XML 37 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 30, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
The Company utilizes the methods of fair value measurement as described in FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” to value its financial assets and liabilities, including the financial instruments issued in the transaction described in Note 3, Strategic Alliance and Investment by Elutions, Inc. and the contingent consideration liability described in Note 2, Acquisition. As defined in FASB ASC 820, fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, FASB ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:
 
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
 
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
 
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
 
In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.
 
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
 
The fair value of the Company’s Elutions Note and the Holder Redemption Option were determined using a binomial lattice model. (See Note 3, Strategic Alliance and Investment by Elutions, Inc., for further discussion of the Elutions Note and Holder Redemption Option.) The Holder Redemption Option was determined to be an embedded derivative liability that was required to be bifurcated and recorded as a liability.
 
The Company has classified the Holder Redemption Option and Elutions Note as Level 3 liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the Holder Redemption Option are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company reassesses the fair value of this liability on a quarterly basis. Based on that assessment, the Company recognized a decrease of $337,000 and an increase of $18,000 in the fair value of this liability during the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. To determine the fair value of the Holder Redemption Option, management evaluates assumptions that require significant judgment. Changes in certain inputs to the valuation model, including the Company’s period end stock price and stock volatility, can have a significant impact on the estimated fair value. The fair value recorded for the Holder Redemption Option may vary significantly from period to period. This variability may result in the actual liability for a period either above or below the estimates recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, resulting in significant fluctuations in other income (expense) as a result of the corresponding non-cash gain or loss recorded. The model requires the following inputs: (i) price of the Company’s common stock; (ii) the expected life of the instrument or derivative; (iii) risk-free interest rate; (iv) estimated dividend yield, and (v) estimated stock volatility. Assumptions used in the calculation require significant management judgment.

The following table sets forth the Level 3 inputs to the binomial lattice model that were used to determine the fair value of the Elutions Note and the Holder Redemption Option:
 
 
 
December 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Common stock price
 
$
0.16

 
$
0.91

Dividend yield
 
0.0
%
 
0.0
%
Credit spread
 
24.9
%
 
16.0
%
Risk-free interest rate
 
1.8
%
 
1.3
%
Estimated stock volatility
 
140.6
%
 
77.3
%

 
In addition, the Company determined that the provision of the Elutions Note that permits Cartesian Limited to prepay the Elutions Note after 18 months if the trading price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $5.50 per share for a specified period of time is an embedded derivative asset that requires bifurcation (the “Issuer Call Option”). As of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of the Issuer Call Option was determined to be immaterial.
 
Because the Company measures the Holder Redemption Option at fair value on a recurring basis, transfers, if any, between the levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the change in circumstances that caused the transfer occurred. There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 liabilities during fiscal years 2017 or 2016.
 
In connection with the acquisition of the Farncombe Entities, the Company recorded a liability related to the Earn-Out portion of the purchase consideration. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had classified the Earn-Out liability as a Level 3 liability and the fair value of the Earn-Out liability was evaluated each reporting period and changes in its fair value were included in the Company's results of operations. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of the Earn-Out liability was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation using a risk-adjusted discount rate applied to management’s estimate of forecasted revenues that were eligible under the Earn-Out as described in the Purchase Agreement. To determine the fair value of the Earn-Out liability, management evaluated assumptions that require significant judgment. Changes in certain inputs to the valuation model, including the Company’s estimate of future revenues, can have a significant impact on the estimated fair value.

On April 17, 2017, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement with the former shareholders of the Farncombe Entities whereby the parties agreed to a final determination of the Earn-Out, that the Earn-Out target was expected to be achieved, and that the Company would pay 100% of the Earn-Out consideration described above to the Sellers. The Earn-Out was paid in full during the third quarter of fiscal 2017. See Note 2, Acquisition, for further discussion of the Earn-Out liability.
 
Because the Company measured the Earn-Out liability at fair value on a recurring basis transfers, if any, between the levels of the fair value hierarchy were recognized at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the change in circumstances that caused the transfer occurred. There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 liabilities during the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
 
As of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consist of the following (in thousands):
 
Total
 
Quoted prices in
 active markets
Level 1
 
Significant other
 observable inputs
Level 2
 
Significant other
 unobservable
inputs
Level 3
December 30, 2017:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Holder Redemption Option
$
633

 
$

 
$

 
$
633

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2016:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Holder Redemption Option
$
970

 
$

 
$

 
$
970

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earn-Out Liability
$
1,903

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,903


 
The following table summarizes the changes to the fair value of the Holder Redemption Option which is a Level 3 liability (in thousands):
 
 
Holder
 Redemption
 Option
Fair value at December 31, 2016
$
970

(Decrease) increase in fair value
(337
)
Fair value at December 30, 2017
$
633


 
Other Fair Value Disclosures
 
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values because of the relatively short-term maturities of these financial instruments.