XML 20 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
6 Months Ended
Jul. 02, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
 
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the twenty-six weeks ended July 2, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
North
America
 
EMEA
 
Total
Balance as of January 2, 2016
 
$
3,947

 
$
7,124

 
$
11,071

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 

 
(241
)
 
(241
)
Goodwill impairment
 
(3,947
)
 
(6,883
)
 
(10,830
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of July 2, 2016
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
The Company performs its impairment testing for goodwill in accordance with FASB ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other.” The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step is a comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. If the reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value, the Company would be required to progress to the second step. In the second step, the Company calculates the implied fair value of goodwill and compares the implied fair value of goodwill to the carrying amount of goodwill on the Company’s balance sheet. If the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater than the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss would be required to be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment on an annual basis on the last day of the first fiscal month of the fourth quarter and whenever events or circumstances indicate that these assets may be impaired. Due to a significant decrease in the Company’s stock price during the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company performed the first step of the goodwill impairment test. Based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test, the estimated fair value of the reporting units did not exceed their carrying value and therefore step two of the test was required. Based on the results of the second step of the goodwill impairment test (i.e., applying the income approach and market approach described under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Impairment of Goodwill and Long-lived Assets"), the Company determined, as of July 2, 2016, that the implied fair value of goodwill was less than the carrying value, which resulted in goodwill impairment of $10.8 million, representing all of that goodwill. The facts and circumstances that led to the impairment of goodwill were primarily a result of the decreased market value of the Company based upon the market price of the Company's common stock.

Testing goodwill for impairment requires significant judgments, which are described more fully under Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Impairment of Goodwill and Long-lived Assets." These judgments include estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for the Company's business, estimation of the useful life over which cash flows will occur, and determination of a weighted average cost of capital. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and potential goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. In addition, financial and credit market volatility directly impacts the Company's fair value measurement through our weighted average cost of capital, used to determine the discount rate, and through the Company's stock price, used to determine our market capitalization.

The July 2015 acquisition of the Farncombe Entities resulted in $3.4 million of goodwill which was recorded in the Company’s EMEA reporting unit. All of this goodwill was determined to be impaired, as of July 2, 2016, as part of the goodwill impairment determination described above. The goodwill and intangible assets related to this acquisition are not deductible for foreign tax purposes. This acquisition is discussed further in Note 2, Acquisition.

The following table summarizes the changes in the major classes of intangible assets as of July 2, 2016 and January 2, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
Tradename
 
Non-Compete
Agreements
 
Customer
Relationships
 
Total
Gross Carrying Amount:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Balance as of January 2, 2016
 
$
86

 
$
57

 
$
1,055

 
$
1,198

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
(9
)
 
(5
)
 
(100
)
 
(114
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of July 2, 2016
 
$
77

 
$
52

 
$
955

 
$
1,084

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated Amortization:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Balance as of January 2, 2016
 
$
(71
)
 
$
(5
)
 
$
(126
)
 
$
(202
)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
6

 
1

 
22

 
29

Amortization expense
 
(12
)
 
(6
)
 
(147
)
 
(165
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of July 2, 2016
 
$
(77
)
 
$
(10
)
 
$
(251
)
 
$
(338
)

 
The identifiable intangible assets in the table above resulted from the July 2015 acquisition of the Farncombe Entities and include the effects of foreign currency translation. This acquisition is discussed further in Note 2, Acquisition. Tradename, non-compete agreements and customer relationships carry amortization periods of six months, four and one-half years and three and one-half years, respectively. The amortization periods are based on the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the intangible assets.
 
Aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets was $76,000 and $165,000 for the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended July 2, 2016, respectively. There was no amortization expense recognized during the twenty-six weeks ended July 4, 2015. The following table outlines the estimated future amortization expense related to amortizing intangible assets as of July 2, 2016.
 
 
(in thousands)
2016 (July 3, 2016 - December 31, 2016)
$
142

2017
284

2018
284

2019
35

2020
1

 
$
746