EX-99.(C)(5) 6 dex99c5.htm PRESENTATION OF CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS LIMITED, DATED AUGUST 12, 2008 Presentation of Citigroup Global Markets Limited, dated August 12, 2008
Exhibit (c)(5)

Project Cypher

Presentation to the Independent
Committee of the Board of Directors
12 August 2008
LOGO


Table of Contents

 

1.

   Transaction Overview
 

2.

   Company Description
 

3.

   Valuation Considerations
     Appendix
     A.    Supplementary Valuation Materials
     B.    Supplementary Transaction Materials
        LOGO


1. Transaction Overview

LOGO


Transaction Background

 

On 5 August 2008, NDS Group PLC (“NDS” or the “Company”) announced an agreement in principle with Permira Advisers LLP (“Permira”) and News Corporation (“News Corp”) as to a US$63 per share price at which Permira and News Corp would take the Company private. Announcement follows an initial proposal on 27 June 2008 with an initial offer value of US$60 per share.
   NDS, (UK Plc listed on Nasdaq), is controlled by News Corp (72% economic interest / 96% voting interest)
      News Corp beneficially owns 100% of NDS Series B Ordinary Shares, which have ten votes per share (as opposed to Series A Ordinary Shares, which have one vote per share)
      Series A Ordinary Shares are held by public
   News Corp and Permira are proposing to take NDS private in a transaction involving the following key components:
      Cancellation of all Series A Ordinary Shares acquired from public shareholders at US$63 per share in cash
      Cancellation of approximately 67% of News Corp’s held Series B Ordinary Shares at US$63 per share in a mix of cash and a US$242m (1) Vendor Note
      “Roll-over” of News Corp’s remaining approximately 33% of Series B Ordinary Shares into NDS
      The cash required to acquire NDS shares from public shareholders and News Corp would be funded through a combination of (i) new equity from Permira, (ii) new NDS debt, and (iii) cash on NDS balance sheet
      The transaction would result in News Corp and Permira owning 49% and 51% of the outstanding shares of NDS, respectively — before dilution from management ownership
   News Corp does not intend to divest its entire stake in NDS, as NDS remains a strategic asset for the group
   The proposed transaction is driven by NDS status as a “CFC” of News Corp, which imposes limitations on the use of NDS cash
      Limits on cash distributions to shareholders
      Limits on acquisitions by NDS in the US
   The partnership with Permira is intended to provide a structure which favourably addresses the CFC issue

 

(1)

Sourced from the Draft Structure Paper prepared by PWC dated 8 August 2008

 

1   LOGO


Transaction Considerations

Approvals and Funding
   News Corp and Permira intend to implement the transaction by way of a scheme of arrangement under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006 (U.K.). Implementation of the scheme will be subject to:
      The approval of Series A Ordinary Shareholders representing a majority in number and 75% in value
      Court approval
      The availability of a certain minimum amount of distributable profits and freely available cash at NDS
      Certain customary conditions, including the receipt of required antitrust approvals
   NDS, News Corp and Permira have negotiated the key areas of the transaction
   The transaction as proposed would be funded by a mix of newly incurred NDS senior and mezzanine indebtedness, an investment provided by Permira and cash on hand at the NDS group
Takeover Code
   As a result of NDS listing on Nasdaq, the proxy statement for the transaction will be subject to review by the SEC
   The UK Panel on Takeovers and Mergers has confirmed that the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the “City Code”) will not apply to the proposed transaction
   The Independent Committee has considered the proposed transaction and made its recommendation that NDS should enter into the proposed transaction and Class A shareholders should vote to approve the proposed transaction
   The NDS board, including the News Corp executives, approved the establishment of the Independent Committee

 

2   LOGO


Transaction Chronology

 

 

Date

  

Description

June 26, 2008

  

•    Initial meeting between Citi and NDS management team

  

•    Management team indicates existence of more optimistic set of assumptions than incorporated in financing

June 27, 2008

  

•    News Corp / Permira publicly announce proposal to take NDS private at offer price of US$60 per share

July 2, 2008

  

•    Citi due diligence session with management team

  

•    Independent Committee of the Board of Directors instructs NDS management to distribute more optimistic set of assumptions to Citi

July 3, 2008

  

•    Management team provides Citi with more optimistic set of assumptions but states belief that base case projections are already aggressive. Upside variables include (i) higher growth rates for 4 business lines in New Technologies segment and (ii) lower recycling rates for its smart cards by one of its largest customers. Upsides provide incremental revenue and EBITDA growth (assuming all upsides are realized, assumptions in total provide incremental EBITDA of US$67m in FY 2012)

July 6, 2008

  

•    Citi discussion with management team re: upside operating assumptions

July 7, 2008

  

•    Per respective shareholder requests to Independent Committee, Citi meeting with Egerton Capital and existing shareholder (Investor X)

July 10, 2008

  

•    Per shareholder request to Independent Committee, Citi discussion with existing shareholder (Investor W)

July 11, 2008

  

•    Citi meeting with Independent Committee

  

•    Per shareholder request to Independent Committee, Citi discussion with existing shareholder (Investor Y)

July 14, 2008

  

•    Management presentation by Abe Peled (CEO) and Alex Gersh (CFO) to Citi

July 17, 2008

  

•    Discussion between Citi and News Corp / Permira with advisors to discuss Independent Committee feedback to proposal. Citi communicates per share valuation level of “number that starts with a 7”

July 18, 2008

  

•    Per shareholder request to Independent Committee, Citi discussion with existing shareholder (Investor Z)

July 24, 2008

  

•    In-person meeting with GS (Permira’s advisor) and JPM (News Corp’s advisor) to discuss Citi valuation approach

  

•    Subsequent discussion with management team re: upside case, who indicates that it is not appropriate to factor all upside assumptions at once

July 29, 2008

  

•    In-person meeting with principals (Permira / News Corp) and their advisors (GS / JPM)

  

•    Principals re-confirm proposal of US$60 per share

  

•    Management team indicates that magnitude of upside related to lower recycling rates are not attainable given recycling practices of key customer today

August 1, 2008

  

•    News Corp / Permira indicates revised offer of US$62 per share

  

•    Independent Committee communicates counter-proposal of US$65 per share

August 4, 2008

  

•    News Corp / Permira indicates “best and final” offer of US$63 per share

  

•    Citi reaches out to Permira’s adviser to confirm whether the offer is truly “best and final” and presses for a bump to US$63.50 per share

  

•    Goldman Sachs confirms US$63 offer per share is “best and final”

August 5, 2008

  

•    NDS announces an agreement in principle as to a US$63 per share price at which to take NDS private

 

3   LOGO


Summary Transaction Overview

 

 

Summary of Transaction Economics and Structure
Consideration / Price  

•    Public shareholders (1)

 

•      Receive US$63 / share (US$1,220m net) in cash for 19.4m (2) Series A shares

 

•    News Corp

  
 

•      Receives US$63 / share (US$1,764m) for 28.0m Series B shares in a mix of cash (US$1,522m) and a US$242m Vendor Note

 

•      Rolls over 14.0m Series B shares for a 49% interest

Third Party Financing  

•    US$918m in equity secured from Permira Funds

 

•    US$1,275m in debt committed by JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley

 

Resulting NDS Ownership

 

•    Permira – 51%

 

•    News Corp – 49%

   }    Before dilution from management ownership
Structure  

•    UK court approved scheme of arrangement

 

•    Requires approval of Series A shareholders representing majority in number and 75% in value

Source: PWC Draft Structure Paper – 8th August 2008.

 

(1)    Includes public shareholders, LTIP and option holders.

(2)    Diluted shares outstanding as per treasury stock method; includes shares, LTIP and option holders. Based on 16.2m Class A shares, 2.4m Options and 0.8m LTIPs.

Sources and Uses (US$ millions, except per share data)

 

Sources

 

Debt financing

   US$ 1,275  

Permira Funds equity contribution (1)

     918  

News Corp B Share Rollover

     882  

Less: News Corp B Share Rollover

     (882 )

Management equity (1)

     14  

News Corp vendor note

     242  

Excess cash on balance sheet (2)

     797  
        

Total sources

   US$ 3,246  

Uses

      

Purchase of public equity

   US$ 1,019  

Purchase of News Corp equity

     2,646  

Acquisition of Options and LTIP Shares

     201  

Less: News Corp equity roll-over

     (882 )

Transaction expenses (3)

     142  

Overfunding (Surplus cash)

     60  

Debt-like obligations assumed (4)

     60  
        

Total uses

   US$ 3,246  

Source: PWC Draft Structure Paper – 8th August 2008.

Note: Based on News Corp ownership pre-deal of 42.0m Series B shares.

 

(1) Based on a US$13.5m minimum management contribution for a combination of Hurdle Shares and Series B shares; management has the option to invest in additional Series B shares.
(2) Assumes US$725m cash on balance sheet and US$72m from options proceeds.
(3) Estimate; includes (a) US$45m of financing, advisory, legal, transaction and (b) investor fees of US$30m (US$15m to Permira; US$15m to News Corp).
(4) Debt like items include costs associated with releasing trapped cash, contingent liabilities from prior acquisitions, liability accruals and claims, and pension deficit (source: PWC).

 

4   LOGO


2. Company Description

 

  LOGO


NDS Business Overview

Business Description

•    NDS Group plc (NDS) is engaged in the business of supplying open end-to-end digital technology and services to digital pay-television platform operators and content providers

•    NDS is a leading provider of Conditional Access (CA) to digital pay TV providers worldwide and in the middleware market

•    By the fiscal year-end 2007, NDS had an install base of c.83m smart cards serving over 50 major TV platforms in 35 countries

•    NDS technologies and services include:

•      Conditional access (CA) and microprocessor security and broadcast stream management

•      Controls access to premium content via encryption

•      Protects premium content from piracy thereby securing revenue streams for its customers

•      Set-top box (STB) and residential gateway middleware

•      Provides consistent user interface irrespective of STB vendor

•      Allows variety of applications to run on STB developed by different manufacturers

•      Digital video recording (DVR) technologies

•      Stores digital content on internal hard disk and makes it accessible for future viewing

•      Electronic program guides (EPGs)

•      Navigation tool to select / discover online content by remote control

•      Interactive infrastructure and applications

•      Features interactive applications and advertising

•      Other

•      Offers IP-based video services, CA and middleware solutions

•      Provides technical support and consulting services

•    NDS provides technologies and services supporting both standard definition and high-definition broadcast television, and a variety of industry and Internet protocol standards

Revenue Breakdown
Revenue by Product
LOGO
Revenue by Major Clients
LOGO

Note: Based on Reported revenues as of fiscal year-end June 2007.

 

(1) Includes Middleware and EPG revenues.
(2) DVR and Interactive infrastructures revenues.
(3) Includes KDG, KBW, Premiere, Foxgtel, Cablevision, Sky NZ, Astro, YES, HOT, Eastern Europe Platforms, Viasat, Gateway Communications, Indovision, Tandberg, Auna, CYTA, Galaxy, Star, Sky (SPOT), Dogan.

 

5   LOGO


Competitive Landscape

Pay TV Market
LOGO
System Integration
Competitive Landscape
LOGO

Note: The above selected competitors are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be an exhaustive list.

 

Source: Company reports and Citi analysis.

 

6   LOGO


Management Case Summary Comparison

Management believes the base case is aggressive. The upside case assumes further optimistic assumptions, which Management does not believe can all be realised. For illustrative purposes, the upside case, as per below, shows revenue and EBITDA assuming all optimistic assumptions are realised.

 

LOGO

 

Source: Company Information.

Note: Financials as of Year end in June. Financials are not adjusted for the management costs or the currency impact.

 

(1)    Assuming 40% Recycling rate for key customers from 2010 onwards.

 

7   LOGO


Management Case: Detailed Comparison

Management believes the base case is aggressive. The upside case assumes further optimistic assumptions, which Management does not believe can all be realised. For illustrative purposes, the upside case, as per below, shows revenue and EBITDA assuming all optimistic assumptions are realised.

 

     Management Case     ‘09-12     Management Revised Upside Case     ‘09-12  

Fiscal Year End June

   2008E     2009E     2010E     2011E     2012E     CAGR     2008E     2009E     2010E     2011E     2012E     CAGR  

Revenue

                        

Conditional Access

   465     477     507     511     556     5.3 %   465     477     511     518     563     5.7 %

Integration, Development and Support

   58     65     69     73     78     6.5 %   58     65     69     73     78     6.5 %

License Fees and Royalties

   120     136     160     180     215     16.3 %   120     136     161     182     217     16.7 %

New Technologies

   187     222     263     342     387     20.3 %   187     222     270     353     441     25.7 %

Other

   6     6     6     6     6     2.5 %   6     6     6     6     6     2.5 %
                                                                

Total Revenue

   835     906     1,004     1,113     1,242     11.1 %   835     906     1,017     1,133     1,305     13.0 %

% Growth

   17.7 %   8.4 %   10.8 %   10.9 %   11.6 %     17.7 %   8.4 %   12.2 %   11.5 %   15.2 %  

COGS

                        

Operations

   (200 )   (208 )   (251 )   (302 )   (352 )   19.2 %   (200 )   (208 )   (251 )   (302 )   (352 )   19.2 %

Smart Card Costs

   (93 )   (113 )   (114 )   (100 )   (109 )   (1.2 )%   (93 )   (113 )   (116 )   (104 )   (114 )   0.2 %

Royalty Costs

   (21 )   (22 )   (24 )   (27 )   (31 )   13.1 %   (21 )   (22 )   (24 )   (28 )   (33 )   14.6 %

Other

   (4 )   (3 )   (3 )   (4 )   (4 )   10.0 %   (4 )   (3 )   (3 )   (4 )   (4 )   10.0 %
                                                                

Total of Cost of Sales

   (317 )   (346 )   (392 )   (433 )   (497 )   12.8 %   (317 )   (346 )   (395 )   (437 )   (503 )   13.3 %

% of Revenue

   38.0 %   38.2 %   39.0 %   38.9 %   40.0 %     38.0 %   38.2 %   38.8 %   38.6 %   38.5 %  

Gross Profit

   518     560     595     680     745     10.0 %   518     560     622     696     803     12.8 %

% Margin

   62.0 %   61.8 %   59.3 %   61.1 %   60.0 %     62.0 %   61.8 %   61.2 %   61.4 %   61.5 %  

Total Operating Costs

   (639 )   (693 )   (764 )   (827 )   (917 )   9.8 %   (639 )   (693 )   (767 )   (831 )   (923 )   10.0 %

% of Revenue

   76.6 %   76.5 %   76.1 %   74.3 %   73.8 %     76.6 %   76.5 %   75.5 %   73.4 %   70.7 %  

EBIT

   196     212     240     286     325     15.2 %   196     212     250     302     383     21.7 %

% Margin

   23.4 %   23.5 %   23.9 %   25.7 %   26.2 %     23.4 %   23.5 %   24.5 %   26.6 %   29.3 %  

EBITDA

   232     251     281     326     363     13.0 %   232     251     291     341     420     18.7 %

% Margin

   27.8 %   27.8 %   28.0 %   29.3 %   29.2 %     27.8 %   27.8 %   28.6 %   30.1 %   32.2 %  

LOGO

 

Source: Company information.            
Note: Financials as of Year end in June. Financials are not adjusted for the management costs or the currency impact.

 

8


Adjustments to Management Projected EBITDA

LOGO

 

9   LOGO


3. Valuation Considerations

 

  LOGO


Summary Valuation

LOGO

 

 

(1) Based on median of 2008-10 FV / EBITDA trading multiple for Kudelski, OpenTV, Aladdin and Macrovision applied to NDS Management Upside Case EBITDA.
(2) Based on median of 2008-10 FV / EBITDA trading multiple for Kudelski, OpenTV, Aladdin and Macrovision applied to NDS EBITDA adjusted for currency, management cost and deferred revenue, as described previously. Firm Value adjusted for NPV of costs associated to deferred revenue of US$89m.
(3) Based on Kudelski 2008 FV / EBITDA multiple applied to NDS management adjusted EBITDA. Firm Value adjusted for NPV of costs associated to deferred revenue of US$89m.
(4) Valuation based on 3.75-year DCF applied to the Management Adjusted Case projections. DCF assumes a WACC of 9.5% and a perpetuity growth rate of 3% to 3.5%. Firm Value to fully diluted Equity Value adjustments incorporates Sept 08 balance sheet projected as per the Presentation to the Independent Directors prepared by News Corp and Permira on 27 June 2008 which includes debt-like items of US$60m and cash position of US$725m. Per share costs reflect 100% of NPV impact.
(5) Based on Management Adjusted Case DCF valuation plus NPV of upsides related to New Technologies segment and the Recycling upside related to key customers (see page 8 and 16 for additional details).
(6-7) Based on 17.5%-22.5% return for Permira, exit in 2012 at 12.0x Forward EBITDA. Firm Value to Equity adjustment based on projected Sept-08 Net Debt.
(8) Based on the high/low range of broker target prices. Brokers include Natexis, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Kaufman Brothers and RBC Capital Markets.
(9) Based on the +15% / +25% premium range on the volume weighted average price (US$51.87) from Q3 2008 earnings release (1 May 2008) to the day prior to the transaction’s initial offer announcement date (26 June 2008).
(10) Based on the +15% / +25% premium range on the volume weighted average price (US$51.10) from the Goldman Sachs report on 29 May 2008 to the day prior to the transaction’s initial offer announcement date.

 

10   LOGO


Share Price Performance

3-Year Share Price Performance
LOGO
Pre Initial Offer Announcement Premium

 

Actual

   Price ($)    Offer
Premium (1)
 

1 day prior (2)

   49.70    26.8 %

Since Goldman Sachs report 29/5/2008 (3)

   51.31    22.8 %

Since 1st May ’08 Earnings Announcement

   52.07    21.0 %

52-week high

   62.04    1.5 %

1-month average

   51.57    22.2 %

3-month average

   50.80    24.0 %

6-month average

   51.16    23.1 %

1-year average

   51.71    21.8 %

3-year average

   47.33    33.1 %

 

Cash Adjusted (4)

   Price ($)    Offer
Premium (5)
 

1 day prior (2)

   38.08    34.9 %

Since Goldman Sachs report 29/5/2008 (3)

   39.70    29.4 %

Since 1st May ’08 Earnings Announcement

   40.46    27.0 %

52-week high

   51.27    0.2 %

1-month average

   39.96    28.6 %

3-month average

   39.20    31.1 %

6-month average

   39.82    29.0 %

1-year average

   40.94    25.5 %

3-year average

   39.75    29.3 %
Post Initial Offer Announcement Performance
LOGO
Source: Factset and Company filings

 

(1) Based on US$63 per share offer price.
(2) Reflects the last closing price prior to the Initial Offer Announcement on 27 June 2008 (Announced post market close).
(3) Goldman Sachs report dated 29 May 2008 downgraded NDS from a buy recommendation to a neutral. NDS share price declined 9.46%/day post report publication.
(4) Based on actual share price(s) adjusted for per share cash balance (on a quarterly basis) using fully diluted shares outstanding based on the treasury stock method.
(5) Based on US$63 per share offer price adjusted for last reported cash balance.

 

11   LOGO


Broker Perspectives

Broker Recommendations
LOGO
Analyst Target Prices (US$)
LOGO
Market Reaction
LOGO
Brokers Valuation Methodologies

 

Broker

  

Stock Rating

  

Methodology

  

WACC / Multiple

RBC Capital

5 August 2008

  

•Outperform - US$66

  

•EPS Multiple

  

•FY09E = 24x

Natexis

5 August 2008

  

•Hold - US$65

  

•DCF

  

•WACC: 9.8%

 

•Terminal EBITDA: 14.5x

Morgan Stanley

29 May 2008

  

•Overweight - US$61

  

•DCF

  

•WACC: 8.7% (1.2 Beta)

 

•Terminal Growth Rate: 2%

Kaufman Bros

30 June 2008

  

•Buy - US$60

  

•FCF

  

•WACC: 11.5%

 

•2012 FCF Multiple: 18.0x

Goldman Sachs

30 June 2008

  

•Neutral - US$55

  

•P/E Multiple

  

•FY08E = 20x

Source: Factset, Brokers’ reports.

 

12   LOGO


Trading Multiples

 

 

LOGO

 

Note:

  Market Data as of 26 June 2007 (day prior to transaction’s initial offer announcement). Calendarised financials. Macrovision pro forma for the acquisition of Gemstar.

 

13   LOGO


Discounted Cash Flow Valuation Summary

 

Discounted Cash Flow Assumptions

 

 

Valuation based on 3.75-year DCF (09/30/08 to 06/30/12).

 

 

Assumes a WACC of 9.5% with perpetuity growth range of 3.0% -3.5% for the Management case and incremental cash flows related to the Recycling Cards upside

 

 

Assumes a WACC of 12.5% with perpetuity growth range of 4.0% - 5.0% for incremental cash flows related to New Technologies upside

 

 

Mid-point Terminal FV/EBITDA of 10.3x for the Management Case or 10.7x for the Management Upside Case

Adjustments Summary

 

 

Management Costs Adjustment

 

   

Management projections do not include management incentivisation costs

 

   

Per discussion with management, incorporates incremental management incentivisation costs (from base of US$17 million in FY 2008 grown in line with projected headcount)

 

 

Shekel Adjustment

 

   

Incorporates incremental cash costs from the differential between the spot rate (3.262 as of 5 July, 2008) and the assumed management rate (3.65)

 

   

Assumes hiring of additional required staff in India instead of Israel (excl. Jungo) to mitigate Shekel impact

 

(USD, per share value unless stated otherwise)

   Management
Case
    Revised Management
Upside Case
 
     Low     High     Low (2)     High (3)  

Implied Share Price (1)

   62.7     66.4     69.4     73.9  

Management Costs

   (3.2 )   (3.8 )   (3.2 )   (3.8 )

Shekel Adjustment

   (3.8 )   (4.0 )   (3.8 )   (4.0 )

Fully Adjusted Share Price (100% NPV of Adjustments)

   55.7     58.6     62.4     66.1  

 

Notes:   Firm Value to fully diluted Equity Value adjustment incorporates 30-Sept-08 balance sheet projected as per the Presentation to the Independent Directors prepared by News Corp and Permira on 27 June 2008 which includes debt-like items of US$60m and cash position of US$725m.

 

(1) Based on fully diluted shares outstanding.
(2) The low case scenario is calculated as the Management case low implied share price plus the NPV of the New Technologies incremental value (at a WACC of 12.5% and a Perpetuity Growth of 4%) plus the recycling cards incremental value (at a WACC of 9.5% and a Perpetuity growth of 3.0%)
(3) The high case scenario is calculated as the Management case high implied share price plus the NPV of the New Technologies incremental value (at a WACC of 12.5% and a Perpetuity Growth of 5%) plus the recycling cards incremental value (at a WACC of 9.5% and a Perpetuity growth of 3.5%)

 

14   LOGO


Management Case Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

 

 

     Projected Fiscal Year End June,  

USD (m)

   FY2009     FY2010     FY2011     FY2012  

EBITDA

   251     281     326     363  

Depreciation & Amortisation

   39     41     39     38  

EBIT

   212     240     286     325  

Tax on EBIT (Tax Rate: 29.5%) in 2008 and 28% thereafter

   59     67     80     91  

NOPLAT

   153     173     206     234  

Depreciation & Amortisation

   39     41     39     38  

Change in Working Capital

   (11 )   (9 )   (13 )   (12 )

Capital Expenditures

   (26 )   (31 )   (30 )   (34 )
                        

Unlevered Free Cash Flow

   132     129     200     230  

Terminal EBITDA

         363  

Terminal Unlevered Free Cash Flow

         227  

 

     Perpetuity Growth Rate  
     2.75%     3.00%     3.25%     3.50%     3.75%  

WACC

   Firm Value as of 30-Sep-08  

8.50%

   3,548     3,691     3,848     4,020     4,211  

9.00%

   3,256     3,375     3,505     3,646     3,801  

9.50%

   3,008     3,109     3,217     3,335     3,463  

10.00%

   2,794     2,880     2,972     3,071     3,179  

10.50%

   2,608     2,682     2,761     2,846     2,937  

WACC

   Firm Value / CY2009E EBITDA Multiple  

8.50%

   14.7 x   15.3 x   15.9 x   16.6 x   17.4 x

9.00%

   13.5 x   14.0 x   14.5 x   15.1 x   15.7 x

9.50%

   12.4 x   12.9 x   13.3 x   13.8 x   14.3 x

10.00%

   11.6 x   11.9 x   12.3 x   12.7 x   13.2 x

10.50%

   10.8 x   11.1 x   11.4 x   11.8 x   12.2 x

 

      Perpetuity Growth Rate
     2.75%    3.00%    3.25%    3.50%    3.75%

WACC

   Equity Value Per Share (1) as of 30-Sep-08

8.50%

   69.9    72.2    74.8    77.6    80.7

9.00%

   65.1    67.0    69.2    71.5    74.0

9.50%

   61.1    62.7    64.5    66.4    68.5

10.00%

   57.6    59.0    60.5    62.1    63.8

10.50%

   54.5    55.7    57.0    58.4    59.9

WACC

   Implied Terminal EBITDA Multiple

8.50%

   11.2x    11.7x    12.3x    12.9x    13.6x

9.00%

   10.3x    10.7x    11.2x    11.8x    12.3x

9.50%

   9.5x    9.9x    10.3x    10.8x    11.3x

10.00%

   8.9x    9.2x    9.6x    10.0x    10.4x

10.50%

   8.3x    8.6x    8.9x    9.2x    9.6x

 

Note:   Valuation based on 3.75-year DCF applied to the Management Case projections. DCF assumes a WACC of 9% to 10% and perpetuity growth rate of 3% to 3.5%, implying a mid-point terminal EBITDA of 10.3x. EBITDA adjusted for currency and management cost.

 

(1) Firm Value to Equity adjustment includes Sept-08 projected debt-like items of US$60m and cash position of US$725m as per the Presentation to the Independent Directors prepared by News Corp and Permira on 27 June 2008.

 

15   LOGO


Revised Upsides Valuation Impact

 

Recycling Cards

Incremental NPV Impact (US$)

 

     Perpetuity Growth Rate
     2.75%    3.00%    3.25%    3.50%    3.75%

WACC

   Equity Value as of 30-Sep-08

8.50%

   91.0    94.9    99.1    103.8    109.0

9.00%

   83.1    86.3    89.8    93.7    97.9

9.50%

   76.3    79.1    82.0    85.2    88.7

10.00%

   70.5    72.9    75.4    78.1    81.0

10.50%

   65.5    67.5    69.7    72.0    74.4
Incremental NPV Impact – Per share (US$)
     Perpetuity Growth Rate
     2.75%    3.00%    3.25%    3.50%    3.75%

WACC

   Equity Value Per Share (1) as of 30-Sep-08

8.50%

   1.5    1.5    1.6    1.7    1.8

9.00%

   1.4    1.4    1.5    1.5    1.6

9.50%

   1.2    1.3    1.3    1.4    1.4

10.00%

   1.2    1.2    1.2    1.3    1.3

10.50%

   1.1    1.1    1.1    1.2    1.2

New Technologies

 

Incremental NPV Impact (US$)

     Perpetuity Growth Rate
     3.50%    4.00%    4.50%    5.00%    5.50%

WACC

   Equity Value as of 30-Sep-08

9.50%

   503.1    548.1    602.1    668.1    750.6

10.00%

   459.2    496.9    541.3    594.6    659.8

12.50%

   314.0    332.0    352.3    375.2    401.5

15.00%

   232.9    243.2    254.4    266.8    280.5

17.50%

   181.6    188.1    195.1    202.6    210.8
Incremental NPV Impact – Per share (US$)
     Perpetuity Growth Rate
     3.50%    4.00%    4.50%    5.00%    5.50%

WACC

   Equity Value Per Share (1) as of 30-Sep-08

9.50%

   8.2    8.9    9.8    10.9    12.2

10.00%

   7.5    8.1    8.8    9.7    10.8

12.50%

   5.1    5.4    5.7    6.1    6.5

15.00%

   3.8    4.0    4.2    4.4    4.6

17.50%

   3.0    3.1    3.2    3.3    3.4

 

Note:   Valuation date as of 30-Sept-08. Assumes stub period of 30-Sept-08 to 30-Jun-08 for FY2009 Cash Flows.

 

(1) Incorporates 30-Sept-08 balance sheet projected as per the Presentation to the Independent Directors prepared by News Corp and Permira on 27 June 2008 which includes debt-like items of US$60m and cash position of US$725m. Fully diluted number of shares of 61.3m.

 

16   LOGO


Management Costs and FX Rate Adjustments - DCF Valuation

 

Shekel / US$ FX Rate Adjustments Valuation - at Spot Rate (2)

 

     Projected year end June,  
     2008     2009     2010     2011     2012  

Israel Total Expenses as per Mgmt - at 3.65

   —       150     161     178     196  

FX Rate

   3.65     3.65     3.65     3.65     3.65  

Adjusted Total Expenses - at Spot Rate 3.26

   —       168     180     199     219  

FX Rate

   3.26     3.26     3.26     3.26     3.26  
                              

Currency Impact Cash Flows - at Spot Rate 3.26

   0.0     (17.9 )   (19.2 )   (21.2 )   (23.3 )

Savings on Staff Reallocation

   0.0     0.0     0.0     3.9     8.4  
                              

Total Impact Cash Flows

   0.0     (17.9 )   (19.2 )   (17.3 )   (14.9 )

Tax Rate

   29.5 %   28.0 %   28.0 %   28.0 %   28.0 %

Tax Savings

   0.0     (5.0 )   (5.4 )   (4.8 )   (4.2 )
                              

Net Currency Impact Cash Flows

   0.0     (12.9 )   (13.8 )   (16.4 )   (19.2 )

Discounted Cash Flows

   0.0     (11.5 )   (11.2 )   (12.2 )   (13.0 )

Terminal Cash Flow

           (19.2 )

Terminal Value @ 2% Perpetuity Growth Rate

   (260.7 )        

PV of Terminal Value

   (177.3 )        

Total PV of Cash Flows at WACC of 9.5%

   (225.3 )        

Assumptions

          

Perpetuity Growth Rate

   2.0 %        

WACC

   9.5 %        

Value as a Sensitivity of Perpetuity Growth and WACC

Total Amount (US$ million)

 

           Perpetuity Growth Rate  
           1.0%     1.5%     2.0%     2.5%     3.0%  
   8.5 %   (259.8 )   (260.9 )   (261.9 )   (263.0 )   (264.0 )
   9.0 %   (240.4 )   (241.3 )   (242.3 )   (243.2 )   (244.2 )

WACC

   9.5 %   (223.5 )   (224.4 )   (225.3 )   (226.1 )   (227.0 )
   10.0 %   (208.8 )   (209.6 )   (210.4 )   (211.2 )   (212.0 )
   10.5 %   (195.8 )   (196.5 )   (197.3 )   (198.0 )   (198.8 )

Value per Share (3) (US$)

 

           Perpetuity Growth Rate  
           1.0%     1.5%     2.0%     2.5%     3.0%  
   8.5 %   (4.32 )   (4.34 )   (4.36 )   (4.37 )   (4.39 )
   9.0 %   (4.00 )   (4.01 )   (4.03 )   (4.04 )   (4.06 )

WACC

   9.5 %   (3.72 )   (3.73 )   (3.75 )   (3.76 )   (3.77 )
   10.0 %   (3.47 )   (3.49 )   (3.50 )   (3.51 )   (3.52 )
   10.5 %   (3.26 )   (3.27 )   (3.28 )   (3.29 )   (3.30 )

 

(1) Shekel / US$ exchange rates based on EIU projections.
(2) Based on Shekel / US$ spot rate as of 5-Jul-08.
(3) Based on Fully Diluted TSM number of shares.

Management Costs Valuation

 

     Projected year end June,  
     2008     2009     2010     2011     2012  

Management Costs

   —       (18.0 )   (20.0 )   (21.9 )   (23.2 )

Cost Per Head ($k)

   4.4     4.4     4.4     4.4     4.4  

Group Headcount (‘000s)

   —       4,128     4,598     5,028     5,328  

Tax Rate

   29.5 %   28.0 %   28.0 %   28.0 %   28.0 %

Tax Savings

   0.0     (5.0 )   (5.6 )   (6.1 )   (6.5 )
                              

Net Management Costs Cash Flows

   0.0     (12.9 )   (14.4 )   (15.8 )   (16.7 )

Discounted Cash Flows

   0.0     (11.5 )   (11.7 )   (11.7 )   (11.4 )

Terminal Cash Flow

           (16.7 )

Terminal Value @ 2% Perpetuity Growth Rate

   (227.0 )        

PV of Terminal Value at WACC of 9.5%

   (154.4 )        

Total PV of Cash Flows at WACC of 9.5%

   (200.8 )        

Assumptions

          

Perpetuity Growth Rate

   2.0 %        

WACC

   9.5 %        

Value as a Sensitivity of Perpetuity Growth and WACC

Total Amount (US$ million)

 

           Perpetuity Growth Rate  
           1.0%     1.5%     2.0%     2.5%     3.0%  
   8.5 %   (206.5 )   (218.7 )   (232.8 )   (249.2 )   (268.6 )
   9.0 %   (193.1 )   (203.6 )   (215.7 )   (229.5 )   (245.7 )

WACC

   9.5 %   (181.3 )   (190.4 )   (200.8 )   (212.6 )   (226.3 )
   10.0 %   (170.8 )   (178.8 )   (187.8 )   (198.0 )   (209.7 )
   10.5 %   (161.4 )   (168.4 )   (176.3 )   (185.2 )   (195.3 )

Value per Share (1) (US$)

 

           Perpetuity Growth Rate  
           1.0%     1.5%     2.0%     2.5%     3.0%  
   8.5 %   (3.43 )   (3.64 )   (3.87 )   (4.14 )   (4.47 )
   9.0 %   (3.21 )   (3.39 )   (3.59 )   (3.82 )   (4.09 )

WACC

   9.5 %   (3.01 )   (3.17 )   (3.34 )   (3.54 )   (3.76 )
   10.0 %   (2.84 )   (2.97 )   (3.12 )   (3.29 )   (3.49 )
   10.5 %   (2.68 )   (2.80 )   (2.93 )   (3.08 )   (3.25 )

 

17


LBO Analysis – Management Case

 

Sources and Uses

 

Sources

   US$ in m       

Uses

   US$ in m  

Term loan A

   300        Purchase of public equity    1,019  

Term loan B

   295        Purchase of News Corp equity    2,646  

Term loan C

   295        News Corp equity rollover    (882 )
              

Total Senior Debt

   890        LTIP    51  
        Options    150  

Mezzanine

   385        Debt-Like Obligation (5)    60  
              

Total Debt

   1,275          

News Corp Vendor Note

   242        Fees & expenses (4)    142  

Excess Cash on Balance Sheet (3)

   725        Overfunding (Minimum Cash)    60  

Cash from Options

   72          

Permira Equity Contribution (1)

   918          

News Corp Equity Roll Over (1)

   882          

Less News Corp Equity Roll Over

   (882 )        

Management Equity (1)

   14          
              

Shareholders’ Equity

   931          
                  

Total Sources (Drawn)

   3,246       

Total Uses

   3,246  
                  

Pro Forma Capitalisation

 

          x CY 08E     %of
Total
    Pricing
     $US m    EBITDA (5)     Adj. EBITDA (5)       L+bps

Term loan A

   300    1.2 x   1.4 x   9.0 %   300

Term loan B

   295    1.2 x   1.4 x   8.9 %   350

Term loan C

   295    1.2 x   1.4 x   8.9 %   400
                           

Total Senior Debt

   890    3.7 x   4.2 x   26.7 %  

Mezzanine

   385    1.6 x   1.8 x   11.6 %   500 - 550
                           

Total Debt (Funded)

   1,275    5.3 x   6.0 x   38.3 %  

News Corp Vendor Note

   242    1.0 x   1.1 x   7.3 %  

Shareholder’s Equity

   1,813    7.5 x   8.6 x   54.4 %  
                           

Total Capitalisation

   3,330    13.8 x   15.7 x   100.0 %  
                           

Revolving Credit Facility

   150         

Acquisition Facility

   50         

Key LBO Model Assumptions

 

 

Transaction closing assumed at 3Q of 2008 (30 September 2008)

 

   

Exit assumed at Year 4 (30 June 2012)

 

 

Purchase at US$63 per share offer price

 

   

Entry and Exit multiples are excl. fees and expenses

 

 

 

Entry at 12.7x( 1) FV/CY EBITDA 08 (5) (or 14.5x (1) FV/Adj. CY EBITDA 08 (5))

 

   

Exit at 12.0x FV/Fwd CY EBITDA

 

 

Sept-08 cash position of US$725m of cash and US$60m of debt-like items(3) as per PWC Draft Structure Paper 8 August 2008

 

 

Structure assumes:

 

 

 

Debt financing at 6.0x CY Adjusted EBITDA 08 (5) as shown above

 

   

Use of existing cash balance, assuming US$60m minimum cash remains on balance sheet

 

   

No shareholder loans

 

   

Permira and News Corp each contribute 51% and 49% of a US$1,800m total equity amount

 

   

Management contribution of US$13.5m

 

Notes:   Analysis based on Management unadjusted projections.

 

(1) Assumes 59.4m fully diluted shares outstanding based on PWC Draft Structure Paper 8 August 2008. Net Cash position of US$665m (cash of US$725m and debt-like items of US$60m)
(2) Based on a US$13.5m minimum management contribution for a combination of Hurdle Shares and Series B shares; management has the option to invest in additional Series B shares
(3) Debt like items include costs associated with releasing trapped cash, contingent liabilities from prior acquisitions, liability accruals and claims, and pension deficit (source: PWC)
(4) Estimate; includes (a) US$45m of financing, advisory, legal, transaction and (b) investor fees of US$30m (US$15m to Permira; US$15m to News Corp).
(5) Management CY EBITDA 08E of US$242m, CY Adjusted EBITDA 08E of US$212m. Adjustment for management costs and deferred revenue.
(6) Total Equity including News Corp Rollover of US$882m.

 

18   LOGO


LBO Analysis – Returns Sensitivity

 

Total Shareholders Returns at US$63

(Exit in 2012)

Adjusted Management Case (1)

 

LOGO

Forward Exit Multiple

Adjusted Management Revised Upside Case (1)

 

LOGO

Forward Exit Multiple

 

(1) Adjusted for Shekel / US$ exchange rate impact only.

 

19   LOGO


Appendix

 

  LOGO


A. Supplementary Valuation Materials

 

  LOGO


EBITDA Adjustments Calculation

 

1. Exchange Rate Adjustment to Israel Cost Base

 

          Year Ended June 30  

(US$ Million, Unless Otherwise Stated)

        2008E    2009E     2010E     2011E     2012E  

FX Rate Assumptions

              

Rate Used in Management Case

   4.11    4.11    3.65     3.65     3.65     3.65  

Spot

   3.26    3.26    3.26     3.26     3.26     3.26  

EIU Projections (Average - Dec YE) (1)

      3.46    3.70     3.85     4.00     4.10  

EIU Projections (Average - Jun YE) (1)

      3.58    3.78     3.93     4.05     4.09  

Israel Total Expenses as per Management (2)

         150     161     178     196  

Implied Total Expenses (IS m)

      —      548     587     650     716  

Adjusted Total Expenses - at Spot Rate

      —      168     180     199     219  

Adjusted Total Expenses - at Projected Rate

      —      145     150     161     175  

FX Adjustment - at Spot Rate

         (18 )   (19 )   (21 )   (23 )

FX Adjustment - at Projected Rate

         5     11     18     21  

Net Savings on Staff Redistribution (1)

              

Reduction Israel Staff

      —      —       —       6     14  

Increase India Staff

      —      —       —       (2 )   (5 )

Impact on EBITDA

              

Incremental FX related Cost - at Spot

         (18 )   (19 )   (17 )   (15 )

EBITDA Post FX Adj. - Spot

         234     262     308     348  

Incremental FX Related Cost - at Projected Rate (a)

         5     11     22     29  

EBITDA Post FX Adj. - at Projected Rate

         256     292     347     392  

2. Management Incentivisation Costs

 

     Year Ended June 30  

(US$ Million, Unless Otherwise Stated)

   2008E     2009E     2010E     2011E     2012E  

Equity Based Compensation Assumptions

          

Equity Based Compensation

   17.0     18.0     20.0     21.9     23.2  

Cost Per Head

   4.4     4.4     4.4     4.4     4.4  

Group Headcount (‘000s)

   3,907     4,128     4,598     5,028     5,328  

Impact on EBITDA

          

Incremental Cost (b)

   (17 )   (18 )   (20 )   (22 )   (23 )

EBITDA Post Equity Based Compensation Costs

     233     261     304     339  

EBITDA Post FX Adj. and Equity Based Compensation Costs

     216     242     287     325  
3. Deferred Revenue Adjustment  
     Year Ended June 30  

(US$ Million, Unless Otherwise Stated)

   2008E     2009E     2010E     2011E     2012E  

Increase / (Decrease) in Units of Cards Shipped (‘000)

          

Customer 1

   0     (6,577 )   (5,943 )   0     0  

Customer 2

   0     (2,400 )   (2,400 )   (2,400 )   (1,800 )

Other

   0     (980 )   (980 )   (443 )   0  
                              

Total

   0     (9,957 )   (9,323 )   (2,843 )   (1,800 )

Increase / (Decrease) in Revenue

          

Customer 1

   0     (38 )   (38 )   0     0  

Customer 2

   (18 )   (12 )   (14 )   (14 )   (11 )

Other

   (6 )   (5 )   (5 )   (2 )   0  
                              

Total

   (23 )   (55 )   (57 )   (16 )   (11 )

Increase / (Decrease) of Associated Costs

          

Customer 1

   0     (17 )   (17 )   0     0  

Customer 2

   (9 )   (7 )   (7 )   (7 )   (5 )

Other

   (2 )   (3 )   (3 )   (1 )   0  
                              

Total

   (10 )   (26 )   (27 )   (8 )   (5 )

Impact on EBITDA

          

Customer 1

   0     (21 )   (21 )   0     0  

Customer 2

   (9 )   (6 )   (6 )   (7 )   (6 )

Other

   (4 )   (2 )   (2 )   (1 )   0  
                              

Incremental Cost (c)

   (13 )   (29 )   (30 )   (8 )   (6 )

EBITDA Post Adjustment for Deferred Revenue

     280     311     334     369  

EBITDA Post Adj. for FX, Incentiv. and Deferred Rev.

     187     212     278     318  

EBITDA Post Total Adjustments (a,b,c)

     187     212     278     318  

 

Source:   NDS information, vendor due diligence reports.
Note:   (1)   Projections from Economic Intelligence Unit. Projected average annual rate.
  (2)   Israel Total Expenses includes Israel operating expenses, Israel-based costs for Jungo and Castup.

 

20   LOGO


Costs Associated to Deferred Revenue - DCF Valuation

 

 

     Projected year end June,  
     2008     2009     2010     2011     2012  

Costs Associated to Deferred Revenue

   (13.0 )   (28.8 )   (30.0 )   (8.1 )   (6.4 )

Tax Rate

   29.5 %   28.0 %   28.0 %   28.0 %   28.0 %

Tax Savings

   (3.8 )   (8.1 )   (8.4 )   (2.3 )   (1.8 )
                              

Net Costs Cash Flows

   (9.1 )   (20.7 )   (21.6 )   (5.8 )   (4.6 )

Discounted Cash Flows

   (8.9 )   (18.5 )   (17.6 )   (4.3 )   (3.1 )

Terminal Cash Flow

           (4.6 )

Terminal Value @ 2% Perpetuity Growth Rate

   (48.1 )        

PV of Terminal Value at WACC of 9.5%

   (32.8 )        

Total PV of Cash Flows at WACC of 9.5%

   (85.2 )        
Assumptions           

Perpetuity Growth Rate

   0.0 %        

WACC

   9.5 %        

 

21   LOGO


WACC Calculation

 

 

     Low     Mid     High  

Cost of Equity

      

US Risk Free Rate (30-Year) (a)

   4.53 %   4.53 %   4.53 %

Equity Market Risk Premium (b)

   4.0 %   5.0 %   6.0 %

Asset Beta (c)

   1.00     1.00     1.00  

Relevered Equity Beta

   1.31     1.31     1.31  

Adjusted Equity Market Risk Premium (d)

   5.2 %   6.5 %   7.9 %

Cost of Equity (e)

   9.8 %   11.1 %   12.4 %

Cost of Debt

      

US Risk Free Rate (10-Year) (f)

   3.98 %   3.98 %   3.98 %

Estimated Credit Spread (g)

   2.50 %   2.50 %   2.50 %

Cost of Debt (Pretax)

   6.48 %   6.48 %   6.48 %

Effective Marginal Tax Rate

   28.0 %   28.0 %   28.0 %

Cost of Debt (After-tax)

   4.66 %   4.66 %   4.66 %

Target Debt/Capitalization (Market)

   30.0 %   30.0 %   30.0 %

WACC (h)

   8.2 %   9.2 %   10.1 %

 

(a) 30-year US Government Bond yield.
(b) Citigroup Financial Strategic Group estimate.
(c) Equity beta low based on NDS beta, high beta based on Kudelski.
(d) Equity market risk multiplied by equity beta.
(e) Cost of Equity = Risk-Free Rate (RF) + Equity Beta (bE) * Equity Risk Premium (RM -RF).
(f) 10-year US Government Bond yield.
(g) Citigroup estimates.
(h) WACC = [(RF+PRP+ID+bE*(RM -RF)+RP)*%E]+[KD*(1 T)*%D].

NDS Asset Beta Analysis

 

     Historical
Beta
   Predicted
Beta
   Market
Leverage
    Asset Beta
(Historic)
   Asset Beta
(Predicted)

Kudelski

   1.17    1.24    5 %   1.12    1.19

Macrovision

   1.09    1.34    (3 )%   1.11    1.37

OpenTV

   1.20    1.46    (87 )%   1.66    2.02

Aladdin

   0.84    0.67    (107 )%   1.22    0.96

Low

   0.84    0.67    (107 )%   1.11    0.96

Median

   1.13    1.29    (45 )%   1.17    1.28

Mean

   1.08    1.18    (48 )%   1.28    1.39

High

   1.20    1.46    5 %   1.66    2.02

NDS

   0.91    1.04    (28 )%   1.08    1.24

 

22   LOGO


B. Supplementary Transaction Materials

 

  LOGO


Financing Overview

 

 

   

Term Loan A, B, C

 

Revolving Credit Facility

 

Mezzanine

 

Vendor Note

Facility

 

•      US$300 million Term Loan A

 

•      US$295 million Term Loan B

 

•      US$295 million Term Loan C

 

•      US$150 million revolving credit

 

•      US$50 million sub-limit for acquisitions

 

•      US$385 million mezzanine

 

•      US$242 million vendor loan

Pricing

 

•      TLA - L+300 bps

(subject to margin ratchet)

 

•      TLB - L+350 bps

(subject to margin ratchet)

 

•      TLC - L+400 bps

 

•      L+300 bps

(subject to margin ratchet)

 

•      L / E+ 5.0% cash pay

 

•      5.5% PIK

 

•      13.0% PIK

Maturity

 

•      TLA – 7 years from close

 

•      TLB – 7.5 years from close

 

•      TLC – 8 years from close

 

•      7 years from close

 

•      9 years from close

 

•      Earliest of:

 

•      An Exit

 

•      Occurrence of a Qualifying IPO

 

•      9.5 years from date of issue

 

•      A refinancing in full of the Senior and Mezzanine Facilities

Required Amortisation

 

•      TLA – repaid in semi-annual instalments starting in December 2009

 

•      TLB, C bullet at maturity

 

•      Bullet at maturity, except for acquisition borrowings which are repaid in semi annual instalments starting 3.5 years from close

 

•      Bullet at maturity

 

•      Bullet at maturity

Source: Joint Term Sheet prepared by Clifford Chance dated 8 August 2008.

Note: Excludes US$75m undrawn acquisition facility with terms no more onerous than the Senior Term Facilities available 4 years from close maturing seven years from close if drawn.

 

23   LOGO


Summary of Key Proposed Terms of Management Equity

 

 

(US$ millions)

   Hurdle Shares(1)   Mandatory B
Ordinary Shares
  Additional B
Ordinary Shares
   Employee Shares(2)

Amount

   US$6.0(3)   US$7.5(4)   Amount TBD    3% of Ordinary Shares

Pro Rata Reduction of News Corp and Permira Investment

   ü   ü   ü   

Voting

     ü   ü   

Tag Along

   ü   ü   ü    ü

Drag Along

   ü   ü   ü    ü

Subject to Leaver Provisions

   ü   ü      ü

Entitled to Receive Dividends / Distributions

     ü   ü   

Source: Presentation to the Independent Directors prepared by News Corp and Permira dated 27 June 2008.

 

(1) Entitled to 8% of any Equity Surplus Proceeds which are proceeds after (i) B Ordinary Shares receive initial investment cost, (ii) options receive 3% of Exit Proceeds, (iii) B Ordinary Shares receive a 13% p.a. compounded return, then (iv) B Ordinary receive 92%/Hurdle Share receive 8% of such surplus.
(2) Granted by the Compensation Committee as follows: (i) 1% at Completion, (ii) 0.75% on 1st anniversary (iii) 0.75% on 2nd anniversary, (iv) 0.50% on 3rd anniversary.
(3) Includes US$0.75m issued to an employee benefit trust.
(4) Management has the option to borrow from NDS to finance subscription of mandatory B shares.

 

24   LOGO


The following pages contain material provided to the Independent Directors of NDS Group Limited (the “Company”) by Citigroup Global Markets Limited (“Citi”) in connection with the proposed transaction involving the Company, News Corporation and Permira Holdings Limited.

 

The accompanying material is subject to the terms of our engagement letter with the Company, including the section entitled “Use of Information” therein, and is solely for use by the Independent Directors in negotiating the terms of a transaction involving the Company. No other person may rely upon the accompanying material. The accompanying material does not constitute an opinion by Citi as to the fairness to the Company or its shareholders of the terms of any actual or proposed transaction involving the Company.

 

The information contained in the accompanying material was obtained from the Company and other sources. Any estimates and projections contained herein have been prepared or adopted by the management of the Company or obtained from public sources, or are based upon such estimates and projections, and involve numerous and significant subjective determinations, and there is no assurance that such estimates and projections will be realised. Citi does not take responsibility for such estimates and projections, or the basis on which they were prepared. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and nothing contained herein is, or shall be relied upon as, a representation, whether as to the past, the present or the future. In preparing the accompanying material, Citi assumed and relied, without independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information and data publicly available or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Citi and upon the assurances of the management of the Company, that they are not aware of any relevant information that has been omitted or that remains undisclosed to Citi.

 

The accompanying material was not prepared for use by readers not as familiar with the Company as the the Independent Directors of the Company and, accordingly, neither the Company nor Citi nor their respective legal or financial advisors or accountants take any responsibility for the accompanying material if used by persons other than the the Independent Directors of the Company. The accompanying material is necessarily based upon information available to Citi, and financial, stock market and other conditions and circumstances existing and disclosed to Citi, as of the date of the accompanying material. Citi does not have any obligation to update or otherwise revise the accompanying materials. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as legal, tax or accounting advice.

 

© 2008 Citigroup Global Markets Limited. Authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. All rights reserved. Citi and Citi and Arc Design are trademarks and service marks of Citigroup Inc. or its affiliates and are used and registered throughout the world.

 

In January 2007, Citi released a Climate Change Position Statement, the first US financial institution to do so. As a sustainability leader in the financial sector, Citi has taken concrete steps to address this important issue of climate change by: (a) targeting US$50 billion over 10 years to address global climate change: includes significant increases in investment and financing of alternative energy, clean technology, and other carbon-emission reduction activities; (b) committing to reduce GHG emissions of all Citi owned and leased properties around the world by 10% by 2011; (c) purchasing more than 52,000 MWh of green (carbon neutral) power for our operations in 2006; (d) creating Sustainable Development Investments (SDI) that makes private equity investments in renewable energy and clean technologies; (e) providing lending and investing services to clients for renewable energy development and projects; (f) producing equity research related to climate issues that helps to inform investors on risks and opportunities associated with the issue; and (g) engaging with a broad range of stakeholders on the issue of climate change to help advance understanding and solutions.

 

Citi works with its clients in greenhouse gas intensive industries to evaluate emerging risks from climate change and, where appropriate, to mitigate those risks.

 

efficiency, renewable energy & mitigation

 

  LOGO