XML 33 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Actions
Argo Group’s subsidiaries are parties to legal actions incidental to their business. As of March 31, 2023, management believed that the resolution of these matters would not materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Federal Securities Class Action
The Police & Fire Retirement System City of Detroit v. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd., et al., No. 22-cv-8971 (S.D.N.Y.)
On October 20, 2022, a securities class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and certain of its current and former officers, alleging securities fraud violations under sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On January 18, 2023, U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan granted the Police and Fire Retirement System City of Detroit and the Oklahoma Law Enforcement Retirement System’s joint motion for appointment as lead plaintiff. On March 27, 2023, lead plaintiffs filed an Amended Class Action Complaint, which alleges that from June 11, 2018 through August 9, 2022, defendants made false and misleading statements concerning the Company’s reserves and underwriting standards. Defendants anticipate making a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, due on or before May 26, 2023. Lead plaintiffs are expected to serve an opposition to said motion on or before July 13, 2023, after which Defendants anticipate serving a reply on or before August 14, 2023.
The Company is not able at this time to determine or predict the ultimate outcome of this proceeding or provide a reasonable estimate or range of estimates of the possible outcome or loss, if any, in this matter.
Transaction-Related Shareholder Litigation
Following the announcement of the proposed transaction with Brookfield Reinsurance Ltd. and BNRE Bermuda Merger Sub Ltd., complaints were filed in the United Stated District Court for the Southern District of New York: Stein v. Argo Group Int’l Holdings. Ltd., et al., 1:23-cv -01947 (S.D.N.Y); O’Dell v. Argo Group Int’l Holdings, Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 1:23-cv-1999 (S.D.N.Y.); Jones v. Argo Group Int’l Holdings. Ltd., et al., 1:23-cv-02606 (S.D.N.Y); Ballard v. Argo Group Int’l Holdings, Ltd., et al., 1:23-cv-02635 (S.D.N.Y); Montgomery v. Argo Group Int’l Holdings, Ltd., et al., 1:23-cv-02749 (S.D.N.Y). The complaints each assert violations of Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act and allege that the proxy statement filed in connection with the proposed transaction between the Company and Brookfield Reinsurance Ltd. and BNRE Bermuda Merger Sub Ltd. omitted certain purportedly material information that rendered the proxy statement incomplete and misleading. The complaints sought, among other things, an order to enjoin the transaction unless additional disclosures were issued; and, if the transaction closes, damages. All of the complaints have been voluntarily dismissed.
Contractual Commitments
We have contractual commitments to invest up to $107.3 million related to our limited partnership investments at March 31, 2023, as further disclosed in Note 3, “Investments.” These commitments will be funded as required by the partnership agreements which can be called to be fulfilled at any time, not to exceed twelve years.