XML 19 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Fair Value Measurement
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement

(3) Fair Value Measurement

The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon their own market assumptions. The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:

Level 1 

Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 

Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and market-corroborated inputs which are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 

Inputs are derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or value drivers are unobservable.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

The carrying values of financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.

The Company classifies its contingent liability within Level 3 as it includes inputs not observable in the market. The Company estimates the fair value of contingent consideration as the present value of the expected contingent payments, determined using the revenue forecast for certain Optelian products through the end of 2023. The fair value of contingent liability is generally sensitive to changes in the revenue forecast. Refer to Note 2 Business Combinations for further information.

The following tables present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the above input categories (in thousands):

 

 

September 30, 2021

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

45,505

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

45,505

 

Restricted cash

 

 

6,884

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,884

 

Contingent liability

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,116

 

 

 

2,116

 

Total

 

$

52,389

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

2,116

 

 

$

54,505

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

45,219

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

45,219

 

Restricted cash

 

 

9,200

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,200

 

Total

 

$

54,419

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

54,419

 

 

The change in fair value of the Company’s contingent liability is included in selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss). The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s Level 3 contingent liability (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30, 2021

 

Balance at the beginning of the period

 

$

-

 

Initial fair value of contingent liability

 

 

1,897

 

Net change in fair value

 

 

219

 

Balance at the end of the period

 

$

2,116

 

 

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis:

In conjunction with the restructuring in Hanover, Germany and the headquarters relocation to Plano, Texas, we wrote down certain long-lived assets held and used to their fair value of $0.2 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $4.5 million, which was included in earnings for the period. The impaired long-lived assets primarily consisted of right-of-use assets, and we used estimated sub-lease payment data to fair value the respective assets. We concluded that this fair value measurement should be categorized within Level 2.