XML 22 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.1
Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Notes to Financial Statements  
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
Note
1.
   Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company"), a Connecticut corporation, is a bank holding company that was organized in
1999.
Patriot Bank, N.A. (the "Bank") (collectively, “Patriot”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Bank is a nationally chartered commercial bank whose deposits are insured under the Bank Insurance Fund, which is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Bank provides a full range of banking services to commercial and consumer customers through its main office in Stamford, Connecticut,
seven
branch offices in Connecticut and
two
branch offices in New York. The Bank's customers are concentrated in Fairfield and New Haven Counties in Connecticut and Westchester County in New York.
 
On
March 11, 2003,
the Company formed Patriot National Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and investing the proceeds in subordinated debentures issued by the Company, and on
March 26, 2003,
the
first
series of trust preferred securities were issued. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), the Trust is
not
included in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
 
On
May 10, 2018,
the Bank completed its acquisition of Prime Bank, a Connecticut bank headquartered in Orange, CT (“Prime Bank”). The closing of the transaction added a new Patriot branch located in the Town of Orange, New Haven County, Connecticut. The results of Prime Bank's operations are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
 
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and to disclose contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management has identified accounting for the allowance for loan and lease losses, the analysis and valuation of its investment securities, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the impairment of goodwill, the valuation of derivatives, and the valuation of servicing assets as certain of Patriot's more significant accounting policies and estimates, in that they are critical to the presentation of Patriot's financial condition and results of operations. As they concern matters that are inherently uncertain, these estimates require management to make subjective and complex judgments in the preparation of Patriot's consolidated financial statements.
 
COVID-
19
Impact:
 
In
March 2020,
the World Health Organization declared novel coronavirus disease
2019
("COVID-
19"
) as a global pandemic. The COVID-
19
pandemic has negatively impacted the global and U.S. economies. Many businesses in the U.S., including those in the markets we serve, were required to close, causing a significant increase in unemployment and loss of revenue.
 
The consolidated financial statements reflect estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, including the amount of the allowance for loan losses. The assumptions and estimates used in the financial statements were impacted by the COVID-
19
pandemic. The COVID-
19
pandemic did have an adverse impact on our earnings and resulted in an increase to the allowance for loan losses when compared to the same period in
2019.
 
We are unable to estimate the full impact of COVID-
19
on our business and operations at this time. The extent of such impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, including when COVID-
19
can be controlled and abated and when and how the economy
may
be reopened. The pandemic could cause us to experience higher credit losses in our loan portfolio, impairment of our goodwill, reduced demand for our products and services, or other negative impacts on our financial position, results of operations, and prospects.
 
On
March 27, 2020,
the President of the United States signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act in response to the coronavirus pandemic. This legislation aims at providing relief for individuals and businesses that have been negatively impacted by the coronavirus pandemic.
 
The Fed has taken, and continues to take, steps to support markets and the economy. Stimulus from Washington and the federal government, in spite of political hurdles and a change in presidential administrations, has also provided meaningful support. The new Biden administration has proposed another
$1.9
trillion stimulus package that is currently making its way through Congress. The market expects the Fed Funds rate to remain at the effective lower bound near
zero
for an extended period of time. Henceforth, the Fed appears to be willing to let inflation run above the
2%
target level, even when unemployment is very low, before removing accommodation.
 
The CARES Act includes a provision for the Company to opt out of applying the “troubled-debt restructuring” (“TDR”) accounting guidance in ASC
310
-
40
for certain loan modifications. Loan modifications made between
March 1, 2020
and the earlier of i)
December 30, 2020
or ii)
60
days after the President declares a termination of the COVID-
19
national emergency are eligible for this relief if the related loans were
not
more than
30
days past due as of
December 31, 2019.
The Company has assessed which loans qualify for this treatment. The CARES Act also permits the Bank to continue to accrue interest on loans that have received deferral treatment as a result of the pandemic. In addition, on
April 7, 2020,
a group of banking regulatory agencies issued a revised interagency statement that offers practical expedients for evaluating whether COVID-
19
loan modifications are TDRs.
 
On
August 3, 2020,
the Federal Financial Institutions Council issued a joint statement, encouraging financial institutions to consider prudent accommodation options to mitigate losses for the borrower and financial institution beyond the initial accommodation period. The joint statement specifically encourages financial institutions to provide consumers with available options for repaying missed payments at the end of their accommodation to avoid delinquencies, as well as options for changes to terms to support sustainable and affordable payments for the long term. These considerations should also include prudent risk management practices at the financial institution based on the credit risk of the borrower. Patriot is actively working with its customers to address any further accommodation needs while carefully evaluating the associated credit risk of the borrowers.
 
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
 
Principles of consolidation and basis of financial statement presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Patriot, and the Bank's wholly owned subsidiaries, PinPat Acquisition Corporation and have been prepared in conformity with US GAAP. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
 
Cash and cash equivalents
Patriot considers all short-term, highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of
three
months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, and short-term investments are recognized as cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
Patriot maintains amounts due from banks which, at times,
may
exceed federally insured limits. Patriot has
not
experienced any losses from such concentrations.
 
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
The Bank is required to maintain an investment in capital stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLB-B”), as collateral, in an amount equal to a percentage of its outstanding mortgage loans and loans secured by residential properties, including mortgage-backed securities. Additionally, the Bank is required to maintain an investment in the capital stock of the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”), as collateral, in an amount equal to
one
percent of
six
percent of the Bank's total equity capital as per its latest Report of Condition (“Call Report”) filed with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The FRB requires that
one
-half of the investment in its stock be funded currently, with the remaining amount subject to call when deemed necessary by the FRB Board of Governors.
 
Shares in the FHLB-B and FRB are purchased and redeemed based upon their
$100
par value. The stocks are non-marketable equity securities, and as such, are considered restricted securities that are carried at cost, and evaluated for impairment in accordance with relevant accounting guidance. In accordance with this guidance, the stocks' values are determined by the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines. The determination of whether the par value will ultimately be recovered is influenced by criteria such as: (a) the significance of any decline in net assets of the FHLB-B or FRB, as applicable, compared to its capital stock amount, and the length of time this situation has persisted; (b) commitments by either the FHLB-B or FRB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to their operating performance; (c) the potential impact of any legislative or regulatory changes; and (d) the regulatory capital ratios and liquidity position of the FHLB-B or FRB, as applicable.
 
Included in the Bank's investment portfolio are shares in the FHLB-B and FRB of
$7.3
 million and
$7.4
 million as of
December 
31,
 
2020
and
2019,
respectively. Management has evaluated its investment in the capital stock of the FHLB-B and FRB for impairment, based on the aforementioned criteria, and has determined that as of
December 
31,
 
2020
and
2019
there is
no
impairment of its investment in either the FHLB-B or FRB.
 
Investment Securities
Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the date individual investment securities are acquired, and the appropriateness of such classification is reassessed at each balance sheet date.
 
Debt securities, if any, that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as “held to maturity” and are recorded at amortized cost. “Trading” securities, if any, are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings. Securities classified as “available-for-sale” are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method of accounting, in order to achieve a constant effective yield over the contractual term of the securities.
 
Patriot conducts a quarterly review and evaluation of the securities portfolio to determine if a decline in the fair value of any security below its cost basis is an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). Our evaluation of OTTI considers the duration and severity of the impairment, our intent to hold the securities, whether or
not
we will be required to sell the securities, and our assessments of the reason for the decline in value and the likelihood of a near-term recovery. If such decline is deemed to be an OTTI, the security is written down to its fair value, which becomes its new cost basis, and the resulting loss is charged to earnings as a component of non-interest income. Other than the credit loss portion, OTTI on a debt security that we have the intent and ability to hold until recovery of its amortized cost is recognized in other comprehensive income/loss, net of applicable taxes. The credit loss portion of OTTI (i.e., any losses resulting from an inability to collect on the instrument) is charged against earnings.
 
Securities transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined using the specific identification method, recorded on the trade date, and reported in non-interest income for the period.
 
At
December 
31,
 
2020
and
2019,
the Bank's investment portfolio includes a
$4.5
million investment in the Solomon Hess SBA Loan Fund (“SBA Fund”). The Bank uses this investment to satisfy its Community Reinvestment Act lending requirements. At
December 
31,
 
2020
and
2019,
the investment in the SBA Fund is reported in the consolidated balance sheets at cost, which management believes approximates fair value.
 
Loans receivable
Loans that Patriot has the intent and ability to hold until maturity or for the foreseeable future generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for unearned income, an allowance for loan and lease losses, if any, and any unamortized discount, premium and deferred fees.
 
Interest income is accrued based on unpaid principal balances. Loan application fees are reported as non-interest income, while other certain direct origination costs, or for purchased loans, any discounts or premiums are deferred and amortized to interest income as a level yield adjustment over the respective term of the loan.
 
Loans are placed on non-accrual status or charged off when collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued
no
later than when the loan is
90
days past due for payment, unless the loan is well secured and in process of collection. Consumer installment loans are typically charged off
no
later than when they become
180
days past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan.
 
Accrued uncollected interest income on loans that are placed on non-accrual status or have been charged off is reversed against interest income. Interest income on such non-performing loans is accounted for on the cash-basis of accounting until qualifying for return to accrual status. Any cash received on non-accrual or charged off loans is
first
applied against unpaid and past-due principal and then to interest, unless the loan is in a cure period. If in a cure period, and management believes there will be a loss, cash receipts are applied to principal until the balance at risk and collateral value, if any, is equal to the amount management believes will ultimately be collected. Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis method until qualifying for return to accrual status.
 
Patriot's real estate loans are collateralized by real estate located principally in Fairfield and New Haven Counties in Connecticut and Westchester County, New York. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of Patriot's loan portfolio is susceptible to regional real estate market conditions.
 
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that Patriot will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due, according to the loan's contractual terms. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and shortfalls generally are
not
classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the circumstances contributing to the borrower's loan performance issues, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment history, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. For commercial and real estate loans, impairment is measured for each individual loan based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the loan's obtainable market price, or, for collateral dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral less applicable selling costs.
 
Impaired loans also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”), where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment or maturity date extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. TDRs are generally placed on non-accrual status until the loan qualifies for return to accrual status. Loans qualify for return to accrual status once they have demonstrated compliance with the restructured terms of the loan agreement and have performed for a minimum of
six
months.
 
Lower balance lending arrangements, such as consumer installment loans, are evaluated for impairment by pooling the loans into homogenous groupings. Accordingly, Patriot does
not
separately identify individual consumer installment loans for impairment, unless such loans are individually evaluated for impairment due to financial difficulties of the borrower.
 
Acquired Loans
Acquired loans are initially recorded at their acquisition date fair values. The carryover of allowance for loan and lease losses is prohibited as any credit losses in the acquired loans are included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. Fair values for acquired loans are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that involves assumptions and judgments as to credit risk, prepayment risk, liquidity risk, default rates, loss severity, payment speeds, collateral values and discount rate.
 
Acquired Impaired Loans- Purchase Credit Impaired “PCI” Loans
Acquired loans that exhibit evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination and for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments are accounted for as PCI loans under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
310
-
30.
The excess of undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable discount and is accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the loans using the interest method. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the non-accretable discount. The non-accretable discount represents estimated future credit losses and other contractually required payments that the Company does
not
expect to collect. Subsequent decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairments through a charge to the provision for loan losses resulting in an increase in the allowance for loan and lease losses. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows result in a recovery of previously recorded allowance for loan and lease losses or a reversal of a corresponding amount of the non-accretable discount, which the Company then reclassifies as an accretable discount that is accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the loans using the interest method.
 
PCI loans are initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, the associated allowance for credit losses related to these loans is
not
carried over at the acquisition date.
 
Acquired loans that met the criteria for non-accrual of interest prior to acquisition were
not
considered performing upon acquisition. When the customers resume payments, to make the nonaccrual loans current, the loans
may
return to accrual status, including the impact of any accretable discounts, if the Company can reasonably estimate the timing and amount of the expected cash flows on such loans and if the Company expects to fully collect the new carrying value of the loans.
 
Acquired Non-impaired Loans
Acquired loans that do
not
meet the requirements under ASC
310
-
30
are considered acquired non-impaired loans. The difference between the acquisition date fair value and the outstanding balance represents the fair value adjustment for a loan and includes both credit and interest rate considerations. Fair value adjustments
may
be discounts (or premiums) to a loan's cost basis and are accreted (or amortized) to net interest income (or expense) over the loan's remaining life in accordance with ASC
310
-
20.
Fair value adjustments for revolving loans are accreted (or amortized) using a straight-line method. Term loans are accreted (or amortized) using the constant effective yield method.
 
Subsequent to the purchase date, the methods used to estimate the allowance for loan and lease losses for the acquired non-impaired loans are consistent with the policy for allowance for loan and lease losses described below.
 
Allowance for loan and lease losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) is regularly evaluated by management, based upon the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, periodic review of loan collectability using historical experience rates, adverse situations potentially affecting individual borrowers' ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions on overall segments of the loan portfolio. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
 
The non-specific ALLL by loan segment is calculated using a systematic methodology, consisting of a quantitative and qualitative analytical component, applied on a quarterly basis to homogeneous loans. The model is comprised of
six
distinct loan portfolio segments: Commercial Real Estate, Residential Real Estate, Commercial and Industrial, Consumer and Other, Construction, and Construction to Permanent – Commercial Real Estate (“Construction to permanent – CRE”). Management monitors a distinct set of risk characteristics for each loan segment. Additionally, management assesses and monitors risk and performance on a disaggregated basis, including an internal risk rating system for loans included in the Commercial loan segment and analyzing the type of collateral, lien position, and loan-to-value (i.e., LTV) ratio for loans included in the Consumer loan segment.
 
Management's ALLL process
first
applies historical loss rates to pools of loans with homogeneous risk characteristics. Loss rates are calculated by historical charge-off rates that have occurred within each pool of homogenous loans over its loss emergence period (“LEP”). The LEP is an estimate of the average amount of time from the point at which a loan loss is incurred to the point in time at which the loan loss is confirmed. In general, the LEP will be shorter in an economic slowdown or recession and longer during times of economic stability or growth, when adverse conditions are
not
generally applicable across a class of borrowers and individual customers are better able to manage deteriorating conditions.
 
Another key assumption is the look-back period (“LBP”), which represents the historical data period utilized to calculate loss rates. A
three
-year LBP is used for each loan segment, in order to capture relevant historical data believed to reflect losses inherent in the loan segment portfolios.
 
After considering the historic loss calculations, management applies additional qualitative adjustments to the ALLL to reflect the inherent risk of loss that exists in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. Qualitative adjustments are made based upon changes in economic conditions, loan portfolio and asset quality data, and credit process changes, such as credit policies or underwriting standards. Evaluation of the ALLL requires considerable judgment, in order to adequately estimate and provide for the risk of loss inherent in the loan portfolio segments.
 
Qualitative adjustments are aggregated into the
eleven
categories described in the Interagency Policy Statement (“Interagency Statement”) issued by the bank regulators. Within the statement, the following qualitative factors are considered:
 
 
Changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards, collection, charge-off, and recovery practices
not
considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses;
 
Changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the condition of various market segments;
 
Changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio and terms of loans;
 
Changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff;
 
Changes in the volume and loss severity of past due loans, the volume of non-accrual loans, and the volume and loss severity of adversely classified or graded loans;
 
Changes in the quality of the loan review system;
 
Changes in the value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans;
 
The existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations;
 
The effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in our current loan portfolio;
 
An additional risk factor for special mention loans and substandard loans, which is designed to approximate the additional risk of these assets and is based on industry data; and
 
An additional risk factor related to COVID-
19
pandemic, which is designed to absorb probable incurred loan losses that are negatively affected by the COVID-
19
pandemic. This factor is derived from an analysis of total loans currently deferred under the COVID-
19
deferral policies and their related collateral position.
 
Patriot provides for loan losses by consistently applying the documented ALLL methodology. Loan losses are charged to the allowance as incurred and recoveries are credited to the ALLL. Additions to the ALLL are charged against income, based on various factors which, in management's judgment, deserve current recognition in estimating probable losses. Loan losses are charged-off in the period the loans, or portions thereof, are deemed uncollectible. Generally, Patriot will record a loan charge-off (including a partial charge-off) to reduce a loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less costs to sell, for collateral dependent loans. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ALLL. Patriot regularly reviews the loan portfolio and makes adjustments for loan losses, in order to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses in accordance with US GAAP.
 
The allowance for loan and lease losses consists primarily of the following
three
components:
 
 
(
1
)
Allowances are established for impaired loans (generally defined by Patriot as non-accrual loans and troubled debt restructured loans). The amount of impairment provided as an allowance is represented by the deficiency, if any, between the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original effective interest rate or the underlying collateral value, less estimated costs to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent, and the carrying value of the loan. Impaired loans that have
no
discounted cash flow or collateral deficiency, if applicable, are
not
considered for general valuation allowances described below.
 
 
(
2
)
General allowances are established for loan losses on a portfolio basis for loans that do
not
meet the definition of impaired. The portfolio is grouped into homogeneous risk characteristics, primarily loan type and, if collateral dependent, LTV ratio. Management applies an estimated loss rate to each pool of homogeneous loans. The loss rates applied are based on Patriot's
three
-year loss LBP adjusted, as appropriate, for the factors discussed above. The evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that
may
be susceptible to significant revision based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan losses
may
be more or less than the ALLL management established which could have an effect on Patriot's financial results.
 
In addition, a risk rating system is utilized to evaluate the general component of the ALLL. Under this system, management assigns risk ratings between
one
and eleven. Risk ratings are assigned based upon the recommendation of the credit analyst and the originating loan officer. The risk ratings are reviewed and confirmed by the management loan committee of the Board of Directors (the “Loan Committee”). Risk ratings are established at the initiation of transactions and are reviewed and changed, when necessary, during the life of the loan. Loans assigned a risk rating of
six
or above are monitored more closely by the credit administration officers and the Loan Committee.
 
 
(
3
)
An unallocated component of the ALLL is considered when necessary to cover uncertainties that could affect management's estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the ALLL reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies applied to estimating specific and general losses in the loan portfolio.
 
In underwriting a loan secured by real property, a property appraisal is required to be performed by an independent licensed appraiser that has been approved by Patriot's Board of Directors. Appraisals are subject to review by independent
third
parties hired by Patriot. All appraisals are reviewed by qualified independent parties to the firm preparing the appraisals. Generally, management obtains updated appraisals when a loan is deemed impaired. These appraisals
may
be more limited than those prepared for the underwriting of a new loan. Additionally, Management reviews and inspects properties before disbursing funds, during the term of a construction loan.
 
The Bank further segmented its loan pools by Pass, Special Mention, and Substandard risk ratings and assigned additional risk premiums to each group. The qualitative and economic factors for all of the pools and subsegments were also evaluated, with Pass loans receiving adjustments to reflect their credit profile relative to the non-impaired criticized assets.  These adjustments generally flow through the qualitative factors addressing severity of past due loans and other similar conditions and the nature and volume of the portfolio and terms of the loans.
 
The Bank's leveraged lending portfolio was evaluated relative to the rest of the Commercial & Industrial (“C&I”) pool, and an additional risk premium was assigned to those loans in aggregate, and is reflected in the commercial and industrial category in the ALLL calculation. These loans were isolated due their risk parameters and profile, including higher leverage than the rest of the Bank's C&I portfolio.
 
The Bank's SBA loan portfolio consists of the unguaranteed portion of certain C&I and Owner-Occupied CRE loans. An additional risk premium was assigned to those loans due to their risk parameters and profile, including higher historical loss rates (based on historical SBA data) than the rest of the C&I and Owner-Occupied CRE portfolio.
 
In
2020,
the Company changed its methodology to estimate its allowance for loan losses. Management has added a qualitative risk factor adjustment related to COVID-
19
pandemic to absorb probable incurred loan losses that are inherent in the pooled loans portfolio.
 
The change in methodology resulted in better alignment of the credit characteristics of the various risk grades and loan types with the calculated allowance. The provision of
$2.2
million in
2020
incorporated these changes.
 
Acquired loans are marked to fair value on the date of acquisition and are evaluated on a quarterly basis to ensure the necessary purchase accounting updates are made in parallel with the allowance for loan loss calculation. Acquired loans that have been renewed since acquisition are included in the allowance for loan loss calculation since these loans have been underwritten to the Bank's guidelines. Acquired loans that have
not
been renewed since acquisition, or that have a PCI mark, are excluded from the allowance for loan loss calculation.
 
While Patriot uses the best information available to evaluate the ALLL, future adjustments to the ALLL
may
be necessary if conditions differ or substantially change from the information used in making the evaluation. In addition, as an integral part of its regulatory examination process, the OCC will periodically review the ALLL. The OCC
may
require Patriot to adjust the ALLL based on its analysis of information available at the time of its examination.
 
Transfers of financial assets
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (
1
) the assets have been isolated from Patriot -- put presumptively beyond the reach of Patriot and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (
2
) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and
no
condition both constrains the transferee from taking advantage of that right and provides more than a trivial benefit for Patriot, and (
3
) Patriot does
not
maintain effective control over the transferred assets through either (a) an agreement that both entitles and obligates it to repurchase or redeem the assets before maturity or (b) the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets, other than through a cleanup call.
 
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale represent the guaranteed portion of Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans and are reflected at the lower of aggregate cost or market value. Patriot originates loans to customers under a SBA program that historically has provided for SBA guarantees of
75
percent of the principal balance of each loan. Patriot generally sells the guaranteed portion of its SBA loans to a
third
party and retains the servicing, holding the unguaranteed portion in its portfolio. The amount of loan origination fees is included in the carrying value of loans sold and in the calculation of the gain or loss on the sale. When sales of SBA loans do occur, the premium received on the sale and the present value of future cash flows of the servicing assets, less the discount of the retained portion of the loan are recognized in income. All criteria for sale accounting must be met in order for the loan sales to occur; see details under the “Transfers of Financial Assets” heading above.
 
Servicing Assets
Servicing assets represent the estimated fair value of retained servicing rights, net of servicing costs, at the time loans are sold. Servicing assets are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues. Impairment is evaluated based on stratifying the underlying financial assets by date of origination and term. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions. Any impairment, if temporary, would be reported as a valuation allowance.
 
Other real estate owned
Assets acquired through, loan foreclosure or in lieu of, are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. In addition, when Patriot acquires other real estate owned (“OREO”), it obtains a current appraisal to substantiate the net carrying value of the asset. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in the results of operations. Costs relating to the development and improvement of the property are capitalized, subject to the limit of fair value of the collateral. Gains or losses are included in non-interest expenses upon disposal.
 
Write-downs of foreclosed properties that are required upon transfer to OREO are charged to the ALLL. Thereafter, an allowance for OREO losses is established for any further declines in the property's value. These losses are included in non-interest expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
Premises and equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized over the shorter of the terms of the related leases or the estimated economic lives of the improvements. Depreciation is charged to operations for buildings, furniture, equipment and software using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets which range from
three
to
forty
years. Gains and losses on dispositions are recognized upon realization. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and improvements are capitalized.
 
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets, which are held and used, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may
not
be recoverable. If impairment is indicated by that review, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value through a charge to non-interest expense.
 
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include core deposit intangibles (“CDI”) and goodwill arising from acquisitions. The initial and ongoing carrying value of intangible assets is based upon modeling techniques that require management to make estimates regarding the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. It also requires use of a discount rate that reflects the current return requirements of the market in relation to present risk-free interest rates, required equity market premiums, peer volatility indicators, and company-specific risk indicators.
 
CDI is amortized on straight-line basis over a
10
-year period because that is managements' estimate of the period Patriot will benefit from Prime Bank's deposit base comprised of funds associated with long-term customer relationships. CDI is evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount
may
not
be recoverable, with any changes in estimated useful life accounted for prospectively over the revised remaining life.
 
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate there
may
be impairment. The annual impairment test is conducted annually as of
October 31,
or whenever certain triggering events occur or there are circumstances that would more likely than
not
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount are identified. Management estimates the fair value of the reporting unit by considering multiple valuation techniques, which include subjective assumptions about the future cash flows of the Company, assumptions within the capitalization rate, valuation multiples, and market data used. The fair value of each reporting unit is compared to the carrying amount of such reporting unit in order to determine if impairment is indicated.
 
Contingent Consideration
Contingent consideration represents an estimate of the additional amount of purchase price consideration and is measured based on the probability that certain loans are restructured in accordance with the related acquisition agreement. Resolution of the contingent consideration was finalized as of
December 31, 2020
and
no
further adjustments are expected.
 
Derivatives
Patriot enters into interest rate swap agreements (“swaps”), to provide a facility to mitigate for the borrower the fluctuations in the variable rate on the respective loan. The customer swaps are simultaneously hedge by offsetting derivatives that Patriot entered into with an outside
third
party. The swaps are reported at fair value in other assets or other liabilities. Patriot's swaps qualify as derivatives, but are
not
designated as hedging instruments, thus any net gain or loss resulting from changes in the fair value is recognized in other noninterest income.
 
The credit risk associated with derivatives executed with customers is similar as that involved in extending loans and is subject to normal credit policies. Collateral is obtained based on management's assessment of the customer. The positions of customer derivatives are recorded at fair value and changes in value are included in noninterest income on the consolidated statement of operations.
 
Income taxes
Patriot recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets (“DTA”s) and liabilities (“DTL”s) are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on DTAs and DTLs of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
 
In certain circumstances DTAs are subject to reduction by a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is subject to ongoing adjustment based on changes in circumstances that affect management's judgment about the realizability of the deferred tax asset. Adjustments to increase or decrease the valuation allowance are charged or credited to the deferred tax component of the income tax provision or benefit.
 
Patriot evaluates its ability to realize its net deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis. In doing so, management considers all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether it is more likely than
not
that the deferred tax assets will be realized. In addition, management assesses tax attributes including available tax planning strategies and net operating loss carry-forwards that do
not
begin to expire until the year
2030.
Based upon this evidence, management recorded a valuation allowance of
$1.9
million as of
December 
31,
 
2020.
See Note
14
for more information on the deferred tax valuation allowance.
 
Management will continue to evaluate its ability to realize the net deferred tax asset. Future evidence
may
indicate that it is more likely than
not
that a portion of the net deferred tax asset will
not
be realized at which point the valuation allowance
may
need to be increased.
 
Patriot had a net deferred tax asset of
$11.5
 million at
December 
31,
 
2020
as compared to a net deferred tax asset of
$11.1
million at
December 31, 2019.
 
On
March 27, 2020,
the CARES Act was signed into law. The CARES Act includes provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of the employer portion of certain payroll taxes, net operating loss carryback periods, and modifications to the net interest deduction limitations. While the Company continues to evaluate the impact of the CARES Act, it does
not
currently believe it will have a material impact on the Company's income taxes or related disclosures.
 
Unrecognized tax benefits
Patriot recognizes a benefit from its tax positions only if it is more likely than
not
that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than
50%
likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information.
 
Patriot's returns for tax years
2018
through
2020
are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for U.S. Federal tax purposes and, for State tax purposes, by the Department of Revenue Services for the State of Connecticut and the State of New York Department of Taxation and Finance.
 
As of
December 
31,
 
2020
and
2019,
the Bank recorded an uncertain tax position (“UTP”) related to the utilization of certain federal net operating losses of
$0
and
$1.2
million, respectively. Additionally, Patriot has
no
pending or on-going audits in any tax jurisdiction.
 
The Company's policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
 
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share represents earnings accruing to common shareholders and are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
 
Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive securities had been converted to common stock, as well as any adjustments to earnings resulting from the assumed conversion, unless such effect is anti-dilutive. Potential common shares that
may
be issued by Patriot include any unvested restricted stock awards, stock options, and stock warrants and are determined using the treasury stock method.
 
Share-based compensation plan
Incentive and compensatory share-based compensation granted to employees is accounted for at the grant date fair value of the award and recognized in the results of operations as compensation expense with an off-setting entry to equity on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. Non-employee members of the Board of Directors are treated as employees for any share-based compensation granted in exchange for their service on the Board of Directors.
 
Patriot does
not
currently have, nor has it had in the past, any grants of share-based compensation to non-employees. However, should such awards exist in the future, the value of the goods or services received shall be measured at the grant date fair value of the award or the goods or services to be received, if determined to be a more reliable measurement of fair value. A liability will be recognized for the award, which will periodically be adjusted to reflect the then current fair value, and compensation expense will be recognized over the requisite period during which the goods or services are received, so that the fair value at the date of settlement is the compensation expense recognized.
 
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors establishes terms and conditions applicable to the vesting of restricted stock awards and stock options. Restricted stock grants generally vest in quarterly or annual installments over a
three
,
four
or
five
year period from the date of grant. All restricted stock awards are non- participating grants.
 
Comprehensive income
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenues, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity in the consolidated balance sheets, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.
 
Segment reporting
Patriot's only business segment is Community Banking. During the years ended
December 
31,
 
2020,
2019
and
2018,
this segment represented all the revenues and income of Patriot.
 
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
The reserve for unfunded commitments provides for probable losses inherent with funding the unused portion of legal commitments to lend. The unfunded reserve calculation includes factors that are consistent with the ALLL methodology for our loan portfolio as well as a draw down factor applied to the various commitments. The reserve for unfunded commitments is included within other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and changes in the reserve are reported as a component of other expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See Note 
18:
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk for further information.
 
Related Party Transactions
Directors and officers of the Company and their affiliates have been customers of and have had transactions with the Company, and it is expected that such persons will continue to have such transactions in the future. Management believes that all deposit accounts, loans, services and commitments comprising such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other customers who are
not
directors or officers. In the opinion of management, the transactions with related parties did
not
involve more than normal risks of collectability, nor favored treatment or terms, nor present other unfavorable features. See Note
20:
Related Party Transactions for further information.
 
Fair value
Patriot uses fair value measurements to record adjustments to the carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in certain instances, there are
no
quoted market prices for certain assets or liabilities. In cases where quoted market prices are
not
available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates
may
not
be realized in an immediate sale or settlement of the asset or liability, respectively.
 
Provided in these notes to the consolidated financial statements is a detailed summary of Patriot's application of fair value measurements and the effect on the assets and liabilities presented in the consolidated financial statements.
 
Advertising Costs
Patriot's policy is to expense advertising costs in the period in which they are incurred.
 
Project expenses
Project expenses represent non-recurring expenses, primarily legal and consulting
not
directly related to the core business of Community Banking. In
2020,
the project expenses consist of a final purchase price adjustment expense of
$556,000
related to the Prime acquisition in
May 2018.
In
2019,
the project expenses principally were the result of
third
party costs related to a formal written agreement (the “Formal Agreement”) with the OCC entered in
November 2018,
and of a non-recurring nature and primarily consultants and legal. In prior years, the expenses were primarily for merger, tax analysis strategy and planning.
 
Revenue Recognition
ASC
606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASC
606"
), establishes principles for reporting information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from the entity's contracts to provide goods or services to customers. The core principle requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services recognized as performance obligations are satisfied.
 
The majority of our revenue-generating transactions are
not
subject to ASC
606,
including revenue generated from financial instruments, such as our loans, letters of credit, derivatives and investment securities, as well as revenue related to our mortgage servicing activities, as these activities are subject to other U.S. GAAP discussed elsewhere within our disclosures. Descriptions of our revenue-generating activities that are within the scope of ASC
606,
which are presented in our income statements as components of non-interest income are as follows:
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts - these represent general service fees for monthly account maintenance and activity- or transaction based fees and consist of transaction-based revenue, time-based revenue (service period), item-based revenue or some other individual attribute-based revenue. Revenue is recognized when our performance obligation is completed which is generally monthly for account maintenance services or when a transaction has been completed (such as a wire transfer). Payment for such performance obligations are generally received at the time the performance obligations are satisfied.
 
Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Standards
 
Accounting Standards Adopted During
2020
 
Effective
January 1, 2020,
the following new Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) were adopted by the Company:
 
ASU
2018
-
13
In
August 2018,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2018
-
13,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic
820
) - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, to modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements.
This ASU removes requirements to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level
1
and Level
2
of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between levels and the valuation processes for Level
3
fair value measurements. ASU
2018
-
13
clarifies that disclosure regarding measurement uncertainty is intended to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. ASU
2018
-
13
adds certain disclosure requirements, including disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level
3
fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level
3
fair value measurements. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2019.
The amendments related to changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level
3
fair value measurements and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively, while all other amendments should be applied retrospectively for all periods presented upon their effective date. The adoption of ASU
2018
-
13
did
not
have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
ASU
2018
-
15
In
August 2018,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2018
-
15,
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic
350
-
40
) - Customer
'
s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract
. ASU
2018
-
15
clarifies certain aspects of ASU
2015
-
05,
“Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement,” which was issued in
April 2015.
Specifically, ASU
2018
-
15
aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). For public business entities, the ASU was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2019,
with early adoption permitted.
 
The amendments in this update align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is
not
affected by the amendments in this update.
 
The amendments in this ASU also require the entity (customer) to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement. The term of the hosting arrangement includes the non-cancellable period of the arrangement plus periods covered by (
1
) an option to extend the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain to exercise that option, (
2
) an option to terminate the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain
not
to exercise the termination option, and (
3
) an option to extend (or
not
to terminate) the arrangement in which exercise of the option is in the control of the vendor.  The entity also is required to apply the existing impairment guidance in Subtopic
350
-
40
to the capitalized implementation costs as if the costs were long-lived assets.
 
The amendments in this ASU also require the entity to present the expense related to the capitalized implementation costs in the same line item in the statement of income as the fees associated with the hosting element (service) of the arrangement and classify payments for capitalized implementation costs in the statement of cash flows in the same manner as payments made for fees associated with the hosting element. The entity is also required to present the capitalized implementation costs in the consolidated balance sheets in the same line item that a repayment for the fees of the associated hosting arrangement would be presented.
 
The adoption of ASU
2018
-
15
did
not
have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
The amendments in this update align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is
not
affected by the amendments in this update.
 
The amendments in this ASU also require the entity (customer) to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement. The term of the hosting arrangement includes the non-cancellable period of the arrangement plus periods covered by (
1
) an option to extend the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain to exercise that option, (
2
) an option to terminate the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain
not
to exercise the termination option, and (
3
) an option to extend (or
not
to terminate) the arrangement in which exercise of the option is in the control of the vendor. The entity also is required to apply the existing impairment guidance in Subtopic
350
-
40
to the capitalized implementation costs as if the costs were long-lived assets.
 
The amendments in this ASU also require the entity to present the expense related to the capitalized implementation costs in the same line item in the statement of income as the fees associated with the hosting element (service) of the arrangement and classify payments for capitalized implementation costs in the statement of cash flows in the same manner as payments made for fees associated with the hosting element. The entity is also required to present the capitalized implementation costs in the consolidated balance sheets in the same line item that a repayment for the fees of the associated hosting arrangement would be presented.
 
The adoption of ASU
2018
-
15
did
not
have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
Accounting Standards Issued But
Not
Yet Adopted
 
ASU
2016
-
13
In
June 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
2016
-
13,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The ASU changes the methodology for measuring credit losses on financial instruments measured at amortized cost to a current expected loss (“CECL”) model. Under the CECL model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of a financial instrument from the date of initial recognition of the instrument. The ASU also changes the existing impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities. In cases where there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-
not
requirement to sell the debt security, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a direct write-down of the amortized cost basis. Additionally, ASU
2016
-
13
notes that credit losses related to available-for-sale debt securities and purchased credit impaired loans should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. ASU
2016
-
13
is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019,
including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2018.
In
November 2019,
the FASB issued ASU
2019
-
10,
which amends the effective date of ASC
326
for smaller reporting companies, as defined by the SEC, and other non-SEC reporting entities, and delays the effective date to fiscal years beginning after
December 31, 2022,
including interim periods within those fiscal periods. As the Company is a small reporting company, the delay will be applicable to the Company. Management is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
ASU
2019
-
12
ASU
2019
-
12,
Income Taxes (Topic
740
) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes
.” The guidance issued in this update simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in ASC
740
related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition for deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. ASU
2019
-
12
also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. The ASU is effective for the Company on
January 1, 2021,
with early adoption permitted, and is
not
expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
 
ASU Update
2020
-
02
In
January 2020,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2020
-
02,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic
326
) and Leases (Topic
842
): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
No.
119
and Update to SEC Section on Effective Date Related to Accounting Standards Update
No.
2016
-
02,
Leases (Topic
842
).
” This ASU adds and amends SEC paragraphs in the Accounting Standards Codification to reflect the issuance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
No.
119,
related to the new credit losses standard, and comments by the SEC staff related to the revised effective date of the new leases standard. This ASU is effective upon issuance. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU
2016
-
13
above.
 
ASU Update
2020
-
03
In
March 2020,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2020
-
3,
Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments.
” This ASU clarifies various financial instruments topics, including the CECL standard issued in
2016.
Amendments related to ASU
2016
-
13
for entities that have
not
yet adopted that guidance are effective upon adoption of the amendments in ASU
2016
-
13.
Early adoption is
not
permitted before an entity's adoption of ASU
2016
-
13.
Other amendments are effective upon issuance of this ASU. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU
2016
-
13
above.
 
ASU Update
2020
-
04
In
March 2020,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2020
-
4
, "Reference Rate Reform"
. This ASU provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this update apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments in this update are effective for all entities as of
March 12, 2020
through
December 31, 2022.
As of
December 31, 2020,
the Company has
not
made any elections under ASU
2020
-
04
but continues to evaluate the impact of reference rate reform and which optional expedients and exceptions might be elected.