Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. - Filed by EDGARfilings.com

10-Q 1 trbbody.htm Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. - Filed by EDGARfilings.com

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the period ended June 30, 2002

[ ]

Transaction Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transaction period from to

Commission File Number 0-29083

THREE RIVERS BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania	25-1843375
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2681 Mosside Boulevard, Monroeville, PA 15146-3315

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (412) 666-8063

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at August 1, 2002
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	8,542,963

THREE RIVERS BANCORP, INC.

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION:				Page No.
	Item 1.Quarterly Financial Statements

		Consolidated Balance Sheets -
			June 30, 2002, December 31, 2001,and June 30, 2001	3

		Consolidated Statements of Income -
			Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2002,and 2001	4

		Consolidated Statement of Changes
			in Stockholders' Equity - Six Months Ended June 30, 2002	6

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
			Six Months Ended June 30, 2002, and 2001	7

		Notes to Consolidated Financial
			Statements	8

	Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
			of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17

	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Discussion About Market Risk			35

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION:

	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			36

	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K			36

THREE RIVERS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

			June 30,		December 31,			June 30,
			2002		2001			2001

			(Unaudited)					(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks			$	35,457	$	46,109		$	22,562
Investment securities available for sale				378,251		380,598			379,862
Loans				580,212		565,902			509,474
Less: Unearned income				10		13			24
		Allowance for loan losses		8,205		7,992			5,699

Net loans				571,997		557,897			503,751
Premises and equipment				4,546		4,458			4,536
Accrued income receivable				5,952		6,133			6,429
Goodwill				6,155		6,652			2,256
Core deposit intangibles				6,240		6,024			--
Bank owned life insurance				13,874		13,556			13,245
Other assets				1,745		1,173			3,313

		TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,024,217	$	1,022,600		$	935,954


LIABILITIES
Non-interest bearing deposits			$	121,743	$	114,192		$	91,691
Interest bearing deposits				650,301		660,061			537,503

Total deposits				772,044		774,253			629,194

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank				150,000		156,000			235,201
Long-term debt				453		512			592

Total borrowed funds				150,453		156,512			235,793


Other liabilities				11,908		9,453			8,212

		TOTAL LIABILITIES		934,405		940,218			873,199


STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value; 5,000,000 sharesauthorized; no shares issued oroutstanding for the periods presented				-		-			-
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 8,542,963, 8,523,906 and 6,677,350 issued and outstanding on June 30, 2002, December 31, 2001 and June 30, 2001, respectively.				85		85			67
Surplus				39,019		38,859			22,504
Retained earnings				46,850		44,342			42,175
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)				3,858		(904	)		(1,991	)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY				89,812		82,382			62,755

	TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		$	1,024,217	$	1,022,600		$	935,954

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

THREE RIVERS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

Unaudited

				Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,

				2002			2001		2002		2001

INTEREST INCOME
	Interest and fees on loans and loans held for sale:
		Taxable		$	10,245		$	9,961	$	20,555	$	19,905
		Tax exempt			89			148		175		288
	Deposits with banks				40			5		47		10
	Federal funds sold				30			67		63		87
	Investment securities available for sale				5,196			5,990		10,261		12,372

			Total Interest Income		15,600			16,171		31,101		32,662

INTEREST EXPENSE
	Deposits				5,466			6,455		10,866		13,138
	Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase				2			4		4		28
	Other short-term borrowings				4			--		27		9
	Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank				2,411			3,837		4,826		7,622
	Long-term debt				11			12		22		25

			Total Interest Expense		7,894			10,308		15,745		20,822

NET INTEREST INCOME					7,706			5,863		15,356		11,840
	Provision for (recovery of) loan losses				(26	)		300		199		450


NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR (RECOVERY OF) LOAN LOSSES					7,732			5,563		15,157		11,390

NON-INTEREST INCOME
	Trust fees				25			30		50		60
	Net realized gain on investment securities				352			--		514		(3	)
	Wholesale cash processing fees				224			159		456		303
	Service charges on deposit accounts				452			509		908		993
	Bank owned life insurance				161			153		318		302
	Other income				335			339		669		627

			Total Non-Interest Income		1,549			1,190		2,915		2,282

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
	Salaries and employee benefits				2,859			2,470		5,667		4,940
	Net occupancy expense				549			443		1,089		928
	Equipment expense				580			427		1,061		830
	Professional fees				244			412		579		732
	Supplies, postage, and freight				274			237		580		445
	Miscellaneous taxes and insurance				340			250		639		463
	FDIC deposit insurance expense				33			29		67		59
	Amortization of goodwill and core deposit intangibles				206			95		412		190
	Merger related costs				539			--		539		--
	Other expense				468			743		1,051		1,567

			Total Non-Interest Expense	$	6,092		$	5,106	$	11,684	$	10,154

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE

(In thousands, except per share data)

Unaudited

			Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,

			2002		2001		2002		2001


INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES			$	3,189	$	1,647	$	6,388	$	3,518
	Provision for income taxes			935		221		1,831		560


NET INCOME			$	2,254	$	1,426	$	4,557	$	2,958


PER COMMON SHARE DATA:
	Basic:
		Net income	$	0.26	$	0.21	$	0.53	$	0.44
		Average shares outstanding		8,540,988		6,750,240		8,536,129		6,676,534
	Diluted:
		Net income	$	0.26	$	0.21	$	0.53	$	0.44
		Average shares outstanding		8,635,065		6,766,754		8,608,536		6,687,660
	Cash dividends declared		$	0.12	$	0.12	$	0.24	$	0.24

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

THREE RIVERS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(In thousands)

Unaudited

	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Surplus		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total


Balance, January 1, 2002	$	-	$	85	$	38,859	$	44,342		$	(904	)	$	82,382
Net Income		-		-		-		4,557			-			4,557
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		-		-		-		-			4,762			4,762
Comprehensive income														9,319
Dividends declared		-		-		-		(2,049	)		-			(2,049	)
Stock options exercised (20,057 shares)		-		-		160		-			-			160

Balance, June 30, 2002	$	-	$	85	$	39,019	$	46,850		$	3,858		$	89,812

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

THREE RIVERS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

Unaudited

		Six Months Ended June 30,

		2002			2001

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income		$	4,557		$	2,958
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
	provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses			199			450
Depreciation and amortization			228			27
Amortization expense of goodwill and core deposit intangibles			412			190
Net accretion of investment securities			315			88
Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities			(514	)		3
Decrease in accrued income receivable			181			36
Increase (decrease) in accrued expense payable			211			(199	)
Net (increase) decrease in other assets			(768	)		197
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities			166			(3,268	)

Net cash provided by operating activities			4,987			482


INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of investment securities and other short-term investments -
	available for sale		(114,046	)		(8,520	)
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities and
	other short-term investments - available for sale		68,867			28,432
Proceeds from sales of investment securities and
	other short-term investments - available for sale		55,051			20,970
Long-term loans originated			(101,797	)		(97,362	)
Principal collected on long-term loans			87,042			77,035
Purchases of premises and equipment			(600	)		(358	)

Net cash provided by investing activities			(5,483	)		20,197


FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net decrease in deposits			(2,209	)		(2,796	)
Net decrease in federal funds purchased, securities sold
	under agreements to repurchase, and other short-term borrowings		--			(9,166	)
Net principal repayments of advances from
	Federal Home Loan Bank		(6,000	)		--
Repayments of long-term debt			(59	)		(41	)
Common stock dividends paid			(2,048	)		(1,602	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised			160			17

Net cash used by financing activities			(10,156	)		(13,588	)


NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH EQUIVALENTS			(10,652	)		7,091
CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1			46,109			15,471

CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JUNE 30		$	35,457		$	22,562

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.	Business and Nature of Operations

Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") is a bank holding company headquartered in Monroeville, Pennsylvania. Through its banking subsidiary the Company operates 25 banking offices in three southwestern Pennsylvania counties. These offices provide a full range of consumer, mortgage and commercial financial products.

2.	Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Three Rivers Bank and Trust Company ("Three Rivers Bank"). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments that are of a normal recurring nature and are considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. They are not, however, necessarily indicative of the results of consolidated operations for a full-year.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company's annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc.'s Form 10K filing.

Basic earnings per share includes, only the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share includes, the weighted average common shares outstanding and any dilutive common stock equivalent shares in the calculation.

On a consolidated basis, cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks, and federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell. During the first six months of 2002, the Company made payments of $2,550,000 for federal income taxes. During the first six months of 2001, the Company made payments totaling $1,050,000 for federal income taxes. Total interest expense paid amounted to $15,535,000 in 2002's first six months compared to $21,021,000 in the same 2001 period.

3.	Acquisition

On July 1, 2001, the Company completed its acquisition of the Pennsylvania Capital Bank ("PA Capital Bank"), which had one office located in downtown Pittsburgh, Allegheny County.

At the acquisition date, the fair value of PA Capital's net assets totaled approximately $16 million, which included cash of $43.4 million, loans receivable with a fair value of $83.7 million, investment securities and other assets with a fair value of $12.7, deposits with a fair value of $123.5 million and other liabilities with a fair value of $279,000. As a result of the transaction, $4.8 million of core deposit intangible ($3.1 million net of taxes) was recorded and is being amortized over 11 years. Additionally, the fair value adjustments required by purchase accounting rules consisted of $582,000 (378,000 net of taxes) and are being recognized as yield adjustments over eight years. Goodwill arising from the transaction totaled $6.5 million.

Condensed Pro forma combined historical results of operations for the prior year as though the Company and PA Capital Bank had been combined at the beginning of 2001 are presented below. For 2002, actual results of operations are used for comparative purposes since the operations of PA Capital Bank have been consolidated with the Company's during that period. These unaudited condensed pro forma combined statements of operations, both pro forma and actual, are presented as if the acquisition had been effective on January 1, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

The unaudited condensed pro forma combined statement of operations include the estimated effect of pro forma adjustments that would have been realized had the acquisition actually occurred at the beginning of the respective periods.

			Actual for the three months ended June 30, 2002			Pro Forma combined for the three months ended June 30, 2001		Actual for the six months ended June 30, 2002		Pro Forma combined for the six months ended June 30, 2001


Interest income			$	15,600		$	18,629	$	31,101	$	37,763
Interest expense				7,894			11,692		15,745		23,722

Net interest income before provision For loan losses				7,706			6,937		15,356		14,041
Provision for loan losses				(26	)		320		199		545

Net interest income after provision For loan losses				7,732			6,617		15,157		13,496
Non-interest income				1,549			1,372		2,915		2,606
Non-interest expense				6,092			5,866		11,684		11,428

Income before income taxes				3,189			2,123		6,388		4,674
Provision for income taxes				935			306		1,831		841

Net income			$	2,254		$	1,817	$	4,557	$	3,833


PER COMMON SHARE DATA
	Basic:
		Net income	$	0.26		$	0.21	$	0.53	$	0.45
		Average shares outstanding		8,540,988			8,587,917		8,536,129		8,514,211
	Diluted:
		Net income	$	0.26		$	0.21	$	0.53	$	0.45
		Average shares outstanding		8,635,065			8,604,431		8,608,536		8,525,337

4.	Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income totaled $8.0 million and $531,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $9.3 million and $5.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Differences between comprehensive income and net income for these periods result entirely from investment security unrealized holding gains and losses, net of income taxes.

5.	Investment Securities

Securities classified as available for sale include securities that may be sold to effectively manage interest rate risk exposure, prepayment risk, and other factors (such as liquidity requirements). These available for sale securities are reported at estimated fair value with unrealized aggregate appreciation/(depreciation) excluded from income and credited/(charged) to a separate component of shareholders' equity on a net of tax basis. The change in the estimated fair value of the available for sale portfolio does inject more volatility in the book value of equity, but has no impact on regulatory capital. The Company presently does not engage in trading activity. Realized gain or loss on securities sold was computed upon the adjusted cost of the specific securities sold. The book and estimated fair values of investment securities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Investment securities available for sale:

			June 30, 2002

					Gross		Gross
			Book		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
			Value		Gains		Losses			Value

U.S. Treasury			$	555	$	18	$	--		$	573
U.S. Agency				36,001		179		(2	)		36,178
State and municipal				28,944		233		(4	)		29,173
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed
	securities			291,348		5,911		(17	)		297,242
Other securities *				15,468		57		(440	)		15,085

		Total	$	372,316	$	6,398	$	(463	)	$	378,251

*	Other investment securities include corporate notes and bonds, asset-backed securities, and equity securities.

Maintaining investment quality is a primary objective of the Company's investment policy which, subject to certain limited exceptions, prohibits the purchase of any investment security below a Moody's Investor's Service or Standard & Poor's rating of "A." At June 30, 2002, 98.6% of the portfolio was rated "AAA" compared to 97.5% at June 30, 2001. Less than 1.2% of the portfolio was rated below "A" or unrated on June 30, 2002.

Loans

The loan portfolio of the Company consists of the following (in thousands):

		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
		2002		2001		2001

Commercial		$	81,918	$	77,770	$	50,650
Commercial loans secured
	by real estate		329,255		296,665		261,398
Real estate - mortgage			145,821		169,048		172,998
Consumer			23,218		22,419		24,428

	Loans		580,212		565,902		509,474
Less: Unearned income			10		13		24

Loans, net of unearned income		$	580,202	$	565,889	$	509,450

Real estate-construction loans were not material at these presented dates and comprised 2.7% of total loans net of unearned income at June 30, 2002. The Company has no credit exposure to foreign countries or highly leveraged transactions.

7.	Allowance for Loan Losses

An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses follows (in thousands, except ratios):

		Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
		June 30,					June 30,

		2002			2001		2002			2001

Balance at beginning of period		$	8,079		$	5,494	$	7,992		$	5,393
Charge-offs:
	Commercial		--			64		63			67
	Real estate-mortgage		118			45		253			82
Consumer			8			20		44			54

Total charge-offs			126			129		360			203

Recoveries:
	Commercial		258			--		335			--
	Real estate-mortgage		13			26		17			37
	Consumer		7			8		22			22

	Total recoveries		278			34		374			59


Net charge-offs (recoveries)			(152	)		95		(14	)		143
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses			(26	)		300		199			450

Balance at end of period		$	8,205		$	5,699	$	8,205		$	5,699

8.	Non-performing Assets

Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans which are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments some of which are insured for credit loss, and (iii) other real estate owned (real estate acquired through foreclosure and in-substance foreclosures). All loans, except for loans that are insured for credit loss, are placed on non-accrual status upon becoming 90 days past due in either principal or interest. In addition, if circumstances warrant, the accrual of interest may be discontinued prior to 90 days. In all cases, payments received on non-accrual loans are credited to principal until full recovery of principal has been recognized; it is only after full recovery of principal that any additional payments received are recognized as interest income. The only exception to this policy is for residential mortgage loans wherein interest income is recognized on a cash basis as payments are received.

The following table presents information concerning non-performing assets (in thousands, except percentages):

		June 30,			December 31		June 30,
		2002			2001		2001


Non-accrual loans		$	2,653		$	3,240	$	2,394
Loans past due 90
	days or more		--			177		62
Other real estate owned			874			417		103

Total non-performing assets		$	3,527		$	3,834	$	2,559

Total non-performing
	assets as a percent
	of loans and loans
	held for sale, net
	of unearned income,
	and other real estate owned		0.61	%		0.67		0.50	%

Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of 1)fair value minus estimated costs to sell, or 2)carrying cost.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i) the gross interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period, (ii) the amount of interest income actually recorded on such loans, and (iii) the net reduction in interest income attributable to such loans (in thousands).

		Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,

		2002			2001		2002			2001

Interest income due in accordance
	with original terms	$	27		$	16	$	42		$	21
Interest income recorded			(10	)		--		(25	)		(2	)

Net reduction in interest income		$	17		$	16	$	17		$	19

9.	Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible Assets

The Company's balance sheet shows both tangible assets (such as loans, buildings, and investments) and intangible assets (such as goodwill and core deposit intangibles). The Company recorded $6.0 million of goodwill and $4.8 million of core deposit intangibles in conjunction with the PA Capital Bank acquisition, as discussed in Note #3, on its balance sheet. The remaining core deposit intangibles relate to branch acquisitions occurring in 1998 and 1999. A reconciliation of the Company's core deposit intangible asset balance is as follows (in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2001		$	6,652
	Amortization expense		(412	)

Balance at June 30, 2002		$	6,240

The Company is amortizing core deposit intangibles over periods ranging from five to eleven years, using the straight-line method of amortization. It is important to note that this intangible amortization expense is not a future cash outflow. The following table reflects the future amortization expense of the intangible assets (in thousands):

Remaining 2002	$	412
2003		824
2004		824
2005		824
2006		824
2007 and after		2,532

Total	$	6,240

The Company's current goodwill arose from the PA Capital Bank acquisition on July 1, 2001. On this date, the Company adopted FAS #142. Accordingly, the Company did not recognized any amortization expense relating to this goodwill during the second half of 2001 or during the six months ended June 30, 2002. Prior to this acquisition, the Company had no goodwill, or corresponding amortization, during 2001. Although the Company has recognized no amortization expense relating to this goodwill, the Company will, however, periodically review the goodwill for impairment as prescribed by FAS #142. During the second quarter, the Company completed its transitional impairment test of goodwill. Based on the results of this test, no goodwill impairment was recorded.

10.

Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings

Total FHLB borrowings consist of the following at June 30, 2002, (in thousands, except percentages):

	Weighted
	Average
Maturing	Amount		Rate

		50,000		7.06
2010 and after		100,000		6.01

	$	150,000		6.36	%

The $150 million of advances maturing in 2005 and after are subject to prepayment penalties and call provisions set forth by the FHLB. The following table summarizes the call provisions for the components of these advances:

Advance Amount	Will Reprice If: Index	Spread	Exceeds
$ 50,000	3 Month Libor	+ 8 basis points	7.50%
50,000	3 Month Libor	+12 basis points	6.03%
50,000	3 Month Libor	+ 9 basis points	7.50%
$150,000

All of the above borrowings bear a fixed-rate of interest. All FHLB stock along with an interest in mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, with an aggregate statutory value equal to the amount of the advances, have been pledged as collateral with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh to support these borrowings.

11.

Capital

The Company is subject to various capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's financial statements.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes that as of June 30, 2002, the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of June 30, 2002, and 2001, as well as, December 31, 2001, the Federal Reserve categorized the Company as "Well Capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since notification that management believes have changed the Company's classification category.

As of June 30, 2002

Actual

For Capital
Adequacy Purposes

To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

(In thousands, except ratios)

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc.

81,406

12.98

50,190

8.00

62,738

10.00

Three Rivers Bank

77,746

12.39

50,182

8.00

62,728

10.00

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc.

73,559

11.72

25,095

4.00

37,643

6.00

Three Rivers Bank

69,901

11.14

25,091

4.00

37,637

6.00

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)

Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc.

73,559

7.37

40,431

4.00

50,538

5.00

Three Rivers Bank

69,901

7.00

40,427

4.00

50,533

5.00

12.

Sky Financial Group, Inc. Merger

On May 7, 2002, the Company and Sky Financial Group, Inc. (Sky Financial) executed a definitive agreement for Sky Financial to acquire all the stock of the Company and merge the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Three Rivers Bank, into Sky Financial

Pursuant to the definitive agreement, stockholders of the Company will be entitled to elect to receive, in exchange for each share of the Company's common stock held, either $18.27 in cash or .80 shares of Sky Financial, or combination thereof. The election process, however, is subject to certain allocation and pro ration mechanisms that are reflective of the definitive agreement, which states that in total, 75% of the Company's common shares will be exchanged for shares of Sky Financial common stock and 25% of the Company's common shares will be exchanged for cash.

The deal provides for the merger of the Company into Sky Financial, and the subsequent merger of Three Rivers Bank into Sky Bank, Sky Financial's commercial banking affiliate. At the time of the definitive agreement, the transaction was valued at $156.5 million, including shares of the Company owned by Sky Financial and the cost to acquire the Company's outstanding options.

Pending approval by shareholders of the Company and various regulatory agencies, the transaction is expected to close September 30, 2002. For information surrounding the transaction, refer to the form 8-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2002.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

("M.D.& A.")

COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT JUNE 30, 2002 AND DECEMBER 31, 2001

.....BALANCE SHEET OVERVIEW.....The Company's total consolidated assets, which totaled $1.02 billion at June 30, 2002, remained relatively unchanged since December 31, 2001. During the first six months of 2002, total loans increased $14.3 million as loan principal originations exceeded repayments for the six month period. Total investment securities decreased $2.3 million during the first six months of 2002. This decrease primarily resulted from principal repayment and sale activity exceeding purchases. Cash and due from banks decreased $10.7 million during the first six months of 2002. This decrease primarily resulted from loan funding, the net run off of deposits and the decrease in FHLB borrowings.

Total deposits decreased by $2.2 million, or 0.3%, since December 31, 2001. The Company's total borrowed funds position decreased $6.1 million, or 3.9%, during the period. Total equity increased by $7.4 million, which represents the effect of net income, dividends declared and an increase in the unrealized investment security holding gains, net of tax, over the period.

.....LOAN QUALITY.....The following table sets forth information concerning Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc.'s loan delinquency and other non-performing assets. At all dates presented, the Company had no troubled debt restructurings which involved forgiving a portion of interest or principal on any loans at a rate materially less than that of market rates: (in thousands, except percentages):

			June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
			2002			2001			2001

Total loan delinquency (past due
	30 to 89 days)		$	3,647		$	6,840		$	4,485
	Total non-accrual loans			2,653			3,240			2,394
	Total non-performing assets*			3,527			3,834			2,559
	Loan delinquency, as a percentage
		of total loans and loans held
		for sale, net of unearned income		0.63	%		1.20	%		0.88	%
	Non-accrual loans, as a percentage
		of total loans and loans held
		for sale, net of unearned income		0.46	%		0.57	%		0.47	%
	Non-performing assets, as a percentage
		of total loans and loans held for sale,
		net of unearned income, and other
		real estate owned		0.61	%		0.67	%		0.50	%

* Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans that are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest and principal payments some of which are insured for credit loss, and (iii) other real estate owned. All loans, except for loans that are insured for credit loss, are placed on non-accrual status upon becoming 90 days past due in either principal or interest.

Between June 30, 2002, and December 31, 2001, total loan delinquency decreased $3.2 million while loans outstanding, net of unearned income, increased $14.3 million, thus causing the delinquency ratio to decrease 57 basis points to 0.63%. Total non-performing assets decreased by $307,000 since December 31,2001 causing the non-performing assets to total loans, net of unearned income, and OREO ratio to decrease to 0.61%. This ratio was further positively affected by the increase in total loans, net of unearned income, and OREO.

....ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES.....As a financial institution which assumes lending and credit risks as a principal element of its business, the Company anticipates that credit losses will be experienced in the normal course of business. Accordingly, the Company consistently applies a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline that is updated on a quarterly basis to determine both the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the necessary provision for loan losses to be charged against earnings. This methodology includes:

a detailed review of all criticized and impaired loans to determine if any specific reserve allocations are required on an individual loan basis. The specific reserve established for these criticized and impaired loans is based on careful analysis of the loan's performance, the related collateral value, cash flow considerations and the financial capability of any guarantor.

the application of formula driven reserve allocations for certain higher risk commercial and commercial real-estate loans are calculated by using a three-year migration analysis of net losses incurred within each risk grade for the entire commercial loan portfolio. The difference between estimated and actual losses is reconciled through the dynamic nature of the migration analysis.

the application of formula driven reserve allocations to installment and mortgage loans which are based upon historical charge-off experience for those loan types. The residential mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company's five-year historical average of actual loan charge-offs experienced in that category. The same methodology is used to determine the allocation for consumer loans except the allocation is based upon an average of the most recent actual three-year historical charge-off experience for consumer loans.

The application of formula driven reserve allocations is based upon review of historical losses and qualitative factors, which include but are not limited to, economic trends, delinquencies, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies and trends in policy exceptions.

After completion of this process, a formal meeting of the Loan Loss Reserve Committee is held to make qualitative adjustments to the formula driven results and evaluate the adequacy of the provision. The Company believes that the procedural discipline, systematic methodology, and comprehensive documentation of this quarterly process is in full compliance with all regulatory requirements and provides appropriate support for accounting purposes.

When it is determined that the prospects for recovery of the principal of a loan have significantly diminished, the loan or the determined uncollectible portion is immediately charged against the allowance account; subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance account. In addition, non-accrual and large delinquent loans are reviewed monthly to determine potential losses. Consumer loans are considered losses when they are 90 days past due, except loans that are insured for credit loss.

The Company's policy is to individually review, as circumstances warrant, each of its commercial and commercial mortgage loans to determine if a loan is impaired. At a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loans with balances in excess of $500,000 within each calendar year. The Company has also identified two pools of small dollar value homogeneous loans that are evaluated collectively for impairment. These separate pools are for residential mortgage loans and consumer loans. Individual loans within these pools are reviewed and removed from the pool if factors such as significant delinquency in payments of 90 days or more, bankruptcy, or other negative economic concerns indicate impairment

The following table sets forth changes in the allowance for loan losses and certain ratios for the periods ended (in thousands, except percentages):

				June 30,			December 31,		June 30,
				2002			2001		2001

Allowance for loan losses				$	8,205		$	7,992	$	5,699
Allowance for loan losses as a
	percentage of each of
	the following:
		total loans, net of
			unearned income		1.41	%		1.41		1.12	%
		total delinquent loans
			(past due 30 to 89 days)		224.98			116.84		127.07
		total non-accrual loans			309.27			246.67		238.05
		total non-performing assets			232.63			208.45		222.70
As a percent of average loans, net of unearned income:
		Annualized net (recoveries) charge-offs			(0.01	)%	*	0.07		0.06	%
		Annualized provision for loan losses			0.07	%		0.20		0.18	%
Total classified loans				$	19,159		$	17,867	$	24,728

* Includes a $251,000 recovery recognized during the six month period. See "Provision for Loan Losses" discussion on page 31.

Since December 31, 2001, the balance in the allowance for loan losses has increased $213,000 while the balance of total loans increased by $14.3 million. The increase in the allowance primarily results from the provision for the six month period, net of net charge-offs. Additionally, the increase in the allowance for loan losses resulted from an increase in outstanding loan levels, as well as a shift of the loan portfolio from 1-4 family mortgage loans to loans that are more commercial in nature. The Company's allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2002, was 309% of non-accrual loans.

For impaired loans, the measurement of impairment may be based upon: 1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate; 2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or 3) the fair value of the collateral of a collateral dependent loan.

The Company had loans totaling $5.9 million at June 30, 2002, and $733,000 at December 31, 2001, being specifically identified as impaired and a corresponding allocation reserve of $1.0 million at June 30, 2002 and $425,000 at December 31, 2001. The average outstanding balance for loans being specifically identified as impaired was $5.6 million for the first six months of 2002 compared to $752,000 for the twelve months of 2001. All of the impaired loans are collateral dependent; therefore the fair value of the collateral of the impaired loans is evaluated in measuring the impairment. There was no interest income recognized on impaired loans during the first six months of 2002 or 2001.

The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among various categories. This allocation is determined by using the consistent quarterly procedural discipline that was discussed above. This allocation, however, is not necessarily indicative of the specific amount or specific loan category in which future losses may ultimately occur (in thousands, except percentages):

			June 30, 2002					December 31, 2001					June 30, 2001

					Percent of					Percent of					Percent of
					Loans in					Loans in					Loans in
					Each					Each					Each
					Category					Category					Category
			Amount		To Loans			Amount		To Loans			Amount		To Loans

Commercial			$	2,787		14.1	%	$	2,185		13.7	%	$	571		9.9	%
Commercial
	loans secured
	by real estate			4,971		56.8			5,307		52.4			4,415		51.3
Real estate -
	Mortgage			217		25.1			264		29.9			280		34.0
Consumer				185		4.0			159		4.0			127		4.8
General risk				45		-			77		-			306		-

		Total	$	8,205		100.0	%	$	7,992		100.0	%	$	5,494		100.0	%

Although real estate-mortgage loans comprise approximately 25% of the Company's total loan portfolio, only $217,000 or 2.6% of the total allowance for loan losses is allocated against this loan category. The real estate-mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company's five-year historical average of actual loan charge-offs experienced in that category. The disproportionately higher allocations for commercial loans and commercial loans secured by real estate reflect the increased credit risk associated with this type of lending and the Company's historical loss experienced in these categories.

At June 30, 2002, management of the Company believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover estimated losses within the Company's loan portfolio.

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001

......PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW.....The Company's net income for the second quarter of 2002 totaled $2.3 million or $0.26 per share on a diluted basis. During the second quarter, the Company incurred pre-tax merger related expenses of $539,000 (see Note #12). Excluding these charges, net income for second quarter was $2.6 million, or $0.27 per share on a diluted basis. The second quarter 2002 results are higher when compared with the $1.4 million or $0.21 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2001.

The Company's return on equity (ROE) averaged 10.42% for the second quarter of 2002 compared to 9.00% ROE in the second quarter of 2001.

Net interest income increased by $1.8 million, or 31.4%, as a result of declining interest rates causing an increase in the net interest margin from 2.60% in the second quarter of 2001 to 3.29% in the second quarter of 2002. The Company's equity base has been positively affected by the issuance of additional shares in connection with the PA Capital Bank acquisition and by an increase in other comprehensive income due to a increase in value of the Company's available for sale securities portfolio. The following table summarizes some of the Company's key performance indicators (in thousands, except per share and ratios):

	Three Months Ended

	June 30, 2002		June 30, 2001

Net Income	$	2,254	$	1,426
Diluted earnings per share		0.26		0.21
Return on average equity		10.42		9.00	%
Return on average assets		0.89		0.61	%
Average diluted common shares outstanding		8,635		6,767

.....NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN.....The Company's net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds interest paid on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income is a primary source of the Company's earnings; it is affected by interest rate fluctuations as well as changes in the amount and mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. It is the Company's philosophy to strive to optimize net interest income performance in varying interest rate environments. The following table compares the Company's net interest income performance for the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2001 (in thousands, except percentages):

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Net

		2002			2001			Change		% Change

Interest Income		$	15,600		$	16,171		$	(571		(3.5	)
Interest Expense			7,894			10,308			(2,414		(23.4	)

Net interest income			7,706			5,863			1,843		31.4
Tax-equivalent adjustment			165			105			60		57.1

Net tax-equivalent interest income		$	7,871		$	5,968		$	1,903		31.9

Net interest margin			3.29	%		2.60	%		0.69		N/M
	N/M - Not meaningful

Three Rivers Bancorp's net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis increased by $1.9 million, or 31.9%, due primarily to the increase of the net interest margin percentage and an increase in average earning assets. The net interest margin increased 69 basis points to 3.29%, reflecting a 134 basis point decrease in the cost of funds, which was partially offset by a 59 basis point decrease in the earning asset yield. Total average earning assets increased $55.7 million during the second quarter 2002 compared to the same period of 2001. This resulted from a $63.7 million, or 12.7%, increase in total loans and a $8.9 million increase in deposits with banks. These increases, however, were partially offset by a decrease in investments of $17.7 million, or 4.5%.

During the second quarter, the Company used the cash flow from mortgage backed securities to pay down FHLB Borrowings, which reduced interest rate risk and decreased margin compression as a result of the leverage program the Company has had in place over the last six years.

.....COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME..... Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company's total tax-equivalent interest income for the second quarter of 2002 decreased by $511,000 or 3.1% when compared to the same 2001 period. This decrease resulted from a decline in the yield earned on interest bearing assets, which decreased 59 basis points to 6.59% for the three month period ending June 30, 2002. Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total loan portfolio decreased by 64 basis points to 7.33% due to the downward repricing of floating-rate loans. The yield on total investment securities decreased by 47 basis points to 5.70% due to the increased prepayments and the corresponding increase in the amortization of premiums. The decrease in the yield earned on interest bearing assets, however, was partially offset by a $55.7 million or 6.2% increase in total average earning assets. The increase in total average earning assets is primarily the result of assets acquired in connection with the PA Capital Bank acquisition.

The Company's total interest expense for the second quarter of 2002 decreased by $2.4 million, or 23.4% when compared to the same 2001 period. This lower interest expense was due to the 134 basis point decrease in the yield on interest bearing liabilities, which averaged 3.98% for the second quarter 2002. The decrease in the yield on interest bearing liabilities, however, was partially offset by an $18.5 million or 2.4% increase in total average interest bearing liabilities.

Within interest-bearing liabilities, total deposits increased $103.0 million, or 19.1%. This, however, was offset by a decrease in borrowed funds of $84.5 million, or 35.8%. The increase in total deposits is primarily the result of deposits acquired in connection with the PA Capital Bank acquisition. The proceeds received from investment security principal and interest receipts, security sales, as well as from the growth of the deposit base were used to pay down the higher costing borrowings as well as to fund loan originations. FHLB advances had an average cost of 6.45% in the second quarter of 2002, which compares to the cost of 6.54% for the prior year second quarter. However, during the second quarter of 2002, these borrowings were 304 basis points greater than the average cost of deposits, which was 3.41%. Overall, the Company's total cost of funds decreased by 134 basis points to 3.98%.

It is recognized that interest rate risk does exist from this use of borrowed funds to leverage the balance sheet. The Company has asset liability policy parameters that limit the maximum amount of borrowings to 40% of total assets. For the second quarter of 2002, the level of short-term borrowed funds and FHLB advances to total assets averaged 15.0%. At quarter end, the Company had borrowed funds to total assets of 14.7%, which is within the parameters set by the Board of Directors of the Company. The Company plans to continue to use cash flow from mortgage-backed securities and increasing deposits to pay down borrowings during the next several quarters.

The table that follows provides an analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis setting forth (i) average assets, liabilities, and stockholders' equity, (ii) interest income earned on interest earning assets and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iii) average yields earned on interest earning assets and average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iv) Three Rivers Bancorp's interest rate spread (the difference between the average yield earned on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities), and (v) Three Rivers Bancorp's net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average total interest earning assets). For purposes of this table, loan balances include non-accrual loans and interest income on loans includes loan fees or amortization of such fees which have been deferred, as well as, interest recorded on non-accrual loans as cash is received. Additionally, a tax rate of approximately 35% is used to compute tax equivalent yields.

Three Months Ended June 30 (In thousands, except percentages)

						2002 Actual									2001 Actual

						Interest									Interest
			Average			Income/			Yield/			Average			Income/			Yield/
			Balance			Expense			Rate			Balance			Expense			Rate

Interest earning assets:
	Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income		$	567,083		$	10,367			7.33	%	$	503,359		$	10,145			7.97	%
	Deposits with banks			9,548			40			1.68			697			5			2.63
	Federal funds sold			6,959			30			1.73			6,114			67			4.36
	Total investment securities			374,883			5,328			5.70			392,596			6,059			6.17

Total interest earning Assets/interest income				958,473			15,765			6.59			902,766			16,276			7.18
Non-interest earning assets:
	Cash and due from banks			19,118									14,453
	Premises and equipment			4,552									4,764
	Other assets			36,756									23,970
	Allowance for loan losses			(8,130	)								(5,621	)

TOTAL ASSETS			$	1,010,769								$	940,332


Interest bearing liabilities:
	Interest bearing deposits:
		Interest bearing demand	$	60,319		$	148			0.98	%	$	41,482		$	82			0.79	%
		Savings		58,042			156			1.08			57,815			269			1.87
		Money markets		113,618			449			1.59			46,774			338			2.80
		Other time		411,200			4,713			4.60			394,136			5,764			5.87

	Total interest bearing deposits			643,179			5,466			3.41			540,207			6,453			4.79
	Short term borrowings:
		Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings		1,267			6			1.90			392			4			4.05
	Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank			150,000			2,411			6.45			235,273			3,838			6.54
		Long-term debt		467			11			9.45			576			13			8.84

Total interest bearing liabilities/interest expense				794,913			7,894			3.98			776,448			10,308			5.32
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
	Demand deposits			119,141									89,631
	Other liabilities			9,913									10,887
Stockholders' equity				86,802									63,366

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY			$	1,010,769								$	940,332

Interest rate spread										2.61	%								1.86	%
Net interest income/ net interest margin							7,871			3.29	%					5,968			2.60	%
Tax-equivalent adjustment							(165	)								(105	)

Net Interest Income						$	7,706								$	5,863

.....PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES..... The Company's provision for loan losses for the second quarter of 2002 totaled a negative $26,000, or an increase to income. The negative provision resulted from a recovery of $251,000 during the quarter. This represents a $326,000 decrease from the provision level experienced in the 2001 second quarter. Including the aforementioned recovery, the Company recognized net loan recoveries of $152,000, or 0.11%, on an annualized basis, of average loans in the second quarter of 2002. The Company applies a consistent methodology and procedural discipline to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at on a quarterly basis. (See further discussion in Note# 7 to the consolidated financial statements herein and the Allowance for Loan Losses section of the MD&A.)

.....NON-INTEREST INCOME..... Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2002 totaled $1.5 million which represents a $359,000, or 30.2%, increase when compared to the same 2001 quarter. This increase resulted primarily from gains recognized from investment security sales of $352,000 in the second quarter of 2002. Additionally, wholesale cash processing fees increased $65,000 as a result of an expanded customer base in the second quarter of 2002. These increases, however, were partially offset by a $57,000 decrease in service charges on deposit accounts.

.....NON-INTEREST EXPENSE..... Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2002 totaled $6.1 million which represents a $986,000, or 19.3%, increase when compared to the same 2001 quarter. This increase was primarily due to the following items:

-	a $389,000, or 15.7%, increase in salaries and employee benefits, which resulted from normal annual salary increases and an increase in full time equivalent employees.

-	A $106,000 increase in net occupany expense, which primarily resulted from a second quarter lease charge of $84,000 for the Pitt Times office, which was the former PA Capital premises. This charge is $28,000 per month and was not incurred during the second quarter 2001.

A $153,000 increase in equipment expense, which resulted from additional depreciation expense incurred for fixed assets acquired in the PA Capital Bank transaction. Additionally, the Company incurred a charge of $102,000 during the second quarter as a result of making computer hardware updates throughout various branches.

-	a $111,000 increase in amortization of core deposit intangibles that resulted from the acquisition of PA Capital Bank on July 1, 2001.

-	A $539,000 increase in merger related costs, which result as the merger with Sky Financial Group, Inc. progresses (see Note #12).

the above increases, however, were partially offset by a $275,000, or 37.0%, decrease in other expense. This decrease primarily resulted from a decrease in the expenses incurred for services provided by Ameriserv Financial, Inc. of $141,000 as well as a decrease in advertising expenditures of $58,000.

.....INCOME TAX EXPENSE..... The Company's provision for income taxes for the second quarter of 2002 increased $714,000 to $935,000 from the quarter ending June 30, 2001 as a result of a higher level of pretax earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Additionally, during the second quarter 2001, the Company received a refund from Ameriserv Financial, which offset the tax provision for the quarter ending June 30, 2001. The refund represents federal income tax overpayments made during the 1998 and 1999 tax years. During that time, Three Rivers Bank was a consolidated entity of Amerserv Financial, and as outlined by the tax separation agreement entered into by the Companies at spin-off, the Company is entitled to Three Rivers Bank's portion of such overpayments. The Company's tax-free asset holdings consist primarily of municipal investment securities, bank owned life insurance, and commercial loan tax anticipation notes. A net deferred income tax liability of $2.2 million has been provided as of June 30, 2002, on the differences between taxable income for financial and tax reporting purposes.

.....NET OVERHEAD BURDEN..... The Company's efficiency ratio (non-interest expense divided by total revenue) decreased to 64.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 compared to 71.3% for the same period of 2001. Significant factors contributing to the lower efficiency ratio in 2002 is a higher level of net interest income and non-nterest income. These positive factors, however, were partially offset by a higher level of non-interest expense.

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001

.....PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW..... The Company's net income for the first six months of 2002 totaled $4.6 million or $0.53 per share on a diluted basis. During the first six months of 2002, the Company incurred pre-tax merger related expenses of $539,000 (see Note #12). Excluding these charges, net income for first six months of 2002 was $4.9 million, or $0.57 per share on a diluted basis. The results from the first six months of 2002 are higher when compared with the $3.0 million or $0.44 per diluted share for the first six months of 2001.

The Company's return on equity (ROE) averaged 10.65% for the first six months of 2002 compared to 9.45% ROE reported in the first six months of 2001.

Net interest income increased by $3.5 million, or 29.7%, as a result of declining interest rates causing an increase in the net interest margin from 2.63% in the first six months of 2001 to 3.29% in the same period of 2002. The Company's equity base has been positively affected by the issuance of additional shares in connection with the PA Capital Bank acquisition as well as an increase in other comprehensive income due to an increase in value of the Company's available for sale securities portfolio. The following table summarizes some of the Company's key performance indicators (in thousands, except per share and ratios):

		Six Months Ended

		June 30, 2002		June 30, 2001

Net Income		$	4,557	$	2,958
	Diluted earnings per share		0.53		0.44
	Return on average equity		10.65		9.45	%
	Return on average assets		0.92		0.63	%
	Average diluted common shares outstanding		8,609		6,688

.....NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN.....The Company's net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds interest paid on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income is a primary source of the Company's earnings; it is affected by interest rate fluctuations as well as changes in the amount and mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. It is the Company's philosophy to strive to optimize net interest income performance in varying interest rate environments. The following table compares the Company's net interest income performance for the first six months of 2002 to the first six months of 2001 (in thousands, except percentages):

		Three Months Ended June 30,
								Net
		2002			2001			Change			% Change

Interest Income		$	31,101		$	32,662		$	(1,561	)		(4.8	)
Interest Expense			15,745			20,822			(5,077	)		(24.4	)

Net interest income			15,356			11,840			3,516			29.7
Tax-equivalent adjustment			315			211			104			49.3

Net tax-equivalent interest income		$	15,671		$	12,051		$	3,620			30.0

Net interest margin			3.29	%		2.63	%		0.66			N/M
	N/M - Not meaningful

Three Rivers Bancorp's net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis increased by $3.6 million, or 30.0%, due primarily to the increase of the net interest margin percentage and an increase in average earning assets. The net interest margin increased 66 basis points to 3.29%, reflecting a 137 basis point decrease in the cost of funds, which was partially offset by a 61 basis point decrease in the earning asset yield. Total average earning assets increased $46.9 million during the first six months of 2002 compared to the same period of 2001. This resulted from a $70.8 million, or 14.3%, increase in total loans, a $4.5 million increase in deposits with banks and a $3.8 million increase in federal funds sold. These increases, however, were partially offset by a decrease in investments of $32.2 million, or 8.0%.

During the first six months, the Company used the cash flow from mortgage backed securities to pay down FHLB Borrowings, which reduced interest rate risk and decreased margin compression as a result of the leverage program the Company has had in place over the last six years.

.....COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME..... Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company's total tax-equivalent interest income for the first six months of 2002 decreased by $1.5 million or 4.4% when compared to the same 2001 period. This decrease resulted from a decline in the yield earned on interest bearing assets, which decreased 61 basis points to 6.68% for the six month period ending June 30, 2002. Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total loan portfolio decreased by 73 basis points to 7.43% due to the downward repricing of floating-rate loans. The yield on total investment securities decreased by 49 basis points to 5.71% due to the increased prepayments and the corresponding increase in the amortization of premiums. The decrease in yield on interest earning assets, however, was partially offset by a $46.9 million or 5.2% increase in total average earning assets. The increase in total average earning assets is primarily the result of assets acquired in connection with the PA Capital Bank acquisition.

The Company's total interest expense for the first six months of 2002 decreased by $5.1 million, or 24.4%, when compared to the same 2001 period. This lower interest expense was due to the 137 basis point decrease in the yield on interest bearing liabilities, to an average of 4.03% for the first six months of 2002. The decrease in the yield on interest bearing liabilities was, however, partially offset by a $9.4 million increase in average interest bearing liabilities between the two periods.

Within interest-bearing liabilities, total deposits increased $92.5 million, or 17.1%. This, however, was partially offset by a decrease in borrowed funds of $83.1 million, or 35.1%. The increase in total deposits is primarily the result of deposits acquired in connection with the PA Capital Bank acquisition. The proceeds received from investment security principal and interest receipts, security sales, as well as from the growth of the deposit base were used to pay down the higher costing borrowings as well as to fund loan originations. FHLB advances had an average cost of 6.48% in the first six months of 2002, which compares to the cost of 6.54% for the prior year six months. However, during the first six months of 2002, these borrowings were 302 basis points greater than the average cost of deposits, which was 3.46%. Overall, the Company's total cost of funds decreased by 137 basis points to 4.03%.

It is recognized that interest rate risk does exist from this use of borrowed funds to leverage the balance sheet. The Company has asset liability policy parameters that limit the maximum amount of borrowings to 40% of total assets. For the first six months of 2002, the level of short-term borrowed funds and FHLB advances to total assets averaged 15.4%. At quarter end, the Company had borrowed funds to total assets of 14.7%, which is within the parameters set by the Board of Directors of the Company. The Company plans to continue to use cash flow from mortgage-backed securities and increasing deposits to pay down borrowings during the next several quarters.

Six Months Ended June 30 (In thousands, except percentages)

						2002 Actual									2001 Actual

						Interest									Interest
			Average			Income/			Yield/			Average			Income/			Yield/
			Balance			Expense			Rate			Balance			Expense			Rate

Interest earning assets:
	Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income		$	564,170		$	20,795			7.43	%	$	493,398		$	20,266			8.16	%
	Deposits with banks			5,099			47			1.86			589			10			3.37
	Federal funds sold			7,610			63			1.67			3,809			87			4.57
	Total investment securities			371,344			10,511			5.71			403,572			12,510			6.20

Total interest earning Assets/interest income				948,223			31,416			6.68			901,368			32,873			7.29
Non-interest earning assets:
	Cash and due from banks			17,328									14,099
	Premises and equipment			4,487									4,765
	Other assets			37,318									23,343
	Allowance for loan losses			(8,074	)								(5,537	)

TOTAL ASSETS			$	999,282								$	938,038


Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits:
	Interest bearing demand		$	54,595		$	248			0.92	%	$	41,358		$	163			0.79	%
		Savings		57,918			309			1.08			57,682			557			1.95
		Money markets		119,532			942			1.59			46,464			701			3.04
		Other time		401,617			9,367			4.70			395,628			11,715			5.97

	Total interest bearing deposits			633,662			10,866			3.46			541,132			13,136			4.90
	Short term borrowings:
		Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings		3,249			31			1.92			1,322			37			5.64
	Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank			150,226			4,826			6.48			235,140			7,623			6.54
	Long-term debt			481			22			9.22			597			26			8.59

Total interest bearing liabilities/interest expense				787,618			15,745			4.03			778,191			20,822			5.40
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
	Demand deposits			115,747									86,611
	Other liabilities			9,590									10,657
Stockholders' equity				86,327									62,579

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY			$	999,282								$	938,038

Interest rate spread										2.65	%								1.89	%
Net interest income/ net interest margin							15,671			3.29	%					12,051			2.63	%
Tax-equivalent adjustment							(315	)								(211	)

Net Interest Income						$	15,356								$	11,840

.....PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES..... The Company's provision for loan losses for the first six months of 2002 totaled $199,000 or 0.07% of average total loans, which represents a $251000 decrease from the provision level experienced in the same period of 2001. The decrease in provision resulted from a recovery of $251,000 during the second quarter. Including the aforementioned recovery, the Company recognized net loan recoveries of $14,000, or 0.01%, on an annualized basis, of average loans in the first six months of 2002. The Company applies a consistent methodology and procedural discipline to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at on a quarterly basis. (See further discussion in Note# 7 to the consolidated financial statements herein and the Allowance for Loan Losses section of the MD&A.)

.....NON-INTEREST INCOME..... Non-interest income for the first six months of 2002 totaled $2.9 million which represents a $633,000, or 27.7%, increase when compared to the same 2001 period. This increase resulted primarily from gains recognized from investment security sales of $514,000 during the first six months of 2002. Additionally, wholesale cash processing fees increased $153,000 as a result of an expanded customer base in the first six months of 2002.

.....NON-INTEREST EXPENSE..... Non-interest expense for the first six months of 2002 totaled $11.7 million which represents a $1.5 million, or 15.1%, increase when compared to the same 2001 period. This increase was primarily due to the following items:

-	a $727,000, or 14.7%, increase in salaries and employee benefits, which resulted from normal annual salary increases and an increase in full time equivalent employees.

-	A $161,000 increase in net occupany expense, which primarily resulted from a lease charge of $168,000 for the Pitt Times office, which was the former PA Capital premises. This charge is $28,000 per month and was not incurred during the first six months of 2001.

A $231,000 increase in equipment expense, which resulted from additional depreciation expense incurred for fixed assets acquired in the PA Capital Bank transaction. Additionally, the Company incurred a charge of $102,000 during the second quarter as a result of making computer hardware updates throughout various branches.

-	a $135,000 increase in supplies, postage and freight, which resulted primarily from additional costs associated with the annual report printing and mailing.

-	A $176,000 increase in miscellaneous taxes and insurance, which resulted from an increase in the accrual for the Bank's annual Pennsylvania Shares Tax. This tax is expected to increase as a result of an increase in equity from the PA Capital acquisition.

-	a $220,000 increase in amortization of core deposit intangibles that resulted from the acquisition of PA Capital Bank on July 1, 2001.

-	A $539,000 increase in merger related costs, which result as the merger with Sky Financial Group, Inc. progresses (see Note #12).

-	the above increases, however, were partially offset by a $516,000, or 32.9%, decrease in other expense. This decrease resulted from a decrease in the expenses incurred for services provided by Ameriserv Financial, Inc. of $243,000 as well as a decrease in advertising expenditures of $143,000.

.....INCOME TAX EXPENSE..... The Company's provision for income taxes for the first six months of 2002 increased $1.3 million to $1.8 million from the first six months of 2001 as a result of a higher level of pretax earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Additionally, a refund from Ameriserv Financial, Inc. for federal income tax overpayments made during the 1998 and 1999 tax years offset the tax provision for the quarter ended March 31, 2001. The Company's tax-free asset holdings consist primarily of municipal investment securities, bank owned life insurance, and commercial loan tax anticipation notes. A net deferred income tax liability of $2.2 million has been provided as of June 30, 2002, on the differences between taxable income for financial and tax reporting purposes.

.....NET OVERHEAD BURDEN..... The Company's efficiency ratio (non-interest expense divided by total revenue) decreased to 62.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to 70.8% for the same period of 2001. Significant factors contributing to the lower efficiency ratio in 2002 is a higher level of net interest income and non-nterest income. These positive factors, however, were partially offset by a higher level of non-interest expense.

INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

Asset/liability management involves managing the risks associated with changing interest rates and the resulting impact on the Company's net interest income, net income and capital. The management and measurement of interest rate risk at Three Rivers Bancorp is performed by using the following tools: 1) simulation modeling which analyzes the impact of interest rate changes on net interest income, net income and capital levels over specific future time periods. The simulation modeling forecasts earnings under a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in the absolute level of interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, prepayments and changes in the volumes and rates of various loan and deposit categories. The simulation modeling also incorporates all off balance sheet hedging activity as well as assumptions about reinvestment and the repricing characteristics of certain assets and liabilities without stated contractual maturities; 2)static "GAP" analysis which analyzes the extent to which interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities are matched at specific points in time; and 3) market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis. The overall interest rate risk position and strategies are reviewed by senior management and the Company's Board of Directors on an ongoing basis.

The following table presents a summary of the Company's static GAP positions (in thousands, except for the GAP ratios):

		June 30, 2002			December 31, 2001			June 30, 2001

Six month cumulative GAP
	RSA	$	270,439		$	287,061		$	252,190
	RSL		(265,880	)		(289,346			(327,942	)
	Off-balance sheet hedges		--			--			(40,000	)

GAP		$	4,559		$	(2,285		$	(35,752	)

	GAP ratio		1.02X			0.99X			0.88X

	GAP as a % of total assets		0.45			(0.22	)		(3.82	)%
One year cumulative GAP
	RSA	$	409,552		$	404,315		$	363,368
	RSL		(375,296	)		(387,574			(362,825	)
Off-balance sheet hedges			--			--			--

	GAP	$	34,256		$	16,741		$	543

	GAP ratio		1.09X			1.04X			1.00X

	GAP as a % of total assets		3.34			1.64			0.06	%

When June 30, 2002, is compared to December 31, 2001, both the Company's six month and one year cumulative GAP ratios became increasingly positive. This resulted primarily from a decrease in rate sensitive liabilities as of June 30, 2002.

Management places primary emphasis on simulation modeling to manage and measure interest rate risk. The Company's asset liability management policy seeks to limit net interest income variability over the first twelve months of the forecast period to ±7.5% and net income variability to ±15.0% based upon varied economic rate forecasts which include interest rate movements of up to 200 basis points and alterations of the shape of the yield curve. Additionally, the Company also uses market value sensitivity measures to further evaluate the balance sheet exposure to changes in interest rates. Market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis captures the dynamic aspects of long-term interest rate risk across all time periods by incorporating the net present value of expected cash flows from the Company's assets and liabilities. The Company monitors the trends in market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis on a quarterly basis.

The following table presents an analysis of the sensitivity inherent in the Company's net interest income, net income and market value of portfolio equity. The interest rate scenarios in the table compare the Company's base forecast or most likely rate scenario at June 30, 2002, to scenarios which reflect ramped increases and decreases in interest rates of 200 basis points along with performance in a stagnant rate scenario with interest rates held flat at the June 30, 2002, levels. The Company's most likely rate scenario is based upon published economic consensus estimates. Each rate scenario contains unique prepayment and repricing assumptions that are applied to the Company's expected balance sheet composition that was developed under the most likely interest rate scenario.

Interest Rate Scenario	Variability of Net Interest Income			Variability of Net Income			Change In Market Value of Portfolio Equity

Base		0	%		0	%		0	%
Flat		1.5			3.9			(4.6	)
200bp increase		1.1			2.8			(28.7	)
200bp decrease		(1.6	)		(3.9	)		34.6

As indicated in the table, the maximum negative variability of Three Rivers Bancorp's net interest income and net income over the next twelve month period was (1.6%) and (3.9%) respectively, under a downward rate shock forecast reflecting a 200 basis point increase in interest rates. The variability of market value of portfolio equity was 34.6% under this interest rate scenario. Finally, this sensitivity analysis is limited by the fact that it does not include any balance sheet repositioning actions the Company may take should severe movements in interest rates occur such as lengthening or shortening the duration of the securities portfolio or entering into additional off-balance sheet hedging transactions. These actions would likely reduce the variability of each of the factors identified in the above table in the more extreme interest rate shock forecasts.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity can be analyzed by utilizing the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Cash equivalents decreased by $10.7 million from December 31, 2001 to June 30, 2002. During the first six months of 2002 there was $5.0 million of net cash provided by operating activities. This was more than offset by $5.5 million of net cash used by investing activities and $10.2 million of net cash used by financing activities. Within investing activities, the cash needed for investment securities purchases exceeded cash proceeds from sales by $59.0 million. Cash advanced for new loan fundings totaled $101.8 million and exceeded the cash received from loan principal payments by $14.8 million. Within financing activities, net deposits decreased by $2.2 million due primarily to the run-off of certificates of deposits. Management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its deposit requirements and meet its customers' credit needs.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

As presented in Note# 11 the Company exceeds all regulatory capital ratios at June 31, 2002. Furthermore, the Company is considered "well capitalized" under all applicable FDIC regulations. It is the Company's intent to maintain the FDIC "well capitalized" classification to ensure the lowest deposit insurance premium.

The Company's Board of Directors believes that dividends are a key component of total shareholder return, particularly for retail shareholders. During the first six months of 2002, the Company declared a $0.24 per share dividend. The fourth quarter 2001 dividend was paid during the first quarter of 2002.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT

This Form 10-Q contains various forward-looking statements and includes assumptions concerning the Company's beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, estimates, intentions, operations, future results, and prospects, including statements that include the words "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "plan" or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and are subject to risk and uncertainties. In connection with the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company provides the following cautionary statement identifying important factors (some of which are beyond the Company's control) that could cause the actual results or events to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by the forward-looking statements and related assumptions.

Such factors include the following: (i) risk resulting from the spin-off and the operation of Three Rivers Bancorp as a separate independent company, (ii) the effect of changing regional and national economic conditions; (iii) the effects of trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (iv) significant changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds; (v) inflation, stock and bond market, and monetary fluctuations; (vi) credit risks of commercial, real estate, consumer, and other lending activities; (vii) changes in federal and state banking and financial services laws and regulations; (viii) the presence in the Company's market area of competitors with greater financial resources than the Company; (ix) the timely development of competitive new products and services by the Company and the acceptance of those products and services by customers and regulators (when required); (x) the willingness of customers to substitute competitors' products and services for those of the Company and vice versa; (xi) changes in consumer spending and savings habits; (xii) unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings; and (xiii) other external developments which could materially impact the Company's operational and financial performance.

The foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive, and neither such list nor any forward-looking statement takes into account the impact that any future acquisition may have on the Company and on any such forward-looking statement.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Discussion About Market Risk

Refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis, pages 21 thru 24, 27 thru 30 and Interest Rate Sensitivity section on page 32 for discussion about Quantitative and Qualitative Market Risk.

Part II Other Information

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

On April 25, 2002, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The matters submitted to a vote of stockholders were approved, and the stockholder votes thereon are summarized as follows:

Election of Directors (Proposal One)

Nominee	For		Against

J. Thomas Allen		6,758,517		46,760
I.N. Rendall Harper, Jr.		6,760,259		45,018
W. Harrison Vail		6,747,160		58,117
Charles R. Zappalla		6,750,753		54,254

Election of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the Company in 2002 (Proposal Two)


For	Against		Abstain

6,710,443		74,657		21,176

No other proposals were considered at the annual meeting.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits are being filed as a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:

2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K, filed on May 8, 2002, of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc., File No. 000-29083).

10.6	Amendment to Change in Control Agreement dated April 1, 2000 between Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. and Terry K. Dunkle. (Original Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2000, of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc., File No. 000-29083).

10.7	Amendment to Change in Control Agreement dated April 1, 2000 between Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. and W. Harrison Vail. (Original Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2000, of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc., File No. 000-29083).

15.1	Independent Accountants Review Report

(b) Reports on Form 8-K: The following reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2002:

Form 8-K filed on May 8, 2002 reporting the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Sky Financial Group, Inc.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc.

		Registrant

Date: August 9, 2002		/s/ Terry K. Dunkle

		Terry K. Dunkle
		Chairman, President and
		Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 9, 2002		/s/ Anthony M.V. Eramo

		Anthony M.V. Eramo
		Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

/s/ Terry K. Dunkle, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer August 9, 2002

/s/ Anthony M. V. Eramo, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY

August 9, 2002

To the Stockholders and

Board of Directors of

Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc.

Management of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries have prepared the consolidated financial statements and other information in the Form 10-Q in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and are responsible for its accuracy.

In meeting its responsibilities, management relies on internal accounting and related control and monitoring systems, which include selection and training of qualified personnel, establishment and communication of accounting and administrative policies and procedures, appropriate segregation of responsibilities, and programs of internal audit. These systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance that financial records are reliable for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets, and that assets are safeguarded against unauthorized use or disposition. Such assurance cannot be absolute because of inherent limitations in any internal control system.

Management also recognizes its responsibility to foster a climate in which Company affairs are conducted with the highest ethical standards. The Company's Code of Conduct, furnished to each employee and director, addresses the importance of open internal communications, potential conflicts of interest, compliance with applicable laws, including those related to financial disclosure, the confidentiality of propriety information, and other items. There is an ongoing program to assess compliance with these policies.

The Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors consists solely of outside directors. The Audit Committee meets periodically with management and the independent accountants to discuss audit, financial reporting, and related matters. The Company's external and internal auditors have direct access to the Audit Committee.


/s/ Terry K. Dunkle			/s/ Anthony M.V. Eramo

Terry K. Dunkle			Anthony M.V. Eramo
Chairman, President &			Vice President &
Chief Executive Officer			Chief Financial Officer