XML 114 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements

 

Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability assuming an orderly transaction in the most advantageous market at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used in measuring fair value.

 

Short-term Financial Instruments

 

The inputs used in measuring the fair value of cash and short-term investments are considered to be Level 1 in accordance with the three-tier fair value hierarchy. The fair market values are based on period-end statements supplied by the various banks and brokers that held the majority of the Company’s funds. The fair value of other short-term financial instruments (primarily accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses) approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.

 

Other Financial Instruments

 

The Company has segregated its financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date in the table below. The Company has no non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value.

 

The carrying amounts of the liabilities measured at fair value are as follows:

 

Description Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
             
Liabilities at March 31, 2013:                
Embedded conversion options $  $  $591,078  $591,078 
                 
                 
Total measured at fair value $  $  $591,078  $591,078 
                 
Liabilities at December 31, 2012:                
Embedded conversion options $  $  $780,960  $780,960 
                 
                 
Total measured at fair value $  $  $780,960  $780,960 

 

The liabilities measured at fair value in the above table are classified as “derivative and other liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of Level 3 liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2013:

 

Balance at
December 31,
2012
  Established in
2012
  Modification
of Convertible
Debt Agreement
  Conversion to
Common Stock
  Change in
Fair Value
  Effect of
Extinguishment
of Debt
  Balance at
March 31,
2013
 
                    
$780,960  $  $250,361  $(68,994) $(193,093) $(178,156) $591,078 

 

Gains and losses in the fair value of derivative instruments are classified as the “change in the fair value of derivative instruments” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

The fair value of the embedded conversion options is determined based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and includes the use of unobservable inputs such as the expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends. Changes in any of the assumptions related to the unobservable inputs identified above may change the fair value of the embedded conversion options. Increases in expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends generally result in increases in fair value, while decreases in the unobservable inputs generally result in decreases in fair value.

 

In July and November 2011, we issued convertible notes that contained embedded conversion options which met the criteria for derivative liabilities. The fair value of the conversion options, at March 31, 2013, approximates $591,000.

 

In October 2012, the Company purchased a Certificate of Deposit (“CD”) from its commercial bank in the amount of $53,000. This CD bears interest at an annual rate of 0.20% and matures on June 24, 2013. The $53,000 carrying value of the CD approximates its fair value. This CD collateralizes the Letter of Credit described in Commitment and Contingencies (see Note 16).

Note 5 — Fair Value Measurements

 

Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability assuming an orderly transaction in the most advantageous market at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used in measuring fair value.

 

Short-term Financial Instruments

 

The inputs used in measuring the fair value of cash and short-term investments are considered to be Level 1 in accordance with the three-tier fair value hierarchy. The fair market values are based on period-end statements supplied by the various banks and brokers that held the majority of the Company’s funds. The fair value of other short-term financial instruments (primarily accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses) approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.

 

Other Financial Instruments

 

The Company has segregated its financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date in the table below. The Company has no non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value.

The carrying amounts of the derivative liabilities are as follows:

 

Description   Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
                         
Liabilities at December 31, 2012:                                
Embedded conversion options   $     $     $ 780,960     $ 780,960  
                                 
Total measured at fair value   $     $     $ 780,960     $ 780,960  
                                 
Liabilities at December 31, 2011:                                
Embedded conversion options   $     $     $ 1,823,207     $ 1,823,207  
                                 
Total measured at fair value   $     $     $ 1,823,207     $ 1,823,207  
                                 
Liabilities at December 31, 2010:                                
Embedded conversion options   $     $     $ 1,812,447     $ 1,812,447  
                                 
Total measured at fair value   $     $     $ 1,812,447     $ 1,812,447  

 

The liabilities measured at fair value in the above table are classified as “derivative and other liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

The following tables set forth a summary of changes in the fair value of Level 3 liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

Description   Balance at 
December 31, 
2011
    Established in 2012     Conversion to 
Common
Stock
    Change in
Fair Value
    Reclass to Equity     Balance at 
December 31,
2012
 
Derivative liabilities:                                                
Embedded conversion options   $ 1,823,207     $     $ (549,936 )   $ (492,311 )   $     $ 780,960  
Contingent consideration   $     $ 11,109,020     $     $ 4,334,932     $ (15,443,952 )   $  

 

Description   Balance at 
December 31,
2010
    Established in 
2011
    Modification of 
Warrant Agreements
    Conversion to 
Common Stock
    Change in
Fair Value
    Balance at 
December 31,
2011
 
Derivative liabilities:                                                
Stock purchase warrants   $ 1,812,447     $     $ (1,434,322 )   $     $ (378,125 )   $  
Embedded conversion options   $     $ 2,085,513     $     $ (169,965 )   $ (92,341 )   $ 1,823,207  

 

Gains and losses in the fair value of the contingent consideration are classified as the “change in fair value of contingent consideration” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. All other gains and losses in the fair value of derivative instruments are classified as the “change in the fair value of derivative instruments” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The fair value of the contingent consideration is determined using a probability weighted cash flow approach, which includes unobservable inputs such as projected achievement of certain technical milestones and discount rate. Changes in any of the assumptions related to the unobservable inputs identified above may change the fair value of the contingent consideration. Increases in projected achievement of certain technical milestones dates generally result in increases in fair value, while increases in discount rate generally result in decreases in fair value.

 

The fair value of the stock purchase warrants and embedded conversion options is determined based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and includes the use of unobservable inputs such as the expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends. Changes in any of the assumptions related to the unobservable inputs identified above may change the fair value of the stock purchase warrants. Increases in expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends generally result in increases in fair value, while decreases in the unobservable inputs generally result in decreases in fair value.

 

The terms of certain stock purchase warrants were modified in January 2011, resulting in a reclassification of the fair value of these warrants from derivative liabilities to additional paid-in capital. In addition, unamortized deferred financing costs relating to the issuance of the stock purchase warrants was also reclassified to additional paid-in capital.

 

In July and November 2011, we issued convertible notes that contained embedded conversion options which met the criteria for derivative liabilities. The fair value of the conversion options, at December 31, 2012, approximates $800,000.

 

In October 2012, the Company purchased a Certificate of Deposit (“CD”) from its commercial bank in the amount of $53,000. This CD bears interest at an annual rate of 0.20% and matures on June 24, 2013. The $53,000 carrying value of the CD approximates its fair value. This CD collateralizes the Letter of Credit described in Commitment and Contingencies (see Note 22).