Basis of Financial Statements

3 Months Ended

Aug. 31, 2011

Basis of Financial Statements

Note 1.    Basis of Financial Statements

            In the opinion of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (“Greystone”), the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments and reclassifications, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly its financial position as of August 31, 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three-month periods ended August 31, 2011 and 2010.  These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 and the notes thereto included in Greystone’s Form 10-K for such period. The results of operations for the three-month periods ended August 31, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Greystone will continue as a going concern.  Greystone reported a net loss for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 and net income for the two fiscal years prior thereto.  Greystone believes that it has the capacity to produce sufficient plastic pallets to achieve profitability.  However, Greystone continues to be dependent on one customer. Sales to this major customer were approximately 73% of pallet sales (54% of total sales) for the three-month period ended August 31, 2011 and 77% of pallet sales (58% of total sales) for the three-month period ended August 31, 2010. To date, Greystone has received substantial advances from investors to finance its operations and will require additional substantial funding and/or personal guarantees of debt in order to attain its business plan and continue to achieve profitable operations.  Historically, Greystone has been successful in financing its operations primarily through short-term loans and personal guarantees of bank loans by its officers and directors. Management has continued to seek long-term and/or permanent financing, and on March 15, 2011, Greystone entered into an amended bank loan agreement which provides for a three-year term on Greystone’s primary indebtedness.  While such amendment’s extended terms provided important near-term relief, profitable growth will still require additional capital resources. Neither the receipt of additional funding in adequate amounts nor the successful implementation of Greystone’s business plan can be assured.  The combination of these factors raises substantial doubt about Greystone’s ability to continue as a going concern.