XML 18 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.2
Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2023
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
“MetLife” and the “Company” refer to MetLife, Inc., a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1999, its subsidiaries and affiliates. MetLife is one of the world’s leading financial services companies, providing insurance, annuities, employee benefits and asset management. MetLife is organized into five segments: U.S.; Asia; Latin America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”); and MetLife Holdings.
Basis of Presentation
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported on the interim condensed consolidated financial statements. In applying these policies and estimates, management makes subjective and complex judgments that frequently require assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. Many of these policies, estimates and related judgments are common in the insurance and financial services industries; others are specific to the Company’s business and operations. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented in conformity with GAAP. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full year performance. Except for balances affected by the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-12 noted below, the December 31, 2022 consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited consolidated financial statements included in MetLife, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 Annual Report”), which include all disclosures required by GAAP. Therefore, these interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the 2022 Annual Report.
Adoption of ASU 2018-12 - Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts
Effective January 1, 2023, the Company adopted ASU 2018-12, Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts, as amended by ASU 2019-09, Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944): Effective Date; ASU 2020-11, Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944): Effective Date and Early Application; and ASU 2022-05, Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944): Transition for Sold Contracts (“LDTI”), with a transition date of January 1, 2021 (the “Transition Date”). Adoption of LDTI impacted the Company’s accounting and presentation related to long-duration insurance contracts and certain related balances for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Amounts within these interim condensed consolidated financial statements which were previously presented, have been revised to conform with the current year accounting and presentation under LDTI. Disclosures as of the Transition Date are reflected in summary within “— Recent Accounting Pronouncements — Adoption of ASU 2018-12 - Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts,” and in further detail (at the disaggregated level) within Notes 3, 4, 5 and 7.
Consolidation
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MetLife, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as well as partnerships and joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling financial interest, and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The Company uses the equity method of accounting or the fair value option (“FVO”) for real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests (“investee”) when it has more than a minor ownership interest or more than a minor influence over the investee’s operations. The Company generally recognizes its share of the investee’s earnings in net investment income on a three-month lag in instances where the investee’s financial information is not sufficiently timely or when the investee’s reporting period differs from the Company’s reporting period.
Revisions
Cash flows from short term investments in the prior years’ Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, which were previously presented net, have been revised to gross presentation to conform with the current year presentation. The revision in presentation was not material to the previously presented financial statements.
The Company originates mortgage loans and transfers proportional rights to cash flows of certain mortgage loans to third parties. These transactions were previously accounted for by the Company as sales of portions of the related mortgage loans. During the second quarter of 2023, management determined that certain of these pre-existing transactions did not meet the criteria for sale accounting and recorded an adjustment to reflect those transfers as secured borrowings. This adjustment did not result in changes to the Company’s economic exposure or key financial reporting metrics. Based on management’s assessment of both quantitative and qualitative factors, the error correction was not material to the Company’s current period or prior period financial statements and prior periods have not been revised.
Pending Reinsurance Transaction
In May 2023, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with subsidiaries of Global Atlantic Financial Group, a retirement and life insurance company, to reinsure an in-force block of universal life, variable universal life, universal life with secondary guarantees, and fixed annuities, which are reported in the MetLife Holdings segment. At the closing of the transaction, the Company will enter into reinsurance agreements on a coinsurance basis for the general account products, and on a modified coinsurance basis for the separate account products, representing total liabilities of approximately $17.0 billion. Under the terms of such agreement, assets primarily consisting of fixed maturity securities available-for-sale (“AFS”) and mortgage loans supporting the general account liabilities will be transferred to the reinsurers at closing reduced by an approximately $2.3 billion pre-tax ceding commission. The Company will retain separate account assets of approximately $5.5 billion under the modified coinsurance arrangement.
The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2023 and is subject to regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other closing conditions. See Note 9 for additional information on assets to be transferred to the reinsurers at closing, including associated impairments recorded to net investment gains (losses).
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The following table presents the Company’s significant accounting policies which have changed as a result of the adoption of LDTI with cross-references to the notes which provide additional information on such policies.
Accounting Policy
Note
Future Policy Benefit Liabilities
3
Policyholder Account Balances
4
Market Risk Benefits
5
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired, Unearned Revenue and Other Intangibles
7
Derivatives
10
Future Policy Benefit Liabilities
Traditional Non-participating and Limited-payment Long-duration products
The Company establishes future policy benefit liabilities (“FPBs”) for amounts payable under traditional non-participating and limited-payment long-duration insurance and reinsurance policies which include, but are not limited to, most whole and term life & endowment products, accident & health, fixed annuities, pension risk transfers, structured settlements, institutional income annuities and long-term care products. Generally, amounts are payable over an extended period of time and the related liabilities are calculated as the present value of future expected benefits and claim settlement expenses to be paid, reduced by the present value of future expected net premiums.
FPBs are measured as cohorts (e.g., groups of long-duration contracts), with the exception of pension risk transfers and longevity reinsurance solutions contracts, each of which are generally considered their own cohort. Contracts from different subsidiaries or branches, issue years, benefit currency and product types are not grouped together in the same cohort.
Such liabilities are established based on methods and underlying assumptions in accordance with GAAP and applicable actuarial standards. A net premium ratio (“NPR”) approach is utilized, where net premiums (i.e., the portion of gross premiums required to fund expected insurance benefits and claim settlement expenses) under the contract are accrued each period as an FPB. The NPR used to accrue the FPB in each period is determined by using the historical and present value of expected future benefits and claim settlement expenses for the cohort divided by the historical and present value of expected future gross premiums for the cohort.
Cash flow assumptions are incorporated into the calculation of a cohort's NPR and FPB reserve. These assumptions are used to project the amount and timing of expected benefits and claim settlement expenses to be paid and the expected amount of premiums to be collected for a cohort. The principal inputs and assumptions used in the establishment of FPBs are actual premiums, actual benefits, in-force policies, and best estimate cash flow assumptions to project future premium and benefit amounts. The Company’s primary best estimate cash flow assumptions include expectations related to mortality, morbidity, termination, claim settlement expense, policy lapse, renewal, retirement, disability incidence, disability terminations, inflation and other contingent events as appropriate to the respective product type and geographical area. Upon transition to LDTI, generally, the NPR and FPB reserve are updated retrospectively on a quarterly basis for actual experience and at least once a year for any changes in future cash flow assumptions, except for claim settlement expenses, for which the Company has elected to lock in assumptions at the Transition Date or inception (for contracts sold after the Transition Date), as allowed by LDTI. The resulting remeasurement (gain) loss is recorded through net income and reflects the impact on the change in the NPR based on experience at end of the quarter applied to the cumulative premiums received from the inception of the cohort (or from the Transition Date for contracts issued prior to the Transition Date) to the beginning of the quarter. The total contractual profit pattern is recognized over the expected life of the cohort by retrospectively updating the NPR. If net premiums exceed gross premiums (i.e., expected benefits exceed expected gross premiums), the FPB is increased, and a corresponding adjustment is recognized immediately in net income.
The change in FPB reflected in the statement of operations is calculated using a locked-in discount rate. For products issued prior to the Transition Date, a cohort level locked-in discount rate was developed that reflects the interest accretion rates that were locked in at inception of the underlying contracts (unless there was a historical premium deficiency event that resulted in updating the interest accretion rate prior to the Transition Date), or the acquisition date for contracts acquired through an assumed in-force reinsurance transaction or a business combination. For contracts issued subsequent to the Transition Date, the upper-medium grade discount rate used for interest accretion is locked in for the cohort and represents the original upper-medium grade discount rate at the issue date of the underlying contracts. The FPB for all cohorts is remeasured to a current upper-medium grade discount rate at each reporting date through other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”).
The Company generally interprets the upper-medium grade discount rate to be a rate comparable to that of a U.S. corporate single A rate that reflects the duration characteristics of the liability. The upper-medium grade discount rate is determined by using observable market data, including published upper-medium grade discount curves. In situations where market data for an upper-medium grade discount curve is not available (e.g., in certain foreign jurisdictions), spreads are applied to adjust the available observable market data to an upper-medium grade discount curve. The last liquid point on the upper-medium grade discount curve for each jurisdiction grades to an ultimate forward rate, which is derived using assumptions of economic growth, inflation, and a long-term upper-medium grade spread.
The table below summarizes the market data and spreads applied to determine the upper-medium grade discount rate for products issued in key jurisdictions that are included in the disaggregated rollforwards in Note 3.
Disaggregated rollforwards
Jurisdiction
Observable
base curve
Spread applied to derive upper-medium grade discount rate
U.S. Annuities, MetLife Holdings Long-term Care
United States
Single A curve
No spread applied as there is an observable single A base discount curve.
Asia - Whole and Term Life & Endowments,
Asia - Accident & Health
Japan
Japanese government bond yield
A spread is applied based on local corporate bonds whose credit is deemed to approximate single A bonds. The spread is based on weighted average bond yields up to 10 years and held flat for years 10 to 30.
Korea
Korean government bond yield
A spread is applied based on local corporate bonds whose credit is deemed to approximate single A bonds. The spread is based on weighted average bond yields up to five years and held flat for years five to 30.
Latin America Fixed Annuities
Chile
Chilean government bond yield
A blended spread is applied based on local corporate bonds whose credit is deemed to approximate single A bonds. The spread is based on weighted average bond yields up to 10 years and held flat for years 10 to 25.
Mexico
Mexican government bond yield
There are few public corporate bonds denominated in Mexican pesos with a credit rating higher than sovereign bonds. Therefore, a spread is applied based on local corporate bond yields to approximate a single A equivalent bond.
For limited-payment long-duration contracts, the collection of premiums does not represent the completion of the earnings process, therefore, any gross premiums received in excess of net premiums is deferred and amortized as a deferred profit liability (“DPL”). The DPL is presented within FPBs and is amortized in proportion to either the present value of expected benefit payments or insurance in-force of each cohort to ensure that profits are recognized over the life of the underlying policies in that cohort, regardless of when premiums are received. This amortization of the DPL is recorded through net income within policyholder benefits and claims. Consistent with the Company’s measurement of traditional long-duration products, management also recognizes a FPB reserve for limited-payment contracts that is representative of the difference between the present value of expected future benefit payments and the present value of expected future net premiums, subject to retrospective remeasurement through net income and OCI, as described above. The DPL is also subject to retrospective remeasurement through net income, however, it is not remeasured for changes in discount rates.
Traditional participating products
The Company establishes FPBs for traditional participating contracts in the U.S., which include whole and term life participating contracts in both the open and closed block using a net premium approach, similar to traditional non-participating contracts. However, for participating contracts, the discount rate and actuarial assumptions are locked in at inception, include a provision for adverse deviation, and all changes in the associated FPBs are reported within policyholder benefits and claims. See Note 8 for additional information on the closed block. For traditional participating contracts, the Company reviews its estimates of actuarial liabilities for future benefits and compares them with current best estimate assumptions. The Company revises estimates, to increase FPBs, if the Company determines that the liabilities previously established for future benefit payments less future expected net premiums in the aggregate for this line of business prove inadequate.
Additional Insurance Liabilities
Liabilities for universal, variable universal, and variable life policies with secondary guarantees (“ULSG”) and paid-up guarantees are determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits payable when the account balance is projected to be zero and recognizing those benefits ratably over the life of the contract based on total expected assessments. The additional insurance liabilities are updated retrospectively on a quarterly basis for actual experience and at least once a year for any changes in future cash flow assumptions. The assumptions used in estimating the secondary and paid-up guarantee liabilities are investment income, mortality, lapse, and premium payment pattern and persistency. The assumptions of investment performance and volatility for variable products are consistent with historical experience of appropriate underlying equity indices, such as the S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) 500 Index. The benefits used in calculating the liabilities are based on the average benefits payable over a range of scenarios.
The resulting remeasurement (gain) loss recorded through net income reflects the impact on the change in the ratio of benefits payable to total assessments over the life of the contract based on experience at end of the quarter applied to the cumulative assessments received as of the beginning of the quarter.
Subsequent to the Transition Date, for annuitization benefits, future benefits expected to be paid during the annuitization phase are discounted using an upper-medium grade discount rate to determine the excess benefit upon annuitization. The discount rate is not locked in for expected annuitization benefits, and is required to be updated quarterly, consistent with other components of the annuitization benefit cash flows. Changes in the discount rate applied to the future annuitization payments are reflected in net income.
Premium Deficiency Reserves on Short-Duration Contracts
Premium deficiency reserves may be established for short-duration contracts to provide for expected future losses and certain expenses that exceed unearned premiums. These reserves are based on actuarial estimates of the amount of loss inherent in that period, including losses incurred for which claims have not been reported. The provisions for unreported claims are calculated using studies that measure the historical length of time between the incurred date of a claim and its eventual reporting to the Company. Anticipated investment income is considered in the calculation of premium deficiency losses for short-duration contracts.
Policyholder Account Balances
Policyholder account balances (“PABs”) represents the amount held by the Company on behalf of the policyholder at each reporting date. This amount includes deposits received from the policyholder, interest credited to the policyholder’s account balance, net of charges assessed against the account balance and any policyholder withdrawals. This balance also includes liabilities for structured settlement and institutional income annuities, and certain other contracts, that do not contain significant insurance risk, as well as the estimated fair value of embedded derivatives associated with indexed annuity products.
Market Risk Benefits
As defined by LDTI, market risk benefits (“MRBs”) are contracts or contract features that guarantee benefits, such as guaranteed minimum benefits, in addition to an account balance, which expose insurance companies to other than nominal capital market risk (equity price, interest rate, and/or foreign currency exchange risk) and subsequently protect the contractholder from the same risk. These contracts and contract features were generally recorded as embedded derivatives or additional insurance liabilities prior to the Transition Date. Certain contracts may have multiple contract features or guarantees. In these cases, each feature is separately evaluated to determine whether it meets the definition of an MRB at contract inception. If a contract includes multiple benefits that meet the definition of an MRB, those benefits are aggregated and measured as a single compound MRB.
All identified MRBs are required to be measured at estimated fair value, whether the contract or contract feature represents a direct, assumed or ceded capital market risk. All MRBs in an asset position are aggregated and presented as an asset, and all MRBs in a liability position are aggregated and presented as a liability. Changes in the estimated fair value of MRBs are recognized in net income, except for the portion of the fair value change attributable to the change in nonperformance risk of the Company which is recorded as a separate component of OCI.
The Company generally uses an attributed fee approach to value MRBs, where the attributed fee is determined at contract inception by estimating the fair value of expected future benefits and the expected future fees. The attributed fee percentage is the portion of the expected future fees due from contractholders deemed necessary at contract inception to fund all future expected benefits. This typically results in a zero fair value for the MRB at inception. The estimated fair value of the expected future benefits is estimated using a stochastically-generated set of risk-neutral scenarios. Once calculated, the attributed fee percentage is fixed and does not change over the life of the contract. All fees due from contractholders (or payable to reinsurers in the case of ceded MRBs) in excess of the attributed fees are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees.
Other Policy-Related Balances
Other policy-related balances include policy and contract claims, premiums received in advance, unearned revenue (“UREV”) liabilities, obligations assumed under structured settlement assignments, policyholder dividends due and unpaid, policyholder dividends left on deposit and negative value of business acquired (“VOBA”).
The liability for policy and contract claims generally relates to incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) death, dental and vision claims. In addition, generally included in other policy-related balances are claims which have been reported but not yet settled for death, dental and vision. The liability for these claims is based on the Company’s estimated ultimate cost of settling all claims. The Company derives estimates for the development of IBNR claims principally from analyses of historical patterns of claims by business line. The methods used to determine these estimates are continually reviewed. Adjustments resulting from this continuous review process and differences between estimates and payments for claims are recognized in policyholder benefits and claims expense in the period in which the estimates are changed or payments are made.
The Company accounts for the prepayment of premiums on its individual life, group life and health contracts as premiums received in advance. These amounts are then recognized in premiums when due.
The UREV liability relates to universal life and investment-type products and represents policy charges for services to be provided in future periods. The charges are deferred as unearned revenue and amortized on a basis consistent with the methodologies and assumptions used for amortizing deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”) for the related contracts. Changes in the UREV liability for each period (representing deferrals less amortization) are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees.
See “— Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Intangibles” for a discussion of negative VOBA.
Recognition of Insurance Revenues and Deposits
Premiums related to whole and term life & endowment products, individual accident & health, disability, individual and group fixed annuities (including pension risk transfers, certain structured settlements, and certain income annuities), long-term care and participating products are recognized as revenues when due from policyholders. Policyholder benefits and expenses are provided to recognize profits over the estimated lives of the insurance policies. When premiums are due over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided, any excess profit is deferred as a DPL and recognized into earnings in a constant relationship to insurance in-force or, for annuities, the present value of expected future policy benefit payments.
Premiums related to short-duration non-medical health and disability, accident & health, and certain credit insurance contracts are recognized on a pro rata basis over the applicable contract term. Unearned premiums, representing the portion of premium written related to the unexpired coverage, are reflected as liabilities until earned.
Deposits related to universal life and investment-type products are credited to PABs. Revenues from such contracts consist of fees for mortality, policy administration and surrender charges and are recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees in the period in which services are provided. All fees due from contractholders (or payable to reinsurers in the case of ceded MRBs) in excess of the attributed fees on contracts with MRBs are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. Amounts that are charged to earnings include interest credited and benefit claims incurred in excess of related PABs.
All revenues and expenses are presented net of reinsurance, as applicable.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Intangibles
The Company incurs significant costs in connection with acquiring new and renewal insurance business. Costs that are related directly to the successful acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts are capitalized as DAC. Such costs include:
incremental direct costs of contract acquisition, such as commissions;
the portion of an employee’s total compensation and benefits related to time spent selling, underwriting or processing the issuance of new and renewal insurance business only with respect to actual policies acquired or renewed;
other essential direct costs that would not have been incurred had a policy not been acquired or renewed; and
the costs of direct-response advertising, the primary purpose of which is to elicit sales to customers who could be shown to have responded specifically to the advertising and that results in probable future benefits.
All other acquisition-related costs, including those related to general advertising and solicitation, market research, agent training, product development, unsuccessful sales and underwriting efforts, as well as all indirect costs, are expensed as incurred.
VOBA is an intangible asset resulting from a business combination that represents the excess of book value over the estimated fair value of acquired insurance, annuity, and investment-type contracts in-force at the acquisition date. The estimated fair value of the acquired liabilities is based on projections, by each block of business, of future policy and contract charges, premiums, mortality and morbidity, separate account performance, surrenders, operating expenses, investment returns, nonperformance risk adjustment and other factors. Actual experience with the purchased business may vary from these projections. VOBA is subject to periodic recoverability testing for traditional life and limited-payment contracts, as well as universal life type contracts.
Beginning on the Transition Date, DAC and VOBA for most long-duration products are amortized on a constant-level basis that approximates straight-line amortization on an individual contract basis. The DAC and VOBA related to U.S. annuities are amortized over expected benefit payments, and for all other long-duration products are generally amortized in proportion to policy count. For short-duration products, DAC and VOBA are amortized in proportion to actual and expected future earned premiums.
DAC and VOBA are aggregated on the financial statements for reporting purposes. See Note 7 for additional information on DAC and VOBA amortization. Amortization of DAC and VOBA is included in other expenses.
The Company generally has two different types of sales inducements which are included in other assets: (i) the policyholder receives a bonus whereby the policyholder’s initial account balance is increased by an amount equal to a specified percentage of the customer’s deposit; and (ii) the policyholder receives a higher interest rate using a dollar cost averaging method than would have been received based on the normal general account interest rate credited. The Company defers sales inducements and amortizes them over the life of the policy using the same methodologies and assumptions used to amortize DAC for the related contracts. The amortization of sales inducements is included in policyholder benefits and claims. Each year, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential recoverability issue exists, the Company reviews deferred sales inducements (“DSI”) to determine the recoverability of the asset. DSI assets were $128 million and $133 million at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.
Value of distribution agreements acquired (“VODA”) is reported in other assets and represents the present value of expected future profits associated with the expected future business derived from the distribution agreements acquired as part of a business combination. Value of customer relationships acquired (“VOCRA”) is also reported in other assets and represents the present value of the expected future profits associated with the expected future business acquired through existing customers of the acquired company or business. The VODA and VOCRA associated with past business combinations are amortized over the assets’ useful lives ranging from nine to 40 years and such amortization is included in other expenses. Each year, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible impairment exists, the Company reviews VODA and VOCRA to determine whether the asset is impaired.
For certain acquired blocks of business, the estimated fair value of the in-force contract obligations exceeded the book value of assumed in-force insurance policy liabilities, resulting in negative VOBA, which is presented separately from VOBA as an additional insurance liability included in other policy-related balances. The estimated fair value of the in-force contract obligations is based on projections by each block of business. Negative VOBA is amortized on a basis consistent with the methodologies and assumptions used for amortizing DAC for the related contracts. Such amortization is recorded as an offset in other expenses.
Reinsurance
For each of its reinsurance agreements, the Company determines whether the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Cessions under reinsurance agreements do not discharge the Company’s obligations as the primary insurer. The Company reviews all contractual features, including those that may limit the amount of insurance risk to which the reinsurer is subject or features that delay the timely reimbursement of claims.
The reinsurance recoverable for traditional non-participating and limited-payment contracts is generally measured using a net premium methodology to accrue the projected net gain or loss on reinsurance in proportion to the gross premiums of the underlying reinsured cohorts; and is updated retrospectively on a quarterly basis for actual experience and at least once a year for any changes in cash flow assumptions. The locked-in discount rate used to measure changes in the reinsurance recoverable recorded in net income was established at the Transition Date, or at the inception of the reinsurance coverage for new reinsurance agreements entered into subsequent to the Transition Date. The reinsurance recoverable is remeasured to an upper-medium grade discount rate through OCI at each reporting date, similar to the underlying reinsured contracts. The reinsurance recoverable for other long-duration contracts and associated contract features is measured using assumptions and methods generally consistent with the underlying direct policies, except that for reinsured MRBs, the entire change in fair value is recognized in net income each reporting period.
For reinsurance of existing in-force blocks of long-duration contracts that transfer significant insurance risk, the difference, if any, between the amounts paid (received), and the liabilities ceded (assumed) related to the underlying reinsured contracts is considered the net cost of reinsurance at the inception of the reinsurance agreement. The net cost of reinsurance is amortized on a basis consistent with the methodologies and assumptions used for amortizing DAC related to the underlying reinsured contracts. Subsequent amounts paid (received) on the reinsurance of in-force blocks, as well as amounts paid (received) related to new business, are recorded as ceded (assumed) premiums; and ceded (assumed) premiums, reinsurance and other receivables (future policy benefits) are established.
For prospective reinsurance of short-duration contracts that meet the criteria for reinsurance accounting, amounts paid (received) are recorded as ceded (assumed) premiums and ceded (assumed) unearned premiums. Ceded (assumed) unearned premiums are reflected as a component of premiums, reinsurance and other receivables (future policy benefits). Such amounts are amortized through earned premiums over the remaining contract period in proportion to the amount of insurance protection provided. For retroactive reinsurance of short-duration contracts that meet the criteria for reinsurance accounting, amounts paid (received) in excess of the related insurance liabilities ceded (assumed) are recognized immediately as a loss and are reported in the appropriate line item within the statement of operations. Any gain on such retroactive agreement is deferred and is amortized as part of DAC, primarily using the recovery method.
Amounts currently recoverable under reinsurance agreements are included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables and amounts currently payable are included in other liabilities. Assets and liabilities relating to reinsurance agreements with the same reinsurer may be recorded net on the balance sheet, if a right of offset exists within the reinsurance agreement. In the event that reinsurers do not meet their obligations to the Company under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable, reinsurance recoverable balances could become uncollectible. In such instances, reinsurance recoverable balances are stated net of allowances for uncollectible reinsurance, consistent with credit loss guidance which requires recording an allowance for credit loss (“ACL”).
Premiums, fees and policyholder benefits and claims include amounts assumed under reinsurance agreements and are net of reinsurance ceded. Amounts received from reinsurers for policy administration are reported in other expenses.
If the Company determines that a reinsurance agreement does not expose the reinsurer to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk, the Company records the agreement using the deposit method of accounting. Deposits received are included in other liabilities and deposits made are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. As amounts are paid or received, consistent with the underlying contracts, the deposit assets or liabilities are adjusted. Interest on such deposits is recorded as other revenues or other expenses, as appropriate. Periodically, the Company evaluates the adequacy of the expected payments or recoveries and adjusts the deposit asset or liability through other revenues or other expenses, as appropriate.
Derivatives
Freestanding Derivatives
Freestanding derivatives are carried on the Company’s balance sheet either as assets within other invested assets or as liabilities within other liabilities at estimated fair value. The Company does not offset the estimated fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting agreement.
Accruals on derivatives are generally recorded in accrued investment income or within other liabilities. However, accruals that are not scheduled to settle within one year are included with the derivative’s carrying value in other invested assets or other liabilities.
If a derivative is not designated as an accounting hedge or its use in managing risk does not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative are reported in net derivative gains (losses) except as follows:
Statement of Operations Presentation:
Derivative:
Net investment income
Economic hedges of equity method investments in joint ventures
Derivatives held within contractholder-directed investments supporting unit-linked variable annuity type liabilities (“Unit-linked investments”)
Economic hedges of fair value option securities (“FVO Securities”) which are linked to equity indices
Hedge Accounting
To qualify for hedge accounting, at the inception of the hedging relationship, the Company formally documents its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedging transaction, as well as its designation of the hedge. Hedge designation and financial statement presentation of changes in estimated fair value of the hedging derivatives are as follows:
Fair value hedge - a hedge of the estimated fair value of a recognized asset or liability - in the same line item as the earnings effect of the hedged item. The carrying value of the hedged recognized asset or liability is adjusted for changes in its estimated fair value due to the hedged risk.
Cash flow hedge - a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability - in OCI and reclassified into the statement of operations when the Company’s earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged item.
Net investment in a foreign operation (“NIFO”) hedge - in OCI, consistent with the translation adjustment for the hedged net investment in the foreign operation.
The changes in estimated fair values of the hedging derivatives are exclusive of any accruals that are separately reported on the statement of operations within interest income or interest expense to match the location of the hedged item. Accruals on derivatives in net investment hedges are recognized in OCI.
In its hedge documentation, the Company sets forth how the hedging instrument is expected to hedge the designated risks related to the hedged item and sets forth the method that will be used to retrospectively and prospectively assess the hedging instrument’s effectiveness. A derivative designated as a hedging instrument must be assessed as being highly effective in offsetting the designated risk of the hedged item. Hedge effectiveness is formally assessed at inception and at least quarterly throughout the life of the designated hedging relationship. Assessments of hedge effectiveness are also subject to interpretation and estimation and different interpretations or estimates may have a material effect on the amount reported in net income.
The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated fair value or cash flows of a hedged item; (ii) the derivative expires, is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur; or (iv) the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative is not highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated fair value or cash flows of a hedged item, the derivative continues to be carried on the balance sheet at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in net derivative gains (losses). The carrying value of the hedged recognized asset or liability under a fair value hedge is no longer adjusted for changes in its estimated fair value due to the hedged risk, and the cumulative adjustment to its carrying value is amortized into income over the remaining life of the hedged item. The changes in estimated fair value of derivatives related to discontinued cash flow hedges remain in OCI unless it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transactions will occur on the anticipated date or within two months of that date, the derivative continues to be carried on the balance sheet at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized currently in net derivative gains (losses). Deferred gains and losses of a derivative recorded in OCI pursuant to the discontinued cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction that is no longer probable of occurring are recognized immediately in net investment gains (losses).
In all other situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative is carried at its estimated fair value on the balance sheet, with changes in its estimated fair value recognized in the current period as net derivative gains (losses).
Embedded Derivatives
As discussed above, certain guarantees previously accounted for as embedded derivatives are accounted for as MRBs upon adoption of LDTI. The Company issues certain products and investment contracts and is a party to certain reinsurance agreements that have embedded derivatives. The Company assesses each identified embedded derivative to determine whether it is required to be bifurcated. The embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for as a freestanding derivative if:
the contract or contract feature does not meet the definition of a MRB (as a result of the adoption of LDTI);
the combined instrument is not accounted for in its entirety at estimated fair value with changes in estimated fair value recorded in earnings;
the terms of the embedded derivative are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract; and
a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would qualify as a derivative instrument.
Such embedded derivatives are carried on the balance sheet at estimated fair value with the host contract and changes in their estimated fair value are generally reported in net derivative gains (losses). If the Company is unable to properly identify and measure an embedded derivative for separation from its host contract, the entire contract is carried on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income. Additionally, the Company may elect to carry an entire contract on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income if that contract contains an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Changes to GAAP are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in the form of ASUs to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. The following tables provide a description of ASUs recently issued by the FASB and the impact of their adoption on the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Adoption of ASU 2018-12 - Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts
The Company adopted LDTI effective January 1, 2023 with a Transition Date of January 1, 2021. The standard required a full retrospective transition approach for MRBs, and allowed for a transition method election for FPBs and DAC, as well as other balances that have historically been amortized in a manner consistent with DAC. The Company has elected the modified retrospective transition approach for all FPBs, DAC, and related balances on all long-duration contracts, subject to the transition provisions. Additionally, an amendment in LDTI allowed entities to make an accounting policy election to exclude certain sold or disposed contracts or legal entities from application of the transition guidance. The Company did not make such an election.
Under the modified retrospective approach, the Company was required to establish LDTI-compliant FPBs, DAC and related balances for the Company’s Transition Date opening balance sheet by utilizing the Company’s December 31, 2020 balances with certain adjustments as described below.
The following table presents a summary of the Transition Date impacts associated with the implementation of LDTI to the consolidated balance sheet:
Premiums, Reinsurance and Other Receivables Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Value of Business AcquiredOther
Assets
Future Policy BenefitsPolicyholder Account BalancesOther Policy-related BalancesMarket Risk Benefit LiabilitiesDeferred Income Tax LiabilityRetained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In millions)
Balances as reported, December 31, 2020$17,870 $16,389 $11,685 $206,656 $205,176 $17,101 $— $11,008 $36,491 $18,072 
Reclassification of carrying amount of contracts and contract features that are market risk benefits(59)— — (1,818)(958)(72)2,789 — — — 
Adjustments for the difference between previous carrying amount and fair value measurement for market risk benefits(12)— — — — — 5,112 (1,079)(4,121)76 
Removal of related amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income— 4,007 42 (7,911)— 1,043 — 2,405 — 8,512 
Adjustment of future policy benefits to remeasure cohorts where net premiums exceed gross premiums under the modified retrospective approach32 — — 719 — — — (160)(527)— 
Effect of remeasurement of future policy benefits to an upper-medium grade discount rate351 — — 34,119 — — — (7,438)— (26,330)
Adjustments for the cumulative effect of adoption on additional insurance assets and liabilities19 — — 83 — — — (13)(42)(9)
Other balance sheet reclassifications and adjustments upon adoption of the LDTI standard(32)21 15 (7,490)7,519 (40)— — 23 (6)
Balances as adjusted, January 1, 2021$18,169 $20,417 $11,742 $224,358 $211,737 $18,032 $7,901 $4,723 $31,824 $315 
The Transition Date impacts associated with the implementation of LDTI were applied as follows:
Market Risk Benefits (See Note 5)
The full retrospective transition approach for MRBs required assessing products to determine whether contract or contract features expose the Company to other than nominal capital market risk. The population of MRBs identified was then reviewed to determine the historical measurement model prior to adoption of LDTI. If the MRB was a bifurcated embedded derivative prior to the adoption of LDTI, the existing measurement approach was retained, except that the fair value of the MRB at inception was recalculated to isolate the contract issue date nonperformance risk of the Company.
If, prior to the adoption of LDTI, the MRB was partially a bifurcated embedded derivative (e.g., a contract with multiple features where one was a bifurcated embedded derivative and one was an additional insurance liability), or was accounted for under a different model, the at-inception attributed fee ratio was calculated for every identified MRB, and using the at inception attributed fee ratio, the fair value of the MRB at the contract issue date was calculated to isolate the contract issue date nonperformance risk of the Company.
At the Transition Date, the impacts to the financial statements of the full retrospective approach for MRBs include the following:
The amounts previously recorded for these contracts within additional insurance liabilities, embedded derivatives, and other insurance liabilities were reclassified to MRB liabilities;
The difference between the fair value of the MRBs and the previously recorded carrying value at the Transition Date, excluding the cumulative effect of changes in nonperformance risk of the Company, was recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings;
The cumulative effect of changes in nonperformance risk between the contract issue date and the Transition Date was recorded as an adjustment to opening accumulated OCI (“AOCI”) as of the Transition Date; and
Corresponding reinsured MRB balances were established at the Transition Date, with changes in counterparty credit risk recorded in opening retained earnings as of the Transition Date and are classified within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.
Future Policy Benefits (See Note 3)
Traditional Non-participating Long-duration products
Loss recognition balances related to unrealized investment gains associated with certain long-duration products previously recorded in AOCI were removed;
Contracts in-force as of the Transition Date were grouped into cohorts; a revised NPR was calculated for each cohort using the existing Transition Date balance, best estimate cash flow assumptions without a provision for adverse deviation, and the historical discount rates used for the contracts within the cohort prior to the adoption of LDTI (the “locked-in” discount rate). For any cohorts where the net premiums exceeded gross premiums (NPR exceeded 100%), the FPB was increased for the excess of net premiums over gross premiums, with a corresponding adjustment recorded to opening retained earnings as of the Transition Date;
The difference between the FPB balance calculated at the current upper-medium grade discount rate and the FPB balance calculated at the locked-in discount rate was recorded as an adjustment to opening AOCI as of the Transition Date; and
Corresponding adjustments were made to ceded reinsurance balances.
Limited-payment Long-duration products
Limited-payment long-duration products transition to LDTI follows a similar approach to traditional non-participating products, except that these product cohorts may have a DPL which is adjusted at the Transition Date. If an increase to FPB depleted the DPL, the remaining adjustment was recorded to opening retained earnings as of the Transition Date.
Additional insurance liabilities
The contracts and contract features that met the definition of a MRB were reclassified;
The impact of updating assessments used in the calculation of the additional insurance liabilities to reflect the constant margin amortization basis for UREV liabilities was recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings and AOCI; and
Corresponding adjustments were made to ceded reinsurance balances.
DAC and other balances to be amortized in a manner consistent with DAC (VOBA, DSI and UREV) (See Note 7 for information on DAC, VOBA and UREV)
The opening balances of these accounts were adjusted for removal of the related amounts in AOCI, as these balances are no longer amortized using expected future gross premiums, margins, profits or earned premiums.
Other balance sheet reclassifications and adjustments at LDTI adoption (See Notes 3, 4 and 7)
Individual income annuities reclassification
Prior to the Transition Date, the Company classified all structured settlement and institutional income annuity products within FPBs. While the pre-LDTI GAAP reserving model was the same for these products, upon transition to LDTI, the reserving model for a subset of these products changed, requiring the Company to reclassify $7.4 billion of FPBs to PABs at the Transition Date.
Other reclassifications and adjustments
Other minor reclassifications and adjustments were made to conform to LDTI presentation requirements.
The following table presents the effects of the retrospective application of the adoption of the new LDTI accounting guidance to the Company’s previously reported consolidated balance sheet:
December 31, 2022
As Previously
Reported
Adoption
Adjustment
Post
Adoption
(In millions)
Assets
Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables$17,461 $(97)$17,364 
Market risk benefits$— $280 $280 
Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired$22,983 $(3,330)$19,653 
Deferred income tax asset$2,830 $(391)$2,439 
Other assets$11,026 $(1)$11,025 
Total assets$666,611 $(3,539)$663,072 
Liabilities
Future policy benefits$204,228 $(17,006)$187,222 
Policyholder account balances$203,082 $7,515 $210,597 
Market risk benefits$— $3,763 $3,763 
Other policy-related balances$19,651 $(1,227)$18,424 
Deferred income tax liability$325 $625 $950 
Other liabilities$25,980 $(47)$25,933 
Total liabilities$639,324 $(6,377)$632,947 
Equity
Retained earnings$41,953 $(1,621)$40,332 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)$(27,083)$4,462 $(22,621)
Total MetLife, Inc.'s stockholders' equity$27,040 $2,841 $29,881 
Noncontrolling interests$247 $(3)$244 
Total equity$27,287 $2,838 $30,125 
Total liabilities and equity$666,611 $(3,539)$663,072 
The following table presents the effects of the retrospective application of the adoption of the new LDTI accounting guidance to the Company’s previously reported interim condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
As
Previously
Reported
Adoption
Adjustment
Post
Adoption
As
Previously
Reported
Adoption
Adjustment
Post
Adoption
(In millions)
Revenues
Premiums$11,721 $(165)$11,556 $22,492 $(319)$22,173 
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees$1,516 $(144)$1,372 $2,934 $(250)$2,684 
Other revenues$616 $(1)$615 $1,276 $(1)$1,275 
Net investment gains (losses)$(685)$$(682)$(1,203)$$(1,199)
Net derivative gains (losses)$(1,195)$225 $(970)$(2,054)$133 $(1,921)
Total revenues$15,556 $(82)$15,474 $31,312 $(433)$30,879 
Expenses
Policyholder benefits and claims$11,790 $(175)$11,615 $22,983 $(194)$22,789 
Policyholder liability remeasurement (gains) losses$— $(1)$(1)$— $(42)$(42)
Market risk benefits remeasurement (gains) losses$— $(757)$(757)$— $(2,197)$(2,197)
Interest credited to policyholder account balances$492 $35 $527 $1,122 $31 $1,153 
Policyholder dividends$193 $$194 $391 $$393 
Other expenses$3,083 $(175)$2,908 $6,103 $(243)$5,860 
Total expenses$15,558 $(1,072)$14,486 $30,599 $(2,643)$27,956 
Income (loss) before provision for income tax$(2)$990 $988 $713 $2,210 $2,923 
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)$(140)$213 $73 $(99)$468 $369 
Net income (loss)$138 $777 $915 $812 $1,742 $2,554 
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests$$(1)$$11 $(1)$10 
Net income (loss) attributable to MetLife, Inc.$132 $778 $910 $801 $1,743 $2,544 
Net income (loss) available to MetLife, Inc.'s common shareholders$103 $778 $881 $709 $1,743 $2,452 
Comprehensive income (loss)
$(15,323)$8,175 $(7,148)$(27,482)$14,378 $(13,104)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of income tax$$(1)$$$(1)$
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to MetLife, Inc.$(15,328)$8,176 $(7,152)$(27,490)$14,379 $(13,111)
Net income (loss) available to MetLife, Inc.'s common shareholders per common share:
Basic$0.13 $0.96 $1.09 $0.87 $2.13 $3.00 
Diluted$0.13 $0.95 $1.08 $0.86 $2.12 $2.98 
The following table presents the effects of the retrospective application of the adoption of the new LDTI accounting guidance to the Company’s previously reported interim condensed consolidated statements of equity:
As Previously
Reported
Adoption
Adjustment
Post
Adoption
(In millions)
Retained Earnings
Balance at December 31, 2021$41,197 $(4,366)$36,831 
Net income (loss)$669 $965 $1,634 
Balance at March 31, 2022$41,406 $(3,401)$38,005 
Net income (loss)$132 $778 $910 
Balance at June 30, 2022$41,101 $(2,623)$38,478 
Balance at December 31, 2022$41,953 $(1,621)$40,332 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2021$10,919 $(13,370)$(2,451)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax$(12,831)$5,238 $(7,593)
Balance at March 31, 2022$(1,912)$(8,132)$(10,044)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax$(15,460)$7,398 $(8,062)
Balance at June 30, 2022$(17,372)$(734)$(18,106)
Balance at December 31, 2022$(27,083)$4,462 $(22,621)
Total MetLife, Inc.’s Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2021$67,482 $(17,736)$49,746 
Balance at March 31, 2022$53,965 $(11,533)$42,432 
Balance at June 30, 2022$37,101 $(3,357)$33,744 
Balance at December 31, 2022$27,040 $2,841 $29,881 
Noncontrolling Interests
Balance at December 31, 2021$267 $— $267 
Change in equity of noncontrolling interests$$(1)$
Net income (loss)$$— $
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax$(2)$— $(2)
Balance at March 31, 2022$272 $(1)$271 
Change in equity of noncontrolling interests$(11)$$(10)
Net income (loss)$$(1)$
Balance at June 30, 2022$266 $(1)$265 
Balance at December 31, 2022$247 $(3)$244 
Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2021$67,749 $(17,736)$50,013 
Balance at March 31, 2022$54,237 $(11,534)$42,703 
Balance at June 30, 2022$37,367 $(3,358)$34,009 
Balance at December 31, 2022$27,287 $2,838 $30,125 
The following table presents the effects of the retrospective application of the adoption of the new LDTI accounting guidance to the Company’s previously reported interim condensed consolidated statement of cash flows:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
As Previously
 Reported
Adoption
Adjustment
Post
Adoption
(In millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$6,392 $41 $6,433 
Cash flows from financing activities
Policyholder account balances - deposits$56,109 $277 $56,386 
Policyholder account balances - withdrawals$(52,428)$(318)$(52,746)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities$(7,182)$(41)$(7,223)
Other Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
The table below describes the impacts of the other ASUs adopted by the Company.
StandardDescriptionEffective Date and
Method of Adoption
Impact on Financial Statements
ASU 2022-02, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses
(Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures

The amendments in the new ASU eliminate the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings by creditors that have adopted the current expected credit loss guidance while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. In addition, the amendments require that a public business entity disclose current-period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investment in leases.January 1, 2023, the Company adopted, using a prospective approach.The adoption of the new guidance has reduced the complexity involved with evaluating and accounting for certain loan modifications. The Company has included the required disclosures within its interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting; as clarified and amended by ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope; as amended by ASU 2022-06, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)—Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848
The guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, with certain exceptions. ASU 2021-01 amends the scope of the recent reference rate reform guidance. New optional expedients allow derivative instruments impacted by changes in the interest rate used for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment to qualify for certain optional relief. The amendments in ASU 2022-06 extend the sunset date of the reference rate reform optional expedients and exceptions to December 31, 2024.
Effective for contract modifications made between March 12, 2020 and December 31, 2024.
The guidance has reduced the operational and financial impacts of contract modifications that replace a reference rate, such as London Interbank Offered Rate, affected by reference rate reform.

Contract modifications to replace reference rates affected by the reform occurred during 2021, and 2022 and have continued into 2023. Based on actions taken to date, the adoption of the guidance has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material ongoing impact on its interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Future Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements
ASUs not listed below were assessed and either determined to be not applicable or are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures. ASUs issued but not yet adopted as of June 30, 2023 that are currently being assessed and may or may not have a material impact on the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures are summarized in the table below.
StandardDescriptionEffective Date and
Method of Adoption
Impact on Financial Statements
ASU 2023-02, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures
(Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method

The amendments in this update permit reporting entities to elect to account for their tax equity investments, regardless of the tax credit program from which the income tax credits are received, using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. In addition, disclosures describing the nature of the investments and related income tax credits and benefits will be required.January 1, 2024, to be applied on either a modified retrospective or a retrospective basis subject to certain exceptions (with early adoption permitted).The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the guidance on its interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2022-03, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to
Contractual Sale Restrictions
The amendments in this update clarify that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. In addition, the amendments clarify that an entity cannot, as a separate unit of account, recognize and measure a contractual sale restriction. The amendments also require entities that hold equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions to make disclosures about the fair value of such equity securities, the nature and remaining duration of the restriction(s) and the circumstances that could cause a lapse in the restriction(s).
January 1, 2024, to be applied prospectively with any adjustments from the adoption of the amendments
recognized in earnings and disclosed on the date of adoption (with early adoption permitted).
The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the guidance, and it does not expect the adoption of the guidance to have a material impact on its interim condensed consolidated financial statements.