6-K

FORM 6-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the period of: December 6, 2007 to January 15, 2008

Platinum Group Metals Ltd.

(SEC File No. 0-30306)

Suite 328 – 550 Burrard Street, Vancouver BC, V6C 2B5, CANADA

Address of Principal Executive Office

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover:  Form 20-F [  ] Form 40-F  [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [   ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:  Yes  [   ]  No  [X]

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-___________

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: January 15, 2008	“Frank R. Hallam”
	FRANK R. HALLAM DIRECTOR & CFO

Q1 Financials for period ending Nov 30, 2007

Q1 MDA for period ending Nov 30, 2007

CEO certification for Q1 filing

CFO certification for Q1 filing

News Release for January 14, 2008 

EX-99.01

Platinum Group Metals Ltd.

(Exploration Stage Company)

Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

For the quarter ended November 30, 2007

(Unaudited)

Filed: January 14, 2008

The attached interim financial statements have

not been reviewed by the Company’s auditor.

A copy of this report will be provided to any shareholder who requests it.

See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial statements.

1.            NATURE OF OPERATIONS

The Company is a British Columbia corporation incorporated on February 18, 2002 by an order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia approving an amalgamation between Platinum Group Metals Ltd. and New Millennium Metals Corporation (“New Millennium”). The Company is an exploration company conducting work on mineral properties it has staked or acquired by way of option agreements in Ontario, Canada and the Republic of South Africa. The Company has not yet determined whether its mineral properties contain ore reserves that are economically recoverable. The Company defers all acquisition, exploration and development costs related to mineral properties. The recoverability of these amounts is dependant upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the development of the property, and future profitable production, or alternatively, upon the Company’s ability to dispose of its interests on an advantageous basis.

The Company has incurred losses from inception and does not currently have the financial resources to sustain operations in the long-term. The Company is dependant upon its ability in the future to achieve profitable operations and, in the meantime, to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they become due. External financing, predominantly by the issuance of equity to the public, will be sought to finance the operations of the Company, however, there is no assurance that sufficient funds can or will be raised.

2.            SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”) and include the significant policies outlined below.

(a)            Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation

The financial statements of entities which are controlled by the Company through voting equity interest, referred to as subsidiaries, are consolidated. Variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which include, but are not limited to, special purpose entities, trusts, partnerships and other legal structures, as defined by the Accounting Standards Board in Accounting Guideline 15, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, are entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a “controlling financial interest” or there is not sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. VIEs are subject to consolidation by the primary beneficiary who will absorb the majority of the entities’ expected losses and/or residual returns.

These interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Platinum Group Metals (RSA) (Pty) Ltd. (“PTM RSA”). PTM RSA holds mineral rights and conducts operations in the Republic of South Africa. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

The Company’s 37% working interest in the Western Bushveld Joint Venture (Note 5) is recorded using the equity method.

(b)            Mineral properties and deferred exploration costs

Mineral properties consist of exploration and mining concessions, options and contracts. Acquisition and leasehold costs and exploration costs are capitalized until such time as the property is put into production or disposed of either through sale or abandonment. If put into production, the costs of acquisition and exploration will be amortized over the life of the property based on the estimated economic reserves. Proceeds received from the sale of any interest in a property will first be credited against the carrying value of the property, with any excess included in operations for the period. If a property is abandoned, the property and deferred exploration costs are written off to operations.

Management of the Company reviews and evaluates the carrying value of each mineral property for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the related asset may not be recoverable. Where estimates of future net cash flows are available and the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized and assets are written down to fair value which is normally determined using the discounted value of future cash flows. Where estimates of future net cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, management assesses whether the carrying value can be recovered by considering alternative methods of determining fair value. When it is determined that a mineral property is impaired it is written down to its estimated fair value.

(c)            Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term money market instruments, which are readily convertible to cash and have original maturities of 90 days or less. The Company holds no asset-backed commercial paper.

(d)            Reclamation and closure costs

The Company recognizes the estimated fair value of liabilities for asset retirement obligations including reclamation and closure costs in the period in which they are incurred. A corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related asset is recorded and amortized over the life of the asset. The amount of the liability is subject to re-measurement at each reporting period and is accreted over time to the estimated asset retirement obligation ultimately payable through charges to operations.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is possible that the Company’s estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities could change as a result of changes in regulations, the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in technology and the means and cost of reclamation. Based on management’s estimates, the Company has determined that there are no reclamation liabilities as at period end.

(e)            Income taxes

Future income taxes relate to the expected future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amount of balance sheet items and their corresponding tax values. Future tax assets, if any, are recognized only to the extent that, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that the future income tax assets will be realized. Future income tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment or substantive enactment.

(f)            Short-term investments

Short-term investments comprise guaranteed investment certificates with original maturities of more than 90 days.

 (g)            Fixed assets

Fixed assets are recorded at cost and are amortized on the declining balance basis at the following annual rates:

Computer equipment                                                             30%

Computer software                                                                30%

Office furniture and equipment                                           20%

The leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis to amortize the costs over the three year term of the related lease.

(h)            Earnings (loss) per common share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

The Company uses the treasury stock method for the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Diluted earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the year. Common equivalent shares consist of the incremental common shares arising upon the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants, but are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive.

(i)            Measurement uncertainty

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenditures during the reporting period. Significant items where management’s judgement is applied include the assessment of impairment of long-lived assets, amortization, income tax provisions, contingent liabilities, stock-based compensation and asset retirement obligations. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(j) Translation of foreign currencies

The Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar. For integrated foreign operations, monetary assets and liabilities are translated at period end exchange rates and other assets and liabilities are translated at historical rates. Revenues, expenses and cash flows are translated at average exchange rates. Gains and losses on translation of monetary assets and monetary liabilities are charged to operations.

The accounts of self-sustaining foreign operations are translated at period end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates. Differences arising from these foreign currency translations are recorded in shareholders’ equity as a cumulative translation adjustment until they are realized by a reduction in the investment.

(k)            Stock-based compensation

The Company follows the recommendations of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”) Handbook Section 3870, Stock-based Compensation and Other Stock-based Payments. Accordingly, the fair value of all stock-based awards granted are estimated using the Black-Scholes model and are recorded in operations over their vesting periods. The compensation cost related to stock options granted is recorded in operations.

Cash received on the exercise of stock options is credited to share capital and the amount previously recognized in contributed surplus is also transferred to share capital.

(l) Capital leases

Leases of fixed assets which transfer substantially all the benefits and risks incident to ownership of property to the Company are classified as capital leases.

Capital leases are capitalized by recording an asset and a liability at the lower of the amounts equal to the fair value of the leased property or the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are allocated between the reduction of the lease liability and the lease interest expense for the period.

(m)   Changes inaccounting policies

Effective January 1, 2007, we have adopted CICA Handbook Sections 3855 Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement; Section 3861 Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation; Section 3865 Hedges; Section 1530 Comprehensive Income and Section 3251 Equity. As the Company has not previously undertaken hedging activities, adoption of Section 3865 currently has no impact. Prior to January 1, 2007, the principal accounting policies affecting financial instruments related to marketable securities that were valued at the lower of original cost and fair market value.

CICA section 3855 requires that all financial assets, except those classified as held to maturity, and loans and receivables, must be measured at fair value. All financial liabilities must be measured at fair value when they are classified as held-for trading, otherwise, they are measured at amortized cost. Investments classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair market value (or marked to market) based on quoted market prices with unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and reported as other comprehensive income or loss. Those instruments classified as held-for-trading, have gains or losses included in earnings in the period in which they arise.  All of the Company’s investments have been designated as available-for-sale.

Comprehensive income is the change in our net assets that results from transactions, events and circumstances from sources other than our shareholders and includes items that would not normally be included in net earnings such as unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments. Other comprehensive income includes the gains and losses from available-for-sale securities which are not included in net income (loss) until realized.

The adoption of Sections 1530 and 3855 impacts our opening equity. The unrealized gain on the available-for-sale securities from purchase to August 31, 2007 was $1,874,001, which is reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated other comprehensive income. The net unrealized gain on the available-for-sale securities for the three months ended November 30, 2007 was $167,000. There would be no tax impact resulting from adjustments arising from comprehensive income as there are sufficient unrecognized future tax benefits available to offset any future tax liability arising.

(n)            Financial instruments

The Company’s financial instruments are comprised of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, marketable securities, amounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities and advances from WBJV partners.   Unless otherwise stated it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.  The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and advances from WBJV partners approximate their carrying value due to their short-term maturity or their capacity of prompt liquidation.  Marketable securities are recorded in the financial statements at fair value.

3.            AMOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Expenditure advances receivable consist of funds advanced to officers, directors and consulting geologists for exploration and corporate activities conducted in the normal course of business and bear no interest.

4.            MARKETABLE SECURITIES

At November 30, 2007, the Company has the following marketable securities:

Available-for-sale shares	Number of Shares	Cost ($)	Accumulated Unrealized Gains ($)	Fair Value ($)
MAG Silver Corp.	100,000	50,000	1,489,000	1,539,000
West Timmins Mining Inc.	800,001	160,000	552,001	712,001
Total Marketable Securities		210,000	2,041,001	2,251,001

On September 1, 2007 the Company recognized an adjustment of $1,874,001 to the opening balance of accumulated other comprehensive income pursuant to adoption of the new CICA Handbook Section 3855 Financial Instruments – Recognition Measurement.  The amount represents the unrealized gain on available-for-sale marketable securities held by the Company at September 1, 2007.

During the three month period ended November 30, 2007 the Company recognized an unrealized gain of $167,000 (2006 - $nil) on marketable securities designated as available-for-sale in other comprehensive income.

(a)            MAG Silver Corp.

In 2003 the Company earned a finders’ fee of 200,000 shares of MAG Silver Corp. (“MAG”), a company with two directors and one officer in common with the Company, with an assigned value of $0.50 per share for introducing MAG to certain individuals and mineral properties located in Mexico. During 2003 the Company sold 100,000 of these shares for proceeds of $67,630.

(b)            West Timmins Mining Inc.

In 2002 New Millennium granted Sydney Resource Corporation (“SYR”), a company with three directors in common with the Company, an option to earn a 50% interest in New Millennium’s 100% owned Simlock Creek gold project, located in the Cariboo Mining District of British Columbia. On December 2, 2003 the Company and SYR agreed to terminate the Option and the Company then sold the property to SYR outright in exchange for 1,200,000 shares of SYR at a value of $0.20 per share.  SYR was reorganized and named West Timmins Mining Inc. on September 14, 2006.  At November 30, 2007 the Company held 800,001 West Timmins Mining Inc. shares.

5.INVESTMENT IN WESTERN BUSHVELD JOINT VENTURE (THE “WBJV”)

	Nov. 30, 2007	Aug. 31, 2007
Opening Balance	$14,779,302	$10,861,834
Additional investment	2,952,221	3,917,468
Balance before translation	17,731,523	14,779,302
Translation adjustment	(2,323,863)	(2,365,876)
Ending Balance	$15,407,660	$12,413,426

Details of the assets of the WBJV excluding the property rights contributed by the other venture partners are as follows:

On October 26, 2004 the Company entered into the Western Bushveld Joint Venture (the “WBJV”) with a subsidiary of Anglo Platinum Limited (“Anglo Platinum”) and Africa Wide Mineral Prospecting and Exploration (Pty) Limited (“Africa Wide”) to pursue platinum exploration and development on combined mineral rights covering approximately 67 square kilometres on the Western Bushveld Complex of South Africa. The transaction closed effective January 26, 2005. The Company contributed all of its interests in portions of the farms Onderstepoort 98JQ and Elandsfontein 102JQ (see (ii) (1) and (ii) (2) below). Anglo Platinum contributed its interests in portions of the farms Koedoesfontein 94JQ, Elandsfontein 102JQ and Frischgewaagd 96JQ. Later, in 2007, Anglo Platinum contributed its 50% interest in Portion 11 of the farm Frischgewaagd bringing the total area of the WBJV to approximately 72 square kilometres. The Company and Anglo Platinum each hold a 37% working interest in the WBJV, while Africa Wide holds a 26% working interest.

In April 2007 the shareholders of Africa Wide sold100% of their company to Wesizwe Platinum Ltd. The transaction closed in September 2007 and since then Wesizwe has become responsible for all of the rights and obligations of Africa Wide.

The Company is the operator of the WBJV. From October 2004 to April 2006 the Company funded a required exploration program in the amount of Rand 35 million (at August 31, 2005 approx. C$6.44 million). Since then the partners of the WBJV have been required to fund further expenditures pro-rata based upon their working interest in the Joint Venture. From April 2006 to March 2007 the partners to the WBJV approved budgets in the amount of Rand 76,393,208 (approximately C$11.7 million at September 2006). In July 2007 the WBJV participants approved a new cash budget for the WBJV totaling Rand 102,976,176 (approximately C$15.5 million in July 2007). At November 30, 2007 Anglo Platinum had an unspent contribution balance to the WBJV of Rand 4,661,386 (C$686,156).At November 30, 2007 Africa Wide had an unspent contribution balance to the WBJV of Rand 3,282,596 (C$483,198).

Once a bankable feasibility study has been completed, the respective deemed capital contribution of each party will be credited by adding their contribution of measured, indicated, and inferred PGE ounces from the original contributed properties comprising the WBJV, determined in accordance with the South African SAMREC code. Inferred ounces will be credited at US$0.50 per ounce, indicated ounces will be credited at US$3.20 per ounce and measured ounces will be credited at US$6.20 per ounce. Ounces contributed to the WBJV by Anglo Platinum in 2007 from a 50% interest in Portion 11 of the Farm Frischgewaagd 96 JQ will receive an equalization credit of US$0.62 per inferred ounce, US$10.37 per indicated ounce and US$39.55 per measured four element or “4E” ounce of combined platinum, palladium, rhodium and gold. Each party will then have the opportunity to contribute additional capital in order to catch up any resulting shortfall in their contributed capital and thereby maintain their respective working interest in the JV. Should a party not wish to participate, the JV agreement provides a mechanism whereby the parties may elect to become “non-contributory” to the JV and by doing so they would be subject to dilution.

The Company has concluded that it has significant influence over the operations of WBJV but not joint control and is therefore recording the investment using the equity method.

The initial exchange of the Company’s pre-existing interests in the Elandsfontein and Onderstepoort properties for the interest in WBJV has been recorded at cost as it represents a non-monetary exchange. The balance paid to date under the Company’s commitment to spend up to Rand 35 million in exploration costs has also been recorded as a cost of the investment.

To November 30, 2007 the joint venture does not maintain separate books and records for the WBJV. All receipts, disbursements and net assets, excluding mineral properties contributed by other venturers’, are recorded in the books and records of the Company on behalf of the joint venture. Of the $5,810,257 in accounts payable at November 30, 2007 an amount of $5,364,000 (approximately Rand 36.5 million) was incurred on behalf of the WBJV.

Effective May 31, 2006 the Company concluded that the functional currency of WBJV was the South African Rand as expenditures in the WBJV were principally being incurred in Rand and funded by advances from the venturers which were denominated in Rand. The Company therefore considers its equity investment in the WBJV to be self sustaining and it translates its share of net equity of WBJV using the current rate method with translation gains and losses included in cumulative translation adjustment as a separate component of shareholder’s equity.

From inception of the joint venture to November 30, 2007 there have been no material earnings or losses as all activities of the joint venture have been in connection with acquiring mineral rights and exploring the properties for minerals.

 (a) Elandsfontein interest

In December 2002 the Company acquired an option to purchase 100% of the surface and mineral rights to 365.64 hectares of the farm Elandsfontein 102 JQ located in the Western Bushveld area. The Company made an initial payment to the Vendors of Rand 150,000 (approx. C$29,500) and agreed to terms for the purchase of both mineral and surface rights.

The Company exercised its option to purchase the Elandsfontein property by way of written notice on June 26, 2003. A dispute arose with the Vendors as to the purchase price and the matter was referred for Expert Determination as provided for in the option agreement.

In 2005 the Company and the Vendors reached agreement whereby the Company purchased all surface and mineral rights to the property in exchange for Rand 7.0 million (approximately C$1.4 million). In September 2005 the Company was granted a “New Order” prospecting permit under the new Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (2002) over the Elandsfontein property.

(b) Onderstepoort interest

During 2003 the Company entered into several option agreements to acquire mineral rights on seven portions of the farm Onderstepoort 98 JQ located in the Western Bushveld. The Company could earn 100% of the mineral rights over certain portions and 50% of the mineral rights over the balance. To earn its interests the Company was required to make aggregate prospecting and option payments over time to the vendors of Rand 12.44 million (approximately C$2.24 million) ending April 2008. Of this amount Rand 834,000 was paid. The Company now holds New Order prospecting permits on all of these farm portions.

During fiscal 2007 the Company negotiated and executed the buy-out and cancellation of one of the option agreements described above to acquire a 50% undivided interest in two farm portions in exchange for 50,000 common shares of the Company valued at $230,000. The Company also negotiated an agreement in principle to buy-out and cancel all of the remaining option agreements for all remaining farm portions for one additional payment of 50,000 shares. The documentation to execute this second agreement has still to be finalized. By negotiating the buy-out and cancellation of these option agreements the Company will eliminate all future option payments for this property while keeping the property under its control with regard to the mineral rights as granted to it by the Government of South Africa under New Order prospecting permits.

6.            MINERAL PROPERTIES

Period ended November 30, 2007

Year ended August 31, 2007

(a)            Republic of South Africa

(i)            War Springs and Tweespalk

On June 3, 2002, the Company acquired an option to earn a 100% interest in the 2,396 hectare War Springs property and the 2,177 hectare Tweespalk property both located in the Northern Limb or Platreef area of the Bushveld Complex north of Johannesburg. Acquisition and exploration costs on these properties to November 30, 2007 total $3,419,425 (August 31, 2007 - $3,394,062).

The Company may purchase 100% of these mineral rights at any time for US$690 per hectare. The Company has also agreed to pay prospecting fees to the vendors of US$3.25 per hectare. The vendors retain a 1% NSR Royalty on the property, subject to the Company’s right to purchase the NSR at any time for US$1.4 million. A 5% finders’ fee applies to vendor payments.

Under the new Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (2002), which became effective in May 2004, Old Order permits were to be converted into New Order permits during a transition period. This process is now complete for the War Springs and Tweespalk properties. The June 3, 2002 option agreement provides for amendments as may be needed to maintain the parties in the same commercial position as they were in under the preceding mineral legislation and such amendments are yet to be completed.

Black Economic Empowerment groups Africa Wide and Taung Minerals (Pty) Ltd. each have acquired a 15% interest in the War Springs project carried to bankable feasibility. The Company’s retains a net 70% project interest.

Africa Wide also has a 30% participating interest in the Tweespalk property. During the period the Company received payment in full from Wesizwe Platinum Ltd. for Africa Wide’s share of costs to August 31, 2007, which amounted to R1,549,673 (C$223,618 at November 30, 2007). The payment was treated as a recovery of costs relating to the Tweespalk property.

 (b)            Ontario

 (i)            Lac des Iles River

On May 5, 2000, New Millennium entered into an option agreement to acquire a 50% interest in the Lac des Iles River property located near Thunder Bay, Ontario in exchange for cash payments ($43,500 paid in total) and the completion of exploration expenditures. On October 6, 2006, the Company and the property vendors entered into a termination and sale agreement whereby the option agreement was cancelled and the Company purchased an undivided 100% interest in the property subject only to underlying 2.0% Net Smelter Return Royalties. In settlement the Company made a one-time payment to the vendors of $50,000 in lieu of past and future exploration expenditure commitments not incurred.

(ii)            South Legris

In April 2000, and later as amended in January 2005, the Company acquired an option to earn a 50% interest in the South Legris property located near Thunder Bay, Ontario in exchange for cash payments ($105,000 paid in total) and the completion of certain exploration expenditures. The Company wrote off $587,369 in deferred acquisition and exploration costs related to the property at August 31, 2004. On October 13, 2006, the Company and the property vendors entered into a termination and sale agreement whereby the option agreement was cancelled and the Company purchased an undivided 100% interest in the property subject only to underlying 2.0% Net Smelter Return Royalties. In settlement the Company made a one-time payment of $50,000 in lieu of past and future exploration expenditure commitments not incurred.

(iii)    Shelby Lake

On June 28, 2000, New Millennium entered into an option agreement to earn up to 60% interest in the Shelby Lake property, located near Thunder Bay, Ontario in exchange for cash payments of $15,000 (paid), issue 30,303 shares (issued) and complete $500,000 in exploration expenditures over a four-year period. On October 18, 2006, the Company and the property vendor entered into a termination and sale agreement whereby the option agreement was cancelled and the Company purchased an undivided 100% interest in the property for a one-time payment of $5,000 subject only to an underlying 2.0% Net Smelter Return Royalty, of which the Company may buy back one half for $500,000.

(iv)            Agnew Lake

The Company has earned a 99% interest in certain claims located near Sudbury, Ontario known as the Agnew Lake property subject to a 2% royalty interest payable to the original vendor.The Company optioned the Agnew Lake property to Pacific Northwest Capital Corporation (“PFN”) on June 18, 2000. On June 22, 2001, the Company and PFN optioned their property interests to Kaymin Resources Limited (“Kaymin”), a subsidiary of Anglo Platinum Limited. At August 31, 2004, the Company had directly performed $512,265 worth of exploration work and caused further work of approximately $3,140,805 to be performed through the joint venture arrangement with PFN and Kaymin. At August 31, 2005 the project was not active and the Company wrote off its remaining investment in the property amounting to $276,852. Kaymin has vested as to a 26.17% interest in the property in accordance with the terms of their option agreement. PFN has terminated their option on the property and retains no working interest.

  (v)            Lakemount

On November 6, 2003 the Company acquired an option to earn up to a 62% interest in the Lakemount property located near Wawa, Ontario. Exploration results on the project to date have been of interest, but in light of certain title deficiencies and a complex title chain, the Company has abandoned the project. During fiscal 2007, deferred acquisition and exploration costs relating to the project in the amount of $1,323,222 were written off.

 (c)            Title to mineral properties

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, in accordance with industry standards for the current stage of exploration of such properties, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Property title may be subject to unregistered prior agreements and non-compliance with regulatory requirements.

7.            FIXED ASSETS

8.            SHARE CAPITAL

(a)            Authorized

Unlimited common shares without par value

(b)            Issued and outstanding

At November 30, 2007 there were 61,474,247 shares outstanding.

During the period ended November 30, 2007:

(i)   485,500 stock options were exercised for proceeds of $568,750.

During the year ended August 31, 2007:

(ii)   6,333,194 share purchase warrants were exercised for proceeds of $11,454,791 and 914,375 stock options were exercised for proceeds of $625,575.

(iii)   the Company issued 50,000 common shares in connection with the acquisition of mineral properties at a fair value of $230,000. A filing fee of $2,258 related to this issue of shares was paid by the Company.

During the year ended August 31, 2006:

(iv)   the Company issued 25,000 common shares in connection with the acquisition of mineral properties at a fair value of $40,000.

(v)   843,047 share purchase warrants were exercised for proceeds of $1,181,305 and 164,500 stock options were exercised for proceeds of $117,750.

(vi)   the Company closed non-brokered private placements for 2.2 million units at a price of $1.45 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one half a common share purchase warrant, with each whole warrant exercisable into a common share at a price of $1.75 for a period of 18 months until April 13-21, 2007. Filing fees of $7,000 and a finder’s fee of $45,704 related to this financing were paid by the Company in cash.

(vii)   the Company closed a non-brokered private placement for 1.7 million units at a price of $1.45 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one half a common share purchase warrant, with each whole warrant exercisable into a common share at a price of $1.75 for a period of two years until March 6, 2008. Filing fees of $7,532 related to this financing were paid by the Company in cash.

(vii) the Company closed a brokered private placement for 5.6 million units at a price of $1.80 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one half a common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant is exercisable to purchase an additional common share until March 31, 2007 at a price of $2.10 per share. Agent’s fees amounted to 7.0% of gross proceeds, which totalled $705,600, which was paid in cash. The Agents’ legal and other costs totalling $56,000 were paid by the Company. The Company also paid $23,498 as a filing fee.

(c)            Incentive stock options

The Company has entered into Incentive Stock Option Agreements (“Agreements”) with directors, officers and employees. Under the terms of the Agreements, the exercise price of each option is set at the fair value of the common shares at the date of grant. Stock options granted to certain employees of the Company vest on average at an amount of 25% per six month period, while stock options granted to other employees, directors and officers are subject only to a four month initial hold period.

The following tables summarize the Company’s outstanding stock options:

The weighted average exercise price of the exercisable options at period end was $1.58.

(i) During the period ended November 30, 2007 the Company granted 1,247,500 stock options to employees. The Company has recorded $228,312 ($141,367 expensed and $86,945 capitalized against mineral properties) of compensation expense relating to stock options granted or vested in this period.

The following weighted average assumptions were used in valuing stock options granted during the period:

(ii) During the year ended August 31, 2007 the Company granted 1,265,000 stock options to employees. The Company has recorded $1,487,661 of compensation expense relating to stock options granted or vested in this period.

The following weighted average assumptions were used in valuing stock options granted during the year:

(d)   Share purchase warrants

All of the outstanding warrants expire on March 6, 2008.

9.            CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS

The following table summarizes the Company’s Contributed Surplus:

10.            RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with related parties are as follows:

(a) Management, salary, consulting fees, and Director’s fees of $90,930 (2006 - $89,218, 2005 - $68,873) were incurred with directors during the period. At November 30, 2007, $5,760 was included in accounts payable (2006 - $Nil).

(b) The Company received $33,951 (2006 - $35,858) during the period from MAG Silver Corp. (“MAG”), a company with two common directors and a common officer, under the terms of a 2003 service agreement for administrative services. Accounts receivable at the end of the period includes an amount of $2,509 due from MAG for other trade receivables.

(c)   During the period the Company accrued or received payments of $27,000 (2006 – $11,700) from West Timmins Mining Inc. (“WTM”), a company with three common directors and a common officer, for administrative services. Accounts receivable at the end of the period includes an amount of $3,025 due from WTM for other trade receivables.

(d)   During the year ended August 31, 2005, the Company entered into an office lease agreement with Anthem Works Ltd. (“Anthem”), a company with a common director. During the period ended November 30, 2007 the Company accrued or paid Anthem $17,215 under the office lease agreement (2006 - $15,583).

These transactions are in the normal course of business and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the consideration established and agreed to by the noted parties.

11.            CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS

The Company’s remaining minimum payments under its office and equipment lease agreements, which it has entered into for the years ending on August 31, as well as its South African subsidiary commitments, are as follows as at November 30, 2007.

12.            SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION

(a)            Net change in non-cash working capital

(b)            Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:

13.            SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The Company operates in one operating segment, that being exploration on mineral properties. Investment in joint ventures, fixed assets, capitalized costs for mineral rights and deferred exploration relate to properties situated as follows:

14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to November 30, 2007, 96,000 common shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of 96,000 stock options at prices between $0.50 per share and $1.10 per share for aggregate proceeds of $83,500.

EX-99.02

Platinum Group Metals Ltd.

(Exploration Stage Company)

Supplementary Information and MD&A

For the periodended November 30, 2007

Filed: January 14, 2008

A copy of this report will be provided to any shareholder who requests it.

Management Discussion and Analysis

1.         DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The Company is a British Columbia corporation incorporated on February 18, 2002 by an order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia approving an amalgamation between Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (“Old Platinum”) and New Millennium Metals Corporation (“New Millennium”). The Company is an exploration and development company conducting work primarily on mineral properties it has staked or acquired by way of option agreement in Ontario, Canada and the Republic of South Africa. The Company has not yet determined whether its mineral properties contain ore reserves that are economically recoverable. The Company defers all acquisition, exploration and development costs related to mineral properties. The recoverability of these amounts is dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the development of the property, and any future profitable production; or alternatively upon the Company’s ability to dispose of its interests on an advantageous basis.

2.         DISCUSSION OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

a) Results of Operations

Any reference to “period” refers to the three month period ended November 30, 2007. The Company continues to bevery active and focused on its projects in South Africa.The Company also conducted work on its Canadian projects during the period.  A1,125metre drill program was commenced on the Company’s Lac Des Iles projectsbefore the end of the quarter. During the 3 month period the Company incurred a net lossof $1,205,754(2006 - $2,179,312). Before a non-cash charge for stock based compensation of $141,367(2006 - $212,459)and mineral property costs written off of $Nil (2006 - $1,323,222), general and administrative expenses totaled $1,229,918 (2006 - $776,244). Interest, other income and recoveries amounted to $165,531(2006 - $132,613).  During the period Wesizwe Platinum Ltd. repaid the Company an amount of $21,205for the cost of administrative amounts recorded as advances due from Africa Wide.  Total global exploration expenditures for the Company’s account, including the Company’s share of WBJV expenditures during the period totaled $3,067,788 (2006 - $880,420).  Of this amount $2,890,027was for the WBJV (2006 - $867,252) and $177,761for other exploration (2006 - $13,168). After meeting its earn in requirements in April 2006, Platinum Group Metals Ltd. is currently responsible only for its 37% pro-rata share of expenditures for the Western Bushveld Joint Venture (“WBJV”). Total WBJV expenditures (see below) during the periodby all Joint Venture partners amounted to$7,830,935(2006: $2,389,003).

On October 27, 2004, the Company announced the formation of the WBJV with Anglo Platinum Limited and Africa Wide Mineral Prospecting and Exploration (Pty) Limited. Work commenced immediately thereafter on the project and the rate of work has accelerated since then. Activities have consistedof research and data review, prospecting, mapping, engineering and drilling of the project area. At the time of writing there are 4 high speed diamond drills turning on WBJV properties. On January 10, 2007, the Company completed a positive pre-feasibility study for the Project 1 area of the WBJV. During 2007 the WBJV commissioned a bankable feasibility study for the Project 1 area of the WBJV. This work is currently underway. On September 7, 2007 the Company published its most recent resource calculation for the WBJV. (See Item 2d. “Exploration Programs and Expenditures” below)

The Company has increased its general level of activity in the past three years in South Africa. Activities in Canada have been reduced, as the more advanced nature of the WBJV project has caused it to become an investment focus for the Company. The Company still actively reviews many potential property acquisitions in the normal course of business. The Company also makes efforts to raise its profile and liquidity in the capital markets.

The following tables set forth selected financial data from the Company’s unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with these Interim financial statements.

	Periodended Nov. 30, 2007	Periodended Nov. 30, 2006
Interest & other income	$165,531	$132,613
Net Loss	($1,205,754)	($2,179,312)
Net Loss Per Common Share	($0.02)	($0.04)
Total Assets	$39,513,494	$29,379,683
Long Term Debt	Nil	Nil
Dividends	Nil	Nil

The following table sets forth selected quarterly financial information for each of the last eight (8) quarters.

Quarter Ending	Interest & Other income	Net Loss	Net Loss per share
November 30, 2007	$165,531	($1,205,754)	($0.02)
August 31, 2007	$203,489	($1,392,894)	($0.03)
May 31, 2007	$165,873	($1,830,268)	($0.03)
February 28, 2007	$138,384	($1,355,649)	($0.02)
November 30, 2006	$132,613	($2,179,312)	($0.04)
August 31, 2006	$100,991	($1,200,351)	($0.02)
May 31, 2006	$55,062	($515,092)	($0.01)
February 28, 2006	$53,234	($1,447,883)	($0.03)

The Company has not declared nor paid dividends on its common shares. The Company has no present intention of paying dividends on its common shares, as it anticipates that all available funds will be invested to finance the growth of its business.

b) Trend Information

Other than the financial obligations as set out in the table provided at item 6 below, there are no identifiable trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will result in, or that are reasonably likely to result in, the Company’s liquidity either increasing or decreasing at present or in the foreseeable future. The Company will require sufficient capital in the future to meet its acquisition payments and other obligations under mineral property option agreements for those properties it considers worthwhile to incur continued holding and exploration costs upon. The Company intends to utilize its cash on hand in order to meet its obligations under mineral property option agreements. It is unlikely that the Company will generate sufficient operating cash flow to meet all of these ongoing obligations in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Company will likely need to raise additional capital by issuance of equity within the next year. The Company has no immediate plan or intention to issue any debt in order to raise capital for future requirements; however, the Company is working to complete a bankable feasibility study for the Project 1 area of the WBJV. If a production decision is taken by the WBJV upon completion of that study, the Company will most likely pursue debt financing for a portion of its share of the capital requirements for that project.

At the time of writing there is a favourable macro-trend with regard to the market for metal commodities and related products, however, it is the opinion of the Company that its own liquidity will be most affected by the results of its own acquisition, exploration and development activities. The acquisition or discovery of an economic mineral deposit on one of its mineral properties may have a favourable effect on the Company’s liquidity, and conversely, the failure to acquire or find one may have a negative effect.

c) Risk Factors

The Company’s securities should be considered a highly speculative investment and investors should carefully consider all of the information disclosed in the Company’s Canadian and U.S. regulatory filings prior to making an investment in the Company. For a discussion of risk factors applicable to the Company, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s most recent annual information form filed with Canadian provincial securities regulators, which was also filed as part of the Company’s most recent annual report on Form 40-F with the S.E.C. Without limiting the foregoing, the following risk factors should be given special consideration when evaluating an investment in the Company’s securities.

General

Resource exploration and development is a speculative business, characterized by a number of significant risks including, among other things, unprofitable efforts resulting not only from the failure to discover mineral deposits but also from finding mineral deposits, which, though present, are insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from production.

The Company’s business is subject to exploration and development risks

All of the Company’s properties are in the exploration stage and no known reserves have been discovered on such properties. At this stage, favorable drilling results, estimates and studies are subject to a number of risks, including:

·   the limited amount of drilling and testing completed to date;

·   the preliminary nature of any operating and capital cost estimates;

·   the difficulties inherent in scaling up operations and achieving expected metallurgical recoveries;

·   the likelihood of cost estimates increasing in the future; and

·   the possibility of difficulties procuring needed supplies of electrical power and water.

There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by us or by our joint venture partners in the exploration of the properties described herein will result in discoveries of precious metals in commercial quantities or that any of our properties will be developed. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of precious metals and no assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of precious metals will in fact be realized or that any identified resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) resource which can be legally and economically exploited. Estimates of reserves, mineral deposits and production costs can also be affected by such factors as environmental permit regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. In addition, the grade of precious metals ultimately discovered may differ from that indicated by drilling results. There can be no assurance that precious metals recovered in small-scale tests will be duplicated in large-scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale.

Political and economic instability may affect the Company’s business

South Africa has undergone significant change in its government and laws since the free elections in 1994. At present, Mining Legislation in South Africa is continuing to undergo change. The new Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act became law on May 1, 2004. The regulation and operation of this new law is still being implemented. In association with the new Act, the Mining Charter sets out a target of 26% ownership and participation in the mineral industry by “Historically Disadvantaged Persons” within ten years, but the mechanisms to fully affect this objective are still evolving. Accordingly, the South African legal regime may be considered relatively new, resulting in risks related to the possible misinterpretation of new laws, unilateral modification of mining or exploration rights, operating restrictions, increased taxes, environmental regulation, mine safety and other risks arising out of new sovereignty over mining, any or all of which could have an adverse affect on the Company. There is no certainty that the Company will be able to convert its existing exploration rights into mining rights. The Company’s operations in general may also be affected in varying degrees by political and economic instability, terrorism, crime, fluctuations in currency exchange rates and inflation.

The Company is subject to risk of fluctuations in the relative values of the Canadian Dollar as compared to the South African Rand and the U.S.Dollar

The Company may be adversely affected by foreign currency fluctuations. The Company is primarily funded through equity investments into the Company denominated in Canadian Dollars. Several of the Company’s options to acquire properties in the Republic of South Africa may result in option payments by the Company denominated in South African Rand or in U.S. Dollars over the next three years. Exploration and development programs to be conducted by the Company in South Africa will also be funded in South African Rand. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Canadian Dollar and the South African Rand or U.S. Dollar may have an adverse affect on the Company.

The Company’s properties are subject to title risks

The Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. These defects could adversely affect the Company’s title to such properties or delay or increase the cost of the development of such properties. In addition, the Company’s properties may be subject to aboriginal or other historical rights that may be claimed on Crown properties or other types of tenure with respect to which mineral rights have been conferred. The Company is not aware of any aboriginal land claims having been asserted or any legal actions relating to native issues having been instituted with respect to any of the mineral properties in which the Company has an interest. The Company is aware of the mutual benefits afforded by co-operative relationships with indigenous people in conducting exploration activity and is supportive of measures established to achieve such co-operation.

Environmental risk

Environmental legislation on a global basis is evolving in a manner that will ensure stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessment of proposed development and a higher level of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes to environmental legislation in Canada or South Africa will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental risks may exist on properties in which the Company holds interests which are unknown at present and which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators. Furthermore, future compliance with environmental reclamation, closure and other requirements may involve significant costs and other liabilities. In particular, the Company’s operations and exploration activities are subject to Canadian and South African national and provincial laws and regulations governing protection of the environment. Such laws are continually changing, and in general are becoming more restrictive.

The mineral exploration industry is extremely competitive

The resource industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases, and the Company competes with many companies that possess greater financialresources and technical facilities. Competition could adversely affect the Company’s ability to acquire suitable new producing properties or prospects for exploration in the future. Competition could also affect the Company’s ability to raise financing to fund the exploration and development of its properties or to hire qualified personnel.

Metal prices affect the success of the Company’s business

Metal prices have historically been subject to significant price fluctuation. No assurance may be given that metal prices will remain stable. Significant price fluctuations over short periods of time may be generated by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company, including domestic and international economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates, global or regional consumption patterns, speculative activities and increases or decreases in production due to improved mining and production methods. Significant reductions or volatility in metal prices may have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, including the economic attractiveness of the Company’s projects, the Company’s ability to obtain financing and, if the Company’s projects enter the production phase, the amount of the Company’s revenue or profit or loss.

d) Exploration Programs and Expenditures

General

The Company continues to be active in the Republic of South Africa (“RSA”). In 2003 the Company acquired a 100% South African subsidiary named Platinum Group Metals RSA (Pty.) Ltd. (“PTM RSA”) for the purposes of holding mineral rights and conducting operations on behalf of the Company. The Company conducts all of its South African exploration and development work through PTM RSA.

Mineral property acquisition costs deferred during the periodtotaled $8,625(2006 - $150,124). Of this amount acquisition costs relating to the Company’s37% pro-rata share of the WBJV amounted to$7,419(2006 - $45,079)while the balance related to Canadian properties.  Exploration costs incurred globally in the periodfor the Company’s interests totaled $3,067,788(2006 - $880,420). Of that amount $23,488(2006 - $3,000) was incurred on the Company’s Canadian properties and $3,044,300(2006 - $877,420) was incurred on the Company’s South African properties. Of the South African amount, $2,890,027was for the Company’s 37% share of WBJV expenditures (2006 - $867,252).  The total amount (100%) of exploration expenditures by all Joint Venture partners for the three month periodfor the WBJV came to $7,810,883which was higherthan the 100% amount spent in the same period last year (2006 - $2,343,924).

During the period there were no write-offs in deferred costs relating to South African or Canadian projects, while write-offs in the same period in 2006 amounted to $1,323,222 for Canada and Nil for South African properties. For more information on mineral properties see Note 5 and 6 of the Company’s August 31, 2007 Audited Consolidated Financial Statementsor November 30, 2007 unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

Western Bushveld Joint Venture

On October 26, 2004 the Company (37%) entered into a Joint Venture with Anglo Platinum Limited (“Anglo Platinum”) (37%) and Africa Wide Mineral Prospecting and Exploration (Pty) Limited ( “Africa Wide” ) (26%) to pursue platinum exploration and development on combined mineral rights covering approximately 67 square kilometres on the Western Bushveld Complex of South Africa. The Company contributed all of its interests in portions of the farms Onderstepoort 98 JQ and Elandsfontein 102 JQ. For more details of the properties contributed by the Company see Note 5 of the Company’s audited consolidated year end financialstatements. Anglo Platinum contributed its interests in portions of the farms Koedoesfontein 94 JQ, Elandsfontein 102 JQ and Frischgewaagd 96 JQ.

The Company is the operator of the WBJV. From October 2004 to April 2006 the Company funded a required exploration program in the amount of Rand 35 million (at August 31, 2005 approx. C$6.44 million). Since then the partners of the WBJV have been required to fund their portion of further expenditures pro-rata based upon their working interest in the Joint Venture. From April 2006 to March 2007 the partners to the WBJV approved budgets in the amount of Rand 76,393,208 (approximately C$11.7 million at September 2006). In July 2007 the WBJV participants approved a new cash budget for the WBJV totaling Rand 102,976,176 (approximately C$15.5 million in July 2007). At November 30, 2007 Anglo Platinum had an unspent contribution balance to the WBJV of Rand 4,661,386(C$686,156) which will be used to fund their pro-rata share of further expenditures on the WBJV. At November 30, 2007 Africa Wide had an unspent contribution balance to the WBJV of Rand 3,282,596(C$483,198) which will be used to fund their pro-rata share of further expenditures on the WBJV.

To November 30, 2007 all receipts, disbursements and net assets, excluding mineral propertiescontributed by other venturersto the WBJV are recorded in the books and records of the Company on behalf of the Joint Venture. Of the $5,810,257in the Company’s accounts payable at November 30, 2007 an amount of $5,364,000(approximately Rand 36.5million) was incurred on behalf of the WBJV.

In April 2007 Africa Wide accepted an offer for the purchase of 100% their company from Wesizwe Platinum Ltd. (WEZ:JSE). The transaction closed in September 2007 and Wesizwe paid consideration of 57.4 million new shares of Wesizwe at a deemed price of Rand 10.48 per share for total consideration of Rand 601.5 million (approximately C$90 million). Since September 2007 Wesizwe has become responsible for all of the rights and obligations of Africa Wide.

On April 9, 2007 the Company announced the formal contribution to the WBJV of a 50% interest in the mineral rights to the 494 hectare Portion 11 of the Farm Frischgewaagd 96 JQ (“Portion 11”) by Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd., a subsidiary of Anglo Platinum. With this addition the geographic area of the WBJV now covers approximately 72 square kilometres of territory. Portion 11 now forms part of the Project 2 area of the WBJV. This expanded Project 2 area is adjacent to the WBJV “Project 1” area. Anglo Platinum’s 50% interest in Portion 11 relates to New Order mineral rights that were converted from Old Order rights in 2007. All of the parties to the shared mineral rights on Portion 11 and RE 4 are working toward a detailed co-operation agreement. Current drilling being conducted under initial co-operation agreements is expected to continue.

Once a bankable feasibility study has been completed the respective deemed capital contribution of each party will be credited based on their contribution of measured, indicated, and inferred PGM ounces from the contributed properties comprising the WBJV, determined in accordance with the South African SAMREC code. Under the terms of the original WBJV Agreement, inferred ounces will be credited at US$0.50 per ounce, indicated ounces will be credited at US$3.20 per ounce and measured ounces will be credited at US$6.20 per ounce. The Company will also be credited for its Rand 35 million expenditure as described above. Each party will then have the opportunity to make equalizing cash payment, or contribute capital going forward in order to catch up any resulting shortfall in their contributed capital and thereby maintain their respective working interest in the JV. Should a party not wish to participate, the JV agreement provides a mechanism whereby the parties may elect to become “non-contributory” to the JV and by doing so they would be subject to dilution.

Portion 11 was contributed to the WBJV in 2007 as originally planned under the existing terms of the October 2004 WBJV Agreement. For this later contribution of Portion 11 the original credit rates for equalization as described above have been amended to US$0.62 per inferred ounce, US$10.37 per indicated ounce and US$39.55 per measured ounce in order to adjustfor current market conditions.

In January 2007 the Company published a Pre-Feasibility Report and an updated Independent Resource Estimate which shows Measured, Indicated and Inferred “4E” (platinum, palladium, rhodium and gold) resources for the Project 1 area of the WBJV. On February 7, 2007 the Company published an initial Independent Resource Estimate for the Project 2 area of the WBJV. Later, on September 7, 2007 the Company published its most recent resource calculation for the WBJV.

The Pre-Feasibility Study and revised resource estimation for the Project 1 area of the WBJV was dated January 15, 2007. A report titled “Technical Report Western Bushveld Joint Venture Project 1 (Elandsfontein and Frischgewaagd)” was filed by the Company on www.sedar.com January 30, 2007. The Pre-Feasibility Study considers and outlines the details and possible mitigation of several considered projects risks, not yet assessed in full detail, including metallurgical recoveries, smelting and refining costs, surface and mining rights, permits, and involvement of communities in compliance with the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act (2002).

The Pre-Feasibility Study’s findings were positive for a platinum mine in the Project 1 area of the Western Bushveld Joint Venture (“WBJV”) in South Africa. The partners of the WBJV gave their approval to advance towards a Bankable Feasibility Study for an underground mine producing 155,000 ounces per annum platinum or 250,000 ounces per annum platinum, palladium, rhodium and gold in concentrate with a total mine life over 18 years.

Resources in the Measured and Indicated categories can be included in a financialmodel under SAMREC and NI-43101 guidelines. Further drilling is now investigating additional areas with reef potential along strike on Project areas 2 and 3 within the Joint Venture area. Since March 2005 PTM has drilled more than 140,000 metres of core in 220 boreholes.  At the time of writing the Company has four diamond drilling rigs deployed on the WBJV. The WBJV property includes the untested projected surface trace of the Merensky and UG2 reefs which have been intercepted in a number of drill holes outside of areas where resources have been defined to date.

Summary resource details from published reports for Project 1, Project 1a and Project 2 follow in the table below. Platinum Group Metals Ltd. holds a 37% interest in the 4E ounces attributable to the WBJV. The prill splits and 4E estimates for Project 2 have been calculated by arithmetic mean. The prill splits and 4E estimates for Project 1 and 1a have been tested for reasonableness by kriging on the individual elements. Copper and nickel as well as the minor platinum group elements have also been estimated with a statistical process of Simple Kriging for Project 1 and 1a. Absent values for copper, nickel and the minor platinum group elements have been derived from regressed values.

		Resource		WBJV	Tonnes	Grade	Width	Prill Split (4E)				WBJV Ozs
Project	Reef	Category	Cut-Off	Interest	In Millions	4E	Metres	Pt	Pd	Rh	Au	In Millions
Project 1
	MR	Measured	300 cm g/t	100%	6.305	7.03	1.18	64%	27%	4%	5%	1.425
	UG2	Measured	300 cm g/t	100%	7.165	3.75	1.56	63%	26%	10%	1%	0.864
	MR	Indicated	300 cm g/t	100%	12.181	6.78	1.22	64%	27%	4%	5%	2.655
	UG2	Indicated	300 cm g/t	100%	18.579	3.96	1.44	63%	26%	10%	1%	2.365
	MR	Inferred	300 cm g/t	100%	0.289	6.47	1.03	64%	27%	4%	5%	0.060
	UG2	Inferred	300 cm g/t	100%	2.387	4.40	1.49	63%	26%	10%	1%	0.338
Project 1a
	MR	Inferred	300 cm g/t	100%	1.871	6.48	1.15	64%	27%	4%	5%	0.390
	UG2	Inferred	300 cm g/t	100%	2.973	5.00	1.57	63%	26%	10%	1%	0.478
Project 2
RE 4	MR	Inferred	100 cm g/t	50%	6.54	5.84	1.42	68%	24%	5%	3%	0.614
	UG2	Inferred	100 cm g/t	50%	11.95	4.63	1.57	59%	29%	11%	1%	0.890
Ptn 11	MR	Indicated	1.18 - 1.24 m	50%	0.220	7.38	1.21	62%	28%	5%	5%	0.025
	UG2	Indicated	1.27 m	50%	0.050	4.32	1.27	59%	29%	11%	1%	0.004
	MR	Inferred	1.11 - 1.55 m	50%	16.100	6.00	1.46	62%	28%	5%	5%	1.550
	UG2	Inferred	1.23 m	50%	16.240	4.62	1.23	59%	29%	11%	1%	1.200
		Total Measured 4E Ounces										2.289
		Total Indicated 4E Ounce										5.049
		Total Inferred 4E Ounces										5.520

MR = Merensky Reef              UG2 = Upper Group 2 Reef

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors:The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. We use certain terms in this document, such as “measured,” “indicated,” and “inferred,” “reserves,” “resources,” that the SEC guidelines strictly prohibit U.S. registered companies from including in their filings with the SEC. “Resources” are not “Reserves” and so do not have demonstrated economic viability. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our U.S. regulatory filings, File No. 0-033562, which may be secured from us, or from the SEC’s website at:  http://sec.gov/edgar.shtml.

Project 1 and Project 1a: A 39% and 41% total geological loss for the Merensky Reef and UG2 Reef respectively was applied to the resource area to accommodate for areas of potentially un-mineable structural and geological conditions. This geological loss considers losses for faults, dykes, potholes and areas of iron replacement pegmatite. Structural loss estimates are based on drilling, field mapping and remote sense data which include a high resolution aeromagnetic survey. The Merensky mineral resource estimate is based on 158 boreholes with 178 intercepts and the UG2 is based on 192 intercepts within the 1,087 hectare area. The prill split has been calculated by weighted averages as a proportion of the total 4E and the grades have been estimated with a more rigorous statistical process of Simple Kriging. The cut-off was determined on a practical mining width and the known costs and mining methods regionally. Platinum Group’s independent consulting Qualified Person has provided the resource estimate according to the SAMREC code. The reconciliation to the CIM codes is that the categories are the same. The resources are located on New Order prospecting permits that provide for the right to be converted to mining rights. Charles Muller of Minxcon is the Qualified Person (“QP”) for this report. He is registered with the SACNASP (South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions) (Registration No. 400201/04). Mr. Muller is an independent consultant with 18 years experience as a geologist, and resource evaluator. Samples were analyzed under Platinum Group’s and Anglo Platinum’s protocols including insertion of blanks, duplicates and certified reference materials in the assay stream once in every 24 or fewer samples. This is in addition to internal quality control measures undertaken by the contracted analytical facilities. Mr. Muller has visited the property on numerous occasions and has completed sufficient testing procedure to be satisfied that he has reasonably verified the data.

Project 2 – Remaining Extent of Ptn 4 of the farm Frischgewaagd 96 JQ:An iron replacement area that was delineated by drilling and detailed aeromagnetics was subtracted. In addition to that, a further 18% geological loss was applied. Charles Muller is the Qualified Person (“QP”) for the resource assessment report. He is registered with the SACNASP (South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions) (Registration No. 400201/04). Mr. Muller is an independent consultant with 18 years experience as a geologist, and resource evaluator. Samples were analyzed under Platinum Group’s and Anglo Platinum’s protocols previously published for the project including insertion of blanks, duplicates and certified reference materials in the assay stream once in every 24 or fewer samples. This is in addition to internal quality control measures undertaken by the contracted analytical facilities.

Project 2 – Ptn 11 of the farm Frischgewaagd 96 JQ: A 20%-30% total geological loss was applied to the area to accommodate for areas of potentially un-mineable structural and geological conditions. This geological loss considers losses for faults, dykes, potholes and an area of iron replacement pegmatite. Structural loss estimates are based on drilling, field mapping and remote sense data which include a high resolution aeromagnetic survey. The Merensky mineral resource estimate is based on 15 boreholes with 39 intercepts within the 494 ha area and 13 boreholes with 35 intercepts for the UG2 mineral resource estimate. The cut-off was determined on a practical mining width and the known costs and mining methods regionally. There are several other qualified person estimates in the public domain with other degrees of confidence on the same area. Once due diligence on further drilling and evaluation has been completed by the Company’s QP, the resource classification for a 43-101 compliant report will be updated. The Company’s independent consulting Qualified Person has provided this initial resource according to the SAMREC code. The reconciliation to the CIM codes is that the categories are the same. Mr. David Gray, of Snowden, is the independent QP for the resource assessment report of Frischgewaagd 96 JQ, Portion 11. He is registered with the SACNASP, the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions, Registration No 400018/04. Mr. Gray has more than 17 years of relevant experience in platinum group metal resource assessments. Sampling was conducted using Anglo Platinum’s protocols, as previously published for the project. This includes the insertion of blanks, duplicates and certified reference materials in the assay stream, which is followed by routine quality analysis. These quality controls are in addition to the internal quality control measures undertaken by the contracted analytical facilities. Assays have been completed largely at Anglo Platinum’s laboratories in Johannesburg by standard fire assay procedures. Data has been verified by the QP to the extent that he has personal experience with the compilation of the data at the time it was collected and the protocols employed at Anglo Platinum during the data collection.

Northern Limb, Bushveld - War Springs and Tweespalk Properties

On June 3, 2002, the Company entered an option agreement whereby it may earn a 100% interest in the 2,396 hectare War Springs property and the 2,177 hectare Tweespalk property both located in the Northern Limb or Platreef area of the Bushveld Complex north of Johannesburg. Acquisition and exploration costs on these properties to November 30, 2007 total $3,419,425(November 30, 2006 - $3,048,206).

By prior agreement with the holders of the Old Order mineral rights the Company had an option to purchase 100% of these mineral rights for US$690 per hectare. The Company also agreed to pay prospecting fees to the vendors of US$3.25 per hectare. The vendors retain a 1% NSR Royalty on the property, subject to the Company’s right to purchase the NSR at any time for US$1.4 million. A 5% finders’ fee applies to vendor payments.

Under the new Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (2002), which became effective in May 2004, Old Order permits were to be converted into New Order permits during a transition period. This process is now complete for the War Springs and Tweespalk properties. The June 3, 2002 option agreement provides for amendments as may be needed to maintain the parties in the same commercial position as they were in under the preceding mineral legislation and such amendments are yet to be completed.

Black Economic Empowerment groups Africa Wide and Taung Minerals (Pty) Ltd. haveeach acquired a 15% interest in the War Springs project carried to bankable feasibility. The Company’s retains a net 70% project interest.

Africa Wide also has a 30% participating interest in the Tweespalk property. During the period the Company received payment in full from Wesizwe Platinum Ltd. for Africa Wide’s share of costs to August 31, 2007, which amountedto R 1,549,673 (C$223,618 at November 30, 2007). The payment wastreated as a recoveryof costs relating to the Tweespalk property.

Lakemount, Ontario

On November 6, 2003 the Company acquired an option to earn up to a 62% interest in the 3,017 hectare Lakemount property located near Wawa, Ontario. Exploration results on the project to date have been of interest, but in light of certain title deficiencies and a complex title chain, the Company has abandoned the project. Deferred acquisition and exploration costs relating to the project in the amount of $1,323,222 were written off in the year ended August 31, 2007.

Lac Des Iles Area Properties, Ontario

On May 5, 2000, New Millennium entered into an option agreement to acquire a 50% interest in the Lac des Iles River property located near Thunder Bay, Ontario in exchange for cash payments ($43,500 paid in total) and the completion of exploration expenditures. On October 6, 2006, the Company and the property vendors entered into a termination and sale agreement whereby the option agreement was cancelled and the Company purchased an undivided 100% interest in the property subject only to an underlying 2.0% Net Smelter Return Royalty. In settlement the Company made a one-time payment to the vendors of $50,000 in lieu of past and future exploration expenditure commitments not incurred.

In April 2000, and later as amended in January 2005, the Company acquired an option to earn a 50% interest in the South Legris property located near Thunder Bay, Ontario in exchange for cash payments ($105,000 paid in total) and the completion of certain exploration expenditures. The Company wrote off $587,369 in deferred acquisition and exploration costs related to the property at August 31, 2004. On October 13, 2006, the Company and the property vendors entered into a termination and sale agreement whereby the option agreement was cancelled and the Company purchased an undivided 100% interest in the property subject only to underlying 2.0% Net Smelter Return Royalties. In settlement the Company made a one-time payment of $50,000 in lieu of past and future exploration expenditure commitments not incurred.

On June 28, 2000, New Millennium entered into an option agreement to earn up to 60% interest in the Shelby Lake property, located near Thunder Bay, Ontario in exchange for cash payments of $15,000 (paid), the issue of 30,303 shares (issued) and the completion of exploration expenditures. On October 18, 2006, the Company and the property vendor entered into a termination and sale agreement whereby the option agreement was cancelled and the Company purchased an undivided 100% interest in the property for a one-time payment of $5,000 subject only to an underlying 2.0% Net Smelter Return Royalty.

In late 2006 a 1,090 metre drill program was conducted on the Company’s Lac Des Iles area projects. A further drillprogram planned for 1,125 metreswas commenced during the period. For more details of the Company’s Lac Des Iles properties see Note 6of the Company’s audited year end financial statements or unaudited interim financial statements for the three month period ended November 30, 2007.

Agnew Lake, Ontario

The Company’s Agnew Lake property was not active during the period. The Company has directly performed $512,265 worth of past exploration work and caused further work of approximately $3,140,805 to be performed through the joint venture arrangement with PFN and Anglo Platinum Limitedto August 31, 2005. Occurrences of PGMs have been located on the property, but no resource has been delineated to date. At August 31, 2005 the Company wrote off its remaining investment in the property of $276,852. In 2007 Anglo Platinumadvised the Company that it would cease further funding of the project. Anglo Platinumalso notified the Company that they would vest as to a 26.17% interest in the property in accordance the terms of their option agreement. PFN has now terminated its option and retains no working interest.

e) Administration Expenses

Before a non-cash charge for stock based compensation of $141,367 (2006 - $212,459), and mineral property costs written off of $Nil (2006 - $1,323,222), and not including interest, other income and recoveries in the year of $165,531 (2006 - $132,613), general and administrative expenses totaled $1,229,918 (2006 - $776,244). Since 2002 the Company has grown substantially through its amalgamation with New Millennium Metals Corporation and its expansion into the Republic of South Africa. This growth is reflected in the costs described herein. During 2004 the Company opened and staffed a permanent office in Johannesburg and commenced active exploration on the ground. The costs described above include management and consulting fees of $74,963 (2006 - $55,597); office and miscellaneous expenses of $58,238 (2006 - $63,334); professional fees of $181,455 (2006 - $67,959); salaries and benefits of $406,419 (2006 - $246,310); shareholder relations expense of $49,444 (2006 - $83,293); travel expenses of $196,497 (2006 - $102,734); mail, news releases and printing expense of $31,981 (2006 - $35,815) and promotion expenses of $48,641 (2006 - $33,817).

f) Related Party Transactions

Management and consulting fees, salaries and Director’s sitting fees in the periodof$90,930(2006 - $89,218) were incurred with directors of the Company. Of this amount approximately $49,680(2006 - $43,538) is related to fees for the Company’s President. At November 30, 2007 there were $5,760in fees (2006 - $Nil) owed and included in accounts payable.

The Company received $33,951(2006 - $35,858) during the period from MAG Silver Corp. (“MAG”), a company with two common directors and a common officer under anadministrative servicesagreement. Accounts receivable at the end of the periodinclude an amount of $2,509due from MAG.

During the periodthe Company accrued or received payments of $27,000(2006 – $11,700) from West Timmins Mining Inc. (“WTM”) formerly Sydney Resource Corporation, a company with three common directors and a common officer, for administrative services. Accounts receivable at the end of the period include an amount of $3,025due from WTM.

During the year ended August 31, 2005, the Company entered into an office lease agreement with Anthem Works Ltd. (“Anthem”), a company with a common director. During the periodended November 30, 2007 the Company accrued or paid Anthem $17,215 under the office lease agreement (2006 - $15,583).

These transactions are in the normal course of business and are measured at the exchange

amount which is the consideration established and agreed to by the noted parties.

g) Shareholder Relations’ Expenses

Shareholder relations’ expense during the periodtotaled $49,444(2006 - $83,293). The Company manages its shareholder relations as an internal function. The Company has been active in raising its profile with both retail and institutional investors. Since May 2005 Roth Investor Relations (“Roth”) has been contracted at a rate of US$5,000 per month to provide distribution of the Company’s information to US institutions and other international analysts and money managers. Prior to May 2005 Roth was contracted by the Company to provide services, on an invoice basis, as needed from time to time. Roth has offices in New Jersey, USAand affiliated offices in London and Johannesburg. Mr. Larry Roth is the Company’s primary contact with the firm. Since June 2005 Mr. Tony Mahalski of LM Associates in London, U.K., has been engaged for a fee of GBP 1,000 per month for the purpose of general business development and the raising of the Company’s profile in Europe.

h) Travel and Promotion Expenses

Travel expenses for the period amounted to $196,497 (2006 - $102,734). These activities relate to the supervision of ongoing operations in South Africa and Canada, new property investigations and meetings with potential and current institutional and sophisticated investors. Promotional expenses in the period amounted to $48,641 (2006 - $33,817) and these costs relate to design work, media relations, printed material, postage and trade show attendance.

i) Property Acquisition Expenses

Property acquisition expenditures during the period totaled $8,625 (2006 - $150,124) in cash. This includes $Nil for properties in Ontario, and $8,625 to acquire or maintain option rights to the South African properties. Cash payments or accruals totaled $8,625 (2006 - $150,124) and share issuances for property acquisitions totaled $Nil (2006 - $Nil).

The Company evaluates its property interests on an ongoing basis and intends to abandon properties that fail to remain prospective. The Company is confident that it will be able to meet its earn-in obligations on those properties which management considers to be of merit. At the time of writing the Company was incurring further property acquisition expenses through its activities in Ontario, Canada and South Africa.

j) Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

3.         CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

In preparing financialstatements, management has to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Based on historical experience, current conditions and expert advice, management makes assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates and assumptions form the basis for judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities and reported amounts for revenues and expenses. Different assumptions would result in different estimates, and actual results may differ from results based on these estimates. These estimates and assumptions are also affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Critical accounting estimates are those that affect the consolidated financialstatements materially and involve a significant level of judgment by management. Management’s critical accounting estimates apply to the assessment for the impairment of mineral properties and the valuation of other assets and liabilities such as fixedassets, investments, reclamation costs, accounting for income and resource taxes, mineral resources and contingencies.

4.         SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company’s accounting policies are set out in Note 2 of its Consolidated Audited Financial Statements for the year ended August 31, 2007as well as Note 2 of its Consolidated unauditedInterimFinancial Statements for the period ended November 30, 2007. There are several policies that are significantto the financialresults of the Company.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company defers all costs relating to the acquisition and exploration of its mineral properties. Any revenues received from such properties are credited against the costs of the property. When commercial production commences on any of the Company’s properties, any previously capitalized costs would be charged to operations over the life of the property using a unit-of-production method. The Company regularly reviews deferred exploration costs to assess their recoverability and when the carrying value of a property exceeds the estimated net recoverable amount, provision is made for impairment in value.

The existence of uncertainties during the exploration stage and the lack of definitive empirical evidence with respect to the feasibility of successful commercial development of any exploration property do create measurement uncertainty concerning the calculation of the amount of impairment to the value of any mineral property. The Company relies on its own or independent estimates of further geological prospects of a particular property and also considers the likely proceeds from a sale or assignment of the rights before determining whether or not impairment in value has occurred.

Future income taxes are calculated based on the liability method. Future income taxes arise from the recognition of the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted or substantively enacted tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financialstatement carrying amounts and the tax bases of certain assets and liabilities. TheCompany records a valuation allowance against any portion of those future income tax assets that it believes will, more likely than not, fail to be realized.

5.         ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Effective September 1, 2007, we have adopted CICA Handbook Sections 3855 Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement; Section 3861 Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation; Section 3865 Hedges; Section 1530 Comprehensive Income and Section 3251 Equity. As the Company has not previously undertaken hedging activities, adoption of Section 3865 currently has no impact. Prior to September 1, 2007, the principal accounting policies affecting financial instruments related to marketable securities that were valued at the lower of original cost and fair market value.

CICA Section 3855 requires that all financial assets, except those classified as held-to-maturity, and loans and receivables, must be measured at fair value. All financial liabilities must be measured at fair value when they are classified as held-for-trading, otherwise, they are measured at amortized cost. Investments classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair market value (or marked to market) based on quoted market prices with unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and reported as other comprehensive income or loss. Those instruments classified as held-for-trading, have gains or losses included in earnings in the period in which they arise.  All of the Company’s investments have been designated as available-for-sale.

Comprehensive income is the change in our net assets that results from transactions, events and circumstances from sources other than our shareholders and includes items that would not normally be included in net earnings such as unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments. Other comprehensive income includes the unrealized gains and losses from available-for-sale securities which are not included in net income (loss) until realized.

The adoption of Sections 1530 and 3855 impacts our opening equity. The unrealized gain on the available-for-sale securities from purchase to August 31, 2007 was $1,874,001, which is reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated other comprehensive income. The net unrealized gain on the available-for-sale securities for the three months ended November 30, 2007 was $167,000. There would be no tax impact resulting from adjustments arising from comprehensive income as there are sufficient unrecognized future tax benefits available to offset any future tax liability arising.

6.         LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company issued a total of 485,500(2006 – 2,515,069) common shares during the period. Of this 485,500shares (2006 – 2,515,069) were issued for cash proceeds of $568,750(2006 - $3,736,666). During the periodNilshares (2006 – Nil) were issued for mineral properties for a fair value of $Nil(2006 - $Nil). Cash proceeds are net of share issuances to be spent on mineral property acquisitions, exploration and development as well as for general working capital purposes. See Subsequent Events for further equity issuances. The Company’s primary source of capital has been from the sale of equity. At November30, 2007 the Company had cash and cash equivalents on hand of $13,428,947compared to cash and cash equivalents of $11,356,152at November30, 2006.

In respect of the acquisition of mineral properties and exploration expenditures, investment in and advances to the WBJV totaled approximately $8 million during the quarter while advances received from partners exceeded this amount for a net cash inflow of $828,103. In the comparative period of 2006 the Company had expenditures to the WBJV totaling approximately $2.5 million and a net cash outflow of $2.4 million. The Company receives lump sum cash advances at various times as laid out in agreed budgets from its joint venture partners to cover the costs of the WBJV. The balance of cash outflows is made up of management fees and expenses of $74,963 (2006 - $55,597) and other general and administrative expenses of $1,131,932 (2006 - $703,713).

In the normal course of business the Company enters into transactions for the purchase of supplies and services denominated in South African Rand. The Company also has cash and certain liabilities denominated in South African Rand. As a result the Company is subject to foreign exchange risk from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. In the past year to the time of writing this report, the South African Rand has fallen in value against the Canadian Dollar by approximately 14%.

The following Table discloses the Company’s continual obligations for optional mineral property acquisition payments, and committed lease obligations for office rent and equipment. The Company has no long term debt or loan obligations. Under the terms of several of the Company’s mineral property option and purchase agreements, the Company is required to make certain scheduled acquisition payments and incur minimum annual exploration expenditures as summarized in the table below in order to preserve the Company’s interests in the related mineral properties. In the event the Company is unable or unwilling to make these payments, it is likely that the Company would forfeit our rights to acquire the related properties.

Payments by period
Total		< 1 Year	1 – 3 Years	3 – 5 Years	> 5 Years
Optional Acquisition Payments	$ 5,178,000	$ 5,178,000	$0	$ 0	$ 0
Lease Obligations	254,068	77,264	165,986	10,818	0
Totals	$ 5,432,068	$ 5,255,264	$165,986	$ 10,818	$0

In addition to the above the Company will be required to pay an equalizing amount under the terms of the WBJV agreement based on the measured, indicated and inferred 4E PGE ounces reported in a bankable feasibility study.  See item d) “Exploration Programs and Expenditures” above for details of how the equalizing payment will be calculated.

7.         OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

The Company has an unlimited number of common shares authorized for issuance without par value. At January 9, 2008 there were 61,570,247 shares outstanding, 4,046,375 incentive stock options outstanding and 850,000 common share purchase warrants outstanding.

8.DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in filings made pursuant to both U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian Securities Administration requirements are recorded, processed, summarized and reported in the manner specified by the relevant securities laws applicable to the Company. The Company operates in both Canada and the Republic of South Africa and work is ongoing to improve and modernize these controls and to ensure that they remain consistently applied in both jurisdictions. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Company’s disclosure control procedures as of November 30, 2007 through inquiry, review, and testing, as well as by drawing upon their own relevant experience. The Company retained an independent third party specialist in 2007 to assist in the assessment of its disclosure control procedures. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as at November 30, 2007, the Company’s disclosure control procedures were effective. Management is also developing and implementing a plan to address disclosure controls and procedures on a forward looking basis as the Company continues to grow.

The Company also maintains a system of internal controls over financial reporting designed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with Canadian GAAP. The Company retained an independent third party specialist in 2007 to assist in the assessment of its internal control procedures. The Board of Directors approves the financial statements and ensures that management discharges its financial responsibilities. The Board’s review is accomplished principally through the audit committee, which is composed of independent non-executive directors.

The audit committee meets periodically with management and auditors to review financial reporting and control matters. The Board of Directors has also appointed a compensation committee composed of non-executive directors whose recommendations are followed with regard to executive compensation.

From time to time the board may also form special sub-committees, which must investigate and report to the Board on specific topics.

During the year ended August 31, 2007, the Company effected the changes in internal control over financialreporting that have materially affected, or may materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financialreporting. The Company has (i) taken steps to improve segregation of duties and the authorization process through the addition of accounting personnel; and (ii) reviewed and refined internal control processes; and (iii) adopted and published new corporate governance policies; and (iv) reviewed and improved general controls over information technology; and (v) enhanced financialcontrol over period close processes.

The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financialreporting, and evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financialreporting as at each fiscal year end. Management has used the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) framework to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financialreporting as at November 30, 2007. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that as at November 30, 2007, the Company’s internal control over financialreporting was effective.

9.         AMEX CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company’s common shares are listed on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”). Section 110 of the AMEX company guide permits AMEX to consider the laws, customs and practices of foreign issuers in relaxing certain AMEX listing criteria, and to grant exemptions from AMEX listing criteria based on these considerations. A company seeking relief under these provisions is required to provide written certification from independent local counsel that the non-complying practice is not prohibited by home country law. A description of the significant ways in which the Company’s governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies pursuant to AMEX standards is posted on the Company’s website at www.platinumgroupmetals.net and a copy of such description is available by written request made to the Company.

10.            SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to November 30, 2007, 96,000 common shares were issuedpursuant to the exercise of 96,000 stock options at prices between $0.50 per share and $1.10per share foraggregate proceeds of $83,500.

11.            LIST OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

a) Directors:

Eric Carlson

Frank R. Hallam

R. Michael Jones

Iain McLean

Barry W. Smee

b) Officers:

R. Michael Jones (President)

FrankR. Hallam (Chief Financial Officer, Secretary)

Peter C. Busse (Chief Operating Officer)

EX-99.03

Form 52-109F2

Certification of Interim Filings

I, R. Michael Jones, Chief Executive Officer of Platinum Group Metals Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings) of Platinum Group Metals, (the issuer) for the interim period ending November 30, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings;

3. Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the interim filings;

4. The issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for the issuer, and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP; and

5.  I have caused the issuer to disclose in the interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent interim period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 8, 2008

“signed”

_______________________

R. Michael Jones, CEO

EX-99.04

Form 52-109F2

Certification of Interim Filings

I, Frank R. Hallam, Chief Financial Officer of Platinum Group Metals Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings) of Platinum Group Metals, (the issuer) for the interim period ending November 30, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings;

3. Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the interim filings;

4. The issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for the issuer, and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP; and

5.  I have caused the issuer to disclose in the interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent interim period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 8, 2008

“signed”

_______________________

Frank Hallam, CFO

EX-99.05

News Release No. 08-147 January 14, 2008

Platinum Group Reports First Quarter Financial Results

(Vancouver/Johannesburg) Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PTM-TSX; PLG-AMEX) (“Platinum Group”) announces the publication of the Company’s unaudited financial results for the quarter ended November 30, 2007. For complete details of the November 30, 2007 financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis please see the Company’s filings on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) or on EDGAR (www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/webusers.htm).

The Company’s cash position at November 30, 2007 was $13.43 million, including $1.17 million in project funding held on behalf of the partners of the Western Bushveld Joint Venture (“WBJV”). The Company’s cash is invested with the Royal Bank of Canada in guaranteed investment certificates or is held in a current account. An additional $2.0 million was held in short term investments which consist of guaranteed investment certificates with original terms of more than 90 days. The Company also held marketable securities at quarter end with a market value of $2.25 million. All amounts herein are reported in Canadian dollars unless otherwise specified. None of the Company’s cash has been invested in asset backed commercial paper.

Accounts receivable at quarter end totalled $600,730 while accounts payable amounted to $5.81 million. Accounts receivable were comprised primarily of value added taxes repayable to the Company in Canada and in South Africa while accounts payable were due mostly for drilling, sampling, geophysical and engineering work conducted on the WBJV. Further project funding from partners Anglo Platinum and Wesizwe Platinum of $700,000 in aggregate is due to be contributed in the second quarter.

Global exploration expenditures for the Company’s account in the first quarter, including the Company’s share of WBJV expenditures, totaled $3,067,788 (2006 - $880,420). Of this $2,890,027 was for the WBJV (2006 - $867,252) and $177,761 was for other exploration (2006 - $13,168). After meeting its earn in requirements in April 2006, Platinum Group is currently responsible for its 37% pro-rata share of expenditures for the WBJV. Total WBJV expenditures during the quarter by all Joint Venture partners totaled $7,830,935 (2006 - $2,389,003).

The Company’s loss for the quarter ended November, 2007 amounted to $1.21 million or $0.02 per share as compared to $2.18 million or $0.04 per share for the prior year’s quarter ended November 30, 2006. The current loss includes $141,367 as a non-cash charge for Stock Based Compensation (2006 - $212,459). The loss for the same period in 2006 included a charge for the write-off of Canadian mineral property acquisition and deferred exploration costs of $1.32 million. General overhead and administration costs for the quarter amounted to $1.37 million (2006 - $0.99 million) before interest income and management fees earned of $165,531 (2006 - $132,613). The increase in general and administrative costs in the quarter is primarily the result of the Company’s increased activity level in South Africa and increased staffing levels as the Company prepares for potential project development in South Africa.

During the quarter the Company raised funding of $568,750 by issuance of 485,500 shares for the exercise of stock options.

The Company’s key project is its 37% interest in the WBJV, a platinum exploration and development project on combined mineral rights covering approximately 72 square kilometres on the Western Bushveld Complex of South Africa. The Company is primarily focused on the completion of a feasibility study for the WBJV and on obtaining relevant permitting from the Government of South Africa. Completion and announcement of the feasibility study results by the Company as operator of the WBJV is expected in early 2008. The feasibility study will be used for a project build decision and if implemented the Company would then need to complete project financing for its share of capital costs and expand its capabilities as operator. Permit applications are in process and final permitting is expected during 2008.

About Platinum Group Metals Ltd.

Platinum Group is based in Vancouver BC, Canada and Johannesburg, South Africa. Platinum Group has a management team in both Canada and South Africa, which have successful track records of more than 20 years in exploration, mine discovery, mine construction and mine operations. The Company was formed in 2000 and is focused on the development of platinum operations. It holds significant mineral rights in the Northern and Western Bushveld Igneous Complex of South Africa.

Platinum Group is also a significant mineral rights holder in the area surrounding Canada’s only primary platinum and palladium mine near Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada.

On behalf of the Board of

Platinum Group Metals Ltd.

“Frank R. Hallam”

Chief Financial Officerand Director

- 30 -

For further information contact:
	R. Michael Jones, President or John Foulkes, Manager Corporate Development Platinum Group Metals Ltd., Vancouver Tel: (604) 899-5450 / Toll Free: (866) 899-5450 www.platinumgroupmetals.net	Larry Roth Roth Investor Relations, NJ Tel: (732) 792-2200

The TSX Exchange and the American Stock Exchange have not reviewed and do not accept responsibility for the accuracy or adequacy of this news release, which has been prepared by management.

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Canadian and U.S. securities laws. Such statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the timing of future activities by the Company, future anticipated exploration and development programs, the review of technical information, the discovery and delineation of mineral deposit and resources, business plans, potential mining scenarios, business trends and future operating factors. Although the Company believes that such statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as: believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, postulate and similar expressions, or are those, which, by their nature, refer to future events. All statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements by the Company are not guarantees of future results or performance, and that actual results may differ materially from those in forward looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, variations in the nature, quality and quantity of any mineral deposits that may be located, the Company’s ability to obtain any necessary permits, consents or authorizations required for its activities, the Company’s ability to produce minerals from its properties successfully or profitably, to continue its projected growth, or to be fully able to implement its business strategies. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, including that data is incomplete and considerable additional work will be required to complete further evaluation, including but not limited to drilling, engineering and socio-economic studies and investment;  no firm quotes for costs have been received;  the legal right to mine the project discussed has not been confirmed or applied for and the process for such application is new in South Africa; the potential capital cost of the project is beyond the current means of the Company and there can be no assurance that financing for further work will be available. There are significant risks with respect to grade estimation, metallurgical recovery and mining plans that may result in over estimation or failure to meet targets. Any estimates, plans or studies prepared by or on behalf of other companies with respect to the project have not been prepared or reviewed by the Company or the Company’s QPs and such disclosure can’t and should not be in any way be attributed to the Company or the Company’s QPs, independent or non-independent. Any reference to Project 2 does not imply that this is a stand alone area for any potential mine plan. The reader is referred to the Company’s filings with the SEC and Canadian securities regulators for disclosure regarding other risk factors. There is no certainty that any forward looking statement will come to pass and investors should not place undue reliance upon forward-looking statements.