Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Commitments and Contingencies	14. Commitments and Contingencies Letters of Credit The Company utilizes letters of credit to back certain payment obligations relating to its facility operating leases and certain vendor requirements. The Company has approximately $1.3 million in outstanding standby letters of credit as of June 30, 2011. During the quarter ending September 30, 2011, the Company expects its outstanding standby letters of credit to be reduced by $0.3 million to approximately $1.0 million. Legal Matters In November 2001, Register.com Inc. (“Register.com”), its Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and former Vice President of Finance and Accounting Richard D. Forman and its former President and Chief Executive Officer Alan G. Breitman (the “Individual Defendants”) were named as defendants in class action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities laws in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. A Consolidated Amended Complaint, which is now the operative complaint, was filed in the Southern District of New York on April 19, 2002. The purported class action alleges violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”) and Sections 10(b), Rule 10b-5 and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) against Register.com and Individual Defendants. The essence of the complaint is that defendants issued and sold Register.com’s common stock pursuant to the Registration Statement for the March 3, 2000 Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) without disclosing to investors that certain underwriters in the offering had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors. The complaint also alleges that the Registration Statement for the IPO failed to disclose that the underwriters allocated Register.com shares in the IPO to customers in exchange for the customers’ promises to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices above the IPO price, thereby maintaining, distorting and/or inflating the market price for the shares in the aftermarket. The action seeks damages in an unspecified amount. The action is being coordinated with approximately 300 other nearly identical actions filed against other companies. On July 15, 2002, Register.com moved to dismiss all claims against it and the Individual Defendants. On October 9, 2002, the Court dismissed the Individual Defendants from the case without prejudice. This dismissal disposed of the Section 15 and 20(a) control person claims without prejudice, since these claims were asserted only against the Individual Defendants. On February 19, 2003, the Court denied the motion to dismiss the complaint against Register.com. On December 5, 2006, the Second Circuit vacated a decision by the district court granting class certification in six of the approximately 300 nearly identical actions that are part of the consolidated litigation, which are intended to serve as test, or “focus” cases. The plaintiffs selected these six cases, which do not include Register.com. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the petition for rehearing filed by the plaintiffs, but noted that the plaintiffs could ask the District Court to certify more narrow classes than those that were rejected. The parties in the approximately 300 coordinated cases, including the parties in Register.com’s case, reached a settlement. It provides for releases of existing claims and claims that could have been asserted relating to the conduct alleged to be wrongful from the class of investors participating in the settlement. The insurers for the issuer defendants in the coordinated cases will make the settlement payment on behalf of the issuers, including Register.com. On October 6, 2009, the Court granted final approval to the settlement. Two appeals are proceeding. Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss both appeals. Four additional appeals that had been filed have been withdrawn. We intend to continue to defend the action vigorously if the settlement does not survive the appeal. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter. We have notified our underwriters and insurance companies of the existence of the claims. We presently believe, after consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial position. In addition to the legal matters mentioned above, we and our subsidiaries are named from time to time as defendants in various legal actions that are incidental to our business and arise out of or are related to claims made in connection with our customer and vendor contracts and employment related disputes. We believe that the resolution of these legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. There were no material legal matters that were reasonably possible and estimable at June 30, 2011. In addition, there were no material legal matters for which an estimate could not be made.

14. Commitments and Contingencies

Letters of Credit

The Company utilizes letters of credit to back certain payment obligations relating to its facility operating leases and certain vendor requirements. The Company has approximately $1.3 million in outstanding standby letters of credit as of June 30, 2011. During the quarter ending September 30, 2011, the Company expects its outstanding standby letters of credit to be reduced by $0.3 million to approximately $1.0 million.

Legal Matters

In November 2001, Register.com Inc. (“Register.com”), its Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and former Vice President of Finance and Accounting Richard D. Forman and its former President and Chief Executive Officer Alan G. Breitman (the “Individual Defendants”) were named as defendants in class action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities laws in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. A Consolidated Amended Complaint, which is now the operative complaint, was filed in the Southern District of New York on April 19, 2002.

The purported class action alleges violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”) and Sections 10(b), Rule 10b-5 and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) against Register.com and Individual Defendants. The essence of the complaint is that defendants issued and sold Register.com’s common stock pursuant to the Registration Statement for the March 3, 2000 Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) without disclosing to investors that certain underwriters in the offering had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors. The complaint also alleges that the Registration Statement for the IPO failed to disclose that the underwriters allocated Register.com shares in the IPO to customers in exchange for the customers’ promises to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices above the IPO price, thereby maintaining, distorting and/or inflating the market price for the shares in the aftermarket. The action seeks damages in an unspecified amount.

The action is being coordinated with approximately 300 other nearly identical actions filed against other companies. On July 15, 2002, Register.com moved to dismiss all claims against it and the Individual Defendants. On October 9, 2002, the Court dismissed the Individual Defendants from the case without prejudice. This dismissal disposed of the Section 15 and 20(a) control person claims without prejudice, since these claims were asserted only against the Individual Defendants. On February 19, 2003, the Court denied the motion to dismiss the complaint against Register.com. On December 5, 2006, the Second Circuit vacated a decision by the district court granting class certification in six of the approximately 300 nearly identical actions that are part of the consolidated litigation, which are intended to serve as test, or “focus” cases. The plaintiffs selected these six cases, which do not include Register.com. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the petition for rehearing filed by the plaintiffs, but noted that the plaintiffs could ask the District Court to certify more narrow classes than those that were rejected.

The parties in the approximately 300 coordinated cases, including the parties in Register.com’s case, reached a settlement. It provides for releases of existing claims and claims that could have been asserted relating to the conduct alleged to be wrongful from the class of investors participating in the settlement. The insurers for the issuer defendants in the coordinated cases will make the settlement payment on behalf of the issuers, including Register.com. On October 6, 2009, the Court granted final approval to the settlement. Two appeals are proceeding. Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss both appeals. Four additional appeals that had been filed have been withdrawn. We intend to continue to defend the action vigorously if the settlement does not survive the appeal. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter. We have notified our underwriters and insurance companies of the existence of the claims. We presently believe, after consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial position.

In addition to the legal matters mentioned above, we and our subsidiaries are named from time to time as defendants in various legal actions that are incidental to our business and arise out of or are related to claims made in connection with our customer and vendor contracts and employment related disputes. We believe that the resolution of these legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. There were no material legal matters that were reasonably possible and estimable at June 30, 2011. In addition, there were no material legal matters for which an estimate could not be made.