Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2020
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]	Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Standards Accounting Standards Adopted During 2020 Effective January 1, 2020, the following new Accounting Standards Updates (ASU) were adopted by the Company: ASU 2018 - 13 In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018 - 13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820 ) - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, to modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. This ASU removes requirements to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between levels and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018 - 13 clarifies that disclosure regarding measurement uncertainty is intended to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. ASU 2018 - 13 adds certain disclosure requirements, including disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments related to changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively, while all other amendments should be applied retrospectively for all periods presented upon their effective date. The adoption of ASU 2018 - 13 did not have any impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. ASU 2018 - 15 In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018 - 15, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350 - 40 ) - Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract . ASU 2018 - 15 clarifies certain aspects of ASU 2015 - 05, “Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement,” which was issued in April 2015. Specifically, ASU 2018 - 15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). For public business entities, the ASU was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in this update. The amendments in this ASU also require the entity (customer) to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement. The term of the hosting arrangement includes the non-cancellable period of the arrangement plus periods covered by ( 1 ) an option to extend the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain to exercise that option, ( 2 ) an option to terminate the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain not to exercise the termination option, and ( 3 ) an option to extend (or not to terminate) the arrangement in which exercise of the option is in the control of the vendor. The entity also is required to apply the existing impairment guidance in Subtopic 350 - 40 to the capitalized implementation costs as if the costs were long-lived assets. The amendments in this ASU also require the entity to present the expense related to the capitalized implementation costs in the same line item in the statement of income as the fees associated with the hosting element (service) of the arrangement and classify payments for capitalized implementation costs in the statement of cash flows in the same manner as payments made for fees associated with the hosting element. The entity is also required to present the capitalized implementation costs in the consolidated balance sheets in the same line item that a repayment for the fees of the associated hosting arrangement would be presented. The adoption of ASU 2018 - 15 did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted ASU 2016 - 13 In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016 - 13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments . The ASU changes the methodology for measuring credit losses on financial instruments measured at amortized cost to a current expected loss (“CECL”) model. Under the CECL model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of a financial instrument from the date of initial recognition of the instrument. The ASU also changes the existing impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities. In cases where there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than- not requirement to sell the debt security, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a direct write-down of the amortized cost basis. Additionally, ASU 2016 - 13 notes that credit losses related to available-for-sale debt securities and purchased credit impaired loans should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016 - 13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019 - 10, which amends the effective date of ASC 326 for smaller reporting companies, as defined by the SEC, and other non-SEC reporting entities, and delays the effective date to fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal periods. As the Company is a small reporting company, the delay will be applicable to the Company. Management is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements. ASU 2019 - 12 ASU 2019 - 12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740 ) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” The guidance issued in this update simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in ASC 740 related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition for deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. ASU 2019 - 12 also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. The ASU will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2021, with early adoption permitted, and is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements. ASU Update 2020 - 02 In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020 - 02, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326 ) and Leases (Topic 842 ): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 119 and Update to SEC Section on Effective Date Related to Accounting Standards Update No. 2016 - 02, Leases (Topic 842 ). ” This ASU adds and amends SEC paragraphs in the Accounting Standards Codification to reflect the issuance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 119, related to the new credit losses standard, and comments by the SEC staff related to the revised effective date of the new leases standard. This ASU is effective upon issuance. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU 2016 - 13 above. ASU Update 2020 - 03 In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020 - 3, “Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments.” This ASU clarifies various financial instruments topics, including the CECL standard issued in 2016. Amendments related to ASU 2016 - 13 for entities that have not yet adopted that guidance are effective upon adoption of the amendments in ASU 2016 - 13. Early adoption is not permitted before an entity’s adoption of ASU 2016 - 13. Other amendments are effective upon issuance of this ASU. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU 2016 - 13 above.

Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards Adopted During

2020

Effective

January 1, 2020,

the following new Accounting Standards Updates (ASU) were adopted by the Company:

ASU

2018

August 2018,

the FASB issued ASU

No.

2018

13,

Fair Value Measurement (Topic

820

) - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, to modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements.

This ASU removes requirements to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level

and Level

of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between levels and the valuation processes for Level

fair value measurements. ASU

2018

clarifies that disclosure regarding measurement uncertainty is intended to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. ASU

2018

adds certain disclosure requirements, including disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level

fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level

fair value measurements. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after

December 15, 2019.

The amendments related to changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level

fair value measurements and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively, while all other amendments should be applied retrospectively for all periods presented upon their effective date. The adoption of ASU

2018

did

not

have any impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU

2018

August 2018,

the FASB issued ASU

No.

2018

15,

Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic

350

) - Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract

. ASU

2018

clarifies certain aspects of ASU

2015

05,

“Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement,” which was issued in

April 2015.

Specifically, ASU

2018

aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). For public business entities, the ASU was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after

December 15, 2019,

with early adoption permitted.

The amendments in this update align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is

not

affected by the amendments in this update.

The amendments in this ASU also require the entity (customer) to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement. The term of the hosting arrangement includes the non-cancellable period of the arrangement plus periods covered by (

) an option to extend the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain to exercise that option, (

) an option to terminate the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain

not

to exercise the termination option, and (

) an option to extend (or

not

to terminate) the arrangement in which exercise of the option is in the control of the vendor. The entity also is required to apply the existing impairment guidance in Subtopic

350

to the capitalized implementation costs as if the costs were long-lived assets.

The amendments in this ASU also require the entity to present the expense related to the capitalized implementation costs in the same line item in the statement of income as the fees associated with the hosting element (service) of the arrangement and classify payments for capitalized implementation costs in the statement of cash flows in the same manner as payments made for fees associated with the hosting element. The entity is also required to present the capitalized implementation costs in the consolidated balance sheets in the same line item that a repayment for the fees of the associated hosting arrangement would be presented.

The adoption of ASU

2018

did

not

have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting Standards Issued But

Not

Yet Adopted

ASU

2016

June 2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

13,

Financial Instruments-Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

. The ASU changes the methodology for measuring credit losses on financial instruments measured at amortized cost to a current expected loss (“CECL”) model. Under the CECL model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of a financial instrument from the date of initial recognition of the instrument. The ASU also changes the existing impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities. In cases where there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-

not

requirement to sell the debt security, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a direct write-down of the amortized cost basis. Additionally, ASU

2016

notes that credit losses related to available-for-sale debt securities and purchased credit impaired loans should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. ASU

2016

is effective for fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2019,

including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2018.

November 2019,

the FASB issued ASU

2019

10,

which amends the effective date of ASC

326

for smaller reporting companies, as defined by the SEC, and other non-SEC reporting entities, and delays the effective date to fiscal years beginning after

December 31, 2022,

including interim periods within those fiscal periods. As the Company is a small reporting company, the delay will be applicable to the Company. Management is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU

2019

ASU

2019

12,

“Income Taxes (Topic

740

) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.”

The guidance issued in this update simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in ASC

740

related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition for deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. ASU

2019

also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. The ASU will be effective for the Company on

January 1, 2021,

with early adoption permitted, and is

not

expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU Update

2020

January 2020,

the FASB issued ASU

No.

2020

02,

“Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic

326

) and Leases (Topic

842

): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin

No.

119

and Update to SEC Section on Effective Date Related to Accounting Standards Update

No.

2016

02,

Leases (Topic

842

” This ASU adds and amends SEC paragraphs in the Accounting Standards Codification to reflect the issuance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin

No.

119,

related to the new credit losses standard, and comments by the SEC staff related to the revised effective date of the new leases standard. This ASU is effective upon issuance. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU

2016

above.

ASU Update

2020

March 2020,

the FASB issued ASU

No.

2020

“Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments.”

This ASU clarifies various financial instruments topics, including the CECL standard issued in

2016.

Amendments related to ASU

2016

for entities that have

not

yet adopted that guidance are effective upon adoption of the amendments in ASU

2016

13.

Early adoption is

not

permitted before an entity’s adoption of ASU

2016

13.

Other amendments are effective upon issuance of this ASU. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU

2016

above.