madhavan Nambiar.

No directors have service contracts with us providing for benefits upon termination of their service as a director.

Effective February 15, 2004, we adopted a code of ethics for all of our employees and for all of our directors and senior officers in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. On July 19, 2005, we adopted amendments to the code of ethics for our officers. On August 19, 2005, we adopted amendments to the code of ethics for our directors.

We will provide a copy of the codes of ethics for our directors, officers and employees to any person without charge, upon a written request sent to our principal executive office.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors reviews, acts on and reports to the Board of Directors with respect to various auditing and accounting matters, including the recommendation of our independent auditors, the scope of the annual audits, fees to be paid to the independent auditors, the performance of our independent auditors and our accounting practices.

As of the date of this annual report, our Audit Committee is comprised of the following members, all of whom are independent directors, as determined by the NASDAQ listing standards applicable to us: Sridar A. Iyengar, Sunil N. Phatarphekar, Rashesh C. Shah and M. Madhavan Nambiar.

Mr. Sridar A. Iyengar has been designated the independent audit committee financial expert as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC issued pursuant to Section 407 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Prior to his appointment as a member of our Board of Directors, Mr. Iyengar was a partner at KPMG, retiring in March 2002 as Partner-in-Charge of KPMG’s Emerging Business Practice.

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers our stock option plans. The members of the Compensation Committee are Ajit Balakrishnan, Diwan Arun Nanda and Sunil N. Phatarphekar.

In general, corporate governance principles for Indian companies whose shares are not traded on any Indian stock exchange are set forth in India’s Companies Act. Corporate governance principles under provisions of Indian law may differ in significant ways from corporate governance standards for U.S. NASDAQ-listed companies. The corporate governance standards for U.S. NASDAQ-listed companies are included in the “5000” series of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules, known as the NASDAQ Listing Rules and referred to herein as the “Rules”. Under Rule 5615(a)(3), foreign private issuers such as ourselves are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain of the requirements of the Rules. Under the Rules, foreign private issuers must disclose any alternative home country practices that they follow.

The following are the requirements of the Rules we do not follow and the home country practices we follow in lieu of these Rule requirements. Our independent Indian counsel has submitted to the NASDAQ a letter, dated June 27, 2005, certifying that our corporate governance practices as described below are not prohibited by and are consistent with Indian law.

In lieu of the requirements of Rule 5250(d)(2) and Rule 5250(d)(3), we follow Indian law, under which companies whose shares are not traded on any Indian stock exchange are not required to prepare and/or distribute quarterly and interim reports to shareholders. However, we have in the past regularly released copies of press releases and conference call transcripts relating to our quarterly results of operations by posting them on our website. Further, we furnish press releases relating to our quarterly results of operations with the SEC on Form 6-K and we currently intend to continue to do so.

In lieu of the requirements of Rule 5605(b)(1), we follow the Companies Act, which does not require that a majority of the Board of Directors of Indian companies be comprised of independent directors. Nevertheless, as of the date of this annual report, our Board has determined that four out of its seven members are independent.

In lieu of the requirements of Rule 5605(b)(2), we follow the Companies Act, which does not require independent directors to hold regularly scheduled meetings at which only such independent directors are present (i.e., executive sessions). Under the Companies Act, our Board of Directors as a whole is responsible for monitoring our business, although it is permitted to delegate specific responsibilities to designated directors or to non-director executive officers.

In lieu of the requirements of Rule 5605(d), we follow Indian law, which requires companies to form a Compensation Committee in case of remuneration payable to specified managerial personnel by companies having no profits or inadequate profits. In such a case, a “Remuneration Committee” is required to be constituted for approving the payment of remuneration to certain specified “managerial personnel” as defined in the Companies Act. Such Remuneration Committee, if constituted for this purpose, should consist of at least three non-executive independent directors including nominee directors, if any. For purposes of the Companies Act “managerial personnel” include the company’s managing director, whole time director and manager, each as defined under the Companies Act.

We do not pay and currently do not intend to pay any remuneration to any of our managerial personnel as defined in the Companies Act. As such, we are not required to constitute a Remuneration Committee under the Companies Act. However our Board of Directors has formed a compensation committee, which currently comprises of three directors including one independent director, for the sole purpose of administering our stock option plans and other compensation plans as may be approved by our shareholders from time to time.

Four of our directors, Mr. Ajit Balakrishnan, Mr. Sridar Iyengar, Mr. Sunil Phatarphekar and M. Madhavan Nambiar, receive remuneration from our wholly-owned US subsidiary Rediff Holdings, Inc., in their capacity as directors of that subsidiary. There is no restriction under Indian law on paying remuneration to directors of an Indian company having no profits or inadequate profits who are, at the same time, also directors of a non-Indian subsidiary.

In lieu of the requirements of Rule 5605(e), we follow the requirements of the Companies Act pursuant to which directors are required to be appointed by shareholders at their general meeting. In addition, under the Companies Act, our board can make appointments, subject to any regulations in a company’s articles of association, to fill any casual vacancies caused if the office of a director is vacated before his term of office has expired. Any person so appointed shall hold office only up to the date up to which the director in whose place he is appointed would have held office. Our board also has the power to

appoint additional directors who shall hold office only up to the date of our next annual general meeting of the company. The Companies Act also allows our board to appoint an alternate director to act for a director during his absence for a period of not less than three months from the state in which the board meetings are ordinarily held. Finally, our Articles of Association states that Ajit Balakrishnan, Diwan Arun Nanda and Rediffusion Holdings Private Limited (earlier called Rediffusion Advertising Private Limited), are entitled to appoint and have appointed Mr. Balakrishnan as Director on the Board and Chairman of Rediff.com India Ltd. so long as they hold, singly or jointly, not less than 10% of the issued, subscribed and paid up capital of Rediff.com India Ltd. Mr. Balakrishnan serves an indefinite term and is not required to retire by rotation.

In lieu of the requirements of Rule 5620(c), we follow the Companies Act, under which a quorum for purposes of a meeting of the holders of our common stock is considered present as long as five of our members are present in person.

As a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to Regulations 14A and 14C under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As such, in lieu of the requirements of Rule 5620(b), we follow the requirements of the Companies Act. Section 176 of the Companies Act prohibits a company incorporated thereunder, such as us, from soliciting proxies. Because we are prohibited from soliciting proxies under Indian law, we will not meet the proxy solicitation requirement of Rule 5620(b). However, in accordance with Indian law, we give written notices of all our shareholder meetings (containing a statement that a shareholder is entitled to appoint a proxy, or, where that is allowed, one or more proxies, to attend and vote instead of himself, and that a proxy need not be a member) to all our shareholders and we also furnish such notices with the SEC under Form 6-K.

Other than as noted above, we intend to comply with all other applicable NASDAQ corporate governance standards.

As of March 31, 2013, we had 397 employees and full-time consultants. Of such employees, 144 are in our shopping, sales and marketing teams, 92 are creative and editorial, 122 are dedicated to technology and product development, 7 are dedicated to production and circulation and 32 are administrative. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good. The table sets forth the distribution of our employees by main category of activity:

Some of the employees deployed in the deal business were shifted to sales and marketing division.

Our Articles of Association provide that each of our directors may receive an attendance fee for every Board and Committee meeting, provided that no director shall be entitled to an attendance fee in excess of Rs.2,000 per meeting. In fiscal year 2013, we did not pay any attendance fees to our directors. Mr. Ajit Balakrishnan, who is our Managing Director, does not receive any additional compensation for his service on our Board of Directors. Directors of our US subsidiaries receive compensation for their service on the boards of these subsidiaries.

The following table sets forth details regarding compensation paid to executive officers and directors of the Company during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.

In January 2002, our Board of Directors approved the 2002 Stock Option Plan (“2002 plan”) which provides for the grant of incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options to our employees. All options under these plans are exercisable for our ADSs. Necessary approvals from the regulators in India have been obtained. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, we made appropriate filings with the SEC prior to the first exercise date of the options granted under the 2002 plan. Unless terminated sooner, this plan will terminate automatically in January 2012. A total of 280,000 of our Equity Shares were reserved for issuance under the 2002 plan.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, there were no grants made under the 2002 plan.

Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, the warrants granted under the 2002 plan vest at a rate of 25% on each successive anniversary of the grant date, until fully vested. The options granted under the 2002 ADR plan vest at the rates set forth in every award.

In June 2004, our Board of Directors approved the 2004 Stock Option Plan (“2004 plan”), which provides for the grant of stock options to our employees. All options under the 2004 plan are exercisable for our ADSs. Unless terminated sooner, the 2004 plan will terminate automatically in January 2014. A total of 358,000 Equity Shares are currently reserved for issuance pursuant to the 2004 plan.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, 750 options equivalent to 375 equity shares at a weighted average exercise price of US$5.16 per share were forfeited due to resignation of the employees.

Under the terms of the 2004 plan, our Board of Directors or a committee or a sub-committee of the board will determine and authorize the grant of options to eligible employees. These options will vest at the rates set forth in each award. Each option grant carries with it the right to purchase a specified number of our ADSs at the exercise price during the exercise period, which expires ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price is determined by our Board of Directors (or a committee or a sub-committee of the board) and shall be no more than 110% of the fair market value and no less than 50% of the fair market value of our ADSs on the date of the grant.

We have obtained the approvals for the implementation of the 2004 plan. We also made the necessary filings with the SEC prior to the first exercise date of the options granted under the 2004 plan.

Our 2006 Employee Stock Option Plan (the “ESOP 2006”) allows for the grant to our employees of options to purchase our Equity Shares. Each option granted gives the employee the right to purchase a specified number of our Equity Shares under the ESOP 2006. The ESOP 2006 was adopted and approved by our Compensation Committee on June 20, 2006 in accordance with the approval granted by our shareholders on March 31, 2006. A total of 150,000 Equity Shares were approved for issuance under the ESOP 2006.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, 6,000 options equivalent to 6000 equity shares at a weighted average exercise price of US$0.20 per share were forfeited due to resignation of the employees.

Equity Shares acquired upon the exercise of options granted pursuant to the terms of the ESOP 2006 are not subject to any lock-ups. In the case of termination or resignation of the employee, the employee shall have the right to exercise only the options vested up to the time of termination or resignation, and the unvested warrants options shall lapse. In the case of the death of an employee, all options granted to him or her shall vest in full on his or her legal heirs. The period during which vested options may be exercised expires ten years after the date of grant.

Our 2006 ADR Linked Employee Stock Option Plan (the “ADR Linked ESOP 2006”) allows for the grant to our employees of options to purchase our ADRs representing Equity Shares of the Company. Each option granted gives the employee the right to purchase a specified number of our ADRs under the ADR Linked ESOP 2006. The ADR Linked ESOP 2006 was adopted and approved by our Compensation Committee on October 3, 2006 in accordance with the approval granted by our shareholders on March 31, 2006. A total of 520,000 Equity Shares (equivalent to 1,040,000 ADRs) were approved for issuance under the ADR Linked ESOP 2006.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, 9,250 options equivalent to 4,625 equity shares at a weighted average exercise price of US$11.84 per share were forfeited due to resignation of the employees.

ADRs acquired upon the exercise of options granted pursuant to the terms of the ADR Linked ESOP 2006 are not subject to any lock-ups. In the case of termination or resignation of the employee, the employee shall have the right to exercise only the options vested up to the time of termination or resignation, and the unvested options shall lapse. In the case of the death of an employee, all options granted to him or her shall vest in full on his or her legal heirs. The period during which vested options may be exercised expires ten years after the date of grant.

The Company provides for gratuity on an actuarial valuation. The Company has an unfunded defined benefit retirement plan covering eligible employees in India. This plan provides for a lump-sum payment to be made to vested employees at retirement, death or termination of employment of an amount equivalent to 15 days basic salary, payable for each completed year of service. These gratuity benefits vest upon an employee’s completion of five years of service.

The following tables set out the amounts recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013. The measurement date used is March 31 of the relevant fiscal year.

Accumulated benefit obligation was US$247,312 and US$290,852 as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 respectively.

Net gratuity cost for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 comprise of the following:

The assumptions used in accounting for gratuity in the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were as follows:

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future services, are expected to be paid:

The expected benefits are based on the same assumptions used to measure the company’s benefit obligation as of March 31, 2013.

Employees based in India and the Company each, contribute at the rate of 12% of salaries to a provident fund maintained by the Government of India for the benefit of such employees. The provident fund is a defined contribution plan. Accordingly, the Company expenses such contributions as incurred. Amounts contributed by the Company to the provident fund, in aggregate, were US$252,004, US$279,396 and US$259,684 for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively.

The Company provided US$137,007, US$197,905 and US$161,779 for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, as the compensated absences liability for the amounts to be paid as a result of employee’s rights to compensated absences, considering anticipated forfeiture, in the year in which earned.

Six of our largest shareholders beneficially hold an aggregate of approximately 63% of our Equity Share capital. As a result, such shareholders, if they were to act collectively, could exercise control or significantly influence most matters requiring shareholder approval, including significant corporate transactions.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, we earned advertising revenues of US$721,974, US$ Nil and Nil, respectively, from Edelweiss Capital Services Ltd in which Rashesh Shah a director of Rediff is shareholder and director.

During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, we incurred product development expenses (including amounts capitalized) of US$167,833, US$137,490 and US$95,395, respectively, on account of services rendered by Tachyon Technologies Private Ltd, an equity method investee.

During the year ended March 31, 2013, we wrote off US$206,974 trade account receivables from Edelweiss Capital Service Ltd. in which a director of Rediff is shareholder and director against, the recorded allowance. The allowance for trade account receivables were made in fiscal year ended March 31, 2012.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, we subscribed to rights issued by Runa Inc. and by means of the exercise of those rights purchased shares in Runa Inc. for US$104,987. A director of the Company is a shareholder and key member of the management personnel of Runa Inc.

There are restrictions on conversion of Indian Rupees into U.S. dollars. Before February 29, 1992, the Reserve Bank of India determined the official value of the Rupee in relation to a weighted basket of currencies of India’s major trading partners. In February 1992, a new dual exchange rate mechanism was introduced by allowing conversion of 60% of the foreign exchange received on trade or current account at a market-determined rate and the remaining 40% at the official rate. All importers were, however, required to buy foreign exchange at the market rate except for certain specified priority imports. In March 1993, the exchange rate was unified and allowed to float. In February 1994 and again in August 1994, the Reserve Bank of India announced relaxation in payment restrictions in the case of a number of transactions. Since August 1994, the Government of India has substantially complied with its obligations owed to the International Monetary Fund, under which India is committed to refrain from using exchange restrictions on current international transactions as an instrument in managing the balance of payments. Effective July 1995, the process of current account convertibility was advanced by relaxing restrictions on foreign exchange for various purposes, such as foreign travel and medical treatment.

In December 1999, the Indian Parliament passed the Foreign Exchange Management Act (“FEMA”), which replaced the earlier Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (“FERA”). The FEMA came in to effect on June 03, 2000. This legislation indicated a major shift in the policy of the government with regard to foreign exchange management in India. While FERA was aimed at conservation of foreign exchange and its utilization for the economic development of the country, the objective of FEMA is to facilitate external trade and promote the orderly development and maintenance of the foreign exchange market in India.

FEMA permits most transactions involving foreign exchange except those prohibited or restricted by the Reserve Bank of India. FEMA has eased restrictions on current account transactions. However the Reserve Bank of India continues to exercise control over capital account transactions (i.e., those which alter the assets or liabilities, including contingent liabilities, of persons). The Reserve Bank of India has issued regulations under FEMA to regulate various kinds of capital account transactions, including certain aspects of the purchase and issuance of shares of Indian companies.

Restrictions on Sale of the Equity Shares Underlying the ADSs and for Repatriation of Sale Proceeds

Other than mutual funds that may purchase ADSs subject to terms and conditions specified by the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”), a person resident in India is not permitted to hold ADSs of an Indian company. ADSs issued by Indian companies to non-residents have free transferability outside India. However, under Indian regulations and practice, a dealer authorized by the Reserve Bank of India must be notified of the sale of equity shares underlying ADSs by a non-resident of India to a resident of India, as well as of any renunciation by a non-resident in favor of a resident of India of the right to subscribe to such equity shares granted pursuant to a rights offering, provided the price for sale of such equity shares is in accordance with Reserve Bank of India pricing guidelines. If not, prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India is required for any such transfer. Under current Indian law, Equity Shares may only be deposited into our depositary facility in exchange for ADSs, under certain circumstances, and the number of ADSs that can be outstanding at any time is limited as follows: after any offering of ADSs, Equity Shares can be deposited for issuance of ADSs only to the extent that (a) holders have surrendered ADSs and withdrawn Equity Shares from the ADS facility and (b) such holders sold such Equity Shares through SEBI registered stock brokers in a domestic Indian stock market. As our Equity Shares are not listed on any Indian stock exchange, if you elect to surrender your ADSs and receive Equity Shares, you would be unable to redeposit outstanding Equity Shares with our Depositary and receive ADSs.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a foreign investor were to withdraw its equity shares from the ADS program, its investment in the equity shares would be subject to the general restrictions on foreign ownership and may be subject to the portfolio investment restrictions and limitations. Further, foreign investors who withdraw their equity shares from the ADS program with the result that their direct or

indirect holding in the company crosses certain thresholds specified in the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 (“Takeover Code”), the shareholder may be required to make a public offer to the remaining shareholders of the company under the Takeover Code. For details see the section titled “Restriction on Foreign Ownership and Indian Securities”. Our shares are not listed on the Indian stock exchange and, therefore, we are not subject to the Takeover Code. If on conversion of our ADSs, an ADS holder does cross the specified threshold, he will not be required to make any public offer.

Investors who seek to sell in India to resident Indians any Equity Shares withdrawn from the depositary facility will be subject to the pricing guidelines specified by the Reserve Bank of India for such sales and also be subject to certain reporting requirements and approval in certain circumstances if the investors desires to convert the Rupee proceeds from such sale into foreign currency and repatriate such foreign currency from India. Prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India will be required in the event the price for any such sale does not comply with such pricing guidelines.

Active, liquid trading markets generally result in lower price volatility and more efficient execution of buy and sell orders for investors. Liquidity of a securities market is often a function of the volume of the shares that are publicly held by unrelated parties. Although ADS owners are entitled to withdraw the Equity Shares underlying the ADSs from the depository facility at any time, subject to certain legal restrictions, there is no public market for our Equity Shares in India or elsewhere. Under current Indian law, Equity Shares may only be deposited into our depositary facility in exchange for ADSs, under certain circumstances and the number of ADSs that can be outstanding at any time is limited as follows: after any offering of ADS, Equity Shares can be deposited for issuance of ADS only to the extent that (a) holders have surrendered ADS and withdrawn Equity Shares from the ADS facility and (b) such holders sold such Equity Shares through SEBI-registered stock brokers in a domestic Indian stock market. Since our Equity Shares are unlisted, if you elect to surrender your ADS and receive Equity Shares, you may be unable to re-deposit our Equity Shares on an automatic basis under existing laws.

Indian companies are permitted to raise debt in various forms (commonly referred to as “External Commercial Borrowing” or “ECB”) from internationally recognized sources such as international banks, international capital markets, multilateral financial institutions, export credit agents, suppliers of equipment, foreign collaborators and foreign equity holders, subject to the regulations laid down by the Reserve Bank of India in this regard. These regulations govern all the important aspects of ECBs including amount and maturity, all-in cost ceilings (including rate of interest and fees and expenses payable in foreign currency) end-use, security and prepayment/redemption.

Indian borrowers are allowed to raise up to US$20 million, in the event the minimum average maturity of the ECB is three years and up to US$750 million, in the event the minimum average maturity is five years, without Reserve Bank of India approval (the “automatic route”) so long as, inter alia, the following conditions are met.

All proposals for the issuance of ECBs that do not fall into the parameters set out above will need the approval of the Reserve Bank of India.

The maximum amount of ECBs that may be raised by an eligible borrower under the automatic route is US$750 million, or its equivalent, during a single financial year. The primary responsibility to ensure that ECBs raised/utilized are in conformity with the RBI instructions is that of the borrower and any contravention of the RBI guidelines will be viewed seriously and may invite penal action.

The Ministry of Finance, through the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (through Depositary Receipt Mechanism) Scheme 1993 (the “Scheme”), has allowed Indian corporates to issue Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (“FCCBs”). Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Scheme, the issuance and terms of FCCBs are subject to the same conditions and restrictions set forth above for ECBs. All proposals for the issuance of FCCBs that do not fall under the automatic approval route set out in the Scheme and that do not meet the conditions and restrictions set forth for ECBs will need the approval of the Reserve Bank of India.

Pursuant to the directions issued by the RBI on the two-way fungibility of ADSs, a person resident outside India is permitted to purchase, through a registered stock broker in India, shares of an Indian company for the purposes of converting the same into ADSs, subject, inter alia, to the following conditions:

From November 23, 2002, the Reserve Bank of India has permitted existing shareholders of Indian companies to sell their shares through the issuance of ADRs against the block of existing shares of the Indian company, subject to the following conditions:

There is no public market for our Equity Shares in India, the United States or any other market. Our ADSs evidenced by ADRs have been traded in the United States, initially on the NASDAQ National Market (now the NASDAQ Global Market), under the ticker symbol “REDF” since June 14, 2000, when they were issued by our depositary, Citibank, N.A., pursuant to a Deposit Agreement. From June 24, 2002 to October 6, 2006, our ADSs traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market (formerly the NASDAQ Small Cap Market) under the same ticker symbol. Beginning on October 9, 2006, our ADSs have been trading on the NASDAQ Global Market. Each ADS represents one-half of one Equity Share.

The number of outstanding Equity Shares as of March 31, 2013, was 14,810,178. We have been informed by our depository that as of June 19, 2013, there were 23 record holders of ADRs evidencing 9,295,956 ADSs (representing 4,647,978 Equity Shares) in the United States.

The tables below set forth high and low trading prices for our ADSs on the NASDAQ Capital Market from April 1, 2005 to October 6, 2006 and on the NASDAQ Global Market since October 9, 2006.

During fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Company did not receive any reimbursement or payments from the depository, either directly or indirectly.

The Company’s ADS depositary has sought, and the Company has agreed to, certain changes to the terms of the ADS deposit agreement and related arrangements under which the depositary provides its services. Pursuant to these changes, the depositary may charge persons holding or beneficially owning ADSs on applicable record dates established by the depositary up to $2.00 per 100 ADSs (or fractions thereof) held, as a “depositary services fee”. A portion of the aggregate depositary services fees that the depositary may collect in a given year, as well as certain other amounts, may be made available to the Company, solely to defray costs the Company may incur in conducting certain investor relations and other activities related to the ADS program.

In addition to the depositary services fee, the depositary retains the right under the ADS deposit agreement to charge holders or beneficial owners of ADSs certain other fees, including in the event a holder or beneficial owner withdraws from the ADS program the shares underlying its ADSs, or in the event the Company distributes cash or stock dividends or makes other distributions to ADS holders. In most of these cases, the depositary has the right to charge up to $5.00 per 100 ADSs (or fractions thereof) as to which the particular service is being provided.

For further information concerning the fees that the depositary retains the right to charge, and other aspects of the terms under which the depositary provides its services, see the deposit agreement filed as an exhibit to the post-effective amendment no. 1 to the registration statement on Form F-6, being filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the ADS program and the amending of the terms of the deposit agreement.

As of June 1, 2000, foreign investment in and divestment from Indian securities have been regulated by the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act (“FEMA”), the notifications and regulations issued by the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) thereunder, and the rules made by the Ministry of Finance of the Government of India. A summary of the regulatory environment for foreign investment in India is provided below.

The RBI issued the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000, as amended (the “Regulations”) to regulate the issuance of Indian securities including American Depositary Receipts to persons resident outside India and the transfer of Indian securities by or to persons resident outside India.

The Regulations provide that an Indian entity may issue securities to a person resident outside India or record in its books any transfer of security from or to such person only in the manner set forth in the FEMA and the rules and regulations made there under or as permitted by the Reserve Bank of India.

Subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions, Indian companies issuing ADSs are no longer required to obtain approval of the Ministry of Finance or the Reserve Bank of India under the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through Depositary Receipt Mechanism) Scheme, 1993, as amended from time to time, or the 1993 Scheme.

The 1993 Scheme is distinct from other policies described below relating to investments in Indian companies by foreign investors. The issuance of ADSs pursuant to the 1993 Scheme also affords to holders of ADSs the benefits of Sections 115AC and 115ACA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for purposes of the application of Indian tax.

Currently, subject to certain exceptions, foreign direct investment and investment by individuals of Indian nationality or origin residing outside India, or non-resident Indians, including investment in the ADSs, does not require prior approval of the Government of India or the Reserve Bank of India, although a declaration in the prescribed form, detailing the foreign investment must be filed with the Reserve Bank of India once the foreign investment is made in the Indian company. The Government of India has indicated that in all cases the Reserve Bank of India would continue to be the primary agency for the purposes of monitoring and regulating foreign investment. The foregoing description applies only to an issuance of shares by, and not to a transfer of shares of, Indian companies.

The consolidated FDI Policy dated April 05, 2013 states that indirect foreign investment shall include all types of foreign investments i.e. FDI, investment by FIIs, NRIs, ADRs, GDRs, Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs) and convertible preference shares and convertible currency debentures and that all investment directly by a non-resident entity into the Indian company would be counted towards direct foreign investment.

Chapter 4 of the FDI policy sets out guidelines for calculation of direct and indirect foreign investment in Indian Companies.

Foreign investment through an investing Indian company would not be considered for calculation of indirect foreign investment in case the Indian company is “owned and controlled” by resident Indians. If the investing company is owned or controlled by “non resident entities”, the entire investment by the investing company into the Indian company would be considered as indirect foreign investment.

Subject to the limitations set forth below, a person resident outside India may transfer the shares held by him in Indian companies in accordance with the Regulations. A person not resident in India (a “non-resident Indian”) may transfer, by way of sale or gift, the shares held by him to any other person resident outside India without the prior approval of the RBI. A non-resident Indian may transfer the shares held by him, by way of sale, only to another non-resident Indian without the prior approval of RBI.

Person’s resident outside India may also transfer shares or convertible debentures in Indian companies held by them to a person resident in India by way of gift, without prior approval of the RBI. Person’s resident outside India can sell the shares of an Indian company on a recognized Stock Exchange in India through a stock broker registered with stock exchange or a merchant banker registered with SEBI, without prior approval of the RBI. Further, Chapter 3 of the FDI Policy grants general permission for the transfer of shares by a person resident outside India to a person resident in India (and vice versa) subject to compliance with certain terms, conditions and reporting requirements mentioned therein.

Under current Indian regulations and practice, the RBI must approve the sale of equity shares underlying GDSs from a non-resident of India to a resident of India if the sale does not meet the requirements of paragraph 3.4.2 of chapter 3 of the FDI policy. As foreign exchange controls are in effect in India, the RBI will approve the price at which equity shares are transferred based on a specified formula, and sale at a higher price per share may not be permitted.

Pursuant to recent amendments, subject to certain RBI pricing guidelines, no RBI approval is required for the sale by a person resident outside India to a person resident in India of underlying shares withdrawn from an ADR program, if certain conditions are met, the prescribed procedure is followed and a confirmation from the authorized dealer is obtained in the prescribed form in respect of the transfer of shares.

In the event of a sale of the underlying shares withdrawn from an ADR program, remittance overseas of the proceeds from such sale is permitted.

The RBI has consolidated its various circulars on foreign investments in India, in a Master Circular No. 15/2012-13 dated July 2, 2012, summarizing the current regulatory provisions as amended from time to time.

Pursuant to the Master Circular, foreign investment in any form is prohibited in a company or a partnership firm or a proprietary concern or any entity, whether incorporated or not (such as trusts), which is engaged or proposes to engage in the following activities:

Real estate business does not include the development of townships, construction of residential/commercial premises and roads or bridges, educational institutions, recreational facilities, city and regional level infrastructure and townships. Partnership firms / proprietorship concerns having investments pursuant to FEMA regulations are not allowed to engage in the print media sector.

In addition to the above, investment in the form of foreign direct investment is also prohibited in certain sectors such as:

Besides foreign investment in any form, foreign technology collaboration in any form including licensing for franchise, trademark, brand name, management contract is also completely prohibited for Lottery Business and Gambling and Betting activities. Foreign investment in Trusts other than investment by SEBI registered FVCIs in domestic VCF is not permitted.

The Ministry of Finance, in its notification dated April 30, 2007, categorized as debt all foreign investment in the form of preference shares (other than fully convertible preference shares), such as nonconvertible, optionally convertible or partially convertible, and mandated that such investments conform with the ECB Guidelines. Foreign investment in the form of fully convertible preference shares is treated as part of share capital. Such investment is included in calculating foreign equity for purposes of sectoral caps on foreign equity, where such caps have been prescribed.

The price of shares of an Indian company listed on any recognized stock exchange in India and issued to non-residents under the foreign direct investment scheme on an automatic basis, cannot be less than the price established in accordance with the applicable guidelines issued by the SEBI. Where an Indian company is not listed on any recognized stock exchange in India, the minimum issue price of the shares would be based on a fair valuation of shares done by a chartered accountant as per the discounted free cash flow (“DCF”) method.

Every Indian company issuing shares or convertible debentures in accordance with the Regulations is required to submit a report to the RBI within 30 days of receipt of the consideration and another report within 30 days from the date of issue of the shares, in the prescribed form, to the non-resident purchaser.

The above description applies only to a primary issuance of shares or convertible debentures by, and not to a transfer of shares of, an Indian company.

The Indian Government has set up the Foreign Investment Implementation Authority (“FIIA”) in the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion. The FIIA has been mandated to (i) translate foreign direct investment approvals into implementation, (ii) provide a proactive one-stop aftercare service to foreign investors by helping them obtain necessary approvals, (iii) sort out operational problems and (iv) meet with various Indian Government agencies to find solutions to foreign investment problems.

A variety of methods for investing in shares of Indian companies are available to non-resident Indians. Subject to certain terms and conditions, these methods allow non-resident Indians to make portfolio investments in shares and other securities of Indian companies on a basis not generally available to other foreign investors. Under the Portfolio Investment Scheme, an non-resident Indian can purchase up to 5% of the paid-up value of the shares issued by a company, subject to the condition that the aggregate paid-up value of shares purchased by all non-resident Indians do not exceed 10% of the paid-up capital of the company (which can be raised to 24% by a resolution of the shareholders of a company). The total holding of all FIIs in a company is subject to a cap of 24% of the total paid-up capital of a company, which can be increased to the relevant statutory cap/ceiling in respect of the said company with the passing of a special resolution by the shareholders of the company in a general meeting. In addition to portfolio investments in Indian companies, non-resident Indians may also make foreign direct investments in Indian companies pursuant to the foreign direct investment route discussed above.

Overseas Corporate Bodies, or OCBs, at least 60% of which are owned by non-resident Indians, were allowed to invest into Indian companies by way of portfolio investment. The RBI no longer recognizes OCBs as an eligible class of investment vehicle under various routes and schemes under the foreign exchange regulations. However entities owned by Non-Resident Indians (which were formerly classified as Overseas Corporate Bodies) continue to enjoy all facilities available to other foreign investors.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign Institutional Investors) Regulations, 1995, as amended (“Foreign Institutional Investor Regulations” or “FII Regulations”) enable foreign institutional investors, including institutions such as pension funds, investment trusts, asset management companies, nominee companies and incorporated/institutional portfolio managers referred to as Foreign Institutional Investors, or FIIs, to make portfolio investments in all securities of listed and unlisted companies in India. Investments by registered Foreign Institutional Investors or non-resident Indians made through a recognized stock exchange are known as Portfolio Investments. Foreign institutional investors wishing to invest and trade in Indian securities in India under these guidelines are required to register with the SEBI. General permission has been granted by the RBI to FIIs to invest and trade in Indian securities and no separate application has to be made in this respect. However, since the SEBI provides a single window clearance, a single application must be made to the SEBI. Foreign institutional investors are not necessarily required to register with the SEBI as Foreign Institutional Investors and may invest in securities of Indian companies pursuant to the Foreign Direct Investment route discussed above, but in order to make Portfolio Investments freely and to remit funds into and outside India without an approval for each remittance, registration as an FII or as a ‘sub-account’ of an FII is necessary.

Foreign institutional investors, who are registered with the SEBI, are required to comply with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign Institutional Investors) Regulations, 1995, or Foreign Institutional Investor Regulations. A registered FII may buy, subject to the ownership restrictions discussed below, and sell freely. securities issued by any Indian company, realize capital gains on investments made through the initial amount invested in India, subscribe to or renounce rights offerings for shares, appoint a domestic custodian for custody of investments made and repatriate the capital, capital gains, dividends, income received by way of interest and any compensation received towards sale or renunciation of rights offerings of shares. An FII may not hold more than 10% of the total issued capital of a company in its own name, a corporate/individual sub-account of the FII may not hold more than 5% of the total issued capital of a company and a broad based sub-account of the FII may not hold more than 10% of the total issued capital of a company. The total holding of all FIIs in a company is subject to a cap of 24% of the total paid-up capital of a company, which can be increased to the relevant statutory cap/ceiling in respect of the said company with the passing of a special resolution by the shareholders of the company in a general meeting.

FIIs are also permitted to purchase shares and debentures, subject to FII limits, of an Indian company either through:

Regulation 15A of the SEBI Regulations provides that an FII or sub-account may issue, deal in or hold, offshore derivative instruments such as participatory notes, equity linked notes or any other similar instruments against underlying securities, listed or proposed to be listed, on any stock exchange in India, only in favour of those entities which are regulated by any relevant regulatory authority in the countries of their incorporation or establishment, subject to compliance with a “know your client” requirement. An FII or sub-account is also to ensure that no further downstream issue or transfer of any offshore derivative instrument is made to any person other than a regulated entity. SEBI has made amendments to the Regulations, by adding Section 15A effective on 3 February 2004, to incorporate such changes. SEBI has pursuant to its circular dated 19 February 2004 clarified that the following entities would be deemed to be regulated entities for the purpose of Section 15A of the SEBI (Foreign Institutional Investors) Regulations, 1995:

Historically, all FIIs issuing offshore derivatives or other financial instruments against underlying Indian securities were obliged to report any issuance, renewal, cancellation or redemption of the aforesaid instruments to SEBI every two weeks. However, in its circular dated 2 April 2004, SEBI advised all FIIs to change the frequency of submission of the report from bi-weekly to monthly. SEBI has specified that these submissions should be made by the seventh calendar day of the month following the relevant period. In addition and as a result of the 2 April 2004 circular, FIIs who have not traded and have no outstanding investments in Indian securities during a particular month (or reporting period) are not required to submit “any” reports for such period.

Registered FIIs are generally subject to tax under Section 115AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961. There is uncertainty under Indian law as to the tax regime applicable to foreign institutional investors that hold and trade ADSs. As such, FIIs are urged to consult with their Indian legal and tax advisors before making an investment in ADSs issued by an Indian company.

In addition to making portfolio investments in Indian companies, foreign institutional investors may make foreign direct investments in Indian companies pursuant to the foreign direct investment route discussed above.

Qualified Foreign Investor or QFI is a non-resident investor (other than SEBI registered FII and SEBI registered FVCI) who meets the KYC requirements of SEBI for the purpose of making investments in accordance with the regulations of RBI and/or SEBI.

QFls are permitted to invest through SEBI registered Depository Participants (DPs) in equity shares of listed Indian companies through recognized brokers on recognized stock exchanges in India as well as in equity shares of Indian companies which are offered to public in India.

QFls are also permitted to acquire equity shares by way of right shares, bonus shares or equity shares on account of stock split / consolidation or equity shares on account of amalgamation, demerger or such corporate actions subject to the prescribed investment limits. QFIs are allowed to sell the equity shares so acquired subject to the relevant SEBI guidelines.

The individual and aggregate investment limits for the QFls is 5% and 10% respectively of the paid up capital of an Indian company. These limits are over and above the FII and NRI investment ceilings prescribed under the Portfolio Investment Scheme for foreign investment in India, but must be within the FDI sectoral cap.

Dividend payments on equity shares held by QFls may either be remitted to the designated overseas bank accounts of the QFIs or credited to a Rupee account. Dividend payments may be used for fresh purchases of equity shares.

Under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011, as amended, or Takeover Code, upon the acquisition of more than 5% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of an Indian public listed company, a purchaser is required to notify the company, and the company and the purchaser are required to notify all the stock exchanges on which the shares of such company are listed. Upon the acquisition of 25% or more of such shares or voting rights or a change in control of the company, the acquirer must make an open offer to the other shareholders, offering to purchase at least 26% of the outstanding shares of the company at a minimum offer price as determined pursuant to the Takeover Code. Upon conversion of ADSs into equity shares, an ADS holder may be subject to the Takeover Code; if the shareholding of the ADS holder on conversion exceeds 25% of the paid up capital of the Indian company and the Indian company is listed in India. An ADS holder may also be subject to the Takeover Code if the ADS holder becomes entitled to exercise voting rights, in any manner whatsoever, on the underlying shares. Similar disclosures must be made under the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading), Regulations, 1992, or Insider Trading Regulations, if the equity shares of the Indian company are listed on a recognized stock exchange in India. So long as our Equity

Shares are unlisted in India, the provisions of the Takeover Code and the Insider Trading Regulations will not be applicable.

Qualified Institutional Placement under the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009

In order to make Indian markets more competitive and efficient, the Government of India introduced an additional instrument for listed companies to raise funds from domestic markets in the form of a Qualified Institutional Placement, or QIP. Key features of the QIP program are as follows:

Because our Equity Shares are not listed on any Indian stock exchange, we are not eligible to participate in the QIP program.

The following table provides information relating to the beneficial ownership of our equity shares for:

Sunil N. Phatarphekar, a director of the Company, holds 6,000 equity shares which resulted from the exercise of the stock options.

Ashok Narasimhan, a director of the Company, holds 6,000 equity shares which resulted from the exercise of the stock options.

Our ADSs are currently listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Market and each ADS is represented by one-half of one Equity Share of par value of LOGO

5 per share.

Our ADSs are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Act. We have been informed by our depository that as of June 19, 2013, 9,295,956 ADSs were held by 23 record holders of ADRs in the United States.

The following discussion of Indian tax consequences for investors in ADSs and Equity Shares received upon redemption of ADSs who are not resident in India, whether of Indian origin or not, is based on the current provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2012, including the special tax regime for ADSs contained in Section 115AC, as amended, and certain regulations implementing the Section 115AC regime. The Indian Income-tax Act is amended every year by the Finance Act of the relevant year. Some or all of the tax consequences of Section 115AC and other relevant provisions may be amended or modified by future amendments to the Indian Income-tax Act.

In the event there is any double taxation avoidance agreement between two states and an investor is a resident of either of the states, then to the extent the provisions of the Double taxation avoidance agreement are more favorable to the investor, under the Indian Income-tax Act, the provisions of the Double taxation avoidance agreement would prevail. However, the Finance Act, 2012 has introduced provisions relating to General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) under which certain arrangements could be declared to be an impermissible avoidance arrangement. The consequences of such arrangements include denial of a tax benefit or a benefit under a tax treaty. The GAAR was originally proposed to become effective on April 1, 2013. Based on the recommendation of a panel which was formed to study proposed GAAR, the GAAR provisions are now proposed to be effective April 1, 2016 onwards. Based on the recommendation of the panel, the Finance Act, 2013 has revised the provisions related to GAAR as proposed by the Finance Act, 2012.

The following summary is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of the tax consequences under Indian law of the acquisition, ownership and sale of our ADSs and our Equity Shares by non-resident investors. Potential investors should, therefore, consult their own tax advisers on the tax consequences of such acquisition, ownership and sale, including specifically the tax consequences under Indian law, the law of the jurisdiction of their residence, any tax treaty between India and their country of residence, and in particular the application of the regulations implementing the Section 115AC regime.

For purposes of the Indian Income-tax Act, an individual is a resident of India during any fiscal year, if he (i) is in India in that year for 182 days or more or (ii) having within the four years preceding that year been in India for a period or periods amounting in all to 365 days or more, is in India for period or periods amounting in all to 60 days or more in that year. The period of 60 days is substituted by 182 days in case of an Indian citizen or person of Indian origin who being resident outside India comes on a visit to India during the financial year or an Indian citizen who leaves India as a member of the crew of an Indian ship or for the purposes of employment outside India. A company is resident in India in any fiscal year if it is an Indian company or the control and management of its affairs is situated wholly in India in that year. A firm or other association of persons is resident in India except where the control and the management of its affairs are situated wholly outside India.

Shareholders who receive dividends by a domestic company will not be subject to tax on the distribution if the company has paid the dividend distribution tax (the “DDT”). Consequently, withholding tax on dividends paid to shareholders does not apply. However, if dividends are declared, we are required to pay taxes at a rate of 16.995%, including applicable surcharge and Education Cess, of the total dividend declared. If the company has not paid the DTT, the shareholder would be taxable at the applicable Indian Income-tax rates depending on the legal status of the shareholders.

Any transfer of ADSs outside India by a non-resident investor to another non-resident investor does not give rise to Indian capital gains tax.

Though there is no specific provision exempting the redemption of ADSs, it can be inferred from the provisions of Section 47(xa) that transfer by way of conversion of bonds referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 115AC into shares or debentures of any company would not be considered as transfer and therefore the same would be exempt.

In terms of Article 8(3) of the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through Depository Receipt Mechanism) Scheme, 1993, (Scheme) issued by the Central Government, conversion of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (including ADSs) into equity shares will not give rise to any capital gains liable to tax in India.

Since the exemption is provided under the Scheme and not under the Indian Income-tax Act, it is not certain whether Indian tax authorities would grant the exemption. Moreover, Article 7(3) of the Scheme clarifies that the cost of acquisition of the underlying shares acquired through the redemption of ADRs, shall be determined as the price of ordinary shares of the issuing company prevailing on the Stock Exchange on the date of the advice or redemption. Therefore, the tax authorities may contend that since the Scheme does not provide the methodology for calculating the capital gains on sale of underlying shares in the case of unlisted companies, the benefit under the Scheme would not be available to companies not listed in India. In such a case, there may be a risk of taxability of gains on acquisition of underlying Equity Shares upon redemption of ADSs.

Subject to any relief under any relevant double taxation treaty, a gain arising on the sale of an equity share by a non-resident investor will generally give rise to a liability for Indian capital gains tax and tax is required to be withheld at source. Capital gains on sale of equity shares, which have been held for more than 12 months (measured from the date of advice of redemption of ADSs by the depositary in the case of non-resident sellers) are considered as long-term capital gains and generally taxable at the rate of 20%, except in the case of a sale of equity shares entered into on a recognized stock exchange in India and the transaction is chargeable to Securities Transaction Tax (“STT”). Surcharge on this tax would be applicable at the rate of 2% in the case of non-resident corporations if the total income exceeds Rs.1 Crore (Rs.10 million). However, no surcharge is leviable on individuals or an association of persons for the fiscal year 2013. In all the above cases, the amount of tax and surcharge, if any, would be increased by an Education Cess of 2% and Secondary and Higher Education Cess of 1% resulting in an aggregate Education Cess of 3%.

Article 9(5) of the Scheme indicates that the long term capital gains on sale of redeemed underlying shares held by non-resident investors in the domestic market would be charged to tax at 10% in accordance with the provisions of section 115AC. Though section 115AC provides for lower rate of tax (i.e., 10% plus surcharge where applicable and Education Cess of 3%) on long term capital gains arising from transfer of ADSs (other than one between two non-residents made outside India), it is unclear whether the lower rate of tax would also extend to gains arising from transfer of shares converted from ADSs under the amended provisions of Section 115AC. However, it may be noted that certain other provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act also provide for lower rate of tax (i.e., 10% plus surcharge where applicable and Education Cess of 3%) for specific classes of taxpayers, such as FIIs, registered with SEBI.

Long-term capital gains realized on the sale of equity shares which are listed in India will be exempt from tax if the transaction of that sale is entered into on a recognized stock exchange in India and the transaction is charged to STT and the contract for the sale of the equity shares is settled by the actual delivery or transfer of those shares.

Where equity shares have been held for 12 months or less, the rate of tax varies and will be subject to tax at normal rates of income tax applicable to non-residents under the provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act, subject to a maximum of 40% (plus applicable surcharge and Education Cess as mentioned above), except in the case of a sale of Equity Shares entered into in a recognized stock exchange in India and the transaction is charged to STT. The actual rate of tax on short-term gains depends on a number of factors, including the legal status of the non-resident holder and the type of income chargeable in India.

During the period the underlying Equity Shares are held by non-resident investors on a transfer from our depositary upon redemption of ADSs, the provisions of the Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement entered into by the Government of India with the country of residence of the non-resident investors will be applicable in the matter of taxation of any capital gain arising on a transfer of our Equity Shares.

Short-term capital gains realized on the sale of equity shares which are listed in India will be chargeable to tax at 15%. Surcharge on this tax would be applicable at the rate of 2% in the case of non-resident corporations if the total income exceeds Rs.1 Crore (Rs.10 million). However, no surcharge is leviable on individuals or an association of persons for the fiscal year 2013. In all the above cases, the amount of tax and surcharge, if any, would be increased by cess of 3%, provided the transaction of the sale is entered into in a recognized stock exchange in India and the transaction is charged to STT and the contract for the sale of the shares is settled by the actual delivery or transfer of those shares.

Pursuant to Article 7(3) of the Scheme, in the case of companies listed in India, the purchase price of the equity shares would be the price of the equity shares prevailing on the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (“BSE”) or the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (“NSE”) on the date the depositary gives notice to the custodian of the redemption of ADSs. However, pursuant to Section 49(2A) of the Indian Income-tax Act , where the capital asset, being a share or debenture of a company, becomes the property of the assessee by way of conversion of bonds, debentures, debenture stock, or deposit certificate in any form, the cost of acquisition of the asset to the assessee shall be deemed to be that part of the cost of debenture, debenture-stock, bond or deposit certificate in relation to which such asset is acquired by the assessee. Therefore, it is unlikely that the beneficial tax treatment prescribed under the Scheme would be available to the investor for the fiscal year 2013.

Issuance to non-resident holders of additional ADSs or equity shares or rights to subscribe for equity shares made with respect to ADSs or equity shares are not subject to tax in the hands of the non-resident holder.

However, under section 56(2)(viia) of the Indian Income-tax Act, where a firm or a closely held company receives any share of another closely held company without consideration or for a consideration which is less than the fair market value (fair market value exceeding INR 0.05 million), the fair market value /excess shall be taxable in the hands of the recipient. There is a possibility that the tax authorities may tax the recipient under section 56(2)(viia) of the Indian Income-tax Act. A view may be taken that there is no transfer of shares when fresh shares or rights are allotted and that consequently the provisions of section 56(2)(viia) are not attracted. However, litigation with the tax authorities cannot be ruled out on this issue.

It is unclear as to whether capital gain derived from the sale of rights by a non-resident holder, not entitled to exemption under a tax treaty, to another non-resident holder outside India will be subject to Indian capital gains tax. If rights are deemed by the Indian tax authorities to be situated within India, as our situs is in India, the gains realized on the sale of rights will be subject to Indian taxation. These rights would generally be in the nature of short-term capital assets.

Upon the issuance of the Equity Shares underlying our ADSs, we are required to pay a stamp duty of 0.1% per share of the issue price. A transfer of ADSs is not subject to Indian stamp duty. Normally,

upon the acquisition of equity shares from a depositary in exchange for ADSs representing these equity shares in physical form, an investor would be liable for Indian stamp duty at the rate of 0.25% of the market value of the equity shares at the date of registration. Similarly, a sale of equity shares by an investor would also be subject to Indian stamp duty at the rate of 0.25% of the market value of the equity shares on the trade date, although customarily the tax is borne by the transferee, that is, the purchaser. In case the equity shares of the company are held in a “dematerialized” form, such as a book-entry system, no stamp duty would be payable on the acquisition or transfer of the equity shares.

At present, there are no Indian taxes on wealth, gifts or inheritance, which may apply to our ADSs and any underlying Equity Shares.

Brokerage or commissions paid to stockbrokers in connection with the sale or purchase of shares traded in India is subject to a service tax of 12.36%. The stockbroker is responsible for collecting the service tax and paying it to the relevant authority. Payments received in India in convertible foreign exchange are currently exempted from the levy of service tax provided certain conditions are satisfied.

The following is a summary of United States federal income tax considerations relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of ADSs or Equity Shares by U.S. Holders (as defined below) that will hold their ADSs or Equity Shares as “capital assets” (generally, property held for investment) under the United States Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). This summary is based upon existing United States federal income tax law, which is subject to differing interpretations or change, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary does not discuss all aspects of United States federal income taxation which may be important to particular investors in light of their individual investment circumstances, including holders subject to special tax rules (e.g., financial institutions, insurance companies, broker-dealers, partnerships and their partners, and tax-exempt organizations (including private foundations)), holders that are not U.S. Holders, holders that own (directly, indirectly, or constructively) 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our Equity Shares entitled to vote, holders that will hold our ADSs or our Equity Shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion, constructive sale, or other integrated transaction for United States federal income tax purposes, or holders that have a functional currency other than the United States dollar, all of whom may be subject to tax rules that differ significantly from those summarized below. In addition, this summary does not discuss any non-United States, state, or local tax considerations. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the United States federal, state, local, and non-United States income and other tax considerations of an investment in our ADSs or our Equity Shares.

For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of ADSs or Equity Shares that, for United States federal income tax purposes, is (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes created in, or organized under the law of, the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof, (iii) an estate the income of which is includible in gross income for United States federal income tax purposes regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a United States court and which has one or more United States persons who have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

If a partnership is a beneficial owner of our ADSs or Equity Shares, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.

For United States federal income tax purposes, U.S. Holders of ADSs will be treated as the beneficial owners of the underlying shares represented by the ADSs.

A primary consideration related to making an investment in ADSs or Equity Shares for United States investors is whether we will become classified as a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”). A foreign corporation, such as us, will be treated as a PFIC, for United States federal income tax purposes, if 75% or more of its gross income consists of certain types of “passive” income or 50% or more of its assets are passive. For the purpose of applying the income and assets tests described above, we will be treated as owning its proportionate share of the assets and earning the proportionate share of the income of any other corporation that we own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more (by value) of the stock of such corporation.

We do not expect to be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for United States federal income tax purposes for the most recent taxable year ended March 31, 2013. However, there is no guaranty that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with our determination. Moreover, we may become classified as a PFIC for one or more future taxable years, particularly under circumstances where we determine not to deploy significant amounts of cash for business development purposes. The determination of whether we are, or will become, classified as a PFIC is a fact intensive determination that is made annually based on the composition and amounts of income that we earn and the composition and valuation of our assets, all of which are subject to change. For purposes of determining whether we are, or will become, classified as a PFIC, cash and other liquid assets are categorized as passive assets and the value of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles are taken into account. The value of our assets for a taxable year is determined by reference to the average of the fair market values of our assets determined as of the end of each quarterly period during the taxable year. In addition, the composition of our assets will be affected by how, and how quickly, we spend our liquid assets that we presently hold. To the extent we are able to deploy substantial amounts of cash for business development purposes, our level of active assets, as compared with our passive assets, may become more prominent.

If we are classified as a PFIC for any year during which a U.S. Holder holds our ADSs or Equity Shares, we generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years during which such U.S. Holder holds our ADSs or Equity Shares.

Because PFIC status is a fact intensive determination made on an annual basis, no assurance can be given regarding our classification as a PFIC. The discussion immediately below under the headings “Distributions” and “Sale or Other Disposition of ADSs or Equity Shares” describes certain tax considerations if we are not subject to classification as a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes, and are followed by a summary of the PFIC rules under the heading “Passive Foreign Investment Company” if we were to be classified as a PFIC. United States investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the potential application and effect of the PFIC rules in connection with their prospective investment in our ADSs or our Equity Shares.

The gross amount of cash distributions with respect to the ADSs (or Equity Shares) will, upon receipt by the Depositary (or by you), be includible in your gross income as dividend income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles. Because we do not intend to determine our earnings and profits on the basis of United States federal income tax principles, any distribution paid will generally be treated as a dividend for United States federal income tax purposes. A non-corporate recipient of dividend income will generally be subject to tax on dividend income from a “qualified foreign corporation” at a maximum United States federal tax rate of 20% rather than the marginal tax rates generally applicable to ordinary income so long as certain holding period requirements are met. A non-United States corporation (other than a PFIC) generally will be considered to be a qualified foreign corporation (i) if it is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive tax treaty with the United States which the Secretary of Treasury of the United States determines is satisfactory for purposes of this provision and which includes an exchange of information program or (ii) with respect to any dividend it pays on stock which is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. There is currently a tax treaty in effect between the United States and India which the Secretary of Treasury has determined is satisfactory for these purposes and we believe we should be eligible for the benefits of the treaty. United States corporate holders will generally not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for distributions to domestic corporations in respect of distributions on our ADSs or our Equity Shares.

Beginning in 2013, a recently enacted tax on net investment income imposed at a 3.8% rate will also apply to dividends received by certain individuals who meet specified income thresholds ($250,000 for joint returns).

The United States dollar value of any distribution made by us in Rupees will be determined by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date the distribution is received by the Depositary (or you if you hold our Equity Shares), regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars on that date. Any subsequent gain or loss in respect of such Rupees arising from exchange rate fluctuations will be ordinary income or loss. This gain or loss will generally be treated as United States source gain or loss for United States foreign tax credit limitation purposes.

Dividends generally will be treated as income from foreign sources for United States foreign tax credit limitation purposes. You may be eligible, subject to a number of complex limitations, to claim a foreign tax credit in respect of any foreign withholding taxes imposed on dividends received on the ADSs or the Equity Shares. If you do not elect to claim a foreign tax credit for foreign tax withheld, you may instead claim a deduction, for United States federal income tax purposes, in respect of such withholding, but only for a year in which you elect to do so for all creditable foreign income taxes.

You generally will recognize capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes upon a sale or other disposition of ADSs or Equity Shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized from the sale or disposition and your adjusted tax basis in the ADSs or the Equity Shares. Such gain generally will be long-term if, on the date of such sale or disposition, you held such ADSs or Equity Shares for more than one year and will generally be treated as United States source gain or loss for United States foreign tax credit limitation purposes. The deductibility of a capital loss may be subject to limitations.

If we are or were to become classified as a PFIC for any taxable year, and unless you make a special election (including a “mark-to-market” election, as described below), you would be subject to special rules with respect to (i) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or Equity Shares, and (ii) any “excess distribution” made by us on the ADSs or Equity Shares (generally, any distributions paid to you in respect of ADSs or Equity Shares during a single taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received by you during the three preceding taxable years or, if shorter, your holding period for such ADSs or Equity Shares).

As an alternative to the foregoing rules, a holder of “marketable stock” in a PFIC may make a mark-to-market election, provided that the shares are “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange.” So long as our ADSs are regularly traded on the NASDAQ Global Market, our ADSs should be treated as

marketable stock on a qualified exchange for this purpose. No assurances, however, may be given whether the ADSs would be treated, or continue to be treated, as “regularly traded” on such exchange. If you make a valid mark-to-market election, you will generally (i) include as ordinary income for each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of your ADSs or Equity Shares as determined at the end of the taxable year over the adjusted tax basis of such ADSs or Equity Shares and (ii) deduct as a loss the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of your ADSs or Equity Shares over the fair market value of such ADSs or Equity Shares as determined at the end of the taxable year, but only to the extent of the amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election. Your adjusted tax basis in your ADSs or Equity Shares would be adjusted to reflect any income or loss resulting from the mark-to-market election.

The rules for PFICs are complex and several other special elections are available, including the election to treat us as a “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”). A QEF election would require a holder of Equity Shares or ADSs to include in its income a share of our income on an annual basis even absent a distribution to pay taxes on that share of income.

If you own ADSs or Equity Shares during any year that we are classified as a PFIC, you must file an annual Internal Revenue Service Form 8621 that describes the distributions received on ADSs or Equity Shares and the gain realized on the disposition of ADSs or Equity Shares. You are urged to consult your tax advisor concerning the United States federal, state and local income tax consequences of acquiring, holding, and disposing of ADSs or Equity Shares.

Our disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the objectives of the control system. As such, disclosure controls and procedures or internal control systems may not prevent all error and all fraud. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, at our Company have been detected.

Our management, with the participation of our Chairman and Managing director, who serves as our Principal Executive Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer who serves as Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 referred as the “Exchange Act “) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on such evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chairman and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chairman and Managing director, who serves as our Principal Executive Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer who serves as Principal Financial Officer, and effected by our management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with established policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman and Managing director and our Chief Financial Officer, our Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013. In making this assessment, our management primarily used the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO”). Based on such assessment, our management has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte Haskins & Sells, has audited the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F, and as part of their audit, has issued their report, included herein, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013.

During the period covered by this annual report, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

The following table summarizes the fees billed to us by our principal accountant, Deloitte Haskins & Sells, Mumbai, India and its affiliates (collectively “Deloitte”) for various services rendered to us during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Audit fee represents the aggregate fees for Deloitte in connection with the audits of our annual integrated consolidated financial statements and statutory audits.

Tax fees primarily comprise fees for tax audit and permitted tax advisory services. Tax fees also include other corporate tax services such as assistance with foreign income tax and service tax.

Our Audit Committee charter requires us to obtain the prior approval of our Audit Committee on every occasion we engage our principal accountants or their associated entities to provide us any audit or non-audit services. We disclose to our Audit Committee the nature of services that are provided. All of the services provided by our principal accountants or their associated entities in the previous three fiscal years (since the emergence of the pre-approval rules), have been pre-approved by our Audit Committee.

On February 23, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to US$8,861,320 of our Equity Shares under a share repurchase program. In their meeting held on July 21, 2011, our Board of Directors, considering the then-current market price of our ADSs, terminated the share repurchase program. The information set forth below reflects the share purchases made in connection with the share repurchase program.

The consolidated financial statements in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our fiscal year ends on March 31 of each year so all references to a particular fiscal year are to the year ended March 31 of that year. The consolidated financial statements, including the notes to these financial statements, audited by Deloitte Haskins & Sells, an independent registered public accounting firm, are set forth at the end of this annual report.

Although we have translated in this annual report certain Indian Rupee amounts into U.S. dollars, this does not mean that the Indian Rupee amounts referred to could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars at any particular rate, the rates stated earlier in this annual report, or at all. The Reserve Bank of India publishes the exchange rate on each date. The published rate on March 31, 2013 was LOGO

54.39 per US$1.00. The reporting currency for the financial statements is the U.S. dollar and the translation from Indian Rupees to U.S. dollars has been performed using rates specified by the Reserve Bank of India.

The main objective as stated in our Memorandum of Association is to carry on and undertake the business of providing online information services in various languages via electronic and other forms of communications for local and other subscribers in India and abroad and to deal in all the materials connected therewith. For purposes of carrying out this main objective, we are also authorized under our Memorandum of Association to carry on and undertake the business of publishers of dailies, weeklies, fortnightly, newspapers, periodicals, journals, magazines, directories, souvenirs, year-books and other literary works in the electronic and other forms in any language and on any subject and marketing including export markets, sell/distribute such published items to subscribers in India and abroad.

The following description of our share capital does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by the Company’s Articles of Association and Memorandum of Association, as amended, the provisions of the Companies Act, as currently in effect, and other applicable provisions of Indian law.

Our authorized share capital is 24,000,000 Equity Shares, par value LOGO

5 per share (after giving effect to our 2 for 5 reverse share split effective May 3, 2000). As of March 31, 2013, 14,810,178 Equity Shares were issued and outstanding.

The Equity Shares are our only class of share capital. However, our Amended and Restated Articles of Association and the Companies Act permit us to issue classes of securities in addition to the equity shares. For the purposes of this annual report, “shareholder” means a shareholder who is registered as a member in the register of members of our Company.

In connection with our sales of Equity Shares to our investors from April 1998 through December 1999, we entered into nine separate shareholders rights agreements with our shareholders which provide for, among other things, certain preemptive, registration, co-sale and information rights, as well as the right of some shareholders to appoint members or observers of our Board of Directors. Some of the agreements also provide the shareholders with protective provisions that require us to obtain our shareholders’ consent to take certain actions that would otherwise only require our Board’s approval.

On February 24, 2000, we entered into an Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Rights Agreement with certain of our shareholders to amend, restate, supersede and replace all nine previous shareholder agreements we entered into with our shareholders. The Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Rights Agreement, which became effective on the completion of our initial ADR offering, provides for the following shareholder rights:

Certain holders of at least 30% of our Equity Shares can require us, subject to limitations, to effect a registration or qualification of the securities either with the NASDAQ Global Market (formerly the NASDAQ National Market), the NSE or the BSE. We are not required to effect:

At any time after we become eligible to file a registration statement on Form F-3, certain holders of our Equity Shares may require us to file registration statements on Form F-3 with respect to their Equity Shares. We are not required to affect this registration:

Each of the foregoing registration rights is subject to conditions and limitations, including the right of the underwriters in any underwritten offering to limit the number of Equity Shares to be included in such registration. We are required to bear all the expenses of all such registrations, except underwriting discounts and commissions. The registration rights with respect to any holder thereof terminate upon the earlier of when the holder may sell the Equity Shares within a three-month period pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act, or the time when the holder is able to convert the registrable securities into ADSs which are traded on the NASDAQ Global Market.

The Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Rights Agreement also provides certain preemptive, information and co-sale rights to our shareholders.

Under the Companies Act, unless our Board of Directors recommends the payment of dividends, we may not declare dividends. Similarly, under our Amended and Restated Articles of Association, although the shareholders may, at the annual general meeting, approve a dividend in an amount less than that recommended by the Board of Directors, they cannot increase the amount of the dividend. In India, dividends are generally declared as a percentage of the par value of a company’s equity shares. The SEBI has mandated that listed companies must declare dividends on a per share basis, so that there is clarity on the exact returns shareholders receive from equities on their equity ownership. Any dividend recommended by the Board of Directors subject to the limitations described above, will be distributed and paid to shareholders in proportion to the paid up value of their shares within 30 days of the approval by the shareholders at the annual general meeting. The Board of Directors may also declare interim dividends and the amount of dividends, including interim dividends, is required to be deposited in a separate bank account within five days from the date of declaration of such dividends. If such dividend, including interim dividend, has not been paid or claimed within 30 days of declaration of such dividend, we are required to transfer the total amount of dividend which remains unpaid or unclaimed within seven days of the expiry of the 30 day period, to a special bank account. Under the Companies Act if a dividend has been declared by a company but has not been paid within 30 days from the date of declaration to any shareholder entitled to the payment of the dividend, each director of the company, if he is knowingly a party to the default, will be punishable with imprisonment and also liable to fines. Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Articles of Association, our Board of Directors has discretion to declare and pay interim dividends without shareholder approval. With respect to Equity Shares issued during a particular fiscal year (including any Equity Shares underlying ADS issued to the Depositary in connection with the offering or in the future), cash dividends declared and paid for such fiscal year will be on a pari passu basis to the outstanding Equity Shares. Under the Companies Act, dividends can only be paid in cash to the registered shareholder (or to his order or his banker’s order) at a record date fixed on or prior to the annual general meeting.

Under the Companies Act, dividends and interim dividends may be paid out of profits of a company in the year in which the dividend is declared or out of the undistributed profits of previous fiscal years. Before declaring a dividend, the Companies Act requires that we provide for depreciation in accordance with the Companies Act and also transfer to our reserves a minimum percentage of our profits for that year, ranging between 2.5% to 10.0%, depending upon the dividend percentage to be declared in such year. The Companies Act further provides that, in the event of inadequacy or absence of profits in any year, dividends may be declared for such year out of the company’s accumulated profits, subject to the following conditions:

In addition to permitting dividends to be paid out of current or retained earnings as described above, the Companies Act permits us to distribute an amount transferred from the general reserve or surplus in our profit and loss account to our shareholders in the form of bonus shares, which is similar to paying a stock dividend. The Companies Act also permits the issuance of bonus shares from a securities premium account. These bonus shares must be distributed to shareholders in proportion to the number of equity shares owned by them. Bonus shares are distributed to shareholders in the proportion recommended by the Board of Directors. Shareholders of record on a fixed record date are entitled to receive such bonus shares.

The Companies Act gives shareholders the right to subscribe for new shares in proportion to their respective existing shareholdings unless otherwise determined by a special resolution passed by a general meeting of the shareholders. For approval, this special resolution must be approved by a number of votes which is not less than three times the number of votes against the special resolution. If the special resolution is not approved, the new shares must first be offered to the existing shareholders as of a fixed record date. The offer must include: (1) the right, exercisable by the shareholders of record, to renounce the shares offered in favor of any other person; and (2) the number of shares offered and the period of the offer, which may not be less than 15 days from the date of offer. If the offer is not accepted it is deemed to have been declined. Our Board of Directors is authorized under the Companies Act to distribute any new shares not purchased by the preemptive rights holders in the manner that it deems most beneficial to the Company.

We must convene an annual general meeting of shareholders within 15 months of the previous annual general meeting or within six months after the end of each fiscal year and may convene an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders when necessary or at the request of a shareholder or shareholders holding at least 10% of our paid up capital carrying voting rights. The annual general meeting of the shareholders is generally convened by our company secretary pursuant to a resolution of the Board. Written notice setting out the agenda of the meeting must be given at least 21 days (excluding the days of

mailing and receipt) prior to the date of the general meeting to the shareholders of record. Shareholders who are registered as shareholders on the date of the general meeting are entitled to attend and vote at such meeting.

The annual general meeting of shareholders must be held at our registered office or at such other place within the city in which the registered office is located; meetings other than the annual general meeting may be held at any other place if so determined by the Board of Directors. Our registered office is located at 1st floor, Mahalaxmi Engineering Estate, L. J. First Cross Road, Mahim (West), Mumbai 400 016.

Our Articles of Association provide that a quorum for a general meeting is the presence of at least five shareholders in person.

At any general meeting, voting is by show of hands unless a poll is demanded by a shareholder or shareholders present in person or by proxy holding at least 10% of the total shares entitled to vote on the resolution or by those holding shares with an aggregate paid up capital of at least Rs.50,000. Upon a show of hands, every shareholder entitled to vote and present in person has one vote and, on a poll, every shareholder entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy has voting rights in proportion to the paid up capital held by such shareholders.

Any shareholder may appoint a proxy. The instrument appointing a proxy must be delivered to us at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. A proxy may not vote except on a poll. A corporate shareholder may appoint an authorized representative who can vote on behalf of the shareholder, both upon a show of hands and upon a poll.

Ordinary resolutions may be passed by simple majority of those present and voting at any general meeting for which the required period of notice has been given. However, specified resolutions such as amendments to our Amended and Restated Articles of Association and the Memorandum of Association, commencement of a new line of business, the waiver of preemptive rights for the issuance of any new shares and a reduction of share capital, require that votes cast in favor of the resolution (whether by show of hands or poll) are not less than three times the number of votes, if any, cast against the resolution.

Pursuant to the Companies (Issue of Share Capital with Differential Voting Rights) Rules, 2001, issued on March 9, 2001, by the Department of Company Affairs, Government of India, a company limited by shares is authorized to issue shares with differential voting rights if the articles of association of the company so authorizes. Our Amended and Restated Articles of Association do not authorize issuance of shares with differential voting rights.

Pursuant to Section 192A of the Companies Act, a listed public company must pass certain corporate resolutions, as notified by the Central Government, only through postal ballot. Since as of the date of this report, the Company is not a “listed public company”, the provisions of Section 192A of the Companies Act do not currently apply to us.

Holders of our ADS may exercise voting rights only through a depositary, unlike an owner of Equity Shares, who can exercise voting rights directly. An owner of ADS generally will have the right under the deposit agreement to instruct the Depositary to exercise the voting rights for the Equity Shares represented by the ADS. Owners of ADS have no rights pursuant to the Companies Act, under which we were incorporated, and are limited to those rights granted to them pursuant to the deposit agreement.

It is our expectation that our Depositary will forward notices of shareholders’ meetings to the ADS holders together with information explaining how to instruct the Depositary to exercise the voting rights on the Equity Shares represented by ADS. If the Depositary timely receives voting instructions from an owner of ADS, it will endeavor to vote the securities represented by those ADS in accordance with such voting instructions. In the event that voting takes place by a show of hands, the depositary bank will cause the custodian to vote all deposited securities in accordance with the instructions received from owners of a majority of the ADS for which the depositary bank receives voting instructions. However, the ability of the

Depositary to carry out voting instructions may be limited by practical and legal limitations and the terms of the securities on deposit. We cannot assure that holders of ADS will receive voting materials in time to enable them to return voting instructions to the depositary bank in a timely manner.

We maintain a register of shareholders. For the purpose of determining the shares entitled to annual dividends, the register is closed for a specified period prior to the annual general meeting. The date on which this period begins is the record date.

To determine which shareholders are entitled to specified shareholder rights, we may close the register of shareholders. The Companies Act requires us to give at least seven days’ prior notice to the public before such closure. We may not close the register of shareholders for more than thirty consecutive days, and in no event for more than forty-five days in a year.

Following the introduction of the Depositories Act, 1996, as amended, and the repeal of Section 22A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, as amended, which enabled companies to refuse to register transfers of shares in some circumstances, the equity shares of a public company are freely transferable, subject only to the provisions of Section 111A of the Companies Act. Since we are a public limited company, the provisions of Section 111A will apply to us. Our Articles currently contain provisions which give our directors discretion to refuse to register a transfer of shares in some circumstances. Furthermore, in accordance with the provisions of Section 111A(2) of the Companies Act, our directors may refuse to register a transfer of shares if they have sufficient cause to do so. If our directors refuse to register a transfer of shares, the shareholder wishing to transfer his, her or its shares may file a civil suit or an appeal with the Company Law Board constituted under Section 10E of the Companies Act. Pursuant to Section 111A(3) of the Companies Act, if a transfer of shares contravenes any of the provisions of the Indian Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 or the regulations issued there- under or the Indian Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 or any other Indian laws, the Company Law Board may, on application made by the company, a depository incorporated in India, an investor, the Securities and Exchange Board of India or other parties, direct the rectification of the register of records. The Company Law Board may, in its discretion, issue an interim order suspending the voting rights attached to the relevant shares before making or completing its investigation into the alleged contravention. Notwithstanding such investigation, the rights of a shareholder to transfer the shares will not be restricted.

Under the Companies Act, unless the shares of a company are held in a dematerialized form, a transfer of shares is effected by an instrument of transfer in the form prescribed by the Companies Act and the rules there-under together with delivery of the share certificates.

Section 187C of the Companies Act requires beneficial owners of shares of Indian companies who are not holders of record to declare to us details of the holder of record and the holder of record to declare details of the beneficial owner. Any person who fails to make the required declaration within 30 days may be liable for a fine of up to LOGO

1,000 for each day the declaration is not made. Any lien, promissory note or other collateral agreement created, executed or entered into with respect to any equity share by its registered owner, or any hypothecation by the registered owner of any equity share, shall not be enforceable by the beneficial owner or any person claiming through the beneficial owner if such declaration is not made. Failure to comply with Section 187C will not affect our obligation to register a transfer of shares or to pay any dividends to the registered holder of any shares pursuant to which the declaration has not been made. While it is unclear under Indian law whether Section 187C applies to holders of ADS, investors who exchange ADS for the underlying Equity Shares will be subject to the restrictions of Section 187C. The provisions of Section 187C of the Companies Act do not, however, apply to a trustee holding shares of a company for the benefit of the beneficiaries of a trust.

At least 21 days before the annual general meeting of shareholders excluding the days of mailing and receipt, we must distribute to our shareholders a detailed version of our audited balance sheet and profit and loss account and the related reports of the Board and the auditors, together with a notice convening the annual general meeting. Under the Companies Act, we must file the balance sheet and annual profit and loss account presented to the shareholders within 30 days of the conclusion of the annual general meeting with the Registrar of Companies (“RoC”) in Mumbai, which is in the State of Maharashtra, India. Our registered office is located in Mumbai. We must also file an annual return containing a list of our shareholders and other information, within 60 days of the conclusion of the meeting.

Pursuant to a green initiative, the RoC has permitted companies to effect service of documents to its members through an electronic mode, provided the company has obtained e-mail addresses of its members for sending the documents through e-mail. In cases where any member has not registered his e-mail address with the company, service of documents will be effected by other modes of service.

Under the Companies Act, approval of at least 75% of a company’s shareholders voting on the matter and approval of the High Court of the State in which the registered office of the company is situated is required to reduce a company’s share capital. A company may, under some circumstances, acquire its own equity shares without seeking the approval of the High Court. However, a company would have to extinguish the shares it has so acquired within the prescribed time period. A company is not permitted to acquire its own shares for treasury operations. An acquisition by a company of its own shares (without having to obtain the approval of the High Court) must comply with prescribed rules, regulations and conditions as laid down in the Companies Act. In addition, private and unlisted public companies such as ours, would have to comply with the Private Limited Company and Unlisted Public Limited Company (Buy-back of Securities) Rules, 1999, notified by the Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs of the Government of India on July 6, 1999 and public companies which are listed on a recognized stock exchange in India would have to comply with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Buy-back of Securities) Regulations, 1998, or Buy-back Regulations. Since we are not listed on any recognized stock exchange in India, we would have to comply with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act and the Private Limited Company and Unlisted Public Limited Company (Buy-back of Securities) Rules, 1999.

Subject to the rights of creditors, workmen and the holders of any shares entitled by their terms to preferential repayment over the Equity Shares, if any, in the event of our winding-up the holders of the Equity Shares are entitled to be repaid the amounts of paid up capital or credited as paid upon those Equity Shares. Further, in the event of a winding up, the shareholders of the Company would be liable for an amount not exceeding the aggregate unpaid amount of the face value of shares of the Company held by such shareholders. All surplus assets after payments to the holders of any preference shares and other creditors shall be paid to holders of Equity Shares in proportion to their shareholdings at the commencement of the winding-up.

This annual report and other information filed or to be filed by the Company can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at:

You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1800-SEC-0330.

Copies of these materials can also be obtained upon written request from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Assistance, by mail: 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, or by e-mail: PublicInfo@sec.gov

The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings with the SEC using its EDGAR system.

Additionally, documents referred to in this Form 20-F may be inspected at our registered office, which is located at Mahalaxmi Engineering Estate, 1st Floor, L.J. First Cross Road, Mahim (West), Mumbai 400 016, India.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rediff.com India Limited and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated August 15, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Rediff.com India Limited and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of March 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Item 15 under Controls and Procedures of the accompanying Form 20-F titled Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2013 and our report dated August 15, 2013 of the Company expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Rediff.com India Limited (“Rediff”) was incorporated as a private limited company in India on January 9, 1996 under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and was converted to a public limited company on May 29, 1998. Rediff’s American Depository Shares (“ADSs”) are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market.

In February 2001, Rediff established Rediff Holdings, Inc. (“RHI”), a Delaware Corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary to be a holding company for certain investments in the United States of America. In March 2001, Rediff acquired Value Communication Corporation (“ValuCom”). On February 27, 2001, RHI acquired thinkindia.com, Inc (“thinkindia”), later renamed Rediff.com Inc. On April 27, 2001, RHI acquired India Abroad Publications, Inc. (“India Abroad”), a print and online news company.

On November 26, 2010, Rediff acquired Vubites India Private Limited (“Vubites”) from the Chairman and Managing Director of Rediff (referred to as “the CMD”) and a principal shareholder in Rediff. Vubites enables small and local businesses to advertise on national TV channels within their city to reach their target audiences (see Note 6).

Rediff with its subsidiaries (“the Company”) is in the business of providing online internet based services, focusing on India and the global Indian community. Its websites consists of channels relevant to Indian interests such as cricket, astrology, matchmaker and movies, content on various matters like news and finance, search facilities, a range of community features such as e-mail, chat, messenger, e-commerce, broadband wireless content and mobile value-added services to mobile phone subscribers in India. The Company also enables its customers to insert localized advertisements on national television channels by providing a platform to create an advertisement and prepare a media plan. Additionally, the Company publishes two weekly newspapers, ‘India Abroad’ and ‘India in New York’, in North America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Rediff and its wholly – owned subsidiaries and variable interest entity (VIE) in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated on consolidation.

Investments in entities in which the Company can exercise significant influence, but does not own a majority equity interest or otherwise control, are accounted for using the equity method. The Company records its share of the results of these companies in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss as equity in net earnings (loss) of equity method investees. The Company reviews its investments for other-than-temporary impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the investment may not be fully recoverable. Investments identified as having an indication of impairment are subject to further analysis to determine if the impairment is other-than-temporary and this analysis requires estimating the fair value of the investment. The determination of fair value of the investment involves considering factors such as current economic and market conditions, the operating performance of the companies including current earnings trends and forecasted cash flows, and other company and industry specific information. Measurement of any impairment loss is based on its excess of the carrying value of the investment over its fair value.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent liabilities on the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include allowances for doubtful trade accounts receivables, impairment of goodwill, property, plant and equipment, intangible and investments, useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, valuation of deferred tax assets, stock based compensation and employee benefits. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

India Online business includes revenues from advertising and fee based services. Advertising includes advertisement and sponsorships. Fee based services include e-commerce, subscription services and mobile value-added services. E-commerce revenues primarily consist of commission earned on sale of items to customers who shop online while subscription services consist of subscriptions received for using e-mail and other subscriber services. Mobile value-added services include revenues derived from providing value added short messaging services and other related products to mobile phone users.

Advertisement and sponsorship income is derived from customers who advertise on the Company’s website or to whom direct links from the Company’s website to their own websites are provided and income earned from sending targeted emails to Rediffmail subscribers.

Revenue from display of advertisement and sponsorship is recognized ratably based on delivery over the contractual period of the advertisement, commencing when the advertisement is placed on the website or broadcast. Revenues are also derived from sponsor buttons placed in specific areas of the Company’s website, which generally provide users with direct links to sponsor websites. These revenues are recognized ratably over the period in which the advertisement is displayed, provided that no significant Company obligations remain and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. Company obligations may include guarantees of a minimum number of impressions, or times, that an advertisement appears in pages viewed by users of the Company’s website. To the extent that minimum guaranteed impressions are not met, the Company defers recognition of the corresponding revenues until the guaranteed impression levels are achieved. The Company also earns revenues from the sending of e-mail messages to its users on behalf of advertisers and such revenues are recognized ratably over the contracted period.

E-commerce revenue primarily consists of commission from the sale of books, music, apparel, confectionery, gifts and other items to retail customers who shop at the Company’s online store. Customers directly place orders with vendors through the Company’s website. When an order is placed, the Company informs the vendor through an intranet and also confirms whether payment has already been collected by the Company through credit card/debit card or cheques, or whether the payment is to be made by the customer on cash-on-delivery (“COD”) basis. The vendor then dispatches the products to the customers. The vendor sends a periodic summary of the transactions executed for which the Company has collected payments on its behalf. The Company makes payment to the vendor after deduction of its share of margin, commission and costs. The Company recognizes as revenues the commission earned on these transactions and shipping costs recovered from customers.

Subscription service revenues primarily include income from various paid e-mail and other service products for the Company’s registered user base. Subscription income is deferred and recognized pro rata as fulfilled over the terms of such subscription.

Mobile value-added services (“MVAS”) revenues are derived from providing value added short messaging services (“SMS”), e-mail and other related products to mobile phone users. The Company contracts with third-party mobile phone operators for sharing revenues from these services. Mobile value-added services based revenues are recognized when the service is performed.

US Publishing business primarily include advertising and sponsorship revenues and consumer subscription revenues earned from the publication of India Abroad, a weekly newspaper distributed primarily in the United States and Canada. It also includes the advertising revenues of Rediff India Abroad, the website catering to the Indian community in the United States.

Advertising revenues are recognized at the time of publication of the related advertisement. Subscription income is deferred and recognized pro rata as fulfilled over the terms of such subscription.

Revenues from banners and sponsorships are recognized over the contractual period of the advertisement, commencing when the advertisement is placed on the website, provided that no significant obligations remain and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. Obligations may include guarantee of a minimum number of impressions, or times that an advertisement appears in pages viewed by users of the Company’s website. To the extent that minimum guaranteed impressions are not met, the Company defers recognition of the corresponding revenues until the guaranteed impression levels are achieved.

Costs and expenses have been classified according to their primary functions in the following categories:

Cost of revenues primarily include cost of content for the Rediff websites, editorial costs, employee compensation, stock-based compensation, internet communication, data storage, software usage, printing and circulation costs for the India Abroad and India in New York newspapers and fee based services related costs.

Sales and marketing expenses primarily include employee compensation for sales and marketing personnel, advertising and promotion expenses, market research costs and stock-based compensation. The costs of advertising are expensed as and when incurred.

Product development costs primarily include software development expenses, compensation of product development personnel and stock-based compensation. Internal and external costs incurred to develop internal use software during application development stage is capitalized when the Company’s managing director has authorized and committed to funding the development, and it is probable that the software development will be completed and the software will perform the function intended. Upgrades and enhancements are capitalized only when these relate to additional features or result in additional functionality which the existing software is incapable of performing. All costs incurred during the preliminary project and post implementation and operation stages are expensed as incurred.

These costs primarily include employee compensation of administrative and supervisory staff whose time is mainly devoted to strategic and managerial functions, rent, insurance premiums, electricity, telecommunication costs, legal and professional fees, stock-based compensation costs and other general expenses.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity at the date of purchase of three months or less and that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash to be cash equivalents.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, balances in current accounts, deposits with banks which are unrestricted as to withdrawal and use.

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. The Company computes depreciation for all property, plant and equipment using the straight-line method so as to expense the costs over the estimated useful lives of assets. The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:

Capital work-in-progress is not depreciated until the construction and installation of the asset is complete, and the asset is available for use.

Costs incurred in the operations stage that provides additional functions or features to the Company’s website are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful life of three years. Maintenance expenses or costs that do not result in new features or functions are expensed as product development costs.

Securities that do not have readily determinable fair market values are recorded at cost, subject to an impairment charge for any other than temporary decline in value. The fair values of these securities are not estimated if there are no events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant effect on the fair value. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of these securities.

Acquisitions of subsidiaries and businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method. Acquisition related costs are recognized in statement of comprehensive loss as incurred. The acquiree’s identifiable assets and liabilities are recognized at their fair value at the acquisition date.

Purchase consideration in excess of the identifiable assets and liabilities is recognized as goodwill. Gain resulting from excess of the acquiree’s identifiable assets and liabilities over the purchase consideration is recognized, after reassessment, in the statement of comprehensive loss.

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase consideration over the fair values of the aquiree’s identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Goodwill is assessed for impairment on an annual basis on January 1 or earlier when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

Goodwill impairment assessment is a two-step test. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the impairment loss amount, if any.

The Company uses an income-based valuation approach to determine the fair value of the reporting unit by estimating the present value of future cash flows after considering current economic conditions and trends, estimated future operating results and growth rates, anticipated future economic and regulatory conditions and availability of necessary technology.

When required to perform the second step, the Company compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss equal to that excess amount is recognized, not to exceed the goodwill carrying amount. The Company determines the implied fair value of goodwill for a reporting unit by assigning the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of the goodwill. This assignment process is only for purposes of testing goodwill impairment and the Company does not adjust the carrying amounts of the recognized assets and liabilities (other than goodwill, if appropriate) or recognize previously unrecognized intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet as a result of this assignment process.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been presented in US dollars as the reporting currency. The functional currency of Rediff is the Indian Rupee (“Rs.” or “Rupee”) while that of its subsidiaries domiciled in the United States is the US dollar and in Canada is the Canadian dollar. Transactions in foreign currency are recorded at the original rates of exchange prevailing at the time of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are restated using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the balance sheet. Exchange differences arising on settlement of transactions and restatement of monetary assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date are recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss.

For the purposes of presenting the consolidated financial statements, Rupees have been converted into US dollars for balance sheet accounts using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date, and for revenue and expense accounts using a monthly weighted-average exchange rate. The gains or losses resulting from such translation are reported as other comprehensive income or loss, which is a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

Basic earnings per share has been computed by dividing the net income (loss) from operations by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the period, including equity share equivalents for ADSs issued. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of equity shares including equity share equivalents for ADSs issued and dilutive potential equity shares outstanding during the period, using the treasury stock method for options, except where the results would be anti-dilutive. Dilutive potential equity shares consist of the incremental equity shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options. The Company also reports earnings (loss) per ADS, where two ADSs represent one equity share.

Income taxes consist of current income taxes and the change in the deferred tax balances during the year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for each entity and taxing jurisdiction for future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and net operating loss carry-forwards, measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which such temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of changes in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits for which future realization is uncertain.

The Company evaluates each tax positions to determine if it is more likely than not that a tax position is sustainable, based on its technical merits. If a tax position does not meet the more likely than not threshold, a liability is recorded. Additionally, for a position that is determined to, more likely than not, be sustainable, the Company measures the benefit at the highest cumulative probability of greater than 50% of being realized and establish a liability for the remaining portion.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. The Company subjects such long-lived assets to a test of recoverability based on the undiscounted cash flows expected from use or disposition of such assets. Such events or circumstances would include changes in the market, technological obsolescence and adverse changes in profitability or regulation. If the asset is impaired, the Company recognizes an impairment loss as the difference between the estimated fair values determined using discounted cash flows and the carrying value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value less the cost to sell.

The Company measures the cost of services received from employees, associates, retainers and non-employee directors in exchange for share based compensation at the grant date fair value award. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation on a straight line basis over the vesting period.

The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts receivable after considering the financial condition of the customer, ageing of the accounts receivable, historical experience and the current economic environment. Trade accounts receivable balances are written off against allowances only after all means of collections have been exhausted and potential of recovery is considered remote.

The Company provided for gratuity, a defined benefit retirement plan (the Gratuity Plan) covering eligible employees. The Gratuity Plan provides a lump-sum payment to vested employees at retirement, death, incapacitation or termination of employment, of an amount based on the respective employee’s salary and the tenure of employment. Vesting occurs upon completion of five years of service. The defined benefit liability is determined by actuarial valuation, at each balance sheet date, using the projected unit credit method.

Eligible employees of the Company receive benefits from a provident fund, a defined contribution plan. Both the employee and the Company make monthly contributions to this provident fund plan equal to a specified percentage of the covered employee’s salary. Amounts collected under the provident fund plan are deposited in a government administered provident fund. The Company’s contribution to fund the benefits is expensed as incurred.

The Company provided the compensated absences liability for the amounts to be paid as a result of employee’s rights to compensated absences in the year in which it is earned.

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a company during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances excluding transactions resulting from investments from owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive income (loss) for the periods presented includes net income (loss) and foreign currency translation adjustments.

In February 2013, the FASB issued revised guidance on “Comprehensive Income: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The revised guidance does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. However, the revised guidance requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The revised guidance is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012 for public entities. The revised guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In fiscal 2011, Company discontinued the use of certain software included in Website development costs and recorded an impairment charge of US$109,658 representing carrying amount.

In fiscals 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Company incurred depreciation and amortization expense of US$3,617,535, US$3,028,924 and US$3,249,417, respectively.

On November 26, 2010, the Company acquired all of the equity interests in Vubites India Private Limited (“Vubites”) from the CMD, a principal shareholder in the Company (promoter and owner of Vubites). Additionally in accordance with the terms of the acquisition, Vubites’ shareholder’s loan from CMD was assumed and settled by the Company. Rediff and Vubites were not under common control because the CMD does not have controlling financial ownership interest in Rediff and as a result the acquisition has been accounted as a business combination using the purchase method. Excess of acquisition date fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed (after reassessment) of US$420,589 over purchase consideration represents contribution from the principal shareholder and has been recognized in the statement of shareholders’ equity.

This acquisition gives an opportunity for revenue growth by providing affordable local advertising on the television media to small businesses to reach their target audiences within the same city.

The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as at the acquisition date was as follows:

Acquisition related expense of US$73,125 has been recognized as general and administrative expenses in the statement of comprehensive loss. The Company settled Vubites’s employee stock options by cash consideration of US$140,468, of which an amount of US$103,946 representing the excess amount paid over the acquisition date fair value of these stock options has been immediately recognized as compensation cost in the statement of comprehensive loss. Additionally, an amount of US$140,468 was payable to Vubite’s employees which was contingent on these employees remaining in employment for period of 16 months from the acquisition date.

The results of operation of Vubites are included in the consolidated financial statements effective from November 26, 2010. Proforma financial information related to the acquisition has not been disclosed as the effect on the Company’s consolidated revenues and results of operations are not material.

In August 2010, promissory notes of Runa Inc. with a carrying amount of US$1,300,000 were converted into equity shares upon exercise of conversion option by the Company resulting in an equity interest ownership in Runa Inc. of 10%.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Runa Inc. offered right issue to existing shareholder and the Company subscribed of US$104,987 to maintain the existing ownership.

The Company’s investments in equity method investees interest were as follows:

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, the Company impaired its investment of US$543,220 in Tachyon Technology Private Limited after concluding that such investment was other than temporarily impaired due to uncertainties involved and fitment with long term strategy.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, the Company sold its investment in Eterno Infotech Private Limited for a consideration of US$937,866 and recorded a gain of US$749,897 under the heading “Gain on sale of equity method investee” in consolidated statement of comprehensive loss.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Company sold its investment in Imere Technology Private Limited for a consideration of US$1,452,944 and recorded a gain of US$1,292,168 and included as “Gain on sale of equity method investee” in consolidated statement of comprehensive loss.

The Company’s goodwill is in respect of its acquisition of India Abroad. The goodwill has been allocated to the US Publishing business, reporting unit.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 were as follows:

In fiscal year 2013, the Company recognised a goodwill impairment loss of US$2,000,000. The impairment was on account of the weakness in the publishing industry which resulted in reduction of the US publishing business’s projected operating results and estimated future cash flows. The Company used an income-based valuation approach to determine the fair value of the reporting unit by estimating the present value of future cash flows after considering current economic conditions and trends, estimated future operating results and growth rates.

The following table summarizes the carrying amount of intangible assets comprise:

Customer contracts and intellectual property are amortized on a straight line basis over a period of three and seven years, respectively. The Company recognized amortization expense of intangible assets of US$168,863, US$470,845 and US$414,959 in fiscal 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively. The aggregate estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is given in the table below:

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 the Company formed Rediff.com India Limited Employee Trust (“Trust”). The Trust is controlled and administrated by senior employees of the Company. The Company is the primary beneficiary of the Trust and, accordingly has consolidated the Trust. The Trust acquired 1,015,000 shares for a consideration of US$4,426,605 and reserved these shares for benefit of Company’s employees and directors.

Sales and marketing expense includes advertising cost of US$1,524,086, US$1,650,747 and US$92,135 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively.

The Company’s principal related parties are its founder shareholders, directors and companies that the founder shareholders and directors control. The Company enters into transactions with such related parties in the normal course of business. Related party transactions and balances, other than purchase of subsidiary from a principal shareholder as described in note 6, are as follows:

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Company earned advertising revenues of US$721,974, US$ Nil and US$ Nil respectively, from Edelweiss Capital Services Ltd in which a director of Rediff is shareholder and director.

During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Company incurred product development expenses (including amount capitalized) of US$167,833, US$137,490, and US$95,395, respectively, on account of services rendered by Tachyon Technologies Private Ltd, an equity method investee.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Company wrote off US$206,974 trade account receivables from Edelweiss Capital Services Ltd in which a director of Rediff is shareholder and director against the recorded allowance. The allowance for trade account receivables was recorded in the year ended March 31, 2012.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Company subscribed to rights issued by Runa Inc. and by means of the exercise of those rights purchased shares in Runa Inc. for US$104,987. A director of the Company is a shareholder and key member of the management personnel of Runa Inc.

Accumulated benefit obligation was US$247,312 and US$290,852 as of March 31, 2012 and 2013 respectively.

Net gratuity cost for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 comprise of the following:

The assumptions used in accounting for gratuity in the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were as follows:

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future services, as appropriate are expected to be paid

The expected benefits are based on the same assumptions used to measure the Company’s benefit obligation as of March 31, 2013.

The components of income before income taxes and equity in net earnings of equity method investees are as follows:

The reconciliation of estimated income tax expense at Indian statutory income tax rate to income tax expense reported in the statements of comprehensive loss is as follows:

The tax effects of significant temporary differences that resulted in deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

Rediff’s net operating loss carry forwards aggregating approximately US$7,676,956 as of March 31, 2013 will expire between April 2013 and March 2019.

As of March 31, 2013, ValuCom has net operating loss carry forwards available to offset future federal taxable income of US$3,033,000, which expire in years 2021 through 2031.

As of March 31, 2013, Rediff Holdings, Inc. has net operating loss carry forwards of approximately US$7,126,000 for federal income tax purposes, which expire in years 2020 through 2032.

Realization of the future tax benefits related to the deferred tax asset is dependent on many factors, including the Company’s ability to generate taxable income within the net operating loss carry forward period. Management has considered these factors and believes that a valuation allowance is required for each of the periods presented.

Recoverable taxes mainly consist of withholding tax on income from advertising services and interest income, which the Company claimed as refund.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 is as follows:

The Company’s two major tax jurisdictions are India and the U.S., though the Company also files tax returns in other foreign jurisdiction. In India, tax returns from fiscal year 2010 are subject to examination by the direct taxing authority. The assessments for fiscal year 2000 onwards are subject matters of appeals with the direct taxing authorities. The Company’s U.S. federal and state tax returns pertaining to fiscal year 2012 onwards remains subject to examination in accordance with the statute of limitation prescribed by the relevant authorities.

The chief operating decision maker’s (Rediff’s Chairman and Managing Director) allocates resources to and assess the performance of the segments of the Company. The chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance by results of the segment before operating expenses.

The Company has two operating segments, namely, the India Online business and the U.S. Publishing business.

Following are the segment results and segment assets for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013.

The following is a reconciliation of the segment results to (loss) income before income taxes of the Company for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013.

The following is a reconciliation of the segment assets to the total assets as at March 31, 2012 and 2013.

Revenues are attributed to individual countries according to the location of the customers.

No single customer accounted for 10 percent or more of the total revenues for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Concentrations of credit risk exist when changes in economic or geographic factors affect groups of counter parties whose aggregate credit exposure is material in relation to the Company’s total credit exposure.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents and accounts receivable.

The Company maintains the majority of its cash in Indian Rupees with reputed banks in India with high quality credit rating.

The Company performs ongoing evaluations to determine customer credit limit, but no collateral is required. In 2012 and 2013, approximately 88% and 85% of our accounts receivable were derived from revenues earned from customers located in India. The majority of the customers outside India are located in the United States.

In January 2002 the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2002 Stock Option Plan (“2002 plan”), which provides for the grant of stock options to the Company’s employees. Unless terminated sooner, a grant under this plan will terminate automatically after expiry of 10 years from the date of issue of such grant. A total of 280,000 of the Company’s equity shares were reserved pursuant to 2002 plan.

Under the terms of the 2002 plan, the board or a committee or a sub-committee of the board will determine and authorize the grant of options to eligible employees. Such options vest at the rate of 25% on each successive anniversary of the grant date, until fully vested. Each option grant carries with it the right to purchase Company’s one ADS at the exercise price during the exercise period, which expires ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price is determined by the board (or a committee or a sub-committee of the board) and shall be no more than 110% of the fair market value of ADS and no less than 50% of the fair market value of ADS on the date of the grant.

A summary of option activity under the 2002 ESOP plan as of March 31, 2013, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:

The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during the year ended March 31, 2013 was US$78,645. There were no vesting during the year ended March 31, 2011 and 2012.

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the year ended March 31, 2012 was US$14.98. There were no options granted during the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2013. The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during the year ended March 31, 2012 was US$912,558. There were no options exercised during the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2013.

Cash received from option exercises under the 2002 Stock Option Plan for the year ended March 31, 2012 was US$243,234.

As of March 31, 2013, there was US$55,208 of total unrecognized option cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years. To the extent the forfeiture rate is different from what we have anticipated stock-based compensation related to these awards will be different from our expectations.

In June 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2004 Stock Option Plan (“2004 plan”), which provide for the grant of stock options to the Company’s employees. Unless terminated sooner, the grant under this plan will terminate automatically after expiry of 10 years from the date of issue of such grant. A total of 358,000 of the Company’s equity shares were reserved pursuant to 2004 plan.

Under the terms of the 2004 plan, the board or a committee or a sub-committee of the board will determine and authorize the grant of options to eligible employees. Such options vest at the rate of 25% on each successive anniversary of the grant date, until fully vested. Each option grant carries with it the right to purchase Company’s one ADS at the exercise price during the exercise period, which expires ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price is determined by the board (or a committee or a sub-committee of the board) and shall be no more than 110% of the fair market value of ADS and no less than 50% of the fair market value of ADS on the date of the grant.

A summary of option activity under the 2004 ESOP plan as of March 31, 2013, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:

The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during the year ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was US$146,602, US$705,890 and US$108,481, respectively.

There were no options granted during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013. The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during the year ended March 31, 2012 was US$1,230,857. There were no options exercised during the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2013.

Cash received from option exercises under the 2004 Stock Option Plan for the year ended March 31, 2012 was US$912,310.

As of March 31, 2013, there was US$14,131 of total unrecognized option cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.3 year. To the extent the forfeiture rate is different from what we have anticipated stock-based compensation related to these awards will be different from our expectations.

The 2006 Stock Option Plan (“2006 ESOP”) consists of two plans, namely the ADR Linked Employee Stock Option Plan-2006 and Employee Stock Option Plan-2006 which is linked to the shares of the Company. These plans were adopted and approved by the Compensation committee on June 20, 2006 in accordance with the approval granted by shareholders on March 31, 2006. Unless terminated sooner, the grant under this plan will terminate automatically after expiry of 10 years from the date of issue of such grant. A total of 670,000 equity shares were approved for issuance under both the plans.

Under the terms of the 2006 plans, the board or a committee or a sub-committee of the board will determine and authorize the grant of options to eligible employees. Such options vest at the rate of 20% - 25% on each successive anniversary of the grant date, until fully vested. Each option grant carries with it the right to purchase Company’s one equity share / ADS depending on the plan to which the option relates at the exercise price during the exercise period, which expires ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price for the ADR Linked Employee Stock Option Plan-2006 is determined by the board (or a committee or a sub-committee of the board) and shall be no more than 110% of the fair market value of ADS and no less than 50% of the fair market value of ADS on the date of the grant. The exercise price for the Employee Stock Option Plan-2006 is also determined by the board (or a committee or a sub-committee of the board) and shall not be less than the face value of equity shares.

A summary of option activity under the 2006 ESOP plan as of March 31, 2013, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:

The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during the year ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was US$740,930, US$873,798 and US$1,542,072 respectively.

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the year ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was US$15.37, US$12.86 and US$ Nil for each option, respectively. The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during the year ended March 31, 2012 was US$670,998. There were no stock options exercised during the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2013.

Cash received from option exercises under the 2006 Stock Option Plan for the year ended March 31, 2012 was US$209,133.

As of March 31, 2013, there was US$903,962 of total unrecognized option cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years. To the extent the forfeiture rate is different from what we have anticipated stock-based compensation related to these awards will be different from our expectations.

There was no grant during the year ended March 31, 2013. The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:

Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The expected term of stock options granted under the Plans is based on historical exercise patterns, which the Company believes are representative of future behavior. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

Total stock-based compensation cost recognized under the various employee stock option plans were US$559,157, US$787,874 and US$756,090 for the year ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively. The compensation cost has been allocated to cost of revenues and operating expenses as follows:

For the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, the following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share and ADS:

Potentially dilutive shares relating to outstanding employee stock option aggregating 255,080, 324,027 and 140,247 as at March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for these periods as their effect was anti-dilutive.

Dividends, if any, will be declared and paid in Indian Rupees. Indian law requires that any dividend be declared out of accumulated distributable profits only after the transfer to a general reserve of a specified percentage of net profit computed in accordance with current regulations. The remittance of dividends outside India is governed by Indian law on foreign exchange and is subject to applicable taxes.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate their fair values due to the short- term nature of these instruments.

As discussed in Note 8, the Company’s US publishing business reporting unit has been measured at fair value of US$6.35 million on a non-recurring basis, using level 3 — unobservable inputs, for annual goodwill impairment test. Accordingly, the Company has recorded an impairment charge of US$2,000,000 on December 31, 2012.

Estimation of fair value of financial instrument relies on management judgment; however there are inherent uncertainties in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair values are not necessarily indicative of all the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction as of March 31, 2013. The estimated fair value amounts as of March 31, 2013 have been measured as of this date, and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these consolidated financial statements.

As of March 31, 2013, the Company has commitment for purchase of computer equipment and cost to develop internal use software aggregating US$675,458.

The Company leases office premises and residential apartments for employees under various operating leases. Certain of these arrangements have free or escalating rent payment provisions. The Company recognized rent expense under such arrangements on a straight-line basis. Operating lease expense that has been included in the determination of the net income is as follows:

The minimum annual lease commitments under the above operating leases that have initial or remaining terms in excess of one year are as follows:

On June 21, 2000, Rediff, certain of its directors and others (Ajit Balakrishnan, Arun Nanda, Abhay Havaldar, Sunil Phatarphekar, Charles Robert Kaye and Tony Janz) were named as defendants in a criminal complaint (RCC Complaint Number 76 of 2000) filed by Mr. Abinav Bhatt, who was then a 22 year old student, before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pune, India, alleging commission of an offence, under Section 292 of the IPC for distributing, publicly exhibiting and putting into circulation obscene, pornographic and objectionable material. The RCC Complaint alleged that Rediff, through its website “www.rediff.com”, provided a search facility that enabled Internet users to view pornographic, objectionable and obscene material. On November 27, 2000, the Judicial Magistrate passed an order on the Complaint holding that a prima facie case under Section 292 of the IPC had been made out against Rediff and directed commencement of criminal proceedings against all the defendants. A criminal writ petition was filed in the High Court of Mumbai (Sunil N. Phatarphekar & Ors. v. Abhinav Bhatt and Ors., Mumbai High Court, Criminal Writ Petition No. 1754 of 2000) by the aforementioned defendants, seeking among other relief the setting aside of the order of the Judicial Magistrate. The High Court of Mumbai in its order dated December 20, 2000, while granting ad-interim relief to the petitioners in the Writ Petition, stayed the order of Judicial Magistrate pending final disposal of the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition has been admitted by the High Court of Mumbai. While Rediff believes that the lawsuit is without merit, and that it and its directors have a valid defense to the charges, in the event that it is unsuccessful in its defense, Rediff and its directors may face both criminal penalties and monetary fines or damages.

Under Indian law, any person who publishes or transmits or causes to be published in the electronic form, any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it, shall be punished (i) for the first conviction, with imprisonment of up to five years and with a fine of up to Rs.100,000 (approximately US$2,000); and (ii) in the event of a second conviction, with imprisonment of up to ten years and with a fine of up to Rs.200,000 (approximately US$4,000).

In May, 2008, a complaint was filed by The Board of Control of Cricket in India (“BCCI”) against Sandeep Goyal and Rediff alleging that the depiction of images on the online game known as Indian Fantasy League started by Sandeep Goyal has been violative of the Indian Premier League (“IPL”) trademark. BCCI is seeking (a) a permanent injunction restraining defendants from the use of logo “Indian Fantasy League.com”; (b) shutdown of the website Indianfantasyleague.com; (c) to render the accounts of all profits earned by the said website and damages to the tune of Rs.1.0 million (approximately US$20,000). Rediff has filed its response to BCCI Complaint, and among the defenses Rediff has raised are: (a) it is Sandeep Goyal who has infringed the trademark of IPL and not Rediff.com; (b) Rediff.com only provides the domain hosting and web based email solution services which enables the subscriber to set up and manage their website as per the terms and conditions of Rediff business solutions; (c) subscribers such as Sandeep Goyal are required to abide by and comply with the terms and conditions Rediff imposes on its subscribers which provides that the subscriber shall be solely responsible for producing, electronically uploading and maintaining his website and such subscriber shall ensure that all upload material shall be owned and/or properly licensed by the Subscriber and shall not adversely affect any rights of any third party. Although Rediff believes that it has valid defenses to the charges, if Rediff is unsuccessful after exhausting all legal remedies, we could be subject to monetary fines or damages.

In February, 2006, a complaint was filed by Marksman Pvt. Ltd. against various telecom operators and internet service providers and Rediff.com alleging infringement of copyright of Marksman by way of dissemination of information relating to scores, alerts and updates and or other events happenings via Short Message Service (SMS) Technology on wireless and mobile telephones in respect of One Day International Cricket Matches (“ODIs”) during India’s tour of Pakistan Scheduled in February, 2006. The Company has filed its response and among the defenses raised were: (a) Rediff.com along with other telecom operators and service providers have not infringed the copyrights of Marksman; (b) the information relating to scores, alerts and updates and or other events happening via Short Message Service (SMS) Technology on wireless and mobile telephones in respect of ODIs which was being provided to subscribers was sourced from public domain and as such no exclusivity can be claimed since it falls into public domain. The one judge panel, while dismissing a request for an interim order, has directed the defendants to maintain the accounts of the SMS received during the ODIs. Marksman will have to first amend the suit to seek damages before any claim is made against Rediff.com.

In 2006, Marksman has sought to amend the suit prayer to include damages. Although the Company believes that it has valid defenses to the charges, if the Company is unsuccessful after exhausting all legal remedies, the Company could be subject to monetary fines or damages.

In March, 2009 a complaint was filed against Rediff and 12 other defendants by S. Ramkumar, alleging violation of his patent rights in respect of Mobile phones with plurality of SIM cards sold through Rediff’s Shopping website. S. Ramkumar is seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants, including Rediff, from infringing upon his patent with respect to the Mobile phones with plurality of SIM cards allocated to different communication networks, by manufacturing, marketing, selling and distributing mobile phones having simultaneous use of more than one SIM thereby infringing his products and patented process. S. Ramkumar is also claiming damages in the amount of Rs.1.0 million (approximately US$20,000). Rediff has already filed its response to the court based on the following defenses: (a) it is the vendors, and not Rediff, that sells shopping products on its website and that it has not infringed on any of Ramkumar’s intellectual property rights; (b) Rediff’s Shopping website only provides an online platform that enables customers and sellers to enter into sale/purchase transactions and it is not involved in the sale or purchase of the goods/products listed on its website; and (c) vendors are required to comply with the terms and conditions Rediff imposes on vendors using Rediff Shopping, which include providing Rediff with the description of their products, prices and product images, and which also specifically provide that vendors shall not infringe on third party rights, including third-party intellectual property rights. The case is likely to be taken up for arguments sometime in the future. Though Rediff is arrayed as a defendant, S. Ramkumar’s main grievance is only against the other defendants who are manufacturing, selling and distributing multiple SIM cards in alleged violation of the patent in favor of the S. Ramkumar. However, given the nature of the suit and pleadings there would not be any substantial monetary claim on the Company.

The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims, which have arisen in the ordinary course of its business. Those actions, when ultimately concluded and determined, will not, in the opinion of management, have a material effect on the results of operations, cash flows or the financial position of the Company.

The Company has not recognized any loss accrual for the litigation disputes as the Company believes that it is probable that it would be successful on resolution of the litigation. The maximum total loss relating to these disputes would be US$44,000 excluding any interest and penalties, which amounts cannot be reasonably estimated at this point of time.

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.


REDIFF.COM INDIA LIMITED

By:	/s/ Ajit Balakrishnan
	Name:	Ajit Balakrishnan
	Title:	Chairman and Managing Director (Principal Executive Officer)

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.


REDIFF.COM INDIA LIMITED

By:	/s/ Swasti Bhowmick
	Name:	Swasti Bhowmick
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


	Page

CROSS REFERENCE TO FORM 20-F ITEM HEADINGS		1
CURRENCY OF PRESENTATION AND CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS		4
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		5
EXCHANGE RATES		6
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA		7
RISK FACTORS		8
BUSINESS		30
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		43
MANAGEMENT		59
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS		68
EXCHANGE CONTROLS		69
TRADING MARKET		73
RESTRICTION ON FOREIGN OWNERSHIP OF INDIAN SECURITIES		75
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS		82
TAXATION		84
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		91
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES		93
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS		94
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION		95
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION		96
EXHIBIT INDEX		104
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F-1


Fiscal Year Ended March 31,	Period End		Average ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		High		Low

2009		50.95		46.46		52.06		39.89
2010		45.14		47.36		50.53		44.94
2011		44.65		45.57		47.57		44.03
2012		51.16		48.11		54.23		43.95
2013		54.39		54.53		57.22		50.56


Month	High		Low

February 2013		54.48		52.97
March 2013		55.05		54.10
April 2013		54.88		53.94
May 2013		56.50		53.74
June 2013		60.59		56.42
July 2013		61.12		58.91


	Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
	2009			2010			2011			2012			2013
	(in US$ thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Comprehensive Loss:
Revenues		25,429			18,843			21,795			19,942			15,659
Cost of revenues		10,376			10,115			10,796			10,774			9,952
Operating expenses		30,589			20,302			19,696			20,006			19,571
Net loss		(11,258	)		(8,028	)		(6,572	)		(7,677	)		(11,432	)
Earnings (loss) per Equity Share – basic	US$	(0.770	)	US$	(0.552	)	US$	(0.477	)	US$	(0.558	)	US$	(0.828	)
Earnings (loss) per Equity Share – diluted	US$	(0.770	)	US$	(0.552	)	US$	(0.477	)	US$	(0.558	)	US$	(0.828	)
Weighted average number of equity shares
- Basic		14,615,800			14,563,197			13,783,033			13,758,635			13,795,178
- Diluted		14,615,800			14,563,197			13,783,033			13,758,635			13,795,178


	As of March 31,
	2009		2010		2011		2012		2013
	(in US$ thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Current assets		54,345		52,244		45,804		32,073		24,718
Current liabilities		6,927		8,161		8,773		6,530		6,963
Total assets		71,612		69,541		63,940		50,468		37,849
Total liabilities		7,605		8,935		9,838		7,732		8,043
Total shareholders’ equity		64,007		60,606		54,102		42,736		29,806


U.S. GAAP x		International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ¨		Other ¨


	For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
	2011			2012			2013
	US$			US$			US$
Net cash (used in ) generated from operating activities		495,637			(5,203,546	)		(2,540,551	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(7,278,620	)		(4,423,623	)		(547,678	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(1,320,158	)		1,364,677			—
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(8,103,141	)		(8,262,492	)		(3,088,229	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		334,952			(4,113,794	)		(1,433,127	)


Year ended March 31,	Operating leases		Capital commitments
Year ended March 31,	US$		US$

2014		350,284		675,458
2015		217,794		—
2016		224,328		—
2017		231,058		—
2018		278,742		—

Total		1,302,206		675,458


	As of March 31, 2013 (in US$ thousands)
Accounts payable in U.S. dollars		(1,040	)
Accounts receivable in U.S. dollars, net of allowance		2,070
Cash balances held in U.S. dollars		56
Net foreign currency exchange exposure		1,086


Name	Age	Position
Ajit Balakrishnan⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	65	Chairman and Managing Director
Swasti Bhowmick	47	Chief Financial Officer
Diwan Arun Nanda⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	69	Director
Sunil N. Phatarphekar^(1)(2)(3)	49	Director
Ashok Narasimhan⁽¹⁾	65	Director
Sridar Iyengar⁽¹⁾⁽³⁾	66	Director
Rashesh C. Shah^{(1) (3)}	49	Director
M. Madhavan Nambiar^{(1) (3)}	62	Director


	As at March 31,
Department	2011		2012		2013
Technology and Product Development		119		108		122
Sales and Marketing		79		120		144
Editorial		80		81		79
General & Administration		33		83		32
Creative		17		19		13
Production & Circulation		7		7		7

Total		335		418		397


Name	Salary and other compensation (US$)

Ajit Balakrishnan		200,000	⁽¹⁾

Swasti Bhowmick		150,846	⁽²⁾

Sridar A. Iyengar		25,000	⁽¹⁾

Sunil Phatarphekar		20,000	⁽¹⁾

M. Madhavan Nambiar		20,000	⁽¹⁾


Year ending March 31,	US$

2014		47,713
2015		42,140
2016		52,234
2017		161,243
2018		65,913
2019-2023		446,148


	Price Per ADS (in U.S. dollars)
	High		Low
Fiscal year ending March 31, 2008		27.50		6.46
Fiscal year ending March 31, 2009		9.77		1.40
Fiscal year ending March 31, 2010		4.50		1.75
Fiscal year ending March 31, 2011		9.90		1.69

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2012
First Quarter (April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011)		17.98		7.13
Second Quarter (July 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011)		14.48		6.57
Third Quarter (October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011)		11.20		4.89
Fourth Quarter (January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2012)		9.55		6.40
Fiscal year ending March 31, 2013
First Quarter (April 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012)		7.21		3.50
Second Quarter (July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012)		4.65		2.70
Third Quarter (October 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012)		4.45		1.82
Fourth Quarter (January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2013)		3.82		2.58
Fiscal year ending March 31, 2014
First Quarter (April 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013)		3.54		2.30


Previous six months	High		Low
February 2013		3.19		2.68
March 2013		3.19		2.58
April 2013		2.87		2.60
May 2013		3.54		2.63
June 2013		2.88		2.30
July 2013		2.81		2.38


	Shares Beneficially Owned As of June 30, 2013					Shares Beneficially Owned As of June 30, 2012					Shares Beneficially Owned As of June 30, 2011
Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Equity Shares held		Percent of total Equity Shares outstanding			Number of Equity Shares held		Percent of total Equity Shares outstanding			Number of Equity Shares held		Percent of total Equity Shares outstanding
Officers and Directors
Ajit Balakrishnan ^{(1)(1A) (1B) (1C) (1D)}		3,463,982		23.39	%		3,463,982		23.39	%		3,463,982		23.42	%
Diwan Arun Nanda ⁽¹⁾		3,444,742		23.26	%		3,444,742		23.26	%		3,444,742		23.29	%

All Directors and Officers as a Group (2 persons)		4,720,722		31.87	%		4,720,722		31.87	%		4,720,722		31.92	%

Other shareholders holding more than 5% shareholding
Rediffusion Holdings Private Limited⁽¹⁾		2,200,002		14.85	%		2,200,002		14.85	%		2,200,002		15	%
Draper India International		—		—			2,200,000		14.85	%		2,200,000		15	%

Draper International India LP		21,78,000		14.71	%		—		—			—		—
Rediff.com India limited Employee Trust (1D)		1,015,000		6.85	%		1,015,000		6.85	%		1,015,000		6.86	%
Edelweiss Finance and Investment Ltd.		1,523,000		10.28	%		1,523,000		10.28	%		1,523,000		10.30	%


Period	Total number of Shares purchased ⁽¹⁾		Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan or programs		Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
			US$				US$
Month # 12 (March 2010)		750,000		4.08		—		5,538,325
Month # 09 (December 2010)		265,000		5.16		—		NA

Total		1,015,000


Exhibit No.		Description of Document

*1.1		Articles of Association, as amended.

*1.2		Memorandum of Association, as amended.

*1.3		Certificate of Incorporation, as amended.

*2.1		Form of Deposit Agreement among Rediff.com, Citibank, N.A., and holders from time to time of American Depository Receipts issued thereunder (including as an exhibit, the form of American Depository Receipt).

*2.2		Rediff.com’s specimen certificate for equity shares.

*2.3		Amended and Restated Shareholder Rights Agreement dated February 24, 2000 between Rediff.com and the shareholders of Rediff.com.

*4.1		1999 Employee Stock Option Plan.

*4.2		1999 Associate Stock Option Plan.

***4.3		2002 Stock Option Plan.

****4.4		2004 Stock Option Plan.

*******4.5		2006 Employee Stock Option Plan.

********4.6		2006 ADR Linked Employee Stock Option Plan.

*4.7		Form of Indemnification Agreement.

*******4.8		Indemnification Agreement dated November 8, 2005 between Rediff.com and Sridar A. Iyengar.

*******4.9		Indemnification Agreement dated November 8, 2005 between Rediff.com and Ashok Narasimhan.

*******4.10		Indemnification Agreement dated November 8, 2005 between Rediff.com and Pulak Chandan Prasad.

*******4.11		Indemnification Agreement dated November 8, 2005 between Rediff.com and Joy Basu.

*4.12		Sublease dated July 5, 1999 between Shreenathji Balaji Computech Private Limited and Rediff.com.

*4.13		Letter Agreement dated December 28, 1998 between Rediffusion-Dentsu, Young & Rubicam Limited and Rediff.com.

*4.14		Promoters Agreement dated January 9, 1996 between Ajit Balakrishnan and Diwan Arun Nanda.

**4.15		Stock Purchase Agreement among Rediff.com, ValuCom and shareholders of ValuCom dated March 21, 2001.

**4.16		Stock Purchase Agreement among Rediff.com, India Abroad and shareholders of India Abroad dated March 21, 2001, as amended on April 27, 2001.

**4.17		Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Reorganization among Rediff.com, Thinkindia.com, Inc., Rediff Holdings, Inc., the principal stock holders of Think India and certain other parties thereto dated February 27, 2001.

*****4.18		Agreement for sale of assets of Value Communications Corporation dated April 8, 2004.

******4.19		Underwriting Agreement dated November 9, 2005 between Rediff.com and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

†12.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

†12.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

†13.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

†13.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

†15.1		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


†101		The following financial information from the Rediff.com India Limited Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2013 is formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


		Page(s)
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2 – F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and 2013		F-4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive loss for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013		F-5

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013		F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013		F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-8 – F-31


	Equity shares												Treasury shares
	Equity shares												(Equity shares held by controlled trust)
	Number of shares		Equity share capital US$		Additional paid-in- capital US$		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) US$			Accumulated deficit US$			No of shares			US$			Total shareholders’ equity US$
Balance as of March 31, 2010		14,615,800		1,735,105		127,847,598		(3,845,603	)		(62,024,654	)		(750,000	)		(3,106,447	)		60,605,999
Stock-based compensation						559,157														559,157

Net loss											(6,572,014	)								(6,572,014	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment								408,618												408,618
Contribution from principal shareholder (See Note 6)						420,589														420,589
Repurchase of equity shares for treasury (See Note 13)														(265,000	)		(1,320,158	)		(1,320,158	)

Balance as of March 31, 2011		14,615,800		1,735,105		128,827,344		(3,436,985	)		(68,596,668	)		(1,015,000	)		(4,426,605	)		54,102,191
Stock-based compensation						787,874														787,874

Net loss											(7,677,245	)								(7,677,245	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment								(5,841,093	)											(5,841,093	)
Stock option exercised		194,378		21,621		1,343,056														1,364,677

Balance as of March 31, 2012		14,810,178		1,756,726		130,958,274		(9,278,078	)		(76,273,913	)		(1,015,000	)		(4,426,605	)		42,736,404
Stock-based compensation						756,090														756,090

Net loss											(11,432,223	)								(11,432,223	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment								(2,254,312	)											(2,254,312	)

Balance as of March 31, 2013		14,810,178		1,756,726		131,714,364		(11,532,390	)		(87,706,136	)		(1,015,000	)		(4,426,605	)		29,805,959


Furniture and fixtures		10 years
Computer equipment and software		1 to 3 years
Office equipment		3 to 10 years
Vehicles		8 years
Leasehold improvements		6 years
Website development costs		3 years


Net asset acquired at fair values
	US $
Cash acquired		23,155
Property, plant & equipment		202,856
Other assets		63,947
Amortizable intangible assets:
Customer contracts		16,270
Intellectual property		3,423,682

Total assets		3,729,910

Liabilities assumed:
Loan from Principal shareholder and the CMD of Rediff		2,711,622
Other liabilities		68,449
Deferred tax liability, net		205,159

Total Liabilities		2,985,230

Net assets acquired		744,680

Purchase price		324,091
Contribution from a principal shareholder		420,589


	Percent of ownership of equity shares
Tachyon Technology Private Limited (Impaired in fiscal 2009)		26	%
Imere Technology Private Limited (up to October 8, 2012)		44	%
Eterno Infotech Private Limited (Up to December 19, 2011)		43	%
Bigslick Infotech Private Limited (Impaired in fiscal 2010)		37	%


	For years ended March 31,
	2011			2012			For the period ended October 8, 2012
	US$			US$			US$
Revenues		480,045			362,280			320,005
Total costs		1,307,874			700,337			72,910
Profit (loss) from operations		(827,829	)		(338,057	)		247,095
Earnings (loss) attributable to Rediff*		(785,707	)		(215,735	)		84,310


	For the year ended March 31,
	2012						2013
	Gross		Accumulated impairment		Net		Gross		Accumulated impairment		Net
	US$		US$		US$		US$		US$		US$
As at beginning of the year		10,515,168		8,515,168		2,000,000		10,515,168		8,515,168		2,000,000
Impairment		—		—		—		—		2,000,000		2,000,000
As at end of the year		10,515,168		8,515,168		2,000,000		10,515,168		10,515,168		—


Options	Number of Options (in terms of shares)		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term (year)		Aggregate intrinsic value
			US$				US$
Outstanding as at April 1, 2012		17,750		16.61
Expired		1,250		2.28

Outstanding as at March 31, 2013		16,500		17.69		5.6		—

Exercisable as at March 31, 2013		8,625		13.70		3.2		—


Options	Number of options (in terms of shares)		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term (year)		Aggregate intrinsic value
			US$				US$
Outstanding as at April 1, 2012		135,487		11.40
Forfeited		375		5.16

Outstanding as at March 31, 2013		135,112		11.41		3.6		19,600

Exercisable as at March 31, 2013		117,237		12.37		3.2		12,450


Options	Number of options (in terms of shares)		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term (year)		Aggregate intrinsic value
			US$				US$
Outstanding as at April 1, 2012		516,438		8.48
Forfeited		10,625		5.26

Outstanding as at March 31, 2013		505,813		8.50		5.9		1,132,420

Exercisable as at March 31, 2013		363,563		9.80		5.3		793,030


	Years ended March 31,
	2011	2012	2013
Dividend yield	0%	0%		—
Expected term	5.5 – 7 years	5.5 – 7 years		—
Risk free interest rates	2.04% – 2.77%	1.23% – 2.84%		—
Expected volatility	75.88% – 77.61%	78.36% – 81.98%		—


Description	Balance at Beginning of Period		Expense / Reversal			Bad debts written off			Effect of exchange rate changes			Balance at end of period
	US$		US$			US$			US$			US$
Fiscal 2013		3,200,434		(48,580	)		(2,106,011	)		(169,543	)		876,300
Fiscal 2012		4,022,664		37,700			(423,245	)		(436,685	)		3,200,434
Fiscal 2011		4,128,829		(144,263	)		—			38,098			4,022,664


For the year ending March 31,	US$
2014		350,284
2015		217,794
2016		224,328
2017		231,058
2018		278,742