XML 31 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 30, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
The Company performed its impairment testing for goodwill in accordance with FASB ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other.” The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step is a comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. If the reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value, the Company would be required to progress to the second step. In the second step, the Company calculates the implied fair value of goodwill and compares the implied fair value of goodwill to the carrying amount of goodwill on the Company’s balance sheet. If the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater than the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss would be required to be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

The Company evaluated goodwill for impairment on an annual basis on the last day of the first fiscal month of the fourth quarter and whenever events or circumstances indicate that these assets may be impaired. Due to a significant decrease in the Company’s stock price during the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company performed the first step of the goodwill impairment test. Based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test, the estimated fair value of the reporting units did not exceed their carrying value and therefore step two of the test was required. Based on the results of the second step of the goodwill impairment test (i.e., applying the income approach and market approach described under Note 1, Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Polices - Goodwill), the Company determined, as of July 2, 2016, that the implied fair value of goodwill was less than the carrying value, which resulted in goodwill impairment of $10.8 million, representing all of that goodwill. The facts and circumstances that led to the impairment of goodwill were primarily a result of the decreased market value of the Company based upon the market price of the Company's common stock.
 
The following table summarizes the changes in the major classes of intangible assets for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017 (in thousands).
 
 
 
 
 
Non-Compete
 
Customer
 
 
Gross Carrying Amount:
 
Tradename
 
Agreements
 
Relationships
 
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2016
 
$
71

 
$
48

 
$
881

 
$
1,000

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
7

 
4

 
82

 
93

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of December 30, 2017
 
$
78

 
$
52

 
$
963

 
$
1,093

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated Amortization:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Balance as of December 31, 2016
 
$
(71
)
 
$
(15
)
 
$
(357
)
 
$
(443
)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
(7
)
 
(2
)
 
(44
)
 
(53
)
Amortization expense
 

 
(11
)
 
(264
)
 
(275
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of December 30, 2017
 
$
(78
)
 
$
(28
)
 
$
(665
)
 
$
(771
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible assets, net as of December 30, 2017
 
$

 
$
24

 
$
298

 
$
322


 
The identifiable intangible assets in the table above resulted from the July 2015 acquisition of the Farncombe Entities and their balances include the effects of foreign currency translation. This acquisition is discussed further in Note 2, Acquisition. Tradename, non-compete agreements and customer relationships carry amortization periods of six months, four and one-half years and three and one-half years, respectively. The amortization periods are based on the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the intangible assets.
 
Aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets was $275,000 and $301,000 for fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. The following table outlines the estimated future amortization expense related to amortizing intangible assets as of December 30, 2017
 
(in thousands)
2018
$
287

2019
34

2020
1

 
$
322