XML 105 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Derivative Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts recorded in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
Asset Derivatives
 
Classification
 
June 30,
2014
 
September 30,
2013
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity swap and option agreements
 
Receivables, net
 
$
1.3

 
$
0.4

Foreign exchange forward agreements
 
Receivables, net
 
0.7

 
1.7

Foreign exchange contracts
 
Other assets
 
0.1

 

Total asset derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
2.1

 
2.1

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
 
Receivables, net
 
0.1

 
3.7

Call options
 
Derivatives
 
324.6

 
221.8

Futures contracts
 
Derivatives
 
0.1

 

Other embedded derivatives
 
Other invested assets
 
11.6

 

Foreign exchange contracts
 
Receivables, net
 
0.1

 
0.1

Total asset derivatives
 
 
 
$
338.6

 
$
227.7


Liability Derivatives
 
Classification
 
June 30,
2014
 
September 30,
2013
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
 
$
1.8

 
$

Interest rate contracts
 
Other liabilities
 
0.1

 

Commodity contracts
 
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
 

 
0.5

Foreign exchange forward agreements
 
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
 
5.0

 
4.6

Foreign exchange contracts
 
Other liabilities
 
0.3

 
0.1

Total liability derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
7.2

 
5.2

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
 
Other liabilities
 
4.3

 
1.9

FIA embedded derivative
 
Contractholder funds
 
1,864.5

 
1,544.4

Futures contracts
 
Other liabilities
 

 
1.0

Foreign exchange forward contracts
 
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
 
0.3

 
5.3

Equity conversion feature of preferred stock
 
Equity conversion feature of preferred stock
 

 
330.8

Total liability derivatives
 
 
 
$
1,876.3

 
$
1,888.6

Changes in AOCI from Derivative Instruments
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of AOCI and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative, representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness, are recognized in current earnings.
The following table summarizes the pretax impact of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, and within AOCI, for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013:
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion)
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
 
Classification
Three months ended
 
June 30,
2014
 
June 30,
2013
 
June 30,
2014
 
June 30,
2013
 
June 30,
2014
 
June 30,
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
 
$
1.3

 
$
(1.0
)
 
$
0.1

 
$
(0.3
)
 
$

 
$

 
Consumer products cost of goods sold
Interest rate contracts
 
(1.9
)
 

 
(0.4
)
 

 

 

 
Interest expense
Foreign exchange contracts
 

 
0.2

 

 
0.4

 

 

 
Net consumer products sales
Foreign exchange contracts
 
(2.4
)
 
4.0

 
(1.0
)
 
0.5

 

 

 
Consumer products cost of goods sold
Total
 
$
(3.0
)
 
$
3.2

 
$
(1.3
)
 
$
0.6

 
$

 
$

 
 
Nine months ended
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
 
$
1.4

 
$
(3.4
)
 
$
0.1

 
$
(0.2
)
 
$

 
$
(0.1
)
 
Consumer products cost of goods sold
Interest rate contracts
 
(1.9
)
 

 
(0.4
)
 

 

 

 
Interest expense
Foreign exchange contracts
 
0.2

 
0.8

 
0.1

 
0.7

 

 

 
Net consumer products sales
Foreign exchange contracts
 
(3.6
)
 
7.2

 
(2.0
)
 
(0.4
)
 

 

 
Consumer products cost of goods sold
Total
 
$
(3.9
)
 
$
4.6

 
$
(2.2
)
 
$
0.1

 
$

 
$
(0.1
)
 
 


Fair Value Contracts and Other
For derivative instruments that are used to economically hedge the fair value of Spectrum Brands’ third party and intercompany foreign currency payments, commodity purchases and interest rate payments, and the equity conversion feature of the Company’s redeemable preferred stock, the gain (loss) associated with the derivative contract is recognized in earnings in the period of change. FGL recognizes all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, including derivative instruments embedded in Fixed Indexed Annuity ("FIA") contracts, and any changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recognized immediately in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, the Company recognized the following gains (losses) on these derivatives:
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
 
Classification
 
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Nine months ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
Equity conversion feature of preferred stock
 
$
38.0

 
$
52.6

 
$
(12.7
)
 
$
81.9

 
Gain (loss) from the change in the fair value of the equity conversion feature of preferred stock
Oil and natural gas commodity contracts
 
(2.2
)
 
9.6

 
(12.4
)
 
0.8

 
Other income (expense), net
Commodity contracts
 
0.1

 
(0.2
)
 

 
(0.2
)
 
Cost of consumer products and other goods sold
Foreign exchange contracts
 
(0.2
)
 
0.5

 
0.4

 
(1.8
)
 
Other income (expense), net
Call options
 
91.1

 
16.5

 
226.6

 
114.1

 
Net investment gains
Futures contracts
 
10.5

 
3.5

 
24.9

 
12.5

 
Net investment gains
Change in fair value of other embedded derivatives
 
0.3

 

 
0.3

 

 
Net investment gains
FIA embedded derivatives

 
145.8

 
53.7

 
320.1

 
(35.1
)
 
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
Total
 
$
283.4

 
$
136.2

 
$
547.2

 
$
172.2

 
 


Additional Disclosures
Cash Flow Hedges
When it determines appropriate, Spectrum Brands uses interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges with the changes in fair value recorded in AOCI and as a derivative hedge asset or liability, as applicable. The swaps settle periodically in arrears with the related amounts for the current settlement period payable to, or receivable from, the counter-parties included in accrued liabilities or receivables, respectively, and recognized in earnings as an adjustment to interest expense from the underlying debt to which the swap is designated. At June 30, 2014, Spectrum Brands had a series of U.S. dollar denominated interest rate swaps outstanding which effectively fix the interest on floating rate debt, exclusive of lender spreads, at 1.36% for a notional principal amount of $300.0 through April 2017. At September 30, 2013, Spectrum Brands did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding. The derivative net loss on these contracts recorded in AOCI by the Company at June 30, 2014 was $0.9 and noncontrolling interest of $0.6. At June 30, 2014, the portion of derivative net loss estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings over the next twelve months is $0.8, net of tax and noncontrolling interest.
Spectrum Brands periodically enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the risk from forecasted foreign currency denominated third party and intercompany sales or payments. These obligations generally require Spectrum Brands to exchange foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars, Euros, Pounds Sterling, Australian Dollars, Brazilian Reals, Mexican Pesos, Canadian Dollars or Japanese Yen. These foreign exchange contracts are cash flow hedges of fluctuating foreign exchange related to sales of product or raw material purchases. Until the sale or purchase is recognized, the fair value of the related hedge is recorded in AOCI and as a derivative hedge asset or liability, as applicable. At the time the sale or purchase is recognized, the fair value of the related hedge is reclassified as an adjustment to "Net consumer and other product sales" or purchase price variance in "Cost of consumer products and other goods sold." At June 30, 2014, Spectrum Brands had a series of foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding through September 2014 with a contract value of $221.5. The derivative net loss on these contracts recorded in AOCI at June 30, 2014 was $2.1, net of tax benefit of $0.6 and noncontrolling interest of $1.5. At June 30, 2014, the portion of derivative net loss estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings over the next twelve months is $2.0, net of tax and noncontrolling interest.
Spectrum Brands is exposed to risk from fluctuating prices for raw materials, specifically zinc and brass used in its manufacturing processes. Spectrum Brands hedges a portion of the risk associated with the purchase of these materials through the use of commodity swaps. The hedge contracts are designated as cash flow hedges with the fair value changes recorded in AOCI and as a hedge asset or liability, as applicable. The unrecognized changes in fair value of the hedge contracts are reclassified from AOCI into earnings when the hedged purchase of raw materials also affects earnings. The swaps effectively fix the floating price on a specified quantity of raw materials through a specified date. At June 30, 2014, Spectrum Brands had a series of zinc swap contracts outstanding through June 2015 for 5 tons with a contract value of $9.9. At June 30, 2014, Spectrum Brands had a series of brass swap contracts outstanding through June 2015 for one ton with a contract value of $3.9. The derivative net gain on these contracts recorded in AOCI at June 30, 2014 was $1.2, net of tax expense of $0.1. At June 30, 2014, the portion of derivative net gain estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings over the next twelve months is $1.2, net of tax.
Fair Value Contracts
Spectrum Brands
Spectrum Brands periodically enters into forward and swap foreign exchange contracts to economically hedge the risk from third party and intercompany payments resulting from existing obligations. These obligations generally require Spectrum Brands to exchange foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars, Canadian Dollars, Euros or Australian Dollars. These foreign exchange contracts are fair value hedges of a related liability or asset recorded in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The gain or loss on the derivative hedge contracts is recorded in earnings as an offset to the change in value of the related liability or asset at each period end. At June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, Spectrum Brands had $154.3 and $108.5, respectively, of notional value for such foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding.

Spectrum Brands periodically enters into commodity swap contracts to economically hedge the risk from fluctuating prices for raw materials, specifically the pass-through of market prices for silver used in manufacturing purchased watch batteries. Spectrum Brands hedges a portion of the risk associated with these materials through the use of commodity swaps. The swap contracts are designated as economic hedges with the unrealized gain or loss recorded in earnings and as an asset or liability at each period end. The unrealized changes in fair value of the hedge contracts are adjusted through earnings when the realized gains or losses affect earnings upon settlement of the hedges. The swaps effectively fix the floating price on a specified quantity of silver through a specified date. At June 30, 2014, Spectrum Brands had a series of such swap contracts outstanding through September 2015 for 35 troy ounces with a contract value of $0.7. At September 30, 2013, Spectrum Brands had a series of such swap contracts outstanding through April 2014 for 45 troy ounces with a contract value of $1.0.
Oil and natural gas commodity contracts
Compass’ primary objective in entering into derivative financial instruments is to manage its exposure to commodity price fluctuations, protect its returns on investments and achieve a more predictable cash flow in connection with its operations. These transactions limit exposure to declines in commodity prices, but also limit the benefits Compass would realize if commodity prices increase. When prices for oil and natural gas are volatile, changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instrument contracts underlying Compass’ derivative financial instrument management activities may result in significant non-cash income or expense activity. Cash losses or gains only arise from payments made or received on monthly settlements of contracts or if Compass terminates a contract prior to its expiration. Compass does not designate its derivative financial instruments as hedging instruments for financial reporting purposes and, as a result, Compass recognizes the change in the respective instruments’ fair value in earnings.
Settlements in the normal course of maturities of derivative financial instrument contracts result in cash receipts from, or cash disbursements to, Compass' derivative contract counterparties. Changes in the fair value of Compass' derivative financial instrument contracts, which includes both cash settlements and non-cash changes in fair value, are included in income with a corresponding increase or decrease in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets fair value amounts.
Compass' natural gas and oil commodity contract derivative instruments are comprised of swap contracts. Swap contracts allow Compass to receive a fixed price and pay a floating market price to the counterparty for the hedged commodity.
The following table presents our proportionate share of Compass’ volumes and fair value of the oil and natural gas derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2014 (presented on a calendar-year basis) : 
(in millions, except volumes and prices)
 
Volume Mmmbtus/Mbbls
 
Weighted average strike price per Mmbtu/Bbl
 
June 30,
2014
Natural gas:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Remainder of 2014
 
8,211

 
$
4.15

 
$
(2.5
)
Total natural gas
 
8,211

 
 
 
$
(2.5
)
Oil:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Remainder of 2014
 
137

 
$
91.87

 
$
(1.5
)
2015
 
186

 
94.98

 
(0.3
)
Total oil
 
323

 
 
 
$
(1.8
)
Total oil and natural gas derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
$
(4.3
)

At September 30, 2013, Compass had outstanding derivative contracts to mitigate price volatility covering 16,018 Billion British Thermal Units ("Mmmbtus") of natural gas and 375 Thousand Barrels ("Mbbls") of oil. At June 30, 2014, the average forward NYMEX oil prices per Bbl for the remainder of 2014 and 2015 was $103.82 and $97.62, and the average forward NYMEX natural gas prices per Mmbtu for the remainder of 2014 was $4.47.
Compass derivative financial instruments covered approximately 68% and 74% of production volumes for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and 77% and 70% of production volumes for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and from inception to period ended June 30, 2013, respectively
Other Embedded Derivatives
On June 16, 2014, FGL invested in a $35.0 fund-linked note issued by Nomura International Funding Pte. Ltd. The note provides for an additional payment at maturity based on the value of a hypothetical investment in AnchorPath Dedicated Return Fund (the "AnchorPath Fund") of $11.3, which is based on the actual return of the fund. At maturity of the fund-linked note, FGL will receive the $35.0 face value of the note plus the value of the hypothetical investment in the AnchorPath Fund. The additional payment at maturity is an available-for-sale embedded derivative reported in "Other embedded derivatives".
Credit Risk
Spectrum Brands is exposed to the risk of default by the counterparties with which Spectrum Brands transacts and generally does not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to credit risk. As appropriate, Spectrum Brands monitors counterparty credit risk on an individual basis by periodically assessing each such counterparty’s credit rating exposure. The maximum loss due to credit risk equals the fair value of the gross asset derivatives that are concentrated with certain domestic and foreign financial institution counterparties. Spectrum Brands considers these exposures when measuring its credit reserve on its derivative assets, which was insignificant at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.
Spectrum Brands’ standard contracts do not contain credit risk related contingent features whereby Spectrum Brands would be required to post additional cash collateral as a result of a credit event. However, Spectrum Brands is typically required to post collateral in the normal course of business to offset its liability positions. At June 30, 2014, Spectrum Brands did not post any cash collateral related to such liability positions. At September 30, 2013, Spectrum Brands had posted cash collateral of $0.5 related to such liability positions. In addition, at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, Spectrum Brands had no posted standby letters of credit related to such liability positions. The cash collateral is included in "Receivables, net" within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Compass places derivative financial instruments with the financial institutions that are lenders under a revolving credit agreement entered into by Compass (the "Compass Credit Agreement") that it believes have high quality credit ratings. To mitigate risk of loss due to default, Compass has entered into master netting agreements with its counterparties on its derivative financial instruments that allow it to offset its asset position with its liability position in the event of a default by the counterparty.
FGL is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by its counterparties on the call options and reflects assumptions regarding this nonperformance risk in the fair value of the call options. The nonperformance risk is the net counterparty exposure based on the fair value of the open contracts less collateral held. FGL maintains a policy of requiring all derivative contracts to be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA") Master Agreement.
Information regarding FGL’s exposure to credit loss on the call options it holds is presented in the following table:
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
September 30, 2013
Counterparty
 
Credit Rating
(Fitch/Moody's/S&P) (a)
 
Notional
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Collateral
 
Net Credit Risk
 
Notional
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Collateral
 
Net Credit Risk
Merrill Lynch
 
A/*/A
 
$
2,150.9

 
$
100.4

 
$
57.2

 
$
43.2

 
$
2,037.8

 
$
70.7

 
$

 
$
70.7

Deutsche Bank
 
A+/A2/A
 
2,639.8

 
114.9

 
76.5

 
38.4

 
1,620.4

 
51.7

 
23.0

 
28.7

Morgan Stanley
 
*/A3/A
 
2,116.6

 
98.1

 
75.6

 
22.5

 
2,264.1

 
75.7

 
49.0

 
26.7

Royal Bank of Scotland
 
A-/*/A-
 

 

 

 

 
364.3

 
20.3

 

 
20.3

Barclay's Bank
 
A/A2/A
 
256.0

 
11.2

 

 
11.2

 
120.8

 
3.4

 

 
3.4

 
 
 
 
$
7,163.3

 
$
324.6

 
$
209.3

 
$
115.3

 
$
6,407.4

 
$
221.8

 
$
72.0

 
$
149.8


(a) Credit rating as of June 30, 2014 except for Royal Bank of Scotland which is as of September 30, 2013. An * represents credit ratings that were not available.
Collateral Agreements
FGL is required to maintain minimum ratings as a matter of routine practice under its ISDA agreements. Under some ISDA agreements, FGL has agreed to maintain certain financial strength ratings. A downgrade below these levels provides the counterparty under the agreement the right to terminate the open derivative contracts between the parties, at which time any amounts payable by FGL or the counterparty would be dependent on the market value of the underlying derivative contracts. FGL’s current rating allows multiple counterparties the right to terminate ISDA agreements. No ISDA agreements have been terminated, although the counterparties have reserved the right to terminate the ISDA agreements at any time. In certain transactions, FGL and the counterparty have entered into a collateral support agreement requiring either party to post collateral when the net exposures exceed pre-determined thresholds. These thresholds vary by counterparty and credit rating. As of June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, counterparties posted $209.3 and $72.0 of collateral, of which $152.1 and $72.0, respectively, is included in "Cash and cash equivalents," with an associated payable for this collateral included in "Other liabilities" in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining $57.2 of non-cash collateral was held by a third-party custodian at June 30, 2014. Accordingly, the maximum amount of loss due to credit risk that FGL would incur if parties to the call options failed completely to perform according to the terms of the contracts was $115.3 and $149.8 at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.
FGL held 2,016 and 1,693 futures contracts at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively. The fair value of the futures contracts represents the cumulative unsettled variation margin (open trade equity, net of cash settlements). FGL provides cash collateral to the counterparties for the initial and variation margin on the futures contracts which is included in "Cash and cash equivalents" in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount of collateral held by the counterparties for such contracts was $8.7 and $5.9 at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.