XML 38 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
12 Months Ended
May 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
  
a.
Basis of Presentation - The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred net losses of approximately $25 million since inception, including a net loss of $516,930 and net income of $4,135,062 for the years ended May 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Additionally, though the Company had a net working capital increase recently, the Company still had both working capital and shareholders’ deficiencies at May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012 and negative cash flow from operations since inception. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management expects to incur additional losses in the foreseeable future and recognizes the need to raise capital to remain viable. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
 
b.
Principles of consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Arkados Group, Inc. (the “Parent”), and its wholly owned subsidiaries, which include: CDKnet, LLC, Creative Technology, LLC, CDK Financial Corp. Diversified Capital Holdings, LLC, Arkados, Inc. and Arkados Wireless Technologies, Inc. Currently, Arkados, Inc., however, is the only active entity with operations. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
c.
Business combinations - We account for acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting which requires that the assets and liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values. Because of the expertise required to value intangible assets and intellectual property research and development “IPR&D”, we typically engage a third party valuation firm to assist management in determining those values. Valuation of intangible assets and IPR&D entails significant estimates and assumptions including, but not limited to: determining the timing and expected costs to complete projects, estimating future cash flows from product sales, and developing appropriate discount rates and probability rates by project. We believe that the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions. To the extent actual results differ from those estimates, our future results of operations may be affected by incurring charges to our statements of operations. Additionally, estimates for purchase price allocations may change as subsequent information becomes available.
 
d.
Cash and cash equivalents - The Company considers investments in highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
 
 
e.
Allowance for doubtful accounts - The Company records a bad debt expense / allowance based on management’s estimate of uncollectible accounts. The Company has not recorded any bad debt expense in any of the years ended May 31, 2013 and 2012.
 
 
f.
Equipment - Equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Equipment is being depreciated over a period of seven years. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are charged to operations as incurred, whereas the cost of significant betterments is capitalized. Upon the sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and gains or losses are reflected in operations.
 
 
g.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - The Company reviews long-lived assets, certain identifiable assets and goodwill related to those assets for impairment whenever circumstances and situations change such that there is an indication that the carrying amounts may not be recovered. To the extent there has been any impairment such impairment has been record in the statement of operations.  
 
h.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, other receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amounts of debt were also estimated to approximate fair value. The Company cannot estimate the fair value of the remaining outstanding payroll tax penalties and interest recorded in connection with the 2004 merger and legacy payables. As defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic No. 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement). This fair value measurement framework applies at both initial and subsequent measurement.
 
 
  
 
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by ASC Topic No. 820 are as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable securities and listed equities.
 
 
 
Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Instruments in this category generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and collars.
 
Level 3 – Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
 
i.
Revenue Recognition - The Company derives revenues from two sources – sales of products and revenues related to service and custom development activities. For product sales, revenue is recognized when our products are shipped to our customers. Shipping documents and the completion of any customer acceptance requirements, when applicable, are used to verify product delivery or that services have been rendered. Shipping costs are charged to cost of sales as incurred. For sales related to development, the Company recorded revenues pursuant to a number of term development contracts. The revenues are earned and recorded based on pre-determined milestones. When revenues within a pre-determined milestone have been partially earned, the Company records such progress billings as “Revenues earned not yet billed.” Such revenues are billable under the terms of the arrangement once the milestone has been fully completed. The Company also monitors estimated costs to complete such long term contract to the revenues to be earned to ensure that if there is an estimated loss to record to complete their obligation to fulfill the terms of such development contract, such loss existed. As of each of May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012, there were no long term contracts for which revenues were yet to be earned outstanding. 
 
j.
Shipping and Handling Costs - Shipping and handling costs are normally FOB the Company’s factory. These costs are included in cost of goods sold.
 
k.
Advertising Costs - All advertising costs are expensed as incurred. The Company has not had any advertising costs in each of the last two years.
 
l.
Income (Loss) Per Share - Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. For the year ended May 31, 2013, there was a net loss, as a result, there are no dilutive securities presented since it would have an anti-dilutive effect. Potentially dilutive securities as of May 31, 2013 were comprised of 2,350,080 of warrants, 2,960,000 of options, and 40,000,000 shares of common stock issuable as a result of convertible debt instruments. For the year ended May 31, 2012 the diluted loss per share is the same as basic loss per share since the exercise price of the 5,895,545 warrants and 3,610,000 options exceeded the market on such day.
 
 
m.
Equity Based Compensation - In computing the impact, the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant based on the Black-Scholes options-pricing model utilizing certain assumptions for a risk free interest rate; volatility; and expected remaining lives of the awards. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the Company’s stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. In estimating the Company’s forfeiture rate, the Company analyzed its historical forfeiture rate, the remaining lives of unvested options, and the amount of vested options as a percentage of total options outstanding. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, or if the Company reevaluates the forfeiture rate in the future, the stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what we have recorded in the current period.
 
    
     
The Company has recorded compensation expense for the years ended May 31, 2013 and 2012, in the amounts of $-0- and $-0-, respectively.
 
n.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, equity based transactions and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
o.
Research and Development –All research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
 
p.
New Accounting Pronouncements –
 
In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU” 2013-11 on  “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists”.  The amendments in this ASU are to improve the current U.S. GAAP because they are expected to reduce diversity in practice by providing guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits and will better reflect the manner in which an entity would settle at the reporting date any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position when net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses, or tax credit carryforwards exist.  Current U.S. GAAP does not include explicit guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. This Update applies to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted.
 
All newly issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements have been deemed to be not applicable or immaterial to the Company.